ArticlePDF Available

Further insights into killer whales Orcinus orca preying on white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in South Africa

Authors:
  • Centro Studi Squali - Sharks Studies Centre - Scientific Institute

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tams20
African Journal of Marine Science
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/tams20
Further insights into killer whales Orcinus orca
preying on white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in
South Africa
A Towner, P Micarelli, D Hurwitz, MJ Smale, AJ Booth, C Stopforth, E Jacobs,
FR Reinero, V Ricci, A Di Bari, S Gavazzi, G Carugno, M Mahrer & E Gennari
To cite this article: A Towner, P Micarelli, D Hurwitz, MJ Smale, AJ Booth, C Stopforth, E Jacobs,
FR Reinero, V Ricci, A Di Bari, S Gavazzi, G Carugno, M Mahrer & E Gennari (01 Mar 2024):
Further insights into killer whales Orcinus orca preying on white sharks Carcharodon carcharias
in South Africa, African Journal of Marine Science, DOI: 10.2989/1814232X.2024.2311272
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2024.2311272
Published online: 01 Mar 2024.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
African Journal of Marine Science 2024, 46(1): 1–5
Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved
Copyright © NISC (Pty) Ltd
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF
MARINE SCIENCE
ISSN 1814-232X EISSN 1814-2338
https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2024.2311272
African Journal of Marine Science is co-published by NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group)
This is the nal version of the article that is published
ahead of the print and online issue
Rapid communication
Further insights into killer whales Orcinus orca preying on white sharks
Carcharodon carcharias in South Africa
A Towner1,2* , P Micarelli3,4 , D Hurwitz5, MJ Smale6, AJ Booth1, C Stopforth7, E Jacobs8, FR Reinero4,
V Ricci4, A Di Bari4, S Gavazzi4, G Carugno4, M Mahrer9 and E Gennari1,10,11
1 Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
2 South African International Maritime Institute (SAIMI), Ocean Sciences Campus, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa
3 Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
4 Sharks Studies Centre – Scientific Institute, Massa Marittima, Italy
5 Simon’s Town Boat Company, Cape Town, South Africa
6 Department of Zoology and the Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa
7 Drone Fanatics SA, Mossel Bay, South Africa
8 Keep Fin Alive, Mossel Bay, South Africa
9 W.M. Keck Science Department, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California, United States
10 Oceans Research Institute, Mossel Bay, South Africa
11 South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB), Makhanda, South Africa
* Corresponding author, e-mail: alisontowner@gmail.com
Photography and video footage, captured by researchers and tourists on board two vessels, provided insights into
the predation techniques employed by an adult male killer whale Orcinus orca in Mossel Bay, South Africa. The
incapacitation of its prey, a juvenile white shark Carcharodon carcharias (~2.5 m TL), followed by consumption
of the liver, occurred within less than 2 minutes, highlighting the predator proficiency of the killer whale. Notably,
another adult male killer whale, and constant traveling companion with the first, was observed approximately 100 m
away and was not involved during the predation. The following day a second carcass of a different eviscerated
white shark (3.55 m TL) washed ashore in the vicinity, indicating that at least two white sharks may have been killed
during the interaction.
Keywords: direct observation, foraging strategy, Mossel Bay, predation behaviour, white sharks
Elasmobranchs are possibly underestimated as prey
species in the diet of killer whales Orcinus orca (Fertl
et al. 1996); though documented records exist worldwide
(Reyes and García-Borboroglu 2004; Williams et al. 2009;
Jorgensen et al. 2019), these are often from remote
offshore locations. At least two populations of killer whales
have been identified as elasmobranch specialists—
in New Zealand waters (Visser 1999) and in the
northeastern Pacific (Ford et al. 2011). The risk of killer
whale predation prompts behavioural and distribution
changes in numerous marine predators (Pitman and
Durban 2010; Breed et al. 2017), where the ‘fight or flight’
response hinges on the trade-off between mortality risk
and access to prey (Ripple et al. 2014). Certain killer
whale populations specialise in a narrow prey range and
may display morphological and genetic distinctiveness
(Ford and Ellis 2014; Kiszka et al. 2021). In South Africa,
an offshore morphotype of killer whale was described
by Best et al. (2014), the first description of its kind in the
Southern Hemisphere. A distinctive pair of males, believed
to belong to this morphotype, appeared in the region in the
following year; they often hunted together and preyed on
various shark species, including white sharks Carcharodon
carcharias (Towner et al. 2022). The killer whales,
nicknamed Port and Starboard because of their dorsal fins
being bent in opposite directions, exhibited a predilection
for extracting and consuming the lipid-rich liver of sharks
(Engelbrecht et al. 2019; Towner et al. 2022), leading to
the displacement of various shark species from coastal
sites, including the broadnose sevengill shark Notorynchus
cepedianus, bronze whaler Carcharhinus brachyurus
and white shark Carcharodon carcharias, inducing
mesopredator release and trophic changes (Engelbrecht
et al. 2019; Hammerschlag et al. 2019; Towner et al. 2022).
