A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Self-Efficacy Pathways to Childhood Depression
Albert Bandura
Stanford UniversityConcetta Pastorelli, Claudio Barbaranelli, and
Gian Vittorio Caprara
University of Rome, "La Sapienza"
This prospective research analyzed how different facets of perceived self-efficacy operate in concert
within a network of sociocognitive influences in childhood depression. Perceived social and academic
inefficacy contributed to concurrent and subsequent depression both directly and through their impact on
academic achievement, prosocialness, and problem behaviors. In the shorter run, children were depressed
over beliefs in their academic inefficacy rather than over their actual academic performances. In the
longer run, the impact of a low sense of academic efficacy on depression was mediated through academic
achievement, problem behavior, and prior depression. Perceived social inefficacy had a heavier impact
on depression in girls than in boys in the longer term. Depression was also more strongly linked over time
for girls than for boys.
Childhood depression is a matter of major concern because of its
prevalence and impairment of functioning. Moreover, it often is
not a transient phenomenon that children outgrow. Depressive
episodes are recurrent if the contributing factors remain unabated.
Early depressive vulnerability is, therefore, predictive of frequency
and severity of depression in adulthood (Petersen et al., 1993).
Rates of depression vary by ethnicity and culture, but women are
generally more prone to depression than men. However, gender
differences do not begin to emerge until late adolescence (Culbert-
son, 1997; Nolen-Hoeksema & Girgus, 1994). Gender differences
in susceptibility to depression have been attributed to a variety of
factors, including sex role socialization, more stressors in women's
lives,
negatively biased self-systems, use of ruminative rather than
active coping strategies, neurobiologic dysfunctions, and socio-
structural constraints and impediments (Hammen, 1990; Nolen-
Hoeksema, 1991; Petersen et al., 1993; Rehm, 1988).
Although theories of depression differ in the particular de-
terminants they feature, they generally subscribe to the
diathesis-stress model as the guiding metatheory. Within this
Albert Bandura, Department of Psychology, Stanford University; Con-
cetta Pastorelli, Claudio Barbaranelli, and Gian Vittorio Caprara, Depart-
ment of Psychology, University of Rome, "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy.
The research reported in this article was supported by grants from the
Grant Foundation, the Spencer Foundation, and the Johann Jacobs
Foundation.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Albert
Bandura, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall,
Building 420, Stanford, California 94305-2130; or to Gian Vittorio Ca-
prara, Dipartimento di Psicologia, Universita Degli Studi di Roma, "La
Sapienza," Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
conceptual framework, external stressors constitute risk factors
that act on personal predispositions to produce bouts of depres-
sion. Depending on theoretical orientation, the diathesis or
predispositions may be primarily cognitive, constitutional, or a
blend of.these different types of susceptibilities. The diathesis-
stress model is often combined with epidemiological risk-buffer
models. Protective factors are posited as conditions that can
buffer the adverse effects of stressors. This metatheory is
heavily cast in reactive terms.
Social cognitive theory posits an agentic model of depression in
which individuals play a proactive role in their adaptation rather
than simply undergo experiences through environmental stressors
acting on their personal vulnerabilities. Within an agentic perspec-
tive,
positive contributors to successful adaptation represent en-
ablement factors that operate proactively rather than just protective
or sheltering factors. Protectiveness shields individuals from harsh
realities or weakens their impact. Enablement equips them with the
personal resources to select and structure their environments in
ways that cultivate competencies and set a successful course for
their lives. This is the difference between proactive recruitment of
positive guidance and support for shaping one's life circumstances
and reactive adaptation to them. At the intraindividual level, peo-
ple are enabled rather than merely buffered by competencies and
beliefs of personal efficacy.
Among the mechanisms of human agency, none is more central
or pervasive than people's beliefs in their efficacy to regulate their
own functioning and to exercise control over events that affect
their lives (Bandura, 1997). Perceived self-efficacy refers to beliefs
in one's capabilities to produce given attainments. A sense of
personal efficacy is the foundation of human agency. Unless
people believe they can produce desired effects by their actions,
they have little incentive to act or to persevere in the face of
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999, Vol. 76, No. 2, 258-269
Copyright 1999 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-3514/99/S3.00
258
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.