ArticlePDF Available

Study on Economic Analysis of Cost and Return of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L) in Rajasthan, India

Authors:

Abstract

The present study was conducted to analyze the cost and return of rabi maize in Banswara district of Rajasthan. The study area was selected on the basis of highest gross cropped area of rabi maize in study area. A sample of 120 farmers were selected randomly in the study area during the year 2020-21. Farmers were categorized into two categories i.e., beneficiary (canal irrigation) and non- beneficiary (other than canal irrigation) farms. The standard cost concept method of the CACP was used to calculate cost of cultivation of maize crop. Results revealed that overall cost of cultivation was found ₹37573.98 and ₹37857.86on beneficiary and non- beneficiary farms, respectively. Overall net return was found more on beneficiary compared to non- beneficiary farms. Return per rupee was found more on beneficiary farms compare to non- beneficiary farms i.e., 2.15 and 1.92, respectively.
... The potential countries in present time for its production are India, Africa, Peru, Brazil, Java, Australia, Pakistan and the United States. Among these countries, India produces over 6 lakh tons of cluster bean annually and is the largest producer of cluster bean in the world with a contribution of nearly 75 to 80 per cent of the world's total production of cluster bean [5][6][7]. ...
Article
The present study aimed to determine the costs and returns of cultivating cluster bean in Southern Haryana during 2020-21 farming season. The study was based on primary data. A total of 80 farmers were interviewed from the purposively selected districts of Bhiwani and Mahendargarh. The findings revealed that the per hectare cost of cluster bean cultivation ₹40,241 and ₹44,553 in Bhiwani and Mahendargarh districts, respectively. On average, the per hectare yield, gross returns, and net returns from cluster bean cultivation in Bhiwani district were 10.82 quintals, ₹49,002, and ₹8,758, respectively. While that of Mahendargarh district were 11.02 quintals, ₹52,732, and ₹8,178, respectively. The benefit-cost (B:C) ratio and B:C ratio over variable cost were 1.21 and 2.34 for Bhiwani, while it was 1.18 and 2.32 for Mahendargarh district. The slightly lower B:C ratio in Mahendargarh district was primarily due to the higher cost of labor.
... Accordingly, the primary data has been collected .The parameters considered for the assessment of the impact of IFS project on the farming community were with respect to the change in cropping pattern, change in yield, change in cost of cultivation, change in income, effect on employment generation, survival rate of planting material. The analytical tools employed for the study were descriptive statistics like averages, percentages and graphical analysis and cost of cultivation of the selected horticultural worked out as per formats of Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) [6,7] and arrived the gross income, Net income and B:C ratios. ...
Article
Integrated farming system (IFS) is recognized as the best solution to the farmers for providing income assurance and nutritional security to the farmers particularly for the small and marginal farmers with limited resources. Looking into the importance of the Integrated farming system, Government of Karnataka has implemented the IFS project to the farming communities of different districts coming under the jurisdictions of the University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot from the financial supports of Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY). Hence, the present study at College of Horticulture, Bidar was undertaken as one of the project implemented campus of the University for assessing impact of IFS Phase II on the beneficiary farmers of Bidar district. Initially, this project has created awareness about the IFS project among the selected beneficiaries through training programmes and then distributed the farm inputs like vegetable seeds, field crop seeds, vegetable seedlings, fruit grafts, nutrient specials, bio-fertilizers, and farm implements like battery operated sprayers, seedling planters and cycle weeders. The study found that, before implantation of the project, the farmers in the Bidar districts were generally growing Redgram with intercropping of Greengram/ Blackgram/Jowar/Soyabean and sugarcane crop, after implantation of the IFS project, there was a change in crops cultivation to the horticultural crops. The farmers who had received the benefits of seeds/seedlings and the technical information at free of cost for the cultivation of the horticultural crops, it was observed that, papaya crops growers were realised higher net profits of Rs. 1,10,988 per acre with the B:C ratio of 1.45, followed by the farmers of marigold crop (Rs. 1,01,881/acre), watermelon (Rs. 84459/acre), onion (Rs. 72,938/acre), chilli (Rs. 49,023/ acre) and Brinjal (Rs. 39,801/acre). Further, it was found that, the use of farm machineries like sprayers, farmers reduced the cost and time requirment of labour for spraying of pesticides. Similarly, famers used cycle weeders have opined that, for weeding men and women labours requiremnt was reduced to the tune of 12 to 15 days/ acre for men labours and 8-9 man days/acre for women labour and the use of Vegetable Handy Planter resulted in reduction labour and time requirment in planting of seedlings to the tune of 40 to 50 per cent of time duration. Hence, in overall, the IFS project interventions have benefited the farmers economically for minimizing the cost of production through availing the inputs at free of cost and also helps them for realizing the higher income from adoption of the best technologies given through the university.
Article
Full-text available
