ArticlePublisher preview available

Meditation App Habits and Mental Health: A Longitudinal Study of Meditation App Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Mobile mindfulness meditation apps are an accessible resource for managing mental health during stressful life events. However, long-term stressors may warrant more persistent engagement with mindfulness meditation over time. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dynamic relationships between COVID-19-related worry, mindfulness meditation app use, mindfulness meditation habit strength, and mental health over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-report and app usage data were collected from a sample of mindfulness meditation app users at six time points between April 2020 and May 2021. Poisson regression models were used to analyze associations between COVID-19-related worry, multiple measures of mindfulness meditation app use, self-reported mindfulness meditation habit strength, and three mental health outcomes: anxiety, stress, and depression. COVID-19-related worry was associated with increased mindfulness meditation app use and higher rates of anxiety, stress, and depression (p < 0.001). Increases in mindfulness meditation app habit strength were associated with greater mindfulness meditation app use (p < 0.001). Increases in mindfulness meditation app habit strength were linked to more app use and, when other variables were taken into account, lower rates of anxiety, stress, and depression (p < 0.01). These findings underline the potential of regular use of mindfulness meditation apps in maintaining mental health during ongoing stressors like the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should investigate the causal relationship between mindfulness meditation app habits and mental health, as well as identify strategies to promote strong mindfulness meditation app habits that may protect mental health when exposed to prolonged and pervasive stressors. This study is not preregistered.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Mindfulness (2023) 14:2276–2286
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02217-1
While fear and worry are common psychological responses
to stressful life events, prolonged exposure may compro-
mise the cognitive and emotional resources necessary for
adaptively coping with psychological distress (Fofana et
al., 2020). Critically, maladaptive coping responses have
been shown to exacerbate the adverse eects of stressful
life events on mental health outcomes, while adaptive cop-
ing responses (e.g., problem solving, perspective taking,
acceptance) have been associated with more positive mental
health outcomes (Görgen et al., 2014; Muñoz-Navarro et al.,
2021; Oti-Boadi et al., 2021; Pilch et al., 2021; Vintila et
al., 2023). Heightened levels of COVID-19-related fear and
worry have been linked to more frequent use of maladaptive
coping strategies such as rumination (Muñoz-Navarro et al.,
2021; Oti-Boadi et al., 2021; Pilch et al., 2021; Vintila et al.,
2023), so research is needed to identify and recommend the
Major adverse life events can trigger acute and chronic
stress responses that severely increase the risk of mental
health problems (Kleber, 2019; Thoits, 2010). The COVID-
19 pandemic has been a signicant stressor for many, caus-
ing abrupt disruptions to daily life and creating a large
burden on population-wide mental health. Fear and worry
related to COVID-19, such as feelings of uncertainty and
concerns for one’s health, have signicantly contributed to
the worsening of mental health during the pandemic (Fitz-
patrick et al., 2020; Kämpfen et al., 2020; Mertens et al.,
2020; Muñoz-Navarro et al., 2021; Simsir et al., 2022).
Sara Cloonan
sacloona@asu.edu
1 College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University,
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Abstract
Objectives Mobile mindfulness meditation apps are an accessible resource for managing mental health during stressful life
events. However, long-term stressors may warrant more persistent engagement with mindfulness meditation over time. The
purpose of this study was to investigate the dynamic relationships between COVID-19-related worry, mindfulness medita-
tion app use, mindfulness meditation habit strength, and mental health over the rst year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method Self-report and app usage data were collected from a sample of mindfulness meditation app users at six time points
between April 2020 and May 2021. Poisson regression models were used to analyze associations between COVID-19-re-
lated worry, multiple measures of mindfulness meditation app use, self-reported mindfulness meditation habit strength, and
three mental health outcomes: anxiety, stress, and depression.
Results COVID-19-related worry was associated with increased mindfulness meditation app use and higher rates of anxiety,
stress, and depression (p < 0.001). Increases in mindfulness meditation app habit strength were associated with greater mind-
fulness meditation app use (p < 0.001). Increases in mindfulness meditation app habit strength were linked to more app use
and, when other variables were taken into account, lower rates of anxiety, stress, and depression (p < 0.01).
Conclusions These ndings underline the potential of regular use of mindfulness meditation apps in maintaining mental
health during ongoing stressors like the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should investigate the causal relationship
between mindfulness meditation app habits and mental health, as well as identify strategies to promote strong mindfulness
meditation app habits that may protect mental health when exposed to prolonged and pervasive stressors.
