ArticlePDF Available

Sleep apnea in patients with exacerbated heart failure and overweight

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background Exacerbated heart failure is a condition with a high frequency of hospitalizations and mortality, especially in overweight patients. Screening and treatment for sleep apnea can be helpful in these patients. Purpose To determine the frequency and the phenotypic characteristics and of sleep apnea in patients with overweight and exacerbated heart failure. To assess systolic and diastolic function in patients with obstructive and central sleep apnea. To follow patients for one year and to assess hospitalization and mortality. Methods We conducted a single-centre, prospective cohort study form 120 consecutive patients hospitalized for exacerbation heart failure in the cardiology department. 70 patients meet inclusion criteria – Apnea-Hypopnea index (AHI) > 5, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) > 6, NTproBNP>900 pg/ml, and Body mass index(BMI) >25. All patients receiving optimal medical treatment. The follow-up period was 1 year. The primary endpoint was death for any reason. Sleep apnea screening was performed with ApneaLinkTM. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the E/e‘m ratio. Results From 70 with sleep apnea 73% (n=51) has obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 27% (n=19) has central sleep apnea (CSA). Detected significant changes in LVEF between the OSA group and CSA group (EF% 49.7±8.5vs43.3±9.6.4;p=0.008). Statistically significant changes there was about E/e’m ratio (E/e’m-17.01±3.7 vs 19.3±2.73; p=0.015) and BMI (BMI-38.2±6.5 vs 32.2±3.6; p<0.001). We found a moderate reverse correlation between the LVEF and the number of central sleep apnea events (r=-0,34;p=0,003). Simple linear regression was used to test if the left ventricular ejection fraction significantly predicted the number of central apnea events. The overall regression was statistically significant (R2 = 0.120, F(1,68) = 9.26, p = .003). It was found that the left ventricular ejection fraction significantly predicted the number of central apnea events (β = -0.06, p = .003). Patients from both groups were followed up regarding first hospitalization for heart failure and mortality over a period of 12 months. First hospitalization in patients with CSA occurs significantly sooner than in patients with OSA. The average number of months without hospitalization for HF in patients with CSA was 6.7 months versus 9.7 months in patients with OSA (Log Rank (Mental-Cox) p=0.012). The OSA group had a median survival of 10.5 months versus 9.3 months in the CSA group (Log Rank (Mental-Cox) p=0.026). Conclusion Sleep apnea is a common comorbidity in patients with exacerbated heart failure and overweight. OSA occurs to a greater extent than CSA. Patients with reduced systolic function are at higher risk of central sleep apneas events. Low LVEF% can be used as a prognostic factor regarding the occurrence of central sleep apnea events. Controlling sleep apnea can reduce patient readmissions and mortality.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Sleep apnea in patients with exacerbated heart failure and overweight
Petar Kalaydzhiev
a
,
b
,
*
, Nikolay Poroyliev
a
,
b
, Desislava Somleva
a
,
b
, Radostina Ilieva
a
,
b
,
Dimitar Markov
a
,
b
, Elena Kinova
a
,
b
, Asen Goudev
a
,
b
a
Medical University, Soa, Bulgaria
b
University Hospital Tsaritsa Yoanna eISUL, Byalo More St N8, Clinical of Cardiology, Soa, Bulgaria
article info
Article history:
Received 7 December 2022
Received in revised form
8 February 2023
Accepted 24 February 2023
Available online 28 February 2023
Keywords:
Exacerbated heart failure
Obstructive sleep apnea
Central sleep apnea
abstract
Sleep disorders are a common concomitant comorbidity in patients with heart failure. The aims of our
study are to determine the incidence and phenotypic characteristics of sleep apnea in overweight pa-
tients with exacerbated heart failure and to assess the degree of involvement of systolic and diastolic
function impairment in the individual group. From 100 screened patients with heart failure in our
department from 2015 to 2017, 61 met the inclusion criteria and participated in the study. 82% (n ¼50) of
the patients had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and 18% (n ¼11) had central sleep apnea (CSA). The CSA
group had a signicantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than the OSA group (EF%
49.6 ±8.5 vs 41.8 ±11.4; p ¼0.013). A negative correlation was found between LVEF and the number of
central apnea events (r ¼0.52; p <0.001). More frequent hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) and
higher mortality rate were found in the CSA group. Screening for sleep apnea in patients with exacer-
bated heart failure and obesity is necessary for the complex treatment of these patients.