In recent times, India has witnessed a remarkable surge in agricultural production, surpassing the demand and establishing itself as a leading global exporter in agronomy and horticulture crops. However, it is important to note that this sector has also been associated with environmental impacts, contributing to various forms of pollution that negatively affect water, soil, air quality, and human health. To address the environmental impact of food production, it is essential to assess the overall environmental consequences of the entire food supply chain. Maize cultivation significantly impacts the environment, especially concerning resource usage and the environmental effects of fertilizer, insecticides, and electricity production. In order to evaluate the environmental consequences associated with maize cultivation, a life cycle assessment was conducted using the cradle-to-farm gate approach. The aim was to quantify and pinpoint the system’s environmental hotspots. A land-based functional unit (i.e., one hectare of potato cultivation) has been taken in the study. For the evaluation of environmental correlations and estimation of potential environmental impact, the LCA research incorporated the use of SimaPro version 9.5 software in conjunction with the ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint methods. This selected approach facilitated the assessment of all inputs and outputs included in the study, providing valuable insights into their environmental implications. The characterization results show that fertilization, irrigation, sowing, and harvesting have considerable environmental impacts, with fertilization having the most influence. Irrigation contributes 94.5 percent to water usage and 21.3 percent to freshwater eutrophication. Based on the recipe endpoint scores, the overall impact totals 144.8 points, with human health prominently leading at 129.0 points. Additionally, in order to see the environmental and economic viability of the selected crop an alternative scenario along with life cycle costing has been performed.
Article
Full-text available
An investigation entitled "Economic Analysis of Costs and Returns of wheat in Jammu district of J&K state" was conducted in wheat grown two different development blocks of Jammu district (R. S. Pura and Bishnah) during the agricultural year 2015-16. Four villages from each block were selected randomly. Further, from each village, 10 farmers were selected randomly, so as to constitute a total sample size of 80. Primary data on costs & returns of the wheat was done by interviewing the farmers with the help of specially structured and pre-tested schedule and by visiting growers. The total cost constituted was highest Rs. 41180.64 on large farms followed by Rs. 39977.58, Rs. 38892.65 and Rs. 35713.07 on medium, small and marginal farms respectively. However, on all farms total cost was Rs. 38856.23 per hectare, of which the total variable cost was Rs. 21530.06, total fixed cost was Rs. 15751.06 and managerial cost was Rs. 1575.11/ha. The gross return was highest Rs. 67002.50 on marginal farms followed by Rs. 66385.00, Rs. 65615.00 and Rs. 65230.00 on large, small and medium farms respectively. However, on all farms gross return was Rs. 65911.75/ha. The net return was highest in case of marginal farms Rs. 31289.43, followed by Rs. 26722.35, Rs. 25252.42 and Rs. 25204.36 of small, medium and large farms respectively. However, the all farms net return was Rs. 27055.52. The cost benefit ratio was highest in case of marginal farms ie. 1.88, followed by 1.69, 1.63 and 1.61 of small, medium and large farms respectively.
Article
Full-text available
The present investigation was attempted to study the resource use structure, to estimate the cost of cultivation and to study the marketing of maize. In all, 90 farmers were selected from Karjat tahsil of Ahmednagar district in western Maharashtra. The data related to the Agricultural year 2008-09 was taken for the present study. The sample farmers were classified into three size groups of holdings i. e. small, medium and large. The Cobb-Douglas type of production function was used for functional analysis.
Article
Maize is the most important cereal and it is mostly used as grain, feed, fodder, and industrial products. In the present study, an attempt was made to calculate the cost of cultivation and to evaluate the of maize conducted in Ariyalur district of Tamil Nadu. Totally 98 respondents were purposively selected and interviewed from the district to examine the cost and returns of maize among the farmers in the study area. The data was gathered in the form of pre-structured interview schedule. Random sampling technique was adopted for selection of respondents. The study shows cost and returns of rainfed maize and irrigated maize cultivation per hectare and benefit cost ratio in different farm size groups. The total cost of cultivation of rainfed maize was identified as Rs.58338.54 for marginal farmers with benefit cost ratio 1.03, Rs.56301.69 for small farmers with benefit cost ratio 1.08 and Rs.54090.75 for semi-medium farmers with benefit cost ratio 1.15. The total cost of cultivation of irrigated maize was identified as Rs.94442.74 with benefit cost ratio 1.35 for marginal farmers, Rs.92473.29 with benefit cost ratio 1.38 for small farmers and Rs.91857.83 with benefit cost ratio 1.43 for semi-medium farmers. Those cost of cultivation includes all the expenses like, plant protection chemicals, land preparation, harvesting and other intercultural operations. This study clearly shows cost of cultivation decrease with increase in farm size.
Article
The present study has been made to work out the cost of cultivation, profitability and production as well as marketing constraints of wheat cultivation faced by farmers. The primary data were collected from 105 sample respondents (40 small, 40 medium and 25 large) through pre-tested interview schedule. The cost of cultivation was found to be highest on large farm ( 29379.88/ha) as compared to medium farm ( 26155.99/ha) and small farm ( 21942.80/ha). The gross income received from wheat cultivation was to be 50166.54 per hectare on overall farms, while gross income was found to be maximum in case of large farm ( 55817.55/ha) followed by medium farm ( 50191.20/ha) and small farm ( 44490.87/ha). The net income, farm business income, family labour income and farm investment income were found to be 24340.32, 35779.93, 27969.70 and 34498.43 per hectare, respectively on overall farms. The benefit cost ratio was to be highest on small farm (1:2.027) as compared to medium (1:1.918) and large farm (1:1.899). The wheat cultivators reported that potential yield could not be achieved due to various production constraints viz. lack of soil testing facilities, lack of knowledge of plant protection measures, lack of knowledge of recommended package of practices, unavailability of hired human labour, irregularity of electricity supply, lack of capital, lack of proper training, disease problems, unavailability of high yielding variety seed and unavailability of fertilizers at operation period.
State of Rajasthan Agriculture Report
  • M Swain
  • S S Kalamkar
  • M Ojha
Swain M, Kalamkar SS, Ojha M. State of Rajasthan Agriculture Report; 2012.
Economics analysis of groundnut crops in western district of Odisha
  • R K Rout
  • S Behera
  • M Jena
  • P Nanda
Rout RK, Behera S, Jena M, Nanda P. Economics analysis of groundnut crops in western district of Odisha. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.