While aerial footage has provided insights into the hunting
strategies employed by the killer whales in the region
(Towner et al. 2023), knowledge gaps persist regarding the
duration of a complete predation event and the potential
Introduction
Published online 01 Mar 2024
Towner, Micarelli, Hurwitz, Smale, Booth, Stopforth, Jacobs, Reinero, Ricci, Bari, Gavazzi, Carugno, Mahrer and Gennari
2
for solitary hunting of white sharks by these particular killer
whales, as opposed to cooperative foraging behaviour.
Materials and methods
Mossel Bay (34.1747° S, 22.0834° E) is located ~400 km
east of Cape Town in South Africa’s Western Cape Province
(Figure 1). Seal Island, situated ~800 m offshore (Jewell
et al. 2013; Gennari et al. 2022), was the focal point of
observations. Members of the public, either on land at the
village of Tergniet or aboard one of two vessels (named
Wildcatt and Shark Warrior), documented a killer whale pair
engaging in predatory behaviour against at least one white
shark in the Mossel Bay region. These sightings occurred
between 13:00 and 15:30, ~100 m south of Seal Island.
Results
At 12:30 on 18 June 2023, shore-based observations of
the killer whales Port and Starboard (herein referred to
as KWP and KWS) were reported at Tergniet. At 14:12,
in response to the sighting, an 8-m semi-rigid inflatable
vessel named Wildcatt launched from Mossel Bay harbour
and first sighted both killer whales south of Seal Island at
14:17. A notable surface slick was apparent, with diving
kelp gulls Larus dominicanus and the distinct smell of
shark liver (EJ and CS, pers. obs.) suggesting that a
predation event had occurred prior to the boat’s arrival.
The boat followed the killer whale pair—which remained
at least 100 m apart—for several minutes (Figure 2a,b).
KWP moved north of Seal Island and the vessel followed
him, before heading back to the south of Seal Island where
KWS remained >100 m away from KWP, on the other side
of the island (Figure 2a). At 15:02, a juvenile white shark
of ~2.5 m TL appeared at the surface, and KWS appeared
directly after it (Figure 2b,c). KWS then gripped the left
pectoral fin of the shark and thrust forward with the shark
several times before eventually eviscerating it (Figure 2). A
second vessel, named Shark Warrior, an 11.5-m catamaran
previously engaged in shark cage-diving activities at Seal
Island, remained ~100 m away and recorded video footage
of the events. Several minutes post-predation, researchers
on board Shark Warrior captured images of KWS with a
bloody piece of peach-coloured liver in its mouth (Figure 2i).
Discussion
Whereas solitary foraging behaviour has been observed
among specific killer whales in the sea around Cape
Town, exemplified by the activities of an individual killer
whale named Ettie (S Elwen and colleagues, Sea Search
Research & Conservation and Stellenbosch University,
AFRICA
South
Africa
SOUTH
AFRICA
Western
Cape
Cape
Town Mossel Bay

Mossel Bay
Tergniet Plettenberg Bay
Seal Island
INDIAN OCEAN

INDIAN OCEAN
Predation Seal Island Mossel Bay
Harbour
22°15 E
34°12 S
34° S
22°45 E 23°45 E23°15 E
Figure 1: Location of recent observations of the killer whale pair in Mossel Bay, Western Cape Province, South Africa
African Journal of Marine Science 2024, 46(1): 1–5 3
unpublished data), this research offers evidence that at
least one killer whale, known for shark predation, has the
ability to prey on subadult white sharks independently. All
other documented predation by killer whales on sharks
in the region has involved 2–6 individuals. Remarkably,
the period from seizing the shark by the pectoral fin to
eviscerating it lasted less than 2 minutes. Aerial footage
filmed in the same area the previous year had recorded
multiple predation events, including killer whales pursuing
and approaching white sharks. Initially, the white sharks
seemed unaware of the presence of killer whales but then
would begin tightly circling the killer whale in response to
being approached, with another killer whale blocking off
the shark’s offshore escape path (Towner et al. 2023).
These predation events persisted for nearly 2 hours and
involved about six killer whales, including KWS, in the
hunting activity. However, predation on a white shark by
a lone killer whale has not been documented previously.
An incident in False Bay where KWP was seen carrying
a bronze whaler shark in its mouth on 31 May 2019
(Towner et al. 2022) further supports the notion that lone
killer whales likely handle and immobilise juvenile and
subadult sharks (sized ~2.5–3.5 m TL). A white shark of
2.5 m TL would be expected to weigh ~100 kg and could
have a hepatosomatic index of between 5% and 24%
(i.e. a liver mass of 5–24 kg) (Cliff et al. 1989). However,
cooperative hunting might be required for killing larger
prey owing to the substantial size of large white sharks,
which can reach 6.5 m TL and 2.5 tonnes (Christiansen
et al. 2014).
