ArticlePDF Available

Formative Assessment, Examples, and Feedback: Universal Practices of Effective Teaching

Authors:

Abstract

This article explores how to carry out formative assessment, use examples, and give feedback; three practices that are common to all teaching methods.
Formative Assessment, Examples, and
Feedback: Universal Practices of Effective
Teaching
Stephen L. Chew November 20, 2023
There are dozens of teaching methods that a teacher might use, but instead of emphasizing their
differences, I want to focus on what they have in common. These are practices that all teaching methods
value. Used correctly, they are universal components of effective teaching. I can think of three such
practices: using formative assessments, providing examples of concepts, and giving students feedback.
https://www.teachingprofessor.com
No teaching method I’m aware of claims that any of these activities hurts learning or is not part of good
teaching practice.
If we accept all three as good teaching practices, then all teachers should know how to design and
implement them for optimal learning. But I see little evidence of that. In my experience, teachers
typically generate examples intuitively, without worrying about whether students find them helpful.
Many teachers use formative assessments such as clicker questions without a purpose or learning goal
in mind, just a vague sense that using them is a good idea. Finally, I’ve seen examples of feedback that
are unhelpful or even hurtful to student learning and motivation. There is strong evidence that all three
practices can enhance learning, but teachers must design and implement them correctly, which is not
straightforward to do.
Just carrying out a practice intuitively is no guarantee of its effectiveness. Effective pedagogy is theory-
driven practice to achieve a desired learning outcome. By theory driven, I mean that teachers need to
have an accurate understanding of how people learn and use it to implement practices. Teachers should
also have a purpose or desired learning goal in mind when using a given practice. Examples of desired
learning outcomes include strengthening memory for important concepts and improving metacognitive
awareness. Using these practices effectively involves designing and implementing activities with
principles of how people learn in mind, assessing their impact with regard to a desired learning
outcome, and then modifying them if needed.
The reason these three practices are universal is that they are flexible. Teachers can adapt them to
address multiple important learning goals. Let me illustrate using a framework of the cognitive
challenges of effective teaching (Chew & Cerbin, 2021; for a general overview, see Cerbin, 2022, and to
learn more about each challenge, see my essay here). These are the nine challenges that teachers and
students must successfully negotiate for students to learn:
1. Student mental mindset: Students hold attitudes and beliefs about a course or topic, such as
how useful or interesting it will be and how hard they expect to work, that can affect their
participation, learning strategies, and motivation.
2. Metacognition and self-regulation: Students make judgments about their current level of
mastery of concepts that affect both how they study and how much they believe they need to
study.
3. Student fear and mistrust: Students may fear that, instead of supporting their learning, teachers
are trying to weed out the members of the class who don’t really belong there.
4. Insufficient prior knowledge: Some students may start a class with far less prior knowledge than
other students, which makes their learning much more difficult.
5. Misconceptions: Students often hold faulty or mistaken beliefs at the start of a course.
6. Transfer of learning: Students fail to apply what they learn to new situations.
7. Selective attention: Students can focus their attention on only a small portion of the
environment and miss most everything else.
https://www.teachingprofessor.com
8. Constraints of mental effort and working memory: Students have two major limitations in
cognitive processingthe amount of concentration (mental effort) available to them and the
capacity to hold information consciously (working memory).
9. Ineffective learning strategies: Students generally prefer the least effective strategies for long-
term learning.
Formative assessments, examples, and feedback can address most of the nine challenges to some
extent, as Table 1 shows. Teachers can use these practices to address multiple learning goals
simultaneously.
Teaching Practice
Cognitive Challenges
Formative
Assessment
Student mental mindset
Metacognition and self-regulation
Student fear and mistrust
Insufficient prior knowledge
Misconceptions
Transfer of learning
Constraints of mental effort and working memory
Ineffective learning strategies
Examples
Student mental mindset
Metacognition and self-regulation
Student fear and mistrust
Insufficient prior knowledge
Misconceptions
Transfer of learning
Constraints of mental effort and working memory
Ineffective learning strategies
Feedback
Student mental mindset
Metacognition and self-regulation
Student fear and mistrust
Misconceptions
Transfer of learning
Ineffective learning strategies
Table 1. Cognitive challenges that each of the three universal teaching practices address
Formative assessments are low- or no-stakes activities designed to give both students and teachers
feedback about the students’ thinking, level of understanding, and learning. It is an umbrella term for a
huge number and variety of activities, such as muddiest point papers, practice exams, exit tickets,
predict-observe-explain, peer instruction, clicker questions, and the venerable think-pair-share. There
are many good books on formative assessments (e.g., Angelo & Cross, 1993; Barkley & Major, 2015),
plus many useful websites. Think-pair-share, for example, can create a sense of community in a class
https://www.teachingprofessor.com
and promote student engagement (Mundelsee & Jurkowski, 2021)both part of student mindset. It can
provide teachers and students with feedback about how well students are understanding concepts,
which is vital for metacognition and self-regulation. Teachers can use it to promote effective learning
strategies such as retrieval practice and spaced practice, refute common misconceptions, promote
transfer of knowledge to new situations, and give students practice in applying knowledge, reducing
cognitive load. Still, the way one implements think-pair-share influences its impact (Mundelsee &
Jurkowski, 2021), and it may not be the best format for some students (Cohen et al., 2019). Peer
instruction, which often makes use of digital response systems, is another popular formative
assessment, especially in STEM fields. It’s what many faculty think they are doing when they use clicker
questions. Evidence for its effectiveness in promoting learning is strong (Crouch, & Mazur, 2001), but
once again, teachers must implement it correctly, which is not a simple task (Dancy et al., 2016; Schell &
Butler, 2018).
