Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Open Peer Review on Qeios
Quantum Resonance with the Mind: a Comparative Analysis
of Buddhism's Eighth Consciousness, Quantum Holography
and Jung's Collective Unconscious
David Leong1
1 University of Canberra
Funding: No specific funding was received for this work.
Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.
Abstract
This interdisciplinary exploration discusses the intricate conceptual linkages among Buddhism’s Eighth State of
Consciousness, Quantum Holography, and the Jungian Collective Unconscious. Central to this study is examining the
Eighth Consciousness in Buddhist thought—a realm that transcends the conventional sensory and mental states to
connect with a more universal and profound awareness. Drawing parallels, Quantum Holography posits that every part
of the universe retains information about the whole, much like a hologram. This notion seemingly mirrors the Jungian
concept of the Collective Unconscious, which postulates a shared reservoir of memories and ideas across humanity.
The paper contends that the intricate dance of photons, oscillating between particle and wave states, mediates
perception through resonance and hints at a multi-layered consciousness stratum that mirrors the vast, enigmatic
quantum reality expanse. The study illuminates the intersections and divergences among these frameworks through
meticulous comparative analysis, positing that an integrative understanding of quantum theories and Buddhist wisdom
can unravel the human psyche’s profound depths. By weaving Eastern philosophies with the Western psychological
and quantum theoretical tapestry, the discourse unveils a multifaceted consciousness comprehension, championing
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 1/24
integrative approaches as invaluable tools for decoding the mind and universe's enigmatic interplay from a quantum
viewpoint.
David Leong
Charisma University
david.leong@charisma.edu.eu
Keywords: Buddhism, Quantum theory, Jungian Collective Unconscious, Quantum Resonance, Mind.
Introduction
The profound interconnections between consciousness, quantum mechanics, and metaphysical insights open pathways
to a nuanced understanding of the human psyche. Amidst this complex web of interdisciplinary studies, the convergence
of Buddhism’s Eighth State of Consciousness and Jung’s (1936) Collective Unconscious provides a rich tapestry of
thought, drawing parallels between the innermost layers of human cognition and the vast expanse of universal wisdom.
While empirical explorations into consciousness continue to expand, a space beyond the tangible exists—an enigmatic
realm that transcends the known. Here, Buddhist thought and Jungian theory intersect, offering alternative lenses to
perceive and interpret the anomalies of consciousness (Liang, 2012; Moacanin, 2003).
At the core of this discourse is the indispensable function exerted by photons in eliciting consciousness, thereby sculpting
and demarcating the contours of perceived reality. Photons, as elementary particles of light, are integral to the processes
underpinning human perception and consciousness, contributing significantly to our understanding and interpretation of
reality. These quantized energy packets interact intricately with human sensory systems, facilitating the emergence and
awareness of consciousness and, consequently, playing a crucial role in framing the individual’s interpretative perception
of their surrounding environment. Here, the dynamic interplay between photons and consciousness is recognized as a
cardinal point of inquiry, opening avenues for deeper exploration into the nuanced mechanisms through which
consciousness is invoked, sustained, and defined in our interactive engagement with reality. The role of photons, in this
respect, is not merely ancillary; instead, it is central, bearing significant implications for the academic investigation into the
nature of consciousness and what is apprehended as reality.
From the Buddhist perspective, reality emerges not as a fixed entity but through the continuous unfolding of
consciousness, traversing from the most immediate sense perceptions to the deepest, universal layers of awareness
(McWilliams, 2011). Echoing this sentiment, Jung’s (1936) Collective Unconscious encapsulates shared memories and
ideas, a reservoir of human experience that stretches beyond individual cognition.
In the Yogācāra school of Mahayana Buddhism, there exists a nuanced classification termed the "Eight Consciousnesses"
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 2/24
(Sanskrit: aṣṭa vijñānakāyāḥ) (Shun’ei & Tagawa, 2009). This schema, illustrated in Figure 2, delineates the quintet of
sensory perceptions, and three distinct forms of cognitive consciousness further complement these: the primary mental
consciousness (manovijñāna), the tainted or distorted mental consciousness (kliṣṭamanovijñāna), and the foundational
store-house consciousness (ālāyavijñāna) (Cao, 2022). Of significant note is the eighth consciousness, the ālāyavijñāna,
which is postulated to function as the foundational bedrock for the preceding seven forms to explain the working of karma
(Meynard, 2011). This pivotal consciousness is believed to retain the latent imprints (vāsanāḥ) of antecedent experiences.
Such retained impressions subsequently act as seminal points (bīja) that influence and shape future karmic trajectories
within the present existence and in successive rebirths.
The concept of ālāyavijñāna, often translated as ‘storehouse consciousness’, delves into the realm of subterranean mental
activities that persistently transpire across an individual's lifespan and, within the Buddhist paradigm, across multiple
incarnations. This concept encapsulates the essence of an individual’s persistent lineage, intertwined with the accrued
potential of their karma, thereby justifying its appellation as a ‘storehouse’. Foundational to the Yogācāra school of Indian
Buddhism—termed ‘Practitioners of Yoga’—the doctrine of ālāyavijñāna stands alongside other cardinal principles such as
Consciousness-Only (vijñapti-mātra) and the Three Natures (trisvabhāva). Between the 3rd and 5th centuries CE, the
Yogācāra school thrived in India, subsequently impacting subsequent Buddhist derivations, especially within Tibetan and
East Asian traditions. The conceptual evolution of ālaya-vijñāna mirrors this historical trajectory. Historically, the
origination of ālāyavijñāna was a resolution to a set of quandaries emerging from the Abhidharmic assertion of the
transient nature of all cognitive processes. The primary concerns addressed included the sustainability of karmic potential,
latent afflictions (kleśa), the phased journey towards enlightenment, and the enigma of reincarnation. As this subliminal
stratum of consciousness was clarified, it offered a more profound elucidation concerning the fabricated nature of
perception, encapsulated in the term vijñapti-mātra, and the shared reality of our experiential universe (bhājana-loka).
Significantly, since the ālāyavijñāna epitomizes the repository of antecedent karmic deeds, its transformation or
purification becomes paramount on the pilgrimage to spiritual emancipation, subsequently morphing into the ‘stainless
consciousness’ (amala-vijñāna). Certain canonical texts even draw parallels between it and tathāgathagarbha, or ‘Buddha-
nature’—a linkage further expounded upon by subsequent Tibetan and Chinese Buddhist scholars, in tandem with other
Yogācāra ideologies they assimilated. In contemporary discourse, parallels have been drawn between ālaya-vijñāna and
the unconscious cognitive processes underscored in depth psychology and cognitive scientific theories.
In response to the burgeoning empirical corpus on phenomena affiliated with consciousness and informed by Buddhist
postulations from the 3rd to 5th centuries, this study seeks to elucidate the confluences between quantum resonance,
consciousness, and ālayavijñāna. Such a confluence necessitates an expansive intellectual foray that synergistically
melds the Buddhist concept of the Eighth State of Consciousness with Jung's Collective Unconscious. This paper’s
central proposition asserts that the emergence of reality constitutes a dynamic and fluid evolution, significantly mediated
by the agency of photons, which inherently carry informational content. This unfolding process of reality is intricately
tethered to the delicate interplay between consciousness and its multifaceted interfaces, which extend from immediate,
tangible elements to elusive, ethereal dimensions. In their dualistic nature, the photons oscillate between discrete,
quantifiable particles and waves of latent potentialities (Mandal, 2021). As particles, photons bear specific information
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 3/24
units, contributing to concrete and observable reality.
