ArticlePDF Available

A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters Technology, Potential Applications and Current Research in Indonesia

Authors:

Abstract

Wave energy is a promising renewable resource and is increasingly in demand in most countries, including Indonesia. The potential for the use of wave energy is quite large in Indonesia, especially in areas with coastlines that are directly exposed to open ocean waters. The use of this wave energy has the potential to be integrated with breakwater buildings in several locations as an alternative that can be considered. This is a significant solution, especially in areas where the implementation of network connections is not possible. However, wave energy technology among other renewable technologies is still considered in ongoing development. Another obstacle is the challenge of energy transfer where there is a requirement for a steady and uninterrupted energy supply, while the voltage generated from the surge can vary continuously. Therefore, this paper shows a general overview of wave energy converter (WEC) technology and power conversion. A solid perception concerning them is outlined. Furthermore, this paper describes research and projects for energy conversion and wave power as well as alternatives to WEC technology and suitable locations in Indonesia.
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ
Kyushu University Institutional Repository
A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters
Technology, Potential Applications and Current
Research in Indonesia
Muhammad Alfan Santoso
Integrated Port-Coastal Zone Planning and Management Research Group, Research Center for
Hydrodynamic Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
Wijayanti, Yureana
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University
Ridwan Budi Prasetyo
Integrated Port-Coastal Zone Planning and Management Research Group, Research Center for
Hydrodynamic Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
Setyandito, Oki
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University
https://doi.org/10.5109/7151712
出版情報:Evergreen. 10 (3), pp.1642-1650, 2023-09. 九州大学グリーンテクノロジー研究教育セン
ター
バージョン:
権利関係:
EVERGREEN Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, Vol. 10, Issue 03, pp1642-1650, September 2023
A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters Technology,
Potential Applications and Current Research in Indonesia
Muhammad Alfan Santoso1, Yureana Wijayanti2,*, Ridwan Budi Prasetyo1,
Oki Setyandito2, Nizam3, Aprijanto1, Andri Subandriya4, Aries Taufiq Kurniawan5,
Agus Sudaryanto6, and Bayu Sutejo7
1Integrated Port-Coastal Zone Planning and Management Research Group, Research Center for
Hydrodynamic Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia
2Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480
3Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah Mada University,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4Research Center for Energy Conversion and Conservation, National Research and Innovation Agency
(BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia
5Master Program in System Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta,
Indonesia
6Research Center for Environmental and Clean Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency
(BRIN), Banten, Indonesia
7Geospatial for Disaster and Energy Potential, Geospatial Research Center, National Research and Innovation
Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia 16911
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:
Email: yureana.wijayanti@binus.ac.id
(Received February 8, 2023; Revised August 15, 2023; accepted September 2, 2023).
Abstract: Wave energy is a promising renewable resource and is increasingly in demand in most
countries, including Indonesia. The potential for the use of wave energy is quite large in Indonesia,
especially in areas with coastlines that are directly exposed to open ocean waters. The use of this
wave energy has the potential to be integrated with breakwater buildings in several locations as an
alternative that can be considered. This is a significant solution, especially in areas where the
implementation of network connections is not possible. However, wave energy technology among
other renewable technologies is still considered in ongoing development. Another obstacle is the
challenge of energy transfer where there is a requirement for a steady and uninterrupted energy
supply, while the voltage generated from the surge can vary continuously. Therefore, this paper
shows a general overview of wave energy converter (WEC) technology and power conversion. A
solid perception concerning them is outlined. Furthermore, this paper describes research and projects
for energy conversion and wave power as well as alternatives to WEC technology and suitable
locations in Indonesia.
Keywords: wave energy; power take-off; renewable energy; ocean energy; power conversion
1. Introduction
Wave energy has emerged as a renewable energy
source1), besides solar2–5), wind6,7), biomass8–11), and
geothermal12,13), which already developed earlier, due to
the energy crisis and environmental concerns14,15). One of
the many benefits of wave energy is the percentage of
power generation. Wave energy power is up to 90%
compared to wind or solar devices is 20-30%1). Also, it has
high applicability regarding the location where around
37% of the worlds population lives in the coastal area16)
and it has relatively low obstacles from the coastal
environment1) and from social conflict17,18). However,
there are challenges in wave energy technology, such as
wave energy implementation requires stages to convert
the oscillatory motion of waves into electricity output to
the grid19,20), the power level varies in accordance with
wave height and period which inquire certain energy
storage system types to ensure a regular power output21,22)
- 1642 -
EVERGREEN Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, Vol. 10, Issue 03, pp1642-1650, September 2023
and funding barrier as the wave energy converter plant
needs large investment23). Important factors to evaluate
wave energy resources are wave variability24), wave
climate availability25), and power estimation16). A steady
and moderate wave is more reliable than a strong but
unsteady wave, hence the sites with a such steady wave
are more appropriate for the implementation of wave
energy26). Many researchers have conducted research and
evaluation on wave energy resources of areas or countries,
such as Swedish27), Australia28), Africa29), China30–33), and
Indonesia34,35).
The policy of Indonesian national energy stated that the
renewable energy target is at least 23% of the total energy
power must be met by 202536). In the meantime, in 2022,
the quantity of renewable energy power plants is around
11.6%, which is still below the target of national installed
capacity37). Water for energy is one of the alternatives to
the problem of an increase in energy demand38,39).
Indonesia has a coastline of 54,716 km40) and is located
between two oceans that have enormous potential to be
used as new renewable energy. Rizal and Ningsih35) have
conducted research on 20 locations of wave energy
throughout Indonesia. A site can be selected for the
placement of a wave power generation system if the
annual mean wave energy is > 15 kW/m41). Furthermore,
the southern location of Java also has the potential for
wave energy42,43), and even Bali and West Nusa Tenggara
have wave energy available throughout the year44). This
finding is in alignment with other research results and
shows that south java45) and the sea south of Kuta Bali are
potential locations for the placement of a wave energy
generation system46). Meanwhile, a study on Sumatras
west coast was conducted regarding evaluating the
potential for wave energy47). Ribal et al.48) have developed
a map of wave energy flux in Indonesia using a satellite
with a high resolution of about 5.5 km (Figure 1).
