ArticlePDF Available

Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement

Authors:
300 ORIGINAL PAPER / ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement
ABSTRACT
Background: The integration of articial intelligence (AI) into medical education has
sparked a paradigm shift in pedagogical approaches, reshaping the way medical
knowledge is accessed, processed, and applied. Medical education is a dynamic eld
that demands continuous adaptation to the evolving healthcare landscape. ChatGPT, an
advanced AI language model, with its natural language understanding and generation
capabilities, oers a multifaceted toolset that enhances various aspects of medical edu-
cation. Objective: The objective of this paper is to explore how ChatGPT, an advanced AI
language model, is transforming medical education by serving as a dynamic information
resource and driving curriculum reform. It aims to highlight the multifaceted uses of
ChatGPT and its potential to reshape the pedagogical landscape in medical education.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar databases
were searched to assess the literature that met the study objectives from 2019 to August
2023 with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The results demonstrate
that ChatGPT’s applications in medical education are diverse and encompass real-time
curriculum adaptation, personalized learning, and collaborative learning. Its capacity to
provide immediate and contextually relevant information has the potential to enhance the
quality of medical education signicantly. Conclusion: ChatGPT’s integration into medical
education represents a transformative shift in educational approaches. It oers a wide
range of capabilities, from serving as a repository of medical knowledge to facilitating
collaborative learning. As medical education continues to evolve, ChatGPT emerges as
a powerful tool that can reshape pedagogy and drive meaningful curriculum reform to
meet the needs of modern healthcare practice.ChatGPT emerges as a transformative
tool that holds the potential to reshape the landscape of medical pedagogy and drive
meaningful curriculum reform.
Keywords: Articial intelligence, ChatGPT, medical education, curriculum.
1. BACKGROUND
e integration of articial intelli-
gence (AI) into and other generative
language models in medical education
has sparked signicant interest, re-
shaping the way medical knowledge is
accessed, processed, and applied. is
has oered potential benets and posed
various challenges. Moreover, it has in-
troduced innovative possibilities for
enhancing the learning process Among
these advancements, ChatGPT, a state-
of-the-art generative language model,
emerges as a prominent tool with versa-
tile uses in medical education.
Medical education is a dynamic eld
that demands continuous adaptation
to the evolving healthcare landscape.
ChatGPT, an advanced AI language
model, with its natural language under-
standing and generation capabilities,
oers a multifaceted toolset that en-
hances various aspects of medical edu-
cation.
Articial intelligence technology is
not just activating comprehensive re-
forms in global medical education; it is
also fundamentally altering the land-
scape and accessibility of medical edu-
cation. It has the potential to enable ex-
tensive personalization and diversica-
tion of medical education. It is impera-
tive to address t he issues and challenges
presented by A I in medical education
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education:
Applications and Implications for Curriculum
Enhancement
Yasar Ahmed
1Medical Oncology Department, St
Vincent’s University Hospital. Ireland
Corresponding author: Yasar Ahmed, Consultant
Medical Oncologist, Medical Oncology
Department, St Vincent’s Universit y Hospital.
Dublin, Telephone: +353871022059. E-mail:
drhammor@gmail.com, ORCID ID https://orcid.
org/0000-0002-0691-9718
doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.300-305
ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305
Received: JUL 25, 2023
Accepted: SEP 04, 2023
ORIGINAL PAPER
© 2023 Yas ar Ahme d
This is an O pen Ac cess artic le distribu ted und er the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-
Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc/./) which permits unrestricted non-
commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ORIGINAL PAPER / ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305 301
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement
and curriculum. Collaborative eorts involving scholars and
society are essential in driving medical education towards el-
evated standa rds of qualit y, ecienc y, and long-term viability
(1).
e objective of this paper is to explore how ChatGPT, an
advanced AI language model, is transforming medical ed-
ucation by serving as a dynamic information resource and
driving curriculum reformis article explores the various
applications of ChatGPT within the realm of medical educa-
tion, highlighting its potential for reforming the curriculum.
rough a synthesis of existing literature and insights, this
art icle shed light on t he multifaceted ways in wh ich ChatGPT
is being leveraged to optimize medical education practices. It
provides valuable perspectives for educators, researchers, and
policyma kers on how to eectively leverage ChatGPT’s capa-
bilities while addressing the concerns surrounding its imple-
mentation in medical education.
2. OBJECTIVE
is article explores the various applications of ChatGPT
within t he realm of medic al education, h ighlighting it s poten-
tial for reforming the curriculum.
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS
High-quality data that fullled the study objectives were
included. Furthermore, exhaustive research on articles avail-
able in gateways and reputable databases such as PubMed,
Scopus, Web of Science, ER IC, and Google Scholar were con-
sidered for literature review. Articles published in English
from 2019 to 2023 were selected.
We searched the key words of “Articial Intelligence” OR “
AI” OR “ChatGPT” AND “medical education” OR “medical
curriculum
Gray literature, theses, abstracts short communication,
opinion papers, leer to the editor, commentary articles,
non–English-language articles and literature dated before
2019, were excluded from the study.
4. RESULTS
USES OF CH ATGPT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION
e incorporation of articial intelligence (AI) into med-
ical education has introduced innovative possibilities for en-
hancing the learning process. A mong these advancements,
ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art generative language model,
emerges as a prominent tool with versatile uses in medical
education(2). ChatGPT can be useful in medical education,
including tailoring education based on the needs of the stu-
dent with immediate feedback. It can also be used to enhance
communication skills given proper academic mentoring(3).
Additionally, a recent preprint by Benoit showed the prom-
ising potential of ChatGPT in rapidly craing consistent re-
alistic clinical vignees of variable complexities that can be a
valuable educational source with lower costs(4).
1.1. Enhancing Information Access and Dissemination
ChatGPT’s ability to swily retrieve and present medical
information has the potential to revolutionize the accessi-
bilit y of medical k nowledge(5). Whether students are seeking
explanations of medical concepts, treatment protocols, or
diagnostic criteria, ChatGPT can provide immediate re-
sponses, streamlining the process of information acquisition.
