BookPDF Available

Abstract

The book offers an interdisciplinary overview of the film and place relationship from an intercultural perspective. It explores the complex domain of place and space in cinema and the film industry's role in establishing cultural connections and economic cooperation between India and Europe. With contributions from leading international scholars, various case studies scrutinise European and Indian contexts, exploring both the established and emerging locations. The book extends the dominantly Britain-oriented focus on India’s cinema presence in Europe to European countries such as Italy, Switzerland, Poland, Slovenia, Finland, and Sweden, where the Indian film industry progressively expands its presence. The chapters of this book look at Indian film production in Europe as a cultural bridge between India and Europe, fostering mutual understanding of the culture and society of the two regions. This interdisciplinary book will be of interest to researchers in film studies, cultural anthropology, cultural geography, tourism, economics, sociology, and cultural studies. It will also be interest to practitioners working in local authorities, destination management, tourism, and creative business, all of whom see the value of film production in attracting visitors, investment, and creating new networks with local economic actors. The book offers much-needed data and tools to translate their professional goals and potentials into effective regional strategies and activities.
Film and Place in an Intercultural
Perspective
The book oers an interdisciplinary overview of the lm and place relationship
from an intercultural perspective. It explores the complex domain of place and
space in cinema and the lm industry’s role in establishing cultural connections
and economic cooperation between India and Europe.
With contributions from leading international scholars, various case studies
scrutinise European and Indian contexts, exploring both the established and
emerging locations. The book extends the dominantly Britain-oriented focus
on India’s cinema presence in Europe to European countries, such as Italy,
Switzerland, Poland, Slovenia, Finland, and Sweden, where the Indian lm industry
progressively expands its presence. The chapters of this book look at Indian lm
production in Europe as a cultural bridge between India and Europe, fostering
mutual understanding of the culture and society of the two regions.
This interdisciplinary book will be of interest to researchers in lm studies,
cultural anthropology, cultural geography, tourism, economics, sociology,
and cultural studies. It will also be of interest to practitioners working in local
authorities, destination management, tourism, and creative business, all of whom
see the value of lm production in attracting visitors, investment, and creating new
networks with local economic actors. The book oers much-needed data and tools
to translate their professional goals and potentials into eective regional strategies
and activities.
Krzysztof Stachowiak, PhD, is a professor of economic geography at the
Faculty of Human Geography and Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University in
Poznań, Poland. His research focuses on the creative economy (the role of culture
and the creative sector in the economic development of cities and regions),
creative cities, economic and spatial mechanisms of the creative industries (in
particular the lm industry), knowledge-based economy (innovative regions,
clusters), the geography of lm, and audiovisual media. He is the author of
numerous publications on the creative economy and the role of the creative
sector in developing cities and regions. His latest work includes papers on
“The rise of lm production locations and specialised lm services in European
semi-peripheries” and “Innovation dynamics in the lm industry: The case of the
Soho cluster”. He is an executive editor of the journal Quaestiones Geographicae.
Hania Janta, PhD, is an associate researcher and project coordinator of the
EU-India Platform-funded “FilmInd The Indian Film Industries as a driver
of new socio-economic connections between India and Europe” project at the
Department of Social Sciences, University of Basel. Previously, she worked as
a lecturer/senior lecturer at Bournemouth University, School of Tourism, and as
a senior lecturer at the University of Surrey, School of Hospitality and Tourism
Management. Her research interests include labour and human capital issues as
well as contemporary forms of mobility. She has published peer-reviewed papers
and co-edited special issues in a range of journals. Her latest co-edited book (with
Andriotis and Stylidis): “Tourism Planning and Development in Eastern Europe”
was published in 2022. She is an evaluator and expert Reviewer for the European
Commission and various National Science Foundation bodies.
Jani Kozina, PhD, is a research associate at the Research Centre of the Slovenian
Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU) and an assistant professor of cultural
and economic geography at the Postgraduate School ZRC SAZU. He has also been
a visiting researcher at the Cardi Metropolitan University, School of Management.
He is a holder of Diploma of Excellence for the Black Sea – Danubian Social &
Economic Innovator, Under the aegis of the European Commission – DG MARE
(2019) and a recipient of Special Mention of the Jury at the European Union Prize
for Cultural Heritage/Europa Nostra Award (2015). He has (co)authored several
articles and books on the role of creative economy, cultural and creative industries,
and the creative class in urban and regional development. He is a member of several
editorial boards and professional associations. He was a guest editor of the Special
issue: Green creative environments at the scholarly journal Acta Geographica
Slovenica.
Therese Sunngren-Granlund holds a Master of Arts degree in Entrepreneurship
in the Arts, and currently works as a research manager at the Faculty of Arts
and Humanities at Novia University of Applied Sciences in Jakobstad, Finland.
In this capacity, she is responsible for overseeing the faculty’s project portfolio,
which encompasses about 25 EU-funded and nationally projects. Throughout her
involvement in various projects, Sunngren-Granlund has cultivated comprehensive
expertise in strategic development pertaining to the creative industries, as well as
regional development and place branding in rural areas. Most recently as principal
investigator for the research project “The impact of cultural and educational
investments in society”. Prior to her current position, Sunngren-Granlund worked
as a professional artist, participating in multiple exhibitions held in locations such
as Helsinki, Bergen, Stockholm, Ljubljana, Berlin, Montescaglioso, Como, and
Milan. Furthermore, she holds a certicate from the Artists’ Research Laboratory
XIV CSAV, where she had the opportunity to collaborate with the visiting professor
and artist Yona Friedman.
Film and Place in an
Intercultural Perspective
India-Europe Film Connections
Edited by Krzysztof Stachowiak,
Hania Janta, Jani Kozina and
Therese Sunngren-Granlund
First published 2024
by Routledge
4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2024 selection and editorial matter, Krzysztof Stachowiak, Hania
Janta, Jani Kozina, Therese Sunngren-Granlund; individual chapters, the
contributors
The right of Krzysztof Stachowiak, Hania Janta, Jani Kozina, Therese
Sunngren-Granlund to be identied as the authors of the editorial material,
and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in
accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1988.
The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.
com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license. Funded by the
Polish National Science Centre (Project No. 2017/27/Z/HS4/00039), Novia
University of Applied Sciences, and the Research Center of the Slovenian
Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks, and are used only for identication and explanation
without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-1-032-27569-7 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-032-27571-0 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-003-29334-7 (ebk)
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347
Typeset in Times New Roman
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
List of gures viii
List of tables xi
List of contributors xii
Acknowledgements xvii
PART I
Introduction 1
1 Introduction: Film and place from an intercultural
perspective 3
KRZYSZTOF STACHOWIAK, HANIA JANTA, JANI KOZINA,
AND THERESE SUNNGREN-GRANLUND
2 From real to reel and back again: Multifaceted relations
between lm, space, and place 16
KRZYSZTOF STACHOWIAK
PART II
Experiencing place through lm 39
3 Destination Europe: The practices of mapping in
contemporary Bombay cinema 41
RANJANI MAZUMDAR
4 Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 63
MIMI URBANC, PRIMOŽ GAŠPERIČ, AND JANI KOZINA
5 European locations in Bollywood songs: Exploring mobile
bodies and new song genres 83
SHIKHA JHINGAN
Contents
vi Contents
PART III
On location: lm production, lm policy, and place 99
6 On the Italian trail of Indian lms through the lens of media
industry studies 101
MARCO CUCCO AND MASSIMO SCAGLIONI
7 Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 118
HANIA JANTA AND METKA HERZOG
8 Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers
within the context of Central and Eastern Europe 136
JANI KOZINA AND ANA JELNIKAR
9 Production culture, interpersonal relations, and the interna-
tionalisation of lmmaking industry: The case of Indian lm
productions in Poland 159
MALWINA BALCERAK, KRZYSZTOF STACHOWIAK,
AND MARCIN ADAMCZAK
10 Film productions as a part of the regional identity in rural
areas – the case of the Nordic countries 179
THERESE SUNNGREN-GRANLUND
PART IV
Beyond the screen: socio-spatial impact of lm 193
11 Beastly places: European encounters with Bollywood’s
non-human geographies 195
VEENA HARIHARAN
12 Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism: The
case of Purab Aur Pachhim 211
PANKAJ JAIN AND AJAY RAINA
13 ‘Namastey London’: Bollywood movies and their impact
on how Indians perceive European destinations 225
BHARATH M. JOSIAM, DANIEL SPEARS, KIRTI DUTTA,
SANJUKTA A. POOKULANGARA, AND TAMMY L. KINLEY
Contents vii
PART V
Conclusions 243
14 Conclusions: Film as a driver of new socio-economic
connections between India and Europe 245
HANIA JANTA, KRZYSZTOF STACHOWIAK, JANI KOZINA, AND
THERESE SUNNGREN-GRANLUND
Index 251
1. Winter landscape with a red car. Nordic landscapes have
recently featured in Bollywood lms, including the blockbuster
War from 2019 1
1.1 Conceptual framework of the book 5
2.1 Nexus of relationships between lm and other media
and place/space 22
2.2 Main types of space in the lm 26
2. An aerial view of Lake Bled in Slovenia 39
3.1 A 360-panorama captured by a drone camera 43
3.2 The car chase on ice in War 46
3.3 The camera infrastructure for the snow in War 46
3.4 The bike chase in War shot in the mountains of Serra da
Estrela, Portugal 47
3.5 The bike chase in War in Praça do Comércio, Lisbon,
Portugal 48
3.6 The friends in their car travelling through Spain
in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara 50
3.7 Aerial view of the journey across the Spanish countryside
in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara 50
3.8 Arjun’s view of underwater marine life in Zindagi Na Milegi
Dobara 51
3.9 Sky diving shot in Seville, the South of Spain in Zindagi Na
Milegi Dobara 52
3.10 Aerial view of London in Fan 56
3.11 View of Dubrovnik’s Old Town architecture in Fan 57
3.12 Shahrukh Khan’s running style in Fan 58
3.13 Shahrukh Khan being chased in Darr 59
4.1 Film-selection process 66
4.2 Cloud tag generated from the lming locations 69
4.3 Share of urban and rural settings (dierences between countries) 71
4.4 Types of urban features visible in the settings 71
4.5 Types of rural features visible in the settings 72
Figures
Figures ix
4.6 Mountainous and non-mountainous elements of the setting
(dierences between countries) 73
4.7 Types of mountains visible in the settings 74
4.8 Types of water visible in the settings (dierences between
countries) 75
4.9 Types of water visible in the settings (dierences between
scene types) 75
4.10 Iconic landscapes are widely featured in Indian lms shot in
Poland, Sweden, Finland, Slovenia, and Switzerland 77
5.1 In the song ‘Tere mere hothon pe’, we see Sridevi and Rishi
Kapoor at a picturesque location in Switzerland in Chandni (1989) 84
5.2 and 5.3 On a weekend trip to Europe, Alizeh (Anoushka
Sharma) and Ayaan (Ranbir Kapoor) recreate the song from
Chandni by playing it through a boom box 84
5.4 Shahrukh Khan and Madhuri Dixit in a European location in Dil
To Pagal Hai (1997) 87
5.5 and 5.6 In Queen (2012), ‘Badra Bahar’, a background song is
used to capture Rani’s uneasy encounter with the Eiel Tower in
the city of Paris 88
5.7–5.9 In Cocktail (2012), the background songs depict the emo-
tional journey of the three protagonists in three distinct spaces 91
5.10 Tiger Zinda Hai (2017) ends with the ‘Swag’ song shot at
Mykonos, Greece with a large crew of dancers and performers 92
3. Lisbon in Portugal. Portugal features as one of the destinations
oering generous incentives 99
6.1 Map of Italian regions involved in Indian audiovisual works
(2010–2022) 109
6.2 The reasons for outsourcing Indian lm shoots 113
7.1 The iconic bridge in Saanen, outside Gstaad, where the hallmark
1995 lm Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge was shot 122
7.2 One of the authors posing with the statue of Bollywood director,
Yash Chopra, in Interlaken 123
7.3 Dhoom 3 features on the marketing material of a bungee jump-
ing company located in Vercasca, Ticino 130
8.1 The analysed topics of Indian lm shooting in Slovenia 142
8.2 Film shooting for the Dhruva project at Maribor Edvard Rusjan
Airport, Slovenia 143
8.3 Film shooting for the Dhruva project in Maribor, Slovenia 144
8.4 Film shooting for the Khaidi No. 150 project at lake Bled, Slovenia 144
8.5 Film shooting in Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia 145
8.6 Film shooting in the site of high mountain herdsmen’s villages
Velika Planina, Slovenia 145
8.7 The advertising campaign “Drive less. Film green. Film in
Slovenia” of the Slovenian Film Commission 149
x Figures
9.1 Indian and Polish lm crews during the lm shooting at the
European Solidarity Centre in Gdańsk, Poland 173
9.2 Indian lm crew during the lm shooting at the Gdańsk Lech
Walesa Airport in Poland 174
4. The statue of Bollywood director Yash Chopra (1932–2012) 193
11.1 The snow-capped Praxmar Mountains 201
11.2 Encounter between Tiger and the Wolf. He combats the wolf
single-handedly 202
11.3 A pack of wolves approach Tiger and Junior 202
13.1 Total attributes cited by country 236
13.2 Countries cited for ‘no image’ 236
5. Warsaw, with its iconic Palace of Culture and Science, is a
symbol of a modern and rapidly developing city 243
4.1 Selected lms and scenes by countries involved 67
4.2 Selected variables 67
4.3 The most common urban and rural places in selected countries 69
6.1 Indian audiovisual productions lmed in Italy (2010–2022) 106
8.1 The characteristics of the interviewees from India and Slovenia 141
13.1 Demographic prole of respondents 232
13.2 Enthusiasm and engagement with Bollywood movies 233
13.3 Top Bollywood movies inducing travel to Europe 233
13.4 Top European countries Indians want to visit induced
by Bollywood movies 234
13.5 Top ve European countries and their destination attributes as
seen by Indians 234
13.6 Bottom ve European countries and their destination attributes
as seen by Indians 235
Tables
Marcin Adamczak is an associate professor at Adam Mickiewicz University in
Poznań. He lectures also at Film School in Łódź and University of Gdańsk.
Awarded by Krzysztof Mętrak Grand Prix for young lm critics (2011). He
is the author of books (published in Polish) Global Hollywood, Europe and
Polish Cinema After 1989 (2010), Besides the Screen: Production Studies
and Social Roles of Film (2014), and Capitals of Film Industry: Hollywood,
Europe, China (2019). He is co-founder of distribution company Velvet Spoon.
He is a member of International Federation of Film Critics and Polish Film-
makers Association.
Malwina Balcerak, PhD, works at the Faculty of Human Geography and Plan-
ning, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. Her research focuses on public
art (the role of public art in urban development), geography of lm, cultural
geography, and festivalisation of urban space. She was a team member of the
international research project “FilmInd The Indian Film Industry as a Fac-
tor for New Socio-Economic Links between India and Europe”, implemented
under the EqUIP (EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and Humanities)
initiative.
Marco Cucco is Associate Professor at the University of Bologna (Italy) and Head
of the postgraduate Master programme in Film and Audiovisual Management.
He received his PhD degree in communication at the Università della Svizzera
Italiana (Switzerland). His research interests concern mainly lm industry and
cultural policy. He wrote several articles published by international journals
(Studies in European Cinema, Film Studies, European Journal of Communi-
cation, Media, Culture & Society, Journal of Transcultural Communication,
Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies), and three books. Currently, he is
Vice-Chair of the Film Studies Section of ECREA.
Kirti Dutta is a TEDx speaker with over 28 years of experience and has helped
manage and build processes in institutions of higher learning. She is currently
Dean, School of Entrepreneurship, Rishihood University (RU), and Found-
ing Dean-Research at RU. Her areas of interest include brand management,
Contributors
Contributors xiii
consumer behaviour, services, digital, and neuromarketing. She is a prolic
researcher and has co-authored more than 90 publications and three research-
based textbooks. She has also conducted a number of FDPs and MDPs for
Maharatna and Multinational companies. She is Founding Editor for Interna-
tional Journal of Entrepreneurship and Startup Ventures.
Primož Gašperič, PhD, is a research associate at the Research Centre of the Slo-
venian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute. His
research activities focus mainly on the history of cartography and old maps, but
also on regional geography, landscape perception and representations in photog-
raphy and lm. He has (co-)authored several publications, including books. He
is head of the Geographical Museum, a special part of the Geogracal Institute,
a member of the editorial board of the journal Geographic Horizon and the sci-
entic book series Geography of Slovenia.
Veena Hariharan is associate professor of cinema studies at the School of Arts
and Aesthetics, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Her essays and articles on docu-
mentary, non-ction cinema and the environment have appeared in anthologies
and journals. She is currently Alexander Von Humboldt Fellow at Goethe Uni-
versity, Frankfurt, working on her project on non-human-human entanglements
in cinema and new media. Her book Embers of Reason: Contemporary Indian
Documentary and the Secular Imagination is forthcoming from Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Metka Herzog is a research coordinator at swisspeace, Swiss Peace Foundation,
and teaches political science at the University of Basel. Her thematic interests
are focused on highly skilled mobilities, politics of migration, and migrants’
civic engagement. Metka holds an MSc in International Development Studies
from Utrecht University and a PhD in Public Policy and Policy Analysis from
Maastricht University.
Pankaj Jain is an internationally recognized academic leader in Sustainability,
Jain Studies, Film Studies, and Diaspora Studies. He is the head of department
of Humanities & Languages and the chair of The India Centre at FLAME
University. Until 2020, he was the founding co-chair of India Initiatives Group
and Associate Professor in the Departments of Philosophy & Religion and
Anthropology at the University of North Texas, a tier-1 American university.
He holds a PhD from the University of Iowa and an M.A. from Columbia
University. His B.E. was in Computer Science from Karnatak University. Prof.
Jain has about 30 years of work experience in academia and industry. He has
coedited the Encyclopedia of Indian Religions (2022) and Indian and West-
ern Philosophical Concepts in Religion (2023). His earlier monographs are
Dharma in America: A Short History of Hindu-Jain Diaspora (2019), Dharma
and Ecology of Hindu Communities: Sustenance and Sustainability (2011),
and Science and Socio-Religious Revolution in India: Moving the Mountains
(2015).
xiv Contributors
Ana Jelnikar is research assistant at the Research Centre of Slovenian Academy
of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Anthropological and Spatial Studies. Her main
research interest revolves around the cultural and literary connections between
India and Slovenia in the wider historical context of former Yugoslavia and East-
Central Europe. She is the author of Universalist Hopes in India and Europe;
The Worlds of Rabindranath Tagore and Srečko Kosovel (Oxford University
Press, Delhi, 2016), and co-author of A Passage to India: Two Missionary Trav-
elogues, Contexts and Analyses (published in Slovene, Koper: Annales, 2021).
Shikha Jhingan is Associate Professor at the Department of Cinema Studies,
School of Arts and Aesthetics, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Her research
work focuses on music and technologies of sound dispersal across diverse
media platforms. Her work brings a sound studies perspective to Bollywood
lms and their intermedial footprints. She has published articles in the jour-
nals Seminar and Bioscope: South Asian Screen Studies and Feminist Media
Histories and several book anthologies. Her most recent article has been pub-
lished in A Companion to Indian Cinema by Wiley Blackwell (2022). She is
currently working on her book manuscript on the female voice of Bombay
lm songs.
Bharath M. Josiam is recently retired as Professor of Hospitality and Tour-
ism Management from the College of Merchandising and Hospitality Man-
agement at the University of North Texas. He has been a faculty member at
leading Hospitality Management programmes in the United States for over
35 years. His research interests are in consumer behaviour and management
issues in hospitality and tourism. He has co-authored over 60 journal articles
and presented over 100 papers at international conferences. He serves on the
editorial board of various journals and on paper review committees. He serves
at universities worldwide as Evaluator and External Examiner for doctoral
dissertations.
Tammy L. Kinley is Professor in the Merchandising and Digital Retailing
Department as well as Academic Associate Dean in the College of Mer-
chandising, Hospitality and Tourism at the University of North Texas. Her
research interests include consumer behaviour, shopping behaviour, and
niche industries. She has held top leadership positions in several professional
organisations.
Ranjani Mazumdar is a professor of cinema studies at the School of Arts & Aes-
thetics, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Her publications focus on the cinematic
city, spatial aesthetics, and techno-urbanism. She is the author of Bombay Cin-
ema: An Archive of the City (2007), co-editor with Neepa Majumdar of the
Wiley Blackwell Companion to Indian Cinema (2022), and guest editor of a spe-
cial issue of Bioscope on cinema and techno-materiality. Her current research
focuses on globalisation and lm culture, intermedial encounters, and the inter-
section of technology, travel, design, and colour in 1960s Bombay Cinema.
Contributors xv
Sanjukta A. Pookulangara earned her PhD degree from the University of
Missouri, Columbia, and is currently Professor of Merchandising and Chair in
the College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism at the University of North
Texas. Dr. Pookulangara’s research interest is designed to develop strategies for
the retail industry and create new pedagogy for students. Her research investi-
gates motivations associated with consumers as it relates to channel strategy and
use of social media. Additionally, she has also investigated emerging economies
such as India specically consumer behaviour and collaborative consumption.
Ajay Raina has produced, directed, and edited many ction shorts, documentary
lms, and TV programmes besides having written innumerable screenplays for
feature lms and an unpublished novel in English. He has won the National
Award (Rajat Kamal), the Golden Conch, IDPA Silver Trophy, and RAPA Award
for his documentary lms, many of which have screened at numerous forums,
seminars and at major international and national lm festivals. His documen-
tary lm “Between Border and the Fence. On Edge of a Map” (2011) is short-
listed among 12 best documentaries of the year 2011–2012 by the well-known
Walker Art Magazine. He has taught courses in cinema studies, lm direction,
documentary, and screenplay writing at the Film Institute Pune, University of
Pennsylvania, Srishti Institute of Design, and Flame University. Presently, he is
a professor of Film at Institute of Design, Nirma University.
Massimo Scaglioni is Full Professor of Media History and Economics at Università
Cattolica, Milan. He is the co-founder and director of Ce.R.T.A. (Research Cen-
tre for Television and Audiovisual Media) and director of the Master’s course
“Fare TV”. He is co-applicant of the Global Media and Internet Concentration
Project awarded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of
Canada and co-investigator of the project “Public Service Media in the Age of
Platforms” awarded by CHANSE. He is the author of several books on media
and broadcasting history and industry, including A European Television Fiction
Renaissance (Routledge 2021).
Daniel Spears is Associate Professor of Hospitality & Tourism at UNT and Visit-
ing and Aliate Professor of International Sustainable Tourism at CATIE in
Costa Rica. He teaches and researches tourism and service marketing, consumer
behaviour, and strategic management. Dr. Spears has published 40 academic
journal articles and book chapters and, with research presented over 80 inter-
national conferences in the tourism management and marketing disciplines. In
addition, he has worked, trained, and consulted several organisations and inter-
national governments. Dr. Spears also served in the U.S. Army as a combat
medic.
Mimi Urbanc is Senior Research Fellow and deputy director at the Research Cen-
tre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU). Her research
activities have been focused on cultural landscapes, their management, land-
scape perception, and landscape representations in literature, photography, and
xvi Contributors
lm. She has (co)authored several publications, including books. She was the
chief editor of the book series Thought, Society, Culture: Exploring Cultural
Spaces of Europe published by Peter Lang Verlag until recently and is human
geography editor of the scholarly journal Acta geographica Slovenica, pub-
lished by Založba ZRC.
The editors acknowledge funding of the FilmInd project – The Indian lm industry
as a driver of new socio-economic connections was carried out within the EU-India
Platform for Social Sciences and Humanities (EqUIP), nanced by national fund-
ing of the participating countries with Professor Walter Leimgruber, University of
Basel, as the Principal Investigator. The authors acknowledge the receipt of fund-
ing from the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia
and Slovenian Research Agency (Research programme P6–0101), Swiss National
Science Foundation (Project No. IZEQZ1_180340), Academy of Finland (69 037;
324796), Polish National Science Centre (Project No. 2017/27/Z/HS4/00039), and
the Indian Council for Social Science Research (with special thanks to Mahesh
Madhukar). The editors would also like to thank Dr. Metka Herzog for initiating
the project.
Acknowledgements
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-1
Figure 1 Winter landscape with a red car. Nordic landscapes have recently featured in
Bollywood lms, including the blockbuster Wa r from 2019.
Source: raland / stock.adobe.com
Part I
Introduction
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-2
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
The aim of the book
European governments, tourism ministries, and lm commissions have recently
been working towards promoting their respective countries as lmmaking desti-
nations (Cucco and Dagnino 2018; O’Regan 2018; Cucco and Richeri 2021). In
doing so, they emphasise the oer of professional services and good value for
money based on local services and incentives. Besides beneting the lm industry,
having a location featured in a lm is also meant to promote the tourism industry
(so-called lm-induced tourism [Buchmann 2010]). The link between lm loca-
tions and the tourism potential is now becoming signicantly apparent across
Europe, potentially fostering a post-pandemic recovery (Garrison et al. 2022). In
addition, the infrastructure that makes the mobilisation of foreign locations pos-
sible is a complex ecology involving event management companies, technologies,
the hotel industries, unskilled labour and trained lm personnel in the countries
where shooting is conducted. A spatial perspective is especially relevant, consider-
ing that the lm industry relies heavily on local and global production networks
(Nachum and Keeble 2003; Coe 2015). This infrastructure enables not just the
promotion of tourism, but also employment opportunities, knowledge sharing, and
country branding with long-term economic and transcultural eects.
The Indian lm industry produces over 1,500 lms annually (Dastidar and
Elliott 2020). While Indian cinema has long had a presence in certain parts of the
world linked to its diaspora, in the recent past, it has crossed over to non-South
Asian audiences (Ebrahim 2008; Hassam and Paranjape 2010; Hong 2021). This
expansion has also led to the widespread incorporation of new locations in the
production process. Despite the large number of Indian lms produced abroad,
little is known about the mobilities of the Indian crews in Europe and the various
socio-economic impacts that they have on European territory.
The book Film and Place in an Intercultural Perspective: India-Europe Film
Connections discusses the complex domain of place and space in cinema and the
role that the lm industry plays in establishing cultural connections and economic
cooperation between India and Europe. Particular emphasis is placed on under-
standing how locations shape and are shaped by lm production and circulation.
The main threads of the book aim to investigate the construction of place through
1 Introduction
Film and place from an intercultural
perspective
Krzysztof Stachowiak, Hania Janta, Jani Kozina,
and Therese Sunngren-Granlund
4 Krzysztof Stachowiak et al.
the use of European locations in Indian cinema; map the scale and analyse the spe-
cic locations across Europe where Indian cinemas are being shot (European-wide
and country-specic analyses); identify the specic nature of the infrastructure
that allows for mobility and operation of lm crews in these European locations;
investigate the role of policies supporting lm production and lm collaboration
between India and Europe; examine the cultural practices of European and Indian
lm production workers; and analyse the socioeconomic impact of the Indian lm
industry in Europe and India.
Written by both Indian and European researchers, various case studies scrutinise
European contexts, both established (Western Europe) and emerging (Central and
Eastern Europe and Northern Europe). The book extends the dominantly Britain-
oriented focus on India’s cinema presence in Europe to other countries, such as
Italy, Switzerland, Poland, Slovenia, Finland, and Sweden, where the Indian lm
industry progressively expands its presence.
