ArticlePDF Available

Experiences of Stigmatization and Discrimination in Accessing Health Care Services Among People Living with HIV (PLHIV) in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Taylor & Francis
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care
Authors:
  • Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research

Abstract and Figures

Background Recent advances in care and treatment have turned HIV into a “chronic but manageable condition”. Despite this, some people living with HIV (PLHIV) continue to suffer from stigma and discrimination in accessing health care services. This study examined the experience of stigma and discrimination and access to health care services among PLHIV in Akwa Ibom State. Methods The Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research (CCCRN), implementing a USAID-funded Integrated Child Health and Social Services Award (ICHSSA 1) project, conducted a community-based cross-sectional survey in 12 randomly selected local government areas in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. A structured quantitative questionnaire was used for data collection. In total, 425 randomly selected PLHIV were interviewed after providing informed consent. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted using the data analytical application Stata 14. Results The study revealed that 215 PLHIV (50.4%) had been denied access to health care services, including dental care, because of their HIV status in Akwa Ibom State. Respondents reported being afraid of: gossip (78%), being verbally abused (17%), or being physically harassed or assaulted because of their positive status (13%). Self-stigmatization was also evident; respondents reported being ashamed because of their positive HIV status (29%), exhibiting self-guilt (16%), having low self-esteem (38%), and experiencing self-isolation (36%). Women, rural residents, PLHIV with no education, unemployed, single, young people aged between 19 and 29 years, and older adults were more likely to experience HIV-related stigmatization. Conclusion Data from the study revealed that the percentage of PLHIV who experience health-related stigmatization because of their HIV status is high in Akwa Ibom State. This finding calls for the prioritization of interventions to reduce stigma, enhance self-esteem, and promote empathy and compassion for PLHIV. It also highlights the need for HIV education for family and community members and health care providers, to enhance the knowledge of HIV and improve acceptance of PLHIV within families, communities, and health care settings.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Experiences of Stigmatization and Discrimination in
Accessing Health Care Services Among People
Living with HIV (PLHIV) in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
Peters Adekoya
1
, Faith D Lannap
1
, Fatima Anne Ajonye
1
, Stanley Amadiegwu
2
, Ifeyinwa Okereke
1
,
Charity Elochukwu
1
, Christopher Ayaba Aruku
1
, Adeyemi Oluwaseyi
1
, Grace Kumolu
1
,
Michael Ejeh
1
, Ayodotun O Olutola
1
, Doreen Magaji
3
1
Centre for Clinical Care and Clinical Research, Abuja, Nigeria;
2
Catholic Relief Services, Abuja, Nigeria;
3
United States Agency for International
Development, Abuja, Nigeria
Correspondence: Faith D Lannap, Email annap@cccr-nigeria.org; faithlannap@gmail.com
Background: Recent advances in care and treatment have turned HIV into a “chronic but manageable condition”. Despite this, some
people living with HIV (PLHIV) continue to suffer from stigma and discrimination in accessing health care services. This study
examined the experience of stigma and discrimination and access to health care services among PLHIV in Akwa Ibom State.
Methods: The Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research (CCCRN), implementing a USAID-funded Integrated Child Health and
Social Services Award (ICHSSA 1) project, conducted a community-based cross-sectional survey in 12 randomly selected local
government areas in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. A structured quantitative questionnaire was used for data collection. In total, 425
randomly selected PLHIV were interviewed after providing informed consent. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were
conducted using the data analytical application Stata 14.
Results: The study revealed that 215 PLHIV (50.4%) had been denied access to health care services, including dental care, because of
their HIV status in Akwa Ibom State. Respondents reported being afraid of: gossip (78%), being verbally abused (17%), or being
physically harassed or assaulted because of their positive status (13%). Self-stigmatization was also evident; respondents reported
being ashamed because of their positive HIV status (29%), exhibiting self-guilt (16%), having low self-esteem (38%), and experien-
cing self-isolation (36%). Women, rural residents, PLHIV with no education, unemployed, single, young people aged between 19 and
29 years, and older adults were more likely to experience HIV-related stigmatization.
Conclusion: Data from the study revealed that the percentage of PLHIV who experience health-related stigmatization because of
their HIV status is high in Akwa Ibom State. This nding calls for the prioritization of interventions to reduce stigma, enhance self-
esteem, and promote empathy and compassion for PLHIV. It also highlights the need for HIV education for family and community
members and health care providers, to enhance the knowledge of HIV and improve acceptance of PLHIV within families, commu-
nities, and health care settings.
Keywords: orphans and vulnerable children, household, stigmatization, discrimination, people living with HIV, health-related stigma
Introduction
Globally, about 40 million people were estimated to be living with human immunodeciency virus (HIV) in 2021, and
since the beginning of the epidemic, more than 84.2 million people have been infected and about 40.1 million people
have died of HIV.
1
Nigeria ranks third among the countries with the highest burden of HIV infection in the world, with
more than two million people living with HIV (PLHIV) as at 2019 and approximately 45,000 AIDS-related deaths in the
country.
2,3
The advances in care and treatment have turned HIV into a “chronic but manageable condition”. Regardless,
PLHIV continue to suffer from stigmatization and discrimination from their families, communities, and health care
providers.
4
As a result, HIV/AIDS is increasingly being recognized as not merely a medical problem, but also a social
problem.
5
Erving Goffman dened stigma as “the phenomenon whereby an individual with an attribute which is deeply
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 45–58 45
© 2024 Adekoya et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.
php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the
work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For
permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care Dovepress
open access to scientific and medical research
Open Access Full Text Article
Received: 7 November 2023
Accepted: 1 February 2024
Published: 19 February 2024
discredited by his or her society is rejected as a result of that attribute”, and the results of stigma, which include
prejudice, shame, isolation, rejection, and discrimination, are directed at people believed to have that illness or trait.
6,7
Stigmatization emanates from a lack of understanding of the illness (ignorance and misinformation), and also because
some people have negative attitudes towards or negative beliefs about it.
8
HIV-related stigmatization can be described as a process of devaluing people who live with or are connected with the
disease.
9
Discrimination is one mechanism through which stigma is manifested, and refers to discriminatory behaviors
perpetuated by HIV-uninfected individuals towards HIV-infected people.
10,11
HIV stigma is primarily due to a fear of
HIV, ie fear of contracting the disease, and a lack of knowledge about how HIV transmission occurs.
12
Stigmatization
manifests in the form of negative attitudes by the public towards those affected, as well as through negative experiences
of those living with HIV.
13,14
HIV is transmitted predominantly through sexual intercourse. Therefore, in many countries,
including Nigeria, HIV is perceived as a consequence of immoral sexual behavior.
15
Previous studies have found that
women and girls between the ages of 18 to 29 years with HIV/AIDS reported more intense stigma than men, especially
women who reside in rural area.
16–19
Stangl et al
20
devised a comprehensive theoretical framework to interrupt or alleviate the detrimental effects of health-
related stigmatization. Within this framework, they delineated the stigmatization process into domains, encompassing drivers
and facilitators, stigma markings, and stigma manifestations. These stigmatizations extend beyond affecting the impacted
populations to inuencing organizations, institutions, and society. The initial domain focuses on factors driving or facilitating
health-related stigma, ranging from the fear of infection through casual contact with communicable diseases to social
judgment and blame.
20,21
Stigma markings, shaped by drivers and facilitators, involve applying a stigma to individuals or
groups based on a particular health condition or perceived differences, including demographic and economic characteristics.
21
After the application of stigma, it gives rise to various experiences, including discrimination in areas such as housing, forced
eviction upon knowledge of health conditions, verbal abuse, and gossip, among other manifestations.
Stigma experiences encompass both internal, known as “self-stigma”, and external stigma. Self-stigma is when
a stigmatized group member adopts negative societal beliefs associated with their status. External stigma involves stigmatiza-
tion from external groups regarding a person’s health condition.
