ArticlePDF Available

Taxonomic notes on longhorned beetles with the descriptions of several new taxa (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)

Authors:
  • Free Economic Society of Russia

Abstract and Figures

Many newly published taxonomy modifications are discussed. Several taxonomy news is proposed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Humanity space International almanac VOL. 13, No 1, 2024: 21-38
21
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E5021D95-8238-4F33-A9F6-0BBE908A2D20
DOI: 10.24412/2226-0773-2024-13-1-21-38
EDN: VDXIRF
Taxonomic notes on longhorned beetles with the descriptions of
several new taxa (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)
M.A. Lazarev
Free Economic Society of Russia, Department of Scientifics Conferences and
All-Russian Projects
Tverskaya str., 22a, Moscow, 125009, Russia
e-mail: humanityspace@gmail.com, cerambycidae@bk.ru
Key words: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, taxonomy, zoogeography, new genus, new
subgenus, new synonyms, new rank, another subfamily added.
Abstract: Many newly published taxonomy modifications are discussed. Several
taxonomy news is proposed.
Introduction.
Many taxonomic publications on Cerambycidae are regularly
appear each year without special comments by colleagues. I propose
here alternative positions on several questionable cases. Several new
synonyms cannot be accepted. Several new names were in fact
synonyms. Certain taxonomy acts were not acceptable. Rank of six
species names was downgraded to subspecies. A new genus and a
new subgenus were proposed, as well as many new synonyms.
One old subfamily name was restored, as well as one subspecies
name. A wrong geographical record was corrected, as well as some
other wrongly published data. Rank of one old name was restored.
1. A new unacceptable tribal system of Lepturinae was proposed by
Zamoroka (2022b): Cariliini (Carilia, Acmaeops, Gaurotes,
Paragaurotes, Dinoptera, Gnathacmaeops, Cortodera); Pidoniini
(Pidonia, Fallacea), Evodiini (Evodinus, Brachyta). Lepturini
includes 6 Palaearctic genera (Anoplodera, Nivellia, Leptura,
Anastrangalia, Grammoptera, Strangalia); Stenocorini -
2 (Stenocorus, Anisorus), Rhamnusiini - 3 (Rhamnusium, Akimerus,
Enoploderes), Rhagiini - 2 (Pachyta, Rhagium).
Cortodera cannot be in one tribe with all genera around
Dinoptera; Rhamnusium, Akimerus, and Enoploderes are totally
M.A. Lazarev
22
different on larval and imaginal characters, so until better decisions it
is necessary conserve traditional system of Palaearctic Lepturinae
with 7 tribes: Xylosteini, Encyclopini, Oxymirini, Enoploderini,
Rhamnusiini, Rhagiini, Lepturini.
2. Evodinellus borealis (Gyllenhal, 1827) = Pidonia petrovi
Danilevsky, 2023a, syn. nov. on the base of the type series study.
3. Megarhagium Reitter, 1913 and Hagrium Villiers, 1978 must be
accepted as valid genera names as in Villier (1978).
4. Very different genera Brachysomida Casey, 1913 and
Pseudogaurotina Plavilstshikov, 1958 were inadequately published
by Zamoroka (2022b) as subgenera of one genus, and impossible
combination was proposed: Brachysomida (Pseudogaurotina)
excellens”.
5. According to Zamoroka (2022b), Evodinus borealis does not
belong to the separate genus Evodinellus Winkler, 1929” or
Evodinus LeConte, 1850 = Evodinellus Plavilstshikov, 1915. But
American Evodinus differs from Evodinellus borealis (Gyllenhal,
1827) by the position of antennal insertions, which are situated in
Evodinellus borealis in front of anterior eye margins, while in
Evodinus antennal insertions disposed behind the line connecting
anterior eye margins.
6. The names of very different genera: Acmaeops LeConte, 1850 and
Euracmaeops Danilevsky, 2014 were wrongly published by
Zamoroka (2022b) as synonyms.
7. Wrong synonyms were accepted by Zamoroka (2022a):
Cortodera flavimana (Waltl, 1838) = C. moldovana
Danilevsky, 1995”. In fact, C. moldovana has no connection with
C. flavimana, but close to C. tibialis (Marseul, 1876), and especially
to C. tibialis rossica Danilevsky, 2001b. No evidences of the
presence of С. flavimana and C. moldovana in Ukraine exist.
M.A. Lazarev
23
8. Cornumutila quadrivittata (Gebler, 1830) was wrongly recorded
for Ukraine by Zamoroka (2018, 2022a). C. quadrivittata is widely
distributed in Siberia (Lazarev, 2009) and does not penetrate to
Europe. A single record for Moscow Region was very doubtful.
Only C. lineata (Letzner, 1844) is distributed in Europe.
9. Pedostrangalia revestita corsica Vartanis, 2024b, stat. nov. was
described from France (Corsica) as a species on the bases of red
anterior legs in combination with black other legs. No other features
are observed that distinguish the new taxon from P. r. revestita.
10. The reality of two different subgenera of
Stictoleptura [Paracorymbia sensu Miroshnikov, 2021, 2016]
subgen. Batesiata Miroshnikov, 1998 and S. subgen. Pyrrholeptura
Lazarev, 2016 was not accepted by Miroshnikov (2016, 2021).
I insist on three fundamental differences: Pyrrholeptura is
characterized by red elytral color, shallow male abdominal
emargination and dense elytral punctation. The difference in color
between two subgenera can't be denied, but Miroshnikov shows
several examples of different taxa where elytral color is not
important. Such reasoning is irrelevant. He shows male abdominal
emargination in both species, but the shape of those structures in his
photos is distinctly different, as well as elytral punctation in his
photos of P. (Batesiata) tesserula and P. (B.) pyrrha”.
So, Stictoleptura (Batesiata Miroshnikov, 1998) and
S. (Pyrrholeptura Lazarev, 2016) are good valid names.
11. Stictoleptura (Maculileptura Danilevsky, 2014) was not accepted
by Miroshnikov (2021) who did not see the differences of this taxon
from Paracorymbia (s. str.) Miroshnikov, 1998. But that valid name
was established by Danilevsky (2014) instead of Paracorymbia
(s. str.) «group maculicornis» Miroshnikov (1998). All characters of
the group were published by Miroshnikov (1998: 594): Last
abdominal male sternite with shallow, narrow, short, but well distinct
impression, slightly emarginated apically; hind male tibiae not
curved, with two apical spines; elytra yellowish, monochrome or
with dark apex and lateral margin; antennal joints with light bases or
with light rings.
M.A. Lazarev
24
12. Several new synonyms are proposed: Xylotrechus (Xylotrechus
Chevrolat, 1860 = Fulvotrechus Zamoroka, 2021 =
Hieroglyphotrechus Zamoroka, 2021 = Igneotrechus Zamoroka,
2021 = syn. nn.), Xylotrechus Chevrolat, 1860 =
Spinotrechus Zamoroka, 2021, syn. nov.
In general Zamoroka’s publications were often based on
molecular data, but strong morphological argument were usually
ignored. For example, such cases as one tribe for so different genera
as Rhamnusium, Akimerus and Enoploderes, as well as joining of
Rutpela maculata (Poda von Neuhaus, 1761) and Stenurella nigra
(Linnaeus, 1758) inside one genus show complete absurdity of
his method.
