ArticlePublisher preview available

From modesty to market: shareholder reactions to humility rhetoric in family and nonfamily firms under media scrutiny

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Family firms are typically associated with a respected system of values, yet the impact of such values on shareholder reactions remains to be understood. We examine the presence of humility rhetoric in corporate communications, characterized by language emphasizing modesty and collaboration, and its effect on shareholder reactions for both family and nonfamily firms. Analyzing 2250 shareholder letters from S&P 500 family and nonfamily firms and 1460 shareholder letters from small and medium-sized family and nonfamily firms, this study finds strong evidence supporting the positive impact of humility rhetoric on shareholder reactions for family firms. Further, interesting effects emerge when considering the influence of positive and negative media coverage. We bolster these findings with a sample of small and medium-sized family and nonfamily businesses and find consistent results. Our findings help advance the economic theory of family firms by highlighting the capital market implications of humility rhetoric in these firms and its importance in shaping positive shareholder reactions. Further, from a methodological perspective, this study introduces a measure of humility rhetoric using a computer-aided text-analysis approach, extending its applicability to broader research contexts.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.: (0123456789)
1 3
Small Bus Econ (2024) 63:755–780
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00878-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
From modesty tomarket: shareholder reactions tohumility
rhetoric infamily andnonfamily firms undermedia
scrutiny
PaulSanchez · RobertJ.Pidduck · DuyguPhillips ·
JoshuaJ.Daspit · DanielT.Holt
Accepted: 9 January 2024 / Published online: 5 February 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024
Abstract Family firms are typically associated with
a respected system of values, yet the impact of such
values on shareholder reactions remains to be under-
stood. We examine the presence of humility rhetoric
in corporate communications, characterized by lan-
guage emphasizing modesty and collaboration, and
its effect on shareholder reactions for both family and
nonfamily firms. Analyzing 2250 shareholder letters
from S&P 500 family and nonfamily firms and 1460
shareholder letters from small and medium-sized
family and nonfamily firms, this study finds strong
evidence supporting the positive impact of humility
rhetoric on shareholder reactions for family firms.
Further, interesting effects emerge when considering
the influence of positive and negative media cover-
age. We bolster these findings with a sample of small
and medium-sized family and nonfamily businesses
and find consistent results. Our findings help advance
the economic theory of family firms by highlighting
the capital market implications of humility rhetoric
in these firms and its importance in shaping positive
shareholder reactions. Further, from a methodologi-
cal perspective, this study introduces a measure of
humility rhetoric using a computer-aided text-anal-
ysis approach, extending its applicability to broader
research contexts.
Plain English Summary Family firms and non-
family firms are evaluated differently by sharehold-
ers based on various values, one of which is the level
of humility exhibited in corporate communications.
“Humility is not thinking less of yourself, it’s thinking of
yourself less” – C.S. Lewis.
Supplementary Information The online version
contains supplementary material available at https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1007/ s11187- 024- 00878-3.
P.Sanchez(*)
Department ofManagement & Entrepreneurship, Ivy
College ofBusiness, Iowa State University, 2340 Gerdin
Business Building, 2167 Union Drive, Ames, IA50011,
USA
e-mail: psanch26@iastate.edu
R.J.Pidduck
Department ofManagement, Strome School ofBusiness,
Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA
e-mail: rpidduck@odu.edu
D.Phillips
Department ofBusiness Administration, University
ofDelaware, Newark, USA
e-mail: duygu@udel.edu
J.J.Daspit
Department ofManagement, McCoy College ofBusiness,
Texas State University, SanMarcos, USA
e-mail: josh.daspit@txstate.edu
D.T.Holt
Department ofManagement & Entrepreneurship, College
ofBusiness, Louisville University, Louisville, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Humble leadership refers to a leadership style characterized by a leader's self-awareness, openness to feedback, and recognition of others' contributions. It involves acknowledging one's limitations and being receptive to new ideas and diverse viewpoints (Lim, 2024, Sanchez et. al., 2024. Zhang, Javaid, Liao, Choi and Kim in (2024) suggest that humility can be divided into five subdimensions: honesty, fairness, generosity, respect, and freedom from arrogance. Salehzadeh and Ziaeian in (2024) argue that humility is different from low self-esteem in that it is a personal orientation based on an accurate understanding of o ...