22
Perceived stigma involves perceptions of how stigmatized
groups are treated in a situation, while anticipated stigma includes expectations of bias if their health condition is
disclosed.
23,24
Additionally, there is secondary or “associative” stigma, referring to the stigma experienced by family, friends,
or health care providers associated with members of stigmatized groups.
20,25
HIV-related stigmatization is linked to
misinformation about disease transmission, fear, and moral judgments among those living with the virus, and studies indicate
that there is discrimination in health care facilities or communities, including denial of care, breaches of condentiality, and
humiliating attitudes, or gossiping.
14,26
External stigma from the community leads to internalized stigma, resulting in self-
exclusion from social events and anticipating exposure that may lead to adverse health and psychosocial outcomes.
14
Evidence from Nigeria
27
and other parts of Africa, such as Ghana
28
and Ethiopia,
15
reveals a level of HIV-related
stigmatization and discrimination. Efforts to reduce stigma related to HIV/AIDS will not only help countries to achieve
key strategies of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but also protect and promote the human rights of PLHIV.
29
This study examined the experience of stigma and discrimination among PLHIV in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria, and their
effects on access to health care services.
Methods and Materials
Study Design
The study was a community-based study. It employed a cross-sectional survey procedure, using a multi-stage random and
purposive sampling technique with random selection of eligible respondents from 12 local government areas (LGAs) in
Akwa Ibom State. The study used primary data and made use of a quantitative method to gather data.
Study Area
The study was conducted in 12 LGAs which were randomly selected from 31 LGAs where the Integrated Child Health and
Social Services Award (ICHSSA 1) project has been implemented in Akwa Ibom State, for the data collection exercise. Akwa
https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
46
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Ibom State occupies a landmass of 8412 km
2
and is bounded to the north by Abia State, to the east by Rivers State, to the west
by Cross River State, and to the south by the Atlantic Ocean. It has the longest coastline in Nigeria. Akwa Ibom State consists
of 31 LGAs, which are further divided into three senatorial districts, namely, Akwa Ibom North-East, Akwa Ibom North-West,
and Akwa Ibom South. The major ethnic groups are Ibibio, Annang, and Oron. The state is one of the largest producers of
crude oil in Nigeria and is of major economic importance in the country. ICHSSA 1 is a USAID-funded project designed to
mitigate the impact of HIV/AIDS on vulnerable children and their households in Akwa Ibom State. The ICHSSA 1 project
includes more than 4000 PLHIV beneciaries who have been served in the state. The state is located in the South-South region
of Nigeria, with a projected population of 5,482,177, according to the 2017 NBS Demographic Population Bulletin. The state
has an HIV prevalence of 5.6%, which is the highest among the 36 states of Nigeria, and this state accounts for about 41% of
vertically transmitted HIV infections in children in the country.
3,30,31
The study population included all the randomly selected
beneciary households in the selected LGAs.
Sample Size Calculation
where Z is the value for a selected α level (type 1 error) of 0.05 = 1.96; e is the acceptable margin of error = 5%; p is the
estimate of variance = 0.5 (in the absence of any data regarding stigma in PLHIV in Akwa Ibom); therefore, assuming
p = 0.5 (maximum variability), q=1−p=1−0.5=0.5.
Therefore, the sample size comes out to be:1:9620:5 10:5ð Þ
0:0052
However, with the response rate of 90%, the overall sample size used for the study was 425.
Training and Supervision
Adequate numbers of enumerators in Akwa Ibom State, including community case managers and volunteers from among
the PLHIV population, were trained by the Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research, Nigeria (CCCRN), team
leader. The training dwelt on study methodology, indicator measurements for the Stigma Index, and quantitative data
collection procedures. Consequently, at the end of the training and on the basis of satisfactory performance, qualied
interviewers in the team were formed to staff each of the randomly selected LGAs in the state. Two additional teams
were kept on reserve/standby. During the interview, teams in each LGA worked closely with the supervisors, while the
team leader supervised the exercise. However, adequate arrangement was made for constant communication among the
team leader, supervisor, and eld members while in the eld, especially through WhatsApp, calls, and SMS.
Study Measurement Tool and Data Collection
The study adopted a multi-stage random sampling technique in which four respondents who were HIV positive were
randomly selected from all 10 wards in each of the 12 LGAs where the study was implemented. Data were collected by
a team comprising the team leader, two supervisors, and 10 trained interviewers who were trained in the content of the
research instrument, both in English and in the local language (Ibibio).
The study instrument is a well-structured quantitative questionnaire, which was administered by trained interviewers.
All interviews were conducted in a private room, where no one could overhear the discussion. The Stigma Index
questionnaire explored the demographics; experiences with stigmatization, discrimination, and advocacy; and experi-
ences with testing, disclosure, and access to services. Other areas were experiences with stigma/discrimination from other
people, access to health, educational services, and their experiences with enternal and internal stigmatization.
The outcome variable for this study was dened as health-related stigmatization, which was measured by asking the
question “Have you been denied health care services, including dental care services, because of your HIV status in the
past 12 months?”. Respondents who responded “Yes” were classied as having experienced health-related stigmatization,
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
47
Dovepress Adekoya et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
while respondents who responded “No” were classied as not having experienced health-related stigmatization because
of their HIV status.
Data Processing and Analysis
The data were extracted using KoboCollect software, cleaned, and analyzed using Stata software (version 14). Univariate
and bivariate analyses were applied. First, we described the characteristics of the study population (frequency counts and
percentages of socio-demographic variables, experience of stigmatization and discrimination among PLHIV, and a pie
chart showing the percentage distribution of health-related stigma). Secondly, logistic regression was used to test the
association between the outcome (health-related stigma) and independent variables (socio-demographic variables,
including age, sex, marital status, level of education, employment status, place of residence, and orphan living with
you), and nally, a logistic regression analysis was conducted, showing the experience of internal stigmatization on
health-related stigma.
Ethical Considerations
The data were collected after obtaining ethical approval from the ethics committee, University of Uyo, Teaching
Hospital, Akwa Ibom State. Each study participant was informed in detail about the research objectives, methods, and
techniques, and written and signed informed consent was obtained from the participants who were 18 years and above,
while for participants under the age of 18 consent was provided by their parent/legal guardian on their behalf. This study
was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the data collection procedure was anonymous to
maintain the privacy and condentiality of any information.
Results
A total of 425 PLHIV were included in the analysis. The majority of the respondents were female, and were the head of
their households. Also, about one-third of the respondents were between the ages of 30 and 39 years and were rural
residents. Most of the respondents were married and about three-quarters of the respondents were employed. In this
study, about 41% of the respondents had received secondary education and more than one-quarter of the households had
an orphan living with them (Table 1).
Percentage of Health-Related Stigma Among PLHIV in Akwa Ibom State
More than half of the PLHIV in Akwa Ibom State had been denied health care services, including dental care, in the past
12 months because of their HIV status. The overall percentage of health-related stigma among PLHIV was 50.4%
(Figure 1).
Table 1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Demographic Characteristics of PLHIV
Households in Akwa Ibom State
Demographic Characteristics Frequency (n=425) Percentage (%)
Age (years)
<18 33 7.8
19–29 112 26.4
30–39 142 33.4
40–49 85 20.0
50+ 53 12.5
(Continued)
https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
48
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Experience of External and Internal Stigmatization/Discrimination Among PLHIV
During the past 12 months, 21% of the respondents had felt excluded from social activities and gatherings, 11% had
experienced exclusion from religious activities, while more than half of the respondents had experienced exclusion from
their family and friends because of their HIV status in the past 12 months. Also, 58% of PLHIV were unable to secure
accommodation or had been forced to change their accommodation, while 56% had lost their jobs or source of income
because of their HIV status.
About 70% of the respondents were afraid of being gossiped about, 17% were afraid of being verbally abused, and
13% were scared of being physically harassed or assaulted because of their HIV-positive status. As regards self-
stigmatization, 29% of the respondents were ashamed of being HIV positive and 16% exhibited self-guilt, while
a larger percentage of the respondents (38%) had low self-esteem because of their HIV status. About 5% had thought
Table 1 (Continued).
