ChapterPDF Available

Can Intergenerational Mentoring Prevent Ageism?

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Intergenerational mentoring is a way to break down barriers between different generations by utilizing mentoring. Intergenerational mentoring with older adults provides opportunities for activities and learning for young people. Various studies have suggested that providing opportunities for older adults and younger adults to spend time together could be an excellent opportunity to debunk many of the beliefs that young people may have about older adults. Stereotyping or discrimination of someone due to age is known as ageism. Empathy has been shown to be associated with ageism. Higher empathy scores were negatively correlated with total ageism scores meaning that the more empathy a person has, the less ageism that they possess. Therefore, it could be that providing opportunities for the generations to spend time together could increase their empathy for that group and reduce their ageism.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Chapter
Can Intergenerational Mentoring
Prevent Ageism?
Keri D.Larsen, MyiaGraves and RylieBroussard
Abstract
Intergenerational mentoring is a way to break down barriers between different
generations by utilizing mentoring. Intergenerational mentoring with older adults
provides opportunities for activities and learning for young people. Various studies
have suggested that providing opportunities for older adults and younger adults to
spend time together could be an excellent opportunity to debunk many of the beliefs
that young people may have about older adults. Stereotyping or discrimination of
someone due to age is known as ageism. Empathy has been shown to be associated
with ageism. Higher empathy scores were negatively correlated with total ageism
scores meaning that the more empathy a person has, the less ageism that they possess.
Therefore, it could be that providing opportunities for the generations to spend time
together could increase their empathy for that group and reduce their ageism.
Keywords: intergenerational mentoring, ageism, mentoring, empathy, successful aging
. Introduction
The word mentor comes from the Greek word meaning enduring. It is defined as a
sustained relationship between a youth and an adult. Intergenerational mentoring is
a unique way of bringing two groups together to share their strengths while provid-
ing a mutually beneficial relationship. This social relationship that is mentoring has
two main roles as experts and as role models. In its natural form, mentoring occurs
because of friendships, teaching, coaching, collegiality and counseling; at the same
time, it can also be planned. This planned mentoring occurs through structured pro-
grams in which mentors and participants are selected and matched through a formal
process. For example, new teachers are paired with more experienced teachers to help
them learn how to be an even better educator or students that start a new sport may
be paired with someone who has been playing that sport for a while so they can learn
what they need to know to succeed. Mentoring can be facilitated in so many different
situations.
According to Butler, ageism is discrimination against individuals or groups on
the basis of their age []. This concept was patterned after sexism and racism. Butler
later refined his concept of ageism to a “process of systematic stereotyping and
discrimination against people because they are old” []. Regardless of the definition
that is subscribed to, ageism has been shown to have a negative impact on a persons
physical and mental health; which in turn affects their quality of life. Since ageism is
Intergenerational Relations – Contemporary Theories, Studies and Policies
an increasing problem in society, it would be wonderful to find a way to eliminate it.
To put this into perspective, is it possible that intergenerational mentoring is a way to
increase empathy and value for older adults and, in turn, help prevent ageism? Most
of the research discussed in this chapter supports this in the affirmative.
. Defining mentoring
In the United States, older adults are the fastest growing subgroup of the popula-
tion. Due to growth in this population, there are many societal concerns of which
ageism is a major concern. Mentoring presents a unique opportunity for positive
intergenerational interactions to reduce the gap between diverse generations [].
Mentoring is a kind of activity that involves establishing an ongoing in-person
relationship with another person. A mentor is someone who shares their knowledge,
skills, and experience over a prolonged period of time. Intergenerational mentoring
is a type of mentoring where older adults provide guidance to younger people by
sharing their experiences and wisdom []. For instance, an older person can provide
consistent support to a younger person going through a difficult situation or period in
life. Intergenerational mentoring participants may vary in age from preschool through
university students and settings such as older adults living in long-term care facilities
or independent community dwellings []. This collaboration between younger people
and older people presents many chances to interact in meaningful activities that can
have mutual benefits.
