ArticlePublisher preview available

Parenting Stress in Families of Children with Disabilities

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Using measures of child and family functioning, this study evaluated levels of parenting stress in 880 families of children with disabilities. Results suggest that factors such as income, time available for interaction with the child, and social support predict parenting stress much better than do aspects of child functioning. Implications for intervention and for future research are discussed.
Amcnun
juurnul
of
Urthopaychruty,
71(2),
Apnl2001
@
2001
Aniencdn
Orthopsychiatnc
Associahon,
Inc.
Parenting Stress in Families
of
Children with Disabilities
Timothy
B.
Smith,
Ph.D.,
Matthew N.I.
Oliver,
M.A., Mark
S.
Innocenti,
Ph.D.
Using measures of child and familyfunctioing, this study evaluated levels of parenting
stress in
880
families of children with disabilities. Results suggest that factors such as
inconw,
time available for interaction with the child, and social support predict parenting
stress much better than do aspects of childfunctioning. Implications for internention
und
firfuture research are discussed.
arenting stress is an important variable to
consider when providing services for chil-
P
dren or their families. It has been associated
with low parenting satisfaction, higher symptoma-
tology
(Koeske
&
Koeske, 1990),
abusive behavior
(Kelly, 1998; Rodriguiz
&
Green, 1997; Whipple
&
Webster-Strattun, 1991),
and insecure child at-
tachment
(Hadidian
&
Merbian, 1996; Jarvis
&
Creasey, 1991).
Indeed, some authors have argued
that
in
order for many families to carry out pre-
scribed treatments for their children, professionals
must first assist parents in managing their stress
levels
(Dunst, Leet,
&
Trivette, 1988; McDowell,
Saylor, Taylor, Boyce,
&
Stokes, 1995).
Parenting stress is a particularly salient variable
when working with families that include children
who have developmental disabilities
(Qson, 1997).
Multiple demands on family resources are preva-
lent
in
such families, and stress levels tend to be
elevated
(Beresford, 1994; Tunali
&
Power, 1993)
and adversely affect perceptions of family func-
tioning
(@son, 1997).
Furthermore, families with
children who have developmental disabilities must
be considered as being at particular risk for prob-
lematic parent-child relationships that can interfere
with child development and needed interventions
(McKay, Pickens,
&
Stewart, 1996)
Although past research has indicated that parents
of children with disabilities do experience high
levels of stress, it is unclear to what degree this
stress is related to family functioning variables,
such as social support and financial resources, as
well as to the severity of the child’s disability
(Feldman, Leger,
&
Walton-Allen, 1997; lnnocen-
ti,
Huh,
&
Boyce, 1992; Rodriguiz
&
Murphy, 1997).
Information about the relative impact of family re-
sources and the child’s level of developmental
im-
pairment on parenting stress would not only help
in
identifying which parents are more at-risk for ad-
verse symptomatology,
it
would also help
in
de-
signing more effective interventions by targeting
the variables that are most related to parenting
stress. The present study was conducted to deter-
mine the relative weight of both family and child
functioning variables
in
predicting parenting stress.
METHOD
Participants
A
total of
880
parents of a child who was moder-
ately to severely developmentally delayed were re-
~~~
A
revised version
of
a paper submitted
to
fllp
lournal
iri
/une
7999.
Research was supported
iri
part by
U.S.
Departmerit
of
Edura-
tiori
corrtract
HS90010007
to
the
Early
Iriterueritiori
Research Institute, Utah State Uriiversify.
Authors
are at: Dryartmerit
of
Coioiseliiig
Psychology arid Special Education,
Brigliam
Young
University, Provo, Utah (Smith); Departmrrit
of
Psychology,
Uriiversity
of
South
Dakota, Vermilliori (Oliver); arid Early Iriteruerrtiori Research
lristitute,
Utah State University, Logan
(/ririo~riti).
257
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Parents of children diagnosed with autism experience higher levels of stress compared to parents of typically developing children and those with other disabilities (Bonis, 2016;Dabrowska and Pisula, 2010;Smith et al., 2001). Stress may stem from the additional demands parenting an autistic child may present, such as managing behaviors that challenge, changes in the parent's life (e.g., routines, relationships with friends and family), as well as difficulties finding and organizing autism services, or overcoming barriers or challenges with the education systems (Bonis, 2016, Hayes andWatson, 2013). ...
