ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

The aim of this paper is to make designers aware of the interactions that exist between decisions made during the design phase and their consequences on Life Cycle Costs (LCC) in the context of a predetermined business model. Based on the value analysis, LCC and computational method, the proposed methodology can serve as a practical guide to explain the different design strategies according to the business model requirements. Profitability requires the engineer to identify a balanced product architecture by varying parameters such as component reliability, operational availability, accessibility solutions and maintenance plans. A case study is presented, without calculation details, to compare two design solutions in terms of total cost. An industrial system consisting of three components in series is used. This method allows designers to adapt solutions to the economic model in which they will operate. This time-consuming and costly method is not recommended for all industrial products, but is relevant for technologically complex and long-lived products such as trains, wind turbines or manufacturing equipment.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) (2024) 18:837–846
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01622-z
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Interactive design on the product life cycle costs: a case study
Khaled Benfriha1·Oussama Adjoul2·Abdel-Hakim Bouzid3·Peter Wardle4
Received: 4 August 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2023 / Published online: 7 February 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2024
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to make designers aware of the interactions that exist between decisions made during the design phase
and their consequences on Life Cycle Costs (LCC) in the context of a predetermined business model. Based on the value
analysis, LCC and computational method, the proposed methodology can serve as a practical guide to explain the different
design strategies according to the business model requirements. Profitability requires the engineer to identify a balanced
product architecture by varying parameters such as component reliability, operational availability, accessibility solutions and
maintenance plans. A case study is presented, without calculation details, to compare two design solutions in terms of total
cost. An industrial system consisting of three components in series is used. This method allows designers to adapt solutions to
the economic model in which they will operate. This time-consuming and costly method is not recommended for all industrial
products, but is relevant for technologically complex and long-lived products such as trains, wind turbines or manufacturing
equipment.
Keywords Design process ·Case study ·Maintenance cost ·Reliability ·Life cycle cost ·Business models
1 Introduction
This paper presents a new approach to simplify the inter-
action between the design process and companies’ business
models. Indeed, the interactions that exist between the prod-
uct design process and the business model can be difficult
for the designer to consider [1]. Difficulties due to marketing
constraints, technological developments and the evolution of
consumer behaviour and habits. These are some of the many
constraints that can make a product incompatible with the
common market [2].
The idea is to highlight the different approaches that
designers can take to consider the business models in which
the product will be used. For example, depending on whether
the product is sold or rented, the engineering solutions will be
affected by this situation. They will have the same availability
BKhaled Benfriha
khaled.benfriha@ensam.eu
1AMIT, Arts Et Métiers Institute of Technology, HESAM
Université, Paris, France
2EMP, École Militaire Polytechnique, Alger, Algeria
3ETS, École de Technologie Supérieure, Québec, Montréal,
Canada
4WLV, University of Wolverhampton, Telford, Shropshire, UK
but will differ in terms of component reliability, manufactur-
ing process and life cycle and maintenance costs [3].
In addition, if the designer decides to place more emphasis
on the reliability of a product at the design stage, the initial
cost to the consumer will increase due to the additional ver-
ification, quality control and testing that will be required.
This results in a decrease in the cost associated with avail-
ability during operation, as shown in Fig. 1. Conversely, if
the designer chooses to produce a product with the lowest
acquisition cost, he must select components with low relia-
bility, without redundancy and without a health monitoring
system. This lack of reliability is thus compensated for by a
high level of availability, with consequences for the life cycle
and maintenance costs. In fact, maintenance costs increase
due to multiple interventions and corrective actions that cause
a loss during production [4].
In this paper, the reader will find a global methodology that
clarifies the different steps of an industrial project, consider-
ing the concept of the business model. The aim is to adapt
the product to its economic environment, while respecting
the required functions and performance.
However, this approach should be used with caution, as
it is expensive and time-consuming [5]. It is important to
note that it is only applicable to large multi-technological
industrial projects with a long lifetime, such as production
123
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This paper proposes a new simultaneous optimization model of the industrial systems design and maintenance. This model aims to help the designer in searching for technical solutions and the product architecture by integrating the maintenance issues from the design stage. The goal is to reduce the life-cycle cost (LCC) of the studied system. Design/methodology/approach Literature indicates that the different approaches used in the design for maintenance (DFM) methods are limited to the simultaneous characterization of the reliability and the maintainability of a multicomponent system as well as the modeling of the dynamic maintenance. This article proposes to go further in the optimization of the product, by simultaneously characterizing the design, in terms of reliability and maintainability, as well as the dynamic planning of the maintenance operations. This combinatorial characterization is performed by a two-level hybrid algorithm based on the genetic algorithms. Findings The proposed tool offers, depending on the life-cycle expectation, the desired availability, the desired business model (sales or rental), simulations in terms of the LCCs, and so an optimal product architecture. Research limitations/implications In this article, the term “design” is limited to reliability properties, possible redundancies, component accessibility (maintainability), and levels of monitoring information. Originality/value This work is distinguished by the use of a hybrid optimization algorithm (two-level computation) using genetic algorithms. The first level is to identify an optimal design configuration that takes into account the LCC criterion. The second level consists in proposing a dynamic and optimal maintenance plan based on the maintenance-free operating period (MFOP) concept that takes into account certain criteria, such as replacement costs or the reliability of the system.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This work presents a methodology for simultaneous design and maintenance optimization which objective’s the minimization of the life cycle cost. This methodology helps designers to optimize the design of complex industrial systems (multi-component systems) based on the minimization of the life cycle cost (LCC). The research contribution comes from integrating two optimization tasks which traditionally are carried out in separate ways. In fact, during the design phase, the system architecture is usually optimized by neglecting maintenance expenses. While during the operational phase the system architecture is already finalized and maintenance optimization approaches allow only determining a minimum maintenance cost. In this work, design optimization refers to the optimization of reliability and maintainability characteristics. There are two approaches for optimizing reliability. The first one considers component reliability as a decision variable, and its cost is considered as a predetermined increasing function of component reliability. The second approach aspires to determine the type and number of redundant components of each subsystem. On top of that, there are two approaches for maintainability. The first one considers component accessibility as a decision variable, and its cost is considered as a predetermined increasing function of component accessibility. While, the second approach focuses more on the monitoring architecture. In addition, the maintenance optimization is able to optimally and automatically select what maintenance actions are applied, when they are applied, and to which structural components they are applied, so that the system can perform these missions with the required confidence level.