Preregistration This study is not preregistered.
Keywords Mindfulness meditation · Mobile app · Habit strength · COVID-19 · Mental health
Accepted: 4 September 2023 / Published online: 15 September 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023
Meditation App Habits and Mental Health: A Longitudinal Study of
Meditation App Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic
SaraCloonan1· RylanFowers1· JenniferHuberty1· ChadStecher1
1 3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) may be at greater risk of suffering from psychological distress compared to the general population. This study aimed to investigate the effects of mindfulness practice as delivered using Headspace on psychological and cognitive outcomes among HCWs in Singapore. Methods A total of 80 HCWs were recruited and randomly assigned to engage in either 3 weeks (10 min/day) of mindfulness practice using Headspace or an active control condition (Lumosity; involving playing cognitive games). Participants were administered several self-report measures and two working memory (digit span) tasks at pre- and post-intervention, and one-month follow-up. Results There were no significant between-condition changes on any outcome variables from pre- to post-intervention. From pre-intervention to 1-month follow-up, there were significantly greater improvements among Headspace participants on fear of COVID-19 (p = .005), compassion satisfaction (p = .007), trait mindfulness (p = .002), self-compassion (p = .005), sleep quality (p = .002), and the forward digit span task (p < .001). Several outcomes were mediated by increases in trait mindfulness or self-compassion. Conclusions Use of Headspace may lead to downstream benefits in reducing distress and improving psychological health outcomes among HCWs. The findings have implications for improving psychological support resources for HCWs amidst a pandemic. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04936893).
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has not only accounted for a substantial number of deaths in the United States but also deleterious mental health outcomes. We integrated multiple lines of previous research to better understand psychological strengths and difficulties in the face of the pandemic by testing a moderated mediation model that posited that rumination mediates the relationship between COVID-related stress and depression, and mindfulness moderates the relationship between COVID-related stress and rumination. The participants were 196 young adults (79.6% female, 53.1% persons of color), who ranged in age between 18 and 33 years (M = 21.21; SD = 3.62). The participants completed measures of COVID-19 stress, rumination, mindfulness, and depressive symptoms at four time points spanning 1 month. Cross-sectional moderated mediation analysis of the data showed that COVID-related stress predicted rumination, which in turn, predicted depressive symptoms. In addition, mindfulness buffered the relationship between COVID-related stress and rumination. Later, we ran exploratory analyses to examine the robustness of the main models at each wave, linear mixed-effects models to investigate change over time, and conducted a cross-lagged model to test for directional effects. Notably, the longitudinal findings suggested that COVID-related stress and rumination tended to decrease over time and mindfulness remained temporally stable. Additionally, increases in rumination predicted increases in depression. Some longitudinal findings did not consistently congrue with cross-sectional results. Overall, the findings highlight the diverse ways in which individuals cope with stress and the promise of mindfulness as a protective factor against the negative effects of pandemic-related stressors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Mindfulness interventions were shown to be effective in improving well-being and reducing perceived stress in several conditions. These effects were also found in online mindfulness-based training, especially in employees in organizational environments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of an online mindfulness intervention on healthy employees, especially after the first Italian Covid-19 lockdown. Participants in the intervention group underwent an 8-week mindfulness online training program based on the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) protocol compared to a control (no-intervention) group. All participants filled in weekly surveys for the whole intervention duration via online questionnaires to measure their habits, mindfulness (FFMQ-15), emotion regulation (ERQ), positive and negative affect (PANAS), depression, anxiety and stress (DASS-21), resilience (RSA) and insomnia (ISI). 69 participants in the intervention group and 63 in the no-treatment control group were considered in the longitudinal analyses. We found significant differences between the intervention and control groups over time in the measures of mindfulness (in particular the nonreactivity subscale), positive affect, depression, and insomnia. Moreover, we found that the frequency of practice and ease perceived in practicing were positively correlated to several indices of well-being (mindfulness, positive affect, cognitive reappraisal) and negatively correlated to several indices of stress (negative affect, depression, anxiety, stress, insomnia, expressive suppression). These results show the importance and effectiveness of online mindfulness training programs to cope with stress among employees, especially after the Covid-19 lockdown.
