PreprintPDF Available

A New Method for Sportive Performance and Recovery: Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Review)

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract

During sports and exercise, the cardiovascular system, respiratory system, musculoskeletal system, nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system play an active role. With the start of exercise, sympathetic activity in the body increases and parasympathetic activity is suppressed. With the end of the exercise, sympathetic activity decreases, while parasympathetic activity increases and contributes to the recovery process of the individual. The contribution of the parasympathetic system to the restructuring/recovery during the rest period is important in terms of reducing the fatigue of the athletes and enabling them to recover in the early period. Stimulation of the vagus nerve, which is the main branch of the parasympathetic system, can affect many cardiovascular, pulmonary, and metabolic parameters both during rest and exercise. Our article aims to evaluate the potential benefits and effects of using auricular vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for sports purposes on the recovery and performance of athletes in light of the literature. Recovery after exercise can be accelerated with auricular VNS. The negativities caused by overload and excessive training can be reduced. Thanks to better rest and early recovery, the performance in the following training program can be increased. Injuries that may occur due to insufficient recovery can be prevented or injuries can be reduced. We can expect that the auricular VNS method will be used soon in light of sufficient scientific data due to its effects that cannot be considered doping.
1
A New Method for Sportive Performance and Recovery: Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
(Review)
Ali Veysel ÖZDEN1, Hasan Kerem ALPTEKİN2, Mehmet ÜNAL3
1. Bahcesehir University, Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul, Turkey. Assistant Professor
Orcıd ID: 0000-0003-2349-996X. aliveysel.ozden@bau.edu.tr
2. Bahcesehir University, Health Sciences Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey. Associate Professor Orcıd ID:
0000-0003-2429-5651. hasankerem.alptekin@bau.edu.tr
3. Yeniyuzyil University, Health Science Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey. Professor Orcıd ID: 0000-0002-
9275-3020. mhmt_unal@yahoo.com
Corresponding author: Ali Veysel ÖZDEN, Bahcesehir University, Vocational School of Health
Services, Istanbul, Turkey. aliveysel.ozden@bau.edu.tr
Abstract
During sports and exercise, the cardiovascular system, respiratory system, musculoskeletal
system, nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system play an active role. With the start of
exercise, sympathetic activity in the body increases and parasympathetic activity is suppressed. With
the end of the exercise, sympathetic activity decreases, while parasympathetic activity increases and
contributes to the recovery process of the individual. The contribution of the parasympathetic system
to the restructuring/recovery during the rest period is important in terms of reducing the fatigue of the
athletes and enabling them to recover in the early period. Stimulation of the vagus nerve, which is the
main branch of the parasympathetic system, can affect many cardiovascular, pulmonary, and
metabolic parameters both during rest and exercise.
Our article aims to evaluate the potential benefits and effects of using auricular vagus nerve
stimulation (VNS) for sports purposes on the recovery and performance of athletes in light of the
literature. Recovery after exercise can be accelerated with auricular VNS. The negativities caused by
overload and excessive training can be reduced. Thanks to better rest and early recovery, the
performance in the following training program can be increased. Injuries that may occur due to
insufficient recovery can be prevented or injuries can be reduced. We can expect that the auricular
VNS method will be used soon in light of sufficient scientific data due to its effects that cannot be
considered doping.
Keywords: sportive performance; sportive recovery; auricular vagus nerve stimulation; exercise;
autonomic nervous system
Introduction
Today, sport is one of the most important social activities that is followed with great interest
by a wide audience and performed by most of us personally. Even in today's world countries, sports
have become the way for countries to show strength to each other. As such, it is not just an athlete who
is involved in physical activity. The ability of athletes, who must take part in the arena as gladiators of
the modern age, try to do the best for themselves, their teams, and their countries, and strive to exhibit
their sportive performances at the highest level, includes many variables. The duration, frequency,
intensity of the trainings, adequate and balanced nutrition of the athlete, sleep pattern, the materials
used, the training conditions and rest periods after the training, getting ready for the activity again
2
includes multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches. It is only possible for athletes to increase
their performance, to reach the optimal level and to maintain this level for a long time, by operating in
perfect harmony with so many variables. In addition, the short recovery time is very important for the
athlete to be ready for the activity again.
In recent years, professional athletes in all branches of sports have a very intense training and
match schedule. For example, in the US National Basketball League, it is seen that athletes play every
2 days in some periods. When football clubs are considered, when the league matches, European
matches and cup matches come to the same period, the athletes play in periods of 2-3 days. As a result
of this intense calendar, the recovery of the athletes cannot reach the desired level. Inadequate
recovery, on the other hand, reduces performance in the long run, and can lead to injuries in addition
to this. The insufficiency and limited nature of the applications and methods currently used in the
market for this problem do not meet the need.
The autonomic nervous system consists of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous
system. They usually play opposite roles in the body, when one of them increases activity, the other is
suppressed. With the start of exercise or sports activity, sympathetic activity increases in the body and
reaches the plateau value in maximal activity after a certain period. With the end of sports activity, the
suppressed parasympathetic activity starts to increase, and the sympathetic system returns to the
resting state in time (1). After exercise, parasympathetic system activation continues for up to 48
hours. If the exercise is intense and resistant, parasympathetic system activity can extend up to 72
hours. Also, due to anaerobic respiration rate increases during exercise, there may be decreases in
parasympathetic reactivation (2). Different parameters depending on the analysis of the variability
between heartbeat times can be used in the evaluation of autonomic nervous system activity. One of
these, HF (High Frequency) power, which indicates parasympathetic system activity, may reflect
insufficient recovery from previous training, and this may indicate unfavorable conditions for
performance improvements (3). In a study conducted with swimmers, it was found that the
performance was higher in people with high parasympathetic activity at night (4). Supporting this, in
the study conducted by Buch, Peake & Stanley, those with high pre-exercise sympathetic activity
showed low performance. In another trial by Gratze, Luft & Mayer involving runners, it was revealed
that athletes with low sympathetic activity and low heart rate before the race finished the marathon
earlier. Low sympathetic activity and/or high parasympathetic activity and low heart rate before
training or exercise can be evaluated as performance indicators. This is also a sign that the recovery
after the previous workout or exercise is adequate (5,6).
