ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

This paper suggests that the innovation process has intensified as a result of the application of new digital technologies. These technologies that simulate, model and integrate, intensify the innovation process through facilitating economy of effort and definiteness of aim. Of all the many analytical lenses used to examine innovation, the most valuable in accounting for this "automation of innovation" is Rothwell's concept of the 5th Generation Innovation Process. Our paper revisits this element of Rothwell's (1992) prize-winning article in R&D Management. It reviews the use of a range of enabling technologies and strategic management practices for the automation of innovation that were either in gestation or unknown at the time of Rothwell's paper. Rothwell's speculation about the increased "electronification" of the innovation process, and of related technological and strategic integration, has proven to be correct. The use of the new "lectronic toolkit" can transform the innovation process by facilitating the transfer, transformation and control of information. Using insights from contemporary innovation and management research, this paper examines the benefits and limitations of these digital technologies in dealing with the challenges of innovation of reducing costs and increasing speed, predictability and strategic organisational integration. It presents a conceptual framework for assessing the intensification of innovation and outlines some strategic managerial precepts that will facilitate effective use of these technologies. The paper concludes with speculations about future developments in the intensification of innovation and its impact for strategic management, together with questions for further research.
53
International Journal of Innovation Management
Vol. 6, No. 1 (March 2002) pp. 53–83
© Imperial College Press
THE INTENSIFICATION OF INNOVATION
MARK DODGSON
National Graduate School of Management, The Australian
National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
mark.dodgson@anu.edu.au
DAVID M. GANN
and AMMON. J SALTER
SPRU — Science and Technology Policy Research
University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK
d.gann@sussex.ac.uk
a.j.salter@sussex.ac.uk
Received 29 November 2001
Revised 11 January 2002
Accepted 24 January 2002
This paper suggests that the innovation process has intensified as a result of the application
of new digital technologies. These technologies that simulate, model and integrate, intensify
the innovation process through facilitating economy of effort and definiteness of aim. Of
all the many analytical lenses used to examine innovation, the most valuable in accounting
for this “automation of innovation” is Rothwell’s concept of the 5th Generation Innovation
Process. Our paper revisits this element of Rothwell’s (1992) prize-winning article in
R&D Management. It reviews the use of a range of enabling technologies and strategic
management practices for the automation of innovation that were either in gestation or
unknown at the time of Rothwell’s paper. Rothwell’s speculation about the increased
“electronification” of the innovation process, and of related technological and strategic
integration, has proven to be correct. The use of the new “electronic toolkit” can transform
the innovation process by facilitating the transfer, transformation and control of information.
Using insights from contemporary innovation and management research, this paper examines
the benefits and limitations of these digital technologies in dealing with the challenges of
innovation of reducing costs and increasing speed, predictability and strategic organisational
integration. It presents a conceptual framework for assessing the intensification of innovation
and outlines some strategic managerial precepts that will facilitate effective use of these
Correspondence to: David M. Gann, SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, University of
Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK
S1363919602000495.p65 06/19/2002, 10:28 AM53
... Desde el punto de vista de la innovación sustentable, Lall (2001) establece que afecta positivamente a la competitividad empresarial, ya que dicha innovación vuelve a las organizaciones más eficientes; más responsables y, a la vez, más rentables (Montes, 2008). El autor añade que no se trata de dividir a la organización con la implementación de la innovación sustentable y la eco-eficiencia en la búsqueda del desarrollo sostenible, sino por el contrario integrarlas de una manera sistémica; ya que resultan ser elementos necesarios para las empresas que simplemente desean seguir siendo competitivas o perseguir ventajas a largo plazo (Dodgson et al., 2002). 2007), proponen que la capacidad de una empresa para implementar innovación sustentable, puede determinar la diferenciación de la marca y fomentar su comercialización y orientación estratégica, logrando eventualmente una competitividad superior. ...
Article
Full-text available
En el contexto global relacionado con la crisis social y ambiental, este artículo tiene como objetivo realizar un análisis de las variables que influyen en la competitividad de las empresas multitiendas de la Región de Coquimbo, Chile, a partir de la formulación y uso efectivo de una propuesta de valor sustentable. Se presenta un modelo causal compuesto por siete hipótesis, con seis variables de estudio: propuesta de valor sustentable (socio-ambiental), fidelidad del cliente, co-creación de valor, innovación sustentable, eco-eficiencia y, competitividad empresarial. La población objetivo, mediante muestra representativa de 383 personas, son los consumidores de las principales tiendas del retail regional. Para el contraste del modelo propuesto se emplea el método de ecuaciones estructurales, a través de los Mínimos Cuadrados Parciales (PLS). Se determina que las hipótesis planteadas son aceptadas y que los factores señalados explican en un 89,9% la varianza de la competitividad empresarial.
