ArticlePublisher preview available

Stimulus Recognition and the Mere Exposure Effect

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

A meta-analysis of research on Zajonc's (1968) mere exposure effect indicated that stimuli perceived without awareness produce substantially larger exposure effects than do stimuli that are consciously perceived (Bornstein, 1989a). However, this finding has not been tested directly in the laboratory. Two experiments were conducted comparing the magnitude of the exposure effect produced by 5-ms (i.e., subliminal) stimuli and stimuli presented for longer durations (i.e., 500 ms). In both experiments, 5-ms stimuli produced significantly larger mere exposure effects than did 500-ms stimuli. These results were obtained for polygon (Experiment 1), Welsh figure (Experiment 2), and photograph stimuli (Experiments 1 and 2). Implications of these findings for theoretical models of the mere exposure effect are discussed.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1992,
Vol. 63, No. 4, 545-552Copyright 1992 by the American Psychological Association, Inc.
0022-3514/92/S3.00
Stimulus Recognition and the Mere Exposure Effect
Robert
F.
Bornstein and Paul R. DAgostino
Gettysburg College
A meta-analysis of research on Zajonc's (1968) mere exposure effect indicated that stimuli per-
ceived without awareness produce substantially larger exposure effects than do stimuli that are
consciously perceived (Bornstein,
1989a).
However, this
finding
has not been tested directly in the
laboratory. Two experiments were conducted comparing the magnitude of the exposure effect
produced by S-ms
(i.e.,
subliminal) stimuli and stimuli presented for longer durations
(i.e.,
500 ms).
In both experiments, 5-ms stimuli produced significantly larger mere exposure effects than did
500-ms
stimuli.
These results were obtained for polygon (Experiment
1),
Welsh
figure
(Experiment
2),
and photograph stimuli (Experiments
1
and 2). Implications of these findings for theoretical
models of the mere exposure effect are discussed.
Since the publication of Zajonc's
(1968)
monograph describ-
ing the
mere exposure effect
(i.e.,
the observation that repeated,
unreinforced exposure is sufficient to enhance attitude toward
a stimulus), there have been more than 200 published experi-
ments investigating the exposure-affect relationship (Born-
stein, 1989a). The exposure effect has proven to be a robust,
reliable phenomenon, yielding strong results for a variety of
stimuli
(e.g.,
polygons, drawings, photographs, nonsense words,
and idiographs) and a variety of rating procedures
(e.g.,
liking
ratings, pleasantness ratings, and forced-choice preference
judgments). Furthermore, researchers have used paradigms
and procedures from exposure effects research to investigate a
wide variety of psychological phenomena, including advertis-
ing effects (Sawyer, 1981), social perceptions and behaviors
(Saegert, Swap, & Zajonc, 1973), stereotypes and prejudice
(Ball
&
Cantor, 1974), food preferences (Pliner, 1982), environ-
mental preferences (Herzog, Kaplan, & Kaplan, 1976), aes-
thetic
judgments
(Berlyne,
1974),
verbal learning (Zajonc, Mar-
kus,
& Wilson, 1974), implicit memory (Gordon & Holyoak,
1983),
and attitude formation (Grush, 1976).
A number of experiments have demonstrated that typical
mere exposure effects can be obtained by stimuli that are nei-
ther recalled nor recognized by subjects (Bonanno
&
Stillings,
1986;
Bornstein, Leone, & Galley, 1987; Kunst-Wilson & Za-
jonc,
1980; Mandler, Nakamura, & Van Zandt,
1987;
Seamon,
Brody, & KaufT, 1983a,
1983b;
Seamon, Marsh,
&
Brody,
1984).
These findings suggest that awareness of stimulus content is
not required for the production of mere exposure effects. Thus,
Portions of this article were presented at the 98th Annual Conven-
tion of the American Psychological Association, Boston, August 13,
1990.
This research
was
supported by an Institutional Self-Renewal grant
from Gettysburg College to Robert
F.
Bornstein and Paul R. DAgos-
tino.
