ChapterPDF Available

Film productions as a part of the regional identity in rural areas – the case of the Nordic countries

Authors:
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-13
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
The creative industries receive increased attention – including in peripheral areas –
as municipalities, investors, and people who work in these industries hope that it will
boost their region.
(Sand 2020)
Many regions, municipalities, cities, and towns are working strategically to dene
their own place brands. In this process, lm and TV productions can be a powerful
tool and resource (Nordström 2018; Lind 2019). Film and television productions
are mobile and often produced in places where the economic and production con-
ditions are to their best advantage. If these productions become associated with
the place and are exposed to an international audience, this can sometimes trans-
late to extensive marketing values for the location or region in question (Lind and
Kristensson Uggla 2019).
This chapter aims to discuss how lm productions, and especially Indian lm
productions, are used, can be used, and could be used as a tool in regional develop-
ment in European rural areas in general and in Nordic and Finnish rural areas in
particular. Which lessons could be learned from previous productions and what are
the potential benets and challenges when attracting lm productions to a remote
region in Northern Europe?
Given the low number of Indian lm productions made in the Nordic coun-
tries so far, zooming in on Indian lm productions in Finland specically has its
challenges as a research eld.
That said, the topic of regional development through the lens of the interna-
tional lm industry touches on issues of periphery and centre (Dahlström 2005;
Sand 2020; Chow and Sand 2020), the balancing act of commercial and artistic
objectives (Miles and Paddison 2005; Florida 2002; Sacco et al. 2008), as well
as the connection between regional development, place branding, and narrative
capital (Lind 2019; Lind and Kristensson Uggla 2019).
The report Film and Regional Development – Policy and Practice in the Nor-
dic Countries (Dahlström 2005) discusses how regional lm projects can have
10 Film productions as a part of the
regional identity in rural areas –
the case of the Nordic countries
Therese Sunngren-Granlund
180 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
favourable eects on employment, education and training, regional identity, and
place branding. According to Dahlström, it is important to keep in mind that out-
comes from regional investments in lm productions often take time to manifest
and that some results are indirect, meaning that estimating the wider impact of lm
productions on regional development and identity, as well as how it aects employ-
ment and turnover, can sometimes be challenging.
Culture-led local and regional development has gained attention globally dur-
ing the past few decades, and there are both failures and success stories that can
be used to understand culture’s ability to create social and economic value (Miles
and Paddison 2005). Furthermore, economist Pier Luigi Sacco draws attention not
only to the size of the creative industries but also to the importance of cultural
involvement, which he believes to be crucial for the exchange of ideas between
dierent sectors (Sacco et al. 2008). The connection between cultural participation
and innovation also implies that narratives connected to the place are of importance
to the local population as well as to the hospitality industry (Lind and Kristensson
Uggla 2019).
Methodological remarks
This chapter is based on an analysis of lm policy documents in Finland, Sweden,
Norway, Denmark, and Iceland (2020–2022), as well as on ten in-depth inter-
views conducted between 2020 and 2021 with Finnish stakeholders working in the
lm industry. The policy documents were all accessed online through the ocial
websites of the respective country’s national and regional lm commissions.
The policy documents, such as “Finland Film Commissions Production
Guide”, “Film in Iceland – Filming in Iceland”, “Norwegian Film Commission
Funding & Partners”, “CPH Film Fund – How to Get Funding”, and “Nordic Film
Commissions Our Shared Ambition” contain, among other things, information
about national incentives and tax rebates, which productions are eligible for sup-
port, how to apply for incentives, and the size of incentives in terms of percentages
or sums. The policy documents and websites also provide facts about locations,
scenery, daylight, and weather conditions. There are also details about local service
companies, salaries, working hours as well as which permits and documents are
needed and when (shooting, working, and visas).
The interviews were part of an international project studying the connections
between Indian lm industries and European locations with the objective to com-
prehend the socio-cultural and economic eects of Indian lm productions in
Europe. The study’s key research question was: Does Finland attract the Indian
lm industry, and how? The interview guide covered topics including methods
for attracting international lm productions, collaboration between dierent stake-
holder, and infrastructural and organisational arrangements. All the interviews
were held in English and conducted online via Teams or Zoom. Each interview
was approximately 45 minutes to an hour long. Professionals from the Finnish lm
industry, such as producers, cinematographers, art directors, location scouts, and
technical crew, as well as regional lm commissions were among the respondents,
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 181
and they were mainly reached through professional websites and networks. None
of the interviewees were of Indian origin. This means that the scene is set in a Finn-
ish context. Nevertheless, similarities are probably to be found in the other Nordic
countries as well as in other rural areas in Europe.
Rural areas, regional identity, and the creative industries
In Finland, 89% of the country’s territory is considered predominantly rural
(OECD 2008) and according to the Finnish Environment institute (SYKE 2020),
about 72% of the population reside in the urban areas of the country, which means
that 28% live in rural areas. Putting these numbers in a European context, the cor-
responding numbers are that around 20% of the population lives in predominantly
rural regions, and that rural regions make up approximately half of the continent
(European commission 2021). These gures show that in Finland, both the territory
considered as predominantly rural and the number of people living in such areas is
higher than in the rest of Europe.
According to the Finnish geographer Anssi Paasi (2011), a region’s identity is
developed by the acts of its citizens, while at the same time the actions of the
people of that region are inuenced by larger-scale entities, such as the state
and the global system. As a result, regional identity is a dynamic process that is
simultaneously produced, practised, and impacted by the local populace and larger
entities, continuously.
