ArticlePDF Available

Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood

Authors:

Abstract

Valuable possessions or inheritances are objects that can be inherited, inheritance in this case is not only about tangible objects such as land, houses, jewelry, and so on, but works of art are also the inheritance rights of the creator that can be inherited. to his family. This article applies normative juridical research methods to analyze the copyright transfer process and identify its implications for Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Research highlights that while copyright is transferable, such actions can violate positive legal provisions. As a result, this study offers a new perspective on the conflict between copyright transfer and existing legal norms, providing a basis for a rethink of relevant regulations. The implications of these findings could impact on further understanding of the relationship between copyright, inheritance, and legal protection of minors.
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023 | 7079
Volume 7 Issue 6 (2023) Pages 7079-7087
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini
ISSN: 2549-8959 (Online) 2356-1327 (Print)
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
Dwi Asri Mukaromah1, Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi2
Universitas Ngurah Rai, Indonesia(1,2)
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
Abstract
Valuable possessions or inheritances are objects that can be inherited, inheritance in this case
is not only about tangible objects such as land, houses, jewelry, and so on, but works of art are
also the inheritance rights of the creator that can be inherited. to his family. This article applies
normative juridical research methods to analyze the copyright transfer process and identify its
implications for Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Research highlights that while copyright is
transferable, such actions can violate positive legal provisions. As a result, this study offers a
new perspective on the conflict between copyright transfer and existing legal norms,
providing a basis for a rethink of relevant regulations. The implications of these findings could
impact on further understanding of the relationship between copyright, inheritance, and legal
protection of minors.
Keywords: early childhood, copyright transfer, legal aspect
Copyright (c) 2023 Dwi Asri Mukaromah & Cokorde Istri Dian Laksmi Dewi
Corresponding author : Dwi Asri Mukaromah
Email Address : dwiasrim@yahoo.com (Bali, Indonesia)
Received 27 October 2023, Accepted 23 December 2023, Published 23 December 2023
Introduction
Laws and regulations are the main pillars in maintaining the order of society and
creating improvements in various aspects of life (Al-Farouqi et al., 2020). The community has
witnessed a number of significant improvements that have emerged as a result of efforts to
create and update regulations. This regulation has a vital role in ensuring a sense of legal
certainty, providing guidelines for the conduct of individuals and business entities, and
ensuring the protection of the rights and obligations of all parties (Maha & Harahap, 2023; T.
P. B. Putra & Handayani, 2023).
In addition, the development of science and technology has brought profound changes
in various sectors of life. These advances not only affect the way we work and interact, but
also have a profound impact on the economy, the environment, and society as a whole.
National development efforts also play an important role in advancing society, creating jobs,
and reducing social inequality (Akbar et al., 2022). None of this may have been achieved
without regulations supporting and directing these developments.
In the midst of advances in science and technology, there is an increase in activity in
the technology sector marked by the emergence of innovative discoveries. However,
ironically, public and market participants' awareness of the importance of protecting
Intellectual Property Rights is often minimal. Intellectual Property Rights are the foundation
that protects intellectual property rights such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, and others
(Arsalova, 2023; Asril et al., 2021). It is an essential element that supports innovation, creation,
and development in a variety of fields, including art and literature. Therefore, it is important
for the public and market participants to more honestly understand and support the protection
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
7080 | Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023
of Intellectual Property Rights in order to continue to create innovation and creativity that can
encourage the progress of society as a whole (Awatari & Purwanto, 2020).
Due to the commercial value in individual intellectual property (IPR) and the fact that
IPR has been around since the beginning, it is now used in international trade. This is the basis
of the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPs), which requires member
countries to harmonize domestic rules with international obligations. In accordance with Law
Number 7 of 1994 concerning the Ratification of the Agreement on the Establishment of the
World Trade Organization or WTO (The World Trade Organization), Indonesia is one of the
countries that signed the agreement (Syamsiah, 2021).
Seven categories make up intellectual property rights, or IPRs, including
copyrights,patents, brands, geographical indications, trade secrets, plant variety protection,
industrialdesigns, and integrated circuit layout designs (Puspitasari, 2022; Muh. A. D. Putra,
2021). Seven categories of intellectual property rights (IPR) form the legal basis that provides
very important protection for rights holders and innovators in various fields. First, copyright
protects creative works such as writing, music, visual arts, and software, giving rights holders
exclusive control over the reproduction, distribution, performance, and adaptation of their
works. Second, patents are a very important form of protection in science and technology,
giving holders exclusive rights to create, use, and sell technical innovations or processes over
a period of time. Third, trademark rights protect the brand identity and logo of a product or
service, preventing others from using the mark without permission. Fourth, geographical
indications protect products originating from certain geographical areas that have a certain
reputation or unique characteristics. Trade secrets are confidential information that gives a
business a competitive advantage, such as secret recipes or production methods. Sixth, the
protection of plant varieties relates to new and innovative plant varieties that have been
developed by plant breeders, allowing rights holders to control the distribution and
reproduction of such plants. Seventh, industrial design and integrated circuit layout design
protect the external appearance of products, such as furniture design or integrated circuit
layout design in electronic semiconductors, ensuring that design innovations also get
recognition and protection. The importance of IPR lies in the drive for innovation and
creativity, rewarding individuals and companies who invest time and resources in creating
something new, and fostering economic growth and technological development around the
world. Through IP protection, we create an environment that supports innovation and the
formation of better products. The objects organized by IPR are creations that arethe result of
human intellect (Bosio, 2021).