The growing problematic behaviors in younger people, such as criminal activ-
ity and high-level drug use, has increased []. Older mentors, particularly those
who have experienced similar situations as high-risk youth, have been found to be
effective in reaching out and relating to those who feel misunderstood by family
and community members []. It is important to create positive environments and to
have engaging experiences despite their life circumstances in order to encourage the
younger individuals to strive for their full potential. And, for some older adults, this
results in having a reason to continue on and have a purpose in life. Mentor expecta-
tions are to serve as a guide for psychological support which can reflect positively on a
young persons self-esteem.
As previously mentioned, intergenerational mentoring is also beneficial for older
adults. Older adult mentors who participate in intergenerational mentoring programs
report an improvement in physical health, cognitive function, and psychosocial well-
being []. Available evidence suggests that intergenerational mentoring and activities
may improve older adults’ sense of self-worth, self-esteem, and life satisfaction.
Overall, intergenerational mentoring is a promising approach to decreasing the gap
between generations and increasing the understanding of the extent to which differ-
ent generations can support one another.
. Mentoring and intergenerational relationships
Intergenerational relationships prove themselves to be important as they are
described as “lifelong, continuous, and dynamic parent-child relationships and family-
based interpersonal relationships across generations” []. These relationships can
bring forth positive feelings, provide an exchange of resources and support, and deliver
opportunity and structure for intergenerational interactions, which can be applied to
Can Intergenerational Mentoring Prevent Ageism?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003215
all generations involved []. A study, conducted by geriatric RNs, Wu and Chiou from
Taiwan, enhanced these ideas through observing  older adults (ages  and above)
who were described as having a low quality of life and having depressive symptoms. Wu
and Chiou [] determined that higher depressive symptoms were significantly associ-
ated with poor social support and intergenerational relationships, which shows how
important mentoring is for all of those involved. However, it is important to note some
limitations of the study: convenience sampling; a number of adults with severe depres-
sive symptoms that denied participation, the number of children and grandchildren each
older adult had, and causal inferences of risk factors like social support and intergenera-
tional relationships, all may have affected the valid results of this study.
It has been determined that intergenerational relationships and mentoring may
bring about many benefits to the older population. With relationships connected to
the younger generations, older adults can establish a sense of self-importance by pass-
ing on knowledge to others, as well as improved cognitive function, physical health,
and social activity [–]. Furthermore, mentoring provides a self-given purpose
through spending time teaching and learning from those in other generations [, ].
On the other hand, intergenerational relationships can also help with the reduction of
negative stereotypes that ageism promotes [, ]. Mentoring can provide an escape
out of comfort zones that older adults may linger in, and provide feelings of joy and
freedom from the impending process of aging [].
. Issues related to ageism
In this chapter, we have discussed mentoring and its benefits for so many different
individuals and groups of individuals, in addition to many different settings. It seems
that mentoring in its many forms is beneficial to so many. Let us take a look at the
concept of successful aging.
. What is successful aging?
Life expectancy has increased because we have better medical care and are start-
ing to focus on prevention. Thus, people are better able to take care of themselves.
However, what good is longevity if a person does not have their physical or mental
health? Furthermore, one person’s idea of what is meant by successful aging may be
different from that of another person. Successful aging has come to be equated with
the quality of aging, but what does it really mean? High physical and psychological
functioning in old age and being free from disease is how some define successful
aging. For many people, successful aging brings about ideas of “life satisfaction,
longevity, freedom of disability, mastery and growth, active engagement with life,
and independence” [].
As part of a research project, one of the authors was afforded an opportunity to
ask a group of  older adults what successful aging meant to them []. See Table 
for several of their responses.
As you can see from the responses, people have a vastly different idea of what suc-
cessful aging is to them. All of these ideas denote positive attributes or things that most
people want to ascribe to as we get older. But, where does that leave the person that is
disabled or has limits to their independence? Does that mean that they are not aging suc-
cessfully? By defining successful aging, are we excluding many older adults that do not
fit the definition? Additionally, what would being excluded from that grouping do to the
Intergenerational Relations – Contemporary Theories, Studies and Policies
mental health of those individuals? Therefore, it seems that we, as a society, need to have
some concept of successful aging to work towards. So, what is missing?
