ArticlePublisher preview available

Quiet revolutions in early-modern England

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Revolutions are invariably viewed as the violent replacement of an existing political order. However, many social innovations that result in fundamental institutional and cultural shifts do not occur via force nor have clear beginning and ending dates. Focusing on early-modern England, we provide the first-ever quantitative inquiry into such quiet revolutions. Using existing topic model estimates that leverage caselaw and print-culture corpora, we construct annual time series of attention to 100 legal and 110 cultural ideas between the mid-sixteenth and mid-eighteenth centuries. We estimate the timing of structural breaks in these series. Quiet revolutions begin when there are concurrent upturns in attention to several related topics. Early-modern England featured several quiet, but profound, revolutionary episodes. The financial revolution began by 1660. The Protectorate saw a revolution in land law. A revolution in caselaw relating to families was underway by the early eighteenth century. Elizabethan times saw an increased emphasis on basic skills and showed signs of a Puritan revolution affecting both theology and ideas on institutions. In the decade before the Civil War, a quiet revolution of dissent preceded the turmoil that led to a king’s beheading.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Received: 11 March 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published online: 27 August 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023
Peter Murrell
pmurrell@umd.edu
Peter Grajzl
grajzlp@wlu.edu
1 Department of Economics, The Williams School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics,
Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA
2 CESifo, Munich, Germany
3 Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Quiet revolutions in early-modern England
PeterGrajzl1,2· PeterMurrell3
Public Choice (2024) 200:357–381
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01093-6
Abstract
Revolutions are invariably viewed as the violent replacement of an existing political order.
However, many social innovations that result in fundamental institutional and cultural
shifts do not occur via force nor have clear beginning and ending dates. Focusing on early-
modern England, we provide the rst-ever quantitative inquiry into such quiet revolutions.
Using existing topic model estimates that leverage caselaw and print-culture corpora, we
construct annual time series of attention to 100 legal and 110 cultural ideas between the
mid-sixteenth and mid-eighteenth centuries. We estimate the timing of structural breaks
in these series. Quiet revolutions begin when there are concurrent upturns in attention
to several related topics. Early-modern England featured several quiet, but profound,
revolutionary episodes. The nancial revolution began by 1660. The Protectorate saw a
revolution in land law. A revolution in caselaw relating to families was underway by the
early eighteenth century. Elizabethan times saw an increased emphasis on basic skills and
showed signs of a Puritan revolution aecting both theology and ideas on institutions. In
the decade before the Civil War, a quiet revolution of dissent preceded the turmoil that
led to a king’s beheading.
Keywords Quiet revolutions · Text-as-data · Machine-learning · Time series · Caselaw ·
Culture · Early-modern England
JEL Classications C80 · C22 · K00 · Z10 · N43 · P10
1 3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Thus, our analysis of early English law suggests that major developments in financial markets were already ongoing in the first part of the seventeenth century (Grajzl & Murrell, 2021c, 2022b, earlier than mooted in most previous studies. In addition to the findings on Baconian Theology noted above, in Grajzl and Murrell (2023b) we locate the stirrings of the English scientific revolution in 1558 to 1610, earlier than is conventional (Wootton, 2015). Given the central place of the financial and scientific revolutions in any story of England's rise, these are fundamental findings. ...
... 39.4, something remarkable happened in England during 1550-1750, and one of the enduring puzzles of history is what that was and when it happened. Grajzl and Murrell (2023b) address this puzzle directly. In the age of two major political revolutions, this paper looks for quiet revolutions-periods of fundamental institutional and cultural shifts that do not occur via force nor have clear beginning and ending dates. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Machine learning (ML) and associated computational advances have opened entirely new avenues for the processing and analysis of large data sets, especially those containing text. In this chapter, we show how ML can extend the scope of historical institutional and cultural analysis. We first provide an overview of some of the scattered existing literature using ML methods to study historical institutions and culture. We then use our own work on pre-nineteenth-century English caselaw and print culture to illustrate the possibilities and the challenges in using ML as a tool for systematic quantitative inquiry into the origins, change, and impact of institutions and culture. We highlight the power of ML for distilling core facts from large corpora and generating datasets amenable to analysis using conventional econometric analysis. We demonstrate how our work allowed us to explore the deep institutional roots of specific legal and cultural ideas, analyze the coevolution of ideas within caselaw and culture, examine the impact of caselaw on economic development both before and during the Industrial Revolution, and discern critical junctures in England’s legal and cultural development. Focusing on historical institutions and culture, the chapter illuminates the types of lessons that can be learned from the application of ML in new institutional economics. It also suggests a pathway that researchers applying ML to history can follow when trying to find a practical, implementable set of methods among the proliferation of new techniques that is usual when an area of research is in its infancy.