In contrast, their wave-like aspect unveils a spectrum of possibilities, subtly influencing the perceptual field and
interpretation of reality in alignment with the act of observation. Consequently, the perception and understanding of reality
are conceived as dynamic and perpetually evolving phenomena, intricately underpinned by the nuanced interaction of
consciousness with photons' informational and dual aspects. This discourse necessitates a deeper academic exploration
into these complex interactions, as they offer pivotal insights into the nuanced, continuous emergence and transformation
of reality, with photons serving as integral informational and mediational agents in this information extraction process.
Diving deeper into the concept of ālayavijñāna, it is characterized as a subliminal reservoir of consciousness that
perpetually accumulates experiential imprints across an individual’s lifespan and, within the Buddhist doctrine, over
successive lifecycles (Hershock, 2023). Jung's Collective Unconscious articulated similar notions as an aggregate for
immediate sensory perceptions and deeper, latent predispositions—a realm abundant with archetypes and shared human
experiences that transcend individual consciousness.
Furthermore, introducing the dimension of quantum resonance bridges the empirical and the metaphysical. Quantum
holography postulates that every part of the universe contains information about the whole, echoing the Buddhist principle
of interdependence and non-duality. Thus, integrating these concepts implies that individual consciousness, as epitomized
by ālayavijñāna, is not just a passive receptacle but an active participant in shaping and defining reality.
Juxtaposing this with Jung’s Collective Unconscious reinforces that shared, universal symbols and narratives play an
integral role in this process. The intersections between these varied domains underscore a foundational tenet: that the
genesis and interpretation of reality are emergent products of the multidimensional interactions of consciousness,
transcending linear confines and extending into the realm of the collective and the quantum.
Through this melding of Eastern philosophical insights and Western psychoanalytic theory, this paper explores the
multifaceted dimensions of consciousness and its pivotal role in shaping our perception of reality. In navigating the
crossroads of ālayavijñāna, quantum holography, and Jung’s Collective Unconscious, this investigation seeks to
transcend the traditional boundaries that often bifurcate spiritual, psychological, and scientific realms. The confluence of
these domains fosters a more holistic understanding of consciousness and emboldens interdisciplinary approaches,
positioning them as indispensable in unravelling the complexities of experiential reality.
Theoretically, this synthesis offers an enriched framework that challenges and refines extant paradigms in psychology,
spirituality, and quantum mechanics. By recognizing the intersections and overlaps, scholars can embark on more
nuanced and integrated inquiries, bridging divides that have traditionally fragmented these disciplines.
On a practical plane, the insights gleaned hold profound implications. For practitioners, the enhanced understanding of
consciousness can inform interventions, tapping into the deep reservoirs of the collective and the personal, while in
quantum research, the integration with consciousness can open new avenues for exploration, challenging the boundaries
of what is known and understood. Studies of consciousness and the mind focus on an evolving and “nonstationary world
in which new organismic states are continually being synthesized to form a better adaptive relationship with the
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 4/24
environment. These new states can thereupon be maintained in a stable fashion to form a substrate for the synthesis of
yet more complex states in a continuing evolutionary progression” (Grossberg, 2012, p. xiii). This paper heralds a clarion
call for a more holistic, integrated, and interdisciplinary approach to the mysteries of consciousness and reality.
Literature Review
Brain studies play a central role in this pursuit for more than the ego-centric reason that brains are the crucibles of
all human experience. The brain is a universal measurement device acting on the quantum level. Data from all of
our senses, - even a few light quanta! - are synthesized by our minds into a common dynamical coin that supports
a unitary experience, rather than a series of dislocated experiential fragments (Grossberg, 2012, p. xiv).
History and Evolution of the Eight Consciousness States and ālayavijñāna: An In-depth Analysis
The construct of the eight consciousnesses represents a sophisticated taxonomy in Buddhist thought that seeks to
unravel the multifaceted layers of human cognition and perception. Historically rooted in the traditions of the Yogācāra
school of Mahayana Buddhism, this classification captures the nuances of human consciousness from sensory
perceptions to deeper cognitive processes. The sensory consciousnesses refer to (Keng, 2019):
Sight-consciousness: Pertains to visual cognition and the interpretation of visual stimuli.
Hearing-consciousness: Concerned with auditory perception and the processing of sounds.
Smell-consciousness: Relates to olfactory perceptions and the deciphering of various odours.
Taste-consciousness: Engages with gustatory sensations, differentiating between sweet, salty, bitter, etc.
Touch-consciousness: Centres on tactile sensations, recognizing textures, temperatures, and sensations on the
skin.
Each sensory consciousness offers a unique vantage point on the external world, channelling specific kinds of sensory
information into the cognitive matrix.
In consciousness studies, mind-consciousness is the sixth state, pivotal as an integrator of sensory experiences
(Somaratne, 2021). This state is tasked with receiving, processing, and interpreting the information gleaned from the five
senses. By doing so, it crafts a synthesized, cohesive representation of one’s sensory experiences. Seen as a nexus
within the consciousness framework, the mind-consciousness adeptly bridges external sensory data with internal cognitive
frameworks. Its profound significance lies in its ability to assimilate sensory inputs and its adeptness at intertwining these
with the individual’s pre-existing cognitive structures, such as memories, aspirations, disinclinations, and creative
ideations. Thus, the mind-consciousness offers a harmonized interface between the unprocessed stimuli from the external
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 5/24
environment and an individual’s internal cognitive landscape. This dynamic interplay ensures that individuals perceive
their environment not as disjointed sensory fragments but as a unified, meaningful continuum. This pivotal role
underscores its importance in shaping one's experiential reality.
Within the schema of consciousness delineation, mano-consciousness is the seventh state, representing a more intricate
layer of cognitive engagement (Shun’ei & Tagawa, 2009). Deriving its foundational principles from Yogācāra philosophy,
this dimension of consciousness extends beyond the immediate sensory realm, venturing into the abstract, conceptual,
and even metaphysical terrains of thought.
While the previously discussed mind-consciousness acts as a platform for weaving together immediate sensory
experiences and their corresponding interpretations, mano-consciousness operates on a profound scale. Its purview
encompasses the synthesis of abstract contemplations, ethical reflections, discerning judgments, and intricate decision-
making paradigms. Within this cognitive expanse, individuals wrestle with the more significant questions of existence,
navigate the complexities of ethical conundrums, and undertake self-reflective odysseys. Positioning itself as the
epicentre of meta-cognition, the mano-consciousness transcends mere sensory integration. It prompts individuals to turn
their analytical gaze inwards, prompting self-scrutiny of one’s cognitive mechanisms, foundational beliefs, and intrinsic
thought architectures. Such a layered and deep-seated form of cognition plays a pivotal role in the human quest for
meaning, self-understanding, and philosophical exploration.
