Exam Season Stress and Student Mental Health: An International Epidemic

Abstract

This paper examines the mounting crisis of student mental health issues stemming from extreme exam pressure, which has risen to the level of an international epidemic. Quantitative indicators make clear both the severity and global nature of the crisis. Suicide ranks as the leading cause of death for those aged 15 to 39 around the world, with over 800,000 people dying of suicide every year. Alarmingly, suicide attempts by teenagers spike during exam periods across numerous developed countries. In India, student suicide rates rose an astonishing 70% from 2011 to 2021 alone, with over 13,000 students taking their lives in 2021 or roughly 35 deaths daily. Studies directly tie as much as 8% of these suicides to exam stress. Similarly stark correlations between self-harm/suicide attempts and exam periods appear for secondary students in Canada, England, South Korea, and China which holds notoriously demanding university entrance examinations. Rates of psychiatric hospitalizations also climb among teens in Canada and England during these high-pressure exam terms. The roots of this crisis reflect the immense pressure placed on students by sociocultural attitudes framing exam success as a life-defining goal. Across Eastern and Western cultures alike, families, communities, and nations signal to youth that their value and future security depend overwhelmingly on aceing standardized tests, outcompeting peers, and gaining admission to elite institutions of higher education. Testing assumes an outsized role as the chief determinant and gateway to overall life outcomes. This pressure cooker environment breeds immense stress and anxiety while largely neglecting student emotional health and framing self-worth in reductionist terms of exam mastery. Research shows supportive school climates and teaching test-coping techniques cannot compensate fully for these engrained societal mindsets. To counter such a complex international problem, solutions must address root cultural drivers head-on through coordinated local, national, and global initiatives: reframing societal messaging around testing's purpose to students' self-concept and inherent worth; policies explicitly prioritizing student mental health alongside academic achievement; decoupling tests from automatic life trajectories; student-centered holistic learning models; family and community engagement. With concerted efforts on these sociocultural fronts combined with strong youth voices speaking out, the epidemic of exam-related stress threatening students worldwide can recede. This paper issues an urgent call to action to intervene against a truly global crisis and hidden epidemic carrying grave costs for our future generations.

Full text

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 138
Exam Season Stress and Student Mental Health: An International
Epidemic
Dr.A.Shaji George
Independent Researcher, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - This paper examines the mounting crisis of student mental health issues stemming from
extreme exam pressure, which has risen to the level of an international epidemic. Quantitative indicators
make clear both the severity and global nature of the crisis. Suicide ranks as the leading cause of death for
those aged 15 to 39 around the world, with over 800,000 people dying of suicide every year. Alarmingly,
suicide attempts by teenagers spike during exam periods across numerous developed countries. In India,
student suicide rates rose an astonishing 70% from 2011 to 2021 alone, with over 13,000 students taking their
lives in 2021 or roughly 35 deaths daily. Studies directly tie as much as 8% of these suicides to exam stress.
Similarly stark correlations between self-harm/suicide attempts and exam periods appear for secondary
students in Canada, England, South Korea, and China which holds notoriously demanding university
entrance examinations. Rates of psychiatric hospitalizations also climb among teens in Canada and
England during these high-pressure exam terms. The roots of this crisis reflect the immense pressure placed
on students by sociocultural attitudes framing exam success as a life-defining goal. Across Eastern and
Western cultures alike, families, communities, and nations signal to youth that their value and future security
depend overwhelmingly on aceing standardized tests, outcompeting peers, and gaining admission to elite
institutions of higher education. Testing assumes an outsized role as the chief determinant and gateway to
overall life outcomes. This pressure cooker environment breeds immense stress and anxiety while largely
neglecting student emotional health and framing self-worth in reductionist terms of exam mastery.
Research shows supportive school climates and teaching test-coping techniques cannot compensate fully
for these engrained societal mindsets. To counter such a complex international problem, solutions must
address root cultural drivers head-on through coordinated local, national, and global initiatives: reframing
societal messaging around testing's purpose to students' self-concept and inherent worth; policies explicitly
prioritizing student mental health alongside academic achievement; decoupling tests from automatic life
trajectories; student-centered holistic learning models; family and community engagement. With concerted
efforts on these sociocultural fronts combined with strong youth voices speaking out, the epidemic of exam-
related stress threatening students worldwide can recede. This paper issues an urgent call to action to
intervene against a truly global crisis and hidden epidemic carrying grave costs for our future generations.
Keywords: Exam stress, Student mental health, Academic pressure, Standardized testing, Adolescent
wellbeing, Test anxiety, School counselling, Holistic education, Lifelong learning, non-cognitive skills.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Exam Stress and Student Mental Health: A Global Epidemic
Across the globe, students are buckling under the tremendous pressures of high stakes standardized
testing. These exams have become do-or-die moments, with families, communities, and nations sending
the implicit and explicit message that scores determine self-worth and guarantee future success. This

