ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

We document the first visual observation of a Lasiurus cinereus (Hoary Bat) flying over the open ocean, 49 km from the northern California coast. This observation provides further evidence that this migratory species at times utilizes offshore habitat. Hoary Bats face significant, population level threats from collisions with onshore wind turbines, particularly during late-summer and autumn migration periods. The location of this sighting within a leased offshore wind-energy area highlights the potential for Hoary Bats to be impacted by planned offshore wind-energy development.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of North American Bat Research NotesVolume 2, 2024 No. 2
First Visual Record of a
Hoary Bat
(Lasiurus cinereus) over
the Open Ocean
William L. Kennerley, Lisa T. Ballance, Rachael
A. Orben, Leigh G. Torres, and Donald I. Solick
Journal of North American Bat Research
The Journal of North American Bat Research (ISSN 2994-1075) is published by the Eagle Hill Institute, PO Box 9, 59 Eagle Hill Road,
Steuben, ME 04680-0009. Phone: 207-546-2821 Ext. 4. E-mail: ofce@eaglehill.us. Webpage: https://www.eaglehill.us/nabr. Copyright
© 2023, all rights reserved. Published on an article by article basis. Special issue proposals are welcome. The Journal of North
American Bat Research is an open access journal. Authors: Submission guidelines are available at https://www.eaglehill.us/programs/
journals/nabr/nabr.shtml. Co-published journals: The Northeastern Naturalist, Southeastern Naturalist, Caribbean Naturalist, and
Eastern Paleontologist, each with a separate Board of Editors. The Eagle Hill Institute is a tax exempt 501(c)(3) nonprot corporation of
the State of Maine (Federal ID # 010379899).
Board of Editors
Loren K. Ammerman, Department of Biology, Angelo
State University, San Angelo, TX, USA
Aaron J. Corcoran, Department of Biology, University
of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Paul A. Faure, Department of Psychology, Neurosci-
ence & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton,
ON, Canada
Joseph S. Johnson, School of Information Technology,
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Allen Kurta, Department of Biology, Eastern Michigan
University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA • Journal Editor
Joerg-Henner Lotze, Eagle Hill Institute, Steuben, ME,
USA • Publisher
Maria C. MacSwiney Gonzalez, Centro de Investiga-
ciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Vera-
cruz, México
Joy M. O'Keefe, Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at
Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Jorge Ortega, Departamento de Zoología, Escuela Na-
cional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico
Nacional, Ciudad de México, México
Bernal Rodríguez Herrera, Centro de Investigación en
Biodiversidad y Ecología Tropical, Universidad de
Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
Sharlene E. Santana, Department of Biology and Burke
Museum of Natural History and Culture, University
of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Robert Schorr, Colorado Natural Heritage Program,
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
J. Angel Soto-Centeno, Department of Earth & Envi-
ronmental Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark,
NJ, USA
Bailey Tausen, Eagle Hill Institute, Steuben, ME •
Production Editor
Theodore J. Weller, USDA Forest Service, Pacic
Southwest Research Station, Arcata, CA, USA
Craig K.R. Willis, Department of Biology and Centre
for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, University of
Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
♦ The Journal of North American Bat Research
is a peer-reviewed and edited journal for science
related to all aspects of the biology, ecology, and
conservation of bats, Order Chiroptera, and their
habitats in North America, including Canada,
Mexico, the USA, and the West Indies (Baha-
mas, Greater Antilles, and Lesser Antilles). (ISSN
2994-1075 [online]).
♦ The journal features research articles, notes,
and research summaries on bats.
It offers article-by-article online publication
for prompt distribution to a global audience.
It offers authors the option of publishing large
files such as data tables, and audio and video
clips as online supplemental les.
Special issues - The Journal of North American
Bat Research welcomes proposals for special is-
sues that are based on conference proceedings
or on a series of invitational articles. Special
issue editors can rely on the publisher’s years of
experiences in efciently handling most details
relating to the publication of special issues.