This rapid communication builds on previous research
that these killer whales predominantly target the livers of
white sharks while discarding the rest of the carcass. On
19 June 2023, the day after the observed predation event
in this study, a fresh, subadult white shark carcass (3.55 m
TL) with its liver removed washed ashore at Mossel Bay,
~1 km from the site of the witnessed predation event
(Figure 3). Although direct observations of the predation
event were lacking, reports from observers on the vessel
Wildcatt indicated an oily slick, seabirds feeding on
the ocean surface, and the distinct smell of shark liver,
suggesting the possibility of another predation before their
arrival in the same area. Stretch marks along the shark’s
flanks may further align with observations of solitary
hunting for white sharks by KWS (Figure 2); however, it
remains unknown how killer whales open large sharks to
feed on their livers. The stretch marks, possibly indicating
either torsion or tension applied to the shark, might provide
a clue, but closer inspection of carcasses or more field
observations will be necessary to confirm the technique
used. Various carnivores selectively consume specific
anatomical portions of prey—examples include harbour
seals Phoca vitulina (Hauser et al. 2008), brown bears
Ursus arctos (Erlenbach et al. 2014), wolves Canis lupus
(a) (b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f) (g)
(h) (i)
Figure 2: Behavioural sequence of killer whales Orcinus orca around Seal Island in Mossel Bay, South Africa. (a) Killer whale ‘Port’ (KWP)
patrolling south, and then moving north of Seal Island and remaining >100 m from the predation event, with no further interaction with killer
whale ‘Starboard’ (KWS). (b) KWS surfaces near a juvenile white shark Carcharodon carcharias (~2.5 m TL) and then (c) seizes the shark’s
left pectoral fin, (d) causing the shark to bow and twist at the surface. (e) After a breath, KWS grasps the partially immobilised shark’s left
pectoral fin, pushing the shark forward again; submersion of the shark marks it for potential evisceration. (f, i) Kelp gulls Larus dominicanus
diving to feed on scraps of shark liver tissue, and a large oily surface slick appears. (g, h) KWS photographed post-event, holding a piece of
the shark’s peach-coloured liver in its mouth with some blood visible, at ~100 m north of the initial site. Photographs Christiaan Stopforth
and Francesca Romana Romeiro/Sharks Studies Centre – Scientific Institute (SSCSI)
Towner, Micarelli, Hurwitz, Smale, Booth, Stopforth, Jacobs, Reinero, Ricci, Bari, Gavazzi, Carugno, Mahrer and Gennari
4
(Bosch et al. 2015) and indeed killer whales (Whitehead
and Reeves 2005).
Killer whales offer insights into ecological specialisation
and divergence within adaptable mammalian predators
(Ford and Ellis 2014). Research across global regions has
shown that the species can exhibit remarkably specialised
diets, selectively foraging for a small subset of potential
prey species in different regions. The rapid and swift
consumption of white shark prey by KWS in this study likely
reflects the adult predator’s skill and efficiency as opposed
to heightened vigilance against loss of prey to another
predator (Ford and Ellis 2014). Prey handling-time could
be influenced by anthropogenic stressors, especially while
spending periods hunting very close to the shoreline of a
major town (Engelbrecht et al. 2019; Towner et al. 2022).
In conservation strategies for vertebrate predators, an
understanding of both the hunting dynamics and nutritional
ecology is crucial (Kohl et al. 2015). Managing complex
interactions among protected species, particularly those
that have recently experienced population declines, poses
significant management difficulties (Moxley et al. 2019).
Such challenges could become even more pronounced as a
result of ecosystem alterations triggered by climate change
and other human-induced stresses (Carnicer et al. 2011;
Moritz et al. 2012). These evolving conditions underscore
the significance of adaptable conservation strategies and
vigilant ecological monitoring.
Acknowledgements — Thanks are extended to Elton Polly of
Go Dive and the staff of White Shark Africa, whose vessels provided
the platforms for these observations. We thank the Department of
Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment for permitting the ongoing
research on this topic. Thanks also to Dr Simon Elwen and
various members of the Killer Whale Sightings Group where these
observations were reported.
ORCID
Anthony John Booth: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5561-9260
Enrico Gennari: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4334-727X
Esther Jacobs: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7769-9567
Primo Micarelli: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-3770
Francesca Ramana Reinero: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-1227
Malcolm Smale: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1135-8687
Alison Towner: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-7066
References
Best PB, Meÿer MA, Thornton M, Kotze PGH, Seakamela SM,
Hofmeyr GJG et al. 2014. Confirmation of the occurrence of a
second killer whale morphotype in South African waters. African
Journal of Marine Science 36: 215–224.
Bosch G, Hagen-Plantinga EA, Hendriks WH. 2015. Dietary
nutrient profiles of wild wolves: insights for optimal dog nutrition.
British Journal of Nutrition 113 (Suppl. 1): S40‒S54.
Breed GA, Matthews CJD, Marcoux M, Higdon JW, LeBlanc B,
Petersen SD, Ferguson SH. 2017. Sustained disruption of narwhal
habitat use and behavior in the presence of Arctic killer whales.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America 114: 2628–2633.
Carnicer J, Coll M, Ninyerola M, Pons X, Sanchez G, Penuelas J.
2011. Widespread crown condition decline, food web disruption,
and amplified tree mortality with increased climate change-type
drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America 108: 1474–1478.
