Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
128
Breaking Barriers: Strategies for Fostering
Inclusivity in The Workplace
Arlene Garrick, W. David Johnson, Susan W. Arendt
Apparel, Events and Hospitality Management, Iowa State University, 31 MacKay Hall,
MacKay Hall, 2302 Osborn Dr, Ames, IA 50011, United States
Email: agarrick@iastate.edu, david220@iastate.edu, sarendt@iastate.edu
Abstract
This paper focuses on promoting inclusivity in the workplace, particularly addressing equality
and inequality issues. Its objective is to provide practical tips and advice to managers on
fostering an inclusive workplace culture, recognizing the significance of inclusion for
employee well-being and organizational success. The researchers define and discuss various
forms of workplace inequality, examine root causes, and then present a comprehensive range
of tactics managers can use to encourage diversity. The paper explores creating an inclusive
work culture, implementing diversity and inclusion policies, ensuring fair hiring processes,
addressing bias and discrimination, promoting diversity training, and providing equal chances
for career growth. Furthermore, the paper delves into the obstacles that hinder the
attainment of inclusivity, including resistance to change, unintentional prejudices, ignorance,
and structural barriers. It supplements these discussions with best practices, illustrating
successful examples of organizations that have effectively promoted inclusivity in the
workplace. The methodology to be employed involves a qualitative research approach. The
paper underscores the importance of promoting inclusivity and urges managers to address
equality and inequality issues actively. By implementing these strategies, managers can
cultivate a culture of equality where all employees can thrive and contribute to the company's
success.
Keywords: Inclusivity, Workplace Equality, Workplace Inequality, Diversity and Inclusion
Strategies, Organizational Culture
Introduction
Background and Significance
In recent years, the recognition of employment inequality has grown significantly
among scholars, policymakers, and practitioners. This increased awareness is rooted in the
understanding that establishing inclusive workplaces is a moral and strategic necessity for
organizations. Extensive efforts by scholars and researchers have been dedicated to studying
employment inequality, unveiling its diverse forms and implications (For example, Bonaccio
Vol 14, Issue 2, (2024) E-ISSN: 2222-6990
To Link this Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i2/20799 DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i2/20799
Published Date: 02 February 2024
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
129
et al., 202; Padavic et al., 2020; Pager & Shepherd, 2008). These endeavors have underscored
the adverse effects of inequality on individual well-being, job satisfaction, and career
advancement opportunities. Moreover, studies have shown that diverse and inclusive
workplaces can increase innovation, creativity, and organizational performance (Dobbin &
Kalev, 2019; Thomas & Ely, 2020).
Policymakers have similarly acknowledged the imperative of addressing employment
inequality to champion social justice and equal opportunities. Governments and regulatory
bodies have responded by introducing policies to reduce discrimination and promote
workplace diversity and inclusion. These initiatives foster environments where individuals are
evaluated based on skills and qualifications rather than factors such as gender, race, age,
ability, or socioeconomic status.
Practitioners, including human resources professionals and organizational leaders,
increasingly recognize the moral and competitive advantages of fostering inclusivity (Frei &
Morriss, 2023; Korkmaz et al., 2022; SHRM, n.d.). They appreciate that diverse perspectives
and experiences contribute to improved decision-making, enhanced problem-solving, and a
better understanding of customers. Consequently, organizations strive to establish diverse
and equitable environments that attract top talent, retain employees, and drive innovation.
Despite progress in certain areas, employment inequality persists in many workplaces.
Challenges such as gender pay gaps, underrepresentation of marginalized groups in
leadership positions, and biases in recruitment and promotion processes continue to impede
progress toward inclusivity. There is an evident need for ongoing efforts to address and rectify
employment inequality (Field et al., 2023; International Labor Organization, 2022; McKinsey
and Company, 2020).
Problem Statement
Despite the recognized importance of diversity and inclusion in the workplace,
persistent challenges undermine the realization of truly inclusive environments. Various
studies and reports highlight ( For example, Randall, 2023; McKinsey & Company, 2020; ILO,
2022; ILO, 2021; Hunt et al., 2018; Hunt et al., 2015) critical issues organizations face in
fostering diversity and inclusion, with tangible consequences for employee well-being,
organizational performance, and societal progress.
Examining the challenges in fostering diversity and inclusion reveals multifaceted issues
that demand strategic interventions. Systemic underrepresentation and discriminatory
practices, as evidenced by rigorous field experiments and sociological studies (Bertrand &
Mullainathan, 2018; Pager & Shepherd, 2008), perpetuate inequality and hinder talent
utilization across organizations, particularly affecting marginalized groups in recruitment,
promotions, and career progression. Despite widespread implementation, the ineffectiveness
of diversity programs, supported by research (Dobbin & Kalev, 2019; Chang et al., 2019), is
marked by multifaceted challenges, including resistance to change, insufficient cultural
transformation, and a gap between program design and actual impact on workplace
dynamics. The pervasive nature of unconscious bias, highlighted in studies (Greenwald &
Krieger, 2020; Jones et al., 2023), influences decision-making processes, perpetuating subtle
prejudices and posing a challenge to creating genuinely inclusive cultures, impacting
employee morale, team dynamics, and overall organizational cohesion. Additionally, reports
from McKinsey (Hunt et al., 2018) and Catalyst (Catalyst, 2022) indicate limited progress in
leadership diversity, with the glass ceiling persisting and hindering the full potential of diverse
perspectives at the decision-making level.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
130
Hendy (2022); Ely and Thomas (2019) shed light on the difficulty of translating inclusive
leadership practices from diversity ideals. They pinpoint shortcomings in leadership abilities,
particularly in fostering a culture of belonging, embracing intellectual humility, and managing
the complexities of diverse teams. These challenges pose obstacles to successfully
implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives, underscoring the need for research-based
solutions to reshape workplace dynamics. Additionally, Ely and Thomas (2020) discuss the
skepticism surrounding the widely held belief that increasing diversity in the workforce
automatically enhances a company's performance. They challenge this notion and argue that
contrary to popular rhetoric, no conclusive research supports the direct economic benefits of
workforce diversification. Instead, they assert that organizations must adopt a learning-
oriented approach and be open to changing their corporate culture and power structure to
fully leverage the advantages of increased racial and gender diversity.
Objectives of Paper
This paper pursues dual objectives. Firstly, it seeks to contribute to the ongoing
discourse on employment inequality by examining its diverse aspects and exploring effective
strategies for fostering inclusivity in the workplace. By shedding light on the severity of the
issue, the paper aims to raise awareness among stakeholders, inspire action, and encourage
organizations to prioritize inclusivity in their practices and policies.
Secondly, this paper endeavors to guide managers in cultivating inclusive workplace
cultures. Through the synthesis of research findings and best practices, the objective is to
equip managers with actionable strategies and tactics. The overarching aim is to create an
environment where diversity is valued, and all employees can thrive and contribute
meaningfully to the organization's success.
Methodology
This paper employs a qualitative approach to comprehensively review existing
literature, case studies, and expert insights. The qualitative approach allows for an in-depth
exploration and analysis of the complexities of employment inequality and the strategies for
fostering inclusivity.
The literature review extensively examines scholarly articles, books, and reports on
employment inequality, diversity, inclusion, and organizational behavior. A total of 46
resources, including peer-reviewed journals, books, and industry reports, were explored ( See
Table 1). The focus is on gathering insights into the various forms of employment inequality,
the challenges faced by individuals from marginalized groups, and the strategies organizations
have employed to promote inclusivity. The synthesis of these diverse sources helps provide a
comprehensive understanding of the topic.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
131
Table I
A compilation of key resources used
Author(s)
Year
Title
Focus
Source/Journals/Industry
Articles/Books
Cox, T.