We
thank Larry
Jacoby,
Richard Moreland, and several anonymous
reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Rob-
ert
F.
Bornstein, Department of Psychology, Gettysburg
College,
Get-
tysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.
although it
is
clear that some type of learning process underlies
the exposure effect (Gordon
&
Horyoak,
1983;
Harrison, 1977),
this learning process apparently can take place entirely outside
of conscious awareness, involving implicit rather than explicit
knowledge about a stimulus.
Not only do stimuli perceived without awareness produce
robust exposure effects, but a meta-analysis of research on the
exposure effect indicated that mere exposure effects produced
by stimuli that are not recognized at better-than-chance accu-
racy are substantially larger than mere exposure effects pro-
duced by clearly recognized stimuli. Bornstein (1989a) used
meta-analytic techniques to compare the magnitude of attitude
enhancement in mere exposure studies involving subliminal
stimuli and studies using stimuli presented for longer exposure
durations. A mean effect size
r
of .528 was found for subliminal
stimuli, whereas the mean effect size for stimuli presented for
longer exposure durations was .140. These data indicate that
subliminal mere exposure effects are considerably stronger
than typical mere exposure effects and suggest that awareness
of stimulus content may somehow inhibit the exposure effect.
A
subsequent meta-analysis of mere exposure effects research fur-
ther demonstrated that across all mere exposure experiments
there is an inverse relationship between stimulus recognition
accuracy and the magnitude of the exposure effect (Bornstein,
1989b).
Bornstein's (1989a, 1989b) meta-analytic findings regarding
the inverse relationship of stimulus recognition accuracy to the
magnitude of the mere exposure effect
have
not been replicated
in the laboratory. Further examination of this issue
is
important
for
two
reasons.
First, this
finding
has implications for theoreti-
cal models of the exposure effect. Extant models of the expo-
sure effect (i.e., the two-factor, opponent-process, and attitude
formation models) cannot easily accommodate this pattern of
results (see Harrison, 1977; Stang, 1974b). Thus, if laboratory
studies confirm that stimuli perceived without awareness pro-
duce significantly stronger mere exposure effects than do stim-
uli that are clearly recognized, extant models of the exposure
effect may need to be revised or replaced.
Second, this issue
has
important implications for
the
study
of
545
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Consequently, people who recognize that they have read or heard the same statement from the same source before should attribute their feeling of fluency to that previous encounter rather than to the truthfulness of the statement. Bornstein and D'Agostino (1992) advanced the idea of fluency discounting with respect to the mere-exposure effect-the phenomenon that repeated stimulus presentations increase positive affect. Specifically, the authors proposed that stimulus recognition diminishes the mereexposure effect, because studies had found the effect to be stronger when statements were repeated subliminally rather than supraliminally (Bornstein, 1989;Bornstein & D'Agostino, 1992). ...
... Bornstein and D'Agostino (1992) advanced the idea of fluency discounting with respect to the mere-exposure effect-the phenomenon that repeated stimulus presentations increase positive affect. Specifically, the authors proposed that stimulus recognition diminishes the mereexposure effect, because studies had found the effect to be stronger when statements were repeated subliminally rather than supraliminally (Bornstein, 1989;Bornstein & D'Agostino, 1992). However, others failed to replicate stronger mere-exposure effects for subliminally presented stimuli (Newell & Shanks, 2007) and even observed a positive relationship between stimulus recognition and likability (Brooks & Watkins, 1989;Newell & Shanks, 2007;Stafford & Grimes, 2012). ...
... Based on this finding, the integrative model of the truth effect considers recognition to be one of several mediators between repetition and judged truth (Unkelbach et al., 2019). Yet there are also contrasting theoretical arguments and findings suggesting that recognition counters the truth effect (e.g., Bornstein & D'Agostino, 1992;Garcia-Marques et al., 2017). Moreover, up to now, a link between recognition and truth judgments has not yet been empirically substantiated, as prior research investigated truth judgments as a function of recognition judgments, not as a function of factual recognition on the cognitive-process level. ...
