ChapterPDF Available

Chapter 7 SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA REGION INSECT FAUNA III (ORDER LEPIDOPTERA II: SUPERFAMILIES Papilionoidea, Pyraloidea, Tineoidea, Yponomeutoidea, Tortricoidea, Zygaenoidea) OF TURKEY

Authors:
Chapter 7
SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA REGION INSECT
FAUNA III (ORDER LEPIDOPTERA II:
SUPERFAMILIES Papilionoidea, Pyraloidea,
Tineoidea, Yponomeutoidea, Tortricoidea,
Zygaenoidea) OF TURKEY
Hall BOLU1
1 Assoc. Dr./ Dcle Unversty, Faculty of Agrculture, Department of Plant Protecton, TR 21280/
besn@dcle.edu.tr, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5488-0056
100 .Halil Bolu
Introduction
Insects (Insecta) are the most numerous group of animals in the world,
with over one million species that have been described (Price, 1997). Insects
are dicult to study because they represent the most species-rich, yet one of
the least known, of all taxa of living organisms, a problem that is compounded
by a dearth of skilled entomologists. Although the number of described
insect species is uncertain due to synonyms and the lack of a global list, most
authorities recognize 900 000-1 000 000 named morpho-species, representing
56% of all species known on Earth (Groombridge, 1992; Anonymous, 2003).
Sensible estimates of the number of insects yet to be discovered range from
another 1 million to 30 million species (Erwin, 1982-1991), although most
predict around 2-8 million more species (May, 1990; Gaston, 1991; Stork, 1997;
Ødegaard, 2000). Conservative estimates suggest that 50-90% of the existing
insect species on Earth have still to be discovered, yet the named insects alone
comprise more than half of all known species of organism.
Insects constitute the most diverse form of animal life in terrestrial
ecosystems. Most species are innocuous and essential components of natural
ecosystems. Because they are cold-blooded, the rates of key physiological
processes in their life cycles are determined by environmental conditions,
especial ly temperature and precipitation. In general, they have short generation
times, high fecundity and high mobility (Moore & Allard 2008).
About 150,000 species of living Lepidoptera have been described in
approximately 124 families. At the species level, this is about 17% of the
world’s known insect fauna. However, estimates suggest that there may be
two or three times this number of species in the order.
e order Lepidoptera is divided into two as diurnal butteries (Rhopalocera)
and noctiurnal butteries (Moths) (Heterocera). e antennae of the former
are of the knob type; frenulum (bristle or bristles located at the bottom of the
anterior edge of the second wing) is absent; the body is thin; they y during the
day. In the latter, the antenna is of dierent shapes; there is a frenulum; the body
is thickly built; they y at night. However, many systematists nd it correct to
divide Lepidoptera into 2 suborders, called Frenatae and Jugatae. In the Jugatae,
the veining of both pairs of wings is similar and the wings are joined to each other
by a small protrusion (Jugum). In Frenatae, the hind wings are smaller and less
veined, and the two wings are joined to each other only by the frenulum, or they
are attached to each other by the enlarged bottom of the hindwing.
Lepidoptera species utilize all parts of plants roots, trunk, bark, branches,
twigs, leaves, buds, owers, fruits, seeds, galls and fallen material. Larvae
feeding in concealed situations wood borers, leaf and bark miners, casebearers,
leaf tiers and leaf rollers usually belong to more primitive families; exposed
feeders, especially those that feed by day, are from more recent lineages.
. 101
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Butteries and moths play an important role in the natural ecosystem
as pollinators and as food in the food chain; conversely, their larvae are
considered very problematic to vegetation in agriculture, as their main source
of food is oen live plant matter.
Turkey in fact seems to be like a small continent in terms of biological
diversity. Despite the Anatolia is not a continent alone, it contains all
properties of a continent that should have an ecosystem and habitat. Each of
seven geographical regions in Turkey has a distinguishable climate, ora and
fauna.
is study aims to determine insect species found in various ecologies on
Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey.
