ArticlePDF Available

الاستخدامات والإشباعات المحققة من استخدام تطبيق تيك توك من وجهة نظر المستخدمين المراهقين دراسة علمية محكمة لـ ألكسندر دورات و باتريسيا دياس ، ترجمة بن شراد م. أمين

Authors:
  • Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Journalisme et des Sciences de l'Information (ENSJSI) d'Alger

Abstract

تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى رسم خريطةٍ لممارسات المراهقين الذين تتراوح أعمارهم بين10 سنوات و-16 سنة على تطبيق تيك توك اعتمادا على نظرية الاستخدامات والإشباعات، أين أجرينا استطلاعًا مسحيًا على الإنترنت اعتمدنا فيه على عينةٍ غير احتمالية مُكونةٍ من 347 مستخدمًا مراهقا لتطبيق تيك توك، وقد أظهرت النتائج الميدانية التي توصلنا إليها وجود اختلافاتٍ دالةٍ بين المراهقين الأصغر سنا (10-12 سنة) وبين المراهقين الأكبر سنًا (13-16سنة): إذ أظهر المراهقون الأصغر سنًا حرصًا أكبر على الخصوصية وأبانوا استمتاعًا أكبر بخوض تجاربهم كمُنشئين للمحتوى، بينما ركّز المراهقون الأكبر سناً بشكل أساسي على عملية بناء جمهورهم الخاص وتنميته، كما وجدنا أنّ "الترفيه" و"التعبير عن الذات" هما الدافعان الرئيسيان لاستخدام المنصة من قبل هؤلاء المراهقين وأخيرًا وليس آخرًا، أظهرت نتائج الدراسة أنّ حوالي 50% من مفردات العينة المستجوبة يعترفون بممارستهم سلوكًا واحدًا على الأقل يدل على إدمانهم على التطبيق وتعلّقهم به.
TikTokPracticesamongTeenagersinPortugal:
AUses&GratificationsApproach
&PatríciaDiasAlexandreDuarte
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363940926_TikTok_Practices_among_Teenagers
_in_Portugal_A_Uses_Gratifications_Approach
1
2
12UGM
2.2TikTok
3 2
3
1 3
23
3.3
4 3
4
4
1TikTok
42TikTok
5
1
TikTok
0202COVID1922 222
21
TikTok
U&G
743TikTok
20
71
2
UGCUGM
2

TikTok
,Klug0202U&G
21
(UGM)
0202Wang,
O’HaraLermer
2007;Simmons022
Bresnick02
Patel&Binjola
,0202
Yang
02
Wang2020Feng02
3
Yang02
Wang,0202
TikTok
Snapchat
VineMusical.ly
TikTok
Klug,2020)
Bresnick02TikTok
TikTok
UGC
Omar&Dequan,0202
webcelebrityeconomy,Tang02the
economyofvisibility
BanetWeiser2018PatelandBinjola,0202
TikTok
4
Klug,0202VanDijck027
TikTok
0
0UGM
UGM
WunschVincent&Vichery
2006
2009,Shao
Omar&Dequan0202
(UGM)
Shao2009
UGM
5
UGM
McQuail0227
022
UGM
TikTok
Omar&Dequan,0202
Shao022UGM
Feng
2019;Wang2020
Feng2019
6
Yang
02
TikTok
Anderson,0202
TikTok
AI
Zhang,0202
Anderson023
Bresnick
022020)Klug
TikTok
0.0TikTok
ByteDance021
TikTokDouyin
7
023TikTok
AppStore02
TikTokmusic.ly
TikTok
430.1
2
TikTok
Patel&Binjola0202
TikTokKlug0202
TikTok
7
12
Bresnick02Yang02Zhang0202
TikTok
Kennedy0202
TikTok
8
Patel&Binjola0202TikTok
TikTok
Yang2019
Kennedy0202
TikTok
Paasonen02
TikTokdaSilvaMonteiro0202
TikTok02
4TikTok
YouTube
Kennedy0202
TikTokBossen&Kottasz,2020
9
Kennedy0202
TikTok
TikTok
Bresnick02
Anderson
2020
TikTok
Wang0202
Xu2019
Klug0202
TikTok
Bresnick02
10
Bresnick02TikTok
TikTok
Yang02
7 0
Wang0202
0202Pateland
Binjola
Xu2019
UGCUser
generatedcontent
Shao2009
11
TikTok
BossenandKottasz2020
3
Shao2009
TikTok
(UGM)0202
(Omar&Dequan
Zhang0202
VanDijck027
0202Omar&Dequan
12
(UGM
TikTok
Klug0202
Van
Dijck02
0202Klug
TikTok
TikTok
Wang0202
VanDijck2013
Xu
2019
13
022Courtois
04
TikTok0202
Chung&Wei
0202Shao&Lee
Shao022
Bossen&Kottasz0202
Omar&Dequan0202
TikTok
TikTok
7
7
14
2
21TikTok
20
27
07
Creswell2003
Google
21TikTok
2deVaus
2013
10
02
21
(Bossen&Kottasz,2020)
0
(Kennedy,2020)
7
X
4
X
15
0
X
1
Klug(2020)
3
Klug(2020)
Anderson(2020)
Wang(2020)
2
Wang(2020)

