Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Page 1/13
The Role of Resilience in Entrepreneurial Success:
A Qualitative Study of Startup Founders
Lutana Dewi
Prasetiya Mulya University
Research Article
Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Resilience, Startup Founders, Challenges, Strategies, Success, Qualitative
Research
Posted Date: March 13th, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4084600/v1
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read Full License
Additional Declarations: The authors declare no competing interests.
Page 2/13
Abstract
This qualitative study delves into the multifaceted role of resilience in entrepreneurial success, focusing
on the experiences and perspectives of startup founders. Through in-depth interviews, the study explores
how resilience manifests in the entrepreneurial journey, its impact on decision-making, and strategies
employed to navigate challenges. Findings highlight resilience as a critical factor in overcoming setbacks,
fostering innovation, and sustaining motivation amidst adversity. Resilience is conceptualized as the
ability to bounce back from failures, adapt to change, and persevere in the pursuit of entrepreneurial
goals, encompassing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions. Challenges faced by startup
founders include nancial constraints, market uncertainties, competition, and personal stressors.
Participants employ cognitive and emotional strategies, such as reframing challenges, seeking social
support, and practicing mindfulness, to cultivate resilience and sustain motivation. Resilient
entrepreneurs exhibit higher levels of persistence, adaptability, and creative problem-solving, positioning
them for long-term success in dynamic market environments. The study underscores the importance of
fostering resilience skills in aspiring entrepreneurs and integrating resilience-building mechanisms within
entrepreneurial ecosystems. Practical implications include the development of resilience-building
programs, mentorship initiatives, and support networks tailored to the unique needs of entrepreneurs.
Despite limitations such as sample size constraints and reliance on self-reported data, the study
contributes to theoretical understanding of resilience in entrepreneurship and informs strategies to
support and empower entrepreneurs on their journey towards success in uncertain and challenging
environments.
1. Introduction
Entrepreneurship is often romanticized as a journey marked by success stories, disruptive innovations,
and lucrative ventures. However, behind the glamour lies a reality fraught with uncertainty, risk, and
formidable challenges. Startup founders navigate a complex terrain characterized by erce competition,
resource constraints, market volatility, and the omnipresent threat of failure. In this context, the ability to
withstand setbacks, adapt to changing circumstances, and persevere in the face of adversity becomes
paramount. This ability, known as resilience, has garnered increasing attention from researchers,
policymakers, and practitioners seeking to understand its role in entrepreneurial success. Resilience,
rooted in psychological and organizational theories, has been dened in various ways across disciplines.
In the context of entrepreneurship, resilience is often conceptualized as the capacity to bounce back from
failures, setbacks, and adversities encountered in the pursuit of entrepreneurial goals (M. H. Emon & Nipa,
2024). It encompasses cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions, reecting an individual's ability
to maintain composure, problem-solve effectively, and adapt to changing circumstances amidst
uncertainty (Cardon et al., 2013). Resilience enables entrepreneurs to navigate the inherent challenges of
the entrepreneurial journey, including market uctuations, technological disruptions, funding gaps, and
personal stressors (Cope, 2011). The importance of resilience in entrepreneurship is underscored by its
implications for venture survival, growth, and innovation. Research suggests that resilient entrepreneurs
Page 3/13
are better equipped to withstand the inevitable setbacks and failures encountered in the early stages of
venture development (Shepherd et al., 2015). They exhibit higher levels of persistence, adaptability, and
creative problem-solving, enabling them to pivot, iterate, and capitalize on opportunities emerging from
adversity (Hmieleski & Baron, 2009). Moreover, resilience is associated with enhanced psychological well-
being, reduced burnout, and greater job satisfaction among entrepreneurs (Stephan & Roesler, 2010).
