The Myths Surrounding Time Dilation and E = mc^2

Abstract

This article investigates the paradox surrounding the fact, that while the equations involved in Einstein's special theory of relativity lead to logical absurdities, they are nevertheless supported by many experiments.

Full text

1
The Myths Surrounding Time Dilation and E = mc2
Frederick David Tombe,
Belfast, Northern Ireland,
United Kingdom
sirius184@hotmail.com
7th September 2023
Abstract. This article investigates the paradox surrounding the fact, that while the
equations involved in Einstein’s special theory of relativity lead to logical absurdities,
they are nevertheless supported by many experiments.
Time Dilation and GPS Atomic Clocks
I. In Einstein’s famous 1905 paper, “On the Electrodynamics of Moving
Bodies”, [1], he ignores the physical medium for the propagation of light waves
and then proceeds to derive the equations for the Doppler effect in a ray of light.
But because he turns logic on its head by treating the speed of light as a
constant, without reference to the physical medium of propagation, he interprets
his resulting equations as inertial transformations involving the absurd concept
of time dilation. The equations in question actually preceded Einstein and they
are known as the Lorentz transformations, [2]. The time equation takes the form,
tꞌ = γ(t – vx/c2) (1)
where, γ = 1/√(1 – v2/c2). We know however, that when the Earth
completes an orbit of the Sun, relative to the background stars, a year has passed
by for all observers, no matter what their perspective is, yet nevertheless, the
atomic clocks used in orbiting GPS satellites, where v << c, appear to confirm
equation (1), so long as we treat t as the period associated with the frequency of
the electromagnetic radiation that is incident on the caesium atoms in the GPS
clocks.
The Interpretation
II. Einstein derived equation (1) on the basis that, x = ct, and so it specifically
pertains to the return-path longitudinal Doppler effect in a ray of
electromagnetic radiation. Some explaining is therefore required as to how this
very same equation can then be used in connection with the physical process
that is involved with the radiation that is absorbed by the caesium atoms in a
moving atomic clock. Radiation being reflected off a moving target seems to
have something in common with the absorption of radiation by a moving target.
This was discussed in the article, “Atomic Clocks and Relativity”, [3], in
connection with the changes that occur in both the kinetic energy and the

2
gravitational energy of GPS clocks. At the end of the article, the observation
was made that the frequency shift equation,
f' = fo(1 − v²/2c²) (2)
connects with the Lorentz transformation equation (1), but only providing
that the famous equation, E = mc2, derives exclusively from the applied
radiation pressure, and that this equation does not have general application. All
this can only make sense if the time term, t, in a Lorentz transformation, applies
to the angular period of the rotating electron-positron dipoles that densely fill all
of space to form the medium for the propagation of light, [4], [5], [6]. As such, x,
in equation (1) will be the circumference of these tiny dipoles, while c will be
their circumferential speed, equal to the speed of light. By 1937, a general
picture had emerged of light constituting waves that propagate through a fine-
grained vortex sea in which the speed of propagation equates to the circulation
speed of the tiny constituent vortices themselves, [7].
The Equation E = mc2 and its Origins
III. In the September addendum to the famous 1905 paper, “Does the Inertia of
a Body Depend upon its Energy-Content?”, [8], where the equation, E = mc2, is
generally believed to have first appeared, Einstein’s derivation muddles two
independent events simultaneously. The first event is the emission of light from
a body, along with the reasonable assumption that the mass of the body will
reduce as a result of the loss of the electromagnetic energy. Note that Einstein
uses the symbol, L, for the electromagnetic energy, but the more familiar
symbol, E, will be used here to avoid confusion. The second event is the
application of a Lorentz transformation to the energy that is involved in the
emitted electromagnetic radiation, but it’s only actually the first event which
should be relevant as regards linking the lost mass to the speed of light. While
this connection can be made with reference to Maxwell’s radiation pressure
equation, the relevant derivation being found in Section VI of, “The Double
Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field”, [6], it’s not clear as to whether or not
Einstein ever knew about Maxwell’s equation for radiation pressure. But
whatever, the fact that Einstein uses the Lorentz transformation as a means of
introducing the speed of light into the analysis, merely conceals a tautology,
because electromagnetic energy is only connected to the Lorentz transformation
in the first place because of the equation E = mc2. The connection comes from
the energy-momentum four-vector which is in turn established from the
transverse Doppler effect. The mass term, m, is actually irrelevant in the
analysis. And so, in order to introduce the all-important ½(v²/c²) factor, Einstein
employs this tautology. He actually begins with the return-path longitudinal