Parasympathetic capacity is the determinant of restructuring and recovery (restoration) after
exercise (7). Endurance training is known to increase running performance and parasympathetic
modulation before and after running (8). So, it can be said that there is a reciprocal
relationship between exercise and the autonomic nervous system. There are various factors that limit
performance during exercise, prevent the individual from doing the activity for a longer period, and
thus cause fatigue. Fatigue can be psychological and neurogenic; as well as lactic acid accumulation,
ammonia accumulation, increase in blood potassium level, emptying of glycogen stores, increase
of adenosine compounds, increase in blood hydrogen level, blood pH shift to acid direction can
cause fatigue and decrease in performance (9). Recovery after exercise is possible by returning all
these changes that occur during exercise to baseline values. During the recovery period of the person,
the sympathetic system activity is suppressed, and the parasympathetic system activity becomes
prominent. Autonomic nervous system regulation, which is not considered as doping and can increase
physical capacity and recovery in athletes, can be practically done with vagus nerve stimulation
(VNS) from the ear (10). There is no study in the literature examining the effect of VNS on recovery
3
and performance in athletes. In this article, potential benefits and effects of using this method for
sportive purposes are evaluated.
Vagus Nerve Stimulation
VNS has long been used invasively in the treatment of depression and epilepsy (since 1997),
and vagus nerve modulation continues to be of interest for many physiological/pathological
conditions due to the wide distribution of the vagus nerve in the body (11). VNS can affect
cardiovascular parameters both at rest and during exercise (12). It has been shown in the study of
Clancy et al. that auricular VNS can reduce sympathetic activity (13). Transcutaneous VNS improves
cardiac baroreflex sensitivity and autonomic modulation (14). VNS also has the potential to affect
local and systemic circulation. Czura et. al. showed in their study that VNS shortened the bleeding
time in the incision area and increased local thrombin levels, and that thrombin level did not change in
the systemic circulation (15). It has been reported that noninvasive auricular VNS changes the fluid
passage between the extracellular and intracellular compartments by bioimpedance analysis (16). Both
human and animal studies indicate that VNS can reduce or reverse ischemia-related damage
(17,18,19,20,21,22,23). VNS also has effects that reduce pain and inflammation (24,25,26). These data
show that VNS may cause modulation in the autonomic nervous system and thus contribute to
recovery after exercise. As aerobic performance increases, parasympathetic system activity is expected
to increase in parallel. This situation suggests that people who do regular sports will recover better
than normal people. However, after an excessive or intense exercise program, more activity may be
needed in the parasympathetic system.
Auricular VNS is used as an effective and safe method in the treatment of many diseases like
epilepsy, depression, and migraine etc. and it can be claimed to be advantageous compared to the
invasive method (27). Increasing vagus nerve activity causes modulation in the autonomic nervous
system and cerebral neuronal networks (11). Since the method only stimulates afferent fibers, it
changes cerebral activity through the nucleus tract solitarius and may cause different effects
in different parts of the body through neuronal connections (28,29). Optimal stimulation parameters in
auricular VNS are still unclear and studies have also stated that different stimulation parameters may
cause different effects. The vagus nerve provides the brain-gut connection; in addition, its widespread
distribution in the body and its relationship with different physiological conditions cause a
complicated structure. This situation can be controlled with biofeedback or closed loop stimulation
systems (30,31). The widespread and local effects of VNS can create an opportunity for its use in
different indications. In their study, Staats, Giannakopoulos, Blake, Liebler & Levy reported clinical
improvement in respiratory capacity in two Covid-19 patients treated with non-invasive VNS
(32). Another study by Kaniusas et. al. similarly suggests that non-invasive VNS may be potentially
beneficial in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by Covid-19 (33).
Auricular VNS can increase peripheral perfusion. In addition, studies are also seen in the
literature showing increased healing by VNS in brain ischemic damage (34,35,36,37,38,39). In rat
models with ischemia and reperfusion, it was found that post-ischemic angiogenesis in the brain was
increased by auricular VNS; and in ischemic penumbra, expression levels of brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF) were found to be high (40). VNS can improve functional status after traumatic brain
injury (41). Similar positive results regarding VNS have been reported in peripheral nerve injury (42).
In addition, intraoperative VNS can accelerate wound healing by autonomic mechanisms (43).
Auricular VNS allows a more controlled effect only by stimulation of afferent fibers. Side effects are
also very rare compared to cervical, abdominal, or other vagal nerve stimulation methods containing
4
efferent fibers (44). Common side effects include tingling or pain around the stimulation site; also,
some participants reported itching or a rash in the ear (27,45)
The small number of studies, the application of different stimulation parameters and different
protocols may cause different results in the literature about VNS. In addition, it can be said that
invasive, cervical non-invasive and auricular applications of VNS can lead to different results.
Auricular VNS includes only afferent fiber stimulation and acts through cerebral neuromodulation.
For this reason, the effects of regulation on homeostasis may be mostly in the form of adaptive or
capacity increase. The fact that auricular VNS is non-invasive and easily applicable suggests that it
can be used to increase physiological adaptations in athletes. In a situation where physiological data
are collected from the body and stimulation is personalized with machine learning, VNS can increase
the sportive potential and capacity of the users.
Recovery and Performance
It is stated that parasympathetic effects in normal persons persist during high-intensity
exercise and are evident in the early stages of recovery. These parasympathetic effects may play an
important role in preventing sudden cardiac death during these periods of increased risk (46). After
exercise, vagus-mediated heart rate recovery accelerates in well-trained athletes but decreases in
patients with chronic heart failure (47). Ebersole, Cornell, Flees, Shemelya, & Noel stated that
sympathetic nervous system withdrawal after maximal exercise may be more effective during recovery
than previously thought (48). However, there are also studies indicating that the delayed decrease in
heart rate within the first minute after gradual exercise is a strong data on overall mortality, regardless
of exercise workload, the presence or absence of myocardial perfusion defects, and heart rate changes.
It has been suggested that this may reflect decreased vagal activity (49,50). Abnormal heart rate
recovery may be caused by delayed sympathetic withdrawal, delayed parasympathetic reactivation, or
both (51). If the exercise intensity increases, acute recovery of the pre-ejection period weakens. This
event is an indicator of parasympathetic withdrawal after exercise (52).