Regardless of whether the region is considered rural or urban, all places have a
brand, whether it is in print or not. A place brand is the sum of the associations that
exist around the place, for residents and for the outside world (Nordström 2018).
Today many regions, municipalities, cities, and towns are working strategically to
dene their own place brands, with the aim of attracting new residents, visitors and
business establishments (Logar 2022). In this process, lm and TV productions can
be a powerful tool and resource (Nordström 2018; Lind 2019).
Film is a multi-faceted eld which, in addition to direct values from production
and consumption, contributes to inspiration, identity creation and lifting places and
regions. The medium’s main strength lies in its narrative format, which creates and
conveys representations of our world, and where certain lms aects us personally
while others have an inuence on a collective level (Lind 2019). Film production
can also create powerful synergies between dierent competences and industry
areas and enable exchange of experience and collaborations. Economist Pierre
Luigi Sacco points out how the creative industries, including lm, strengthens
and develops innovation, welfare, sustainable development, social cohesion, and
learning (Sacco 2011).
Film and television productions are mobile and are often produced in places
where the economic and productions conditions are to their best advantage.
When trying to attract lm productions to a place, eective marketing of the
location’s qualities is of great importance. If these productions are associated
with the place and exposed to an international audience, it can mean exten-
sive marketing values, while also strengthening the location’s self-image and
182 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
identity for those who live there so-called secondary values (Lind and Kris-
tensson Uggla 2019).
Research by Pier Luigi Sacco (2011) and Richard Florida (2002) has contrib-
uted to a new and revitalised view of the creative industries’ value creation and
contribution to places, cities, and regions. According to Florida, the development
of the creative class is important in order to develop both creativity and innovation
in a region (Florida 2002). Sacco, on the other hand, talks about Culture 3.0, stat-
ing that the creative industries’ contribution to society cannot be reduced to direct
and short-term eects alone. Typical of research on creative clusters placed outside
urban centres, including those related to the lm industry, is that it often focuses
on how the creative industries impact and develop their geographical locations
from a regional development perspective (Hedling 2012). More unusual is to turn
the question around, that is, how does the fact that the place is peripheral aect the
creative cluster (Sand 2020).
However, previous research shows that lm industry clusters tend to form in
a “natural” way (Medel and Gossel 2015), meaning that most of the world’s lm
industry clusters have congregated in highly populated regions, where urban amen-
ities are easily accessible. Since the production system within the lm industry is
mainly project based, being close to actors participating in the production process
is a strong incentive for businesses and creative individuals to stay near each other
(Rosenfeld and Hornych 2010).
On the other hand, in more remote regions with a scattered populace, develop-
ing a strong and sustainable lm milieu is often a great challenge (Sand 2017).
Therefore, trying to impact the emergence of these types of structures or clusters in
peripheral and/or not so densely populated regions through external inuences can
be demanding, for reasons such as poor production volume, brain drain, and lack
of resources in the form of sucient critical mass.
Film funding and regional development in a Nordic context
Initiated by the country council of western Sweden, the rst regional lm fund
in the Nordic countries, Film i Väst, was founded in Trollhättan, 1992. The main
objective of Film i Väst was to promote professional lm and media production in
order to revitalise the region, which was struggling after economic crisis, industrial
decline, and growing unemployment (Hedling 2012). Since the beginning, Film
i Väst, or “Trollywood”, has had remarkable success with attracting numerous
international actors and directors. Unlike regional lm funds in the other Nordic
countries, Film i Väst changed the geography of lm production in Sweden. How-
ever, during the 1990s, lm production in Sweden decentralised into three regions:
Filmpool Nord in the north, Film i Skåne in the south, and Film i Väst in western
Sweden (Dahlström and Hermelin 2007). Stockholm, the capital, did not get its
own regional lm fund until 2007 (Sand 2020).
In 1999, the Northern Film and Media Foundation (POEM), an audiovisual pro-
duction resource centre, was established in northern Finland. The aim of POEM was
to develop and promote the lm industry in Northern Finland (Lähteenmäki-Smith
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 183
2005; Sand 2020). Some years later, POEM’s project portfolio was merged with
that of BusinessOulu. Today the Finnish lm commission operates as the rst point
of contact for all international inquiries about lming in Finland, utilising produc-
tion resources and services and obtaining funding. The Finnish lm commission
consists of a consortium of seven regional lm commissions located across the
country: Finnish Lapland Film Commission, North Finland Film Commission,
East Finland Film Commission, Southeast Finland Film Commission, West Finland
Film Commission, Film Tampere, and Åland Film Commission (Film in Finland
2022). Using joint resources, the regional lm commissions are pooled together to
promote Finland as a single international location for lm production (Janta 2021).
Inspired by their Nordic neighbours, local investors and public authorities estab-
lished Norway’s rst regional fund, Film 3 in Lillehammer in 2001. At the time,
the lm industry in the region was more or less non-existent, and the intention of
Film 3 was to increase the creative development of the region (Sand 2017, 2020).
Today, the Norwegian Film Institute (NFI) operates as the main lm nancing
body in Norway. NFI collaborates with the Norwegian Film Commission and the
four regional lm commissions, as well with the ve regional lm funds (Norwe-
gian Film Commission 2022).
In Denmark, Den Vestdanske Filmpulje, DVF, was founded in 2002 in Aarhus.