Copyright which is one type of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is essentially a private
right (civil). In the sense that a person is free to seek registration and protection of his
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) or not (Mahendra & Kartika, 2020).
Copyright is one of the important aspects in the concept of intellectual property rights
(IPR) (Zarnuji, 2020). This is an exclusive right granted to the owner of an intellectual work,
such as books, music, or other works of art. Copyright gives the owner the right to control and
protect the work for a certain period of time. This right is permanent, which means that the
owner has full control over the work, including the right to allow or prohibit use by others
(Arsadi et al., 2022). With copyright, the owner can regulate the rights related to his work, such
as reproduction, distribution, and adaptation. Copyright also protects the work from
unauthorized use, and this strengthens the owner's right to take legal action against copyright
infringement (Dahen, 2022). In contrast, rights temporarily acquired by third parties with the
consent of their owners are another mechanism that can be applied in the context of IPR, such
as licenses or contractual agreements, which can give third parties the right to use the work
for specific purposes, but within the time frame and limitations specified by the owner.
Result An idea generated by human thought and then brought to life through creativity
or innovation. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is a concept in the realm of technology that is
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023 | 7081
tied to intellectual predicates that are abstract in nature, so IPR becomes different from
material objects in their physical form. For example, a patent is one example of IPR.
Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (Copyright Law) is a legal instrument
that provides a legal basis for copyright protection in Indonesia. In the Copyright Law, there
is a clear definition of what is considered a copyrighted "work". Creation is described as any
work that grows from inspiration, ability, thinking, imagination, dexterity, skill, or expertise
of an individual which is then embodied in tangible form (Nofianti & Bustani, 2022). It covers
various aspects of science, art, and literature, and includes works created by individuals in
various fields (Baskoro, 2021; Dana et al., 2021).
Given such an inclusive definition, works in the humanities, arts, and sciences are
expressly included in the scope of copyright protection. This means that writers, artists,
scientists, and humanities practitioners have exclusive rights to their works resulting from the
creative process, research, or creation. This right provides protection against unauthorized
use, reproduction, distribution, and copying of these works by others. This encourages
innovation, creation, and further research in various fields, as creators feel secure and
recognized for their contributions to the development of science, arts, and humanities (Gultom
et al., 2021).
Through careful formulation in the Copyright Law, the government creates a legal
framework that supports and promotes the development of culture, art, and science (Shilvia
et al., 2022). It also provides incentives for creative individuals to continuously innovate and
create new works that can benefit society at large (Endria, 2023). As part of the legal system,
copyright protection is an important tool in facilitating cultural and intellectual growth and
development in Indonesia (Lalaar et al., 2023).
Copyright is the exclusive right of the creator that develops spontaneously based on
the declarative principle when a production becomes tangible without prejudice to limitations
in accordance with the law (Destyarini et al., 2022; Zarnuji, 2020). Copyright is an inherent and
indefeasible right that is protected as long as the inventor is alive and for a number of years
after his death (Achmad & Roisah, 2020; Asmaul et al., 2023; Chandrika & Dewanta, 2019).
According to the Copyright Act, this period is 70 years. If a right is absolute, it can essentially
be declared to have been infringed by anyone and defended against them (Simatupang, 2021).
Methods
This legal research is a normative legal research that emphasizes the enforcement of
positive legal norms (ius constitutum), focusing on the implementation and implementation
of law in practice. This research is more oriented to the statutory approach related to the
exploration and analysis of legal problem formulations. In this study, researchers examine
legal regulations that have been described in certain laws, and then identify and evaluate legal
concepts that have been made standards of behavior that can be considered appropriate or
inappropriate. This kind of normative legal research covers diverse sectors in the legal system
that have been regulated in writing. It includes an exploration of how certain legal concepts
have been regulated in the framework of previous legislation, and how their implementation
has occurred in real practice. In the process, the study applies descriptive techniques, which
allow the researcher to carefully document and explain the legal aspects under investigation.
The main objective of normative legal research such as this is to provide deep insight into how
law functions in specific contexts and how existing legal concepts impact the behavior and
decisions of legal practitioners. The results of this kind of research can be used to understand
legal implementation, provide practical guidance, and help formulate policies that are more
effective in dealing with legal issues that arise in society.
Result and Discussion
Creation includes works in art, science, literature, and others are objects of copyright.
Article 40 paragraph (1) letter f of the Copyright Law states that protected works include the
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
7082 | Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023
fields of science, literature, and art. This includes works of art in all media, such as paintings,
drawings, engravings, calligraphy, sculptures, or collages. The definition of "image" in the Law
of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright article 40 letter f lists,
among others, motifs, schemes, drawings, logos, color components, and beautiful typefaces as
referred to by the description of "image". The Copyright Law expressly defines any production
of works with the phrases "works of art in all forms, such as paintings, drawings," and
"paintings in the form of logos". Images, written words, or a combination of both can serve as
logos. Understanding the types and logos makes the visual aspect with the help of logo
anatomy.
A creation is an intangible movable object. As stated in Article 499 of the Burgerlijk
Wetboek (BW), "things" are things and rights that can be governed by property rights. As
stated in Articles 503-505, BW also addresses the qualities or characteristics of matter,
including (i) (goods) and intangibles (rights), (ii) movable and immovable objects, and (iii)
tangible objects, including consumable and non-consumable commodities.
According to Article 16 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright,
Copyright can be transferred or transferred in whole or in part due to inheritance, grants,
endowments, wills, written agreements, or other causes permitted in accordance with the
provisions of laws and regulations. Copyright holders are not only creators but can also be
owned by other parties through the transfer of rights. One type of undeniable right owned by
the creator of a work is the transfer of copyright.