Genetic and environmental factors can affect recovery and autonomic nervous system activity
after exercise or sports. In a study conducted in Chinese healthy people; it has been observed that there
is a delayed regulation in the autonomic nervous system after exercise compared to Caucasian
races. This delayed autonomic recovery may result from elevated sympathetic activity
or vagal withdrawal in the Chinese (53). In people with high body mass index, autonomic
recovery worsens after activity and the parasympathetic level remains low (54). Caffeine intake
impairs autonomic recovery after exercise by increasing sympathetic activity. Heart rate and blood
pressure were found to be higher during recovery in people who took caffeine
(55,56,57). Normotensive subjects with higher resting systolic blood pressure (110-120 mmHg) had
moderately delayed autonomic recovery after exercise compared to subjects with lower systolic
pressure (<110 mmHg) (58).
Fatigue and incomplete recovery after exercise is important as it leads to a decrease in exercise
performance and a greater risk of injury. With correct exercise programs, it is possible to increase
parasympathetic activity after exercise in the long term (59). When evaluated acutely, as exercise
intensity increases, the decrease in sympathetic activity and parasympathetic reactivation slows down
after exercise (52,60). Prolongation of exercise duration does not affect the withdrawal in sympathetic
activity after exercise, but it suppresses the recovery in parasympathetic activity (61). Sympathetic
hyperactivity seen after exercise competes with endothelial (nitric oxide) dependent vasodilator
activity by causing vasoconstriction (62). In addition to changes in the cardiac autonomic nervous
system during the recovery period, muscular sympathetic nervous system activity in the periphery is
5
also higher than the resting state (63). However, there are studies showing a decrease in blood pressure
along with a decrease in parasympathetic activity after exercise. This situation has been associated
with peripheral vasodilation (64). Recovery and performance status are closely related to autonomic
nervous system activity levels. Insufficient recovery adversely affects the next performance. Different
measurement methods, different exercise programs, individual and environmental differences can
affect assessments of recovery and performance. Biofeedback controlled application of autonomic
nervous system modulation can provide more efficient sports recovery and performance.
Sportive Use of the VNS
In the recovery period after exercise, parasympathetic nervous system activity occupies a very
important place (65). Metaboreflex stimulation (e.g., muscle and blood acidosis) is probably a key
determinant of parasympathetic reactivation in the short term (0-90 minutes post-exercise). On the
other hand, baroreflex stimulation (e.g., exercise-related changes in plasma volume) probably
mediates parasympathetic reactivation in the medium term (1-48 hours post-exercise). Autonomic
recovery occurs faster in people with more aerobic fitness, but if the intensity and duration of the
exercise increases, the recovery becomes longer. When writing an exercise prescription, the autonomic
nervous system activity of the person must be taken into consideration. The time required for recovery
after a training session is important for optimizing physiological adaptations and performance. These
adaptations can be achieved in the long term with exercise and training applications customized
according to the autonomic nervous system activity. Increasing evidence indicates that the level of
parasympathetic activity after exercise is a marker of performance increase (66,67). The elevation in
vagal activity at rest and after exercise occurs when positive adaptation to exercise takes place and
allows increases in performance (68).
Autonomic recovery after exercise; can be affected by exercise intensity, exercise duration,
maximum exercise modality as well as recovery posture and recovery activity (60). While intensive
training may result in suboptimal performance in subsequent training sessions; chronic imbalance
between training stress and rest can lead to overload or overtraining syndrome. Whole-body cold-
water application after exercise is used by athletes to increase and accelerate recovery and has been
shown to increase parasympathetic reactivation. It is also stated that parasympathetic reactivation is
associated with longer-term physiological recovery and daily training performances (69). Modulation
of parasympathetic activity after exercise; may have beneficial effects in the elimination of
dysfunction in the autonomic nervous system due to exercise, in the recovery of microtraumas and
regaining of homeostasis. In this way, recovery after exercise can become faster and more effective.
Electrical stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve may be beneficial in increasing parasympathetic
activity after exercise. In regular use, permanent effects may occur because VNS increases
neuroplasticity and changes in neuronal firing patterns (70). The autonomic nervous system controls
physiological parameters such as increased hydrogen concentration, decreased glycogen stores, and
lactic acid accumulation. Post-exercise physical recovery techniques can accelerate parasympathetic
reactivation (71). So, VNS after exercise, by improving parasympathetic activity, can also provide
regulation of dysfunctional state in the autonomic nervous system and/or can facilitate recovery
(72,73,74,75).
Conclusion
Autonomic nervous system changes and resultant bodily adaptations are critical during
exercise and sportive activities. In the treatment of diseases such as epilepsy and depression,
neuromodulation of the autonomic nervous system is already performed invasively or non-invasively,
6
but there is no data on its use for sports purposes. Parasympathetic enhancement after exercise or
sports is essential for controlling the sympathetic system and normalizing the functions to the resting
level. Auricular VNS seems efficient in increasing parasympathetic activity with the advantages of
being noninvasiveness and not having apparent side effects. So, it can be said that recovery after
exercise can be accelerated with auricular VNS. In this way, the negativities caused by overload and
excessive training can be reduced. Thanks to a better rest and recovery, the performance in the next
training program can be increased. Injuries that may occur due to insufficient recovery can be
prevented or reduced.
Conflict of Interest
Ali Veysel Ozden is one of the co-founders of Vagustim® Company which produces VNS
devices.
Funding
There is no funding.
Authors’ Contributions
Ali Veysel Özden has given substantial contributions to the conception, design and the writing
of the manuscript, authors Hasan Kerem Alptekin and Mehmet Ünal revised it critically and
completed the missing parts of the article. All authors have participated to drafting the manuscript. All
authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
All authors contributed to the manuscript and read and approved the final version of the
manuscript.
Resources
1. Coote JH. Recovery of heart rate following intense dynamic exercise. Exp Physiol. 2010
Mar;95(3):431-40.
2. Buchheit M, Laursen PB, Ahmaidi S. Parasympathetic reactivation after repeated sprint exercise.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Jul;293(1):H133-41.
