This book is based on the hypothesis of a governance gap. It presents a multi-dimensional view, from the perspectives of corporategovernance, project management, and the development sector, includingnonprofit governance, which substantiates this hypothesis. The hypothesisis further corroborated by ethical normative considerations whose particularintricacy and weight carry perhaps the most fruitful explorations inthese chapters.The book's case study, which follows the course of a major developmentproject carried out over a period of 20 months, has confirmed thehypothesis of the governance gap. The analysis of around 400 exampleshas led to a multi-perspectival understanding of the kinds of problems andopportunities that come into focus once one begins to address governanceissues. Based on this understanding, drawing on the governance rolesframed in organizational theories and on several models developed byscholars at the University of St. Gallen, a solution for bridging this governancegap has been developed, the so-called Project Governance Model.Its application to the experience and understanding gained from this particularproject has proven to be fundamental.The governance gap, which this book has examined, is specific to thefunctioning of development projects in nonprofit organizations or NGOs.That gap has special interest if only because NGOs are in the business,finally, of promoting self-governance among the people with whom theycarry out their projects.Project governance is defined herein as a process-oriented system bywhich projects are strategically directed, integratively managed, and holisticallycontrolled, in an entrepreneurial and ethically reflected way, appropriateto the singular, time-wise limited, interdisciplinary, and complexcontext of projects.Six key responsibilities have been identified. Together, they constituteintegrated modules of the Project Governance Model (and are italicized inthe following paragraphs):System management provides a systemic understanding of the environmentand of influences. This book adapts the St. Gallen ManagementModel to the context of development projects, an application that allowsone to set up a project in the first place. The same system understanding,and the lessons that come from it, allow all of the involved actors, from themanager to the donors and stakeholders, to steer the project in its environmentand to guide it toward specific objectives.The specific tasks of the governance board in directing and controllingthe project and its mission are the subject of mission management.Pursuing the development mission requires sensitivity to what developmentcooperation signifies. True development cooperation is made possibleonly through a discursive and recognition-based approach. The challengesinherent in development cooperation may pose threats to the integrityof the project - and indeed, the case study has identified 130 caseswhich have ethical relevance to that integrity. The study has yielded theneed to resort to a universally valid normative foundation. Such a foundationis proposed in integrity management through an approach which combinesdiscourse ethics and recognition ethics. Such a combined approachallows development actors to understand and explicate integrity challengesto the integrity of the project and its organizational elements, creatingso-called tension-zones between the challenges and the elements themselves.A practical process model illustrates how such integrity challengescan be resolved.Development cooperation ultimately relies on stakeholders. In order togo beyond lip-service to these parties, management tools and managementcommitment are needed. The proposed extended stakeholder managementmodule provides a model with specific focus on the broad identification ofstakeholders and a continuous monitoring of the expectations and claimswhich come to exist between the project and its stakeholders.Risk management allows one to detect risks in an all-inclusive way onceagain through reliance on system understanding. This book has emphasizedin particular the need for strategies capable of responding when risk down-sides occur with all of their troubling and messy consequences, aswell as the need for monitoring risks on the level of project governance.Finally, audit management expands on the audit roles of governance. Insightsderiving from the case study propose that internal audit capabilitiesbe strengthened in development projects and that audit needs are alignedon the governance level.In summary, the proposed model for project governance allows one toclose the governance gap in development projects, which was outlined indetail, and thereby contributes to bridging another gap as well, the famousone between theory and practice. The importance of such project governance,however, does not lie exclusively in its support for a proper implementationof development objectives; project governance as it is presentedhere also becomes an implicit part of the objective of true and systemicallyunderstood development cooperation.