Fig. 1: Wave energy flux climate in Indonesia48)
The mean wave power in Indonesia can reach up to 30
kW/m or potentially higher. Small islands located farther
north and west of Sumatra can also tap into wave power
as an alternative energy source, reducing their reliance on
electricity from the mainland. The study also revealed that
wave energy is consistently accessible year-round in
certain areas, such as the southern part of Java Island, Bali
Island, and West Nusa Tenggara. In the west Sumatera
region, wave energy shows great potential specifically
from March to November, offering a substantial resource
during that period.
There have been many studies related to wave energy
potential and studies related to technology35,36), however,
it is still rare to discuss the Power take-off (PTO)
technology which is the core part of the wave energy
converter (WEC) that has the potential to be applied in
Indonesia. Likewise, when carrying out efficiency
calculations and economic feasibility studies depend on
the PTO system49).
This paper aimed to review the wave energy converters
and power conversions in Indonesia that can be used to
understand their status and further research direction in
energy conversion or PTO systems. This paper will briefly
describe WEC and PTO, then proceed with looking at the
research studies on WEC and PTO that have been carried
out to understand the description of their applications in
Indonesia.
2. Methods
The approach employed in this review relies on a
scoping review protocol developed using the Preferred
Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analysis (PRISMA). Figure 2 shows the PRISMA flow
diagram.
Fig. 2: PRISMA flow diagram for the study
It consists of several steps50) such as defining eligibility
criteria, defining information sources, study selection,
data collection process, data item selection, and eligibility
criteria. A systematic search was conducted to find all
articles published in English and other languages related
to the subject of the current review from 2000 to 2022 in
Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, Taylor and
Francis as well as Google Scholar databases51,52). Scopus,
being widely recognized for its extensive range of
- 1643 -
A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters Technology, Potential Applications and Current Research in Indonesia
bibliometric data52-53), is the preferred choice. Previous
authors54,55) who conducted systematic literature reviews
on construction materials also utilized the Scopus
database, thus validating its selection as the data retrieval
tool for this review. To ensure the relevance of journal
articles to the current investigation, an inclusion/exclusion
criterion was established. The search strings or keywords
used for the search are "wave energy, wave energy
converter, power technology in coastal and marine areas,
site for wave energy converter, tidal energy, marine
renewable energy, and ocean current power generation".
The articles found were then selected according to the
scope of the subject of this current review.
3. Result and discussion
3.1. Variety of wave energy converters
WEC devices are designed and developed according to
their location of harvest. It can be located offshore,
nearshore, or onshore, which is defined by the gap
between the beach line and the sea water level of the WEC
location16,56) (Figure 3).
Fig. 3: A typical WEC location at the marine waters16)
WEC devices located onshore are either attached to a
breakwater or placed on the coastline area. The working
principles that are suitable for this location are oscillating
water column (OWC) or overtopping (OT) devices. In
OWC, the water pressure is directed across a chamber
column19), while in OT, the water pressure is captured in
the form of a reservoir wave energy extraction57). The
objective of these techniques is to increase the waves
pressure58) or air pressure59) to generate electricity.
The advantage of the onshore location is easy to
maintain, has a lower cost (absence of mooring cable), and
has fewer obstacles60). On the other hand, waves onshore
are weakened, hence the energy is low. Examples of WEC
onshore devices are Limpet and SSG, for OWC and OT,
respectively56,61) (Table 1).
Table 1. WEC technology categories based on their working
principles and locations16,56).
WEC
categories
Working principles
Location and
example of device
Oscillating
Water
Column
(OWC)
Onshore : Limpet
Nearshore :
Oceanlix
Offshore : OE
Buoy
Oscillating
Body or
Water
Activated
Bodies
(WAB)
Nearshore : CETO
III, Oyster,
Seareaser,
WaveStar
Offshore :
Archimides Wave
Swing AWS,
PowerBuoy,
Pelamis
Overtopping
(OT)
Onshore : SSG
Nearshore :
Waveplane
Offshore : Wave
dragon
The working principle suitable for nearshore WEC
devices is OWC, OT, or water-activated bodies (WAB).
The points that should be taken into consideration in
applying these devices are mooring cost, sea cable
placement, and the possibility of medium wave energy
(located before the wave-breaking zone). Some examples
of nearshore WEC devices which has been implemented
are CETO and Oyster in the UK and WaveStar in
Denmark.
Research on WEC around the world in 2017-2021
shows that the oscillating body type is the most studied
type, followed by OWC and WEC overtopping60) (Tab le
2).
- 1644 -
EVERGREEN Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, Vol. 10, Issue 03, pp1642-1650, September 2023
Table 2. WEC research locations from 2017-202160)
There are 3 (three) ways to harness wave power:
hydraulically, pneumatically, and mechanically. These
forms of gaining energy are called Take-Off systems or
Power take-off (PTO)62), and they consist of several
phases depending on the types of conversions that occur
(primary, secondary, and tertiary conversion) until gaining
the correct signal for input to the grid63) (Figure 4).
Fig. 4: Stages of wave energy conversion, modified from
Jusoh et.al63)
Primary conversion is the conversion of wave motion
(in airflow, water flow, or body movement) through
hydraulic, pneumatic, or mechanical systems1). The
objective of this conversion is to transform the waveslow
frequency (1 Hz) into a quick movement by pneumatic
and mechanical systems, to enhance the velocity of the
flow. Secondary conversion includes the energy
conversion from the generated workflow in the previous
stage, into electricity. The components employed for this
are hydraulic turbines and pneumatic turbines and
electrical generators. Tertiary conversion delivers the
correct power signal for grid input.
PTO systems are a very important element of WEC.
The feasibility of the WEC relies on its PTO system.
Many various concepts have been conducted to design the
PTO system of the WEC49) (Figure 5). The PTO systems
working methods most used methods are the hydraulic
motor, turbine transfer, and direct mechanical and direct
electrical drive. Yet, there are some new methods such as
hybrid systems, triboelectric nanogenerators, and others.
Fig. 5: The PTO systems working principles, modified from
Ahmed et al.49)
Estimating the economic value of a newly developed
wave energy converter during its journey from
conceptualization to commercialization poses a challenge.
The widely accepted metric for assessing the economic
potential of energy technologies is the levelized cost of
energy (LCoE)64). Nevertheless, estimating the LCoE for
wave energy technologies is complicated by the absence
of dominant technology and uncertainties related to
untested PTO system65,66,59,67).