. Ageism defined
Robert Butler coined the termageism” in  []. His definition stipulates that
ageism is a process of systematic stereotyping and discrimination against people
because they are old, just as racism and sexism accomplish this for color and gender”
[]. According to the World Health Organization, ageism refers to stereotypes,
prejudice and discrimination toward others or oneself based on age []. In other
words, ageism refers to how we think, how we feel and how we act toward others or
oneself based on age. Yes, a person can have stereotypes about themselves. If a person
feels that older adults cannot benefit from exercise then they likely believe that about
themselves and do not exercise – a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy. Could this dis-
crimination affect our health and serve to prevent successful aging?
According to Allen et al., adults –years of age experience ageism every day
[]. The World Health Organization reports that  of the world’s population
negatively stereotype based on a person’s age []. What are the implications of this
phenomenon of ageism on the increasingly enlarging group of older adults?
. Ageism and health
Ageism has many diverse but negative health effects for the older adult popula-
tion. For example, the discrimination and community-perceived assumptions about
the aging population can cause negative impacts on the mental, social, and physi-
cal health realms which can lead to a decrease in quality of life and eventually in
longevity.
The mental impact of ageism, such as being seen as unimportant can cause nega-
tive self perceptions that can issue real self disvalue. Hence, why “the most frequently
examined condition, depression, showed evidence that ageism was associated with
onset of the condition and a lifetime of depression” []. Moreover, the impacts of
. enjoying life
. being gracious with myself
. staying in shape
. eating right and keeping my weight managed
. having fun in life
. being independent
. having a social life
. learning something new each day
. not taking myself too seriously
. plastic surgery
Tab le 1 .
What is successful aging?.
Can Intergenerational Mentoring Prevent Ageism?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003215
ageism may cause cognitive decline. Individuals dealing with depressive symptoms
over time that are being negatively affected by age stereotypes from society are more
likely to develop Alzheimer’s-disease-related brain changes [].
Ageism can also affect the social life of an older person, which may be one of the
most determining factors of how deep the effects of ageism can be. To illustrate, older
adults navigate a narrower life-space than younger people; life space refers to the spa-
tial area in which a person moves about and interacts with the world. Upon retirement
from the paid workforce, older adults spend more time in their immediate neighbor-
hoods []. With that said, the older generation is comfortable to limit themselves to
only expending time and energy to what needs immediate attention. This could cause
them to neglect further social interactions with others in their age group and those
in the younger population. As a result, they may not continue learning new skills on
how to communicate and understand the always advancing generation. Perhaps with
increased socialization, such narratives might stall perpetuation of age stereotypes
and reveal the problem of ageism toward older adults []. Furthermore, socializa-
tion of older adults is important as it can lead to group identification that enables the
application of self-compassion and empathy to motivate those to continue to search
for a purpose in their lives, learn new things, meet new people and engage in activities
that they find fascinating and rewarding. However, ageism can cause discrimination,
causing attitudes of feeling out of place which could impede their pursuit of their
definition of successful aging.
. Prevention of ageism
The looming question here is - Can Ageism be prevented? According to the World
Health Organization, in conjunction with the United Nations, there are three strate-
gies that may lead us toward eliminating ageism. Those strategies include the follow-
ing: policies and laws; education; and intergenerational experiences []. Policies and
laws are necessary for regulating and prohibiting ageism in our workplaces and in
healthcare. Education is vital to helping people understand and recognize ageism in
our own worlds. And, finally, intergenerational mentoring is a strategy that intention-
ally brings together groups of different ages and creates a necessary dialog between
people of different ages that does not exist in everyone’s world.
Figure  depicts four generations of Acadians passing on the vital aspect of life
for them – fishing. The Acadians are a group of people of French descent who settled
in the New France colony of Acadia when they were expelled from Nova Scotia. This
culture is being kept alive in the daily activities of the people. This is intergenerational
mentoring to help preserve a culture. Moreover, it is easy to imagine the benefits of
this type of mentoring including and not limited to teaching young generations that
older adults are valuable.