Like the regional lm funds in the neighbouring Nordic countries, the intention
here was also to strengthen the local lm industry (Sand 2020). DVF has since been
joined by two more Danish regional lm funds: Copenhagen Film Fund and Film-
Fyn. Today the regional lm funds collaborate with The Danish Film Institute
DFI, Denmark’s national agency for lm and cinema culture, as well as with the
regional lm commissions in Denmark (Det Danske Filminstitut 2022; Ol 2022).
In comparison with the other Nordic countries, Iceland is a bit of an exception.
Because of the country’s size, lm production in Iceland is not concentrated to any
specic region (Skúladóttir 2005; Sand 2020). Iceland, however, has oered a tax
rebate since 1999. Today the tax incentive is 25%, and in some cases even up to
a 35% refund on production costs (Film in Iceland 2022). Other Nordic countries
oering national, government-funded lm and television production incentives are
Finland, Sweden, and Norway. The latter oering an incentive of a 25% cash rebate
on local spending, with a possibility to increase the total incentive by combining it
with regional funding (Northern Norway Film Commission 2022).
In Finland, the national lm production incentive is administrated by Business
Finland (Business Finland is a Finnish public-sector company promoting tourism
and international investment in Finland), while also providing services for inter-
nationalisation and funding of innovative projects, with a maximum of 25% cash
rebate of production costs (Business Finland 2022). Combined with regional incen-
tives, it is possible to get up to a 40% cash rebate when lming in Finland (Film in
Finland 2022). In Sweden, Film i Väst launched a regional production tax-rebate
programme in 2019 (Economou 2019), and in August 2022, the Swedish govern-
ment announced that they will set aside SEK 100 million yearly in lm production
incentives (Kazinik 2022). Denmark in 2022 still did not oer any government
funded lm and television lming incentives. However, several regional lm funds
184 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
are oering dierent incentives; the conditions for eligibility may vary between
regions though (Fixer in Denmark 2022; CPH Film Fund 2022).
A challenge shared by all the Nordic countries at the time of starting to establish
regional lm funds was that they were all struggling with retaining their creative
talents, who tended to move to larger creative metropoles for more job opportuni-
ties (Chow and Sand 2020).
Strategies for attracting international lm productions to Finland
In this part, the results of the interviews with stakeholders from the Finnish lm
industry are discussed. Thematically, the section covers strategies for attracting
lm productions to Finland and identifying pull factors, discusses Indian lm pro-
ductions shot in Finland experiences and lessons learned and nally suggests
potential opportunities for regional niches. These are discussed in detail later.
The interview ndings reveal that one of the main reasons for international lm-
makers to come to Finland corresponds to the common notion of the nation as an
Arctic landscape covered with snow, as seen in both the Indian lm productions
War (2019) and Shamitabh (2015).
However, other locations, seasons, and weather conditions are equally promi-
nent, and Finland can oer a variety of scenery and settings from the archipelago in
the south, through the picturesque historical wooden towns and modern cityscapes,
to the lake lands and the endless forests with midnight sun and northern lights.
Finland is often presented as a new and uncharted location for lm productions,
and nding unique locations that haven’t been used in other lm productions is
therefore often not a problem. As one respondent states:
I would say that the main things that the foreign companies are looking for
are the locations. So, if you’re looking for snow, that’s denitely an advan-
tage for Finland. Especially now with the climate change, you get less and
less snow in central Europe. So, some of those productions are now moving
up to Scandinavian areas. So obviously the nature and locations are one
[advantage].
(R3)
Compared to the neighbouring countries, primarily the Nordics and Baltic states
but also to some extent Russia, another important competitive advantage for Fin-
land is the well-developed infrastructure. Even more remote locations are easily
reachable by road, and even in the wilderness, mobile phone coverage and Internet
connectivity are usually not an issue. Finland also has ve international airports
with Helsinki-Vantaa airport serving as an international hub, being the gateway for
Asia to the rest of Europe. One respondent also mentions accessibility and good
infrastructure as a possible competitive advantage:
[What] we have is accessibility, and very good infrastructure. So Finnish
Lapland, because of the longstanding tourism and even before that, because
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 185
of the logging industry, so we have like, roads going everywhere, and then
we have hotels, so accommodation, and everything is working well, and air-
ports. So, you can get to these wilderness landscapes easily. And then you
still have a hotel on the other side of the road. So, I think those are the things
that kind of make us, sort of, compete.
(R6)
Several respondents also emphasised the value of punctuality in the lm industry
and the fact that the high quality of Finnish work is an important selling point
internationally. This can be compared to Switzerland, which is a well-known
destination in Bollywood cinema, continuously attracting lmmakers because of,
among other things, its excellent infrastructure (see Chapter 7).
I would also think that one key selling point is the Finnish quality of
work. Finns are reliable in the productions, and what we say usually
means that the thing is being delivered on time, in budget. And so the
production budgets tend to be slightly less in Finland than elsewhere in
the Nordic area.
(R3)
Another important key aspect of lm production in Finland, often brought up by
the respondents, is the low level of bureaucracy. On publicly held land, which
makes up a large portion of Finland’s surface area, permits are often not required
due to a national law known as “Everyman’s Right”. If a permit is required, the
process is typically quite fast and simple, with the local regional lm commission
or the Finnish production company being able to handle the permits in just a short
period of time.