13. Wrong synonyms proposed by Zamoroka (2021): Xylotrechus =
Rusticoclytus must be rejected, and valid name
Xylotrechus (Rusticoclytus Vives, 1977) generally accepted (Vives,
1977, 2000; Villiers, 1978, 1979; Demelt, 1982; Bílý & Mehl, 1989;
Marquet, 2001, 2015; Pesarini & Sabbadini, 2007; Sama, 2008; Löbl
& Smetana, 2010; Danilevsky, 2012, 2020; Alekseev & Maryutin,
2019; Stolbov et al., 2019; Trócoli, 2019; Gradinarov &
Sivilov, 2020; Sakalian et al., 2020 and others) must be preserved.
14. Xyloclytus was wrongly upgraded to genus rank by Zamoroka
(2021). Valid subgenus name Xylotrechus (Xyloclytus Reitter, 1913)
must be preserved.
15. Teratoclytus D.W. Zaitzev, 1937 cannot be moved to
Anaglyptini, as it was proposed by Zamoroka (2021) and must be
returned to Clytini (elytral bases without tubercles).
16. Humeromaculatus Özdikmen, 2011: 537 (type species Cerambyx
figuratus Scopoli, 1763) was introduced as a subgenus of
Chlorophorus. It was upgraded to genus level by Zamoroka (2021)
without sufficient reasons. Sparganophorus Zamoroka, 2021 (type
species Clytus diadema Motschulsky, 1854) was described for a
single species, which was placed by Özdikmen (2022) in
Ch. (Humeromaculatus), so Ch. (Humeromaculatus Özdikmen, 2011
= Sparganophorus Zamoroka, 2021, syn. nov.
M.A. Lazarev
25
17. Perderomaculatus Özdikmen, 2011: 537 (type species
Cerambyx sartor Müller, 1766) was upgraded by Zanoroka (2021) to
genus level without sufficient reasons, the valid name must be
Chlorophorus (Perderomaculatus).
18. Chlorophorus (Viridiphorus Zamoroka, 2021, type species:
Callidium herbstii Brahm, 1790) = Chlorophorus (Brevenotatus
Özdikmen, 2022, type species: Clytus distinguendus Perroud, 1855),
syn. nov. as Ch. herbstii was included in Ch. (Brevenotatus).
19. New synonyms must be accepted:
Stenurella (Priscostenurella Özdikmen, 2013) =
Rutpela (Eduardvivesia Zamoroka, Trócoli, Shparyk & Semaniuk,
2022) = Rutpela (Nigromacularia Zamoroka, Trócoli, Shparyk &
Semaniuk, 2022), syn. nn.
20. Ropalopus hungaricus olympicus Vartanis, 2024c was described
as R. insubricus olympicus Vartanis, 2024c from Greece (Olympos
Mt., Pieria prov., 700-1000 m), and R. hungaricus creticus Vartanis,
2024c was described as a species from Crete.
21. Chlorophorus cannot be separated from Clytini, so Clytini
Mulsant, 1839 = Chlorophorini Zamoroka, 2021, syn. nov.
22. Three new combinations were incorrectly accepted by Zamoroka
et. al. (2022): Rutpela (Eduardvivesia) vaucheri (Bedel, 1900),
R. (Nigrostenurella) nigra (Linnaeus, 1758), R. (Nigromacularia)
septempunctata (Fabricius 1793). All three taxa must be left in
Stenurella as: S. (Priscostenurella) vaucheri, S. (P.) septempunctata
and S. (Nigrostenurella) nigra.
Several species were placed by Zamoroka et. al. (2022) in
wrong subgenera: Stenurella (Priscostenurella) jaegeri (Hummel,
1825), S. (P.) novercalis (Reitter, 1901), S. (s. str.) hybridula
(Reitter, 1902), S. (s. str.) approximans (Rosenhauer, 1856). Must be:
S. (Stenurelloides) jaegeri, S. (S.) novercalis, S. (Iberostenurella)
hybridula, S. (Crassostenurella) approximans.
M.A. Lazarev
26
23. Oxypleurus nodieri Mulsant, 1839 was placed by Zamoroka
(2022a) in Atimiini without sufficient reasons. The species belongs
to Saphanini as it is generally accepted.
24. Wrong synonyms were accepted by Zamoroka (2022a):
Tetropium fuscum (Fabricius, 1787) = T. tauricum
Shapovalov, 2007”. The holotype of T. tauricum strongly differs
from many hundreds of known T. fuscum. Up to now only very
peculiar holotype of T. tauricum is known. So, rather probably it was
just a teratic specimen of local species - T. castaneum (Linnaeus,
1758). According to Plavilstshikov (1940), T. fuscum was not
collected in Crimea. T. castaneum only was recorded for Crimean
fauna by Zagaikevich (1991: 153). In fact T. fuscum is absent in
Crimea. It was only recorded by Bartenev (2009) with question mark
on the base of WEB European Cerambycidae list of 2000 by
M.L. Danilevsky.
25. Anoplistes balcanicus Sláma, 2010 described from Bulgaria was
wrongly published as a subspecies of A. halodendri (Pallas, 1773) by
Danilevsky (2020) on the bases of the records by Muraj (1960) of
Purpuricenus ephippium for Albania. Asias ephippium was also
recorded for Bulgaria by Angelov (1995) and for Rumania by Panin,
Săvulescu (1961). But in fact, Anoplistes balcanicus Sláma, 2010
does not similar to A. halodendri because of short antenna and legs,
peculiar elytral design. So, Anoplistes balcanicus Sláma, 2010 must
be accepted as a valid species name, as it was originally introduced.
The presence of Anoplistes halodendri in Balcan area rests
rather doubtful.
26. Plagionotus detritus caucasicola Plavilstshikov, 1940 =
P. d. grecus Vartanis, 2023, syn. nov.
Plagionotus detritus caucasicola Plavilstshikov, 1940 was
described with two taxonomy rank in the original publication: as
“m.” [morpha] and as “форма” [forma]. The later makes the name
available, and it was generally accepted (Özdikmen & Turgut, 2009;
Löbl & Smetana, 2010; Danilevsky, 2010; Özdikmen, 2014; Vitali,
2016; Rapuzzi & Sama, 2018; Lazarev, 2019; Danilevsky, 2020;
Vartanis, 2023 and others).
M.A. Lazarev
27
Vartanis (2023) accepted P. d. caucasicola Plavilstshikov,
1940 as a valid name, but proposed no distinguishing characters. In
fact, the Caucasian populations are just identic to Greece
populations. Populations from Peloponnesus were described by
Vartanis (2023) and I’ve got good series from Northern Greece
(Thessaly): 7 males, 8 females from Ossa Mt. and 1 male, 2 females
from near Kalabaka (Meteora). Greece specimens are also rather pale
as specimens from Caucasian populations, have same wide yellow
pronotum anteriorly, wide yellow elytral stripes, and posterior elytral
stripes are partly or totally conjugated.
Acronyms of collections:
MD - collection of M. Danilevsky (Moscow)
ML - collection of M. Lazarev (Moscow)
SM - collection of S. Murzin (Moscow)
ZMM - collection of Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University
Plagionotus detritus caucasicola Plavilstshikov, 1940
Figs. 1-3
Type locality. Russia, Republic of Adygea, Maykop environs (on the
bases of lectotype designation).
Description. Dark areas of pronotum and elytra rather light-brown;
elytra with widened transverse yellow stripes behind middle, dark
stripes in between very narrow; anterior pronotal yellow area very
wide, often joined with central transverse pronotal stripe; narrow
yellow transverse stripe behind elytral bases more or less reduced or
totally absent; body length: 14.3-17.5 mm.