The most basic distinction relates to the terms of the agreement on which it is based.
Waqf, grants, and wills are examples of legal instruments that can transfer ownership of
intellectual property without the need for an agreement process. Temporary transfer of rights.
The element of agreement between both parties is required for copyright through a written
agreement.
Transfer of copyright must be done either without a notarial deed or with clear and
good writing. Transfer of copyright can be switched or transferred means only economic
rights, while moral rights remain attached to the creator. According to Article 5 Paragraph 2
of the Copyright Act, moral rights can not be transferred as long as the creator is alive, but the
exercise of such rights can be transferred by will or for other reasons feasible under the law
after the creator dies.
Although oral agreements are not prohibited in the Criminal Code, they do not have
the same legal force as written agreements in Indonesia. The agreement is signed in writing
before a notary or government official which has perfect evidentiary power. This is due to
popular misconceptions about the importance of signing formal agreements. Many people also
make written agreements that do not meet the requirements for the validity of an agreement
outlined in Article 1320 of the Criminal Code.
In Indonesia, the term of copyright protection is generally the lifetime of the creator
plus 50 years, or 50 years after the first announcement, publication, or creation-except
broadcasting works, which are protected for 20 years from the first broadcast-or indefinitely
for the moral right of inclusion of the creator's name on the work and the copyright held by
the state on folklore and cultural products of the community that belong together.
Moral rights cannot be transferred while the creator is alive, but after the creator passes
away, the exercise of rights can be transferred by will or for other causes in accordance with
the provisions of the law. When moral rights are transferred, the beneficiary has the option to
surrender or refuse to exercise them, subject to an affidavit stating their acquiescence or
refusal.
Protecting the moral rights of the Creator is a very important principle in copyright
law. It includes rights granted to actors, such as writers, artists, scientists, and other creators,
who create works in fields such as the arts, sciences, and humanities. This moral right includes
the right to be identified as the creator of the work, unless otherwise agreed. In addition, moral
rights also include the right to prevent distortion, mutilation, or alteration of their creation, as
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023 | 7083
well as actions that may harm their honor or good name. It is a way to honor and understand
individual contributions in the development of culture, art, and science.
In the digital age, electronic information is becoming increasingly important in
protecting copyright. Electronic information includes databases that record copyrights, actors,
and agreements and terms related to copyright. The existence of this electronic information
facilitates the management, monitoring, and protection of copyrights, including the moral
rights of perpetrators. The protection of moral rights and the management of copyright
information are integral in maintaining a balance between copyright and the public interest. It
also plays a role in motivating creators to continue contributing to culture, art, and science, as
their rights are recognized and respected. Thus, protecting the moral rights of the Creator is
an important prerequisite for advancing innovation and diversity in society.
Moral Rights, as defined in Article 5 paragraph 1 of the Copyright Law of 2014, are
rights that are attached forever to their creators, and these rights cannot be eliminated or lost.
It refers to the essential rights that the creator has to his work, which lasts forever. In the
context of moral rights, creators have the right to use their name on copies used to share their
work with the public, including the right to use pseudonyms or aliases, change products in a
publicly appropriate manner, change the title and subtitle of their work, and protect their
rights in the event of distortion, mutilation, alteration, or other actions that may damage their
honor or reputation. This moral right belongs to the creator himself and is not transferable to
third parties.
Conversely, the economic rights associated with copyright will pass to a third party if
the copyright is transferred. This means that when a copyright holder decides to transfer his
or her copyright to another person or entity, the economic rights associated with the work
belong to that party. This is the principle stipulated in Article 16 paragraph 2 of the Copyright
Law. It is important to understand the difference between these moral rights and economic
rights, as copyright transfers have different legal consequences depending on the type of
transfer made. Thus, the Copyright Law provides a clear framework for regulating moral
rights and economic rights in order to provide appropriate protection for creators and
copyright holders.
The transfer of economic rights in the context of copyright can occur through two
different modes of action, namely through endowments, grants, and wills or through written
agreements (Yusra et al., 2022). These two modes have different legal consequences, especially
in terms of the transfer of economic rights.
First, if the transfer of economic rights occurs through endowments, grants, or wills,
then the economic rights to the work fully pass to the copyright holder. In this case, the
copyright owner has full control over all economic rights related to his work, which includes
the obligation to reward the creator in the form of royalties. The legal consequences arising
from the transfer of economic rights in this context are based on legal regulations governing
endowments, grants, or wills.
Second, if the transfer of economic rights occurs through a written agreement, then the
economic rights will transfer to the copyright holder based on the agreement contained in the
agreement. In this case, each party involved in the agreement must comply with the agreed
rights, obligations and conditions. This agreement usually has a predetermined period of time,
and the copyright holder is entitled to receive payment according to the terms agreed in the
agreement. It creates a clear legal framework for regulating the economic rights and
obligations of the parties involved in the transfer of copyright through written agreements.
Given these differences, the legal system creates a solid basis for safeguarding the
rights of creators and copyright holders, and provides a transparent framework for the transfer
of economic rights in a variety of contexts and situations involving copyright.
The UUHC regulations, however, only outline the process of transferring copyright.
Any transfer of copyright is seen as the result of a contract, and interpretation, such as this
greatly affects the ability of the copyright holder to manage economic rights. The legal
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
7084 | Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023
relationship that develops in theory begins with various legal activities that culminate in
various legal outcomes. The amount of control granted to a non-creator under copyright
depends on the type of activity undertaken to transfer it. In terms of economic rights, viz. As
a giver of wakaf, hibah, and zakat, the copyright holder can fully or partially according to the
creator's wishes, And, if the right is transferred by agreement, it can also be based on the
agreement reached between the inventor and the transferee of the right.