Despite its signicance, the role of resilience in entrepreneurial success remains underexplored,
particularly from a qualitative perspective. While quantitative studies have examined the relationship
between resilience and venture outcomes, qualitative research offers a deeper understanding of how
resilience manifests in the lived experiences, perceptions, and strategies of startup founders. Qualitative
approaches allow researchers to explore the nuances of resilience, uncovering its underlying
mechanisms, contextual inuences, and implications for entrepreneurial practice (Patton, 2015). By
delving into the narratives and insights of entrepreneurs, qualitative research can elucidate the complex
interplay between resilience, decision-making, and venture performance in real-world contexts (Gioia et al.,
2013). This qualitative study seeks to address this gap in the literature by exploring the role of resilience
in entrepreneurial success through in-depth interviews with startup founders. By adopting a
phenomenological approach, the study aims to uncover the subjective experiences, perspectives, and
strategies related to resilience among entrepreneurs. Specically, the study seeks to answer the following
research questions:
How do startup founders conceptualize and dene resilience in the context of entrepreneurship?
What are the key challenges, setbacks, and adversities faced by startup founders in their
entrepreneurial journey?
How do startup founders perceive the role of resilience in navigating challenges and overcoming
setbacks?
What strategies do startup founders employ to cultivate and enhance resilience in themselves and
their ventures?
By addressing these questions, the study aims to provide rich insights into the multifaceted nature of
resilience in entrepreneurship, shedding light on its implications for venture development, innovation, and
long-term success. The ndings of this study have implications for entrepreneurial education, support
programs, and ecosystem interventions aimed at fostering resilience among aspiring and practicing
entrepreneurs. In recent years, the importance of resilience in entrepreneurship has gained traction amidst
growing recognition of the volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) nature of the business
environment (Lengnick-Hall et al., 2011). The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, has underscored the
resilience imperative for entrepreneurs, as startups grapple with unprecedented challenges ranging from
supply chain disruptions to shifting consumer behavior (Ratten, 2020). Against this backdrop,
understanding how entrepreneurs harness resilience to weather crises, adapt to new realities, and seize
emerging opportunities is of paramount importance. Moreover, as entrepreneurship continues to be
championed as a driver of economic growth, job creation, and innovation, there is a pressing need to
support and empower entrepreneurs in their quest for success. By illuminating the role of resilience in
Page 4/13
entrepreneurial endeavors, this study contributes to the growing body of knowledge aimed at enhancing
our understanding of the entrepreneurial process and informing evidence-based interventions to support
startup founders on their journey towards success.
2. Literature Review
Resilience in entrepreneurship has emerged as a prominent area of inquiry within the elds of psychology,
management, and entrepreneurship studies. Drawing on diverse theoretical perspectives and empirical
evidence, researchers have sought to unpack the multifaceted nature of resilience, its antecedents,
manifestations, and implications for entrepreneurial success. This literature review provides an overview
of key concepts, theories, and ndings related to resilience in entrepreneurship, highlighting recent
developments and debates in the eld. Resilience, rooted in developmental psychology and
organizational behavior theories, has been dened in various ways across disciplines. In the context of
entrepreneurship, resilience is often conceptualized as the capacity to bounce back from setbacks,
failures, and adversities encountered in the pursuit of entrepreneurial goals (Coutu, 2002; Luthans et al.,
2007). It encompasses cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions, reecting an individual's ability
to maintain composure, problem-solve effectively, and adapt to changing circumstances amidst
uncertainty (Cardon et al., 2013). Theoretical frameworks such as the Conservation of Resources (COR)
theory (Hobfoll, 1989) and the Psychological Capital (PsyCap) framework (Luthans et al., 2007) provide
valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying resilience in entrepreneurship. COR theory posits that
individuals strive to acquire, retain, and protect valuable resources (e.g., time, energy, social support) and
that the loss or threat of resource loss can trigger stress reactions (Hobfoll, 1989). In the context of
entrepreneurship, resource availability and resourcefulness are critical determinants of resilience, as
entrepreneurs must navigate resource constraints, market uncertainties, and competitive pressures (M. M.