Indexing - The Journal of North American Bat
Research is a young journal whose indexing at this
time is by way of author entries in Google Scholar
and Researchgate. Its indexing coverage is ex-
pected to become comparable to that of the Insti-
tute's first 3 journals (Northeastern Naturalist,
Southeastern Naturalist, and Journal of the North
Atlantic). These 3 journals are included in full-text
in BioOne.org and JSTOR.org and are indexed in
Web of Science (clarivate.com) and EBSCO.com.
The journal's staff is pleased to discuss ideas
for manuscripts and to assist during all stages of
manuscript preparation. The journal has a page
charge to help defray a portion of the costs of
publishing manuscripts. Instructions for Authors
are available online on the journal’s website
(https://www.eaglehill.us/nabr).
It is co-published with the Northeastern Natu-
ralist, Southeastern Naturalist, Caribbean Natu-
ralist, Eastern Paleontologist, and other journals.
♦ It is available online in full-text version on
the journal's website (https://www.eaglehill.us/
nabr). Arrangements for inclusion in other data-
bases are being pursued.
Cover Photograph: A Hoary Bat ying over the ocean off Arcata, CA. Photograph © W.L. Kennerley.
Journal of North American Bat Research Notes
W.L. Kennerley, L.T. Ballance, R.A. Orben, L.G. Torres, and D.I. Solick
2024 No. 2
1
Journal of North American Bat Research Notes
2024 N2:1–5
First Visual Record of a Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus) over
the Open Ocean
William L. Kennerley1, Lisa T. Ballance1,2, Rachael A. Orben1,2,
Leigh G. Torres1,2, and Donald I. Solick3,4,*
Abstract - We document the rst visual observation of a Lasiurus cinereus (Hoary Bat) ying over
the open ocean, 49 km from the northern California coast. This observation provides further evidence
that this migratory species at times utilizes offshore habitat. Hoary Bats face signicant, population-
level threats from collisions with onshore wind turbines, particularly during late-summer and autumn
migration periods. The location of this sighting within a leased offshore wind-energy area highlights
the potential for Hoary Bats to be impacted by planned offshore wind-energy development.
On 3 October 2022, at 13:05 PDT, one of us (WLK) observed a Lasiurus cinereus
(Palisot de Beauvois) (Hoary Bat) over the Pacific Ocean at 40°56’59” N, 124°43’08”
W, 49 km off the coast of Arcata, California (Fig. 1). The sighting occurred during a re-
search cruise aboard the R/V Pacific Storm, on which WLK was conducting strip-transect
surveys for seabirds. Observing conditions were rated “excellent” (Ballance 2018) at the
time of the sighting, with sea state conditions of Beaufort 2, equating to a wind speed
of approximately 2.1–3.1 ms-1. Winds were from the north-northeast and conditions the
previous night were calm, with light winds 1.0–2.2 ms-1 from the north-northwest (NOAA
National Data Buoy Center 1971). The Hoary Bat was first observed flying at a height
of 5–10 m, approaching generally towards the vessel from the north. The bat and vessel
came within 50 m of each other, and the bat was photographed (Sony A9, 200–600 mm
lens with 1.4x teleconverter, Sony Corporation, New York, NY) before continuing to fly
towards the south-southwest. We identified the individual as a Hoary Bat based on grayish
body pelage, a buffy collar, white elbow patches, and lightly colored leading edges of the
wings (Fig. 2).
Hoary Bats are strong iers capable of traveling long distances. The species is highly
migratory, with individuals moving from breeding areas widely spread across North
America to southern or coastal wintering areas (Baerwald et al. 2014, Cryan 2003, Cryan
et al. 2014b). During migration, Hoary Bats are regular visitors to the Farallon Islands off
California (Cryan and Brown 2007, Tenaza 1966) and to Bermuda (Allen 1923, Van Gelder
and Wingate 1961), demonstrating a capacity for sustained, overwater ight. However, a
recent review of current and historic records of offshore bats in North America (Solick and
Newman 2021) indicated that Hoary Bats had never been visually identied from ships.