Article
Full-text available
This article describes a new interactive design approach integrating the constraints associated with production include manufacturing and assembling. The proposed method, in the form of an algorithm, allows optimisation of product design by minimizing production costs at each iteration, without compromising its functionality. The novelty of this algorithm in terms of modeling and optimisation of production costs in the design phase is its ability to dynamically evaluate the cumulative costs of production as a function of design and procedural choices. The availability of this information first allows the identification of design points and/or procedural points that generate significant production costs, and second, suggests improvements and recommendations that aim to optimize production costs. These experiments were conducted at a smart factory installed in our organisation. The proposed algorithm involves four steps. To optimise production costs, the designer must input all of the required data into the simulation and thereby identify the most significant cost elements to optimise. Then, the designer uses the suggested recommendation list to modify the relevant design and/or manufacturing parameters, thus obtaining the new, optimised production costs. If the first result is unsatisfactory, other iterations can be performed.
Article
Full-text available
The shift from sequential to concurrent engineering has led to changes in the way design projects are managed. In order to assist designers, many effective tools have been developed to support collaborative engineering. Nowadays, industrial scenarios encourage companies to adopt product lifecycle management solutions, even if they may not be able to understand their benefits. Indeed, product lifecycle management roadmap is quite difficult to implement and return on invest can take time. Moreover, many free solutions with comparable functionalities are developed, which have been increasingly successful. In this article, we test different configurations of software to make a comparison between free software and market solutions. In this experiment, 72 students in a Master’s degree course aimed to design mechanical products by using dedicated software to assist collaborative distributed design, using two different configurations: free and commercial solutions. The research question to be solved is: as engineering educators, what is the most efficient way to train our students to collaborative distributed design? This experiment allowed us to compare design functionalities between the two configurations, in order to determine ways to improve efficiency in a collaborative distributed design situation. Finally, the feedback generated in this experiment allowed us to adapt training practices in engineering education.
Article
This article describes a new approach to simultaneous optimization of design and maintenance of large-scale multi-component industrial systems. This approach, in a form of an algorithm, aims to help designers in the search for solutions by characterizing the components and their architecture including maintenance issues. The aim is to improve the performance of the industrial systems by maximizing the Total Operational Reliability (TOR) at the lowest Life Cycle Cost (LCC). In the case of this research, the term "design" refers to the reliability properties of the components, possible redundancies, faulty component accessibility, and the ability to improve the component real-time monitoring architecture. The term “maintenance” refers to maintenance plan adapted to the opportunistic dynamic maintenance plan. Simultaneous optimization of design and maintenance is achieved by a two-level hybrid algorithm using evolutionary (genetic) algorithms. The first level identifies the optimal design solutions calculated relative to the TOR and the LCC. The second proposes a dynamic maintenance plan that maximizes the reliability of the system throughout its operating life.
Book
This primer can serve as a handy guide to help you get a solid hold on the concepts of Life-Cycle Costing Analysis (LCCA or simply LCC). Students of engineering will at once recognise the importance of this weapon in their armoury, when you will, almost certainly, be handling ‘sustainability-related’ issues in your career. LCC, for that matter, is a universal tool in the sustainability toolkit and is used by practitioners from different backgrounds. It can be applied to systems and projects, big and small, as well as to single pieces of equipment and machinery. Some numerical problems appear at the end of some of the chapters. You can ‘recreate an examination atmosphere’ and try to solve the sample examination paper appended at the end of this booklet. There is also a collection of numerical exercises at the end, for the sake of revision, after you have read through the book and understood the concepts. A glossary of terms is also presented at the end. In addition to the theory and the numerical exercises, it is always important to read published journal papers to understand how researchers apply this tool in practice. As the author is based in Sweden, the Swedish currency – SEK – is used more commonly in this book.
Book
Although technology and productivity has changed much of engineering, many topics are still taught in very similarly to how they were taught in the 70s. Using a new approach to engineering economics, Systems Life Cycle Costing: Economic Analysis, Estimation, and Management presents the material that a modern engineer must understand to work as a pr.
Book
This book promotes and describes the application of objective and effective decision making in asset management based on mathematical models and practical techniques that can be easily implemented in organizations. This comprehensive and timely publication will be an essential reference source, building on available literature in the field of asset management while laying the groundwork for further research breakthroughs in this field. The text provides the resources necessary for managers, technology developers, scientists and engineers to adopt and implement better decision making based on models and techniques that contribute to recognizing risks and uncertainties and, in general terms, to the important role of asset management to increase competitiveness in organizations.