©2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Introduction
Sleep apnea is more common in patients with heart failure (HF)
than in the general population. There are two main types of sleep
apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea is caused by an obstruction of the
upper airway, while central sleep apnea is caused by a lack of signal
from the central nervous system to the respiratory muscles. The
comorbidity rate in patients with OSA and heart failure is high. The
frequency varies from 11 to 38% in different studies. In patients with
CSA, this percentage is even higher 28e82% [1]. This statistic raises
the question of the diagnosis and treatment of these comorbidities.
In these patients, hospitalization due to exacerbation of HF is a
more frequent phenomenon compared to patients without sleep
apnea [2]. Treatment options are being explored, and currently
positive results are reported only in the obstructive type, while in
the case of central apnea, the studies have not reported denite
benets [3]. The high comorbidity rate may be due to the fact that
the two disorders, sleep apnea and heart failure, share common risk
factors [4,5]. There is a lack of sufcient data on the type of sleep
apnea that prevails during hospitalization for exacerbated heart
failure. It is not established whether there is an association between
high NTproBNP (N-Terminal Fragment of the Prohormone Brain-
Type Natriuretic Peptide - NT-proBNP) and Apnea-Hypopnea In-
dex (AHI) and whether it can be used as a predictive value for the
severity of sleep apnea in these patients, which we will seek an
answer in the present study. Our study aims to differentiate the
frequency and type of sleep apnea in patients with overweight and
exacerbated heart failure, evaluate the systolic and diastolic func-
tion in the individual groups, and determine whether there is a
correlation between the severity of heart failure and the type of
sleep apnea.
2. Materials and methods
We conducted a single-centre, prospective cohort study in
which patients hospitalized in the Cardiology Clinic of UMHAT
Tsaritsa Joanna - ISULtook part from 2015 to 2017. In 100
consecutive patients with clinical and laboratory evidence of
exacerbated heart failure - New York Heart Association (NYHA)
class II/III and Body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2, additional lab-
oratory methods were used to assess the degree of heart failure
using NTproBNP. Measurements were conducted on a Point of Care
- Roche Cobas h 232 System. Patients with NTproBNP
values >300 pg/ml were included. The screening for sleep apnea
was conducted using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and an
*Corresponding author.
E-mail address: pkalaidjiev@gmail.com (P. Kalaydzhiev).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Sleep Medicine: X
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sleep
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100065
2590-1427/©2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Sleep Medicine: X 5 (2023) 100065
ApneaLinksomnographic screening system, which was attached
to patients on the rst night of their stay in the unit. The number
and type of apneas and hypopneas per hour were measured -
Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI). The somnographic recordings were
analysed with ApneaLinkReporting Software to determine the
sleep apnea phenotype. All patients with ESS >6 pts and AHI >5
were included. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography was used
to assess systolic and diastolic function. To assess systolic function,
measurement of the left ventricular ejection fraction using the
Simpson method was used, and to measure diastolic function, the
ratio E/e'm (the ration of the wave of early diastolic lling of the
mitral inow- E and the tissue Doppler velocity of the medial mitral
annulus-e'm) was used. Exclusion criteria were: acute respiratory
failure, acute coronary syndrome, severe renal or hepatic failure,
and chronic lung diseases (COPD). Sixty-one patients met the in-
clusion criteria. They were divided into two groups according to the
type of sleep apnea - with CSA and with OSA. Patients were fol-
lowed up for HF hospitalizations and mortality rate over a two-year
period. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22.0 (Chi-
cago, Illinois). Statistical methods for comparison using Pearson's
chi-squared test and Student's t-test as appropriate. Correlation
analysis for linear dependence were used. Simple linear regression
was performed to test signicantly predicted value. The Kaplan-
Meier method was used to analyze the survival rate and rst HF
hospitalization. The comparison between the two groups was
performed using the Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Data with a p-
value <0.05 were considered signicant.
3. Results
From 100 screened consecutive patients, sleep apnea was found
in 61% of them (n ¼61). Of these, 82% (n ¼50) had obstructive sleep
apnea, and 18% (n ¼11) had central sleep apnea. Regarding the
demographic indicators of age and gender, no signicant differ-
ences were found in the individual groups.
When comparing the ejection fraction (EF%) of the left ventricle
between the two groups, signicantly lower values of EF were
recorded in the group with central sleep apnea compared to the
group with OSA (LVEF % 49.6 ±8.5 vs 41.8 ±11.4; p ¼0.013).