1994
Cultural diversity
in organizations:
Theory, research,
and practice
Theoretical and
practical
aspects of
cultural
diversity in
organizations
Berrett-Koehler
Publishers
Eisenbeiss,
et al,
2008
Transformational
leadership and
team innovation:
Integrating team
climate principles
Cross-cultural
leadership and
its impact on
team
innovation
Journal of Applied
Psychology
Pager, D., &
Shepherd,
H.
2008
The sociology of
discrimination:
Racial
discrimination in
employment,
housing, credit,
and consumer
markets
Sociological
perspective on
racial
discrimination
in various
sectors
American Sociological
Review
Kim et al.
2015
The effects of
mentoring on role
stress, job
attitude, and
turnover
intention in the
hotel industry
Role of
mentoring in
reducing role
stress and
turnover
intention
International Journal of
Hospitality Management
Manoharan,
A., & Singal,
M.
2017
A systematic
literature review
of research on
diversity and
diversity
management in
the hospitality
literature
Diversity and
diversity
management in
the hospitality
industry
International Journal of
Hospitality Management
Diller, J. V.
2018
Cultural diversity:
A primer for the
human services
Primer on
cultural
diversity for
human services
Cengage Learning
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
132
Chang et al.
2019
Does Diversity
Training Work the
Way It’s
Supposed to?
Examination of
the
effectiveness of
diversity
training
programs
Harvard Business Review
Jones et al.
2023
Not so subtle:
Uncovering the
pervasive and
persistent nature
of subtle
prejudice
Subtle
prejudice and
its persistent
impact in
various
contexts
Journal of Applied
Psychology
Bourke, J. &
Titus, A.
2020
The key to
inclusive
leadership
Inclusive
leadership
practices and
their impact
Harvard Business Review
Livingston,
R.
2020
How to promote
racial equity in
the workplace
Strategies for
promoting
racial equity in
the workplace
Harvard Business Review
Thomas, D.
A., & Ely, R.
J.
2020
Cultural diversity
at work: The
effects of
diversity
perspectives on
work group
processes and
outcomes
Effects of
diversity
perspectives on
work group
processes and
outcomes
Oxford Handbook of
Workplace Diversity
Grindstaff,
L.
2022
Barriers to
inclusion: Social
roots and current
concerns
Social roots and
contemporary
concerns
regarding
inclusion
barriers
Uprooting Bias in the
Academy: Lessons from
the Field
Smith, J. A.,
& Davis, R.
2022
Leading
inclusively: The
role of
management in
fostering diversity
and equality
Inclusive
leadership and
the role of
management in
fostering
diversity
Journal of Applied
Management
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
133
Smith, J. A.,
& Johnson,
L. R.
2022
Employment
inequality: A
comprehensive
review of
challenges and
strategies
A
comprehensive
review of
challenges and
strategies in
employment
inequality
Journal of Applied
Management
Williams et
al.
2021
The complexity of
race and ethnicity
in the workplace:
Understanding
the impact of
identity and bias
Understanding
the impact of
identity and
bias in the
workplace
Journal of Social Issues
Chamorro-
Premuzie, T.
& Berg, K.
2021
Fostering a
Culture of
Belonging in the
Hybrid Workplace
Strategies for
fostering a
culture of
belonging in
hybrid
workplaces
Harvard Business Review
Dobbin, F.,
& Kalev, A.
2019
Why diversity
programs fail
Examination of
reasons behind
the failure of
diversity
programs
Harvard Business Review
Levine, S.
2020
Diversity
Confirmed To
Boost Innovation
And Financial
Results
Relationship
between
diversity and
innovation and
financial
outcomes
Forbes Newsletter
In addition to the literature review, this paper incorporates real-world examples and
case studies of organizations that have successfully promoted workplace inclusivity. These
examples are practical illustrations of the strategies and initiatives discussed and highlight
successful approaches resulting in tangible positive outcomes. Including these best practices
aims to inspire and guide managers in their efforts to foster inclusivity.
By adopting a qualitative research methodology, this paper acknowledges the value of
qualitative data in capturing the complexities and nuances of employment inequality and
inclusion. It recognizes the importance of combining theoretical insights with real-world
experiences to provide practical and actionable recommendations for managers and
organizations seeking to address employment inequality and promote inclusivity.
In shaping this research paper, a rigorous selection process was employed to curate a
diverse and comprehensive range of resources from reputable journals, books, and industry
articles (see Table 2). The goal was to ensure the inclusion of well-established academic
perspectives, in-depth analyses, and real-world insights into the multifaceted domain of
diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
134
Table II
Summary of the criteria, methods, and justifications for the selection of resources
Source
Type
Inclusion Criteria
Search Methods
Justification
Journals
Peer-reviewed
articles from
esteemed journals;
publication dates
2015 to 2023.
Extensive searches on
academic databases
(PubMed, PsycINFO,
Google Scholar) using key
terms ('diversity and
inclusion,' 'workplace
diversity').
The chosen articles directly
align with the manuscript's
research focus, covering
diverse aspects of diversity
management,
organizational practices,
and the impact of diversity
on workplace dynamics.
Books
Scholarly
contributions,
authority in the
field, relevance to
research objectives.
Meticulous review of
academic publishers,
libraries, and book
repositories for works
addressing theoretical
foundations and practical
implications of diversity
and inclusion.
Selected books provide a
deeper theoretical
understanding, offering
comprehensive insights into
the historical context,
theoretical frameworks, and
strategic considerations in
workplace diversity.
Industry
Articles
Practical relevance,
offering insights
into real-world
applications of
diversity and
inclusion strategies.
Consultation of
reputable industry
sources (Harvard
Business Review, Forbes,
company reports) to
capture contemporary
perspectives on diversity
and inclusion practices.
Industry articles contribute
a pragmatic dimension,
incorporating insights from
successful diversity
initiatives, organizations'
challenges, and emerging
corporate landscape trends.
This meticulous article selection process aimed to construct a nuanced narrative that
draws from various sources, enriching the manuscript with a well-rounded understanding of
diversity and inclusion from both academic and practical standpoints. The research focus
guided the selection criteria and methods, ensuring that each chosen resource contributes
meaningfully to the overarching themes explored in this paper.
Study Context
The context of this study is tied to the contemporary landscape of organizational
diversity and inclusion, which is influenced by various factors, including societal norms, legal
frameworks, and corporate policies. Understanding the dynamics of workplace diversity
requires a nuanced examination within the broader context of organizational, national, and
international environments.
Diversity and inclusion are not universal concepts but are shaped by specific regions'
cultural, legal, and social landscapes. Policies and regulations governing workplace diversity
practices can vary significantly between countries, impacting how organizations address
these issues (Jonsen et al., 2021; Corrington et al., 2020; Mapes et al., 2020). Additionally,
cultural attitudes toward diversity, equity, and inclusion are crucial in shaping organizational
practices (McKinsey & Company, 2022; ILO, 2020).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
135
For instance, the United States has a history of affirmative action policies and anti-
discrimination laws, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, influencing organizational practices
and responses to diversity. In contrast, other countries may have different legal frameworks
and historical contexts that shape their approach to diversity and inclusion. Moreover,
industry-specific contexts also influence diversity initiatives. The technology sector, for
example, has faced scrutiny for gender and racial imbalances, leading to industry-specific
efforts and discussions on improving diversity and inclusion (Gonzalez, 2023; World Economic
Forum, 2021).