The book’s intercultural perspective and interdisciplinary approach
This book proposes an intercultural perspective on studying Indian lm produc-
tions in Europe, which would help in understanding how Indian lms reect
and shape cultural interactions and exchanges between India and Europe. In
this way, the book builds on and moves forward the concept of “intercultural
lm” that has recently started to be more frequently used by scholars from dif-
ferent academic elds. The use of intercultural perspective “can be understood
as expressing a critical awareness of lmic depictions of cultural encounters,
transnational migration and cultural dierences in contemporary multicultural
societies, and the need for illustrative audio-visual representations of intercul-
tural encounters” (Jacobsson 2017, p. 54). Through the chapters of this book,
we try to look at Indian lm production in Europe as a cultural bridge between
India and Europe, fostering mutual understanding of the culture and society
of the two regions. In order to achieve that, an interdisciplinary approach was
needed. It allowed for a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the
cultural inuences and representations of Indian lms produced in Europe and
how audiences perceive them in India and Europe. It can also help by shedding
light on how Indian lmmakers see and represent European locations, cultures,
and societies in their lms.
Hence, the book oers an interdisciplinary overview of the relationship between
lm and place from an intercultural perspective by bringing together the diverse
disciplinary perspectives of lm studies, geography, and cultural and political
studies. The book contributes to broader academic debates on globalisation, trans-
nationalism, knowledge transfer, urbanism, and destination branding. Most impor-
tantly, the book explores the globalisation of the Indian lm industry further by
shedding more light on the relations between India and Europe. The book high-
lights the patterns of value chains regarding lm production and consumption as
signicant components of globalisation processes. In addition to lm tourism, the
book also aims to explore other neglected spatial and sectoral impacts related to
Introduction 5
employment opportunities, knowledge exchange, and country branding with long-
term economic and transcultural eects. The content of the book is based on the
widely researched and taught cultural and creative sectors, which include all sec-
tors whose activities are based on cultural values or other artistic individual or
collective creative expressions.
An interdisciplinary approach to studying Indian lm productions in Europe
assumes numerous topics to gain a more holistic understanding of the Indian–
European cultural exchange. We have identied three main threads that correspond
to the book’s parts and selected the topics which seemed to be essential form the
intercultural perspective (see Figure 1.1). The rst key aspect may involve explor-
ing how lms can be used as a medium for experiencing dierent places and cul-
tures, which will be covered in part II of the book. This can include studying how
Indian lms represent dierent places and spaces in Europe and how these repre-
sentations may shape the viewer’s perception and understanding of these places.
Cultural geography in general, and lm geography in particular, are the elds which
provide theories and concepts for understanding these aspects (Aitken and Zonn
1994; Aitken and Dixon 2006; Lukinbeal and Zimmermann 2006, 2008; Sharp
and Lukinbeal 2015; Lukinbeal and Sommerlad 2022). Geographical perspective
Figure 1.1 Conceptual framework of the book.
Source: Own elaboration
6 Krzysztof Stachowiak et al.
can contribute to the analysis of landscape representation in Indian lms and how
it reects the reality of the place where the lms are shot, as well as how Indian
movies represent or stereotype Europe (Slusser and Rabkin 1989; Lefebvre 2006;
Urbanc et al. 2021). Film studies is another discipline that can be applied to this
research, as it can provide insight into the formal and stylistic elements of Indian
lms that contribute to their representation of place and space. This can include
analysing how lm elements shape the viewer’s engagement with the represented
spaces and places (Gamson et al. 1992; Allen 1993). Additionally, cultural studies
and intercultural communication can be involved in this research, as it can pro-
vide insight into the cultural values and dierences that are represented in Indian
lms and how European audiences receive them. This can include analysing how
Indian lms reect or challenge cultural stereotypes and how they reect or chal-
lenge cultural norms and values in European societies (Krauss 2012; Krämer 2016;
Lourenço 2017).
The second key aspect of Indian lm production in Europe is examining lm
production and lm policy, which can provide insight into the economic and politi-
cal factors that shape the Indian lm industry’s presence in Europe (part III of the
book). As a starting point, we might consider the examination of the local lm
infrastructure in Europe, including the availability of lm production facilities,
such as studios, sound stages, and equipment rental houses, as well as the availabil-
ity of trained crews and professional services, such as casting and location scouting
(Jäckel 2003; Luther 2010; Katsarova 2014). Film incentives provided by national
and regional governments to attract international lm production were already the
subject of many studies (Olsberg and Barnes 2014; Meloni et al. 2015; Halle 2016;
Hill and Kawashima 2016). This provides insight into the challenges and opportu-
nities of Indian lm production in Europe. The incentives can provide funding, tax
breaks, and more intangible benets, such as creating a lm-friendly environment
for Indian lm production companies and can play a signicant role in attracting
Indian lm production to Europe. This can also foster studying how Indian and
European lmmakers collaborate and share ideas and techniques and how cultural
dierences may aect the collaboration process. One theme that may be central
to our book is the idea of local and regional identity in Indian lms produced in
Europe (Cresswell and Dixon 2002; Singh 2011). This can include studying how
Indian lms represent dierent regions and cities in Europe and how these repre-
sentations reect or challenge local and regional identities.
A third thread of an interdisciplinary approach to Indian lm productions in
Europe involves a theme of the socio-spatial impact of the lm, in particular top-
ics such as place branding, destination management, and lm tourism (Lehu 2007;
O’Connor et al. 2008; Horrigan 2009). These themes help to understand how
Indian lm productions are used to promote a specic image or branding of a Euro-
pean city or region and how this image is then incorporated into the marketing and
promotion of the city or region as a tourist destination (Gyimóthy 2018). Similarly,
studying lm tourism might reveal the extent to which Indian lm productions in
Europe attract tourists to specic locations and how they engage with the place
Introduction 7
they are visiting due to their connection to the lm (Frank 2016; Nanjangud and
Reijnders 2020). This thread has been explored in part IV of the book.
In terms of readership, the book is expected to be of great interest to two audi-
ences. The rst group of readers represents researchers, academics, and both
undergraduate and postgraduate students, particularly in the elds of lm studies,
cultural anthropology, cultural geography, tourism studies, economics, sociology,
cultural studies, cultural diplomacy, etc. These readers can learn about and discover
the nexus between lm, as one of the sub-sectors of the emerging cultural and crea-
tive industries, and urban and regional development. The second group of readers
represents local authorities, destination marketing organisations, tourism opera-
tors and creative business owners, all of whom see the value of lm production
in attracting visitors, investment and creating new networks with local economic
actors. The book oers much-needed data and tools to translate their professional
goals and potentials into eective regional strategies and activities. It is expected
for the book to be of high interest to academic and non-academic actors not only
from India and Europe as the two subcontinents in the limelight but also from other
parts of the world where the Indian lm industry has started gradually mobilis-
ing locations for lming and targeting audiences (e.g. North and South America,
Africa, Australia). The book has an interdisciplinary character and a strong inter-
national appeal.
Book structure
The edited collection oers a unique overview of empirical and theoretical stud-
ies on the mobilisations of European locations in Indian cinema. It explores the
diversity of the European landscapes utilised “on-screen”; place representations
and place images as well as the key factors “beyond the screen”, including the
infrastructure, lm policies and business and diplomatic networks that have shaped
the use of these spaces, and subsequent social, cultural and economic impacts of
consuming the cinematic experiences. The book is divided into ve parts, consist-
ing of 14 chapters. The organisation of the chapters is based on the following logic.
Part I sets the scene and provides a background to the unique context of Indian
lm productions shooting in European locations by examining the mechanisms
determining the intercultural cooperation between the two regions. The chapters
in this part review the contribution of dierent disciplinary perspectives aiming
to address some of the urgent questions important to contemporary studies of lm
production and consumption, lm policy, cultural studies, sociology, geography
and tourism. It also presents state-of-the-art theoretical debates on the relationship
between lm, space and place.
Part II focuses on the mobilisation of European locations in Indian cinema by
examining the diversity of the landscapes used and the meanings they attempt to
convey, the relationship between space and place as well as place imaginations.
The presented case studies also deepen our understanding of utilising particular
European geographical landscapes and Indian lm genres.
8 Krzysztof Stachowiak et al.
In the opening chapter of part II, Ranjani Mazumdar looks at the use of European
locations in four genre-diverse lms from Bombay cinema. The main focus is on
the practices of mapping, which relate to so-called cartographic consciousness. The
chapter also looks at the infrastructure, trade, and diplomatic networks that have
made the use of European spaces possible. Four lms are being analysed: Zindagi
Na Milegi Dobara (2011), War (2019), Fan (2016), and Tamasha (2016). All of them
involve European locations as a vital part of storytelling. The chapter establishes the
signicant role of cinematic cartography as an infrastructural, aesthetic, spatial, and
cultural practice that produces a unique imagination of Europe on screen.
In the following chapter, Mimi Urbanc, Primož Gašperič, and Jani Kozina focus
on the representation of landscapes and the depiction of landscape features in
Indian lms shot in Europe. The study is quantitative, and it is based on a sample
of 594 lm scenes from 34 Indian lms shot in ve European countries – Finland,
Poland, Slovenia, Sweden, and Switzerland. The analysis in this chapter shows the
wide variety of landscape elements depicted. For instance, urban areas are mainly
represented by historical and modern images and green and blue infrastructure. On
the other hand, the countryside is predominantly represented by forests, meadows
and grasslands, villages, mountains, and elds, and less often by vineyards and
water elements. As the authors point out, there is a clear divide in representation
between Central and Northern Europe, with the former being based on (medieval)
heritage, culture, and tradition. In contrast, Northern Europe relies more on the
modern urban fabric.
The third chapter of this part of the book by Shikha Jhingan explores the rela-
tionship between European landscape and lm songs, which intensied in the
1990s with the Bollywoodisation of Indian cinema. Based on textual analysis
and ethnographic research, the chapter traces the genealogy of lm songs shot
in European locations to highlight the transformations in their aural and visual
style along the axis of industrial practice. The author distinguishes between two
types of lm songs that have not only become commonplace in recent years but
also rely heavily on a relationship with the place they depict or in which they are
made. Thus, background songs evoke the characters’ mood, and their aective
states seem to ow from and into the locations inhabited by them. These songs
also give us an aural perspective of the European city, subtly incorporating its
sounds and musical culture. The second type of song, the dance songs, involves
many dancers and crowd managers, enabling intercultural interactions and an
embodied engagement with the European locations used for shooting. The chap-
ter also identies the main factors that have contributed to the rise in the popu-
larity of this type of lm song. The most important of these is the rise of global
dance cultures and the emergence of mobile dancing bodies no longer contained
by geographical boundaries.
Part III sheds light on the specic spatial attraction factors in Europe. Four
chapters examine push factors as well as competing pull factors, including various
organisational arrangements and institutional mechanisms that exist in dierent
territorial contexts, in both mature (Italy and Switzerland) and new destinations
Introduction 9
(Finland, Slovenia, and Sweden), in attracting the lm producers. The case studies
featured here scrutinise lm production cultures by looking at the contemporary
lm policies, developed to attract foreign lm producers to their destinations as
well as private initiatives which benet from the “runaway productions”. The ana-
lysed cases demonstrate potential large economic impacts from the cooperation
between Indian lm producers and European stakeholders.
The contribution by Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni on the Italian trail of
Indian lms brings together two study traditions linked to media industry studies:
the political economy of media and production studies. The former is a useful tool
for relating companies’ actions to the public policies regulating or supporting the
media industry and for highlighting key trends in the market and corporate strategy.
At the same time, the latter is essential for understanding the production cultures
in which the companies operate and where the audiovisual products are created.
The authors theoretically identied three types of drivers for the delocalisation
of Indian lm shoots in Western countries: logistical, nancial and appeal. These
categories can be further broken down. For delocalisation in Italy, the chapter con-
rmed these three types, albeit in just some of their forms. The most relevant fac-
tors of delocalisation in the Italian context seem to be good local services, the
weather, tax incentives, and a desire for the spectacular. As their analysis shows,
Indian audiovisual productions’ choice of Italian locations is not an exceptional
phenomenon but rather a trend that has remained stable throughout the last decade.
The added value of this chapter is to represent the follow-up of research undertaken
by the two authors a decade ago on the same topic (Cucco and Scaglioni 2014). It
extends the study period (from 2010 to early 2022) and thus oers a more reliable
overview on the Indian–Italian collaboration.
The chapter by Hania Janta and Metka Herzog complements the contemporary
outlook on Indian lm productions in the Western European context by the Swiss
example. Switzerland has been an established destination in Bollywood cinema for
decades but now faces challenges in keeping its status as a lm-friendly destina-
tion. This is partly due to the sheer number of other emerging destinations globally
(see Kozina and Jelnikar in this volume). Janta and Herzog examine the attraction
factors that make Bollywood lmmakers and other Indian lm industries produc-
ers choose or return to shoot in Swiss regions, despite Switzerland’s lack of com-
petitive incentive schemes. Using qualitative data from in-depth interviews with
location stakeholders in Switzerland, this chapter explores the changing landscape
of foreign lmmaking in Switzerland. Their ndings illustrate that well-known
attributes, such as ecient business administration, proximity to high-end tourism
facilities, and specialist sta, play a key role in attracting large-scale productions.
The pristine environment and diverse linguistic and geographical landscapes create
new opportunities for lmmakers to use multilingual Switzerland as a substitute
location. However, this can lead to issues related to the authenticity of the des-
tination and displacement. This chapter contributes to the literature by exploring
globalised lm production, lm-induced tourism, lm policy, and attraction factors
of destinations.
10 Krzysztof Stachowiak et al.
Against the background of traditional Indian lmmaking in Western Europe
since the 1990s, the contribution of Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar portrays the
emerging trends of Indian lm production in Central and Eastern Europe. The
processes of political, economic, and social cohesion, since the expansion of the
European Union in 2004 have opened new opportunities for Indian producers
to explore “exotic” locations. Slovenia, the smallest of the countries belonging
to Central and Eastern Europe, has featured as an example thereof. This chapter
explores the processes, mechanisms and cultural contexts that have popularised
destinations in Central and Eastern Europe in general and Slovenia in particular.
As a post-socialist country that has maintained strong ties to the Western world,
Slovenia is shown to occupy a rather specic place in the context of Indian–Euro-
pean lm co-production while exhibiting tendencies that characterise the wider
region. This serves to underline both the unity and diversity of the region itself
and the problem complex at hand. The comparative advantages of Slovenia as a
destination for lmmakers are discovered to be aordable lming locations, a
great variety of landscapes displaying beautiful natural scenery as well as cul-
tural heritage, skilled technicians and talented performers. The authors conclude,
however, that Slovenia has only acted as a backdrop for Indian lmmakers so far
and that more eorts need to be made to raise its prole among lmmakers and,
consequently, the audience.
The contribution by Malwina Balcerak, Krzysztof Stachowiak, and Marcin
Adamczak examines production culture, interpersonal relations, and the inter-
nationalisation of the lmmaking industry using the case of Indian lm produc-
tions in Poland. The chapter indicates the role of interpersonal relations as an
essential element of Indian production culture and points out the role of the
individual dimension in international lm production. The chapter conceptually
refers to and discusses the concept of production culture by Caldwell (2008)
and applies it to explain interpersonal relations in collaboration with the Indian
lm industry. Using data from individual in-depth interviews with key actors
involved in Indian lm production in Poland, the chapters oer an analysis of
Indian lm production culture from the perspective of Polish lmmakers. The
authors demonstrate how the individual dimension is embedded in culture: the
individual’s actions are determined by social norms and rules, both formal and
informal. The latter seems to be no less important in international lm coopera-
tion. This is an important conclusion from the point of view of the internation-
alisation of lmmaking, as many of the activities of public authorities in support
of internationalisation are oriented towards an organisational or more formalised
dimension.
The nal chapter of this part rounds the European continent with some evi-
dence from the Nordic rural regions. Therese Sunngren-Granlund discusses how
lm productions, and especially Indian lm productions, are used to foster regional
development in rural areas of the Nordic context. Her chapter is based on an analy-
sis of current lm policy documents in the following countries: Finland, Sweden,
Norway, Denmark, and Iceland, with a deeper focus on Finland, where ten in-depth
Introduction 11
interviews with Finnish stakeholders working in the lm industry were also con-
ducted between 2020 and 2021. The author identied the Arctic landscape covered
in snow, as depicted in both Indian lm productions Wa r (2019) and Shamitabh
(2015), as one of the primary draws for foreign lmmakers to come to Finland.
Other important pull factors are the well-developed infrastructure, with ve inter-
national airports, roads across the country and national mobile phone coverage
not being an issue even in more remote locations. In addition to this, the low level
of bureaucracy and the quality of work were factors often mentioned as positive
aspects by the Finnish respondents themselves, making it comparable to the Swiss
context explored by Janta and Herzog also in this volume. The research ndings
suggest that Indian and international lm productions can be an opportunity for
the creative industries in the Nordic region, as well as a resourceful contributor to
regional development.
Part IV moves beyond the screen to the various impacts that the Indian
film production in Europe entails; from cultural impacts as part of soft pub-
lic diplomacy, to social impacts that have wider consequences for the audi-
ences and their consumption habits, both in Europe and India, to economic
impacts related to employment and knowledge sharing. The presented studies
engage in the conceptual debates on globalisation, transnationalism, knowl-
edge transfer, intercultural aspects, and the various practices related to the film
consumption.
Veena Hariharan’s contribution to this volume discusses how we can read these
geo-scapes as more than just backgrounds, and instead as complex ecologies for
extraction – of human and non-human habitats, labour, resource, and capital. Euro-
pean locations are frequently used as backdrops for song and stunt sequences in
popular Indian lms. These European locations, which are created through visually
appealing geographies of mountains, rivers, fjords, valleys, and forests teeming
with wild animals, are as much about India’s idea of Europe, as they are about
creating a “Europe” for the Indian imagination. The use of animals in lms is
implicated in the exploitative dynamic of the entertainment industrial complex
that animal activists have protested time and again in connection with the circus,
animal sports, performances, etc. Through a textual and contextual analysis of the
lm Tiger Zinda Hai (2017), one of the latest animal lms shot in Europe – featur-
ing wild wolves and superstar Salman Khan, Hariharan shows the entanglements
of screenwriters, producers, directors, actors, production crew, and VFX artists
with wranglers, animal trainers, and performing animals to produce the lm’s non-
human geographies.
The chapter by Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina sheds light on how the lm Purab
Aur Pachhim, the East and the West, by Manoj Kumar, brought Indian immigrants
to the screen for the rst time. Despite its non-formulaic and unconventional sub-
ject, PAP emerged as the fourth highest-grossing Hindi lm in 1970, beating many
other lms with established plotlines, actors, and directors. The lm’s underly-
ing message, articulated through its songs and unique narrative, makes it relevant
for research even though 50 years have passed since its release. Discussing a few
12 Krzysztof Stachowiak et al.
examples from the lm, the authors explore how it, with its conscious and uncon-
scious biases, presents an exclusive image of India rooted in the fundamental
tenets of Hindu nationalism. Yet there is no evidence that Purab Aur Pachhim
was produced with the sole aim of promoting Hindu nationalism. What is undeni-
able, according to the authors, is that the rise of Hindu nationalism over the past
100 years has had an impact on Indian art as well as on Indian artists.
In the nal chapter of this part, Bharath M. Josiam et al. analyse the percep-
tion of European destinations through the eyes of Bollywood lm viewers to
determine how perception is inuenced by what is seen in lms by collecting
and analysing 670 surveys from Indian lm consumers. The results indicate that
Bollywood lms strongly inuence the perceived destination image of European
countries among a large segment of the Indian population. European destinations
were divided into the top ve and bottom ve destinations for Indian tourists, and
the data was then compared to world tourism statistics. The ndings show dier-
ences in destination preference among Bollywood viewers and worldwide tourist
trends. According to the research, prominently featuring a landscape in Bolly-
wood movies can signicantly impact Indians’ perception on the destination’s
image. European countries frequently portrayed in lms have higher marks in
multiple perception categories than those not featured in blockbuster Bollywood
lms. As demonstrated by Hudson and Ritchie (2006), if destinations proactively
engage in eorts with movie producers and studios to lm at their location, it can
result in successful lm tourism. As Bollywood lms seem to have such a sig-
nicant inuence on the perceived image and travel intentions of Indian viewers,
destination marketers must concern themselves with Bollywood lms to tap into
an auent emergent market of Indian tourists.
Part V provides a summary of the collection; it reviews the various discipli-
nary approaches (geography, lm studies, media studies), themes (attraction fac-
tors, meanings and imaginary, regional development), European location contexts
(Finland, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Poland), and methodologies (in-depth
interviews, surveys, textual analysis, ethnographic research or cinematic analy-
sis) applied by the researchers. The chapter ends by outlining directions for future
research, focusing on the changing character of the lm industry, including the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, lm policy as well as technological and envi-
ronmental challenges and opportunities.
Acknowledgement
FilmInd project – The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic con-
nections was carried out within the EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and
Humanities (EqUIP) and nanced by national funding from the participating coun-
tries. The authors acknowledge the receipt of funding from the Ministry of Educa-
tion, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia and Slovenian Research Agency
(Research programme P6–0101), Swiss National Science Foundation (Project No.
Introduction 13
IZEQZ1_180340), Academy of Finland, Polish National Science Centre (project
no. 2017/27/Z/HS4/00039).
References
Aitken, S. C. and Dixon, D. P., 2006. Imagining geographies of lm. Erdkunde, 60,
326–336.
Aitken, S. C. and Zonn, L., eds., 1994. Place, power, situation, and spectacle: A geography
of lm. Lanham: Rowman & Littleeld.
Allen, R., 1993. Representation, illusion, and the cinema. Cinema Journal, 32, 21–48.
Buchmann, A., 2010. Planning and development in lm tourism: Insights into the experi-
ence of lord of the rings lm guides. Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development,
7, 77–84.
Caldwell, J. T., 2008. Production culture: Industrial reexivity and critical practice in lm
and television. Durham: Duke University Press.
Coe, N. M., 2015. Global production networks in the creative industries. In: C. Jones,
M. Lorenzen and J. Sapsed, eds., The Oxford handbook of creative industries. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 486–501.
Cresswell, T. and Dixon, D., eds., 2002. Engaging lm: Geographies of mobility and iden-
tity. Lanham: Rowman & Littleeld.
Cucco, M. and Dagnino, G., 2018. Public lm policy and the rise of economic principles:
The case of Switzerland. In: P. C. Murschetz, ed., Handbook of state aid for lm. Lugano:
Springer International Publishing, 427–445.
Cucco, M. and Richeri, G., 2021. European lm commissions as transcultural promoters and
mediators. Journal of Transcultural Communication, 1, 45–57.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2014. Shooting Bollywood abroad: The outsourcing of Indian
lms in Italy. Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies, 2, 417–432.
Dastidar, S. G. and Elliott, C., 2020. The Indian lm industry in a changing international
market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 44, 97–116.
Ebrahim, H., 2008. From ‘ghetto’ to mainstream: Bollywood in South Africa. Scrutiny 2:
Culture and Circulation in the Indian Ocean, 13, 63–76.
Frank, S., 2016. Dwelling-in-motion: Indian Bollywood tourists and their hosts in the Swiss
Alps. Cultural Studies, 30.
Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W. and Sasson, T., 1992. Media images and the social
construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.
Garrison, S., Wallace, C. and Chen, X., 2022. Media tourism and COVID-19: An empirical
investigation of the impact of COVID-19 on the Scottish tourism industry. Tourism, Cul-
ture & Communication. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830422x16600594683373
Gyimóthy, S., 2018. Transformations in destination texture: Curry and Bollywood romance
in the Swiss Alps. Tourist Studies, 18, 292–314.
Halle, R., 2016. German lm policy’s new horizons. International Journal of Cultural Pol-
icy, 22, 724–742.
Hassam, A. and Paranjape, M., eds., 2010. Bollywood in Australia: Transnationalism and
cultural production. Crawley: University of Western Australia Publishing.
Hill, J. and Kawashima, N., 2016. Introduction: Film policy in a globalised cultural econ-
omy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22, 667–672.
14 Krzysztof Stachowiak et al.
Hong, Y., 2021. The power of Bollywood: A study on opportunities, challenges, and audi-
ences’ perceptions of Indian cinema in China. Global Media and China, 6, 345–363.
Horrigan, D., 2009. Branded content: A new model for driving tourism via lm and branding
strategies. Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Refereed Journal of Tourism, 4,
51–65.
Hudson, S. and Ritchie, J. R. B., 2006. Promoting destinations via lm tourism: An empiri-
cal identication of supporting marketing initiatives. Journal of Travel Research, 44,
387–396.
Jäckel, A., 2003. European lm industries. London: British Film Institute.
Jacobsson, A., 2017. Intercultural lm: Fiction lm as audio-visual documents of intercul-
turality. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 38, 54–69.
Katsarova, I., 2014. Supporting the European lm industry. Brussels: European Parliamen-
tary Research Service.
Krämer, L., 2016. Bollywood in Britain: Cinema, brand, discursive complex. London:
Bloomsbury Publishing.
Krauss, F., 2012. Bollywood’s circuits in Germany. In: A. G. Roy, ed., The magic of Bol-
lywood: At home and abroad. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 295–317.
Lefebvre, M., ed., 2006. Landscape and lm. New York: Routledge.
Lehu, J.-M., 2007. Branded entertainment: Product placement and brand strategy in the
entertainment business. London: Kogan Page.
Lourenço, I., 2017. Bollywood in Portugal: Watching and dancing practices in the construc-
tion of alternative cultural identities. Etnográca, 21, 175–202.
Lukinbeal, C. and Sommerlad, E., 2022. Doing lm geography. GeoJournal, 87, 1–9.
Lukinbeal, C. and Zimmermann, S., 2006. Film geography: A new subeld. Erdkunde, 60,
315–325.
Lukinbeal, C. and Zimmermann, S., eds., 2008. The geography of cinema – a cinematic
world. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Luther, W., 2010. Movie production incentives: Blockbuster support for lackluster policy.
Washington: Tax Foundation.
Meloni, G., Paolini, D. and Pulina, M., 2015. The great beauty: Public subsidies in the Ital-
ian movie industry. Sardinia: Centre for North South Economic Research, University of
Cagliari and Sassari.
Nachum, L. and Keeble, D., 2003. MNE linkages and localised clusters: Foreign and indig-
enous rms in the media cluster of central London. Journal of International Management,
9, 171–192.
Nanjangud, A. and Reijnders, S., 2020. Cinematic itineraries and identities: Studying Bol-
lywood tourism among the Hindustanis in the Netherlands. European Journal of Cultural
Studies, 25, 659–678.
O’Connor, N., Flanagan, S. and Gilbert, D., 2008. The integration of lm-induced tourism
and destination branding in Yorkshire, UK. International Journal of Tourism Research,
10, 423–437.
Olsberg, J. and Barnes, A., 2014. Impact analysis of scal incentive schemes supporting lm
and audiovisual production in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
O’Regan, T., 2018. Revisiting lm cities and lm services: Methodology, theory and appli-
cations. Journal of African Cinemas, 10, 9–29.
Sharp, L. and Lukinbeal, C., 2015. Film geography: A review and prospectus. In: S. P.
Mains, J. Cupples and C. Lukinbeal, eds., Mediated geographies and geographies of
media. Dordrecht: Springer, 21–35.