... hip styles and employee behaviour is very important. Humble leadership, distinguished by its emphasis on collaboration, openness, and humility, has been acknowledged as a catalyst for fostering proactive conduct in teams. However, the significance of psychological empowerment as a mediator in this relationship cannot be emphasised enough (Lim, 2024, Sanchez et. al., 2024. This paper aims to examine the important role of psychological empowerment in mediating the relationship between modest leadership and proactive conduct among employees. First and foremost, humble leadership creates a basis for psychological empowerment by fostering an environment marked by trust, respect, and autonomy (Kang, Li & Hua, ...
Article
Full-text available
In today's fast-paced business world, the link between different leadership styles and how employees act is very important. Humble leadership, which includes being humble, honest, and respectful, has become a good way to get workers to be proactive. Support from coworkers has had some effect on this relationship, but not a lot of research has been done on it. The aim of this study is to find out how group support affects the connection between humble leadership and active participation. The effect of humble leadership on proactive behaviour is increased by support from colleagues, which creates a friendly and helpful work environment. This study looks at the ways that employee views and actions are affected by the help that coworkers give. A full review of the current studies and the theory theories that support it is needed to do this. The results show that when employees feel supported by their coworkers, they are more likely to show the same level of humility and support as their bosses, which makes them act more proactively. Colleagues' help also increases the effect of humble leadership by creating a sense of community among teams, making people feel safer, and encouraging the sharing of knowledge. This study adds a lot to our knowledge about how leadership, social support, and employee behaviour all affect each other in complicated ways. This study shows that peer support is important for handling the link between humble leadership and aggressive behaviour. It gives useful information for companies that want to create a culture of teamwork, creativity, and success that can be used in real life. The topic of talk also includes possible future study paths and how they might affect the way organisations work.
... However, it can also lead to an overestimation of one's personal agentic capabilities likely leading to managerial hubris and undesirable venture outcomes (Hayward et al., 2006). Humility can also positively impact the development of emotional and social competencies (Hendijani and Sohrabi, 2019;Sanchez et al., 2024). Overall, transcendent faith provides useful tools for entrepreneurs to overcome the problems of act-value uncertainty through building patience and resilience to persevere in the face of delayed actualization of decision outcomes while also teaching humility that the ultimate consequences that arise in uncertain environments is not fully under the control of entrepreneurs. ...
Article
Uncertainty permeates the world of entrepreneurship. Yet, understanding how entrepreneurs perceive and make decisions in the face of uncertainty remains elusive. The value of Bayesian decision models with their probabilistic-based assumptions is only of limited help to entrepreneurs in solving the problem of uncertainty. This research extends the utility of non-probabilistic modes of entrepreneurial cognition as a supplementary epistemology for shedding light into the ‘black box’ of how entrepreneurs navigate unknowable futures. We conceptualize core insights, on how decision-makers make sense of, interpret, and act amidst life's deep uncertainties. Specifically, we introduce four decision heuristics entrepreneurs adopt—grounded in the shared foundations in broader conceptions of uncertainty from the psychology of religious faith—that help systematize why (a) intuitive insight, (b) generative doubt, (c) redemptive choice, and (d) transcendent faith, enhance our understanding of how elements of uncertainty throughout the venture development journey are often addressed. Implications for future research are discussed.
... When we examine these questions in the context of the papers published in this special issue, we find the following insights. Stommel et al. (2024) and Sanchez et al. (2024) provide nuance to the understanding of why family firms exist alongside nonfamily firms. Stommel et al.'s study suggests that family firms will be able to pursue a broader set of opportunities than nonfamily firms because their reference points are lower and more opportunities will be perceived as favorable. ...
