Content uploaded by Stephanie Ness
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Stephanie Ness on Dec 11, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1942
ISSN: 1004-9037
https://sjcjycl.cn/
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.778061
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PATHS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHTS ON
SEGMENT ROUTING
Tayyab Muhammad1*, Dr. M. Scott Kingsley2, Dr. Stephanie Ness3
1*Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Southern Methodist University,
Dallas, US
tmuhammad@smu.edu & tayyab@tayyabmunir.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1753-3241
2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Southern Methodist University,
Dallas, US
mkingsley@smu.edu
3Diplomatische Akademie, ness.stephanie@gmail.com
*Corresponding Author: Tayyab Muhammad
*Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Southern Methodist University, Dallas,
US
tmuhammad@smu.edu & tayyab@tayyabmunir.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1753-3241
Abstract
This article introduces Segment Routing (SR), a network technology facilitating flexible and
scalable traffic routing by allowing source nodes to specify packet routes through segmented
paths. The architecture's principles include source routing, flow restriction for efficient state
management, MPLS and IPv6 compatibility, and simplified network operations. SR's
advantages in data centers encompass flexibility, scalability, programability, reduced
complexity, and improved security. The article explores SR-MPLS, a strategy combining SR
with MPLS for dynamic route steering, scalability, workload distribution, and optimization of
broadcast, multicast, and unknown unicast traffic. Key considerations for successful SR
deployment include traffic engineering, security, scalability, IPv6 integration, redundancy,
high availability, and compliance with regulatory standards. In summary, SR and SR-MPLS
emerge as powerful tools for simplifying network operations, improving scalability, and
optimizing resource utilization in evolving network architectures.
1. INTRODUCTION TO SEGMENT ROUTING ARCHITECTURE
Segment routing (SR) is a network technology that enables flexible and scalable routing of
traffic across large and complex networks. It is based on the concept of source-routed paths,
where the source node specifies the path that a packet should take through the network (Zheng
et al, 2021).
Based on source routing, segment routing enables the creation of paths by merging segments.
Sub-paths are a subset of segments. Its own number is called the Segment ID (SID), and as
was already explained, OSPF or ISIS advertises these segments. One or more segments in a
stack, sometimes referred to as a segment list or stack list, can make up a segment routing path.
A header modification to IPv4 and IPv6 packets is used to achieve SR. Segment identifiers
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PATHS : IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1943
(SIDs), which are used to designate the path the packet should take, are listed in this header
extension. Each SID stands for a route node or hop (Song et al 2021).
A node receives packets and sends them to the appropriate next hop by reading the next SID
from the header. Until the packet arrives at its destination, this procedure is continued. A list
of three segments in the segment list may be used to connect the Source node A and Destination
node N, as you can seen in the figure 1 below. The packet would travel from Source node A
to Transit node C during Segment 1. Segment 1 is popped off in this case, and Segment 2 is
used to switch the packet to Node H. The packet is then switched until it reaches the target
node N using Segment 3, with Segment 2 also being popped off.
Figure 1: Segment Routing
The segment Identifier (or SID), which is a flat 32-bit unsigned integer, serves as the unique
identifier for each segment. In segment routing, segments is divided into two types.
Global Segment: A global segment is an ID value that is significant throughout the whole
Segment Routing domain. Each node in the SR domain is aware of this value and applies the
same action to the related instruction set or Label in its forwarding table (LFIB). For this
reason, it is called a "Global Segment ID." Segment Routing Global Block (SRGB) is the name
of the 16000–23999 default reserved label range for Cisco nodes used for these reasons. As
this range is vendor-specific, other suppliers could choose to utilize a different range (Barakat
et al, 2019).
Local Segment: This is an ID value with local relevance, and the accompanying instruction
may only be carried out by the source node. Due to the fact that this range only applies to that
specific node, these values are not assigned using the SRGB range but rather the locally
specified label range. A unique kind of segment identifier (SID) called a local SID (LSID) is
used to achieve local segmenting. On SR nodes, LSIDs are given to interfaces and are used to
specify the local segment to which an interface belongs (Ghaffari et al, 2022).
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1944
A network administrator gives an LSID to a collection of interfaces on SR nodes to establish
a local segment. Following the creation of a local segment, SR nodes will direct traffic between
interfaces inside that local segment without consulting the IGP.
1.1. Explanation of the Segment Routing architecture principles
By giving network operators more freedom and control, segment routing (SR), a type of
network design, streamlines and improves network routing. To achieve its objectives, SR
depends on a few key principles. The segment routing concepts in architecture are described
as follows:
Source Routing Paradigm:
SR leverages the source routing paradigm.
A node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions called “segments.”
Each section corresponds to a distinct motion or hop.
Topological or service-based segments are also possible.
In an SR domain, a segment may have global semantics or local semantics depending on the
node (Liaskos et al 2022).
Flow Restriction and Sate Efficiency:
SR allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path.
Per-flow state is maintained only at the ingress nodes to the SR domain.
This approach minimizes state overhead in the network.
Compatibility with MPLS and IPv6:
SR directly applied to the MPLS architecture without changes to the forwarding plane.
In MPLS, a segment is encoded as an MPLS label, and an ordered list of segments is encoded
as a stack of labels.
For IPv6, SR introduces a new type of routing header.
A segment is encoded as an IPv6 address (Wu, & Cui, 2023).
An ordered list of segments is encoded as addresses in the routing header .
Routing Policies without Per-Flow Entries:
SR allows the implementation of routing policies without requiring per-flow entries at
intermediate routers.
Intermediate nodes follow the ordered segments in the packet header.
Network Simplification and Automation:
Segment routing simplifies networks by removing protocols and automating operations.