Christiansen HM, Lin V, Tanaka S, Velikanov A, Mollet HF,
Wintner SP et al. 2014. The last frontier: catch records of white
sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in the northwest Pacific Ocean.
PLoS ONE 9: e94407.
Cliff G, Dudley SFJ, Davis B. 1989. Sharks caught in the protective
gill nets off Natal, South Africa. 2. The great white shark
Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus). South African Journal of
Marine Science 8: 131–144.
(a) (b)
Figure 3: (a) On 19 June 2023 (the morning after the documented predation event), a dead white shark Carcharodon carcharias, this time
a different subadult measuring 3.55 m TL, washed ashore ~1 km from the previous predation site in Mossel Bay. A necropsy revealed
that, similar to other sharks preyed on by killer whales in the region, the white shark had been torn open at the pectoral girdle and its liver
removed. (b) The white shark’s carcass showed prominent stretch marks along the flanks, possibly induced by the strategy observed
with KWS and described in Figure 2; however, this is speculative as predation on this shark was not observed and it could have been
cooperatively hunted by both KWS and KWP. Photographs Christiaan Stopforth
African Journal of Marine Science 2024, 46(1): 1–5 5
Engelbrecht TM, Kock AA, O’Riain MJ. 2019. Running scared:
when predators become prey. Ecosphere 10: e02531.
Erlenbach JA, Rode KD, Raubenheimer D, Robbins CT. 2014.
Macronutrient optimization and energy maximization determine
diets of brown bears. Journal of Mammalogy 95: 160–168.
Fertl DA, Acevedo-Gutierrez A, Darby FL. 1996. A report of killer
whales feeding on a carcharhinid shark in Costa Rica. Marine
Mammal Science 12: 606–611.
Ford JK, Ellis GM. 2014. You are what you eat: foraging
specializations and their influence on the social organization and
behavior of killer whales. In: Yamagiwa J, Leszek Karczmarski L
(eds), Primates and cetaceans: field research and conservation
of complex mammalian societies. Tokyo: Springer. pp 75–98.
Ford JK, Ellis GM, Matkin CO, Wetklo MH, Barrett-Lennard LG,
Withler RE. 2011. Shark predation and tooth wear in a population
of northeastern Pacific killer whales. Aquatic Biology 11:
213–224.
Gennari E, Irion DT, Cowley PD. 2022. Active acoustic telemetry
reveals ontogenetic habitat-related variations in the coastal
movement ecology of the white shark. Animal Biotelemetry 10:
article 25.
Hammerschlag N, Williams L, Fallows M, Fallows C. 2019.
Disappearance of white sharks leads to the novel emergence
of an allopatric apex predator, the sevengill shark. Scientific
Reports 9: article 1908.
Hauser DD, Allen CS, Rich Jr HB, Quinn TP. 2008. Resident
harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in Iliamna Lake, Alaska:
summer diet and partial consumption of adult sockeye salmon
(Oncorhynchus nerka). Aquatic Mammals 34: 303–309.
Jewell OJD, Johnson RL, Gennari E, Bester MN. 2013. Fine-scale
movements and activity areas of white sharks (Carcharodon
carcharias) in Mossel Bay, South Africa. Environmental Biology
of Fishes 96: 881–894.
Jorgensen SJ, Anderson S, Ferretti F, Tietz JR, Chapple T, Kanive P
et al. 2019. Killer whales redistribute white shark foraging
pressure on seals. Scientific Reports 9: article 6153.
Kiszka JJ, Caputo M, Méndez-Fernández P, Fielding R. 2021.
Feeding ecology of elusive Caribbean killer whales inferred from
Bayesian stable isotope mixing models and whalers’ ecological
knowledge. Frontiers in Marine Science 8: article 423.
Kohl KD, Coogan SC, Raubenheimer D. 2015. Do wild carnivores
forage for prey or for nutrients? Evidence for nutrientspecific
foraging in vertebrate predators. BioEssays 37: 701–709.
Moritz MA, Parisien MA, Batllori E, Krawchuk MA, Van Dorn J,
Ganz DJ, Hayhoe K. 2012. Climate change and disruptions to
global fire activity. Ecosphere 3: 1–22.
Moxley JH, Nicholson TE, Van Houtan KS, Jorgensen SJ. 2019.
Nontrophic impacts from white sharks complicate population
recovery for sea otters. Ecology and Evolution 9: 6378–6388.
Pitman RL, Durban JW. 2010. Killer whale predation on penguins in
Antarctica. Polar Biology 33: 1589–1594.
Reyes LM, García-Borboroglu P. 2004. Killer whale (Orcinus
orca) predation on sharks in Patagonia, Argentina: a first report.
Aquatic Mammals 30: 376–379.
Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EGH,
Hebblewhite M et al. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the
world’s largest carnivores. Science 343: 124–148.
Towner AV, Watson RGA, Kock AA, Papastamatiou Y, Sturup M,
Gennari E et al. 2022. Fear at the top: killer whale predation
drives white shark absence at South Africa’s largest aggregation
site. African Journal of Marine Science 44: 139–152.
Towner AV, Kock AA, Stopforth C, Hurwitz D, Elwen SH. 2023.