In the inheritance system, the conditions listed in Article 2 of the Civil Code are called
rechtsfictie (basic things). Another interpretation that can be taken from the provisions of
Article 2 of the Civil Code states that a child has subjective rights from birth until death,
although it should be noted that not every child has the power to give consent or perform legal
acts. The preceding descriptions and explanations should be debated for legal clarity. What is
the typical age limit for children to be considered adults capable of performing legal acts?
In almost every topic of law, there is a law of authority, although not all legal subjects
have prowess. The ability to do the right thing in accordance with the law is referred to as
competence. With respect to the competence of an act, the law does not regulate it definitively.
The law only partially regulates which is only claimed Incompetence in Chapter 1330 of the
Civil Code (Al-Farouqi et al., 2020).
The concept of legal competence is recognized by positive law. According to MM
Djojodigoeno, the ability to perform legal acts is the single factor that distinguishes between
adults and immature people. People who are unable to assess and enforce their own interests
are those who have not been able to enforce the law. Legally capable persons are those who
can analyze risks and protect their own interests. Actions that give rise to rights and
obligations are referred to as legal actions themselves. There are two kinds of legal actions,
namely unilateral legal actions and two-party legal actions (Awatari & Purwanto, 2020).
Positive law sets an age limit for a person to be considered legally competent to protect
the rights of many people. The finesse of positive law includes a number of provisions. This
may be due to societal factors at the time the regulation was enacted. As is well known, there
are various rules that state that a child is someone under the age of eighteen. These regulations
indicate that an adult is a person over the age of eighteen.
The rule in the Compilation of Islamic Law is another rule that regulates the age of
majority. According to the Compilation of Islamic Law, a person can be considered an adult
at the age of 21 years. This applies to everyone who is not physically or mentally disabled and
has never been married. According to the Civil Code, a person is considered an adult when he
or she reaches the age of 21. If a person is married, the person is considered an adult according
to the Civil Code. Legal capacity does not apply if the individual has an impaired memory, is
deaf, or is wasteful. The size of the waste is determined by the judge's approval.
The ability to become a legal subject, especially as a supporter of rights and obligations.
In theory, everyone has subjective rights from the womb until death, as stipulated in article 2
of the Civil Code, but not all legal subjects have the ability and competence to perform legal
acts. When a child has legal capacity, he/she has the ability to have subjective rights, including
the ability to perform legal activities and give or not give permission (Fetum, 2021).
A different right is granted by the provisions of article 2 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the
Civil Code, which states that a child in the womb of a woman is deemed to have been born if
it is in the child's interest and the child in the womb dies at birth or is deemed to have never
existed before or dies when born, which means that the child already has the rights of a legal
subject. It is clear from the previous article that what is regulated in the Civil Code, especially
article 2, provides legal protection to children still in the womb of their biological mother, as
well as the rights that will be enjoyed when the child is born.
Article 1320 of the Civil Code regulates the essential requirements that must be met in
order for an agreement to be considered valid (Lalaar et al., 2023; Sari & Kusuma, 2020). There
are four main conditions that must be met. The agreement of the parties to the agreement is
the first condition. All parties involved must agree with the content of the agreement and enter
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023 | 7085
into a voluntary agreement. Then, the condition of the capacity to enter into an agreement
emphasizes that the parties involved must have legal capacity, namely reaching the age of
majority in accordance with applicable law and have adequate mental abilities. In addition, an
agreement must have a clear and specific object. The object of the agreement should be easily
identifiable, and all parties involved should understand well what the object of the agreement
is. Finally, the cause or purpose of the agreement must be lawful. This means that the purpose
of the agreement must not involve activities that are illegal, unethical, or violate applicable
law. Article 1320 of the Civil Code also limits the ability of certain individuals to enter into
agreements. This includes those who have not reached the age of majority, individuals who
have been subject to legal sanctions, and in some cases, women in a legal context. This
regulation aims to protect individuals who may not have the capacity to make legal decisions
independently, while ensuring that all agreements made are valid and in accordance with
applicable law.
According to the description above, the difference in age limit as a condition for being
categorized as capable of acting according to the law or can be said to be capable of performing
legal acts has implications and has juridical consequences for whether or not a person who has
the status of a legal subject as a bearer of legal rights and obligations, as well as the validity of
all legal actions.
Conclusion
Because copyright is regulated sui generis by separate laws, so now Copyright Law
No. 28 Year 2014, can not be said that the nature of copyright property is the same as the
property according to BW. The procedure for transferring copyright is not entirely based on
BW regulations because it is sui generis. Even the contractual independence that is regulated
by Book III BW has its limitations. One of these restrictions is the prohibition of freedom that
clashes with the law, in this case the Copyright Act. The transfer of copyright can be
transferred or transferred means only economic rights, while moral rights remain attached to
the creator. As long as the creator is alive moral rights can not be transferred, but in its
implementation can be transferred by other reasons in accordance with the provisions of the
Act which is contained in Article 5 paragraph (2) of the Copyright Act. Copyright can be
transferred due to: inheritance, grants, endowments, wills, written agreements, and other
causes justified by law in accordance with the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (2) of the
Copyright Act. Transfer of Copyright to be stronger and follow then there must be an
agreement in it, so that all parties can perform their obligations and get their rights. Regarding
the transfer of copyright by early childhood, early childhood is seen as not a legal subject so
that it is not yet capable of performing legal acts, therefore in the process of transferring the
child guardianship is required by the court. When viewed from the Civil Code Article 1320
transfer of Copyright to early childhood implications violate Article 1320 of the Civil Code
which explains that the transfer must be made by legal subjects who are capable, this means
that children are classified as subjects who are not yet capable so violate the subjective
elements of the agreement. The agreement can be canceled, but it is still considered valid if
there is no determination of nullity from the judge.