Material and Methods
Entomology studies on insect species of Southeastern Anatolia Region
(Adıyaman, Batman, Gaziantep, Diyarbakır, Mardin, Siirt, Şanlıurfa, Şırnak)
in dierent ecological provinces were made between the years 1948-2020
(Fig u re 1).
Fgure 1. Samplng localtes n the Southeastern Anatola Regon of Turkey.
In this study, I prepared for the inventory has reached the major advantage
of the waterways:
-Currently in Turkey, published or unpublished entomology journals
related to scanning,
-Giving more weight to faunistic studies, and in the meantime, the insect
fauna of our country foreign scientic journals that publishes articles about
scanning,
102 .Halil Bolu
-Faculty of Agriculture, Faculty of Science and Regional Plant Protection
Research Institute in the library of books on insect fauna and the screening
of the booklet,
-e doctorate (PhD) and the master’s thesis of entomology in the region
on the scanning,
-Review of other studies on the insect fauna in the area.
In this study, I evaluated the information as described above were
obtained.
It is also the addition of my current research and observations.
Results and Discussion
Surveys on insect species in various ecologies have been conducted in
the provinces (Adıyaman, Batman, Gaziantep, Diyarbakır, Mardin, Siirt,
Şanlıurfa, Şırnak) of Southeastern Anatolia region between the years 1948-
2020. Almost 2600 species and subspecies almost 180 families belonging to
13 insect orders are dened owing to these studies. In this study: 34 species
belonging to 4 superfamilies in the order Lepidoptera were determined.
Species are given in systematic order. In addition, information was given
about the distribution of Lepidoptera species in the Southeastern Anatolia
Region and their host plants.
ORDER Lepidoptera
SUPERFAMILY Papilionoidea Latreille, 1802
FAMILY Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809
Carcharodus alceae (Esper, 1780)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
. 103
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Fgure 2. Dorsal (a), ventral (b), and lateral (c) vew of the adult stage of Carcharodus
alceae.
FAMILY Lycaenidae Leach, 1815
Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus, 1767)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 3. Dorsal (a), and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Lampdes boetcus.
104 .Halil Bolu
Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 4. Dorsal (a), and ventral (b) vew of the adult (female) stage of Lycaena
phlaeas.
Nordmannia acaciae (Fabricius)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbar, Southeastern Anatolian
Region, Host plant: Almond (Maçan, 1986; Bolu et al., 2005a-b; Bolu & Çınar,
2005; Bolu et al., 2011).
Fgure 5. Larva (a), prepupae (b) and the adult stage (c) (lateral vew) of Nordmanna
acacae.
. 105
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Fgure 6. Adult stage (dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew) of Nordmanna acacae.
Polyommatus coridon (Poda, 1761)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 7. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Polyommatus cordon.
Polyommatus agestis (Denis & Schiermüller, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
106 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 8. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (male) of Polyommatus
agests.
Fgure 9. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (female) of Polyommatus
agests.
FAMILY Nymphalidae Ranesque, 1815
Argynnis pandora (Denis & Schiermüller, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 10. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Argynns pandora.
. 107
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Chazara briseis Linnaeus, 1764
Distribution of the studies area: Mardin, Ho st plant: A lmond (Recorded
by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 11. Dorsal (a) and ventral (a) vew of the adult stage (male) of Chazara brses.
Hipparchia (Neohipparchia) parisatis (Kollar, [1849])
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 12. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (male) of Hpparcha
parsats.
Hipparchia statilinus Hufnagel, 1766
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
108 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 13. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (male) of Hpparcha
statlnus.
Hyponephele lycaon (Rottemburg, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 14. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of male ndvdual of Hyponephele lycaon.
Fgure 15. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of female ndvdual of Hyponephele lycaon.
. 109
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1764)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 16. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (male) of Coenonympha
tulla.
Issoria lathonia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 17. Dorsal (top) and ventral (bottom) vew of male (a) and female (b)
ndvduals of Issora lathona.
110 .Halil Bolu
Kirinia roxelana (Cramer, 1777)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 18. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (Male) of Krna roxelana.