The ālaya-consciousness emerges as the eighth state and is a distinct paradigm profoundly differentiated from other
states of consciousness. Termed as the ‘storehouse consciousness’, it serves as an archival system, safeguarding the
latent traces of past experiences and, crucially, storing the foundational ‘seeds’ that have the potential to germinate into
future actions and consequences. Delving into its profound implications, the ālaya-consciousness becomes a pivotal
determinant in shaping karmic trajectories and the perpetuating cycles of life, death, and reincarnation. Upon tracing the
evolutionary lineage of these consciousness states, a noteworthy transition becomes evident: the transition from the
immediacy of tangible realities, as epitomized by sensory consciousnesses, to the expansive, intangible, and temporally
unconstrained realm of ālayavijñāna (Shun’ei & Tagawa, 2009). The ālaya-consciousness is not merely a passive
receptacle but a dynamic matrix that captures the essence of one’s existence, transcending the confines of a single
lifetime and influencing subsequent actions and reactions.
With its profound reach and depth, this unique consciousness traces its origin to the seminal doctrines and philosophical
discourses of the Yogācāra school. It is not merely a transient cognitive state fixated on the present but a temporal
continuum, amalgamating the vestiges of the past, the immediacy of the present, and the myriad possibilities of the future.
It enshrines within its depths the latent dynamics of karma, elucidating the intricate web where past actions and decisions
cast their shadow on present circumstances and inherent predispositions. It functions as a metaphysical ledger,
meticulously chronicling every thought, action, and intention, poised for manifestation under conducive conditions in
subsequent actions, situations, or incarnations.
Furthermore, the ālaya-consciousness underpins the Buddhist conceptualization of samsara, the relentless cycle of
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 6/24
existence. The intricate patterns etched within this consciousness drive the ceaseless cycle of birth, demise, and rebirth.
This cycle perseveres until enlightenment illuminates the path, enabling an escape from this karmic whirlpool.
The eight consciousness states present a panoramic view of human consciousness, blending the immediate sensory
perceptions with the vast continuum of existence. The intricate interplay between these states provides a framework to
understand human cognition, behaviour, and spiritual evolution in the Buddhist paradigm. The deep-rootedness of
ālayavijñāna offers insights into the transformative power of past experiences, emphasizing the importance of mindful
living and conscious actions. The triad of mind-consciousness, mano-consciousness, and ālaya-consciousness provides a
gradient of cognitive depth, each state delving progressively deeper into the intricacies of human cognition and existence.
Rooted in the rich philosophical tapestry, these states provide a framework to understand the multifaceted nature of
consciousness, guiding seekers on their journey towards enlightenment and ultimate truth.
Quantum Mechanics and Holography: Linkage to Consciousness Studies
In the expansive field of quantum physics, several theories have emerged that profoundly question and reshape the
traditional viewpoints on reality, space, and time (Hawking & Penrose, 2010; Plotnitsky, 2022). Particularly noteworthy are
the theories of Bohm’s (2002) ‘holomovement’ and Di Biase’s (2016) ‘holoinformational flux’. Despite echoing the theme of
universal interconnectedness and holism, both theories delineate this phenomenon through different yet equally riveting
perspectives.
The inception of a hologram, a phenomenon bearing significant relevance to these theories, is initiated when an object is
illuminated by a laser beam, thereby giving rise to a sophisticated array of wave patterns. This interference of wave
patterns encapsulates exhaustive information concerning the object’s dimensions and form. When this wave pattern is
subsequently projected, it gives birth to a three-dimensional representation of the object in space, embodying a complex
mesh of interconnected informational nodes. This paradigm of holography exhibits a phenomenal characteristic: the
encapsulation and reflection of the holistic information within each section. This characteristic is not merely an abstract
concept but has been validated mathematically and empirically, highlighting that every fragment of a holographic system
embodies information about the entire structure. This perspective not only paves the way for groundbreaking
advancements in information storage and retrieval mechanisms but also fosters a potential transformation in the approach
to consciousness studies. In this context, it could potentially cultivate a fertile ground for exploring the non-local
dimensions of consciousness, a domain where information is perceived as interwoven, transcending the boundaries of
individual, isolated entities.
The exploration and implementation of these principles are positioned to instigate a seismic shift in our conceptual
frameworks and engagements with both technological and natural ecosystems. This evolution promises to facilitate a
more profound comprehension of reality's complex and interconnected fabric, thus nurturing an environment where
technological advancements and natural systems are perceived and engaged through a lens of intricate
interconnectedness and interdependency.
Bottom of Form
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 7/24
Bohm (2002) introduced a theoretical framework that features reality's interconnected and holistic nature. His theory,
rooted in the quantum realm, postulates that an underlying, more primary layer of reality lies beneath our observable
universe. Bohm (2002) referred to this as the ‘implicate order’, contrasting it with the ‘explicate order’, representing the
tangible and observable phenomena of our everyday experience. Bohm (2002) advanced a comprehensive framework to
understand the quantum universe. His theory was anchored around two contrasting orders: the explicate and the
implicate. The explicate order represents the manifest, observable realm, the reality with which our senses engage daily.
In contrast, the implicate order delves into the unmanifest, enfolded dimension where everything is intertwined in an
unbroken wholeness.
In Bohm’s (2002) conception, the universe operates like a hologram, where every segment contains information about the
entire system. This concept aligns with the characteristics of holography, as detailed earlier, where the information about
the whole system is distributed and replicated within its segments. In the implicate order, everything is interconnected
through Bohm and Peat's (2010) ‘holomovement’ (Bohm & Peat, 2010).
At the heart of the holomovement is the intricate dance between two primary orders of reality: the implicate (or enfolded)
order and the explicate (or unfolded) order. The former represents a deeper, underlying dimension of reality where
everything is interconnected in an unmanifested form, while the latter pertains to the observable, tangible manifestations
that we recognize in our everyday experiences.
The holomovement is characterized by a perpetual and dynamic process of unfolding and enfolding. In this paradigm, the
tangible, observable phenomena of the explicate order are seen as emergent properties that unfold from the deeper,
interconnected web of the implicate order. However, this emergence is not a one-way process. The entities and
phenomena of the explicate order continuously fold back or ‘enfold’ into the implicate, maintaining a fluid and cyclical
relationship between the two orders. Bohm and Peat’s (2010) conceptualization challenges the traditionally linear and
fragmented understanding of the universe. Instead of viewing entities and phenomena as isolated occurrences, the
holomovement underscores the inherent interconnectedness and interdependence that pervades reality. Every
observable phenomenon, from the minutest particle to vast cosmic structures, is seen as a manifestation emerging from
the holistic backdrop of the implicate order. This continuous flux between manifestation and unmanifest potentiality is what
gives rise to the term ‘holomovement’.
Beyond its scientific implications, the concept of holomovement also holds profound philosophical and existential
connotations. It posits a universe where individual entities are not merely isolated constructs but are deeply intertwined
facets of a singular, coherent, and dynamic whole. Such a viewpoint has significant implications for various disciplines,
from physics and cosmology to consciousness studies and social sciences. Bohm and Peat’s (2010) holomovement offers
a transformative lens through which to perceive and engage with the universe. It champions a fluid, interconnected reality
perpetually in motion, emphasizing the deep-rooted relationships between the manifest and the unmanifest, the
observable and the potential.