Considering this study's focus on the challenges, effectiveness, and leadership practices
in promoting diversity and inclusion, the context extends beyond a generic understanding to
a detailed exploration of the specific environments in which organizations operate. This
context-driven approach enables a more nuanced and insightful analysis of the issues and
solutions proposed in the manuscript, recognizing the diversity of challenges faced by
organizations operating in different contexts.
The Complexity of Employment Inequality
Employment Inequality
The problem of employment inequality is complex and multifaceted. It can be
manifested in various forms, such as unconscious bias, discrimination, and structural
impediments (Baldwin et al., 2019; Pager & Shepherd, 2019). This section will explore these
aspects of employment inequality, drawing on various scholarly sources and actual instances
to comprehensively understand the challenges (Greenwald & Krieger, 2020; Jones et al.,
2023). Analyzing the scope and severity of employment inequality sets the stage for
identifying effective tactics to foster inclusivity ( see Table 3).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
136
Table III
Research theme, papers, and main focus
Themes
Papers -Authors and dates
Main Focus
Employment
Inequality Complexity
Baldwin et al. (2019), Pager &
Shepherd (2019)
Describes employment
inequality as complex and
multifaceted, exploring its
manifestations and
challenges.
Unconscious Bias
Greenwald & Krieger (2020), Jones
et al. (2023)
Defines unconscious bias, its
impact on hiring and
promotion decisions, and
presents research findings
on its prevalence - the
impact of unconscious bias
on workplace dynamics,
including feedback,
performance evaluations,
and assignments.
Cognitive Processes
and Societal
Conditioning
Smith & Brown (2019)
Discusses how cognitive
processes and societal
conditioning contribute to
forming unconscious biases.
Impact on Hiring,
Promotions, and
Workplace Dynamics
Bertrand & Mullainathan (2018),
Jones et al. (2023)
Examines the influence of
unconscious bias on hiring,
promotions, and workplace
dynamics, citing relevant
studies.
Mitigation Strategies
Atewologun et al. (2018), Smith &
Johnson (2022)
Advocates for recognizing
and addressing unconscious
bias through awareness
programs, training, and
inclusive policies.
Gender Bias
Ariella (2023), Smith & Brown
(2019)
Highlights the widespread
and ingrained nature of
gender bias in unconscious
attitudes, emphasizing the
need for awareness and
inclusive policies.
Unconscious Bias
Unconscious bias refers to the automatic, unconscious judgments and stereotypes
individuals hold towards others based on gender, race, age, and other social identities. These
biases are formed due to societal conditioning and personal experiences, and they can
influence decision-making processes, including those related to hiring, promotion, and other
employment decisions.
Unconscious bias has a significant impact on various aspects of the employment
process. Hiring can affect the evaluation of resumes and job applications, leading to biased
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
137
selection criteria and decisions. For example, individuals may unconsciously favor candidates
with similar backgrounds or characteristics, resulting in a need for more diversity in the
candidate pool (Greenwald & Krieger, 2020). Unconscious bias can also influence interview
processes, with interviewers unintentionally favoring candidates who resemble them or fit
into traditional stereotypes of success.
Similarly, unconscious bias plays a role in promotion decisions. Managers and decision-
makers may favor similar employees regarding demographic characteristics or shared
experiences. This can perpetuate existing inequalities and limit the opportunities for
underrepresented groups to advance within organizations (Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2018).
Unconscious bias can also impact performance evaluations, resulting in differential treatment
and biased assessments of employee capabilities and contributions.
Studies have demonstrated the prevalence and consequences of unconscious bias in
employment settings. Greenwald and Krieger (2020) conducted research using the Implicit
Association Test and found that many individuals exhibit implicit biases that align with
stereotypes related to gender, race, and other social categories. These biases can influence
judgments and decisions even among individuals who explicitly endorse equality and fairness.
Furthermore, research by Bertrand and Mullainathan (2018) focused on the impact of
unconscious bias in hiring decisions. They conducted a field experiment where fictitious
resumes were sent in response to job postings, varying only in terms of the names that
indicated different racial backgrounds. The study revealed that resumes with "White-
sounding" names received a significantly higher callback rate than those with "Black-
sounding" names, highlighting the impact of unconscious bias on hiring practices.
These examples and studies underscore the prevalence and consequences of
unconscious bias in employment settings. Organizations must recognize and address
unconscious bias through awareness programs, training, and inclusive policies and practices.
By actively mitigating unconscious bias, organizations can foster fairer, more inclusive
workplaces that provide equal opportunities for all individuals.
Unconscious Bias and its impact
Unconscious bias is influenced by cognitive processes and societal conditioning, which
contribute to the formation of automatic, implicit judgments and stereotypes. These biases
shape how individuals perceive and evaluate others, influencing their decisions and behaviors
in various contexts, including hiring, promotions, and workplace dynamics.
Cognitive processes play a significant role in the formation of unconscious biases. Our
brains naturally seek to simplify and categorize information to process it more efficiently. As
a result, individuals tend to rely on mental shortcuts, known as heuristics, to make quick
judgments and decisions. These heuristics can lead to biases when applied to social categories
and attributes.
Societal conditioning also plays a crucial role in the development of unconscious bias.
Individuals are exposed to cultural messages, media portrayals, and social norms that
reinforce stereotypes and create expectations about certain groups from an early age. These
societal influences shape individuals' perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs, leading to
internalizing biases without conscious awareness.
The impact of unconscious bias on hiring, promotions, and workplace dynamics is well-
documented. During hiring, unconscious bias can lead to biased evaluations of candidates'
qualifications and abilities. For example, research by Smith and Brown (2019) found that
unconscious bias can result in preferential treatment toward candidates who align with
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
138
traditional gender roles or possess characteristics associated with certain racial or ethnic
groups. This bias can lead to underrepresenting marginalized groups and perpetuating
existing inequalities in the workforce.
Unconscious bias also affects promotion decisions, as individuals tend to favor
employees similar to themselves regarding background, experiences, or social identities. This
similarity bias can result in excluding individuals from underrepresented groups from career
advancement opportunities (Jones et al., 2023). Furthermore, unconscious bias can influence
workplace dynamics, affecting team interactions, collaboration, and decision-making
processes. Stereotypes and biases can shape perceptions of competence, credibility, and
authority, leading to unequal treatment and limited opportunities for certain individuals or
groups (Smith & Brown, 2019).
Research by Jones et al. (2023) highlights the impact of unconscious bias on workplace
dynamics. Their study found that implicit biases, including feedback, performance
evaluations, and assignments, can influence managerial decisions. Biases can lead to
differential treatment, affecting employee morale, job satisfaction, and career progression.
These examples and studies demonstrate how unconscious bias affects hiring, promotions,
and workplace dynamics, perpetuating inequalities and hindering diversity and inclusion
efforts. Gender bias is widespread and ingrained in unconscious attitudes. Given the constant
reinforcement of cultural messages perpetuating stereotypes about men and women, it
appears challenging to eliminate such biases. Even individuals who perceive themselves as
fair and equitable may easily activate and act upon unconscious gender bias. Addressing
unconscious bias requires raising awareness, providing training programs, and implementing
inclusive policies and practices that mitigate bias and promote fair treatment and equal
opportunities for all individuals.