Although Hoary Bats have been detected acoustically from offshore structures (e.g., buoys
and lighthouses) and boats in the Atlantic, such detections are rare compared to other mi-
gratory species, like L. borealis (Müller) (Eastern Red Bat) and Lasionycteris noctivagans
(LeConte) (Silver-haired Bat) (Solick and Newman 2021).
1Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Hateld Ma-
rine Science Center, Newport, OR 97365. 2Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wild-
life, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Hateld Marine Science Center, Newport,
OR 97365. 3Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94304. 4Vesper Bat Detection Services,
Fort Collins, CO 80524. *Corresponding author - dsolick@vesperbats.com.
Associate Editor: Theodore J. Weller, USDA Forest Service Pacic Southwest Research Station
2
Figure 1. Location of the Hoary Bat sighting (yellow star), within lease area OCS-P0562 in the
Humboldt Wind Energy Area (hatched), off the northern California coast. The inset map shows the
area of the sighting in relation to two proposed wind-energy areas off Oregon.
Figure 2. Photographs of the Hoary Bat, taken by WLK from the R/V Pacic Storm, on 3 October 2022.
Journal of North American Bat Research Notes
W.L. Kennerley, L.T. Ballance, R.A. Orben, L.G. Torres, and D.I. Solick
2024 No. 2
3
Hoary Bats can y at high altitudes (≤2400 m; Peurach 2003), well beyond the visual
range of human observers and outside the acoustic range of ultrasonic detectors (about 30
m; Adams et al. 2012); perhaps partly explaining the low number of offshore records. The
observed individual was ying at a perceptible height in daylight, about 6 hrs after sunrise.
Bats ying during daylight hours on land are rare and may indicate disease, disturbance, or
an early start to foraging. However, most offshore bat sightings (Solick and Newman 2021)
and many offshore acoustic detections have occurred during daytime (Peterson et al. 2016).
It is often assumed that these day-ying bats are searching for a place to rest, as indicated
by several accounts of bats landing on ships in the Atlantic and remaining for many hours
(Solick and Newman 2021). However, the Hoary Bat we observed did not attempt to land
on our vessel, suggesting it was not in need of rest, although it likely had been in con-
tinuous ight for many hours. Day-ying bats are vulnerable to diurnal predators, such as
gulls (Boshamer and Bekker 2008, Mikula et al. 2016), and although a Larus occidentalis
Audubon (Western Gull) was seen following the ship at the time of our sighting, we did not
observe any obvious interaction with the Hoary Bat.
The lack of oceanic, visual records for any bats off the Pacic Coast, compared to the
mid-Atlantic region of North America (Solick and Newman 2021), may indicate some
combination of less activity by bats over the Pacic Ocean, less survey effort by research-
ers, or the lack of a centralized reporting system for casual observers. Recent research has
attempted to rectify this knowledge gap. In 2014 and 2015, acoustic detectors (Anabat II, Ti-
tley Scientic, Brendale, Australia) were deployed on Newport Hydrographic Line cruises
out to 60 km off the central Oregon coast, but no conrmed bat detections were identied
(R. Suryan, NOAA Fisheries, Juneau, AK, 2023 pers. comm.). In 2021, the U.S. Geologi-
cal Survey began long-term acoustic surveys for bats at multiple locations 0.3110 km off
the California coast, which should provide more systematic insight into offshore activity
by Hoary Bats and other species (G. Reyes and B. Schulze, USGS Western Ecological Re-
search Center, Sacramento, CA, 2023 pers. comm.).
Given the time of year and the southerly direction of ight, this individual was possibly
migrating. Hoary Bats apparently move south along the Pacic Coast in autumn (Brown
1935, Dalquest 1943), but recent attempts to track Hoary Bats during this time of year in-
dicate that individuals y in various directions. While two Hoary Bats tagged in Humboldt
Redwoods State Park, California, remained somewhat locally, one bat ew a circuit of
>1,000 km inland before returning to the initial point of capture (Weller et al. 2016). Dur-
ing the same month as our observation, a Hoary Bat was tagged in Muir Woods National
Monument, California, before being detected by an automated telemetry station (Motus),
near Olympia, Washington, about 1,000 km north (G. Reyes, USGS Western Ecological
Research Center, Sacramento, CA, 2023 pers. comm.). Thus, recent observations suggest
that seasonal movements of Hoary Bats may be more complex than previously described.