Di Biase’s (2016) work introduces another dimension to understanding the universe’s interconnected fabric. His concept of
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 8/24
‘holoinformational flux1’ is reminiscent of Bohm’s holomovement yet distinct in its emphasis on information as the essence
of this flow. In Di Biase’s (2016) conceptualization, the universe is not just a dynamic dance of energy and matter but is
fundamentally rooted in information. This ‘information’ is not just in the conventional sense but in a deeply quantum and
holistic manner. The holoinformational flux, therefore, posits that there exists a constant flow of quantum information,
connecting every part of the universe in a holistic and non-local manner.
While Bohm's and Di Biase’s (2016) theories advocate for an interconnected universe, their focal points differ. Bohm’s
holomovement speaks to reality's dynamic, fluid nature, underpinned by a continuous process of unfolding and enfolding
between the explicate and implicate orders. Di Biase (2016), on the other hand, leans into the informational matrix of the
universe, positing that, at its core, reality is bound by an intricate web of quantum information. Despite their distinct
emphases, the two theories can be perceived as complementary. While Bohm illuminates the dynamic nature of
existence, Di Biase (2016) accentuates the informational underpinnings of this dynamism. Together, they paint a picture
of a universe where everything is connected and part of a grand informational symphony, harmonizing in the dance of the
holomovement. This holoinformational flux essentially represents a ceaseless flow of information and energy,
underscoring the non-local nature of quantum phenomena. Non-locality, as proposed in quantum mechanics, suggests
that events happening at one location can instantaneously influence events at another distant location, without any
exchange of force or energy in the intervening space. Bohm’s theory elevates this notion, proposing that this non-local
connectedness is not just a quirky property of quantum particles but a fundamental feature of the universe.
In theoretical physics and consciousness studies, conceptualising the universe through Bohm’s (1990, 2002, 2004)
perspective opens doors to a deeper, almost mystic level of interconnectedness, elucidating a dimension where the
boundaries between the self and the universe blur. This is vividly illustrated in the process of hologram creation, a
phenomenon where the interference patterns generated by lasers encapsulate comprehensive information about the
entire system, dispersed evenly throughout its components. This occurrence illuminates a pervasive interconnectedness
intrinsic to the universe when scrutinized through Bohm’s (2002) theoretical lens. In this reality, each fragment mirrors the
whole and is intimately intertwined, orchestrated by a non-local, holoinformational flux embedded within the implicate order
(Bohm & Peat, 2010).
An analysis of this perspective unveils substantial repercussions for consciousness studies, particularly in examining
human perception and cognition. The elevated consciousness transcends the boundaries of individuality, morphing into
an integral component of an interconnected matrix that pervades the universe. This suggests a paradigm shift in
understanding human cognition and experiences, positing that thoughts, perceptions, and experiences are not isolated or
confined to an individual entity but are part of a vast, interconnected network that resonates with the cosmic dance of the
implicate and explicate orders.
As we delve deeper, it becomes apparent that conventional means of perceiving reality, predominantly through the five
senses, yield a version of reality that starkly contrasts with the consciousness that operates at an elevated plane. Herein
lies the potential for a transformative experience of reality, which gravitates towards a state of oneness or what Bohm
termed ‘indivisible wholeness’ (Bohm & Peat, 2010). This proposition unveils the intriguing possibility that our thoughts
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 9/24
and experiences are not merely individualistic occurrences but could potentially be resonances emanating from the
deeper, unseen layers of the implicate order. These resonances, in turn, ripple into the observable, tangible realm of the
explicate order, shaping our perceived reality.
Further contemplation on this theory underscores the dynamism and fluidity of perception and reality construction. The
interactions between objects or the phenomena perceived are not static; they imprint upon experiences, creating a
dynamic flux that moulds our understanding and interpretation of reality. The depth of this interaction is such that,
depending on the level of consciousness attained, individuals might construct different realities, each echoing their
respective levels of understanding and comprehension. This nuances the theory of reality, hinting at a universe that is not
fixed but ever-changing, moulded continuously by the oscillations of consciousness navigating various planes of
understanding. The contemplation of the universe through Bohm’s (2002) lens offers a transformative approach to
understanding reality and consciousness. It nudges us towards realising a universe that is not segmented but fluid, where
individual entities are not isolated but fragments of a larger, interconnected whole, deeply rooted in the cosmic fabric of
the implicate order. This approach, thus, beckons a profound shift in the study and understanding of consciousness,
fostering a pathway towards realizing the interconnected essence of existence.
In conclusion, Di Biase’s (2016) theory of a nonlocal holoinformational flux emphasizes the profound interconnectedness
of the universe, a concept which harmonizes with the principles of holography. This view challenges our conventional
understandings of space, time, and individuality and suggests that, at a fundamental level, everything — from quantum
particles to conscious beings — is deeply interconnected in a holistic tapestry of information and meaning. The
propositions of Bohm’s (2002) holomovement and Di Biase’s (2016) holoinformational flux invite scholars and thinkers to
reconceptualize the universe’s fabric. By suggesting a dynamic and intrinsically informational reality, they beckon us
towards a richer, more interconnected understanding of existence.
Understanding Consciousness through Jung’s Collective Unconscious
In Jung's (1936) seminal work, he distinguished the personal and collective unconscious, as outlined, hinges notably on
the origins and attributes of the contents housed within each. The personal unconscious is characterized as a repository
for elements that were once within individual consciousness but have receded from this plane due to forgetfulness or
repression. This reservoir houses experiences and elements once actively engaged by the individual but have since been
relegated to the margins of their conscious awareness, awaiting potential retrieval or resurgence. Jung (1936) described
this reservoir as the
second psychic system of a collective, universal, and impersonal nature which is identical in all individuals. This
collective unconscious does not develop individually but is inherited. It consists of pre-existent forms, the
archetypes, which can only become conscious secondarily and which give definite form to certain psychic contents
(Jung, 1936, p. 99).
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 10/24
Figure 1. Visualizing the layers of Jung’s (1936) Collective Unconscious
Conversely, the collective unconscious represents a dimension of the psyche that harbours contents fundamentally
distinct in their genesis and nature. Unlike the personal unconscious, the constituents of the collective unconscious have
never traversed the territory of individual consciousness. These components are not the result of personal experiences or
acquired knowledge but are rather innate, bequeathed through the channels of heredity. This sphere (in Figure 1)
harbours archetypes, universal symbols and themes shared across humanity, transcending individual experiences and
timelines. These archetypes are considered a legacy of human evolution, imprints of shared human experiences that have
accrued over generations, residing deep within the collective psyche of the human race.
In this vein, the collective unconscious is a testament to a shared heritage of psychological elements and experiences, a
reservoir of the collective wisdom and narratives woven into the fabric of human existence with time. It hints at a deeper
connectivity within the human species, a tapestry of shared experiences and understandings that bind individuals in a
complex web of collective memory and inherited psychological landscapes (Castleman, 2004). Figure 1 delineates a
horizontal comprehension of the three distinct levels of mental organization: the conscious personal level, the
unconscious personal level, and the collective unconscious level. These layers represent an architecture of the mind
where each stratum plays a pivotal role in cognitive processing and psychological experience. At the foundation, the
collective unconscious level epitomizes vortical, holistic insights. This term ‘vortical’ refers to a dynamic, spiralling
movement of awareness that engages with the entire spectrum of consciousness in a non-linear, integrative manner. It
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 11/24
signifies an immersive, encompassing understanding that extends beyond the fragmented, compartmentalized knowledge
represented at the personal consciousness and unconscious levels.