Exploring the Multifaceted Challenge
To comprehensively understand the challenges of employment inequality, it is essential
to examine its different facets. Unconscious bias, rooted in our cognitive processes and
societal conditioning, can lead to discriminatory practices in hiring, promotion, and other
employment decisions (Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2018; Smith & Brown, 2019). Discrimination
based on gender, race, age, ability, and socioeconomic status can result in unequal treatment
and limited opportunities for certain individuals or groups (Williams et al., 2021; Johnson &
Lee, 2020). Structural impediments, such as systemic biases within organizations and societal
structures, can also perpetuate employment inequality (Dobbin & Kalev, 2019; Pager et al.,
2020).
Drawing on scholarly sources and real-world examples, this section will delve into these
aspects, examining the scope and severity of employment inequality (Smith & Johnson, 2022;
Jones et al., 2023). By understanding the challenges holistically, we can identify effective
tactics to foster inclusivity in the workplace.
Discrimination
Discrimination in the workplace manifests in various forms, including gender, race, age,
ability, and socioeconomic status. These forms of discrimination result in unequal treatment,
limited opportunities, and barriers to advancement for certain individuals or groups. Gender
discrimination remains a prevalent issue in many workplaces, with women facing challenges
such as the gender pay gap, lack of representation in leadership positions, and biases in hiring
and promotion decisions (Williams et al., 2021; Pager & Shepherd, 2019).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
139
Racial Discrimination
Racial discrimination is another significant aspect of employment inequality. Individuals
from racial and ethnic minority groups face biases and stereotypes that affect their career
advancement opportunities and equal workplace treatment (Pager & Shepherd, 2019;
Williams et al., 2021). Studies have revealed disparities in hiring, promotion, and access to
leadership positions for racial and ethnic minorities (Pager & Shepherd, 2019). For instance,
research conducted by Williams et al. (2021) found that individuals from Black and Hispanic
backgrounds face discrimination and are underrepresented in top management positions.
Age Discrimination
Age discrimination, often referred to as ageism, is a form of discrimination based on an
individual's age. Older workers frequently encounter biases that limit their job prospects and
opportunities for career development, with research highlighting the impact on hiring
decisions, training opportunities, and promotions (Pager & Shepherd, 2019; Williams et al.,
2021).
A study by Williams et al (2021) highlighted that older employees face challenges
accessing employment due to a perceived lack of technological skills or concerns about
retirement.
Discrimination Based on Ability
Discrimination based on ability, commonly known as ableism, involves unfair treatment
and exclusion of individuals with disabilities. Ableism can manifest through inaccessible
workplaces, discriminatory hiring practices, and limited accommodations. Studies have
documented disparities in employment rates, wages, and career progression for individuals
with disabilities (Williams et al., 2021; Pager & Shepherd, 2019). For example, Pager and
Shepherd found that individuals with disabilities face barriers to employment due to stigma
and stereotypes.
Socioeconomic Status Discrimination
Socioeconomic status discrimination is rooted in disparities related to an individual's
socioeconomic background. Individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often need
help accessing quality education, job opportunities, and advancement. Studies have
demonstrated that socioeconomic status influences hiring decisions, career progression, and
access to resources and networks (Williams et al., 2021). For instance, Pager and Shepherd
(2019) showed that individuals from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds face
difficulties securing employment due to limited social and professional networks.
These examples and references highlight the unequal treatment and limited
opportunities faced by individuals or groups due to various forms of discrimination in the
workplace. Addressing these discriminatory practices is crucial for fostering inclusivity and
creating equitable environments where all individuals have equal career development and
success opportunities.
Structural Impediments
Structural impediments refer to systemic biases within organizations and societal
structures that perpetuate employment inequality (Pager & Shepherd, 2019). These biases
are deeply embedded in policies, practices, and norms, leading to barriers for marginalized
individuals. Within organizations, structural impediments can manifest through biased
recruitment and selection processes, a lack of diversity in leadership positions, and limited
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
140
opportunities for career advancement. Research has shown that biases in hiring decisions,
such as favoring individuals from privileged backgrounds or relying on informal networks,
perpetuate inequality (Pager and Shepherd, 2019). Moreover, the lack of diversity in
leadership positions can perpetuate discriminatory practices and limit the representation of
marginalized groups (Pager and Shepherd, 2019).
At a societal level, structural impediments can be observed through broader systems of
oppression, unequal access to education and resources, and cultural biases (Pager and
Shepherd, 2019). These factors create barriers that disproportionately affect individuals from
marginalized groups in their pursuit of equal employment opportunities. Addressing
structural impediments requires a comprehensive approach that challenges systemic biases,
implements equitable policies and practices, and promotes diversity and inclusion at all levels
of organizations and society. Recognizing and actively working to dismantle these structural
barriers is essential for creating truly inclusive workplaces that provide equal opportunities
for all individuals, regardless of their background or identity.
Strategies for Fostering Inclusivity
Fostering inclusivity at work requires a multifaceted approach that involves various
strategies and initiatives (Lee et al., 2022; Brown et al., 2020). These tactics include diversity
training, mentorship, sponsorship programs, adaptable working conditions, and data and
metrics to monitor development and pinpoint problem areas (Johnson et al., 2022; Davis &
Anderson, 2023). Strong leaders are crucial in promoting an inclusive workplace, requiring
cultural competence and empathy (Smith & Davis, 2022; Wilson, 2022).
Organizations can raise awareness and educate employees about unconscious biases
by implementing diversity training programs and fostering a more inclusive and equitable
workplace (Anderson et al., 2023; Brown, 2021). Mentorship and sponsorship programs
support and guide underrepresented individuals, offering opportunities for skill development
and advancement (Lee et al., 2022; Smith et al., 2023). Adaptable working conditions, such as
flexible schedules and remote work options, can accommodate diverse needs and promote
work-life balance (Davis, 2022). Moreover, organizations must establish data-driven metrics
to monitor progress and identify areas for improvement (Smith et al., 2023).
Recognizing the crucial role of management and leadership, this section will emphasize
the importance of leaders in promoting inclusivity at work. Managers should possess essential
competencies such as cultural competence, empathy, and the ability to create a
psychologically safe environment where employees feel valued and respected (Brown, 2022;
Johnson, 2021).
Diversity Training. One effective strategy for fostering inclusivity is the implementation
of diversity training programs (Anderson et al., 2023; Smith & Brown, 2019). These programs
raise awareness among employees about unconscious biases, stereotypes, and prejudices
that can hinder inclusivity. Diversity training helps create a more inclusive and equitable work
environment where individuals from all backgrounds feel valued and respected by providing
education and promoting understanding.
Mentorship and sponsorship programs foster inclusivity and address disparies for
underrepresented individuals (Lee et al., 2022). In the context of these iniaves, mentorship
involves a seasoned professional (mentor) imparng guidance, advice, and knowledge to a
less experienced counterpart (mentee). These dynamics fosters career development, skill
enhancement, and personal growth through a nurturing and educaonal relaonship
(Omadeke, 2021).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
141
On the other hand, a sponsorship program takes a more proacve stance, with a senior
professional (sponsor) acvely championing and supporng the career progression of a junior
individual (protégé). Sponsors leverage their inuence to create opportunies, enhance
visibility, and bolster the protégé's advancement within the organizaonal hierarchy (
Omadeke, 2012). In essence, mentorship underscores the importance of guidance and
knowledge transfer, focusing on the educaonal aspects of professional development. In
contrast, sponsorship is characterized by acve advocacy, emphasizing the creaon of
opportunies for career advancement.
Mentorship and sponsorship programs collecvely oer indispensable guidance,
support, and avenues for career development, parcularly benecial for individuals facing
barriers to advancement. Acng as advocates, mentors, and sponsors assists individuals in
navigang organizaonal challenges and facilitates valuable networking opportunies (Lee &
Brown, 2022). By fostering strong relationships between employees from different
backgrounds, these programs enhance diversity and promote equal opportunities for career
growth.