3. Chalencon S, Busso T, Lacour JR, Garet M, Pichot V, Connes P, Gabel CP, Roche F, Barthélémy
JC. A model for the training effects in swimming demonstrates a strong relationship between
parasympathetic activity, performance and index of fatigue. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52636.
4. Garet M, Tournaire N, Roche F, Laurent R, Lacour JR, Barthélémy JC, Pichot V. Individual
Interdependence between nocturnal ANS activity and performance in swimmers. Med Sci Sports
Exerc. 2004 Dec;36(12):2112-8.
5. Stanley J, Peake JM, Buchheit M. Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise:
implications for training prescription. Sports Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):1259-77.
6. Gratze G, Mayer H, Luft FC, Skrabal F. Determinants of fast marathon performance: low basal
sympathetic drive, enhanced postcompetition vasodilatation and preserved cardiac performance after
competition. Br J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;42(11):882-8.
7. Chen JL, Yeh DP, Lee JP, Chen CY, Huang CY, Lee SD, Chen CC, Kuo TB, Kao CL, Kuo CH.
Parasympathetic nervous activity mirrors recovery status in weightlifting performance after training. J
Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jun;25(6):1546-52.
8. Boullosa DA, Tuimil JL, Leicht AS, Crespo-Salgado JJ. Parasympathetic modulation and running
performance in distance runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Mar;23(2):626-31.
9. Unal, M. Athlete Health and Performance. Istanbul: İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi. 2019.
10. Pugh J, Pugh C. Neurostimulation, doping, and the spirit of sport. Neuroethics. 2021;14(Suppl
2):141-158.
7
11. Kaniusas E, Kampusch S, Tittgemeyer M, Panetsos F, Gines RF, Papa M, Kiss A, Podesser B,
Cassara AM, Tanghe E, Samoudi AM, Tarnaud T, Joseph W, Marozas V, Lukosevicius A, Ištuk N,
Šarolić A, Lechner S, Klonowski W, Varoneckas G, Széles JC. Current Directions in the Auricular
Vagus Nerve Stimulation I - A Physiological Perspective. Front Neurosci. 2019 Aug 9;13:854.
12. Mulders DM, de Vos CC, Vosman I, van Putten MJ. The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on
cardiorespiratory parameters during rest and exercise. Seizure. 2015 Dec;33:24-8.
13. Clancy JA, Mary DA, Witte KK, Greenwood JP, Deuchars SA, Deuchars J. Non-invasive vagus
nerve stimulation in healthy humans reduces sympathetic nerve activity. Brain Stimul. 2014 Nov-
Dec;7(6):871-7.
14. Antonino D, Teixeira AL, Maia-Lopes PM, Souza MC, Sabino-Carvalho JL, Murray AR,
Deuchars J, Vianna LC. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation acutely improves spontaneous cardiac
baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young men: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Brain Stimul.
2017 Sep-Oct;10(5):875-881.
15. Czura CJ, Schultz A, Kaipel M, Khadem A, Huston JM, Pavlov VA, Redl H, Tracey KJ. Vagus
nerve stimulation regulates hemostasis in swine. Shock. 2010 Jun;33(6):608-13.
16. Ulgen Y, Buyuksarac B, Tunc B, Solmaz H. Extracellular and Intracellular Fluid Shifts on the
Onset of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc.
2019 Jul;2019:6888-6891.
17. Xia H, Liu Z, Liang W, Zeng X, Yang Y, Chen P, Zhong Z, Ye Q. Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Alleviates Hepatic Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury by Regulating Glutathione Production and
Transformation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Jan 21;2020:1079129.
18. Zhang Q, Lai Y, Deng J, Wang M, Wang Z, Wang M, Zhang Y, Yang X, Zhou X, Jiang H. Vagus
Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway. Oxid
Med Cell Longev. 2019 May 7;2019:9549506.
19. Wang M, Deng J, Lai H, Lai Y, Meng G, Wang Z, Zhou Z, Chen H, Yu Z, Li S, Jiang H. Vagus
Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury through Inhibiting NF-κB
Activation and iNOS Protein Expression. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Feb 20;2020:7106525.
20. Inoue T, Abe C, Sung SS, Moscalu S, Jankowski J, Huang L, Ye H, Rosin DL, Guyenet PG,
Okusa MD. Vagus nerve stimulation mediates protection from kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury
through α7nAChR+ splenocytes. J Clin Invest. 2016 May 2;126(5):1939-52.
21. Yagi M, Morishita K, Ueno A, Nakamura H, Akabori H, Senda A, Kojima M, Aiboshi J,
Costantini T, Coimbra R, Otomo Y. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve improves intestinal
blood flow after trauma and hemorrhagic shock. Surgery. 2020 Mar;167(3):638-645.
22. Zhang Y, Li H, Wang M, Meng G, Wang Z, Deng J, Wang M, Zhang Q, Yang S, Jiang H. Vagus
Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Acute Skeletal Muscle Injury Induced by Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats.
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019 Feb 28;2019:9208949.
23. Ortiz-Pomales YT, Krzyzaniak M, Coimbra R, Baird A, Eliceiri BP. Vagus nerve stimulation
blocks vascular permeability following burn in both local and distal sites. Burns. 2013 Feb;39(1):68-
75.
24. Chakravarthy K, Chaudhry H, Williams K, Christo PJ. Review of the Uses of Vagal Nerve
Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015 Dec;19(12):54.
25. Busch V, Zeman F, Heckel A, Menne F, Ellrich J, Eichhammer P. The effect of transcutaneous
vagus nerve stimulation on pain perception--an experimental study. Brain Stimul. 2013 Mar;6(2):202-
9.
26. Lerman I, Davis B, Huang M, Huang C, Sorkin L, Proudfoot J, Zhong E, Kimball D, Rao R,
Simon B, Spadoni A, Strigo I, Baker DG, Simmons AN. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation alters
neural response and physiological autonomic tone to noxious thermal challenge. PLoS One. 2019 Feb
13;14(2):e0201212.
27. Yap JYY, Keatch C, Lambert E, Woods W, Stoddart PR, Kameneva T. Critical Review of
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice. Front
Neurosci. 2020 Apr 28;14:284.