Demographic Characteristics Frequency (n=425) Percentage (%)
Sex
Male 159 37.4
Female 266 62.6
Level of education
No education 64 15.1
Primary education 120 28.2
Secondary education 176 41.4
Tertiary education 65 15.3
Employment status
Unemployed 108 25.4
Employed 317 74.6
Place of residence
Rural 278 34.6
Urban 147 65.4
Marital status
Single 198 46.6
Married 129 30.4
Separated/divorced 48 11.3
Widowed 50 11.8
Household headship
Female 242 56.9
Male 183 43.1
Do you have any HIV orphans living with you?
Yes 88 20.7
No 337 79.3
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
49
Dovepress Adekoya et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
about taking their own lives (suicidal) because of their HIV status. In the past 12 months, 36% of the respondents had
isolated themselves from friends and family, 5% had avoided hospital, 7% had chosen not to attend a social gathering,
5% had decided to stop working/not to apply for jobs or even seek any opportunities, while 12% had decided to stop
having sex or a sexual partner because of their HIV status. Also, about 20% of the respondents had decided to stop
childbearing for fear of transmitting the disease to their unborn children or sexual partner (Table 2). More than 50% of
the respondents had been forced to declare their status in order to attend an educational institution or get a scholarship,
and about 43% had been forced to declare their status before they could access health care services. Moreover, in the past
12 months, 54% of the respondents had confronted, challenged, and educated someone who was stigmatizing or
discriminating against them, and one-quarter of the respondents had supported someone else with regard to stigma and
discrimination. The results also show that about half of the respondents believed that they had experienced stigmatization
because they were HIV positive, 12% of the respondents felt that they experienced stigmatization because people were
afraid of getting infected with HIV, and 14% had experienced stigmatization because people do not understand what HIV
is. Also, about half of the respondents expressed that the root cause of stigmatization is fear of being infected with HIV
(Table 3).
Figure 1 Percentage of PLHIV who have been denied health services, including dental care, because of their HIV status in the past 12 months in Akwa Ibom State.
Note: 50.4% (blue) reported having experienced health-related stigma, while 49.6% (orange) reported that they had not experienced health-related stigma.
Table 2 Experience of External Stigmatization and Discrimination Among People Living with HIV
External Stigma Frequency
(n=425)
Percentage
(%)
Have you ever felt excluded from social gatherings/activities in the past 12 months?
Yes 91 21.4
No 334 78.6
Have you ever experienced exclusion from religious activities?
No 377 88.7
Yes 48 11.3
Have you ever experienced exclusion within your family/relatives?
Yes 245 57.7
No 180 42.3
(Continued)
https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
50
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Table 2 (Continued).
External Stigma Frequency
(n=425)
Percentage
(%)
Because of your HIV status, in the past 12 months have you been forced to change your
accommodation or unable to secure accommodation?
Yes 247 58.1
No 178 41.9
In the past 12 months, have you lost a job or a source of your income because of HIV?
Yes 239 56.2
No 186 43.8
In the past 12 months, have you been fearful of any of the following things happening to you?
Being gossiped about 297 69.7
Being physically harassed/assaulted 55 13.1
Being verbally insulted 73 17.2
Table 3 Experience of Internal Stigmatization and Discrimination Among People Living with HIV
Frequency
(n=425)
Percentage
(%)
Have you ever experienced the following feelings because of your HIV status? (internal
stigma)
Ashamed 121 28.5
Self-blaming 69 16.2
Low self-esteem 161 37.9
Suicidal 22 5.2
No feeling 52 12.2
Have you done the following because of your HIV status in the past 12 months?
Avoided hospital 21 4.9
Isolated self from family and friends 154 36.2
Chosen not to attend social gathering 31 7.3
Decided not to apply for a job/stop working 14 3.3
Decided not to get married 44 10.3
Decided not to have (more) children 78 18.4
Decided not to have sex 50 11.8
Withdrew from/did not take on opportunities 10 2.4
None 23 5.4
(Continued)
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
51
Dovepress Adekoya et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Experience of Testing, Disclosure, and Treatment Among PLHIV
The results showed that the majority of the respondents had been tested because a family member(s) was ill or had died
from HIV, while 28% had been tested because of suspected HIV-related symptoms. About 12% had been tested because
of pregnancy and 6% because a family member(s) was HIV positive. With regard to disclosing their status, more than
90% of the respondents had been pressurized into disclosing their status. About 43% of the respondents knew
organizations or groups that they can go to for help if they experience stigmatization or discrimination. They also
expressed that advocating for the right of all PLHIV (35%) and raising the awareness and knowledge of the public about
HIV (31%) should be the important tasks for these organizations to address stigma and discrimination (Table 4).
Table 3 (Continued).
Frequency
(n=425)
Percentage
(%)
For which of these have you been forced to declare your status in the past 12 months?
Applying for a job or set pension plan 21 4.9
Attending an educational institution or getting a scholarship 215 50.6
Getting health care 184 43.3
Getting medical insurance 2 0.5
Obtain a visa or applying for permanent residency 3 0.7
In the past 12 months, have you done any of the following because you are HIV positive?
Confronted, challenged, or educated someone who was stigmatizing and/or discriminating 229 53.9
Participated in an organization or a group that works to address stigma and discrimination 72 16.9
Supported others living with HIV in relation to stigma and/or discrimination 110 25.9
Tried to get a community leader to take action about issues of stigma and discriminating 13 3.1
Spoken to the media about issues of stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV 1 0.2
Why do you think you have experienced HIV-related stigma/discrimination?
Because of my HIV 214 50.4
People are afraid of getting infected 52 12.2
People are ashamed of associating with me 15 3.5
People do not understand what HIV is 59 13.9
People do not like my behavior/lifestyle 7 1.7
Religious belief/moral judgment 29 6.8
No stigma/discrimination 49 11.5
In your own opinion, what do you think are the root causes of HIV stigmatization?
Fear of being infected 210 49.4
Lack of awareness 104 24.5
Illiteracy 73 17.2
Cultural belief 13 3.1
Do not know 25 5.9
https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
52
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Association of Socio-Demographic Parameters of Study Participants and
Health-Related Stigma (Logistic Regression Analysis) (n=425)
Table 5 shows the association of socio-demographic characteristics of the study subjects with health-related stigma using
logistic regression analysis. All independent variables were entered in the logistic regression model. The results are
presented as odds ratio (OR), 95% condence interval (CI), and p-values. The results of the study showed that young
age, place of residence, marital status, and education were signicantly associated with health-related stigma. It was found
that respondents who were urban residents were 29% less likely to experience health-related stigmatization compared with
rural residents (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.279–1.147). With regard to age, signicantly, respondents who were between the ages
of 19 and 29 years were 18% more likely to experience health-related stigmatization (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 2.119–0.233)
compared with respondents aged less than 18 years, while respondents between the ages of 30 and 49 years were less likely
to experience health-related stigmatization. The odds of being denied access to health care services because of their HIV
status increased signicantly, by 36%, among respondents aged 50 years and above (OR=1.36, 95% CI: 2.508–0.204).
The results further showed that male respondents were 52% less likely to experience health-related stigmatization
compared with female respondents (OR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.527–0.518). With regard to educational status, the odds of
being denied access to health care services because of their HIV status increased signicantly with no formal education
compared with those with higher educational level, as respondents with no formal education were 29% more likely to
have experienced health-related stigmatization compared with respondents with education (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 0.443–
Table 4 Experience of Testing, Disclosure, and Treatment Among People Living with HIV
Frequency
(n=425)
Percentage
(%)
Why were you tested for HIV?
Employment 4 0.9
Family member is positive 27 6.4
Illness/death of family member 217 51.1
Pregnancy 52 12.2
Referred due to suspected HIV-related symptoms 117 27.5
To prepare for marriage 8 1.9
What kind of experience do you have about disclosing your status?
