ArticlePDF Available

INVESIGAT ION OF WORK-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL PAININ PHYSIOTHERAPISTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors:
  • Kutahya Health Sciences University

Abstract

Aim: Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) can be defined as a feeling of discomfort arising from bones, tendons, ligaments or muscles. MSP is more common in some healthcare professionals. Among healthcare professionals, physiotherapists are also at a higher risk for MSP. The aim of this study is to compare the MSPs of physiotherapists working with different patient types. Method: We recruited 110 physiotherapists who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Physiotherapists with rheumatic disease-causing MSP were excluded. Participants were contacted online between June-August 2020. MSP of the participants was evaluated with the Cornell Musculoskeletal Disorder Questionnaire. The statistical significance level was set as p<0.05. Findings: We recruited a total of 110 physiotherapists (26.2±3.1 age). While physiotherapists recruiting pediatric patients work in private institutions, orthopedic and neurological patients work in public institutions(p<0.001). Job satisfaction(p=0.011), neck area score(p=0.002), right wrist score(p=0.016), back score(p=0.011), low back score(p=0.014), right upper leg score(p=0.034) among physiotherapists who received different patient types scores were different. Results: Physiotherapists recruiting pediatric patient groups work in the private sector. Physiotherapists receiving orthopedic patient group have higher job satisfactionlevels. Physiotherapists in the neurological patient group had higher scores on the right wrist, back, lower back and right upper leg in work-related MSP.
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
Research Article
INVESIGAT ION OF WORK-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
IN PHYSIOTHERAPISTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Fatih ÖZYURT
1
, Sinan TUNA
2
, Cihan Caner AKSOY
3
Abstract
Aim: Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) can be defined as a feeling of discomfort arising from bones,
tendons, ligaments or muscles. MSP is more common in some healthcare professionals. Among
healthcare professionals, physiotherapists are also at a higher risk for MSP. The aim of this
study is to compare the MSPs of physiotherapists working with different patient types.
Method: We recruited 110 physiotherapists who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Physiotherapists with rheumatic disease-causing MSP were excluded. Participants were
contacted online between June-August 2020. MSP of the participants was evaluated with the
Cornell Musculoskeletal Disorder Questionnaire. The statistical significance level was set as
p<0.05.
Findings: We recruited a total of 110 physiotherapists (26.2±3.1 age). While physiotherapists
recruiting pediatric patients work in private institutions, orthopedic and neurological patients
work in public institutions(p<0.001). Job satisfaction(p=0.011), neck area score(p=0.002), right
wrist score(p=0.016), back score(p=0.011), low back score(p=0.014), right upper leg
score(p=0.034) among physiotherapists who received different patient types scores were
different.
Results: Physiotherapists recruiting pediatric patient groups work in the private sector.
Physiotherapists receiving orthopedic patient group have higher job satisfactionlevels.
Physiotherapists in the neurological patient group had higher scores on the right wrist, back,
lower back and right upper leg in work-related MSP.
Keywords: Job satisfaction; Musculoskeletal pain; Neurological; Orthopedic; Physiotherapist.
1
: Arş. Gör., Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu, Kırşehir, Türkiye,
fatih.ozyurt10@gmail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-0201-9798
2
Sinan TUNA, Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Fizyoterapi ve
Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Kütahya, Türkiye, sinantuna@outlook.com, ORCID: 0000-0003-2735-
5955
3
Cihan Caner AKSOY, Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve
Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, cihancaner.aksoy@ksbu.edu.tr, ORCID: 0000-0003-0538-3613
Received: 06.07.2023
Accepted: 21.08.2023
Cite for: Özyurt, F., Tuna, S., Aksoy, C.C., (2023). Fizyoterapistlerde İşe Bağlı Kas İskelet Sistemi Ağrılarının
Araştırılması: Kesitsel Çalışma. 4(2), 305 320.
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
Fizyoterapistlerde İşe Bağlı Kas İskelet Sistemi Ağrılarının Araştırılması:
Kesitsel Çalışma
Öz
Amaç: Kas-iskelet sistemi ağrısı (KİSA), kemikler, tendonlar, bağlar veya kaslardan
kaynaklanan bir rahatsızlık hissi olarak tanımlanabilir. KİSA, bazı sağlık profesyonellerinde
daha yaygın gözükmektedir. Sağlık profesyonelleri arasında fizyoterapistler de KİSA
bakımından yüksek risk altındadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı hasta tipleri ile çalışan
fizyoterapistlerin KİSA karşılaştırmaktır.
Yöntem: Dahil edilme ve dışlama kriterlerini karşılayan 110 fizyoterapist çalışmaya dahil
edildi. Romatizmal hastalığa neden olan KİSA’lı fizyoterapistler çalışma dışı bırakıldı.
Katılımcılarla Haziran-Ağustos 2020 tarihleri arasında online olarak iletişime geçildi.
Katılımcıların KİSA’ları Cornell Kas-iskelet Bozuklukları Anketi ile değerlendirildi.
İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p<0,05 olarak belirlendi.
Bulgular: Toplam 110 fizyoterapist (26.2±3.1 yıl) dahil edildi. Pediatrik hasta alan
fizyoterapistler özel kurumlarda çalışırken, ortopedik ve nörolojik hasta alanlar kamu
kurumlarında çalışmaktadır(p<0,001). İş doyumu(p=0,011), boyun bölgesi skoru(p=0,002), sağ
bilek skoru(p=0,016), sırt skoru(p=0,011), bel skoru(p=0,014), sağ üst bacak skoru(p=0,034)
farklı hasta tipi ile çalışan fizyoterapistler arasında farklılık saptanmıştırmerkezi ve kesinlik alt
boyutları ile arasında negatif, sağlığın önemi ve öz farkındalık alt boyutlarıyla ise pozitif yönlü
ve anlamlı ilişkinin mevcut olduğu görülmektedir (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Pediatrik hasta grupları ile çalışan fizyoterapistler özel sektörde çalışmaktadır.
Ortopedik hasta grubu ile çalışan fizyoterapistlerin doyum düzeyleri daha yüksektir.