Direct observation of killer whales preying on white sharks and
evidence of a flight response. Ecology 104: e3875.
Visser I. 1999. Benthic foraging on stringrays by killer whales
Orcinus orca in New Zealand waters. Marine Mammal Science
15: 220‒227.
Whitehead H, Reeves R. 2005. Killer whales and whaling: the
scavenging hypothesis. Biology Letters 1: 415–418.
Williams AJ, Petersen SL, Goren M, Watkins BP. 2009. Sightings
of killer whales Orcinus orca from longline vessels in South
African waters, and consideration of the regional conservation
status. African Journal of Marine Science 31: 81–86.
Manuscript received September 2023 / revised December 2023 / accepted January 2024
... The need for the latter analysis (i.e., a regional evaluation of population trends using available monitoring data) was identified directly in the discussion of the former. Low levels of simulated removals had the potential to lead to population decline (Bowlby et al., 2022), which was concerning given that removals were similar to average mortalities from the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board (KZNSB) bather protection program (Cliff and Dudley, 2011;Kock et al., 2022) and killer whales were contributing to additional mortality in the Western Cape Towner et al., (2022aTowner et al., ( ,2022bTowner et al., ( ,2024. Thus, Bowlby et al. (2023) developed a regional model to assess whether the relative abundance declines in the Western Cape were indicative of a broader population decline in South Africa. ...
... Our main conclusions were: (1) the monitoring indices from different regions were highly variable and exhibited no general consistency, making the overall temporal trend relatively flat; (2) redistribution is a biological process that could influence relative abundance at specific monitoring locations in the absence of changes in population-level abundance. There was evidence for killer whales causing localized redistribution of white Towner et al., (2022aTowner et al., ( ,2022bTowner et al., ( ,2024 and broadnose sevengill (Notorynchus cepedianus) sharks (Engelbrecht et al., 2019;Engelbrecht, 2024) in addition to a geographical pattern in the human-shark incident data that is consistent with partial redistribution of white sharks; and (3) the lack of evidence for abundance increase following protection is concerning and a longterm, standardized monitoring program throughout South Africa should be implemented to better track changes in population status. The two conclusions that Gennari et al. (2024) contend are not supported by the analyses are: (1) that the regional trend is not flat (i.e., relatively stable) and (2) that redistribution is not consistent with the patterns in the human-shark incident data. ...
... For example, it would be reasonable to expect a simple positive feedback loop in False Bay or Gansbaai, which would progressively reduce habitat suitability for white sharks and exacerbate localized decline rates. Consider the following scenario: increasing predation pressure from killer whales (Engelbrecht at al. 2019) Towner et al., (2022aTowner et al., ( ,2022bTowner et al., ( ,2024 reduces white shark presence at former aggregation sites Towner et al., (2022aTowner et al., ( ,2022bTowner et al., ( ,2024. As presence declines, cage dive operators reduce the number and duration of trips (Towner et al., 2022a), causing bait inputs and attraction to the site to progressively decline. ...
Article
Full-text available
A recent Letter to the Editor by Gennari et al. (2024) contends that methodological issues and data uncertainties may be obscuring declines in abundance of the white shark population in South Africa in the analyses of Bowlby et al. (2023). We have addressed their critiques using scientifically accepted analytical understanding to demonstrate why our ecological conclusions remain unchanged: (1) the relative abundance of white sharks has not exhibited systematic increases or declines at a regional level since protection in 1991, and (2) observed data on human-shark incidents are consistent with the hypothesis that white sharks have partially redistributed along the South African coastline. Future long-term, standardized monitoring throughout South Africa would be expected to substantially reduce uncertainty about the population trend and status of white sharks. Ultimately, the lack of abundance increase following protection remains concerning and necessitates continued conservation efforts
... In South Africa, killer whales use a special hunting technique which consists in causing a large tear across the pectoral girdle of broad-nose sevengill sharks (Notorynchus cepedianus) to access the liver and feed only on this organ (Engelbrecht et al., 2019). In South Africa, killer whales have been observed hunting and targeting the liver of juvenile white sharks (Towner et al., , 2024. However, it is still unclear what strategy killer whales use to access the liver of that prey (Towner et al., 2024). ...
... In South Africa, killer whales have been observed hunting and targeting the liver of juvenile white sharks (Towner et al., , 2024. However, it is still unclear what strategy killer whales use to access the liver of that prey (Towner et al., 2024). ...
Article
Full-text available
Killer whales (Orcinus orca) are the apex predator in global oceans, and as such they are afforded access to prey species at all trophic levels and sizes. Due to their enhanced cognitive abilities, they are frequent predators of other ocean giants, including large sharks. Observations of these predator-prey interactions are rare globally; however, records appear to be increasing in recent years, possibly due to increased access to surveillance. Here we present reports of killer whales hunting and preying on the world’s largest fish species, the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), by collating and analyzing photo and video footage collected from four unique predation events spanning six years (2018 – 2024) in the southern Gulf of California. Across all events, orcas displayed a seemingly approach to collaboratively hunting and killing whale sharks, characterized by focusing on attacking the pelvic area (claspers and pelvic fins) which exsanguinates the prey and allows access to the lipid-rich liver. Photo identification of the killer whales revealed that an individual adult male “Moctezuma” was engaged in three of the four events, and the females involved in event four had previously been sighted with him. We suggest the potential existence of a specialized pod of elasmobranch-hunting killer whales occurring in the Gulf of California.