In todays society, many young people grow up without the benefit of an older
person in their lives. This can be due to the fact that young families find it difficult
to make a living where they grew up and have decided to relocate their family.
Or, the older generation has passed away. Overall, there can be any number of
reasons that older adults are missing from the picture, and this can cause the
dialog between the ages to be missing as well. This creates a deficiency in the
understanding of the richness of benefits that can be shared between the genera-
tions. Dialog among people of different age groups is one of the things that can
help clear up misunderstandings related to getting older and help build empathy
for older adults.
Intergenerational Relations – Contemporary Theories, Studies and Policies
Recent research has shown that in young adults, gender and low levels of empathy
were strong predictors of ageism. And, as a result, negative attitudes toward older adults
[]. Empathy is being able to put yourself in someone else’s situation. People that do
not have the capacity to put themselves in someone elses situation are more likely to
have discriminatory thoughts and ideas about older adults. But, it was found that college
students that have increased interactions with older adults showed less negative attitudes
toward older adults []. These results are outstanding. They postulate that it is possible
to increase empathy in young people by creating interactions between them and their
older counterparts. Which, in effect, is intergenerational mentoring.
Figure  depicts a proud Grandfather holding his grandson. This is a natural
intergenerational mentoring relationship. This little boy has been afforded the
Figure 2.
Grandparent and grandson spending time together.
Figure 1.
Culture preservation through intergenerational mentoring.
Can Intergenerational Mentoring Prevent Ageism?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003215
Author details
Keri D.Larsen*, MyiaGraves and RylieBroussard
Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond,LA, UnitedStates
*Address all correspondence to: keri.larsen@selu.edu
opportunity to learn many things from his grandfather; thus fostering a wonderful,
rich and rewarding relationship. Unfortunately, many children grow up without
this opportunity. While this is sad, we can compensate for it with programs in which
young people and older people are matched up to create an artificial mentoring
relationship. Furthermore, Leedahl, Brasher, LoBuono, Wood and Estus, also found
that intergenerational interactions between college students and older adults was able
to decrease many of the negative attitudes that the younger people had toward the
older ones [].
. Conclusions
It is very easy to see how important intergenerational mentoring can be to prevent
ageism by creating avenues for dialog between the generations and increasing empa-
thy toward older adults, but most of this information is anecdotal. There is definitely a
lack of empirical evidence that supports these ideas. This gap in the literature further
warrants more exploration of intergenerational mentoring and the benefits to older
adults and possibly the prevention of ageism. An exhaustive search of the literature
was unable to produce research studies where intergenerational mentoring brought
about any negative effects. And, since empathy seems to be something that can be
changed; it is highly likely that it could prevent ageism, and turn this theoretical
perspective into beneficial results.
©  The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/.),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Intergenerational Relations – Contemporary Theories, Studies and Policies
[] Butler R. Ageism: Another form of
bigotry. The Gerontologist.
;():-
[] Butler R. Why Survive?: Being Old in
America. st ed. Baltimore, MA: John
Hopkins University Press; 
[] VanderVen K. Adults are still needed!
Intergenerational and mentoring
activities. Reclaiming Children & Youth.
;():-
[] Mano M. Role of intergenerational
mentoring for supporting youth
development: An examination of the
Across Ages” program in the US.
Educational Studies in Japan.
;:-
[] Juris JJ, Bouldin ED, Uva K,
Cardwell CD, Schulhoff A, Hiegl N.
Virtual intergenerational reverse-
mentoring program reduces loneliness
among older adults: Results from a pilot
evaluation. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public
Health. ;():. DOI:./
ijerph
[] Lee K, Juckett LA, Jarrott SE.
Documented outcomes for older adults in
intergenerational programming: A
scoping review. Journal of
Intergenerational Relationships.
;:-
[] Wu H-Y, Chiou A-F. Social media
usage, social support, intergenerational
relationships, and depressive symptoms
among older adults. Geriatric Nursing.
;():-. DOI:./j.
gerinurse...