Bresnick(2019)Klug
(2020)
0
Anderson(2020)
7
Shao&Lee(2020);Chung
&Wei(2020);Omar&
Dequan(2020)
4
Anderson(2020)
Yang (2019)
1
X
3
Shao(2009);Bresnick
(2019);Klug(2020)
Xu
(2019)

Shao(2009);Bresnick
(2019);Klug(2020)
02
Bresnick(2019);Klug
(2020)
TikTok
TikTok
16
TikTok
TikTok
0202Azerion
TikTok.
02027122 222
0202
7.7
ExcelSPSSde)
Vaus
4 7
TikTok
Kalton0202
TikTok
2
4
21
14TikTok
17
20743
20
2004.
713.
0
4
4
TikTok
Azerion2020
TikTok2
1271
TikTok42.
20
COVID19
Azerion20204.
18
10TikTok
720
Azerion
202072.72
20
BossenKottasz.2020
19
12TikTok
12.7
2027
Ponte
2017;Dias&Brito2020.
71
Ponte&Batista02
20
7TikTok
4
10
11.12234.4
22
TikTok.3
Xu02
4TikTok
21
TikTok

2.4
3.30.1
Bresnick02
TikTokPOV
PointofView30.7
TikTok.744.
01.0
Chaudron02Ponte&Batista02
71.
20
71
POV
4.
TikTok12
Shao&Lee0202
71
TikTok
22
Livingstone023
2
121.
TikTokers3
20
7134.
44.3
TikTok
23
Klug0202
323
.0
20
71
7.37.3
POV4.4
7.0.
.01.
24
23
TikTokers
Klug2020;Patel&Binjola0202
tag
(1896.8%
20.4
71
25
TikTokers
Shao022
20
40TikTok
Shao2009

12
26
0202
TikTok
0202
TikTokers
TikTok
131.0
TikTok7.
TikTok
3.
TikTok
4.
13.3
27
3.7
.
1.3
TikTokChung&
Wei
0202
4
28
2
31.
TikTok3.
Klug0202
TikTok
4.
20
TikTok42.71
Ponte&Batista02
124.
00.
29
2
Yang2019
TikTok
Bereznak022.12
0
47.71
42
TikTok71.
30