Moreover, ChatGPT’s breadth of knowledge spans across
diverse medical disciplines and specialties. is breadth en-
ables it to function as an all-encompassing resource, accom-
modating the multifaceted nature of medical education(6).
Medical students, oen required to navigate a spectrum of
subjects, can rely on ChatGPT to provide succinct yet com-
prehensive explanations that span from anatomy to pharma-
cology to clinical practice. is capacity to consolidate in-
formation into concise responses aligns with the modern de-
mand for ecient and eective learning tools(7,8).
In the realm of medical education, the pursuit of accuracy
is of paramount importance. Medical students and educators
ali ke must be assured that the in formation they access i s cred-
ible, evidence-based, and up-to-date. ChatGPT, while pro-
cient in generating responses, is not immune to potential in-
accuracies or outdated information. erefore, its integration
necessitates a rigorous validation process. is validation in-
volves cross-referencing C hatGPT’s responses wit h reputable
medical literature, peer-reviewed research, and established
medica l guidelines. is two-step verication, combining the
power of AI with the expertise of human evaluators, serves as
a safeguard against misinformation and reinforces the com-
mitment to accuracy(9).
ChatGPT’s role as a comprehensive and immediate infor-
mation resource holds immense promise in the realm of med-
ical education. Its ability to swily retrieve and consolidate
medical knowledge, coupled with the potential for real-time
updates, presents an opportunity to redene how medical
students and educators access information(10,11). Never-
theless, it is crucial to recognize that ChatGPT’s deployment
requires rigorous validation and quality control measures to
ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information it pro-
vides(12,13). As educators harness the potential of ChatGPT,
they must navigate the balance between technological conve-
nience and a steadfast commitment to oering accurate and
up-to-date medical information to nurture the next genera-
tion of healthcare professionals(14).
1.2. Personalized Learning Experiences
e customization of learning experiences is a pivotal as-
pect of modern education. is discourse delves into how
ChatGPT can contribute to personalized learning in medical
education, tailoring content to individual students’ needs,
learning styles, and preferences(15). By doing so, ChatGPT
has the potential to foster a more engaging and eective edu-
cational journey, ultimately shaping a new frontier in medical
pedagogy.
In the realm of medical education, the heterogeneity of
students’ backgrounds, prior knowledge, and learning paces
underscores the signicance of personalized learning ap-
proaches.(16) ChatGPT, powered by its capacity for natural
language understanding and generation, has the ability to an-
alyze student queries, responses, and interactions, creating a
unique prole of each learner.(17) is personalized prole
serves as a blueprint for tailoring educational content and en-
gagement strategies that resonate with indiv idual students.
e tailoring of content encompasses adapting educational
material to align with the specic needs of each learner. For
instance, a student grappling with complex anatomical con-
cepts might receive explanations that emphasize visual aids,
interactive diagrams, or step-by-step breakdowns. Con-
302 ORIGINAL PAPER / ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement
versely, a more experienced student seeking advanced med-
ical discussions could be provided with in-depth analyses,
research papers, and case studies(18). rough this content
adaptation, ChatGPT ensures that each student receives in-
formation that is at their level of comprehension, preventing
frustration from overly complex material or boredom from
oversimplied content(19).
Learning styles play a crucial role in knowledge absorption
and retention. ChatGPT s abilit y to recognize and accommo-
date various learning styles, whether auditory, visual, or kin-
esthetickinaesthetic, is transformative(20). Visual learners
can benet from diagrams, charts, and visual aids, while au-
ditory learners can engage through voice interactions that
explain complex concepts. KinestheticKinaesthetic learners
might receive interactive simulations that allow them to en-
gage directly with medical scenarios. is alignment with in-
dividual learning preferences enhances information assimila-
tion, making the learning process more intuitive and enjoy-
able.
Furthermore, ChatGPT’s continuous interaction with
students generates insights into their preferences, pace, and
areas of interest. Over time, ChatGPT can identify paerns
in students’ queries and responses, adapting its responses ac-
cordingly(21). For instance, if a student frequently seeks in-
formation on cardiology, ChatGPT can proactively provide
updates on the latest cardiology research or suggest relevant
resources. is proactive approach not only fosters student
engagement but also nurtures a sense of ownership over the
learning process.
Engagement lies at the heart of eective education. e
dynamic, conversational nature of ChatGPT contributes to
a heightened sense of engagement and interactivity. Rather
than passively consuming information, students actively
participate in discussions, debates, and queries(22). is
two-way interaction transforms the learning experience from
a monologue to a dialogue, fueling curiosity and exploration.
Additionally, ChatGPT’s responsiveness to students’ queries
creates a sense of immediacy, mirroring the real-time nature
of medical practice(23).
ChatG PT’s potential to c ontribute to person alized le arnin g
in medical education marks a sign icant advancement i n ped-
agogical strategies. By adapting content, catering to diverse
learning styles, and fostering engagement through interactive
conversations, ChatGPT oers a pathway to create a tailored
educational journey for each student. As medical educators
seek to enhance learning outcomes and equip students with
versatile skills, ChatGPT emerges as a transformative tool
that has the potential to redene the boundaries of personal-
ized medical education(24).
1.3. Faci litating Cur riculum Adaptation
Medical education must remain adaptable to the ev-
er-evolving landscape of healthcare. ChatGPT’s dynamic ca-
pabilities can aid educators in promptly updating curr icula to
reect the latest medical advancements and emerging trends.
As medical educators strive to prepare students for the com-
plexities of hea lthcare prac tice, the cha llenge of maint aining a
curriculum that reects the latest advancements becomes in-
creasingly critical. In this context, ChatGPT, an advanced AI
lang uage model, oers a transformative solut ion by servi ng as
a tool for real-time curriculum adaptation in medical educa-
tion(25).
