Content uploaded by Alexander Ohnemus
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Alexander Ohnemus on Aug 19, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Human Mating Pairing of Similar Strategists is Definitely Constructivist and Possibly
Hereditary Hypothesis
WARNING: Dimensionality causes any of the following assertions to be less rigorous as
humans are very complex and unpredictable creatures.
(Group Theory)(Differential Equations)(Chaos Theory) Genes are ONLY associated with traits.
A particular gene can never be known, for certain, to be derived into a particular trait. In the
past, scholars have argued that some human populations are more r-strategist and others are
more k-strategist. Constructivism definitely explains those group differences. No clear link will
ever known for sure as far as hereditary differences between populations. Yet, certainly all
Europeans are inherently privileged. Behavioral genetics may unfortunately emerge again , yet
violating civil liberties is bigotry and unethical and science is never settled. Some women are
more satisfied in committed relationships and others in casual sex. No one will ever know for
sure if k-strategist women are more sexually satisfied in committed relationships. Likewise, no
one will ever be certain if casual sex is more sexually satisfying for r-strategist women. As a
conjecture, couples that have sex together often are more likely to stay together, thus, NOT
beyond a reasonable doubt, two r-strategists may make a sexually satisfied couple. As well as,
NOT beyond a reasonable doubt, two k-strategists may make a sexually satisfied couple.
Stereotypically, promiscuous European women are likely to marry and procreate with
Subsaharan men. Subsaharan men are stereotypically r-strategists and the European women
they obtain are generally are also r-strategists.
Work Cited
Ohnemus , Alexander . "Constructivist Law and Hereditary HEURISTIC Theorem."
ResearchGate.net .
www.researchgate.net/publication/373044636_Constructivist_Law_and_Hereditary_HEURISTIC
_Theorem. Accessed 18 Aug. 2023.
Rushton, J P. “Do r/K reproductive strategies apply to human differences?.” Social biology vol.
35,3-4 (1988): 337-40.
McGue, Matt. “The End of Behavioral Genetics?.” Xin li xue bao. Acta psychologica Sinica vol.
40,10 (2008): 1073-1087. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2008.01073
Wongsomboon, Val et al. “Women's Orgasm and Sexual Satisfaction in Committed Sex and
Casual Sex: Relationship Between Sociosexuality and Sexual Outcomes in Different Sexual
Contexts.” Journal of sex research vol. 57,3 (2020): 285-295.
doi:10.1080/00224499.2019.1672036.
Pew Research Center . "THE RISE OF INTERMARRIAGE." pewresearch.org. 16 Feb. 2012.
www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2012/02/16/chapter-1-overview/. Accessed 1 Mar. 2023.