... A review by Naicker et al. (2023) found that parents with higher resolution reported reduced psychological distress and depression, an overall higher capacity to cope with stress, higher levels of marital satisfaction, and seeking and accessing social support. Importantly, although parents of children diagnosed with autism experience higher levels of stress (Smith et al., 2001), resolution is still associated with lower stress in parents of children with autism (Sheeran et al., 1997). However, while the relationship between resolution and stress is established, explanations for why this relationship exists are less developed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Resolution of a child’s diagnosis, the process of accepting and adjusting to the reality of a child’s significant diagnosis, has been often associated with decreased parental stress. Hope, a potential buffer against psychological distress, has been suggested as a potential explanation for this relationship. However, the mediating role of hope in the relationship between resolution of diagnosis and parental stress has not been explored. Methods This study aimed to examine whether four types of hope (child, parental, societal, denial of diagnosis) mediated the relationship between resolution to an autism diagnosis and reduced parental stress. Participants included 73 parents (Mage = 43.22, SD = 7.69, female 97.3%) of autistic children (Mage = 11.15, SD = 4.56, male = 67.1%). Results Resolution to diagnosis was negatively and significantly correlated with resolution to diagnosis, as well as child, parental and societal hope. These three hopes were also significantly and negatively correlated with parental stress. Importantly, when controlling for level of support and autism awareness, parental hope mediated the relationship between resolution to diagnosis and parental stress. Denial of diagnosis was not correlated with resolution or parental stress but did have significant but weak associate with the other hopes. Discussion These findings suggest that hope based on parent’s abilities to support their child and be supported themselves play an important role in parental stress once parents are more resolved to their child’s diagnosis. Supporting parents to manage factors associated with supporting their child’s needs, may benefit parents of autistic children.
... Такође, резултати ранијих истраживања износе налазе који говоре да је квалитет живота породица дјеце са сметњама у развоју нарушен и да је повезан са депресивним стањима и родитељским дистресом (Sarajlija et al., 2013;Dardas & Ahmad, 2014;Dizdarevic et al., 2020). У истраживању које је обухватило 880 родитеља дјеце са сметњама у развоју испитивао се ниво доживљеног стреса, а добијени резултати показали су да сам степен сметње у развоју има минималан утицај на родитељски стрес (Smith et al., 2001). Резултати ранијих студија показују да родитељи дјеце са тешкоћама у развоју доживљавају више стреса у односу на родитеље дјеце типичног развоја (Gupta, 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
The quality of life in families of children with developmental disabilities significantly influences family functionality and the well-being of all members. Various family characteristics often affect this quality. This study aimed to examine the impact of family characteristics and family stress levels on the quality of life in families of children with developmental disabilities. The sample consisted of 122 parents of children with developmental disabilities. Data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale (Beach FQOL Scale), and the Stress Symptoms Scale-16. The results showed that parents rated their family's quality of life as satisfactory, with Family Interactions being the highest-rated domain and Emotional Well-being the lowest. Families with only one child reported better quality of life in the domains of Family Interactions, Parenting, and Support compared to families with three or more children. Families of children with hearing, speech, or voice impairments reported the highest satisfaction in the Family Interactions domain. Furthermore, the findings indicated that parents in the sample experienced relatively low stress levels, with no significant correlation between family quality of life and stress levels.
... Research in the field of childhood disability shows that parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) face a significant risk of decreased health and well-being [1][2][3][4][5]. evidence from several studies has shown that parents experience chronic physical, psychological, social, and economic problems that include, but are not limited to, increased pain [6][7][8], high stress levels [2,9,10], risk of developing depression and anxiety disorders [11], employment challenges [12,13], economic burden [13], and even elevated risk of cardiovascular disease or premature death [3,14]. it is increasingly being recognized that many parents of children with NDD are in a vulnerable position due to their extensive caregiving role and the implications this role has on their everyday life and functioning. ...
Article
Purpose: To explore the impact of the online ENVISAGE program for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) on parents' perception of themself, their child with a disability, and their family, as well as to explore experiences of participating in the program in Croatia. Methods: In this before-after discourse analysis study, participants took part in the five-week ENVISAGE program. There were two semi-structured interviews for each participant: within one month before and after participating in the program. The proportions of positive, neutral, and negative sentences about themself, their child, and their family from two interviews were compared on an individual and group level. The perceived changes and experiences with the program were also analyzed qualitatively. Results: Data from thirteen participants were included. From the three pre-determined discourse categories (self, child, and family), most changes were observed in parents' perception of self (average increase in positive views of 8.8% and decrease in negative of 5.3%). Qualitative results showed multiple positive self-perceived impacts on parents' lives. Participants' experiences with ENVISAGE were consistently positive; all believed they benefited from the program. Conclusions: The results support our assumption that participation in ENVISAGE positively affects multiple areas of life, particularly parents' views of themself.
