A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Meditation States and Traits: EEG, ERP, and Neuroimaging Studies
B. Rael Cahn
University of California, San Diego, and University
of Zurich Hospital of Psychiatry
John Polich
The Scripps Research Institute
Neuroelectric and imaging studies of meditation are reviewed. Electroencephalographic
measures indicate an overall slowing subsequent to meditation, with theta and alpha
activation related to proficiency of practice. Sensory evoked potential assessment of
concentrative meditation yields amplitude and latency changes for some components and
practices. Cognitive event-related potential evaluation of meditation implies that practice
changes attentional allocation. Neuroimaging studies indicate increased regional cerebral
blood flow measures during meditation. Taken together, meditation appears to reflect
changes in anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal areas. Neurophysiological
meditative state and trait effects are variable but are beginning to demonstrate consistent
outcomes for research and clinical applications. Psychological and clinical effects of
meditation are summarized, integrated, and discussed with respect to neuroimaging data.
Keywords: meditation, EEG, ERP, fMRI
Overview and Definitions
Electroencephalographic (EEG) studies of
meditative states have been conducted for al-
most 50 years, but no clear consensus about the
underlying neurophysiological changes from
meditation practice has emerged. Sensory
evoked potential (EP) and cognitive event-
related potential (ERP) assessments of medita-
tive practice also reflect variegated results.
Some reliable meditation-related EEG fre-
quency effects for theta and alpha activity, as
well as EEG coherence and ERP component
changes, have been observed. Positron emission
tomography (PET) and functional magnetic res-
onance imaging (fMRI) studies are beginning to
refine the neuroelectric data by suggesting pos-
sible neural loci for meditation effects, although
how and where such practice may alter the
central nervous system (CNS) have not yet been
well characterized. The current study reviews
and summarizes the neuroelectric results in con-
junction with neuroimaging findings. Toward
this end, meditation terms and effects are de-
fined, the results of neuroelectric meditation
studies are collated, and the findings are related
to other neuroimaging reports.
The word meditation is used to describe prac-
tices that self-regulate the body and mind,
thereby affecting mental events by engaging a
specific attentional set. These practices are a
subset of those used to induce relaxation or
altered states such as hypnosis, progressive re-
laxation, and trance-induction techniques (Vaitl
et al., 2005). Given that regulation of attention
is the central commonality across the many
divergent methods (R. J. Davidson & Goleman,
1977), meditative styles can be usefully classi-
fied into two types—mindfulness and concen-
trative— depending on how the attentional pro-
cesses are directed. Most meditative techniques
lie somewhere on a continuum between the
B. Rael Cahn, Department of Neurosciences and Medical
School, University of California, San Diego, and Labora-
tory for Psychopharmacology and Brain Imaging, Univer-
sity of Zurich Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland;
John Polich, Department of Neuropharmacology, The
Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA.
This work was supported by National Institute on Drug
Abuse Grant DA14115 to John Polich, and by a grant from
The Fetzer Institute. B. Rael Cahn was supported in part by
National Institute of General Medical Sciences Medical
Scientist Training Grant T32 GM07198.This paper is
16434-NP from The Scripps Research Institute. We thank
Arnaud Delorme and Lee Schroeder for helpful comments,
and gratefully acknowledge the support and guidance of
Mark Geyer and Franz Vollenweider.
Correspondence concerning this article should be ad-
dressed to John Polich, Cognitive Electrophysiology Labo-
ratory, Department of Neuropharmacology TPC-10, The
Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road,
La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail: polich@scripps.edu
This article is reprinted from Psychological Bulletin,
2006, Vol. 132, No. 2, 180 –211.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice © 2013 American Psychological Association
2013, Vol. 1(S), 48–96 2326-5523/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/2326-5523.1.S.48
48