P. d. detritus (Linnaeus, 1758) is characterized by dark-
brown ground color of elytra and pronotum; light central pronotal
stripe usually well developed; yellow elytral stripes usually very
narrow; body length: 10-19 mm (Plavilstshikov, 1940).
Material. Lectotype (Figs 1-2) designated by Danilevsky (2009),
published by Lazarev (2019), male (length: 14.0 mm; width:
4.2 mm) with 4 labels: 1) “Cauc. occ. bor. / Maikop / 25.V.[1]928”;
2) “ex coll. Shaposhnikov”; 3) [red] “LECTOTYPUS / Plagionotus
detritus / forma CAUCASICOLA / Plavilstshikov, 1940 /
M. Danilevsky des., 2008”; 4) [pink] “Зоомузей МГУ (Москва,
M.A. Lazarev
28
РОССИЯ) / ZMMU Col 00180 / Zool. Mus. Mosq. Univ. /
(Mosquae, ROSSIA) / ex coll. N. N. Plavilstshikov” - ZMM;
Paralectotype (Fig. 3): 1 female, Maykop, 5.6.1935 - ZMM.
Additional materials. 1 male, Krasnodar Reg., L’vovskaya,
16.6.1966 - ZMM; 1 female, Ekaterinodar, 9.7.1914, Lyutkovsky -
ZMM; 1 male, 1 female, Stavropol, V. Lutshnik - ZMM; 1 male,
Armenia, Dilizhan, 5000’, 26.7.1934, N. Plavilstshikov - ZMM;
1 female, Transcauc., Kars - ZMM; 1 male, Krasnodar,
Novoprokhladnoe, 13.6.1956-1959 - MD; 1 female, Sochi,
Lazarevskoe, 4.8.1983, A. Koval - MD; 1 male,
Krasnodar, Ubinskoe, 10.5.1976, M. Kravchenko - MD; 1 male,
Krasnodar, Ubinskoe, 2.5.1991, A. Abramov - MD; 1 male,
Krasnodar, Ubinskoe, 5.8.1976, Belov - ML; 1 male, Krasnodar,
Novoprokhladnoe, 25.5.1959 - MD;. 3 males (Fig. 4),
4 females (Fig. 5), Ossa Mt. (East), VII.2001, P. Tauzin - ML;
4 males, 4 females, with the same label - SM; 1 male, 2 females, 1-2
km N Kalabaka, Meteora, VI, 1981, M. Sláma - ML.
Distribution. Russia, North Caucasus, Georgia, Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkey; Greece (Thessaly, Peloponnesus); the
records for Syria (Plavilstshikov, 1940; Danilevsky, 2020; Vartanis,
2023) were most probably connected with P. detritus
africaeseptentrionalis Tippmann, 1952.
27. Dorcadion fulvum erythropterum Fischer von Waldheim, 1823 =
Dorcadion fulvum opillicum Zamoroka, 2019, syn. nov. Big
available series of the species (including series from “Opillya” -
geographic region of the Podolian Upland in Lvov Oblast, Ivano-
Frankovsk Oblast and Ternopol Oblast in western Ukraine) show a
great degree of geographical variability masking local forms.
28. Dorcadion fulvum heracles Vartanis, 2024a, stat. nov. was
described from Greece (Olympus Mt., Pieria prov.) as a species on
the bases of black first antennal joint and black anterior legs.
No other features are observed that distinguish the new taxon from
D. f. fulvum (Scopoli, 1763).
M.A. Lazarev
29
29. The new wrong synonyms were published by Zamoroka (2022a):
without analises of corresponding materials and with false statement:
“ranges of some of them completely overlap”. “Dorcadion
cinerarium cinerarium (Fabricius, 1787) = D. c. macropoides
Plavilstshikov, 1932 = D. c. zubovi Lazarev, 2011”,
D. c. panticapaeum Plavilstshikov, 1951 = D. c. bartenevi
Lazarev, 2011 = D. c. skrylniki Lazarev, 2011 = D. c. azovense
Lazarev, 2011 = D. c. gorodinskii Danilevsky, 1996 = D. c. demidovi
Danilevsky, 2013 = D. c. mosyakini Danilevsky, 2021“; Dorcadion
equestre (Laxmann, 1770) = D. e. vadimi Danilevsky, 2021”;
“Dorcadion holosericeum Krynicki, 1832 = D. h. ustinovi
Danilevsky, 2021”. Most probably Zamoroka did not know such
specimens, so, valid names must be preserved: D. c. macropoides
Plavilstshikov, 1932; D. c. zubovi Lazarev, 2011; D. c. bartenevi
Lazarev, 2011; D. c. skrylniki Lazarev, 2011; D. c. azovense
Lazarev, 2011; D. c. gorodinskii Danilevsky, 1996; D. c. demidovi
Danilevsky, 2013; D. c. mosyakini Danilevsky, 2021; D. e. vadimi
Danilevsky, 2021; D. h. ustinovi Danilevsky, 2021.
30. The wrong synonyms Falsomesosella truncatipennis Pic, 1944 =
F. taibaishana Lazarev, 2021 published by Lin, Weigel & Ge (2021),
can’t be accepted, as holotype of F. truncatipennis (depicted by Lin
et al., 2021) from Zhejiang (see Lin, 2015) is distinctly wider with
more elongated prothorax, besides its type area is strongly distant.
So, F. taibaishana Lazarev, 2021 is a valid name.
31. Quasimesosella ussuriensis was recorded by Danilevsky (2023b:
334) for the south of Khabarovsk Region (Listvyanaya River), but
according to personal communication by N. Anisimov (November,
2023), that record must be connected with Listvenichnaya River
from Malyi Khingan in Jewish Autonomous Republic. The record of
that species for Duchin must be connected with Dichun River south-
eastwards Radde (Jewish Autonomous Republic).
32. Paratetrops gen. nov.
Type species. Tetrops warnckei Holzschuh, 1977.
Description. Body densely covered with long thick black erect setae;
antennae extremely sick, with apical joints about as long as wide;
M.A. Lazarev
30
pronotum with smooth central stripe; elytra with rough big
punctation. A single species distributed in south Turkey is known -
Paratetrops warnckei (Holzschuh, 1977), new rank.
Etymology. close to Tetrops. Gender masculine.
33. Tetrops peterkai Scořepa, 2020 is downgraded to subspecies
rank: Tetrops praeustus peterkai Scořepa, 2020, stat. nov.;
type locality: Czech Republic, Moravia, Hor Pole environs.
According to the original description the species is distributed
in Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Germany.
34. Tetrops praetermitus Sláma, 2020a is downgraded to subspecies
rank: Tetrops praeustus praetermitus Sláma, 2020, stat. nov.; type
locality. Bohemia, Lásenice. According to Sláma (2020b) the taxon
is distributed in South Bohemia only.
35. Phytoecia (Musaria) rubropunctata (Goeze 1777) was wrongly
recorded for Ukraine by Zamoroka (2022a). It is a West European
species absent in Ukraine; it does not penetrate east of Germany (Bense,
1995; Sama, 2003), but was recently recorded for Spain, France and
Italy only (Löbl & Smetana, 2010; Danilevsky, 2020). Old wrong
published records could be based on specimens of Ph. (M.) argus
(Frölich, 1793) or Ph. (M.) faldermanni (Faldermann, 1837).