However, several of the respondents emphasised that none of the previously
mentioned pull factors individually constitutes a sales advantage when promoting
Finland as a lming location. It is rather the sum of all the factors, that is, the com-
bination of locations, incentives, logistics professional and creative local crews that
determines whether an international lm production chooses Finland as a lming
location or not.
Indian lm productions in Finland
In Finland, there has so far been two Indian lm productions. Shamitabh (2015),
directed by R. Balki, was partly shot in several locations in Helsinki and in Finnish
Lapland, and Wa r (2019), directed by Siddhart Anand, which was partly shot in
locations close to the Arctic Circle and the city of Rovaniemi in Finnish Lapland
(see Chapter 3).
Shamitabh is the rst Indian lm shot in Finland. The opening weekend gross
in India was EURO 2.7 million which proved the lm to be a box oce success
(Snapper Films 2015). According to the Finnish Lapland Film Commission, the
lm War is the largest lm production so far to have been shot in Finnish Lapland
186 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
(Lapland. 2019). In India, Wa r was also the highest-grossing Bollywood action
lm in 2019 (Bollywood Hungama 2022).
Even though the Indian lm industry is one of the largest in the world (Josiam
2014), the in-depth interviews showed that there are no specic strategies or meas-
ures to attract Indian lm productions to Finland. Several of the respondents said
that it is rather the other way around: Indian cinema has already for decades been
interested in shooting abroad and therefore Indian productions are often the ones
taking the rst step into a collaboration. None of the respondents has any explana-
tion as to why there have not been more Indian lm productions in Finland, but the
lack of active marketing towards Indian lm productions and the lack of networks
within the Indian lm industry are probably part of the reason. However, according
to the interviewees there is both potential for and interest in further collaboration
with Indian lm producers from the Finnish side.
Experiences and lessons learned from the Indian lm productions
The rst-hand experiences from both the Indian lm productions are gener-
ally perceived as positive by the respondents, although some dierences in
the production culture were often brought up by the interviewees. The dis-
parities, however, were more often referred to as nds, rather than as negative
dierences.
One distinguishing factor often mentioned was the dierence in the range of
responsibilities in relation to the size of the crew, where the Finnish crews usually
were smaller and had more comprehensive tasks, while the Indian crew members
occasionally had very limited specialisations or ambiguous job descriptions. This
was also pointed out by two of the interviewees working on set:
The dierence come; I would say mostly because of the crew sizes. In India
it’s 400 people crew. In Finland we seldom have over 40.
(R4)
Yeah, the crew was massive even though it was like a mini unit. . . I don’t
remember how many people. But the people who was own to the mountain-
side was like 52 people or something.
(R9)
Another cultural dierence on set which was often mentioned by the respondents
was the Indian crew’s ability to adapt to a new situation if required or given the
opportunity. The interviewees often described it as a way of working that was new
for them and sometimes time-consuming, but on the other hand also stress-free and
creative. Several of the respondents also highlighted that they learned a lot from the
Indian lm crew during shooting:
That’s more like a cultural dierence, also, between Scandinavia
and India, is that they have more time. Like we, here, tend to prepare
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 187
really well, but then shoot really fast . . . in Indian productions, they
have more days to accomplish the same thing, so it allows people
to also, you know, plan on the set. Like we go to a location that they
have chosen, or that we have chosen together, and then basically we
start from zero on that day, that kind of OK, this is what we will do
today, and this is the plan . . . and denitely there is more time to do
the things that are needed. So, both ways are really good, and I think
the most special thing I experienced, I’ve never experienced in my life
in any other lm cultures: they are totally ne with changing plans . . .
and that was the most signicant thing that I love to work with Indian
productions, it’s that it’s very laid back, because of this attitude.
(R5)
I think we learned a lot from the Indians, they are so . . . they have been
shooting all over the world and they are really really experienced people.
And really good in what they do.
(R4)
Finally, the importance of serving qualitative Indian food on set was also some-
thing that often was commented on, however it was commonly accepted that the
importance of food quality was just another factor that needed to be taken care of.
The prevailing notion was that if the catering didn’t meet high standards, neither
the Indians nor the Finns on set would be happy. One of the respondents recalls
tasting the food at the recce, which is something that is not usually done:
When they went to do the recce, they wanted to taste the food on the premises.
So, they made them to cook for them, and they liked, they loved it, and then
it was OK. I don’t know if I’d ever tasted the food, if I went on a recce, never
ever, I think.
(R4)
Opportunities for a regional niche
British place marketing expert Simon Anholt believes that a place’s narrative capi-
tal is not forever given and that the established perception and reputation of a place,
region, or country regularly needs to be earned and reinforced. This reinforcement
of the narrative capital of the place can, for example, come from a lm reaching a
wide audience (Lind 2019), which is something that could be desirable for a region
that wants to increase its number of tourists and/or population.
According to the researcher Joakim Lind (2019), the rst step for a region which
in the future wishes to be present on the international lm map is to develop knowl-
edge about the lm industry’s value-creating and consider the lm industry as a
central part of their regional development.
Based on the answers from the interviews, it can also be concluded that all lm
industries do not have similar needs. Meaning, a region or location that wants to
188 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
attract international lm industry or a specic lm genre could, instead of trying
to attract just everyone, nd it benecial to start by focusing on one, and learn as
much as possible about their specic needs, whether that is the Indian lm industry
or any other.