I felt pressure from other people NOT living with HIV to disclose my status 413 97.2
Health care professional told other people about my HIV status without my consent 12 2.8
Do you know any organization or group you can go to for help if you experience stigma or
discrimination?
Yes 186 43.8
No 239 56.2
What do you think is the most important task that organizations should carry out to address
stigma/discrimination?
Advocating for the rights of all PLHIV 149 35.1
Providing emotional, physical, and referral support 81 19.1
Educating people living with HIV about living with HIV 62 14.6
Raising the awareness and knowledge of the public about HIV 133 31.2
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
53
Dovepress Adekoya et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
1.028). Similarly, respondents who were employed were 90% less likely to experience health-related stigma when
compared with respondents who were unemployed (OR=0.10, 95% CI: 0.686–0.466). Moreover, the odds of experien-
cing health-related stigma increased signicantly, by 20%, among respondents who were single compared with married
respondents (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.540–0.957). Finally, respondents with orphaned children living with them were 13%
Table 5 Association of Socio-Demographic Parameters of Study Subjects with
Health-Related Stigma (Logistic Regression Analysis) (n=425)
Variable OR 95% CI p-Value
Age (years)
<18 ref
19–29 1.1764 2.119–0.233 0.014*
30–39 0.7615 1.752–0.229 0.132
40–49 1.0572 2.124–0.010 0.052
50+ 1.3564 2.508–0.204 0.021*
Sex
Female ref
Male 0.4780 0.527–0.518 0.986
Place of residence
Rural ref
Urban 0.7135 0.279–1.1478 0.00*
Educational status
Tertiary ref
No education 1.2925 0.443–1.028 0.006*
Primary 0.3840 0.264–0.957 0.246
Secondary 0.0764 0.446–1.282 0.805
Employment status
Unemployed ref
Employed 0.1098 0.686–0.466 0.709
Marital status
Married ref
Divorced 0.6460 0.053–1.345 0.070
Single 1.2074 0.540–0.957 0.004*
Widowed 0.4176 0.446–1.281 0.344
Orphan living with you
No ref
Yes 1.1346 0.194–0.843 0.220
Note: *p-Value less than 0.05, which indicates a signicant relationship between the two variables
analyzed in binary logistic regression.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, condence interval.
https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
54
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
more likely to experience health-related stigma when compared with respondents with no orphaned children residing
with them (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.194–0.843).
Logistic Regression Analysis Showing the Experience of Internal Stigmatization on
Health-Related Stigma (n=425)
Table 6 shows the association between internal stigmatization on health-related stigma using logistic regression analysis.
The results revealed that respondents who were afraid of being physically assaulted or harassed because of their status
were 11% more likely to experience health-related stigmatization (OR=1.111, 95% CI: 1.836–0.185) when compared
with respondents who were afraid of being gossiped about because of their HIV status. Those respondents who were
afraid of being verbally insulted were 3% less likely to experience health-related stigmatization (OR=0.977, 95% CI:
1.517–0.438) compared with respondents who were afraid of being gossiped about owing to their HIV status (Table 6).
Furthermore, the odds of experiencing health-related stigmatization increased signicantly among respondents who
experienced internal stigmatization, such as blaming self (OR=1.405, 95% CI: 2.178–0.633), and respondents with low
self-esteem (OR=1.267 (95% CI: 1.944–0.589) compared with respondents who did not experience any internal
stigmatization; similarly, respondents who were ashamed (OR=1.620, 95% CI: 1.319–0.079) and suicidal (OR=1.077,
95% CI: 1.035–1.191) had higher odds of experiencing health-related stigmatization. Also, respondents who thought they
were being stigmatized because they looked sick with AIDS (OR=1.527, 95% CI: 2.131–0.923), or thought that people
were afraid of being infected by them (OR=1.329, 95% CI: 2.001–0.657), had signicantly higher odds of experiencing
health-related stigmatization compared with respondents who did not feel stigmatized, and respondents who thought that
people were ashamed of associating with them because of their status had higher odds of experiencing health-related
stigmatization (OR=1.098, 95% CI: 2.190–0.006).
Table 6 Logistic Regression Analysis Showing the Effects of Internal Stigmatization on Health-Related
Stigma (n=425)
Variable OR 95% CI p-Value
Do you fear the following might happen to you?
Being gossiped about ref
Being physically assaulted 1.111 1.836–0.185 0.016*
Being physically harassed and/or threatened 1.038 1.127–0.450 0.401
Being verbally insulted 0.977 1.517–0.438 0.000*
Internal stigma
No negative feelings ref
Ashamed 1.620 1.319–0.079 0.082
Blaming self 1.405 2.178–0.633 0.000*
Low self-esteem 1.267 1.944–0.589 0.000*
Do you know any organization or group you can go to for help if you experience stigma or
discrimination?
No ref
Yes 0.894 0.590–1.356 0.600
Note: *p-Value less than 0.05, which indicates a signicant relationship between the two variables analyzed in binary logistic regression.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, condence interval.
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
55
Dovepress Adekoya et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Discussion
The ndings in the study suggest that there is a high level of stigmatization towards PLHIV in accessing health services in
Akwa Ibom State. This is consistent with previous studies.
4,15,26,32,33
Also in line with previous studies, the level of
stigmatization appears to be quite high in this study, with about 50% of PLHIV having been denied access to health care
services, including dental care, in the past 12 months, because of their HIV status. This high level of health-related
stigmatization may have substantial adverse effects on the day-to-day lives of HIV-infected people. It could result in
psychological and emotional stress, inconsistent health care-seeking behavior, and non-disclosure of HIV status.
15
Besides,
it may also lead to non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy, retention in care, and eventually causing people not to attain viral
suppression. By 2030, Nigeria is set to achieve the 95–95–95 goal set by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
(UNAID): 95% of all PLHIV will know their HIV status, 95% of all people with diagnosed HIV infection will receive
sustained antiretroviral therapy, and 95% of all people receiving antiretroviral therapy will have viral suppression.
Subsequently, high levels of stigmatization and discrimination among PLHIV create the circumstances for spreading HIV
and undermine the ability of individuals and communities to protect them, which is one difculty in achieving the three 95s.
In this study, place of residence, age, educational status, and marital status were signicantly associated with health-
related stigmatization and discrimination against HIV-infected people. In line with previous studies, respondents who
reside in urban areas are less likely to experience health-related stigmatization compared with rural residents.
15,26,27
This
is because urban residents have access to various mass media, which are a powerful way of sending public health and
health promotion messages to the population, and particularly for sending messages relating to stigmatization and
discrimination to the community.
15
Furthermore, people with no education were more likely to experience health-related stigmatization, which is
supported by past studies.
26,34,35
Uneducated PLHIV who are not knowledgeable about HIV and modes of transmission
of the virus are more likely to experience HIV-related stigma. Young and single individuals were more likely to
experience health-related stigma owing to their HIV status, in line with previous studies
4,15
which stated that young
and single individuals may experience stigmatization; this can be attributed to the fact that most unmarried people are
viewed as being promiscuous, and engaging in high-risk behaviors including indiscriminate drug use. Single/unmarried
individuals are vulnerable to higher levels of stigmatization because of a lack of social support resulting from isolation,
discrimination, prejudice, and lack of psychosocial support from their family members and the society once their status is
revealed. The study showed that male individuals were less likely to experience health-related stigmatization compared
with female individuals; this is in contrast with previous studies in India,
4,36
which reported that males experienced
stigmatization more than females, but is consistent with other studies in India.
37,38
Individuals who experience self-stigmatization, such as self-guilt or low self-esteem, or individuals who are ashamed
of their status or even suicidal, were more likely to experience health-related stigmatization when compared with
individuals with no self-stigmatization. This nding is in line with a previous study.