Acknowledgment
We extend our deepest gratitude to all parties involved in the completion of this
research. Countless individuals and groups have provided invaluable support, and though we
cannot name each one individually, your contributions have been truly meaningful to the
success of this endeavor. May the kindness and hard work of all involved serve as an enduring
inspiration for greater achievements in the future. Thank you for the unwavering effort and
encouragement that has been bestowed upon us.
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
7086 | Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023
References
Achmad, A., & Roisah, K. (2020). Status Hukum Ghostwriter dan Pemegang Hak Cipta dalam
Plagiarisme Menurut Undang-Undang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana
(Udayana). https://www.academia.edu/download/84325674/35897.pdf
Akbar, A., Suryanti, N., & Suryamah, A. (2022). Hubungan Dan Kedudukan Hukum Atas
Special Purpose Vehicle Dalam Transaksi Pembiayaan Proyek. Jurnal Sains Sosio
Humaniora, 6(1), 9871003. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v6i1.21224
Al-Farouqi, A., Sutrisno, N., & Riswandi, B. A. (2020). The Law of Anime: Otaku, Copyright,
Fair Use, and It’s Infringements in Indonesia. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, 3(1),
4260. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol3.iss1.art3
Arsadi, I. M. S. W., Ardhya, S. N., & Adnyani, N. K. S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap
Karya Intelektual Karakter Fiksi Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor
28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 5(2), 644662.
https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i2.51692
Arsalova, K. (2023). Fenomena Copy-Paste Desain Fesyen Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-
Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta (Studi Perbandingan Hukum
Kekayaan Intelektual Negara Amerika Serikat, Korea Selatan Dan Perancis). Jurnal
Privat Law, 11(1), 130139. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.47219
Asmaul, A., Karim, K., & Adhilia, L. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak
Cipta Melalui Internet. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, Query date: 2023-10-26 15:14:52.
http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/254
Asril, F. A., Permata, R. R., & Ramli, T. S. (2021). Perlindungan Hak Cipta pada Platform
Digital Kreatif YouTube. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 10(2), 146162.
https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v10i2.10368
Awatari, P. D. C., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hasil Karya
Seni Transformasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Cipta. Kertha Semaya: Journal
Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 161169. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v09.i01.p14
Baskoro, S. (2021). Hak Cipta Menurut Hukum Islam.
Bosio, E. (2021). Global human resources or critical global citizens? An inquiry into the
perspectives of Japanese university educators on global citizenship education.
Prospects, Query date: 2023-08-10 09:00:16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09566-6
Chandrika, R., & Dewanta, R. (2019). Kajian Kritis Konsep Pembajakan di Bidang Hak Cipta
Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Rechtidee, Query date: 2023-10-26
15:14:52. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/304320801.pdf
Dahen, L. D. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Cipta Berdasarkan
Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. EKSEKUSI, 3(2), Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.24014/je.v3i2.13358
Dana, G. A. W., Mangku, D. G. S., & Sudiatmaka, K. (2021). Implementasi Uu Nomor 28 Tahun
2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Terkait Peredaran Cd Musik Bajakan Di Wilayah Kabupaten
Buleleng. Ganesha Law Review, 2(2), 109120. https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v2i2.203
Destyarini, N., Dewi, I. P. D. S., Savitri, R., & Naridha, A. N. F. (2022). Copyright Issue On
Music Back Sound Usage On Youtube Video. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(1), 116.
https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.1.2022.1-16
Endria, H. A. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Praktik Pengalihan Hak Asuh Anak Kepada
Orangtua Asuh Di Pati Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Kekuasaan, 3(1), 93146.
https://doi.org/10.24167/jhpk.v3i1.5775
Fetum, F. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pencipta dan Pemegang Hak Cipta Konten
Kreator Instagram. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 2(2), 8799.
https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7163
Gultom, H. D. A., Sukardi, E., & Waileruny, S. (2021). Kajian Terhadap Hak Eksklusif Atas
Jingle Dari Perspektif Hak Cipta Dan Merek. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 135
150. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3978
Legal Aspect of Copyright Transfer by Early Childhood
DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5536
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 2023 | 7087
Lalaar, R. R., Silubun, Y. L., Mote, H. H. F., & Fenetiruma, R. P. (2023). Legalitas Hak Cipta
Atas Konten Eksploitasi Anak Dalam Media Sosial Tiktok. Jurnal Restorative Justice,
7(1), 7180. https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v7i1.5262
Maha, M. A. R., & Harahap, A. M. (2023). Analisis peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-
undang nomor 2 tahun 2022 tentang cipta kerja terkait ketentuan waktu istirahat bagi
pekerja/buruh. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 346.
https://doi.org/10.29210/1202322949
Mahendra, P. R. A., & Kartika, I. M. (2020). Memperkuat Kesadaran Bela Negara Dengan Nilai-
Nilai Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Kekinian. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Undiksha, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v8i3.28600
Nofianti, A., & Bustani, S. (2022). Perlindungan Terhadap Pencipta Aplikasi Cxm (Studi
Putusan Nomor 60/Pdt.Sus-Hak Cipta/2020). Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(2), 249260.