The interviews also revealed that there is close co-operation between the Baltic
states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and the Nordic countries due to the proximity
both geographically and historically, meaning it is possible to think of the entire
Nordic and Baltic region as one production hub where crews and equipment can
move around easily (Janta 2021). For regions wanting to be more present on the
international lm map, networking and collaborating with other already- established
actors and learning from them along the way could be a both a constructive and
quite feasible way to get started.
Conclusions
The purpose of this chapter has been to discuss the potential for using lm produc-
tion as a tool for regional development in a Nordic and European context. What
can be learned from other regions and previous productions, which networks and
infrastructure are needed, and what are the possible advantages and diculties of
luring lm projects to a remote area. The research is based on a review of existing
lm policy documents from Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland, as
well as on the ten in-depth interviews with Finnish lm industry stakeholders that
were conducted during 2020–2021.
The rst regional lm fund was Film i Väst, founded in 1992 in Sweden. Soon
after its funding, Film i Väst inspired the other Nordic countries to establish their
own regional lm funds during the 1990s and early 2000 (Sand 2020). At the time
of starting to establish regional lm funds, a challenge shared by all the Nordic
countries was that they were all struggling with retaining their creative talents, who
tended to move to international creative hubs for more job opportunities (Chow
and Sand 2020). Today, all Nordic countries have regional and national lm funds,
and all, except Denmark, oer government-funded lm and television lming
incentives.
According to the ndings from interviews with stakeholders in the Finnish lm
industry conducted as part of the FilmInd project, an Arctic landscape covered
in snow, as depicted in both Indian lm productions War (2019) and Shamitabh
(2015), is one of the primary draws for foreign lmmakers to come to Finland.
Other important pull factors are the well-developed infrastructure, with ve inter-
national airports, roads across the country and national mobile phone coverage not
being an issue even in more remote locations. In addition to this, the low level of
bureaucracy and the Finnish quality of work were factors often mentioned as posi-
tive aspects by the Finnish respondents themselves.
It was, however, emphasised among the respondents that none of the previously
identied pull factors individually constitute sales advantages, when promoting
Finland as a lming location. It is often the sum of all these aspects, that is, the
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 189
combination of locations, incentives, logistics, professional and creative local crew
that determines whether an international lm production chooses Finland as a lm-
ing location or not.
Even though India has one of the largest lm industries in the world (Josiam
2014), the in-depth interviews revealed that no special tactics or actions have been
taken to draw Indian lm productions to Finland. One reply even saying that it is
rather the other way around, with Indian lm already having a long history of inter-
est in shooting overseas and frequently being the ones to initiate a collaboration.
However, it is clear from the experiences of the two Indian lm productions that
were held in Finland that there is interest on the part of the Finnish side in increas-
ing the collaboration with the Indian lm industry.
A region’s rst step towards being visible on the global lm map is to learn
about the value that the lm industry creates. Viewing lm as a key component of
their regional economy could be an important rst step towards becoming more
“visible” on the international lm map (Lind 2019). Second, it is important to
identify unique local and regional strengths in order to be able to market them
eectively.
The interview responses made it evident that dierent lm industries possess
distinct requirements. This implies that if a particular region or location aims to
attract the global lm industry, it may be more advantageous for them to initially
focus on a specic lm industry or genre and gain extensive knowledge about its
specic needs. This applies to the Indian lm industry as well as any other lm or
creative industry.
Limitations and future research
It should be noted that no Indian respondents were included among the interview-
ees. The reason for this is that during the time the interviews were conducted, it
was not possible to reach any Indian stakeholders who were involved in the lm
productions shot in Finland. Although this is acknowledged as a limitation, it is
also a possible future research step.
In line with the increased interest in northern Europe as a lming location
(Lunde 2022), the number of Indian lm productions is also expected to increase,
which makes it likely that there will be additional opportunities to both broaden
and deepen this research in the future.
Acknowledgement
FilmInd project The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic
connections was carried out within EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and
Humanities and nanced by national funding of the participating countries. Novia
University of Applied Sciences acknowledges funding from the Academy of
Finland. The author would also like to thank the interviewees from Finland for
their kind cooperation in the research.
190 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
References
Bollywood Hungama, 2022. Bollywood top grossers worldwide 2019. Available from:
www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-oce-collections/worldwide/2019/ (access date
11.09.2022).
Business Finland, 2022. Production incentive for the audiovisual industry. Available from:
www.businessnland./en/for-nnish-customers/services/funding/cash-rebate (access
date 29.08.2022).
Chow, P.-S. and Sand, S. A., 2020. Regional screen ecosystems at the peripheries: Produc-
tion and talent development in Tromsø and Aarhus. Journal of Scandinavian Cinema, 10
(2), 169–189.
CPH Film Fund, 2022. How to get funding. Available from: http://cphlmfund.com/en/
(access date 29.08.2022).
Dahlström, M., 2005. Film och regional utveckling i Norden. In: M. Dahlström, H. Bjarna-
dóttir, B. Hermelin, J. Jörgensen, K. Lähteenmäki-Smith, G. Rusten, M. G. Skúladóttir
and E. Wengström, eds., Film och regional utveckling i Norden. Stockholm: Svenska
lminstitutet & Nordregio, 7–11.
Dahlström, M. and Hermelin, B., 2007. Creative industries, spatiality and exibility: The
example of lm production. Norsk Geogrask Tidskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geogra-
phy, 61 (3), 111–121.
Det Danske Filminstitut, 2022. Funding. Available from: www.d.dk/en/english/funding
(access date 30.08.2022).