It provides granular traffic control while achieving high bandwidth utilization without
compromising resiliency (Moreno et al, 2017).
Network resiliency is achieved with rapid restoration (50ms) of connectivity.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1945
Advantages of Segment Routing in Data Center Networks
Flexibility and scalability: SR offers fine-grained control over traffic flows and the building
of complicated routing pathways over vast networks. Because of this, it is appropriate for a
range of networking settings, including those found in businesses, service providers, and data
centres.
Programability: SR is simple to integrate with current network management systems since
it can be setup and managed using industry-standard protocols like BGP.
Reduced complexity: SR does away with the requirement that transit routers keep path state
data. The complexity of network operations and maintenance is greatly reduced (Schüller et
al, 2018).
Simplified operations: Operations are made simpler by SR by lowering the number of
protocols that need to be handled.
Performance improvement: By enabling network administrators to direct traffic along the
most effective routes, SR has enhanced network performance.
Increased dependability: By offering several channels for traffic to go, SR increases
network dependability. By doing this, the effects of network failures have been decreased.
Cost-Effectiveness: Compared to traditional designs, this architecture is less expensive to
deploy and maintain because of its streamlined design, decreased cabling, and fewer network
components (Davoli et al, 2015).
Improved security: By enabling network administrators to separate traffic from various
security zones, SR improves network security.
1.2. Segment Routing Network Requirements and Design Considerations
In order to improve the network architecture of data centers, it will find segment routing (SR)
as a useful option. It's essential to take into account a number of specifications and design
factors that are suited to the particular requirements of your data center or business
organization if you want to deploy SR successfully (Schüller et al, 2018). Key specifications
and design factors include the following:
Requirements:
Traffic Engineering: Determine the traffic patterns and needs inside the data center using
traffic engineering. Determine the necessity of load balancing, resource utilization that is
efficient, and traffic optimization. The capacity to plan traffic flows in accordance with these
specifications should be provided by SR (Giorgetti et al, 2017).
Service Chaining: Verify if SR supports service chaining if the organization depends on a
series of network services (such as firewalls, load balancers, and WAN accelerators). It must
specify how these services are organized and configured inside the network architecture.
Scalability: Take into account the data center's size and room for expansion. To handle more
network devices and traffic, SR should scale well.
Security: Examine the situation's security requirements and decide how SR might improve
security. This could entail traffic isolation, segment isolation, and the capacity to reroute
traffic away from particularly vulnerable portions.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1946
Integration of IPv6: Consider IPv6 adoption while assessing the IP addressing scheme.
Ascertain that SR can function properly with both IPv4 and IPv6 (Li & Yeung, 2020).
Redundancy and High Availability: Consider network redundancy and high availability
while making your plans. Path diversity and failover techniques should be supported by SR
to ensure service continuity.
Design Considerations:
Segment Identification: Define the types of segments that would be utilized in the SR
implementation in the segment identification step. These might be MPLS labels, IPv6
addresses, or any other appropriate identification. Ensure uniformity throughout the network.
Path Computation: Determine the parameters for path calculation, such as the shortest path,
the lowest possible latency, or the highest possible bandwidth. Use path computing
algorithms that support the objectives of traffic engineering.
Topology Mapping: Draw a precise topology map of the network in the data center. This
map is crucial for SR planning and execution (Pereira et al, 2020).
Configuration Management: Create a plan for SR's configuration management.
Maintaining segment lists, regulations, and traffic engineering guidelines falls under this.
Monitoring and Analytics: Implement network monitoring and analytics tools to get
information about SR's performance. For proactive management, real-time visibility into
network health and traffic is essential.
Segment Naming and Labeling: Establish concise and accurate naming standards and
labeling strategies for segments. Configuration and troubleshooting are made simpler as a
result (Cianfrani et al, 2016).
Testing and Validation: Before implementing SR in production, implement a rigorous
testing and validation procedure. To check that SR complies with the standards and performs
as anticipated, simulate several situations.
Change Management: Create a change management procedure to deal with revisions,
additions, and alterations to the SR implementation (Cianfrani et al, 2016).
Compliance and Regulatory Requirements: Ensure that the SR implementation conforms
with applicable regulatory and industry standards.
2. SR-MPLS (SEGMENT ROUTING MULTIPROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING MPLS):
SR-MPLS employs a source-based routing strategy in which the source router encodes in the
packet header the path that a packet is supposed to follow. This route is represented by a stack
of segment identifiers (SIDs), each representing a different forwarding instruction. MPLS is a
packet forwarding system that routes packets using labels. The ingress router assigns MPLS
labels to packets, which are then utilized by following routers to route the packets along the
most efficient path (Chen et al, 2023).
A network node adds a prefix-SID label to a packet in the MPLS data plane operations under
certain circumstances. When a Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) linked to a Prefix-SID
corresponds to the destination itself or the next-hop destination, which is selected during the
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PATHS : IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1947
forwarding process, this occurs. Furthermore, this action takes place if the downstream
neighbour has Segment Routing (SR) capabilities and the node is set up to give priority to SR
label imposition. Alternately, the node will apply a prefix-SID label to the packet if the
aforementioned FEC does not have a corresponding Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) label
(Akiya et al, 2017). These rules basically define when the prefix-SID label is applied to packets
inside the MPLS network, allowing for more precise routing and forwarding choices (Wang et
al, 2022). As you can see in figure 2 bellow:
Figure 2: SR-MPLS
2.1. Exploration of SR-MPLS technology and its benefits for network.
In order to meet the changing demands of contemporary networks, Segment Routing over
Multiprotocol Label Switching (SR-MPLS) is a novel networking technique that combines the
benefits of Segment Routing (SR) with MPLS. The advantages of MPLS technology for
networks are explored in detail here:
Network Creation:
Dynamic route steering is made possible by segment modification in SR-MPLS.