[] Zhong S, Lee C, Foster MJ, Bian J.
Intergenerational communities: A
systematic literature review of
intergenerational interactions and older
adults’ health-related outcomes. Social
Science & Medicine. ;:.
DOI:./j.socscimed..
[] Interventions to reduce ageism against
older adults: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. American Journal of
Public Health. ;().
DOI:.FAJPH..
[] Knight T, Skouteris H, Townsend M,
Hooley M. The act of giving: A systematic
review of nonfamilial intergenerational
interaction. Journal of Intergenerational
Relationships. ;():-.
DOI:./..
[] Gualano MR, Voglino G, Bert F,
Thomas R, Camussi E, Siliquini R. The
impact of intergenerational programs on
children and older adults: A review.
International Psychogeriatrics.
;():-. DOI:./
sx
[] Canedo-García A, García-Sánchez
J-N, Pacheco-Sanz D-I. A systematic
review of the effectiveness of
intergenerational programs. Frontiers in
Psychology. ;:-. DOI:./
fpsyg..
[] Moody HR. From successful aging to
conscious aging. In: Wykle M,
Whitehouse P, Morris D, editors.
Successful Aging through the Life Span:
Intergenerational Issues in Health.
New York: Springer; . pp. -
[] Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Human aging:
Usual and successful. Science (New York,
N.Y.). ;:-
[] World Health Organization. 
World Health Organization Global
Report and Ageism. . Available from:
http://www.ageism.
org/-world-health-organization-
global-report-on-ageism/
References
Can Intergenerational Mentoring Prevent Ageism?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003215
[] Allen JO, Solway E, Kirch M, Singer D,
Kullgren JT, Moïse V, et al. Experiences of
everyday ageism and the health of older
US adults. JAMA Network Open.
;():e-e.
DOI:./jamanetworkopen.
. 
[] Chang ES, Kannoth S, Levy S,
Wang SY, Lee JE, et al. Global reach of
ageism on older persons’ health: A
systematic review. PLoS One.
;():e. DOI:./
journal.pone.
[] Carr D. Ageism and late-life
mortality: How community matters.
Social Science & Medicine. ;().
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov//
[] Tsai T-H, Wong AM, Lee H-F,
Tseng KC. A study on the motivation of
older adults to participate in exercise or
physical fitness activities. Sustainability.
;():. DOI:./
su
[] Larsen KD, Graves M, Bowers A,
Nahapetyan L, Saba V, Apulu P.
Association of ageism and empathy in
young adults. Journal of Gerontology and
Geriatric Medicine. ;:
[] Bodner E, Bergman YS,
Cohen-Fridel S. Different dimensions of
ageist attitudes among men and women:
A multigenerational perspective.
International Psychogeriatrics.
;:-
[] Leedahl SN, Brasher MS,
LoBuono DL, Wood BM, Estus EL.
Reducing ageism: Changes in students’
attitudes after participation in an
intergenerational reverse mentoring
program. Sustainability.