Within the collective unconscious level, an aggregation of shared memories, archetypes, and experiences transcends
individual psychology and is emblematic of the human condition at large. It is a reservoir of universal symbols and themes
that underpin and influence the personal layers of consciousness, providing a rich tapestry of meaning and understanding
that is accessible, albeit not always readily, to all individuals (Jon Mills, 2019). The holistic insight at this level
encompasses a deep, intuitive apprehension of these shared psychological elements and their intricate interplay with
personal experiences and cognitions, thereby offering a comprehensive framework for interpreting and navigating the
multifaceted landscape of the human psyche.
Furthermore, this vortical, holistic insight within the collective unconscious level constitutes a crucial mechanism for the
individuation process, serving as a guide for personal development and self-realization by fostering a dynamic dialogue
between the personal and collective dimensions of consciousness. Through engaging with and integrating these insights,
individuals can achieve a more balanced, harmonious alignment between their unique psychological constitution and the
universal attributes of the human mind, thereby facilitating a deeper understanding of self and others within the broader
context of the shared human experience.
Further exploration into these concepts might illuminate the rich and intricate interplay between the individual and the
collective, offering nuanced perspectives on the dimensions of human consciousness and the complex networks that
define and shape the human experience at both personal and collective levels.
Consciousness and Realities
The topic of consciousness and its interrelation with varying realities remains a focal point in contemporary scholarly
dialogues. Drawing upon the current corpus of extant literature, it is possible to delineate a rich and diverse landscape of
theories and hypotheses that attempt to elucidate this complex interplay. This discourse encapsulates the current
scholarly perspectives on the nuances of consciousness and the manifold realities it interacts with.
In recent years, neuroscience has made significant strides in decoding the intricate workings of the brain, facilitating
deeper insights into the nature of consciousness (Seymour, 2023). Mediano et al. (2022) extensively explored the
neurobiological substrates of conscious experience, proposing theories like the Integrated Information Theory, which
posits that consciousness is integrally linked to the organization and integration of information in the brain. Meanwhile, in
philosophy, scholars have been engaging with questions of subjective experience and the potential limitations of human
cognition in apprehending reality in its entirety (Coseru, 2022).
Moreover, quantum physics has introduced fascinating and revolutionary perspectives on the potential
interconnectedness of consciousness and the physical world. As elucidated by Stapp (2007), the quantum theory presents
the concept of a participatory universe where the conscious observer plays a vital role in manifesting physical realities
(Froese, 2022). These theories resonate with Bohm’s concept of ‘holomovement’, which proposes a holographic
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 12/24
framework of reality, pointing to an unbroken and dynamic flow of connections that permeate the universe (Di Biase,
2016; Storoy, 2014).
Furthermore, transpersonal psychology brings forth theories that transcend the boundaries of the individual, suggesting
the existence of collective or universal levels of consciousness. These perspectives often converge with spiritual and
mystical traditions, which propose the existence of higher planes of reality accessible through altered states of
consciousness (Canova, 2023).
Exploring alternative realities has also been a topic of interest in virtual and augmented reality technologies (Morimoto et
al., 2022). In this context, scholars argue that these technologies can create complex, immersive realities, extending the
boundaries of human experience and potentially altering our perceptions of reality (Kim, 2023).
Drawing upon this rich tapestry of perspectives, it is evident that the discourse on consciousness and realities is
multifaceted and deeply interdisciplinary. The current scholarly trajectory seems to be moving towards a more integrated
approach, seeking to weave together insights from neuroscience, philosophy, physics, and transpersonal psychology to
construct a more comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between consciousness and the diverse realities
it navigates (Mills & Goodwyn, 2023).
In conclusion, diverse approaches and perspectives mark the academic discourse surrounding consciousness and
realities. As research continues to evolve in this domain, future scholarly endeavours are anticipated to expand our
understanding of the complex and nuanced relationship between consciousness and the manifold realities it interacts with.
Discussion
This paper’s proposition illuminates a crucial, insufficiently examined dimension within consciousness studies. This
exploration beckons scholars to venture into the relatively untrodden domains of human perception and consciousness.
This signalled a demand for a more nuanced, integrative interrogation into the conceivable amalgamation of
consciousness and non-local resonance. This endeavour promises to instigate a seminal shift in apprehending human
cognitive processes and their latent potentials. This theory suggests that resonance is pivotal for the human perceptual
system to discern and make sense of the sensory stimuli to which it is exposed. Yet, intriguingly, even amidst the
profound role of resonance in shaping perception, most individuals do not routinely access or consciously acknowledge
non-local information in their day-to-day experiences.
Often such intuitive foreknowledge involves perception of implicit information about non-local objects and/or events
by the body’s psychophysiological systems. Recent experiments have shown that the intuitive perception of a
future event is related to the degree of emotional significance of that event, and a new study shows that both the
brain and the heart are involved in processing a pre-stimulus emotional response to the future event (Bradley,
2006, p. 1).
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 13/24
Such an observation suggests that human cognitive structures, which have evolved primarily to navigate and thrive in a
tangible world, might inherently sideline or overlook non-local information, thereby prioritizing immediate and contextually
relevant perceptions.
One can argue that this phenomenon is rooted in the evolutionary development of human cognition. The intricacies of
navigating the three-dimensional world necessitate focusing on localized, tangible information, which serves as the
primary data for sustaining human life and facilitating interactions with the immediate environment. However, it is
noteworthy that the existing frameworks of cognition might not fully encapsulate the capacity to perceive non-local
information consciously, a concept that potentially expands the dimensions of human perception beyond the conventional
boundaries established by empirical sciences. In addition, scholars have ventured into the realm of quantum physics to
elucidate the enigmatic nature of consciousness, postulating that there might be underlying quantum processes that
facilitate the engagement with non-local phenomena. These theoretical perspectives propose a paradigm shift, urging a
move from a materialistic interpretation of consciousness to a more encompassing view, which acknowledges the
potential for resonance with non-local information (Lohrey & Boreham, 2022).
Furthermore, this claim invites a deeper exploration into the potential realms of consciousness that remain largely
uncharted. Integrating non-local information within conscious awareness arguably presents a rich avenue for future
research, potentially unveiling new layers of understanding about human cognition and its connection with the broader
universe. This could redefine the boundaries of human knowledge, offering innovative perspectives on the
interconnectedness of all phenomena and the nature of reality itself.
This paper asserts that the photon’s pivotal role emerges as an increasingly salient point of discussion, warranting
rigorous academic exploration. Photons operate as crucial mediators in the perceptual process, essentially moulding the
fabric of an individual’s subjective reality. The postulated hypothesis in this context underscores that individual perceptions
are inevitably rooted in a resonance mechanism between the observer and the observed object. This resonance,
intriguingly, is not a mere passive reflection of external reality but involves dynamic interactions with non-local information,
predominantly mediated through the agency of photons. The mechanics of this process are both intricate and profound.
Photons interact with an object, are reflected, and converge onto the observer’s retina (Hébert, 2022). This interception of
photons, carrying a myriad of information, instigates a cascade of physiological and cognitive processes, ultimately
culminating in what the observer perceives as their subjective reality. However, this reality is not an absolute construct but
is, instead, a personal interpretation distilled through the observer's cognitive filters and past experiences (Vuong, 2023).