By applying label operations to packets, ingress nodes may manage service pathways.
Independent forwarding and centralised programming control are integrated by SR-MPLS.
It supports both conventional and SDN networks, guaranteeing backward compatibility with
current hardware as the network evolves.
Smooth migration to software-defined networking (SDN) without causing infrastructure
disruption (Alemayehu, 2019).
By combining Segment Routing features within the MPLS framework, SR-MPLS makes it
easier to build overlay networks. Network designers take advantage of SR's traffic
engineering and path management features as well as the well-established label-switching
capabilities of MPLS.
Scalability:
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1948
A segment-based forwarding paradigm is used by SR-MPLS.
Each section represents a particular movement or hop along the course.
By using segments, SR-MPLS streamlines route calculation and eliminates the requirement
for intermediary nodes to keep per-flow state.
Large-scale networks with various traffic patterns require this scalability benefit more than
anything.
By relying on an IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) for the distribution of labels and
computation pathways, SR-MPLS streamlines the control plane.
Segment allocation may be done dynamically using SR-MPLS.
Due to its versatility, SR-MPLS scales without requiring a lot of manual setup.
The ideas of Software-Defined Networking (SDN) are closely aligned with SR-MPLS.
Between conventional MPLS networks and SDN-capable designs, it serves as a bridge.
Features for automation make provisioning, monitoring, and maintenance easier while
improving overall scalability (Chunduri et al, 2018).
Workload Distribution:
The forwarding path is divided into segments by SR-MPLS, and each segment is given a
distinct Segment Identifier (SID).
Because SR-MPLS enables network managers to specify specified pathways for traffic flows,
it provides exact traffic engineering.
The capability of SR-MPLS to create and maintain certain pathways might be advantageous
for workloads that demand predictable and deterministic network performance. Applications
that are sensitive to delay, jitter, or packet loss will find this to be very useful.
Sensitive workloads are kept isolated from less secure or non-critical traffic by being
deployed on various segments along with workloads with different security or isolation needs
(Swallow et al, 2017).
SR segments can be used to guide workloads through a series of services, ensuring that the
essential services are used in a certain order to satisfy operational needs.
The network adjusts as workloads increase or change by dynamically reallocating resources,
enhancing pathways, and making sure workload-related traffic is handled properly.
Integration in Networks:
Using MPLS labels, it defines explicit pathways for packets at Layer 3 (L3).
The IP networks, routers, and MPLS infrastructure that are already in place can coexist with
SR-MPLS even if it doesn't use UDP encapsulation as VXLAN does.
Exact traffic engineering, service chaining, network segmentation, and centralised or
distributed control plane operation are all made possible by SR-MPLS (Chunduri et al, 2018).
Changes to network setup may be necessary for SR-MPLS integration, especially if SR-
MPLS-specific segments and rules must be added.
Broadcast, Multicast, and Unknown Unicast Optimization:
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1949
Using Source-based broadcast forwarding the source router can only forward broadcast
traffic to the required next-hop routers.
Broadcast traffic is suppressed using this approach at certain network locations, such as the
network's edge or the boundary between two networks (Cianfrani, et al, 2017).
By applying Multicast source trees the source router may build a network of routers that will
serve as the next hops for multicast traffic. Multicast routing may perform better and be more
scalable as a result.
Multicast traffic is suppressed using this method at certain network locations, such as the
network's edge or the boundary between two networks.
Routers can store the forwarding data for unicast destinations using this approach, known as
unicast routing caches. By doing this, unicast routing might perform better.
Unicast traffic is suppressed using this method at certain locations inside the network, such
as its edges or the boundaries between networks (Shvedov et al, 2022).
Role in Data center networking and service provider networking:
It makes network configuration and operation simplified.
Capabilities for traffic engineering are improved by SR-MPLS.
It enhances scalability and enables dynamic network changes.
SR-MPLS improves load balancing and traffic routing in data centers.
Fine-grained Quality of Service (QoS) policies are made possible by it.
SR-MPLS improves network resilience by quickly rerouting traffic.
SR-MPLS optimizes resource use and traffic routing in service provider networks.
For 5G networks, it allows network slicing (Hao et al, 2016).
By routing traffic through certain services, SR-MPLS makes it easier to link services
together.
Effective multicast distribution and multicast VPNs are made possible.
SRv6 functionality can be added to SR-MPLS to increase routing flexibility.
2.2. How How SR-MPLS enables seamless communication across data center
Segment Routing MPLS (SR-MPLS) enables seamless communication across data centers by
providing a number of key benefits, including:
Data Center Networking:
A robust and programmable MPLS variant is offered by SR-MPLS.
It enables data centres to engineer traffic and forward MPLS packets without depending on
Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Traffic Engineering (TE).
The fundamental concept is to segment the packet forwarding path, assign Segment
Identifiers (SIDs) to these segments, and encapsulate segment data into packets at the ingress
(Gay et al 2017).
With this strategy, network designs are made simpler yet MPLS's label switching advantages
are kept.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1950
Overlay Network Communication:
The seamless connectivity between geographically separated data centres is made possible
by SR-MPLS.
Service providers may employ a single SR/MPLS data-plane protocol on their transport
devices thanks to unified SR/MPLS transport.
Service providers get uniform policy, automation, scalability, and improved monitoring
capabilities across data centres and transport domains by providing SR/MPLS handoff from
data centres (Ventre,et al 2020).