... Revolutions that are a sequence of steps and successions that lead to stable outcomes are relatively rare. And as Grajzl and Murrell (2023) observe, many social innovations that result in fundamental shifts in institutions or culture occur via nonviolent means and do not have a clear beginning or end. Afghanistan has these features of instability as well as lack of a clear beginning or end. ...
Article
Full-text available
Analysis of revolutions typically focuses on de jure constitutions and how their elite- or mass-led character influences their consequences. De facto constitutions are political and economic rules that people use to govern themselves which may or may not be recognized in the evolving de jure constitution. We argue that the nature of change resulting from revolutions depends on whether the emergent constitutional order recognizes the autonomy of de facto constitutions. We theorize neglect, disregard, and hostility toward de facto constitutions contributes to cycles of constitutional instability. We use this theory to explain Afghanistan’s unending revolution. Neither elite-led nor mass-led revolutions in Afghanistan produced a lasting constitutional order because they share a disregard for the de facto constitution.
Article
Full-text available
This special issue reflects one of the first systematic inquiries into the effects of revolutions on institutional change, a topic previously explored only tangentially across diverse social science domains. It fosters interdisciplinary discourse on revolutionary outcomes among economists, political scientists, sociologists, and economic historians informed by the public choice research program. The issue is divided into two parts, the first of which focuses on regime overthrow and institutional transformation and the second of which focuses on rational-choice theoretic analyses of revolution and its results. By employing analytical narratives and comparative analyses of contemporary and historical revolutions, the issue advances both theoretical and empirical understandings of revolution, revolutionary dynamics, and their implications.
Article
Full-text available
We examine how pre-Industrial-Revolution English caselaw development on land, inheritance, and families affected, and was affected by, economic and demographic outcomes. Our yearly measures of caselaw development are derived from existing topic-model estimates that reflect a comprehensive corpus of reports on pre-1765 court cases. We estimate a structural VAR model using these caselaw time-series in combination with measures of real per-capita income and vital rates. Pre-industrial caselaw development profoundly shaped economic development. Strikingly, the areas of caselaw that stimulated real-income growth are on families and inheritance, not land. Caselaw on families and inheritance was especially important as a driver of real income and birth rates after 1710. Caselaw developments were spurred primarily by changes in real income, not by changes in vital rates. Incorporation of endogenous caselaw development leaves intact the findings of the existing literature that examines pre-industrial economic-demographic interactions. However, our findings do imply that any Malthusian trap that was present in pre-industrial England was made less severe as a result of developments in caselaw on families and inheritance.
Article
We provide a quantitative macrohistory of the evolution and coevolution of three fundamental elements of English caselaw: property, contract, and procedure. Our dataset is derived from a comprehensive corpus of reports on early-modern English court cases. Leveraging existing topic-model estimates, we construct annual time series of attention to each of the three legal domains between the years 1552 and 1764 and estimate a structural VAR. Property and procedure are affected for decades by their own shocks. Procedure and property coevolve. In contrast, contract adjusts quickly to its own shocks and does not coevolve with the other two areas of caselaw. We identify the episodes and events outside the legal system that correspond to systemic shocks. Edward Coke was a shock to procedure. The commercial revolution raised attention to contract. The Glorious Revolution, interestingly, did not lead to elevated attention to property issues, but the Civil War and Interregnum did. The evolution of contract, while relatively autonomous from the internal dynamics of the legal system, was, of the three legal domains, least autonomous from society.
Book
From 1789 in France to 2011 in Cairo, revolutions have shaken the world. In their pursuit of social justice, revolutionaries have taken on the assembled might of monarchies, empires, and dictatorships. Revolutions: A Very Short Introduction illuminates the revolutionaries, their strategies, their successes and failures, the major theories of revolution, and the ways in which revolutions continue to dominate world events and the popular imagination. Starting with the city-states of ancient Greece and Rome, this VSI traces the development of revolutions through the Renaissance and Reformation, the Enlightenment and liberal constitutional revolutions such as in America, and their opposite—the communist revolutions of the 20th century.