;():. DOI:./
su
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Major incidents of ageism have been shown to be associated with poorer health and well-being among older adults. Less is known about routine types of age-based discrimination, prejudice, and stereotyping that older adults encounter in their day-to-day lives, known as everyday ageism. Objective: To examine the prevalence of everyday ageism, group differences and disparities, and associations of everyday ageism with indicators of poor physical and mental health. Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted using survey data from the December 2019 National Poll on Healthy Aging among a nationally representative household sample of US adults ages 50 to 80 years. Data were analyzed from November 2021 through April 2022. Exposures: Experiences of everyday ageism were measured using the newly developed multidimensional Everyday Ageism Scale. Main outcomes and measures: Fair or poor physical health, number of chronic health conditions, fair or poor mental health, and depressive symptoms. Results: Among 2035 adults ages 50 to 80 years (1047 [54.2%] women; 192 Black [10.9%], 178 Hispanic [11.4%], and 1546 White [71.1%]; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [8.0] years [weighted statistics]), most participants (1915 adults [93.4%]) reported regularly experiencing 1 or more forms of everyday ageism. Internalized ageism was reported by 1664 adults (81.2%), ageist messages by 1394 adults (65.2%), and interpersonal ageism by 941 adults (44.9%). Mean Everyday Ageism Scale scores were higher for several sociodemographic groups, including adults ages 65 to 80 years vs those ages 50 to 64 years (11.23 [95% CI, 10.80-11.66] vs 9.55 [95% CI, 9.26-9.84]) and White (10.43 [95% CI, 10.20-10.67]; P < .001) and Hispanic (10.09 [95% CI, 9.31-10.86]; P = .04) adults vs Black adults (9.23 [95% CI, 8.42-10.03]). Higher levels of everyday ageism were associated with increased risk of all 4 negative physical and mental health outcomes examined in regression analyses (with odds ratios [ORs] per additional scale point as high as 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17-1.23] for depressive symptoms and b = 0.039 [95% CI, 0.029-0.048] for chronic health conditions; P values < .001). Internalized ageism was the category associated with the greatest increase in risk of poor outcomes for all health measures (with ORs per additional scale point as high as 1.62 [95% CI, 1.49-1.76] for depressive symptoms and b = 0.063 [95% CI, 0.034-0.092] for chronic health conditions; P values < .001). Conclusions and relevance: This study found everyday ageism to be prevalent among US adults ages 50 to 80 years. These findings suggest that commonplace ageist messages, interactions, and beliefs may be harmful to health and that multilevel and multisector efforts may be required to reduce everyday ageism and promote positive beliefs, practices, and policies related to aging and older adults.
Article
Full-text available
Social isolation and loneliness can create negative health outcomes for older adults. Informed by social capital and intergroup contact theories, our goal was to reduce these social problems using an intergenerational reverse-mentoring program. During fall 2020, we implemented an adapted, fully online version of Cyber-Seniors that encouraged undergraduate students to provide technology mentoring to local older adults in a seven-county area in rural Appalachia. We recruited gerontology students through the university and local older adults through local aging organizations. We collected data through pre-and post-tests that included validated measures (Lubben Social Network Scale-6 and UCLA 3-item loneliness scale) and open-ended questions about the program. Thirty-one students and nine older adults completed the pre-survey; twenty students and eight older adults completed the post-survey. We made comparisons using t-tests and considered p < 0.20 to indicate meaningful differences given the anticipated small sample size in this pilot project. Isolation did not change among older adults but increased among students in the family domain (p = 0.14) between baseline and follow-up. Loneliness improved between the pre- and post-tests among older adults (mean: 5.6 (SD = 2.2) to 4.1 (SD = 1.3), p = 0.17) but not among students (mean: 5.0 (SD = 1.5) to 5.2 (SD = 1.7), p = 0.73). In open-ended responses, older adults described learning new ways to interact with friends and family as a result of the program. This program was acceptable and suggested effectiveness in an important health-related domain (loneliness). While larger studies are needed to fully test the program’s impact, this pilot evaluation suggests that reverse mentoring programs can be implemented virtually and may improve social outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
Studies have found that older adults often experience severe problems due to a lack of exercise, including an increased risk of falls, increased psychological problems and reduced social participation. However, the practicality and sustainability of exercise or physical fitness activities among older adults are questionable because these adults may face physical and psychological obstacles. Hence, this study proposed a research model to explore the physical fitness behaviours of the elderly subjects and the specific factors for maintaining their motivation to participate in exercise or physical fitness activities. A survey for a total of 101 subjects of residents of Chang Gung Health and Culture Village (CGHCV) was conducted to investigate the effects of the elderly’s group identification and psychological proximity on their attitude and intention toward physical fitness. The results show that the group identification of the physical fitness activities, psychological proximity, intention toward physical fitness and subjective norms of the subjects did not affect their attitudes towards physical fitness or their intention to participate in exercise or physical fitness activities in the future. Therefore, the influence of group identification with other older adults of the same age on empathy allowed the subjects to understand the problematic aspects of physical fitness. Group identification among the subjects allowed them to adjust to their physical fitness problems through sympathy. It mediated the physical fitness problems of the subjects through the ageism effect.