I’ve written about using examples to promote learning here (see also Renkl, 2014, 2023). I define
examples as instances, illustrations, or activities that are representative of a concept; they include
problem sets, worked problems, and analogies. Designing a good example is not straightforward. The
fact that teachers know so much more about a topic than their students can result in their choosing
examples that are clear to them but opaque to students and giving explanations that they believe are
thorough and precise but students find confusing. There are dimensions, such as cognitive load and
familiarity, that teachers may not think about when selecting examples but that impede student
understanding.
Student feedback from assignments, activities, and exams can, ideally, help students with metacognition
and self-regulation. It can inform students about the effectiveness of their study strategies and promote
a growth mindset. Yeager et al. (2014) have shown that what they call “wise feedback” can build student
trust in the teacher, especially among minoritized students. Providing constructive, accessible feedback
is challenging, however, and bad feedback can discourage learning (Hattie & Yates, 2014). Finally,
students often have trouble using feedback to regulate their learning.
Formative assessments, examples, and feedback can be so helpful for learning that they are part of
virtually all teaching methods. Teachers should be proficient in using them and adapting them to their
students’ needs. That, however, requires more than simply going through the motions and hoping for
the best. Like all teaching methods, they can be implemented inappropriately, rendering them
ineffective and possibly harmful to learning. Teachers need to understand how they work and design
them to achieve specific learning goals.
References
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques (2nd ed.). Jossey Bass.
Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2015). Learning assessment techniques: A handbook for college faculty.
John Wiley & Sons.
Cerbin, W. J. (2022, May 20). Cognitive challenges of effective teaching. Psychology Teacher
Network. https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/psychology-teacher-network/introductory-
psychology/challenges-to-teaching
Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2021) The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of
Economic Education, 52(1), 1740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266
https://www.teachingprofessor.com
Cohen, M., Buzinski, S. G., Armstrong-Carter, E., Clark, J., Buck, B., & Reuman, L. (2019). Think, pair,
freeze: The association between social anxiety and student discomfort in the active learning
environment. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(4), 265
277. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000147
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American
Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970977. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
Dancy, M., Henderson, C., & Turpen, C. (2016). How faculty learn about and implement research-based
instructional strategies: The case of peer instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1),
010110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010110
Hattie, J. A., & Yates, G. C. (2014). Using feedback to promote learning. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, &
C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the
curriculum (pp. 4558). Society for the Teaching of
Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php
Mundelsee, L., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students’
in-class participation. Learning and Individual
Differences, 88, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
Renkl, A. (2014). Learning from worked examples: How to prepare students for meaningful problem
solving. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education:
Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 118130). Society for the Teaching of
Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php
Renkl, A. (2023). Using worked examples for ill-structured learning content. In C. E. Overson, C. M.
Hakala, L. L. Kordonowy, & V. A. Benassi (Eds.), In their own words: What scholars and teachers want you
to know about why and how to apply the science of learning in your academic setting (pp. 207224).
Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/itow
Schell, J. A., & Butler, A. C. (2018). Insights from the science of learning can inform evidence-based
implementation of peer instruction. In Frontiers in
Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00033
Yeager, D. S., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., Brzustoski, P., Master, A., Hessert, W. T., Williams,
M. E., & Cohen, G. L. (2014). Breaking the cycle of mistrust: Wise interventions to provide critical
feedback across the racial divide. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 804
824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033906
Stephen L. Chew, PhD, is a professor of psychology at Samford University. Trained as a cognitive
psychologist, he endeavors to translate cognitive research into forms that are useful for teachers and
students. He is the recipient of multiple awards for his teaching and research. Author contact:
slchew@samford.edu.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Think-Pair-Share (TPS) is a teaching strategy thought to increase in-class participation, especially with shy students. After thinking for themselves, students talk to their seatmate to exchange their ideas and finally show their willingness to participate in-class by raising their hand. In the present field study, we tested TPS with 393 ninth-grade students against two variations, Think-Share (TS; first think, then raise hand) and Share (S; directly raise hand). Students reported on their shyness, and reported in each condition on their hand raising, state anxiety, and motives for (non-)hand raising. Analyses revealed that TPS led to more hand raising compared to the S condition. Lower levels of hand raising in TS were fully mediated by state anxiety. Shy students reported social evaluative concerns, and they raised their hand less frequently than their non-shy peers but also benefited from TPS. These results indicate the importance of peer collaboration for in-class participation.