Traditiona l medical c urric ula oen encou nter dic ulties in
keeping up wit h the relentless pace of medica l breakthroughs.
e time required to design, approve, and implement cha nges
to curricula can result in students learning outdated infor-
mation or missing out on emerging medical paradigms(26).
ChatGPT’s ability to aggregate and process vast volumes of
information in real time can address this challenge by func-
tioning as a dynamic content updater. By continuously moni-
toring the latest medical literature, research publicat ions, and
clinical guidelines, ChatGPT can identify and integrate cut-
ting-edge knowledge into the curriculum on the y(27).
is real-time curriculum adaptation goes beyond mere in-
formation dissemination. ChatGPT’s natural language pro-
cessing capabilities enable it to contextualize and integrate
new knowledge seamlessly into existing curricula(28). For
instance, if a groundbreaking study challenges conventional
treatment approaches, ChatGPT can swily synthesize the
implic ations of thi s study, outline t he rationale for t he change,
and present it in a manner that aligns with the broader cur-
riculum. is adaptability ensures that students receive not
only updated information but also a comprehensive under-
standing of the context and implications of these updates.
Furthermore, ChatGPT’s personalized learning features
enable it to cater to the diverse learning paces and prefer-
ences of individual students. Recognizing that students prog-
ress through curricula at varying speeds, ChatGPT can iden-
tify areas where students require additional focus or where
they exhibit accelerated progress.(29) By tailoring content
delivery based on individual progress, ChatGPT fosters a
learning experience that is both tailored and engaging. is
adaptive mechanism enhances student motivation and reten-
tion, resulting in a more ecient and eective educational
journey(30).
While ChatGPT’s potential for real-time curriculum adap-
tation is promising, it is vital to recognize the ethical implica-
tions of rapid changes. Ensur ing that the upd ated inform ation
is meticulously validated and corroborated t hrough reputable
sources is imperative to prevent the dissemination of misin-
formation.(31) is validation process, involving human ex-
perts and established medical literature, ser ves as a safeguard
against potential inaccuracies that may arise from the fast-
paced integration of new information(13)
ChatGPT’s role as a tool for real-time curriculum adapta-
tion presents an innovat ive solution to the cha llenge of equip-
ping medical students with the most current knowledge. Its
ability to monitor, synthesize, and contextualize emerging
medical advancements empowers educators to oer a curric-
ulum t hat reects t he dynam ic nature of medic al practice(11).
However, this transformation must be underpinned by a
commitment to accuracy, quality assurance, and ethical con-
siderations. By embracing ChatGPT as a pa rtner in curr icular
evolution, medica l education can bridge the gap between rap-
idly evolving medical knowledge and the educational frame-
work, fostering a generation of healthcare professionals who
are well-prepared to address the ever-changing landscape of
medicine(32).
1.4. Addressing Clinical Scenarios and Prob-
lem-Solving
e heart of medical education lies in preparing future
ORIGINAL PAPER / ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305 303
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement
physicians to navigate complex clinical scenarios with com-
petence and condence. Clinical problem-solving, a cor-
nerstone of medical practice, demands a mastery of crit-
ical thinking, diagnostic skills, and evidence-based deci-
sion-making. As medical educators strive to cultivate these
competencies, the integration of articial intelligence (AI),
particularly ChatGPT, has emerged as a potent tool to aug-
ment this process(3,33). e ability to eectively handle clin-
ical scenarios requires a deep understanding of medical con-
cepts and the capacity to apply this knowledge in real-world
contexts. ChatGPT’s AI capabilities position it as a dynamic
platform to recreate lifelike patient interactions. By inpuing
a hypothetical patient case, students can engage in simulated
conversations with ChatGPT, emulating the dialogue that
transpires in actual clinical encounters(8,18,27). is simula-
tion transcends the passive consumption of information and
immerses students in the intricacies of patient-provider com-
munication, enabling them to respond to queries, convey di-
agnoses, and discuss treatment options.
e simulated patient interactions facilitated by ChatGPT
extend beyond scripted conversations. e AI model’s adap-
tive responses mimic the unpredictability and variability
that characterize clinical consultations. is adaptability
enhances students’ ability to think on their feet, cultivate
empathy, and grasp the nuances of patient communica-
tion(7,23,33). As students engage in these interactions, they
develop the crit ical commun ication ski lls that u nderpin eec-
tive pat ient care, foster ing a well-rounded approach to cli nical
problem-solving(3).
Furthermore, ChatGPT’s potential to simulate diverse pa-
tient presentations allows medical students to practice clin-
ical decision-making with a range of scenarios, from routine
cases to complex medical puzzles(34). is multifaceted ex-
posure enhances students’ diagnostic acumen, enabling them
to identify paerns, formulate hypotheses, and select appro-
priate diagnostic tests. e iterative nature of these simula-
tions encou rages students to rene t heir diagnostic st rategies,
promoting a growth mindset and cultivating resilience in the
face of diagnostic uncertainty(35).
Diagnostic and treatment approaches in medicine hinge
on evidence-based decision-making. ChatGPT’s integration
enables students to engage in discussions with an AI model
that draws on a vast repository of medical literature, clinical
guidelines, and research ndings(8,11,16,18,24). As students
pose queries about treatment options or diagnostic criteria,
ChatGPT responds with evidence-based recommendations,
enabling students to witness the synthesis of medical knowl-
edge into actionable insights. is not only enriches students’
understanding of evidence-based practice but also empowers
them to apply this approach to their clinical endeavors.
However, the integration of ChatGPT for clinical prob-
lem-solving comes with considerations. Ensuring the accu-
racy a nd reliabil ity of AI-generated recommendations is pa ra-
mount. Rigorous validation processes, human oversight, and
ali gnment wit h established me dical gu idelines a re essential to
prevent the d issemin ation of erroneous i nformation(5,11,30).
Addit ionally, foster ing a nuance d understand ing of the li mita-
tions of A I among students is crucial to ensu re that ChatGPT
is seen as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for
clinical judgment.