There is also a difference in the diastolic dysfunction indicators,
with the E/e'm ratio in the CSA group being signicantly higher (E/
e'm-17.1 ±3.7 vs 20.9 ±2.5; p ¼0.002). The NTproBNP values also
support this data, patients with CSA have signicantly higher
values compared to patients with OSA (2857.36 ±1090.90 pg/ml vs
1359.12 ±740.64 pg/ml, p ¼0.001).
Regarding BMI, signicantly higher values were found in the
OSA group compared to the patients with CSA (BMI 38.5 ±7.1 v s
31.9 ±4.5; p ¼0.005).
No signicant difference was registered in the degree of severity
regarding sleep disorder. Comparison of AHI between the two
groups showed no difference (OSA 41.8 ±23.2 vs CSA 37.7 ±12.6;
p¼0.575). The data summary is presented in Table 1.
Standard heart failure therapy during the study period included
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor
blockers (ACEi or ARB), Sacubitril/Valsartan, beta blockers and di-
uretics. Patients in both groups were on standard heart failure
therapy. The percentage distribution is shown in Table 2. There was
no signicant difference in therapy between the two groups.
After conducting a correlation analysis, a strong negative cor-
relation was found between the number of central apnea events
(apneas and hypopneas) and the left ventricular ejection fraction
r¼0.52, p <0.001. The distribution and data are presented in
Fig. 1.
Simple linear regression was used to test if the left ventricular
ejection fraction signicantly predicted the number of central
apnea events. The overall regression was statistically signicant
(R
2
¼0.32, F(1, 59) ¼28.26, p <0.000). It was found that the left
ventricular ejection fraction signicantly predicted the number of
central apnea events (
b
¼-1.829, p <0.000).
A strong correlation was also found between BMI and the degree
of daytime sleepiness based on the ESS (r ¼0.649; p <0.001).
Simple linear regression was used. It was found that the BMI
signicantly predicted the ESS (
b
¼0.27, p <0.000).
No correlation was found between AHI and NTproBNP
(r ¼0.038; p ¼0.770).
Patients from both groups were followed up regarding rst
hospitalization for heart failure and mortality over a period of 24
months. Mortality in the OSA group for 2 years was 38% (n ¼19),
and 63.6% (n ¼7) in the CSA group.
First hospitalization in patients with CSA occurs signicantly
sooner than in patients with OSA. The average number of months
without hospitalization for HF in patients with CSA was 5.3 months
versus 12.8 months in patients with OSA (Log Rank (Mental-Cox)
p¼0.009). Refer to Fig. 2.
The OSA group had a median survival of 18.7 months versus
13.09 months in the CSA group. The data approached but did not
exceed the limit of signicance (p ¼0.063). The survival curve is
presented in Fig. 3.
4. Discussion
For the rst time in Bulgaria, a prospective cohort study is being
conducted on sleep apnea and exacerbated heart failure and over-
weight. In our study we found that 61% of tested patients have sleep
apnea. 82% (n ¼50) of patients had OSA, and 18% (n ¼11) had CSA.
On a global scale, a study on this topic was conducted by Schulz R
et al. [6]. Two hundred and three patients with exacerbated heart
failure were studied, of whom 145 (71%) had sleep apnea. The dis-
tribution of the OSA and CSA percentage is also at the expense of
OSA, without obesity being an inclusion criterion. The percentage of
patients with central sleep apnea in the study by Sin and coworkers
was signicantly higher which may be due to the larger number of
patients studied [7]. In 2017 Arzt M et al. performed an extensive
analysis of patients in the German registry SchlaHF for patients with
reduced systolic function. A high rate of CSA was also found in their
study [8]. The high repeatability of the data conrms the need to
screen heart failure patients for sleep apnea.
We found signicant differences between patients with
Table 1
Summary of demographic, echocardiographic and sleep parameters.
OSA group (n ¼50) CSA group (n ¼11) P Value
Age, yr 66.2 ±9,1 66.1 ±11.9 0.991
Sex, m% m 52% m 54% 0.878
ESS 12.1 ±2.9 10,6 ±3.2 0.144
LVEF, % 49.6 ±8.5 41.8 ±11.4 0.013
AHI 41.8 ±23.2 37.7 ±12.6 0.575
BMI 38.5 ±7.1 31.9 ±4.5 0.005
E/e'm 17.1 ±3.7 20.9 ±2.5 0.002
NTproBNP, pg/ml 1359.12 ±740.64 2857.36 ±1090.9 0.001
Av. Saturation, % 83.9 ±6.8 86.6 ±6.6 0.257
Low Saturation, % 65.3 ±12.7 67.6 ±12.8 0.590
Av. Pulse, bpm 75.5 ±11.1 76.4 ±11.7 0.825
Max. Pulse, bpm 131.1 ±42.5 121.4 ±51.2 0.511
N of Desaturation 381.1 ±212.6 397.5 ±184.4 0.813
Obstructive sleep apnea(OSA); Central sleep apnea(CSA); male %(m%); Epworth
Sleepiness Scale (ESS); Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI); The ration of the wave of early
diastolic lling of the mitral inow- E and the tissue Doppler velocity of the medial
mitral annulus-e'm(E/e'm); Left ventricular ejection fraction in %(LVEF%); N-Ter-
minal Fragment of the Prohormone Brain-Type Natriuretic Peptide e(NT-proBNP);
beats per minute (bpm).