Adaptable Working Conditions. Recognizing that employees have diverse
responsibilities and obligations outside of work, organizations that provide flexibility and
work-life balance options can attract and retain a more diverse workforce. Adaptable working
conditions, such as flexible schedules and remote work options, play a pivotal role in fostering
inclusivity within the workplace by accommodating individual needs (Davis, 2022). For
instance, when organizations offer employees the flexibility to set their schedules or work
remotely, it acknowledges individuals' varied responsibilities, such as medical appointments
or unique family circumstances. This approach not only enhances the overall inclusivity of the
work environment but also signifies a commitment to recognizing and valuing the individual
needs of each employee. Moreover, adaptable working conditions support employees' well-
being and contribute to productivity and engagement, aligning with the broader goal of
creating a workplace that respects and meets the diverse needs of its workforce.
Data-Driven Metrics. Organizations committed to fostering inclusivity use data-driven
metrics to monitor their progress and identify areas for improvement (Davis & Anderson,
2023). By collecting and analyzing relevant data, such as diversity representation at different
levels, pay equity, and employee satisfaction surveys, organizations can identify disparities
and take targeted actions to address them. Regular measurement and evaluation help
organizations track their diversity and inclusion initiatives, hold themselves accountable, and
ensure continuous progress.
Role of Management and Leadership. Management and leadership roles must be
balanced in promoting equality and inclusivity. Strong leaders actively champion diversity and
inclusion, lead by example, and create an environment where all voices are heard and valued
(Smith & Davis, 2022). Effective leaders possess essential competencies such as cultural
competence, empathy, and the ability to navigate complex organizational dynamics (Lee &
Brown, 2022). Leaders can foster a climate of equality and inclusivity throughout the
organization by setting the tone from the top and integrating inclusive practices into everyday
operations.
By implementing these strategies, organizations can unleash the power of diversity and
create inclusive workplaces that harness the full potential of their employees. Embracing
diversity goes beyond merely checking boxes—it involves cultivating an environment where
individuals from all backgrounds feel included, respected, and empowered to contribute their
unique perspectives and talents. Through diversity training, mentorship and sponsorship
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
142
programs, adaptable working conditions, data-driven metrics, and strong leadership,
organizations can build inclusive cultures that drive innovation, enhance employee
engagement, and achieve sustainable success.
Overcoming Obstacles to Inclusivity
Resistant to Change. When exploring common barriers and resistance to diversity and
inclusion initiatives, it is crucial to devise strategies for overcoming them (Dobbin & Kalev,
2019). A prevalent obstacle is resistance to change, with some individuals hesitating to
embrace initiatives due to fears of disrupting established norms or perceived threats to their
positions. To address this resistance, fostering open dialogue and communication becomes
essential. Providing opportunities for employees to voice concerns and engage in discussions
aids in creating a better understanding and reducing resistance. Emphasizing the business
case for inclusivity is also crucial, highlighting tangible benefits such as improved innovation,
productivity, and competitiveness (Dobbin & Kalev, 2019).
Additionally, involving key stakeholders, including senior leaders and managers, in
designing and implementing initiatives and adopting a comprehensive change management
approach with clear goals and ongoing support proves effective in overcoming resistance
(Dobbin & Kalev, 2019). Understanding and addressing barriers and resistance are vital for
creating inclusive and diverse workplaces. Strategies such as fostering open dialogue,
emphasizing the business strategy, involving key stakeholders, and implementing a
comprehensive change management approach help overcome resistance and promote a
culture of inclusivity (Dobbin & Kalev, 2019).
Unintentional Prejudice. Even with good intentions, unintentional prejudice can persist
(Atewologun et al., 2018). Addressing these biases is crucial for fostering a truly inclusive
environment. Strategies involve increasing self-awareness and mitigating biases through
education and training (Atewologun et al., 2018). Education plays a key role in raising self-
awareness about unconscious biases. Training programs that highlight the existence and
impact of these biases help individuals recognize and acknowledge their biases. Providing
tools and techniques within training programs, such as perspective-taking, empathy-building,
and challenging stereotypes, empowers individuals to actively work towards mitigating the
impact of unconscious biases in daily interactions and decision-making. Creating a culture of
inclusivity, where individuals feel comfortable discussing biases and seeking feedback, is also
crucial. Encouraging open dialogue and opportunities for ongoing discussions and reflection
contributes to a supportive environment, empowering individuals to address their biases.
Therefore, addressing unintentional biases requires strategies to increase self-awareness and
mitigate biases through education and training. By promoting self-reflection, challenging
assumptions, and fostering open dialogue, organizations can minimize the impact of
unintentional biases and create a more inclusive environment (Atewologun et al., 2018).
Importance of Promoting Inclusivity. Promoting inclusivity in the workplace is paramount for
employee well-being and organizational success (Kalev, Dobbin, & Kelly, 2006). From a moral
standpoint, it is essential to recognize every individual's inherent value and dignity, regardless
of their background or characteristics (Strayhorn, 2019). Organizations commit to fairness,
equality, and employee respect by fostering inclusivity. However, the imperative to address
employment inequality goes beyond moral considerations. There is a strong strategic
rationale for promoting inclusivity in the workplace. Research consistently shows that diverse
and inclusive organizations outperform their counterparts in various aspects, including
innovation, decision-making, and financial performance (Levine, 2020; Kalev et al., 2006).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
143
Diverse teams bring broader perspectives, experiences, and ideas, enhancing problem-solving
and creativity (Rock & Grant, 2016). Inclusive environments also foster a sense of belonging
and psychological safety, boosting employee engagement, productivity, and overall well-
being (Arsel et al., 2022; Chamorro-Premuzie & Berg, 2021; Fath et al., 2021). Therefore,
addressing employment inequality aligns with moral principles and strategic objectives.
Organizations prioritizing inclusivity uphold fundamental values and gain a competitive edge
in today's diverse and globalized business landscape.
Ignorance about Diversity and Inclusion. Educating employees and leaders about diversity and
inclusion concepts and practices is crucial for combating ignorance and promoting inclusivity
(Chang et al., 2019). Organizations can create a more inclusive and equitable work
environment by increasing awareness and understanding. One effective strategy for
addressing ignorance about diversity and inclusion is the implementation of comprehensive
training programs. These programs should cover key concepts such as unconscious bias,
privilege, cultural competency, and allyship (Tynes, 2022). Training sessions can incorporate
interactive activities, case studies, and real-world examples to enhance learning and
encourage reflection. In addition to training, organizations can promote diversity and
inclusion through regular communication and awareness campaigns. Sharing success stories,
highlighting diverse role models, and showcasing the positive impact of inclusivity can help
dispel misconceptions and foster a culture of acceptance and understanding. Leaders play a
critical role in driving education and awareness. Leaders must lead by example and promote
diversity and inclusion through their behaviors and decision-making. Organizations can
provide leadership development programs addressing diversity and inclusion, equipping
leaders with the knowledge and skills necessary to create inclusive teams and foster a
supportive work environment (Tynes, 2022). Engaging employees through employee resource
groups, diversity committees, or diversity and inclusion task forces can also effectively
promote education and awareness. These platforms allow employees to contribute to
diversity initiatives, share their perspectives, and collaborate on creating a more inclusive
workplace. Regular evaluation and assessment of diversity and inclusion initiatives are
important for identifying areas for improvement and measuring progress. Organizations can
collect employee feedback, conduct surveys, and track key diversity and inclusion metrics to
gauge the effectiveness of their education and awareness efforts.