... Organisational change is driven by an environment integrated with innovation. This insight is supported by studies of technological advances and the acceleration of creativity, both of which have been studied for two decades [20]. Below ( Figure 5) shows the human aspects of the automation process under strategic planning. ...
... These include support resources (e.g., Hornsby et al., 2002), energy resources (e.g., de Clercq et al., 2016Weinberger et al., 2018;Williamson et al., 2019), autonomy resources (e.g., de Spiegelaere et al., 2014;Hornsby et al., 2002), control resources (e.g., de Clercq et al., 2016Janssen, 2000), and fairness resources (e.g., Janssen, 2004;Moon et al., 2008). By enabling the exploration of ideas and reducing the effort of collecting and transferring information and feedback, digital affordances support innovative activities (Dodgson et al., 2002;Kankanhalli et al., 2015). Hence, employeeperceived information technology (IT) support for innovation is likely to reflect a perceived gain of support resources (see Halbesleben et al., 2014) that is associated with digital affordances and allows for resource accumulation and thus a higher likelihood of net resource gains when engaging in corporate entrepreneurial behavior. ...
Article
Full-text available
Based on conservation of resources theory, this paper examines the mediating mechanisms in the relationship between digital affordances and employee corporate entrepreneurship participation likelihood. Findings from an experimental study with 207 employees show a statistically significant and positive indirect effect of digital affordances on employee corporate entrepreneurship participation likelihood through employee‐perceived information technology support for innovation and a statistically significant and—contrary to our expectations—positive indirect effect through employee‐perceived work overload. Results are corroborated by insights from in‐depth interviews with senior managers. They provide support for digital affordances as action potentials that are associated with resource gains that in turn foster employee corporate entrepreneurship participation likelihood.
... The single organization model however only covers the management level of an organization which is participating in construction innovation in the capacity of either OO or SO. The functional organization of a construction related firm can be divided into management (business) level and project levels (Gann and Salter, 2002)the former level deals with the strategic interests of the firm, whereas the latter level focuses on the project in hand. ...
... Interestingly, despite its similarity with the word creativity, innovation is found to be five times more likely to collocate with business (n=4049, span=20) than creativity does (n=782, span=20) in 1.9-billion-word Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE) (Davies, 2013). One possible reason is that innovation in business is more closely related to tangible products (Dodgson et al., 2002;Purcell, 2019;Startupr Hong Kong Limited, 2018), while creativity in business has a meaning closer to my definition, that it is focused on the mental or physical process of creating (including identification of opportunities) rather than the products (DeTienne & Chandler, 2004;Gundry & Kickul, 1996;Sarasvathy, 2001;Timmons, 1989). ...
Article
Full-text available
Creativity is the new literacy; we cannot leave a whole generation of people behind."-Chase Jarvis (TNW, 2017) "You can't use up creativity. The more you use, the more you have."-Maya Angelou "If I can try to make it fun that for me is what being creative is about; it's having fun and looking at life through like a sort of the lens of a child really."-Taika Waititi (TED x Talks, 2010).