Article
Full-text available
The present study aims to identify psychological factors affected by the COVID-19 pandemic given the information we have about reactions during previous pandemics, which documented features of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. We investigated the relationship between health anxiety, symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, and coping mechanisms in the general population and among students. The study was conducted on Romanian population (n = 759), aged between 18–70 years old (M = 33.24), general population (n = 485), and students (n = 274). The results showed that the general population is more anxious when confronted with the new virus compared to students (t (757) = 1.902, p < .05, p = .029). Following the analysis of the hierarchical regression, the results revealed that when controlling the health anxiety variable, a high level of anxiety symptoms and stress, and a low level of depression symptoms could predict anxiety for COVID-19 (R2 = .070, Fchange(3, 754) = 16.759, p ˂ .001). Also, we found that maladaptive strategies are the ones which explain the relationship between health anxiety and COVID-19-related anxiety (95% CI = .011 – .057). The results of this study bring extra knowledge and shed new light on the psychological aspects of the current sanitary crisis and contribute to the understanding of the way people relate to this disease.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the constructs proposed by two influential theoretical frameworks: the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and the Big Five (B5) model of personality in predicting health-related coping behavior during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Both adaptive (i.e., preventive) and maladaptive (i.e., avoidant behavior and wishful thinking) coping behavior was measured. The study was conducted during the first wave of the pandemic. The sample consisted of 397 persons from the general Polish population. The findings provided strong support for the PMT constructs’ predictive value, especially with regard to pandemic-related adaptive behavior. The B5 personality traits accounted for a small proportion of the variability of coping behavior, especially when maladaptive behavior was the outcome. The PMT model showed incremental validity over and above demographic variables and personality traits in predicting preventive behavior, avoidant behavior, and wishful thinking; however, the patterns of relationships differ across the types of coping behavior. According to the current results, to increase adherence to preventive measures during an epidemic, all the PMT constructs should be considered while persuasive communication to the public is formulated.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Behavioral habits are often initiated by contextual cues that occur at approximately the same time each day; so, it may be possible to identify a reflexive habit based on the temporal similarity of repeated daily behavior. Mobile health tools provide the detailed, longitudinal data necessary for constructing such an indicator of reflexive habits, which can improve our understanding of habit formation and help design more effective mobile health interventions for promoting healthier habits. Objective: This study aims to use behavioral data from a commercial mindfulness meditation mobile phone app to construct an indicator of reflexive meditation habits based on temporal similarity and estimate the association between temporal similarity and meditation app users' perceived health benefits. Methods: App-use data from June 2019 to June 2020 were analyzed for 2771 paying subscribers of a meditation mobile phone app, of whom 86.06% (2359/2771) were female, 72.61% (2012/2771) were college educated, 86.29% (2391/2771) were White, and 60.71% (1664/2771) were employed full-time. Participants volunteered to complete a survey assessing their perceived changes in physical and mental health from using the app. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the temporal similarity measure to predict future behavior, and variable importance statistics from random forest models were used to corroborate these findings. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between temporal similarity and self-reported physical and mental health benefits. Results: The temporal similarity of users' daily app use before completing the survey, as measured by the dynamic time warping (DTW) distance between app use on consecutive days, significantly predicted app use at 28 days and at 6 months after the survey, even after controlling for users' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, total app sessions, duration of app use, and number of days with any app use. In addition, the temporal similarity measure significantly increased in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for models predicting any future app use in 28 days (AUC=0.868 with DTW and 0.850 without DTW; P<.001) and for models predicting any app use in 6 months (AUC=0.821 with DTW and 0.802 without DTW; P<.001). Finally, a 1% increase in the temporal similarity of users' daily meditation practice with the app over 6 weeks before the survey was associated with increased odds of reporting mental health improvements, with an odds ratio of 2.94 (95% CI 1.832-6.369). Conclusions: The temporal similarity of the meditation app use was a significant predictor of future behavior, which suggests that this measure can identify reflexive meditation habits. In addition, temporal similarity was associated with greater perceived mental health benefits, which demonstrates that additional mental health benefits may be derived from forming reflexive meditation habits.