Structural Barriers
Structural barriers within organizations and society can present significant challenges
to inclusivity (Grindstaff, 2022; Pager & Shepherd, 2008). These barriers can take various
forms, including biased policies, discriminatory practices, and unequal access to resources
and opportunities. Addressing structural barriers requires a comprehensive and systemic
approach (Livingston, 2020; Pager & Shepherd, 2008). Organizations must critically evaluate
their policies and practices to identify and eliminate any that perpetuate inequality. This
includes revisiting hiring and promotion procedures, evaluating compensation structures, and
ensuring policies are designed to promote equity and inclusivity.
Leadership plays a crucial role in dismantling structural barriers. Leaders can influence
organizational culture and practices by actively advocating for changes to policies and
procedures. Implementing transparent and equitable recruitment, promotion, and
performance evaluation processes is essential in minimizing structural barriers (Bourke &
Titus, 2020). Organizations can also collaborate with external partners, such as industry
associations, community organizations, and policymakers, to address systemic issues.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
144
Engaging in advocacy efforts and supporting initiatives that promote diversity and inclusion
at a broader societal level can contribute to dismantling structural barriers (Bourke & Titus,
2020; Hendy, 2022).
While the strategies outlined above are crucial for addressing obstacles to inclusivity,
we must ground our understanding in concrete data. Statistical and empirical evidence can
shed light on the prevalence and severity of these challenges, providing a quantitative
perspective to complement the qualitative insights discussed. Key statistical indicators such
as the gender pay gap ( see Table 4) and representation in leadership roles (see Table 5)
underscore the importance of addressing employment inequality and the effectiveness of
inclusivity initiatives.
Table IV
Gender Pay Gap in USA and Canada 2018-2022
Year
Average Gender Pay Gap (%)USA
Average Gender Pay Gap (%)Canada
2018
18.9
18.44
2019
18.47
18.65
2020
17.65
17.57
2021
16.86
16.67
2022
16.98
17.14
Note: Adapted from OECD (2023), Gender wage gap (indicator). doi: 10.1787/7cee77aa-en
Table V
Female vs Male Representation in Leadership Roles within Fortune 500 Companies
Year % of Women – Fortune 500 CEO % of Men – Fortune 500 CEO
2018 4.8 (24) 95.2 (476)
2019 6.6 (33) 93.4 (467)
2020 7.4 (37) 92.6 (463)
2021 8.2 (41) 91.8 (459)
2022 8.8 (74) 91.2 (766)
2023 10.6 (53) 89.6 (454)
Note: Table compiled from information derived from
https://fortune.com/2023/10/05/most-powerful-women-list-2023-female-executives-rising-
to-the-top/ and https://www.shrm.org/executive/resources/articles/pages/women-run-ten-
percent-fortune-500.aspx
Case Study 1: Marriott International
Marriott International is known for its commitment to promoting inclusivity and
diversity. They have implemented various initiatives aimed at creating an inclusive workplace
environment. One of Marriott's notable programs is the "Voyage Global Leadership
Development Program." This program provides opportunities for individuals from
underrepresented communities to develop leadership skills and advance in their careers.
Through mentorship, training, and networking opportunities, the program supports the
organization's growth and advancement of diverse talent.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
145
Marriott also emphasizes the importance of diversity and inclusion in its supplier
diversity program. They seek to work with diverse suppliers, including minority-owned,
women-owned, and LGBTQ+-owned businesses, to foster economic inclusion and support
diverse communities. Regarding employee resource groups (ERGs), Marriott has several ERGs
that support, network, and advocate for employees from various backgrounds. These ERGs
include groups focused on women, people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, veterans, and
individuals with disabilities. These groups play a crucial role in fostering a sense of belonging
and promoting inclusivity within the organization.
Additionally, Marriott actively participates in external diversity and inclusion initiatives.
They collaborate with industry organizations and engage in partnerships that promote
diversity and inclusivity in the broader community. While specific outcomes and lessons
learned from Marriott's inclusivity initiatives may vary, their commitment to creating an
inclusive workplace is a valuable example for other hospitality organizations and beyond
organizations (Marriott, n.d.).
Case Study 2: Salesforce
Salesforce is another organization known for its commitment to inclusivity and diversity.
They have implemented various initiatives to create an inclusive workplace, including forming
employee resource groups (ERGs) focused on various underrepresented communities. These
ERGs provide support, networking opportunities, and a platform for employees to raise
awareness of diversity-related issues. One notable initiative by Salesforce is their "Women's
Surge" program, the 2013 brainchild of Marc Benioff, the co-founder and chief executive of
Salesforce, which aims to increase the representation of women in leadership roles. The
program focuses on mentorship, leadership development, and creating an inclusive
environment for women to thrive (Gelles, 2015).
The outcomes of Salesforce's efforts have been promising. They have achieved gender
pay parity and significantly progressed in diversifying their leadership positions. Salesforce
has also been recognized as one of the best workplaces for diversity and inclusivity.
Key lessons from Salesforce's approach include
• empowering employee resource groups,
• investing in leadership development programs for underrepresented
groups, and
• regularly monitoring and addressing diversity metrics.
Case Study 3: Sodexo
Sodexo is recognized for promoting inclusivity and diversity within its organization. They
have implemented various initiatives to create an inclusive workplace environment.
One notable initiative by Sodexo is its commitment to gender equality. They have set
specific targets to increase the representation of women in leadership positions. Through
programs such as the Sodexo Women's International Forum for Talent (SWIFT) and the
SoTogether Network, Sodexo provides opportunities for women to develop their skills, build
networks, and advance in their careers.
Sodexo also strongly emphasizes fostering diversity and inclusion through its employee
resource groups (ERGs). These groups, such as the African Heritage Network and the Pride
Employee Network, provide support, networking opportunities, and advocacy for employees
from various backgrounds.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
146
Regarding supplier diversity, Sodexo actively seeks to work with diverse suppliers,
including minority-owned and women-owned businesses. They have established supplier
diversity programs to increase the representation of these suppliers within their supply chain.
Sodexo's efforts in promoting inclusivity have been recognized externally. They have
received accolades for their diversity and inclusion practices, such as being included in the
Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index and receiving awards for their commitment to LGBT+
equality.
By implementing these initiatives and fostering an inclusive culture, Sodexo aims to
create a work environment where employees feel valued, respected, and empowered to
contribute their unique perspectives and talents (Sodexo, n.d.).
These case studies demonstrate how organizations like Marriott International, Sodexo,
and Salesforce successfully implement inclusive practices and policies. Their initiatives,
outcomes, and lessons learned are valuable examples of other organizations striving to
promote inclusivity in their workplaces.
Findings and Conclusion
The research delved into the complexities of diversity and inclusion, gender disparities,
unconscious biases, and systemic obstacles. This study casts a critical eye on the hiring and
promotion processes. An extensive literature review revealed pervasive biases tied to race,
gender, and unconscious preferences, like the similar-to-me bias within hiring. Minority
groups consistently face undervaluation, with women encountering biases from hiring
algorithms and potential discrimination linked to motherhood. A comprehensive examination
of predictive technologies across all stages of the hiring process is essential for understanding
and mitigating bias in hiring algorithms. Despite sharing a common foundation in machine
learning, tools employed in the early stages may differ significantly from those used later.
Even seemingly similar technologies may rely on distinct data types or present predictions in
varying ways. Analyzing predictive tools throughout the recruitment process elucidates
"hiring algorithms" functionality and identifies potential points for bias introduction.