Scalable and Extensible Architecture:
Traditional MPLS's flexibility and protocol complexity constraints are solved by SR-MPLS.
It offers effective path selection while streamlining the control plane.
During network evolution, the use of SDN principles enables compatibility with current
devices (Brundiers et al, 2021).
Interoperability and Integration:
With other network technologies like Ethernet and IP, SR-MPLS is compatible. This enables
integrating SR-MPLS onto current data center networks simple.
The gap between data center networks and transport domains is filled by SR-MPLS.
It improves visibility across distributed central, regional, and edge data centers and
harmonizes rules and handoffs (Trimponias et al, 2017).
Workload Distribution:
Workloads are being equally distributed across several data centers using SR-MPLS. This
might enhance dependability and performance.
SR-MPLS allows workload mobility inside the fabric using VXLAN.
The movement of workloads among several virtual environments may be done without much
difficulty while keeping consistency in automation and visibility (Carpa et al, 2014).
Consequently, SR-MPLS is a strong and adaptable network routing technology that is
employed to provide smooth communication between data centers. Data center networking
benefits include overlay network connectivity, a scalable and flexible architecture,
interoperability and integration, and task allocation.
3. (SRGB) SEGMENT ROUTING GLOBAL BLOCK :
The Segment Routing Global Block (SRGB) is a label range reserved within the Segment
Routing architecture that is primarily used for Global Segments. The standard SRGB colour
space ranges from 16,000 to 23,999. A Prefix-SID in this context acts as a domain-wide unique
index, referring to a specific label within the SRGB range. Because the index begins at zero,
the first index equates to 16,000 as the label value. A Prefix of 1.1.1.65/32 with a Prefix-SID
index of 65, for example, would translate to label 16065 (Tian et al, 2020).
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PATHS : IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1951
A Global Segment is directly represented by its Global Label value in this approach, making
operations easier to handle. While the usage of several SRGBs is permitted, it adds complexity
for users and can affect network operations. It shows that when a non-default SRGB is
required, it can be allocated between 16,000 and 1,048,575 or up to the corresponding platform
maximum. The SRGB should be the same size across all nodes, with the present maximum
size set at 64,000 labels. Segment Routing activities across the network are uniform and
effective thanks to this standardized methodology (Jadin et al, 2019).
As shown bellow in the figure 3 and figure 4:
Figure 3: Segment Routing Global Block
Figure 4: Recommended SRGB allocation
3.1. SRGB as the routing protocol data center architectures
Let's examine SRGB and its significance in data center deployments:
Prefix-SID and Label Association:
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1952
Administrators may precisely manage how packets are routed via the network, optimising for
variables like latency, bandwidth, and resource utilization, by giving Prefix-SIDs distinct
labels.
Fast rerouting and fail over methods are made possible by the SRGB and Prefix-SID labeling
scheme, which lowers downtime and maintains high availability.
By linking Prefix-SIDs to specific labels, administrators may quickly design and administer
the network, making it simpler to execute traffic engineering and routing regulations (Barakat
et al, 2019).
Uniformity and predictability in the network are ensured by maintaining a constant SRGB
range and Prefix-SID to label mapping across all data centre nodes.
Utilizing label resources effectively is made possible by the mapping of Prefix-SIDs to labels
inside the SRGB. As needed, data centers distribute labels while assuring uniqueness and
avoiding label fatigue (Zheng et al, 2021).
SRGB Features and Capabilities:
SRGB offers a method for labeling segments with globally distinct names. Thus, a particular
label value designates the same segment over the whole network, making label interpretation
easier and guaranteeing uniform forwarding behavior.
Fine-grained traffic engineering capabilities are made possible by SRGB within the network.
Network administrators may manage traffic flows depending on parameters like latency,
bandwidth, and connection utilization by linking various Prefix-SIDs with certain labels
inside the SRGB (Song et al, 2021).
When a connection or node fails, SRGB helps the network to quickly converge. The network
could swiftly divert traffic via backup pathways thanks to established label mappings,
minimizing downtime and ensuring high availability.
By offering a standardized mechanism for mapping Prefix-SIDs to labels, SRGB streamlines
network operations. Segment Routing in the network is now simpler and easier to build and
operate, and SRGB enables effective label resource management (Liaskos et al, 2022).
SRGB’s Global Labeling Architecture:
The ability to guarantee the worldwide uniqueness of labels and segments inside the SR
domain is one of the fundamental benefits of the worldwide Labeling Architecture. This
distinction improves the dependability and predictability of the network.
The Global Labeling Architecture's standardized label allocation and indexing make network
design and administration easier (Ghaffari et al, 2022).
The Global Labeling Architecture enables smooth interoperability between SR-enabled
devices from various suppliers or administrative domains. Interoperability guarantees that
devices can appropriately understand and send communication based on the standardized
labels, which is essential in multi-vendor or multi-domain networks.
The Global Labeling Architecture enables precise network traffic engineering.
Large networks' scalability needs are supported by the global labeling architecture.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1953
High Availability and Resilience:
Assuring network services and applications are available and functional even in the event of
failures or interruptions is known as high availability in SR with SRGB.
High Availability techniques aid in speedy traffic rerouting along other routes in the case of
a link or node failure inside an SR domain.
Load balancing is a function of both high availability and load distribution, which divides
traffic across all available channels. This enhances the use of network resources and avoids
congestion on certain lines or nodes.
Segment IDs (SIDs) and effective segment steering are made possible by SRGB. When
primary pathways fail, high availability and resilience make sure that backup paths with
various SIDs are instantly accessible and may be used.
With this scalability, the network can adapt to shifting needs without sacrificing
dependability (Wang et al, 2022).