Introduction 15
Singh, J. P., 2011. Globalized arts: The entertainment economy and cultural identity. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Slusser, G. E. and Rabkin, E. S., eds., 1989. Mindscapes: The geographies of imagined
worlds. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Urbanc, M., Fridl, J. and Resnik Planinc, T., 2021. Landscapes as represented in textbooks
and in students’ imagination: Stability, generational gap, image retention and recognis-
ability. Children’s Geographies, 19, 446–461.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-3
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction: space and place in geography and lm
It is commonly assumed that places have a kind of instrumental role, that is, they
serve as a backdrop to events or are presented in a certain way. This is generally
true, but the essence of the relationship between lm and place has a much more
profound implication. In this chapter, we will try to show that places are not so
much shown as produced or created by the lm. A key concept in understanding the
relationship of lm to space and place is the concept of representation, which – in
the face of technological shifts – is changing. Representation does not just mean
portrayal or depiction. Thanks to specic means of expression and lm techniques,
as well as the active role of the audience in the reception of the lm, it also concerns
the creation of places in a cultural sense. As a consequence, the space-lm relation-
ship also changes. Just as, according to classical concepts, space is socially pro-
duced (Lefebvre 1974/1991), so places can be culturally produced. This happens
by giving new meanings to dierent elements of space and “familiarising” them in
this way, which leads to the transformation of space into place. We will try to show
how the mechanism of creating a place through lm occurs. On the one hand, lmic
means of expression are used for this, and on the other, the spatiality of lm itself
inuences the cultural production of places. The latter aspect has been missing in
lm geography, and this chapter tries to ll this gap. By considering this spatiality
of lm, it is possible to discover that what we see on the screen is paradoxically not
the only element that allows the spatial dimension of lm to be constructed. The
space beyond the screen, or more broadly, the space of the entire presented world,
is crucial here. It seems that the so-called spatial turn in the humanities and in
reection on lm can be an interesting source of inspiration (Jones 2015).
The relationship between lm and space and place will be explored by combin-
ing ideas from human geography, particularly the geography of culture and lm
geography as well as lm studies. Place is a central concept in human geography.
Generally, a place is a geographical location of any size or conguration, compa-
rable to the equally general meanings of such concepts as area, region, or location.
However, in human geography, and more broadly in the humanities, place is often
given more importance (Cresswell 2004). A fundamental characteristic of the place
is that it has meaning. Relph (1976), Tuan (1977), and many others who followed
2 From real to reel and back again
Multifaceted relations between lm,
space, and place
Krzysztof Stachowiak
From real to reel and back again 17
them treated the place as a subjectively felt and experienced phenomenon. Human-
istic geographers regarded the place as an irreducible component of human experi-
ence, without which human experience could not be created or interpreted. Such
experiences included perception of place, sense of place, or memories associated
with the place.
On the one hand, places were understood as shaping the unique experiences of
individuals and, on the other, as specic to dierent cultures. In this way, places
reected and articulated cultural customs or cultural dierences in modes of per-
ception. With the emergence of the “new” cultural geography in the 1980s, particu-
lar attention was paid to how places are represented in various cultural forms such
as art, lm, literature, and maps (Mitchell 2000).
As Tuan (1977, p. 6) notes:
in experience, the meaning of space often merges with that of place. “Space”
is more abstract than “place”. What begins as undierentiated space becomes
place as we get to know it better and endow it with value. . . . The ideas
“space” and “place” require each other for denition. From the security and
stability of place we are aware of the openness, freedom, and threat of space,
and vice versa. Furthermore, if we think of space as that which allows move-
ment, then place is pause; each pause in movement makes it possible for
location to be transformed into place.
Space, as opposed to a place, has been seen as a meaningless sphere, an element
that, like time, creates fundamental dimensions for human life. When people give
meaning to a part of space and then attach themselves to it – for example, by nam-
ing it – it becomes a place. As Cresswell (2004, p. 10) notes:
although this basic dualism of space and place runs through much of human
geography since the 1970s, it is confused somewhat by the idea of social
space – or socially produced space – which, in many ways, plays the same
role as place.
Film geography tries to apply the concepts of place and space in various types of
analyses, such as the image of the place and the ways of presenting the place in
the lm (Hirsch and O’Rourke 2017), researching lm and place/space relations
through the city (Hallam et al. 2008; Hallam 2010; Hallam and Roberts 2014),
examining the crossover of cinematic spaces in architecture (Koeck 2013) (Cairns
2013) or understanding urban phenomena through the moving image (Penz and Lu
2011). Based on the ideas of lm geography, we can argue that, in the case of lm,
we are dealing with a culturally produced space which, in the process of creation
and then reception of the lm, becomes meaningful and thus turn into a place.
Films, as well as novels, often evoke a sense of place – a feeling that the viewer
or reader knows what it is like to “be there”. A “sense of place” is a subjective and
emotional attachment people have to place (Tuan 1977). However, it is important
18 Krzysztof Stachowiak
to remember that places are not like chairs or automobiles and do not come out of
a factory as nished products. Places are very much in process (Pred 1984) and are
created by cultural practices, such as literature, lm, and music (Aitken and Zonn
1994; Leyshon et al. 1998; Cresswell and Dixon 2002).
Our experience of real space can easily be transferred, on an isomorphic basis,
to the experience of the spatiality of lm. Moreover, this simple extension of our
experience to lm has been a slowing factor in the development of geographical
reection on the lm. As Aitken and Zonn (1994, p. 5) speculated, geographers
have been slow to make a serious study of lm because of “the geographer’s tradi-
tional emphasis on the material conditions of social life wherein representation is
subsidiary to ‘physical reality’ ”. The traditional distinction between lm location
(where lms are shot) and lm setting (where the action of the lm takes place)
was thus founded on the assumption that one is an extension of the other. Mean-
while, these categories correspond to specic types of space. Drawing on the con-
tributions of lm geography, media geography, lm studies, and visual culture and
media studies, the chapter will map the lmic territory, propose a typology of lm
spaces, and reect on their relationship to real-world spaces and places. The chap-
ter thus discusses the spatiality of lm and its consequences for geographical space.
The main consequences are not only the negotiation of meanings and the taming of
space but also the creation of spatial orientation skills in a “parallel” world, that is,
the one created by the lm.
Depicted, represented, or created: how do we see what is
on the screen?
At the heart of most lm theories was the explicit or tacitly accepted assumption
that every object depicted on screen must be in front of the camera at the right time
and in the right place (Thompson and Bordwell 2003; Villarejo 2007; Bordwell
and Thompson 2008). Disputes only concerned the question of whether “depict”
meant: to reproduce, reect, or merely to signify (Allen 1993). This, however,
concerned the question of the relationship between the real object and the depicted
object and did not compromise the essence of the principle of representation itself.
Nevertheless, there has always been the question of a fundamental dierence
related to the fact of the heterogeneous status of what can be represented in a lm.
It has always been considered specic to the cinema to represent by means of a
reection of what actually exists in the material world around us, regardless of the
intentions of the artist, who only intervenes in this world by the simple fact of lm-
ing it. It was no less obvious to represent a world that had previously been created
for the cinema, either in a studio or, much later, by means of digital techniques
(Giralt 2010).
Although in both cases, we are dealing with the representation of a world previ-
ously non-existent in the reality in which we too live, the dierence concerning
the status of representation is fundamental (Cosgrove 2008). The interference of
digital techniques in the world of cinema, whose ontology has hitherto been deter-
mined by photographic reproduction, brings about a revolutionary change. In fact,
From real to reel and back again 19
we are no longer dealing with representation in the sense of Renaissance concepts
(see more, especially with a reference to landscape, in Cosgrove 2008), which the
cinema did not cancel, but only took over and modied, replacing the dexterity of
the painters hand with the eciency of the camera. This was undoubtedly a sig-
nicant breakthrough, but not as radical as that brought about by digital techniques.
Although classical techniques of recording moving images attempted to invade
the region of the representation of the world, they left at the centre an unchanging
relationship between a real object and its representation. In contemporary cinema,
which continues to and successfully simulate the existence of the worlds it depicts,
we are increasingly confronted with entirely new situations. What previously never
and nowhere existed appears on the screen. What has never existed anywhere
before, which has no prototype, appears on the screen. The dinosaurs in Steven
Spielberg’s Jurassic Park (1993) come out of nowhere. Baudrillard’s (1994) obser-
vation that the image is prior to what it depicts is not just a showy metaphor but
a fact. Therefore in cinema, we are no longer dealing with a represented world.
The cinema still presents quasi-real worlds, possible or probable, regardless of the
techniques it uses to do so. However, the ontological foundation of representation
has changed: representation remains as the act of bringing into existence something
that functions on the laws of reality (Hall 2013).
The concept of representation, however, is not just an ontological problem for
cinema, raising doubts mentioned earlier. It is also the foundation for bringing into
existence a world or worlds that are autonomous from the world in which we also
live. At the same time, however, they are “similar” enough to enable us to men-
tally and emotionally connect with them, to experience what “happens” in these
worlds as probable or even real. Real in the sense that what is said about human
aairs – psychological, moral, and social – can, by transposition, also apply to our
reality. The concept of the represented world most often refers to the cinema of
ction, to the feature lm, although other types of cinematic expression, such as
documentaries, also “represent”. They represent, by all means, “our” world, people
who live in a particular time and place, and what we watch on screen happens to
them or has really happened to them. In a ctional lm, the actors we watch there
also “really” exist, and their lives may take place in the real Paris or Tokyo. Nev-
ertheless, these actors are inscribed within the ction and thus become “ctional”
people, and what surrounds them (objects, landscapes, architecture) also belongs
only to this ctional story, nowhere else. What the ctional lm presents is a made-
up story, taking place in a made-up world. The degree of resemblance of this world
to our reality may vary greatly, but this does not change its status in any way – it
is always a ctional world, even if its authors claim to be reporting real events that
involve real people.
To describe the world depicted in an action lm, the French aesthetician Éti-
enne Souriau (Souriau 1951, 1953), introduced a special term: diegesis. Diegesis
is the universe of cinematic ction constituted by a system of means of expres-
sion (scenes, shots, editing, sound, music, light, set design, etc.), and thus the only
component of the lm’s structure that is a real object, available in perception to
the spectator. This universe is intentionally delineated by the author and implied
20 Krzysztof Stachowiak
and constructed, through perceptual and cognitive processes and structures, by the
viewer. In other words, diegesis consists of time and space, processes, events, states
of aairs, people and objects, otherwise, it is the world presented, both in physi-
cal terms (objects physically visible on the screen) and in references (what is not
visible on the screen but we know exists) (see more in Bordwell 1985, pp. 14–26).
The exposure to the represented world of a lm triggers a particular attitude in
the viewer, characterised by a duality. On the one hand, the viewer easily enters this
world, especially if the lm in question does not violate his or her perceptual habits,
does not disappoint expectations, remaining in harmony with the common-sense
experience of reality perception. On the other hand, the viewer is able to distance
himself from this world, accept its conventionality, and open up to what is new and
unexpected. Crucial in dening the relationship between lm and place is the role
of the viewer in interacting with the cinematic world. Initially, a passive role was
assumed for the viewer, who assimilated what he or she saw on the screen accord-
ing to the author’s intentions, or according to the laws of perception, both general
and culturally conditioned. It is worth recalling the conviction of early semiotic
theorists that the viewer merely “decodes” the meaning of lm texts according
to assimilated codes (Metz 1974). Newer lm theorists, however, emphasise the
active participation of the viewer in the creation of meaning, and even a kind of co-
authorship by the viewer, resulting from both the function of the viewer’s mind and
the “opening up” of the text itself. The active role of the spectator is mainly empha-
sised by cognitive approaches (Banaji 2006; Shimamura 2013). In their view, the
lm merely provides the viewer with signals through which he or she constructs
what is presented. The reception of a lm is a ow of hypotheses that are constantly
revised as a result of the inux of new information. Also, proponents of the phe-
nomenological orientation maintain that a lm can only be understood due to the
intentional nature of the viewer’s consciousness, which models its representation.
Others still strongly emphasise the role of interpretation (Gaut 2010).
The active role of the spectator has consequences in expanding the meaning of
representation. The lm ceases to be just a depicted “image of reality” (whether
we are dealing with a reality whose existence is conrmed by our knowledge and
memory or with a fake “reality” from an atelier or a computer). It becomes a cul-
tural artefact, a metaphor for a reality that no longer shows (depicts) it but only
represents it. Replacing the notion of depiction with that of representation frees
us from the whole complex of concepts and problems associated with showing,
reproducing or recreating. Representations merely refer to the world, delimiting
some possible area of its meanings while at the same time suggesting the exist-
ence of an extensive context beyond this area. Film photography no longer certies
reality. For it creates what it supposedly only shows. According to Flusser (2011),
contemporary media produce “technical images” that, although they look as if they
were images of objectively existing reality, by conveying the illusion of reality,
in fact, present only themselves. If cinema, like other media, is able to produce
images that have no necessary relationship to reality, which at one time seemed
to be its ontological foundation, even a condition of existence, then the concept of
representation gains a new meaning. If the viewer is not constrained either by the
From real to reel and back again 21
perceptual experience gained from the reception of the real world, or by the system
of compulsions determined by the codes or specic narrative strategies of the text,
and can freely traverse the areas of the text, then certain possibilities open up for
a departure towards a previously unrepresented world that represents only itself.
From real to reel? The winding roads of the relationship between
space and lm
In order to present the complex nexus of relations between lm and other media
and place, we propose in this section a model that combines the geographic under-
standing of space with the perspective of lm studies. It highlights two things.
First, it allows us to draw attention to the fact that the presence of spaces in cultural
texts is not limited to visual representation, but may have a dierent character. Sec-
ond, the model proposes a typology of space resulting from the weaving of the rela-
tionship between the lm and the place. This weave leads to the creation of three
types of space: real, mediated, and imaginary. This distinction will be important
for understanding the typology of space in the lm presented in the next section.
The space of the real world, the one that surrounds us and from which we draw
our experiences, is often the basis of lm registration. It is the one that appears on
screen, either representing itself or playing the role of other spaces. Tuan (1974)
introduced the term topophilia to describe people’s aective bond with a place.
Topophilia consists of sensual, aesthetic, intellectual feelings and a sense of belong-
ing. The familiarity of a place is determined by three interrelated components: the
physical surroundings of the object, the activities of the people and the meanings
(Ellard 2015). Art and its various forms are recognised as one way of taming space,
both through making meanings and through artistic practices that take place in a
specic space or that involve space (e.g. space can become material in site-specic
art) (Kwon 2002; Fleming 2007). Film is one such activity that has wide-ranging
eects, primarily on the image of place (Kim and Richardson 2003; Mercille 2005;
O’Connor et al. 2008; Hudson et al. 2011). Places can be “assimilated” not only by
lm but also by other types of art, such as literature, painting, or photography. All
these cultural forms inuence how we may think and feel about dierent places.
Thus, both generic spaces and specic places are represented by dierent
forms of culture. This representation can be of two kinds: verbal or visual (see
Figure 2.1). To the former, we can mainly include literature, to the others the visual
arts, that is, painting, photography, or lm. Film is quite unique in that it uses
both types of communication to depict events. Through dialogues or monologues
delivered by characters, spaces, and places can be described, while at the same
time, the visual sphere of the lm depicts the space on the screen to us. This visu-
ality is of great importance here, and in the case of cinema, it can be a source of
pleasure (Mulvey 1999). The description of a space or place in literature explains,
as it were, its qualities through the prism of narrative. The space represents the
author’s vision of the world, expressed in verbal language. Reproducing this
space requires the audience to “translate” it into their spatial codes (Terentowicz-
Fotyga 2018). In general terms, we would say that the viewers have to use their
22 Krzysztof Stachowiak
imagination to visualise the space described in the text. As a result, the space has
an imaginary rather than a mediated character.
Literature often involves the depiction of spaces and places that are either c-
tional or based on real-world locations, and in order to fully understand and engage
with these depictions, readers must use their imagination to visualise the spaces
and places described in the text. This process of using imagination to conjure up a
mental image of the spaces and places depicted in literature is an important aspect
of reading and can help to enrich the reading experience. It is worth noting, how-
ever, that the extent to which readers rely on their imagination to visualise the
spaces and places depicted in literature can vary. Some texts may provide very
detailed descriptions of the physical features and characteristics of the spaces and
places depicted, while others may be more abstract or symbolic in their depiction
of these elements. In these cases, readers may need to draw on their own personal
experiences and cultural knowledge in order to construct a mental image of the
spaces and places depicted in the text. Nevertheless, this type of space is imagined
or imaginary (see Figure 2.1).
Literature and the lm often depict imaginary spaces or worlds that do not exist
in the real world. These imaginary spaces can be as simple as a single room or as
complex as an entire universe, and they can be created for a variety of purposes,
such as to tell a story, explore an idea, or evoke an emotion. One of the key features
of imaginary spaces in literature and lm is that they allow for creating environ-
ments and situations that would not be possible or practical in the real world. This
can give writers and lmmakers the freedom to explore a wide range of themes and
Figure 2.1 Nexus of relationships between lm and other media and place/space.
Source: Own elaboration
From real to reel and back again 23
ideas in a way that is not limited by the constraints of reality. At the same time,
however, imaginary spaces in literature and lm can also be used to comment on or
reect aspects of the real world. For example, the imaginary world of Middle-earth
in The Lord of the Rings novels and lms can be seen as a metaphor for the real
world and can be used to explore themes such as power, conict, and redemption
(Mathijs 2006). In this way, imaginary spaces in literature and lm can serve as a
way to engage with and understand the complexities of the real world in a more
imaginative and creative way.
Many imaginary spaces in literature and lm are inspired by real-world spaces
and can incorporate real-world geography, architecture, and culture elements. This
can be especially true in cases where the imaginary space is intended to be a c-
tionalised version of a real place or to serve as a metaphor for a real-world issue or
theme. For example, the imaginary world of Middle-earth in The Lord of the Rings
novels and lms is inspired by the landscapes and cultures of Europe, particularly
those of the Anglo-Saxon and Norse traditions (Garth 2020). Similarly, the city of
Hogwarts in the Harry Potter series is inspired by the architecture and culture of
medieval Europe (Whited 2002). In these cases, the use of real-world elements in
the creation of the imaginary space can help to make the space feel more grounded
and believable to the audience and can also provide a sense of familiarity and reso-
nance with the real world. At the same time, however, it is important to note that the
imaginary spaces depicted in literature and lm are ultimately ctional creations
and despite they should not be confused with the real world, the phenomenon of
fandom shows it is not always the case (see for instance Bell 2015 for a study of
Harry Potter fandom).
The visual arts, on the other hand, operate with images, which, with the pri-
macy of the sense of sight in human perception – just to mention that sight is the
most valued sense (Enoch et al. 2019) and we are living in an era of visual culture
(Howells 2003) – makes elds such as photography or lm play a key role in cul-
ture today. Even a two-dimensional image is thus a more “rich” representation of
the real-world space than a verbal description. Through visual representations, the
experience of real places becomes mediated and they themselves become part of
the media. In this case, we can speak of mediated space.
Visual representations of real places, such as photographs, videos, and maps,
can be seen as a form of mediation, because they provide a ltered or interpreted
version of the real place. These visual representations can capture certain aspects
of the real place and omit or distort others, and they often rely on the viewer’s
prior knowledge and expectations to make sense of the image. As a result, the
experience of a real place through a visual representation is necessarily dierent
from experiencing the place in person. In this sense, all forms of representation,
including visual ones, can be seen as a form of mediation, because they involve the
interpretation and communication of an experience or concept through a medium
that is separate from the original experience. This can be especially signicant in
the case of digital media, where the representation is often not only separate from
the original experience but also accessible to a potentially global audience (Brown
2018). Visual culture, which includes forms of media such as photography, lm,
24 Krzysztof Stachowiak
and television, has the power to shape and inuence our understanding and experi-
ence of spaces and places. By presenting images of these spaces and places, visual
culture can create a mediated version of these locations that is separate from the
physical reality of the place. As a result, the experience of a place through visual
culture can be limited to consuming the images of the place through the media
(Breek et al. 2018). This can be especially true in cases where the images presented
in the media are carefully curated or presented in a specic way in order to convey
a particular message or perspective (Couldry and McCarthy 2004). Visual culture
can provide a limited or biased view of a place, and it is important to consider the
context and intentions behind the images being presented in order to fully under-
stand and engage with the place depicted.
Alongside images (still and moving), one of the most important forms of visual
representation of space is the map. A map can be a form of representation of real
space, depicting a wide range of information about spaces and places, including
their geography, topography, landmarks, infrastructure, and other features. At the
same time, a map or a concept of a map can also be used to examine the spatial
dimensions of the lm. Conley (2007, p. 1) in his book Cartographic cinema
argues that “even if a lm does not display a map as such, by nature it bears an
implicit relation with cartography”. Conley’s argument is based on the idea that
lms depict locations and spaces, whether real or ctional and that these loca-
tions and spaces can be thought of as being mapped out within the lm. Even if a
lm does not show a physical map, it can still be considered to have an implicit
cartographic element because it represents a spatial narrative. This can be seen in
the way that characters move through and interact with dierent locations within
the lm, as well as the way that the lm itself is structured around these locations.
Films can also be used to represent and depict real-world places, either through
the use of actual locations or through the use of special eects and computer-
generated imagery. In these cases, the lm can be seen as a way of mapping out and
depicting these places in a visual and spatial way. Overall, this perspective on the
relationship between lm and cartography highlights the idea that lms can be seen
as a form of spatial representation, even if they do not show a physical map. This
view suggests that lms can be thought of as a way of mapping out and depicting the
world (also imaginary worlds) in a visual and spatial way (Penz and Koeck 2017).
Bruno (2002) argues that cartography is not necessarily a medium for mastering
space, but that it can extend subjectivity and emotion into space. Maps are not just
objective representations of the physical world, but that they can also be used to
convey subjective experiences and emotions (cf. King 1996). Therefore, maps can
be used to represent the emotional signicance of dierent places, or the way that
they can convey the subjective experiences of people who live or have lived in a
particular place. Bruno’s (2002) perspective on cartography highlights the idea that
maps are not just neutral, objective representations of the world, but that they can
also be used to convey subjective experiences and emotions. This view challenges
the traditional understanding of cartography as a purely scientic and technical dis-
cipline, and suggests that maps can be used to represent and convey a wide range
of human experiences and emotions.
From real to reel and back again 25
Mapping the lmic territory: types of space in the lm
Film space is specic; it is not simply the space we know from everyday experience,
although the sensations that ow from it help us build models of the space experi-
enced in the lm experience. Any reection on space in art begins with the funda-
mental observation that the space we experience when interacting with art is not the
same space in which we live and act. Each art form shapes it in its way, proposing
a specic take on the parameters that dene real space. The nite character of its
space, delimited and framed yet isomorphic to the innity of real space, is specic
to each artistic work. It is generally believed that lm as art is closest to being able
to depict authentic relations occurring in real space. However, the opposite claim to
this opinion seems equally convincing – lm, thanks to its means of expression,
has almost unlimited possibilities for creating space, for which the starting point is
no real system. We can therefore speak of two roles of space in the lm: represent-
ing and creating.
In the real world, but also in certain types of art, such as theatre, we deal
with a three-dimensional space in which all relationships occur between three-
dimensional gures. In the lm, however, we are dealing with the projection onto
a plane. Their play only creates the illusion of depth, giving the appearance of
a three-dimensional existence to a two-dimensional world. On the other hand, a
closer bond connects the space of the lm image with the space of the painting
image since perspective vision is the basis for the illusion of the three dimensions
of the depicted world. Nevertheless, this is where the fundamental similarities end,
as illusiveness does not entirely determine the nature of lm space, which is expe-
rienced in several ways, including through the play of sets, editing that results in
changing shots, and the non-image location of the sound. Consequently, it would
be simpler to say that the lm does not so much reproduce a real space or create
an entirely new space but that it successively marks this space with individual
images. The successive lm images are a kind of partial sign, marking a whole
space, or rather one of many spaces. As a rule, lm space (given in particular lm)
is not xed and unchanging. On the contrary, it changes with the development of
the plot, places of action, and the introduction of dierent modalities of expres-
sion. To capture this changing character of space, Figure 2.2 proposes to frame the
spatiality of the lm concerning three categories of space: prolmic, diegetic, and
virtual. This framework is an amalgam of the concepts of space and place present
in human geography and the reection on space present in lm studies. It argues
that lm creates its own space through various elements such as sets, editing, and
sound. Prolmic space refers to what is captured on lm, including studio sets and
practical locations. Diegetic space is the ctional world of the lm, represented on
screen through mise-en-scène and framing. The relationship between on-screen
and o-screen space inuences our perception of the lm space. Editing plays a
crucial role in creating cinematic space, allowing for the manipulation and conti-
nuity of space. Ultimately, lm space is a combination of what is shown and what
is imagined by the audience. These will be elaborated in the following sections of
the chapter.
26 Krzysztof Stachowiak
Prolmic space
Prolmic space is everything placed in front of the camera that is then captured on
lm and constitutes the lm image. Tuan (1990, p. 435) has once argued that
[in order] to understand human reality better, it helps to see people and their
works as compounded of realism and fantasy. The concepts captured by
these two words give us a handle to explore human nature and culture. It is,
however, a slippery handle, for although “realism” and “fantasy” have clear
and opposite meanings conceptually, their application to real-life situations
is often ambiguous and problematical. A point of view or a pattern of behav-
ior that appears realistic can seem, with a shift in perspective, fantastic, and
vice-versa.
Calling a space “real” in relation to a lm can also get bogged down in this ambigu-
ity. Particularly as the lm seeks to imitate reality, to recreate or represent it. There-
fore, instead of using “real space”, we propose the notion of “prolmic space”.
In lm studies, it is referred to as a “prolmic event”, which Kuhn and Westwell
(2020, p. 386) describe as
the slice of the world in front of the lm camera including actors or perform-
ers, lighting, sets, props and costumes, as well as the setting itself, as opposed
to what eventually appears on the cinema screen. In studio-made ction
lms, the prolmic event is a set constructed for the purpose of being lmed.
At the other extreme, in observational documentary forms like direct cinema,
lmmakers seek, as a fundamental element of their practice, to preserve the
Figure 2.2 Main types of space in the lm.
Source: Own elaboration based on Bordwell and Thompson (2008) and Kuhn and Westwell (2020)
From real to reel and back again 27
integrity of the real-life space and time of the prolmic event. Many lms
occupy a middle ground in their organisation of, or relationship with, the
prolmic event: as for example in the case of location-shot, but acted, lms.
The prolmic event utilises real-world space through the use of (a) studio space
or (b) practical locations. A studio is generally considered as a workshop for artists,
but in relation to lm a workshop or building for cinematographic, sound, or music
recording and is generally referred to as a stage, and the term studio or studios
generally means all the buildings on a lm company’s site, whatever their func-
tion. A studio or studio complex may include some or all of the following: silent
and soundstages, set preparation workshops, stores and lockups, makeup salons
and dressing rooms, wardrobe rooms and laundry, production and administration
oces, editing suites, processing laboratories, sound mixing studios, audio suites,
scoring or orchestral stage, library, special eects and model workshops, backlot,
water tank, preview screening room, and commissary.
Sets are constructed environments designed to mimic real-world locations or
create entirely ctional spaces. They allow lmmakers to have greater control over
the look and feel of the space depicted on screen, and they can be used to create a
wide range of environments and settings. Film sets are constructed environments
that are used to depict the setting of a lm. They can be built in lm studios or
on location, and they are used to create a wide range of environments and set-
tings, including city streets, natural landscapes, and historical sites. Film sets are
an important part of the lmmaking process, as they allow lmmakers to have
greater control over the look and feel of the space depicted on screen. This can be
especially useful when lming in a controlled environment, such as a lm studio,
where the lmmakers can control the lighting, camera angles, and other elements
of the set to create the desired eect. Film sets can be constructed in a variety of
ways, depending on the needs of the lm. They can be built from scratch using raw
materials, or they can be created using pre-existing structures, such as warehouses
or factories. In some cases, lmmakers may use a combination of both approaches,
building certain elements of the set while using existing structures as a foundation.