26
Individuals who were afraid of
being gossiped about or who were afraid of being physically harassed or assaulted because of their HIV status had
a higher odds of experiencing health-related stigmatization; this is consistent with a study conducted in Peru, where
a respondent declared that “they would rather die than go back to the hospital again for care”, because of being gossiped
about by health care professionals.
39
The study indicated that respondents who knew organizations or groups who could
help during stigmatization were less likely to experience health-related stigmatization. This is consistent with a study
conducted in Kenya, which discovered that PLHIV who participated in organization or group activities experienced
signicantly less stigmatization than individuals who did not. Elimination of discrimination and stigma from the day-to-
day life of PLHIV will help in reducing the barriers to counseling and treatment, and improve the quality of care.
40
Strengths and Limitations of the Study
The study had a high completion rate and provided an understanding of stigma characteristics among PLHIV, thereby bringing
into focus the areas still in need of further study and improvements in practice. The high response rate was achieved because
questionnaire interviews were conducted among the project beneciaries. However, this study is not without its limitations.
One of the limitations was the use of closed-ended (yes/no) questions; a more accurate representation of questions would be
https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
56
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
the use of a stigma scale. Moreover, the study was conducted in only 12 LGAs, and a greater knowledge of stigma
characteristics may have been obtained if the study had been conducted in more LGAs in the state.
Conclusion
In this study, more than half of the PLHIV in Akwa Ibom State experienced health-related stigmatization, as many of the
respondents were denied access to healthcare services, including dental care, because of their HIV status. The study
indicated that young people, single individuals, uneducated people and rural residents were more likely to experience
health-related stigmatization. Also, PLHIV who suffer from internal stigma are more likely to experience HIV health-
related stigmatization. This nding serves as a key indicator in generating and implementing policies against health-
related stigmatization among PLHIV and other HIV-related stigma in Akwa Ibom State, where HIV is predominant. The
older population should be considered when drafting such policies.
Acknowledgment
This paper is made possible by the Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research Nigeria (CCCRN) with support from the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under cooperative agreement funding for the ICHSSA 1 project.
The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of USAID or the United States
Government.
Funding
This study is funded, as part of the approved scope of work for CCCRN ICHSSA 1 Project on orphan and vulnerable
households in Akwa Ibom State, through the US Agency for International Development (USAID), Cooperative
Agreement (72062020CA00006).
Disclosure
The authors report no conicts of interest in this work.
References
1. UNAIDS. Global HIV statistics; the joint united nations programme on HIV/AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland; 2020. Available from: https://www.
unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2020/unaids-data. Accessed April 1, 2021.
2. UNODC, HIVandAID; 2023. Avaialble from: https://www.unodc.org/nigeria/en/hiv-and-aids.html#:~:text=Nigeria%20ranks%20third%20among%
20countries,in%20Nigeria%20as%20at%202018.Accessed February 09, 2024.
3. UNAIDSData; 2020. Available from: https://www.avert.org/sites/default/les/styles/responsive_articlecustom_user_desktop_1x/public/Nigeria%
20updated%20August2017_2.png?itok=uRThI2xD&timestamp=1565964521. Accessed February 09, 2024.
4. Sahoo SS, Khanna P, Verma R, et al. Social stigma and its determinants among people living with HIV/AIDS: a cross-sectional study at ART center
in North India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:5646–5651. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_981_20
5. Yi S, Chhoun P, Suong S, Thin K, Brody C, Tout S. AIDS-related stigma and mental disorders among people living with HIV: a cross-sectional
study in Cambodia. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121461. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121461
6. Arrey AE, Bilsen J, Lacor P, Deschepper R. Perceptions of stigma and discrimination in health care settings towards sub-Saharan African migrant
women living with HIV/AIDS in Belgium: a qualitative study. J biosocial sci. 2017;49(5):578–596. doi:10.1017/S0021932016000468
7. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc; 1963.
8. Oke OO, Akinboro AO, Olanrewaju FO, Oke OA, Omololu AS. Assessment of HIV-related stigma and determinants among people living with
HIV/AIDS in Abeokuta, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312119869109. doi:10.1177/2050312119869109
9. Aggleton P, Wood K, Malcolm A, Parker R. HIV-Related Stigma Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: Case Studies of Successful
Programmes. Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2005.
10. Earnshaw VA, Smith LR, Chaudoir SR, Amico KR, Copenhaver MM. HIV stigma mechanisms and well-being among PLWH: a test of the HIV
stigma framework. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1785–1795. doi:10.1007/s10461-013-0437-9
11. Mavis Dako-Gyekephyllis Dako-Gyeke, Phd and Emmanuel Asampong Experiences of Stigmatization and Discrimination in Accessing Health
Services: voices of Persons Living with HIV in Ghana. Social Work in Health Care, 54:269–285,2015 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0098–1389 print/1541–034X online DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2015.1005268; 2015.
12. Nyblade L, Stangl A, Weiss E, Combating AK. HIV stigma in health care settings: what works? J Int AIDS Soc. 2009;12(1):15. doi:10.1186/1758-
2652-12-15
13. Arinaitwe I, Amutuhaire H, Atwongyeire D, et al. Social Support, Food Insecurity, and HIV Stigma Among Men Living with HIV in Rural
Southwestern Uganda: a Cross-Sectional Analysis, HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care, 657–666; 2021.
14. Turan B, Budhwani H, Fazeli PL, et al. How does stigma affect people living with HIV? The mediating roles of internalized and anticipated HIV stigma in
the effects of perceived community stigma on health and psychosocial outcomes. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(1):283–291. doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1451-5
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S447551
DovePress
57
Dovepress Adekoya et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
15. Diress GA, Ahmed M, Linger M. Factors associated with discriminatory attitudes towards people living with HIV among adult population in
Ethiopia: analysis on Ethiopian demographic and health survey, SAHARA-J: journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 17: 1,38–44; 2020.
16. Sandelowski M, Lambe C, Barroso J. Stigma in HIV-positive women. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(2):122–128. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04024.x
17. Rueda S, Mitra S, Chen S, et al. Examining the associations between HIV-related stigma and health outcomes in people living with HIV/AIDS:
a series of meta-analyses. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e011453. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011453
18. Parcesepe AM, Nash D, Tymejczyk O, et al. Gender, HIV-Related Stigma, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults Enrolling in HIV
Care in Tanzania. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(1):142–150. doi:10.1007/s10461-019-02480-1
19. Ekstrand ML, Heylen E, Mazur A, et al. The role of HIV stigma in ART adherence and quality of life among rural women living with HIV in India.
AIDS Behav. 2018;22(12):3859–3868. doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2157-7
20. Stangl AL, Earnshaw VA, Logie CH, et al. The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research,
intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas. BMC Med. 2019;17(31). doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3
21. Hargreaves J, Stangl A, Bond V, et al. P14.14 Intersecting stigmas: a framework for data collection and analysis of stigmas faced by people living
with hiv and key populations. Sex Transm Infect. 2015;91(Suppl2):A203.1–A203. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2015-052270.526
22. Rao D, Desmond M, Andrasik M, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efcacy of the unity workshop: an internalized stigma reduction
intervention for African American women living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012;26(10):614–620. doi:10.1089/apc.2012.0106
23. Zelaya CE, Sivaram S, Johnson SC, Srikrishnan AK, Suniti S, Celentano DD. Measurement of self, experienced, and perceived HIV/AIDS stigma
using parallel scales in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2012;24(7):846–855. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.647674
24. Quinn DM, Chaudoir SR. Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: the impact of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, and cultural stigma
on psychological distress and health. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(4):634–651. doi:10.1037/a0015815
25. Holzemer WL, Makoae LN, Greeff M, et al. Measuring HIV stigma for PLHAs and nurses over time in ve African countries. SAHARA J J Soc
Asp HIV/AIDS Res Alli. 2009;6(2):76–82. doi:10.1080/17290376.2009.9724933
26. Egbe TO, Nge CA, Ngouekam H, Asonganyi E, Nsagha DS. Stigmatization among People Living with HIV/AIDS at the Kumba Health District,
Cameroon. J Int Assoc Pro AIDS Care. 2020;19. doi:10.1177/2325958219899305
27. Dahlui M, Azahar N, Bulgiba A, et al. HIV/AIDS related stigma and discrimination against PLWHA in Nigerian population. PLoS One. 2015;10
(12):e0143749. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143749
28. Ulasi CI, Preko PO, Baidoo JA, et al. HIV/AIDS-related stigma in Kumasi, Ghana. Health Place. 2009;15(1):255–262. doi:10.1016/j.
healthplace.2008.05.006
29. Adane B, Yalew M, Damtie Y, Kefale B. Perceived Stigma and Associated Factors Among People Living with HIV Attending ART Clinics in
Public Health Facilities of Dessie City, Ethiopia, HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care, 551–557; 2020.