Unfortunately, most employment algorithms default to producing biased outcomes. While
predictive technologies hold the potential to mitigate interpersonal bias, only those actively
addressing underlying disparities offer hope for advancing equity rather than hindering it (
Kelly-Lyth, 2021; Bogen, 2019). The detrimental impact of the similar-to-me bias becomes
evident as employers favor those resembling their characteristics. This trend perpetuates
further biases, especially if interviewers share similar backgrounds.
As the findings reveal these systemic issues, it becomes evident that concerted efforts
are necessary to combat these biases. Strategies, ranging from diversity training and
mentorship to adaptable working conditions, emerge as instrumental in dismantling
entrenched prejudices. Beyond the moral imperative, the study positions inclusivity as a
driver of innovation, productivity, and organizational resilience. The conclusion resonates
with an ongoing commitment, emphasizing the necessity for continuous assessment and
adaptation of strategies. Organizations can embrace enduring success amid today's dynamic
business landscape complexities by fostering a workplace culture where every individual feels
valued and empowered.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
147
Best Practices and Successful Examples
Case Studies of Organizations Promoting Inclusivity
Importance of Promoting Inclusivity. Fostering workplace inclusivity is significant for
employee well-being and organizational success (Downey et al., 2015; Eisenbeiss et al., 2008;
Kalev et al., 2006). From a moral standpoint, it is essential to recognize every individual's
inherent value and dignity, irrespective of their background or characteristics (Eisenbeiss et
al., 2008). Addressing employment inequality is not just a moral imperative buts also a
strategic one.
Recommendations for Managers. Based on the strategies discussed, managers can take
specific actions to foster inclusivity in their organizations. First, they can commit to diversity
and inclusion by promoting inclusive behaviors and creating an inclusive organizational
culture (Ely & Thomas, 2019). This includes addressing bias, fostering psychological safety,
and encouraging diverse perspectives.
Second, managers should prioritize diversity and inclusion in talent acquisition and
development processes. This involves implementing fair and inclusive hiring practices,
providing equal opportunities for growth and development, and ensuring diverse
representation at all levels of the organization (Ely & Thomas, 2019).
Third, managers can promote inclusivity by facilitating open communication and
collaboration among employees from diverse backgrounds. Encouraging dialogue, creating
employee resource groups, and providing diversity and inclusion training can all foster
inclusivity in the workplace (Ely & Thomas, 2019).
Implications for Employee Well-being and Organizational Success. Employee well-being,
engagement, and productivity are positively impacted by Promoting inclusivity. When
employees feel valued, respected, and included, they experience higher job satisfaction,
engagement, and overall well-being (Eisenbeiss & Knippenberg, 2008). Inclusive workplaces
foster a sense of belonging, psychological safety, and trust, which enhance employee morale
and motivation. Moreover, an inclusive work environment can lead to sustainable
organizational success and competitive advantage. By leveraging diverse perspectives and
talents, organizations can drive innovation, adapt to a diverse customer base, and make
better decisions (Eisenbeiss & Knippenberg, 2008; Kalev et al., 2006). Inclusive organizations
attract and retain top talent, strengthening their ability to outperform competitors and
achieve long-term success.
Future Research
Given the dynamic nature of workplace dynamics and diversity and inclusion initiatives,
numerous avenues for future research present valuable opportunities. Researchers may
explore the long-term impact of specific diversity training programs on organizational culture
and employee behavior. Simultaneously, exploring the intersectionality of various diversity
aspects, such as race, gender, and sexual orientation, could yield deeper insights into the
unique challenges faced in the workplace.
In addition, evaluating interventions designed to reduce implicit bias in the workplace
becomes crucial for fostering a more equitable and inclusive organizational culture. Assessing
the impact of mentorship and sponsorship programs on the career advancement of
underrepresented groups offers another promising avenue, shedding light on their
contribution to achieving organizational diversity goals.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
148
Moreover, a comprehensive examination of the influence of organizational policies on
promoting inclusivity is essential. This examination involves identifying and mitigating
potential biases within these policies, ensuring they align with the overarching goal of creating
a diverse and equitable workplace. This multifaceted approach to future research addresses
various dimensions of workplace diversity and inclusion, contributing to a more nuanced and
actionable understanding of these complex dynamics.
Research Limitations
While this paper strives to offer a comprehensive guide to fostering inclusivity, it is
essential to acknowledge its limitations. The recommendations provided are based on
existing literature and general observations, and their applicability may vary across different
organizational contexts. The effectiveness of certain strategies may depend on the industry,
organizational size, and geographical location. Moreover, the rapidly evolving nature of
workplace dynamics necessitates continuous adaptation and refinement of diversity and
inclusion strategies. Future research could delve into these contextual nuances to provide
more tailored guidance for organizations.
References
Ariella, S. (2023). 25 women in leadership statistics [2023]: Facts on the gender gap in
corporate and political leadership. Zippia. Retrieved November 26, 2023, from
https://www.zippia.com/advice/women-in-leadership-
statistics/#:~:text=What%20percent
Atewologun. D., Cornish, T., & Tresh, F. (2018). Unconscious Bias Training: An Evidence-Based
Review. Equality and Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/research-report-113-
unconcious-bais-training-an-assessment-of-the-evidence-for-effectiveness-pdf.pdf
Baldwin, M. W., Brown, L. J., & Rothman, A. J. (2019). The social psychology of inclusivity and
exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(2), e12419.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2018). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha
and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic
Review, 94(4), 991-1013.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2018). Discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence
from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 1-22.
Bogen, M. (2019). All the ways hiring algorithms can introduce bias. Harvard Business
Review. https://hbr.org/2019/05/all-the-ways-hiring-algorithms-can-introduce-
bias
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020). The
participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle:
Employer concerns and research evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 135-
158.
Bourke, J., & Titus, A. (2020). The key to inclusive leadership. Harvard Business Review.
https://hbr.org/2020/03/the-key-to-inclusive-leadership
Chamorro-Premuzie, T., & Berg, K., (2021). Fostering a Culture of Belonging in the Hybrid
Workplace. https://hbr.org/2021/08/fostering-a-culture-of-belonging-in-the-hybrid-
workplace
Chang, E., Milkman, K., Zarrow, L., Brabaw, K., Gromet, D., Rebele, R., Massey, C.,
Duckworth, A., & Grant, A. (2019, July 9). Does diversity training work the way it’s
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
149
supposed to? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/07/does-diversity-
training-work-the-way-its-supposed-to
Corrington, A., Hebl, M., Stewart, D., Madera, J., Ng, L., & Williams, J. (2020). Diversity and
inclusion of understudied populations: A call to practitioners and
researchers. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 72(4), 303–323.
https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000188
Cox, T. (1994). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. Berrett-
Koehler Publishers.
Dashper, K. (2020). Mentoring for gender equality: Supporting female leaders in the
hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102397.
Diller, J. V. (2018). Cultural diversity: A primer for the human services. Cengage Learning.
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2019). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 97(7),
14-17.