H. Emon & Khan, 2023). The PsyCap framework, on the other hand, emphasizes the role of positive
psychological resources—namely, hope, ecacy, resilience, and optimism—in fostering resilience and
performance in organizational settings (Luthans et al., 2007). Resilience, as one component of PsyCap, is
seen as a self-regulatory mechanism that enables individuals to bounce back from setbacks, maintain
motivation, and pursue goals despite challenges (Luthans et al., 2015). Empirical research has
highlighted the positive relationship between PsyCap, resilience, and entrepreneurial outcomes,
suggesting that interventions aimed at enhancing these psychological resources can bolster
entrepreneurial success (Luthans et al., 2018). Recent studies have explored the antecedents and
outcomes of resilience in entrepreneurship, shedding light on the factors that contribute to resilience
development and its implications for venture performance. One line of research has focused on the role
of individual characteristics, such as personality traits, cognitive styles, and emotional intelligence, in
shaping entrepreneurial resilience (Stephan & Roesler, 2010). For example, studies have found that traits
such as openness to experience, conscientiousness, and emotional stability are positively associated
with resilience and entrepreneurial success (Rauch & Frese, 2007; Uy et al., 2013). Similarly, research has
highlighted the importance of emotional intelligence—the ability to perceive, understand, and regulate
emotions—in fostering resilience and adaptive coping strategies among entrepreneurs (Baron et al.,
Page 5/13
2016). Moreover, studies have examined the inuence of external factors, such as social support
networks, organizational culture, and institutional environments, on entrepreneurial resilience (Hitt et al.,
2011). Social support, in particular, has been identied as a critical resource that buffers the negative
impact of stressors and enhances resilience among entrepreneurs (Wu et al., 2015). Research suggests
that access to supportive networks—comprising mentors, peers, and advisors—can provide entrepreneurs
with emotional validation, instrumental assistance, and valuable feedback, thereby bolstering their
condence, motivation, and resilience (Fisher et al., 2014). In addition to its antecedents, resilience has
been linked to various outcomes at the individual, venture, and ecosystem levels. At the individual level,
resilience is associated with enhanced psychological well-being, reduced burnout, and greater job
satisfaction among entrepreneurs (Stephan & Roesler, 2010). Resilient entrepreneurs exhibit higher levels
of persistence, adaptability, and creative problem-solving, enabling them to navigate challenges,
capitalize on opportunities, and achieve sustainable growth in their ventures (Hmieleski & Baron, 2009).
Moreover, resilience is seen as a key determinant of venture survival, growth, and innovation, as startups
must weather numerous setbacks and failures before achieving success (Shepherd et al., 2015). Recent
research has also explored the role of resilience in shaping entrepreneurial ecosystems and fostering
economic development. Resilient entrepreneurs are seen as catalysts for change, driving innovation, job
creation, and wealth generation within their communities (Ratten, 2020). In the context of crises such as
the COVID-19 pandemic, resilient entrepreneurs play a crucial role in adapting to new realities, pivoting
business models, and leveraging emerging opportunities to revitalize local economies (Welter et al.,
2021). Moreover, resilient ecosystems characterized by supportive infrastructure, collaborative networks,
and conducive regulatory environments are more likely to nurture and sustain entrepreneurial ventures
over the long term (Stam & Spigel, 2016). Despite the growing recognition of resilience as a critical
determinant of entrepreneurial success, several gaps and challenges remain in the literature. First, there is
a need for greater conceptual clarity and consistency in dening and operationalizing resilience in
entrepreneurship. While researchers have adopted various denitions and measures of resilience, there is
limited consensus on its underlying dimensions, boundary conditions, and manifestations in different
contexts (Patel et al., 2015). Future research should strive to develop a unied framework of resilience
that captures its dynamic nature and context-specic nuances in entrepreneurship. Second, there is a
paucity of longitudinal studies examining the development and trajectory of resilience in entrepreneurship
over time. Most existing research relies on cross-sectional data, limiting our understanding of how
resilience evolves in response to changing circumstances, experiences, and interventions (Fisher et al.,
2017). Longitudinal studies tracking entrepreneurs' resilience from startup formation to venture exit could
provide valuable insights into the factors that shape resilience trajectories and their implications for
venture outcomes. Third, there is a need for more culturally sensitive and contextually grounded research
on resilience in entrepreneurship. While much of the literature has focused on Western contexts and high-
tech industries, less attention has been paid to the experiences of entrepreneurs in non-Western settings,
emerging economies, and traditional sectors (Amorós et al., 2016). Cultural values, societal norms, and
institutional frameworks may shape the perception, expression, and enactment of resilience in diverse
entrepreneurial contexts, warranting a more nuanced and inclusive approach to research.
