This study is aimed at assessing the antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic, and antioxidant effects of Citrus reticulata (C. reticulata) fruit peel hydroethanolic extract and two flavonoids, hesperidin and quercetin, in nicotinamide (NA)/streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced type 2 diabetic rats. In addition, GC-MS and HPLC-MS analyses of the extract were performed and the results indicated the presence of multiple flavonoids including hesperidin, quercetin, naringin, and polymethoxylated flavones (nobiletin and tangeretin). To achieve the aim of the study, diabetic rats with NA/STZ-induced T2DM were orally treated with C. reticulata fruit peel hydroethanolic extract, hesperidin, and quercetin at a dose of 100 mg/kg b.w./day for four weeks. The treatments with C. reticulata fruit peel extract, hesperidin, and quercetin significantly ameliorated the impaired oral glucose tolerance; the elevated serum fructosamine level; the diminished serum insulin and C-peptide levels; the altered HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS, and HOMA-β cell function; the decreased liver glycogen content; the increased liver glucose-6-phosphatase and glycogen phosphorylase activities; the deleteriously affected serum lipid profile; the elevated serum AST and ALT activities; and the raised serum creatinine and urea levels in the diabetic rats. The treatments also produced remarkable improvement in the antioxidant defense system manifested by a decrease in the elevated liver lipid peroxidation and an increase in the lowered glutathione content and GPx, GST, and SOD activities. Furthermore, the three treatments enhanced the mRNA expression of GLUT-4 and the insulin receptor β-subunit, but only quercetin produced a significant increase in the expression of adiponectin in adipose tissue of diabetic rats. In conclusion, C. reticulata fruit peel hydroethanolic extract, hesperidin, and quercetin have potent antidiabetic effects which may be mediated through their insulinotropic effects and insulin-sensitizing actions. In addition, the alleviation of the antioxidant defense system by the extract, hesperidin, and naringin may have an important action to enhance the antidiabetic actions and to improve liver and kidney functions in NA/STZ-induced diabetic rats.
1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the most common diseases in the world, results from impairments in insulin secretion and/or insulin action leading to disturbances in the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins [1, 2]. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has classified DM into type 1 DM (T1DM), type 2 DM (T2DM), gestational DM (GDM), and many other specific types of diabetes [3]. T2DM is much more prevalent in humans than T1DM and is responsible for 90% of DM incidence [4, 5]. The main reasons for T2DM are impaired tissue insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance which was coupled to pancreatic β-cell dysfunction [6–8]. Many experimental animal models of T2DM were applied by several publications to validate the use of new therapies and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism(s) of action of the tested drugs [9, 10].
Nicotinamide (NA)/streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced DM is the most commonly used animal model of T2DM in rats. STZ, an antibiotic drug formed by Streptomyces achromogenes, has damaging effects on the β-cells in the islets of Langerhans [11–13]. Many reports stated that the damaging effect of STZ on β-cells of pancreatic islets is caused by the stimulation of oxidative stress and suppression of antioxidant defense [14–16]. Furthermore, the intracellular biotransformation of STZ results in the production of nitric oxide (NO) which speeds up the formation of DNA strand breaks, leading to β-cells’ necrosis [17]. NA injection before STZ in this DM-induced model, on the other hand, partially counteracts the destructive effect of STZ on β-cells, and it leads to the loss of the early phase of glucose stimulation of insulin secretion which is a feature of T2DM [18–20]. It was also proven by many investigators that in NA/STZ-induced DM, there are both impairment in insulin secretion and insulin resistance, which is a characteristic feature of T2DM [21–23].
The search for suitable antihyperglycemic agents from natural sources has been focused on plants applied in traditional medicines partly because they have lower side effects than the currently used conventional drugs [24]. Recently, there is an increased interest in the medical benefits of flavonoids because their supplementation seems to be accompanied by reduced risks for certain severe maladies and increased survival as stated by previous publications [25–27]. Citrus fruit peels, i.e., the outer layers of many fruits including lemons, oranges, mandarins, and grapefruits, have been demonstrated to be rich in flavonoid content [27–30]. Flavonoids found in citrus fruits were mainly allocated to three classes: flavanones, flavones, and flavonols [31].