36. A new subgenus Phytoecia (Danilevskia subgen. nov., type
species: Saperda molybdaena Dalman, 1817) is proposed for
4 species: Ph. (Danilevskia) molybdaena (Dalman, 1817),
Ph. (Danilevskia) uncinata (W. Redtenbacher, 1842),
Ph. (Danilevskia) tenuilinea Fairmaire, 1876 and Ph. (Danilevskia)
badenkoi Danilevsky, 1988. The new taxon is characterized by the
absence of the dense solid elytral scaly cover consisting of small
scales or very short setae. Such cover is typical for
Ph. (Opsilia Mulsant, 1862). Besides all Ph. (Danilevskia) has
unicuspid mandibulae and eyes with joined dorsal and ventral lobes.
New subgenus name is feminine. The name is dedicated to Mikhail
Leontievich Danilevsky - a specialist on Palaearctic Cerambycidae
and my constant colleague.
M.A. Lazarev
31
37. Up to now Palaearctic Cerambycidae includes 8 subfamilies
(Parandrinae, Prioninae, Lepturinae, Necydalinae, Spondylidinae,
Apatophyseinae, Cerambycinae, Lamiinae). Now another one must
be accepted: Agapanthiinae Mulsant, 1839 (type genus Agapanthia
Audinet-Serville, 1835, monobasic), which was traditionally
included in Lamiinae.
Agapanthiinae is characterized by moderately or small body
size; usually strongly elongated; parallel sided or with sides slightly
diverging posteriorly; antennae usually long, often much longer than
body, usually 12-segmented (in Pseudocalamobius -
11-segmented); frons usually sloping backwards; prothorax always
without lateral spines or tubercles; legs short; anterior coxae
spherical; claws simple, divergent, without tooth-like appendages or
denticles; metepisternae very narrow, parallel sided. Larvae with
cylindrical “C”-like curved body, without legs; head slightly
elongated, strongly prominent; abdominal ventral ampullae
partly reduced.
Agapanthiinae differ from Lamiinae by many larval
characters: “C”-like curved body, slightly elongated head, rounded
laterally, ventral ampullae partly or totally reduced.
38. Agapanthia kindermanni Pic, 1905 must be returned to the
original subspecies rank as Agapanthia dahli kindermanni Pic, 1905.
39. Agapanthia lateralis Ganglbauer, 1884 is downgraded to subspecies
rank: Agapanthia dahli lateralis Ganglbauer, 1884, stat. nov.
40. Agapanthia mutinensium Sama & Rapuzzi, 2010 is downgraded
to subspecies rank: Agapanthia dahli mutinensium Sama & Rapuzzi,
2010, stat. nov.
41. Agapanthia pustulifera Pic, 1905 is downgraded to subspecies
rank: Agapanthia dahli pustulifera Pic, 1905, stat. nov.
42. Agapanthia salviae Holzschuh, 1975 is downgraded to subspecies
rank: Agapanthia dahli salviae Holzschuh, 1975, stat. nov.
M.A. Lazarev
32
43. Agapanthia schurmanni Sama, 1979 is downgraded to subspecies
rank: Agapanthia dahli schurmanni Sama, 1979, stat. nov.
44. Agapanthia subsimplicicornis Sama & Rapuzzi, 2010 is
downgraded to subspecies rank: Agapanthia dahli subsimplicicornis
Sama & Rapuzzi, 2010, stat. nov.
45. Zaitzev D.W. (original spelling - Zaitzev 1931, 1937) was
wrongly published several times (Löbl & Smetana, 2010;
Danilevsky, 2020) as Zaitzev D.A. The original spelling was
unacceptably changed by Zamoroka (2021) to “Zajciw”.
Acknowledgements. I am very grateful to M. Danilevsky (A.N. Severtsov
Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow,
Russia), A. Gusakov (Zoological Museum of Moscow State University,
Moscow, Russia) and S. Murzin (Moscow, Russsia) for supplying me with
material for study. My special thanks to M. Danilevsky for
permanent consultations.
M.A. Lazarev
33
Figs 1-5. Plagionotus detritus caucasicola Plavilstshikov, 1940:
1. Lectotype, male; 2. Lectotype labels; 3. Paralectotype, female, Maykop,
5.6.1935; 4. Male, Ossa Mt. (East), VII.2001, P. Tauzin;
5. Female with the same label.
M.A. Lazarev
34
REFERENCES
Alekseev S.K. & Maryutin V.G. 2019. Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera:
Cerambycidae) of the Federal Natural Monument «Kaluga City Forest». -
Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve. 23: 3-30.
Angelov P. 1995. Coleoptera, Cerambycidae. Part 1 (Prioninae, Lepturinae,
Necydalinae, Aseminae, Cerambycinae). - Fauna Bulgarica. 24. Sofia: 206 pp.
Bartenev A.F. 2009. Longicorn-beetles of Left-Bank Ukraine and Crimea. Kharkov:
Kharkov National University, 405pp. [in Russian]
Bense U. 1995. Longhorn beetles. Illustrated key to the Cerambycidae and
Vesperidae of Europe. Weikersheim: Markgraf Verlag. 512 pp.
Bílý S. & Mehl O. 1989. Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) of
Fennoscandia and Denmark. - Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica. 22: 1-203.
Danilevsky M.L. 2009. Species Group Taxa of Longhorned Beetles
(Coleoptera,Cerambycidae) Described by N.N. Plavilstshikov and Their
Types Preserved in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University
and in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
St. Petersburg. - Entomological Review. 88 (3): 630-663.
Danilevsky M.L. 2012. Additions and corrections to the new Catalogue of
palaearctic Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) edited by I. Löbl and A. Smetana,
2010. Part. III. - Munis Entomology & Zoology. 7 (1): 109-173.
Danilevsky M.L. 2014. Longicorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea) of Russia
and adjacent countries. Part 1. Moscow: Higher School Consulting 1: 1-
522, 36 pls.
Danilevsky M.L. 2010. Additions and corrections to the new Catalogue of
Palaearctic Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) edited by I. Löbl and A. Smetana,
2010. - Russian Entomological Journal. 19 (3): 215-239.
Danilevsky M.L. (ed.). 2020. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, vol. 6 (1),
Chrysomeloidea I (Vesperidae, Disteniidae, Cerambycidae). Revised and
updated edition. Leiden / Boston: Brill. i-xxii, 1-712.
Danilevsky M.L. 2023a. А new species of the genus Pidonia Mulsant, 1863
(Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from the Russian Far East. - Humanity space.
International almanac. 12 (5): 464-467.
Danilevsky M.L. 2023b. Longicorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea) of Russia
and adjacent countries. Part 3. М.: IAE. 874 p. [in Russian]
Demelt C. 1982. Nachtrag zur Kenntnis der Cerambycidenfauna Griechenlands
(ohne Inseln). - Entomofauna Zeitschrift für Entomologie, Linz. 92 (17):
240-242.
Ganglbauer L. 1884. Bestimmungs-Tabellen der europäischen Coleopteren. VIII.
Cerambycidae. (Schluss.) Mit Berücksichtigung der Formen Algiers und
des paläarktischen Asiens, exclusive jener von Japan. - Verhandlungen der
kaiserlich-königlichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. 33
(1883): 437-586.
Gradinarov D. & Sivilov O. 2020. First records of Xylotrechus pantherinus
(Savenius, 1825) and X. stebbingi Gahan, 1906 (Cerambycidae:
Cerambycinae) in Bulgaria. - ZooNotes, 161: 1-4.
M.A. Lazarev
35
Gyllenhal L. 1827. Insecta Suecica descripta. Classis I. Coleoptera sive Eleutherata.