Economou, V., 2019. Film i Väst launches the rst Swedish tax-rebate scheme. Available
from: https://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/369384/ (access date 30.08.2022).
European commission, 2021. Rural development. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/
regional_policy/en/policy/themes/rural-development/ (access date 11.07.2022).
Film in Finland, 2022. Finland lm commission production guide. Available from: www.
filminfinland.com/4a2e59/siteassets/finland-film-commission-production-guide.pdf
(access date 01.09.2022).
Film in Iceland, 2022. Up to 35% reimbursement, stunning nature and professional ser-
vices. Available from: https://lminiceland.com/incentives-to-lm-in-iceland/ (access
date 01.09.2022).
Fixer in Denmark, 2022. Filming in Denmark. Available from: https://xerdenmark.com/
lming-in-denmark/ (access date 02.09.2022).
Florida, R., 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Hedling, O., 2012. Making lms in Scandinavia: On work and production infrastructure in the
contemporary regional sector. In: A. Dawson and S. Holmes, eds., Working in the global lm
industries: Creativity, systems, space, patronage. London: Bloomsbury Academics, 57–74.
Janta, H., ed., 2021. Comparative report on the infrastructure of lm production & the
impact of Indian lm industries on place. Basel: University of Basel.
Josiam, B. M., Spears, D., Dutta, K., Pookulangara, S. A. and Kinley, T. L., 2014. ‘Namastey
London’: Bollywood movies and their impact on how Indians perceive European destina-
tions. Hospitality Review, 31 (4).
Kazinik, D., 2022. Klart: Nu blir det billigare att spela in lm i Sverige. SVT Nyheter/Kultur.
Available from: www.svt.se/kultur/lmbranschen-far-100-miljoner-i-produktionsrabatter-
stod-lmstod-svensk-lm-bidrag-kulturministern (access date 01.09.2022).
Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., 2005. The regional dimension of the lm sector in Finland. In: M.
Dahlström, H. Bjarnadóttir, B. Hermelin, J. Jörgensen, K. Lähteenmäki-Smith, G. Rusten,
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 191
M. G. Skúladóttir and E. Wengström, eds., Film och regional utveckling i Norden. Stock-
holm: Svenska lminstitutet & Nordregio, 178–195.
Lapland.., 2019. War – Bollywood blockbuster in Lapland. Available from: www.lapland.
/lm/for-productions/war-bollywood-action-movie-lapland/ (access date 12.08.2022).
Lind, J., 2019. The impact of lm on people and destinations: En rapport om värden
av lm och tv för utveckling av platser och regioner med fallstudie av japanskt Taiga
Drama i Stockholm 2019. Analysmodell och vägledning vid internationella lm-
produktioner. En rapport inom pilotstudie #11 i Smart Kreativ Stad. Stockholm: Film
Capital.
Lind, J. and Kristensson Uggla, B., 2019. The narrative capital of the place. How the
millennium narratives generate place-related values and attract tourists to Sweden. In: C.
Lundberg and V. Ziakas, eds., The Routledge handbook of popular culture and tourism.
London: Routledge, 311–324.
Logar, E., 2022. Place branding as an approach to the development of rural areas: A case study
of the brand ‘Babica in Dedek’ from the Škofja Loka Hills, Slovenia. Acta Geographica
Slovenica, 62 (2), 119–133.
Lunde, A. F., 2022. Bollywood til Balestrand: Landskap skal ha same x-faktor som stjernene.
Morgenbladet. Available from: www.morgenbladet.no/kultur/reportasje/2022/10/07/
fra-bollywood-til-balestrand/?fbclid=IwAR3K4MBB9Dcf8BnVh4s6FEViOqMeQ2y1Q
WkmS3q3CGxjicvOJY3s4zxx-x0 (access date 09.10.2022).
Medel, A. and Gossel, B., 2015. Film industry clusters: A strategy for urban and regional
development? Austral Communicación, 4 (1), 65–81.
Miles, S. and Paddison, R., 2005. The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban
Studies, 42, 833–839.
Nordström, H., 2018. Platsmarknadsföring: Konsten att attrahera invånare, besökare och
investeringar till en plats. Huskvarna: Placebrander.
Northern Norway Film Commission, 2022. Incentives – Northern Norway lm commission.
Available from: www.northernnorwaylm.no/incentives (access date 01.09.2022).
Norwegian Film Commission, 2022. Funding & partners. Available from: www.
norwegianlm.com/funds (access date 01.09.2022).
OECD, 2008. OECD rural policy reviews: Finland. Available from: www.oecd.org/nland/
oecdruralpolicyreviewsnland.htm (access date 09.08.2022).
Ol, 2022. Film funding in Denmark on Ol. Available from: www.ol.com/country/
Film-Funding-Cinema-Denmark-16.html (access date 30.08.2022).
Paasi, R., 2011. The region, identity, and power. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,
14, 9–16.
Rosenfeld, M. W. and Hornych, C., 2010. Could cities in de-industrialized regions become
hot spots for attracting cultural businesses? The case of media industry in Halle and der
Saale (Germany). European Planning Studies, 11 (5), 371–384.
Sacco, P., 2011. Culture 3.0: A new perspective for the EU-2014–2020. Structural funds
programming, produced for the OMC working group on cultural and creative industries.
Brussels: European Expert Network on Culture.