ChatGPT’s potential to si mulate patient interact ions opens
a new avenue for enhancing clinical problem-solving in med-
ical education. By engaging in lifelike dialogues, students
practice communication skills, rene diagnostic approaches,
and hone evidence-based decision-making(3,36). e inte-
gration of AI i nto this educational contex t bridges the gap be-
tween theoretical knowledge and practical application, ulti-
mately fostering a generation of healthcare professionals who
are adept at navigating the intricate landscape of clinical sce-
narios(25,32). As medical education evolves to embrace tech-
nology, ChatGPT stands as a catalyst for advancing the art
and science of clinical problem-solving.
5. DISCUSSION
Collaborative Learning and Peer Interaction
In the realm of medical education, the shi from passive
knowledge consumption to active engagement and collabo-
ration has gained traction as educators recognize the value of
foster ing a commun ity of learner s. Collaborat ive learn ing and
peer interaction are not only foundational to building a sense
of camaraderie but also instrumental in enhancing critical
thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills(10). In
thi s context, the i ntegration of artici al intelligence (AI), par-
ticularly ChatGPT, holds the potential to reshape the land-
scape of collaborative learning in medical education.
Collaborative learning is predicated on the notion that col-
lective wisdom and diverse perspectives contribute to deeper
understanding and insight. ChatGPT emerges as an AI tool
that can amplify the collaborative learning experience by
acting as a virtual discussion partner. (3)As medical students
convene in virtual spaces to discuss medical cases, research
ndings, or clinical scenarios, ChatGPT can serve as a facili-
tator, providing input, generating questions, and oering in-
sights that stimulate thoughtful discussions(37). is A I-me-
diated discourse encourages students to explore varying
viewpoints, consider alternative approaches, and critically
analyze medical concepts from multifaceted angles.
One of ChatGPT’s standout aributes is its capacity to pro-
cess multiple inputs simultaneously, making it an ideal tool
for group discussions. Medical students can input queries
or prompts into ChatGPT, which then generates responses
that contribute to the ongoing conversation. is asynchro-
nous interaction transcends traditional constraints of time
and space, allowing students to engage in discussions at their
own pace(21,27,38). Additionally, ChatGPT’s impartiality
ensures that all voices are considered, promoting an inclusive
learning environment where diverse perspectives are valued.
Informat ion sharing i s another corner stone of collaborat ive
learning. ChatGPT’s ability to rapidly retrieve and synthe-
size medical information from diverse sources transforms it
into a knowledge repository that students can tap into(5,29).
Medica l students ca n pose queries to ChatGPT about spec ic
medical topics, recent research ndings, or clinical guide-
lines. is AI-generated information serves as a springboard
for informed discussions and shared insights, enriching the
collective knowledge of the group.(38) By fostering a culture
of infor mation excha nge, ChatGPT empowers students to ex-
plore beyond their immediate areas of expertise and broaden
their understanding of the medical landscape.
Collaborative problem-solving, a skill integral to medical
304 ORIGINAL PAPER / ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement
practice, is honed t hrough interactive engagement w ith peers.
ChatGPT’s role in collaborative problem-solving lies in gen-
erating alternative solutions, posing probing questions, and
guiding students through complex scenarios(3,27,39). As
students collectively tackle clinical dilemmas or diagnostic
challenges, ChatGPT can oer diverse perspectives, encour-
aging students to critically evaluate options, weigh the pros
and cons, and arrive at well-informed decisions. is itera-
tive process mirrors the collaborative nature of medical de-
cision-making and nurtures the analytical skills essential for
eective medical practice(29,32).
However, the integration of ChatGPT into collaborative
learning requires careful consideration of its role and limita-
tions. While AI can enhance group discussions, the human
element remains pivotal. Students must recognize that
ChatGPT’s insights are based on existing data and may not
encompass every nuance of medical practice.(9) Encouraging
students to engage in reective discussions that challenge
AI-generated responses fosters a culture of critical inquiry
and aligns with the ethos of medical education.
ChatGPT’s potential to facilitate collaborative learning
and peer interaction in medical education marks a trans-
formative stride toward creating an enriched and dynamic
learning environment. By fostering discussions, sharing
information, and guiding collaborative problem-solving,
ChatGPT contributes to the cultivation of teamwork, crit-
ical thinking, and information exchange among medical stu-
dents. As medical education evolves, ChatGPT emerges as a
catalyst for harnessing the power of technology to enhance
colla borative lear ning, empoweri ng students to lea rn not only
from the knowledge within textbooks but also from the col-
lective wisdom of their peer(24,34).
Revolutionizing medical curricula through ChatGPT:
a paradigm shi
Medical curricula have traditionally relied on standard-
ized textbooks and lectures to disseminate knowledge. How-
ever, the emergence of AI, particularly ChatGPT, challenges
this conventional model by oering dynamic and interac-
tive learning experiences(6). ChatGPT’s capacity to provide
immediate, contextually relevant information to students
is a game-changer in curriculum design. It allows educators
to pivot from a rigid, pre-structured curriculum to a uid,
adaptable framework where information is delivered on de-
mand, c atering to the d iverse learning needs of i ndiv idual stu-
dents(11,19) .
ChatGPT’s inuence on curriculum reform extends be-
yond information delivery. It empowers students to be active
participants in their learning journey(22). In the traditional
model, students oen passively receive information. In con-
trast, ChatGPT encourages students to pose questions, en-
gage in dialogue, a nd drive their own learning. is shi  from
passive absorption to active inquiry fosters a sense of own-
ership over one’s education and cultivates critical thinking
skills—essential aributes for modern healthcare practi-
tioners(40).