Page 6/13
3. Research Methodology
The research methodology employed in this study was guided by a qualitative approach, aiming to
explore the role of resilience in entrepreneurial success through in-depth interviews with startup founders.
Qualitative methods were chosen to allow for a rich exploration of the subjective experiences,
perceptions, and strategies related to resilience among entrepreneurs, enabling a nuanced understanding
of the phenomenon in its natural context.
Sampling Strategy
A purposive sampling strategy was used to select participants for the study. Startup founders were
recruited based on their diverse industry backgrounds, venture stages, and geographical locations to
ensure a broad representation of experiences and perspectives. Recruitment efforts involved reaching out
to entrepreneurs through professional networks, entrepreneurial organizations, and online platforms
dedicated to startup communities.
Data Collection
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with each participant to gather rich, detailed insights into their
experiences of resilience in entrepreneurship. The interviews were conducted in-person or via video
conferencing platforms, depending on the preferences and availability of the participants. The interview
guide was designed to elicit responses related to the conceptualization of resilience, key challenges
faced, strategies employed, and perceptions of resilience in the entrepreneurial journey. Each interview
began with informed consent obtained from the participant, outlining the purpose of the study,
condentiality measures, and their rights as participants. The interviews were audio-recorded with the
permission of the participants to ensure accurate data capture. Throughout the interview process, the
interviewer maintained a neutral stance, encouraging participants to share their experiences openly and
reect on their journey as entrepreneurs.
Data Analysis
Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the interview data and identify recurring patterns, themes,
and insights related to resilience in entrepreneurship. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed
verbatim, ensuring delity to participants' responses and preserving contextual nuances. The transcripts
were then systematically analyzed using an iterative process of coding, categorization, and theme
development. Initially, open coding was used to generate a comprehensive list of codes representing key
concepts, experiences, and phenomena discussed by the participants. These codes were then organized
into broader categories and themes based on their relevance to the research questions and theoretical
frameworks. Through constant comparison and reexivity, emergent themes were rened, revised, and
interconnected to create a coherent narrative of resilience in entrepreneurship. Data triangulation was
employed to enhance the trustworthiness and validity of the ndings. Triangulation involved comparing
data from multiple sources, such as interviews, eld observations, and secondary sources, to corroborate
Page 7/13
key themes and insights. Member checking was also conducted, whereby participants were provided with
a summary of the ndings and given the opportunity to validate or clarify their responses, ensuring the
accuracy and credibility of the interpretations.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical guidelines outlined by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) were followed throughout the research
process to ensure the protection of participants' rights and well-being. Informed consent was obtained
from all participants prior to their involvement in the study, and measures were taken to maintain
condentiality and anonymity of their responses. Participants were assured of their right to withdraw
from the study at any time without repercussions, and their data were securely stored and accessed only
by the research team.
Limitations
Despite efforts to ensure rigor and validity, several limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the
sample size was relatively small, limiting the generalizability of the ndings to broader populations of
entrepreneurs. Secondly, the study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to biases such as
social desirability and recall errors. Finally, the qualitative nature of the study precludes causal inference,
and future research employing longitudinal designs or mixed-method approaches could provide further
insights into the dynamics of resilience in entrepreneurship. Overall, the research methodology employed
in this study facilitated a comprehensive exploration of the role of resilience in entrepreneurial success,
providing valuable insights into the experiences, perceptions, and strategies of startup founders. Through
a rigorous process of data collection, analysis, and interpretation, the study generated rich, contextually
grounded ndings that contribute to the growing body of knowledge on resilience in entrepreneurship.