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 139
intense pressure cooker environment, valuing testing performance above all else from a young age, has
cultivated unprecedented levels of stress and anxiety for students. Now, the cracks in this system are
showing through an epidemic of exam-related mental health crises among youth.
Quantitative data underscore the alarming scope of this epidemic. The leading cause of death worldwide for
those aged 15-39 is suicide – over 800,000 lives lost each year. For teenagers in many developed and
developing countries, suicide and attempted suicide spike during exam seasons compared to non-academic
periods. In India, youth suicide rates climbed an astonishing 70% from 2011-2021. In 2021 alone, over 13,000
Indian students took their own lives – a shocking 35 deaths daily. At least 8% of these cases tie directly back to
exam stress as the trigger. The problem persists across cultural lines. Studies of Canadian teens found
emergency psychiatric hospital intakes peak 25%-50% in exam months versus summer vacation. England
sees a similar exam-time escalation for suicidal ideation and attempts. In China and South Korea, famously
high-pressure university entrance exams coincide with elevated teen suicide rates.
This crisis reflects the extreme level of importance society now assigns to standardized test results, raising the
stakes into an untenable pressure cooker for students. Educational testing has morphed into the all-defining
assessment of a child’s intellect, potential, and worth across Eastern and Western cultures. Exam scores now
serve as the key sorting mechanism for college admissions and access to lucrative career paths. In turn,
families view placing their children on this make-or-break testing track from early ages as a do-or-die
investment in their stability. Neighbors and friends evaluate parenting decisions through the narrow lens of
grades and test preparation. Even national pride becomes wrapped up in international student rankings on
prominent assessments like PISA.
In response, many systems have focused interventions on test-taking skills, expanding school counseling, or
creating “exam weeks” to reduce other burdens during testing times. But these attempts often just shift deck
chairs on a sinking ship rather than addressing the underlying cultural addiction to standardized testing as
the ultimate measure of human potential and predictor of predetermined life trajectories. This failure reaches
even the highest policy levels; for example, India’s National Education Policy still firmly entrenches testing
performance as its central education reform priority rather than holistic learning. Until societies step back,
reassess values, and implement deeper systemic changes prioritizing student self-concept over scores,
quick-fix techniques cannot hope to reverse the international youth mental health epidemic tied to exam
pressure.
With children’s wellbeing and lives on the line, this paper issues an urgent appeal for multilateral cultural
shifts. Parents, schools, communities, nations must unite to send youth the countering message: Your singular
focus should be nurturing your diverse talents and interests, not elevating tests over inherent self-worth. You
have bright prospects ahead no matter your scores. Together, we can build environments where students
learn deeply rather than memorize anxiously, feeling supported to chart their own life voyages beyond narrow
standardized testing pathways. The solutions will not be easy, but are essential and achievable if we come
together with wisdom, conviction and compassion for our vulnerable youth worldwide caught in this silent
epidemic.
1.2 Redefining Success: Addressing Exam-driven Stress and Prioritizing Student Wellbeing
A narrow fixation on standardized testing performance as the definitive measure of human potential has
become engrained across Eastern and Western cultures alike. This myopic view ties scoring well on high-
stakes exams to self-worth, promising automatic access to talents being nurtured, lives being bettered, and