P. Kalaydzhiev, N. Poroyliev, D. Somleva et al. Sleep Medicine: X 5 (2023) 100065
2
obstructive sleep apnea and those with central sleep apnea in terms
of ejection fraction and diastolic function. Decreased systolic
function, elevated NTproBNP values, and increased left ventricular
lling pressures, increase the risk of central apnea events. A
possible pathophysiological explanation for this phenomenon is
that patients with reduced systolic function also have a lower left
ventricular lling pressure, as well as increased pulmonary
pressure, which increases the risk of hyperventilation and Cheyne-
Stokes breathing during sleep [8,9]. We used linear regression
analysis to demonstrate the strong correlation between the
occurrence of central apneas and decreased systolic function. Left
ventricular ejection fraction has a signicant predictive value for
occurrence of Cheyne-Stokes breathing (R
2
¼0.32, F(1, 59) ¼28.26,
p<0.000).
BMI is a denite risk factor for both SA and heart failure [10,11].
Sin DD et al. studied 450 patients with congestive heart failure,
with obesity being the leading risk factor for concomitant sleep
disorder. Similar results were published by Lee SJ et al., who found a
strong correlation between BMI and daytime sleepiness (ESS) [12].
In our research, we also conrm this dependence.
To support the diagnosis of exacerbated heart failure, we addi-
tionally used NTproBNP tests. As expected, they were signicantly
higher in the CSA group, corresponding to the lower systolic
function in these patients. We found no correlation between AHI
and NTproBNP. A similar comparison was also conducted by Hüb-
ner RH et al. in the study of 60 patients with obstructive sleep
apnea and heart failure [13]. This shows us that NTproBNP can't
help us with the degree of severity of sleep apnea as well as its type.
In our study, we found that patients with central sleep apnea
had signicantly more frequent hospitalization for heart failure
than patients with obstructive sleep apnea (Log Rank (Mental-Cox)
p¼0.009) Fig. 2. This conclusion was also reached by Khayat R et al.
in their study [14]. Similar to us, they followed up patients with
exacerbated heart failure and sleep disorders, and rehospitalization
for heart failure in the CSA group was signicantly higher than that
in the OSA group. The lower systolic function and higher percent-
age of hospitalizations in the CSA group determines the worse
quality of life in these patients. Although both groups were on
standard heart failure therapy, lower systolic function in the CSA
Table 2
Distribution of used medications.
Medication OSA group (n ¼50) CSA group (n ¼11) P Value
Beta blockers (%) 92% 82% 0.294
ACEi or ARB or Sacubitril/Valsartan (%) 84% 64% 0.133
Mineralocorticoid blockers (%) 70% 82% 0.350
Loop and thiazide diuretics (%) 62% 82% 0.185
Obstructive sleep apnea(OSA); Central sleep apnea(CSA); angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).
Fig. 1. Correlation analysis of the relationship between ejection fraction and number of
central sleep apnea events. EF% - ejection fraction %.
Fig. 2. Survival Functions Kaplan-Meier method for time to rst hospitalization for
Heart Failure (HF) in months Obstructive sleep disease (OSD); Central sleep disease
(CSD).
Fig. 3. Survival Functions Kaplan-Meier method survival in months. Obstructive sleep
disease (OSD); Central sleep disease (CSD).
P. Kalaydzhiev, N. Poroyliev, D. Somleva et al. Sleep Medicine: X 5 (2023) 100065
3
group was an independent risk factor for higher rehospitalization
and higher mortality [15].
Mortality in the CSA group was higher, approaching but not
reaching signicance. In another of their publications, Khayat and
coworkers discuss the increased mortality rate in patients with CSA
and acute heart failure [16].
Timely diagnosis could help the addition of adjunctive therapy
to patients with sleep disorders and exacerbated heart failure,
which would improve the prognosis especially in patients with low
systolic function [17].