Nörolojik hasta grubundaki fizyoterapistlerin işle ilgili KİSA sağ bilek, sırt, bel ve sağ üst bacak
puanları daha yüksek saptanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: İş doyumu; Kas-iskelet ağrısı; Nörolojik; Ortopedik; Fizyoterapist.
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
1.INTRODUCTION
Musculoskeletal pain (MSP); It can be defined as a feeling of discomfort arising from bones, tendons,
ligaments or muscles (Gómez-Rodríguez et al., 2020). his type of pain not only diminishes an
individual's quality of life but also has negative effects on their overall well-being from a
biopsychosocial perspective. While MSP typically becomes more common with age as a natural
consequence of aging, it can also affect younger individuals due to factors such as repetitive movements,
traumas, or occupations involving heavy physical work (Silva Guerrero et al., 2018).
Various factors contribute to the development of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) in the workplace,
including biomechanical errors, inadequate equipment to support proper biomechanics, repetitive
movements, prolonged static posture, excessive use, and long working hours (Duray & Yağci, 2017).
MSP is particularly prevalent in certain occupational groups, with healthcare workers being among the
most affected. Within the healthcare profession, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and nurses
are at a higher risk of experiencing musculoskeletal problems (Atlı et al., 2020). Physiotherapy, as one
of these professions, involves treatment approaches such as manual therapy, electrophysical agents, and
exercise training, which can lead to physical strain and demanding postures. Physiotherapists are
particularly susceptible to MSP due to the inherent conditions of their job. Studies have reported a high
incidence of MSP, especially among physiotherapists working with severe neurological and orthopedic
patient groups (Nordin et al., 2011).
In a study investigating the occurrence of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) among physiotherapists based on
their employment status in public or private institutions, it was found that the prevalence of MSP was
lower among those working in public institutions compared to those in private institutions. This
difference was attributed to variations in working hours and conditions(Korkulu & Kolçak, 2019). In a
study examining the occurrence of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) among physiotherapists based on their
employment status in public or private institutions, it was found that the prevalence of MSP was lower
among those working in public institutions compared to those in private institutions. This difference was
attributed to variations in working hours and conditions. In the picture that emerges, Taken together,
MSP causes both tangible and intangible challenges for physiotherapists, including reduced quality of
life, decreased workforce efficiency, and increased healthcare expenses(Iqbal & Alghadir, 2015).
In the literature, there are many studies investigating MSP in different health professions. However, the
number of studies investigating MSP in physiotherapists is quite limited. Therefore, the aim of this study
is to examine the presence of MSP in physiotherapists working in different patient groups. The
hypothesis of this study is that the musculoskeletal pain of physiotherapists working in different patient
groups is different.
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
2. METHODS
2.1 Study design and setting
This study was planned as a cross-sectional study. Study data were collected online from June to August
2020. This study was approved by the Non-Interventional Ethics Committee of Kütahya Health Sciences
University with the decision numbered 2020/05. Physiotherapists actively working in Turkey the sample
of the study. Social media tools were used to reach the sample.
2.2 Procedure
The forms to be used in the study were transferred to electronic media. Physiotherapists who were
interested in participating in the study accessed the study forms through Google Forms, which were
promoted via announcements on social media platforms and messaging applications commonly used by
physiotherapists. The first page of the form provided detailed information about the study. Participants
were directed to the section containing the scales after indicating their agreement to participate by
checking the corresponding box. Physiotherapists who chose not to participate were directed to a thank
last page, and their data was not recorded. The first section of the questionnaire focused on gathering
sociodemographic information from the participants. Subsequently, the Cornell Musculoskeletal
Discomfort Questionnaires and questions related to working conditions were presented.
2.3 Participants
The study included participants who had graduated from the physiotherapy and rehabilitation
department, were actively working in their job, and volunteered to participate. Individuals with
rheumatic diseases such as ankylosing spondylitis or rheumatoid arthritis, which could potentially
contribute to musculoskeletal pain, were excluded from the study. (Khan & Fasih, 2017).
2.4 Outcome
2.4.1 Sociodemographic Information
In the sociodemographic information of the participants; age (in years), gender, height (ib-n
centimeters), body weight (in kilograms), regular exercise habit (at least 3 days a week at least 30
minutes of exercise) (answered as yes or no), information about the institution, professional experience
(years), smoking and alcohol use (answered as yes or no). Additionally, participants were asked about
the type of patients they treat (Fuat & Seda, 2021).
2.4.2 Job related questions
In addition to the previous sociodemographic information, the participants were asked about their work
schedule, including the number of days worked per week and the number of hours worked per day. The
number of patients they treated was also queried. Participants were asked about the general patient group
they typically treated (Fuat & Seda, 2021). Furthermore, the participants were asked to assess whether
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
they found the working conditions in their institutions to be ergonomic. If they responded negatively,
they were asked to provide the reason for their response. Lastly, participants were asked to rate their job
satisfaction on a scale from 0 to 10, with "0" indicating no satisfaction at all and "10" indicating complete
satisfaction with their job (Yakut & Yakut, 2011).
2.4.3 Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires
Musculoskeletal pain of the individuals participating in the study was evaluated with the Cornell
Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire. The questionnaire questions the frequency and severity of
pain in various body parts and whether it interferes with the ability to do work. Participants are asked to
mark different pain areas or regions on the scale. While the scale is transferred to Google Forms, there
are questions about different body parts on each page. In the scale, how often he felt pain in the last
week, using a 5-point Likert scale (1-never, 2- one-two times/week, 3- three-four times/week, 4-once
every day, 5-several times every day) pain intensity on a 3-point Likert scale (1- Sligthly, 2-Moderately,
3-Very uncomfortable) and whether or not the pain interfered with the work on a 3-point Likert scale
(1-Not at all, 2-slightly, 3-substantially intereference) are being investigated. The score of the scale was
obtained by multiplying the frequency of pain, the severity of pain and the level of disability (Erdinc et
al., 2011). The scale score can be 0-90 points for each region according to the scoring system. A high
score indicates a high disability level for the relevant region. Erdinç et al. Turkish validity and reliability
study of the scale was conducted in 2011 (Erdinc et al., 2011). The Cronbach Alpha value of the three
sub-headings of the questionnaire, namely frequency of pain, severity and disability, was 0.88,
respectively; 0.89 and 0.88 (Fuat & Seda, 2021).