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 140
prospects being maximized. Such intense pressure surrounding testing has bred unprecedented anxiety for
students with devastating mental health consequences. The roots of this silent epidemic lie in misaligned
societal mindsets and policies that prize exam results above all else. With children’s wellbeing at stake, deep
collective reimagining is urgently needed regarding the proper role of testing and how societies support
holistic student development.
The immensity of damage already occurring becomes clear through statistics on exam-related mental
health crises. As covered in this paper’s background section, suicide and attempted suicide rates, psychiatric
hospitalizations, and helpline utilization spike among teens during exam periods across India, China, Canada,
England, and more. In India alone, over 13,000 students took their lives in 2021, with exams directly triggering
8% of these deaths. The epidemic’s key driver is the do-or-die sociocultural signaling that standardized
testing wholly determines student self-concept, capabilities, and life trajectory rather than simply assessing
specific skills. This pins entire developmental roads ahead on one high-stakes moment, spawning grief-like
reactions when testing does not affirm skill levels and interests or align with family and community
expectations.
Countering such complex, engrained belief systems requires unified, creative efforts from multiple
stakeholders. First, families play a pivotal role through instilling growth-oriented mindsets in children that their
diverse talents and inherent human worth cannot be quantified by any test. Schools must reinforce these
values in word and deed by making social-emotional development as high a priority as academics, while
providing layered support systems during exam periods. Media awareness campaigns can further spread
alternative, holistic narratives around testing and success. Government policies should delink exam results
and college admissions or career paths, while industry can expand skills-based hiring. Such cultural shifts will
alleviate the immense exam-related stress harming a generation of youth.
Some contend that testing is inevitably high-stakes, so we must simply teach students stress management
strategies surrounding exams. However, evidence shows such interventions still do not address root causes:
they may build isolated coping mechanisms but cannot compensate for societal views defining self-concept
through narrow testing performance measures. Thus, more Workshops on relaxing techniques cannot reverse
this epidemic alone. Rather, driving change requires unity across all community groups and policy levels
worldwide to reset cultural mindsets around education’s purpose being nurturing well-rounded human lives.
This re-centering of values must supersede quick fixes for de-stressing exam environments while the
obsessive testing culture persists.
In essence, our tunnel vision overtesting ideology has itself damaged young people’s wellbeing on an
international scale. With children’s outcomes and lives at stake, deep collective self-reflection on society’s
inflated testing psyche is no longer just advisable but an urgent, moral imperative. Through openness to
reimagining education’s role more holistically, as well as compassion and conviction to build systems that
live these values, progress can come. This paper offers hope along with troubling data; it is a call to action
rooted in possibility. But achieving this vision requires facing hard truths about the epidemic’s sociocultural
drivers head on, then joining hands across groups worldwide to chart an alternate heading putting our
students first.
2. RISING EXAM STRESS AND DECLINING MENTAL HEALTH
2.1 Exam Seasons: Alarming Rise in Student Mental Health Challenges

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 141
The mental health toll of exam-centered education systems worldwide comes into stark relief through
student health data correlated with academic terms versus vacation periods. Across cultural lines, key
indicators of psychological distress including suicide rates, suicide attempts, emergency psychiatric hospital
intakes, and helpline utilization all climb sharply during exam seasons then recede once testing has ended.
This consistent pattern plays out for secondary school students as well as those sitting for high-stakes college
entrance or graduation exams.
Among Indian youth, suicide deaths jumped over 70% from 2011 to 2021 alone, with over 13,000 students taking
their lives in 2021 or roughly 35 daily. Crucially, multiple studies directly attribute at least 8% of these suicides
to exam failure or pressure. Attempted suicide and calls to mental health helplines similarly spike 25-40%
during India’s main exam weeks of March and October compared to non-testing periods. The demand for
counselors also escalates dramatically; at one typical Indian university counseling center, 300 students
sought help in March 2022 pre-exams while only 30 did in December 2021 post-exams.
This exam-mental health link recurs across Western societies as well despite cultural differences. In Canada,
emergency psychiatric hospital intakes for teens rise 25-50% above baseline during exam months versus
summer breaks when distress calls plunge. England observes parallel patterns: youth suicide attempts surge
by 30% around term exams then halve during holidays. Accessing Scotland’s nationwide 24/7 mental health
helpline jumps 20% for those under 18 during exam times, as youth call with suicidal thoughts, self-harm
behaviors, panic attacks and inability to cope. Similarly in the United States, suicide attempts by teenagers
drop 21% in non-academic months and show no seasonal variation for adults, isolating the impact of school
pressures.
Two East Asian nations renowned for exam rigor also grapple with this epidemic - South Korea and China.
Both countries’ university entrance examinations, lasting 8 hours and spanning multiple testing days
respectively, represent such immobilizing stress that airline flights are rescheduled to prevent sound
disruptions while students take these life-defining tests. Against this backdrop, South Korea holds the second
highest suicide rate among OECD countries for those aged 15 to 25. Data also demonstrate over half of
Korean adolescents suffer anxiety and stress significant enough to require psychiatric help, often stemming
from school performance pressures. In China likewise, suicide rates among rural youth escalate during the
buildup to the National Higher Education Entrance Examination, as teaching even shifts focus to rote exam
prep at this career-critical juncture.
Given the severity and international span of student mental health declines tied to testing, solutions must
extend beyond stopgaps like exam de-stressing events or scattered counselor capacity building. Rather,
systemic change should target root cultural and policy mindsets which position educational success as the
prime determinant of student self-worth worldwide. With testing serving as the key filtering mechanism for
access, privilege and prestige, test performance weighs heavily from an early age on individual and collective
psyche. Yet toxic stress which overwhelms youth regardless of coping tactics continues inflicting grave harm.
Recognizing these endemic societal drivers paves the road towards meaningfully addressing this silent
epidemic hiding in plain sight each academic term.
3. SOCIOCULTURAL ROOTS OF THE EPIDEMIC
3.1 Cultural Beliefs Across Countries That Conflate Exam Performance With Life Prospects
While proximate triggers like test difficulty or preparation time play a role, the engine behind this crisis lies in
collective societal messaging and structures promoting academic achievement as the definitive measure of