Citrus reticulata (C. reticulata) or tangerine fruit peels have been shown to contain high concentrations of three flavanones: hesperidin, naringin, and narirutin [32]. Citrus peel also contains good quantities of flavonol and quercetin [33]. Hesperidin, a glycosylated flavanone of hesperetin, has been reported by Constantin et al. [34] and Parhiz et al. [35] to decrease intestinal glucose absorption and inhibit the gluconeogenic pathways, thereby leading to antihyperglycemic actions in diabetic human beings. Quercetin, a principal flavonol found in citrus fruits especially in fruit peels, was found to have antidiabetic actions in diabetic animal models at doses of 10, 25, and 50 mg/kilogram body weight (kg b.w.) [36]. It is a glycone of rutin, and it is a parent compound of a number of various flavonoids [37, 38]. Although the antidiabetic effects of hesperidin and quercetin were reported by some publications, the mechanisms of their antidiabetic actions are not fully elucidated. In addition, further investigations are needed to assess their comparative effects with the crude extract of C. reticulata fruit peel.
Therefore, the present study was conducted to assess the comparative antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic, and antioxidant effects of C. reticulata fruit peel hydroethanolic extract, hesperidin, and quercetin in NA/STZ-induced DM in Wistar rats and to suggest their mechanisms of action.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Animals
Adult male rats of Wistar strain weighing about 130-150 g and aged 10-12 weeks were used in the present experimental research work. The animals were supplied from the animal house of the National Research Center (NRC), El-Tahrir Street, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. They were maintained under strict care for about 10 days before the start of the experiment to exclude any intercurrent infection. The rats were housed in clean polypropylene cages (six rats/cage) with a well-aerated standard stainless steel frame and wood mulch at the bottom of cage. The rats were maintained under normal controlled atmospheric temperature (), humidity (), and daily normal 12-hour (hr) light/dark cycle. Moreover, they had free access to water and were provided daily with standard pelleted chow diet ad libitum. All animal procedures were in accordance with the guidelines and recommendations of the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee for Use and Care of Animals, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Egypt (ethical approval number is BSU/FS/2015/14). All instructions were followed, and all precautions were considered to minimize discomfort, distress, and pain of rats under investigations.
2.2. Drugs and Chemicals
STZ (2-deoxy-2-(3-methyl-3-nitrosoureido)-D-glycopyranoside), NA, hesperidin, and quercetin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA. NA, hesperidin, and quercetin were kept at 2–4°C, while STZ was stored at -20°C. All other used chemicals were of analytical grade and were commercially obtained.
2.3. Extract Preparation of C. reticulata Fruit Peel
C. reticulata or tangerine fruits were purchased from the local market at Beni-Suef Governorate, Egypt. The purchased fruits were manually flaked and were cleaned by washing with running water till completely clean. The washed peels were then dried in a good aerated area. Then, the dried peels were ground to a powder by an electric mortar. The finely obtained powder (0.5 kg) was drenched in 70% ethanol for 3 days. The mixture was filtered by using a Whatman No. 2 filter paper for removal of peel particles. The water and ethanol were vaporized by a Rotavapor to obtain a semisolid viscous mass which was stored in dark bottles in a deep freezer at -30°C pending its use for the treatment.
2.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis
Chemical analysis of C. reticulata peel hydroethanolic extract was performed in the Central Laboratory of the Faculty of Postgraduate Studies for Advanced Sciences, Beni-Suef University, Egypt, by using the Gas Chromatography (GC) System 7890A/5975C Inert Mass Spectrometry (MS) with a Triple Axis Detector, Agilent Technologies, Germany. The constituents were recognized by comparing their mass spectra with the spectra of derivatives in the Library Search Report (C:\Database\NIST11.L; C:\Database\demo.l) as well as in the NIST08s, WILEY8, and FAME libraries.
2.5. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography- (HPLC-) Mass Spectrometry (MS) Analysis
HPLC-MS analysis of C. reticulata fruit peel hydroethanolic extract was performed in the Central Laboratory of the Faculty of Postgraduate Studies for Advanced Sciences, Beni-Suef University, Egypt, by using the HPLC-MS system, 1260 Infinity, Agilent Technologies, Germany coupled with a Diode Array Detector (DAD). Standards including gallic acid, naringin, quercetin, hesperidin, nobiletin, and tangeretin were used to identify their peaks in the HPLC-MS chromatogram. The C. reticulata fruit peel hydroethanolic extract was dissolved in water : methanol (80 : 20 /) at a concentration of 10 mg/3 ml and filtered with a 0.45 μm filter, before injection of 20 μl into the HPLC system. Spectral UV data from all peaks were collected in the range of 240-400 nm, and chromatograms were recorded at 340 and 270 nm according to the method of Negri et al. [39].
