Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Chapter
Fostering a Positive Workplace
Culture: Impacts on Performance
and Agility
CătălinaRadu
Abstract
This chapter explores the profound influence of a positive workplace culture on
work performance and organizational agility. It delves into the multidimensional
aspects of positive psychology, organizational culture, and their interplay in creating
a flourishing work environment. A positive workplace culture, informed by principles
from positive psychology, sets the stage for a thriving and engaged workforce. By
cultivating an environment that values employee well-being, growth, and collabora-
tion, organizations can unlock the full potential of their teams and enhance overall
performance. This chapter examines how a positive culture positively impacts work
performance, leading to increased productivity, efficiency, and quality of work.
We delve into the key elements of a positive workplace culture, including fostering
a growth mindset, encouraging resilience in the face of challenges, and promot-
ing psychological safety. Through these components, employees are empowered to
take risks, innovate, and embrace change, contributing to enhanced organizational
agility, which means companies can adapt quickly to changing market dynamics and
seize new opportunities. Therefore, this chapter offers valuable insights for human
resources (HR) professionals, managers, and leaders seeking to create a positive, agile
work environment that fuels organizational success.
Keywords: positive psychology, organizational culture, work performance,
organizational agility, workforce well-being, work engagement
1. Introduction
In the current dynamic business environment, organizations are not merely
aiming for survival but are actively pursuing extraordinary success. At the heart of
attaining this level of achievement lies the cultivation of a positive workplace culture.
This chapter sets out on a quest to delve into the deep-reaching influence of a positive
workplace culture on two crucial dimensions of organizational performance: work
performance and organizational agility.
The concept of a positive workplace culture has its roots in the principles
of positive psychology and organizational culture. It is a powerful catalyst that
fosters a flourishing work environment where employees thrive and become
deeply engaged. Through a deliberate focus on employee well-being, personal
Human Resource Management - An Update
2
development, and collaborative dynamics, organizations can unlock the latent
capabilities within their workforce, resulting in elevated levels of performance and
productivity.
2. Cultivating a positive workplace culture: the catalyst for success
2.1 Positive psychology and positive intelligence: foundations for a positive
organizational culture
A positive workplace culture encompasses a range of components that foster a
harmonious and productive working atmosphere. While it is not synonymous with
positive psychology or positive intelligence, it certainly draws on principles from
these areas to create a workplace where employees can thrive, grow, and contribute
positively to the organization’s success. Hence, it is crucial to examine positive
psychology and positive intelligence to a certain extent.
Positive psychology is a field of psychology focusing on the positive aspects
of human behavior and well-being. A positive workplace culture aligns with posi-
tive psychology by emphasizing aspects like employee well-being, recognition,
and personal growth. It encourages practices such as gratitude, mindfulness, and
strengths-based approaches to foster a more positive and fulfilling work experience
for employees.
Positive psychology is closely linked to the concept of happiness, which incor-
porates both the idea of a state (how we feel at a given moment) and the general
satisfaction with life [1]. However, there is a difference between happiness and
positivity, with the former indicating the state (how we feel) and the latter being a
mindset set at a positive level [2]. Actually, the concept of well-being was studied long
before discussing positive psychology. Subjective well-being (SWB) subsumes a set of
constructs that include happiness, life satisfaction, and morale [3].
Within the realm of positive psychology, a widely recognized model is the PERMA
model [4], which consists of five distinct components that individuals intrinsically
seek and that can be individually examined:
• P - Positive Emotion
• E - Engagement
• R - Relationships
• M - Meaning
• A - Accomplishment
This model highlights various facets of well-being and personal fulfillment, each
representing a vital aspect of an individual’s psychological and emotional experience.
Positive emotions refer to a wide range of feelings beyond joy and happiness, includ-
ing enthusiasm, satisfaction, pride, hope, interest, love, compassion, amusement,
and gratitude. Cultivating these emotions can enhance well-being [5]. Additionally,
resilience is crucial when facing adversity, and positive emotions can help develop
coping strategies and recover faster from challenging situations [6, 7]. Studies have
3
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
also shown that positive emotions are linked to improved physical health, longer life,
and healthier relationships.
Engagement, akin to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s “flow,” involves being fully
absorbed in an activity, losing track of time, and boosting productivity [4, 8]. It
hinges on one’s passion and is subjectively assessed.
Relationships, as the third element in the PERMA acronym, recognizing humans
as inherently social beings, emphasize positive connections with others. This involves
feeling loved and valued by family, friends, colleagues, or supervisors [4]. Research
indicates that positive relationships are pivotal in preventing cognitive decline and
promoting better physical health in older individuals [9]. Consequently, relationships
are vital throughout life and particularly crucial as we grow older.
Meaning refers to people seeking a sense of purpose, desiring actions that hold
value, and connecting to something greater [4]. In positive psychology, meaning is
pivotal. While happiness focuses on the present, meaning integrates the past, pres-
ent, and future. Thoughts about the future and the past are associated with a higher
level of meaning in life but a lower level of happiness. Happiness is closely related to
receiving, whereas meaning is more associated with the idea of giving [10].
Accomplishment involves achieving goals through effort and self-motivation, lead-
ing to improved well-being as people take pride in their achievements [4].
PERMA model was criticized for not significantly differing from the older SWB
model [11, 12], yet the response was that the PERMA model provides a more detailed
breakdown of well-being components, allowing for a nuanced understanding of
individual goals and priorities [13].
The PERMA model has been adapted and applied specifically to measure well-
being in the workplace. This adaptation is often referred to as the Workplace PERMA-
Profiler [14], and it focuses on assessing well-being and positive psychological factors
in the context of work and employment. One of the authors adapted the 23 items (15
– three for each PERMA element; plus other 8 – one for overall well-being, three for
negative emotions, three for health, and one for loneliness) and made the instrument
available for use in various countries for validation and improvement purposes [15].
For instance, the instrument was validated in Japan [16], South Korea [17], Germany
[18], and Romania [19].