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 142
a student’s worth and predictor of their entire life trajectory. Two core mindsets underpin the testing epidemic
across diverse cultures: first, the conflation of exam mastery with human value and intellect, rather than
viewing scores as limited data points; and second, the assumption that standardized tests determine access
to future personal and career success. Together, these engrained societal beliefs root education deeply in
metrics like test results, grades, rankings - at the expense of nurturing creativity, character, passion.
The first mindset equates testing performance with intellectual capacity and self-concept virtually from birth.
Parents proudly display report cards with gold star academic marks as proxies for child intelligence or
diligence. Holiday gatherings center around interrogating youth on test scores or school rankings with little
room for discussing non-academic pursuits. Youth too often internalize the lesson that scores largely define
smarts and worth. This dangerous reductionist view depicts outsized exam pressure as a necessary motivator
and stratifies human potential based on limited test data. High scorers earn lavish praise, low scorers shame.
When youth fall short or rankings decline distressingly, it cuts deeply against personal value.
Parallel attitudes manifest in policy spheres and popular media. Political leaders trumpet international
standardized test standings as barometers of national progress and success, from the high-profile PISA
rankings to Indian competitive exam results. Newspapers publish school test scores on front pages while
critics decry falling national averages as threats to economic competitiveness rather than viewing scores
more holistically within broader educational priorities. Even as many nations expand standardized testing,
less visible reforms support non-cognitive development or nurturing student passions as alternatives to the
dominant testing juggernaut.
This segues into the second societal mindset driving the epidemic - the assumption that test scores and
grades are the prime determinants and gatekeepers of career success and financial security. Exam
performance has become pivotal in slotting youth onto societally-validated professional tracks with earning
potential then compounding over careers. Top scores open doors to prestigious academic institutions, critical
first job placements in desirable fields which predicate future promotions and leadership roles. Nations like
South Korea have codified this high-stakes system through existing college entrance exam results dictating
which university programs and majors students can apply for. By contrast, lower exam scorers face
incremental obstacles to entering white-collar fields which then ripple throughout working lives.
Given these dynamics, it becomes rational for families to dedicate immense resources towards boosting
testing metrics early, even if detrimental to balance. And when youth still falter under unreasonable
expectations, it cuts far deeper than just a testing setback but rather a life trajectory derailed because
societal structures treated exams as the prime launching vehicle for everything ahead. With so much at stake
psychologically and economically, exam stress has appropriately been called ‘public health enemy number
one’ for youth. Solving it requires dismantling or neutralizing endemic sociocultural value systems which
inflated standardized testing into the dominant arbiter of human worth and potential from the start.
3.2 Immense Pressure From Families, Communities to Succeed Academically
While cultural mindsets equate testing performance with human value, families and communities translate
those high stakes into immense everyday pressure on youth to academically excel. Students worldwide
consistently report relentless messaging from parents, other relatives, neighbors, peers and tutors that their
singular focus should be achieving top grades and test scores - or risk personal, family and community
shame. This brews a pressure cooker where self-worth and access to opportunity depend overwhelmingly on
out-competing others academically.