Article
Full-text available
Population connectivity shapes dispersal, genetic structure, and responses to climate change. Understanding these patterns is vital for identifying threats and improving species management strategies. In May 2024, a fisher from Indonesia with a satellite tag in their possession contacted local conservationists from non-profit organisation Project Hiu. The Project Hiu staff contacted Wildlife Computers with the serial number and successfully located the tag owner. Remarkably, the tag was identified as having been attached to a 390 cm total-length (TL) subadult female white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) in May 2012 in South Africa. Through subsequent investigations, including email correspondence and interviews with the fishers, we have determined that in November 2016, a 473 cm TL female shark (misidentified at the time as a longfin mako shark, Isurus paucus) was captured in longline gear off the coast of Indonesia, Southeast Asia. This remarkable sequence of events marks the first documented movement and connectivity of a white shark between South Africa and Southeast Asia (Indonesia). Over the 4.5 years at liberty, the shark grew in length an estimated 83 cm (18.4 cm per year), supporting previous findings on growth rates for the species. This record of events highlighted both the potential for misidentification and trade of threatened and protected shark species and the increasing benefits of close collaboration with local fishers. This newly discovered link expands our understanding of their wide-ranging connectivity among remote regions, advances our knowledge of their biology and behavior, and underscores the importance of ongoing international research and conservation efforts to protect these apex predators and their habitats.
Article
Knowledge of killer whale ( Orcinus orca ) feeding ecology in tropical waters is scarce. In the southwest Indian Ocean, opportunistic sightings provide a valuable source of information to better understand their behaviour, diet and distribution. Here, we compile existing records of killer whale predation on elasmobranchs in the southwest Indian Ocean, including sightings of three undescribed prey species regionally: a giant manta ray ( Mobula birostris ), a sicklefin devil ray ( Mobula tarapacana ) and a tiger shark ( Galeocerdo cuvier ). Documenting such observations is important to increase knowledge on killer whale ecology in the tropics and the cascading impact they might have on prey populations.
Article
Full-text available
Orcas (Orcinus orca) are the top marine predators of the ocean, targeting multiple taxa including teleost fishes, elasmobranchs, seabirds, sea turtles, pinnipeds, odontocetes and other large cetaceans. According to their foraging strategies, genetics, acoustics, and morphology, orcas differentiate into ecotypes. Despite their cosmopolitan distribution, orcas are poorly studied in areas such as the Humboldt Current System of the Southeast Pacific coast. Since 2018 in northern Chile, presumed Type A orcas have been observed foraging on South American sea lions (Otaria byronia),benefiting from the presence of fishing vessels facilitating their hunt. These orcas were observed also pursuing large mixed groups of dusky (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) and long-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus capensis); however, predation on dusky dolphins was not documented. Here, we provide 28 additional sightings of orcas in two upwelling hotspots along northern Chile (15 around the Chañaral, Choros, and Damas Islandsin the Humboldt Penguin National Reserve from 2010–2023 and 13 in the Mejillones Peninsula from 2022–2023) and the first records of orcas effective hunting on dusky dolphins in this area. We present three new observations of orca tooth rake marks on fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) dorsal fins in northern Chile. Furthermore, we observed the same orcas on two occasions foraging on dusky dolphins and sharing dolphin meat among group members. Overall, these observations suggest that orcas in northern Chile forage on marine mammals, especially on dusky dolphins, and the number of such predation events seems to be increasing near the coast.
Article
Full-text available
Orcas (Orcinus orca) have a worldwide distribution and as apex predators feed on a wide variety of prey, including marine mammals, seabirds, sea turtles, cephalopods, teleost fish and elasmobranchs. Historically, there have been few observations of orca predation on large elasmobranch species nor are they commonly identified in the stomach contents of deceased orcas. In recent years there has been an increase in observational records of orca predation, such as on white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in South Africa, which could indicate that elasmobranchs serve a greater importance in their diet than previously considered. These events are often documented by members of the public due to the development and affordability of innovative cameras, including the use of the drones (unoccupied aerial vehicles). Here we describe new predator-prey interactions between orcas and large shark species in Cabo Pulmo National Park (CPNP), a small no-take marine protected area located in the Gulf of California. In this paper, we were able to successfully identify individuals from the described orca pods in the region; specifically, the same individuals hunting sharks over a period of nearly two years. We discuss the potential implications of these new ecological interactions, given the importance of tourism to sustain the management of CPNP, as cascading impacts have been documented elsewhere in light of orca predations on sharks.