28. Frangos E, Richards EA, Bushnell MC. Do the psychological effects of vagus nerve stimulation
partially mediate vagal pain modulation? Neurobiol Pain. 2017 Jan-Jul;1:37-45.
8
29. De Couck M, Nijs J, Gidron Y. You may need a nerve to treat pain: the neurobiological rationale
for vagal nerve activation in pain management. Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1099-105.
30. Kaniusas E, Kampusch S, Tittgemeyer M, Panetsos F, Gines RF, Papa M, Kiss A, Podesser B,
Cassara AM, Tanghe E, Samoudi AM, Tarnaud T, Joseph W, Marozas V, Lukosevicius A, Ištuk N,
Lechner S, Klonowski W, Varoneckas G, Széles JC, Šarolić A. Current Directions in the Auricular
Vagus Nerve Stimulation II - An Engineering Perspective. Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 24;13:772.
31. Wang Y, Li SY, Wang D, Wu MZ, He JK, Zhang JL, Zhao B, Hou LW, Wang JY, Wang L, Wang
YF, Zhang Y, Zhang ZX, Rong PJ. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: From
Concept to Application. Neurosci Bull. 2021 Jun;37(6):853-862.
32. Staats P, Giannakopoulos G, Blake J, Liebler E, Levy RM. The Use of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve
Stimulation to Treat Respiratory Symptoms Associated With COVID-19: A Theoretical Hypothesis
and Early Clinical Experience. Neuromodulation. 2020 Aug;23(6):784-788.
33. Kaniusas E, Szeles JC, Kampusch S, Alfageme-Lopez N, Yucuma-Conde D, Li X, Mayol J,
Neumayer C, Papa M, Panetsos F. Non-invasive Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential
Treatment for Covid19-Originated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Front Physiol. 2020 Jul
28;11:890.
34. Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Fayyaz T, Hulsey DR, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP.
Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of
stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):698-706.
35. Khodaparast N, Kilgard MP, Casavant R, Ruiz A, Qureshi I, Ganzer PD, Rennaker RL 2nd, Hays
SA. Vagus Nerve Stimulation During Rehabilitative Training Improves Forelimb Recovery After
Chronic Ischemic Stroke in Rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Aug;30(7):676-84.
36. Hays SA, Ruiz A, Bethea T, Khodaparast N, Carmel JB, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus
nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training enhances recovery of forelimb function after ischemic
stroke in aged rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Jul;43:111-8.
37. Baig SS, Falidas K, Laud PJ, Snowdon N, Farooq MU, Ali A, Majid A, Redgrave JN.
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Upper Limb Repetitive Task Practice May
Improve Sensory Recovery in Chronic Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Dec;28(12):104348.
38. Kimberley TJ, Pierce D, Prudente CN, Francisco GE, Yozbatiran N, Smith P, Tarver B, Engineer
ND, Alexander Dickie D, Kline DK, Wigginton JG, Cramer SC, Dawson J. Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Paired With Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Chronic Stroke. Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2789-2792.
39. Wu D, Ma J, Zhang L, Wang S, Tan B, Jia G. Effect and Safety of Transcutaneous Auricular
Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Recovery of Upper Limb Motor Function in Subacute Ischemic Stroke
Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study. Neural Plast. 2020 Aug 1;2020:8841752.
40. Jiang Y, Li L, Ma J, Zhang L, Niu F, Feng T, Li C. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation promotes
functional recovery and enhances the post-ischemic angiogenic response in an ischemia/reperfusion
rat model. Neurochem Int. 2016 Jul;97:73-82.
41. Pruitt DT, Schmid AN, Kim LJ, Abe CM, Trieu JL, Choua C, Hays SA, Kilgard MP, Rennaker
RL. Vagus Nerve Stimulation Delivered with Motor Training Enhances Recovery of Function after
Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 May 1;33(9):871-9.
42. Darrow MJ, Mian TM, Torres M, Haider Z, Danaphongse T, Seyedahmadi A, Rennaker RL 2nd,
Hays SA, Kilgard MP. The tactile experience paired with vagus nerve stimulation determines the
degree of sensory recovery after chronic nerve damage. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Jan 1;396:112910.
43. Murakami H, Li S, Foreman R, Yin J, Hirai T, Chen JDZ. Intraoperative Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Accelerates Postoperative Recovery in Rats. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):320-330.
44. Ben-Menachem E, Revesz D, Simon BJ, Silberstein S. Surgically implanted and non-invasive
vagus nerve stimulation: a review of efficacy, safety and tolerability. Eur J Neurol. 2015
Sep;22(9):1260-8.
45. Redgrave J, Day D, Leung H, Laud PJ, Ali A, Lindert R, Majid A. Safety and tolerability of
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-
Dec;11(6):1225-1238.
46. Kannankeril PJ, Le FK, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ. Parasympathetic effects on heart rate recovery
after exercise. J Investig Med. 2004 Sep;52(6):394-401.
9
47. Imai K, Sato H, Hori M, Kusuoka H, Ozaki H, Yokoyama H, Takeda H, Inoue M, Kamada T.
Vagally mediated heart rate recovery after exercise is accelerated in athletes but blunted in patients
with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 15;24(6):1529-35.
48. Ebersole KT, Cornell DJ, Flees RJ, Shemelya CM, Noel SE. Contribution of the Autonomic
Nervous System to Recovery in Firefighters. J Athl Train. 2020 Sep 1;55(9):1001-1008.
49. Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Lauer MS. Heart-rate recovery immediately
after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1351-7.
50. Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher VF, Vora S, Kalisetti D, Prakash M, Do D, Myers J. Heart rate
recovery: validation and methodologic issues. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Dec;38(7):1980-7.
51. Borresen J, Lambert MI. Autonomic control of heart rate during and after exercise : measurements
and implications for monitoring training status. Sports Med. 2008;38(8):633-46.
52. Michael S, Jay O, Graham KS, Davis GM. Higher exercise intensity delays postexercise recovery
of impedance-derived cardiac sympathetic activity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017 Aug;42(8):834-
840.