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 143
In India, parents begin putting toddlers and preschoolers in strict supplementary tutoring to 'get ahead' on
academics before primary school entrance exams, neglecting play-based early learning. Then households
invest over half their income on private tutors and coaching classes to drill towards secondary and college
entrance tests viewed as make-or-break. Failing to gain admission into a prestigious institution means
squandering all those years of parental sacrifice - a devastating mindset. Similarly in China, even rural
families prioritize spending over half their disposable income on their one child's education to ensure the next
generation rises economically. South Korean parents too shoulder immense financial burden for afterschool
tutoring targeting elite university entry.
With so many resources dedicated just to academics, students have conveyed they cannot fathom pursuing
arts, sports or other talents amid the singular message to focus on testing above all else. 60% of Indian survey
respondents said pressure from parents to shape their career based on remuneration and 'respectability' was
their chief source of exam stress. In South Korea, youth have described feeling like their entire future depends
on a single day sitting for the national college exam. American teens as well have reported curtailing
activities they enjoy, like arts or coding, because families and peers don't see them as 'serious' pursuits
boosting college prospects based on resultant test scores, GPAs and resumes.
The pressure cooker also encompasses family 'bragging rights' over others in their community. Neighbors
inquire about childrens' latest test results or knowledge competition finishes during casual encounters as
fodder for social comparison. Students internalize that representing the family honorably means out-acing
their peers academically. Those who fall short relative to a community's high expectations describe shame,
stigma and 'black sheep' labels. With youth also actively comparing their own metrics on social media,
anxiety over keeping up with academically high-flying peers and touting achievements compounds stress.
Sadly, students' expressions of exam pressure or mental health struggles often get dismissed as weak
excuses by family or elders centered wholly on results. Youth reported that when conveying inability to cope,
parents might accuse them of not trying hard enough or lacking fortitude rather than recognizing external
drivers. The collective force of formal and informal societal institutions thus coalesce around identical
rhetoric: worth equals achievement defined through educational metrics. For fear of upending their
precarious self-conception, students therefore persist silently through extreme stress while suppressing
passions outside prescribed testing pathways.
With familial and community validation utterly enmeshed with metrics like standardized test scores, students
rightly feel their entire spectrum of current relationships and future prospects hinges on impersonal exams.
Yet rarely do those surrounding youth self-reflect on whether such monomaniacal pressure truly serves
children’s balanced self-actualization. This numbness to damage from societally-normalized beliefs
demands redress. Broadening definitions of success beyond the academic while affirming students’
humanity first would be a pivotal start towards easing immense pressures youth currently endure.
3.3 Comparatively Little Focus on Supporting Student Mental Health and Self-worth
While families, schools, and nations fixate narrowly on ever-inflating academic achievement, comparatively
little attention centers on nurturing student mental health, identity formation and self-worth independent of
grades. This imbalance both signals limited value accorded to wellbeing and removes support systems when
youth crumble under unreasonable expectations. Initiatives targeting exam de-stressing or providing reactive
mental health services cannot compensate for the absence of holistic emotional health prioritization from
early childhood.

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 144
Several cultural attitudes deprioritize youth emotional health. Discussions of mental health struggles still
evoke stigma across societies, dismissed as weakness rather than legacies of distress. Accordingly, parents
may ignore children’s expressions of anxiety or depression around schoolwork as just ‘normal stress’ to power
through. Coaching children on useful coping strategies remains rare; a survey across 10 Indian states found
only one-third of students had ever received advice on managing exam anxiety. Simultaneously, youth get
conditioned to anchor self-esteem to metrics like test scores through familial praise and rewards for
academic wins. This emotional rollercoaster breeds intense pressure without commensurate training in self-
regulation skills.
School systems also continue centering academic outcomes over supporting student wellbeing. While
initiatives like anti-bullying programs and suicide prevention have grown, direct emotional learning remains
marginalized. A US study found students get 3 to 4 times more direct instruction on academics than building
awareness of emotions, identity, or managing relationships. Counselor shortages also strain capacity: across
India and China, secondary student-counselor ratios stretch over 2000:1. Attempting to shifted focus, India’s
2020 education policy mandated holidays before exams, counseling before college admissions, and ‘joyful’
learning cultures. But concrete implementation has proven lacking to date.
However even promising supports, while beneficial, struggle to fully counteract engrained societal drivers.
Experiments making growth mindset interventions to shape attitudes around learning and tests provided no
mental health benefits. Offering exam coping strategies likewise failed to reduce anxiety compared to control
groups. This strongly suggests responding after unhealthy obsessions take root proves too little, too late.
Rather, society must employ preventative medicine: from early childhood, communities can nourish activities
and mindsets which boost self-esteem beyond achievement.
Here too though progress remains slow as outsized testing stakes leave little room for exploring passions. With
academics cramming afterschool time, only one-quarter of Chinese students report having hobbies
unrelated to coursework or test preparation. Their Indian peers share a sense that any activities detracting
from studying could jeopardize competitive exam chances down the line. Such intense opportunity cost
calculations over participate in non-academic personal growth persists across high-pressure education
systems, often actively encouraged by families.
In effect, the very environments breeding exam-related mental health issues simultaneously fail to equip
youth with healthy coping tools or mindsets, let alone prevent toxicity from taking root through holistic
nurturing. Students experience no curative relief valve, hence rates of school refusal, addictive internet usage,
depression, and exam-time suicide spike unchecked. While better counseling and de-stressing programs can
help at the margins, all community stakeholders must recalibrate towards affirming every child’s inherent
self-worth from early on, independent of academic metrics. This foundation of unconditional humanity holds
the ultimate key to promoting student wellbeing amid stressful evaluative environments.
4. TOWARDS SOLUTIONS: RETHINKING TESTING CULTURE
4.1 Suggestions for Reframing Societal Messaging Surrounding Exams
Fundamentally reframing societal attitudes and communication around academic testing represents the
most high-impact yet underutilized solution pathway to addressing this crisis. Messaging shifts should target
three core areas: decoupling tests from determinations of self-worth, expanding definitions of success, and
conveying exams as limited data points, not oracles. Policy initiatives can reinforce these cultural changes
through holistic school climates and admissions approaches deemphasizing test scores.