Melanargia galathea (Linnaeus, 1758) larissa
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 19. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Melanarga galathea.
. 111
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Polygonia egea (Cramer, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds (Aydın,
2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 20. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (Male) of Polygona egea.
Vanessa atalanta (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: D iya rba k ır, Ho st plant: Plum (Recorded
by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 21. e adult stage of Vanessa atalanta on the plum tree.
Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbar, Southeastern Anatolian
Region, Host plant: Weed s (Karaat et al., 1986; Aydın, 2012; Recorded by
Halil Bolu).
112 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 22. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Vanessa cardu.
FAMILY Papilionidae Latreille, 1802
Archon apollinus (Herbst, 1789)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 23. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of female (top) and male (bottom)
ndvduals of Archon apollnus.
. 113
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Iphiclides podalirius Linnaeus, 1758
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Almond
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 24. Ventral (a) and Dorsal (b) vew of male ndvdual of Iphcldes podalrus.
Fgure 25. Dorsal vew of the adult stage and larval stage of Iphcldes podalrus.
Papilio machaon Linnaeus, 1758
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
114 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 26. Dorsal vew of the adult stage (female) of Paplo machaon.
Zerynthia cerisy (Godart, 1824)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 27. Dorsal (a), and ventral vew of the adult stage of Zeryntha cersy.
Zerynthia polyxena (Denis & Schiermüller, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Aristolochia
rotunda (Polaszek et al., 2022).
. 115
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Fgure 28. Adult [dorsal (a), ventral (b)], larval (c) and pupal (d) stage of Zeryntha
polyxena.
FAMILY Pieridae Swainson, 1820
Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Almond (Bolu
et al., 2005a-b; Bolu & Çınar, 2005; Aydın, 2012).
Fgure 29. Male (top-bottom) and female (mddle) ndvduals of Apora crataeg.
116 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 30. Larva (a), prepupa (b), and pupa (c) stage of Apora crataeg.
Colias croceus (Georoy, 1785)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 31. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Colas croceus [male
(top) and female (m./b.)]. Polymorphsm of C. croceus (C.c.f. croceus (1,2), C.c.f. helce
(3)).
. 117
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Euchloe ausonides (Lucas, 1852)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 32. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Euchloe ausondes.
Pieris brassicae Linnaeus, 1758
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Cabbage
(Aydın, 2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 33. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage (female) of Pers
brasscae.
Pieris rapae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Cabbage
(Aydın, 2012; Recorded by Halil Bolu).
118 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 34. Larva stage (a); lateral (b) and dorsal (c) vew of the adult stage of Pers
rapae.
Pontia edusa Fabricius, 1777
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
. 119
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Fgure 35. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of male (top) and female (bottom)
ndvduals of Ponta edusa.
SUPERFAMILY Pyraloidea Latreille, 1809
FAMILY Pyralidae Latreille, 1809
Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller, 1879)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Siirt, Şanlıurfa, Host plant:
Determined in warehouses and factories (Ergül et al., 1972).
Ancylolomia tentaculella (Hübner, 1796)
Distribution of the studies area: Şanlıurfa, Host plant: Gramineae,
(Ünlü et al., 1995).
Cynaeda dentalis (Denis & Schiermüller, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Şanlıurfa, Host plant:Unknown (Ün
et al., 1995).
Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Zeller, 1839)
Distribution of the studies area: Şanlıurfa, Host plant: Pomegranate
(Mart & Kılınçer, 1993).
Nymphula nymphaeata Linnaeus, 1758
120 .Halil Bolu
Distribution of the studies area: Şanlıurfa, Host plant: Potamogeton sp.,
Hydrocharis morsus-ranae (Ünlü et al., 1995).
Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner, 1796)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Mardin, Şanlıurfa, Host
plant: Maize (Gözüaçık & Mart, 2005).
Plodia interpunctella (Hübner, [1813])
Distribution of the studies area: Adıyaman, Diyarbakır, Siirt, Şanlıurfa,
Host plant: Determined in warehouses and factories (Ergül et al., 1972).