Furthermore, ChatGPT’s potential to simulate patient in-
teractions and generate clinical scenarios presents a ground-
breaking avenue for experiential learning. Medical curricula
oen struggle to provide adequate patient exposure, espe-
cially in the early stages of training. ChatGPT bridges this
gap by oer ing reali stic scenar ios for students to prac tice clin-
ical decision-making, diagnostic skills, and patient commu-
nication. is experiential learning not only enhances clin-
ical acumen but also instills a sense of condence in medical
students as they transition to real patient encounters.(41) e
reformative impact of ChatGPT on medical curricula is not
limited to content delivery—it extends to the very essence
of assessment. Traditional assessments oen emphasize rote
memorization and regurgitation of information. ChatGPT
introduces the concept of dynamic assessments, where stu-
dents are evaluated based on their ability to synthesize infor-
mation, apply critica l think ing, and col laborate eectively. By
posing complex scenarios and assessing students’ responses
in real-time, ChatGPT transforms assessments into a tool for
gauging students’ clinical reasoning, decision-making skills,
and adaptability(42).
However, this transformative potential is met with consid-
eration s. As ChatGP T’s role evolves in medic al curr icula, et h-
ical implications arise. Striking a balance between the conve-
nience of AI and the preservation of the doctor-patient rela-
tionsh ip is crucia l(6,26, 29). Ensuring that students recognize
the boundaries of AI’s capabilities is essential to prevent an
overreliance on technology that may compromise empathy
and human connection—cornerstones of eective patient
care.
6. CONCLUSION
ChatGPT’s integration into medical curricula marks a
seismic shi in education methodology. Its ability to deliver
dynamic, interactive, and experiential learning experiences
challenges the traditional notions of curriculum design and
content delivery. As medical educators contemplate cur-
riculum reform, ChatGPT’s potential to adapt, engage, and
simulate real-world scenarios positions it as an instrument
of change. e journey towards curriculum reform fueled by
ChatGPT is a testament to the dy namic nature of medical ed-
ucation, where AI technology and human expertise collabo-
rate to nurture a new generation of healthcare professionals
equipped to navigate the intricacies of modern medicine.
As medical education strives for continuous improvement,
ChatGPT emerges as a transformative tool that holds the
potential to reshape the landscape of medical education and
drive meaningful curriculum reform
ChatGPT’s integration into medical education represents
a transformative shi in educational approaches. It oers
a wide range of capabilities, from serving as a repository of
medical knowledge to facilitating collaborative learning. As
medical education continues to evolve, ChatGPT emerges as
a powerful tool that can reshape pedagogy and drive mean-
ing ful cur riculu m reform to meet the needs of moder n health-
care practice. ChatGPT emerges as a transformative tool that
holds the potentia l to reshape the landscape of medica l educa-
tion and drive meaningful curriculum reform.
Authors’ contributions: All authors have equally contributed to the
concep t and design of the s tudy, analysis and interpretation of the
data, literature search and writing the manuscript. All authors have
revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content,
and all authors have read and agreed to the published final ver sion
of the ar ticle.
ORIGINAL PAPER / ACTA INFORM MED. 2023, 31(4): 300-305 305
Utilization of ChatGPT in Medical Education: Applications and Implications for Curriculum Enhancement
Conict of interes t: The authors declare no conict of interest related
to this study of any kind. unding Information: No funding was received
for this ar ticle.
Financial support and sponsorship: No funding was received for this
article.
REFERENCES
1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Global Can-
cer Observatory, Cancer Tomorrow: Cancer Incidence and Mor-
tality Worldwide, IARC Cancer Base, 2018.
2. Pawlicki T., Dunscombe P., Mundt A.J., Scalliet P. (Eds.), Quality
and Safety in Radiotherapy, CRC Press, 2010.
3. Elnahal S.M., Blackford A., Smith K., Souranis A.N., Briner V.,
McNu T.R, DeWeese T.L., Wright J.L., Terezakis S.A., Identifying
Predictive Factors for Incident Reports in Patients Receiving Radi-
ation erapy, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2016; 94(5):993-999.
4. Hosseini A., Robinson N., Treatment Errors and Near-misses in a
Radiotherapy Department, IRPA, 2015.
5. IAEA Tecdoc Series, Application of the Risk Matrix Method to Ra-
diotherapy, IAEA, Vienna, 2016.
6. Carlord S., Öhrn A., Gunnarsson A., Experiences From Ten Years
of Incident Reporting in Health Care: a Qualitative Study Among
Department Managers and Coordinators, BMC Health Serv Res,
2018; 18(1): 113.
7. Lam C., Medlam G., Wighton A., Breen S.L., Bissonneej P., Mc-
Gowan T.S., Carlone M, Milosevic M.F., A Practice-Based Taxon-
omy for Radiation Treatment Errors, Journal of Medical Imaging
and Radiation Sciences, 2013; 44 (4): 173-179
8. Kang H., Gong Y., Design of a User-Centered Voluntary Report-
ing System for Patient Safety Event, Stud Health Technol Inform,
2017;245:733-737.
9. Greenham S., Manley S., Turnbull K., Homann M., Fonseca A.,
Westhuyzen J., Last A., Aherne N.J., Shakespeare T.P., Application
of an Incident Taxonomy for Radiation erapy: Analysis of Five
Years of Data from ree Integrated Cancer Centres, Rep Pract
Oncol Radiother, 2018; 23(3):220-227.
10. Hewi T.A., Chreim S., Fix and Forget or Fix and Report: A Qual-
itative Study of Tensions at the Front Line of Incident Reporting,
BMJ Qual Saf, 2015; 24(5): 303-10.
11. Chang D.W., Cheetham L., te Marvelde L., Bressel M., Kron T., Gill
S., Tai K.H., Ball D., Rose W., Silva L., Foroudi F., Risk Factors for
Radiotherapy Incidents and Impact of an Online Electronic Re-
porting System, RadiotherOncol., 2014;112(2):199-204.
12. Ribeiro A.L.C., Teixeira F.C., Paiva E., A Tool for Reporting and
Evaluation of Incidents in External Beam Radiation erapy, Ra-
diology, 2019; 4: 88-98.
13. Montgomery L., Fava P., Freeman C.R., Hijal T., Maiea C., Park-
er W., Kildea J., Development and Implementation of a Radi-
ation erapy Incident Learning System Compatible with lo-
cal Workow and a National Taxonomy. J Appl Clin Med Phys.