2.5 Sample size
G*PowerSoftware (ver. 3.1.9.2, Düsseldorf, Germany) program was used to calculate the number of
samples to participate in our study. In an article using Cornell Musculoskeletal System scoring in
physiotherapists, the mean and standard deviations of the back scores between male and female genders
were taken as reference and analyzed using t tests. The analysis was performed at 80% power, 0.50
margin of error and 0.5 effect size. As a result of the analysis, a total of 86 people were planned to
participate in the study (Fuat & Seda, 2021). Considering that missing data will emerge during the
evaluation, it was planned to include 104 people in the study by giving a 20% reduction margin.
2.6 Statistical analysis
SPSS® (ver. 22.0; IBM Corp., NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Variables were analyzed using
visual (probability plots, histograms) and analytical methods Kolmogorov-Smirnov to distinguish
whether the data were normally distributed. Relationships between categorical variables were compared
with Chi-square or Fisher Exact test comparison test. Parametric tests were used for normal distribution
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
data and non-parametric tests were used for non-normally distributed data. Values for continuous
variables were expressed in terms of mean ± standard deviation (mean±SD), standard mean error (SEM),
and confidence intervals (95% CI). Values for categorical variables were expressed as proportional (%).
The Spearman correlation analysis was used to correlate the data between the variables examined.
Kruskal Wallis Test and Bonferoni post-hoc test were used to compare 3 or more groups. Statistical
significance level was set as p<0.05 (Songül et al., 2021).
3. RESULT
A total of 136 individuals participated in the study, consisting of 80 women and 56 men. However, 26
participants were excluded from the analysis due to missing data. The data from 110 participants were
included and analyzed in our study. Table 1 presents the descriptive characteristics of the participating
physiotherapists. Among the participants, 46 (41.8%) were male and 64 (58.2%) were female. In terms
of patient groups, 23 (20.9%) physiotherapists treated orthopedic patients, 24 (21.8%) treated
neurological patients, 25 (22.7%) treated pediatric patients, and 38 (34.5%) treated a mixed patient
population.
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of physiotherapists (N=110)
X±SD/n(%)
Sex
Male
46 (41.8)
Female
64 (58.2)
Age (years)
26.2±3.1
BMI (kg/m2)
22.32±2.96
Type of institution
Public (University Hospital- State Hospital)
45 (40.9)
Private (Special Education Center- Private Hospital)
65 (59.1)
Type of Patient Received
Orthopedic Patient
23 (20.9)
Neurological Patient
24 (21.8)
Pediatric Patient
25 (22.7)
Mixed Patient
38 (34.5)
Finding Working Conditions Ergonomic
Yes
28 (25.5)
No
82 (74.5)
Reasons for Not Finding the Working Conditions Ergonomic
Bed-Chair Lengths Fixed
31 (28.2)
Working in the Wrong Posture
7 (6.4)
Difficulty of Patient Type
10 (9.1)
Equipment-Device Lack- Physical Conditions of Working Condition
25 (22.7)
Others
37 (33.6)
Smoking
Yes
26 (23.6)
No
84 (76.4)
Alcohol Use
Yes
17 (15.5)
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
No
93 (84.5)
Regular Exercise Habit
Yes
22 (20.0)
No
88 (80.0)
Presence of Neck Pain
Yes
84 (76.4)
No
26 (23.6)
Presence of Right Shoulder Pain
Yes
49 (44.5)
No
61 (55.5)
Presence of Left Shoulder Pain
Yes
44 (40.0)
No
66 (60.0)
Presence of Right Upper Arm Pain
Yes
31 (28.2)
No
79 (71.8)
Presence of Left Upper Arm Pain
Yes
18 (16.4)
No
92 (83.6)
Presence of Right Forearm Pain
Yes
39 (35.5)
No
71 (64.5)
Presence of Left Forearm Pain
Yes
23 (20.9)
No
87 (79.1)
Presence of Right Wrist Pain
Yes
54 (49.1)
No
56 (50.9)
Presence of Left Wrist Pain
Yes
33 (30.0)
No
77 (70.0)
Presence of Back Pain
Yes
88 (80.0)
No
22 (20.0)
Presence of Low Back Pain
Yes
83 (75.5)
No
27 (24.5)
Presence of Hip Pain
Yes
33 (30.0)
No
77 (70.0)
Presence of Right Upper Leg Pain
Yes
19 (17.3)
No
91 (82.7)
Presence of Left Upper Leg Pain
Yes
19 (17.3)
No
91 (82.7)
Presence of Right Knee Pain
Yes
32 (29.1)
No
78 (70.9)
Presence of Left Knee Pain
Yes
32 (29.1)
No
78 (70.9)
Presence of Right Lower Leg Pain
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
Yes
18 (16.4)
No
92 (83.6)
Presence of Left Lower Leg Pain
Yes
19 (17.3)
No
91 (82.7)
Presence of Right Foot Pain
Yes
22 (20.0)
No
88 (80.0)
Presence of Left Foot Pain
Yes
17 (15.5)
No
93 (84.5)
Average Number of Patients Taken per Week
26.61±16.30
Job Experience (Year)
3.24±2.93
Number of Days Worked per Week
5.07±0.63
Hours Worked Per Day
7.99±0.69
Job Satisfaction
5.04±2.51
The most commonly reported areas of pain experienced by physiotherapists are as follows: 80% in the
back, 76.4% in the neck, and 75.5% in the low back. The region-specific scores for musculoskeletal pain
reported by the participants are provided in Table 2.
Table 2. Region-specific score of musculoskeletal pain
Region
X±SD
Neck
7.02±9.96
Right Shoulder
3.87±8.10
Left Shoulder
3.30±7.18
Right Upper Arm
1.47±4.41
Left Upper Arm
1.10±4.41
Right Wrist
6.71±17.87
Left Wrist
2.25±6.36
Back
11.89±17.23
Low back
11.21±19.46
Hip
1.95±7.21
Right Upper Leg
1.39±6.33
Left Upper Leg
1.47±6.36
Right Knee
2.13±5.95
Left Knee
2.22±7.06
Right Lower Leg
1.71±6.91
Left Lower Leg
1.79±6.89
Right Foot
1.75±7.57
Left Foot
1.38±5.81
Total
64.69±96.36
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
The comparison specific to the type of patient taken is given in Table 3.