1
.
20
Bossen&Kottasz2020;Omar&Dequan2020
TikTok
74.1%
44.371
TikTokers
42
TikTokers
Klug2020
31
TikTok02
10
0.
71
02020
TikToker
32
0
TikTok21
TikTok
Shao2009
20Bossen&Kottasz
2020
71
Klug2020
POV
TikTok
TikTok
Kennedy0202
2
Azerion2020
33
Shao&Lee0202
20
Bossen&Kottasz2020)
71
0202Patel&Binjola
0202KlugTikTok
TikTok
34
Castells1996;Van
Dijck
2018
Zhou020
/
TikTok
TikTok
TikTokers
Klug0202
VanDijck027
TikTok
CECC
020202
35
1. Anderson,KatieElson.2017.Gettingacquaintedwithsocialnetworksandapps:Periscope
up!Broadcastingvialivestreaming.LibraryHiTechNews34:1620.
2. Anderson,KatieElson.2020.Gettingacquaintedwithsocialnetworksandapps:Itistime
totalkaboutTikTok.LibraryHiTechNews37:712.
3. Azerion.2020.TikTokemPortugal.Lisbon:LisbonDigitalSchool.Availableonline:
https://bit.ly/2XNCZEJ(accessedon20May2020).
4. BanetWeiser,Sarah.2018.Empowered:PopularFeminismandPopularMisogyny.
Durham:DukeUniversityPress.
5. Bereznak,Alyssa.2019.MemesAretheNewPopStars:HowTikTokBecometheFutureof
theMusicIndustry.TheRinger.June27.Availableonline:
https://www.theringer.com/tech/2019/6/27/18760004/tiktokoldtownroadmemes
musicindustry(accessedon19December2020).
6. Bossen,ChristinaBucknell,andRitaKottasz.2020.Usesandgratificationssoughtbypre
adolescentandadolescentTikTokconsumers.YoungConsumers21:46378.
7. Bresnick,Ethan.2019.IntensifiedPlay:CinematicStudyofTikTokMobileApp.Available
online:www.researchgate.net/publication/335570557_Intensified_Play_Cinematic_study
_of_TikTok_mobile_app(accessedon5January2021).
8. Castells,Manuel.1996.TheRiseoftheNetworkSociety.London:WileyBlackwell.
9. Chaudron,Stephane,RosannaDiGioia,andMonicaGemo.2018.YoungChildren(08)
andDigitalTechnology,aQualitativeStudyacrossEurope.EUR29070.Availableonline:
https://bit.ly/2XwYDNn(accessedon7March2020).
10. Chung,Yongkuk,andXinWei.2020.EffectsofPerceivedQualityofTikTokonUser
SatisfactionandContinuanceIntentionandtheRoleofCommercialViability.TheJournal
ofKoreaContentsAssociation20:7789.
11. Courtois,Cedric,PeterMechant,LievenDeMarez,andGinoVerleye.2009.Gratifications
andseedingbehaviorofonlineadolescents.JournalofComputerMediated
Communication15:10937.
12. Creswell,John.2003.ResearchDesign,Qualitative,Quantitative,andMixedMethods
Approaches.ThousandOaksandLondon:SagePublications.
13. daSilvaMonteiro,J.C.2020.Tiktok comonovosuportemidiáticoparaaaprendizagem
criativa.RevistaLatinoAmericanadeEstudosCientíficos,520.
14. deVaus,David.2013.SurveysinSocialResearch.London:Routledge.
15. Dias,Patrícia,andRitaBrito.2020.Howfamilieswithyoungchildrenaresolvingthe
dilemmabetweenprivacyandprotectionbybuildingtrustAportraitfromPortugal.
JournalofChildrenandMedia14:5673.
36
16. Feng,YuLiang,ChunChinChen,andShuMingWu.2019.EvaluationofCharmFactorsof
ShortVideoUserExperienceusing
17. FAHPACaseStudyofTikTokAPP.IOPConferenceSeries:MaterialsScienceand
Engineering688:055068.
18. Kalton,Graham.2020.IntroductiontoSurveySampling.London:Sage.
19. Kennedy, Melanie. 0202. ‘If the Rise of the TikTok Dance and eGirlAesthetichastaught
us Anything, it’s that Teenage Girls Rulethe Internet Right Now’: TikTok Celebrity, Girls
andtheCoronavirusCrisis.EuropeanJournalofCulturalStudies23:106976.
20. Klug, Daniel. 0202. It took me almost 72 min to practice this”. Performance and
ProductionPracticesinDanceChallengeVideosonTikTok.arXivarXiv:2008.13040.
21. Laermer,Richard,andMichaelSimmons.2008.Punkmarketing:Juntateàrevolução.
Alfragide:Leya.Livingstone,Sonia,KjartanÓlafsson,EllenJ.Helsper,FranciscoLupiáñez
Villanueva,GiuseppeA.Veltri,andFransFolkvord.2017.
22. MaximizingOpportunitiesandMinimizingRisksforChildrenOnline:TheRoleofDigital
SkillsinEmergingStrategiesofParentalMediation.JournalofCommunication67:82
105.
23. McQuail,Denis.2003.TeoriadaComunicaçãodeMassas.FundaçãoLisboa:Calouste
Gulbenkian.
24. O’Hara, Kenton, April Slayden Mitchell, and Alex Vorbau. 0223. Consuming video on
mobiledevices.PaperpresentedatSIGCHIConferenceonHumanFactorsinComputing
Systems,SanJose,CA,USA,April28May3;pp.85766.
25. Omar,Bahiyah,andWangDequan.2020.Watch,shareorcreate:Theinfluenceof
personalitytraitsandusermotivationonTikTokmobilevideousage.InternationalJournal
ofInteractiveMobileTechnologies14:12137.
26. Paasonen,Susanna.2018.Affect,data,manipulation,andpriceinsocialmedia.
Distinktion:JournalofSocialTheory19:21429.
27. Patel,Keshav,andHimaniBinjola.2020.TikToktheNewAlternativeMediafor
YoungstersforOnlineSharingofTalent:AnAnalyticalStudy.JournalofAdvanced
ResearchinJournalismandMassCommunication7:1619.
28. Ponte,Cristina,andSusanaBatista.2019.EUKidsOnlinePortugal.Usos,competências,
riscosemediaçõesdainternetreportados
29. porcriançasejovens(917anos).EUKidsOnlineeNOVAFCSH.Availableonline:
https://bit.ly/2XnKClm(accessedon3April2020).
30. Ponte,Cristina,TeresaSofiaCastro,SusanaBatista,andAnaJorge.2017.Crescendoentre
Ecrãs:Ousodemeiostecnológicosporcrianças(3a8anos).EntidadeReguladoraparaa
ComunicaçãoSocial(ERC):Availableonline:https://bit.ly/39hwteM(accessedon3April
2020).
31. Shao,G.2009.Understandingtheappealofusergeneratedmedia:Ausesand