https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v4i2.13598
Puspitasari, R. (2022). Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual
Property, 4(1), 11232. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art1
Putra, Muh. A. D. (2021). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Penerbit Terhadap Buku Ciptaan Yang
Telah Menjadi Public Domain. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, 3(2), 8192.
https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol3.iss2.art5
Putra, T. P. B., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2023). Fungsi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Industri Kecil Alkohol di Desa
Bekonang Kecamatan Mojolaban Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Discretie, 4(1), 212219.
https://doi.org/10.20961/jd.v4i1.73831
Sari, N. I. P., & Kusuma, A. A. G. A. D. (2020). Pengaturan Perlindungan Hak Cipta Permainan
Video. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(8), 11291137.
https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i08.p01
Shilvia, C. V., Sabrina, A. S., & shabarullah, shabarullah. (2022). The Concept Of Copyright In
Civil Law And Islam. Al-Mudharabah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah, 3(2), 126
152. https://doi.org/10.22373/al-mudharabah.v3i2.3424
Simatupang, K. M. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak Cipta dalam Ranah Digital.
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(1), Article 1.
https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.67-80
Syamsiah, S. (2021). Jual beli buku bajakan secara online perspektif hukum positif dan hukum ekonomi
syariah [Diploma, IAIN BENGKULU]. http://repository.iainbengkulu.ac.id/5396/
Yusra, M., Pratama, M., & Kholis, N. (2022). Studi Bibliometrik Pada Penelitian Wakaf Untuk
Pengentasan Kemiskinan Tahun 1995-2022. At-Thullab Jurnal Mahasiswa.
https://journal.uii.ac.id/thullab/article/view/23889
Zarnuji, Z. Z. (2020). Legal Protection Regarding Names and Visual Artists in the World of
Writing from a Copyright Perspective. Journal of Creativity Student, 5(1), 4364.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jcs.v5i1.36287
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The goal to be achieved through this research is to identify, assess and analyze legal protection for creators and copyright holders of Instagram creator content, Copyright Holders and Instagram Content Creators get legal protection for creations and content created based on their original thoughts or ideas and creativity. into the Instagram platform in Indonesia. The type of research used to write this thesis uses normative legal research in the preparation of this scientific paper with a descriptive method, especially related to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and other supporting regulations. From the results of the research using the above method, the authors get answers to the existing problems that Copyright Holders and Instagram Content Creators get legal protection for creations and content created based on their original thoughts or ideas and creativity into the Instagram platform in Indonesia. In addition, the Copyright Law provides protection related to moral rights and economic rights, moral rights and economic rights are exclusive rights owned by creators or content creators that must be protected by the Copyright Law. Criminal sanctions for copyright infringement have provided legal protection for creators and copyright holders of Instagram creator content, this is regulated in the Copyright Law, which contains 8 (eight) provisions relating to criminal sanctions for copyright infringement, namely Article 112 to Article 119 of the Copyright Act. In this case, it is clear that there is a threat of criminal sanctions for people who deliberately steal other people's content, but the lack of legal information for Instagram content creators has made it impossible for people to be convicted under these provisions.DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7163
Article
Full-text available
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengamati Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang cipta kerja terkait ketentuan waktu istirahat bagi pekerja/buruh serta untuk mengetahui berbagai macam dampak keterkaitan ketentuan waktu istirahat bagi pekerja/buruh. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian hukum (teoritis) dengan mengacu pada kepustakaan yaitu penelitian hukum melalui penelaahan sumber-sumber literatur sekunder atau yang disebut dengan pencarian literatur hukum. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan oleh penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan adalah tipe penelitian yuridis normatif. Pemerintah meresmikan Perppu tentang Cipta Kerja No. 2 Tahun 2022. Perppu ini dikembangkan menggunakan berbagai metode hukum. Ketentuan telah diatur di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada memang dimungkinkan, untuk memenuhi kepentingan dan kebutuhan pengusaha atau pemberi kerja seperti pengaturan dalam hal kerja lembur, waktu istirahat dan cuti, juga bekerja pada waktu hari libur resmi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian kerja adalah perjanjian antara pekerja/buruh dengan pengusaha atau pemberi kerja yang memuat syarat syarat kerja, hak, dan kewajiban para pihak. Untuk dapat meningkatkan perlindungan kepada kepada pekerja, maka perlu dibuat aturan yang spesifik terhadap waktu kerja dan waktu istirahat menyesuaikan pola kerja untuk pekerja. Pemerintah telah membuat aturan turunan yang mengatur pola kerja bisa dibuat aturan turunan yang spesifik untuk memberikan perlindungan kepada Pekerja, khususnya aturan mengenai waktu kerja dan waktu istirahat yang menyesuaikan pola kerja.