Integration with Underlay and Overlay Protocols:
In order to ensure that SR can survive with current network technologies, SRGB facilitates
the smooth integration of SR with underlay and overlay protocols.
It enables SR to coexist with protocols like MPLS, IPv6, and BGP, easing the switch to SR
while keeping current infrastructure compatible.
SRGB offers more control over how SR and the underlay/overlay protocols interact, enabling
effective traffic engineering and route management (Al Mtawa et al, 2022).
Policy-Based Routing and Traffic Engineering:
The definition of particular SIDs for enforcing traffic regulations and routing choices is made
possible by SRGB, which improves policy-based routing.
Although network administrators may establish SR pathways and direct traffic in accordance
with predetermined regulations, it makes fine-grained traffic engineering easier.
SRGB allows for fine-grained control over how traffic moves across the network in
accordance with regulations and traffic engineering needs, which helps to optimize network
resources (Chen et al, 2023).
Interoperability and Standardization:
SRGB is an essential component of standardized SR solutions, guaranteeing consistency and
compatibility between the products and implementations of various suppliers.
It makes the adoption and deployment of SR by organizations easier by streamlining the
standardization process for technologies relevant to SR.
By encouraging vendor-neutral solutions, SRGB standardization lowers the possibility of
vendor lock-in and fosters healthy competition in the networking sector (Cianfrani et al,
2016).
SRGB in Segment Routing provides benefits in label allocation, scalability, interaction with
existing protocols, policy-based routing, traffic engineering, and interoperability. These
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1954
advantages make SRGB an essential component for the effective implementation and
acceptance of Segment Routing in modern networking systems.
3.2. Evaluation of the scalability and robustness of SRGB in large-scale data center
deployments.
SRGB is commonly used in large-scale data center deployments due to its scalability and
robustness. Let's assess how SRGB functions in these circumstances:
Scalability:
SRGB is well-known for its scalability in large-scale data centre deployments. It enables
efficient label allocation and can manage a large number of devices and pathways without
sacrificing performance. Scalability is critical in data centers, where network sizes may
rapidly rise (Pereira et al, 2020).
SRGB has the ability to scale with the rising number of data centre services, applications,
and network nodes.
Support for dynamic resource allocation to deal with traffic increase.
Scalability of SRGB in complicated data centre topologies, including spine-leaf systems.
Elasticity in SRGB allows it to respond to changing traffic patterns and capacity
requirements.
Robustness:
SRGB is intended to provide network robustness. It reduces the likelihood of label clashes
and enables for quick rerouting in the event of a network breakdown. This improves network
resilience and minimizes disturbance in large-scale installations.
Resistance to network failures such as connection, node, and equipment failures.
Rapid convergence and recovery procedures are used to ensure high availability with little
service downtime.
Fault tolerance methods within the SRGB to maintain service continuity.
SID redundancy solutions to improve network robustness (Swallow et al, 2017).
Extensive testing under a variety of failure situations is required to prove robustness.
Policy-Based Routing:
SRGB supports policy-based routing by assigning labels depending on network regulations
and needs. This adaptability enables the adoption of complicated routing strategies within the
data center, improving control and optimization.
It can allow fine-grained policy-based routing using SIDs.
Flexibility in creating and implementing traffic restrictions according to data center
requirements.
Verification of SRGB's ability to follow particular routing and policy standards.
Integration of policy-based routing with current data center rules and control systems.
Monitoring and reporting tools for assessing policy compliance and optimizing performance
(Chunduri et al, 2018).
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1955
Interoperability:
Interoperability is of the highest importance in data center networks with several devices and
manufacturers. SRGB is based on standard protocols and is intended to interoperate with
other devices that enable segment routing, improving interoperability and eliminating
integration issues.
SRGB offers seamless interaction with current networking protocols, standards, and data
center equipment.
Compatibility with underlay and overlay networks, allowing for a seamless transition to
SRGB.
Extensive testing and certification of SRGB's compatibility with many network devices and
manufacturers (Hao et al, 2016).
Coexistence with existing SRGB routing and forwarding technologies ensures little
interruption during implementation.
SRGB is also compatible with many network virtualization and orchestration technologies.
Industry Support and Expertise:
As a well-established networking technology, SRGB benefits from industry backing and
knowledge. This implies that there are tools, documentation, and a community of specialists
accessible to assist with large-scale data centre implementation and troubleshooting.
SRGB is a commonly used and well-supported segment routing component that is backed by
considerable subject knowledge and industry expertise.
The presence of competent SRGB specialists who are versed in its setup and operation
benefits the design, installation, and troubleshooting of a data centre network employing
SRGB (Kalmykov et al, 2021).
SRGB deployments in large-scale data centers are improved in terms of durability and
stability by thorough documentation, best practices, and the collective expertise of the
networking community, guaranteeing dependable and efficient deployment (Ventre et al,
2020).
SDN SID PCEs
4. SR TRAFFIC-ENGINEERING:
Segment Routing Traffic Engineering (SR Traffic-Engineering) is a process that uses the
concepts of Segment Routing (SR) to optimize the flow of network traffic through a network.
It enables network managers to regulate and steer traffic flows along specified channels to
achieve different goals such as minimizing congestion, lowering latency, or optimizing
resource utilization (Li & Yeung, 2020). SR Traffic Engineering does this by establishing
specific pathways or segments for traffic to follow across the network. SR Traffic-Engineering
is shown in Figure 5.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PATHS : IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1956
Figure 5: SR Traffic-Engineering
4.1. Study of SR Traffic-Engineering as the control plane protocol for Segmenting
Routing based networks
As the control plane protocol for Segmenting Routing based networks, let's perform a thorough
analysis of SR Traffic-Engineering:
Introduction to SR Traffic-Engineering:
Segment Routing (SR) serves as the control plane protocol for the network traffic engineering
technique known as SR Traffic-Engineering (SR-TE). Network administrators are able to
precisely control the route that traffic goes via a network thanks to SR-TE.