Article
Full-text available
Ageism is a societal concern that greatly affects the social, emotional, physical, and mental health of older adults. One way to decrease ageist attitudes and improve the treatment of older adults is to address and improve age stereotypes among young adults. Using data from students participating in an intergenerational digital-learning program, the present study investigated change in students’ stereotypes of older adults and aging. We examined change from pre- and post-scores in student attitudes toward older adults and the type of adjectives used to describe older adults. We also analyzed responses to open-ended questions about changes in perception of older adults and aging and interest in working with older adults. Findings showed that: (1) Students’ attitudes improved following participation in the program; (2) students used fewer negative words to describe older adults following participation; (3) answers to open-ended questions demonstrated that many students improved their perceptions of older adults; and (4) many students showed increased interest in working with older adults in their future careers. Programs that reduce age stereotypes should be promoted in order to reduce young people’s harmful ageist stereotypes, ensure respectful treatment of older adults in all workplace and social situations, and increase interest in aging-related fields.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Although there is anecdotal evidence of ageism occurring at both the structural level (in which societal institutions reinforce systematic bias against older persons) and individual level (in which older persons take in the negative views of aging of their culture), previous systematic reviews have not examined how both levels simultaneously influence health. Thus, the impact of ageism may be underestimated. We hypothesized that a comprehensive systematic review would reveal that these ageism levels adversely impact the health of older persons across geography, health outcomes, and time. Method A literature search was performed using 14 databases with no restrictions on region, language, and publication type. The systematic search yielded 13,691 papers for screening, 638 for full review, and 422 studies for analyses. Sensitivity analyses that adjusted for sample size and study quality were conducted using standardized tools. The study protocol is registered (PROSPERO CRD42018090857). Results Ageism led to significantly worse health outcomes in 95.5% of the studies and 74.0% of the 1,159 ageism-health associations examined. The studies reported ageism effects in all 45 countries, 11 health domains, and 25 years studied, with the prevalence of significant findings increasing over time (p < .0001). A greater prevalence of significant ageism-health findings was found in less-developed countries than more-developed countries (p = .0002). Older persons who were less educated were particularly likely to experience adverse health effects of ageism. Evidence of ageism was found across the age, sex, and race/ethnicity of the targeters (i.e., persons perpetrating ageism). Conclusion The current analysis which included over 7 million participants is the most comprehensive review of health consequences of ageism to date. Considering that the analysis revealed that the detrimental impact of ageism on older persons’ health has been occurring simultaneously at the structural and individual level in five continents, our systematic review demonstrates the pernicious reach of ageism.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the reported benefits of intergenerational programming, relatively few empirical studies have reported outcomes specific to older adult participants. We conducted a scoping review to assess older adult-specific outcomes that have been quantitatively assessed in the intergenerational programming literature and the tools used to measure such outcomes. We identified 28 studies that utilized quantitative measures to assess older adult outcomes, such as depression, loneliness, and quality of life. Researchers are encouraged to adopt rigorous methodologies when assessing older adult outcomes in order to highlight the impact of intergenerational programming for older adult participants.
Article
Ageism the deeply entrenched biases that people hold about old age—is a persistent social problem that intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic. The harmful physical, emotional, and cognitive health consequences of individual-level age bias are well-documented, with most studies operationalizing ageism as an older adult's personal encounters with age discrimination, self-perceptions of their own aging, and internalized negative beliefs about old age. However, the impacts of community-level age bias on older adults' well-being have received less attention. This commentary reviews recent evidence (Kellogg et al.,) showing that county-level explicit age bias is associated with lower mortality rates among older adults, with effects limited to older adults residing in counties with relatively younger populations. Effects were not detected in counties with relatively older populations, or for implicit age bias. These counterintuitive findings require further exploration, including the use of more fine-grained measures of community-level ageism, attention to the role of gentrification in communities, and the development of new measures of structural ageism, drawing on approaches used to study the impacts of structural racism. Data science approaches, including the use of social media data in tandem with mortality data, may reveal how age bias affects older adults. Communities are especially important to older adults, who spend much of their time in areas immediately proximate to their homes. As more individuals age in place, and as federal funding for home-based and community services (HCBS) increases, researchers should identify which community-level characteristics, including age bias, undermine or enhance late-life well-being.