One of the major limiting factors in our study is the low number
of patients in the CSA group. Analyzing the cohort in more recruited
patients would allow the conclusions drawn to be conrmed or
rejected. Studies in this eld are highly limited due to the multi-
stage conduct of the studies, the hospitalization of the patients, and
the severe general condition of exacerbated symptoms of heart
failure. Globally, the main studies also have low numbers of
patients.
Due to economic constraints, continued positive airway pres-
sure (CPAP) therapy was not added to the patients with OSA, which
allowed the comparison between the two groups. Adding CPAP
therapy to the management of patients with OSA would undoubt-
edly improve the prognosis of these patients [18].
Since patient recruitment and follow-up, there have been sig-
nicant advances in heart failure therapy and the use of new classes
of medications such as SGLT2 inhibitors, which in our patients were
not included [19]. Which conrms the need for new studies in this
area.
5. Conclusion
Sleep apnea is a common comorbidity in patients with exacer-
bated heart failure and obesity. OSA occurs to a greater extent than
CSA. Patients with reduced systolic function are at higher risk of
central sleep apneas events. Low LVEF% can be used as a prognostic
factor regarding the occurrence of central sleep apnea events.
Controlling sleep apnea can reduce patient readmissions and
mortality. Large-scale, long-term randomized trials will be needed
to test the possibility of nding an effective therapy for central
sleep apnea would improve the prognosis of patients with exac-
erbated heart failure and overweight.
References
[1] Damy T, Margarit L, Noroc A, et al. Prognostic impact of sleep-disordered
breathing and its treatment with nocturnal ventilation for chronic heart
failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:1009e19.
[2] Tsai M, Khayat R. Sleep apnea in heart failure. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc
Med 2018 Mar 22;20(4):33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-018-0624-0.
[3] Kasai T. Sleep apnea and heart failure. J Cardiol 2012 Aug;60(2):78e85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.05.013.
[4] Drager LF, Togeiro SM, Polotsky VY, Lorenzi-Filho G. Obstructive sleep apnea:
a cardiometabolic risk in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2013;62(7):569e76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.045.
[5] Costanzo MR, Khayat R, Ponikowski P, et al. Mechanisms and clinical
consequences of untreated central sleep apnea in heart failure. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2015;65(1):72e84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.025.
[6] Schulz R, Blau A, B
orgel J, Duchna HW, Fietze I, Koper I, Prenzel R, Sch
adlich S,
Schmitt J, Tasci S. Andreas S; working group Kreislauf und Schlaf of the
German Sleep Society (DGSM). Sleep apnoea in heart failure. Eur Respir J 2007
Jun;29(6):1201e5. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00037106.
[7] Sin DD, Fitzgerald F, Parker JD, Newton G, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Risk factors for
central and obstructive sleep apnea in 450 men and women with congestive
heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999 Oct;160(4):1101e6. https://
doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9903020.
[8] Arzt M, Oldenburg O, Graml A, Erdmann E, Teschler H, Wegscheider K,
Suling A, Woehrle H, Investigators SchlaHF. Phenotyping of sleep-disordered
breathing in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection
fraction-the SchlaHF registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2017 Nov 29;6(12):e005899.
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005899.
[9] Ali Valika, Rosa Costanzo Maria. Sleep-Disordered breathing during congestive
heart failure: to intervene or not to intervene? Card Fail Rev 2017;3(2):134e9.
https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2017:7:1.
[10] Ramar K, Caples SM. Cardiovascular consequences of obese and nonobese
obstructive sleep apnea. Med Clin 2010 May;94(3):465e78. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.mcna.2010.02.003.
[11] Sin DD, Fitzgerald F, Parker JD, Newton G, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Risk factors for
central and obstructive sleep apnea in 450 men and women with congestive
heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999 Oct;160(4):1101e6. https://
doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9903020.
[12] Lee SJ, Kang HW, Lee LH. The relationship between the Epworth Sleepiness
Scale and polysomnographic parameters in obstructive sleep apnea patients.
Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2012 Apr;269(4):1143e7. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s00405-011-1808-3.
[13] Hübner RH, El Mokhtari NE, Freitag S, Rausche T, G
oder R, Tiroke A, Lins M,
Simon R, Bewig B. NT-proBNP is not elevated in patients with obstructive
sleep apnoea. Respir Med 2008 Jan;102(1):134e42. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.rmed.2007.07.023.
[14] Khayat R, Abraham W, Patt B, Brinkman V, Wannemacher J, Porter K,
Jarjoura D. Central sleep apnea is a predictor of cardiac readmission in hos-
pitalized patients with systolic heart failure. J Card Fail 2012 Jul;18(7):
534e40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.05.003.
