The discovery of corporatism and its successes in the 1980s fueled a “growth indus try” for comparative political economy. By the early 1990s, its decline and even collapse shifted the terms of debate. Whereas initially interest was sparked by the need to investigate corporatist success, the new focus centered on the causes and consequences of corporatism’s seeming demise. The analysis of Swedish political economy is paradigmatic of this shift. In the 1970s, Sweden embodied the model corporatist country. Its highly centralized bar gaining between densely representative organizations of labor and capital was encouraged by government, which used social and economic policies to underpin and facilitate such arrangements. The outcomes were apparently beneficial for all concerned: the economy was efficient, as indicated by Swedish competitive success internationally, but also relatively equitable, as evidenced by the country’s record of redistribution.