... Qualitative content analysis was selected as the method for analysis (Schreier, 2021). Content analysis is textual analysis, in which the aim is to organize the data into concise and clear content without losing the information it contains. ...
Article
Research on self-efficacy in parents who have children with special needs appears fragmented and relatively scarce. The purpose of the research was to analyze (1) how the self-efficacy of parents who have children with special needs has been researched in 2000-2020 and (2) what implications the research provides to support parents’ self-efficacy. This was a state-of-the-art review in which a total of 23 articles were selected (n=10 from EBSCO and n=13 from ScienceDirect). The data were analyzed with the method of qualitative content analysis. For the research question 1, three upper categories were formed: Self-efficacy from the perspective of the parent’s well-being; Self-efficacy in relation to the child; and Self-efficacy in relation to the support offered to parents. For the research question 2, all articles (n=21) that included any implications were used for answering this question. Implications were categorized into Social support and services; Support for parents’ well-being; and Knowledge and skills offered to parents. Based on the analysis more research is needed about the connection between perceived well-being and self-efficacy from the parents’ own perspective. Cognitive-behavioral therapeutic interventions would be beneficial for parents who find their child’s behavior challenging. They also need continuous access to behavioral therapeutic methods. Article visualizations: </p
... This is a 36-item self-completion scale that quickly screens for stress in the parent-child relationship (e.g., 'my child is not able to do as much as I expected'). The PSI-SF has been used extensively in a variety of contexts and samples in the US (Haskett et al., 2006;Reitman et al., 2002;Smith et al., 2001), with good test-retest reliability (average score of 0.76) and high internal consistency (0.85) in the original validation study in rural and urban areas of Virginia (Abidin, 1990). Moreover, the PSI-SF has been found to have high test-retest reliability and validity in a sample of parents of South Africa children (Potterton et al., 2007) and sensitivity to change after parenting programs (Cowen & Reed, 2002;Wolfe & Hirsch, 2003). ...
Article
Full-text available
The high prevalence of child maltreatment requires innovative, scaleable solutions. Three community-wide surveys (2012, 2013, and 2016) in Touwsranten, South Africa, assessed parents’ positive parenting and corporal punishment; their mental health, substance misuse, parenting stress and intimate partner violence; children’s mental health; and interest in parenting support, in preparation for an intervention to support positive parenting. The first two surveys followed parents longitudinally. Focus group discussions were also held in 2017. Across surveys one and two, corporal punishment and positive parenting were reported as frequent. Child and parent mental health problems, parenting stress, intimate partner violence, and risky alcohol use increased across surveys 1 and 2 and remained steady at the third survey. Survey 3 revealed no change in corporal punishment, parent or child mental health, or intimate partner violence; reports of risky alcohol use and parenting stress increased; and there was a small increase in use of positive parenting strategies. Qualitative data suggested that corporal punishment, alcohol use, and intimate partner violence may have been under-reported. Parents indicated a desire for parenting support. The consequent intervention design included the delivery of four parenting programs alongside a social activation process intended to amplify the message of parenting programs, with the intention of increasing positive parenting and reducing corporal punishment community-wide.
Chapter
School-aged children with disabilities face heightened rates of bullying victimization compared to their typically developing peers. This chapter emphasizes the important role that parents of children with disabilities play in bullying prevention and intervention. First, school-based interventions for reducing bullying victimization among children with disabilities, such as inclusion, social-emotional learning, and multi-component programming, are reviewed. Furthermore, this chapter reviews recommendations for how parents can engage in communication with their child regarding bullying and strategies to help children with disabilities develop skills for handling such situations. Guidelines are provided for parents who seek to report bullying incidents to school personnel. This chapter also outlines helpful responses to bullying by school personnel as perceived by parents of children with disabilities. Lastly, this chapter explores considerations for schools and parents when supporting children with disabilities who are both bullied and bully others.