gratificationperspective.InternetResearch19:725.
37
32. Shao,Jinhua,andSangKhee Lee. 0202. The Effect of Chinese Adolescents’ Motivation to
UseTikTokonSatisfactionandContinuedUseIntention.TheJournaloftheConvergence
onCultureTechnology6:10715.
33. Tang,Dihua.2019.TheNewSituationofMarketingintheSelfMediaEraTakingTikTokas
anExample.Paperpresentedat2ndInternationalWprkshoponAdvanceinSocialScience
(IWASS2019),Chengdu,China,October3031;pp.15571560.
34. VanDijck,José.2013.Youhaveoneidentity:PerformingtheselfonFacebookand
LinkedIn.Media,Culture&Society35:199215.
35. VanDijck,José,ThomasPoell,andMartijnDeWaal.2018.ThePlaformSociety:Public
ValuesinaConnectiveWorld.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
36. Wang,Yunwen.2020.Humorandcameraviewonmobileshortformvideoappsinfluence
userexperienceandtechnologyadoptionintent,anexampleofTikTok(DouYin).
ComputersinHumanBehavior110:106373.
37. Xu, Li, Xiaohui Yan, and Zhengwu Zhang. 02. Research on the causes of the “Tik Tok”
appbecomingpopularandtheexistingproblems.JournalofAdvancedManagement
Science7:5963.
38. Yang,Shuai,YuzhenZhao,andYifangMa.2019.AnalysisoftheReasonsandDevelopment
ofShortVideoApplicationTakingTikTokasanExample.Paperpresentedat20199th
InternationalConferenceonInformationandSocialScience(ICISS2019),Manila,
Philippines,July1214;pp.1214.
39. Zhang,Zongyi.2020.InfrastructuralizationofTikTok:Transformation,power
relationships,andplatformizationofvideoentertainmentinChina.Media,Culture&
Society43:21936.
40. Zhou,YiMou,andSangHoLee.2021.AStudyontheInfluencingFactorsonFlowand
AddictionofTikTokServiceUsers.JournaloftheKoreaConvergenceSociety12:12532.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
During the global lockdowns brought about by the Coronavirus crisis, TikTok saw a phenomenal rise in users and cultural visibility. This short essay argues that the media attention paid to TikTok during this time can be read as a celebration of girlhood in the face of the pandemic, and can be seen to contribute to the transformation of girls’ ‘bedroom culture’ (McRobbie and Garber, 2006) from a space previously conceptualised as private and safe from judgement, to one of public visibility, surveillance and evaluation. Focusing on Charli D’Amelio, this essay argues that the increasing visibility of TikTok and rising celebrity of D’Amelio during the Coronavirus crisis continues and intensifies the longer history of young female celebrity culture, and obscures the dangers and impacts faced by girls around the world who are situated outside of the ideals embodied in TikTok stars like D’Amelio.
Article
Full-text available
Internet users are increasingly becoming self-publishing consumers. Applying the Uses and Gratifications (U&G) perspective, this study investigated how people use TikTok in terms of consuming, participating and producing behaviors, and examined the role of personality traits and users’ motivation as predictors to this integrated usage behavior. An online survey was conducted to recruit 385 TikTok users using online network sampling technique. Our findings suggest that it was users’ motivations, not personality traits, that have significant influence on TikTok use. Results show that users’ motivations – namely archiving, self-expression, social interaction and peeking – are significant predictors to TikTok usage behaviors but differ in levels and influence. This study contributes to both the theoretical and the empirical understanding of media use in a user-generated media (UGM) context.
Article
Full-text available
By reviewing literature on short video apps and interviewing experts, this study determined three major aspects of Tik Tok user experience, emotionality, interactivity and usability, and identified nine key factors to construct the hierarchical structure of analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Based on questionnaires from experts, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine each dimension and factor weight. Considering the defects of AHP, we introduced the fuzzy theory and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to solve related problems. Finally, through the FAHP software developed by MATLAB 2015a GUI, the fuzzy weight of charm factors involved in the Tik Tok user experience is concluded as follows: emotional factors account for 48.77%, interactive factors for 31.23%, and usability factors for 20.00%. This study provides certain reference for design and update of short video apps.
Article
