The genus Neopelma Sclater, 1860 contains five species of manakins found in humid tropical forests east of the Andes in South America. All five are cryptic in plumage and morphology. Neopelma chrysolophum Pinto, 1944 of SE Brazilian montane Atlantic Forests is so similar in appearance to the elevationally parapatric (Whitney et al. 1995) N. aurifrons Wied-Neuwied, 1831 occurring in lowland Atlantic Forest further north, that it was originally suggested to be a subspecies of the latter (Pinto 1944). In an examination of vocal data and habitat preference as well as morphology, Whitney et al. (1995) proposed that the genus Neopelma as currently defined is not monophyletic and hypothesized that N. aurifrons would be most closely related to the two species in Tyranneutes Sclater & Salvin, 1881. Capurucho et al. (2018) investigated the relationships in Neopelma and Tyranneutes and found that Neopelma was indeed paraphyletic. Their phylogenetic analysis indicated that Tyranneutes is nested within Neopelma, and that N. chrysolophum is sister to a clade containing Tyranneutes and the remainder of Neopelma. However, Capurucho et al. (2018) did not include N. aurifrons in their study and were therefore unable to conclusively settle on a proper taxonomic arrangement of the group. Capurucho et al. (2018) hypothesized that N. aurifrons would be sister to N. chrysolophum, based on biogeographical patterns and elevational replacement of N. aurifrons by N. chrysolophum. Harvey et al. (2020) included all species-level taxa of both Neopelma and Tyranneutes. Their topology was consistent with that of Capurucho et al. (2018), with Neopelma paraphyletic with respect to Tyranneutes. However, they found that Neopelma aurifrons is not sister to N. chrysolophum but instead represents the earliest divergence within the remaining Neopelma after the split with Tyranneutes. The paraphyly of Neopelma combined with the availability of information on all members of the genus provides an opportunity to revise taxonomy to better reflect evolutionary history. Tyranneutes is characterized by diminutive size, proportionally short tails, and differently structured vocalizations relative to Neopelma sensu lato (see below). They also prefer taller, more mature and more humid forest in general than Neopelma (Whitney et al. 1995). The two species of Tyranneutes are a morphologically, vocally, and ecologically coherent group, so we prefer to maintain them in a genus separate from other members of the complex. Resolving paraphyly therefore requires placement of Neopelma in two genera. Because aurifrons is the type species of Neopelma, a new genus name is required for N. chrysolophum: