The education systems of the Dinaric region follow world educational trends and continuously apply them in educational policies through a series of strategic documents, improvements to curricula, the development of quality professional teaching materials, and teacher training for teachers and school directors. The orientation of educational policymakers towards the development of students’
... [Show full abstract] language literacy is practically realized through teachers’ work, but its effects can be evaluated through student achievements. One of the best ways to compare strategic education goals and achieved results is to participate in international large-scale assessments, such as IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). The purpose of this chapter is to examine the content of the national curricula in the Dinaric region, dedicated to language literacy and the development of reading skills, as well as to compare the similarities and differences of those curricula. Through a qualitative document analysis, we examined the planned curriculum in six education systems and concluded that the time recommended for teaching the mother tongue is within the limits of the average time recommended for European countries (Eurydice, 2021), but the teaching effects are not the same. Reading literacy as a separate subject area is not represented in the curricula of the Dinaric region, but it is instead an integral part of all curricula to some extent. A greater focus on the teaching of non-linear and non-artistic texts is needed, as well as improvements to curricula in accordance with reading purpose. Our findings are significant for educational policymakers in the Dinaric region and other countries facing similar challenges, as well as for teachers and other professionals whose interest is closely related to reading comprehension.