2.6. Induction of T2DM
Experimental T2DM was induced in male Wistar rats, fasted for 16 hours (hrs), by a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of STZ at a dose level of 50 mg STZ/kg b.w. (dissolved in citrate buffer of pH 4.5), 15 minutes after the i.p. injection of 120 mg NA/kg b.w. [40]. Ten days after NA/STZ injection, overnight-fasted rats were orally supplemented with glucose (3 g/kg b.w.) by oral gavage. After 2 hrs of oral glucose administration, blood samples taken from the lateral tail vein were left to coagulate and then centrifuged. Thereafter, serum glucose level was detected. After screening of serum glucose levels, the rats which have serum glucose levels of 180-300 mg/dl after 2 hrs of oral glucose loading were considered mildly diabetic and were included in the experiment. Rats with serum glucose levels outside this range were excluded.
2.7. Experimental Design
The rats included in the experiment were divided into five groups, each group comprising six rats as follows: (1)Group 1 was regarded as the normal control group and received the equivalent volume of the vehicle, 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), by oral gavage daily for four weeks(2)Group 2 was regarded as the diabetic control group and received the equivalent volume of 1% CMC by oral gavage daily for four weeks(3)Group 3 served as diabetic rats that were treated with C. reticulata fruit peel hydroethanolic extract at a dose level of 100 mg in 5 ml 1% CMC/kg b.w./day [41], by oral gavage, for four weeks(4)Group 4 served as diabetic rats that were treated with hesperidin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, MO, USA), at a dose level of 100 mg (dissolved in 5 ml 1% CMC)/kg b.w./day, by oral gavage, for four weeks [42].(5)Group 5 served as diabetic rats that were treated with quercetin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, MO, USA), at a dose level of 100 mg (dissolved in 5 ml 1% CMC)/kg b.w./day, by oral gavage, for four weeks [43].
Each week, the dose was adjusted according to the alterations in b.w. to stabilize the correct dose per kg b.w. of rats during the entire period of the experiment.
2.8. Blood and Tissue Sampling
At the day before decapitation, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed for all individual rats. Blood samples were withdrawn from the lateral tail veins of overnight-fasted rats at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes following the oral glucose loading (3 g/kg b.w.), left to clot, and centrifuged at 4000 rounds per minute (rpm) for 15 minutes. After that, sera were quickly collected for the detection of serum glucose levels.
A day following OGTT, the overnight-fasted animals were anaesthetized by diethyl ether inhalation anaesthesia and blood samples were obtained from the jugular vein. Then, after decapitation by cervical dislocation, rats were dissected and liver, visceral adipose tissue, and pancreas were excised and perfused in saline. The blood from each rat was collected in gel and clot activator tubes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes. The obtained sera were stored in a deep freezer at -30°C until they were used for biochemical detection. The liver was kept in a deep freezer at -30°C pending its use for the determination of liver glycogen content and homogenization in saline (2% /). Pieces of visceral adipose tissue (3 mm³) were kept in a deep freezer at -70°C pending their use in RNA isolation and RT-PCR analysis. Pancreas from each rat was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and transferred to the Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, for processing, blocking in wax, sectioning, and staining with the trichrome PAS method.
2.9. Biochemical Assays
Serum glucose level was determined based on the method of Trinder [44] by a reagent kit obtained from Randox Laboratories, United Kingdom (UK). Serum fructosamine level was determined according to the method of Baker et al. [45]. Serum insulin and C-peptide levels were determined by an ELISA kit obtained from Linco Research Inc., USA, according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IS), and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β cell function) were calculated according to the equations described by Mishra et al. [46] and Aref et al. [47]. The measurement of serum total cholesterol (TC) and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels was performed based on the publication of Allain et al. [48], using a reagent kit obtained from Randox Laboratories (UK). Serum triglyceride (TG) level was determined based on the method of Finley and Tietz [49]. Serum LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) level was determined based on Friedewald et al.’s [50] formula (). Serum vLDL-cholesterol (vLDL-C) was calculated based on Norbert’s [51] formula (). FFA level in serum was estimated based on the publication of Duncombe [52]. Aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) activities in serum were measured, respectively, based on the publication of Gella et al. [53], by reagent kits delivered from Randox Laboratories (UK). Serum creatinine and urea levels were determined by using kits obtained from Biosystems S.A. (Spain) according to the methods of Fabiny and Ertingshausen [54] and Tabacco et al. [55], respectively.
Liver glycogen content was estimated based on the procedure of Seifter et al. [56]. Glucose-6-phosphatase (G-6-Pase) and glycogen phosphorylase activities in liver homogenates were assayed based on the procedures of Kabir and Begum [57] and Stalmans and Hers [58], respectively.
Liver lipid peroxidation (LPO) was estimated by malondialdehyde (MDA) detection based on the publication of Preuss et al. [59]. Liver glutathione (GSH) content was detected based on the publication of Beutler et al. [60]. Liver glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activities were detected based on the procedures of Matkovics et al. [61] and Mannervik and Gutenberg [62], respectively. The enzyme SOD activity in liver was measured based to the procedure of Marklund and Marklund [63].
