Many different studies have described patterns of wildlife use in the Amazon region, but few have focused on native communities in the Vaupes department (Colombia), in areas distant from urban centers. This distant communities are often misunderstood or not properly considered in wild life legal framework, government interventions, and discussions concerning biodiversity conservation strategies in their territories. This ends up creating a significant hole in the development of a holistic body of knowledge around biodiversity conservation, which includes the special knowledge indigenous people hold about it. ¿Who is hunting wildlife in this tribes, what are their traditional and socioeconomic realities, what species are they interested in and what places are they visiting for collecting
them?. The results presented here, are originated in the analysis of data gathered during 6 months by experienced
indigenous wildlife users, applying different participatory methods and techniques. They describe the patterns of wild
fauna consumption by Yapu multiethnic community in Vaupes. The description of the use of wild fauna was organized
according to three components: species, users and spaces. Each one was considered as a subset composed by a group of variables; frequency of capture, biomass, seasonality for species subset; hunters economic activity, ethnic group, type of community roles, for users subset, and for the spaces subset: identification of the harvested place, distance to the community, and type of fauna obtained from it. Through a local agreement between the author and the indigenous community, a participatory research imbedded in the community’s priorities was created. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, workshops, field trips, and daily hunting reports from 12 experienced local users,
complemented with constant participant observation of social spaces of the community such as the elder’s council, traditional ceremonies, daily activities with the general community and classwork with local school students. A total of 12,772 organisms (6,976 insects) were registered and classified in 82 species of wild fauna; 32 fish species, 22 mammals, 12 insects, 12 birds, 2 reptile, and 2 amphibian species. Biomass input to the community for the six months studied summed up 2001.8 kg (37.7 kg of insects), fish being the most frequently captured group, opposite to birds and amphibians, reported as the less hunted groups. Variation in biomass, species preference, and hunting places
among hunters, are mainly explained by ethnic distribution of hunting areas, related to community roles, and family history. Streams are the most visited hunting places, representing a priority space for hunters when looking for wild fauna as food resources. An importance index for species is analyzed using biomass, number of specimens captured and their month persistence in reports. Besides from presenting the special features of the systems of wildlife use in Yapu, this study includes a local comparison with other wild life consumption studies in Colombia.