4. Results and Findings
The analysis of interview data yielded rich insights into the role of resilience in entrepreneurial success,
elucidating the experiences, perceptions, and strategies of startup founders. The ndings revealed several
key themes related to the conceptualization of resilience, challenges faced, strategies employed, and
perceptions of resilience in the entrepreneurial journey.
4.1 Conceptualization of Resilience
Participants exhibited a nuanced understanding of resilience, emphasizing its multifaceted nature and
dynamic manifestations in the entrepreneurial context. Resilience was conceptualized as the ability to
bounce back from setbacks, adapt to changing circumstances, and persevere in the pursuit of
entrepreneurial goals. Participants highlighted the importance of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral
dimensions of resilience, noting its role in maintaining motivation, managing stress, and fostering
innovation amidst uncertainty. One participant remarked, "Resilience for me is about being able to
weather the storms, to keep going when things get tough, and to nd creative solutions to problems that
Page 8/13
arise." Another participant described resilience as "the capacity to stay focused on your vision despite the
setbacks and challenges that come your way."
4.2 Challenges Faced
Participants identied a range of challenges and adversities encountered in their entrepreneurial journey,
including nancial constraints, market uncertainties, competition, and personal stressors. Financial
challenges were cited as a signicant barrier to venture growth, with limited access to capital hindering
innovation and expansion efforts. Market uncertainties, exacerbated by rapid technological changes and
shifting consumer preferences, posed challenges in product development, market penetration, and
revenue generation. Competition emerged as a pervasive threat, with startups vying for market share and
resources in crowded industries. Participants described the pressure to differentiate their offerings, build
brand awareness, and secure strategic partnerships to stay competitive. Personal stressors, such as work-
life balance, founder conicts, and self-doubt, also took a toll on entrepreneurial well-being, affecting
motivation, decision-making, and mental health. One participant shared, "The biggest challenge for me
has been securing funding to scale our operations. We've had to bootstrap our way through, which has
been incredibly stressful and limiting in terms of growth opportunities."
4.3 Strategies Employed
Participants employed various strategies to cultivate and enhance resilience in themselves and their
ventures, drawing on personal strengths, support networks, and adaptive coping mechanisms. Cognitive
strategies, such as reframing challenges as opportunities, setting realistic goals, and maintaining a
positive outlook, were commonly mentioned. Participants emphasized the importance of mindset shifts,
resilience-building exercises, and self-reection in overcoming obstacles and maintaining motivation.
Emotional strategies, such as practicing mindfulness, seeking social support, and engaging in self-care
activities, were also instrumental in managing stress and enhancing resilience. Participants highlighted
the role of peer support networks, mentorship programs, and entrepreneurial communities in providing
emotional validation, practical advice, and networking opportunities. Moreover, participants emphasized
the importance of maintaining a sense of purpose, passion, and intrinsic motivation in sustaining
resilience amidst adversity. One participant stated, "I've learned to embrace failure as a learning
opportunity and to view setbacks as temporary obstacles on the path to success. Surrounding myself
with supportive mentors and peers has been crucial in maintaining perspective and staying motivated."
4.4 Perceptions of Resilience
Overall, participants perceived resilience as a critical determinant of entrepreneurial success, enabling
founders to navigate challenges, capitalize on opportunities, and achieve sustainable growth in their
ventures. Resilience was seen as a dening characteristic of successful entrepreneurs, distinguishing
those who persevered in the face of adversity from those who succumbed to setbacks. Participants
emphasized the importance of resilience in fostering innovation, creativity, and resilience in
entrepreneurial ecosystems. One participant reected, "Resilience is the secret sauce that separates the
winners from the losers in entrepreneurship. It's not just about having a great idea or access to resources
Page 9/13
—it's about having the resilience to keep pushing forward when things get tough." Moreover, participants
highlighted the role of resilience in shaping organizational culture, team dynamics, and venture
outcomes. Resilient leaders were seen as role models who inspired condence, instilled resilience, and
fostered a culture of perseverance within their teams. Resilient ventures were characterized by agility,
adaptability, and a willingness to embrace change, positioning them for long-term success in dynamic
market environments.