Article
Full-text available
Research attention to family firms has significantly increased in recent years, with a growing application of economic theories such as agency theory and resource-based theory to explain differences between family firms and nonfamily firms and heterogeneity among family firm populations. Despite this progress, the formulation of an economic theory of family business remains notably absent. Merely applying existing economic theories of the firm to the realm of family business is inadequate, as these general theories fail to incorporate the idiosyncratic aspects of family firms, such as the pursuit of socioemotional wealth. This paper seeks to advance economic theories specific to family firms and lay the groundwork for future studies. We advocate for interdisciplinary research using insights from fields such as economics, management, sociology, and psychology to investigate the complex dynamics governing family firms and their economic behaviors, decision-making, and performance.
Article
Full-text available
Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) is an important construct in the fields of management and entrepreneurship research. Interest in EO knowledge continues to thrive with a burgeoning research agenda in multiple contexts and with diverse implications. However, a subset of this research, which endeavors to apply the EO construct to explain or predict individuals’ entrepreneurial beliefs and behaviors, has met with resistance. This paper examines the case for EO at the individual level (Ind.EO). We consider the EO legacy concerns, and the various theoretical implications and benefits of doing so. Drawing upon an “EO as a family of constructs” framework, we propose paths forward for studying Ind.EO credibly, consistent with, but distinct from, traditional firm-level EO. Finally, we outline a research agenda and discuss the contributions and potential implications for Ind.EO research across the wider entrepreneurship discipline.
Article
There is a resurgence in both the advancement and critique of research at the intersection of religion and entrepreneurship. It is precisely because there are important conflicts, tensions, and paradoxes in religion and entrepreneurship that this stream of research is important to the field of entrepreneurship as a source of meaningful heterodoxy. Without grappling with these values and concerns, entrepreneurship scholars are left with an incomplete and possibly emaciated understanding of entrepreneurship. When properly harnessed to build bridges across social divides, the intersection of religion and entrepreneurship is an important source of fresh, new, and heterodox insights into the processes through which entrepreneurs strive to transform organizations and society through entrepreneurial action and an emerging subfield of entrepreneurship research.
Article
Humility is a concept grounded in a self-view that something greater than oneself exists. A multitude of disciplines to date have sought to understand how humility impacts leaders, as well as the individuals, teams, and organizations they lead. Despite overlapping research questions, methodologies, and empirical contexts, studies examining leader humility have developed largely in isolation with little overlap between fields. This has created a fundamental divide between micro and macro researchers who suggest that humility is conceptualized as both a mutable behavioral state and a stable leader trait, respectively. We provide a systematic review of research on leader humility at multiple organizational levels of analysis to provide linkages across disciplinary and theoretical divides. We couple our systematic review with a meta-analysis of 212 unique studies, identifying 99 estimates for the relationships between leader humility and numerous individual, team, and organizational variables. Among all variables, we find humble leadership most strongly predicts followers’ satisfaction with the leader and the leaders’ participative decision making. We also find humble leadership does not affect their own job performance or the performance of organizations, but improves the performance of their followers and teams. Building on our results, we call for research across academic disciplines.
Article
We examine how entrepreneurs’ political values affect their ventures’ stakeholder orientation, and how this orientation affects venture funding. We also show how the political ideologies of financiers influence their investment choices and relationships with entrepreneurs. Using a sample of 652 ventures backed by 332 financiers and information on political values and ideologies of entrepreneurs and financiers, along with text-based analyses of documents to infer stakeholder orientation, we find ventures with a narrow orientation obtain more funding than those with a broader orientation, and this relationship is moderated by financiers’ political ideologies. The findings have implications for stakeholder theory in entrepreneurship.
Chapter
This collection is the first comprehensive selection of readings focusing on corporate bankruptcy. Its main purpose is to explore the nature and efficiency of corporate reorganisation using interdisciplinary approaches drawn from law, economics, business, and finance. Substantive areas covered include the role of credit, creditors' implicit bargains, non-bargaining features of bankruptcy, workouts of agreements, alternatives to bankruptcy, and proceedings in countries other than the United States, including the United Kingdom, Europe, and Japan.