SUPERFAMILY Tineoidea Latreille, 1810
FAMILY Psychidae Boisduval, 1829
Amicta oberthuri Hey.
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Şanlıurfa, Host plant:
Barley, Chickpeas, Lentils, Melon, Watermelon, Wheat, (Türkmen, 1987).
FAMILY Tineidae Latreille, 1810
Kermania pistaciella Amsel, 1964 (Oinophilidae)
Distribution of the studies area: Adıyaman, Batman, Diyarbakır,
Gaziantep, Mardin, Siirt, Şanlıurfa, Host plant: Pistachio (Küçükarslan,
1966; Günaydın, 1978; Bolu, 2002; Bolu et al., 2005b; Şimşek & Bolu, 2017;
Bolu, 2020).
SUPERFAMILY Tortricoidea Latreille, 1802
FAMILY Tortricidae Latreille, 1802
Archips rosana (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Mardin, Host plant: Cherry (Çınar et
al., 2004; Bolu et al., 2005a-b).
Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Şanlıurfa, Host plant: Apple,
Pomegranate (Mart & Altın, 1992; Bolu et al., 2005b).
Grapholita janthinana (Duponchel, 1843)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarba r, Host plant: Almond, Apple
(Maçan & Maçan, 1987; Bolu et al., 2005a-b; Bolu & Çınar, 2005).
Hedya nubiferana Haworth, 1811
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Almond (Bolu
et al., 2005a-b; Bolu & Çınar, 2005).
. 121
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiermüller, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Adıyaman, Diyarbakır, Host plant:
Vineyard (Maçan, 1984).
Polychrosis botrana Schi
Distribution of the studies area: Gaziantep, Host plant: Vineyard
(Sipahi, 1957).
SUPERFAMILY Yponomeutoidea Stephens, 1829
FAMILY Yponomeutidae Stephens, 1829
Prays oleae Bernard, 1788
Distribution of the studies area: Mardin, Host plant: Olive (Kaplan et
al., 2011).
Ypsolopha persicella (Fabricius, 1787)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Almond (Bolu
et al., 2005b; Bolu & Çınar, 2005).
SUPERFAMILY Zygaenoidea Latreille, 1809
FAMILY Zygaenidae Latreille, 1809
Adscita statices (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
122 .Halil Bolu
Fgure 36. Dorsal (a) and ventral (b) vew of the adult stage of Adscta statces.
eresimima ampelophaga (Bayle-Barelle, 1809)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Vineyard
(Maçan, 1984).
Zygaena loti (Denis & Schiermüller, 1775)
Distribution of the studies area: Diyarbakır, Host plant: Weeds
(Recorded by Halil Bolu).
Fgure 37. e adult stage of Zygaena lot.
As a result, Southeastern Anatolia Region is a region bordering with
neighboring countries. erefore, it is a region rich in ora and fauna. It is
necessary to protect and record this biodiversity. However, the random and
uncontrolled entry of plant production materials from neighboring countries
into the region creates negative eects in terms of “Plant Protection”. In
order to preserve the natural diversity and balance, quarantine rules must be
carefully followed when planting materials are brought into the country by
citizens or by import.
. 123
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
REFERANCES
Anonymous, (2003). Measurng bodversty for conservaton. e Royal Socety,.
London, England. 65 p.
Aydın, M. (2012). Sarım Çayı Vads (Kulp) Paplonodea Ve Hesperodea (Lepdop-
tera) Faunası Ve Ekolojs Üzerne Araştırmalar. T.C. Yüzüncü Yıl Ünverstes,
Fen Blmler Ensttüsü, Byoloj Anablm Dalı, Yüksek Lsans Tez, Van, S: 87.
Bolu, H. (2002). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölges Antepfıstığı Alanlarındak Böcek ve
Akar Faunasının Saptanması. Turk. entomol. derg., 26 (3): 197-208.