Article
Full-text available
Background Little is known about the fine-scale behavioural choices white sharks make. The assessment of movement at high spatio-temporal resolution can improve our understanding of behavioural patterns. Active acoustic telemetry was used along a coastal seascape of South Africa to investigate the movement-patterns of 19 white sharks tracked for 877 h within habitats known to host different prey types. Results A three-state hidden Markov model showed higher ontogenetic variability in the movements of white sharks around estuary-related coastal reef systems compared to around a pinniped colony. Our results further suggest white sharks (1) use the same searching strategy in areas where either pinnipeds or fishes are present; (2) occupy sub-tidal reef habitats possibly for either conserving energy or recovering energy spent hunting, and (3) travel directly between the other two states. Conclusions White sharks appear not to simply roam coastal habitats, but rather adopt specific temporally optimized behaviours associated with distinct habitat features. The related behaviours are likely the result of a balance among ontogenetic experience, trophic niche, and energetics, aimed at maximizing the use of temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments and resources. The possible implications for the future conservation of white sharks in coastal areas are discussed, with particular attention to South Africa’s present conservation and management challenges.
Article
Full-text available
Risk-induced fear effects exerted by top predators are pervasive in terrestrial and marine systems, with lasting impacts on ecosystem structure and function. The loss of top predators can disrupt ecosystems and trigger trophic cascades, but the introduction of novel apex predators into ecosystems is not well understood. We documented the emigration of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in response to the presence of a pair of killer whales, Orcinus orca, at a large white shark aggregation site in South Africa. Between February and June in 2017, five white shark carcasses washed up on beaches in Gansbaai, Western Cape Province, four of which had their livers removed. Sightings per unit effort (sea days) and telemetry data demonstrated that white sharks emigrated from Gansbaai following these predation events, and in response to further sightings of this pair and other killer whale pods in the vicinity. Tagging data demonstrated the immediate departure of white sharks from Gansbaai, and some sharks were subsequently moving east. Contrary to expected and well-documented patterns of white shark occurrence at this site, their sightings dropped throughout the following 2.5 years; change-point analysis on both datasets confirmed these departures coincided with killer whale presence and shark carcasses washing out. These findings suggest that white sharks respond rapidly to risk from a novel predator, and that their absence triggered the emergence of another predator, the bronze whaler Carcharhinus brachyurus. Predator–prey interactions between white sharks, other coastal sharks, and killer whales are increasing in South Africa and are expected to have pronounced impacts on the ecosystem.
Article
Full-text available
Investigating the feeding ecology of marine predators is critical for understanding their roles and functional importance in ecosystems. However, assessing the diet of large and wide-ranging predators can be challenging, particularly in the case of rare and elusive species. Killer whales (Orcinus orca) are large apex predators in global oceans, but very little is known about their feeding ecology in tropical ecosystems, particularly in the Caribbean Sea. Killer whales are distributed throughout the Caribbean, and are a regular target of artisanal whalers in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (West Indies). Here we investigate the feeding ecology of Caribbean killer whales using a combination of stable isotope analysis (δ¹⁵N, δ¹³C) and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) data from whalers operating from St. Vincent. Potential prey data from the Caribbean region included large pelagic teleosts, sea turtles, oceanic sharks, cetaceans, and oceanic cephalopods. Mixing models suggest that the contribution of odontocete cetaceans to the diet of killer whales is the most important (overall mean contribution: 60.4%), particularly mesopelagic delphinids (Lagenodelphis hosei; 26.4%, SD = 0.14), large teuthophageous odontocetes (Physeter macrocephalus, Globicephala macrorhynchus; 20.0%, SD = 0.14), and epipelagic delphinids (Stenella attenuata; 14%, SD = 0.14). Oceanic sharks (Carcharhinus longimanus) had a contribution of 17.0% of the diet of killer whales (SD = 0.13), and other potential prey had a relatively marginal contribution. TEK data suggest that whalers believe killer whales feed almost exclusively on cetaceans, particularly odontocete species that they hunt (e.g., G. macrorhynchus). Stable isotope and TEK data were consistent to some extent, although TEK data are qualitative and based on a limited number of observations. Despite some limitations (including sample size for both methods), this study highlights the value of combining independent data sources and methodologies to investigate the ecological roles of marine predators in data-poor regions.
Article
Full-text available
Complex interactions between protected populations may challenge the recovery of whole ecosystems. In California, white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) mistargeting southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) are an emergent impact to sea otter recovery, inhibiting the broader ecosystem restoration sea otters might provide. Here, we integrate and analyze tracking and stranding data to compare the phenology of interactions between white sharks and their targeted prey (elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris) with those of mistargeted prey (sea otters, humans). Pronounced seasonal peaks in shark bites to otters and humans overlap in the late boreal summer, immediately before the annual adult white shark migration to elephant seal rookeries. From 1997 to 2017, the seasonal period when sharks bite otters expanded from 2 to 8 months of the year and occurred primarily in regions where kelp cover declined. Immature and male otters, demographics most associated with range expansion, were disproportionately impacted. While sea otters are understood to play a keystone role in kelp forests, recent ecosystem shifts are revealing unprecedented bottom‐up and top‐down interactions. Such shifts challenge ecosystem management programs that rely on static models of species interactions.