2018;19(1):259-270.
14. Pawlicki T., Coey M., Milosevic M., Incident Learning Systems
for Radiation Oncology: Development and Value at the Local, Na-
tional and International Level, Clinical Oncology, 2017; 29(9):
562-567.
15. Anderson J.E., Kodate N., Walters R., Dodds A., Can Incident Re-
porting Improve Safety? Healthcare Practitioners’ Views of the Ef-
fectiveness of Incident Reporting, Int J Qual Health Care. 2013;
25(2): 141-50
16. Radicchi L.A ., Toledo J.C., Alliprandini D.H., Critical Success Fac-
tors for Implementation of an Incident Learning System in Radi-
ation Oncology Department, Rep Pract Oncol Radiother., 2020
(6): 994-1000.
17. Malicki J., Bly R., Bulot M., Godet J.L., Jahnen A., Krengli M.,
Maingon P., Prieto Martin C., Przybylska K., Skrobała A., Valero
M., Jarvinen H., Patient Safety in External Beam Radiotherapy, Re-
sults of the ACCID Project: Current Status of Proactive Risk
Assessment, Reactive Analysis of Events, and Reporting and Learn-
ing Systems in Europe, Radiother Oncol., 2017; 123(1): 29-36.
18. Albiach C.F, Delgado Rodriguez J.M., Rot San Juan M.J., Martin
C.P., Cayuela C.S., Ciscar J.V., Peres-Mulas A., Luisa M.R., Improv-
ing Radiation Oncology Safety in Spain with Risk Matrices - A Re-
view- e MARR Project, Biomedical Journal of Scientic & Tech-
nical Research, 2022; 44(4): 35636-35645
19. Ramirez Vera M.L., Mulas P., Vilanova Ciscar J., Prieto C., Delgado
Rodriguez J. M., Alvarez C., Rodriguez M., Project MARR: Radia-
tion Risk Matrix, 39 Reunion Annual Sociedad Nuclear Espanola,
Reus, Senda Editorial, 2013.
20. Dumenigo C., Mc Donell J., Lopez R., Prieto C., Latin America in
Prevention of accidents in Radiotherapy, FORO Iberoamericano
de Organismos Reguladores Radiologicos y Nucleares, 2014.
... Anfangs handelte es sich um einfache "Wenn-dann-Regeln", welche mittlerweile zu komplexeren Algorithmen weiterentwickelt wurden. Mit der Nutzung von "machine learning" können nun große Datensätze analysiert und Muster entdeckt werden und in der Folge die medizinische Ausbildung und Versorgung von Patient:innen unterstützen [1,3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Zusammenfassung Chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) ist ein Chatbot, der künstliche Intelligenz (KI) einsetzt, um mit den Benutzer:innen zu kommunizieren. Im Bereich der klinischen Neurologie könnte hierdurch die Patientenversorgung vor allem bei komplexen oder seltenen Erkrankungen unterstützt werden. Um das Potenzial der KI als Hilfsmittel in der postgraduellen neurologischen Ausbildung zu untersuchen, wurde ChatGPT mit neurologischen Prüfungsfragen auf Facharztniveau getestet. Die Ergebnisse zeigen kongruent das Potenzial der KI-Systeme in der künftigen Unterstützung von Ausbildung und Patientenversorgung auf. Die Komplexität des neurologischen Fachgebiets stellt allerdings nicht nur für Nachwuchsneurolog:innen eine besondere Herausforderung dar. Des Weiteren hat die KI noch relevante Limitationen für die Translation in die klinische Praxis, hierzu zählen „Halluzinationen“ und die mangelnde Beurteilung der Seriosität von Datenquellen.
... This shift towards individualized learning aligns with the growing demand for education that mirrors the personalized experiences offered by modern Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as ChatGPT (Fütterer et al., 2023), there is a unique opportunity to reshape higher education by offering more adaptable, interactive, and student-centered learning experiences (Naik, 2023;Tulsiani, 2024;Estrellado & Millar, 2023). However, while the potential benefits of ChatGPT in personalized learning are vast (Mai et al., 2024;Montenegro-Rueda et al., 2023;Javaid et al., 2023;Cacicio & Riggs, 2023;Rejeb et al., 2024;Jo, 2024;Ahmed, 2023;Wu et al., 2024), challenges such as ensuring learning quality, engagement, interests, and academic integrity must be carefully considered (Tulsiani, 2024;Yu, 2024;Taani & Alabidi, 2024;Hasanein & Sobaih, 2023;Bin-Nashwan et al., 2023;Zeb et al., 2024;Michel-Villarreal et al., 2023;Zhang & Tur, 2023;Dempere et al., 2023;Kiryakova & Angelova, 2023;Jeyaraman et al., 2023;Islam & Islam, 2024;Gustilo et al., 2024;Labadze et al., 2023;Crompton & Burke, 2024;Liu et al., 2023). Despite these challenges, the integration of ChatGPT into higher education promises to fundamentally transform the learning experiences, preparing students for a future where AI plays an integral role in both work and life (Margarella, 2023;Tulsiani, 2024). ...
Article
This study investigated the impact of AI integration, specifically ChatGPT, on personalized learning involving 785 college students in the Philippines who took the online survey. Utilizing regression analysis and an Omnibus ANOVA test, the study examined the influence of AI Integration alongside demographic variables such as age, sex, educational level, and type of school on personalized learning. Results indicate that AI integration can explain a substantial portion of the variability in personalized learning outcomes (approximately 88.54%). Specifically, ChatGPT demonstrates a significant positive effect on personalized learning, suggesting that as ChatGPT integration increases, personalized learning experiences also increase. However, demographic variables such as age, sex, educational level, and type of school show minimal effects on personalized learning outcomes, except for a potential trend for higher scores in private universities and colleges compared to state universities and colleges. These findings underscore the pivotal role of AI technologies, like ChatGPT, in enhancing personalized learning experiences while highlighting the need for further exploration of contextual factors influencing educational outcomes. The implications extend beyond the study to offer insights for educational stakeholders and policymakers, emphasizing the potential benefits of AI-driven personalized learning initiatives. However, limitations such as sample characteristics, measurement bias, and technology accessibility should be addressed in future research endeavors to maximize the benefits of AI integration in education.