Bolu, H., Özgen, I. & Çınar, M. (2005a). Domnancy of Insect Famles and Speces Re-
corded n Almond Orchards of Turkey. Acta Phytopathologca et Entomologca
Hungarca, 40 (1-2): 145-157.
Bolu, H., Yücel, A. & Ayaz, T. (2005b). GAP İller Meyve Ağaçlarında Zararlı Lep-
doptera Türler Üzernde Br Değerlendrme. GAP IV. Tarım Kongres 2. 21-23
Eylül, Şanlıurfa, S: 1360-1365.
Bolu, H. & Çınar, M. (2005). Elazığ, Dyarbakır ve Mardn İller Badem Ağaçlarında
Zararlı Olan Lepdoptera Türler, Doğal Düşmanları ve Önemller Üzernde
Gözlemler. HR.Ü.Z.F.Dergs, 9 (2): 63-67.
Bolu, H., Özgen, İ. & Ayaz, T. (2011). GAP İller Badem Ağaçlarında Zararlı Böcek
Türler Üzernde Br Değerlendrme. Türkye IV. Btk Koruma Kongres, 28-30
Hazran, Kahramanmaraş, S: 295.
Bolu, H. (2020). Populaton development of Twg Borer Moth, Kermana pstacella
Amsel, 1964 (Lepdoptera: Onophldae) and ts Pupae Parastod Mcroche-
lonus fssls Tobas, 1964 (Hymenoptera: Bracondae) on Pstacho n Turkey.
Internatonal Journal of Innovatve Engneerng Applcatons, 4 (2): 91-95.
Çınar, M., Çmen, İ. & Bolu, H. (2004). Elazığ ve Mardn İller Kraz Ağaçlarında Za-
rarlı Olan Türler, Doğal Düşmanları ve Önemller Üzernde Gözlemler. Türk.
entomol. derg., 28(3): 213-220.
Ergül, C., Dörtbudak, N. & Akülke, A. (1972). Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesn-
dek Hububat ve Mamuller le Baklyat Anbar Zararlılarının Yayılışı ve Zararı
Üzernde Araştırmalar. Btk Koruma Bülten, 12 (2): 129-143.
Erwn, T.L. (1982). Tropcal forests: ther rchness n Coleoptera and other arthropod
speces. Coleoptersts Bulletn, 36: 74-75.
Erwn, T.L. (1991). How many speces are there? Revsted Conservaton Bology, 5:
1-4.
Gaston, K.J. (1991). e magntude of global nsect speces rchness. Conservaton
Bology, 5: 283-296.
Gözüaçık, C. & Mart, C. (2005). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesnde Mısırda Zararlı Le-
pdoptera Türler, Yoğunluk ve Yayılışlarının Belrlenmes Üzernde Çalışma-
lar. Harran Ünverstes Zraat Fakültes Dergs, Clt: 9, No: 4, S: 11-16.
124 .Halil Bolu
Groombrdge, B. (ed.) (1992). Global Bodversty: Status of the Earth’s Lvng Resour-
ces. Chapman and Hall, London, 585 pp.
Günaydın, T. (1978). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesnde Antepfıklarında Zarar Yapan
Böcek Türler, Tanınmaları, Yayılışları ve Ekonomk Önemler Üzernde Araş-
tırmalar. Bölge Zra Mücadele Araştırma Ensttüsü, E.Ü. Zraat Fakültes, Btk
Koruma Bölümü, Uzmanlık Tez, S: 106.
Holland, W.J. (1951). e Buttery Book. Doubleday & Company, Inc. Garden Cty,
New York, 425 pp.
Kaplan, C., Büyük, M. & Eren, S. (2011). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölges zeytn bahçele-
rnde saptanan zararlı ve faydalı böcek türlerler. Btk Koruma Bülten, 51(3):
267-275.
Karaat, Ş.,Göven, M.A. & Mart, C. (1986). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesnde Bazı Ya-
bancı Otların Zararına Yaşayan Böcek Türler Üzernde İlk İncelemeler. Türk-
ye I. Byolojk Mücadele Kongres Bldrler, 12-14 Şubat, Adana, S: 186.