Table 3. Comparison of qualitative data specific to the type of patient received
Orthopedic Patient
(n=23)
Neurological Patient
(n=24)
Pediatric Patient
(n=25)
Mixed Patient
(n=38)
n(%)
n(%)
n(%)
n(%)
p
Sex
Male
15 (65.2)
8 (33.3)
8 (32.0)
15 (39.5)
0.073
Female
8 (34.8)
16 (66.7)
17 (68.0)
23 (60.5)
Type of institution
Public
17 (73.9)
18 (75.0)
0 (0)
10 (26.3)
<0.001
Private
6 (26.1)
6 (25.0)
25 (100)
28 (73.7)
Finding Working
Conditions Ergonomic
Yes
9 (39.1)
8 (33.3)
4 (16.0)
7 (18.4)
0.156
No
14 (60.9)
16 (66.7)
21 (84.0)
31 (81.6)
Presence of Neck Pain
Yes
18 (78.3)
20 (83.3)
14 (56.0)
32 (84.2)
0.052
No
5 (21.7)
4 (16.7)
11 (44.0)
6 (15.8)
Presence of Right
Shoulder Pain
Yes
9 (39.1)
14 (58.3)
9 (36.0)
17 (44.7)
0.414
No
14 (60.9)
10 (41.7)
16 (64.0)
21 (55.3)
Presence of Left
Shoulder Pain
Yes
9 (39.1)
11 (45.8)
7 (28.0)
17 (44.7)
0.531
No
14 (60.9)
13 (54.2)
18 (72.0)
21 (55.3)
Presence of Right
Upper Arm Pain
Yes
3 (13.0)
10 (41.7)
6 (24.0)
12 (31.6)
0.158
No
20 (87.0)
14 (58.3)
19 (76.0)
26 (68.4)
Presence of Left Upper
Arm Pain
Yes
3 (13.0)
6 (25.0)
4 (16.0)
5 (13.2)
0.619
No
20 (87.0)
18 (75.0)
21 (84.0)
33 (86.8)
Presence of Right
Forearm Pain
Yes
5 (21.7)
13 (54.2)
8 (32.0)
13 (34.2)
0.126
No
18 (78.3)
11 (45.8)
17 (68.0)
25 (65.8)
Presence of Left
Forearm Pain
Yes
2 (8.7)
8 (33.3)
6 (24.0)
7 (18.4)
0.203
No
21 (91.3)
16 (66.7)
19 (76.0)
31 (81.6)
Presence of Right Wrist
Pain
Yes
6 (26.1)
15 (62.5)
14 (56.0)
19 (50.0)
0.069
No
17 (73.9)
9 (37.5)
11 (44.0)
19 (50.0)
Presence of Left Wrist
Pain
Yes
2 (8.7)
8 (33.3)
10 (40.0)
13 (34.2)
0.085
No
21 (91.3)
16 (66.7)
15 (60.0)
25 (65.8)
Presence of Back Pain
Yes
18 (78.3)
22 (91.7)
16 (64.0)
32 (84.2)
0.089
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
No
5 (21.7)
2 (8.3)
9 (36.0)
6 (15.8)
Presence of Low Back
Pain
Yes
13 (56.5)
20 (83.3)
20 (80.0)
30 (78.9)
0.123
No
10 (43.5)
4 (16.7)
5 (20.0)
8 (21.1)
Presence of Hip Pain
Yes
6 (26.1)
12 (50.0)
4 (16.0)
11 (28.9)
0.069
No
17 (73.9)
12 (50.0)
21 (84.0)
27 (71.1)
Presence of Right
Upper Leg Pain
Yes
5 (21.7)
8 (33.3)
2 (8.0)
4 (10.5)
0.061
No
18 (78.3)
16 (66.7)
23 (92.0)
34 (89.5)
Presence of Left Upper
Leg Pain
Yes
5 (21.7)
7 (29.2)
2 (8.0)
5 (13.2)
0.199
No
18 (78.3)
17 (70.8)
23 (92.0)
33 (86.8)
Presence of Right Knee
Pain
Yes
5 (21.7)
10 (41.7)
5 (20.0)
12 (31.6)
0.313
No
18 (78.3)
14 (58.3)
20 (80.0)
26 (68.4)
Presence of Left Knee
Pain
Yes
4 (17.4)
9 (37.5)
8 (32.0)
11 (28.9)
0.484
No
19 (82.6)
15 (62.5)
17 (68.0)
27 (71.1)
Presence of Right
Lower Leg Pain
Yes
2 (8.7)
7 (29.2)
4 (16.0)
5 (13.2)
0.246
No
21 (91.3)
17 (70.8)
21 (84.0)
33 (86.8)
Presence of Left Lower
Leg Pain
Yes
2 (8.7)
7 (29.2)
4 (16.0)
6 (15.8)
0.302
No
21 (91.3)
17 (70.8)
21 (84.0)
32 (84.2)
Presence of Right Foot
Pain
Yes
4 (17.4)
8 (33.3)
3 (12.0)
7 (18.4)
0.281
No
19 (82.6)
16 (66.7)
22 (88.0)
31 (81.6)
Presence of Left Foot
Pain
Yes
2 (8.7)
6 (25.0)
4 (16.0)
5 (13.2)
0.451
No
21 (91.3)
18 (75.0)
21 (84.0)
33 (86.8)
Physiotherapists working in different patient types; job satisfaction(p=0.011), neck region MSP
(p=0.002), right wrist region MSP (p=0.016), back region MSP (p=0.011), low back region MSP
(p=0.014), and right upper leg region statistically significant difference was found between MSP
(p=0.034) (Table 4). Finally, a low negative correlation was found between the job satisfactionof the
physiotherapists and the total MSP scores (r= -0.232, p=0.015). (Table 4). Finally, a low negative
correlation was found between the job satisfactionof the physiotherapists and the total MSP scores (r= -
0.232, p=0.015).