30. National Agency for the Control of AIDS (NACA). Global AIDs Response Country Progress Report Nigeria GARPR 2015. National Agency for
the Control of AIDS (NACA). Abuja: Federal Republic of NIGERIA; 2015:1–77.
31. Esther EC. Socio-Cultural Factors Responsible For the High Incidence of HIV in Nigeria: a Study of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. IAA J Art Hum.
2023;10(1):26–31.
32. Oladunni AA, Sina-Odunsi AB, Nuga BB, et al. 3rd. Psychosocial factors of stigma and relationship to healthcare services among adolescents
living with HIV/AIDS in Kano state, Nigeria. Heliyon. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06687. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06687
33. Saki M, PhD K, Sima M, Mohammadi E. Perception of patients with HIV/AIDS from stigma and discrimination. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17
(6):e23638. doi:10.5812/ircmj.23638v2
34. Lipira L, Williams EC, Nevin PE, et al. Religiosity, social support and ethnic identity: exploring “resilience resources” for African American
women experiencing HIV-related stigma. J Acquire Immune Dec Syndr. 2019;81(2):175–183. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000002006
35. Maughan-Brown B, George G, Beckett S, et al. HIV Risk Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Age-Disparate Partnerships: evidence
From KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Dec Syndr. 2018;78(2):155–162. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001656.
36. Kumar N, Unnikrishnan B, Thapar R, et al. Stigmatization and discrimination toward people living with HIV/AIDS in a coastal city of South India.
J Int Assoc Pro AIDS Care. 2017;16(3):226–232. doi:10.1177/2325957415569309
37. Thomas BE, Rehman F, Suryanarayanan D, et al. How stigmatizing is stigma in the life of people living with HIV: a study on HIV positive
individuals from Chennai, South India. AIDS Care. 2005;17(7):795–801. doi:10.1080/09540120500099936
38. Doshi SR, Gandhi B. Women in India: the context and impact of HIV/AIDS. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2008;17(3–4):413–442. doi:10.1080/
10911350802068300
39. Valencia-Garcia D, Rao D, Strick L, Simoni JM. Women’s experiences with HIV-related stigma from health care providers in Lima, Peru: “I would
rather die than go back for care. Health Care Women Int. 2017;38(2):144–158. doi:10.1080/07399332.2016.1217863
40. Turan B, Stringer KL, Onono M, et al. Linkage to HIV care, postpartum depression, and HIV-related stigma in newly diagnosed pregnant women
living with HIV in Kenya: a longitudinal observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):400. doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0400-4
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care Dovepress
Publish your work in this journal
HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal focusing on advances in research in HIV, its
clinical progression and management options including antiviral treatment, palliative care and public healthcare policies to control viral
spread. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use.
Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors.
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/hivaids—research-and-palliative-care-journal
DovePress HIV/AIDS - Research and Palliative Care 2024:16
58
Adekoya et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
... This proportion is higher than what was reported from a previous study in Nigeria, where 29% of respondents reported being ashamed because of their positive HIV status. This study, like the current study, also showed that more rural than urban dwellers reported shame about their HIV-positive status [21], most likely because discriminatory attitudes towards HIV are more prevalent in rural areas, as reported in other studies [22,23]. These studies stated that urban dwellers are more exposed to education about HIV through mass media and interaction with health personnel, thereby making them less discriminatory than their rural counterparts [22]. ...
... This stigma and discrimination provide needless barriers across HIV prevention, testing, and treatment cascades. This is consistent with ndings from previous studies where similar factors were associated with stigma and shame [21,25]. This study suggests a need for targeted interventions aimed at improving awareness and education about HIV, especially in rural communities of Kenya. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Purpose: HIV/AIDS is a highly prevalent infectious diseasemostly in sub-Saharan Africa,and several strategies have been put in place to reduce its spread. This study aimed to assess the determinants of shame in the stigmatization of self-reported women with HIV in Kenya. Methods: The data used in this study were obtained from the 2022 KDHS. The statistical analysis included 332 women aged 15-49 years who reported that their test results indicated that they were HIV positive, and the analysis considered the complex survey design; hence, weights were applied. All the statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 17. Results:Women whose HIV status was disclosed by someone else (AOR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.08-3.65, P=0.028) had significantly greater odds of feeling ashamed than did their counterparts whose status was not disclosed. Although not statistically significant, beingaged 20-24 years (AOR=3.65, 95% CI: 0.66-20.14, P=0.24) and experiencingverbal abuse from healthcare workers (AOR=3.73, 95% CI: 0.84-16.56, P=0.08) werealso factors associated withincreased odds of experiencingshame. Conclusion: Factors contributing to shame among HIV-positive women include community gossip, unauthorized disclosure of status, verbal harassment, and negative treatment by health workers; addressing these problems is very important for addressing HIV-related stigma, improving HIV testing rates, and ensuring better access to treatment, especially among women living in rural areas.
... This is a pointer to the level of stigmatization and discrimination experienced by people diagnosed with STIs. Previous study in Nigeria revealed that high level of health-related stigmatization and discrimination among People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) in Nigeria [30]. Also, in a similar study in India, G et al. [31] discovered that people had negative attitudes towards those infected with STI's making them to suffer social and institutional stigmatization [31]. ...
... On the other hand, legal services were added to the list of services needed by PLWH as suggested by study participants. This may be attributed to that many PLWHs might not find supportive and qualified legal assistance when they face HIV-related discrimination practices in housing, employment, and healthcare services [15,16]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite the global decline in HIV infections and mortality worldwide, the HIV epidemic is still growing in the MENA region. In the region, People Living with HIV (PLWH) are facing many challenges related to cultural values, norms, and provided services which create significant obstacles to HIV prevention and control efforts. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the “2021 Louisiana Needs Assessment Questionnaire” for use among Egyptians and Arabic-speaking population. Methods Arabic translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire passed through five stages. The questionnaire was translated forward and backward then an expert committee reviewed the translated version. Another expert committee reviewed the developed version after modification to assess the content validity using the Content Validity Index (CVI). The last step included a cognitive interview of a convenient sample of 50 adult PLWH in five consecutive rounds to assess subjects’ understanding of questions and response items and their meanings. Results Modifications were carried out all through the translation and adaptation process of the questionnaire including used words, nomenclature of services, adding or omitting response items, and ordering of questions and response items. The synthesized Arabic-adapted questionnaire has adequate content validity and all questions are clearly understood by the studied subjects. The calculated Content Validity Index of all questionnaire items ranged from 0.82 to 1. Conclusion The developed culturally adapted questionnaire has adequate content validity/semantic appropriateness. It can be used to assess the needs of PLWH in the MENA region with minor adaptations to fit each country. It can also be used to follow the outcome and impact of implemented programs and services. Further research is recommended to assess its psychometric properties.