Tom I. Pars IV. Lipsiae: Fleischer, viii + [2] + 761 + [1] pp.
Holzschuh C. 1977. Neue Bockkäfer aus Anatolien und Iran (Col., Cerambycidae). -
Koleopterologische Rundschau. 53: 127-136.
Holzschuh C. 1975. Neue westpalaearktischer Bockkäfer aus den Gattungen
Cortodera, Vadonia und Agapanthia (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). -
Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft österreichischer Entomologen. 26 (2-4)
(1974): 77-90.
Lazarev M.A. 2009. Cornumutila quadrivittata (Gebler, 1830) and C. lineata
(Letzner, 1844), stat. rest. (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from Western
Europe and Russia. - Longicornists, Special Bulletin of the Japanese
Society of Coleopterology, No. 7. Tokyo: 117-126.
Lazarev M.A. 2019. Holotypes and lectotypes of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera,
Cerambycidae) stored at the Zoological Museum Moscow State University.
- Humanity space. International Almanac. 8 (10): 1210-1359.
Lazarev M.A. 2021. A new species of the genus Falsomesosella Pic, 1925
(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from Shaanxi province of China. - Euroasian
entomological journal. 20 (3): 142-143.
Lin M-Y. 2015. Some new localities of Chinese longhorn beetles, Part 2. - Les
Cahiers Magellanes. 17 (NS) (2014): 93-98.
Lin M.-Y., Weigel A. & Ge S. 2021. A new synonym of the species Falsomesosella
truncatipennis Pic, 1944 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Mesosini).
- Zoological Systematics. 6 (4): 342-343.
Löbl I. & Smetana A. (ed.) 2010. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, vol. 6.
Chrysomeloidea. Stenstrup, Apollo Books: 924 pp
Marquet J. 2001. Contribution à l'inventaire des INSECTES du département de
l'Indre. LISTE des COLÉOPTÈRES du PNR BRENNE. - L'Entomologiste.
57 (3-4): 101-122.
Marquet J. 2015. Les Coléoptères des environs de Vladivostok observés en juillet
2012 et juin 2013. - Le Coléoptériste, Bulletin de liaison de l'acorep. 18 (2):
79-81.
Miroshnikov A.I. 1998. A new classification of longicorn beetles of the Anoplodera
complex, tribe Lepturini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) of Holarctic fauna. II.
- Revue d’Entomologie. 77 (3): 588-618.
Miroshnikov A.I. 2016. Myths and reality: critical remarks on M.L. Danilevsky’s
monograph, “Longicorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea) of Russia and
adjacent countries. Part 1”. Moscow: HSC, 2014. 518 p. - Caucasian
Entomological Bulletin. 12 (1): 181-214.
Miroshnikov A.I. 2021. Critical remarks on “Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol.
6/1. Chrysomeloidea I (Vesperidae, Disteniidae, Cerambycidae). Updated and
revised second edition”, Leiden - Boston: Brill, 2020, with corrections and
additions. - Caucasian Entomological Bulletin. 17 (2): 459497.
Mulsant E. 1839. Histoire naturelle des coléoptères de France. Longicornes. Paris:
Maison Libraire, Lyon: Imprimerie de Dumoulin, Ronet et Sibuet. 304 pp.,
3 pls.
Muraj Xh., 1960. Inventarizimi i fam. Cerambycidae ne vendin tone. Quelques
M.A. Lazarev
36
Cerambycides en Albanie. - Buletin i Universitetit Shtetëror Tiranës,
Seria shkencat natyrore. 14 (4): 137-141.
Özdikmen H. 2011. The first attempt on subgeneric composition of Chlorophorus
Chevrolat, 1863 with four new subgenera (Col.: Cerambycidae:
Cerambycinae). - Munis Entomology & Zoology. 6 (2): 535-539.
Özdikmen H. 2014. Turkish red list categories of longicorn beetles (Coleoptera:
Cerambycidae) Part VIIi - Subfamily Cerambycinae: Anaglyptini and
Clytini. - Munis Entomology & Zoology. 9 (2): 687-712.
Özdikmen H. 2013. An attempt on subgeneric composition of the genus Stenurella
Villiers, 1974 (Cerambycidae: Lepturinae: Lepturini). - Munis Entomology
& Zoology. 8 (2): 509-531.
Özdikmen H. 2022. A new attempt on the subgeneric composition of Chlorophorus
Chevrolat, 1863 with descriptions of new subgenera (Cerambycidae:
Cerambycinae). - Munis Entomology & Zoology. 17 (2): 628-693.
Özdikmen H. & Turgut S. 2009. A short review on the genus Plagionotus Mulsant,
1842 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae). - Munis Entomology &
Zoology. 4 (2): 457-469.
Panin S. & Săvulescu N. 1961. Familia Cerambycidae (Croitori). - Fauna Republicii
Populare Române, Insecta 10 (5), Coleoptera. Bucuresti: 523 pp.
Pesarini C. & Sabbadini A. 2007. Notes on some Longhorn beetles from Continental
Greece, with description of two new subspecies (Coleoptera:
Cerambycidae). - Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale in Milano. 148 (1): 17-34, 32 figs.
Pic M. 1905. Descriptions et Notes Diverses. - Matériaux pour servir à l'étude des
Longicornes. 5 (2): 5-15.
Plavilstshikov N.N. 1940. Faune de l'URSS. Insectes Coléoptères, 22. Cerambycidae
II. Fauna SSSR 22: xiv + 785 pp, 382 figs. [in Russian]
Rapuzzi P. & Sama G. 2018. New taxa and notes on the systematic of palearctic
Longhorn-Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). - Munis Entomology &
Zoology. 13 (1): 1-39.
Reitter E. 1913. Fauna Germanica. Die fer des Deutschen Reiches. Nach der
analytischen Methode bearbeitet. IV. Band. (1912). Stuttgart: K. G. Lutz’
Verlag, 236 pp., pl. 129-152.
Sakalian V., Migliaccio E., Tassi F., Doychev D. & Georgiev G. 2020. New and
interesting records of jewel and longhorn beetles from Abruzzo, Lazio and
Molise National Park, Italy (Coleoptera: Buprestidae and Cerambycidae). -
Fragmenta Entomologica, Roma. 52 (1): 63-66.
Sama G. 1979. Una nuova specie di Agapanthia Serville di Macedonia (Coleoptera:
Cerambycidae). - Bolletino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona.
5 (1978): 505-513.
Sama G. 2002. Atlas of Cerambycidae of Europe and the Mediterranean area. Vol.
1: northern, western, central and eastern Europe, British Isles and
continental Europe from France (excl. Corsica) to Scandinavia and Urals.
Zlín: Kabourek. 173 pp.
Sama G. 2008. Preliminary note on the cerambycid fauna of North Africa with the
description of new taxa (Insecta Coleoptera Cerambycidae). - Quaderno di
M.A. Lazarev
37
Studi e Notizie di Storia Naturale della Romagna. 27: 217-245.
Sama G. 2010. Contribution to the recognition of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). -
Biocosme Mésogéen, Nice. 27 (3): 74-86.
Sama G., Rapuzzi P. & Kairouz A. 2010. Catalogue commenté des Cerambycidae
du Liban. An annotated catalogue of the Cerambycidae of Lebanon (Insecta
Coleoptera Cerambycidae). - Quaderni di Studi e Notizie di Storia Naturale
della Romagna 30: 131-201.