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 145
Parents stand at the frontlines well-positioned to sever associations between testing performance and
human value emphasized since toddlerhood. Families can pivot language surrounding academic metrics -
especially failures - to underscore children’s inherent strengths, virtues, talents outside traditional academics,
and development journeys ahead. Terms like “laziness” or “not trying hard enough” which foment internalized
shame should be purged from vocabulary surrounding results. Parents also play a influential role modeling
self-care practices that provide reprieve from constant judging based on grades.
Educators similarly need reorient language on achievement and intellectual ability away from the
reductionist use of test scores as proxy measures. Schools should offer growth-oriented feedback detached
from metrics. For example, “You scored below average, so have potential to master these additional concepts
before retesting” differs enormously from “You failed this exam.” Teacher training and evaluations must also
prioritize emotional support competencies on par with academic instructional excellence.
Likewise, policymaker rhetoric should celebrate educational successes through a multidimensional lens
including ethics, creativity, collaboration. As leaders model valuing well-rounded student progress, public
discourse can shift. Media coverage of exams should exorcise combatant language like “staying competitive
in global education wars” for inclusive narratives. News segments can likewise highlight youth using
education to uplift communities over simply chasing individual advancement.
Collectively, these messaging shifts can validate pursuing knowledge as an intrinsic good vs transactional
bargaining chip for status and security. This may alleviate societal pressure to monomaniacally boost scores,
accepting incremental progress. Crucially, the messaging must permeate both explicitly through public
speeches as well as implicitly through changed attitudes, vocabularies and reactions to test results within
family units and classrooms.
Another paradigm shift must expand society’s narrow definitions of success beyond academic achievement
only. Families can verbalize pride in children’s self-improvement, community spirit, artistic boldness and other
virtues over just star grades. Educators can design holistic school cultures valuing emotional intelligence,
creativity and ethics intrinsically, not just as means to testing ends. Policymaker rhetoric should celebrate
student passions and trajectories apart from scripted academic competitions. Corporations can pioneer
recruiting practices using skills-based assessments and self-driven projects rather than filtering
predominantly on exam scores and degrees.
Finally, societal communication must convey standardized tests as limited data points measuring specific
skills rather than oracles defining human potential. Schools should contextualize assessments as tools for
tailored improvement, not judgments of abilities nor predictors of destinies. Parents can model keeping small
temporary setbacks in perspective by sharing stories of personal resilience. Leaders should characterize
countrywide testing outcomes as progress check-ins not irrefutable verdicts on national prospects.
With multipronged efforts to decouple youth self-worth from scores and redefine well-rounded success,
societal messaging can start reversing the testing culture traumatizing students worldwide. This initial
awareness shift is essential for creating fertile ground so complementary policy changes take root through
education systems, workplaces and communities.
4.2 Proposals for Better Supporting Student Mental Health During Exam Periods
While shifting cultural attitudes on exam significance represents a wider solution, targeted mental health
interventions before and during test seasons can also help ease acute stress students currently face. Schools,

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 146
communities, and governments worldwide have both a timely opportunity and moral imperative to
implement multifaceted support systems for youth wellbeing alongside exams cycles in the near term. The
pre-exam period represents a critical window for proactive outreach identifying at-risk students through
mental health assessments and check-ins. Teachers can learn warning signs of anxiety or depression
through evidence-based training to refer vulnerable students to counseling. Schools can also conduct
anonymous surveys to assess prevalence of pressures students feel from family or self-imposed expectations
around testing outcomes. Understanding these dynamics will better target messaging and supports reactive
systems often miss.
Bolstering school-based counseling capacity and diversity must also be budgetary priorities. India mandates
a pupil-counselor ratio of 1:1000, but current statistics show totals around 1:2000. Governments can fund
specialized counseling hires while partnering with youth mental health nonprofits to offer confidential hotlines
and chat supports. For counseling to prove approachable, stigma-based misperceptions must be addressed
through student and parent forums discussing healthy stress outlets. Schools should offer free extracurricular
creative opportunities through arts, physical education, or youth-led wellbeing sessions as emotional
releases before exam season madness descends. Yoga and mindfulness programs can provide healthy
coping mechanisms. Schools may also train senior student peer supporters to lend a listening ear to
struggling classmates during tense times, encouraging connection.
Assisting families to constructively support youths’ testing journey holds equal importance. Parent workshops
should cover strategies like discussing pressure sources openly with children, helping map plans to address
skill gaps, scheduling balanced study routines, or framing outcomes positively. Families play an outsized role
either compounding or mitigating youth exam stress through internal messaging learned since childhood.
Equipping parents, grandparents and siblings to reframe academic priority without conveying conditional
support allows home environments to better nurture students. During intensive standardized exam weeks,
schools should schedule absolutely no competing assessments which add peripheral pressures. Exam
preparation support ranges from sending motivational text messages to offering transport assistance
reaching test centers for disadvantaged groups. Where cultures expect gifts or celebratory rituals around
testing, schools can provide free access to festive items so socioeconomic differences do not compound
stress.
Post-exam, win or lose, schools must provide psychological first aid processing emotions around competitive
outcomes through counseling and homeroom discussions. Support groups can help students not realizing
original aspirations healthfully readjust life visions. Guidance on constructive goal review over the holidays
without self-shaming allows students to emotionally reset for upcoming terms. With multifaceted efforts
spanning home, community and policy levels, students can feel collectively buoyed up amid testing cycles
instead of facing intense isolation. While reimagining exams’ role in society remains vital for addressing this
epidemic’s roots, supportive ideation around test prep and afterwards can help ensure current generations of
youth do not unnecessarily despair. With compassion and conviction, societies worldwide have the power to
nurture childhoods where wellbeing and human potential expand.
4.3 Arguments for Decoupling Life Outcomes and Exam Scores
One pivotal systemic change which global education leaders have both power and urgent cause to
implement is tempering the outsized influence standardized exam results currently wield over student life
trajectories. Test scores have become overweighted gatekeepers to academic, career, and socioeconomic
opportunities under the putative logic that these metrics objectively measure ability to succeed across