Article
Full-text available
Predatory behavior and top-down effects in marine ecosystems are well-described, however, intraguild interactions among co-occurring marine top predators remain less understood, but can have far reaching ecological implications. Killer whales and white sharks are prominent upper trophic level predators with highly-overlapping niches, yet their ecological interactions and subsequent effects have remained obscure. Using long-term electronic tagging and survey data we reveal rare and cryptic interactions between these predators at a shared foraging site, Southeast Farallon Island (SEFI). In multiple instances, brief visits from killer whales displaced white sharks from SEFI, disrupting shark feeding behavior for extended periods at this aggregation site. As a result, annual predations of pinnipeds by white sharks at SEFI were negatively correlated with close encounters with killer whales. Tagged white sharks relocated to other aggregation sites, creating detectable increases in white shark density at Ano Nuevo Island. This work highlights the importance of risk effects and intraguild relationships among top ocean predators and the value of long-term data sets revealing these consequential, albeit infrequent, ecological interactions.
Article
Full-text available
Despite global declines of apex predatory sharks, evidence for ecosystem consequences remains limited and debated. This is likely a result of both the logistical difficulties of measuring such processes in marine systems and also due to shifting baselines, whereby the ecosystem changes have occurred prior to monitoring. Between 2000–2018, we conducted standardized monitoring of white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) abundance patterns (N = 6,333 shark sightings) and predatory activity (N = 8,076 attacks on seals) at Seal Island, a Cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus) colony in False Bay, South Africa. Over the 18-year study, declines in white shark abundance and attack rates were documented between 2015–2018, with anomalous lows occurring in 2017 and 2018. This included prolonged periods of complete white shark absence from Seal Island. The disappearance of white sharks from Seal Island coincided with the unprecedented appearance of sevengill sharks (Notorynchus cepedianus; N = 120 sightings), an otherwise allopatric kelp-associated apex predator in False Bay. We also recorded a sevengill shark attacking a live seal in the absence of white sharks. These data provide empirical evidence for behavioral shifts in an allopatric marine predator following the decline and disappearance of white sharks from a foraging site. This study demonstrates the importance of historical data and long-term monitoring for disentangling ecological consequences of apex predator declines.
Article
Full-text available
Apex predators play an important role in structuring food webs and are thus key components of healthy, stable ecosystems. While the loss of apex predators has been shown to disrupt ecosystems and trigger trophic cascades, the introduction of novel apex predators to functionally intact systems is less well understood. False Bay, South Africa, is an aggregation site for both white (Carcharodon carcharias) and broadnose sevengill sharks (Notorynchus cepedianus) which together fulfill the role of coastal apex predators. However, since 2009, their position at the top of the food chain has been subverted by the increased presence of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in False Bay. These super predators are known to specialize on certain prey species, and up until 2015 were only documented preying on marine mammals within False Bay. However, in 2015 and 2016 we documented two events in which killer whales preyed upon broadnose sevengill sharks, using a specialized feeding method in which only the liver of each shark was consumed. Although selective feeding on shark liver by killer whales is established, this is the first record of killer whale predations on sevengill sharks in False Bay, and the first documentation of a novel feeding technique, in which killer whales used force applied to the pectoral fins of each shark to rupture the pectoral girdle and thereby access the liver. These predation events resulted in the prolonged absence of sevengill sharks from what is the largest known aggregation site for this species globally, which remained abandoned for up to a month. We briefly review the literature on killer whale behavior, dietary specialization, and population delineation globally and locally, and hypothesize that the novel predations on broadnose sevengill sharks in False Bay are possibly indicative of the arrival of a different sub‐group or ecotype of killer whale in the bay, which habitually feeds on sharks. Due to the unique predatory niche occupied by sevengill sharks in False Bay, the increased presence of these particular killer whales in False Bay could have profound impacts throughout the ecosystem.
Article
Full-text available
Significance Predators are widely understood to impact the structure and stability of ecosystems. In the Arctic, summer sea ice is rapidly declining, degrading habitat for Arctic species, such as polar bears and ringed seals, but also providing more access to important predators, such as killer whales. Using data from concurrently tracked predator (killer whales) and prey (narwhal), we show that the presence of killer whales significantly changes the behavior and distribution of narwhal. Because killer whales are effective predators of many marine mammals, similar predator-induced changes would be expected in the behavior of tracked animals in marine ecosystems worldwide. However, these effects are rarely considered and may frequently go unrecognized.
Chapter
Full-text available
The feeding ecology of predators can have a profound effect on their life history and behaviour. The killer whale—the apex marine predator—has a cosmopolitan distribution throughout the world’s oceans. Globally, it is a generalist predator with a diverse diet, but regionally, different socially and genetically isolated killer whale populations can have highly specialized foraging strategies involving only a few types of prey. In the eastern North Pacific, the three sympatric killer whale lineages have distinct dietary specializations: one feeds primarily on marine mammals, another on salmon, and the third appears to specialize on sharks. These ecological specializations are associated with distinct patterns of seasonal distribution, group size, social organization, foraging behavior, and acoustic activity. Divergent foraging strategies may have played a major role in the social isolation and genetic divergence of killer whale populations.