Skořepa L. 2020. New species of the genus Tetrops Kirby, 1826 in Kirby & Spence
1826 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) from Central Europe. - Humanity space.
International almanac. 9 (5): 563-570.
Sláma M. 2020a. A new species of the genus Tetrops Kirby, 1826 (Coleoptera:
Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) from Bohemia. - Humanity space. International
almanac. 9 (5): 571-576.
Sláma M. 2020b. Tesaříci rodu Tetrops Střední Evropy. - Entomofauna carpathica.
32 (2): 12-18.
Stolbov V.A., Sergeeva E.V., Lomakin D.E. & Sheykin S.D. 2019. A check-list of
longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of Tyumenskaya Oblast of
Russia. - Euroasian Entomological Journal. 18 (3): 199-212.
Trócoli S. 2019. Actualización del catálogo de Longicornios de Marruecos
Actualisation du catalogue des Longicornes du Maroc (Parte III / Partie III:
Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae). - Revue de l'Association Roussillonnaise
d'Entomologie (R.A.R.E.). 28 (3): 143-185, 43 figs, 84 cartes.
Vartanis J. 2023. Plagionotus detritus graecus ssp. nov. - description of a new
subspecies from Greece (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). - Munis Entomology
& Zoology. 18 (2): 928-932.
Vartanis J. 2024a. Dorcadion heracles sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae),
description of a new species from Greece. - Munis Entomology & Zoology.
19 (1): 47-52.
Vartanis J. 2024b. Pedostrangalia corsica sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae),
description of a new species from Corsica Island - France. - Munis
Entomology & Zoology. 19 (1): 73-78.
Vartanis J. 2024c. Ropalopus creticus sp. nov. and Ropalopus insubricus olympicus
ssp. nov. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from Greece. - Munis Entomology &
Zoology. 19 (1): 88-96.
Villiers A. 1978. Faune des Coléoptères de France I. Cerambycidae Paul
Lechevalier, Paris. Encyclopédie Entomologique. XLII: i-xxviii + 611 pp,
1802 figs.
Villiers A. 1979. Coléoptèresrambycides d'Iran. - L'Entomologiste. 35 (3): 114-116.
Vitali F. 2016. Plagionotus (s. str.) detritus detritus (L., 1758), nouveau pour le
Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, avec des notes synonymiques sur l’espèce
(Coleoptera Cerambycidae). - L’Entomologiste. 72 (5): 315-318.
Vives E. 1977. Notes sur les Longicornes ibériques. - L'Entomologiste. 33 (3): 129-133.
Vives E. 2000. Fauna Ibérica. Coleoptera Cerambycidae. - Fauna Ibérica. 12: 1-566,
199 figs & 5 pls.
Zagaikevich I.K. 1991. Taksonomiya i ekologiya usachey. Kiev: Naukova Dumka.
178 pp.
M.A. Lazarev
38
Zaitzev D.W. 1931. Beiträge zur Cerambycidenfauna Volhyniens. - Travaux du
musée Zoologique, 10. Mémoires de la class des Sciences Naturelles et
Techniques. 5: 241-249.
Zaitzev D.W. 1937. Teratoclytus - novyy rid zhukiv-skripuniv (Coleoptera,
Cerambycidae) iz Skhidnogo Sibiru. - Zbirnik Pratz Zoologichnogo
Muzeyu 19. Institut Zoologii ta Biologii AN URSR: 213-216.
Zamoroka A.М. 2018. The longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of the
Eastern Carpathian Mountains in Ukraine. - Munis Entomology and
Zoology. 13 (2), 655-691.
Zamoroka A.M. 2019. A new subspecies of Dorcadion fulvum (Scopoli, 1763)
(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from western Ukraine. - Polish Journal of
Entomology. 88 (4): 363-378.
Zamoroka A.M. 2021. Is Clytini monophyletic? The evidence from five-gene
phylogenetic analysis. - Proceedings of the State Natural History Museum.
37: 191-214.
Zamoroka A.M. 2022a. The longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) of
Ukraine: Results of two centuries of research. - Biosystems Diversity. 30
(1): 46-73.
Zamoroka A.M. 2022b. Molecular revision of Rhagiini sensu lato (Coleoptera,
Cerambycidae): Paraphyly, intricate evolution and novel taxonomy. -
Biosystems Diversity. 30 (3): 295-309.
Zamoroka A.M., Trócoli S., Shparyk V.Y. & Semaniuk D.V. 2022. Polyphyly of the
genus Stenurella (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae): Consensus of morphological
and molecular data. - Biosystems Diversity. 30 (2): 119-136.
Received: 20.12.2023
Accepted: 29.01.2024
... Recently, Zamoroka [1] proposed a new tribe, Chlorophorini, and a new subtribe, Chlorophorina, based on the type genus Chlorophorus Chevrolat, 1863. However, Chlorophorini was subsequently synonymized by Lazarev [2]. Chlorophorus species are predominantly distributed in the Oriental and Palearctic regions, with 18 and 8 taxa recorded in the Afrotropical and Australian regions, respectively. ...
... Nevertheless, these classifications are not supported by Özdikmen [3] and Tavakilian and Chevillotte [8]. Furthermore, Lazarev [2] synonymized Sparganophorus Zamoroka, 2021, with C. The mitogenome has been widely used to study phylogeny in Coleoptera at various taxonomic levels [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Mitochondrial genomes provide more information compared to single molecular markers, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of phylogenetic relationships. ...
... One of the notable species, C. diadema, was placed outside Chlorophorus in both previous studies [1,39] and designated as the type species for the newly established genus Sparganophorus by Zamoroka [1]. This genus was later synonymized with Chlorophorus (Humeromaculatus) by Lazarev [2]. However, C. diadema was placed firmly within the Chlorophorus clade in our results, challenging the validity of Sparganophorus. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chlorophorus Chevrolat, 1863, one of the most species-rich genera of Clytini, comprises 36 subgenera and 302 species/subspecies, with some species being of significant economic importance. To assess the monophyly and subgeneric system of this genus, we newly obtained mitochondrial genomic data from 21 species of Chlorophorus via high-throughput sequencing and reconstructed the phylogeny of this genus using ML and BI methods. The mitochondrial genomes of all sequenced Chlorophorus species were found to comprise 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), two ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and one non-coding region (control region, CR), reflecting a highly conserved gene arrangement. The mitochondrial genomes of the 21 Chlorophorus species range from 15,387 bp to 15,779 bp in length, and all exhibited AT bias. Analysis of the non-synonymous and synonymous substitution rates revealed that ATP8 has the highest evolution rate, whereas COI has the lowest. Further, phylogenetic analyses were performed based on different datasets (13 PCGs + 2 rRNAs, 13 PCGs + 2 rRNAs + 22 tRNAs, PCG123, PCG12) using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. The results indicate that Chlorophorus is monophyletic, but the subgenera Humeromaculatus Özdikmen, 2011; Immaculatoides Özdikmen, 2022; Brevenotatus Özdikmen, 2022; and Chlorophorus (s. str.) Chevrolat, 1863, are not monophyletic. Based on the comparison of male genitalia, we found that the sclerites of the endophallus may exhibit phylogenetic signals for the genus.
... Isotomus Mulsant, 1862, andNeoplagionotus Kasatkin, 2005 Clytini is a controversial group established by Mulsant in 1839, with disputed boundaries due to morphological features (Bezark, 2020;Zamoroka, 2021;Lazarev, 2024). Our analysis revealed that it formed a large monophyletic group (PP 0.98, BS 60, SH-aLRT/UFBoot 94/96) ( Fig. 1 Supplementary Fig. S1), similar to the findings of Lee and Lee (2020) and Zamoroka (2021). ...