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
Table 4. Comparison of qualitative data by type of patient received
According to the Patient Group Received
Orthopedic
Patient (n=23)
Neurological
Patient (n=24)
Pediatric
Patient (n=25)
Mixed Patient
(n=38)
X±SD
X±SD
X±SD
X±SD
p
Age (years)
26.52±3.87
27.25±3.74
26.20±3.20
25.34±1.58
0.256
BMI (kg/m2)
23.69±3.27
22.38±2.61
21.65±2.30
21.90±3.18
0.091
Average Number of
Patients Received per
Week
21.17±16.87
24.25±17.16
26.32±11.08
31.60±17.4
0.072
Job Experience (Year)
3.69±3.70
4.37±3.82
3.32±2.46
2.21±1.49
0.062
Number of Days
Worked per Week
5.26±0.54
4.95±0.62
4.88±0.66
5.15±0.63
0.082
Hours Worked Per
Day
8.13±0.75
7.87±0.89
8.00±0.28
7.97±0.71
0.855
Job Satisfaction
6.34±2.55
5.45±2.53
4.16±2.17
4.57±2.41
0.011*
Neck
3.10±3.74
12.27±13.88
2.66±4.08
8.96±10.44
0.002*
Right Shoulder
1.04±1.77
7.89±12.41
3.90±8.82
3.02±5.40
0.127
Left Shoulder
1.39±3.08
4.37±9.27
1.26±2.36
5.14±8.94
0.347
Right Upper Arm
0.34±0.97
3.93±8.52
0.74±1.54
1.07±2.21
0.075
Left Upper Arm
0.58±1.73
3.31±8.81
0.42±1.26
0.46±1.50
0.494
Right Wrist
0.45±0.83
13.00±26.81
3.78±8.21
8.47±19.76
0.016*
Left Wrist
0.86±3.12
3.18±8.88
1.28±2.03
3.14±7.66
0.145
Back
5.21±8.74
14.54±16.27
7.88±13.07
16.89±22.02
0.011*
Low back
3.06±4.41
15.08±17.29
7.88±17.95
15.89±25.06
0.014*
Hip
1.02±2.17
5.83±14.43
0.42±1.26
1.07±2.67
0.062
Right Upper Leg
0.95±2.17
5.00±12.92
0.12±0.41
0.21±0.68
0.034*
Left Upper Leg
1.36±3.36
4.83±12.79
0.12±0.41
0.30±0.86
0.106
Right Knee
0.67±1.52
6.02±10.77
0.86±2.83
1.39±3.56
0.148
Left Knee
2.41±6.26
5.52±13.07
1.04±2.82
0.81±1.55
0.487
Right Lower Leg
0.41±1.41
3.39±9.17
0.30±0.75
2.36±9.06
0.256
Left Lower Leg
0.67±2.92
3.27±8.79
0.42±1.26
2.44±9.05
0.291
Right Foot
0.26±058
5.45±13.57
0.24±0.70
1.32±6.47
0.166
Left Foot
0.28±1.07
3.25±8.82
0.74±2.80
1.30±6.49
0.399
Total
24.15±24.87
120.18±156.72
34.06±33.69
74.32±85.07
0.005
4. DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to investigate musculoskeletal pain (MSP) in physiotherapists. The findings
of the study revealed that physiotherapists working with different patient types experienced pain in
various body parts, with a higher prevalence in the back, neck, and low back regions. Notably,
physiotherapists working with neurological patient groups reported significantly higher scores for neck
region pain compared to other groups. The study also highlighted that a majority of the participants did
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
not find their working conditions to be ergonomic. This was attributed to factors such as fixed bed-chair
lengths, the challenging nature of patients they treated, and the lack of necessary equipment. Regarding
job satisfaction, the study found that physiotherapists working with orthopedic patient groups exhibited
higher levels of satisfaction, whereas those working with pediatric patient groups reported lower levels
of job satisfaction. It was also observed that physiotherapists working with pediatric patients were
predominantly employed in private institutions, while those working with orthopedic and mixed patient
groups were more commonly employed in public institutions.
The findings of the present study align with previous research conducted by Atli et al. (Atlı et al., 2020),
Arslan et al. (Arslan & Atıcı, 2019), and Akbaba et al. (Akbaba et al., 2018) regarding the prevalence
of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) in physiotherapists. According to these studies, physiotherapists
commonly experience pain in the back, low back, neck, lower back, hand, shoulder, knee, and foot
regions. The current study also reveals that physiotherapists working with neurological patient groups
experience higher rates of MSP. This can be attributed to the increased exertion of muscle power and
the need to support the body weight of multiple patients in this particular patient group. Additionally,
the absence of ergonomic beds and chairs in the institutions where they work contributes negatively to
the occurrence of MSP among these physiotherapists (Akbaba et al., 2018; Arslan & Atıcı, 2019; Atlı
et al., 2020). The consistency between the findings of the present study and the existing literature
strengthens the validity and reliability of the results.
The studies conducted by Adegoke et al. (Adegoke et al., 2008), Abaraogu et al. (Abaraogu et al., 2017),
Nordin et al. (Nordin et al., 2011), and Al-Eisa et al (Al-Eisa et al., 2012). on physiotherapists in various
countries consistently report that musculoskeletal pain (MSP) is commonly experienced in the lower
back and neck regions. Adegoke et al. (Adegoke et al., 2008) found that MSP was most prevalent in the
lumbar region among Nigerian physiotherapists. Similarly, Abaraogu et al. (Abaraogu et al., 2017)
reported that physiotherapists frequently experienced pain in the lower back and neck regions. Nordin
et al. (Nordin et al., 2011) observed that pain was most common in the lumbar region among Malaysian
physiotherapists. In a study by Al-Eisa et al. (Al-Eisa et al., 2012) conducted on physiotherapists from
Egypt and Saudi Arabia, it was also reported that the lower back and neck regions were the areas most
affected by pain. The consistency of these findings across different countries indicates that MSP is a
prevalent issue among physiotherapists worldwide. These studies provide valuable evidence supporting
the notion that MSP is a common concern in the physiotherapy profession.