In addition to their use in lm studios, lm sets can also be built on location, in
order to take advantage of the unique characteristics and atmosphere of a particular
location. This can be especially important in historical or period lms, where the
authenticity of the setting is crucial to the overall credibility of the lm. Overall,
lm sets play a crucial role in the lmmaking process, as they allow lmmakers to
have greater control over the look and feel of the space depicted on screen, and can
be constructed in a variety of ways to meet the needs of the lm.
The second type of prolmic space is location. Location in lm industry as well
as in lm studies is understood as “any place other than a studio where a lm is
partly or wholly shot” (Kuhn and Westwell 2020, p. 292). This can be not only an
external location, such as a street or square, but also an internal location, such as
the interior of a building or structure. These real-world locations depict the setting
of a lm, such as a house, a city street, or a natural landscape. The use of practical
28 Krzysztof Stachowiak
locations can help to create a sense of realism and believability, as the audience is
able to recognise and relate to the real-world spaces depicted on screen. This can
be especially important in historical or period lms, where the authenticity of the
setting is crucial to the overall credibility of the lm (cf. Lukinbeal 2011). The use
of on-location shooting can play a signicant role in the look and feel of a lm, as it
allows lmmakers to take advantage of the unique characteristics and atmosphere
of a particular location. For example, a lm set in New York City might be lmed
on location in the city itself in order to capture the energy and diversity of the city.
In addition to its aesthetic and realism-enhancing benets, on-location shooting
can also present logistical challenges for lmmakers. These challenges can include
obtaining the necessary permits and permissions, coordinating with local residents
and businesses, and dealing with the challenges of lming in a real-world environ-
ment, such as weather and trac. Therefore, the decision to shoot a lm on location
is based on storyline, cost, and practicality (McCurdy 2011).
The use of location in lm has evolved with changes in lming techniques. The
use of location in lm has evolved with changes in lming techniques. The book
edited by Gleich and Webb (2019) provides an interesting history of the use of
location in Hollywood lms. The earliest lms were shot on location using natural
lighting, but the development of articial lighting and faster lm stock soon ena-
bled shooting to take place indoors in the more controllable environment of the
studio. The coming of synchronised sound in the late 1920s made outdoor shooting
more dicult, though scenes in action genres such as the western were routinely
shot on location, as were newsreels. With developments in lm stocks and in image
and sound recording technologies, location work has become increasingly com-
monplace in live-action ction productions.
Diegetic space
Diegesis is a term used in narratology and refers to narrated events. In cinema,
diegesis is the entire ctional world of a lm. Through contact with the work
whether reading a book or watching a lm – the spectator recreates this ctional
world through verbal or visual information provided by the author. Therefore,
diegetic space, as described by Souriau (1951, p. 233), is “space reconstituted
in the thoughts of the spectator”. Moreover, as Kuhn and Westwell (2020,
p. 135) note:
diegetic space has a particular set of meanings (and potential complexities)
in relation to narration in cinema as opposed to, say, the novel; and in a nar-
rative lm, the diegetic world can include not only what is visible on the
screen, but also oscreen elements that are presumed to exist in the world
that the lm depicts – as long as these are part of the main story.
This relationship between what can be seen on the screen and the whole of the
depicted world is central to understanding what lm space, or more precisely,
diegetic space, is.
From real to reel and back again 29
Let us start by explaining the kind of space that is visually accessible and
appears on the screen. On-screen space or simply screen space can be identied
with mise-en-scène, that is, the contents of the lm frame, including elements of
the prolmic event such as performers, settings, costumes, and props. The term
“mise-en-scène” also refers more broadly to what the viewer sees on the screen,
such as lighting, colour, composition, and iconographic aspects of the cinematic
image, to name a few. More importantly, it also refers to the relationship between
on-screen and o-screen space created by the framing of the image and by camera
movement. A key component of lm-style screen space produces meaning, if only
at a very basic level, by providing visual information about the world of a lm’s
narrative (Martin 2014).
A lm cannot reproduce real space in a literal sense, but it can replicate its
inherent relations, creating an arrangement isomorphic to it. If the lmmaker lms
a given scene, situation, event or sequence of events, a process in a continuous
manner, without interfering with the temporal course, we get the impression of
non-interference in the presented world. The lm space reproduces a fragment
of real space that is possible to be captured by the camera. Long shots, far-ung
plans, and particular viewpoints allow us to copy the capacity of our eye to see the
particular space we are in at any given moment. Unlike the perception of the real
world, the cinematic world is subject to framing (Bordwell and Thompson 2008,
pp. 142–149).
The on-screen space is bounded by a frame that separates it from the o-screen
space. The relationship between these two types of space is signicant because
what we see in the frame is always a slice (and thus a suggestion) of something
larger. A familiar gure, such as the close-up, can serve as an example: on the
screen, we see a person’s face, while outside the frame, we make up the rest. This
simple example shows that the o-screen space is the domain of the imagination. It
can be used in various ways, depending on whether the artist wants to stimulate the
viewer’s imagination. Suggestions and cues about o-screen space can be kept to
a minimum. The o-screen space can also be expanded so that what is in the frame
gives the impression of being part of a far greater whole. The o-screen space can
also be used to introduce an element of surprise. Finally, it also happens that the
proportions are reversed, and the central part of the action takes place outside the
frame.
Thus, depth, directions, areas, the camera’s location, the frame, and the relation-
ship between what is in the frame and what is out of the frame determine the basic
dimensions of the screen space. Audiences, however, rarely perceive lm space in
this way. Instead, they speak of the place where the action takes place: the forest,
the room, the city, the mountains and the like. This means they attach more impor-
tance to the space of the world presented (diegetic space) than to the screen space.
The diegetic space exists primarily in their imagination and is the result of the
reconstructions they make during the projections, combining disconnected frames
and lling in the gaps between them.
Our understanding and navigation of lm space is primarily an understanding
and navigation of diegetic space. The diegetic space is the location of the action or,
30 Krzysztof Stachowiak
more precisely, the set of locations of the action where everything relevant takes
place. We try to gure out rst and foremost, where an event takes place, where the
characters are located and whether the change of location is signicant. If there are
no sudden changes of place in the action, we perceive the space as continuous, even
though we deal with space slices.
The most important means of creating cinematic space is editing, which not
only provides numerous operations that deform the isomorphism of lm space in
relation to the real space but also enables the creation of an entirely new space that
has no equivalent in reality. The impression of the continuity of lm space, how-
ever, is a matter not only of what is presented on screen and how it is presented but
also of what is not presented. The lm image, by virtue of its mobility, seems to
transcend the frame that binds it. An implicit, imagined space exists for the viewer
outside its frame. Unlike a painting image, which cannot have any further continu-
ity beyond the frame, a lm image spills out of the frame, as it were. For example,
we are led out of the frame by the gaze of a character who turns in some direc-
tion towards something or someone we do not see but expect to see in a moment.
A sound coming from outside the frame indicates the spatial distance of a fragment
that is not visible at the moment. Although the demarcation of the cinematic image
from its surroundings seems to be equally clear (by the boundary of the screen)
as in the case of a painting, the viewer’s gaze, imagination, and attention are con-
stantly directed outside the frame in many dierent ways.
Finally, it is worth noting the relationship of diegetic space to the lm’s plot.
Usually, the space in a ctional lm serves as the location of the action and is
therefore subordinated to the plot. This subordination has serious consequences,
meaning that all the descriptive parts must be signicantly reduced. In a feature
lm, where one event usually chases another, too much time cannot be devoted
to presenting even the most interesting location, as this would distract the viewer
and slow down the pace of the lm. The presentation of space leads to a slowing
down of the rhythm and, in extreme situations, even to the complete elimination of
events. In turn, by concentrating on events, the role and importance of space must
be reduced. Hence the impression of the secondary character of space in the lm
and its instrumental character as the background of events. Meanwhile, in fact,
space is crucial to the construction of the imagery of the presented world and the
entire diegesis of the lm.
Virtual space
New communication technologies, which are also relevant to lm, are also prompt-
ing a redenition of the notion of cinematic space, as it either completely loses or
ceases to be relevant to real space. Virtual reality – articially created with the help
of digital technology – is the kind of audiovisual spectacle in which the viewer is
located inside a computer-generated space-time and can participate in the unfold-
ing events. Therefore, a particular type of lm space is virtual space, which mostly
changes onscreen space but also inuences the way lms are made, impacting pro-
lmic space. Virtual space along with computer-generated imagery (CGI) used to
From real to reel and back again 31
create this type of space have become integral parts of the lm industry, allow-
ing lmmakers to create and depict virtually anything they can imagine (Currah
2003). From fantastical creatures and alien worlds, to entirely digital sets and back-
grounds, CGI has revolutionised the way lms are made and has opened up a vast
array of creative possibilities for lmmakers.
One of the most notable ways in which CGI has impacted lm is through the
creation of entirely digital environments (Rickitt 2000; Tryon 2009). These virtual
spaces can be used to represent real-world locations that would be too expensive
or logistically dicult to lm on location, or completely ctional worlds can be
created with them. In both cases, CGI allows lmmakers to create highly detailed
and realistic environments that would be impossible to achieve using traditional
techniques. One of the earliest examples of this is the Matrix trilogy, in which the
majority of the lm takes place in a fully digital version of the real world (Isaacs
2013; Jones 2020). This allowed the lmmakers to create a wide range of futuristic
cityscapes, car chases, and ght scenes that would have been nearly impossible to
achieve with practical eects. Similarly, The Lord of the Rings trilogy made exten-
sive use of digital environments to bring Middle-earth to life, creating sweeping
landscapes and battle scenes that would have been extremely challenging to lm
in the real world (Margolis et al. 2008). The city of Pandora in the lm “Avatar”
was entirely created using CGI, as were the fantastical creatures that inhabit it.
This allows for greater exibility and creativity in storytelling, as lmmakers are
no longer limited by the constraints of reality (Brown and Ng 2012). In addition to
creating entirely digital worlds, virtual space and CGI are also frequently used to
enhance and augment real-world locations and sets. For example, lmmakers may
use CGI to add special eects or digital elements to a live-action scene, such as
explosions, re, or other destructive forces. This allows lmmakers to create more
realistic and immersive visuals without having to resort to dangerous or impractical
practical eects.
And back again: connecting reel with real
Film has the ability to alter viewers’ perceptions of place through the use of various
cinematic techniques and storytelling strategies. One way that lm can change our
perception of place is through the manipulation of time and space. Through editing,
ashbacks, and other lming techniques, lm can compress or expand the percep-
tion of time and distance, leading to a distorted sense of the geography of a place.
This can create a sense of displacement for the viewer (Bolan et al. 2011), poten-
tially altering their understanding of the location depicted. Film can also change
the perception of place through mise-en-scène, or the arrangement of elements
within the frame. The use of lighting, costume and set design can create a specic
mood or atmosphere, inuencing the viewer’s emotional response to a location.
This can lead to a perceived transformation of the depicted place, even if it is a real
location (Penz and Lu 2011).
Additionally, a lm can change our perception of place through the portrayal
of events and characters. The representation of historical events and the portrayal
32 Krzysztof Stachowiak
of attitudes and values of characters can inuence our understanding of a specic
time and place’s cultural, political, and social context. This can lead to a revision or
reinterpretation of our perception of the depicted location. Cinematography tech-
niques, such as the use of panoramic shots or aerial views, can highlight the natural
beauty or man-made landmarks of a location. This can create an image of a roman-
ticised or idealised place, potentially leading to a distorted perception of the loca-
tion in the viewer’s mind. This is especially true for the digital age (Giralt 2010).
When real spaces become mediated spaces, the experience of these places is
often shaped by the way they are represented in media. This can be especially true
in lm tourism, as people often visit locations they have seen in lms or TV shows
with the expectation that they will look and feel a certain way. For example, if a
person visits a location they have seen in a lm, they may have certain expectations
about what the place will be like based on how it was depicted. These expectations
can shape their experience of the place, and they may even feel disappointed if the
real location does not match the way it was portrayed in the lm. Beeton (2011,
p. 55) notes:
what is key here, is that these audiences have often unconsciously developed
knowledge of a place via “osmosis” through a variety of media-based expo-
sures. For example, many rst-time visitors to New York claim to “know
where they are” when they look towards the Empire State Building or visit
Times Square, as they have already experienced these places through various
forms of the moving image and storytelling. What the moving images and
their antecedents provide is a framework within which a tourist can begin to
understand the place they are visiting, and also give additional meaning (or
emotional depth) to that place.
Bolan et al. (2011) argue that what motivated lm tourist is “quest for authentic-
ity”. They found out that in relation to what inuences lm-induced tourists, scen-
ery was the dominant motivational driver but narrative/storyline and characters
were also important inuences. In addition emotion/romance and music also have
a role to play, yet their role was signicantly smaller. This points to the prominent
role of diegetic space, given that the scenery – whether natural or articially cre-
ated in the lm studio or through computer graphics – is part of the presented world
(diegetic world). Bolan et al. (2011) proposed also a typology of lm tourists:
(1) scenic/visual tourist inuenced by what they see – they seek out the actual loca-
tion, attracted to landscape (both rural and urban), (2) emotional/nostalgic tourist
inuenced by narrative and characters they identify with – driven to seek out the
lm setting connected to the story, and (3) pure lm tourist, inuenced by most
or all factors in the lm – driven to seek out both actual location and lm setting.
The search for authenticity seems paradoxical if we realise that a lm text is a
cultural convention and what we see on screen, like the whole diegetic world, is not
a reection of the real world. The real world is a kind of starting point or reference
point. One of the most extensively studied cases of the relationship between cin-
ematic space and the real is the screen adaptation of Tolkien’s novel. Through The
From real to reel and back again 33
Lord of the Rings and Hobbit lms, New Zealand’s cultural landscape was trans-
formed into the mythical world of Middle-earth by imposing layers of meaning
to create the cultural landscapes of Middle-earth. The result is that the landscape
portrayal in the lms does not provide many hints of the real cultural landscapes
of New Zealand. However, as Carl et al. (2007) suggest, the heavy use of post-
production digital modications within the lms, combined with “missing” lm
sets in situ, make it challenging for many tourists to perceive a “realistic” sense of
place. The “real” landscapes provide few features of the hyper-real landscapes in
the lms, impacting lm tourists’ experience of the former lm sites.
Film tourism is considered a way to connect real with imaginary space. Places
are essential in anchoring ctional (books, lms, video games) and artistic uni-
verses to reality. Conversely, ctional or imaginary places inuence how people
perceive real places. More recently, what reinforces these relations are geospa-
tial technologies that allow visitors practising cultural tourism to collect extensive
information about lms related to these places. Geospatial technologies contrib-
ute to developing an intermediary territory, a space between the real and fantasy
worlds (Joliveau 2009).
The link between visual media, cultural production and reproduction, and mean-
ing creation occupies a prominent place in geography, lm studies, and cultural
and social studies. With the “spatial turn” in cultural studies, the focus on visual
media and visual culture has been modied to incorporate the role of space and
place in representational theory. As Lukinbeal (2004, p. 248) puts it: “Cinematic
geography, or lm geography is a growing transdisciplinary subeld that focuses
on mapping the Baudrillardian terrain of cinema that precedes the cultural terri-
tory”. Baudrillard (1994, p. 1) referred to the changes in late 20th-century culture
with a cartographic metaphor:
The territory no longer precedes the map, nor does it survive it. It is neverthe-
less the map that precedes the territory – precession of the simulacra – that
engenders the territory, and if one must rerun to the fable, today it is the ter-
ritory whose shred slowly rot across the extent of the map. It is the real, and
not the map, whose vestiges persist here and there in the deserts that are no
longer those of the Empire, but ours.
A few decades later, it became evident that the representation of a place (the map)
can dene and shape our understanding of that place rather than the place itself
(the territory). In other words, the image can take on a life of its own and shape our
understanding of the place, rather than the other way around. This idea is relevant
to how lm and other media can shape our understanding of dierent places. When
we watch a lm or TV show set in a particular location, our understanding of that
place is often shaped by how it is depicted on screen. This can be especially true if
the lm or TV show is inuential or widely seen. If a lm depicts a city as danger-
ous or crime-ridden, this depiction can shape how people perceive and understand
that city, even if it is inaccurate. Similarly, if a lm portrays a place as being par-
ticularly beautiful or exotic, this depiction can inuence people’s desire to visit that
34 Krzysztof Stachowiak
place and shape their expectations of what it will be like. So we can subversively
say that we live in a distorted reality, and the obvious question that comes to mind
is how to assess the extent of this distortion. However, perhaps this is the wrong
question, and we should instead be thinking about how these “media lenses” allow
us to change society and space (both the physical and the social and cultural).
Concluding remarks
The relationship between lm, other media, and space is complex and multifaceted.
The proposed models in this chapter combined geographic understanding with lm
studies, shedding light on two crucial aspects. First, they emphasised that the pres-
ence of spaces in cultural texts extends beyond visual representation and can take
on dierent characteristics. Second, the model introduces a typology of space that
emerges from the interaction between lm and place.
The real world serves as the foundation for lm representation, appearing on
screen as itself or as other spaces. People’s aective bond with a place, described
as topophilia, encompasses sensual, aesthetic, intellectual, and belonging senti-
ments. Various art forms, including lm, shape space and inuence how we per-
ceive dierent places. Literature relies on verbal descriptions to evoke the qualities
of spaces, requiring readers to use their imagination to visualise them, resulting in
an imaginary character.
Imaginary spaces in literature and lm allow the creative exploration of themes
and ideas unconstrained by reality. They can serve as metaphors for the real world
and comment on real-world issues. However, it is essential to acknowledge that
despite incorporating elements from the real world, imaginary spaces remain c-
tional creations.
Visual arts, such as photography and lm, play a signicant role in contempo-
rary visual culture. They provide mediated representations of real places, ltered
through the lens of interpretation and prior knowledge. While traditionally consid-
ered objective representations, maps can also convey subjective experiences and
emotions associated with dierent places. This perspective challenges the notion
of cartography as a purely scientic discipline and highlights its potential for rep-
resenting diverse human experiences.
The interconnectedness of lm, other media, and space oer a rich tapestry of
representations and experiences, allowing us to engage with the real and the imag-
ined in compelling and thought-provoking ways. Film space is not a direct repre-
sentation of real space but rather a constructed and manipulated version shaped by
lmmakers’ artistic vision. Prolmic space encompasses everything that is cap-
tured by the camera and appears on lm. Diegetic space, on the other hand, is where
the narrative unfolds, and the action takes place. Diegetic space is constructed by
combining on-screen elements and the viewer’s imagination. The framing of the
image, camera movement, and editing techniques all contribute to the perception
and understanding of diegetic space. Therefore lm space is not static but rather
dynamic and ever-changing. It evolves throughout the lm as the plot develops,
locations change, and dierent modes of expression are introduced. Editing, in
From real to reel and back again 35
particular, plays a crucial role in shaping and manipulating the cinematic space.
Film space is a complex and multi-dimensional concept involving prolmic and
diegetic elements. It is a space that exists both within the screen’s frame and in the
viewer’s imagination, creating a rich and immersive cinematic experience.
Film profoundly impacts viewers’ perceptions of place through its use of cin-
ematic techniques and storytelling strategies. By manipulating time, space, and
mise-en-scène, lm can distort our understanding of geography, creating a sense of
displacement and transforming the depicted location. The portrayal of events, char-
acters, and cinematography techniques further inuence our perception by shaping
our understanding of a place’’s cultural, political, and social context and highlight-
ing its natural or man-made features. The experience of mediated spaces, such as
lm tourism, is heavily inuenced by how places are represented in media, leading
to expectations and emotional responses that may not align with reality. The search
for authenticity in lm-induced tourism reects the power of lm to create a frame-
work through which tourists understand and emotionally connect with the places
they visit. However, it is important to recognise that lm texts are cultural conven-
tions, and the portrayed diegetic world does not reect the real world. The relation-
ship between cinematic space and the real can be complex, as seen in cases like the
screen adaptation of Tolkien’s novel, where heavy post-production modications
and missing lm sets challenge tourists’ perception of real landscapes. Ultimately,
lm tourism bridges real and imaginary spaces, inuencing the perception of c-
tional and real places and blurring the boundaries between them. The spatial turn
in cultural studies highlights the signicance of space and place in the analysis of
visual media and visual culture, emphasising how lm and other media shape our
understanding of dierent places and contribute to the creation of meaning. Rather
than assessing the extent of distortion, it is essential to recognise the transformative
potential of these “media lenses” in shaping society, space, and culture.
Acknowledgement
The research presented in this chapter was carried out under the project “FilmInd –
The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic connections between
India and Europe”, nanced by the Polish National Science Centre (Project No.
2017/27/Z/HS4/00039).
References
Aitken, S. C. and Zonn, L., eds., 1994. Place, power, situation, and spectacle: A geography
of lm. Lanham: Rowman & Littleeld.
Allen, R., 1993. Representation, illusion, and the cinema. Cinema Journal, 32, 21–48.
Banaji, S., 2006. Reading ‘Bollywood’: The young audience and Hindi lms. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Baudrillard, J., 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Beeton, S., 2011. Tourism and the moving image: Incidental tourism promotion. Tourism
Recreation Research, 36, 49–56.
36 Krzysztof Stachowiak
Bell, C. E., ed., 2015. From here to Hogwarts: Essays on Harry Potter fandom and ction.
Jeerson: McFarland & Company.
Bolan, P., Boy, S. and Bell, J., 2011. ‘We’ve seen it in the movies, let’s see if it’s true’:
Authenticity and displacement in lm‐induced tourism. Worldwide Hospitality and Tour-
ism Themes, 3, 102–116.
Bordwell, D., 1985. Narration in the ction lm. Madison: The University of Wisconsin
Press.
Bordwell, D. and Thompson, K., 2008. Film art: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Breek, P., Hermes, J., Eshuis, J. and Mommaas, H., 2018. The role of social media in collec-
tive processes of place making: A study of two neighborhood blogs in Amsterdam. City &
Community, 17, 906–924.
Brown, J., 2018. Mediated space: The architecture of news, advertising and entertainment.
London: RIBA Publishing.
Brown, W. and Ng, J., 2012. Avatar: An introduction. Animation, 7, 221–225.
Bruno, G., 2002. Atlas of emotion: Journeys in art, architecture, and lm. La Vergne: Verso.
Cairns, G., 2013. The architecture of the screen: Essays in cinematographic space. Bristol:
Intellect.
Carl, D., Kindon, S. and Smith, K., 2007. Tourists’ experiences of lm locations: New Zea-
land as ‘Middle-earth’. Tourism Geographies, 9, 49–63.
Conley, T., 2007. Cartographic cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cosgrove, D., 2008. Geography and vision: Seeing, imagining and representing the world.
London: I. B. Tauris.
Couldry, N. and McCarthy, A., eds., 2004. Mediaspace: Place, scale and culture in a media
age. London: Routledge.
Cresswell, T., 2004. Place: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell.
Cresswell, T. and Dixon, D., eds., 2002. Engaging lm: Geographies of mobility and iden-
tity. Lanham: Rowman & Littleeld.
Currah, A., 2003. Digital eects in the spatial economy of lm: Towards a research agenda.
Area, 35, 64–73.
Ellard, C., 2015. Places of the heart: The psychogeography of everyday life. New York:
Bellevue Literary Press.
Enoch, J., McDonald, L., Jones, L., Jones, P. R. and Crabb, D. P., 2019. Evaluating whether
sight is the most valued sense. JAMA Ophthalmology, 137, 1317–1320.
Fleming, R. L., 2007. The art of placemaking: Interpreting community through public art
and urban design. London: Merrell.
Flusser, V., 2011. Into the universe of technical images. Minneapolis: University of Min-
nesota Press.
Garth, J., 2020. The worlds of J. R. R. Tolkien: The places that inspired middle-earth. Lon-
don: Frances Lincoln Publishers, Princeton University Press.
Gaut, B., 2010. Philosophy of cinematic art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giralt, G. F., 2010. Realism and realistic representation in the digital age. Journal of Film
and Video, 62, 3–16.
Gleich, J. and Webb, L., eds., 2019. Hollywood on location: An industry history. New Brus-
nwick: Rutgers University Press.
Hall, S., ed., 2013. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Lon-
don: Open University Press.
Hallam, J., 2010. Film, space and place: Researching a city in lm. New Review of Film and
Television Studies, 8, 277–296.
From real to reel and back again 37
Hallam, J., Kronenburg, R., Koeck, R. and Roberts, L., eds., 2008. Cities in lm: Architec-
ture, urban space and the moving image. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
Hallam, J. and Roberts, L., eds., 2014. Locating the moving image: New approaches to lm
and place. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hirsch, P. and O’Rourke, C., eds., 2017. London on lm. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howells, R., 2003. Visual culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hudson, S., Wang, Y. and Gil, S. M., 2011. The inuence of a lm on destination image
and the desire to travel: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Tourism
Research, 13, 177–190.
Isaacs, B., 2013. The orientation of future cinema: Technology, aesthetics, spectacle. New
York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Joliveau, T., 2009. Connecting real and imaginary places through geospatial technologies:
Examples from set-jetting and art-oriented tourism. The Cartographic Journal, 46, 36–45.
Jones, N., 2015. Hollywood action lms and spatial theory. New York: Routledge.
Jones, N., 2020. Spaces mapped and monstrous: Digital 3D cinema and visual culture. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Kim, H. and Richardson, S. L., 2003. Motion picture impacts on destination images. Annals
of Tourism Research, 30, 216–237.
King, G., 1996. Mapping reality: An exploration of cultural cartographies. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Koeck, R., 2013. Cine-scapes: Cinematic spaces in architecture and cities. Abingdon:
Routledge.
Kuhn, A. and Westwell, G., 2020. A dictionary of lm studies. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Kwon, M., 2002. One place after another: Site-specic art and locational identity. Cam-
bridge: The MIT Press.
Lefebvre, H., 1974/1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leyshon, A., Matless, D. and Revill, G., eds., 1998. The place of music. New York: Guilford
Press.
Lukinbeal, C., 2004. The map that precedes the territory: An introduction to essays in cin-
ematic geography. GeoJournal, 59, 247–251.
Lukinbeal, C., 2011. ‘On location’ lming in San Diego County from 1985–2005: How
a cinematic landscape is formed through incorporative tasks and represented through
mapped inscriptions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 171–190.
Margolis, H., Cubitt, S., King, B. and Jutel, T., eds., 2008. Studying the event lm: The Lord
of the Rings. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Martin, A., 2014. Mise en scène and lm style: From classical Hollywood to new media art.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mathijs, E., ed., 2006. The Lord of the Rings: Popular culture in global context. London:
Wallower Press.
McCurdy, K. M., 2011. Shoot on location: The logistics of lming on location, whatever
your budget or experience. Burlington: Focal Press.
Mercille, J., 2005. Media eects on image. Annals of Tourism Research, 32, 1039–1055.
Metz, C., 1974. Film language: A semiotics of the cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Mitchell, D., 2000. Cultural geography: A critical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mulvey, L., 1999. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In: L. Braudy and M. Cohen, eds., Film
theory and criticism: Introductory readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 833–844.
38 Krzysztof Stachowiak
O’Connor, N., Flanagan, S. and Gilbert, D., 2008. The integration of lm-induced tourism
and destination branding in Yorkshire, UK. International Journal of Tourism Research,
10, 423–437.
