Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
2
171
© 2023 Matúš Sloboda, Monika Šmeringaiová, Patrik Pavlovský. This is an open access article licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-onCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc-nd/4.0/).
10.2478/nispa-2023-0018
Reducing Error Rate in Property Tax Declaration
Forms through Simplification and Highlighting
Instructions
Matúš Sloboda
1
, Monika Šmeringaiová
2
, Patrik Pavlovský
3
Abstract:
1
Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
2
Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
3
Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
2
172
1. Introduction
173
2. Administrative burden and ways to reduce learning costs
2
174
et al.
175
2
176
3. Study design and methodology
3.1 The case of property tax declaration in the Slovak
Republic
177
3.2 Developing a guidebook
–
–
–
–
2
178
3.3 Materials and procedures
179
Time
Group
Gender
(females)
mean age
Previous experience
with filling out a
property tax
declaration
Session_1
14/12/21
Treatment
(Guidebook)
50% (4)
20
0% (0)
Session_2
17/12/21
Control
(Instruction
s from MoF)
63.5% (7)
21
9% (1)
Session_3
20/12/21
Treatment
(Guidebook)
80% (8)
23
0% (0)
Session_4
21/12/21
Control
(Instruction
s from MoF)
50% (1)
20.5
0% (0)
Session_5
25/11/22
Treatment
(Guidebook)
100% (5)
23.4
0% (0)
Session_6
9/12/22
Control
(Instruction
s from MoF)
100% (2)
23.5
0% (0)
Session_7
19/12/22
Control
(Instruction
s from MoF)
80% (4)
22.2
20% (1)
2
180
Sample size
43
Dependent variable
Number of errors (numeric)
Treatment groups
Treatment group (A – Guidebook, N=23)
Control group (B – MoF instructions, N=20)
Randomisation method
Quasi-random self-selection for one of seven
experimental sessions
Control variables
Time of the session (numeric)
Experienced in filling out the form prior to the
study session (dummy, 0 – no experience, 1 –
previous experience)
Age (numeric)
Gender (dummy, 0 – male, 1 - female)
4. Results
181
Gender
-
Female
Mean
age
(SD)
Previous
experience
with filling
out property
tax
declaration
Mean time
of
completion
(SD) in
minutes
Mean
score
(SD)
Mean
number
of errors
(SD)
Treatment
group (A –
Guidebook)
(N=23)
74%
(17)
22
(3.02)
0% (0)
63.6 (11.9)
54.7
(5.8)
9.6 (5.6)
Control group
(B – MoF
Instructions)
(N=20)
70%
(14)
21.65
(1.53)
10% (2)
61.0 (6.7)
43.3
(3.7)
20.7 (3.7)
2
182
183
Error rate
Predictors
Estimates
CI
p
(Intercept)
20.87
5.26 – 36.47
0.010
Treatment [guidebook]
-11.21
-14.03 – -8.38
<0.001
gender [male]
-4.31
-7.62 – -1.00
0.012
time
4.78
-4.43 – 13.99
0.300
experience [y]
1.94
-4.77 – 8.65
0.561
age
-0.18
-0.75 – 0.39
0.524
Observations
43
R2/R2 adjusted
0.689/0.647
Note: The outcome variable is the error rate in the
property tax form. The predictor is the dummy variable
treatment. The reference levels for treatment are the
control group (MoF instructions), for gender, female,
and for experience, no experience.
2
184
5. Discussion
185
6. Conclusion
2
186
2
190
191
Appendix – Supplements
2
192
193