Positive intelligence reflects our ability to control our minds, with a high level
indicating a friendly, not adversarial, relationship with our thoughts. In the context
of a positive workplace culture, positive intelligence can be related to emotional
intelligence and self-awareness. Leaders who practice positive intelligence are better
equipped to establish a positive work environment by understanding their own emo-
tions and how they impact others and by promoting emotional intelligence among
employees. Positive intelligence is related to but distinct from positive psychology,
which focuses on achieving a positive state. It is recommended to cultivate well-being
and performance through brain “training” involving positive habits, leveraging
neuroplasticity, and emphasizing gratitude and positive messages [20].
Positive intelligence includes countering internal saboteurs, which are automatic
mental patterns rooted in childhood beliefs and assumptions [21]. These patterns,
initially helpful, can now hinder us. Identifying and understanding these saboteurs is
the first step toward enhancing positive intelligence. These saboteurs take on distinct
personalities within our psyche, steering us away from our intended course [21,22].
They include the Hyper-vigilant, Restless, Avoider, Pleaser, Victim, Controller,
Hyper-rational, Hyper-ambitious, Stickler, and a tenth one, the Judge. The Judge is
universal, eroding our self-confidence, effectiveness, and sense of safety.
Human Resource Management - An Update
4
2.2 Crafting the essence: deconstructing the positive workplace culture
Defining a positive organizational culture is not a one-size-fits-all task, as
different cultures may be more suitable for varying organizations, industries, and
contexts. Nevertheless, researchers have introduced diverse dimensions or styles of
organizational culture to evaluate and contrast different organizations’ cultures.
This approach helps pinpoint the strengths and weaknesses of each culture. In this
context, the term “positive” implies a comparative aspect, suggesting better out-
comes. For example, a well-known framework for measuring the organizational cul-
ture is the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) [23]. It identifies
four main types of organizational culture: clan, adhocracy, market, and hierarchy.
Each type of culture has its own characteristics, values, and assumptions, as well as
its own advantages and disadvantages. According to the OCAI, a positive organiza-
tional culture is one that balances the competing values of flexibility and stability.
Another example of a well-known framework is the Denison Organizational Culture
Survey (DOCS) [24], which assesses four primary dimensions of culture: involve-
ment, consistency, adaptability, and mission. According to the DOCS, a positive
organizational culture is one that fosters high levels of employee engagement, align-
ment, innovation, and direction.
Conversely, we can interpret “positive” as an indication that this type of organi-
zational culture is grounded in what is known as positive psychology, which aligns
with the perspective presented in this chapter. From this perspective, organizations
characterized by a positive organizational culture prioritize employee recognition
and foster an environment where employees are empowered to develop, flourish, and
perform at their highest capabilities [25].
A positive workplace culture promotes learning, inclusion, and well-being
among employees and aligns with the core values and goals of the organization. It
serves as the cornerstone of organizational success and employee well-being. Like
organizational culture in general, it encompasses the shared values, beliefs, behav-
iors, and practices that define how individuals interact within an organization, yet
it comprises particular dimensions that define it. To truly understand the essence
of a positive workplace culture, it is essential to delve into its various dimensions
and explore why it is considered a driving force in contemporary organizations.
These dimensions are articulated in various ways by different authors. However, for
the purpose of this chapter, we acknowledge the following nine dimensions as the
primary ones.
2.2.1 Well-being initiatives
These are an integral part of a positive organizational culture, specifically within
the context of promoting employee well-being and creating a positive work environ-
ment, and it is reflected in values, priorities, norms, practices, etc. A positive culture
places a premium on employee well-being, both physical and mental. Wellness
programs, work-life balance initiatives, and stress management support are integral
components. Organizations can implement a series of organizational practices to
enhance workplace happiness and well-being. These may include shifting from
performance evaluations centered on weaknesses to those emphasizing strengths,
aligning job tasks with employees’ unique characteristics through the “job crafting”
approach to create more personally meaningful work experiences, and incorporating
solution-focused brief coaching techniques [26].
5
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
2.2.2 Psychological safety
It refers to the extent to which employees feel comfortable to voice their ideas,
concerns, and feedback without fear of negative consequences, ridicule, or retribu-
tion. Psychological safety is more likely to be fostered in a positive organizational
culture that prioritizes open communication, trust, and transparency. Employees are
encouraged to express their opinions, share innovative ideas, and engage in construc-
tive discussions without the fear of backlash, as an important outcome of trust is
risk-taking in the relationship [27]. A positive culture encourages open and effective
communication at all levels. Employees are comfortable with sharing their ideas and
concerns, fostering a collaborative and innovative environment.
2.2.3 Employee engagement
Engaged employees are emotionally committed to their work and organization.
Research findings indicate a positive correlation between work engagement and job
satisfaction, as well as between work engagement and job performance. Conversely,
there is a negative correlation between work engagement and the intention to leave
one’s job [28]. Engaged employees are more likely to collaborate, innovate, and go the
extra mile, contributing to a productive and harmonious work environment. Thus,
work engagement is not only an outcome but also a driver of a positive organizational
culture, reinforcing the organization’s values and facilitating its overall success.
2.2.4 Inclusivity and diversity
Inclusive cultures create an environment where everyone feels valued and
respected, regardless of their backgrounds. Diversity of thought and perspectives is
encouraged. The management and workforce of an organization hold pivotal roles in
laying the groundwork for change through their acknowledgment of the significance
and worth of cultivating an inclusive and diverse culture [29].
2.2.5 Employee empowerment and autonomy
A positive culture empowers employees to make decisions and take ownership
of their work. It values autonomy and self-direction. Diverse aspects of employee
empowerment, encompassing factors like a sense of competence, meaning, self-
determination, and impact, contribute to heightened organizational commitment.
This, in turn, diminishes intentions to leave the organization, resulting in a more
stable and enduring workforce [30].
2.2.6 Collaboration and teamwork
Encouraging collaboration and fostering strong teamwork is essential. Employees
should feel they are part of a cohesive and supportive team. Research indicates that
business managers who embrace transformational leadership actively promote and
nurture collaboration and teamwork [31]. Collaboration and teamwork hold pivotal
roles within a positive organizational culture, aligning with positive psychology
principles while yielding tangible benefits such as heightened productivity, innova-
tion, and creativity.
