This case regards a patient receiving chiropractic care following work injuries and a vehicular accident to the lumbar spine. The patient has done well under chiropractic care received, continuing to work, but has had residual and continued exacerbation of symptoms largely related to subsequent work activities. There has been a lapse of time, whereby we can ascribe permanency to her condition.
... [Show full abstract] Since there is more than one event involved, apportionment is necessary. The patient has had rigorous diagnostic testing in the form of imaging. Although she displays findings of clinical radiculopathy, such was not demonstrable on EMG testing. This then raises the question as to whether the clinical findings have been associated with chemical or compressive radiculopathy. Commonly, chemical radiculopathy does not demonstrate positive EMG findings. Functional testing inclusive of Physical Performance Testing, NIOSH testing and ROM-sEMG (DynaROMTM ) were performed to provide an understanding of the functional capacity of the patient as part of her work-up for permanency. Classification was performed under the NYS Worker’s Compensation Guidelines for Permanency, and where the calculations have been included. The patient has done remarkably well under chiropractic care received, utilizing the CoxTM technique of flexion-distraction decompression of the spine.