Article
Full-text available
p align="center"> Abstract This legal research identifies legal problems related to the phenomenon of copy-paste design of fashion that happens in the fashion industry through Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning the Copyright and do a comparison of the legal protection of fashion design in the United States, South Korea, and France. This legal research uses descriptive normative research methods. The result of this legal research is the protection of Copyright that the creators have is already set in the current regulations and a comparison of the legal protection of fashion design can be said to be balanced with a state of the United States and South Korea but are still lagging behind the French. Keywords: Copyright Protection; Fashion Design; Comparative Law Abstrak Penulisan hukum ini mengidentifikasi problematika hukum terkait fenomena copy-paste desain fesyen yang terjadi di industri mode melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan melakukan perbandingan perlindungan hukum desain fesyen di negara Amerika Serikat, Korea Selatan, dan Perancis. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif bersifat deskriptif. Hasil dari penulisan hukum ini adalah perlindungan Hak Cipta terhadap pencipta sudah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku saat ini dan perbandingan perlindungan hukum atas desain fesyen dapat dikatakan seimbang dengan negara Amerikat Serikat dan Korea Selatan namun masih tertinggal dari negara Perancis. Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hak Cipta; Desain Fesyen; Perbandingan Hukum</strong
Article
Full-text available
p>Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menunjukkan aspek perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan bagi tenaga kerja pada sentra industri kecil alkohol di Desa Bekonang, Kecamatan Mojolaban, Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif preskriptif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan bahan studi pustaka dan metode silogisme deduksi sebagai teknik analisis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan penerapan perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga kerja sentra industri kecil alkohol di Desa Bekonang telah dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah pusat maupun pemerintah daerah dengan penetapan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan; Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2003 tentang Cipta Kerja; Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja; dan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Sukoharjo Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Ketenagakerjaan. Kepadaan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku untuk melindungi tenaga kerja sentra industri kecil alkohol di Desa Bekonang telah memadai hak dan kebutuhan perlindungan hukum tenaga kerja dengan penetapan norma hukum yang terintegrasi. </p
Article
Full-text available
In this scientific article, the author will discuss the latest problems related to the world of fanfic genre authorship which is currently on the rise because of the rising prestige of world artists and more specifically related to the rise of the Korean entertainment industry as trendsetters in various sectors, especially for book lovers or who like to read books, Fanfiction works are now starting to run rampant on various social media platforms, namely the most talked about and the most impactful is blue bird social media or twitter, many new writers who produce fanfiction works based on artists or idols in the form of diverse writings, Idols and artists are used as visualizations and inspirations although sometimes the author also makes his own groove or character, when the writing rises to the top of trending and get a lot of attention then book publishers are now starting to glance at the existence of twitter fanfiction so that initially the fanfiction is only for entertainment then now it begins to be commercialized in the form of physical books. However, the problem that there are many authors and publishers do not pay attention to the ethics of doing business or the rules or laws that apply related to copyright and intellectual property rights reflected from promotion to the creation of physical books still associate the visuals and names of famous artists or idols so as to indirectly increase the price figure and the number of enthusiasts.
Article
Full-text available
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bahwa karya intelektual karakter fiksi secara independen perlu mendapatkan perlindungan hukum dan masuk ke dalam objek hak cipta. Rumusan masalah yang diajukan yaitu (1) Bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap karakter fiksi di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang – Undang no 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta? dan (2) Bagaimana perlindungan hukum karakter fiksi di Negara Amerika apabila di bandingkan dengan perlindungan hukum karakter fiksi yang ada di Indonesia? Penelitian ini merupakan perbandingan hukum antara hukum hak cipta yang ada di negara Indonesia dengan hukum yang mengatur tentang karakter fiksi yang ada di negara Amerika. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta karakter fiksi hanya bisa dilindungi jika karakter fiksi tersebut masih menjadi satu kesatuan dengan naskah cerita dan diwujudkan ke dalam karya cipta sinematografi, buku cerita, dan permainan video. Sedangkan negara Amerika dimana peraturan merek dagang, hak cipta, dan hak hukum publisitas mendorong penulis untuk memahami dan mengembangkan karakter fiksi independen dan menawarkannya kepada publik untuk dinikmati dalam berbagai bentuk media dan barang dagangan terkait karakter fiksi.
Article
Full-text available
Perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi telah memberi perubahan dalam kehidupan. Teknologi yang memberi dampak cukup besar adalah teknologi dunia internet, adanya internet mengenalkan masyarakat kepada dunia digital. Tentu saja perkembangan ini juga mempengaruhi hukum, terutama hukum terkait hak cipta. Karya cipta yang dahulu masih berbentuk tradisional kini dapat diubah menjadi bentuk digital atau membuat karya cipta digital. Dalam hal ini hukum hak cipta yang sebelumnya melindungi karya cipta bentuk tradision haruslah berkembang dapat mencakup melindungi karya cipta digital salah satunya dengan cara berkolaborasi dengan teknologi. Rumusan masalah yang diangkat ialah bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap ciptaan dalam era digital dan bagaimana implikasi pengaruh teknologi pengaman terhadap perlindungan hukum karya cipta digital. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Bahwa perkembangan teknologi membuat karya cipta dapat diubah menjadi bentuk digital, hal ini memberikan keuntungan seperti mudahnya penyebaran/pengumuman karya cipta namun disisi lain pelanggaran juga semakin mudah terjadi. Menghadapi perkembangan ini WIPO mengeluarkan dua konvensi internasional yang dikenal sebagai WIPO Internet Treaties yang diadopsi oleh beberapa negara. Negara Indonesia dalam hukum positif hak ciptanya telah mengimplementasikan perlindungan karya cipta digital dalam pasal-pasalnya. Saran penulis dalam kajian ini perlu lebih diperkaya hukum hak cipta kita perihal perlindungan karya cipta digital.