On land, Hoary Bats are the predominant bat species killed by collisions with wind-
turbine blades (Allison and Butryn 2020) and are at risk of population decline or extinc-
tion if the current rate of fatalities is not reduced (Frick et al. 2017, Friedenberg and Frick
2021). Notably, our sighting occurred within the Humboldt Wind Energy Area (Fig. 1) in
a section that has since been leased for offshore wind-energy development (lease number
OCS-P0562; BOEM 2023). While it is currently unknown how frequently this species ies
offshore or what proportion of the population uses these areas, our sighting demonstrates
that Hoary Bats can occur in offshore wind-energy areas during autumn, when the annual
peak in collisions occurs at onshore turbines (Allison and Butryn 2020). Although the indi-
vidual we observed was ying well below the typical height of wind-turbine rotors, some
Journal of North American Bat Research Notes
W.L. Kennerley, L.T. Ballance, R.A. Orben, L.G. Torres, and D.I. Solick
2024 No. 2
4
bats may display a degree of attraction to turbines under certain wind conditions (Cryan
et al. 2014a). The degree of risk Hoary Bat populations face from offshore wind-energy
development, therefore, remains uncertain but is worthy of further investigation.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, under Award
Number DE-EE0009800, and also funded in part by the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program, through Interagency Agreement M21PG00011
with the U.S. Department of Energy, Ofce of Energy Efciency and Renewable Energy. We are grate-
ful to Dave Weller and Annette Henry and the Marine Mammal and Turtle Division of the Southwest
Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, for support of this work through the loan of 2 pairs of
25-power big-eye binoculars. We are thankful for the support of the Oregon Wildlife Foundation and
the Friends of Haystack Rock for supporting the purchase of the camera equipment, and for the safe
and professional work of the crew of the R/V Pacic Storm.
Literature Cited
Adams, A.M., M.K. Jantzen, R.M. Hamilton, and M.B. Fenton. 2012. Do you hear what I hear? Impli-
cations of detector selection for acoustic monitoring of bats. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
3:992–998.
Allen, G.M. 1923. The Red Bat in Bermuda. Journal of Mammalogy 4:6.
Allison, T.D., and R. Butryn. 2020. AWWI technical report 2nd edition: Summary of bat fatality
monitoring data contained in AWWIC. AWWI technical report. American Wind Wildlife Institute,
Washington, DC, USA. 27 pp.
Ballance, L.T. 2018. Seabird survey instruction manual. Full technical report. Marine Mammal and
Turtle Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, San Diego, CA,
USA. 59 pp.
Baerwald, E.F., W.P. Patterson, and R.M.R. Barclay. 2014. Origins and migratory patterns of bats
killed by wind turbines in southern Alberta: Evidence from stable isotopes. Ecosphere 5:1–17.
Brown, D.E. 1935. Hoary Bat taken at Westport, Washington. Murrelet 16:72–72.
Boshamer, J., and J. Bekker. 2008. Nathusius’ Pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii) and other species of
bats on offshore platforms in the Dutch sector of the North Sea. Lutra 1:17–36.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. 2023. Offshore Renewable Activities. Available online at
www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/offshore-renewable-activities. Accessed 29 September 2023.
Cryan, P.M. 2003. Seasonal distribution of migratory tree bats (Lasiurus and Lasionycteris) in North
America. Journal of Mammalogy 84:579–593.
Cryan, P.M., and A.C. Brown. 2007. Migration of bats past a remote island offers clues toward the
problem of bat fatalities at wind turbines. Biological Conservation 139:1–11.
Cryan, P.M., P.M. Gorreson, C.D. Hein, M.R. Schirmacher, R.H. Diehl, M.M. Huso, D.T.S. Hayman,
P.D. Fricker, F.J. Bonaccorso, D.H. Johnson, K. Heist, and D.C. Dalton. 2014a. Behavior of bats
at wind turbines. PNAS 111(42):15126–15131.