Article
Full-text available
The authors describe a research-based conceptual framework of how students learn that can guide the design, implementation, and troubleshooting of teaching practice. The framework consists of nine interacting cognitive challenges that teachers need to address to enhance student learning. These challenges include student mental mindset, metacognition and self-regulation, student fear and mistrust, prior knowledge, misconceptions, ineffective learning strategies, transfer of learning, constraints of selective attention, and the constraints of mental effort and working memory. The challenges are described with recommendations on how to address each one. What is effective for one situation may not be effective in others, and no single teaching method will always be optimal for all teachers, students, topics, and educational contexts. The teacher’s task is to manage this complex interaction successfully.
Article
Full-text available
Peer Instruction is a popular pedagogical method developed by Eric Mazur in the 1990s. Educational researchers, administrators, and teachers laud Peer Instruction as an easy-to-use method that fosters active learning in K-12, undergraduate, and graduate classrooms across the globe. Research over the past 25 years has demonstrated that courses that incorporate Peer Instruction produce greater student achievement compared to traditional lecture-based courses. These empirical studies show that Peer Instruction produces a host of valuable learning outcomes, such as better conceptual understanding, more effective problem-solving skills, increased student engagement, and greater retention of students in science majors. The diffusion of Peer Instruction has been widespread among educators because of its effectiveness, simplicity, and flexibility. However, a consequence of its flexibility is wide variability in implementation. Teachers frequently innovate or personalize the method by making modifications, and often such changes are made without research-supported guidelines or awareness of the potential impact on student learning. This article presents a framework for guiding modifications to Peer Instruction based on theory and findings from the science of learning. We analyze the Peer Instruction method with the goal of helping teachers understand why it is effective. We also consider six common modifications made by educators through the lens of retrieval-based learning and offer specific guidelines to aid in evidence-based implementation. Educators must be free to innovate and adapt teaching methods to their classroom and Peer Instruction is a powerful way for educators to encourage active learning. Effective implementation, however, requires making informed decisions about modifications.
Article
Full-text available
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Preparing and Supporting University Physics Educators.] The lack of knowledge about how to effectively spread and sustain the use of research-based instructional strategies is currently a significant barrier to the improvement of undergraduate physics education. In this paper we address this lack of knowledge by reporting on an interview study of 35 physics faculty, of varying institution types, who were self-reported users of, former users of, or knowledgeable nonusers of the research-based instructional strategy Peer Instruction. Interview questions included in this analysis focused on the faculty’s experiences, knowledge, and use of Peer Instruction, along with general questions about current and past teaching methods used by the interviewee. The primary findings include the following: (i) Faculty self-reported user status is an unreliable measure of their actual practice. (ii) Faculty generally modify specific instructional strategies and may modify out essential components. (iii) Faculty are often unaware of the essential features of an instructional strategy they claim to know about or use. (iv) Informal social interactions provide a significant communication channel in the dissemination process, in contrast to the formal avenues of workshops, papers, websites, etc., often promoted by change agents, and (v) experience with research-based strategies as a graduate student or through curriculum development work may be highly impactful. These findings indicate that educational transformation can be better facilitated by improving communication with faculty, supporting effective modification by faculty during implementation, and acknowledging and understanding the large impact of informal social interactions as a mode of dissemination.
Book
Over the past several decades, there has been a continually growing body of scholarship focusing on conditions that promote students’ learning, retention, and transfer of academic knowledge. The term ‘science of learning’ is often used to describe this field of specialization. The present work is organized into five sections containing chapters focused on the history, principles, applications, and practice of the 'science of learning.
Article
We report data from ten years of teaching with Peer Instruction (PI) in the calculus- and algebra-based introductory physics courses for nonmajors; our results indicate increased student mastery of both conceptual reasoning and quantitative problem solving upon implementing PI. We also discuss ways we have improved our implementation of PI since introducing it in 1991. Most notably, we have replaced in-class reading quizzes with pre-class written responses to the reading, introduced a research-based mechanics textbook for portions of the course, and incorporated cooperative learning into the discussion sections as well as the lectures. These improvements are intended to help students learn more from pre-class reading and to increase student engagement in the discussion sections, and are accompanied by further increases in student understanding.
Think, pair, freeze: The association between social anxiety and student discomfort in the active learning environment
  • M Cohen
  • S G Buzinski
  • E Armstrong-Carter
  • J Clark
  • B Buck
  • L Reuman
Cohen, M., Buzinski, S. G., Armstrong-Carter, E., Clark, J., Buck, B., & Reuman, L. (2019). Think, pair, freeze: The association between social anxiety and student discomfort in the active learning environment. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(4), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000147
Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum
  • J A Hattie
  • G C Yates
Hattie, J. A., & Yates, G. C. (2014). Using feedback to promote learning. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 45-58). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php
Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum
  • A Renkl
Renkl, A. (2014). Learning from worked examples: How to prepare students for meaningful problem solving. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 118-130). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.php