53. Sun P, Yan H, Ranadive SM, Lane AD, Kappus RM, Bunsawat K, Baynard T, Hu M, Li S,
Fernhall B. Autonomic Recovery Is Delayed in Chinese Compared with Caucasian following
Treadmill Exercise. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0147104.
54. Gerardo GM, Williams DP, Kessler M, Spangler DP, Hillecke TK, Thayer JF, Koenig J. Body
mass index and parasympathetic nervous system reactivity and recovery following graded exercise.
Am J Hum Biol. 2019 Jan;31(1):e23208.
55. Bunsawat K, White DW, Kappus RM, Baynard T. Caffeine delays autonomic recovery following
acute exercise. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1473-9.
56. Gonzaga LA, Vanderlei LCM, Gomes RL, Valenti VE. Caffeine affects autonomic control of heart
rate and blood pressure recovery after aerobic exercise in young adults: a crossover study. Sci Rep.
2017 Oct 26;7(1):14091.
57. Gonzaga LA, Vanderlei LCM, Gomes RL, Garner DM, Valenti VE. Involvement of
Cardiorespiratory Capacity on the Acute Effects of Caffeine on Autonomic Recovery. Medicina
(Kaunas). 2019 May 23;55(5):196.
58. de Oliveira LS, Fontes AMGG, Vitor ALR, Vanderlei FM, Garner DM, Valenti VE. Lower
Systolic Blood Pressure in Normotensive Subjects is Related to Better Autonomic Recovery
Following Exercise. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):1006.
59. Gifford RM, Boos CJ, Reynolds RM, Woods DR. Recovery time and heart rate variability
following extreme endurance exercise in healthy women. Physiol Rep. 2018 Nov;6(21):e13905.
60. Michael S, Jay O, Graham KS, Davis GM. Influence of exercise modality on cardiac
parasympathetic and sympathetic indices during post-exercise recovery. J Sci Med Sport. 2018
Oct;21(10):1079-1084.
61. Michael S, Jay O, Graham KS, Davis GM. Longer exercise duration delays post-exercise recovery
of cardiac parasympathetic but not sympathetic indices. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Sep;117(9):1897-
1906.
62. Atkinson CL, Lewis NC, Carter HH, Thijssen DH, Ainslie PN, Green DJ. Impact of sympathetic
nervous system activity on post-exercise flow-mediated dilatation in humans. J Physiol. 2015 Dec
1;593(23):5145-56.
63. Tulppo MP, Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kallio M, Seppänen T, Tiinanen S, Mäkikallio TH,
Huikuri HV. Sympatho-vagal interaction in the recovery phase of exercise. Clin Physiol Funct
Imaging. 2011 Jul;31(4):272-81.
64. Weberruss H, Maucher J, Oberhoffer R, Müller J. Recovery of the cardiac autonomic nervous and
vascular system after maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in recreational athletes. Eur J Appl
Physiol. 2018 Jan;118(1):205-211.
65. Javorka M, Zila I, Balhárek T, Javorka K. Heart rate recovery after exercise: relations to heart rate
variability and complexity. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2002 Aug;35(8):991-1000.
66. Stanley J, Peake JM, Buchheit M. Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise:
implications for training prescription. Sports Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):1259-77.
10
67. Düking P, Zinner C, Reed JL, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Predefined vs data-guided training
prescription based on autonomic nervous system variation: A systematic review. Scand J Med Sci
Sports. 2020 Dec;30(12):2291-2304.
68. Bellenger CR, Fuller JT, Thomson RL, Davison K, Robertson EY, Buckley JD. Monitoring
Athletic Training Status Through Autonomic Heart Rate Regulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis. Sports Med. 2016 Oct;46(10):1461-86.
69. Ihsan M, Watson G, Abbiss CR. What are the Physiological Mechanisms for Post-Exercise Cold
Water Immersion in the Recovery from Prolonged Endurance and Intermittent Exercise? Sports Med.
2016 Aug;46(8):1095-109.
70. Conway CR, Xiong W. The Mechanism of Action of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Treatment-
Resistant Depression: Current Conceptualizations. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;41(3):395-407.
71. Laborde S, Wanders J, Mosley E, Javelle F. Influence of physical post-exercise recovery
techniques on vagally-mediated heart rate variability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin
Physiol Funct Imaging. 2023 Sep 27.
72. Staley R, Garcia RG, Stowell J, Sclocco R, Fisher H, Napadow V, Goldstein JM, Barbieri R.
Modulatory Effects of Respiratory-Gated Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Cardiovagal Activity
in Hypertension. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:2581-2584.
73. Samniang B, Shinlapawittayatorn K, Chunchai T, Pongkan W, Kumfu S, Chattipakorn SC,
KenKnight BH, Chattipakorn N. Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Cardiac Function by Preventing
Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Obese-Insulin Resistant Rats. Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 1;6:19749.
74. Nearing BD, Anand IS, Libbus I, Dicarlo LA, Kenknight BH, Verrier RL. Vagus Nerve
Stimulation Provides Multiyear Improvements in Autonomic Function and Cardiac Electrical Stability
in the ANTHEM-HF Study. J Card Fail. 2021 Feb;27(2):208-216.
75. Annoni EM, Van Helden D, Guo Y, Levac B, Libbus I, KenKnight BH, Osborn JW, Tolkacheva
EG. Chronic Low-Level Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Long-Term Survival in Salt-Sensitive
Hypertensive Rats. Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 31;10:25.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In sports, physical recovery following exercise‐induced fatigue is mediated via the reactivation of the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS). A non‐invasive way to quantify the reactivation of the PNS is to assess vagally‐mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV), which can then be used as an index of physical recovery. This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the effects of physical recovery techniques following exercise‐induced fatigue on vmHRV, specifically via the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). Randomized controlled trials from the databases PubMed , WebOfScience, and SportDiscus were included. Twenty‐four studies were part of the systematic review and 17 were included in the meta‐analysis. Using physical post‐exercise recovery techniques displayed a small to moderate positive effect on RMSSD ( k = 22, Hedges’ g = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.20 to 0.61, p = 0.04) with moderate heterogeneity. In the subgroup analyses, cold water immersion displayed a moderate to large positive effect ( g = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.07) compared to none for other techniques. For exercise type, physical recovery techniques performed after resistance exercise ( g = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.89) demonstrated a larger positive effect than after cardiovascular intermittent ( g = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.97), while physical recovery techniques performed after cardiovascular continuous exercise had no effect. No significant subgroup differences for training status and exercise intensity were observed. Overall, physical post‐exercise recovery techniques can accelerate PNS reactivation as indexed by vmHRV, but the effectiveness varies with the technique and exercise type. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Whether in the West or the East, the connection between the ear and the rest of the body has been explored for a long time. Especially in the past century or more, the relevant theoretical and applied research on the ear has greatly promoted the development of ear therapy, and finally the concept of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been proposed. The purpose of taVNS is to treat a disease non-invasively by applying electrical current to the cutaneous receptive field formed by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve in the outer ear. In the past two decades, taVNS has been a topic of basic, clinical, and transformation research. It has been applied as an alternative to drug treatment for a variety of diseases. Based on the rapid understanding of the application of taVNS to human health and disease, some limitations in the development of this field have also been gradually exposed. Here, we comprehensively review the origin and research status of the field.