Article
Full-text available
Repeatedly seen or heard statements are typically judged to be more likely true than statements not encountered before, a phenomenon referred to as truth effect. Similarly, statements judged to be old typically receive higher truth judgments than statements judged to be new. However, it is unclear whether and how this recognition-based truth effect depends on the latent memory states underlying observed recognition judgments. In order to investigate this question, we used a model-based approach to compare truth judgments as a function of recognition judgments (“old” vs. “new”) and their underlying memory states (state of memory certainty vs. state of uncertainty). In three experiments, we observed a recognition-based truth effect and found this effect to be larger in the state of memory certainty than in the state of uncertainty. This result also replicated for subjective instead of modeled memory states. Moreover, we found effects of recognition judgments on judged truth to be stronger than effects of factual repetition in all three experiments. Taken together, our research highlights the role of episodic memory processes in the truth effect and provides a methodological tool that takes underlying memory states into account.
... Importantly, the time interval between the first and second interactions was consistent for all participants-one week. The number of days and tasks was selected based on studies of similar cognitive biases (Hartman et al. 1991;Bornstein and D'Agostino, 1992;Peck and Shu 2009). Within the week, tasks were sent to subjects to interact with the initially presented interface to form user experience. ...
Article
Full-text available
As technological interfaces are relatively new cultural tools, regular interaction can lead to new psychological phenomena, like the baby duck syndrome, where users favor old interfaces over updates. This syndrome is seen as a cognitive bias in human–computer interaction. Two studies were conducted: Study 1 on an Airbnb app (old vs. new versions), and Study 2 on a self-developed website (blue vs. purple design). Subjects completed sequential five usability tasks in two blocks with the resting between. Experimental groups engaged with different interface versions, while control groups used the same one. After completing tasks, subjects filled questionnaires about interface interaction. Study 1 showed significantly higher preference for the old Airbnb version, though scores varied by group. Study 2 revealed a trend of reduced scores in experimental groups on second assessment, not seen in controls. Version-based rating differences were insignificant. Overall, Studies 1 and 2 indicated baby duck syndrome is challenging to study in labs, suggesting it emerges when users are genuinely engaged with the interface. This article has both theoretical and experimental significance for studying the emergence of psychological phenomena in human-digital interaction. As a practical application, the obtained results can be useful for correct development updates for interfaces.
Article
Full-text available
In common buying frameworks of interest for consumer behavior, top-down and bottom-up attentional mechanisms interact, with the prevailing one changing frequently. The current study investigated the effects of increased effort to locate a stimulus on the self-reported valence and intensity associated with the respective stimulus. Two types of stimuli, of positive and negative valences, were evaluated. Both were placed in two visual fields with distractors of the same type; while the distractors were the same, their placement in one field facilitated the target location while in the other made it more difficult. Significant differences were found for the same stimulus in the two visual fields it was presented in concerning the valence, and more moderate regarding the intensity. Within each of the four resulting visual fields (positive stimulus easy to find, positive stimulus difficult to find, negative stimulus easy to find, and negative stimulus difficult to find, respectively), significant negative correlations were found between the time to first fixation (TFF) on target and the self-reported emotion valence; a significant positive correlation between TFF on target and self-reported intensity was found only for the negative stimulus presented in the difficult to find placement.
Article
Full-text available
In common buying frameworks of interest for consumer behavior, top-down and bottom-up attentional mechanisms interact, with the prevailing one changing frequently. The current study investigated the effects of increased effort to locate a stimulus on the self-reported valence and intensity associated with the respective stimulus. Two types of stimuli, of positive and negative valences, were evaluated. Both were placed in two visual fields with distractors of the same type; while the distractors were the same, their placement in one field facilitated the target location while in the other made it more difficult. Significant differences were found for the same stimulus in the two visual fields it was presented in concerning the valence, and more moderate regarding the intensity. Within each of the four resulting visual fields (positive stimulus easy to find, positive stimulus difficult to find, negative stimulus easy to find, and negative stimulus difficult to find, respectively), significant negative correlations were found between the time to first fixation (TFF) on target and the self-reported emotion valence; a significant positive correlation between TFF on target and self-reported Trifu Danut, Stan (Bizon) Claudia Cristina https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJMHRM 37 editor@iaeme.com intensity was found only for the negative stimulus presented in the difficult to find placement.