... Technology-infused reality drives organizational change. The research on flexible automation and on the intensification of innovation-the themes known for over two decades-confirms this observation (Cainarca, Colombo, and Mariotti 1989, Bucklin, Lehmann, and Little 1998, Sanchez 1995, Azani and Khorramshahgol 1991, Dodgson, Gann, and Salter 2002. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
There is a resurging interest in automation because of rapid progress of machine learning and AI. In our perspective, innovation is not an exemption from their expansion. This situation gives us an opportunity to reflect on a direction of future innovation studies. In this conceptual paper, we propose a framework of innovation process by exploiting the concept of unit process. Deploying it in the context of automation, we indicate the important aspects of innovation process, i.e. human, organizational, and social factors. We also highlight the cognitive and interactive underpinnings at micro- and macro-levels of the process. We propose to embrace all those factors in what we call Innovation-Automation-Strategy cycle (IAS). Implications of IAS for future research are also put forward. Keywords: innovation, automation of innovation, unit process, innovation-automation-strategy cycle
... Interestingly, despite its similarity with the word creativity, innovation is found to be five times more likely to collocate with business (n=4049, span=20) than creativity does (n=782, span=20) in 1.9-billion-word Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE) (Davies, 2013). One possible reason is that innovation in business is more closely related to tangible products (Dodgson et al., 2002;Purcell, 2019;Startupr Hong Kong Limited, 2018), while creativity in business has a meaning closer to my definition, that it is focused on the mental or physical process of creating (including identification of opportunities) rather than the products (DeTienne & Chandler, 2004;Gundry & Kickul, 1996;Sarasvathy, 2001;Timmons, 1989). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
[URL of published article: http://www.hkaect.org/jce/5(1)/Law_2021_5(1)_pp121-134.pdf] Creativity is the new literacy; we cannot leave a whole generation of people behind."-Chase Jarvis (TNW, 2017) "You can't use up creativity. The more you use, the more you have."-Maya Angelou "If I can try to make it fun that for me is what being creative is about; it's having fun and looking at life through like a sort of the lens of a child really."-Taika Waititi (TEDx Talks, 2010)
Preprint
Full-text available
As an important strategic emerging industry for building a strong maritime nation, the enhancement of its industrial R&D and innovation capability are always the key driving force for the high-quality development of the marine biomedical industry (MBI). Under the vigorously development of digital economy, the application of digital technology (DT) brings new impetus to the innovation development of MBI. So it is necessary to explore the impact of DT on the innovation efficiency of MBI (MBIIE). Taking eleven coastal provinces and cities as an example, this paper measures the development level of DT (DTTL) with entropy method, and the MBIIE with SBM model. On this basis, it empirically test the impact of DT on the MBIIE by constructing benchmark regression, mediation effect, and moderating effect models. The study results shows that DT can significantly enhance the MBIIE by optimizing the allocation of capital and labor resources, and improving the degree of marketization of factors and products; government attention to DT can positively modulate the effect of DT on MBIIE. This study could help enrich the empirical evidence of the impact of DT on the MBIIE at the theoretical level. And it could provide corresponding countermeasures at the practical level to further promote the MBIIE empowered by DT.
Article
Purpose – In the ever-evolving digital landscape, this study aims to explore which specific personality traits contribute to the innovativeness of startups, with a particular emphasis on understanding how technology adoption mediates this relationship. By doing so, the authors strive to unveil the nuanced dynamics of personality, technology adoption and startup innovativeness in the digital era. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conduct a quantitative empirical analysis using a sample of 1,314 German startups. This study utilizes a mediation analysis to examine the effects of personality traits on the innovativeness of startups, taking technology adoption as a mediator into account. Findings – The empirical results show certain personality traits have direct effects on innovativeness. Also, the results show that technology adoption is a driver of startup innovativeness. In addition, these traits are (partially) mediated by technology adoption. Research limitations/implications – The results shed new light on the interplay of entrepreneurs’ personality and technology adoption in relation to startup innovativeness and therefore underline the importance of technology in this triangular relationship. The authors employ secondary data from startups in Germany, which complicates generalization of the results to other geographical and cultural contexts. Originality/value – This study contributes to the scientific debate on the role of personality traits in entrepreneurship by providing empirical evidence on the mediating effect of technology adoption in the relationship between personality traits and startup innovativeness. The findings offer valuable insights for researchers, entrepreneurs and policymakers interested in understanding and promoting innovativeness in the context of startups.
Article
This study aimed to understand whether the increased use of digital technologies improves innovation performance of firms. Previous studies reveal that the more the firms use digital technologies, the more they can be potentially innovative. However, this is a myth. In fact, one of the main limitations of such studies is their undifferentiated approach toward the vast ocean of digital technologies. Yet, given the increasing pervasiveness of digital technologies at all levels, business and society, a question emerges: how they impact the capability of firms to be innovative? Counter-intuitively, we argue that most frequently used digital technologies have very low impact on innovation performance of firms as innovation is the result of creativity and of constant R&D efforts. By contrast, excess use of digital technologies may even deplete the long-run innovation capability of firms, for instance, by impoverishing the relational capital. We performed two different statistical analysis to understand whether this intuition was grounded and hypotheses would be confirmed. First, we used a principal component analysis to identify the digital technologies that are salient for innovation performance. Second, we conducted a multivariate analysis of variance to understand if the identified technologies predicted innovation performance. All tests were conducted on a large-scale sample of firms operating the European Union. The findings confirmed that digital technologies have very low impact on innovation performance, whilst R&D expenses are the most reliable predictor of innovation. These results challenge the false belief that digital technologies improve innovation performance. At a practical level, the results suggest that decision makers should debias themselves from considering digital technologies as the ultimate ingredient for a successful innovative firm, as this may backfire eventually.