To further complicate this dynamic, the observer is not simply engaging with a static reflection of the external world.
Instead, they are interfacing with a torrent of information that could be conceptualized as part of the ‘holomovement’—a
term borrowed from quantum mechanics, referring to an undivided and unbroken movement of information. When
envisioned within the context of quantum holography, this ‘holomovement’ alludes to an information continuum wherein
every part is intricately connected to the whole in a non-local manner. However, with its inherent limitations, the human
cognitive apparatus cannot possibly assimilate the entirety of this vast informational reservoir. As a result, the photons’
interactions with the observer become a selective process, eliciting specific perceptions that align with the observer’s
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 14/24
cognitive capacities and prior conditioning. This selectivity is both a boon and a limitation. On one hand, it allows for a
manageable interpretation of the world, tailored to the observer's unique cognitive framework. On the other hand, it
inherently limits the spectrum of reality to which the observer has access.
Drawing parallels with Eastern philosophical thought, particularly the Buddhist notion of the Eighth State of
Consciousness, one might argue that such photon-mediated perceptions only provide access to a fraction of a more
profound, interconnected universal awareness. This aligns with the premise that the human experience, as mediated by
photons and their interaction with our sensory apparatus, only offers a sliver of the vast expanse of reality—much like the
tip of an iceberg that belies its massive structure beneath the water’s surface. In summation, while photons play an
indispensable role in shaping our perceptual experiences, the very nature of this interaction is delimited by our cognitive
boundaries. This discussion underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary approaches, amalgamating insights from
quantum physics, consciousness studies, and Eastern philosophies to provide a more holistic understanding of perception
and its relation to the broader universe. Such integrative endeavours promise to enrich our understanding of human
cognition and bridge the apparent chasm between subjective experience and the expansive realm of quantum reality.
Examining the correlation between photon interactions and the Eighth State of Consciousness requires venturing beyond
Western science's empirical confines and the metaphysical terrain of Eastern philosophies. Photons, despite their
microscopic scale, function as carriers of vast information. Nevertheless, these carriers are bound by the limits of our
sensory and cognitive systems, providing a selective, narrowed experience of the external environment. The delivered
information through photons, thus, represents a fractional component of a far-reaching, interconnected matrix of universal
awareness and consciousness symbolized by the ālayavijñāna.
The ālayavijñāna encapsulates a dimension of consciousness that transcends the dichotomy of subject and object
inherent in sensory perception, engendering a non-dual awareness that harmonizes the individual consciousness with
universal principles. Photons may be considered the facilitators or translators of this profound, non-dual awareness into
the language of dualistic sensory experience. These quantum entities bridge the chasm between the absolute and the
relative, the universal and the particular, fostering a dialogue between the immanent and the transcendent dimensions of
consciousness.
In synthesizing these perspectives, one might posit that photons act as messengers, conveying information from the vast
reservoir of the Eighth State of Consciousness or Jung’s collective unconscious to our limited cognitive faculties. They
channel universal insights, albeit in fragmented and coded forms, requiring adept decoding and interpretation by the
observer’s consciousness. Within this dynamic interface, the dance between the absolute and relative, the infinite and
finite, the universal and individual, contributes to the rich tapestry of human perception and experience.
Consequently, the academic examination and integrative approach to perception, where photons serve as mediators with
the Eighth State of Consciousness (alternatively, Jung’s collective unconscious or storehouse consciousness), yields a
fertile ground for interdisciplinary scholarly inquiry and reflection. This paper asserts that photons are pivotal in eliciting
specific recollections from the storehouse consciousness, manifested as quantum holography. Within the depths of the
collective unconscious is a cumulative assembly of shared memories, archetypal symbols, and collective experiences;
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 15/24
these elements encapsulate and reflect the entirety of information inherent in each memory, archetype, and experience.
The interdisciplinary endeavour of amalgamating principles and insights from quantum physics, consciousness studies,
and Eastern philosophical thought possesses the potential to instigate a significant paradigmatic shift in the
comprehension of consciousness and perception. Such a convergence promises to unravel the enigmatic intricacies of
human consciousness and the mind and unlock the profound mysteries of the cosmic expanse. This synthesis of diverse
academic disciplines promises to yield nuanced insights, thereby facilitating a holistic understanding of consciousness that
seamlessly integrates empirical research methodologies with metaphysical explorations, offering a harmonious and
comprehensive framework for understanding the complex phenomena of consciousness and perception.
The Photonic Interaction Hypothesis: A Theoretical Foundation
The primary assertion of this discourse suggests that perception inherently engages a resonance process between the
observer and the observed object. Within this framework, the resonance with non-local information is ostensibly mediated
by photonic interactions. These photons, interacting with the scrutinized object, are subsequently reflected, converging
upon the observer’s retina (sight consciousness). It is posited that this intricate dance of photons facilitates and induces
our sense of reality, serving as the foundational bedrock upon which our perceptual experiences are constructed.
This postulation prompts a significant theoretical inquiry. The assumption that photons play a cardinal role in mediating
reality perception necessitates an exhaustive analysis, for this proposition, if validated, may offer profound insights into
our understanding of reality construction and perception mechanics. It is imperative, therefore, to meticulously unpack the
theoretical and empirical dimensions of this hypothesis, exploring its epistemological and ontological underpinnings.
Perception as Resonance: Towards a New Paradigm
Exploring perception as a form of resonance instigates a transformative conceptual framework within consciousness
studies. Perception, within this paradigm, is not a passive reception of external stimuli but an active, resonant interaction
with the environment. In this schema, photons are not mere carriers of light but active participants in the perceptual
process, facilitating a dynamic interaction between the observer and the external world.
This perspective subtly shifts our perception understanding from a one-way, deterministic process to a two-way, resonant
interaction. The observer is not merely a recipient of external stimuli but actively engages with these stimuli, entering into
a resonant relationship mediated by photonic interactions. This resonance with non-local information through photons
offers a plausible explanation for the richness and depth of our perceptual experiences, providing a theoretical framework
for understanding the immediacy and vibrancy of the perceived reality.
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 16/24
Figure 2. It illustrates the resonance between the observer and the object, facilitated by photons, forms the foundation of perception.
Resonance pertains to the harmonic alignment or attunement between an observer and an object in the context of
consciousness and perception. At its core, this alignment is facilitated by photons, the quantum entities that underpin the
vast majority of our sensory engagement with the external world. Photons act as information carriers, intermediaries
bridging the expanse between the external world and our internal cognitive realm (Figure 2). Their dual role—as particles
and waves—plays a pivotal function in establishing this resonance and underscores the multifaceted nature of perception
and consciousness.
1. Photons as Carriers: When we perceive an object, photons, which have interacted with that object, enter our eyes and
are absorbed by the photoreceptor cells in the retina. This interaction catalyzes a chain reaction of electrochemical
processes, translating these captured photons into neural signals. These signals then travel to the brain, where they
are processed, decoded, and subsequently construed as visual perceptions. In this sense, photons act as
messengers, ferrying information from the object to the observer.