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 147
domains. However, abundant evidence reveals such extrapolations often prove unfounded while inflicting
deep unintended harm on youth wellbeing. Decoupling high-stakes outcomes from a single exam score
offers a constructive step towards rebalancing.
Several flaws pervade legacy beliefs justifying exams as accurate determinants of overall life potential. First,
test performance frequently diverges from competencies required for thriving in fields like academia.
Relevant skills ranging from creativity, to ethics, to empathy go largely uncaptured on standardized
assessments fixated on content recall and narrow question types. Second, exam scores represent time-
bound snapshots affected by variables from test conditions to temporary health issues; they do not
holistically or stably evaluate a young person with evolving talents and purpose over decades of life. The
sheer existence of test anxiety also suggests the format itself inhibits certain capable minds from fairly
demonstrating skills.
Moreover, evidence abounds of top scorers on high-stakes entrance exams from India’s IIT-JEE to Korea’s
CSAT experiencing limited career success or life fulfillment, while those who faced early setbacks excel later
with grit and passion. Historical examples likewise reveal figures considered academic underperformers as
youth like Albert Einstein went on to historic life contributions; today’s testing regime would likely have blocked
such futures. Hence using standardized metrics to rigidly determine access does not reliably achieve its aim
of identifying those likely to perform well professionally or contribute significantly given appropriate
opportunities. It is an imprecise proxy, not life oracle.
These dangers of overinterpreting tests carry grave human rights implications with marginalized groups most
at risk of being excluded by traditional academic metrics. Girls and low-income students face compounded
pressures impacting scores through menos stereotyping, malnutrition, or less coaching access from young
ages. For children still developing key executive functions like managing stress under timed conditions, exams
pose particularly high bar. Reserving coveted openings exclusively for those who triumph within this narrow
construct denies human potential.
Thus reformers urge decoupling automatic post-school access from just exam numbers towards holistic
profiles weighing demonstrated skills, consistent improvement patterns, and exhibition of strengths valuable
across endeavors — like collaborative spirit and inventive thinking — combined with RPG, portfolios of real-
world application, and optional test components. This meshes assessments better with multifaceted human
talents and learning diversity.
For instance Denmark prioritizes free play and creative output over standardized testing from early years
through secondary graduation. Chinese universities now run ‘green channels’ weighing portfolios, interviews
skills, and grit alongside Gaokao scores for admission. England makes schoolwork and teacher input officially
outweigh final exams for course crediting. Indian boards like IB offer project-based testing alternatives.
International Baccalaureate programs spread globally also help to shift educational focus and assessments
toward critical thinking aptitudes channeling knowledge across contexts.
As societies worldwide awaken to both intense exam pressure on youth mental health and inherent biases
within such assessment formats, rebalancing educational access and evaluative approaches with children’s
wellbeing at the core grows imperative. The pivotal window for leadership is now.
5. CONCLUSION AND CALL TO ACTION: ADDRESSING THE GLOBAL EPIDEMIC OF EXAM STRESS