Article
Full-text available
Background Patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFrEF) experience long-term deterioration of autonomic function and cardiac electrical stability linked to increased mortality risk. The Autonomic Neural Regulation Therapy to Enhance Myocardial Function in Heart Failure (ANTHEM-HF) trial reported improved heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate turbulence (HRT) and reduced T-wave alternans (TWA) after 12 months of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). We investigated whether the benefits of chronic VNS persist in the long term. Methods and Results Effects of chronic VNS on heart rate, HRV, HRT, TWA, R-wave and T-wave heterogeneity (RWH, TWH), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) incidence were evaluated in all ANTHEM-HF patients with ambulatory ECG data at 24 and 36 months (n = 25). Autonomic markers improved significantly at 24 and 36 months compared to baseline [heart rate, square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal-to-normal intervals (rMSSD), standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), HF-HRV, HRT slope, P < 0.05]. Peak TWA levels remained reduced at 24 and 36 months (P < 0.0001). Reductions in RWH and TWH at 6 and 12 months persisted at 24 and 36 months (P < 0.01). NSVT decreased at 12, 24, and 36 months (P < 0.025). No sudden cardiac deaths, ventricular fibrillation, or sustained ventricular tachycardia occurred. Conclusion In symptomatic patients with HFrEF, chronic VNS appears to confer wide-ranging, persistent improvements in autonomic tone (HRV), baroreceptor sensitivity (HRT), and cardiac electrical stability (TWA, RWH, TWH).
Article
Full-text available
Monitoring variations in the functioning of the autonomic nervous system may help personalize training of runners and provide more pronounced physiological adaptations and performance improvements. We systematically reviewed the scientific literature comparing physiological adaptations and/or improvements in performance following training based on responses of the autonomic nervous system (ie, changes in heart rate variability) and predefined training. PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched systematically in July 2019. Keywords related to endurance, running, autonomic nervous system, and training. Studies were included if they (a) involved interventions consisting predominantly of running training; (b) lasted at least 3 weeks; (c) reported pre- and post-intervention assessment of running performance and/or physiological parameters; (d) included an experimental group performing training adjusted continuously on the basis of alterations in HRV and a control group; and (e) involved healthy runners. Five studies involving six interventions and 166 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Four HRV-based interventions reduced the amount of moderate- and/or high-intensity training significantly. In five interventions, improvements in performance parameters (3000 m, 5000 m, Loadmax, Tlim) were more pronounced following HRV-based training. Peak oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 peak ) and submaximal running parameters (eg, LT1, LT2) improved following both HRV-based and predefined training, with no clear difference in the extent of improvement in V ˙ O 2 peak . Submaximal running parameters tended to improve more following HRV-based training. Research findings to date have been limited and inconsistent. Both HRV-based and predefined training improve running performance and certain submaximal physiological adaptations, with effects of the former training tending to be greater.
Article
Full-text available
Background. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is regarded as a potential method for recovery in stroke. The effectiveness of taVNS in acute and subacute stroke should be further discussed as previously, only a few small-scale trials have focused on chronic stroke patients. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect and safety of taVNS on upper limb motor function in subacute ischemic stroke patients. Methods. Twenty-one subacute ischemia stroke patients with single upper limb motor function impairment were enrolled and randomly assigned to conventional rehabilitation training with real or sham taVNS, delivered for 15 consecutive days. Electrodes were fixed to the cymba conchae of the left ear with or without electrical stimulation. Conventional rehabilitation training was performed immediately after the end of real or sham taVNS by the same therapists. Baseline assessments were performed on day 0 of enrollment, and posttreatment evaluations were performed at 15 days, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after the first intervention. The assessment included the upper limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-U), the Wolf motor function test (WMFT), the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), and Brunnstrom stage. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured before and after each taVNS intervention. At the same time, any adverse effects were observed during the procedure. Outcomes were assessed by a blind evaluator. Results. There were no significant differences in FMA-U, WMFT, FIM, and Brunnstrom scores between the two groups at baseline (P>0.05). At the endpoint, the FMA-U, WMFT, and FIM scores were significantly higher than before treatment (P
Article
Full-text available
Background: Covid-19 is an infectious disease caused by an invasion of the alveolar epithelial cells by coronavirus 19. The most severe outcome of the disease is the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) combined with hypoxemia and cardiovascular damage. ARDS and co-morbidities are associated with inflammatory cytokine storms, sympathetic hyperactivity, and respiratory dysfunction. Hypothesis: In the present paper, we present and justify a novel potential treatment for Covid19-originated ARDS and associated co-morbidities, based on the non-invasive stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Methods: Auricular vagus nerve stimulation activates the parasympathetic system including anti-inflammatory pathways (the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis) while regulating the abnormal sympatho-vagal balance and improving respiratory control. Results: Along the paper (1) we expose the role of the parasympathetic system and the vagus nerve in the control of inflammatory processes (2) we formulate our physiological and methodological hypotheses (3) we provide a large body of clinical and preclinical data that support the favorable effects of auricular vagus nerve stimulation in inflammation, sympatho-vagal balance as well as in respiratory and cardiac ailments, and (4) we list the (few) possible collateral effects of the treatment. Finally, we discuss auricular vagus nerve stimulation protective potential, especially in the elderly and co-morbid population with already reduced parasympathetic response. Conclusions: Auricular vagus nerve stimulation is a safe clinical procedure and it could be either an effective treatment for ARDS originated by Covid-19 and similar viruses or a supplementary treatment to actual ARDS therapeutic approaches.