The studies conducted by Salik and Özcan (Salik & Özcan, 2004), West and Gardner (West & Gardner,
2001), Cromie et al. (Cromie et al., 2000), Nordin et al. (Nordin et al., 2011), and Glover et al. (Glover
et al., 2005) consistently report a high prevalence of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) among
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
physiotherapists. Salik and Özcan (Salik & Özcan, 2004) found that 85% of physiotherapists
experienced MSP, while West and Gardner (West & Gardner, 2001) reported a prevalence of 55%.
Cromie et al. (Cromie et al., 2000) observed a high rate of 91% MSP among physiotherapists, and
Nordin et al. (Nordin et al., 2011) reported a prevalence of 71.6%. Glover et al. (Glover et al., 2005)
found that 68% of physiotherapists experienced MSP. These studies in the literature highlight several
common causes of MSP among physiotherapists, including excessive rotation and bending movements
in the lumbar region, difficulties in carrying and transferring dependent patients, prolonged periods of
working in the same position, repetitive tasks, and treating a high number of patients in a single day
(Cromie et al., 2000; Glover et al., 2005; Nordin et al., 2011; Salik & Özcan, 2004; West & Gardner,
2001). The findings of our study align with the literature, also reported a high prevalence of MSP among
physiotherapists, with a minimum rate of 80%. Additionally, a significant proportion of participants
(82%) stated that the working conditions were not ergonomic, with fixed bed-chair lengths, difficulties
in patient handling, and working in improper postures cited as reasons. These consistent findings
highlight the importance of addressing the ergonomic factors and workload management in the field of
physiotherapy to reduce the incidence of MSP and improve the well-being of physiotherapists.
The study conducted by Yakut et al. (Yakut & Yakut, 2011) supports our findings, indicating that
physiotherapists who work with orthopedic patients experience higher job satisfaction. This is in line
with the literature, as factors such as personal opportunities, working conditions, and financial gain are
known to influence job satisfaction (Sur et al., 2004).
It was reported in the study conducted by Yakut et al. in Physiotherapists who work with orthopedic
patient type that their job satisfactionis higher (Yakut & Yakut, 2011). Our results are consistent with
the literature. Factors such as personal opportunities, working conditions and financial gain are known
to affect job satisfaction (Sur et al., 2004). The presence of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) is another factor
that can impact job satisfaction. In the orthopedic patient group, physiotherapists may experience shorter
treatment durations, higher patient turnover, and potentially less MSP compared to other patient groups.
These factors may contribute to higher job satisfaction among physiotherapists working with orthopedic
patients. It is important to consider multiple factors when examining job satisfaction in physiotherapists,
as it can be influenced by various aspects of their work environment, patient population, and personal
experiences. By understanding these factors, interventions and improvements can be implemented to
enhance job satisfaction and overall well-being of physiotherapists.
The study our conducted indeed has some limitations that should be taken into consideration. The
collection of data online due to the pandemic may have limited the ability to directly interact with the
participants, potentially impacting the depth and quality of the data obtained. Additionally, the sample
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
of participants predominantly consisting of physiotherapists with less than 5 years of experience may
introduce a bias and limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of
physiotherapists. To address these limitations and further enhance the understanding of MSP and job
satisfaction among physiotherapists, future studies could be conducted in a face-to-face manner,
allowing for more detailed data collection and potentially reaching a wider range of physiotherapists
with varying levels of experience. It would also be beneficial to explore additional risk factors that can
influence job satisfaction, such as organizational factors, interpersonal relationships, workload, and
professional development opportunities. By addressing these limitations and expanding the scope of
investigation, future studies can provide a more comprehensive understanding of MSP and job
satisfaction among physiotherapists, leading to the development of targeted interventions and strategies
to improve their well-being and overall job satisfaction.
The presence of work-related MSP is quite high in physiotherapists. MSP is common especially in the
low back, back, neck, shoulder and wrist regions. Physiotherapists working in different patient groups
do not find the working conditions ergonomic. MSP negatively affects job satisfaction. While job
satisfactionis higher in physiotherapists working with orthopedic patient type, it is less in
physiotherapists working in pediatric patient group. Physiotherapists working with the neurological
patient group have MSP more in the neck region and right wrist region. Likewise, physiotherapists
working in neurological and mixed patient types have more MSP in the lower back and back region.
There are many factors that affect the job satisfaction of physiotherapists. It is thought that making the
working environment of physiotherapists ergonomic, arranging weekly and daily working hours,
optimizing the average number of patients and working in a balanced way from different patient types
will reduce MSP and increase job satisfactionin physiotherapists. There is a need for cohort studies
examining how and when musculoskeletal pain occurs in future studies.
Supporting Institution
None.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare”.
REFERENCES
Abaraogu, U. O., Ezema, C. I., & Nwosu, C. K. (2017). Job stress dimension and work-related
musculoskeletal disorders among southeast Nigerian physiotherapists. International Journal of
Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 23(3), 404409.
Adegoke, B. O. A., Akodu, A. K., & Oyeyemi, A. L. (2008). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
among Nigerian physiotherapists. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, 19.
Akbaba, Y. A., Türkmen, E., & Birinci, T. (2018). Fizyoterapistlerin Çalışma Ortamı ve Koşulları İle
Mesleki Memnuniyetlerinin İncelenmesi/The Investıgation of Work Environment, Working
Conditions and Job Satisfaction among Physiotherapists. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi,
5(1), 15.
Al-Eisa, E., Buragadda, S., Shaheen, A. A., Ibrahim, A., & Melam, G. R. (2012). Work related
musculoskeletal disorders: causes, prevalence and response among egyptian and saudi physical
therapists. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(4), 523529.
Arslan, İ., & Atıcı, E. (2019). Fizyoterapistlerin İş Yüküne Bağlı Kas-İskelet Sistemi Yaralanmalarının
Sağlık Hizmeti Sunumu Üzerine Etkileri. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi,
9(2), 7685.
Atlı, E. A., Altındağ, Ö., Atlı, Ş., Akaltun, M. S., & Ali, G. Ü. R. (2020). The evaluation of
musculoskeletal system problems and related factors in physiotherapists working in Diyarbakır
province. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, 42(3), 277282.