3
Doppler effect equation, as at equation (1), but now applied to the
electromagnetic energy, E, which, when x = ct, takes the form,
Eꞌ = γE(1 – v/c) (3)
Einstein’s next conjuring trick is then to get rid of the undesirable v/c term
in equation (3). This he does by splitting the emitted radiation into two equal
quanta of energy, each travelling in opposite directions, and he does this so that
he can treat these two scalar quantities like vectors. By projecting the two light
rays at an angle, φ, with respect to the axis, Einstein relies on the fact that a
cosine is negative in the third quadrant, so that he can subtract the two v/c terms
out of existence when he performs the Lorentz transformation. This has the
effect of converting the longitudinal Doppler effect into a transverse Doppler
effect, in line with the energy-momentum four-vector. The next step is then to
do a binomial approximation for the case of v << c, so that the factor ½(v²/c²)
emerges as a coefficient applied to the change in the emitted electromagnetic
energy, ∆E, which had occurred due to the Lorentz transformation. Then, by
equating ½(∆E)(v²/c²) with the corresponding change in the classical kinetic
energy of the emitting body, Einstein wrongly concluded that the equation, E =
mc2, is a mass-energy equivalence equation of general applicability.
But Einstein has conflated the change in the body’s mass, due to the
emission of the two quanta of light energy, with the change in the body’s kinetic
energy, due to the Lorentz transformation. The involvement of the speed of light
in the mass-energy relationship, as between the lost mass from the emitting
body and the emitted radiation itself, should however already be present,
whether a Lorentz transformation has been performed or not. The mass-energy
relationship must be established independently of any matters relating to the
Lorentz transformation. It must be established through Maxwell’s radiation
pressure equation, [5]. Einstein’s derivation of E = mc2 is both a tautology and a
series of conjuring tricks, and at the end, he deceptively switches the
electromagnetic origins of E = mc2 away from the domain of the mass contained
within the emitted quanta of EM radiation, and instead places it into the domain
of the lost mass, prior to its emission from the body. Yet, it was only on
conversion to electromagnetic radiation that the speed of light became involved
with the emitted mass in the first place. By this final deception, Einstein paves
the way for the famous equation, E = mc2, to be a mass-energy conversion
equation of general applicability.
Conclusion
IV. The Lorentz transformation equations, as used in Einstein’s theories of
relativity, are simply the equations for the Doppler effect as applied to a ray of
light but interpreted in the absence of the medium for the propagation of light,