Küçükarslan, N. (1966). Antepfıstıklarında Zarar Yapan Fıstık Dal Güves (Kermana
pstacella Amsel.) (Lepdoptera; Onophldae)’nn Byolojs ve Savaşı Üzern-
de İncelemeler. Sabr A. Ş. Basımev. İstanbul, S: 64.
Maçan, S. (1984). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesnde Bağlarda Zarar Yapan Böcek Tür-
ler, Önemllernn Tanınmaları, Yayılışları ve Ekonomk Önemler Üzernde
İncelemeler. Tarım Orman ve Köyşler Bakanlığı, Zra Mücadele ve Zra Ka-
rantna Genel Müdürlüğü, Dyarbakır Bölge Zra Mücadele Araştırma Enst-
tüsü Müdürlüğü, Araştırma Eserler, No: 3, S: 47.
Maçan, G. (1986). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölges’nde Bademlerde Zarar Yapan Böcek
Türler, Önemllernn Tanınmaları, Yayılışları ve Ekonomk Önemler Üzern-
de Araştırmalar. Tarım ve Köyşler Bakanlığı Dyarbakır Bölge Zra Mücadele
Araştırma Ensttüsü Müdürlüğü Araştırma Eserler Sers, No: 5, S: 82.
Mart, C. & Altın, M. (1992). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölges Nar Alanlarında Belrlenen Bö-
cek ve Akar türler. Türkye II Entomoloj Kongres, 28-31 Ocak 1992, S: 725-731.
Mart, C. & Kılınçer, N. (1993). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesnde Narlarda Zararlı Ec-
tomyelos cerotonae Zeller (Lep: Pyraldae) (Harnup Güves)’nn Populasyon
Değşm ve Döl Sayısı. Türk. Entomol. Derg., 17(4): 209-216.
May, R. M. (1990). How many speces? Phlosophcal Transactons of the Royal Socety
B, 330: 292-304.
Moore, B. & Allard, G. (2008). Clmate change mpacts on forest health. Forest Health
and Bosecurty Workng Paper FBS/34E. Rome, FAO.
Polaszek, A., Rugman-Jones, P. Çelk, H. & Bolu, H. (2022). Addtons to the knowle-
dge of Trchogramma from Turkey (Hymenoptera: Trchogrammatdae), wth
descrpton of a new speces. Zoology n the Mddle East, 68 (4): 341-349.
Prce, P.W. (1997). Insect Ecology. John Wley & Sons Inc. New York, 874 p.
Ødegaard, F. (2000). How many speces of arthropods? Erwn’s estmate revsed. Bo-
logcal Journal of the Lnnean Socety, 71: 583-597.
. 125
International eory, Research and Reviews in Agriculture, Forestry and Aquaculture Sciences
Spah, R. (1957). Idocerus stal Feb. ve Polychross botrana Sch. Yaşayışı ve Mücade-
les. Teknk Enformasyon Servs, Ege Matbaası, Ankara, S: 8.
Stork, N. (1997). How many speces are there? Bodversty and Conservaton, 2: 215-
232.
Şmşek, A. & Bolu, H. (2017). Dyarbakır İl antepfıstığı (Pstacae vera L.) bahçelern-
dek zararlı böcek faunasının belrlenmes. D.Ü. Fen Blmler Ensttüsü Derg-
s, 6 (2): 43-58.
Türkmen, Ş. (1987). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesnde Yer Br Baklagl Zararlısı (Am-
cta oberhur Hey. ) (Lepdoptera: Psychdae) Türkye I. Entomoloj Kongres
Bldrler, 13-16 Ekm, İzmr, S: 239-248.