Penz, F. and Koeck, R., eds., 2017. Cinematic urban geographies. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Penz, F. and Lu, A., eds., 2011. Urban cinematics: Understanding urban phenomena through
the moving image. Bristol: Intellect.
Pred, A., 1984. Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-
geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74,
279–297.
Relph, E. C., 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
Rickitt, R., 2000. Special eects: The history and technique. New York: Billboard Books.
Shimamura, A. P., ed., 2013. Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Souriau, É., 1951. La structure de l'univers lmique et le vocabulaire de la lmologie. Revue
Internationale de Filmologie, 2, 231–240.
Souriau, É., 1953. L’univers lmique. Paris: Flammarion.
Terentowicz-Fotyga, U., ed., 2018. Space in literature: Method, genre, topos. Berlin: Peter
Lang.
Thompson, K. and Bordwell, D., 2003. Film history: An introduction. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Tryon, C., 2009. Reinventing cinema: Movies in the age of media convergence. New Brun-
swick: Rutgers University Press.
Tuan, Y.-F., 1974. Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values.
New York: Columbia University Press.
Tuan, Y.-F., 1977. Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press.
Tuan, Y.-F., 1990. Realism and fantasy in art, history, and geography. Annals of the Associa-
tion of American Geographers, 80, 435–446.
Villarejo, A., 2007. Film studies: The basics. London: Routledge.
Whited, L. A., ed., 2002. The Ivory tower and Harry Potter: Perspectives on a literary phe-
nomenon. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-4
Figure 2 An aerial view of Lake Bled in Slovenia. One of the emerging destinations in
Indian lming was featured in many recent lms, including Naayak (2013), Bhai
(2013), Doosukeltha (2013), Super Ranga (2014), Mungaru Male 2 (2016), Babu
Bangaram (2016), Khaidi No. 150 (2017), Vivegam (2017), Jayadev (2018), and
Yuvarathnaa (2021).
Source: zgphotography / stock.adobe.com
Part II
Experiencing place
through lm
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-5
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
The selection of locations for popular Bombay lm productions tends to be eclectic
given their narrative and storytelling style. The locations can include iconic monu-
ments or landscapes that oer picturesque backdrops to stage song sequences; a
region or a part of the world that conveys a sense of familiarity; a place that looks
dramatic through aerial photography; or lavish interiors that carry historic value.
These requirements have made certain sites popular with lm crews, since they
manage to oer almost everything that a blockbuster is supposed to contain. The
use of foreign locations for the production of Hollywood’s global imaginary has
been the subject of much scholarly discussion (Hozic 2001; Govil 2015; Steinhart
2019). Locations outside of the United States have been positioned in these debates
as sites for economic, cultural, and technological transactions that are closely tied
to Hollywood’s status as a powerful, global media industry. There are others who
have explored the ways in which ideas of place and space are transformed by lm’s
encounter with a range of locations (Rhodes and Gornkel 2011; Jaikumar 2019).
In this chapter, I focus on the intertwined networks of transnational imaginaries,
bureaucratic and production infrastructures, embodied histories, and creative ener-
gies, in the cartographic imagination of Europe in Bombay cinema.
The Infrastructure of Cinematic Cartography
The use of foreign locations in Bombay cinema is not new, but the obsession with
these spaces has taken on a certain frenzy since the 1990s (Mazumdar 2007, 2011).
If established destinations proved to be expensive for shooting, the lm industry
started to tap unexplored areas and recently developed global networks dedicated
to handling the movement of nance, personnel, labour, and technology. These
networks have been strengthened by corporate structures alongside informal asso-
ciations. The governments are quick with processing permissions; they have also
approached lmmakers in India on their own to oer locations in their countries.
The India International Film Tourism Conclave (IIFTC) is an organisation
that was set up in 2013 to ease the procedural requirements for Indian lmmak-
ing in European and other international locations.1 Every year, the IIFTC holds
a location pitching event in Bombay where representatives from European lm
commissions, private production companies, and service providers from across the
3 Destination Europe
The practices of mapping in
contemporary Bombay cinema
Ranjani Mazumdar
42 Ranjani Mazumdar
world congregate to sell the visual force of their national territory to the Indian lm
industries. The conclave operates like a mini expo conducted through the display
of lush photographs, videos containing sequences shot in spectacular locations,
tourist videos, and catalogues with details of rebates, tax exemptions, and other
information about trade agreements. These negotiations tend to spill over beyond
the conclave, with line producers, executive producers, location scouts, and other
personnel across nations thinking through nancial matters, script requirements,
and permissions.2
There are many elements that govern this trade and selection of locations: rst,
a constant discussion about climate conditions, such as the length of day, when
the sun rises and sets, how cold or warm it becomes, whether the mountains are
accessible, and what kind of waterfall, riverfront, lake, or ocean can be made avail-
able for use. This pitching of natural landscape is then combined with human-
made monuments and architectural heritage, like recognisable sites of history or
opulent walls found in medieval castles, decorative churches, and so on. Finally,
there is trading in the spectacle of modern urban infrastructure – roadways, high-
ways, dams, skyscrapers, and other architectural wonders.3 This trade in the use of
locations between nations usually involves a heightened sense of space and place,
relayed through depictions in a variety of media forms. What is oered is an index-
ical promise an encounter with the intoxicating forces of nature, history, and
architectural modernity. In an interview published by Cineport, a publication of the
IIFTC, director Imtiaz Ali referred to Portugal as the country with the best natural
light that he had ever seen. “It is very beautiful towards the second half of the day.
It’s a bohemian place, and the sea is very dynamic and cinematic”.4 Reminiscing
about Rockstar, Ali recalled how he did not want a pretty town for the lm but an
elite European location with a touch of darkness. For this reason, Prague came to
his mind. “When I went there, I realised there was a lot of darkness in the art, and
I got to know a lot of folk legends, which I wrote back into the script”.5 In both
these accounts, we can see how place is being framed by natural light and the sea
in one instance and cultural-literary associations in the other. These transactions
in “feelings”, visual cultures, a vast array of disparate experiences, histories, and
infrastructural networks have translated into a cartographic approach in the pro-
duction of Europe. In my discussion, I look at four lms: War (Siddharth Anand
2019), Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara (You Only Have One Life, Zoya Akhtar 2012),
Tamasha (Performance, Imtiaz Ali 2015), and Fan (Maneesh Sharma 2016), since
these narratives have used Europe to deal with espionage, a summer vacation, a
personality disorder, and Shahrukh Khan’s transnational stardom, respectively. The
lms help to highlight the performative dimension of cinematic cartography.
Tania Rossetto has argued that the tendency to “universalise” the map and its
links with power (2019) is dissatisfying, since this marginalises the existence of
a diverse range of mapping practices and techniques (2019). The arrival of geo-
visualisation tools, along with an aesthetic inclination for maps, seems to have
created a desire for overlaps between map thinking and artistic forms (Cosgrove
2008). These intersections have been theorised in Giuliana Bruno’s and Tom Con-
ley’s historical approach to the links between lm, architecture, and cartography
Destination Europe 43
(2002, 2006). Bruno is also critical of positions where the act of mapping is viewed
only as an instrument of hegemonic control since such an approach negates the
aesthetic role of cartographic practices in cinema (2002, p. 207). For Rob Kitchin,
maps belong to the moment, created by embodied, social, and technical practices
that are context dependent. They emerge “through a mix of creative, reexive,
playful, tactile, and habitual practices” (2010, p. 9).
Dennis Cosgrove has argued that programmes like Google Earth, and their oer of
a voyage through virtual space with the aid of digital and photographic images, have
dramatically impacted “popular geographic culture” (2008, p. 171) (Figure 3.1). The
ability to access surface topography like this has made the contemporary juncture
the most “cartographically rich culture in history” (171). Nana Verhoe responds to
the proliferation of navigational tools with some pointed questions: “What does a map
look like when it is itself in movement, in ux, and when we talk about practices of
Figure 3.1 A 360-panorama captured by a drone camera.
Source: Photo by Louis Reed on Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/photos/hzp_aT02R48)
44 Ranjani Mazumdar
mapping and navigating instead of the map as an object?” (2012, p. 144). Verhoe
is clearly interested in the map as a spatial and temporal event beyond xed mathe-
matical ideas of space and measurements, foregrounding navigation as a challenge
to representational constructions of the map.
I draw on these dierent approaches to show how a performative dimension of
cartography (Verhoe 2012) operates in the four lms discussed here through a
series of strategically planned events. A map is usually a compressed articulation
of information that provides a sense of borders, overall land area, and a set of other
features depending on whether the map is about climate, vegetation, political gov-
ernance, or just a mediator of scale in relation to the world. In photographic and
cinematic renderings of place, there is a movement between the prolmic or what
is designed for capture on the camera, and the nal lmic depiction after editing.
Priya Jaikumar provides a succinct account of her own views on the prolmic in
relation to what others have said till now. She refers to Tom Gunning’s understand-
ing of the prolmic as all that is in front of the camera before capture. For many
others, it is a combination of lighting, props, costumes, actors, and setting. Broad-
ening out from these two narratives is Jaikumar’s own approach, where the pro-
lmic reveals intersecting and overlapping imaginations of place and space before
transforming into screen space (Jaikumar 2019). In a somewhat dierent account,
Debashree Mukherjee identies the prolmic as a vibrant site of practice, prac-
titioners, technologies, and nancial networks (2020). What emerges from both
accounts is an understanding of the prolmic as a major exercise in spatial, mate-
rial, and infrastructural arrangements. As I will show, this is a negotiated and cho-
reographed segment prior to the camera’s recording, where several other crucial
elements come to play a role in the construction of identiable locations on screen.
These supposedly extraneous elements that govern the encounter with European
locations are drawn into the “making of” or “behind the scenes” videos. I want to
play out the chaotic and contingent narratives available in the “making of” videos,
alongside their nal projection, as distinct threads that work together in producing
cartographic interactions with Europe on screen.
Espionage and the Performance of Risk in War
War draws on the popular visual form associated with global espionage lms (Potol-
sky 2019; Miller 2003). Its scale of movement is almost planetary, as it incorporates
into its action spectacle the sea, the sky, snow-capped vistas, mountains, rivers, and
valleys. At the same time, we are connected to a network of surveillance, track-
ing, and other gadgets, along with a constant focus on the velocity associated with
global travel (Zimmer 2015; Potolsky 2019). There is swift movement via ights,
ships, boats, and automobiles that ensures quick transnational crossings and access
to international sites. Like in any espionage lm, the central conict works on the
premise that something is amiss. This generates a climate of intrigue and secrecy
that leads to an investigation of networks of nance, geographical sites, and classi-
ed information, a form that has been identied as “the national security sublime”,
with antecedents that go back to the Cold War (Potolsky 2019). The borders can no
Destination Europe 45
longer be secured from within; they need the help of spies operating in an interna-
tional arena.6 It is this spatial discourse that informs the geographical movement
of the protagonists in Wa r.7 Given the blockbuster style of the lm, some of the
typical markers like damage to property and re explosions appear in abundance.
The protagonists go through a “trial by re” and patriotism marks their bodies as
stronger with every physical injury.
War is a major action lm with a broad storyline that focuses on two spies work-
ing for the Indian intelligence, Kabir (Hrithik Roshan) and Khalid (Tiger Shro).
Khalid is trained by Kabir, and despite initial reservations, Kabir is happy to have
him on board. The initial reservation is linked to the fact that Khalid’s father
became a traitor and was accused of treason. Khalid is determined to show his
patriotism and undo the humiliation he and his mother have endured as a result of
his father’s actions. Wa r presents a complicated narrative of suspicion, friendship,
and nal revelation involving these two protagonists, and a series of events linked
to the spies are played out across the world. The production team used the depiction
of bodies confronted with danger on screen to frame the o-screen discourse linked
to the sequences shot in European locations.
The climax of War , which was shot in the Arctic circle, spectacularised Bom-
bay cinema’s long-standing fascination with snow since the 1960s. The depiction
of snow as a site of human struggle with nature has had a long history in visual
culture. Snow can be attractive as well as inhospitable, like the vast expanses of
the desert. In the Arctic action sequence, all these dierent feelings are mobilised
creatively, along with the experience of speed, reminiscent of television coverage
of sports car races. This virtually bloodless sequence maintains the whiteness of the
snow and contrasts this with the yellow and black cars driven by the two protago-
nists (Figure 3.2). Director, Siddharth Anand, wanted an Arctic location to stage an
action on a frozen surface. While the Arctic Circle includes several countries, the
production team selected Rovaniemi, in Lapland, and drew on the services pro-
vided by Finland’s Film Commission.8 The ice sequence is the climax of the lm
and was nally executed on a frozen lake that involved changes to the equipment
to ensure the machines would not freeze; the cars were also created to operate at
freezing point. The drone camera was extensively deployed for the two main pro-
tagonists, driving the cars carefully to ensure no accident would take place during
the close shaves of the chase. These accounts frame the video’s presentation of how
this action was created.9 Paul Jennings, known for his work on several Hollywood
lms, including The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan 2008) and Game of Thrones
(David Benio and D.B. Weiss 2011–2019), was hired to choreograph this action
sequence. In several interviews with the media, Jennings said the sequence was on
par with the best, including the Mission Impossible series with Tom Cruise.10 These
statements in the media added performative value to the way the location was being
framed by the quality of the action sequence.
The location in the Arctic circle was used for the rst time in a lm – a novelty
that Siddharth Anand always highlighted during and after the release of Wa r . He
described the site as the highest point that any action sequence had been shot in.11
They took a month to make sure the ice cover on the lake was thick enough to
46 Ranjani Mazumdar
support the weight of the cars, another week to prepare, and nally a week to shoot.
The video on the making of the three-minute action sequence shows how weather
conditions and the constantly changing quality of the snow, linked to sunlight and
friction caused by the speeding cars, were issues the production team had to deal
with. While a car chase is a tried and tested spectacle in many lms, this one was
identied as a car chase on ice in minus 30 degree Celsius. The video shows how
Figure 3.3 The camera infrastructure for the snow in War .
Source: Yash Raj Films
Figure 3.2 The car chase on ice in War .
Source: Yash Raj Films
Destination Europe 47
there was constant shovelling of heaps of snow when it started to soften; ice had
to be scraped o the cars without damaging the bright paint; transporting the cars
to the site itself was no easy feat, and maintaining them through the course of the
shooting was another major task. The expanse of the snow surface and direct sun-
light falling on the lens were also highlighted as issues that required continuous
management by the cinematographer.12
In these narrative accounts of the shooting, nature’s extreme temperatures,
unpredictability, and vistas are conquered by the lm’s networked, technological,
and transnational infrastructure (Figure 3.3). This is evocative of a cartographic
impulse where, much like the American Frontier in the Hollywood Westerns, the
conquest of brutal weather conditions via infrastructural arrangements, allowed a
cinematically untapped territory to acquire a larger-than-life form on screen with
traces of historical mythology linked to European settlers, albeit in complex ways.
In War, the combination of the two yellow and black cars, captured against the
expanse of a at ice surface, and the use of operatic music, generates an aesthetic
texture that is captivating; it is dramatic, adventurous, and playful, all at once. Jen-
nings referred to the race between the cars as a duel and a dance, like a ballet in
the snow.13 The snow dust trail caused by high-speed friction against the ice can
be viewed as the triumph of technological speed over nature, evocatively staged
through the snow dust formation making the cars disappear and re-appear (Virilio).
As Tiger Shro said, they felt like they were in a video game where an entire ice-
berg was at their disposal to play with.14 The multiple layers of mythology associ-
ated with the shooting of this sequence became crucial to the lm’s publicity for
Indian audiences. The prolmic appeared in the video as the site of a negotiated
extraction where special equipment, personnel, the bodies of stars, and a director’s
obsessions would translate into the conquest of a dicult geographical terrain. The
transaction of skills between Finland, India, and the United States was the result
of a global network that made the cinematic map of this sequence possible. In the
Figure 3.4 The bike chase in War shot in the mountains of Serra da Estrela, Portugal.
Source: Yash Raj Films
48 Ranjani Mazumdar
lm’s popular reception and media reporting, the lines between space, territory,
and place became blurred; the seven other countries with land inside this icy region
became marginal, and Finland emerged as the vibrant centre of the Arctic Circle.
In another bike chase shot in Portugal, we are provided with a dierent kind of
relationship to the prolmic.15 While issues related to the temperamental nature
of the weather are part of the “making of” video, we also learn of the risky nature
of the chase shot on top of a high mountain, Serra da Estrela. The curves of the
road revealed through aerial views taken from a helicopter provide a sense of the
layout to the viewer, detailing how one wrong move by the speeding bikes could tip
them over the cli and to death (Figure 3.4). The video provides some sense of the
infrastructure, but its projection of a narrative of risk linked to bodily harm is the
primary thread, interspersed with how beautiful Portugal is, how warm the people
are, and how good the food is. The warmth of the country is evoked by the scale of
help oered by the Portugal Film Commission as their representatives welcome the
Indian production team. The helicopter used for the shooting is shown in this video,
combined with images from the nal version of the sequence in the lm. Like in the
case of the Iceland shoot, the director commissioned special equipment, ensured
complicated placement of the cameras on vehicles, and hired a cinematographer
from South Africa to micromanage the visceral experience of speed required for
this action sequence. This was clearly in line with the negotiation of velocity in
contemporary espionage lms. Serra da Estrela was the right location to take this
speedy action to another level, with its sinuous roads cutting through the mountain,
captured by drone cameras.16
This expanded vision of space changes drastically when we enter Lisbon in a
diagonal movement across Praça do Comércio, which is a beautiful square that faces
a river on one side (Figure 3.5). A popular tourist attraction, the square provided the
War production team with a at white surface for the entry of the bikes. We then move
through Bica, which is one of Lisbon’s most attractive and typical neighbourhoods,
Figure 3.5 The bike chase in War in Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal.
Source: Yash Raj Films
Destination Europe 49
with its steep, undulating roads, and tramways. The chase continues through this
architectural layout, with the bikes racing across tramlines, going down public
stairways, and ying over moving vehicles. The chase ends nally at the Dom Luis
bridge in Porto, the second most important city in Portugal. This bridge over the
river Duoro was declared a heritage site in 1982 and was shut down for two days to
provide space and time for Kabir’s daredevil jump into the river. The cartographic
narrative here, in one single sequence, combines the mountains with the city of
Lisbon and the bridge in Porto. Wa r is replete with such speed maps that engage
with the thrill of danger introduced through accelerated movement and the pro-
duction of scale. The shutting down of the bridge itself turned into an event, and,
in many of Anand’s accounts, this was seen as a major achievement, with local
residents wanting to know the reasons for a full shutdown of the city.17 Anand
always made it a point to highlight his successful management of risk to conquer
certain sites with the use of dramatic infrastructure, ecient bureaucratic process-
ing, and the support and love of the local population. The prolmic constructions
proved to be crucial for the lm’s publicity, released gradually across dierent
media spaces. In these accounts, the threat to life and the desire to work against
all odds were constantly highlighted, making risk emerge as a major performative
category. While the cartographic desire displayed in the car chase was to capture
the natural landscape of the Arctic Circle, the bike chase was structured to bring
together Portugal’s diverse signs of architectural modernity into a single sequence.
Immersive Cartography in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara
Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara (You only live once, 2012) is a lm that unfolds literally
like a map. This is a road lm that introduces us to three friends – Arjun, a stock
broker living in London (Hrithik Roshan); Kabir, who runs a family construction
business in Bombay (Abhay Deol); and Imran, an advertising copywriter and poet
(Farhan Akhtar). All three decide to meet up for a bachelor vacation in Spain, fol-
lowing which Kabir is supposed to return home to get married to Natasha (Kalki
Koechlin). The vacation becomes an opportunity to confront existential concerns
related to the choices each person has made in their own lives. All three friends land
in Barcelona, and after a brief encounter with the city’s well-known monumental
architecture and its downtown, the three embark on a car journey across Spain, mak-
ing their own itineraries with paper maps (Figure 3.6). The camera often frames
road signs prominently to establish the routes being taken. Except for the opening
moment of arrival in Barcelona, no overtly recognisable physical sites have been
used in the lm. High angle views of the sinuous layout of the road with the automo-
bile making its way through a changing topography of forest foliage, wild grass, the
blue sea, and mountains on both sides are depicted to invoke a pleasurable form of
navigation for the spectator. The Mediterranean sun is dramatic and adds to the over-
all beauty of the unfolding landscape (Figure 3.7). During these automobile jour-
neys, some of the most interesting conversations, songs, and poetry recitations are
staged against the touristic vistas of expansive elds, dazzling blue skies, horses on
the run, and majestic mountains and clis. The wind-swept demeanour of the friends
50 Ranjani Mazumdar
as they drive through picturesque locations captured from a variety of camera angles
gives spectators the pleasure of a breath-taking encounter with Spain’s landscape.
Like in any road movie, Zindagi halts at particular sites during the course of the
journey. Director Zoya Akhtar and her production designer, Suzanne Merwanji,
travelled across Spain prior to the shooting to pick and select their locations.18
Akhtar felt that in a road lm, the locations become characters, but their choices
were made on the basis of events that they believed happened only in Spain.19
A colour palette was worked out, and then, as Akhtar herself has said on several
occasions, they mapped their pre-production location scouting trip onto the shoot-
ing script.20 The belief that Spaniards are people who live each day to the fullest
played an important role in how the events were connected to the lm’s texture.
Figure 3.6 The friends in their car travelling through Spain in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara.
Source: Excel Entertainment
Figure 3.7 Aerial view of the journey across the Spanish countryside in Zindagi Na Milegi
Dobara.
Source: Excel Entertainment
Destination Europe 51
The “feelings” of a pre-production encounter were translated into the overall visual
design of the lm.
Akhtar planned four major immersive attractions as events and procedurally
carved them out for the production. As many have argued, immersion is a spatial
relationship between the body and the environment that has three qualities (Rog-
ers 2019). First, there should be a sense of scale so that in the act of embedding,
the environment appears larger than the body. Immersion also requires a sense
of proximity, of being close to the environment. Finally, there must be a sensory
experience of being enveloped. In Zindagi, this immersive sensibility is deployed
for all the key set-piece attractions. Of these, three were linked to risk and the
fourth to leisure. Scuba diving, sky diving, and the bull run are placed as adventure
sports, while the La Tomatina Festival is a leisure event associated with Spain
that the production team was keen to use. It is the event-oriented imagination of
these “attractions” that keeps our focus on the bodies and their relationship to the
environment. The act of staging here, as I have already indicated, was not linked
to well-known recognisable sites, but to an immersive language associated with
videos of adventure sports. Each friend introduces the others to a dangerous sport.
The friends’ involvement in each of these outdoor sports leads them to ght some
deeply held fears and phobias. Arjun is scared of swimming, and Imran is scared
of heights. On the other hand, Kabir, is far too polite and unable to reverse some of
the major decisions in his life. The production team released a “making of” video
on the use of scuba and sky diving which introduces us to the training process and
to the stars’ personal experiences of fear and wonderment.21 The prolmic account
of the actors’ own exhilarating experience added a layer to the performance on
screen, making both speak to the lm’s cartographic imagination.
The scuba diving sequence was lmed in Costa Brava, a coastal region of Cata-
lonia in north-eastern Spain. This is where the three friends meet Laila (Katrina
Kaif), a fashion designer from London who works for three months every year as a
Figure 3.8 Arjun’s view of underwater marine life in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara.
Source: Excel Entertainment
52 Ranjani Mazumdar
diving instructor. She provides the initial training to the three friends, also intended
as instructions for the audience watching the lm. Having taken the plunge under
pressure from his friends, Arjun is blown away by the beauty of what he sees under
water (Figure 3.8). The combination of music and bodies moving through the den-
sity of underwater marine life turns into a colourful spectacle that appears almost
articial to the eyes. When Arjun resurfaces, he is overwhelmed by the experience
and unable to stop his tears, while the spectator is oered a haptic and mesmerising
cinematic encounter with underwater topography.
The same approach is taken in the sky diving sequence, where it is Imran’s turn
to ght his phobia. Like in the scuba diving sequence, spectators are provided a
brief account of the training all three friends undergo before they decide to dive.
When the three jump out of the aircraft, we see aerial views of the landmass made
to look like a pretty weave of carpet patchwork shown from the point of view of
the friends as well as from high above their ying bodies. Like the underwater
sequence, the sky diving is meant to instil an immersive experience of how to view
the world from this privileged point of view in the sky. The sequence was shot in
Seville, the capital of Andalucía in the south of Spain (Figure 3.9). For the bull-
run sequence, the Zindagi team went to Pamplona. This is the town with the most
famous of the bull runs in Spain, and in the lm, it is Imran’s decision to try this,
despite major opposition from his friends. The nal run to escape the bulls is the
sequence that ends the journey across Spain and becomes the climax with which
the lm ends. The closeness to danger in this controversial sport is played out as
the moment that nally gives all three, especially Kabir, the strength to take certain
crucial decisions.
Akhtar also shot the lm’s most popular song in the midst of a wild tomato
festival known as Tomatina. This sequence oers a dierent kind of sensation of
a large crowd participating in what is an annual festival held in the town of Bunol
that involves tomatoes being thrown at each other. Around 40,000 people take part
Figure 3.9 Sky diving shot in Seville, the South of Spain in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara.
Source: Excel Entertainment
Destination Europe 53
in this crazy festival, with approximately 150,000 tomatoes brought for the event.
The combination of red tomatoes, hose pipes spraying water on the participants and
the wildly cheering crowd made for an unusual cinematic ambience. It was Laila’s
decision to take everyone to Bunol, and the song was staged with everyone partici-
pating in the slug fest. It was shot using two cameras and edited to oer a mesmer-
ising constellation of bodies and wild energy as the friends shed their inhibitions to
participate with gusto. None of these attractions could have been mounted without
diplomatic, trade, technological, and infrastructural networks at play. Originally
thinking of Mexico as a location, the production was shifted to Spain because of the
existence of all these adventure sports. The psychological transformation and thrill
linked to a brush with risk and danger conveyed what the production team believed
was a quality of the people of Spain – to experience life to the fullest.
The only identiable space in the lm is the Mediterranean architectural layout
associated with countries like Spain, Croatia, and Italy. The striking and distinct
look of this form has made it popular with hotels, oces, and housing blocks in
coastal areas of the world. The windows and doors are usually arched, and the roof
is covered with red-coloured clay tiles. The walls have a striking white colour that
helps to deect the sharp sun. The outdoor sensibility enabled by good weather is
structurally drawn into the architectural form as courtyards, gardens, and patios
that sometimes include stone carvings, and ornate detailing on the doors and win-
dow frames. In Zindagi, the audience gets a fair sense of both the interior and the
exterior of this distinctive architectural form.
As is obvious from the range of cinematic attractions oered by Zindagi, the
spectator was clearly invited to a touristic encounter with a major European coun-
try.22 The lm combines car travel, walking, ying, and various outdoor sports to
introduce Spain’s landscape, distinctive architecture, cultural traditions, and daz-
zling sun. In the garb of a coming-of-age story, Zindagi invites spectators into an
immersive experience of travel, embedded rmly in the tourism structure of the
narrative (Bruno 2002; Ruo 2006).