4.5 Implications
The ndings of this study have several implications for theory, practice, and future research in the eld of
entrepreneurship. Firstly, the study contributes to theoretical understanding of resilience as a critical
determinant of entrepreneurial success, shedding light on its conceptualization, antecedents, and
outcomes in real-world contexts. By uncovering the experiences, perceptions, and strategies of startup
founders, the study enriches existing frameworks of resilience in entrepreneurship and informs evidence-
based interventions to support entrepreneurial resilience. Secondly, the ndings have practical
implications for entrepreneurs, policymakers, and ecosystem stakeholders seeking to foster resilience
among startup founders. By identifying key challenges, strategies, and perceptions related to resilience,
the study offers valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying resilience development and its
implications for venture performance. Practical recommendations include the implementation of
resilience-building programs, mentorship initiatives, and support networks tailored to the unique needs of
entrepreneurs. Finally, the study highlights avenues for future research to further explore the dynamics of
resilience in entrepreneurship. Longitudinal studies tracking entrepreneurs' resilience trajectories over time
could provide insights into the factors that shape resilience development and its implications for venture
outcomes. Cross-cultural studies examining the inuence of cultural values, societal norms, and
institutional frameworks on resilience in entrepreneurship could also enrich our understanding of
resilience in diverse contexts.
5. Discussion
The discussion section provides a synthesis of the key ndings from the study, contextualizes them
within existing literature, and explores their implications for theory, practice, and future research in the
eld of entrepreneurship.
The Role of Resilience in Entrepreneurial Success
The ndings of this study highlight the multifaceted role of resilience in shaping the entrepreneurial
journey. Participants exhibited a nuanced understanding of resilience, emphasizing its importance in
navigating challenges, capitalizing on opportunities, and achieving sustainable growth in their ventures.
This aligns with existing research highlighting resilience as a critical determinant of entrepreneurial
success, enabling founders to withstand setbacks, persevere in the face of adversity, and ultimately thrive
in dynamic market environments (Shepherd et al., 2015).
Page 10/13
Theoretical Implications
The study contributes to theoretical understanding of resilience in entrepreneurship by uncovering the
experiences, perceptions, and strategies of startup founders. By elucidating the cognitive, emotional, and
behavioral dimensions of resilience, the ndings enrich existing theoretical frameworks and offer new
insights into the mechanisms underlying resilience development and its implications for venture
performance. The conceptualization of resilience as a dynamic, context-dependent phenomenon
underscores the need for a holistic approach to studying resilience in entrepreneurship, integrating
individual, organizational, and environmental factors (Patel et al., 2015).
Practical Implications
The ndings of this study have practical implications for entrepreneurs, policymakers, and ecosystem
stakeholders seeking to foster resilience among startup founders. By identifying key challenges,
strategies, and perceptions related to resilience, the study offers actionable insights for supporting and
empowering entrepreneurs on their journey towards success. Practical recommendations include the
development of resilience-building programs, mentorship initiatives, and support networks tailored to the
unique needs of entrepreneurs. Moreover, fostering a culture of resilience within entrepreneurial
ecosystems can contribute to the creation of more resilient ventures and vibrant startup communities
(Stam & Spigel, 2016).
Limitations and Future Research Directions
Despite its contributions, this study has several limitations that warrant consideration. Firstly, the sample
size was relatively small, limiting the generalizability of the ndings to broader populations of
entrepreneurs. Future research could employ larger samples and diverse methodologies to validate and
extend the ndings of this study. Secondly, the study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to
biases such as social desirability and recall errors. Future research could triangulate qualitative data with
quantitative measures to enhance the validity and reliability of the ndings. Lastly, the study focused
primarily on Western contexts and high-tech industries, overlooking the experiences of entrepreneurs in
non-Western settings, emerging economies, and traditional sectors. Future research could adopt a cross-
cultural perspective to explore the inuence of cultural values, societal norms, and institutional
frameworks on resilience in entrepreneurship.