Human Resource Management - An Update
6
2.2.7 Resilience and adaptability
Resilience is commonly seen as a promising response to the difficulties presented
by crises and disasters [32]. In essence, a positive organizational culture equips the
workforce with the psychological, emotional, and cognitive tools needed to navigate
adversity and emerge stronger from challenges. It creates an environment where resil-
ience is not just an individual trait but a collective strength that propels the organiza-
tion forward in the face of uncertainty and disruption. A positive culture is adaptable
and open to change. It encourages innovation and a willingness to embrace new
ideas and approaches. Becoming more adaptable poses its challenges. In the context
of engagement, we can distinguish between two types: organizational engagement,
which revolves around the involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm of employees
for their workplace, and job engagement, which pertains to the emotional and
cognitive focus on work-related goals, involving emotional involvement. Intriguingly,
research has revealed that while organizational engagement positively influences an
individual’s adaptability to changes, job engagement can have the opposite effect,
highlighting potential hurdles in organizational change management [25].
2.2.8 Recognition and appreciation
Acknowledging and rewarding employee contributions, both formally and
informally, is a crucial dimension. Regular recognition and appreciation of employee
contributions reinforce a positive culture. Acknowledging and celebrating achieve-
ments motivate employees and enhance morale [33].
2.2.9 Fostering a growth mindset
Organizations that prioritize continuous learning and development create
opportunities for employees to develop and progress in their careers through training
programs, mentorship, and skill-building initiatives. Unfortunately, when employees
hold negative perceptions about employee development, they may feel hindered in
their professional growth, potentially leading to an intention to leave their job [34].
These nine dimensions collectively contribute to a thriving workplace where
employees are motivated, engaged, and aligned with the organization’s mission. As
organizations strive for excellence in today’s dynamic landscape, recognizing and
nurturing these dimensions can foster a culture that not only attracts top talent but
also sustains long-term success.
3. Enhancing organizational success through performance and agility
3.1 Unveiling the essence of work performance
Performance is an objective for each of us, whether we are talking about our
individual performance or that of the team we are a part of [22].
Despite the significance of the concept of performance, the overarching con-
ceptual framework for work performance tends to lack precision. Since the first
definition attempts of individual performance, the concept comprised more different
dimensions [35, 36]. An alternative approach, which is both straightforward and
commonly employed in contemporary settings, simplifies work performance into just
7
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
two dimensions: task performance and contextual performance [37]. The latter, in
many cases, are considered discretionary behaviors, the “extra” that employers seek in
outstanding employees [38].
What defines performance can vary significantly from one role to another,
leading to a multitude of methods for measuring work performance. Some studies
use objective indicators such as productivity, sales, or customer satisfaction, while
others use subjective ratings by supervisors, peers, or self. Some studies also consider
contextual and situational factors that may influence work performance, such as task
characteristics, organizational culture, or environmental conditions [39]. While each
of these measurement methods offers valuable insights, none of them in isolation
comprehensively encompasses the intricate and diverse spectrum of behaviors that
constitute an employee’s workplace performance. Crafting a composite indicator that
effectively considers all these facets proves to be a formidable challenge [40]. Even
when utilizing objective indicators, the ultimate assessment of overall performance is
inherently subjective. This subjectivity hinges on factors like the selection of indica-
tors, the formula employed to aggregate them, and the relative significance assigned
to each indicator [41].
Some scholars have given particular attention to counterproductive behaviors,
which encompass absenteeism, tardiness, personal activities during work hours, and
even more serious issues like theft and substance abuse. This constitutes the adverse
dimension of job performance, characterized by behaviors that directly or indirectly
harm the organization [40, 42–44]. The natural interest in performance is accom-
panied by a focus on individuals to mitigate the detrimental consequences of work-
related investments that may lead to reduced productivity, such as burnout [45].
Factors at the individual level, including personality traits, motivation, skills, and
attitudes, exert an influence on work performance. Simultaneously, organizational
factors like leadership, feedback mechanisms, reward systems, and the prevailing
workplace climate also play a significant role. A series of studies investigate how work
performance affects individual and organizational outcomes such as engagement,
commitment, turnover, or profitability [46].
Of course, it is important to examine the potential interventions and strategies
aimed at enhancing work performance and the evidence and implications of their
effectiveness. We might look at the impact of training, coaching, mentoring, or
empowerment programs on work performance, as well as at the role of technology,
innovation, or diversity in improving work performance. Some studies suggest best
practices and recommendations for managers and practitioners to foster a high-
performance culture in their organizations [47], which is in line with the main idea of
this chapter.
3.2 Navigating the competitive landscape with organizational agility
In the contemporary and rapidly evolving business environment, competitive land-
scapes are marked by perpetual change and inherent unpredictability. Therefore, the
capacity to adapt quickly to various changes is a key success factor. Flexibility, learning,
speed, innovation, and strategy have been identified as the core organizational capa-
bilities essential for achieving and sustaining competitiveness over time [48].
In numerous scenarios, agility stands as a measure of performance in its own right
[49, 50]. Alternatively, it is regarded as a distinct variable that significantly influences
an organization’s performance, competitiveness, or sustainability [51]. However,
its role in securing sustained success within today’s rapidly changing business
Human Resource Management - An Update
8
environment is indisputable. In essence, agility encapsulates an organization’s capac-
ity to swiftly respond to evolving market dynamics and seize emerging opportunities.
When we dissect agility, it becomes evident that it can be assessed at various levels of
analysis—individual, team, or organizational levels [52].
Much like the concept of work performance, the definition of organizational agility
lacks universal consensus [51, 53]. This adaptability, which is intrinsic to agility, can be
quantitatively measured using indicators such as speed, but it also extends to qualita-
tive assessments that encompass sense-making, learning, and innovation. In essence,
organizational agility is not confined to a single metric; rather, it is a multifaceted
trait that hinges on an organization’s capacity to swiftly sense changes in the external
environment, learn from them, and proactively innovate and adapt. This multifaceted
nature of agility underscores its importance as a pivotal factor in an organization’s pur-
suit of sustainable success amidst the ever-evolving dynamics of the business world.