Mapping Inner Turmoil in Tamasha
In some ways, Tamasha (Imtiaz Ali 2015) is also a coming-of-age story, but with
a twist. The European segment, however, is only a part of the lm and, unlike
Zindagi, it highlights heritage sites. Tamasha is about Ved (Ranbir Kapoor), a man
with a personality disorder, and Tara (Deepika Padukone), a woman he meets in
Corsica, France, for the rst time. The two decide to engage in a performance and
not share details of who they are. “What happens in Corsica stays in Corsica” was a
tagline created for the lm. The couple enter into a deeply intimate and psychologi-
cal relationship in a foreign location and call each other Don and Mona (names of
popular villains from Bombay cinema). Following the vacation, the two return to
their routine jobs in India, but having realised she is in love, Tara tracks down Ved
only to realise that his personality is now quite dierent from the persona she fell in
love with in Corsica. After various ups and downs and a break up, the couple make
peace with their inner selves and the romance returns with renewed understanding.
54 Ranjani Mazumdar
The romantic encounter in Corsica is the segment that allows Ved to become
someone diametrically opposed to who he is in his mundane corporate job. The
intensity of this transformation required a location that could hold together psycho-
logical forays, performances, and the power of romance. A typical and well-known
location would not have served the purpose, so Corsica, as a part of France, was
selected for this experiment with the personal experiences of the characters. Imtiaz
Ali deployed spatial navigation deliberately to generate a mental map of inner tur-
moil, romantic attraction, and a desperate desire for freedom.
We arrive in Corsica, literally by sea, as the camera glides over blue-coloured
water against amber-coloured buildings. Tara and Ved have just met for the rst
time. We then move to a procession of people in traditional costume making their
way through the streets as the camera sculpts the walls of the ancient town to reveal
the large numbers of local residents participating in the procession. This is intercut
with Tara, now making her way through the town as well. This new, dierent, and
lively foreign location is introduced with a combined focus on the crowd in the
streets and Tara’s solitary navigation. Tara has her second meeting with Ved at
the city square café, where they begin drinking. This leads up to one of the lm’s
most spectacular songs, staged at the Place du Donjon. At least four “Making of”
videos were made about the shooting of Tamasha, and inevitably, most of them
focus overwhelmingly on the picturisation of “Matargashti”, the song located in
the city square.
A public square connected by several streets to other buildings and spots, Place
du Donjon is an architectural treat for visitors. The song was shot in this location
to ensure the cinematic capture of the buildings, the sea view, the alleyways, and
cafes. We notice a festive air, a sunny disposition, and a constant highlighting of
colonial-style windows, a stone staircase, and the uniqueness of the buildings
with their attached balconies. As the two protagonists perform in the midst of
a lively crowd, they use an edgy, unconventional style of dancing to convey a
rebellious spirit. Ved climbs on to a lamppost and then makes his way from the
window to a balcony. All these movements are choreographed to both showcase
the stars as well as the physical texture of the location. Low-angle views of the
balcony reveal the dramatic quality of the amber-coloured buildings. We also
see vegetables and typical French bread being sold, along with people sitting in
outdoor cafes.
The song literally turns Place du Donjon into a stage, using the site’s unique
architectural form to create a spectacular performance. The Palace of Governors,
located in the square, also houses the Bastia Museum of History. We also get sea-
side views of the village cluster against the Corsican coast and skyline. The song
concludes with the well-known King of Aragon’s staircase, a structure carved into
a limestone cli that looks almost like a naturally covered walkway. It is a popular
site for photographs and legend has it that the 187 steps were rst created in 1420
but have seen changes over a period of time. In mobilising these unusual sites for
the song, Imtiaz Ali was mapping a psychological tale in spatial terms. Ali wanted
uncharted territory for the couple’s meeting, and this song, a major highlight of the
lm, draws on local music, performances, and costume extravaganza, along with
Destination Europe 55
the two stars as the centre piece. In this sequence, local French culture is drawn
upon but re-carved to take over the public square. In one of the “making of” videos
of Tamasha, Ali says:
I read about Corsica in Asterix in Corsica, the comic book. It was fascinating.
Then some of my friends told me about Corsica. I was looking for a place
which was not really explored by tourism that much, but which had the capac-
ity to be very popular as a destination in the years to come. I was also looking
for a place that was not only touristy but cultural. And the great thing about
Corsica is that every 25 kilometres, the geography changes completely . . .
and now I understand why it is called the Isle of beauty. I am really fascinated
by the structure, the sea, the hills, the mountains, the Shepherd culture, the
music, the food.23
The song is followed literally by conversations of made-up stories that unfold
across walks through the charming streets, the staircase in the hotel that the two
protagonists check into, and the room with windows looking out at the mountains
in the distance. The next day, Ved and Tara travel by road in a green convert-
ible, continuing with their performance. This is where Corsica’s rocky interiors
are revealed alongside the sea on one side. We have long sequences of silence
with music as the camera ies with our protagonists in their exploration of foli-
age, streams, and streetscapes. Imtiaz Ali maps the physical texture of Corsica’s
landscape and Mediterranean architecture with a visual and emotional intensity to
stage mind games and intimate psychological forays. The language of performative
interiority required the use of a relatively unknown location where a break from
routine would help to open doors to a magical experience.
Spatialising Shahrukh Khan’s Stardom in Fan
One of India’s most well-known actors, Shahrukh Khan plays a double role in
Maneesh Sharma’s Fan: one as a super star and the other as a fan. The lm intro-
duces us rst to the world of popular fandom via Gaurav (played by Shahrukh
Khan), a boy from Delhi whose obsession with Aryan Khanna (also played by
Shahrukh Khan) takes him to Bombay in search of his idol. But events go astray
and soon Gaurav plots an elaborate revenge plan that is narrated in the second half
of the lm. What emerges is a cat and mouse chase across the world where Gaurav
tries to destroy Aryan Khanna’s reputation, taking advantage of the fact that he
looks like the star.
Fan uses foreign locations primarily to focus on Shahrukh Khan’s global
stardom. The lm moves from a lower-middle-class neighbourhood in Delhi to
Bombay, to London, to Dubrovnik (Croatia), and back again to Bombay and Delhi.
This circular arc, in a sense, follows Khan’s personal biography – growing up in
Delhi and then landing in Bombay. Since the 1990s, Khan acquired a major follow-
ing as one of India’s most successful and bankable male stars abroad. The Euro-
pean segment of the lm, which lasts for around 35 minutes, highlights some of
56 Ranjani Mazumdar
these elements. There are two key locations that are mobilised to aid in the build-up
and crisis of Aryan Khanna’s persona.
The rst is, of course, London, which has maintained a major connection with
Bollywood, and Shahrukh Khan’s fan base in the city is huge. The production
team wanted to present identiable marks of the city, especially those associ-
ated with postcards and tourism videos. It isn’t surprising, therefore, that the
audience is introduced to London through an overhead drone sequence of stock
footage combined with a radio voiceover soundtrack.24 This entry into London
follows a sequence showing a disillusioned Gaurav lighting a match to burn
his fan collection on a terrace and saying to himself, “Fans chase stars, now a
star will chase a fan”. The camera zooms out to reveal Delhi’s rooftop neigh-
bourhood against a hazy winter night sky, with the metro faintly visible in the
distant background. It is from here that we abruptly cut to high-angle drone
shots of London as the camera glides over the river Thames, travelling across
to show London’s landmarks – the Tower Bridge, the Business District, well-
known buildings like the Gherkin and the Shard, St Paul’s Cathedral, and Trafal-
gar Square. This combination of postmodern architecture and historic buildings
like St. Paul’s Cathedral is evocative of London’s aerial views and highlights its
place as a major nancial and tourist centre. On the soundtrack, we hear a radio
programme on Bollywood, with the commentator referring to Aryan Khanna’s
London show, sponsored by Hyundai. We also hear that London is the star’s
favourite city and then follow the actor (Gaurav) running through the streets to
end up outside Madam Tussauds. The excessive force of stardom is showcased
spatially via images of a globalised landscape of celebrity events, endorsements,
performances, electronic billboards, and wax museums. This is a world within
which Aryan Khanna moves as a transnational super star, and the mechanisms
of his stardom, as it connects international space, global entertainment, and a
jet-set life, are foregrounded (Figure 3.10). The act of cartography in this entire
Figure 3.10 Aerial view of London in Fan.
Source: Yash Raj Films
Destination Europe 57
sequence is generated by recognisable city signs, drawing on the signicance of
the Indian diaspora in Khan’s global stardom.
The second location, Dubrovnik, in Croatia, was selected with some care.
Dubrovnik is the destination after London, and the entry to the city is also shot with
a drone camera that glides over red-tiled roofs in the Old Town on a bright sunny
day. Dubrovnik was selected after director, Maneesh Sharma visited ten cities in
search of an ideal location for a foot chase with Shahrukh Khan chasing his double,
the younger fan now turned foe.25 The city has been widely popularised as a tourist
destination by the HBO series Game of Thrones. Dubrovnik is usually a favoured
location for period lms, largely due to the well-preserved iconic sites of the Old
Town and its Renaissance architecture. The defensive stone wall surrounding the
Old Town has the Adriatic Sea on one side and red roof tops on the other. The chase
was structured to ensure navigation of the stone walls, archways, covered streets,
and a range of gothic buildings. Part of the chase was shot in Dubrovnik and part
on a set in Mumbai.
In a video titled Croatia Diaries, addressing the infrastructural arrangements
provided by the Croatian authorities, we see Shahrukh Khan oer his apprecia-
tion of the facilities made available to them.26 A Croatian media representative
highlights the heritage value of the Old Town. Unlike the London segment, where
a recognisable modernity was on display, here we have an encounter with heritage
architecture (Figure 3.11). The production team recalled the strict heritage archi-
tecture laws they had to negotiate to ensure no damage was done to any wall or
roof. Dubrovnik’s Old Town now nds mention in the list of World Heritage sites.
It was bombed in 1991 and was then supported by UNESCO as part of a restoration
project. A special donation of pink tiles helped restore the damage to the dramatic
roofs in the Old Town, also referred to as the fth façade of the city. There are seg-
ments in Croatia Diaries that show how steps were taken to ensure protection of
the site, and this is portrayed as no small achievement since it put pressure on the
Figure 3.11 View of Dubrovnik’s Old Town architecture in Fan.
Source: Yash Raj Films
58 Ranjani Mazumdar
production process. Following the release of the lm and the “making of” videos,
Dubrovnik’s popularisation by Game of Thrones was overlaid by Fan’s use of the
Old Town, and tourist guides have commented on how many arriving in the city
after 2016 have asked for the Shahrukh Khan tour.27
There is another “making of” video that provides specic details of how the
action sequence in Dubrovnik was mounted.28 We learn that Gaurav’s running style
was drawn from the visual archive of the actor’s 1993 lm, Darr (Yash Chopra)
Figure 3.12 Shahrukh Khan’s running style in Fan.
Source: Yash Raj Films
Destination Europe 59
(Figure 3.12). Khan had played the role of an obsessive stalker in Darr, and this
persona clearly inuenced the way Gaurav was characterised in Fan, something
made evident in the video with the inclusion of a chase sequence from the earlier
lm showing a young Sahahrukh Khan running through a busy street (Figure 3.13).
This deep history of the actors running style in Darr is literally pulled out of a pub-
lic archive of lm memory to frame Gaurav’s movement in the Dubrovnik chase
sequence. Khan has always been known for his energetic and speedy body move-
ments on screen, and the wildly crazy and fast paced chase staged in Dubrovnik
was designed to access the heritage architecture associated with the Old Town. In
the “making of” videos, we see all the negotiations that were critical to the way
navigation was structured in the mapping of space. It was the star’s screen biog-
raphy that framed the movement, highlighting the uniquely dierent topography
of this well-maintained medieval town in Europe.29 The video also focuses on an
injury caused during the shooting, and this adds to the performative energy and
mythology associated with the actor’s battle with his own body to ensure the pain
would not get in the way of the energetic navigation of the layout. We see the actor
double up in pain every time the camera stops shooting, drawing attention to the
complex relay between the prolmic and lmic. This is a sequence that brings
together a conuence of energies drawn from the star’s and director’s embodied
past and present, highlighting what Verhoe has referred to as “performative car-
tography” (2012). While Verhoe makes distinctions between mobile media forms
and those linked to xed projection like cinema and television, these borders are
porous when it comes to aesthetic strategies in an all-pervasive digital context. As
Shane Denson has suggested, post-cinema forms do not always need to be viewed
as a clean break from the past. Rather, we must recognise how the aesthetic imagi-
nation is being shaped by “an environment that has been thoroughly transformed
by the operation of computational processing” (2020, p. 2). It is this recognition of
a techno-environmental shift that explains why Neepa Majumdar identies a uid
Figure 3.13 Shahrukh Khan being chased in Darr.
Source: Yash Raj Films
60 Ranjani Mazumdar
movement between real and digital space in the Dubrovnik action sequence (2017,
p. 153). What Majumdar is perhaps alluding to is a shooting and editing style that is
aimed at a spectator located in intermedial space. The sensation of the actor’s wild
movement, split across two dierent characters, is enhanced by the “crazy cam-
era” operations of our post-cinema context, defying the camera’s traditional role
in the capture of space (Denson 2020). The crazy camera eect mediates dierent
apparatuses, blurs on-screen and o-screen modes of perceptual experiences, and
denies the spectator a stable point of view. As I see it, the high-speed navigational
imagination of the chase in Dubrovnik draws on the stylistic cues of mobile media
forms where the viewer is allowed to “feel” the sensation of chaotic movement
through architectural space. In presenting the chase like this, the post-cinema envi-
ronment of Fan is foregrounded as a distinct departure from the context that had
framed the chase in Darr. The Dictionary of Human Geography (Gregory et al.
2009) refers to performative mapping as an approach that focuses on practices
and processes, and how maps are made in embodied and contextual ways. The
prolmic traces of Fan, available in the two “making of” videos discussed here,
provide us with exactly such an account of cinematic cartography.
To conclude, this chapter has methodologically worked with a movement
between the prolmic and lmic to open out a system that allows trade, diplomatic
channels, industrial networks, and technological forces to come to the fore as the
infrastructural esh that frames the aesthetic constellation of Europe in contem-
porary Bombay cinema. The screen events that I have discussed here are linked
to procedural negotiations that are both minute and large, involving a range of
stakeholders. In these negotiations, we see both the use of space and the produc-
tion of space. Through my analysis, I have tried to imagine these on-screen depic-
tions of European locations as dynamic interfaces that carry the inscriptions of
transnational networks and function as “cinematic maps” that are born out of a
contemporary understanding of the relationship between space, place, power, and
technology.
Acknowledgement
This chapter has come out of research conducted under the aegis of Equip: EU-
India Social Science and Humanities Platform funded by the Indian Council of
Social Science Research (ICSSR).
Notes
1 For a sense of the IIFTC Infrastructure and activities, see their ocial website www.
iiftc.com/
2 Drawn from interviews with several Line Producers and Executive Producers in
Bombay – Smriti Jain, Kunal Kapoor, Tanvi Gandhi, Vivek Aggarwal, Rucha Pathak,
etc. March 2020.
3 Interview with Rengarajan Jaiprakash, Line Producer for War and Ashish Singh, Execu-
tive Producer for Fan. Part of the Equip Project. March 2020.
4 Cineport: India’s First Film Location Guide, published by the IIFTC, November 21, 2020.
5 Ibid.
Destination Europe 61
6 For a detailed analysis of Wa r ’s narrative use of surveillance and mapping devices, see
Sharma (2022).
7 For a conceptual analysis of the relationship between the aesthetics of the GPS map and
the espionage genre, see Sen (2021).
8 See Lapland Above Ordinary, available from: www.lapland./lm/for-productions/
war-bollywood-action-movie-lapland/.
9 Making of the car chase sequence in Wa r , available from: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=PHn4RJYc01I.
10 Hollywood action director Paul Jennings says “War” sequences at par with “Mission
Impossible” The New Indian Express, 16.09.2019, available from: www.newindianex
press.com/entertainment/hindi/2019/sep/16/hollywood-action-director-paul-jennings-
says-war-sequences-at-par-with-mission-impossible-2034454.html.
11 Making of the car chase sequence in War, available from: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=PHn4RJYc01I.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid.
15 Making of the bike chase sequence in Wa r, available from: www.dailymotion.com/
video/x7ukupw.
16 For an analysis of the bike chase with a focus on the bodies of the actors in action, see
Sharma (2022).
17 Hrittik Roshan versus Tiger Shro: War shuts down Portugal bridge for two days,
India Today, 30.08.2019, available at: www.indiatoday.in/movies/bollywood/story/
hrithik-roshan-vs-tiger-shroff-war-shuts-down-portugal-bridge-for-2-days-details-
here-1593598-2019-08-30.
18 10 years of Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara Zoya Akhtar and Rima Kagti inter-
viewed by Anupama Chopra Film Companion, available at: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=4aRARo0cXDk.
19 For more on the diverse logics shaping the road movie genre in an international context,
see Cohan and Hark (1997).
20 Making of Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara, Part 2, available at: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=tcdfx7RgNJw.
21 Making of Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara, Part 3, available at: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=xzVyHair-LM.
22 The Spanish government oered the production team concessions to help with the tour-
ism market. Zindagi released in July 2011 and by September of the same year, tourism
from India to Spain rose by 32%. The lm was produced in collaboration with the Span-
ish tourism promotion agency, Turespaña.
23 Making of Tamasha in Bastia, Corsica, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=
E9_LmhiJYb8; Behind the scenes of Tamasha, available from: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=_gU1KQaZxPY; Bollywood in Corsica: Making of Tamasha, available at:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZYO0pDXoh8; Matargashti backstage video song, avail-
able from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Hhvph2i4w.
24 Interview with Manu Anand, the cinematographer of Fan, Bombay, March 2020.
25 Ibid.
26 See Making of Fan: Croatia Diaries, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMY
wAZX-k00.
27 Mark Thomas, “Dubrovnik feeling the Shahrukh Khan eect”, Dubrovnik Times,
18.02.2016, available from: www.thedubrovniktimes.com/news/dubrovnik/item/309-
dubrovnik-feeling-the-shah-rukh-khan-eect.
28 Behind the scenes action in Fan, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4q
PRxj227I.
29 For a dierent analysis of the Dubrovnik sequence and its novel use of special eects to
stage the body in action, see Sharma (2022).
62 Ranjani Mazumdar
References
Bruno, G., 2002. Atlas of emotion: Journeys in art architecture and lm. New York: Verso.
Cohan, S. and Hark, I. R., eds., 1997. The road movie book. London and New York:
Routledge.
Conley, T., 2006. Cartographic cinema. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota
Press.
Cosgrove, D., 2008. Cultural cartography: Maps and mapping in cultural geography. Annales
de Géographie, 660–661 (2–3), 159–178.
Denson, S., 2020. Discorrelated images. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Govil, N., 2015. Producing India as location. In: K. Oakley and J. O’Connor, eds., The Rout-
ledge companion to the cultural industries. London: Routledge.
Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. and Whatmore, S., 2009. The dictionary of
human geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hozic, A. A., 2001. Hollyworld: Space, power, and fantasy in the American economy. Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
Jaikumar, P., 2019. Where histories reside: India as lmed space. Durham and London:
Duke University Press.
Kitchin, R., 2010. Post-representational cartography. Lo Squaderno: Explorations in Space
and Society, 15, 7–12.
Majumdar, N., 2017. Embodiment and stardom in Shahrukh Khan’s fan. Framework: The
Journal of Cinema and Media, 58 (1–2), 144–160.
Mazumdar, R., 2007. Bombay cinema: An archive of the city. Minneapolis and London:
University of Minnesota Press.
Mazumdar, R., 2011. Aviation, tourism and dreaming in 1960s Bombay cinema. Bioscope:
South Asian Screen Studies, 2 (2), 129–155.
Miller, T., 2003. Spyscreen: Espionage on lm and TV from 1930s to the 1960s. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Mukherjee, D., 2020. Bombay hustle: Making movies in a colonial city. New York: Colum-
bia University Press.
Potolsky, M., 2019. The national security sublime: On the aesthetics of government secrecy.
London and New York: Routledge.
Rhodes, J. D. and Gornkel, E., 2011. Taking place: Location and the moving image. Lon-
don and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rogers, A., 2019. Taking the plunge: The new immersive screens. In: C. Buckley, R. Campe
and F. Cassetti, eds., Screen genealogies: From optical device to environmental medium.
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Rossetto, T., 2019. Object oriented cartography. London and New York: Routledge.
Ruo, J., 2006. Virtual voyages: Cinema and travel. Durham and London: Duke University
Press.
Sen, S., 2021. Digital events: Cross talk between media forms and contemporary Hindi
cinema. Unpublished Ph.D., Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Sharma, T., 2022. Kinetic cartographies: Mapping space in contemporary Bombay cinema.
M.Phil. Dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Steinhart, D., 2019. Runaway Hollywood: Internationalizing postwar production and loca-
tion shooting. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Verhoe, N., 2012. Mobile screens: The visual regime of navigation. Amsterdam: Amster-
dam University Press.
Zimmer, C., 2015. Surveillance cinema. New York: New York University Press.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-6
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
A large dance troupe of mostly Indian dancers dressed in extravagant costumes
with a distinct Indian touch spin and dance to loud, hip-hop-infused music. The
moves grow bolder and more extroverted, capturing the attention of the audience.
The air is lled with infectious energy. You are transported to an exotic place – but
the snow-covered Alps in the background bring you back to Europe because this
Bollywood lm extravaganza was actually lmed in Slovenia. This small country
in the heart of Europe is only one of the countries used when Indian lming goes
international.
The fast-growing Indian lm industry – one of the largest in the world (Josiam
2014) – has incorporated European locations since the 1960s. Picturesque lming
locations have a strong appeal to audiences and, at the same time, have sparked
new business ties between India and Europe (Josiam 2014; Jain 2019). Indian
lmmaking has attracted the attention of scholars for several decades, who have
explored various angles and aspects, including cultural transfer between the Indian
and European environments (Rajagopalan 2006; Banaji 2013; Cucco and Scaglioni
2014; Lourenço 2017; Gyimóthy 2018).
This chapter focuses on the representation of landscapes and landscape features
in Indian lms shot in Europe. Conceptually, the research was built around four
notions: lm, landscape, visuality, and representation in particular, landscape
representation. Representation is a concept for framing people’s sensitivity to the
world, and the landscape is one of the pillars thereof (Olwig 2005; Urbanc et al.
2021). A lm is a communication tool and discursive practice for expressing and
representing the relationship between people and landscapes (Farsø and Petersen
2015). It is a mode that helps understand geographical phenomena and a medium to
communicate geographical knowledge (Saunders and Strukov 2018; Kirby 2021).
The focus here is on lm as a subject of inquiry and not on lm as a research prac-
tice (for the latter, see Garrett 2011; Brickell and Garrett 2013; Jacobs 2013, 2016).
Film is a visual medium that transmits a physical sense of place and culture.
“The modern age gives a special place to visuality, to human vision, and to the
process of visualizing, and this characteristic of modernity has played a prominent
role in shaping the contemporary world as we experience it” (Glynn 2015, p. 294).
4 Portraying European landscapes
in Indian lms
Mimi Urbanc, Primož Gašperič, and Jani Kozina
64 Mimi Urbanc et al.
Despite awareness of other (than lm) tools for capturing human sensitivities, such
as art, literature, and music, lm was selected to frame the modern world. One rea-
son might be that lm is a ne example of visual culture embedded in the modern
sociopolitical context (Davison and Falihi 2010) or, as Sommerlad (2022, p. 122)
put it: “lm locations . . . are a good example to trace the reciprocal eects between
cinematic worlds and spheres of everyday life”.
Landscape is one of geography’s fundamental concepts (Wylie 2009). At rst
glance, it might seem unambiguous, but it is not mainly due to its complexity.
Landscape is a tangible as well as intangible (mental, inspired) concept, although
in this chapter landscape is understood as a “way of seeing”, as Cosgrove (1998)
explains. The complexity of the meaning of landscape was well described by
Mitchell (1994, p. 166), who stated:
Landscape is a natural scene mediated by culture. It is both a represented
and presented space, both a signier and a signied, both a frame and what
a frame contains, both a real place and its simulacrum, both a package and a
commodity in the package.
This denition justies the landscape’s suitability for dening the relationship
between people and their environment.
The complex relationship between cinema and landscape, especially the role of
landscapes and how they support the narrative of a lm, has attracted considerable
scholarly attention (see Harper and Rayner 2010; Kumer 2019). This research is
believed to be the rst attempt to study a large and comprehensive set of lms by
evaluating all landscape elements of each of them. This is possible due to a quanti-
tative approach, which allows for a quantiable representation of the scale at which
certain landscape elements appear in the lms. In this way, it oers new options to
study lm locations.
The study was conducted in ve European countries: Finland, Poland, Slo-
venia, Sweden, and Switzerland. The empirical part includes a detailed analysis
of the geographical representations of European locations in Indian cinema. The
geographical elements in the lms were analysed according to categories such as
urban, rural, mountain, and water.
The dichotomy of urban and rural is the most basic division of two types of
places that exist universally (Konjar et al. 2018) and is the rst step in distinguish-
ing between patterns of modernity and traditionalism. The goal was to determine
which urban and rural characteristics are associated with modern and traditional
places of action. Do Indian lmmakers look for urban elements and built envi-
ronments in urban regions (especially cultural heritage such as old town centres,
castles, and bridges), or are they also interested in nearby rural areas and their
corresponding natural beauty? Mountains have been an important element of
Indian lmmaking in Europe since the release of Sangam in 1964, when the Swiss
countryside became a popular lming location for Indian producers. Snow-capped
peaks, glaciers, or mountain pastures provided romantic backdrops in Bollywood
musicals (Gyimóthy 2018). The goal was to determine whether this geographical
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 65
pattern persists in contemporary lms and other non-Swiss destinations. Water as
a characteristic geographical element is an important part of Indian iconography
because it ranks highest among the ve basic elements of nature (Sharma 2008).
The aim was to determine whether various water elements constitute an important
aspect of European scenes in Indian lmmaking. All of the aforementioned ques-
tions form the objective of this chapter; that is, to identify geographical elements
of European screen locations in Indian lms and to reect more broadly on how
European landscapes are used in Indian lm production.
The intention is not to show how landscapes support a narrative of a particular
lm or several of them. Landscape is understood as a medium for human interac-
tion with the environment, and therefore it provides insights into culture (Aitken
and Dixon 2006). To identify the pattern of how landscapes are depicted in Indian
lms shot in Europe, a considerably large and representative pool of lms was
examined, and this guided the approach to lm analysis.
Building a methodological approach to lm analysis
The methodological approach was based on a previous photo analysis to identify
the geographical imagination of Slovenian landscapes (Urbanc et al. 2015). It was
subsequently further developed and applied to a large-scale study of students’ geo-
graphical imagination of landscapes (Urbanc et al. 2016, 2021). For this chapter,
it was adapted for lm analysis (Kozina 2021). The empirical part of the study
is based on a sample of 34 lms released between 2010 and 2018 with only two
exceptions: the blockbusters Fanaa (2006) and Wa r (2019). The lms were shot
in ve countries in Europe: Finland, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden, and Switzerland.
The selection of countries was based on several factors. Diverse countries were
included to identify nuances and capture subtle dierences between European
locations. First, broad geographic coverage and a wide variety of natural, social,
and cultural phenomena were chosen. Second, the countries should be attractive to
Indian lm producers to varying degrees. A prior study (Kozina 2021) shows that
Switzerland has been a highly attractive country for years, Slovenia and Poland
moderately attractive countries, and Finland and Sweden less attractive countries
for Indian lm production in Europe.
The study followed systematic and rigorous steps: lm selection, scene selec-
tion, variable and parameter development, data extraction/coding, and analysis. In
an attempt to mitigate individual biases and establish coherence and uniformity in
all the steps, a set of methodological documents was prepared, containing infor-
mation not only about the content but also about processual and logistical steps.