Ünlü, L. Yücel, A. & Kornoşor, S. (1995). Şanlıurfa İlnde Heterocera (Lepdoptera)
Türler Üzernde Çalışmalar. GAP Bölges, Btk Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerler
Sempozyumu Bldrler, 27-29 Nsan, Şanlıurfa/Türkye, S: 191-206.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
New country and host records of Trichogramma species for Turkey are presented. Trichogramma aurosum Sugonjaev & Sorokina is recorded for the first time from Turkey, and a new species, T. zerynthiae Polaszek & Bolu, is described. Morphological identification based on dissected male genitalia is supplemented by molecular sequence data. http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9CFF5E39-F1D2-42FB-86B8FC8475EC3560
Article
Full-text available
This study was carried out to determine the harmful species for pistachio orchards between 2010 and 2011 in Diyarbakır province. In order to determine the harmful species the beating method and monitoring methods were used. At the end of study 46 harmful species belonging to 22 families in 4 orders, were found. Surveys were done by periods of 10 days between months April-October. Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt & Lauterer (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Anapulvinaria pistaciae Bodenheimer, Eulecanium rugulosum Ashmead (Hemiptera: Coccidae), Kermania pistaciella Amsel (Lepidoptera: Oinophilidae), Chaetoptelius (Hylesinus) vestitus Mulsant & Rey (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Suturaspis pistaciae Lindinger (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and Eurytoma plotnikovi Nikolskaya (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) of the harmful insect species were recorded as important pests according to their density and widespread presence. Psylliodes anatolica Gök & Çilbiroğlu, Aphthona atrocaerulea Stephens, Epitrix hirtipennis Melsheimer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Anthaxia tractata Abeille, Agrilus roscidus Kiesenwetter (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), Aphthona flaviceps Allard, Longitarsus ochroleucus Marsham (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) were the first records for pistachio in Turkey
Article
Full-text available
The cherry pests, their natural enemies and observations on some important species in Elazığ and Mardin provinces of Turkey This study was carried out in the cherry orchards in Elazığ and Mardin provices in 2001-2002. A total of 36 pests on cherry trees and 15 predators with 2 parasitoids, feeding on them were determined in this study. Five economical pests, Stephanitis pyri (Fabricius), Myzus cerasi (F.), Archips rosanus (L.), Capnodis tenebrionis (L.) and Scolytus rugulosus (Müller) were also observed. In addition, the predators, Coccinella semptempunctata L., Synharmonia conglobata (L.), Metasyrphus corollae (Fabricius), Chrysoperla carnea Stephens, Scolothrips longicornis (Priesner) being the most encountered were observed in this province as well.
Article
Full-text available
Investigations on the fauna of insects and mites in pistachio areas in South Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey The present study were done in order to obtain basic information on integrated pest management of pistachio harmful and mites found in pistachio plantations and population fluctuations of the significant species were determined. This study was conducted in Adıyaman, Batman, Mardin, Siirt and Şanlıurfa cities where are located in Southeastern Anatolia Region. As a result 70 harmful insects species belonging to 33 different families, 7 different orders and 3 harmful mites species from 3 different families and also 47 beneficial insects species were found in the sampled pistachio areas. It was observed that 8 economical pests. Those species were Kermania pistaciella Ams., Sulamicerus (Idocerunus) stali (Fieb.), Suturaspis pistaciae Lind., Chaetoptelius vestitus M.-R., Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt and Lauterer, Pistaciaspis pistaciae Arch., Megastigmus pistaciae Walk., Capnodis cariosa Pall.
Article
Full-text available
This study was carried out first in main crop and second maize fields in order to determine the lepidopterous pests and their ditribution and density in Adıyaman, Batman, Diyarbakır, Mardin and Şanlıurfa provinces in South-east Anatolia in 2002-2003. Sesamia cretica Led., S. nonagrioides (Lef.), Spodoptera exigua (Hübner), Acantholeucania loreyi (Duponchel), Agrotis ipsilon Hufnagel, A. segetum (Schiff)., Helicoverpa sp., and Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) were found to be pest of maize.