3.2. Discussion
WEC system research and projects are developed into
simulation and experimental. The experimentation
consists of laboratory and small-scale prototypes. Several
simulation models, laboratory-sized experiments, and
small-scale prototypes are included in this paper. In
Indonesia, several researchers have also studied the
potential application of WEC technology in electrical
energy such as OWC, oscillating body, and overtopping.
A summary of the WEC research in Indonesia is presented
in Table 3.
Table 3. Types of W E C Research in Indonesia
WEC
Reference
Oscillating water column
(OWC)
68,69,70,71,72)
73,74,75,76)
Oscillating body (water
activated bodies) using
Pelamis, AquaBuoy &
Wavebob located offshore
77)
Oscillating body, Floating
WEC using RM3
78)
Oscillating body, Floating
WEC using WaveStar,
located onshore
74,79)
Hybrid, Floating WEC
with solar & wind energy
80)
Author
Affilia tio n
Year
2017-2021
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
China 256 353 471 620 754 504 680 856 1038 1382 9 16 18 17 33
Indo nes ia NA 3224544128NA NA NA NA NA
So uth Kore a 28 27 33 32 47 74 77 88 71 91 6 NA 212
Japan 30 40 44 61 57 78 100 115 119 118 2 2 1 2 2
Ma lay sia 11 5 11 13 10 19 16 24 23 31 3 NA NA NA 1
Singap ore 9 24 18 23 17 36 52 38 43 39 1 1 1 2 NA
Tha iland 23683366 915NA NA NA NA NA
Vietnam 2 3 4 4 2 4 10 9 18 6 1 NA NA 1NA
Canada 48 65 65 78 77 96 96 115 121 180 NA 5 1 NA 3
Germany 110 88 108 112 126 223 222 232 245 267 NA NA NA NA 1
France 95 105 99 110 121 165 158 169 218 218 3 1 1 NA 1
Italy 81 95 92 82 102 163 177 200 173 184 3 2 8 8 3
Netherlands 27 32 28 41 31 62 70 60 79 54 1 1 NA 3 2
Sp a in 121 96 116 114 127 131 131 169 159 170 9 9 14 8 1
UK 78 90 99 143 121 170 214 196 219 246 5 9 14 4 11
USA 211 230 219 278 280 410 393 443 458 518 5 5 7 4 3
Os cillat ing Wa ter C olumn
Oscillating Water Body
Ove rtopp ing (WEC)
- 1645 -
A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters Technology, Potential Applications and Current Research in Indonesia
Rahman & Setiyawan69) simulate the OWC devices that
the electricity generated is enough for Alindau Village
demand. Other researchers conducted a laboratory
experiment on the ocean wave characteristicseffect on air
pressure in OWC68). The potential of electrical energy
generation by the OWC located at 3 locations on the
nearshore of Baron Beach was simulated, and one OWC
device can produce 4.7 MWh/year of electricity70). OWC
was also studied by integrating simulation and prototype
approach to determine the potential rotation of electric
motor drive shaft in the design of the ocean wave power
plant buoy system, located in Bangka Island,
Sumatera71,72). A laboratory experiment was also
conducted by Husain75) on OWC modification using a
double-water-chamber type seawall, which was designed
to enhance the effective wavelength to increase the
efficiency rate and decrease the reflection wave.
Floating WEC located onshore was studied by Madi et
al.79), where a laboratory scale experiment was performed
in a 1:20 scale model of a flap-float horizontal WEC to
study the effect of its arm design. Further study should be
conducted using irregular waves. Aji et al.78) conducted a
simulation of a floating-point absorber buoy, using the
RM3 device on the Sumatras west coast (south Pagai
Island II, Enggano Island), southern coast of Java (Cilacap
and Jember area), and south coast of Bali. Another
simulation on floating WEC was performed by Jufri et
al.64)
Haryuda et al.80) proposed hybrid wind energy,
photovoltaic (PV), and floating WEC system with a
hydraulic system to rotate a 1 KW power 3 phase power
generator. The result of this experiment shows that solar
PV systems hybrid with WEC produce electricity higher
than a hybrid with wind turbines. Setyandito et al.83)
conducted a laboratory experiment of overtopping WEC,
where this device was intended to be attached to the
breakwater structure. However, this study is still
preliminary and should continue to determine the PTO
system that is suitable for this type of WEC. Wahyudie et
al.77) was determining the most suitable locations for the
WEC installation on the south coast of Yogyakarta and
Central Java province. After that, the performance of 3
(three) floating WEC devices of the Pelamis (offshore
semi-submerged slack-moored WEC), the AquaBuoy
(offshore semi-submerged heaving WEC), and the
Wavebob (offshore two-body heaving WEC), was
examined in two sites off the coast of Penyu Bay and
Yogyakarta. For these sites, the Pelamis produced the
highest average annual energy yield of 1.35 GWh, and
1.11 GWh, for the Yogyakarta site and Penyu Bay site,
respectively. It is because regarding wave-to-wire
efficiency, the Pelamis has higher efficiency of wave
power in low intensities. The electrical energy yielded by
solar photovoltaic and floating WEC is 3,574 KW.
The electrical energy produced by wind turbines and
floating WEC is 3,397 KW. The hybrid WEC incorporates
other renewable energy sources to ensure a continuous
power supply84). This integration could also benefit
lowering the cost by using the established offshore wind
turbines20) or/and solar photovoltaic.
4. Conclusion
The effective utilization of renewable resources holds
great promise in Indonesia due to its extensive coastline
and abundant wave resources. One of the challenges,
however, lies in refining the method of harnessing wave
power. Across the globe, there has been substantial
research and implementation of Wave Energy converter
(WEC) devices. This brief review aims to shed light on
the existing WEC technology, encompassing its power
conversion systems, as well as the ongoing WEC research
landscape in Indonesia. Additionally, this review unveils
select studies pinpointing optimal wave energy harvesting
locations. These locations are situated in south Java, Bali,
and west Sumatra. The southern location of Java, even
Bali, and West Nusa Tenggara have wave energy available
throughout the year reaching 30 kW/m. Several
researchers have also studied the potential application of
WEC to electrical energy such as OWC, oscillating body,
and overtopping. The potential locations for the WEC
installation are on the Indian Ocean, on the south coast of
Yogyakarta, and in Central Java province. The Pelamis
produced the highest average annual energy yield of 1.35
GWh. Regarding wave-to-wire efficiency, the Pelamis has
higher efficiency of wave power in low intensities. This is
an interesting finding that the Pelamis device shows high
energy production The potential for this wave energy
market niche is developed in small and remote islands in
Indonesia which are far from the reach of integrated
electricity such as the coastal areas of North Maluku, West
Papua and Papua, NTT or the WEC system installed in
this location can be an alternative energy source for
electrical energy has increased. Hence, the WEC system
installed in this location could be an alternative energy
source for this area. The integration of WCE and other
established offshore renewable energy source (e.g wind
turbine or/and solar PV) not only stabilize power output
fluctuations but also could reduce the cost. Hence, it will
increase competitiveness in its implementation.