Article
Rationale: Population aging is a major societal challenge that the US and many other countries are facing. The roles of intergenerational interactions are being increasingly recognized as important factors influencing health and well-being of older adults and other generations. Objective: This systematic review paper provides a critical assessment of the current state of knowledge about the impacts of intergenerational activities on older adults' health-related outcomes. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in October 2019 within MEDLINE, SocIndex, APA PsycInfo, and CINAHL Complete, using a pre-developed list of relevant keywords. Identified papers were reviewed and selected based on the following eligibility criteria: (1) older adults aged 50 or over as the study population, (2) nonfamily member intergenerational interactions as independent variables, (3) older adults' health-related outcomes as dependent variables, and (4) empirical and quantitative studies performed in the US and written in English. A total of 24 out of 22,674 identified articles met these eligibility criteria. Results: All of the 24 studies focused on evaluating intergenerational programs and their intervention effects. No studies addressed community or environmental interventions/effects. Program-based intergenerational interactions showed positive associations with older adults' physical health, psychosocial health (e.g. reduced depression), cognitive function, social relationships, and well-being/quality of life. Moreover, engagement in intergenerational activities was linked with increased physical and social activities. Conclusions: This review showed solid evidence supporting the significance of program-based interventions in promoting intergenerational activities and associated health benefits. Significant knowledge gaps are also found resulting from the lack of studies examining the roles of physical environmental interventions/factors, diverse types of intergenerational interactions, and location-driven activities. Such studies can contribute to a better understanding of the specific attributes, both program-based and place-based supports, of the community environment that can promote intergenerational interactions and healthy aging in place.
Article
Many older adults are unable to use social media, which may affect their social support and intergenerational relationships and cause depression. To examine this impact on older Taiwanese adults, we used purposive sampling, a cross-sectional, correlational study design, and a structured questionnaire to collect data on participants’ characteristics, social media usage, social support, intergenerational relationships, and depressive symptoms. We studied 153 older adults (aged 60 years and above) and found higher levels of depressive symptoms among participants who took medication, did not exercise regularly or participate in leisure activities, experienced poor health and sleep quality, and had poorer functional ability compared to their counterparts. Depressive symptoms were significantly associated with social media usage, social support, and intergenerational relationships. We recommend considering risk factors and offsetting depressive symptoms by promoting the use of social media and regular exercise to increase social interactions, social support, and intergenerational relationships among older adults.
Article
Meeting the diverse needs of young people who are coping with such problems as delinquent behaviors or poor academic performance is an urgent issue today. This paper aims to demonstrate the benefits of introducing intergenerational mentoring activities into educational programs for supporting "at risk" adolescents by highlighting some innovative and effective methods. Among various types of mentoring activities, this paper will focus on ones in which older adults take on the role of mentors. The significance of mentoring activities in which older adults give emotional support to at risk adolescents has been recognized since the late 1980s in the United States. An important component of this type of "intergenerational mentoring" initiative involves establishing a sense of mutual trust between the older adult mentors and the at risk youth mentees. This paper consists of the following parts. Firstly, the author will describe the rationale and some of the societal factors that are contributing to the emergence of the mentoring activities for at risk adolescents in contemporary society. Secondly, the author will describe key characteristics of intergenerational mentoring activities designed to support at risk adolescents. The primary focus will be on lessons learned from an intergenerational mentoring program called "Across Ages" which is operated by Temple University's Center for Intergenerational Learning. In analyzing this model program, the author will focus on challenging issues related to how the mentor role is constructed and how the mentors function in the context of program goals to produce benefits for the participants. Finally, in concluding this paper, the author will point out that such intergenerational mentoring endeavors not only expand informal helping resources for at risk adolescents but also help in establishing a circulative mentoring process that has implications for the enrichment of the lives of people of all ages in the community.