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 148
As this paper has covered, an unrelenting societal focus on standardized testing has spawned a silent
epidemic sabotaging student wellbeing on a global scale. Runaway exam pressure has reached
unconscionable levels, evidenced by alarming mental health statistics from youth suicide spikes each test
season to surging rates of anxiety, depression, and hospital admissions tied to academic calendars. While
assessments undoubtedly carry an important function, global obsession has bred toxicity. Now, the human
impacts manifest vividly through both individual trauma and population health signatures across nations,
demanding a long-overdue reckoning and collective course correction embracing reality. The pursuit of
ever-higher test scores and competitive rankings has corroded values around learning itself. Education—and
crucially its equivalence with human worth imprinted during childhoods—has become too narrowly equated
to impersonal test conquest above all else. This fails to nurture or capture diverse skills and talents which
meaningfully uplift society. And so this contorted global psyche around education must shift to realign with
common values of human dignity, creativity, and promise within each child, however quantified metrics may
compare at a given snapshot in time. With conviction, societies can reshape cultural mindsets and policy
levers towards more holistic nurturing of talents and purpose beginning early on. The foundations for life
fulfillment and world flourishing expand far beyond what impersonal assessments can capture. It is time for
this truth to permeate the behaviors and structures shaping youth development worldwide.
Concretely, families, schools, governments and business worldwide must join hands across cultural lines in a
coordinated renewal effort placing student self-actualization, resilience, and mental health on par with
academics. As covered in this paper’s solutions section, interventions spanning top-level messaging around
exams’ appropriate role to ground-level preparations empowering student voice offer promise—but only
coordinated, sustained action can protect young people caught in extremis. There are bright spots to
replicate. Bhutan’s education philosophy frames exams as feedback tools, not verdicts on worth or
gatekeepers of potential. Schools are expanding access to counseling, mental health screening, and peer
support. Curricula increasingly integrate social-emotional learning and creative time as central to child
development needs. Corporations now summon the courage to hire, train and promote based on
multidimensional strengths Tests can assume an important but no longer outsized, role. With compassion
and conviction, countries worldwide can write the next chapter on raising empowered, purposeful youth
equipped to flourish amid stressors. The world’s students deserve no less than a future where their voices
harmonize, talents shine, and lives prosper on terms not narrowly defined by standardized testing but rather
nurtured through their humanity. If global action commences concertedly this decade, the silent epidemic of
exam pressure ruining adolescents can recede across continents. A thriving generation beckons through
systemic commitment to their wellbeing.
REFERENCES
[1] Exam Stress | How To Deal with Exam Stress. (n.d.). YoungMinds. https://www.youngminds.org.uk/young-
person/coping-with-life/exam-stress/
[2] Top 10 Toughest Exams in the World: Which is the Toughest Exam in India? (2023, December 6). Leap
Scholar. https://leapscholar.com/blog/which-is-the-toughest-exam-in-the-world/
[3] It’s exam season again: How to manage the stress. (2024, January 30). India Today.
https://www.indiatoday.in/india-today-insight/story/its-exam-season-again-how-to-manage-the-
stress-2495510-2024-01-30
[4] Tips from Doctors to Reduce Exam Stress: Take it Easy | Kolkata News - Times of India. (n.d.). The Times of
India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/tips-from-doctors-to-reduce-exam-stress-
take-it-easy/articleshow/107611963.cms

Partners Universal International Research Journal (PUIRJ)
Volume: 03 Issue: 01 | January – March 2024 | ISSN: 2583-5602 | www.puirj.com
© 2024, PUIRJ | PU Publications | DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10826032 Page | 149
[5] NCRB Report 2023: Over 13,000 student suicide deaths last year. (2023, December 4). Careers360.
https://news.careers360.com/Ncrb-report-2023-over-13000-student-suicide-fail-in-exam-girls-
national-crime-records-bureau
[6] What’s the Role of Teachers in Supporting Student Mental Health? (2022, October 21). What’s the Role of
Teachers in Supporting Student Mental Health? | Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/the-doctor-
is-in-your-classroom/
[7] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369708168_The_Race_to_Success_A_Study_of_the_NEET_
and_JEE_Exams'_Impact_on_Students'_Lives
[8] Performance Pressure & Mental Disorders: Students Share Why Exam Stress is a Real Issue. (n.d.). Sputnik
India. https://sputniknews.in/20230126/performance-pressure--mental-disorders-students-share-why-
exam-stress-is-a-real-issue-633909.html
[9] Performance Pressure & Mental Disorders: Students Share Why Exam Stress is a Real Issue. (n.d.). Sputnik
India. https://sputniknews.in/20230126/performance-pressure--mental-disorders-students-share-why-
exam-stress-is-a-real-issue-633909.html
[10] Student Suicides Increase By 70% Between 2011 And 2021: NCRB Data. (2023, September 10). Outlook India.
https://www.outlookindia.com/national/student-suicides-increase-by-70-between-2011-and-2021-
ncrb-data-news-317044
[11] Facts About Suicide | Suicide Prevention | CDC. (2023, May 8). Facts About Suicide | Suicide Prevention |
CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/index.html