Cryan, P.M., C.A. Stricker, and M.B. Wunder. 2014b. Continental-scale, seasonal movements of a
heterothermic migratory tree bat. Ecological Applications 24:602–616.
Dalquest, W.W. 1943. Distribution of the Hoary Bat along the Pacic Coast. The Murrelet 24:21–24.
Frick, W.F., E.F. Baerwald, J.F. Pollock, R.M.R. Barclay, J.A. Szymanski, T.J. Weller, A.L. Russell,
S.C. Loeb, R.A. Medellin, and L.P. McGuire. 2017. Fatalities at wind turbines may threaten popu-
lation viability of a migratory bat. Biological Conservation 209:172–177.
Friedenberg, N.A., and W.F. Frick. 2021. Assessing fatality minimization for Hoary Bats amid contin-
ued wind energy development. Biological Conservation 262:109309.
Mikula, P., F. Morelli, R.K. Lučan, D.N. Jones, and P. Tryjanowski. 2016. Bats as prey of diurnal birds:
A global perspective. Mammal Review 46:160–174.
Journal of North American Bat Research Notes
W.L. Kennerley, L.T. Ballance, R.A. Orben, L.G. Torres, and D.I. Solick
2024 No. 2
5
NOAA National Data Buoy Center. 1971. Meteorological and Oceanographic Data Collected from the
National Data Buoy Center Coastal-Marine Automated Network (C-MAN) and Moored (Weather)
Buoys. Station NJLC1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. Avali-
able online at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/NDBC-CMANWx. Accessed 15
September 2023.
Peterson, T.S., S.K. Pelletier, and M. Giovanni. 2016. Long-term bat monitoring on islands, offshore
structures, and coastal sites in the Gulf of Maine, mid-Atlantic, and Great Lakes—Final report.
Full Technical Report. Stantec Consulting Services Inc., Topsham, ME, USA. 171 pp.
Peurach, S.C. 2003. High-altitude collision between an airplane and a Hoary Bat, Lasiurus cinereus.
Bat Research News 44:2–3.
Solick, D.I., and C.M. Newman. 2021. Oceanic records of North American bats and implications for
offshore wind energy development in the United States. Ecology and Evolution 11:14433–14447.
Tenaza, R.R. 1966. Migration of Hoary Bats on South Farallon Island, California. Journal of Mam-
malogy 47:533–535.
Van Gelder, R.G., and W.B. Wingate. 1961. The taxonomy and status of bats in Bermuda. American
Museum Novitates 2029:1–9.
Weller, T.J., K.T. Castle, F. Liechti, C.D. Hein, M.R. Schirmacher, and P.M. Cryan. 2016. First direct
evidence of long-distance seasonal movements and hibernation in a migratory bat. Scientic
Reports 6:34585.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Understanding of migration in small bats has been constrained by limitations of techniques that were labor-intensive, provided coarse levels of resolution, or were limited to population-level inferences. Knowledge of movements and behaviors of individual bats have been unknowable because of limitations in size of tracking devices and methods to attach them for long periods. We used sutures to attach miniature global positioning system (GPS) tags and data loggers that recorded light levels, activity, and temperature to male hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus). Results from recovered GPS tags illustrated profound differences among movement patterns by individuals, including one that completed a >1000 km round-trip journey during October 2014. Data loggers allowed us to record sub-hourly patterns of activity and torpor use, in one case over a period of 224 days that spanned an entire winter. In this latter bat, we documented 5 torpor bouts that lasted ≥16 days and a flightless period that lasted 40 nights. These first uses of miniature tags on small bats allowed us to discover that male hoary bats can make multi-directional movements during the migratory season and sometimes hibernate for an entire winter.