Purpose The purpose of this paper was to explore the uses and gratifications sought by the primary target market (pre-adolescent and adolescent groups) of a new social media site, TikTok. The paper also sought to identify how much of a role the motivations of self-expression, social recognition and fame-seeking (important considerations within adolescent psychology development) played in the use of this particular social networking sites (SNS). Design/methodology/approach Following meticulous sampling procedures, ensuring national representation and stringent ethical practices, self-completion questionnaires were sent to pupils at 60 schools in the five key administrative regions of Denmark. The data was examined using analysis of variation tests, followed by a two-step cluster analysis using the log-likelihood method. Findings The findings indicated that passive consumptive behaviours were prevalent among both pre-adolescent and adolescent groups and that the gratification of entertainment/affect was the primary driver behind all behaviours: passive consumptive, participatory and contributory. Pre-adolescent groups were more active and heavier users of TikTok than were adolescents. In line with adolescent psychology theories, the authors found that contributory behaviours were motivated by a wish to expand one’s social networks, by fame-seeking, self-expression and identity-creation needs. Social implications Pre-adolescent consumers are heavier users and interact more with the TikTok SNS than adolescent consumers, including in relation to seeking out new social networks. This is potentially of great concern as children are less likely to understand the hidden dangers of online predatorial and privacy issues. Originality/value The authors extend their understanding of the contributory functions of SNS. Motivations of fame-seeking, self-expression and social recognition are key to understanding the uses and gratifications of TikTok consumers, especially during the adolescent years; contrary to scholarly assertions that these motives are often unconscious, the sample of this study assertively and explicitly confirmed these needs. A further novel insight of this study was that both the gratifications of relationship building and relationship maintenance were sought out via the contributory, rather than the participatory function of TikTok.
Article
The article contributes to complicate the issue of ‘infrastructuralization of platform’ through an empirical study on China’s video streaming platform, Tik Tok. It aims at exploring how video streaming platform will transform in its infrastructural process and changing powering relationships between different actors in the platform ecosystem. After scrutinizing its technique features, business model, platform discourse, and power relationships with government, it argues that the infrastructural process of Tik Tok is not only embodied in its transformation from an entertainment community to an integrated platform, including services in e-commerce, online education, propaganda, and tourism, but more in its growing power of indispensability entrenched in our society. The main argument will be elaborated in two layers: first, Tik Tok attains its power on commercial monetization, content distribution, and acquisition of data sources through its infrastructural ambition of building a ‘video encyclopedia’ that can be salable, ranked, and archived. Second, Tik Tok has started to engage in fields of propaganda and tourism for city branding in alignment with central and local government. Tik Tok thereby wins its legitimacy in content management and government in turn plays as a role of stakeholder sharing the dividend from its contribution for state’s development goals. Therefore, the article not only fills in the gap of a case study on infrastructural video streaming platform but also intends to highlight changing power relationships between government and platform in the process of infrastructuralization.
Article
Mobile short-form videos on social media apps are increasingly popular. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) theories may be extended to short-form video apps to understand and improve app user experience, as well as to persuade new technology-adoption. The present study examined the psychological responses and persuasive outcomes associated with short-form videos on a mobile social media app. In a 2 (low- V.S. high-level humor) X 2 (first- V.S. third-person view) between-subject experimental design, participants (N = 81) were randomly assigned one of the four sets of videos about smart homes; post-viewing, they filled out an online questionnaire. Results of ANCOVA demonstrated significant effects of videos’ humor and camera view on the viewer perceptions of Immersion, Social Presence and Entertainment but not on Spatial Presence and Perceptual Realism: Humor had mixed effects on the interaction between users and the mobile app; the first-person camera view elevated viewers’ Immersion, Social Presence, Entertainment. As a PROCESS mediation test showed, Social Presence mediated (by 56.78%) the indirect link between the level of humor getting from a video and the viewers’ post-viewing intent to adopt the technology depicted in the video. The study demonstrated values of extending HCI theories to mobile short-form video apps. Implications were discussed in terms of using appropriate humor and camera view for improving user experience and persuading serious agenda.