Sacco, P., Ferilli, G. and Pedrini, S., 2008. System-wide cultural districts: An introduction
from the Italian viewpoint. In: S. Kagan and V. Kirchberg, eds., Sustainability: A new
frontier for the arts and cultures. Frankfurt: VAS Verlag, 400–460.
Sand, S. A., 2017. Voices from the peripheries: A study of the regional lm and television
business in Norway. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Trondheim.
192 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
Sand, S. A., 2020. Creative clusters – urban Utopia or regional remedy? A Nordic perspec-
tive on the role of the creative industries in regional development. Nordic Journal of
Media Studies, 2 (1), 109–120.
Snapper Films, 2015. Bollywood lm Shamitabh partly shot in Finland released worldwide.
Available from: https://snapperlms.com/bollywood-lm-shamitabh-shot-partly-in-n-
land-released-worldwide/ (access date 11.08.2022).
Skúladóttir, M. G., 2005. Iceland a national player in a global market. In: M. Dahlström,
H. Bjarnadóttir, B. Hermelin, J. Jörgensen, K. Lähteenmäki-Smith, G. Rusten, M. G.
Skúladóttir and E. Wengström, eds., Film och regional utveckling i Norden. Stockholm:
Svenska lminstitutet & Nordregio, 178–195.
SYKE, 2020. Updated urban-rural classication: Finland’s degree of urbanisation currently
at over 72 per cent. Available from: www.syke./en-US/Current/Updated_urbanrural_
classication_Finlan(57443) (access date 09.08.2022).
... Indian filmmakers often perceive Eastern Europe as a monolithic entity akin to Western Europe, despite the vast cultural and landscape diversity that Europe encompasses (cf. Kozina & Jelnikar, 2023;Stachowiak & Balcerak, 2022;Sunngren-Granlund, 2023;Urbanc et al., 2023). This simplification can be attributed to cinematic convenience and a broader trend of representing 'the West' as a symbol of exoticism and modernity in Indian cinema (Krämer, 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
India has long been known for its film industry and remains by far the largest film producer in the world, surpassing other film-producing superpowers like the US and China. A major factor in India’s dominance in the global media landscape is the outsourcing of film production, especially within Europe. Although there are studies trying to explain the context and mechanisms of foreign settings being incorporated into Indian filmmaking, this knowledge remains scattered and unsystematic. The objective of this paper is to comprehensively examine the evolutionary, spatial, and collaborative dynamics of Indian filmmaking in Europe by analysing statistical data from IMDb as the world’s largest film database. Our findings show that Indian filmmakers appeared relatively infrequently in Europe until the mid-1990s. The British Isles and Western Europe, with London and the Swiss Alps as the main centres, became the first and most popular destinations for outsourcing Indian films. However, this trend has changed in the last two decades, with the focus shifting to other areas in Southern, Central, Eastern, and Northern Europe as well in recent decades. The initial wave of Bollywood productions has gradually been followed by other regional cinematographies. The increasing presence of Indian film shooting in Europe has also led to growing co-production between filmmakers on both (sub)continents. The paper provides a solid basis for further exploration of socio-economic linkages between India and Europe, especially in terms of job creation, local economic development, tourism, and cultural exchange.
Article
Full-text available
Place branding is an approach to stimulating territorial development. From the theoretical point of view, place branding in rural areas should be an inclusive and participatory process. Applications and outcomes of the process have been insufficiently investigated so far in rural areas. The oldest place brand in Slovenia, “Babica in Dedek”, is analyzed to present its socioeconomic circumstances, impacts, and challenges from the perspective of local producers. Three qualitative methods are thus applied: analysis of documents, semi-structured interviews, and a focus group. This case study has revealed factors that contribute to new marketing opportunities, product packaging, holding seminars, and advertising local products in the area. On the other hand, the empirical findings are only partly aligned with the theoretical implications: the impacts of place branding are “sectorally limited” instead of being inclusive and participative.
Article
Full-text available
This article addresses the regionalisation of screen culture in Norway and Denmark, focusing on how regional screen entities in Tromsø and Aarhus are working to professionalise production and talent development at the peripheries of both countries. We outline their distinctive characteristics and circumstances as regional hubs and delineate the key actors that constitute the respective screen ecosystems. We analyse the interplay between regional film policy, production, and talent development in relation to regional development, geography, creativity, innovation, and the economy of culture. Based on an analysis of policies, strategy documents, and interviews conducted with practitioners in Aarhus and Tromsø over the period 2014–2019, we explore the diverse strategies that these regional production hubs employ to develop and—more challengingly—retain talents in the region, and argue that despite the increased attention given to ‘diversity’ in film policy, structural and cultural obstacles remain in the way of sustainable growth.
Article
Full-text available
The creative industries have had a major impact on cultural policy, and it is often argued that these industries can be a vehicle for regional growth. Using regional film production in Norway as a case, I discuss the creative industries, the cluster concept and its impact on policy. I analyse two film policy documents from 2007 and 2015 in order to show how the issue of size and critical mass is an unsettled topic within the creative industries, and I question the relevance of film as an economic and regional development tool in a country with a small film industry, such as Norway. This article shows that the creative industries concept, adopted from international discourses, especially creative industries policies in the UK, has influenced Norwegian film policy, reducing the importance of cultural objectives and increased the focus on the business potential and economic aspects of culture.