The research on WEC is mainly focused on developing
WEC extraction devices, optimizing WEC devices, and/or
oceanography study. The research on PTO system
development in Indonesia is still at an early phase,
therefore further research in energy conversion or PTO
system is encouraged to understand the efficiency,
reliability, and cost factor of the overall WEC system.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our institutions of National
Research and Innovation Agency, Bina Nusantara
University, and Gadjah Mada University which facilitate
us in conducting collaboration work.
- 1646 -
EVERGREEN Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, Vol. 10, Issue 03, pp1642-1650, September 2023
References
1) B. Drew, A.R. Plummer, and M.N. Sahinkaya, A
review of wave energy converter technology,
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy,
223 (8) 887–902 (2009).
doi:10.1243/09576509JPE782.
2) I. Roihan, K. Tjandaputra A., E.A. Setiawan, and
R.A. Koestoer, Installing and testing the grashof
portable incubator powered using the solar box be-
carefor remote areas without electricity,Evergreen,
7(4) 621–628 (2020). doi:10.5109/4150516.
3) K. Marzia, M.F. Hasan, T. Miyazaki, B.B. Saha, and
S. Koyama, Key factors of solar energy progress in
bangladesh until 2017,” Evergreen, 5(2) 7885
(2018). doi:10.5109/1936220.
4) P. Byr ne, N. Putra, T. Maré, N. Abdallah, P. Lalanne,
I. Alhamid, P. Estelle, A. Yatim, and A.L. Tiffonnet,
Design of a solar ac system including a pcm storage
for sustainable resorts in tropical region,Evergreen,
6(2) 143–148 (2019). doi:10.5109/2321009.
5) H.A. Jaffar, A.A. Ismaeel, and A.L. Shuraiji,
Review of hybrid photovoltaic- air updraft solar
application: present and proposed state models,
Evergreen, 9(4) 11811202 (2022).
doi:10.5109/6625729.
6) A.M.M. Ismaiel, and S. Yoshida, Study of
turbulence intensity effect on the fatigue lifetime of
wind turbines, Evergreen, 5(1) 2532 (2018).
doi:10.5109/1929727.
7) R.A. Jessam, Experimental study of wind turbine
power generation utilizing discharged air of air
conditioner blower, Evergreen, 9(4) 11031109
(2022). doi:10.5109/6625722.
8) Z.F. Zahara, Economic assessment of the
sugarcane-based bio-refinery in indonesia,
Evergreen, 5(2) 67–77 (2018). doi:10.5109/1936219.
9) N.B. Prihantini, N. Rakhmayanti, S. Handayani, W.
Sjamsuridzal, W. Wardhana, and Nasruddin,
Biomass production of indonesian indigenous
leptolyngbya strain on npk fertilizer medium and its
potential as a source of biofuel, Evergreen, 7(4)
593601 (2020). doi:10.5109/4150512.
10) A. Rahman, N.B. Prihantini, and Nasruddin,
Biomass production and synthesis of biodiesel from
microalgae synechococcus hs-9 (cyanobacteria)
cultivated using bubble column photobioreactors,
Evergreen, 7(4) 564–570 (2020).
doi:10.5109/4150507.
11) Y. Furutani, K. Norinaga, S. Kudo, J.I. Hayashi, and
T. Watanabe, Current situation and future scope of
biomass gasification in japan,Evergreen, 4(4) 24
29 (2017). doi:10.5109/1929681.
12) Y. Gunawan, N. Putra, E. Kusrini, I.I. Hakim, and
M.D.H. Setiawan, Study of heat pipe utilizing low-
temperature geothermal energy and zeolite-a for tea
leaves withering process,Evergreen, 7(2) 221–227
(2020). doi:10.5109/4055223.
13) B. Prasetyo, Suyanto, M.A.M. Oktaufik, and S.
Himawan, Design, construction and preliminary
test operation of bppt-3mw condensing turbine
geothermal power plant,Evergreen, 6(2) 162–167
(2019). doi:10.5109/2321012.
14) N. Bhasin, R.N. Kar, and N. Arora, Green
disclosure practices in india: a study of select
companies, Evergreen, 2(2) 5–13 (2015).
doi:10.5109/1544075.
15) M.K. Barai, and B.B. Saha, Energy security and
sustainability in japan, Evergreen, 2(1) 4956
(2015). doi:10.5109/1500427.
16) I. López, J. Andreu, S. Ceballos, I. Martínez De
Alegría, and I. Kortabarria, Review of wave energy
technologies and the necessary power-equipment,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27
413434 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.009.
17) N.A. Pambudi, V.S. Pramudita, M.K. Biddinika, and
S. Jalilinasrabady, So close yet so far - how people
in the vicinity of potential sites respond to
geothermal energy power generation: an evidence
from indonesia, Evergreen, 9(1) 1–9 (2022).
doi:10.5109/4774210.
18) M. Muslihudin, W.R. Adawiyah, E. Hendarto, R.D.
Megasari, and M.F. Ramadhan, Environmental
constraints in building process a sustainable
geothermal power plant on the slopes of slamet
mount, central java, indonesia, Evergreen, 9(2)
300309 (2022). doi:10.5109/4793669.
19) N. Delmonte, D. Barater, F. Giuliani, P. Cova, and G.
Buticchi, Review of oscillating water column
converters,” IEEE Trans Ind Appl, 52 (2) 16981710
(2016). doi:10.1109/TIA.2015.2490629.
20) E. Rusu, and F. Onea, A review of the technologies
for wave energy extraction,Clean Energy, 2 (1) 10
19 (2018). doi:10.1093/ce/zky003.
21) A. Babarit, A database of capture width ratio of
wave energy converters,Renew Energy, 80 610
628 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.049.