Article
Full-text available
Infants' preferential looking at novel objects and adults' preference for the familiar indicate that preference may be influenced by whether the objects have been experienced previously. Infants and adults may have opposite preferential tendencies; however, infants' preference for a familiar object which they have experienced orally casts doubt on this as a developmental process. To examine both the influences of experienced modalities and age on the relationship between preference and memory, tactile-visual preference and memory tests were employed in 4- and 5-yr.-olds. The results indicated the dissociation of preference by recognition only in 4-yr.-olds: those who recognized the objects preferred the familiar and the 4-yr.-olds who could not recognize them preferred the novel. The 5-yr.-olds tended to prefer the familiar objects regardless of recognition. The results may suggest an age effect on the relationship between preference and recognition.
Article
Full-text available
Across two studies (Total N = 1,659), we found evidence for cultural differences in attitudes toward socially bonding with conversational AI. In Study 1 ( N = 675), university students with an East Asian cultural background expected to enjoy a hypothetical conversation with a chatbot (vs. human) more than students with European background. Moreover, they were less uncomfortable and more approving of a hypothetical situation where someone else socially connected with a chatbot (vs. human) than the students with a European background. In Study 2 (preregistered; N = 984), we found similar evidence for cultural differences comparing samples of Chinese and Japanese adults currently living in East Asia to adults currently living in the United States. Critically, these cultural differences were explained by East Asian participants increased propensity to anthropomorphize technology. Overall, our findings suggest there is cultural variability in attitudes toward chatbots and that these differences are mediated by differences in anthropomorphism.
Chapter
This chapter defines the concept of aesthetics and its influence on consumer behavior, emphasizing its impact on visual appeal and the evaluation of visual stimuli. It discusses aesthetic psychology and the dimensions of aesthetic experience, highlighting the roles of psychographic and collative variables in appreciating visual stimuli. The chapter delves into the fluency process as a key mechanism that explains the relationships between visual dimensions and aesthetic appreciation. Additionally, it examines how aesthetic dimensions and fluency affect consumer perceptions across various marketing domains, including eco-labels, showcasing their importance in shaping consumer attitudes and decision-making processes.
Article
Full-text available
Color composition is a crucial factor in the aesthetic evaluation of paintings. Several studies have reported a prototype preference for art paintings, where altering the original painting results in a poorer aesthetic evaluation. If the original painting has familiar features, the phenomenon of original preference may be due to the fluency of processing color composition in paintings. However, there are few investigations into the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the preference for original paintings. This study aimed to clarify whether the original preference is due to the fluency of processing color composition using P3 asymmetry to reflect perceptual fluency for stimuli. Oddball tasks with a combination of the original and 180°, or 90° and 270° as control, were performed by swapping the repetitive and deviant stimuli for each task. The results revealed that P3 asymmetry was found only with a combination of 0° and 180°, indicating that the color composition of original paintings can be fluently processed compared with other color compositions in hue-rotated paintings. This explanation may lead to the elucidation of universal color preferences or physiological mechanisms that favor certain color compositions.