4
along with the absurd condition that the speed of light is constant without any
means of reference. This leads to the further absurd concept of time dilation,
never mind the paradox known as the clock paradox, whereby two clocks can
both tick slower than each other. We all know, however, that the passage of
time doesn’t change its rate according to perspective. When the Earth completes
an orbit of the Sun, relative to the background stars, one year has passed by for
everybody.
The Lorentz transformations do not actually apply to time and space as
such but should correctly be applied to the physical medium for the propagation
of light, with the time and space variables pertaining to the angular period and
circumference of the tiny aethereal vortices, which according to Maxwell, [5],
comprise this luminiferous medium. The speed of light is then determined from
the circumferential speed of these constituent vortices.
Meanwhile, the equation, E = mc2, does not have the general applicability
of mass-energy equivalence as claimed by Einstein. This equation first appeared
in embryonic form as equation (132) in Maxwell’s 1861 paper, “On Physical
Lines of Force”, [4], in connection with the density and elasticity of the
luminiferous medium. It is simply Newton’s equation for the speed of a wave in
an elastic solid. This realisation was noted in more recent times by Dr.
Menahem Simhony in connection with binding energy, as explained in, “The
‘Mass-Energy Equivalence’ Deception - The Second Greatest in 20th Century
Physics”, [9], and elaborated on in Section IV of, “The Double Helix Theory of
the Magnetic Field”, [6], as well as in the article, “Radiation Pressure and E =
mc2”, [10]. The equation, E = mc2, never arises unless electromagnetic radiation
is involved, whether it be black body radiation, X-rays, or gamma rays, [11], [12],
and the equation applies either to the radiation itself, or to the wave propagation
medium, as in that very same luminiferous medium that Einstein discarded in
one of the greatest acts of scientific vandalism ever performed.
References
[1] Einstein, A., “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper”, Annalen der Physik 322 (10) pp.
891-921, Bern, (1905)
http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_891-921.pdf
English Translation,
https://users.physics.ox.ac.uk/~rtaylor/teaching/specrel.pdf
[2] Tombe, F.D., “The Lorentz Aether Theory, (2020)
See Appendix B.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339696770_The_Lorentz_Aether_Theory
[3] Tombe, F.D., “Atomic Clocks and Relativity”, (2023)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372165749_Atomic_Clocks_and_Relativity

5
[4] Whittaker, E.T., “A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity”, Chapter 4, pages
100-102, (1910)
“All space, according to the younger Bernoulli, is permeated by a fluid aether, containing an
immense number of excessively small whirlpools. The elasticity which the aether appears to
possess, and in virtue of which it is able to transmit vibrations, is really due to the presence
of these whirlpools; for, owing to centrifugal force, each whirlpool is continually striving to
dilate, and so presses against the neighbouring whirlpools.”
[5] Maxwell, J.C., “On Physical Lines of Force”, Philosophical Magazine, Volume XXI,
Fourth Series, London, (1861)
http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf
[6] Tombe, F.D., “The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field”, (2006)
Galilean Electrodynamics, Volume 24, Number 2, p.34, (March/April 2013)
See section VI for Maxwell’s radiation pressure equation.
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-
Mathematical%20Physics/Download/6371
[7] Lodge, Sir Oliver, “Ether (in physics)”, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Fourteenth Edition,
vol. 8, pp. 751-755, (1937)
See pp. 6-7 in the pdf file in the link below, beginning at the paragraph that starts with,
Possible Structure. −, and note that while the quote suggests that the ether is incompressible,
this is almost certainly not the case. The quote in question, in relation to the speed of light,
reads,
“The most probable surmise or guess at present is that the ether is a perfectly
incompressible continuous fluid, in a state of fine-grained vortex motion, circulating with
that same enormous speed. For it has been partly, though as yet incompletely, shown that
such a vortex fluid would transmit waves of the same general nature as light waves— i.e.,
periodic disturbances across the line of propagation—and would transmit them at a rate of
the same order of magnitude as the vortex or circulation speed.”
http://gsjournal.net/Science-
Journals/Historical%20PapersMechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/4105
[8] Einstein, A., “Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy-Content?”, (1905)
https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
[9] Simhony, M., “The Electron-Positron Lattice Space, Cause of Relativity and Quantum
Effects”, Physics Section 5, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, (1990)
http://web.archive.org/web/20040606235138/www.word1.co.il/physics/mass.htm
[10] Tombe, F.D., “Radiation Pressure and E = mc² ”, (2018)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325859308_Radiation_Pressure_and_E_mc
[11] Tombe, F.D., “The Positronium Orbit in the Electron-Positron Sea”, (2020)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338816847_The_Positronium_Orbit_in_the_Electr
on-Positron_Sea
[12] Tombe, F.D., “The Apparent Dual Nature of Electromagnetic Waves”, (2021)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356194121_The_Apparent_Dual_Nature_of_Electr
omagnetic_Waves