22) D. Clemente, P. Rosa-Santos, and F. Taveira-Pinto,
On the potential synergies and applications of wave
energy converters: a review, Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135 (2021). doi:10.
1016/j.rser.2020.110162.
23) D. Wang, D. Conley, M. Hann, K. Collins, S. Jin, and
D. Greaves, Power output estimation of a rm3 wec
with hf radar measured complex representative sea
states,International Marine Energy Journal, 5 (1)
1–10 (2022). doi:10.36688/imej.5.1-10.
24) N. Khan, A. Kalair, N. Abas, and A. Haider, Review
of ocean tidal, wave and thermal energy
technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 72 590–604 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.rser.
2017.01.079.
25) A. Roberts, B. Thomas, P. Sewell, Z. Khan, S.
Balmain, and J. Gillman, Current tidal power
technologies and their suitability for applications in
coastal and marine areas,J Ocean Eng Mar Energy,
2 (2) 227–245 (2016). doi:10.1007/s40722-016-
0044-8.
26) C. Iuppa, L. Cavallaro, D. Vicinanza, and E. Foti,
Investigation of suitable sites for wave energy
- 1647 -
A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters Technology, Potential Applications and Current Research in Indonesia
converters around sicily (italy),Ocean Science, 11
(4) 543557 (2015). doi:10.5194/os-11-543-2015.
27) V. Castellucci, and E. Strömstedt, Sea level
variability in the swedish exclusive economic zone
and adjacent seawaters: influence on a point
absorbing wave energy converter,Ocean Science,
15 (6) 15171529 (2019). doi:10.5194/os-15-1517-
2019.
28) P. Marsh, I. Penesis, J.R. Nader, and R. Cossu,
Multi-criteria evaluation of potential australian
tidal energy sites, Renew Energy, 175 453–469
(2021). doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.093.
29) H. Bouhrim, and A. El Marjani, Wave energy
assessment along the moroccan atlantic coast,
Journal of Marine Science and Application, 18 (2)
142152 (2019). doi:10.1007/s11804-018-00060-8.
30) Y.C. Chang, P.C. Chu, and R.S. Tseng, Site
selection of ocean current power generation from
drifter measurements,Renew Energy, 80 737–745
(2015). doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.003.
31) Y. Li, N. Ren, X. Li, and J. Ou, Hydrodynamic
analysis of a novel modular floating structure system
integrated with floating artificial reefs and wave
energy converters,J Mar Sci Eng, 10 (8) (2022).
doi:10.3390/jmse10081091.
32) H. Shi, X. Zhang, W. Du, Q. Li, H. Qu, and Z. You,
Assessment of wave energy resources in china,J
Mar Sci Eng, 10 (11) (2022). doi:10.3390/
jmse10111771.
33) Y. Wan, C. Fan, J. Zhang, J. Meng, Y. Dai, L. Li, W.
Sun, P. Zhou, J. Wang, and X. Zhang, Wave energy
resource assessment off the coast of china around the
zhoushan islands,Energies (Basel), 10 (9) (2017).
doi:10.3390/en10091320.
34) I. Alifdini, D.N. Sugianto, Y.O. Andrawina, and A.B.
Widodo, Identification of wave energy potential
with floating oscillating water column technology in
Pulau Baai Beach, Bengkulu, in: IOP Conf Ser
Earth Environ Sci, Institute of Physics Publishing,
2017. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/55/1/012040.
35) A.M. Rizal, and N.S. Ningsih, Description and
variation of ocean wave energy in indonesian seas
and adjacent waters, Ocean Engineering, 251
111086 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.
111086.
36) PT PLN, Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga
Listrik (RUPTL) PT PLN (Persero) 2021-2030,”
2021.
https://web.pln.co.id/statics/uploads/2021/10/ruptl-
2021-2030.pdf (accessed June 6, 2023).
37) IESR Institute for Essential Services Reform,
Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook 2022,” 2022.
www.iesr.or.id.
38) H.Y.S.H. Nugroho, D.R. Indrawati, N.
Wahyuningrum, R.N. Adi, A.B. Supangat, Y.
Indrajaya, P.B. Putra, S.A. Cahyono, A.W. Nugroho,
T.M. Basuki, E. Savitri, T.W. Yuwati, B.H. Narendra,
M.K. Sallata, M.K. Allo, A.R. Bisjoe, N. Muin, W.
Isnan, F. Ansari, A. Sudomo, and A. Hani, Toward
water, energy, and food security in rural indonesia: a
review, Water (Switzerland), 14 (10) (2022).
doi:10.3390/w14101645.
39) Y. Wijayanti, M. Anda, L. Safitri, S. Tarmadja,
Juliastuti, and O. Setyandito, Water-energy nexus
development for sustainable water management in
Indonesia, in: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci,
Institute of Physics Publishing, 2020. doi:10.1088/
1755-1315/426/1/012058.
40) CIA Coastline, The world factbook,Https://Www.
Cia.Gov/the-Wo r l d -Factbook/ Countries/Indonesia/,
(n.d.).
41) A. Pecher, and J.P. Kofoed, Handbook of Ocean
Wave Energy, Springer International Publishing,
Cham, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39889-1.
42) Irhas, and R. Suryaningsih, Study on wave energy
into electricity in the south coast of yogyakarta,
Indonesia,in: Energy Procedia, Elsevier Ltd, 2014:
pp. 149155. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.208.
43) A.T. Kurniawan, R. Budiarto, R.B. Prasetyo, and A.
Budiman, Selecting an Ideal Site for Oscillating-
Water-Column (OWC) Wave Energy Converter for
Hydrogen Production in the Southern Coast of
Yogyakarta, Indonesia, in: Proceeding - 1st
International Conference on Information Technology,
Advanced Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,
ICITAMEE 2020, Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020: pp. 3540.
doi:10.1109/ICITAMEE50454.2020.9398402.
44) M.N. Habibie, M.A. Marfai, H. Harsa, and U.A.
Linarka, Spatial temporal analysis for potential
wave energy resources in Indonesia,in: IOP Conf
Ser Earth Environ Sci, IOP Publishing Ltd, 2021.
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/893/1/012050.
45) N.P. Purba, J. Kelvin, R. Sandro, S. Gibran, R.A.I.
Permata, F. Maulida, and M.K. Martasuganda,
Suitable Locations of Ocean Renewable Energy
(ORE) in Indonesia Region-GIS Approached, in:
Energy Procedia, Elsevier Ltd, 2015: pp. 230–238.
doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.01.035.