Cromie, J. E., Robertson, V. J., & Best, M. O. (2000). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in
physical therapists: prevalence, severity, risks, and responses. Physical Therapy, 80(4), 336351.
Duray, M., & Yağci, N. (2017). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Hastaneleri’nde çalışan yardımcı sağlık
personelinde kas-iskelet ağrısına etkiyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, 10(2),
144151.
Erdinc, O., Hot, K., & Ozkaya, M. (2011). Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort
Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Work, 39(3), 251260.
Fuat, A., & Seda, T. (2021). Fizyoterapistlerin kas-iskelet sistem rahatsızlıkları ile ergonomi
farkındalıkları. Ergonomi, 4(3), 132146.
Glover, W., McGregor, A., Sullivan, C., & Hague, J. (2005). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
affecting members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy, 91(3), 138147.
Gómez-Rodríguez, R., Díaz-Pulido, B., Gutiérrez-Ortega, C., Sánchez-Sánchez, B., & Torres-Lacomba,
M. (2020). Prevalence, disability and associated factors of playing-related musculoskeletal pain
among musicians: a population-based cross-sectional descriptive study. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3991.
Iqbal, Z., & Alghadir, A. (2015). Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical
therapists. Med Pr, 66(4), 459469.
Khan, U., & Fasih, M. (2017). Prevalence of work related neck pain among physiotherapists and its
association with age and gender. Pak J Physiol, 13(3), 3942.
Korkulu, A., & Kolçak, M. (2019). Kamu ve özel sektör ayrımında istihdam edilenlerin bazı
rahatsızlıklara yatkınlık düzeyi. Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 381
391.
Nordin, N. A. M., Leonard, J. H., & Thye, N. C. (2011). Work-related injuries among physiotherapists
in public hospitals: a Southeast Asian picture. Clinics, 66, 373378.
Salik, Y., & Özcan, A. (2004). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a survey of physical therapists
in Izmir-Turkey. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 5, 17.
Selçuk Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt 4/Sayı 2/2023
Journal of Selcuk Health, Volume 4/Issue 2/2023
Silva Guerrero, A. V., Maujean, A., Campbell, L., & Sterling, M. (2018). A systematic review and meta-
analysis of the effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by physiotherapists on pain,
disability and psychological outcomes in musculoskeletal pain conditions. The Clinical Journal of
Pain, 34(9), 838857.
Songül, K., Serkan, İ., Aktuğ, Z. B., & Hasan, A. K. A. (2021). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kas İskelet
Sistemi Rahatsızlıkları ile Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyi ve İnternet Bağımlılığı Arasındaki İlişkinin
İncelenmesi. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 709721.
Sur, H., Hayran, O., Mumcu, G., Soylemez, D., Atli, H., & Yildirim, C. (2004). Factors affecting dental
job satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey in Turkey. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 27(2),
152164.
West, D. J., & Gardner, D. (2001). Occupational injuries of physiotherapists in North and Central
Queensland. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47(3), 179186.
Yakut, H., & Yakut, Y. (2011). Türkiye’deki fizyoterapistlerde kas iskelet sistemi yaralanmaları,
yorgunluk ve mesleki memnuniyetin değerlendirilmesi. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 22(2), 7480.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Playing-related musculoskeletal disorders are the most frequent complaints among instrumental musicians. The aims of this study were: to assess the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain; to evaluate neck, shoulder, and lower back disability; and to determine the associated factors with the presence of musculoskeletal pain among musicians. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. We selected Spaniard musicians over 16 years old who played a musical instrument for at least five hours per week. They answered the Spanish versions of the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, Neck Disability Index and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Results: We found 94.8% of musicians presented at least one symptomatic region in the last 12 months, and 72.3% in the last seven days. Female musicians (OR 4.38, CI 2.11−9.12), musicians with overweight or obesity (OR 5.32, CI 2.18−12.97), and musicians who play more than 14 h per week (OR 3.86, CI 1.80−8.29)were shown to be a higher risk of suffering musculoskeletal pain. Conclusions: Musculoskeletal disorders symptoms are highly prevalent in musicians. The main risk factors related to musculoskeletal disorders symptoms were gender (being female), overweight, obesity, and spending playing more than 14 h a week practicing. This study highlights the need to provide strategies to prevent occupational disabilities among musicians. Further studies are needed to analyse the prevalence of pain in the musician using other sampling methods.
Article
Full-text available
Kamu ve özel sektörde çalışanların aldıkları ücretler, çalışma koşulları, sosyal haklar, ya-şam koşulları, bağlı olunan hukuk dalı vb. farklılık göstermektedir. Kişiler kamu veya özel sektörde çalışmanın fırsat maliyetlerini değerlendirerek ve/veya zorunluluk neticesinde çalışmak istediği sektörü belirlemektedir. Ancak bu seçim ağırlıklı olarak ekonomik fak-törler dikkate alınarak yapılmakta, sektörlerin sağlık üzerindeki etkisi ihmal edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, belirli bir ücret karşılığında bağımlı olarak istihdam edilenlerin bazı sağ-lık problemlerine yakalanma oranını, kamu ve özel sektör ayrımında belirlemek amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan veriler Avrupa Çalışma Koşulları Anketi'nin Türki-ye verileri oluşturmaktadır. Türkiye genelinde toplamda 5115 kişiye anket yapılarak ve-riler toplanmıştır. Bağımlı değişken kamu-özel sektör gibi ikili cevap veren kategorik bir değişken olduğundan dolayı ikili lojistik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucuna göre özel sektörde çalışanların kamu sektöründe çalışanlara göre bazı sağlık sorunlarına yakalanma oranının daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Although publications describe physical demands of the job in the physiotherapy profession, there is a dearth of literature on job stress dimensions (JSDs), and their relationship to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Objective: To investigate JSDs and their relationship to WMSDs among physiotherapists currently practicing in southeast Nigeria. Method: A cross-sectional study using items related to the Job Content Questionnaire and the Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics, and the relationship between WMSDs and JSDs was analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A total of 126 physiotherapists responded. There were high levels of stress in most of the job dimensions investigated: 82.1% and 22.8% of the physiotherapists had WMSDs in at least one body region in the last 12 months and the last 7 days respectively. The lower back was the most commonly affected in both periods. No specific domain was related to development of WMSDs. Conclusion: Over 80% of physiotherapists in southeast Nigeria have WMSDs. However, despite high levels of physical demands on the job, physiotherapists have job control and good social support. Intervention programs aimed at reducing WMSDs in physiotherapists should focus on risk factors that target the physical demands of the job.