Segment identifiers (SIDs), which are used by SR-TE, are distributed to all routers in the
network via SR. SIDs are used to designate which parts of the path traffic should follow. The
SIDs are then used by routers to direct traffic along the desired route.
By storing specific routes inside the packet headers, it offers a flexible and programmable
mechanism to regulate traffic flows, offering accurate traffic engineering capabilities
(Giorgetti et al, 2017).
Benefits of SR Traffic-Engineering in Segment Routing-Based Networks:
In order to ensure effective resource utilization, network managers can optimize traffic
pathways depending on specified parameters like bandwidth, latency, or load balancing.
By directing traffic along predetermined pathways, it lowers congestion and boosts
application performance.
By removing the need for intricate protocols and overlays, SR Traffic-Engineering makes
network administration and scalability simpler.
By providing quick rerouting capabilities in the event of link or node failures, it increases
network resilience and reduces service interruptions.
Network management agility and dynamic response to shifting traffic patterns are made
possible by centrally controlled and programmed traffic pathways (Schüller et al, 2018).
SR Traffic-Engineering Control Plane Operations:
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1957
Label Stacking: SR Traffic-Engineering utilizes MPLS labels or IPv6 segments to encode
traffic path information within packet headers. Labels or segments are stacked to represent
the complete path.
Path Computation: The control plane calculates and programs traffic paths based on network
policies, objectives, and constraints. This ensures that traffic follows the desired path.
Resource Reservation: It allows for the reservation of network resources along the specified
paths, ensuring that sufficient bandwidth and resources are available for critical applications
(Davoli et al, 2015).
Dynamic Adaptation: SR Traffic-Engineering dynamically adapt to network changes, such
as link failures or congestion, by recalculating and rerouting traffic as needed.
Interoperability and Integration:
SR Traffic-Engineering seamlessly integrate with existing routing protocols such as OSPF or
IS-IS).
It coexists with traditional MPLS networks and enhances their capabilities.
It provides interoperability with existing network infrastructure, making it a versatile choice
for network upgrades and enhancements (Moreno et al, 2017).
Use Cases and Deployment Scenarios:
Traffic is being redirected away from crowded lines and nodes using SR-TE to load balance
traffic over different pathways. Networks in data centres perform and are more reliable as a
result.
Traffic from various workloads or security domains is isolated using SR-TE. Networks in
data centres are now more secure as a result.
By giving each tenant a unique set of SIDs, SR-TE is used to allow multi-tenancy in data
centre networks. This improves each tenant's isolation and performance.
SR Traffic-Engineering is used by CDNs and content providers to optimise content delivery
to end consumers.
The development of virtual network segments with certain performance characteristics, such
as improved mobile broadband, ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC), and
massive machine-type communication (mMTC), is made possible in 5G networks by the use
of SR Traffic-Engineering (Moreno et al, 2017).
4.2. Investigation of the benefits of SR Traffic-Engineering
Certainly! Let's look into EVPN (Ethernet Virtual Private Network) advantages in further
detail, such as streamlined provisioning, multi-tenancy support, and improved scalability:
Simplified Provisioning:
Simplified provisioning is one of SR Traffic-Engineering's main advantages.
To set up and govern traffic flows, SR-TE makes use of a centralised controller. This makes
it easier to manage and configure huge, complicated networks.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1958
It simplifies the procedure for creating and controlling network traffic pathways. Traffic
engineering goals may be set by network managers using centralised management, and the
network itself calculates and constructs the pathways dynamically.
This simplification makes provisioning of network services faster and more effective by
lowering human mistake rates and the complexity linked to conventional traffic engineering
techniques (Bhatia et al, 2015).
Multi-Tenancy Support:
Multi-tenancy settings are well supported by SR Traffic-Engineering. It enables businesses
and service providers to designate separate, secure traffic lanes inside the same network
infrastructure for various tenants or clients.
To give each tenant a unique set of SIDs, SR-TE uses multi-tenancy support in networks.
Each tenant's performance and seclusion are aided by this.
SR Traffic-Engineering enables multi-tenancy without the need for complicated overlays or
different physical networks by providing granular control over traffic segmentation (Wu &
Cui, 2023).
Enhanced Scalability:
Modern networks must be able to scale, and SR Traffic-Engineering excels in this area.
By reducing the need for extra signaling protocols or elaborate overlays, it allows networks
to grow effectively.
By dynamically calculating and optimizing traffic pathways, SR Traffic-Engineering can
adapt as the network expands and make sure that resources are used effectively.
Because of its capacity to grow, it is a good fit for big networks and data centers with rising
demand (Wu & Cui, 2023).
Seamless Load Balancing:
Load balancing across network pathways is made possible by SR Traffic-Engineering. Based
on factors like connection utilization, congestion levels, or application-specific needs, traffic
may be allocated intelligently.
SR Traffic-Engineering optimizes the utilization of resources and makes sure that no single
channel becomes a bottleneck by dynamically altering traffic flows. The performance and
dependability of the network are both enhanced by this load-balancing feature (Giorgetti, et
al, 2017).
Interoperability and Coexistence:
The capacity of SR Traffic-Engineering to coexist and work with current network
technologies and protocols is one of its advantages.