... Based on the elytral pattern of all the taxa worldwide, Özdikmen (2022) proposed 36 subgenera for the world fauna. However, Lazarev (2024) synonymized Sparganophorus with Humeromaculatus and Viridiphorus with Brevenotatus, and he treated Perderomaculatus as a subgenus. As Özdikmen (2022) indicated, it should be noted that the subgeneric arrangement of Chlorophorus remains far from its final solution. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chlorophorus fainanensis Pic, 1918 is redescribed. Four species, C. coniperda Holzschuh, 1992, C. diversicolor Holzschuh, 2016, C. orbatus Holzschuh, 1991 and C. pinguis Holzschuh, 1992 are newly reported from China. A new synonymy, Chlorophorus arciferus (Chevrolat, 1863) = Chlorophorus semisinuatus Pic, 1949, syn. nov. is proposed.
Article
Full-text available
Eight new subspecies are described: Agapanthia (Epoptes) dahlii chemalensis ssp. n. (type locality: Chemal, Republic of Altay, Russia), A. (E.) d. setosa ssp. n. (type locality: Eğridir environs, Isparta, Turkey), A. (E.) d. grossicornis ssp. n. (type locality: Çorum, Turkey), A. (E.) d. zaysanensis ssp. n (type locality: Zaysan Lake environs), A. (E.) d. zhidkovi ssp. n. (type locality: 55 km S Makanchi, Kazakhstan), A. (E.) d. vishnyakovi ssp. n. (type locality: Kitab Natural reserve, Zerafshan mountain ridge, Kashkadarya Region, Uzbekistan), A. (E.) d. krivosheinae ssp. n. (type locality: Yangier, Syrdarya Region, Uzbekistan), A. (E.) d. revadensis ssp. n. (type locality: Revad environs, Zerafshan valley, Tadzhikistan). Two synonyms are proposed: A. (E.) pustulifera Pic, 1905 = A. (E.) mutinensium Sama & Rapuzzi, 2010, syn. nov. = A. (E.) subsimplicicornis Sama & Rapuzzi, 2010, syn. nov. New distributional data are represented for 3 subspecies. A key for all subspecies is proposed.
Article
Full-text available
In this study, we sequenced the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene from Tetrops peterkai specimens collected in northern Ukraine, obtaining the first barcodes for this species from the region. These barcodes revealed major genetic differences, supporting the distinction between T. peterkai and its sibling Tetrops praeustus and refuting the early suggestion to synonymize them. These findings underscore the need to formally restore the name Tetrops peterkai Scořepa, 2020, nom. res. Our analysis reveals wide distribution of Tetrops peterkai across Northern and Eastern Europe and Northern Balkans, including the first barcode-based records in Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, France, Norway, and Sweden. In contrast, Tetrops praeustus is more common in southern and western Europe. The ranges of both species broadly overlapping in Central and Eastern Europe. Additionally, the Tetrops species introduced to North America has been identified as Tetrops peterkai, likely originating from France.
Article
Full-text available
Many newly published taxonomy modifications are discussed. Several taxonomy news are proposed. Nine subspecies names of Polyarthron pectinicorne (Fabricius, 1793) used by Sama (2023) are accepted as valid. Taxonomy of Clytus rhamni Germar, 1817 is discussed. Parmena (Pilosoparmena subgen. nov.), type species: Parmena pudescens (Dalman, 1817) is proposed. Phytoecia (Danilevskia Lazarev, 2024, type species Saperda molybdaena Dalman, 1817) [not Danilevskia Kuznetsov, 1970, type species D. silvana Kuznetsov, 1970, Lepidoptera] must be replaced by Ph. (Danilevskovia nom. nov.). New synonyms are proposed: Tetrops praeustus praeustus (Linnaeus, 1758) = T. peterkai Scořepa, 2020, syn. nov. = T. praetermitus Sláma, 2020, syn. nov.
Article
Full-text available
Zamoroka, A. M. (2022). Molecular revision of Rhagiini sensu lato (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae): Paraphyly, intricate evolution and novel taxonomy. Biosystems Diversity, 30(3), 295-309. Due to classical taxonomy, the subfamily Lepturinae is divided into two large tribes Rhagiini s.l. and Lepturini s.l. However, this division is clearly artificial and does not correspond to the evolutionary relationships between the groups of genera with different morphologies that are part of these two tribes. However, there is a consensus among researchers supporting the monophyly of Lepturini s.l. while there is no such consensus for Rhagiini s.l. Over the past three decades, there have been several attempts to revise the tribe Rhagiini s.l. and divide it into smaller tribes. These attempts were somewhat successful based on larval and adult morphology. In general, eight tribes are distinguished within Rhagiini s.l. These include Teledapini, Xylosteini, Encyclopini, Oxymirini, Enoploderini, Rhamnusiini, Rhagiini and Sachalinobiini. However, the new system of Rhagiini s.l. is not always unambiguously accepted by different researchers, which causes discussions among experts. First of all, this is due to the fact that this system is only partially natural and far from fully reflects the phylogeny not only of Rhagiini s.l., but also of entire subfamily Lepturinae. In addition to the classical morphologic methods of studies, the use of the modern molecular phylogenetic methods opens up wide prospects for solving this puzzle. However, there have been very few such studies. Moreover, all of them were based on the use of only one gene. In this study, I used a general time-reversible (GTR) model of sequence evolution based on three mitochondrial (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, COI) and two nuclear (18S rRNA, 28S rRNA) genes. My analysis yielded a well-resolved phylogenetic maximum likelihood tree, which clearly demonstrates the paraphyly of Rhagii-ni s.l. It consists of at least three clades representing different and distantly related evolutionary branches: 1) PaRh, 2) OSaXyR-SEP, 3) GAC. The extant Rhagiini s.l. are mostly heterogeneous relict groups with an intricate evolutionary and phylogeographic history. Most of these groups are represented by one or very few species, often isolated geographically on different continents. In particular, numerous cases of parallel and convergent evolution and homoplasy, a chimeric combination of plesiomorphic and apomorphic morphological characters, were found in all clades. Therefore, the evolutionary "tree" of Rhagiini s.l. is more like a "bush" with numerous relict branches. Finally, I proposed a new taxonomic model of Rhagiini s.l., which is the most consistent with their natural phylogeny, with new developments in nomenclature.