Preprint
Full-text available
Discrimination and stigma towards those living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHAs) pose serious obstacles to their ability to manage their disease and achieve overall wellbeing. These obstacles make it difficult to receive mental health assistance, prolong social isolation, and impede access to healthcare resources. The purpose of this study is to look into the types, prevalence, and factors that influence stigma and prejudice that PLWHAs in Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria, face when they seek antiretroviral therapy (ART). The study also aims to comprehend the ways in which these experiences impact PLWHAs' mental health and ability to receive healthcare. Structured questionnaires were used in this cross-sectional study to gather data from 400 PLWHAs in Ikeja who were undergoing ART. Aspects of stigma such as negative self-image, disclosure concerns, personalized stigma, and public attitudes were all included in the questionnaire. The data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and significant predictors of discrimination and stigma were found using logistic regression analysis. The study also looked at how stigma affects mental health and healthcare access, with an emphasis on identifying important socio-demographic variables that influence these outcomes. The results showed high prevalence of stigma against PLWHAs in Ikeja, in particular, 37.75% of respondents reported they have encountered stigma associated to HIV while seeking healthcare services, and 89.75% of respondents said they were aware of this stigma. Furthermore, 52% of respondents agreed that stigma is exacerbated by the media and societal views, and 45.5% thought that cultural and religious beliefs affected how PLWHAs were treated in their society. Gender, socioeconomic class, and educational attainment were found to be significant predictors of stigma. In addition, 41.5% of respondents experienced unfavorable views from family or friends, and 48.75% of respondents felt ashamed or condemned due to their HIV status. Similarly, 64.25% of PLWHAs said stigma had a major negative impact on their social interactions and mental health, and 65% said stigma made them decide not to disclose their HIV status. While more than a third, 39.75%, of the respondents said that stigma made it difficult for them to get ART and other essential medical services, two-thirds, 67%, stated that the attitudes of healthcare providers influenced their desire to ask for assistance. The study found widespread stigma and prejudice against PLWHAs with a negative influence on mental health and access to healthcare. The study suggests strengthening anti-discrimination laws, holding frequent training sessions for healthcare professionals, improving education and awareness campaigns, and increasing support services for PLWHAs in order to solve these problems. Stakeholders can improve the inclusive and supportive environment for people living with HIV/AIDS by putting these focused actions into practice, which will eventually improve health outcomes and quality of life. These initiatives are essential for reducing HIV/AIDS stigma and advancing a more equitable and compassionate society.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background In Uganda, urban centers face a high prevalence of HIV, exacerbated by misinformation, low testing rates, and non-disclosure of HIV status. However, evidence on the prevalence and determinants of HIV-related misinformation, testing, and disclosure within these urban centers remains limited. This study assessed the prevalence of HIV testing, misinformation, and non-disclosure in selected urban centers of West Nile, Eastern and Northern Uganda to inform targeted interventions aimed at improving HIV awareness, increasing the uptake of HIV testing services, and facilitating disclosure. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 930 households in five urban centres in Uganda. A multistage sampling technique was employed in the selection of participants. A digitized structured questionnaire preloaded on the KoboCollect mobile application. Data were downloaded in Microsoft Excel and exported into Stata version 14 for statistical analysis. Modified Poisson regression was used to determine the factors associated with the outcome variables. Results About 93.2% of respondents were misinformed about HIV, 20.8% had not disclosed their HIV status, and 3.3% had never been tested for HIV. Having a primary level of education (PR:0.96, 95% CI:0.93–0.99, p = 0.035) and spending more than 6 years in the area (PR: 1.05, 95% CI:1.00-1.10, p = 0.029) were associated with “HIV-related misinformation.” Being knowledgeable about some special drugs that a doctor or a nurse could give to a woman infected with the HIV/AIDs virus to reduce the risk of transmission to the baby (PR:1.03, 95% CI:1.00-1.07, p = 0.024) was associated with “HIV testing”. Being married (PR:0.89, 95% CI:0.65 − 0.12, p < 0.001 was associated with “non-disclosure” of HIV status. Conclusion A high proportion of respondents were misinformed about HIV/AIDS, although the majority had been tested and disclosed their serostatus to partners. HIV/AIDS-related misinformation was associated with having a primary education and residing in the area for more than six years. Additionally, knowledge of special medications that healthcare providers can give to women with HIV to reduce the risk of transmission to their babies predicted HIV testing. Disclosure of HIV status was more common among those who were married or widowed. This study suggests the need for intentional educative interventions with clear and correct HIV/AIDs messages to improve knowledge, increase testing, and facilitate the disclosure of HIV status.
Article
Full-text available
Nigeria accounts for 9% of people living with HIV globally, and has the second largest HIV disease burden in the world with 3.2 million, after South Africa which has 6.8 million burden of the disease. The country accounted for about 65% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV as at 2016. Women who are HIV positive, who gave birth and contributed to the pool of mother to child transmission increased to about 26% in 2016, notwithstanding the enhanced efforts devoted to the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT), the nationwide. Meanwhile, NACA states that unprotected heterosexual sex accounts for 80% of new HIV infections in Nigeria, with the majority of remaining HIV infections occurring in key affected populations such as sex workers. It added that Akwa Ibom State tops the prevalence rate chart with about 5.6% of its residents living with the virus, and it’s one of the six states in Nigeria that accounted for 41% of people living with HIV in Nigeria. Thus, HIV is still a major contributor to the burden of disease in Akwa Ibom State and is particularly devastating because it affects the population in their most productive years. The finding of the high HIV incidence calls for renewed and innovative efforts to prevent HIV infection among young adults especially. This paper recommended the need to urgently reach the younger generation with HIV prevention and treatment services, and put in place research that can better understand the factors that are driving HIV transmission among adolescents and young adults in Akwa Ibom State. Keywords: HIV, transmission and adolescents
Article
Full-text available
Background HIV stigma is one of the major barriers to HIV care due to the fear of disclosure and social discrimination. HIV stigma among men in sub-Saharan countries, including Uganda, has been linked to the fear about how HIV status might affect their status in society. HIV among men in sub-Saharan settings has been associated with feelings of shame, reduced self-worth, and self-blame for their HIV positive status. Information about HIV stigma and its associated factors among men living with HIV in rural Uganda is limited. This study assessed the burden of HIV stigma and its association with social support and food insecurity among men accessing HIV care at a rural health facility in southwestern Uganda. Methods We conducted a clinic-based cross-sectional study and consecutively enrolled 252 adult men accessing HIV care at a rural health centre in southwestern Uganda. We collected information on sociodemographic information, HIV stigma, social support, and food insecurity. We fitted modified Poisson regression models to determine the associations between social support, food insecurity, and HIV stigma. Results The mean HIV stigma score of the study participants was 70.08 (SD 19.34) and 75% reported food insecurity 5% of whom were severely food insecure. The risk of HIV stigma was lower among those aged 35 years and above (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]=0.89; 95% CI 0.83–0.96; P=0.003, those who had been on ART for more than 5 years (ARR=0.92; 95% CI=0.84–0.99; P=0.04), and those who had social support (ARR=0.99; 95% CI=0.98–0.99; P=<0.001). Food insecurity was associated with an increased risk of HIV stigma (ARR=1.07; 95% CI 1.00–1.15; P=0.03). Social support moderated the effect of food insecurity on HIV stigma (P=0.45). Conclusion Stigma is common among men living with HIV in rural Uganda and is significantly associated with food insecurity. Social support moderated the effect of severe food insecurity on HIV stigma among men living with HIV. Interventions to build social support systems and to economically empower men living with HIV should be incorporated into the mainstream HIV care clinics.