Thesis
Full-text available
This thesis is a study of how regional film and television companies in Norway manage to survive and achieve their goals in the context of a larger film and television business that is centralised, economically fragile, and subsidy dependent. Interest in production studies has boomed in recent years, but little of this research addresses regional film and television companies. This thesis employs a production studies approach and incorporates theory on place and work on the creative industries. It contributes to the limited amount of research that accounts for both structural framework—in particular, the impact of film policy and dependence on public funding on these companies— and agency in terms of the intrinsic value of regional film and television production in a local, national and global context. Using multiple perspectives, this thesis presents an in-depth exploration of the advantages and disadvantages of being a regional film and television company. The case study is its principal methodological approach, including interviews with film workers at four companies and employees at six regional film agencies, as well as policy documents, websites, newspapers and productions. The thesis focuses on four well-established regional film and television companies that have produced critically acclaimed films. All are located outside Oslo, the hub of film production in Norway. The four companies are Original Film in Tromsø, Northern Norway, Flimmer Film in Bergen, Western Norway, Mer Film in Tromsø/Bergen, Northern/Western Norway, and Filmbin in Lillehammer, central Eastern Norway. This thesis argues that one of the greatest challenges to these regional companies (and the government that supports them) is how to develop strong, sustainable regional film milieus among a scattered populace like Norway’s. The regions suffer from low production volume and brain drain and the research shows that these companies rely on human resources to deal with this challenge. Policy development indicates that the public funding of regional film is mostly based on regional and economic, but also cultural, arguments—regional film, that is, should contribute to regional development, economic growth and diversity. I argue that the economic and rural political rationale for support of this business tends to undermine the cultivation of the cultural value of regional film, as well as its quality and professionalism. However, the companies have managed to produce critically acclaimed films and the thesis reveals how the peripheral location can be a creative and economic advantage.
Article
Full-text available
The film industry seems to have developed most strongly in specific cities/regions around the world. Based mainly on a review of the literature on urban and regional development in places where the film industry has usually been highly concentrated, this article: 1) explains why this concentration has occurred, 2) describes common trends in the industry's international development, 3) examines the film industry's overall economic impact and its contribution to cities/regions, 4) reveals the shared characteristics of film cluster production systems around the world, 5) and presents a model for governments interested in economically enhancing their cities/regions through the formation and development of a film industry-based cluster as a strategy for regional development.
Article
Full-text available
This paper discusses current perspectives and interpretations of region and regional identity. It looks at the social and historical production and transformation of regionality and spatial meaning making. It also reflects on how discourses on regional identity are currently being exploited in various institutional contexts, such as regional planning. The article similarly reflects how purported regional identities are related to the mobility of citizens and how this mobility perhaps calls for a further re-conceptualization of spatial categories. Since regions and identities are historically and spatially contingent, both the theoretical and empirical understanding of what regions and regional identities mean must be based on contextuality. A comparative analysis of such meanings is a most laudable aim to avoid abstract, empty generalizations.This contribution is based on a set of reflections presented at the REGov Workshop. These reflections were offered as part of a panel discussion around the topic “What is a region?” Additional presentations provided in the context of this panel discussion include those of Anthony Lehmann, University of Geneva, John Allen, Open University (UK), and Ronan Uhel, European Environment Agency (this volume). Webcasts of all presentations are available at http://www.reg-observatory.org/outputs.html.
Article
Full-text available
At the beginning of the 1990s, film production in Sweden was heavily centralised in Stockholm. Today, film production in Sweden has decentralised to include three regional film production centres located far from the capital region. The article aims to understand this decentralised location pattern, focusing on the aspects of flexible film work and film workers. The implications of the regionalisation of film production in Sweden for film workers and for regions are explored. Labour and work practice flexibility create important conceptual lenses through which the investigation and analysis were developed. The major empirical source of data was a questionnaire survey of film workers. From the empirical data, different structures of the film industry in the main film regions are discussed. The results show that the geography of film workers diverges from that of film work, reflecting spatial mobility among film workers and willingness to be involved in projects some distance from their county of residence. Multiscalar relations in film work and film projects appear to be the organisational norm within film production. The results also show that it is difficult to generate sufficient income from film production, and most workers are dependent on incomes from sectors outside the film industry.
Chapter
This chapter examines how Stieg Larsson's Millennium trilogy has contributed to Stockholm's narrative capital and generated significant place-related value, particularly in the form of tourism. This study's research question asks how popular culture narratives, such as those in the Millennium series, can contribute to economic and socio-cultural outcomes for a place. The focus is on how fiction-based narratives, despite being imaginary, have tangible impacts on real-world locations, in this case, Stockholm. One of the central themes is the merging of fiction and reality, which creates new opportunities for tourism and place branding. The success of the Millennium narratives in attracting visitors to Stockholm exemplifies how popular culture can reframe the identity of a city. The global appeal of the trilogy, combined with its rich portrayal of Stockholm, has attracted tens of thousands of tourists eager to immerse themselves in the world of Lisbeth Salander and Mikael Blomkvist. These tourists seek real-life locations from books and films, contributing to the city’s cultural and economic landscape. In conclusion, the case of the Millennium trilogy demonstrates how narrative capital can create cultural and economic value for a place. The trilogy's impact goes beyond the immediate financial benefits of tourism; it reshapes the place's cultural identity and strengthens its global brand. This case illustrates the broader potential of popular culture to generate long-lasting effects on the socio-economic landscape of a location. The chapter notes that "Millennium is a great contributor for place branding internationally" (Lind & Kristensson Uggla, 2018, p. 323), underscoring narratives' powerful role in shaping place-related value.