It seamlessly integrates with upcoming technologies, MPLS networks, and conventional
routing protocols, maintaining backward compatibility and reducing downtime during
network upgrades.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1959
The implementation of SR Traffic-Engineering in various network contexts is made easier
by this compatibility, enabling organizations to take use of its advantages without undergoing
a whole network upgrade (Cianfrani et al, 2017).
5. DEPLOYMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES:
5.1. Discussion of key factors to consider when implementing SR Segment Routing using
SR-MPLS, SRGB, and SR Traffic-Engineering.
To achieve a successful deployment of SR Segment Routing using SR-MPLS, SRGB, and SR
Traffic-Engineering, numerous important elements must be considered. The following is a
discussion of those aspects:
Protocol Compatibility: To allow effective forwarding and path optimization inside the
network, make sure that SR-MPLS, SRGB, and SR Traffic Engineering protocols are
seamlessly integrated and compatible. In addition, ensure sure the latest versions of the
necessary features and scalability are supported by the hardware and software.
Network Design and Topology: Adjust the SR Segment Using the network's topology and
design for routing, traffic engineering techniques are improved in accordance with certain
needs and goals. Design a layout that allows for expansion in the future, efficient traffic flow,
and redundancy.
Underlay Network: To enable SR-MPLS, provide a high-performance underlay network.
To maximise underlay network performance, pay attention to elements like link capacity,
link aggregation, and loop prevention strategies. Create a solid underlay network to provide
the SR infrastructure with the stability and foundation it needs to perform effective routing
and forwarding operations (Hao et al, 2016).
Overlay Network: Make Overlay the SR capabilities onto the underlay network, allowing
for dynamic traffic engineering and path optimization while maintaining the integrity and
security of the underlay.
Multitenancy and Network Segmentation: Put into place efficient multitenancy and
network segmentation solutions that enable traffic separation and prioritization while
effectively controlling and using network resources. Configure SR-MPLS
based segmentation if multitenancy or network segmentation is required. Create policies for
isolation and define prefix-SID for tenants or applications.
Management and Monitoring: To provide real-time visibility, fault detection, and
performance monitoring for optimal network operations, establish comprehensive
management and monitoring systems to oversee the deployment of SR Segment Routing.
Implement reliable administration and monitoring tools as a result to learn more about the
deployment of SR Segment Routing. These tools should include configuration management,
network health monitoring, and data collecting on performance.
Interoperability and Vendor Support: Verify the equipment and solutions of various
suppliers are interoperable to ensure seamless integration and adherence to standards, which
is essential for the successful implementation of SR Segment Routing. Additionally, confirm
that the SR-MPLS, SRGB, and SR Traffic-Engineering devices and protocols of your choice
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1960
have active vendor support. This ensures compatibility and makes troubleshooting easier in
the event of problems (Kalmykov et al, 2021).
Security: To protect the SR infrastructure and uphold the confidentiality and integrity of
data, give priority to security measures such as authentication, encryption, access control,
and threat detection systems. Develop the SR Segment Routing architecture to incorporate
security measures. In order to protect against unauthorized access and threats, this comprises
encrypted traffic, secure BGP peering, and authentication mechanisms.
Testing and Validation: Conduct rigorous testing and validation procedures to verify the
correctness, resilience, and efficiency of the SR Segment Routing implementation,
identifying potential issues and fine-tuning configurations for optimal performance. Test the
various scenarios, including link failures, failover, and scalability, to ensure resiliency,
performance, and reliability of the implementation (Shvedov et al, 2022).
5.2. Analysis of operational challenges, troubleshooting techniques, and mitigation
strategies
Operational Challenges:
Configuration Complexity: SR Segment Routing implementation, particularly in large-
scale networks, can be challenging when using SR-MPLS, SRGB, and SR Traffic-
Engineering. Planning is necessary while configuring MPLS labels, SRGB, and traffic
engineering strategies.
Issues with interoperability: It might be difficult to guarantee flawless compatibility across
devices and protocols from various suppliers. Reduced functionality and connection issues
might result from incompatibilities.
Resource Allocation: In networks with a lot of segments and pathways, efficiently assigning
and managing resources like MPLS labels and SRGB segments can be challenging
(Alemayehu et al, 2021).
Fault isolation: Given the dispersed nature of SR-MPLS and the numerous segments
involved, pinpointing the cause of network problems or performance loss can be difficult.
Troubleshooting Techniques:
Segment Verification: Validate the accurate allocation and distribution of MPLS labels and
SRGB segments among network devices. To validate label bindings and segment routing
setups, use the display and debug commands.
Packet Capture and Analysis: Use packet capture tools to collect and analyse SR-MPLS
traffic. This can aid in identifying problems with label stacking, segment identification, or
route selection.
Path Tracing: Trace the path of packets via the network using tools such as traceroute with
segment identification. This can aid in locating a malfunction or misconfiguration.
Logging and Alarms: Set up logging and alarms for crucial events like label allocation
mistakes or BGP peering issues. Monitor syslog messages and SNMP traps for early failure
identification (Chunduri et al, 2018).
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1961
Mitigation Strategies:
Configuration Management: Use configuration management practises to track and record
changes to SR Segment Routing setups. Rollback and version control systems can be quite
useful.
Collaboration with vendors: Work closely with vendors to guarantee correct
interoperability and compatibility. Keep up to current on vendor-specific updates, fixes, and
suggestions for SR-MPLS and associated protocols.
Segment and Label Planning: Properly plan and arrange segments and labels to minimize
depletion and disputes. Regularly assess and optimize resource allocations to ensure effective
utilization.
Network Monitoring: Implement extensive network monitoring systems that enable real-
time visibility into SR Segment Routing efficiency. Implement proactive monitoring to
discover abnormalities and patterns.