Article
Full-text available
Work related musculoskeletal injuries are more common among physiotherapists. This study was conducted among Egyptian and Saudi physical therapists to study the prevalence, causes and their response to work related musculoskeletal disorders. Among 200 physiotherapists only 162 answered the questionnaire giving a total response rate of 81%. 63.9% of Egyptian and 74% of Saudi PTs reported a sustaining musculoskeletal injury. Among Egyptian PTs the highest prevalence of injured body parts was neck (25%) and low back (23.4%). The results revealed that more than one-fifth (21.8%) of Egyptian PTs were injured while performing manual therapy techniques. Maintaining a position for prolonged period of time and performing manual therapy techniques had equal rate (21.3%) of prevalence and led to recurrence of symptoms. 17.1% of Egyptian PTs reported making changes in their work habits as avoiding lifting activities and change of prolonged position frequently. The Saudi PTs reported highest prevalence of low back injury (33%) and neck (29%). Bending and twisting (21%) was the commonest cause that led to injuries among Saudi PTs. Lifting (21%) was the main cause that led to recurrence of symptoms. 21% of Saudi PTs avoided lifting activities where as 11% changed their work habits of improved body mechanics as a response to musculoskeletal injuries. Inspite of high prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries among Egyptian and Saudi PTs, majority continued to work without change to another job. Coping strategy like modification of work habits was used as a response to WRMD.
Article
Full-text available
This study documented the cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) in the Turkish language. The participant group included 48 Turkish workers. The cross-cultural adaptation included the translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review and pretest stages. The adapted Turkish version of the CMDQ (T-CMDQ) was validated through self-administration of the tool and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) among participants. The validity of the T-CMDQ was good; Kappa coefficients between the responses given on the VAS and on the T-CMDQ indicated substantial to almost perfect agreement (ranged between 0.62-0.92 across body parts), and Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the VAS scores and T-CMDQ severity scale responses were all significant (ranged between 0.46-0.83 across body parts). Test-retest reliability of the T-CMDQ was satisfactory; Kappa coefficients, which ranged between 0.56-0.97 across the three scales, indicated moderate to almost perfect agreement between test-retest responses across body parts. This study produced the T-CMDQ with good psychometric properties, presented the first formal validation of the CMDQ and provided useful insights on the cross-cultural adaptation process of a subjective data collection tool which was originally developed in English, into the Turkish language.
Article
Yapılan bu araştırma ile fizyoterapistlerin kas-iskelet sistem rahatsızlıklarının ve ergonomi farkındalık düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Türkiye’nin herhangi bir ilinde ve kurumunda çalışan fizyoterapistlere ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışma nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan tarama modeli ile yürütülmüştür. Kurum ve şehir bilgisine bakılmadan 173 fizyoterapiste uygulanan anket sonucunda elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Anket olarak Cornell Kas İskelet Rahatsızlıkları ve Ergonomi Farkındalık Anketleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma alt problemleri kapsamında fizyoterapistlerin kas-iskelet sistem rahatsızlıklarının ve ergonomi farkındalık düzeyleri arasında; cinsiyete, çalışma yılına, çalışma şekline, çalışma süresine ve aktivite yapma durumuna göre bir farklılaşma olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları incelendiğinde cinsiyet, çalışma şekli, çalışma süresi, kamu veya özel kurumda çalışma durumuna göre anlamlı bir farklılaşma tespit edilmemiş; aktivite yapma durumuna göre anlamlı bir farklılaşma tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarından hareketle araştırma ve araştırmacılara kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları ve ergonomi bilincinin artırılmasına yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
Article
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of physiotherapist delivered psychological interventions combined with physiotherapy on pain, disability and psychological outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions. Methods: The review was conducted in accordance with the (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials from inception to May 2016. Studies were required to compare a psychological intervention delivered by physiotherapists combined with physiotherapy to physiotherapy alone or usual care. Physiotherapists delivering the interventions must have undergone training by a psychologist or a health professional trained in the delivery of psychological interventions. Results: 34 articles met the eligibility criteria, of those, 30 were suitable for meta-analysis. There was low to high quality evidence that physiotherapist delivered psychological intervention combined with physiotherapy decreased pain in the short (26 studies, MD=-0.37; 95% [CI], -0.65 to -0.09) and long term (22 studies, MD=-0.38; 95% [CI], -0.67 to -0.10) and decreased disability in the short term (29 studies, SMD=-0.14; 95% [CI], -0.26 to -0.01). Effect sizes were small. Low to high quality evidence demonstrated small to medium effects for some psychological outcomes at short and long term follow-ups. Discussion: The results indicate that psychological interventions delivered by physiotherapist show promise to improve health outcomes, particularly psychological outcomes, in musculoskeletal pain conditions.
Article
Background: Health professions like dentistry, nursing and physical therapy have been reported at high risk for developing workrelated musculoskeletal disorders. Results of studies conducted in these occupational groups may help formulate prevention strategies. However, no such data among physical therapists has been reported in India. Material and methods: We conducted an online survey among 100 physiotherapists in Delhi. Results: The response rate was 75%. The prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders is found to be high since 92% of them reported to feel some pain after joining physical therapy which affects daily activities and even sometimes forces them to change their work. Physical therapists specialty, gender, furniture used in clinic and duration of patient contact are found to be related to the pain development (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We need to emphasize the role of ergonomics and techniques of patient handling in development of work-related pain symptoms.
Article
To estimate the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders from a snapshot sample of members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP); the trade union, educational and professional body for physiotherapists, physiotherapy assistants and physiotherapy students in the UK. The distribution of musculoskeletal disorders against different variables, including age of therapist, years in practice and clinical specialty, was also investigated. We set out to highlight the job tasks that injured physiotherapists associated with their complaint and to identify any preventive strategies that injured physiotherapists adopted to prevent re-injury.