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRAKHak atas kekayaan intelektual (HAKI) adalah hak kebendaan, hak atas sesuatu benda yang bersumber dari hasil kerja otak dan hasil kerja rasio manusia yang disebut juga dengan intelectual property rights. Ruang lingkup HAKI meliputi, hak cipta, hak paten, hak merek, rahasia dagang, hak desain industri, hak perlindungan varietas tanaman dan hak desain tata letak sirkuit terpadu. Dalam hal ini penulis menitikberatkan pembahasan HAKI di bidang hak cipta. Sangat penting dipahami mengenai pencipta dan pemegang hak cipta. Hukum tidak hanya memberikan perlindungan kepada pencipta tetapi juga kepada pemegang hak cipta. Artinya, pemegang hak cipta tidak hanya oleh pencipta saja tetapi juga bisa dimiliki oleh pihak lain melalui pengalihan hak sebagai salah satu wujud hak mutlak pencipta.Dari tindakan pengalihan hak cipta tersebut akan menimbulkan konsekuensi yuridis yang berbeda bagi pemegang hak cipta yang diperoleh melalui pengalihan serta bentuk jaminan perlindungan hukum bagi mereka. Hal ini sangat terkait dengan kewenangan bertindak bagi pemegang hak cipta kedepannya baik berupa hak moral maupun hak ekonomi. Hubungan hukum yang terjadi diawali dengan perbuatan hukum yang berbeda sehingga konsekuensi yuridisnya pun berbeda. Seberapa besar penguasaan pemegang hak cipta yang bukan pencipta tergantung dari bentuk tindakan pengalihan yang dilakukan. Begitu juga halnya dengan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak cipta melalui lisensi dimana tidak semua pemegang lisensi dapat dikatakan sebagai pemegang hak cipta.
Article
Perkembangan media sosial sangat pesat karena setiap orang ingin memiliki media mereka sendiri. TikTok sebagai salah satu aplikasi hiburan yang saat ini sangat populer di kalangan remaja Indonesia berusia 13 hingga 21 tahun. TikTok juga memberikan dampak positif bagi remaja yang mungkin belum banyak diketahui orang. Atas dasar keuntungan ekonomi maka pengguna Tiktok memproduksi video yang menggunakan anak-anak terlebih khusus anak-anak disabilitas sebagai pemeran dengan tujuan mendapat apresiasi dari penonton berupa komentar dan like pada video tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana legalitas hak cipta atas konten eksploitasi anak dalam media Tiktok. Metode penelitian yang digunakan oleh penulis ialah penelitian hukum normativ atau biasa disebut normative law research. Penelitian hukum normativ merupakan bentuk penelitian hukum yang menggunakan studi kasus normativ berupa pencarian atas bentuk perilaku hukum seperti kajian undang-undang. Hasil penelitian yang dilakukan penulis bahwa Legalitas hak cipta harus memenuhi beberapa kondisi yang telah diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang hak cipta, yakni otomatis berdasarkan prinsip deklaratif, ciptaan diwujudkan dalam bentuk nyata dan tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Atas video eksploitasi anak yang diunggah pada aplikasi Tiktok, secara mutatis mutandis bertentangan dengan Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang perlindungan anak. Dalam Undang-undang tersebut melarang bentuk eksploitasi kepada anak baik berupa eksploitasi ekonomi, sosial dan seksual, atas tindakan tersebut, seseorang akan mendapat sanksi pidana. Dengan demikian maka video eksploitasi anak pada media Tiktok tidak akan mendapatkan hak cipta, karena tidak memenuhi kondisi tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan.
Article
Anak merupakan generasi penerus bangsa yang mempunyai hak atas keberlangsungan hidup dan jaminan atas hukum. Setiap anak yang ada dalam suatu keluarga merupakan tanggung jawab setiap orang tua. Akan tetapi, tak jarang terdapat orang tua yang tidak mampu mewujudkan tanggung jawab tersebut, sehingga anak dititipkan kepada orangtua asuh seperti halnya yang terjadi di Pati, Jawa Tengah. Di daerah ini, ditemukan adanya fenomena orangtua asuh yang disebabkan oleh adanya masalah ekonomi yang membuat para orang tua kandung pergi untuk merantau untuk bekerja. Kondisi ini tentu memunculkan sebuah problem seperti kurangnya kasih sayang yang dirasakan oleh anak-anaknya. Atas dasar tersebut, penelitian ini ingin mengetahui secara lebih mendalam terkait dengan praktik pengalihan hak asuh anak dari orangtua kandung keoada orangtua asuh di Pati, konsekuensi pengalihan dari hak asuh bagi orangtua dan anak asuh, serta praktik pengalihan hak asuh di mata hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode pendekatan kualitatif, yaitu dengan menghimpun data mengenai prosedur pelaksanaan pengasuhan anak dan pertimbangan hukum dalam pengasuhan anak. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan metode wawancara. Sedangkan data sekunder dilakukan dengan studi pustaka. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode analisa kualitatif, yaitu menganalisa data sesuai dengan informasi dan teori-teori yang dipilih. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, terdapat dua cara praktik pengalihan hak asuh anak, yaitu dengan membuat perjanjian secara tertulis dan hanya membuat perjanjian secara lisan. Praktik pengalihan hak asuh anak yang ada di Pati ini betentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan karena hanya berdasar pada hukum adat setempat. Hal ini juga tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 7 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 44 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pelaksanaan Pengasuhan Anak yang menyebutkan bahwa pengasuhan anak memerlukan izin dari Dinas Sosial setempat. Penelitian ini juga memperoleh hasil bahwa, hak dan kewajiban yang dilakukan oleh orangtua asuh maupun anak asuh telah sesuai dengan yang tercantum dalam Pasal 11 PP Nomor 44 Tahun 2017 dan Pasal 26 ayat (1) UU Perlindungan Anak. Dari pelaksanaan praktik pengalihan hak asuh anak di Pati ini menyebabkan beberapa dampak sosial, seperti terjadinya pelanggaran terhadap UU yang berlaku terkait pengasuhan anak, mengakibatkan empat dari lima orang tua kandung lepas dari tanggung jawab yang dimilikinya.