Article
Full-text available
Results of a study of 64 right-handed undergraduates indicate that repeated exposure to briefly presented stimuli increased positive affect through familiarity without enhancing recognition of the stimuli. Following exposure, Ss selected previously shown target stimuli on the basis of affect in the absence of stimulus recognition. Interpreted in terms of the manner in which information can be accessed in long-term storage, the present study extends earlier research by showing that the ability to select target stimuli by affect can occur undiminished over a delay of 1 wk between study and test. Repeated processing during study can produce a form of perceptual learning, called perceptual fluency, that can serve as the basis for stimulus discrimination in the absence of recognition at the time of test. The present results of familiar but unrecognized stimuli are analogous to the memory phenomenon of déjà vu. (14 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Book
This landmark volume brings together the work of the world's leading researchers in subliminal perception. This compilation marks a fundamental shift in the current study of subliminal effects: No longer in question is the notion that perception without awareness occurs. Now, the emphasis is on elucidating the parameters of subliminal effects and understanding the conditions under which stimuli perceived without awareness significantly influence affect, cognition, and behavior. "Perception Without Awareness" firmly establishes subliminal perception within the mainstream of psychological science. Well represented here are the two main research branches that have emerged: One directly investigates the nature of subliminal effects; the other uses subliminal techniques as tools for investigating psychological phenomena such as hypnosis, dreaming, repression, social judgment and inference, psychopathology, and symptom formation. Timely and thought-provoking, "Perception Without Awareness" is sure to be of enormous interest to all psychoanalytic clinicians and scholars, as well as cognitive, clinical, and social psychologists whose work touches upon issues relating to psychopathology, perception, cognition, and memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Comparisons of the relative sensitivity of direct and indirect tasks can provide definitive evidence for unconscious memory when the direct and indirect tasks are matched on all characteristics except instructions. To demonstrate unconscious memory in normal adults, subjects first viewed pairs of words and named one cued word in each pair. During the subsequent assessment of memory, new words and either previously cued words (Experiment 1) or previously uncued words (Experiments 2A and 2B) were presented against a background mask. The subjects judged whether a word was old or new (direct task) or whether the contrast between a word and the mask was high or low (indirect task). For cued words, the direct task was more sensitive than the indirect task. However, for uncued words, the indirect task was initially more sensitive than the direct task, even though the direct task exhibited hypermnesia so that it became more sensitive than the indirect task across trial blocks. The greater initial sensitivity of the indirect task implicates unconscious processes underlying memory for the uncued words. These results indicate that unconscious processes in normal adults can be revealed through comparisons of comparable direct and indirect measures.
Article
We interpret the difference between aware and unaware forms of memory in terms of Polanyi's distinction between tool and object. Aware memory, such as recognition and recall, occurs when memory serves as an object of attention. Unaware memory occurs when memory serves as a tool to accomplish a present task. Both memory-as-tool and memory-as-object can rely on memory for specific prior experiences. Memory used as a tool is a pervasive form of unconscious influence. We present experiments in which memory used as a tool enhances perception, lowers the subjective experience of background noise, increases the fame of nonfamous names, and lowers estimates of the difficulty of anagrams. To escape the pervasive effects of unconscious memory, one must consciously remember the past experience, understand its influence in the present task, and possess a good theory to serve as an alternative basis for behavior. These three criteria may seldom be met.
Article
The contributions of initial stimulus affect and of associative learning to the effects of repeated stimulus exposures were examined in two experiments. Stimuli that were initially positive and stimuli that were initially negative were presented for different number of times, and subjects rated these stimuli afterward on a number of affective dimensions. In all cases, except when negative affect was associatively paired with every stimulus exposure, affective responses became increasingly more positive with increasing exposures. The results were taken to indicate that the exposure effect can overcome an initially negative stimulus affect when the conditions of the mere exposure hypothesis are satisfied. Initial stimulus affect and associative learning of affect were shown to be independent factors, the first influencing the intercept of the exposure function, the second its slope.
Article
A review and meta-analysis of methodological and subject variables influencing the exposure-affect relationship was performed on studies of the mere exposure effect published in the 20 years following Zajonc's (1968) seminal monograph. Stimulus type, stimulus complexity, presentation sequence, exposure duration, stimulus recognition, age of subject, delay between exposure and ratings, and maximum number of stimulus presentations all influence the magnitude of the exposure effect. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of previous reviews of the literature on exposure effects and with respect to prevailing theoretical models of the exposure-affect relationship. Modifications of the 2-factor model of exposure effects that increase the heuristic value of the model are described. A possible evolutionary basis of the exposure effect is discussed.