Preprint
Full-text available
Objective The seasonal discourse surrounding the challenges faced by parents of children with Developmental Disabilities (DD) contributes to their marginalization, with limited exploration of intersectionality based on sociodemographic factors in India. This study aims to investigate differences in stress levels, coping strategies, and quality of life among mothers and fathers of children with DD. Additionally, it seeks to explore the impact of sociodemographic factors on quality of life. Method A cross sectional study with a sample of 400 parents (193 fathers and 207 mothers) as identified through NGOs (working in the field of disability) across the state of Odisha, India participated in the study. Parents were administered with Parental Stress Scale, Ways of Coping questionnaire and Quality of Life BREF in addition to the sociodemographic information Results Findings revealed significant differences in stress, coping strategies, and quality of life between mothers and fathers, with mothers consistently reporting higher stress and lower quality of life in all domains. Multiple regression analysis established a link between quality of life, stress, and coping styles, highlighting that positive reappraisal and escape avoidance coping adversely affected physical, psychological, and environmental domains of quality of life. Sociodemographic findings, confirmed by MANOVA and post hoc analysis, indicated evident marginalization, yet the study did not uncover intersectionality. Conclusion the study advocates for heightened empathy in service delivery to improve the overall quality of life for parents of children with DD, shedding light on the nuanced challenges faced by different demographic groups.
Article
Background: Parents of children with developmental disorders (DD) or disabilities report greater parenting stress than parents of typically developing children. To minimise this stress, stressful factors need to be known and stress needs to be recognised early. The present cross-sectional study aims to systematically assess and compare parenting stress in families of children with various types of disabilities. In addition, the assessment of parenting stress by attending paediatricians will be evaluated. Methods: We surveyed 611 parents about their parenting stress at the Children's Development Center (CDC). Three questionnaires, including the German versions of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) and Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), were used to evaluate parenting stress. Furthermore, attending paediatricians assessed of the child's type of disability and their perception of parenting stress in a separate questionnaire. Results: Fifty-five percent of all parents reported stress at a clinically relevant level, 65% in the child domain and 39% in the parent domain of the PSI. Parenting stress differed significantly across diagnostic categories (p < 0.01) and was associated with childhood disability related issues of behaviour, sleep or feeding issues. Parenting stress was often underestimated by the paediatricians, especially when the children had disabilities perceived as less severe. In one-third of parents with clinically relevant total stress, paediatricians reported low stress levels. Parent-reported financial problems, social isolation, and partnership conflicts were not suspected by paediatricians in ≥85% of cases. Conclusions: Clinically relevant parenting stress was found more often than in comparable studies. An assessment of parenting stress by paediatricians may be complicated by time constraints in medical appointments, the mainly child-centred consultation, or restricted expression of parents' stress. Paediatricians should move from a purely child-centred to a holistic, family-centred approach to treatment. Routine screening of parenting stress using standardised questionnaires could be helpful to identify affected families.
Article
Full-text available
Present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between self-compassion and psychological hardiness, and psychological well-being among mothers of children with autism. The research design was correlational, and its statistical population sample consisted of 101 mothers of children with an autism spectrum disorder. The results of a correlational analysis showed a significant positive relationship between self-compassion and psychological hardiness, and psychological well-being. Multiple regression analysis showed that among the variables of self-compassion and psychological hardiness, the variable of self-compassion had the largest share in predicting the psychological well-being of mothers. Concerning self-compassion, conscious awareness of self-kindness along with psychological hardship could predict the psychological well-being in these groups of mothers, such as raising a child with ASD.
Article
Full-text available
Mothers' experiences in parenting children with disabilities were examined in this 3-year longitudinal study. Thirty-five mother-child pairs participated in the study. Mothers and their children representing one of three disability groups (Down syndrome, hearing impairment, and neurological impairment) were observed wher the children were toddler age, age 3, and age 4 years. Parental stress and adaptation to parenting were documented using the Parenting Stress Index, the Inventory of Parent Experiences, and a clinical intewiew with mothers. Results showed significant relationships between maternal stress and parenting experiences. However, few differences across groups were noted with regard to reported stress or parenting experiences and adaptation. Findings are discussed in terms of their relationships to other study variables (e.g., child's developmental status, attachment, mother—child interaction) and with regard to implications for early intervention service providers.
Article
Full-text available
Most research on parenting stress and abuse factors in parents of children with developmental disabilities has relied almost exclusively on Caucasian, middle-income, intact families. The current study investigated the generalizability of previous findings, examining the relations among parenting stress, abuse potential, and child's intellectual/adaptive functioning in a sample of low-income African American mothers of children with developmental delays. Thirty-three maternal caregivers completed the Child Abuse Potential Inventory and the Parenting Stress Index. Results indicated significant parenting stress, particularly aspects related to the child, as well as considerable physical abuse potential. Parenting stress was strongly correlated with abuse potential, particularly stress related to parental attributes. Neither parenting stress nor abuse potential were significantly correlated with the child's intellectual or adaptive functioning. Concerns regarding the appropriateness of these measures with this population and the need for controlled studies are discussed.