2. Dual Nature of Photons: The quantum mechanics underpinning photons elucidate their dual nature as discrete
particles and continuous waves. When considering photons as particles, they can be visualized as discrete packets of
energy that relay specific information about the properties of an object, such as its colour or luminosity. This particle
perspective offers a granular, detailed insight into the object's attributes. On the other hand, the wave nature of
photons introduces a broader framework, encapsulating a spectrum of possibilities and probabilities. Rather than
pinpointing a definitive state or attribute, the wave perspective embodies a range of potentialities. This wave aspect
emphasizes interconnectedness, continuity, and potential interactions between the observer and the object.
3. The Importance of Resonance: The resonance between the observer and the object, facilitated by photons, forms the
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 17/24
foundation of perception. Without this harmonic interaction, the process of perception would be disjointed or non-
existent. Resonance, in essence, ensures a coherent transfer of information, allowing the observer to derive meaning
and understanding from their interaction with the object.
The role of photons in establishing this resonance is twofold. As particles, photons provide tangible, specific data about
the object, grounding the perception in empirical reality. Conversely, as waves, they encompass a more expansive,
probabilistic view, integrating many potential interpretations and connections. This duality ensures that perception is
grounded in reality and open to interpretation, fostering a dynamic, evolving understanding of the external world. Photons,
with their dual nature, play a crucial role in the intricate dance of perception. They bridge the gap between the observer
and the object, ensuring a harmonious resonance for meaningful engagement with the world. Their particle aspect offers
specificity and detail, while their wave nature introduces breadth, interconnectedness, and possibility. This dual role
underscores the complexity and depth of human perception, weaving together the tangible and the abstract into a
cohesive tapestry of understanding.
Theorizing Photonic Interactions: Implications and Challenges
However, while promising, the photonic interaction hypothesis also presents theoretical and empirical challenges that
must be addressed. Firstly, the exact mechanism through which photons mediate perception and facilitate resonance with
non-local information requires further elucidation. While photons undoubtedly play a role in vision, extending this role to
mediating perception and reality construction necessitates a more thorough theoretical and empirical substantiation.
Furthermore, resonance with non-local information through photons must be clearly defined and operationalized. Non-
locality, within the context of quantum mechanics, refers to the phenomenon where particles separated by large distances
instantaneously affect each other’s states. Applying this concept to perception and consciousness introduces a set of
complex theoretical postulates that require careful examination and validation. The nature, characteristics, and
implications of this non-local resonance in perception must be scrutinized to establish the validity and applicability of this
theoretical framework.
Towards an Integrative Understanding of Perception
Considering the aforementioned considerations, this paper encourages an integrative, multidisciplinary approach towards
understanding perception. The theoretical framework proposed, involving the resonance between the observer and the
observed mediated by photonic interactions, offers a promising avenue for research. However, this avenue must be
navigated with careful consideration of its theoretical assumptions and empirical validations.
An interdisciplinary collaboration between physicists, cognitive scientists, and consciousness researchers may provide the
necessary breadth and depth of understanding to explore this theoretical framework effectively. By combining insights
from quantum mechanics, cognitive science, and consciousness studies, scholars can develop a more nuanced,
comprehensive understanding of perception, reality construction, and consciousness. This endeavour promises to shed
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 18/24
light on the enigmatic processes underpinning perception and holds the potential to revolutionize our understanding of
consciousness and reality. Scholars can open new vistas of understanding by exploring the intricate dance of photonic
interactions and their role in mediating perception, offering unprecedented insights into the nature of existence and
consciousness.
In conclusion, while the assertion presented herein requires further theoretical and empirical scrutiny, it offers a tantalizing
glimpse into a potentially transformative paradigm within consciousness studies. Exploring photonic interactions and their
role in perception and reality construction presents a fertile ground for academic inquiry. It promises to shed light on the
perennial questions of consciousness, perception, and reality that have intrigued and perplexed scholars for centuries.
Intersections and Divergences
While these three constructs—Buddhist consciousness, quantum holography, and the collective unconscious—stem from
distinctly different traditions and disciplines, they converge in their emphasis on the interconnected nature of existence.
Each proposes that individual entities, whether humans or subatomic particles, are intrinsically linked to larger wholes and
that these connections run deeper than conventional wisdom might suggest.
However, it is crucial to recognize the divergences as well. While the Eighth Consciousness and the Collective
Unconscious delve into profound, interconnected realms of awareness, their methods and implications differ. Buddhism
offers a spiritual path to enlightenment, emphasizing the dissolution of the self and the realization of universal truths. In
contrast, Jung's framework is rooted in understanding and integrating the self within the broader context of shared human
experiences.
Implications and Contributions
This paper's endeavour to bridge Eastern philosophical tenets with Western psychological and quantum theories reflects
the growing recognition of the potential of interdisciplinary approaches. Such a melding of perspectives provides a richer,
multidimensional understanding of consciousness, underscoring the idea that the truths of existence might be pieced
together from multiple directions.
The ālayavijñāna and Jung’s collective unconscious concept in analytical psychology delve into deep layers of
consciousness that transcend individual experiences. They both suggest a universal dimension of consciousness and
underline the inherent patterns or forms within the human psyche. However, while the ālayavijñāna is seen as a repository
of latent tendencies from past karmic actions influencing present behaviour and future rebirths, Jung’s collective
unconscious comprises archetypes representing shared human experiences across cultures. Unlike the dynamic seeds in
ālayavijñāna, these archetypes reflect shared human experiences and evolutionary imperatives. While both concepts
allude to the interconnected fabric of human consciousness (or holomovement), their origins, implications, and nuances
are rooted in different cultural and philosophical traditions (Figure 3). The Buddhist concept emphasizes a path toward
spiritual enlightenment, while Jung focuses on psychological integration and wholeness.
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 19/24
Figure 3. It illustrates the interconnected fabric of human consciousness (or holomovement)
Conclusion
In light of the foregoing discussion, it is palpable that photons, through their dual nature, act as pivotal conduits facilitating
the intricate processes of resonance and perception. They bridge the observer and the observed, functioning as carriers
of information, and weave a tapestry that is both minutely detailed (via their particle nature) and expansively
interconnected (via their wave nature). This simultaneous embodiment of specificity and potentiality within photons is
foundational in shaping human consciousness and our engagement with external reality.
The concept of resonance, underlined by photon interactions, echoes prominently within the theoretical constructs of
Quantum Holography, the Eighth Consciousness in Buddhist philosophy, and Jung’s Collective Unconscious. Although
stemming from disparate intellectual traditions, each of these frameworks converges on the notion of an underlying,
unifying field or matrix that is holistic, interconnected, and foundational to consciousness and perception. In synthesizing
these perspectives, it becomes apparent that the resonance facilitated by photons is not merely a physical or biological
process but has profound implications for understanding consciousness at both individual and collective levels. The
dynamic interaction of photons, as particles and waves, mirrors the multi-dimensional nature of consciousness – which is
at once particular, universal, empirical, and transcendent.
Thus, drawing parallels among Quantum Holography, the Eighth Consciousness, and the Collective Unconscious
provides a rich, multifaceted framework for interpreting and understanding the enigmatic phenomena of consciousness
and perception. This integrative viewpoint bridges physical, psychological, and spiritual dimensions. It opens avenues for
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 20/24
a more holistic, interdisciplinary exploration of consciousness, promising deeper insights into the mysteries of the mind
and the cosmos. The convergence of these theories invites scholars and practitioners to adopt a more encompassing
view of consciousness, encouraging a dialogue that transcends disciplinary boundaries and fosters a deeper
understanding of human existence within the vast expanse of the universe.