The literature investigates the main capabilities needed to sense the changes and
to respond to them (i.e., experience, a culture of innovation, appropriate technology)
and also the main enablers used for the same purpose (i.e., training people, investing
in the right equipment) [51, 53]. Agility capabilities and agility enablers, both integral
to organizational agility, address distinct facets. Agility capabilities denote an orga-
nization’s intrinsic traits, skills, and competencies that underpin its agility, enabling
swift and effective adaptation. Conversely, agility enablers encompass the concrete
practices, strategies, tools, or mechanisms implemented by an organization to nurture
and amplify its agility capabilities, serving as the conduits through which agility is
nurtured and perpetuated.
Enhancing agility within organizations is a multifaceted endeavor, encountering
various challenges and obstacles. These include resistance to change, cultural barriers,
resource constraints, and the necessity of making well-calculated risks. Nonetheless,
the pursuit of organizational agility remains a pivotal strategic imperative for organi-
zations, as it empowers them to adeptly navigate the competitive landscape and gain a
strategic advantage.
Moreover, staying attuned to current and future trends, including AI integration,
data analytics, remote work, sustainability, and cybersecurity, is essential for organiza-
tions seeking to thrive in dynamic environments. Research has demonstrated that the
adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies empowers companies to substantially elevate
their agility across diverse dimensions, utilizing a variety of technological solutions
[52]. Embracing these trends will empower organizations to adapt swiftly, make data-
driven decisions, leverage remote workforces, promote sustainability, and fortify their
cybersecurity posture, thus ensuring continued success in a volatile business world.
3.3 The ripple effect: how a positive workplace culture amplifies work
performance and organizational agility
A positive workplace culture serves as a mutual catalyst for both work perfor-
mance and organizational agility, creating a reinforcing loop that fortifies the positive
workplace culture. This interlocking relationship highlights the utmost significance
of actively fostering and sustaining a positive workplace culture. A body of research
[2, 21, 54, 55] attests to the profound impact of positive psychology on workplace
performance and beyond. Indeed, the influence of a positive mindset is considered
substantial, giving rise to innovative concepts like positive organizational behavior
and positive leadership. To illustrate this relationship, we can delve into the impact of
the nine dimensions outlined in Section 2.2.
9
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
3.3.1 Well-being initiatives
Initiatives like wellness and mental health programs boost employee satisfac-
tion, performance and agility. In turn, employee satisfaction and enhanced work
performance contribute significantly to the cultivation of this positive organizational
culture. This positive impact sets off a chain reaction. Traditionally, the prevailing
perspective has regarded performance as the independent variable in the relationship
between performance and well-being. However, there are conceptual models suggest-
ing that the link between happiness and success goes beyond the notion that success
leads to happiness and that well-being can itself generate success [56]. Furthermore,
research has shown there is a direct relationship between psychological capital,
encompassing elements like hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and resilience, and positive
emotions [57]. These positive emotions, in turn, correlate with employees’ attitudes
(including engagement and cynicism) and behaviors (such as productivity or devi-
ance). Additionally, positive emotions serve as mediators in the link between psycho-
logical capital and both attitudes and behaviors. Some authors delved into the impact
of three “positive” individual traits—optimism, personal power, and well-being—and
uncovered their positive influence on work performance, consequently enhancing
organizational productivity [58]. Their findings suggest that implementing positive
psychology principles into organizational policies fosters heightened task focus and
greater employee satisfaction.
3.3.2 Psychological safety
Employees in psychologically safe environments are more likely to voice their ideas
and contribute to organizational performance and agility. Effective communication
within the organization plays a crucial role in enabling members to manage their
responsibilities more effectively. This foundation supports a well-managed orga-
nizational culture. The implementation of effective communication also enhances
the likelihood of achieving the organization’s goals and objectives [59]. Also, it was
demonstrated that psychological safety is a key factor for successfully implementing
agile methods [60].
3.3.3 Employee engagement
When employees are engaged, they tend to be highly committed to their work,
resulting in heightened productivity and overall performance. Furthermore, research
has illustrated that a positive work culture can, in specific cases, enhance adaptability
[61]. Notably, this positive culture often generates a ripple effect, fostering a higher level
of engagement within agile organizations. Empowering employees to make decisions
and enabling them to witness the impact of their contributions further bolsters their
commitment to the organization’s success. This heightened engagement subsequently
elevates morale, productivity, and employee retention rates. It is worth noting that
work engagement shares a significant overlap with performance, representing a potent
motivational force [62]. Engaged employees exhibit a strong desire to go the extra mile
in pursuit of their objectives, driven not merely by immediate circumstances but by
a profound personal commitment to achieving their objectives. At the organizational
level, this relationship between engagement and performance can be even more robust,
as it transcends individual boundaries and spreads motivationally and emotionally to
colleagues, exerting a positive influence on organizational change [63]. Furthermore,
Human Resource Management - An Update
10
numerous studies have explored the potential mediating role of the five components of
the PERMA model in connecting other factors to performance outcomes. For example,
in the context of academic performance, research demonstrated that work engagement
(E – Engagement) acted as a mediator between positive emotions (P – Positive Emotion)
and performance [64]. Similarly, in studies involving various variables, work engage-
ment was found to mediate the relationship between employee attitudes and outcomes,
encompassing negative outcomes such as turnover intention [65].
3.3.4 Inclusivity and diversity
Effectively managing inclusivity and diversity within an organization is a multi-
faceted endeavor with far-reaching benefits. Employees in such an environment feel
valued, respected, and included, which enhances their sense of belonging and pur-
pose within the workplace. This heightened dedication translates into improved job
satisfaction, as employees perceive their workplace as not just a job but a supportive
and inclusive community where they can thrive. This sense of inclusion and belong-
ing often correlates with superior job performance. When employees feel their unique
perspectives and contributions are acknowledged and valued, they are more likely
to strive for excellence in their roles. They bring a wider range of ideas, experiences,
and viewpoints to the table, which can lead to increased innovation and problem-
solving within the organization. Research has shown that companies that effectively
navigate inclusivity and diversity often experience improved financial outcomes [66].