46) I. Alifdini, N.A.P. Iskandar, A.W. Nugraha, D.N.
Sugianto, A. Wirasatriya, and A.B. Widodo,
Analysis of ocean waves in 3 sites potential areas
for renewable energy development in indonesia,
Ocean Engineering, 165 34–42 (2018). doi:10.1016/
j.oceaneng.2018.07.013.
47) A.M. Rizal, and N.S. Ningsih, Ocean wave energy
potential along the west coast of the sumatra island,
indonesia,J Ocean Eng Mar Energy, 6 (2) 137154
(2020). doi:10.1007/s40722-020-00164-w.
48) A. Ribal, A. V. Babanin, S. Zieger, and Q. Liu, A
high-resolution wave energy resource assessment of
indonesia, Renew Energy, 160 13491363 (2020).
doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.017.
49) R. Ahamed, K. McKee, and I. Howard,
Advancements of wave energy converters based on
power take off (pto) systems: a review, Ocean
Engineering, 204 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.
2020.107248.
50) J. Matsimbe, M. Dinka, D. Olukanni, and I. Musonda,
Geopolymer: A Systematic Review of
- 1648 -
EVERGREEN Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, Vol. 10, Issue 03, pp1642-1650, September 2023
Methodologies, Materials, 15 (9) (2022). Doi:
10.3390/ma15196852
51) A. A. Chadegani, H. Salehi, M. M. Yunus, H. Farhadi,
M. Fooladi, M. Farhadi, N. A. Ebrahim, “A
Comparison between Two Main Academic
Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus
Databases,” Asian Social Science, 9 (5) (2013).
Doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
52) E. M. L. Bergman, Finding Citations to Social Work
Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of
Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar,The Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 38 (6) (2012). Doi:
10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
53) L. I. Meho, Using Scopuss CiteScore for assessing
the quality of computer science conferences,
Journal of Informetrics 13 (1) (2019). Doi:
10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.006
54) W. Ahmad, A. Ahmad, K. A. Ostrowski, F. Aslam, P.
Joyklad, A scientometric review of waste material
utilization in concrete for sustainable construction,
Case Studies in Construction Materials 15 (2021).
Doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00683
55) B. Zhang, H. Zhu, P. Feng, P. Zhang, A review on
shrinkage-reducing methods and mechanisms of
alkali-activated/geopolymer systems: Effects of
chemical additives, Journal of Building
Engineering 15 (2022). Doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.
104056
56) S. Jin, S. Zheng, and D. Greaves, On the scalability
of wave energy converters, Ocean Engineering,
243 110212 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.
110212.
57) L. Rusu, and F. Onea, The performance of some
state-of-the-art wave energy converters in locations
with the worldwide highest wave power,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75
1348–1362 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.123.
58) S. Kushwah, An oscillating water column (owc):
the wave energy converter, Journal of The
Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 102 (5)
1311–1317 (2021). doi:10.1007/s40032-021-00730-
7.
59) A.F.O. Falcão, and J.C.C. Henriques, Oscillating-
water-column wave energy converters and air
turbines: a review,Renew Energy, 85 1391–1424
(2016). doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.086.
60) M. Li, H. Luo, S. Zhou, G.M. Senthil Kumar, X. Guo,
T.C. Law, and S. Cao, State-of-the-art review of the
flexibility and feasibility of emerging offshore and
coastal ocean energy technologies in east and
southeast asia,Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 162 112404 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.rser.
2022.112404.
61) H.M. Ramos, C. Teyssier, and P.A. López-Jiménez,
Optimization of retention ponds to improve the
drainage system elasticity for water-energy nexus,
Water Resources Management, 27 (8) 2889–2901
(2013). doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0322-3.
62) D. Gallutia, M. Tahmasbi Fard, M. Gutierrez Soto,
and J. He, Recent advances in wave energy
conversion systems: from wave theory to devices
and control strategies, Ocean Engineering, 252
111105 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.
111105.
63) M.A. Jusoh, M.Z. Ibrahim, M.Z. Daud, A. Albani,
and Z.M. Yusop, Hydraulic power take-off concepts
for wave energy conversion system: a review,
Energies (Basel), 12 (23) (2019). doi:10.3390/
en12234510.
64) A. Tetu, J. F. Chozas, A Proposed Guidance for the
Economic Assessment of Wave Energy Converters
at Early Development Stages, Energies 14 (15)
(2021). Doi: 10.3390/en14154699
65) D. Magagna, R. Monfardini, A. Uihlein,”JRC Ocean
Energy Status Report 2016th Edition, Joint
Research Centre, Directorate for Energy, Ed.;
Technical , Report; Publication Office of the
European Union: Luxembourg (2016). Available
online:https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repositor
y/bitstream/JRC104799/kj1a28407enn.pdf
(accessed on 8 June 2023)
66) J. F. Chozas, A. MacGillivray, A, A. Raventos, H.
Jeffrey, K. Nielsen, D. Aderibigbe,International
Levelised Cost of Energy for Ocean Energy
Technologies; Technical Report; Ocean Energy
Systems (OES): Lisbon, Portugal (2015)
67) Pecher, A.; Kofoed, J.P. Handbook of Ocean Wave
Energy; Springer, Ocean Engineering &
Oceanography: Cham, Switzerland (2017)
68) J.U. Jasron, S. Soeparman, L. Yuliati, and D.B.
Darmadi, Experimental Study on the Effect of
Ocean Wave Characteristics on Air Pressure in
Oscillating Water Column Device,in: IOP Conf Ser
Mater Sci Eng, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2019.
doi:10.1088/1757-899X/494/1/012019.
69) Y
.A. Rahman, and Setiyawan, The Potential of
Conversion of Sea Wave Energy to Electric Energy:
The Performance of Central Sulawesi West Sea
using Oscillating Water Column Technology, in:
IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, IOP Publishing Ltd,
2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/926/1/012073.
70) A.T. Kurniawan, A. Budiman, R. Budiarto, and R.B.
Prasetyo, Wave energy potential using owc
(oscillating water column) system at pantai baron,
gunung kidul, di yogyakarta, indonesia,Journal of
Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and
Thermal Sciences, 92 (2) 191–201 (2022). doi:10.
37934/arfmts.92.2.191201.