About the Author
David Leong, Ph.D., is an entrepreneurship theorist with over twenty-five years of
practical experience as a serial entrepreneur. His entrepreneurial journey
commenced shortly after obtaining his Bachelor of Business Administration degree
from the National University of Singapore in 1994. He has two PhDs – one from
Charisma University and the other from the University of Canberra.
Dr. Leong has been the driving force behind the inception of no fewer than fifteen
ventures, traversing sectors that include corporate finance, consultancy in business
and marketing, technology solutions, asset management, and human resources.
Acknowledged as an authoritative figure and thought leader in the business
domain, Dr. Leong's expertise is frequently solicited by local media outlets like The
Straits Times, Business Times, Lianhe Zaobao, and Channel News Asia,
particularly for his insights on economic trends, political analyses, and human
resources developments. His academic endeavours are focused on the study of entrepreneurship, while he also has a
scholarly interest in the ancient Chinese Yijing (Book of Changes), exploring its intersections with contemporary scientific
fields such as quantum physics.
Dr. Leong is a prolific contributor to academic and professional literature, authoring numerous articles and book chapters
that span his diverse research interests. He has also penned a book titled “Uncertainty, Timing and Luck on Quantum
Terms in Entrepreneurship”, which delves into the nuanced interplay of chance and strategic decision-making in the
entrepreneurial landscape- https://www.amazon.com/Uncertainty-Timing-Quantum-Terms-
Entrepreneurship/dp/1636483534
For a more comprehensive overview of his work and contributions, please refer to
https://peopleworldwide.com/davidleong.html.
Statements and Declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 21/24
construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Footnotes
1 The term ‘holoinformation flux’ pertains to a self-regulating flow that arises from the holographic processing of neuronal
information. In essence, it can be described as the dynamic stream of data in the brain, processed in a manner
reminiscent of holography. This flow can be enhanced or optimized when an individual enters altered states of
consciousness, which are associated with increased synchronicity or coherence of brain wave activity (Di Biase, 2009,
2016).
References
Biase, Francisco Di. (2016). THE HOLOINFORMATIONAL HOLOINFORMATION FOUNDATIONS OF
CONSCIOUSNESS. In Biophysics of Consciousness (pp. 231–250). WORLD SCIENTIFIC.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814644266_0007
Bohm, D. (2002). Wholeness and the implicate order. In Psychology Press. (Vol. 31, Issue 10). Psychology Press.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9112/31/10/042
Bohm, D. (2004). Causality and chance in modern physics. Routledge.
Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (2010). Science, order and creativity. Routledge.
Bohm, David. (1990). A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Philosophical Psychology, 3(2–3), 271–286.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089008573004
Bradley, R. T. (2006). The psychophysiology of entrepreneurial intuition: a quantum-holographic theory. Proceedings of
the Third AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange, 8–10.
Canova, P. (2023). Quantum Spirituality: Science, Gnostic Mysticism, and Connecting with Source Consciousness.
Simon and Schuster.
Cao, Y. (2022). Naming the Seventh Consciousness in Yogācāra. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 50(2), 201–222.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-021-09487-w
Castleman, T. (2004). Threads, knots, tapestries: how a tribal connection is revealed through dreams and
synchronicities. Daimon.
Coseru, C. (2022). Consciousness, content, and cognitive attenuation: A neurophenomenological perspective. In
Routledge Handbook on the Philosophy of Meditation (pp. 354–368).
Di Biase, F. (2009). Quantum-holographic informational consciousness. NeuroQuantology, 7(4), 657–664.
Di Biase, F. (2016). The unified field of consciousness. In UNIFIED FIELD MECHANICS: Natural Science Beyond the
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 22/24
Veil of Spacetime (pp. 230–239).
Froese, T. (2022). Scientific Observation Is Socio-Materially Augmented Perception: Toward a Participatory Realism.
Philosophies, 7(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7020037
Grossberg, S. T. (2012). Studies of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition,
and motor control ((Vol. 70)). Springer Science & Business Media.
Hawking, S., & Penrose, R. (2010). The nature of space and time (Vol. 3). Princeton University Press.
Hébert, M. (2022). Optical models for material appearance. EDP Sciences.
Hershock, P. D. (2023). Consciousness Mattering: A Buddhist Synthesis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Jung, C. G. (1936). The concept of the collective unconscious. Collected Works, 9(1), 42.
Keng, C. (2019). What is Svabhāva-vikalpa and with Which Consciousness(es) is it Associated? Journal of Indian
Philosophy, 47(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-018-09377-8
Kim, M. (2023). Virtual Craft: Experiences and Aesthetics of Immersive Making Culture. Humanities, 12(5), 100.
https://doi.org/10.3390/h12050100
Liang, H. (2012). Jung and Chinese Religions: Buddhism and Taoism. Pastoral Psychology, 61(5–6), 747–758.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0442-3
Lohrey, A., & Boreham, B. (2022). Omni-local consciousness. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 15(1), 193–208.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2022.2107726
Mandal, J. (2021). Emergence of Quantum Mechanics, Human Mind, and Happiness. In Psychology in Modern India
(pp. 405–414). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4705-5_22
McWilliams, S. A. (2011). Contemplating a Contemporary Constructivist Buddhist Psychology. Journal of Constructivist
Psychology, 24(3), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2011.571566
Mediano, P. A. M., Rosas, F. E., Bor, D., Seth, A. K., & Barrett, A. B. (2022). The strength of weak integrated
information theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(8), 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.04.008
Meynard, T. (2011). Buddhist Practice And Yogācāra Epistemology. In The Religious Philosophy of Liang Shuming
(pp. 81–103). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004171510.i-226.39
Mills, J., & Goodwyn, E. (2023). Archetypal Ontology: New Directions in Analytical Psychology. Taylor & Francis.
Mills, Jon. (2019). The myth of the collective unconscious. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 55(1), 40–
53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21945
Moacanin, R. (2003). The essence of Jung’s psychology and Tibetan Buddhism: Western and Eastern paths to the
heart. Simon and Schuster.
Morimoto, T., Kobayashi, T., Hirata, H., Otani, K., Sugimoto, M., Tsukamoto, M., Yoshihara, T., Ueno, M., & Mawatari,
M. (2022). XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine:
Status Quo and Quo Vadis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(2), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020470
Plotnitsky, A. (2022). Reality without realism: Matter, thought, and technology in quantum physics. Springer Nature.
Seymour, K. (2023). Consciousness, Evolution, and the Self-Organizing Brain. Journal of Conscious Evolution, 19(19),
5.
Shun’ei, T., & Tagawa, S. (2009). Living Yogacara: an introduction to consciousness-only Buddhism. Simon and
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 23/24
Schuster.
Somaratne, G. A. (2021). Sensory Experience. In The Buddha’s Teaching (pp. 141–166). Springer Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2410-0_6
Storoy, D. (2014). David Bohm, Implicate Order and Holomovement. Science and Nonduality, 1–10.
Vuong, Q. H. (2023). Mindsponge theory. De Gruyter.
Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, January 10, 2024
Qeios ID: 7SIZ7P · https://doi.org/10.32388/7SIZ7P 24/24