This improvement can stem from factors such as reduced turnover rates, increased
employee engagement, and enhanced productivity, all of which can positively influ-
ence the organization’s profitability and sustainability.
3.3.5 Employee empowerment and autonomy
Empowering employees to take ownership of their work and actively encouraging
them to express their thoughts, ideas, and concerns creates a workplace environment
characterized by a profound sense of ownership and agility. Empowerment, in fact,
is widely regarded as one of the foundational pillars of agility within organizations
[67]. This empowerment-driven approach to management has been substantiated by
numerous studies, which consistently highlight the positive and significant impact
it has on employee work performance [68, 69]. However, it is important to recognize
that the relationship between employee empowerment and performance is not a
straightforward one. Rather, it appears to be influenced by the level of trust as a
crucial mediating factor. Recent research sheds light on the nuanced nature of this
relationship [70]. Trust bridges empowerment and performance, influencing how
effectively empowerment strategies translate into enhanced work outcomes. When
employees feel empowered and trusted by their organization, they are more likely to
take ownership of their responsibilities and engage proactively in their roles.
3.3.6 Collaboration and teamwork
Effective teamwork within an organization brings about several positive out-
comes, including heightened efficiency, increased innovation, and more effective
problem-solving. Studies generally indicate that teamwork exerts a moderate yet
positive influence on work performance [71, 72]. Furthermore, communication and
team building have emerged as essential pillars of agility [67, 73]. Research findings
11
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
shed light on how different organizational cultures impact innovation and, conse-
quently, agility. Clan and adhocracy cultures tend to foster innovation and agility,
while hierarchy and market-oriented cultures often inhibit these qualities [74]. This
emphasizes the significant role of collaboration and teamwork in promoting organi-
zational agility.
3.3.7 Resilience and adaptability
The connection between resilience and adaptability holds a pivotal role in fostering
organizational agility. Importantly, adaptability is an intrinsic component of agility
itself. Thus, the interplay between resilience and adaptability, on the one hand, and
agility, on the other hand, is evident, forming a symbiotic relationship. In essence,
when employees possess a high level of resilience, they are better prepared to face the
challenges that accompany change, which directly contributes to the organization’s
overall agility. This adaptability enables them to pivot, innovate, and remain respon-
sive to the environment. Moreover, it is noteworthy that this synergy between resil-
ience and adaptability extends beyond the realm of organizational agility. Numerous
studies have highlighted their role in enhancing work performance [75–77].
3.3.8 Recognition and appreciation
Providing constructive feedback and consistently recognizing employee con-
tributions serves as a powerful catalyst for motivating individuals to excel in their
respective roles as a base for enhancing work performance [78]. This also plays a
pivotal role in enhancing the overall agility of the organization [73]. When employees
receive constructive feedback regularly, they are not only better equipped to align
their efforts with organizational goals but are also more inclined to proactively seek
opportunities for growth and development.
3.3.9 Fostering a growth mindset
Organizations that make substantial investments in their employees’ growth
and learning not only cultivate a culture of high performance [79], but also estab-
lish an environment conducive to continuous improvement and adaptability [80].
Furthermore, the impact of employee coachability on individual job performance,
adaptability, and promotability has been a subject of recent research. Surprisingly,
it was revealed that employee coachability has a more significant influence on these
aspects compared to effective managerial coaching behaviors [81]. This suggests that
the receptiveness and willingness of employees to be coached play a pivotal role in
their professional development and career progression. Another interesting study
demonstrated the mediating role of intrinsic motivation in the relationship between
perceived investment in employee development and work performance [82]. In
essence, the research demonstrates that the positive correlation between perceived
investment in employee development and work performance holds true primarily
for employees who possess high levels of intrinsic motivation. This underscores the
importance of aligning developmental efforts with the individual motivations of
employees to maximize their performance potential.
However, it is important to acknowledge that the landscape of work performance
and agility is multifaceted. While a positive workplace culture undoubtedly serves as
a central catalyst for these main objectives, it coexists with various other influential
Human Resource Management - An Update
12
Author details
CătălinaRadu
Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
*Address all correspondence to: catalina.radu@man.ase.ro
factors. For example, leveraging cutting-edge technology, including data analytics,
automation and the integration of artificial intelligence, is one such factor. These
technological advancements empower organizations by offering real-time insights
and streamlining routine tasks, thereby enhancing their performance and agility.
4. Conclusions
This chapter comprehensively examines the dynamic relationship between a posi-
tive workplace culture, work performance, and organizational agility. It delves into
the various dimensions of a positive culture, examining how it shapes the mindset
and behavior of employees. Key elements explored refer to well-being initiatives,
psychological safety, employee engagement, inclusivity and diversity, employee
empowerment and autonomy, collaboration and teamwork, resilience and adaptabil-
ity, recognition and appreciation, and fostering a growth mindset.
A positive workplace culture can enhance employee performance, engagement,
satisfaction, and retention, as well as organizational outcomes such as innovation,
productivity, agility and competitiveness.
Therefore, the insights presented in this chapter are valuable and essential for
human resources professionals, managers, and leaders who are dedicated to crafting
a work environment that nurtures positivity, empowers employees, and ultimately
drives organizational triumph. Through a deeper understanding of the intricacies of a
positive workplace culture, we can all embark on a journey toward achieving remark-
able success in the modern corporate landscape.
© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
13
References
[1] Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE,
Smith HL. Subjective well-being: Three
decades of progress. Psychological
Bulletin. 1999;125(2):276-302.
DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
[2] Gladis S. Positive Leadership: The
Game Changer at Work. Annandale:
Steve Gladis Leadership Partners; 2013
[3] Kozma A, Stones MJ. The measurement
of happiness: Development of the
Memorial University of Newfoundland
scale of happiness (MUNSH). Journal of
Gerontology. 1980;35:906-912
[4] Seligman ME. Flourish: A New
Understanding of Happiness and
Wellbeing—And How to Achieve Them.
London: Free Press; 2011
[5] Fredrickson BL. The role of positive
emotions in positive psychology:
The broaden-and-build theory
of positive emotions. American
Psychologist. 2001;56(3):218-226.
DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
[6] Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Positive
affect and the other side of coping.
American Psychologist. 2000;55(6):647-
654. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647
[7] Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL,
Feldman BL. Psychological resilience
and positive emotional granularity:
Examining the benefits of positive
emotions on coping and health. Journal
of Personality. 2004;72(6):1161-1190.
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x
[8] Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The
Psychology of Optimal Experience. New
York: Harper Perennial; 2008
[9] Siedlecki KL, Salthouse TA, Oishi S,
Jeswani S. The relationship between
social support and subjective well-being
across age. Social Indicators Research.
2013;117(2):561-576. DOI:10.1007/
s11205-013-0361-4
[10] Baumeister RF, Vohs KD,
Aaker JL, Garbinsky EN. Some key
differences between a happy life and
a meaningful life. The Journal of
Positive Psychology. 2013;8(6):505-516.
DOI:10.1080/17439760.2013.830764
[11] Goodman F, Disabato D, Kashdan T,
Kauffman S. Measuring well-being: A
comparison of subjective well-being
and PERMA. The Journal of Positive
Psychology. 2017;13(4):321-332.
DOI:10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434
[12] Kashdan T. How Many Ways Can We
Measure Well-Being? [Internet]. New
York: Psychology Today; 2017. Available
from: https://www.psychologytoday.
com/gb/blog/curious/201710/how-
many-ways-can-we-measure-well-being
[Accessed: October 20, 2021]
[13] Seligman M. PERMA and
the building blocks of well-
being. The Journal of Positive
Psychology. 2018;13(4):333-335.
DOI:10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466
[14] Butler J, Kern ML. The PERMA-
profiler: A brief multidimensional
measure of flourishing. International
Journal of Wellbeing. 2016;6(3):1-48.
DOI:10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526
[15] Kern ML. The Workplace PERMA
Profiler [Internet]. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania; 2014.
Available from: https://www.peggykern.
org/uploads/5/6/6/7/56678211/
workplace_perma_profiler_102014.pdf
[Accessed: May 24, 2022]
[16] Watanabe K, Kawakami N,
Shiotani T, Adachi H, Matsumoto K,
Human Resource Management - An Update
14
Imamura K, etal. The Japanese workplace
PERMA-profiler: A validation study
among Japanese workers. Journal of
Occupational Health. 2018;60(5):383-
393. DOI:10.1539/joh.2018-0050-OA
[17] Choi SP, Suh C, Yang JW, Ye BJ,
Lee CK, Son BC, etal. Korean translation
and validation of the workplace positive
emotion, engagement, relationships,
meaning, and accomplishment
(PERMA)-profiler. Annals of
Occupational and Environmental
Medicine. 2019;31(1):1-13.
DOI:10.35371/AOEM.2019.31.E17
[18] Wammerl M, Jaunig J,
Mairunteregger T, Streit P. The German
version of the PERMA-profiler: Evidence
for construct and convergent validity
of the PERMA theory of well-being in
German speaking countries. Journal of
Well-Being Assessment. 2019;3:75-96.
DOI:10.1007/s41543-019-00021-0
[19] Radu C, Mișu S. Positive intelligence
and work performance. Management and
Economics Review. 2023;8(1):117-129.
DOI:10.24818/mer/2023.02-09
[20] Achor S. Positive Intelligence—Three
Ways Individuals Can Cultivate Their Own
Sense of Well-Being and Set Themselves
up to Succeed. Brighton: Harvard Business
Review; 2012. pp. 100-103
[21] Chamine S. Positive Intelligence:
Why Only 20% of Teams and Individuals
Achieve Their True Potential and
How You Can Achieve Yours. Austin:
Greenleaf Group Press; 2012
[22] Radu C. Internal saboteurs and
work performance—Implications for
Hrm practices. Proceedings of the
International Management Conference.
2022;15(1):331-341. DOI:10.24818/
imc/2021/02.10
[23] Cameron KS, Quinn RE. Diagnosing
and changing organisational culture.
Based on the competing values framework.
In: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru
Sekolah Dasar. 3rd ed. Vol. 6. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011. 266 p
[24] Denison D, Nieminen L, Kotrba L.
Diagnosing organizational cultures:
A conceptual and empirical review of
culture effectiveness surveys. European
Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology. 2014;23(1):145-161.
DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2012.713173
[25] Parent JD, Lovelace KJ. The impact
of employee engagement and a positive
organisational culture on an individual’s
ability to adapt to organization change.
In: Eastern Academy of Management
Proceedings: Organization Behavior
and Theory Track. North Andover:
Merrimack ScholarWorks; 2015. pp. 1-20.
Available from: https://scholarworks.
merrimack.edu/mgt_facpub/10/
[Accessed: July 27, 2023]
[26] Kun A, Gadanecz P. Workplace
happiness, well-being and their
relationship with psychological capital:
A study of Hungarian teachers. Current
Psychology. 2022;41(1):185-199.
DOI:10.1007/s12144-019-00550-0
[27] Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD.
An integrative model of organizational
trust. Academy of Management Review.
1995;20(3):709-734. DOI:10.5465/
amr.1995.9508080335
[28] Van Beek I, Taris TW,Schaufeli WB,
Brenninkmeijer V. Heavy work
investment: Its motivational make-up
and outcomes. Journal of Managerial
Psychology. 2013;29(1):46-62
[29] Pless NM, Maak T. Building
an inclusive diversity culture:
Principles. Journal of Business Ethics.
2004;54(2):129-147
[30] Murray WC, Holmes MR.
Impacts of employee empowerment
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
15
and organizational commitment on
workforce sustainability. Sustainability.