2.10. Histological Investigation
Pancreatic tissues fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin were transferred to the Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, for processing, which included embedding in paraffin wax, sectioning at 5 μm thickness, and staining with a modified aldehyde fuchsin stain method according to Bancroft and Stevens [64].
2.11. RNA Isolation and RT-PCR Analysis
The total RNA was isolated from visceral adipose tissue by the GeneJET RNA Purification Kit obtained from Thermo Scientific Verso 1-Step RT-PCR ReddyMix Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA according to the publications of Chomzynski and Sacchi [65] and Boom et al. [66]. The levels of isolated RNA were determined and quantified using an ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer and taking the absorbances at optical densities (OD) of 260 nm and 280 nm. RNA was quantified and qualified based on Finley and Tietz’s [49] formula ().
For each extracted RNA sample, the ratio was between OD at 260 nm and OD at 280 nm and the ratio ranged between 1.7 and 2.0 to ensure the high purity of extracted RNA. Thermo Scientific Verso 1-Step RT-PCR ReddyMix was applied for the synthesis of cloned DNA (cDNA) which, in turn, was amplified by using specific forward and reverse primers by 32 Techne thermal cyclers. The primer pair sequences are as follows: GLUT-4—forward: 5 GCTGTGCCATCTTGATGACGG 3 and reverse: 5 TGAAGAAGCCAAGCAGGAGGAC 3 [1]; insulin receptor β-subunit (IRβ)—forward: 5 CTGGAGAACTGCTCGGTCATT 3 and reverse: 5 GGCCATAGACACGGAAAAGAAG 3 [67]; adiponectin—forward: 5 AATCCTGCCCAGTCATGAAG 3 and reverse: 5 TCTCCAGGAGTGCCATCTCT 3 [68, 69]); and β-actin—forward: 5 TCACCCTGAAGTACCCCATGGAG 3 and reverse: 5 TTGGCCTTGGGGTTCAGGGGG 3 [70]).
2.12. Statistical Analysis
The obtained individual data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the PC-STAT program, University of Georgia, followed by the Least Significance Difference (LSD) test to compare various groups with each other [71]. -probability for the detected parameter represents the general effects between groups. All data are represented as , and significant changes were calculated at and for LSD and at , , and for -probabilities.
3. Results
3.1. GC-MS Analysis of C. reticulata Peel Hydroethanolic Extract
The GC-MS analysis (Table 1 and Figure 1) indicated the presence multiple phytochemicals. The main constituents and groups which have a concentration of more than 1% of the total include 4H-pyran-4-one (a cyclic nucleus in the chemical structure of quercetin, naringin, hesperetin, nobiletin tangeretin, etc.), 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-; 5-hydroxymethylfurfural; 4-hexen-3-one, 4,5-dimethyl; phenol, 4-ethyl-; benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-; benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-; 3,3,4,5,5,7,8-heptamethoxyflavone; 4h-1-benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5,6,7-trimethoxy-; and β-D-glucopyranose, 4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-; n-hexadecanoic acid; tridecanoic acid; 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-; (Z)6,(Z)9-pentadecadien-1-ol; 9,12,15-octadecatrien-1-ol, (Z,Z,Z)-; 9,12,15-octadecatrien-1-ol, (Z,Z,Z)-; 9-octadecenamide, (Z)-.
Number
Retention time
Compound (from the central Library Search Report)
Area % (higher than 1%)
1
15.282
(i) No matches in library
3.50%
2
16.556
(i) 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-
3.55%
3
17.906
(i) No matches in library
1.13%
4
18.080
(i) No matches in library
2.14%
5
18.579
(i) 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural
(ii) 4-Hexen-3-one, 4,5-dimethyl-
17.74%
6
18.981
(i) No matches in library
1.57%
7
19.803
(i) No matches in library
2.65%
8
20.241
(i) No matches in library
1.84%
9
21.329
(i) Phenol, 4-ethyl-
(ii) Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-
(iii) Benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-
1.00%
10
27.047
(i) 3,3,4,5,5,7,8-heptamethoxyflavone
1.78%
11
27.356
(i) 4h-1-benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5,6,7-trimethoxy-
(ii) β-D-Glucopyranose, 4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-
3.00
12
29.940
(i) Dodecane
1.29%
13
32.898
(i) n-Hexadecanoic acid
(ii) Tridecanoic acid
2.88%
14
34.964
(i) 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-
2.37%
15
35.033
(i) 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)-
(ii) (Z)6,(Z)9-Pentadecadien-1-ol
(iii) 9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-ol, (Z,Z,Z)-
2.46%
16
37.253
(i) 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)-
1.34%