A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2025) 55:1365–1378
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06290-w
Hugo F. Posada-Quintero
hugo.posada-quintero@uconn.edu
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of
Connecticut, 06269 Storrs, CT, USA
2 Behavioral and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and
Practice Program, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of
Child Health, University College London, London, UK
3 Tony Kriss Visual Electrophysiology Unit, Clinical and
Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond
Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London,
UK
4 UCL Great Ormond Street Institute for Child Health,
University College London, London, UK
5 Centre for Change and Complexity in Learning, University
of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
6 College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University,
Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, Australia
Abstract
Purpose Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention decit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are conditions that simi-
larly alter cognitive functioning ability and challenge the social interaction, attention, and communication skills of aected
individuals. Yet these are distinct neurological conditions that can exhibit diverse characteristics which require dierent
management strategies. It is desirable to develop tools to assist with early distinction so that appropriate early interventions
and support may be tailored to an individual’s specic requirements. The current diagnostic procedures for ASD and ADHD
require a multidisciplinary approach and can be lengthy. This study investigated the potential of electroretinogram (ERG),
an eye test measuring retinal responses to light, for rapid screening of ASD and ADHD. Methods: Previous studies identied
dierences in ERG amplitude between ASD and ADHD, but this study explored time-frequency analysis (TFS) to capture
dynamic changes in the signal. ERG data from 286 subjects (146 control, 94 ASD, 46 ADHD) was analyzed using two TFS
techniques. Results: Key features were selected, and machine learning models were trained to classify individuals based
on their ERG response. The best model achieved 70% overall accuracy in distinguishing control, ASD, and ADHD groups.
Conclusion: The ERG to the stronger ash strength provided better separation and the high frequency dynamics (80–300 Hz)
were more informative features than lower frequency components. To further improve classication a greater number of
dierent ash strengths may be required along with a discrimination comparison to participants who meet both ASD and
ADHD classications and carry both diagnoses.
Keywords Electroretinogram · Autism spectrum disorder · Attention decit hyperactivity disorder · Time-frequency
analysis · Machine learning
Accepted: 13 February 2024 / Published online: 23 February 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024
Detecting Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Decit
Hyperactivity Disorder Using Multimodal Time-Frequency Analysis
with Machine Learning Using the Electroretinogram from Two Flash
Strengths
Sultan MohammadManjur1· Luis Roberto MercadoDiaz1· Irene OLee2· David HSkuse2· Dorothy A.Thompson3,4·
FernandoMarmolejos-Ramos5· Paul A.Constable6· Hugo F.Posada-Quintero1
1 3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.