Article
Full-text available
1. Predation is an important selective pressure that can influence prey species in numerous ways. Predator–prey relationships are, however, poorly understood in taxa not typically associated with these interactions; this is especially the case when bats (Chiroptera) are the prey. 2. The main aim here is to review and synthesize global information on the predation of bats by birds of prey (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes) and other diurnal bird groups. 3. We compiled data on incidences of predation of bats by diurnal birds, through an extensive multilingual study of bibliographic and Internet-based sources. Scientific papers were found mainly via the Thomson Reuters (Web of Science and Zoological Record) and Scopus data bases, Google Scholar, and Google Books. Additional data were found through Internet searches of trip reports, images and videos carried by Google, Google Images, Flickr, and YouTube. 4. In total, more than 1500 cases of bats being attacked by diurnal predatory birds were obtained. Reports were documented from every continent (except Antarctica) and from 109 countries, and were thus distributed globally between 70°N and 43°S. Overall, we found evidence for predation of bats by 143 species of diurnal raptors (Accipitriformes 107 spp. and Falconiformes 36 spp.) and by 94 non-raptor bird species from 28 families. At least 124 and 50 bat species were taken as prey by raptors and by other diurnal bird species, respectively. 5. Attacks on bats by diurnal raptors were found to be distributed globally and were present in the majority of extant raptor lineages. Attacks on bats by other diurnal birds were also occasionally recorded. Furthermore, the majority of extant bat families featured as prey. These results strongly suggest that predation by birds may act as a major factor affecting the scarcity of daytime activity in bats and as a driver in the evolution of bat nocturnality.
Article
Full-text available
Wind turbines are causing unprecedented numbers of bat fatalities. Many fatalities involve tree-roosting bats, but reasons for this higher susceptibility remain unknown. To better understand behaviors associated with risk, we monitored bats at three experimentally manipulated wind turbines in Indiana, United States, from July 29 to October 1, 2012, using thermal cameras and other methods. We observed bats on 993 occasions and saw many behaviors, including close approaches, flight loops and dives, hovering, and chases. Most bats altered course toward turbines during observation. Based on these new observations, we tested the hypotheses that wind speed and blade rotation speed influenced the way that bats interacted with turbines. We found that bats were detected more frequently at lower wind speeds and typically approached turbines on the leeward (downwind) side. The proportion of leeward approaches increased with wind speed when blades were prevented from turning, yet decreased when blades could turn. Bats were observed more frequently at turbines on moonlit nights. Taken together, these observations suggest that bats may orient toward turbines by sensing air currents and using vision, and that air turbulence caused by fast-moving blades creates conditions that are less attractive to bats passing in close proximity. Tree bats may respond to streams of air flowing downwind from trees at night while searching for roosts, conspecifics, and nocturnal insect prey that could accumulate in such flows. Fatalities of tree bats at turbines may be the consequence of behaviors that evolved to provide selective advantages when elicited by tall trees, but are now maladaptive when elicited by wind turbines.
Article
Full-text available
Long-distance migration evolved independently in bats and unique migration behaviors are likely, but because of their cryptic lifestyles, many details remain unknown. North American hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus cinereus) roost in trees year-round and probably migrate farther than any other bats, yet we still lack basic information about their migration patterns and wintering locations or strategies. This information is needed to better understand unprecedented fatality of hoary bats at wind turbines during autumn migration and to determine whether the species could be susceptible to an emerging disease affecting hibernating bats. Our aim was to infer probable seasonal movements of individual hoary bats to better understand their migration and seasonal distribution in North America. We analyzed the stable isotope values of non-exchangeable hydrogen in the keratin of bat hair and combined isotopic results with prior distributional information to derive relative probability density surfaces for the geographic origins of individuals. We then mapped probable directions and distances of seasonal movement. Results indicate that hoary bats summer across broad areas. In addition to assumed latitudinal migration, we uncovered evidence of longitudinal movement by hoary bats from inland summering grounds to coastal regions during autumn and winter. Coastal regions with nonfreezing temperatures may be important wintering areas for hoary bats. Hoary bats migrating through any particular area, such as a wind turbine facility in autumn, are likely to have originated from a broad expanse of summering grounds from which they have traveled in no recognizable order. Better characterizing migration patterns and wintering behaviors of hoary bats sheds light on the evolution of migration and provides context for conserving these migrants.