... An extensive body of research underscores the significant value that ChatGPT brings to research and education, particularly within the medical domain. Its utility spans a broad spectrum of users, including physicians, healthcare workers, medical students, and even patients, assisting them in making informed, data-driven healthcare decisions [2][3][4][5][6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
(1) Background: As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) evolves, tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into various domains of medicine, including medical education and research. Given the critical nature of medicine, it is of paramount importance that AI tools offer a high degree of reliability in the information they provide. (2) Methods: A total of n = 450 medical examination questions were manually entered into ChatGPT thrice, each for ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4. The responses were collected, and their accuracy and consistency were statistically analyzed throughout the series of entries. (3) Results: ChatGPT 4 displayed a statistically significantly improved accuracy with 85.7% compared to that of 57.7% of ChatGPT 3.5 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ChatGPT 4 was more consistent, correctly answering 77.8% across all rounds, a significant increase from the 44.9% observed from ChatGPT 3.5 (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The findings underscore the increased accuracy and dependability of ChatGPT 4 in the context of medical education and potential clinical decision making. Nonetheless, the research emphasizes the indispensable nature of human-delivered healthcare and the vital role of continuous assessment in leveraging AI in medicine.
Article
Full-text available
Aim The aim of this study was to analyze critical success factors (CSFs) for implementation of an incident learning system (ILS) in a radiation oncology department (ROD) and evaluate the perception of the staff members along this process. Background Implementing an ILS is a way to leverage learning from incidents and is a tool for improving patient safety, consisting of a cycle of reporting and analyzing events as well as taking preventive actions. ILS implementation is challenging, requiring specific resources and cultural changes. Materials and methods An ILS was designed and implemented based on the CSF identified in the literature review. Before starting the ILS implementation, a structured survey was applied to assess dimensions of patient safety culture. After the period of implementation (7 months), the survey was applied again and compared with the initial assessment, and interviews were performed with staff members to evaluate the overall satisfaction with ILS and CSFs. Results Statistically significant improvements were observed in 5 dimensions (12 totals) of the safety culture survey, considering time points before and after the ILS implementation. According to interviewees, “Facilitating committee”, “Efficient data collection”, “Focus on improvement”, “Just culture” and “Feedback to users” were the most relevant CSFs. Conclusions The ILS designed and implemented at ROD was perceived as an important tool to support quality and safety initiatives, promoting the improvement in safety culture. The ILS implementation critical success factors were identified and have shown good agreement between the results of the literature and the users' practical perception.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Incident reporting (IR) in health care has been advocated as a means to improve patient safety. The purpose of IR is to identify safety hazards and develop interventions to mitigate these hazards in order to reduce harm in health care. Using qualitative methods is a way to reveal how IR is used and perceived in health care practice. The aim of the present study was to explore the experiences of IR from two different perspectives, including heads of departments and IR coordinators, to better understand how they value the practice and their thoughts regarding future application. Methods: Data collection was performed in Östergötland County, Sweden, where an electronic IR system was implemented in 2004, and the authorities explicitly have advocated IR from that date. A purposive sample of nine heads of departments from three hospitals were interviewed, and two focus group discussions with IR coordinators took place. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Two main themes emerged from the data: "Incident reporting has come to stay" building on the categories entitled perceived advantages, observed changes and value of the IR system, and "Remaining challenges in incident reporting" including the categories entitled need for action, encouraged learning, continuous culture improvement, IR system development and proper use of IR. Conclusions: After 10 years, the practice of IR is widely accepted in the selected setting. IR has helped to put patient safety on the agenda, and a cultural change towards no blame has been observed. The informants suggest an increased focus on action, and further development of the tools for reporting and handling incidents.
Article
Full-text available
As the third leading cause of death in the U.S., patient safety events (PSE) are difficult to control due to multiple inputs from healthcare providers, systems, or even patients. Inspired by the success of reporting systems in other fields, PSE reporting systems could be a good resource to share and to learn from previous cases. However, the success of such systems in healthcare is yet to be seen due to the low report quality and the lack of interoperability and communication. A knowledge-based and user-centered PSE reporting system is needed to organize the scattered knowledge and improve user-friendliness. We described the development of a knowledge base for patient falls, the most frequent PSE. Based on the knowledge base, user-centered design features were incorporated into the system to improve the reporting accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. This prototype holds promise in improving PSE reporting quality and facilitating human-computer communication.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Collaborative incident learning initiatives in radiation therapy promise to improve and standardize the quality of care provided by participating institutions. However, the software interfaces provided with such initiatives must accommodate all participants and thus are not optimized for the workflows of individual radiation therapy centers. This article describes the development and implementation of a radiation therapy incident learning system that is optimized for a clinical workflow and uses the taxonomy of the Canadian National System for Incident Reporting - Radiation Treatment (NSIR-RT). Methods: The described incident learning system is a novel version of an open-source software called the Safety and Incident Learning System (SaILS). A needs assessment was conducted prior to development to ensure SaILS (a) was intuitive and efficient (b) met changing staff needs and (c) accommodated revisions to NSIR-RT. The core functionality of SaILS includes incident reporting, investigations, tracking, and data visualization. Postlaunch modifications of SaILS were informed by discussion and a survey of radiation therapy staff. Results: There were 240 incidents detected and reported using SaILS in 2016 and the number of incidents per month tended to increase throughout the year. An increase in incident reporting occurred after switching to fully online incident reporting from an initial hybrid paper-electronic system. Incident templating functionality and a connection with our center's oncology information system were incorporated into the investigation interface to minimize repetitive data entry. A taskable actions feature was also incorporated to document outcomes of incident reports and has since been utilized for 36% of reported incidents. Conclusions: Use of SaILS and the NSIR-RT taxonomy has improved the structure of, and staff engagement with, incident learning in our center. Software and workflow modifications informed by staff feedback improved the utility of SaILS and yielded an efficient and transparent solution to categorize incidents with the NSIR-RT taxonomy.