Article
Full-text available
There is increasing interest in using neuro-stimulation devices to achieve an ergogenic effect in elite athletes. Although the World Anti-Doping Authority (WADA) does not currently prohibit neuro-stimulation techniques, a number of researchers have called on WADA to consider its position on this issue. Focusing on trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a case study of an imminent so-called ‘neuro-doping’ intervention, we argue that the emerging evidence suggests that tDCS may meet WADA’s own criteria (pertaining to safety, performance-enhancing effect, and incompatibility with the ‘spirit of sport’) for a method’s inclusion on its list of prohibited substances and methods. We begin by surveying WADA’s general approach to doping, and highlight important limitations to the current evidence base regarding the performance-enhancing effect of pharmacological doping substances. We then review the current evidence base for the safety and efficacy of tDCS, and argue that despite significant shortcomings, there may be sufficient evidence for WADA to consider prohibiting tDCS, in light of the comparable flaws in the evidence base for pharmacological doping substances. In the second half of the paper, we argue that the question of whether WADA ought to ban tDCS turns significantly on the question of whether it is compatible with the ‘spirit of sport’ criterion. We critique some of the previously published positions on this, and advocate our own sport-specific and application-specific approach. Despite these arguments, we finally conclude by suggesting that tDCS ought to be monitored rather than prohibited due to compelling non-ideal considerations.
Article
Full-text available
Several studies have illustrated that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) can elicit therapeutic effects that are similar to those produced by its invasive counterpart, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). VNS is an FDA-approved therapy for the treatment of both depression and epilepsy, but it is limited to the management of more severe, intervention-resistant cases as a second or third-line treatment option due to perioperative risks involved with device implantation. In contrast, tVNS is a non-invasive technique that involves the application of electrical currents through surface electrodes at select locations, most commonly targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) and the cervical branch of the vagus nerve in the neck. Although it has been shown that tVNS elicits hypo- and hyperactivation in various regions of the brain associated with anxiety and mood regulation, the mechanism of action and influence of stimulation parameters on clinical outcomes remains predominantly hypothetical. Suppositions are largely based on correlations between the neurobiology of the vagus nerve and its effects on neural activity. However, tVNS has also been investigated for several other disorders, including tinnitus, migraine and pain, by targeting the vagus nerve at sites in both the ear and the neck. As most of the described methods differ in the parameters and protocols applied, there is currently no firm evidence on the optimal location for tVNS or the stimulation parameters that provide the greatest therapeutic effects for a specific condition. This review presents the current status of tVNS with a focus on stimulation parameters, stimulation sites, and available devices. For tVNS to reach its full potential as a non-invasive and clinically relevant therapy, it is imperative that systematic studies be undertaken to reveal the mechanism of action and optimal stimulation modalities.
Article
Loss of sensory function is a common consequence of neurological injury. Recent clinical and preclinical evidence indicates vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with tactile rehabilitation, consisting of delivery of a variety of mechanical stimuli to the hyposensitive skin surface, yields substantial and long-lasting recovery of somatosensory function after median and ulnar nerve transection and repair. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a specific component of the tactile rehabilitation paired with VNS is necessary for recovery of somatosensory function. In a second experiment in a separate cohort, we investigated whether VNS paired with tactile rehabilitation could improve skilled forelimb motor function. Elements of the study design, including planned sample size, assessments, and statistical comparisons, were preregistered prior to beginning data collection (https://osf.io/3tm8u/). Animals received a peripheral nerve injury (PNI) causing chronic sensory loss. Eight weeks after injury, animals were given a VNS implant followed by six weeks of tactile rehabilitation sessions consisting of repeated application of one of two distinct mechanical stimuli, a filament or a paintbrush, to the previously denervated forepaw. VNS paired with either filament indentation or brushing of the paw significantly improved recovery of forelimb withdrawal thresholds after PNI compared to tactile rehabilitation without VNS. The effect size was twice as large when VNS was paired with brushing compared to VNS paired with point indentation. An independent replication in a second cohort confirmed that VNS paired with brush restored forelimb withdrawal thresholds to normal. These rats displayed significant improvements in performance on a skilled forelimb task compared to rats that did not receive VNS. These findings support the utility of pairing VNS with tactile rehabilitation to improve recovery of somatosensory and motor function after neurological injury. Additionally, this study demonstrates that the sensory characteristics of the rehabilitation paired with VNS determine the degree of recovery.
Article
Context Sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) have accounted for nearly half of the line-of-duty deaths among US firefighters over the past 10 years. In 2018, 33% of all SCDs occurred after the end of a fire service call. Researchers have suggested that an imbalance in autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation of heart rate postcall may interfere with recovery in firefighters. Objective To use heart-rate recovery (HRR) and heart-rate variability (HRV), 2 noninvasive markers of ANS function, to examine the ANS recovery profiles of firefighters. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Firehouse and research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants Thirty-seven male career active-duty firefighters (age = 39 ± 9 years, height = 178.8 ± 5.4 cm, mass = 87.9 ± 11.2 kg). Main Outcome Measure(s) Percentage of maximal HR (%MHR) and HRV (natural log of the square root of the mean sum of the squared differences [lnRMSSD]) were collected after both submaximal and maximal exercise protocols during a 10-minute seated recovery. The HRR profiles were examined by calculating the asymptote, amplitude, and decay parameters of the monoexponential HRR curve for each participant. Results Differences in HRR parameters after 10 minutes of seated recovery were identified after submaximal versus maximal exercise (P < .001). In addition, although ANS was more suppressed after maximal exercise, HRV indicated incomplete recovery, and regardless of the test, recovery %MHR and lnRMSSD values did not return to pretest %MHR and lnRMSSD values. Conclusions Our results suggest that the ANS contributions to recovery in active-duty firefighters are exercise-intensity specific, and this is likely an important factor when establishing best-practice recovery guidelines.