Article
Full-text available
The advent of the coronavirus pandemic has impacted the psychological well-being of many people. This study examined the relationship between fear of COVID-19, psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) and coping strategies adopted by undergraduate students in Ghana. A sample of 209 students were recruited to complete online surveys on fear of COVID-19, psychological distress and coping strategies between June and July 2020. Students scored between normal to mild levels of psychological distress but above average scores on fear of coronavirus (M = 19.45, SD = 6.04). Fear of COVID-19 was positively related to psychological distress. Only maladaptive coping was found to be significantly and positively associated with fear of COVID-19. However post-hoc analysis of the components of coping strategies revealed that denial (β = .17, p = .028), venting (β = .18, p = .036) and humour (β = −.18, p = .023; an adaptive coping strategy) were associated with fear of COVID-19. Finally, both adaptive coping and maladaptive coping strategies had a mediating effect on fear of COVID-19 and psychological distress. These findings emphasize the need to design and optimize institutional interventions that will assess psychological distress and fear of COVID-19 levels during this pandemic and provide psychotherapeutic support for students as they return to school.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Mindfulness practice is thought to underlie the therapeutic effects of mindfulness interventions. Yet, more research is needed to evaluate mindfulness practice effects and identify effective practice types. The present study examined the effects of two types of mindfulness practice (audio-guided and daily life mindfulness practice) on measures of stress and coping in a workplace sample.Methods Employees from a digital marketing firm undergoing stressful organizational restructuring (nfinal = 60; aged 21–57; 95.0% white; 66.7% women) were randomly assigned to a high- (1-day seminar plus 6-week practice) or low-dose (1-day seminar) mindfulness training program. Participants completed 3 days of ecological momentary assessments of stress/coping pre- and post-interventions. Audio-guided mindfulness practice was assessed by the number of audio-guided practice sessions completed during the intervention period; daily life mindfulness practice was indexed by how often participants reported applying mindfulness to daily activities during the intervention period.ResultsAcross the full sample, more frequent daily life mindfulness practice buffered against pre- to post-intervention increases in stress ratings (β = − .18, p = .002), stressor frequency (β = − .32, p < .001), and stressor intensity (β = − .27, p = .003), and decreases in successful coping (β = .25, p = .005). Comparable (but weaker) results were observed for audio-guided mindfulness practice (stress ratings: β = − .15, p = .013; stressor frequency: β = − .27, p < .001; stressor intensity: β = − .22, p = .015; successful coping: β = .17, p = .066).Conclusions Much of the mindfulness meditation RCT literature to date has not measured or reported guided or daily life practices, and this work suggests that measuring both may be important for understanding the stress buffering effects of mindfulness meditation training.
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 has led to mental health adversities worldwide. The current study examined whether daily practice of brief mindfulness training has a beneficial impact on affective well-being, and mitigates the negative impact of exposure to COVID-19 news during the pandemic. Participants were randomly assigned into a mindfulness training (MT) group or a waitlist control (WC) group. Participants in the MT group practiced guided mindfulness meditation for a minimum of 10 min each day for 10 days. Both groups completed questionnaires assessing well-being at baseline and after the 10-day period. We also included four ecological momentary assessments (EMA) interspersed throughout the day to measure fine-grained affective states and recent exposure to COVID-19-related news, which has been linked to negative affect. We observed an increase in positive affect in the MT group compared to the WC group in the post-training assessment. However, no group differences emerged in the other three post-training affective measures of negative affect, anxiety and depression. EMA revealed that the MT group also showed more positive affective valence than the WC group across the 10 days. Notably, the WC group reported more negative affective valence following COVID-19 news exposure, whereas the MT group was not impacted. Taken together, our study indicates brief sessions of guided mindfulness meditation during COVID-19 may boost positive affect and serve as a protective buffer against the negative impact of exposure to COVID-19-related news on affective well-being. These findings highlight the utility of mindfulness meditation as an accessible and cost-effective technique to elevate positive affect amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Interventions to change health behaviors have had limited success to date at establishing enduring healthy lifestyle habits. Despite successfully increasing people's knowledge and favorable intentions to adopt healthy behaviors, interventions typically induce only short-term behavior changes. Thus, most weight loss is temporary, and stepped-up exercise regimens soon fade. Few health behavior change interventions have been successful in the longer term. In this article, we unpack the behavioral science of health-habit interventions. We outline habit-forming approaches to promote the repetition of healthy behaviors, along with habit-breaking approaches to disrupt unhealthy patterns. We show that this two-pronged approach—breaking existing unhealthy habits while simultaneously promoting and establishing healthful ones—is best for long-term beneficial results. Through specific examples, we identify multiple intervention components for health policymakers to use as a framework to bring about lasting behavioral public health benefits.