Article
Hall (1993b) found that the market value of corporate R&D; relative to ordinary capital investment fell precipitously during the 1980s. The present paper examines this result more closely and finds that it was due both to an increase in the value of ordinary capital and to a steep decline in the absolute value of R&D; assets. The latter was concentrated in the electrical, scientific instruments, electronics, and computing sectors. Firm-level productivity results show that the contribution of R&D; to sales or output growth was low during the 1970s and the first half of the 1980s but has increased recently, except in the electrical industry and in the large firm part of the computing, machinery, metals, and motor vehicle industries. The overall explanation for these findings is that the very substantial restructuring of the manufacturing sector during the 1980s raised the valuation of ordinary capital (and of R&D; capital in the medium-technology sectors). At the same time entry by smaller firms and new technology coupled with a speed-up in product cycles eroded the profits in the electrical and computing sectors, leading to a substantial decline in the valuation of these profits.
Article
Experimentation, a form of problem-solving, is a fundamental innovation activity and accounts for a significant part of total innovation cost and time. In many fields, the economics of experimentation are being radically affected by the use of new and greatly improved versions of methods such as computer simulation, mass screening, and rapid prototyping. This paper shows that a given experiment (and the related trial and error learning) can be conducted in different "modes" (e.g., computer simulation and rapid prototyping) and that users will find it economical to optimize the switching between these modes as to reduce total product development cost and time. The findings are confirmed by a large-scale empirical study of the experimentation process in the design of integrated circuits containing either (1) electrically programmable logic devices (EPLDs); or (2) application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). In comparing their different experimentation strategies for analogous design projects, I found that the former (EPLD) - an approach that utilizes many prototype iterations - outperformed the latter (ASIC) by factor of 2.2 (in person-months) and over 43 percent of that difference can be attributed to differences in experimentation strategies. The implications for managerial practice and theory are discussed and suggestions for further research undertakings are provided.
Article
This paper develops a framework for analyzing the competitive implications of innovation. The framework is based on the concept of transilience - the capacity of an innovation to influence the established systems of production and marketing. Application of the concept results in a categorization of innovation into four types. Examples from the technical history of the US auto industry are used to illustrate the concepts and their applicability. The analysis shows that the categories of innovation are closely linked to different patterns of evolution and to different managerial environments. Special emphasis is placed on the role of incremental technical change in shaping competition and on the possibilities for a technology based reversal in the process of industrial maturity.
Article
Ford Motor Company was ranked fourth in the Fortune 500 for the year 2000. Ifs 1999 revenues of over $162 billion come from eight automotive brands (Aston-Martin, jaguar, Volvo, Lincoln, Mercury, Ford, and Mazda) and four service divisions (Ford Credit, Hertz, Quality Care, and Quik-Fit). These businesses give Ford a presence in more than 200 countries and territories, with a workforce approaching 400,000 and 140 manufacturing plants. Ford Motor Company was founded in 1903, and by 1908 had become an industry pioneer, essentially inventing mass production as we know it today. Jacques A. (Jac) Nasser was named president and chief executive officer of the company on January 1, 1999. Born in Lebanon and raised from age four in Australia, Mr. Nasser has been executive vice president of the company, and president of Ford Automotive Operations. Before that, he was group vice president-Product Development. Nasser was elected a company vice president in 1993 as the chairman of Ford Europe, following three years as president of Ford Australia, an organization he joined in 1968, after studying international business at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Mr. Nasser has held a number of other global positions in Asia-Pacific and South America, giving him the broad base of experience that is typical of Ford executives destined for high-level promotions.
Article
In this paper, we propose a resource-based model to explain how expert systems generate sustained competitive advantage for a firm. Specifically, we analyze the extent to which expert systems (ESs) exhibit the attributes of value, rareness, imperfect imitability, and nonsubstitutability associated with a rent-generating resource (e.g., Barney, 1991). Then, we discuss how expert systems yield sustainable competitive advantage through fostering organizational knowledge development and utilization. Finally, we examine the role of ESs in engendering a reciprocal, mutually enhancing relationship with organizational competencies, leading to sustained competitive advantage. Propositions are offered to facilitate future research.