A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Psychotherapy
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Healing From Weight Stigma in Community: A Thematic
Analysis of a Group Intervention for Large-Bodied Individuals
Lisa M. Brownstone
1
, Devin A. Kelly
1
, Erin N. Harrop
2
, Hannah N. Norling
1
, L. P. Palazzolo
1
,
Orphea Wright
1
, and Emily Tiede
1
1
Department of Counseling Psychology, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver
2
Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver
Discrimination against and negative beliefs about large-bodied individuals, known as weight stigma, is
pervasive and harmful. While previous research has focused on the negative consequences of weight stigma,
the present study aims to highlight the lived experience of large-bodied individuals while also exploring the
process of healing from harmful experiences of weight stigma. Ten adult (9/10 White, 8/10 cisgender
women), large-bodied individuals recruited via snowball sampling through a nonprofit, grassroots, eating
disorder advocacy organization participated in a 10-week, counselor-facilitated support group with the
shared goal of healing from the impact of weight stigma. Researchers used reflexive thematic analysis to
analyze video recordings and transcripts of group sessions to answer the following question: how did
participants make sense of their weight stigma experiences and engage with the process of healing in
community? Four primary themes were generated: (a) Community is Essential, (b) Storying, (c)
Deprogramming and Changing Mindset, and (d) Expansive Healing. These results underscore the impact of
weight stigma in the lives of large-bodied individuals and provide insight into how clinicians might support
such individuals engaging in collective healing from these painful experiences.
Clinical Impact Statement
Question: How do large-bodied individuals heal from systemic weight stigma in group psychotherapy?
Findings: Findings suggest that the process of healing from weight stigma includes story-telling,
community-building, fostering a systemic lens, and bolstering self-advocacy skills. Meaning:
Relational-cultural theory, radical healing, and group psychotherapy may be useful when supporting
large-bodied psychotherapy clients in healing from experiences of weight stigma. Next Steps: Future
research should explore how self-determination and advocacy can be fostered for clients who have
experienced weight stigma, as well as how peer- and clinician-facilitated, self-sustaining versions of a
group intervention like this may support clients.
Keywords: weight stigma, community healing, weight inclusive, fat acceptance, disordered eating
Discrimination and prejudice against large-bodied individuals,
known as weight stigma, is pervasive and harmful to physical,
emotional, and social health (e.g., Pearl & Schulte, 2021). First
arising during European colonization as a way to signal social
distinctions in race, class, and gender hierarchies (Stanley & Hicks,
2023;Strings, 2019), weight stigma stereotypes large-bodied
individuals as unintelligent, unlikable, lazy, and immoral (e.g.,
Daníelsdo´ttir et al., 2010;Latner & Stunkard, 2003;Lieberman
et al., 2012;O’Brien et al., 2013;Puhl & Brownell, 2003). Given the
colonial history of associating larger body sizes with “sensuality,
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This article was published Online First October 19, 2023.
Lisa M. Brownstone https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-7621
Devin A. Kelly https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6635-726X
Erin N. Harrop https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0933-1098
Hannah N. Norling https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-6498
L. P. Palazzolo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-8070
Lisa M. Brownstone and Devin A. Kelly hold shared first authorship on
this article.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Lisa M. Brownstone played a lead role in supervision and an equal role in
data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project adminis-
tration, resources, validation, writing–original draft, and writing–review and
editing. Devin A. Kelly played an equal role in conceptualization, data
curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration,
resources, validation, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing.
Erin N. Harrop played a supporting role in formal analysis, investigation,
resources, and writing–review and editing. Hannah N. Norling played a
supporting role in formal analysis, investigation, project administration, and
visualization and an supporting role in writing–original draft and writing–
review and editing. L. P. Palazzolo played a supporting role in formal analysis,
project administration, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing.
Orphea Wright played a supporting role in investigation, writing–original
draft, and writing–review and editing. Emily Tiede played a supporting role in
conceptualization and investigation.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lisa M.
Brownstone, Department of Counseling Psychology, Morgridge College
of Education, University of Denver, 1999 East EvansAvenue, Denver, CO
80208-1700, United States. Email: lisa.brownstone@du.edu
Psychotherapy
© 2023 American Psychological Association 2023, Vol. 60, No. 4, 455–466
ISSN: 0033-3204 https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000509
455