Downey, S. N., Van der Werff, L., Thomas, K. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2015). The role of diversity
practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of
Applied Social Psychology, 45(1), 35-44.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and
team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology,
93(6), 1438–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012716
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2019). Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing
Diversity. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/07/making-differences-
matter-a-new-paradigm-for-managing-diversity
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2020). Getting Serious About Diversity: Enough Already with the
Business Case. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/11/getting-serious-
about-diversity-enough-already-with-the-business-case
Field, E., Krivkovich, A., Kügele, S., Robinson, N and Y. L., (2023). Women in the Workplace
2023. McKinsey and Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-
insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace
Fiske, S. T. (2010). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
Gelles, D. (2015). Salesforce makes strides towards gender equality in Silicon Valley.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/business/salesforce-makes-strides-toward-
gender-equality-in-silicon-valley.html
Gonzales, M. (2023). Racial, Gender Discrimination in Tech Industry Worsening. Strategic
Human Resource Management.
https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/global-
and-cultural-effectiveness/pages/racial-gender-discrimination-in-tech-industry-
worsening.aspx
Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2020). Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. In E. Borgida &
S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination
(2nd ed., pp. 299-320). Sage Publications.
Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2020). Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. In J. F. Dovidio,
M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice,
Stereotyping, and Discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 17-42). Sage Publications.
Griffin, T., & Glover, T. D. (2023). The development of social and cultural capitals for
immigrant hosts of VFR travelers. Leisure Sciences, 45(3), 262-280.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
150
Grindstaff, L. (2022). Barriers to inclusion: Social roots and current concerns. Uprooting Bias
in the Academy: Lessons from the Field, 19-44.
Hendy, N. T. (2022). The Role of Intellectual Humility in Leadership and Promoting Workplace
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belongingness: Leadership Intellectual Humility.
In Implementing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging Management in
Organizational Change Initiatives (pp. 81-98). IGI Global.
Hinchliffe. E. (2023). Women run more than 10% of fortune 500 companies for the first time.
Strategic Human Resource Management.
https://www.shrm.org/executive/resources/articles/pages/women-run-ten-percent-
fortune-500.aspx
Hinchliffe. E., & Abrams, J. (2023). Fortune’s 2023 most powerful women list shows how
female execs are rising to the top in a turbulent business environment. Fortune.
https://fortune.com/2023/10/05/most-powerful-women-list-2023-female-
executives-rising-to-the-top/
Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., & Yee, L. (2018). Delivering through diversity. McKinsey &
Company, 231, 1-39. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-
organizational-performance/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity.
Jones, K. P., Peddie, C. I., Gilrane, V. L., King, E. B., & Gray, A. L. (2023). Not so subtle:
Uncovering the pervasive and persistent nature of subtle prejudice. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 108(1), 33-53.
Jonsen, K., Point, S., Kelan, E. K., & Grieble, A. (2021). Diversity and inclusion branding: a five-
country comparison of corporate websites. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 32(3), 616-649.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1496125
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy
of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review,
71(4), 589-617.
Kang, H. J., Gatling, A., & Kim, J. (2015). The impact of supervisory support on organizational
commitment, career satisfaction, and turnover intention for hospitality frontline
employees. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 14(1), 68-89.
Kelly-Lyth, A. (2023). Challenging Biased Hiring Algorithms, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,
41, (4), 899–928, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab006
Kim, S. S., Im, J., & Hwang, J. (2015). The effects of mentoring on role stress, job attitude, and
turnover intention in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 48, 68-82.
Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2015). The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach.
Routledge.
Levine, S. (2020), Diversity Confirmed To Boost Innovation And Financial Results. Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesinsights/2020/01/15/diversity-confirmed-to-
boost innovation-and-financial-results/?sh=43f56714c4a6
Livingston, R. (2020). How to promote racial equity in the workplace. Harvard Business
Review, 98(5), 64-72.
Manoharan, A., & Singal, M. (2017). A systematic literature review of research on diversity
and diversity management in the hospitality literature. International Journal of
Hospitality Management, 66, 77-91.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
151
Marriott. (n.d.-a). Diversity and inclusion. https://www.marriott.com/diversity/diversity-and-
inclusion.mi
Marriott. (n.d.) Global diversity equity & inclusion
https://www.marriott.com/content/dam/marriott-digital/digitallegal-micorp-
cec/en_us/micorp_diversity-and-inclusion/limited/document/assets-usage-rights/pdt-
DEI-Key-Milestones-930242770908627.pdf
Mazur, B. (2010). Cultural diversity in organizational theory and practice. Journal of
intercultural management, 2(2), 5-15.
McKinsey and Company. (2020). Diversity wins. How inclusion matters.
https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/diversity%20and
%20inclusion/diversity%20wins%20how%20inclusion%20matters/diversity-wins-how-
inclusion-matters-vf.pdf.
OECD. (2021). The Role of Firms in Wage Inequality: Policy Lessons from a Large Scale Cross-
Country Study. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7d9b2208-en.
OECD. (2023). Gender wage gap (indicator )https://data.oecd.org/earnwage/gender-wage-
gap.htm doi: 10.1787/7cee77aa-en (Accessed on 26 November 2023)
Omadeke, J. (2001). What’s the Difference Between a Mentor and a Sponsor. Harvard Business
Review. https://hbr.org/2021/10/whats-the-difference-between-a-mentor-and-a-
sponsor
Padavic, I., Ely, R. J., & Reid, E. M. (2020). Explaining the persistence of gender inequality: The
work–family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 65(1), 61-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/000183921983231
Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in
employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual. Review of Sociology, 34,
181-209. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740
Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B., Western, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage
labor market: A field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 777-799.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400505
Pasztor, S. K. (2019). Exploring the framing of diversity rhetoric in “top-rated in diversity”
organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(4), 455-475.
Rock, D., & Grant, H. (2016, November 4). Why diverse teams are smarter. Harvard Business
Review. https://hbr.org/2016/11/why-diverse-teams-are-smarter
Salesforce (n.d.). Equality. https://www.salesforce.com/ca/company/equality/
Schaeffer, K. (2023). The data on women leaders. Data on Women Leaders in the U.S. | Pew
Research Center
Smith, J. A., & Brown, S. (2019). Unconscious bias and its implications for workplace diversity.
Journal of Diversity and Equality in Organizations, 17(4), 45-62.
Smith, J. A., & Davis, R. (2022). Leading inclusively: The role of management in fostering
diversity and equality. Journal of Applied Management, 20(4), 34-51.
Smith, J. A., & Johnson, L. R. (2022). Employment inequality: A comprehensive review of
challenges and strategies. Journal of Applied Management, 20(3), 81-99.
Sodexo (n.d.). Diversity and inclusion. https://au.sodexo.com/corporate-
responsibility/responsible-community-diversity/diversity-equity-inclusion.html
Solnet, D., Kralj, A., & Baum, T. (2015). 360 degrees of pressure: The changing role of the HR
professional in the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism
Research, 39(2), 271-292.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2024, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2024
152
Strategic Human Resource management (n.d.) Introduction to the Human Resources Discipline
of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-
samples/toolkits/pages/introdiversity.aspx
Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (2020). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity
perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. In N. W. Tippins & S. M. Halualani
(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Workplace Diversity (pp. 77-97). Oxford University
Press.
Tynes, B. (2022). The importance of diversity and inclusion for today’s companies. Forbes. The
Importance Of Diversity And Inclusion For Today’s Companies (forbes.com)
Williams, M. J., Paluck, E. L., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2021). The complexity of race and
ethnicity in the workplace: Understanding the impact of identity and bias. Journal of
Social Issues, 77(4), 963-983.
Williams, J. C., Phillips, K. W., & Hall, E. V. (2021). Double jeopardy? Gender and race effects
on earnings at the intersection of the race and gender wage gaps. Social Forces, 100(2),
827-866.
World Economic Forum. (2021, April). 8 charts that show the impact of race and gender on
technology careers. World Economic
Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/04/gender-race-tech-industry/