Article
Wind energy is an important sector of the renewable energy market. Observations of bat fatalities at wind farms raise concern about impacts to biodiversity, particularly amid projections of wind energy build-out. We investigated how continued wind energy development in the United States and Canada, as well as adoption of measures to reduce bat fatality rates, influence the population viability of the hoary bat (L. cinereus). Our model included uncertainty about population size and dynamics as well as future wind energy development. Results indicate that current levels of wind energy build-out may have already caused substantial population declines. Under our lowest-risk scenario of high maximum growth rate and low wind energy build-out, the median simulated population of 2.25 million hoary bats experienced a 50% decline by 2028. We show that risks of decline and extinction may still be mediated with rapid adoption of measures to reduce bat fatalities. We find that levels of fatality reduction shown to be achievable in empirical studies of fatality minimization, by turbine curtailment, may be sufficient to manage risks. Simulations of population trends suggest that declines exceeding 5% per year support fatality reduction to manage extinction risk. Importantly, both the risks and the level of fatality reduction necessary to manage them were highly uncertain. Population size remains the most critical data gap to determining population viability of hoary bats. Studies to empirically determine baseline estimates of population size and trends over time remain urgently needed to inform conservation action.
Article
Large numbers of migratory bats are killed every year at wind energy facilities. However, population-level impacts are unknown as we lack basic demographic information about these species. We investigated whether fatalities at wind turbines could impact population viability of migratory bats, focusing on the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), the species most frequently killed by turbines in North America. Using expert elicitation and population projection models, we show that mortality from wind turbines may drastically reduce population size and increase the risk of extinction. For example, the hoary bat population could decline by as much as 90% in the next 50 years if the initial population size is near 2.5 million bats and annual population growth rate is similar to rates estimated for other bat species (λ = 1.01). Our results suggest that wind energy development may pose a substantial threat to migratory bats in North America. If viable populations are to be sustained, conservation measures to reduce mortality from turbine collisions likely need to be initiated soon. Our findings inform policy decisions regarding preventing or mitigating impacts of energy infrastructure development on wildlife.
Article
Summary The probability of detecting the echolocation calls of bats is affected by the strength of the signal as well as the directionality and frequency response of the acoustic detectors. Regardless of the research question, it is important to quantify variation in recording system performance and its impacts on bat detection results. The purpose of this study was to compare the detection of echolocation calls among five commonly used bat detectors: AnaBat SD2 (Titley Scientific), Avisoft UltraSoundGate 116 CM16/CMPA (Avisoft Bioacoustics), Batcorder 2·0 (ecoObs), Batlogger (Elekon AG) and Song Meter SM2BAT (Wildlife Acoustics). We used playback of synthetic calls to optimize detection settings for each system. We then played synthetic signals at four frequencies (25, 55, 85 and 115 kHz) at 5-m intervals (5–40 m) and three angles (0°, 45°, 90°) from the detectors. Finally, we recorded free-flying bats (Lasiurus cinereus), comparing the number of calls detected by each detector. Detection was most affected by the frequency dominating the signal and the distance from the source. The effect of angle was less apparent. In the synthetic signal experiment, Avisoft and Batlogger outperformed other detectors, while Batcorder and Song Meter performed similarly. Batlogger performed better than the other detectors at angles off-centre (45° and 90°). AnaBat detected the fewest signals and none at 85 kHz or 115 kHz. Avisoft detected the most signals. In the free-flying bat experiment, Batlogger recorded 93% of calls relative to Avisoft, while AnaBat, Batcorder and Song Meter recorded 40–50% of the calls detected by Avisoft. Numerous factors contribute to variation in data sets from acoustic monitoring; our results demonstrate that choice of detector plays a role in this variation. Differences among detectors make it difficult to compare data sets obtained with different systems. Therefore, the choice of detector should be taken into account in designing studies and considering bat activity levels among studies using different detectors.