[15] Angaran P, Dorian P, Ha ACT, Thavendiranathan P, Tsang W, Leong-Poi H,
Woo A, Dias B, Wang X, Austin PC, Lee DS. Association of left ventricular
ejection fraction with mortality and hospitalizations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr
2020 Jul;33(7):802e811.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.12.016.
[16] Khayat R, Jarjoura D, Porter K, Sow A, Wannemacher J, Dohar R, Pleister A,
Abraham WT. Sleep disordered breathing and post-discharge mortality in
patients with acute heart failure. Eur Heart J 2015 Jun 14;36(23):1463e9.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu522.
[17] Voigt Jeffrey, Emani Sitaramesh, Gupta Sanjaya, Germany Robin, Khayat Rami.
Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of therapies for patients with central
sleep apnea and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol
2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.011. S0002914920303799.
[18] Fox H, Bitter T, Sauzet O, Rudolph V, Oldenburg O. Automatic positive airway
pressure for obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection
fraction. Clin Res Cardiol 2021 Jul;110(7):983e92. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00392-020-01701-1.
[19] McDonagh Theresa A, Metra Marco, Adamo Marianna, Gardner Roy S,
Baumbach Andreas, B
ohm Michael, Burri Haran, Butler Javed,
Celutkien _
e Jelena, Chioncel Ovidiu, Cleland John GF, Coats Andrew JS, Crespo-
Leiro Maria G, Farmakis Dimitrios, Gilard Martine, Heymans Stephane,
Hoes Arno W, Jaarsma Tiny, Jankowska Ewa A, Lainscak Mitja, Lam Carolyn SP,
Alexander R Lyon, McMurray John JV, Mebazaa Alexandre, Mindham Richard,
Muneretto Claudio, Francesco Piepoli Massimo, Price Susanna,
Rosano Giuseppe MC, Frank Ruschitzka, Anne Kathrine Skibelund, ESC Sci-
entic Document Group. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of
acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis
and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of
Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association
(HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42(36):3599e726. https://doi.org/10.1093/
eurheartj/ehab368. 21 September 2021.
P. Kalaydzhiev, N. Poroyliev, D. Somleva et al. Sleep Medicine: X 5 (2023) 100065
4
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background Moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), and is associated with worsening cardiac function and increased mortality.Objectives The automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) trial tested the impact of APAP treatment on changes for the pre-specified endpoints: changes in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), percent-predicted peak VO2 and oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO2-AT).Methods This randomized, controlled pilot study included patients with chronic, stable HFrEF who had moderate-to-severe OSA. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either APAP (AutoSet™, ResMed) or nasal strips (control) for 6 months.Results76 patients have been randomized and 58 had complete data for final analysis. There was a statistically significant change in the APAP intervention arm for the primary endpoint percent-predicted peak VO2 in comparison to control (67 ± 17 to 73 ± 19%; p = 0.01). Additional primary endpoints peak VO2 and VO2-AT showed a trend in increase in the APAP group. Moreover, there were significant improvements within the APAP group for hypoxemia, left ventricular function and quality of life from baseline to 6 months, but not within the control group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively).ConclusionAPAP intervention was shown to significantly improve outcome compared to control group, represented in percent-predicted peak VO2, an established surrogate marker for cardiovascular prognosis in HFrEF. APAP has additional beneficial effects on hypoxemia, cardiac function and quality of life.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of review: In this review, we discuss the current treatment options for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure (HF). We address the role of positive airway pressure (PAP) devices and other emerging therapies. The review includes discussion of recent trials that reported negative consequences for the PAP devices in patients with heart failure. Recent findings: Optimal guideline-directed medical therapies of HF and PAP devices have been the mainstay treatments for HF patients with SDB. Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effect of PAP on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease and heart failure and found no benefit in decreasing fatal and non-fatal CV events. The Sleep Apnea Cardiovascular Endpoints (SAVE) trial evaluated continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation in patients with CV disease and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and did not observe any improvement in CV effect. In patients with HF and central sleep apnea (CSA), adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) was hypothesized to help HF outcomes, but the Adaptive Servo-Ventilation for Central Sleep Apnea in Systolic Heart Failure (SERVE-HF) trial did not show any mortality benefit. Instead, the trial suggested an increase in all-cause and CV mortality in the treatment arm. currently, studies have not shown the use of PAP therapy to improve any risks of CV outcomes or death in HF patients with sleep apnea, but some associations with improvements in symptoms from OSA have been observed.