Article
Full-text available
Background Stigma associated with HIV shapes all aspect of prevention and treatment, yet there are limited data on how HIV-infected adolescents are affected by stigma. Stigma increases risk of psychological problems among HIV-infected individuals which can affect access to treatment and social support services. This study aimed at identifying psychosocial factors of stigma and relationship to healthcare services among adolescents on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Gwale Local Government Area (LGA) of Kano state, Nigeria. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional survey was carried out from January 26 to February 28, 2020 across six health facilities providing ART service in Gwale local government. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. ART clients attending clinics were interviewed following an informed consent. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data and results are presented using simple frequency tables and percentages. Upon completion of univariate analysis, the data was analyzed at the bivariate level using chi-square test to determine associations between different variables. Results One hundred and eight (108) clients voluntarily participated in the study of which 54 (50%) are male respondents and 54 (50%) are female respondents. Under the internalized stigma item, 67% of HIV-infected adolescents who have lost their father or mother to AIDS reported feeling less valuable than other children who are not infected with HIV. Under the perceived stigma items, 86% of participants who have lost their father or mother to AIDS reported to have excluded themselves from health services and social activities in the last twelve months due to fear of being insulted. Under the experienced stigma items, 62% of participants who have lost their father or mother to AIDS reported to have been avoided by friends and colleagues in the last twelve months. Conclusion The study revealed that loss of intimate relation (father or mother) to AIDS and equal treatment with other HIV negative siblings were found to be significantly associated with the three forms of stigma (internalized stigma, perceived stigma, and experienced stigma) including access to healthcare services. There is a need for social and psychological support programs among HIV-infected adolescents.
Article
Full-text available
Extensive discriminatory attitudes in a population can affect people’s willingness to be tested for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), their initiation of antiretroviral therapy, social support as well as the quality of life of people infected with HIV. This study aimed to assess factors associated with discriminatory attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). Secondary data analysis was conducted using data from the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic Health Survey. A total of 26,623 adult populations were included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with discriminatory attitudes. The proportion of participants having discriminatory attitudes towards PLWHA was 93.8% among men and 64.5% among women. This study revealed that rural residence, no formal education, lack of media access, not previously tested for HIV and lack of comprehensive HIV knowledge increase the odds of having discriminatory attitudes. In conclusion, there is a high-level discriminatory attitude towards PLWHA. Improvement in HIV-related knowledge and dealing with wrong perceptions and myths are extremely vital to reduce discriminatory attitudes towards HIV-infected people. Information, education and communication programmes need to intensify its educational campaigns to dispel these misconceptions.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination together have long been recognized as one of the main obstacles in the prevention, care, and treatment of HIV and AIDS. Yet, little has been done on a large scale to combat them. Stigma still precludes many in need of treatment and care for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV). The purpose of this study was to assess the social stigma among PLHIV and the factors influencing it. Material and methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among four hundred PLHIV attending the antiretroviral therapy (ART) center of a tertiary care institute of Haryana, India, using a semi-structured questionnaire and Berger Stigma Scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 software to explore the relationship between a dependent (social stigma score) and other independent variables. Results: The overall mean stigma score in our study was found to be 110.96 ± 17.05. The stigma score in the male PLHIV was higher than in females. Male gender, younger age group (18-25 years), nuclear family, and rural residents PLHIV experienced more stigma as showed by the logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: Stigma and discrimination are a continuous deterrent for program implementation or successful outcomes. Education, behavior change strategies, and building supportive environments to the targeted population (young, single, and rural residents) can provide a roadmap in ending stigma and discrimination.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Despite the fact that responses to epidemics of human immune-deficiency virus (HIV) have gradually improved; it remains one of the world’s public health challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Evidence is still limited in this area and this study aimed to assess the magnitude of perceived stigma and associated factors among people living with HIV (PLWH) in public health facilities of Dessie city, Ethiopia. Methods A health facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a total of 422 PLWH from September 1 to October 30, 2019 in Dessie city. A pretested structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data and it was analyzed using Stata/SE 14. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with perceived stigma. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated to measure the strength and direction of the association. Statistical significance was declared at P value less than 0.05. Results The overall magnitude of perceived stigma among people living with HIV in public health facilities of Dessie city was 41.93% [95% CI: (37.25, 46.75)]. Perceived stigma was positively associated with being female [AOR=2.08, 95% CI: (1.26, 3.46)], living in rural areas [AOR=1.80, 95% CI: (1.10, 2.94)] and not disclosing HIV status [AOR=2.36, 95% CI: (1.19, 4.66)]. Conclusion In this study, the magnitude of perceived stigma was high as compared to UNAIDS standard, and sex, place of residence, and disclosure of HIV serostatus were significantly associated with perceived stigma. The findings suggested that special emphasis should be placed on rural residents in order to reduce perceived stigma. Moreover, counseling should focus on disclosing HIV serostatus to anyone else interested to disclose particularly for females.
Article
Full-text available
We determined the level, type of stigma, and risk factors associated with stigmatization of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) by conducting a cross-sectional study from April to June 2018 in 3 HIV treatment centers in the Kumba Health District (KHD), Cameroon. We reviewed hospital registers, conducted focus group discussions, and administered structured questionnaires. For data analysis, we used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0. We recorded a total stigma index score of 59.1. Internal stigma (odds ratio [OR] 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-4.98) was common in PLWHA. Also, younger age <30 years (adjusted OR [AOR]: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.94) was linked with stigma reduction while low level of education (AOR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.02-2.97) increased the stigma level. HIV-related stigma is pervasive in the lives of PLWHA, with most of them having internal stigmatization. Appropriate health education on HIV will be crucial in reducing stigmatization in the KHD.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction HIV/AIDS-related stigma remains an essential barrier to the formulated care delivery and improved quality of life of people living with HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Only a few studies have evaluated stigma and its determinants as concerns people living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria. Methods A cross-sectional design study recruited 386 people living with HIV/AIDS attending the government clinic, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria, for the assessment of stigma using Berger’s HIV stigma scale and United States Agency International Development-recommended indicators and questions on HIV-related stigma among people living with HIV/AIDS. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21. Results Of the 386 people living with HIV/AIDS, 322 (83.4%) were females and 64 (16.6%) were males, and 96.9% had disclosed their HIV status. Overall, mean perceived stigma score was moderately high at 95.74 (standard deviation = ±16.04). Majority (77.2%) of the participants experienced moderately perceived stigma. Among the subscales, disclosure concerns contributed the most to stigma score at 68.9%. Enacted stigma in the last 12 months was documented in 35.8% (138). There was no association observed between age, gender, marital status and HIV-related stigma. However, low education was associated with higher negative self-image perception (31.83 ± 5.81 vs 29.76 ± 5.74, p < 0.001). Furthermore, higher perceived stigma score was associated with abandonment by spouses (p < 0.001), isolation from household members (p < 0.001) and social exclusion (p < 0.001). We demonstrated a correlation between the domains of enacted stigma and Berger HIV stigma scales except for the loss of resources. Conclusion Perceived HIV-related stigma is moderately high among people living with HIV/AIDS. Low education, disclosure concerns, spousal or household abandonment and social exclusion are the significant contributors. HIV-related stigma preventive interventions at different levels of care are advocated.
Article
Full-text available
HIV-related stigma has been associated with worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among people living with HIV (PLWH). Little is known about how different types of HIV-related stigma (i.e., anticipatory, internalized, or enacted HIV-related stigma) influence HRQoL and whether these relationships differ by gender. The sample included 912 PLWH aged 18 years or older enrolling in HIV care at four health facilities in Tanzania. HRQoL was assessed with the life satisfaction and overall function subscales of the HIV/AIDS-Targeted Quality of Life (HAT-QoL) instrument. Sex-stratified multivariable logistic regression modeled the association of anticipatory, internalized, and enacted HIV-related stigma on poor HRQoL. Across all participants, the mean life satisfaction score was 63.4 (IQR: 43.8, 81.3) and the mean overall function score was 72.0 (IQR: 58.3, 91.7). Mean HRQoL scores were significantly higher for women compared to men for overall function (5.1 points higher) and life satisfaction (4.3 points higher). Fourteen percent of respondents reported recent enacted HIV-related stigma and 13% reported recent medium or high levels of internalized stigma. In multivariable models, high internalized and high anticipatory stigma were significantly associated with higher odds of poor life satisfaction and poor overall function in both men and women. Psychosocial interventions to prevent or reduce the impact of internalized and anticipatory stigma may improve HRQoL among persons in HIV care. Future research should longitudinally examine mechanisms between HIV-related stigma, poor HRQoL, and HIV care outcomes.