Redundancy and Failover: Implement redundancy and failover techniques to reduce service
interruptions in the event of a device or connection failure. Make sure that failover
possibilities are taken into consideration by SR Traffic-Engineering policies.
Training and skill development: Invest in the education and professional advancement of
network engineers and administrators. Give your team the skills and knowledge they need to
efficiently administer and troubleshoot SR Segment Routing (Ventre et al, 2020).
6. REFERENCES
1. Abdullah, Z. N., Ahmad, I., & Hussain, I. (2018). Segment routing in software defined
networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(1), 464-486.
2. Akiya, N., Kini, S., & Chen, M. (2017). Label switched path (LSP) ping/traceroute for
segment routing (SR) IGP-prefix and IGP-adjacency segment identifiers (SIDs) with
MPLS data planes.
3. Tayyab Muhammad. (2021). Overlay Network Technologies in SDN: Evaluating
Performance and Scalability of Vxlan And Geneve. International Journal Of Computer
Science And Technology, 5(1), 39-75. Retrieved from
https://ijcst.com.pk/IJCST/article/view/280
4. Al Mtawa, Y., Haque, A., & Sidebottom, G. (2022). Disjoint-Path Segment Routing:
Network Reliability Perspective. In 2022 International Wireless Communications and
Mobile Computing (IWCMC) (pp. 1076-1081).
5. Alemayehu, K. (2019). Analyzing Impact of Segment Routing MPLS on QoS.
Communication Magazine.
6. Barakat, O. L., Ventre, P. L., Salsano, S., & Fu, X. (2019). Busoni: Policy Composition
and Northbound Interface for IPv6 Segment Routing Networks. In 2019 IEEE 27th
International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) (pp. 1-4).
7. Muhammad, T. and Munir, M. 2023. Network Automation. European Journal of
Technology. 7, 2 (Aug. 2023), 23 - 42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47672/ejt.1547.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1962
8. Bhatia, R., Hao, F., Kodialam, M., & Lakshman, T. V. (2015). Optimized network traffic
engineering using segment routing. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer
Communications (INFOCOM) (pp. 657-665). Hong Kong, China. doi:
10.1109/INFOCOM.2015.7218434.
9. Brundiers, A., Schüller, T., & Aschenbruck, N. (2021, October). On the benefits of loops
for segment routing traffic engineering. In 2021 IEEE 46th Conference on Local
Computer Networks (LCN) (pp. 32-40).
10. Carpa, R., Glück, O., & Lefevre, L. (2014, December). Segment routing based traffic
engineering for energy efficient backbone networks. In 2014 IEEE International
Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS) (pp. 1-6).
11. Chen, J., Wang, Y., Wen, J., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, X. (2023). An Efficient Local Search
Algorithm for Traffic Engineering in Segment Routing Networks. In 2023 24th Asia-
Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS) (pp. 223-226).
12. Tayyab Muhammad. (2019). Revolutionizing Network Control: Exploring the Landscape
of Software-Defined Networking (SDN). International Journal Of Computer Science And
Technology, 3(1), 36-68. Retrieved from https://ijcst.com.pk/IJCST/article/view/281
13. Chunduri, U., Clemm, A., & Li, R. (2018). Preferred Path Routing - A Next-Generation
Routing Framework beyond Segment Routing. In 2018 IEEE Global Communications
Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1-7).
14. Chunduri, U., Clemm, A., & Li, R. (2018, December). Preferred path routing - a next-
generation routing framework beyond segment routing. In 2018 IEEE Global
Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
15. Cianfrani, A., Listanti, M., & Polverini, M. (2016). Translating Traffic Engineering
Outcome into Segment Routing Paths: The Encoding Problem. In 2016 IEEE Conference
on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (pp. 245-250). San
Francisco, CA, USA. doi: 10.1109/INFCOMW.2016.7562080.
16. Tayyab Muhammad. (2022). A Comprehensive Study on Software-Defined Load
Balancers: Architectural Flexibility & Application Service Delivery in On-Premises
Ecosystems. International Journal Of Computer Science And Technology, 6(1), 1-24.
Retrieved from https://ijcst.com.pk/IJCST/article/view/282
17. Cianfrani, A., Listanti, M., & Polverini, M. (2017). Incremental deployment of segment
routing into an ISP network: A traffic engineering perspective. IEEE/ACM Transactions
on Networking, 25(5), 3146-3160.
18. Davoli, L., Veltri, L., Ventre, P. L., Siracusano, G., & Salsano, S. (2015). Traffic
Engineering with Segment Routing: SDN-Based Architectural Design and Open Source
Implementation. In 2015 Fourth European Workshop on Software Defined Networks (pp.
111-112). Bilbao, Spain. doi: 10.1109/EWSDN.2015.73.
19. Gay, S., Hartert, R., & Vissicchio, S. (2017, May). Expect the unexpected: Sub-second
optimization for segment routing. In IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on
Computer Communications (pp. 1-9).
20. Ghaffari, E., Rahmani, A. M., Saberikamarposhti, M., & Sahafi, A. (2022). An Optimal
Path-Finding Algorithm in Smart Cities by Considering Traffic Congestion and Air
Pollution. IEEE Access, 10, 55126-55135.
AOPTIMIZING NETWORK PAT HS: IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT S ON SEGMENT ROUTING
Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing Vol. 38 (4) 2023 1963
21. Giorgetti, A., Sgambelluri, A., Paolucci, F., Cugini, F., & Castoldi, P. (2017). Segment
Routing for Effective Recovery and Multi-domain Traffic Engineering. Journal of Optical
Communications and Networking, 9, A223-A232.