71) R. Priyoko Prayitnoadi, F. Rosa, M. Hudatwi, M.
Ubed Nurhadi, A. Febrianto, and N. Roliana,
Analysis of sea wave power plant design in Bangka
Island Indonesia,in: IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng,
Institute of Physics Publishing, 2019. doi:10.1088/
1757-899X/694/1/012021.
72) R. Walujo Prastianto, I. Syarif Arief, H. Laksana
Guntur, and H. Setiyawan, Performance modeling
of a wave energy converter: pembangkit listrik
tenaga gelombang laut sistem bandulan (‘Pltgl-sb’),”
11 (4) (2016). www.arpnjournals.com.
73) F. Husain, Effect of Wave Power Device
- 1649 -
A Mini Review: Wave Energy Converters Technology, Potential Applications and Current Research in Indonesia
Arrangement in Double-Water-Chamber Type
Seawall towards Wave Power Extraction Rate and
Wave Dissipation,in: IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng,
Institute of Physics Publishing, 2020. doi:10.1088/
1757-899X/875/1/012084.
74) Jufri, D. Paroka, Jalaluddin, and R. Tarakka, The
simulation buoy shape bullet of sea wave energy
absorption based on diameter variations,in: IOP
Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, Institute of Physics
Publishing, 2020. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/885/1/
012021.
75) F. Husain, M.R. Alwi, and Ashury, Efficacy of
Water Chamber Type Seawall to Dissipate Incident
Wave and Its Performance to Extract Wave Power,
in: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, Institute of
Physics Publishing, 2018. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/
135/1/012002.
76) F. Husain, M.Z.M. Alie, and T. Rahman, Parameter
Governing of Wave Resonance in Water Chamber
and Its Application,in: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ
Sci, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2018. doi:10.
1088/1755-1315/140/1/012031.
77) A. Wahyudie, T.B. Susilo, F. Alaryani, C.S.A.
Nandar, M.A. Jama, A. Daher, and H. Shareef,
Wave power assessment in the middle part of the
southern coast of java island,Energies (Basel), 13
(10) (2020). doi:10.3390/en13102633.
78) N. Aji, E. Ekawati, and I.N. Haq, The Simulation of
Wave Energy Conversion by Floating Point
Absorber Buoy in Indonesian Sea Waves,in: 2021
International Conference on Instrumentation,
Control, and Automation (ICA), IEEE, 2021: pp.
112117. doi:10.1109/ICA52848.2021.9625671.
79) M. Madi, Mukhtasor, R.W. Prastianto, T. Tuswan,
and A. Ismail, Experimental study on the effect of
arm design on the performance of a flap-float
horizontal ocean wave energy converter,Nase More,
69 (2) 7783 (2022). doi:10.17818/NM/2022/2.1.
80) S.I. Haryuda, I.W. Susila, I.H. Siregar, and A. Aris,
Power Control of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic-
Wind Turbin-Bouy Conversion Energy Wave Hybrid
System,in: IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, Institute
of Physics Publishing, 2019. doi:10.1088/1757-
899X/494/1/012074.
81) H.A. Imran, M.A. Thaha, M.P. Hatta, and B. Bakri,
Preliminary design of wave energy utilization
model simulation for buoy type seawater pumps,in:
IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, IOP Publishing Ltd,
2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/841/1/012027.
82) B. Triasdian, Y.S. Indartono, N.S. Ningsih, and D.
Novitasari, Device Selection of the Potential Wave
Energy Site in Indonesian Seas, in: IOP Conf Ser
Earth Environ Sci, Institute of Physics Publishing,
2019. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/291/1/012040.
83) O. Setyandito, N. Nizam, A.J. Pierre, G.D. Suputra,
Y. Wijayanti, and M. Anda, “Numerical analysis of
velocity magnitude on wave energy converter
system in perforated breakwater, International
Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 11 (1)
27–33 (2022). doi:10.14710/ijred.2022.38535.
84) J. Burhanudin, A.S.A. Hasim, A.M. Ishak, J.
Burhanudin, and S.M.F.B.S.M. Dardin, A review of
power electronics for nearshore wave energy
converter applications, IEEE Access, 10 16670
16680 (2022). doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3148319.
- 1650 -
... Renewable energy is the government's main focus for alternative energy sources that are environmentally friendly and sustainable 14) . Technology development from renewable energy sources has begun, for example, by utilizing solar [15][16][17][18] , water current 19,20) , wave 21,22) , tidal 23,24) , wind [25][26][27][28] , biomass [29][30][31][32] , geothermal 33,34) , or a combination of the above 35,36) . ...
Article
Full-text available
Similar to any solar conversion application into electrical power, the photovoltaic panel performance is suffering from the high temperature and when it is mounted in hot-dry climates. One method to overcome these setbacks is to marry the PV panel with a solar air updraft system, which led to a decline in its temperature by upgrading the air mass flow facing the PV-panel. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the hybrid Photovoltaic-Air Updraft Solar models. The review presents and discusses the compounds and experimental and theoretical studies that were carried out on the existing PV-solar air updraft models. In addition, the paper proposed a new solar air updraft technique by coupling the PV panel with a swirling air generator. The proposed model is simple and more efficient than the conventional solar air updraft design, leading to higher PV panel cooling performance.
Article
Full-text available
The evolution of renewable energy technologies may surmount fossil fuel disadvantages. Wave energy is considered one of the best alternatives to fossil energy due to its advantages. The 40-year (1979–2018) spatio-temporal distribution of wave energy is presented using European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) datasets. In addition, the common formula used for wave energy evaluation is derived from the linear wave theory in deep water, which is not applicable in shallow water. Therefore, a new equation that is suitable for both shallow and deep water is derived, which improves the accuracy of the wave energy evaluation for various water depths. The main aim is to investigate the spatio-temporal wave energy for offshore China from 1979 to 2018 and combine the new standard of classification to recommend the optimal area. The nearshore zone from Zhejiang province to Guandong province is considered the ideal zone, and the average annual wave energy density in this area is above 10 kW/m.