Pursuing a solid central framework, the team worked in a tightly integrated manner
and made possible thorough discussions within the whole team via online meet-
ings, workshops, and e-mails.
Film selection (Figure 4.1) started with information from IMDb, which was
amended by additional online sources and interviews with experts in the eld.
A pool of 195 lms was created (2 from Finland, 24 from Poland, 13 from Slovenia,
2 from Sweden, and 154 from Switzerland). To ensure comparability and establish
66 Mimi Urbanc et al.
a coherent pool, the upper limit was set at ten movies per country. The inclusion
criteria consisted of: a) public availability of lms on YouTube, Facebook, and
Vimeo, and b) popularity (based on the number of votes on IMDb) criteria. The
nal set consists of 34 lms (Table 4.1): two from Finland, ten from Poland, ten
from Slovenia, two from Sweden, and ten from Switzerland. The timeframe was
extended to include two blockbuster movies with high impact and popularity. One
was lmed in Finland (War 2019) and the other in Poland (Fanaa 2006).
Scene selection focused on a scene as the unit of analysis. It is dened as a
continuous lm scene within a single European locational setting. A lm scene
changes when the action moves to another locational setting. Location refers to
places in geographical space such as cities, towns, villages, regions, or areas (e.g.
the Alps) and not micro-locations within such places (e.g. dierent micro-locations
within a particular city or area). The total number of scenes was 594 (Table 4.1): 14
in Finland, 138 in Poland, 168 in Slovenia, 126 in Sweden, and 148 in Switzerland.
An extensive set of variables was developed, consisting of three broad groups
(Table 4.2). The rst group comprises the scene’s technical details, such as lm
Figure 4.1 Film-selection process.
Source: Own elaboration
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 67
Table 4.1 Selected lms and scenes by countries involved.
Country No. of
lms
Titles No. of
scenes
Share of
scenes (%)
Finland 2 Shamitabh, 2015; War, 2019 14 2
Poland 10 Fanaa, 2006; Saguni, 2012;
Kick, 2014; Bangistan, 2015;
Shaandaar, 2015; Fitoor, 2016;
24, 2016; Shivaay, 2016; Mersal,
2017; Andhadhun, 2018
138 23
Slovenia 10 Naayak, 2013; Doosukeltha, 2013;
Pandavulu Thummeda, 2014;
Super Ranga, 2014; Mr. Airavata,
2015; Babu Bangaram, 2016;
Mungaru Male 2, 2016; Khaidi
No. 150, 2017; Bharjari, 2017;
Vivegam, 2017
168 28
Sweden 2 Ship of Theseus, 2012; Jia aur
Jia, 2017
126 21
Switzerland 10 Don Seenu, 2010; Dookudu, 2011;
Endukante . . . Premanta, 2012;
Baadshah, 2013; Krrish 3, 2013;
Dhoom:3, 2013; Endrendrum Pun-
nagai, 2013; Race Gurram, 2014;
Pooja, 2014; Simmba, 2018
148 25
Total 34 594 100
Source: Own elaboration.
Table 4.2 Selected variables.
Group Variables
Scene ID Basic lm information: lm title, IMDb link, year
Scene information: consecutive number of scene, scene starting
and ending time, scene length
Type of scene within a particular location setting: song
sequence, storyline
Geographical
characteristics
Recognisability from coder’s perspective and naming of scene:
country, (un)known location, name of location, name of exact
micro-location(s)
Recognisability from viewer’s perspective: known or unknown,
indications of known location, indications of “fake location”
Urban-rural elements (from viewer’s perspective): predomi-
nance of urban or rural features, types of urban features, types
of rural features
Mountainous elements: inclusion of mountains elements in
setting
Water elements: water presence, types of water features
Source: Own elaboration.
68 Mimi Urbanc et al.
title, year, and length. The second group considers content criteria that focus on
geographical characteristics, such as location and landscape elements, focusing on
the urban–rural dichotomy, and mountain and water features. The third group con-
siders sociocultural characteristics, such as the main activity and relevance of a
scene to the lm plot. This chapter utilises variables in the rst group and selected
variables in the second group.
The selected variables were formulated as closed questions that either oered
predened choices or required a specic piece of information (a word or a single
sentence). They were divided into three subtypes: a) dichotomous choices (yes/
no), b) choices with predened categories (e.g. the variable rural features visible in
the setting oered the following categories: elds, meadows, grassland, etc.), and
c) open choices (e.g. year of production).
Data extraction and analysis started with building an audiovisual database con-
sisting of full lms, clips of scenes shot in Europe, and image stills. Each national
team (Slovenian, Swiss, Finish, and Polish) performed data extraction for its scenes
after thorough joint discussions in workshops and e-mail correspondence. After
carrying out the evaluation test, the analysis followed, checking and clearing data,
and removing inconsistencies. The team then assigned numerical values to catego-
ries. The basics of the sample, as well as patterns in the variables and relationships
among them, were explored with descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages,
and mean) and cross-tabulations.
European landscapes portrayed in Indian lms
The results of the comparative analysis oer an in-depth geographical overview of
European locations as presented in Indian lms. Section “General characteristics
of the scenes” presents general characteristics, such as the length and type of scene,
and the spatial distribution of screen locations and their recognisability for Indian
audiences. Section on “Geographical characteristics” identies and explains major
geographical elements of European screen locations. The focus is on urban–rural,
mountain, and water typologies.
General characteristics of the scenes
The lms analysed contain 594 scenes (on average 17 scenes per lm), which are
often rather short. On average, they are 43 seconds long, but the dierence between
song scenes and storylines is pronounced. The former are on average 21 seconds
long and the latter 70 seconds long. The length is between one second and 340 and
460 seconds, respectively. Switching from one scene and location to another is
generally swift and dynamic. One reason for the brevity of scenes is that European
scenes tend to be more often song sequences (56%), which contain shorter lm
clips. Storyline scenes predominate only in lms shot in Sweden and Finland (87%
and 64%, respectively), whereas song sequences strongly predominate in the lms
shot in Slovenia (89%). In the case of Poland and Switzerland, both forms are most
balanced. This indicates that Slovenia is a popular country to shoot song sequences
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 69
Table 4.3 The most common urban and rural places in selected countries.
Country Urban settings Rural settings
Finland Helsinki Lapland
Poland Kraków, Gdańsk, Poznań,
Warsaw, Rzeszów
Tatra Mountains, Podzamcze (Silesian
Voivodeship), Stołowe Mountains
Slovenia Ljubljana, Piran, Bled, Mari-
bor, Kamnik
Bohinj, Štanjel, Big Pasture Plateau, Ptuj,
Vintgar Gorge, Jezersko, Logar Valley
Sweden Malmö, Stockholm, Lund Arctic circle (Gulf of Bothnia)
Switzerland Bern, Geneva, Zürich Swiss Alps, Bernese Alps, Canton of Valais
Source: Own elaboration.
as a backdrop, whereas the Scandinavian scenes are embedded in the plot of the
lm. However, it must be considered that only four lms were shot there. It will be
interesting to see whether future lms follow the same pattern.
The majority of the lming locations (82%) were known to the data collectors.
This suggests that Indian lms tend to be shot in locations that are internationally
and/or nationally known or recognisable, or in places with a particular landscape or
scenery associated with the country in question (Table 4.3, Figure 4.2). The micro-
locations in the lms shot in Sweden are imminently urban; geographically, most
scenes were also shot in the Skåne region, a landscape strongly associated with
Swedish lm production. The locations in the Finnish scenes are distributed fairly
evenly between urban and rural settings, with scenes shot in both Helsinki and the
Lapland region in the Arctic Circle. The Slovenian scenes are rich in locations.
Castles, streets, and squares predominate, but there are also lakes, bridges, parks,
gardens, piers, shores, hotels, churches, and caves. In the Polish scenes, micro-
locations related to the urban landscape dominate. These are mainly the old towns
Figure 4.2 Cloud tag generated from the lming locations. The size depends on frequency.
Source: Own elaboration
70 Mimi Urbanc et al.
of large cities, famous historical sites, landmarks (such as the Palace of Culture and
Science in Warsaw or Wawel Castle in Kraków), and the streets of these historic
areas. The non-urban locations are mainly palaces and castles. Of the natural loca-
tions, there are mountain valleys and lakes (mainly from the Tatra Mountains). The
micro-locations of the lms shot in Switzerland are quite diverse and range from
rural (meadows, lakes, vineyards, and castles) and famous Alpine destinations (the
Sphinx Observatory on the Jungfraujoch or the Matterhorn) to picturesque towns
(Thun), city centres (downtown Bern), and airports (Geneva and Zürich).
The recognisability of screen locations from the viewer’s perspective depends
on clear locational indications such as visible place names, ags, famous town-
scapes, and important historical landmarks. It varies slightly between countries;
most scenes with a clear locational indication come from lms shot in Switzerland
(35%). Similarly, there is also a high percentage of clear clues in the Finnish loca-
tions (23%), which may be explained by a small number of lms. Conversely,
only 8% and 4% of the scenes in the Slovenian and Polish samples, respectively,
are known with clear locational information. Thirteen percent of scenes with clear
clues position Sweden in the middle.
The small number of Polish scenes with unique locations may be explained by
the fact that Polish locations (5% of them) are used as fake locations (e.g. Kraków,
Warsaw, and Brzesko as substitutes for London). However, this is not the only
reason. The most ctionalised locations were found in lms shot in Switzerland
(26%); they often stand in for other countries (e.g. the United States, France, or
Germany) and cities (e.g. Chicago). In the Finnish and Swedish scenes, the c-
tionalised locations (14% and 15%, respectively) usually consisted of well-known
national landmarks: for example, churches representing other buildings. Only 2%
of the Slovenian scenes are used for ctionalised locations.
Geographical characteristics
European lming locations in Indian lms are predominantly urban settings (72%).
Such lming locations are more signicant in Poland and Sweden, whereas Swit-
zerland and Finland, in contrast, also exhibit more rural features (Figure 4.3).
Switzerland, in particular, stands out with its predominant mountain landscapes.
The rural background is also somewhat more representative in the romantic song
sequences.
European cities and towns in Indian lms are represented by various elements
(Figure 4.4). However, historic cities and buildings are more common in the Pol-
ish, Swiss, and Slovenian scenes and less visible in the Nordic context. Instead,
modern cities and buildings are more often seen in Sweden and transport districts
in Finland. Central Europe seems to build its competitive advantage on (medieval)
heritage, culture, and tradition. At the same time, northern Europe, known for its
avant-garde architecture and a stronger focus on high-tech industry and innovation,
focuses more on the modern urban fabric. Green and blue infrastructure stand out in
Slovenia, implying a more rural appearance of urban environments in this country.
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 71
Figure 4.3 Share of urban and rural settings (dierences between countries).
Source: Own elaboration
Figure 4.4 Types of urban features visible in the settings.
Source: Own elaboration
This is not surprising because Slovenia does not have many large cities and thus
has one of the most rural characteristics in Europe (Dijkstra and Poelman 2014).
Dierences between scene types reveal that romantic song sequences are more
often portrayed within historical cities and buildings and are surrounded by green
and blue infrastructure. In contrast, regular sequences are more often dominated
72 Mimi Urbanc et al.
by modern cities and buildings and transport infrastructure. The narratives seem to
be more often set in contemporary urban environments, whereas heritage elements
usually romanticise song scenes.
The European countryside in Indian lms is presented by only a few elements
(Figure 4.5). However, there are some signicant dierences between the coun-
tries. The Swiss countryside is more often presented by mountains and typical
Alpine villages and architecture. Poland and Slovenia – the latter being the third
most forested country in the European Union (Eurostat 2018) – are mostly depicted
as green countries with forests, meadows, and grasslands. It is surprising that in
Finland and Sweden, the only countries where the share of forests exceeds that of
Slovenia (Eurostat 2018), forests receive less attention, and elds are more visible.
Not surprisingly, elds are prominent in scenes shot in Poland, which is indeed
a strong agricultural country. Looking at rural elements by scene type shows a
greater presence of meadows and grasslands in song sequences, whereas elds tend
to be used more often as a setting in a storyline.
Mountains are a moderately pronounced feature of European lming locations
(35%). The frequency of mountains exceeds that of rural elements, which occur in
less than one-third of settings (28%). This means that mountains are also depicted
in urban environments. The overlap of urban and mountainous motifs is hardly
surprising, especially when a cross-country comparison is made. Two countries
contribute decisively to the representation of mountainous landscapes in selected
lm scenes: Switzerland and Slovenia (Figure 4.6). In both countries, not only is
the topography rugged and mountainous (less so in Slovenia) but the towns are also
small (Morisson 2021). In contrast, fewer mountainous scenes are shot in Sweden,
Figure 4.5 Types of rural features visible in the settings.
Source: Own elaboration
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 73
Finland, and Poland, which is related to the topography of these countries and, in
the case of Poland, to the greater concentration of lming locations in historical
cities such as Kraków, Gdańsk, and Poznań.
Mountains are more often positioned in the background of song sequences,
implying their romantic role. As a rule, they do not carry the story but presumably
serve as a captivating background motif. This “circumstantial” position could be
explained by the technical and logistical challenges of lming in these locations,
but it is eortless to use them as a background because elevated landforms are
usually highly visible. Mountains that appear in lm scenes convey a considerable
variety of height and land cover. Hills (i.e. forested and green) slightly predomi-
nate (63%) over high mountains with rocky, barren, or snow-covered areas (57%).
Scenes with high mountains are most often shot in Switzerland, and scenes with
hilly images are most often shot in Slovenia (Figure 4.7). The Indian lm industry
tends to remain faithful to the original image of Switzerland (i.e. high mountains),
which sparked Indian lmmakers’ preference for European locations since the
1960s and especially in the 1990s (Tissot 2019). More recently, however, lming
locations are no longer limited to mountains. Comparing song sequences and sto-
rylines by mountain type reveals slight dierences. When mountains appear in the
narrative, they are more likely to be high mountains. One explanation for this could
be the ability of high mountains to act as a dramatic eect or to convey a sense of
uniqueness. Compared to hills, which are ubiquitous in Europe, barren high moun-
tains occur only in the Alps and are therefore less frequently seen in lmmaking.
Figure 4.6 Mountainous and non-mountainous elements of the setting (dierences between
countries).
Source: Own elaboration
74 Mimi Urbanc et al.
As a characteristic geographical element and an important component of Indian
iconography (Sharma 2008), water is depicted slightly less frequently than mountains
(29%). Standing bodies of water (lakes and seas) are the most signicant category
(61%), whereas owing bodies of water (rivers and waterfalls) are a less important
element (25%). Water as a weather phenomenon is rare, appearing as snow in 15%
and rain in only 4% of all settings. Therefore, one could imagine that water serves as
a scene element for the lmmakers during nice (especially sunny) days.
The presence of water varies among the selected countries, but it does not
appear in even half of the scenes in any of them. Water appears more frequently in
mountainous Slovenia and Switzerland and in Finland as “the land of a thousand
lakes” on the one hand, and less often in Sweden and Poland on the other hand.
In Switzerland, the absence of the sea is logical due to its continental location.
Instead, lakes are the most signicant category in this country. There is also no sea
in Polish scenes. The reason for this is probably the (cold) Baltic Sea and coastal
plains, which are not as attractive for lming as other parts of the country, such as
locations along rivers, which are a predominant category from this point of view.
Filming locations in Slovenia and Sweden contain many places by the sea, but for
completely dierent reasons. Unlike Sweden, which is a maritime country and has
a varied coastline with typical landscape features, Slovenia has a very short coast-
line but is on the Mediterranean Sea, with a pleasant climate and famous historical
and tourist sites. The settings from Finland also contain many places by the sea as
well as lakes, but the snow (in Lapland) stands out (Figure 4.8).
Scenes with water are more often part of song sequences than of storylines,
which is especially true for the occurrence of rivers and lakes. The exception is
the occurrence of rain, which occurs exclusively in storylines (Figure 4.9). One
Figure 4.7 Types of mountains visible in the settings (dierences between countries; “other”
in the lms shot in Sweden refers to rocks or small clis, not large enough to be
counted as mountains; i.e. erratics or boulders).
Source: Own elaboration
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 75
Figure 4.8 Types of water visible in the settings (dierences between countries).
Source: Own elaboration
Figure 4.9 Types of water visible in the settings (dierences between scene types).
Source: Own elaboration
often imagines many scenes in Indian movies where pleasant rain makes peo-
ple happy (especially farmers and lovers). The basis for such an idea is that rural
India, with its vast areas of cultivated land, depends on the rainy season. Similarly,
urban settlements depend on monsoon rains during the hot summer (Ravi 2016).
76 Mimi Urbanc et al.
The theoretical link between the importance of water (especially rain) in India and
the creation of a romantic atmosphere (establishing romance, dancing, singing,
etc.) typical of song sequences may be deceptive. Based on the data in this study,
such ideas cannot be conrmed in Europe.
Discussion
Neutral landscapes
Film landscapes are often (mis)used to reinforce national(istic) ideas and feelings
(McLoone 2010). Lukinbeal (2005, p. 3) stated that “Landscape gives meaning to
cinematic events and positions narratives within a particular scale and historical
context”. Unlike a national cinematic identity based on how culture, traditions,
struggles, and landscapes are represented (Spicer 2010), there is no national agenda
behind foreign (Indian) lmmaking in Europe. The landscapes used are not loaded
with national narratives and neuralgic points of history. Indian lms do not show
forms of self-representation, but rather an outsider’s perspective and alienation
from national narratives.
Following the mirror metaphor, and if one understands cinema in general as
a mirror of society (Kumar and Pandey 2017), one could say that Indian lms
provide Europeans with a neutral view of the landscape. In other words, the land-
scapes are not deep or multidimensional, but rather at. Only the surface or the
exterior, the visible layer, is shown. European settings focusing on landscapes that
contain a variety of elements and aspects are rarely an integral part of the nar-
rative, but mostly serve as charming posters. Even when a European location is
embedded in the lm’s plot, the relationship between the lm’s narrative and the
landscape depicted remains supercial. This is especially true in those lms where
European locations were used only for dance scenes. The storytelling aspect is not
pronounced; it is more about visuality.
National landscape stereotypes and recognisability
Despite the neutrality of the landscape in Indian lms that include scenes shot in
Europe, they still unintentionally convey national narratives. Leach (2010) and Aru
and Capineri (2021) note that national narratives are often based on stereotypes.
Indeed, iconic and stereotypical images are immediately recognisable means of
conveying national narratives in the pool of lms. The lms successfully use the
most iconic landscapes that serve as anchors for national landscape stereotypes,
such as Kraków in Poland and Bled in Slovenia. Other examples are the mountains,
which are visible in the scenes shot in Slovenia and Switzerland, the old medieval
towns depicted in the Polish scenes, and the snowy landscapes shown in the polar
parts of Finland (Figure 4.10).
This fact is hardly surprising because Indian lmmakers choose a location based
on their perception of a particular country. National stereotypes and iconic land-
scapes are the main vehicles for creating an image of the self and others. Second,
Indian lmmakers often collaborate with local businesses and institutions, and,
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 77
third, national incentives and subsidies are often tied to shooting iconic landscapes
(Janta and Herzog 2023). It can be concluded that Indian lms retain and use ste-
reotypical images of shooting countries and that European national ideas have been
successfully transferred into Indian lm production. Through iconic and widely
known lming locations, Indian lms perpetuate the European self-image.
The use of iconic landscapes and clear indications are probably the most impor-
tant factors of recognisability. Studies (see Urbanc et al. 2021) show that recognis-
ability is directly linked to distinctive features, clearly dened form, structure, and
obvious meaning. All of these elements are found in the pool of scenes studied here.
Diverse and versatile landscapes
The results convey a wide variety of landscape elements that correspond to dier-
ences among the countries studied. The heterogeneity of Europe is well reected
in Indian lms with European settings. This means that Indian lmmakers are not
fascinated by a single type of landscape, but are attracted by diversity. The argu-
ment that supports this nding is the dynamic between scenes and settings; the shift
Figure 4.10 Iconic landscapes are widely featured in Indian lms shot in Poland, Sweden,
Finland, Slovenia, and Switzerland. Lapland in winter (top left), modern urban
centre in Scandinavia (top centre), Bled (top right), Tatra Mountains (centre
left), Warsaw skyline (centre), downtown Ljubljana (centre right), Matterhorn
aerial view (bottom left), Lake Brienz (bottom centre), and Piran peninsula
(bottom right).
Source: Kushnirov Avraham (top left), Grigory Bruev (top centre), Maja Topole (top right), Artur Hen-
ryk (centre left), Wojciech Zieliński (centre), Tryfonov (centre right), 4Max (bottom left), Can (bottom
centre), Csák István (bottom right). All photos but top right are from AdobeStock
78 Mimi Urbanc et al.
from one to another is rapid. Scenes tend to be short, and so Indian lmmakers
present multiple settings in a relatively short time frame. The European territorial
structure makes this possible. This nding is supported by Janta and Herzog (see
Chapter 8) and Cucco and Scaglioni (2023), who state that landscape diversity and
a multitude of options are one of the most important pull factors for Indian lm
teams in Switzerland and Italy, respectively.
Another pull factor is probably the availability of versatile landscapes that make
it possible to substitute one location for another when lming. The countries in this
pool oer locations that can be easily replaced, but the dierences between coun-
tries are obvious. Comparing the endpoint countries in the number of fake lm-
ing locations (Switzerland 26% and Slovenia 2%) shows that the dierence is not
due to landscape diversity. In terms of geography, both countries have much more
in common (yet it is hard to imagine a Slovenian town replacing, say, Chicago)
than Slovenia and Poland, both of which are at the lower end of fake locations.
Switzerland probably stands out not for its landscape diversity but rather for a
long tradition of foreign (Indian) lmmaking, well-developed general and cultural
infrastructure, and appealing nancial incentives, as indicated by Janta and Herzog
(see Chapter 8). More generally, the reason could be soft power (Brand Directory
2021), whereby Switzerland scored within the top ve nations despite being vastly
outperformed by the other four countries (Germany, Japan, the UK, and Canada) in
terms of territory and population size.
Implications for research and practice
This study has considerable practical value. Films can have a positive impact on
the general perception of a particular country. That country, in turn, can have an
impact on the tourism and leisure industry and have a spillover eect on other sec-
tors (sales of products, attractiveness as a study destination, etc.). Indeed, Indian
lmmakers often use economic potential as an argument when negotiating with
European partners (see Chapter 8), yet the potential for building and strengthening
a country’s soft power is less often addressed. Therefore, this chapter can encour-
age authorities at all levels (EU, national, regional, and local) to consider foreign
lmmaking as an important way to strengthen the presence of Europe as a whole or
an individual country on the world map.
This study also suggests several topics that may be of scholarly interest. The gen-
eral topic concerns the impact of European settings in Indian lms on tourism and
general perceptions of Europe. The second is cultural dierences between Europe
and India, and how their appreciation raises a myriad of issues directly related to
the portrayal of European landscapes, particularly the extent to which human activ-
ities that shaped the landscape (e.g. agriculture) are considered. Is the processual
and dynamic aspect represented at all, or are only the results of this activity (e.g.
cultivated open grassland) acknowledged? If one considers lm an important tool
for developing people’s relationship with their environment, a comprehensive view
can pinpoint the character of the landscape in relation to people and their activities,
thus contributing to a more responsible attitude towards the landscape.
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 79
Limitations
A few limitations merit acknowledgement. First, no similar studies were found
to draw possible parallels with. Some studies have looked at landscapes in lms
(e.g. Lefebvre 2006; Harper and Rayner 2010; Melbye 2010), but with evident
dissimilarities. Because of the qualitative approach to analysis, they dier signi-
cantly from the analysis presented in this chapter. Dierent approaches and data
collection only allow for indirect assessment. Second, the lm selection was based
on criteria other than randomness. Although there is a rational explanation for this
approach, the results and their generalisation to the population of motion pictures
in selected European countries should be interpreted with caution. Third, four
national teams conducted the coding. No matter how much eort went into align-
ing and standardising this process, bias is inevitable. Fourth, some variables have
dierent meanings in dierent national contexts. For example, rurality is a spatially
and culturally dependent category. In other words, the criteria for the meaning of
rural can (and do) dier across countries.
Conclusion
This chapter deals with the representation of European landscapes and landscape
elements in Indian lms shot in Europe. The objective is to identify geographical
elements of European lm locations and provide insight into how they are used in
Indian lm production. The research featured in this study is based on four con-
cepts: lm, landscape, visuality, and representation – in particular, landscape repre-
sentation. The results of a detailed quantitative analysis of 34 lms with 594 scenes
shot in ve European countries (Finland, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden, and Switzer-
land) show a great diversity of landscape elements with a clear urban orientation
in Indian lmmaking in Europe. Urban areas are mainly represented by historical
and modern imagery, and green and blue infrastructure. The countryside is pre-
dominantly represented by forests, meadows and grasslands, villages, mountains,
and elds. Mountains are a moderately pronounced feature, usually in the back-
ground of song sequences, and serve as a captivating background motif. Though
an important component of Indian iconography, water is rarely depicted, primarily
in song sequences. In general, song sequences predominate over storyline scenes.
The former usually contain historical and heritage elements, whereas the storyline
scenes are more often shot in modern settings. In addition, there is a clear divide
between central and northern Europe, with the former relying on (medieval) herit-
age, culture, and tradition. In contrast, northern Europe relies more on modern
urban fabric.
The ndings convey that Indian lms that include scenes in Europe use and
integrate the most iconic European landscapes but do not incorporate national and
historical narratives. Landscapes are understood as a way of seeing, which leads to
the next general ascertainment: that diversity and versatility are valued and desired.
There is a dichotomy between recognisability through iconic landscapes and non-
recognisability through the use of generic and versatile landscapes. A dichotomy is
apparent but not clear.
80 Mimi Urbanc et al.
Acknowledgement
The project FilmInd, The Indian Film Industry as a Driver of New Socio Economic
Connections, was carried out within EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and
Humanities and nanced by national funding of the participating countries. The
authors acknowledge receipt of funding from the Ministry of Education, Sci-
ence, and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovenian Research Agency
(Research programme P6–0101).
We thank the entire FilmInd project team included in the study of European
locations by the Indian lm industries for their contribution to the selection of
variables and data collection: Marcin Adamczak, Malwina Balcerak, and Krzysz-
tof Stachowiak from Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland; Oona Haapamäki and
Therese Sunngren-Granlund from Novia University of Applied Sciences, Finland;
Hanna Janta from the University of Basel, Switzerland; and Rok Ciglič from the
Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Slovenia.
References
Aitken, S. C. and Dixon, D. P., 2006. Imagining geographies of lm. Erdkunde, 60 (4),
326–336.
Aru, S. and Capineri, C., 2021. La ‘grande bellezza’: Thirty years of Italian set locations.
Journal of Cultural Geography, 38 (2), 262–285.
Banaji, S., 2013. Hindi lm audiences outside South Asia. In: K. Gokulsing and W. Dis-
sanayake, eds., Routledge handbook of Indian cinemas. London: Routledge, 391–401.
Brand Directory, 2021. Global soft power index 2021. Available from: https://brandirec
tory.com/globalsoftpower/download/brand-nance-global-soft-power-index-2021.pdf
(access date 12.02.2022).
Brickell, K. and Garrett, B. L., 2013. Geography, lm and exploration: Women and amateur
lmmaking in the Himalayas. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38
(1), 7–11.