Article
Full-text available
This study which is entitled the insect fauna of Southeastern and Eastern Anatolia Regions was carried out during 2002-2004. Samples were taken from the orchards in Diyarbakir, Elazig and Mardin provinces by employing methods such as striking, burlap band traps, and visual examinations of leaves, twigs and other parts of the trees. Trees selected for sampling were inspected once week between March and November. Generally eudominant were the order Coleoptera and Heteroptera. Dominant were only the imagoes order Homoptera and subdominant were Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. The rest 6 orders were subrecedent. As result of this study 205 species spread areas and abundance belonging to 56 families in 11 orders were determined. 205 insects species which were determined in three administrative provinces and on only a culture plant are very important for insects potential in almond areas with this study. This study is very important to be a base to integred pest management studies which will be made in the future.
Article
Full-text available
This study was carried out the whole almond orchards in Elazig, Diyarbakir and Mardin provinces between 2002-2004. It was determined 16 lepidopter species on almond trees and their 11 parasitoids. It was observed that 8 economical harmful lepidopter species; Recurvaria nanella (Denis & Schiffermüller), Gnopharmia stevenaria (Boisduval), Nychiodes amygdalaria (Herrich- Schäffer), Nordmannia acaciae (Fabricius), Diloba caeruleocephala (Linnaeus), Catocala sp., Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus) and Hedya nubiferana (Haworth). In addition, it was determined the parasitoids, Aplomya confinis Fall., Brachymeria sp., Apanteles spp., Ascogaster quadridentata Wesmael, Colesia sp., Brachymeria intermedia (Nees), Eusandalum sp., Itoplectis maculator (F.) and Baryscapus sp.. Aplomya confinis Fall. (Tachinidae) parasitoid of are presented here as a new record for Nordmannia acaciae in World. In this study, Agriopis bajaria (Denis & Schiffermüller), Aleucis distinctata (Herrich- Schäffer), G. stevenaria, Cilix glaucata (Scopoli), A. crataegi, Grapholitha janthinana Dup., H.
Book
Global Biodiversity is the most comprehensive compendium of conservation information ever published. It provides the first systematic report on the status, distribution, management, and utilisation of the planet's biological wealth.
Article
Recent suggestions that insects number tens of millions of species have received much attention. Little consideration, however, has been given to how such estimates compare with what else we know about insect species richness. Perhaps most significantly, the specialist knowledge of the taxonomic community at large has generally been ignored Collation of published and unpublished information from this source provides little to encourage belief in truly vast numbers of undescribed species of insects. For the insect groups for which figures are available, estimates of global total numbers of species are typically less than ten times the numbers of described species. Although minimum global estimates are more readily constructed than upper estimates, these figures uniformly fail to support assertions that there are 30 million or more species of insects. Rather, a figure of less than ten million seems more tenable, and one of around five million feasible. Additional, more circumstantial, evidence tends to support the idea that insect species numbers may not be as vast as has been claimed First, the contribution of canopy specialists to global richness may be less than often suggested. Second, a higher proportion of species than commonly entertained may have moderate to large geographic ranges. Third, the number of groups failing to increase in richness in the tropics may have been underestimated. Finally, the proportion of undescribed species encountered by many taxonomists seems insufficient to justify estimates of vast species numbers.
Article
Erwin's much debated estimate of 30 million species of arthropods is revised. The original estimate is based on the evaluation of host specificity of guilds in beetle samples, and subsequent hierarchical ratio extrapolations. The growing number of studies including mass sampling of arthropods have provided several data sets suitable for obtaining an empirical basis of this estimate. The structure in this modified version is somewhat changed compared to the original estimate in order to make each hierarchical step more easily testable. Plant species are separated into different growth forms, and host specificity measures are based only on phytophagous species. Effective specialization is applied as a measure of host specificity to correct for the fauna shared between plant species. A between community correction factor is applied to correct for differences in host specificity at different spatial scales. There are still great uncertainties attended with such estimates. The largest problems refer to the between community correction factor and the proportion of canopy species to total species. Further work on host specificity and the least known hyperdiverse groups are also needed. The revised version of the estimate does not support hyperestimates of 30 100 million species. Rather, it compares nicely with estimates derived from other estimation methods, indicating a global arthropod species richness of 5–10 million species.