2021;13(6):3163. DOI:10.3390/
su13063163
[31] Pathiranage YL. Organizational
culture and business performance: An
empirical study. International Journal
of Economics and Management Studies.
2019;6(6):1-12. DOI:10.14445/23939125/
ijems-v6i6p101
[32] Boin A, van Eeten MJG. The resilient
organization. Public Management
Review. 2013;15(3):429-445.
DOI:10.1080/14719037.2013.769856
[33] Abdullah N, A. Shonubi O,
Hashim R, Hamid N. Recognition and
appreciation and its psychological effect
on job satisfaction and performance
in a Malaysia IT company: Systematic
review. OSR Journal of Humanities
and Social Science. 2016;21(09):47-55.
DOI:10.9790/0837-2109064755
[34] Rahman W, Nas Z. Employee
development and turnover intention:
Theory validation. European Journal
of Training and Development.
2013;37(6):564-579. DOI:10.1108/
EJTD-May-2012-0015
[35] Murphy KR. Dimensions of job
performance.In:Dillon RF, Pellegrino JW,
editors. Testing: Theoretical and Applied
Perspectives. New York: Praeger; 1989. pp.
218-247
[36] Campbell JP. Modeling the
performance prediction problem in
industrial and organizational psychology.
In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM,
editors. Handbook of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto:
Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990. pp.
687-732
[37] Borman WC,Motowidlo SJ.
Expanding the criterion domain to include
elements of contextual performance.
In: Schmitt N,Borman WC, editors.
Personnel Selection in Organizations. San
Francisco: Jossey Bass; 1993. pp. 71-98
[38] Goodman SA, Svyantek DJ.
Person-organization fit and contextual
performance: Do shared values matter.
Journal of Vocational Behavior.
1999;55:254-275. DOI:10.1006/
jvbe.1998.1682
[39] Atatsi EA, Stoffers J, Kil A. Factors
affecting employee performance: A
systematic literature review. Journal of
Advances in Management Research.
2019;16(3):329-351. DOI:10.1108/
JAMR-06-2018-0052
[40] Koopmans L, Bernaards CM,
Hildebrandt VH, Schaufeli WB, De
Vet HCW, Van Der Beek AJ. Conceptual
frameworks of individual work
performance: A systematic review. Journal
of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine. 2011;53(8):856-866.
DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
[41] Tangen S. Improving the
performance of a performance
measure. Measuring Business
Excellence. 2005;9(2):4-11.
DOI:10.1108/13683040510602830
[42] Sinclair RR, Tucker JS. Stress-CARE:
An integrated model of individual
differences in soldier performance under
stress. In: Britt TW, Castro CA, Adler AB,
editors. Military Life: The Psychology of
Serving in Peace and Combat: Military
Performance. Westport: Praeger Security
International; 2006. pp. 202-231
[43] Tucker JS, Sinclair RR, Mohr CD,
Adler AB, Thomas JL, Salvi AD. Stress
and counterproductive work behavior:
Multiple relationships between demands,
control, and soldier indiscipline over
time. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology. 2009;14(3):257-271.
DOI:10.1037/a0014951
Human Resource Management - An Update
16
[44] Koopmans L,Bernaards CM,
Hildebrandt VH, De Vet HCW, Van
Der Beek AJ. Construct validity of
the individual work performance
questionnaire. Journal of Occupational
and Environmental Medicine.
2014;56(3):331-337. DOI:10.1097/
JOM.0000000000000113
[45] Radu C, Deaconu A,Mișu S,
Triculescu M. The impact of work
investment on performance. Amfiteatru
Economic. 2020;22(14):1103-1120
[46] Tuffaha M. The determinants of
Employee’s performance: A literature
review. Journal of Economics and
Management Sciences. 2020;3(3):14-24.
DOI:10.30560/jems.v3n3p14
[47] Pandey J. Factors affecting job
performance: An integrative review of
literature. Management Research Review.
2019;42(2):263-289. DOI:10.1108/
MRR-02-2018-0051
[48] Zainal AY, Yousuf H, Salloum SA.
Dimensions of agility capabilities
organizational competitiveness in
sustaining. Advances in Intelligent Systems
and Computing. 2020;1153 AISC:762-772.
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_71
[49] Yauch CA. Measuring agility
as a performance outcome. Journal
of Manufacturing Technology
Management. 2011;22(3):384-404.
DOI:10.1108/17410381111112738
[50] Garcia-Gil M, Torres-Unda J,
Esain I, Duñabeitia I, Gil SM, Gil J, etal.
Anthropometric parameters, age, and
agility as performance predictors in elite
female basketball players. Journal of
Strength and Conditioning Research.
2018;32(6):1723-1730. DOI:10.1519/
jsc.0000000000002043
[51] Walter AT. Organizational agility:
Ill-defined and somewhat confusing?
A systematic literature review and
conceptualization. Management
Review Quarterly. 2021;71:343-391.
DOI:10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6
[52] Mrugalska B, Ahmed J.
Organizational agility in industry 4.0:
A systematic literature review.
Sustainability. 2021;13(15):1-23.
DOI:10.3390/su13158272
[53] Žitkienė R,Deksnys M.
Organizational agility conceptual
model. Montenegrin Journal of
Economics. 2018;14(2):115-129.
DOI:10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7
[54] Luthans F, Avey JB,Avolio BJ,
Peterson SJ. The development and
resulting performance impact of positive
psychological capital. Human Resource
Development Quarterly. 2010;21(1):41-
67. DOI:10.1002/hrdq.20034
[55] Lyngdoh T, Liu AH, Sridhar G.
Applying positive psychology to selling
behaviors: A moderated-mediation
analysis integrating subjective well-
being, coping and organizational
identity. Journal of Business Research.
2018;92:142-153. DOI:10.1016/j.
jbusres.2018.07.020
[56] Lyubomirsky S, King LA,
Diener E. The benefits of frequent
positive affect: Does happiness lead
to success? Psychological Bulletin.
2005;131(6):803-855
[57] Avey JB, Wernsing TS, Luthans F.
Can positive employees help positive
organizational change? Impact of
psychological capital and emotions
on relevant attitudes and behaviors.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral
Science. 2008;44(1):48-70.
DOI:10.1177/0021886307311470
[58] Kour J,El-Den J,Sriratanaviriyakul N.
The role of positive psychology in
Fostering a Positive Workplace Culture: Impacts on Performance and Agility
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003259
17
improving employees’ performance
and organizational productivity:
An experimental study. Procedia
Computer Science. 2019;161:226-232.
DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.118
[59] Jiony MM, Tanakinjal GH, Gom D,
Siganul RS. Understanding the effect
of organizational culture and employee
engagement on organizational
performance using organizational
communication as mediator: A
conceptual framework. American Journal
of Economics. 2015;2015(2):128-134.
DOI:10.5923/c.economics.201501.13
[60] Thorgren S, Caiman E. The role of
psychological safety in implementing
agile methods across cultures. Research
Technology Management. 2019;62(2):31-
39. DOI:10.1080/08956308.2019.1563436
[61] Parent JD, Lovelace KJ. Employee
engagement, positive organizational
culture and individual adaptability.
On the Horizon. 2018;26(3):206-214.
DOI:10.1108/OTH-01-2018-0003
[62] Leiter MP, Bakker AB. Work
engagement: Introduction. In:
Bakker AB, Leiter MP, editors. Work
Engagement A Handbook of Essential
Theory and Research. London:
Psychology Press; 2010. pp. 1-9
[63] Bakker AB, van Emmerik H,
Euwema MC. Crossover of burnout
and engagement in work teams. Work
and Occupations. 2006;33:464-489.
DOI:10.1177/0730888406291310
[64] Oriol-Granado X, Mendoza-
Lira M, Covarrubias-Apablaza CG,
Molina-López VM. Positive emotions,
autonomy support and academic
performance of university students:
The mediating role of academic
engagement and self-efficacy. Revista
de Psicodidáctica. 2017;22(1):45-53.
DOI:10.1387/RevPsicodidact.14280
[65] Yalabik ZY, Popaitoon P, Chowne JA,
Rayton BA. Work engagement as a
mediator between employee attitudes
and outcomes. The International
Journal of Human Resource
Management. 2013;24(14):2799-2823.
DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.763844
[66] Patrick HA, Kumar VR. Managing
workplace diversity: Issues and
challenges. SAGE Open. 2012;2(2):1-15.
DOI:10.1177/2158244012444615
[67] Harraf A, Wanasika I, Tate K,
Talbott K. Organizational agility. Journal
of Applied Business Research.
2015;31(2):675-686. DOI:10.19030/jabr.
v31i2.9160
[68] Yang SB, Choi SO. Employee
empowerment and team performance:
Autonomy, responsibility, information,
and creativity. Team Performance
Management. 2009;15(5-6):289-301.
DOI:10.1108/13527590910983549
[69] Hieu VM. Employee empowerment
and empowering leadership: A literature
review. Technium: Romanian Journal
of Applied Sciences and Technology.
2020;2(7):20-28. DOI:10.47577/
technium.v2i7.1653
[70] Baird K, Tung A, Su S. Employee
empowerment, performance appraisal
quality and performance. Journal of
Management Control. 2020;31(4):451-
474. DOI:10.1007/s00187-020-00307-y
[71] Sanyal S, Hisam MW. The impact
of teamwork on work performance
of employees: A study of faculty
members in Dhofar university.
IOSR Journal of Business and
Management. 2018;20(3):15-22.
DOI:10.9790/487X-2003011522
[72] Schmutz JB, Meier LL, Manser T.
How effective is teamwork really? The
relationship between teamwork and
Human Resource Management - An Update
18
performance in healthcare teams: A
systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):1-16. DOI:10.1136/
bmjopen-2018-028280
[73] Muduli A. Workforce agility:
Examining the role of organizational
practices and psychological
empowerment. Global Business and
Organizational Excellence. 2017;36(5):
46-56. DOI:10.1002/joe.21800
[74] Goncalves D, Bergquist M,
Bunk R, Alänge S. Cultural aspects of
organizational agility affecting digital
innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship,
Management and Innovation.
2020;16:13-46. DOI:10.7341/20201641
[75] Duchek S. Organizational resilience:
A capability-based conceptualization.
Business Research. 2020;13(1):215-246.
DOI:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
[76] Walpita YN, Arambepola C.
High resilience leads to better work
performance in nurses: Evidence
from South Asia. Journal of Nursing
Management. 2020;28(2):342-350.
DOI:10.1111/jonm.12930
[77] Sony M, Mekoth N. The relationship
between emotional intelligence, frontline
employee adaptability, job satisfaction
and job performance. Journal of Retailing
and Consumer Services. 2016;30:20-32.
DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.12.003
[78] Bawa MA. Employee motivation and
productivity: A review of literature and
implications for management practice.
International Journal of Economics,
Commerce and Management United
Kingdom. 2017;5(12):662-673
[79] Jacobs R, Washington C. Employee
development and organizational
performance: A review of literature
and directions for future research.
Human Resource Development
International. 2003;6(3):343-354.
DOI:10.1080/13678860110096211
[80] Wainaina CN, Kabare DK,
Mukulu PE. Determinants of employee
adaptability to transformational change
in commercial in Nairobi, Kenya:
Empirical review. International Journal
of Academic Research in Business
and Social Sciences. 2014;4(10):1-9.
DOI:10.6007/ijarbss/v4-i10/1204
[81] Weiss JA, Merrigan M. Employee
Coachability: New insights to increase
employee adaptability, performance,
and promotability in organizations.
International Journal of Evidence Based
Coaching and Mentoring. 2021;19(1):
121-136. DOI:10.24384/kfmw-ab52
[82] Kuvaas B, Dysvik A. Perceived
investment in employee development,
intrinsic motivation and work
performance. Human Resource
Management Journal. 2009;19(3):217-236.
DOI:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00103.x