Article
Researchers in early intervention recognize that instruments used to measure child developmental status should yield reliable and valid data. Many test manuals, however, present little empirical evidence regarding psychometric integrity of test scores, especially as regards young children with exceptionalities. We use data on the Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) from a sample of young children with disabilities as a heuristic for demonstrating the importance of reliability and validity analyses and to illustrate some of the many plausible analyses that can be employed by researchers.
Article
The parenting stress of families who have a child with a disability is an area receiving considerable research. The present study used a family strengths or “normality” perspective to investigate three issues regarding parent-related and child-related parenting stress, as measured by the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) (Abidin, 1990). A large sample (n = 725) of families who had a young child with disabilities participated. A comparison of parent-related and child-related parenting stress between the sample of families with a child with disabilities and the PSI normative sample was conducted. The distribution of PSI scores for the sample of families of children with disabilities was examined for statistical normality, and normative data for these families were presented. An item analysis was conducted on child-related parenting stress to examine issues regarding its construct validity for families of children with disabilities. Issues regarding the use of stress measures and to the construct of child-related stress as these impact on early intervention activities are discussed.
Article
Parenting stress as it pertains to the families of medically fragile children of different ethnic backgrounds has been understudied. Possible correlates of change in parenting stress such as child development, family support, resources and income were examined in the families of 105 infants with intraventricular hemorrhage #opIVH#cp participating in an early intervention program between one and three years of age. Correlational analyses showed that slower developmental progress, along with declines in family resources and social support coincided with increases in parenting stress. Subgroup analyses separately examining these relationships in the 66 white and 39 nonwhite families revealed different correlates for the two populations. Unlike the full sample and the white sample, the non‐white families’ stress changes over the course of intervention seemed correlated only to income change, but not to child's developmental progress or changes in social support. Commonly cited findings regarding parents’ stress examined primarily with white families may need additional consideration with more diverse samples, as the same variables may have different influence in different cultures.†This article is based on senior research of the first author under the direction of the second author.‡Dagger;Support for this research was provided by grant #HS90010001 from the United States Department of Education to the Early Intervention Research Institute #opEIRI#cp of the Utah State University. The authors thank Dr. A. Finch, Dr. A Glen Casto, Mary Ellen Heiner and Sonja Pinckney for their help and consultation.
Article
This study included thirty‐three mothers of children who were attending a preschool program for high‐risk families. The children's age ranged from 36‐54 months. The Attachment Q‐Set and the Parenting Stress Index were used to measure the relationships between parental stress and the security of attachment relationships. Results showed a significant negative relationship between the Child Domain section of the PSI and Attachment Q‐Set scores. Within this sample the mean security scores were significantly higher for the group of mothers with the lowest stress scores.Implications for the field include the importance of a comprehensive, multi‐agency‐coordinated, early intervention service delivery model which could operate on a variety of levels at once. Service providers need to be cognizant of the impact of the stress cycle on families and its developmental outcomes for young children. A paradigm shift may be necessary in order to move early intervention services from a crisis to a preventive‐based model.
Article
The hypothesis that adequacy of resources is related to personal well-being and adherence to professionally prescribed child-level regimens was tested. The subjects were 45 mothers of developmentally delayed infants and toddlers participating in an early intervention program. The mothers completed three measurement scales about their family resources, personal well-being, and commitment to professionally prescribed treatments. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that adequacy of resources was related to both well-being and commitment to child-level interventions even after the effects of maternal age, family socioeconomic status and income, and child age and developmental quotient were statistically removed. The results are discussed in terms of assisting families to meet self-identified needs before asking them to carry out professionally prescribed child-level treatments as part of their involvement in early intervention programs.
Article
Parents of children with disabilities are often reported as having more stress than their counterparts. Because past investigations of parent stress have been limited by considering too few sources of stress, this study gathered a large variety of demographic, child and family process variables. Two domains of parenting stress, including those aspects related to the child's characteristics (child related) and those aspects concerned with the parent's attitudes toward parenting (parent related) were analyzed separately. The results showed that the circumstances and processes of a family, as well as child characteristics, must be taken into account when clinicians attempt to mediate problems. This research has direct application for clinicians and interventionists. If intervention hopes to truly serve families, a thorough understanding of parenting stress is needed.