A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:103983–103995
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29660-w
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Influence ofglyphosate andaminomethylphosphonic
acid onthemobility oftrace elements inuncontaminated
andcontaminated agricultural soils
NathanBemelmans1 · BryanArbalestrie1 · HélèneDailly1· EtienneBodart1· YannickAgnan1
Received: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published online: 11 September 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world. In addition to its herbicidal effect, glyphosate is a chelat-
ing agent that can form complexes with trace elements. Yet, agricultural soils can be contaminated with both organic and
mineral substances, questioning the possible influence of glyphosate application on the trace element mobility. In this context,
we specifically studied the extractability of trace elements in uncontaminated and metal-contaminated agricultural soils by
adding glyphosate, formulated glyphosate, and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA, a degradation product of glyphosate)
in batch experiments from 0 to 100mg L−1. Results showed that, on average, glyphosate enhanced the extractability of the
elements considered (e.g., As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) at 20 and 100mg L−1. Surprisingly, the uncontaminated soil highlighted
the highest influence of glyphosate compared to the contaminated ones, likely resulting from a higher natural element extract-
ability in the contaminated soils. Although formulated glyphosate presented an overall higher impact than unformulated
glyphosate, it was evidenced that AMPA showed lower influence meaning that glyphosate degradation is beneficial to limit
deleterious effects.
Keywords Glyphosate· AMPA· Trace elements· Mobility· Agricultural soil· Contamination
Introduction
Glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine), a non-selective
post-emergence organophosphorus herbicide that inhibits the
biosynthesis of the aromatic amino acids (Pline etal. 2002), is
widely used in agriculture. The commercial glyphosate–based
products include additional molecules (alsocalled co-formu-
lants) to enhance the herbicide role of the active substance
(e.g., by facilitating penetration through the cuticle; Leaper
and Holloway 2000). Unfortunately, the composition of these
glyphosate co-formulants are usually unknown due to com-
mercial confidentiality (Mesnage etal. 2019). The common
glyphosate concentration in the commercial formulated prod-
ucts is 360g L−1, then diluted by the farmer for field appli-
cation. The maximum authorized application of glyphosate
depends on both culture and country: for example, in Bel-
gium, it reaches up to 6L ha−1 of 360g L−1 glyphosate solu-
tion (i.e., 2160g ha−1; Phytoweb 2015).
With a theoretical half-life of 16days (Lewis etal. 2016),
glyphosate is considered to be non-persistent in soil. The
degradation rate, however, varies according to environmen-
tal conditions, such as climate (moisture and temperature),
soil microbial activity, soil organic matter (Alletto etal.
2010; Bento etal. 2016), or even formulation (Wilms etal.
2023). Its main degradation product is aminomethylphos-
phonic acid (AMPA) with a similar chemical structure.
AMPA, however, is more persistent in soil with a typical
half-life that is ranging widely from 23 to 958days (Bento
etal. 2016; Lewis etal. 2016; Bergström etal. 2011). Due
to the widespread use of glyphosate, both glyphosate and
AMPA are largely present as pesticide residues in agricul-
tural soils (Silva etal. 2019). In soil, these molecules can
interact with soil constituents. Indeed, with its three acid
functions (phosphonate, carboxylic, and amino; pKa of 2.6,
5.6, and 10.6, respectively; Sprankle etal. 1975), glypho-
sate has three negative and one positive charges in most
Responsible Editor: Kitae Baek
* Yannick Agnan
yannick.agnan@biogeoscience.eu
1 Earth andLife Institute, Université catholique de Louvain,
Louvain-La-Neuve1348, Belgium
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.