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Different sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) phenotypes, including coexisting obstructive and central sleep apnea (OSA-CSA), have not yet been characterized in a large sample of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving guideline-based therapies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the proportion of OSA, CSA, and OSA-CSA, as well as periodic breathing, in HFrEF patients with SDB. Methods and results: The German SchlaHF registry enrolled patients with HFrEF receiving guideline-based therapies, who underwent portable SDB monitoring. Polysomnography (n=2365) was performed in patients with suspected SDB. Type of SDB (OSA, CSA, or OSA-CSA), the occurrence of periodic breathing (proportion of Cheyne-Stokes respiration ≥20%), and blood gases were determined in 1557 HFrEF patients with confirmed SDB. OSA, OSA-CSA, and CSA were found in 29%, 40%, and 31% of patients, respectively; 41% showed periodic breathing. Characteristics differed significantly among SDB groups and in those with versus without periodic breathing. There was a relationship between greater proportions of CSA and the presence of periodic breathing. Risk factors for having CSA rather than OSA were male sex, older age, presence of atrial fibrillation, lower ejection fraction, and lower awake carbon dioxide pressure (pco2). Periodic breathing was more likely in men, patients with atrial fibrillation, older patients, and as left ventricular ejection fraction and awake pco2 decreased, and less likely as body mass index increased and minimum oxygen saturation decreased. Conclusions: SchlaHF data show that there is wide interindividual variability in the SDB phenotype of HFrEF patients, suggesting that individualized management is appropriate. Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01500759.
Article
Full-text available
Hospitalizations for heart failure are associated with a high post-discharge risk for mortality. Identification of modifiable predictors of post-discharge mortality during hospitalization may improve outcome. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is the most common co-morbidity in heart failure patients. Prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) in a single academic heart hospital. Between January 2007 and December 2010, all patients hospitalized with AHF who have left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% and were not already diagnosed with SDB were the target population. Patients underwent in-hospital attended polygraphy testing for SDB and were followed for a median of 3 years post-discharge. Mortality was recorded using national and state vital statistics databases. During the study period, 1117 hospitalized AHF patients underwent successful sleep testing. Three hundred and forty-four patients (31%) had central sleep apnoea (CSA), 525(47%) patients had obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and 248 had no or minimal SDB (nmSDB). Of those, 1096 patients survived to discharge and were included in the mortality analysis. Central sleep apnoea was independently associated with mortality. The multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for time to death for CSA vs. nmSDB was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.1, 2.4, P = 0.02). Obstructive sleep apnoea was also independently associated with mortality with a multivariable HR vs. nmSDB of 1.53 (CI: 1.1, 2.2, P = 0.02). The Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for the following covariates: LVEF, age, BMI, sex, race, creatinine, diabetes, type of cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, discharge systolic blood pressure <110, hypertension, discharge medications, initial length of stay, admission sodium, haemoglobin, and BUN. This is the largest study to date to evaluate the effect of SDB on post-discharge mortality in patients with AHF. Newly diagnosed CSA and OSA during AHF hospitalization are independently associated with post-discharge mortality. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Article
Full-text available
Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a highly prevalent, though often unrecognized, comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF). Data from HF population studies suggest that it may present in 30% to 50% of HF patients. CSA is recognized as an important contributor to the progression of HF and to HF-related morbidity and mortality. Over the past 2 decades, an expanding body of research has begun to shed light on the pathophysiologic mechanisms of CSA. Armed with this growing knowledge base, the sleep, respiratory, and cardiovascular research communities have been working to identify ways to treat CSA in HF with the ultimate goal of improving patient quality of life and clinical outcomes. In this paper, we examine the current state of knowledge about the mechanisms of CSA in HF and review emerging therapies for this disorder. Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Article
Sleep-disordered breathing is common in heart failure patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Central sleep apnea occurs more commonly in heart failure-reduced ejection fraction, and obstructive sleep apnea occurs more frequently in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Although the two types of sleep-disordered breathing have distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms, both contribute to abnormal cardiovascular consequences. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure has been well defined, whereas treatment strategies for central sleep apnea in heart failure continue to evolve. Unilateral transvenous neurostimulation has shown promise for the treatment of central sleep apnea. In this paper, we examine the current state of knowledge of treatment options for sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure.