Article
Radiation therapy is a basic tool in cancer treatment and so maximising safety during these procedures is essential. Here we present the evolution and development of these safety protocols in Spain by leveraging the so-called risk matrix tool. We also tested its application to 3D radiotherapy treatments. A working group comprising members of the Spanish Society of Medical Physics (SEFM), Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), Spanish Association of Radiotherapy Technicians (AETR), and Spanish Society for Radiation Protection (SEPR) was created with the collaboration of the Nuclear Safety Council, all under the auspices of the Spanish Health Authority, to adapt risk matrix methodology to radiotherapy applications in Spain (the Risk Matrices in Radiotherapy, or MARR project). The application we developed was a very effective tool to integrate the entire methodology as well as previous user experiences into risk analysis. Among its main qualities was the ease with which it could be modified to allow each hospital to generate analysis elements and parameters specific to its own practice and to accommodate process changes as part of their continuous improvement plans. As a continuation of this work, the MARRTA project, which includes the latest application techniques in external radiotherapy (IMRT and IGRT, among others) is currently in its latter research stages.
Article
Aim: To develop and apply a clinical incident taxonomy for radiation therapy. Background: Capturing clinical incident information that focuses on near-miss events is critical for achieving higher levels of safety and reliability. Methods and materials: A clinical incident taxonomy for radiation therapy was established; coding categories were prescription, consent, simulation, voluming, dosimetry, treatment, bolus, shielding, imaging, quality assurance and coordination of care. The taxonomy was applied to all clinical incidents occurring at three integrated cancer centres for the years 2011-2015. Incidents were managed locally, audited and feedback disseminated to all centres. Results: Across the five years the total incident rate (per 100 courses) was 8.54; the radiotherapy-specific coded rate was 6.71. The rate of true adverse events (unintended treatment and potential patient harm) was 1.06. Adverse events, where no harm was identified, occurred at a rate of 2.76 per 100 courses. Despite workload increases, overall and actual rates both exhibited downward trends over the 5-year period. The taxonomy captured previously unidentified quality assurance failures; centre-specific issues that contributed to variations in incident trends were also identified. Conclusions: The application of a taxonomy developed for radiation therapy enhances incident investigation and facilitates strategic interventions. The practice appears to be effective in our institution and contributes to the safety culture. The ratio of near miss to actual incidents could serve as a possible measure of incident reporting culture and could be incorporated into large scale incident reporting systems.
Article
Aims: To discuss the background for incident reporting and learning systems, as well as the infrastructure and operational aspects to run them. Materials and methods: Information from peer-reviewed literature, online resources and the authors' experience synthesised into a concise understanding of the topic. Results: Incident learning systems can be local, national or international, each having the same basic goals but facilitating different audiences and environments. A key component of any reporting and learning system is timely and effective analysis of near-misses and incidents as well as feedback to the users of the system. It is important for staff to know that reports are acknowledged, analysed and acted upon. There is a need to comply with current European legislation and other national systems, which can be addressed together with the steps required for comprehensive management of an incident. Conclusion: Reporting and learning from incidents and near-misses is a key component of quality and safety in radiotherapy. A major benefit of the national or international systems is the potential for a larger database of incidents, supporting wider analysis and comparison, and sharing of knowledge across a larger community.
Article
Purpose: To describe the current status of implementation of European directives for risk management in radiotherapy and to assess variability in risk management in the following areas: 1) in-country regulatory framework; 2) proactive risk assessment; (3) reactive analysis of events; and (4) reporting and learning systems. Material and methods: The original data were collected as part of the ACCIRAD project through two online surveys. Results: Risk assessment criteria are closely associated with quality assurance programs. Only 9/32 responding countries (28%) with national regulations reported clear "requirements" for proactive risk assessment and/or reactive risk analysis, with wide variability in assessment methods. Reporting of adverse error events is mandatory in most (70%) but not all surveyed countries. Conclusions: Most European countries have taken steps to implement European directives designed to reduce the probability and magnitude of accidents in radiotherapy. Variability between countries is substantial in terms of legal frameworks, tools used to conduct proactive risk assessment and reactive analysis of events, and in the reporting and learning systems utilized. These findings underscore the need for greater harmonisation in common terminology, classification and reporting practices across Europe to improve patient safety and to enable more reliable inter-country comparisons.
Article
Purpose To describe radiation therapy cases during which voluntary incident reporting occurred; and identify patient- or treatment-specific factors that place patients at higher risk for incidents. Methods and Materials We used our institution's incident learning system to build a database of patients with incident reports filed between January 2011 and December 2013. Patient- and treatment-specific data were reviewed for all patients with reported incidents, which were classified by step in the process and root cause. A control group of patients without events was generated for comparison. Summary statistics, likelihood ratios, and mixed-effect logistic regression models were used for group comparisons. Results The incident and control groups comprised 794 and 499 patients, respectively. Common root causes included documentation errors (26.5%), communication (22.5%), technical treatment planning (37.5%), and technical treatment delivery (13.5%). Incidents were more frequently reported in minors (age <18 years) than in adult patients (37.7% vs 0.4%, P<.001). Patients with head and neck (16% vs 8%, P<.001) and breast (20% vs 15%, P=.03) primaries more frequently had incidents, whereas brain (18% vs 24%, P=.008) primaries were less frequent. Larger tumors (17% vs 10% had T4 lesions, P=.02), and cases on protocol (9% vs 5%, P=.005) or with intensity modulated radiation therapy/image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (52% vs 43%, P=.001) were more likely to have incidents. Conclusions We found several treatment- and patient-specific variables associated with incidents. These factors should be considered by treatment teams at the time of peer review to identify patients at higher risk. Larger datasets are required to recommend changes in care process standards, to minimize safety risks.