Article
Full-text available
Stenurella genus is represented by nine small-sized and widely distributed Palaearctic species. Representatives of the genus play a key role in the pollination of wild angiosperms, accelerate the detritus cycle and make a significant contribution to the forest food web. A number of species with heterogeneous morphological features found within the single Stenurella genus indicate the need for revision of the taxonomy this genus. The previous attempt to resolve the intrageneric composition of Stenurella was rather artificial because it did not take into an account evolutionary relationships. In this study we tested the existing model of Stenurella intrageneric subdivision using both morphological and molecular approaches. Our results showed that the genus Stenurella is polyphyletic and consists of two unrelated clades. The first clade comprises six species (S. jaegeri, S. novercalis, S. bifasciata, S. melanura, S. hybridula and S. approximans) and the second includes three species (S. septempunctata, S. vaucheri and S. nigra). Moreover, we found that the second clade is closely related to Rutpela due to both morphological and molecular phylogeny. Based on our findings, we revised the present structure of the genus Stenu-rella and transferred three species of the second clade to the genus Rutpela, sensu novo. The genus Rutpela was redescribed in the light of our results. Furthermore, we subdivided the genus Stenurella, sensu nov. into two subgenera, Stenurella, subgen. sensu nov. and Priscos-tenurella, subgen. sensu nov., respectively. Also, the genus Rutpela, sensu nov. was subdivided into four subgenera including Nigrostenu-rella, Rutpela, Eduardvivesia, subgen. nov. and Nigromacularia, subgen. nov. The assessment of the place of Stenurella, sensu novo and Rutpela, sensu novo within Lepturini based on molecular phylogeny, showed that Stenurella, sensu novo belongs to the Anoplodera-branch and Rutpela, sensu novo nested within the Leptura-branch. These together with morphological features confirmed our idea of the evolutionary distinctiveness of Stenurella, sensu novo and Rutpela, sensu novo. We assumed that the general external morphological similarity of Stenurella, sensu novo and Rutpela, sensu novo was the result of convergent evolution, driven by mimetic selection toward imitation of ants or wasps. Finally, our study establishes a natural phylogenetic taxonomy of Stenurella.
Article
Full-text available
The paper presents a new arrangement on subgeneric composition of the genus Chlorophorus Chevrolat, 1863 with new subgenera. As a result of this, a total of 36 subgenera (including the nominotypical subgenus) are determined and described for the world fauna. Chlorophorus is a subcosmopolitan or cosmopolitan genus, and it is currently represented with 274 species and 7 subspecies worldwide. Of the 281 known species-group taxa of Chlorophorus, 242 (and 25 possible species) are evaluated in the present study, and they are placed into a total of 36 subgenera including 31 newly described subgenera. In addition, Chlorophorus castaneorufus (Fairmaire, 1895) is transferred to the genus Demonax Thomson as Demonax castaneorufus (Fairmaire, 1895) comb. nov. A key for subgenera of Chlorophorus is given at the end of present text. Known species-group taxa and their subgenera according to geographic regions in the world are also presented into lists at the end of present text.
Article
Full-text available
The study of the longhorn beetles fauna in Ukraine has been going on for two centuries. During this time, huge collections of materials have been accumulated. These enabled a comprehensive view of the fauna of the longhorn beetles in Ukraine to be formed. However , despite this, the first complete list of the longhorn beetles of the fauna of Ukraine was compiled by Zahajkevych only in the late twentieth century. He listed 275 species. Decades later, Bartenev supplemented Zahajkevych's list with five more species, suggesting that there are 280 species in Ukraine. In 2009, Bartenev expanded his previous list to 284 species. Recently, however, the fauna of the longhorn beetles in Ukraine has been fluctuating due to climate change. The southern species are actively expanding their range to the north, and seven new species of longhorn beetles have been identified in Ukraine over the past decade. In addition, the new synonymy is also the reason for changes in the list of the longhorn beetles in Ukraine. In particular, from Bartenev's latest list, I removed 14 synonymous species and 5 species that have never been registered in Ukraine. In total, the list of the longhorn beetles I have revised includes 279 species from 114 genera, 44 tribes and 6 subfamilies. One of them, Batocera lineolata Chevrolat, 1852, is not naturalized in Ukraine and is known from the only record of a female reared from wooden packaging materials. The degree of study of the longhorn beetle fauna of the physiographic regions of Ukraine is very uneven. The fauna of the western, northern, eastern and extreme southern regions of Ukraine is the most fully studied. At the same time, the fauna of the central regions of Ukraine is still very poorly known. Further research on the longhorn beetles in Ukraine should be conducted in two directions: 1) completing the lists for physiographic regions and 2) monitoring fauna changes under the influence of climate change.
Article
Full-text available
Falsomesosella taibaishana Lazarev, sp.n., similar to the Japanese F. gracilior (Bates, 1884) and the Tai-wanese F. horishana Gressitt, 1938, is described from Taibais-han National Park (China, Shaanxi province). It differs from both related species by its pale transverse elytral band curved backwards and dark antennae with joints which are never reddish basally. The distinguishing characters of the new species are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
All taxa of the genus Plagionotus Mulsant, 1842 in Turkey and the whole world are evaluated. The genus are also discussed in detail. The main aim of this work is to clarify the current status of the genus in Turkey and the whole world. New faunistical data from Turkey are given in the text. A key for Turkish species is also given.
Article
Full-text available
The paper was presented an essay on subgeneric composition of the palaearctic genus Stenurella Villiers, 1974. As a result of the present work, four new subgenera were described except the nominotypical subgenus for the genus Stenurella Villiers, 1974 that has not been included any subgenus until now. Also a key was proposed for all valid taxa of the genus in the text.
Article
Full-text available
A checklist of 99 Longhorn beetle species (Cerambycidae) from 59 genera occurring in Tyumenskaya Oblastof Russia, compiled on the basis of author’s material, muse-um collections and literature sources, is presented. Elevenspecies, Dinoptera collaris (Linnaeus, 1758), Pachytodeserraticus (Dalman, 1817), Stenurella bifasciata (Müller,1776), Tetropium gracilicorne Reitter, 1889, Spondylis buprestoides (Linnaeus, 1758), Pronocera sibirica (Gebler,1848), Semanotus undatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Monochamus impluviatus (Motschulsky, 1859), Lamia textor (Linnaeus,1758), Exocentrus lusitanus (Linnaeus, 1767) and Phytoecia coerulescens (Scopoli, 1763), are recorded for the region forthe first time. В работе представлен аннотированный список жуков-усачей (Cerambycidae) Тюменской области, основанный на материалах авторов, музейных коллекций и литературных данных. Выявлено 99 видов из 59 родов.Одиннаядцать видов: Dinoptera collaris (Linnaeus, 1758), Pachytodes erraticus (Dalman, 1817), Stenurella bifasciata (Müller, 1776), Tetropium gracilicorne Reitter, 1889, Spondylis buprestoides (Linnaeus, 1758), Pronocera sibirica (Gebler, 1848), Semanotus undatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Monochamus impluviatus (Motschulsky, 1859), Lamia textor (Linnaeus, 1758), Exocentrus lusitanus (Linnaeus, 1767) и Phytoecia coerulescens (Scopoli, 1763) для региона приводятся впервые.
Article
Full-text available
All 281 type specimens (including 117 holotypes and 154 lectotypes) of Cerambycidae preserved in Zoological Museum of Moscow University are presented; 19 lectotypes are designated here. New synonyms and a new name are proposed: Saperda Fabricius, 1775 = Nietzscheana Zubov, 2014, syn. nov. and Saperda alberti Plavilstshikov, 1915 = Nietzscheana plutenkoi Zubov, 2014, syn. nov.; Phytoecia ( Parobereina ) plavilschikovi, nom. nov. for Ph. ( P. ) pallidipennis Plavilstshikov, 1926 - junior homonym (not Ph. pallidipennis Redtenbacher, 1848). One species name was downgraded to subspecies rank Dorcadion ( Cribridorcadion ) scabricolle dobrovljanskii Suvorov, 1915, stat. nov. Two specimens of Chapaon apicale Pic, 1922 and Cylindropemus (sic!) griseipennis Pic, 1932 are designated as lectotypes in Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Paris) and corresponding paralectotypes are preserved in Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in Paris as well. Each description of a type specimen includes: original name in original combination, original indication of the type locality, real type locality, reference to the original publication, valid name, defects of the specimen, content of all labels, and sometimes remarks (taxonomy or geography comments).