6. Conclusion
This study has provided valuable insights into the role of resilience in entrepreneurial success through in-
depth interviews with startup founders. The ndings revealed resilience to be a multifaceted
phenomenon, encompassing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions, and playing a pivotal role
in navigating challenges, capitalizing on opportunities, and achieving sustainable growth in ventures. The
study contributes to theoretical understanding by enriching existing frameworks of resilience in
entrepreneurship and highlighting its dynamic manifestations in real-world contexts. By uncovering the
Page 11/13
experiences, perceptions, and strategies of startup founders, the study advances our understanding of
resilience as a critical determinant of entrepreneurial success and underscores the need for a holistic
approach to studying resilience in entrepreneurship. Practically, the ndings have implications for
entrepreneurs, policymakers, and ecosystem stakeholders seeking to foster resilience among startup
founders. Actionable insights include the development of resilience-building programs, mentorship
initiatives, and support networks tailored to the unique needs of entrepreneurs. Moreover, fostering a
culture of resilience within entrepreneurial ecosystems can contribute to the creation of more resilient
ventures and vibrant startup communities. Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that
warrant consideration, including sample size constraints, reliance on self-reported data, and a focus on
specic contexts and industries. Future research could address these limitations by employing larger
samples, diverse methodologies, and cross-cultural perspectives to validate and extend the ndings of
this study.
References
1. Baron, R. A., Franklin, R. J., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not
high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psychological capital. Journal of
Management, 42(3), 742-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495411
2. Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2013). The nature and experience of
entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 479-497.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0078
3. Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 46-55.
4. Fisher, G., Kuratko, D., Bloodgood, J., & Hornsby, J. (2014). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of
audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(6), 719-734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.001
5. Fisher, G., Kuratko, D. F., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). Legitimating the venture’s
employees among multiple stakeholders: An impressions-based view. Journal of Business Venturing,
32(1), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.001
. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research:
Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
7. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American
Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
. Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Entrepreneurs' optimism and new venture performance: A
social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473-488.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41330899
9. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Camp, S. M. (2011). Guest editors' introduction to the special issue:
Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship
Journal, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.107
Page 12/13
10. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for
organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource
Management Review, 21(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001
11. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting
performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly,
21(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20034
12. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital:
Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-
572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
13. Emon, M. H., & Nipa, M. N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship
Development : A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International
Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.47670/wuwijar202481mhemnn
14. Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford
University Press.
15. Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2018). Psychological capital: Developing the
human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
1. Patel, P. C., Thatcher, S. M., & Perrewé, P. L. (2015). What keeps us together and what makes us
separate? An integrative review of the role of social networks and social support in organizational
life. Journal of Management, 41(2), 610-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314537466
17. Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and entrepreneurship: Changing life and work landscape.
Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(6), 503-516.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1769840
1. Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to
entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship
(pp. 41-65). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
19. Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making:
Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 11-46.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314541153
20. Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In M. Wright & D. Dana (Eds.), A research
agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 21-43). Edward Elgar Publishing.
21. Stephan, U., & Roesler, U. (2010). Health of entrepreneurs versus employees in a national
representative sample. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 717-738.
https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470924
22. Uy, M. A., Foo, M. D., & Aguinis, H. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance
entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 31-54.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109350247
23. Welter, F., Baker, T., Wirsching, K., Gartner, W. B., & Zahra, S. A. (2021). Everyday entrepreneurship—A
call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Journal of Business Venturing
Page 13/13
Insights, 15, e00228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00228
24. Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship
Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS),
3(3), 201–209.
25. Wu, W., Lu, Y., & Wang, H. (2015). Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up
performance of social ventures. International Small Business Journal, 33(8), 907-928.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613514900
2. Wynn, D., & Williams, D. W. (2012). The entrepreneur's guide to business law. Cengage Learning.
27. Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of
university students' entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management
Journal, 10(3), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0232-z
2. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.
Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
29. Amorós, J. E., Bosma, N., & Levie, J. (2016). The dynamics of entrepreneurship in Latin America: A
NASCENT perspective. Small Business Economics, 47(4), 829-851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-
016-9740-7