Article
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an underdiagnosed condition characterized by recurrent episodes of obstruction of the upper airway leading to sleep fragmentation and intermittent hypoxia during sleep. Obesity predisposes to OSA and the prevalence of OSA is increasing worldwide, because of the ongoing epidemic of obesity. Recent evidence has shown that surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk including sympathetic activation, systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are significantly increased in obese patients with OSA versus those without OSA suggesting that OSA is not simply an epiphenomenon of obesity. Moreover, findings from animal models and patients with OSA demonstrate that intermittent hypoxia exacerbates the metabolic dysfunction of obesity augmenting insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. In patients with metabolic syndrome, the prevalence of moderate to severe OSA is very high (∼60%). In this population, OSA is independently associated with increased glucose and triglycerides levels as well as markers of inflammation, arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis. A recent randomized controlled cross-over study showed that effective treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for 3 months significantly reduced several components of the metabolic syndrome, including blood pressure, triglycerides and visceral fat. Finally, several cohort studies have consistently shown that OSA is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, independent of obesity. Taken together, these results support the concept that OSA exacerbates the cardiometabolic risk attributed to obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Recognition and treatment of OSA may decrease the cardiovascular risk in obese patients.
Article
Sleep apnea is frequently observed in patients with heart failure (HF). In general, sleep apnea consists of two types: obstructive and central sleep apnea (OSA and CSA, respectively). OSA results from upper airway collapse, whereas CSA arises from reductions in central respiratory drive. In patients with OSA, blood pressure is frequently elevated as a result of sympathetic nervous system overactivation. The generation of exaggerated negative intrathoracic pressure during obstructive apneas further increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, reduces cardiac output, and may promote the progression of HF. Intermittent hypoxia and post-apneic reoxygenation cause vascular endothelial damage and possibly atherosclerosis and consequently coronary artery disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy. CSA is also characterized by apnea, hypoxia, and increased sympathetic nervous activity and, when present in HF, is associated with increased risk of death. In patients with HF, abolition of coexisting OSA by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves LV function and may contribute to the improvement of long-term outcomes. Although treatment options of CSA vary compared with OSA treatment, CPAP and other types of positive airway ventilation improve LV function and may be a promising adjunctive therapy for HF patients with CSA. Since HF remains one of the major causes of mortality in the industrialized countries, the significance of identifying and managing sleep apnea should be more emphasized to prevent the development or progression of HF.
Article
Hospitalized heart failure patients have a high readmission rate. We sought to determine the independent risk due to central sleep apnea (CSA) of readmission in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). This was a prospective observational cohort study of hospitalized patients with SHF. Patients underwent sleep studies during their hospitalization and were followed for 6 months to determine their rate of cardiac readmissions; 784 consecutive patients were included; 165 patients had CSA and 139 had no sleep-disordered breathing (SDB); the remainder had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The rate ratio for 6 months' cardiac readmissions was 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2; P = .03) in CSA patients compared with no SDB. This rate ratio was adjusted for systolic function, type of cardiomyopathy, age, weight, sex, diabetes, coronary disease, length of stay, admission sodium, creatinine, hemoglobin, blood pressure, and discharge medications. Severe OSA was also an independent predictor of readmissions with an adjusted rate ratio of 1.49 (P = .04). In this first evaluation of the impact of SDB on cardiac readmissions in heart failure, CSA was an independent risk factor for 6 months' cardiac readmissions. The effect size of CSA exceeded that of all known predictors of heart failure readmissions.
Article
To determine whether severity patterns or nocturnal ventilation to treat sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with adverse outcomes. Although SDB is frequent during CHF, the relationships between SDB and CHF outcomes are unknown. A total of 384 CHF patients (82% men, mean age 59 ± 13 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤45% (mean LVEF 29 ± 9%) were assessed by polygraphy in our clinic between 2001 and 2009. Nocturnal ventilation was started according to the severity of SDB. Combined endpoints were death, heart transplant, and implant of a ventricular assist device. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), central sleep apnoea (CSA), and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) was 62, 26, and 29%, respectively. A primary endpoint occurred in 31%. Mean follow-up for survivors was 47 ± 25 months. Those with moderate [apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≤5-20/h] and severe SDB (AHI ≥20/h), and OSA and CSA, had poor prognoses compared with patients without SDB (P = 0.036, P = 0.003, respectively). A total of 31% of SDB patients were treated with nocturnal ventilation. Treated SDB had a better outcome than untreated severe SDB after adjustment for confounding factors [P = 0.031; hazard ratio (HR) 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.95]. Subgroup analysis that included only OSA showed a similar result after adjustment (P = 0.017; HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.95). In CHF, SDB is associated with a poor prognosis whatever the SDB pattern, and nocturnal ventilation is associated with a better outcome.