Article
Full-text available
The geopolymer concept has gained wide international attention during the last two decades and is now seen as a potential alternative to ordinary Portland cement; however, before full implementation in the national and international standards, the geopolymer concept requires clarity on the commonly used definitions and mix design methodologies. The lack of a common definition and methodology has led to inconsistency and confusion across disciplines. This review aims to clarify the most existing geopolymer definitions and the diverse procedures on geopolymer methodologies to attain a good understanding of both the unary and binary geopolymer systems. This review puts into perspective the most crucial facets to facilitate the sustainable development and adoption of geopolymer design standards. A systematic review protocol was developed based on the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and applied to the Scopus database to retrieve articles. Geopolymer is a product of a polycondensation reaction that yields a three-dimensional tecto-aluminosilicate matrix. Compared to unary geopolymer systems, binary geopolymer systems contain complex hydrated gel structures and polymerized networks that influence workability, strength, and durability. The optimum utilization of high calcium industrial by-products such as ground granulated blast furnace slag, Class-C fly ash, and phosphogypsum in unary or binary geopolymer systems give C-S-H or C-AS -H gels with dense polymerized networks that enhance strength gains and setting times. As there is no geopolymer mix design standard, most geopolymer mix designs apply the trial-and-error approach, and a few apply the Taguchi approach, particle packing fraction method, and response surface methodology. The adopted mix designs require the optimization of certain mixture variables whilst keeping constant other nominal material factors. The production of NaOH gives less CO2 emission compared to Na2SiO3, which requires higher calcination temperatures for Na2CO3 and SiO2. However, their usage is considered unsustainable due to their caustic nature, high energy demand, and cost. Besides the blending of fly ash with other industrial by-products, phosphogypsum also has the potential for use as an ingredient in blended geopolymer systems. The parameters identified in this review can help foster the robust adoption of geopolymer as a potential "go-to" alternative to ordinary Portland cement for construction. Furthermore, the proposed future research areas will help address the various innovation gaps observed in current literature with a view of the environment and society.
Article
Full-text available
Wave tank model testing has been widely used to assess the performance of Wave Energy Converters (WEC) in different technology readiness levels (TRL). At early stage the use of simple wave conditions such as regular waves and parametric wave spectrum JONSWAP or Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum is acceptable. However at later stages there is a need to use site specific complex wave conditions representative of potential prototype deployment sites. In previous research, 10 different regrouping methods on HF radar measured wave spectrum were tested to find out the most representative sea states for tank testing. It has been shown that by using the K-means clustering technique, the characteristics of wave conditions can be well preserved. In order to assess the power capture performance of a typical WEC in these representative sea states, the RM3 point absorber has been simulated. By analysing how well the average power output predicted from different representative sea-state selection methods compares with the total power output prediction, it is shown that the non-directional wave spectrum K-means clustering method provides the most representative sea states and, for a point absorber, with a very accurate estimation of the total power output, which is not the case by using a traditional binning method. The importance of using the complex site-specific sea states rather than simplified parametric JONSWAP sea states to obtain the accurate total power estimation has also been shown.
Article
Full-text available
A novel modular floating structure (MFS) system moored by tension legs was proposed, which is composed of hexagonal floating modules, floating artificial reefs and wave energy converters (WECs). The integration of floating artificial reefs and WECs into the MFS can improve the marine environment and produce considerable electricity. The effects of both wave characteristics and the module quantity on the hydrodynamic responses of the MFS system were studied in depth, based on a time-domain numerical model. Both the modules’ hydrodynamic interaction effect and the connectors’ mechanical coupling effect were considered. The results indicate that floating artificial reefs combined with WECs can effectively reduce wave loads and convert wave energy into electricity for the MFS system. More modules involved in the MFS system could significantly reduce motion response and produced more wave energy output, which indicates that the MFS system is suitable for large-scale expansion. The effect of different power take-off (PTO) damping coefficients on the WECs’ performance was further investigated, and the optimal damping coefficient was recommended for the MFS system. Finally, the main extreme responses of the MFS system were further investigated, and its safety was checked thoroughly. One survival strategy was proposed, which could efficiently reduce extreme connector loads by more than 50%.
Article
Full-text available
Indonesia as one of the countries that has a very large geothermal potential. Its utilization should be developed because this energy is classified as renewable and sustainable energy. Indonesia has geothermal potential of 28,910 MW, as the second largest country in the world. So far only 1,699 MW of installed capacity or 5.9% of its geothermal potential. The purpose of this study is to describe how the process of building a sustainable geothermal power plant on the slopes of Slamet Mount has not been successful. The study method used is qualitative with interview, observation and documentation techniques in data collection. The data analysis method uses interactive analysis. The results of the study show that the construction process of geothermal power plants on Slamet Mount has actually started since 2005. The initial plan was that in 2021 it could be exploited with 220 megawatts of electricity. In fact, it's not finished yet. One of these constraints is caused by environmental factors which include abiotic, biotic and social components. Abiotic components in the form of geological aspects and extreme land conditions that cause water pollution. The biotic component is the fishery and agriculture sectors of the population affected by the turbidity of the water. The social component is public unrest, resulting in demonstrations against the development process of sustainable geothermal power plant.
Article
Full-text available
Assessments on the configuration design of the ocean wave energy converter are fundamental to obtaining optimum performance under different environmental scenarios. In this study, the physical experimental test was conducted to investigate the suitable configuration of the proposed design of the Flap-Float Horizontal (FFH) energy converter device. A 1:20 scaled model was investigated in the laboratory tank subjected to normal wave conditions. Several parameters, including the arm length and angle of the buoy, were analyzed in different wave steepness to obtain the optimum arm design configuration. A total of 72 model tests were addressed to obtain a proposed maximum torque and voltage output. The result indicated that the best configuration design could be obtained by increasing the angle between the arm and the rope below the water level. In addition, it was discovered that the optimal configuration design with an angle of 880 and an arm length of 0.6 m yield the best results. The influence of the arm design sensitivity to various wave heights tended to be directly linear to the torque and voltage output. Finally, it was found that the greater the wave steepness, the bigger the output results.
Article
Full-text available
Indonesia is an archipelago with significant variations in natural resources, infrastructure, socioeconomic, culture, human resource capacity, accessibility, and access to financial and technical assistance. In this situation, integrated and unique efforts are needed to manage natural resources and build synergy between their protection and utilization to achieve water, energy, and food (WEF) security in accordance with the SDG targets. This paper analyzes the implementations of the WEF nexus in rural Indonesia by examining existing legal frameworks and other related policies, journals, textbooks, and publications. We explore factors influencing the success and failure of the implementation of the WEF nexus approaches from technical, socioeconomic, cultural, political, and institutional perspectives of the rural development framework.