Cosgrove, D., 1998. Social formation and symbolic landscape. Madison: University of Wis-
consin Press.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2014. Shooting Bollywood abroad: The outsourcing of Indian
lms in Italy. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 2 (3), 417–432.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2023. On the Italian trail of Indian lms through the lens of
media industry studies. In: K. Stachowiak, H. Janta, J. Kozina and T. Sunngren-Granlund,
eds., Film and place in an intercultural perspective: India-Europe lm connections. Rout-
ledge, forthcoming.
Davison, M. and Falihi, A., 2010. The conscious gaze: Visuality as practice in the post-mod-
ern world. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities & Nations,
10 (3), 139–149.
Dijkstra, L. and Poelman, H., 2014. A harmonised denition of cities and rural areas: The
new degree of urbanisation. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/
docgener/work/2014_01_new_urban.pdf (access date 18.02.2022).
Eurostat, 2018. Over 40% of the EU covered with forests. Available from: https://ec.europa.
eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20180321-1 (access date 18.02.2022).
Farsø, M. and Petersen, M., 2015. Conceiving landscape through lm: Filmic explorations
in design studio teaching. Architecture and Culture, 3 (1), 65–86.
Portraying European landscapes in Indian lms 81
Garrett, B. L., 2011. Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research.
Progress in Human Geography, 35 (4), 521–541.
Glynn, K., 2015. Visibility, media events and convergence culture: Struggles for the mean-
ing of 9/11. In: S. P. Mains, J. Cupples and C. Lukinbeal, eds., Mediated geographies and
geographies of media. Dordrecht: Springer, 293–312.
Gyimóthy, S., 2018. Transformations in destination texture: Curry and Bollywood romance
in the Swiss Alps. Tourist Studies, 18 (3), 292–314.
Harper, G. and Rayner, J., eds., 2010. Cinema and landscape: Film, nation and cultural
geography. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Jacobs, J., 2013. Listen with your eyes: Towards a lmic geography. Geography Compass,
7 (10), 714–728.
Jacobs, J., 2016. Filmic geographies: The rise of digital lm as a research method and out-
put. Area, 48 (4), 452–454.
Jain, P., 2019. Sara Jahan Hamara: Indian lms and their portrayal of foreign destinations.
Visual Anthropology, 32 (3–4), 343–352.
Janta, H. and Herzog, M., 2023. Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland. In:
K. Stachowiak, H. Janta, J. Kozina and T. Sunngren-Granlund, eds., Film and place in an
intercultural perspective: India-Europe lm connections. Routledge, forthcoming.
Josiam, B. M. et al., 2014. ‘Namastey London’: Bollywood movies and their impact on
how Indians perceive European destinations. Hospitality Review, 31 (4). Available from:
https://digitalcommons.u.edu/hospitalityreview/vol31/iss4/2 (access date 18.02.2022).
Kirby, P., 2021. Geography and lm music: Musicology, gender, and the spatiality of instru-
mental music. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 46 (3), 570–583.
Konjar, M., Kosanović, S., Popović, S. and Fikfak, A., 2018. Urban/rural dichotomy and the
forms-in-between. In: A. Fikfak, S. Kosanovič, M. Konjar and E. Anguillari, eds., Sustain-
ability and resilience: Socio-spatial perspective. The Hague: TU Delft Open, 149–169.
Kozina, J., ed, 2021. Comparative report on the use of European locations by the Indian lm
industries. Ljubljana: ZRC SAZU.
Kumar, H. and Pandey, G. J., 2017. Deconstruction of symbols of reality in Hindi cinema:
A study on calendar girls and Haider. Media Watch, 8 (3), 388–400.
Kumer, P., 2019. Representation of Slovenian lming locations in narratives of foreign-
produced movies. Geographical Bulletin, 91 (1), 95–116.
Leach, J., 2010. The landscapes of Canada’s features: Articulating nation and nature. In: G.
Harper and J. Rayner, eds., Cinema and landscape: Film, nation and cultural geography.
Bristol: Intellect Books, 269–280.
Lefebvre, M., ed., 2006. Landscape and lm. New York: Routledge.
Lourenço, I., 2017. Bollywood in Portugal: Watching and dancing practices in the construc-
tion of alternative cultural identities. Etnográca, 21 (1), 175–202.
Lukinbeal, C., 2005. Cinematic landscapes. Journal of Cultural Geography, 23 (1), 3–22.
McLoone, M., 2010. Landscape and Irish cinema. In: G. Harper and J. Rayner, eds., Cinema
and landscape: Film, nation and cultural geography. Bristol: Intellect Books, 131–146.
Melbye, D., 2010. Landscape allegory in cinema: From wilderness to wasteland. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Mitchell, T. W. J., 1994. Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Lon-
don: The University of Chicago Press.
Morisson, A., Bole, D., Kozina, J., Goluža, M., Turner, C. and Mayer, H., 2021. Transforma-
tion in industrial towns in Slovenia and Switzerland (CRED Research Paper 34). Bern:
CRED – Center for Regional Economic Development.
82 Mimi Urbanc et al.
Olwig, K. R., 2005. Representation and alienation in the political landscape. Cultural Geog-
raphies, 12 (1), 19–40.
Rajagopalan, S., 2006. Emblematic of the thaw: Early Indian lms in Soviet cinemas. South
Asian Popular Culture, 4 (2), 83–100.
Ravi, K., 2016. Romancing the rain in Hindi cinema. Available from: https://theculturetrip.
com/asia/india/articles/romancing-the-rain-in-hindi-cinema/ (access date 18.02.2022).
Saunders, R. and Strukov, V., eds., 2018. Popular geopolitics: Plotting an evolving interdis-
cipline. London: Routledge.
Sharma, K. N., 2008. Water in India: Spiritual and technical aspects. In: H. Selin, ed., Ency-
clopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures.
Dordrecht: Springer.
Sommerlad, E., 2022. Film geography. In: P. C. Adams and B. Warf, eds., Routledge hand-
book of media geographies. London: Routledge, 118–131.
Spicer, P., 2010. Japanese cinema and landscape. In: G. Harper and J. Rayner, eds., Cinema
and landscape: Film, nation and cultural geography. Bristol: Intellect Books, 231–242.
Tissot, T., 2019. Bollywood’s long-standing love aair with Switzerland. Available from:
https://houseofswitzerland.org/swissstories/history/bollywoods-long-standing-love-
aair-switzerland (access date 18.02.2022).
Urbanc, M., Fridl, J. and Resnik Planinc, T., 2021. Landscapes as represented in textbooks
and in students’ imagination: Stability, generational gap, image retention and recognis-
ability. Children’s Geographies, 19 (4), 446–461.
Urbanc, M., Gašperič, P. and Kozina, J., 2015. Geographical imagination of landscapes:
Analysis of the book of photographs Slovenian landscapes. Acta Geographica Slovenica,
55 (1), 99–125.
Urbanc, M., Ferk, M., Fridl, J., Gašperič, P., Ilc Klun, M., Pipan, P., Resnik Planinc, T. and
Šmid Hribar, M., 2016. Oblikovanje predstav o slovenskih pokrajinah v izobraževalnem
procesu [Shaping the Geographical Imagination of Slovenian Landscapes in Education].
Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.
Wylie, J., 2009. Landscape. In: D. Gregory et al., eds., Dictionary of human geography.
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 409–411.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-7
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
In Ae Dil Hai Mushkil (2016), Anushka Sharma and Ranbir Kapoor travel to
Europe from London, for a weekend getaway. In one comic sequence, they recre-
ate ‘Tere mere hothon pe/a sweet melody on our lips’, a song originally performed
by Sridevi and Rishi Kapoor in Chandni (1989) (Figure 5.1).
The choice of location matches the stunningly beautiful and serene panoramic
view in the original number. Framed as an irreverent parody of the original duet
number, the sequence shows Anushka struggling with the long pallu of her yellow
chion sari. This re-creation draws attention to the playback system that allowed
actors to lip sync songs pre-recorded by a few playback singers in the industry.
Ranbir carries a boom box, places it at the location, and plays the song from his
mobile phone. As soon as the introductory music ute fades up, Anushka starts
lip syncing the words, while imitating the dance movements of the original num-
ber (Figures 5.2 and 5.3). The next shot takes us to a new location, a snow-clad
vast expanse; Anushka is now in a red chion sari. Ranbir falls, complaining of
the cold. Anushka shouts at him for being a wimp, reminding him that she is not
wearing any warm clothes. This retro imagination references the popularity of the
original 1980s song, while giving us a glimpse of the material practices and labour
involved in the production of these songs. This self-conscious performance by the
duo reminds us of the dominance of the romantic duet song that became almost
synonymous with the staging of European locations as spectacular sights. This was
made possible through a sudden shift from the narrative to song sequences that
involved a quick transformation in location, costumes, mood, and bodily gestures.
Europe was one of the preferred locations for the visualisation of song sequences
since the 1960s in the Hindi lm industry. This relationship, however, between
European landscape and lm songs intensied in the 1990s post-globalisation
period. Through the enactment of parody, Karan Johar, the director of Ae Dil Hai
Mushkil, reexively made fun of song sequences of his own erstwhile lms, like
the popular ‘Tum paas Aaye’, a fantasy number that was shot in Scotland for Kuch
kuch hota hai. As Ranjani Mazumdar has suggested, these song sequences dis-
rupted space and time, by swiftly moving to characters in foreign locations, with-
out any narrative logic (2007, p. 94). Cinema, according to Mazumdar enabled the
‘spectator’s gaze to travel’, as a contemporary form of ânerie (ibid.). Focusing
on the history of lmed space in Hindi cinema, Priya Jaikumar has argued that as
5 European locations in
Bollywood songs
Exploring mobile bodies and new
song genres
Shikha Jhingan
84 Shikha Jhingan
Figure 5.1 In the song ‘Tere mere hothon pe’, we see Sridevi and Rishi Kapoor at a pictur-
esque location in Switzerland in Chandni (1989).
Source: Yash Raj Films
Figures 5.2 and 5.3 On a weekend trip to Europe, Alizeh (Anoushka Sharma) and Ayaan
(Ranbir Kapoor) recreate the song from Chandni by playing it through
a boom box.
Source: Dharma Production (Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, 2016)
European locations in Bollywood songs 85
‘a spatio-temporal form’ cinema can help us better apprehend the transformations
in the architecture and geography of a place through its material indices and aec-
tive registers (2019). I am tempted to ask, what happens when transformations
in technologies and material practices of cinema engender new sensory, aective
encounters with the architecture and geography of a place?
In recent work on sound and sonic geographies (Gallagher et al. 2017, listen-
ing is viewed as a bodily practice in relationship to space. They make a strong
case for expanded listening as a methodology to explore how ‘bodies reveal them-
selves as malleable and porous, and in some cases highly susceptible to sound’
(622). While drawing attention to the role of sound in producing space, Brandon
LaBelle has insightfully suggested its signicance in thinking about the experi-
ence of the ‘contemporary condition’ of globalisation (2010, p. xvii). Schafer’s
conceptualisation of soundscape as an acoustic eld of study has been used pro-
ductively by lm scholars to think about the spatial marks of sound in cinema
(2012). Helen Hanson for instance has shown how soundscapes ‘provide auditory
cues to dimensions, moods and qualities of narrative urban space’ in the cinematic
city (2013, p. 288).
Discussions on soundscapes of Bombay cinema have highlighted the dominance
of post-synchronised sound that includes dialogues and background score, while
ambient sounds created in studios by foley artists were always given a subservient
status.1 Dialogues were re-recorded in sound secure studios through the use of dub-
bing (ADR) after the lming was over. This meant that sounds recorded on location
during the process of lming were not used in the nal soundtrack.2 According to
Rakesh Ranjan, sound eects in Hindi lms were used for their ‘performative and
narrative attributes’ rather than as cues for spatial settings or psychological terrains
(cited in Pemmaraju 2013, p. 66).3 While dialogues and background music were
created in the post-production stage, songs were recorded prior to lming, so that
actors could lip sync the lyrics in front of the camera.
Several scholars have paid attention to the way songs as stand-alone commodi-
ties or as pre-fabricated entities were loosely integrated into lm narratives Prasad
(1998), Gopalan (2002), and Pemmaraju (2013). The introduction of sync sound
coupled with digital recording practices in the early 2000s brought signicant
transformations in lming practices. While giving importance to the vocal perfor-
mance of actors during lming, sync sound aims to capture the soundscape of the
location as part of the narrative event. Production practices linked to sync sound
recording have changed the way locations are selected, along with a mobilisation
of specialised technologies and gear for producing the scene as a sonic event. Priya
Jaikumar has shown how sync sound recording led to ‘a demand for trained crea-
tive technicians and sound engineers’ as well as those able to ‘work as bouncers or
sound-security personnel on the eld’ (2017).
By focusing on the processes behind the creation of song sequences lmed in
Europe, I want to consider how directors, production personnel, music composers,
sound designers, and actors respond to locations as sonic bodies and form networks
that engender deep sensory encounters with geographical territory. By replacing
lip-synced songs with background songs, song sequences acquire a modular form,
86 Shikha Jhingan
providing a gritty and layered experience of lonesome and precarious immigrant
bodies. On the other hand, diegetically produced musical numbers stage the crea-
tion of the song, revealing to us the source of the music. The placement of the
boombox in Ae Dil Hail Mushkil needs to be seen not just as a nostalgic recreation
of a Bollywood song of the 1990s but also as a sign of new production practices
that lionise collaborative processes in the creation of music. In the last section,
I will discuss dance-driven ‘production numbers’ that demand highly coordinated
mobilisation of musicking bodies that are harnessed through media-driven net-
works of dance (Usha Iyer 2020). Methodologically, I have developed my formal
analysis of song sequences in lms like Queen, Rockstar, Jab Harry Met Sejal, and
Tamasha in conjunction with my eld work in Bombay that has given me a deeper
understanding of production practices in the lm industry. This ethnographic mate-
rial is in dialogue with the internet archive that allowed me access to the making of
the song videos, interviews with choreographers, production crew, music directors,
and sound engineers. The latter as I hope to demonstrate rework the song at the
post-production stage to connect it back with the soundscapes of European loca-
tions, drawing on locally grounded musical practices. I draw on Andrew Leyshon’s
idea of musical network, underlining the connections between network and geog-
raphy to elaborate on new sonic practices and embodied engagement with lmed
space in song sequences narratively located in Europe (2001).
Decoding Film Songs as Sonic Entities in European Locations
Locating romantic duet songs in Europe became a trademark style of Yash Chopra
lms in the 1990s.4 Transporting spectators to bucolic settings, outdoors cafes,
public squares and appealing architectural sites of Europe, these songs ruptured
the soundtrack, from dialogues mixed with foley or dubbed sound to pre-recorded
song sung by playback singers. In Dil To Pagal Hai (1997), for instance, the song
is introduced to transport us from Bombay to a virtual space in Europe, to mark
the ‘special moment’ when the protagonists fall in love with each other. The song,
‘Dholna’ fades up in a moment of passion, drowning the heroine’s heavy breathing
sounds that marked the arousal of forbidden desires. As the couple get locked in an
embrace, the chords of the rhythmic guitar followed by a dramatic chorus create
a sonic bridge: we are now transported to the grassy slopes of Europe as we see
Madhuri Dixit running towards Shahrukh Khan in an open lush green expanse. The
pre-recorded song takes over the sound track with the two leading stars lip sync-
ing to the voices of Lata Mangeshkar and Udit Narayan. Atmospheric conditions,
weather, trac, and bystanders are part of the visual landscape of these lmed
locations, but remain sonically occluded (Figure 5.4).5
However, we see a noticeable shift in the aural and visual style of song sequences,
evoking new aesthetic forms in the post-millennial period. A marked change was
the way romantic duet songs were slowly replaced by ‘background songs’, with
a more organic link with the narrative. These songs convey the inner journey of
characters as they negotiate public spaces in European cities such as lake side
parks, city squares, or public transport, adding to the tone, the mood, and the visual
European locations in Bollywood songs 87
density of the scene. By introducing city sounds, they make porous the boundaries
between song, background score, and noise, adding a thick auditory layer to the
gritty encounters of immigrant characters as precarious, isolated bodies.
In Queen (2012), a lonesome Rani lands up in Paris for her ‘honeymoon’, sans
her ancé, who has ditched her just an evening before her wedding. The song
‘Badra Bahar/O rain cloud’ is built into the narrative, as Rani steps out into the
city with a map in her hand. Amit Trivedi uses the sound of brass instruments and
guitar in the beginning to set the tone.6 The edgy sounds of trac emphasise Rani’s
unease and disenchantment with the city. As soon as Rani looks up (towards the
Eiel Tower), the song halts, giving way to a momentary silence. The expected
viewing of Eiel Tower is deferred, as the sequence cuts to a ashback from Rani’s
point of view: we are made privy to her conversation with Vijay about their upcom-
ing honeymoon in Paris to see this iconic site. We return to the present with the
shot of the Tower looming large at us (Figures 5.5 and 5.6). The sound of low bass
rumble mixed with low trac sounds is grafted on a slow motion-image of the
tower seen through the glass surface of a tourist bus. This reverie is intruded upon
by an obtrusive car horn as we see Rani in a daze in the middle of a street. The song
resumes after a 30 second break. The intermittent use of song and ambient sounds
places Rani in a larger sonic terrain, illustrating her visceral response to the city.
Towards the end of the song when Rani accidently bumps into a salesman selling
miniature Eiel Towers, the edgy sound of Rani gasping for breath becomes part
of the soundtrack even as the song is playing in the backdrop.
As with any new technological practice, the introduction to sync sound record-
ing in the Bombay lm industry was a slow and uneven process. Combined with
the arrival of digital work stations and new software like pro tools, the rst decade
of the new millennium involved a seismic shift in the way the lm industry started
adopting production practices that would lay emphasis on aural realism. Accord-
ing to Budhaditya Chattopadhyay, sync sound recording brought a new approach
Figure 5.4 Shahrukh Khan and Madhuri Dixit in a European location in Dil To Pagal Hai
(1997).
Source: Yash Raj Films
88 Shikha Jhingan
that ‘helped reconstruct the site’s spatial presence within the diegetic story-world’
(2021, p. 72).7 I contend that the practice of sync sound recordings in conjunction
with digital sound practices brought a marked shift in the production and aesthetic
practices that had a bearing in the way songs were blended into narratives, even in
lms that did not use sync sound recording. Background songs in lm narratives
changed the way songs were presented as sonic entities. Sound designers used digi-
tal technologies to introduce ambient sounds to portray the protagonist’s embodied
and material connection with lmed space. Field recordings at locations played a
key role in bringing out the soundscape of the city that were used in background
songs (Parmar 2020). Amit Trivedi, the music director, and sound designers All-
wyn Rego and Sanjay Maurya travelled to Paris to get a sense of its sonic character.
Trivedi listened to the music heard in public places, especially focusing on street
music and busking groups in the city. For the sound designers, this was their rst
trip to Europe, very similar to the way Rani travels to Paris and Amsterdam in the
lm (Rego and Maurya 2020). The duo followed the same route as Rani in the
Figures 5.5 and 5.6 In Queen (2012), ‘Badra Bahar’, a background song is used to capture
Rani’s uneasy encounter with the Eiel Tower in the city of Paris.
Source: Phantom Studios
European locations in Bollywood songs 89
lm and made eld recordings in both cities that became references for creating
the tracks of songs like Badra, with ambient sounds mixed into the musical track.
According to Allwyn Rego, their approach to sound design was aimed to evoke
Rani’s struggle with the city of Paris. As he says:
We paid attention to little things like pedestrian crossings where we can push
a button and it goes tak tak tak, we got these alarm sounds as well. The tik
tak is for 25 seconds for you to cross. And then the screeching sound of trac
when she [Rani] is trying to cross the road. She is distracted and confused so
we needed to create an ambience like that. And there also there is a dier-
ence between Paris and Amsterdam. In Amsterdam people are more friendly
to her.
Sanjay Maurya added:
We also just heard a lot and put that in our head. Not everything was recorded.
We tried to listen and experience that soundscape and then tried to recreate it.
In their work on tourism, Waitt and Duy draw our attention to the non-visual
experiences of tourists through the rubric of embodiment (2010). By tracking
music festivals as performative sites they show how listening practices involve
‘openness and exchange, where bodies are aected and aect each other in and
through place’ (ibid., p. 462). In Queen, the mood of the lm shifts when Rani
moves to Amsterdam and starts shacking in a budget hostel dorm with three other
boys. In contrast to being under a ‘sonic attack’ in Paris, we see Rani’s immersive
engagement with the city of Amsterdam in rhythm with its music and busking cul-
ture. ‘Gujariya’, and ‘Queen’, two background songs deploy a montage of images
to show Rani’s adventures as a solo traveller. The introductory musical piece in
‘Gujariya’ draws on electronic sounds carrying the immersive experience of the
city as we see Rani hanging out with fellow hostel mates in a casino lined up with
slot machines and gaming plazas.8 The faster pace of the city and Rani’s mobility
are referenced sonically through electronic dance music (EDM) sounds, as well as
the acoustic music played by lming the busking artists of the city, bringing in the
urban soundscape of Amsterdam.
Sound design in cinema in the digital era works not just through a process of
selection and foregrounding of ambient sounds, but also through the creation of an
acoustic space with a subtle layering of tracks. A wide dynamic range makes it pos-
sible for sound designers to create subtle layers beneath the music tracks in song
sequences. Access to a combination of various kinds of hardware, software, and
multiple tracks has helped sound designers to push the bar to create sound tracks
that bring in the sensory environment embodied by the protagonists.
While song sequences in Queen follow Rani’s journey and her encounter with
the two cities, in Cocktail (2012), background songs played an important role in
bringing out the dark tonalities of London.9 The lm describes the roller coaster
journey of free spirited and wild Veronica (Deepika Padukone) whose life takes a
90 Shikha Jhingan
turn when she meets Meera (Diana Penty), a woman jilted by her husband upon
arrival as an immigrant. At a chance encounter in a public loo, Veronica notices
Meera’s hapless state and asks her to move in with her as she is nancially com-
fortable and ‘cool’. The two, start bonding with each other. Soon, Veronica meets
Gautam Kapoor at a bar and starts a no-strings-attached relationship with him.
Gautam moves into Veronica’s apartment as her live-in partner. The lm captures
the emotional journey of the three protagonists as casual relationships turn into
love, seriously pushing them to think about who they really are and what they want
in life. Songs that appear in the soundtrack work to create an emotional geography
of the city: locations such as city parks, markets, streets, tube stations and bars
become important sites as the three characters negotiate the city. Background songs
like ‘Lutna’ and ‘Jugni’ in Cocktail carry forward the narrative through montage
sequences that locate the characters in three distinct spaces. As ‘Lutna’ fades into
the soundtrack, we see Veronica in a restless state, getting dressed for another night
of revelry. A heightened experience of Veronica’s sensate, intoxicated, and precari-
ous body is eected through the use of EDM-driven beats combined with strong
melody and Su lyrics. Frustrated that Gautam is not responding to her messages,
Veronica ings the phone at the rest room mirror, scaring the other users. Next, we
see her in a car with other drug users in a dazed state. Acknowledging the experi-
ences of the South Asian diaspora in UK, the lm shows Meera moving out of
Veronica’s elite neighbourhood to relocate herself in Brick Lane, a residential hub
of the South Asian immigrant community. Gautam is shown hanging around the
downtown area sleeping on benches or trying to catch a glimpse of Meera, as she
leaves her workplace (Figures 5.7–5.9)
Both songs draw on the Su tradition of Punjabi music evoking in a nuanced
way, shared experiences of the South Asian immigrants in London. Using a com-
bination of guitars, drums and synth sounds with Lohar’s powerful style of singing
in the opening section, ‘Jugni’ evokes an immersive, embodied presence of the
three lead characters with each undergoing intense emotional turmoil. We follow
Meera’s every day commute from the down town oce complex to Brick Lane.
The rumble of the city with its trac and movement of tubes become part of the
soundscape of the song. Framing the view from Meera’s Brick Lane apartment, we
get a sense of the claustrophobia of the setting, both in the interiors of the apart-
ment as well as the lack of any view from the window of her room. Signs of trac
jams, route diversions, and road repairs add to the visual landscape further high-
lighting the alienating experience of the metropolitan city.
Diegetic Music in Film Songs
In a parallel move, along with the rise of background songs is an upsurge in the
diegetic song sequences lmed in Europe. I focus on sequences that highlight
diegetic musical performance as raison d’être for the placement of songs. At the
outset, these sequences work much harder to use European locations as performa-
tive spaces of music where characters are shown as ‘musicking bodies’ (Chris-
topher Small 1998).10 At a time when background songs are becoming a norm,
European locations in Bollywood songs 91
Figures 5.7–5.9 In Cocktail (2012), the background songs depict the emotional journey of
the three protagonists in three distinct spaces.
Source: Maddock Films Private Limited and Eros International Media Limited
92 Shikha Jhingan
these diegetic song sequences allow characters the chance to sing on screen by lip
syncing to a playback singers voice.11 However, by unpacking production prac-
tices involved in the creation of these songs, I hope to demonstrate the greater
sonic attunement to locations, involving the labour and creativity of local artists.
In Rockstar (2011), Prague became a site for the performance of diegetic music
involving a complex network with other performing bodies, both in front of the
camera and sound studios. Imtiaz Ali brings to us a layered soundtrack co-created
through a collaboration with several European artists. In the narrative, the central
protagonist Janardan/Jordan travels to Prague to perform and record his music,
representing an Indian music company. However, Jordan also hopes to reunite with
Heer, his love-interest, who has moved to Prague with her husband. Instead of
using a touristic vision of Prague, Imtiaz Ali uses space to bring out the city’s
dark beauty, underlining its ancient architecture, gothic style facades, and stories of
witchcraft. Prague, according to Ali, was an ideal location for the two characters to
explore their hidden and passionate relationship.12 Ali also mines the city of Prague
known for its rich musical history and known for its music recording industry. An
interesting sequence in the lm is the prelude to the ‘Hawa Hawa’ song. We see
Jordan walking down a narrow lane while the sound of music pulls him towards the
Maltézské Náměstí (The Maltese Square) in the Lesser Town of Prague, where a
group of Gypsies are playing music. Jordan is intrigued by their music and unusual
rhythm patterns. The sequence frames Jordan as a listener soaking in the music of
Prague and then turns our attention to Jordan as a musician, getting into the ow
of the performance. This musical section becomes a prelude to ‘Hawa Hawa/The
wind’, as Jordan starts singing, dancing, and interacting with the musicians and the
crowd (Figure 5.10).
The production practices involved in the creation of ‘Hawa hawa’ also dem-
onstrate how the gure of the musician is depicted ‘as an auditory and embodied
Figure 5.10 Tiger Zinda Hai (2017) ends with the ‘Swag’ song shot at Mykonos, Greece
with a large crew of dancers and performers.
Source: Yash Raj Films
European locations in Bollywood songs 93
self that responds and resounds’ (Born 2013). According to Imtiaz Ali, the song
was created after he met several folk musicians and performers in Prague, while
researching the locations for the lm. This involved sharing with the local artists
the subject of his lm and inviting ideas from them for a collaborative project.13
Additionally, after attending a gypsy festival in France, he invited some musicians
for the shoot in Prague. ‘Hawa hawa’, was nally written by Irshad Kamil, incor-
porating one of the legendry tales of Sleepy Haunsa/Sleepy John.14 The song is
woven around the story of a queen who slips out at night to party in the depth of
hell. By making references to the queen’s escapades and the consequences she has
to face, the song becomes a metaphor for Heer’s transgressions with Jordan that
ultimately leads to a tragic situation in the course of their lives.
Unlike the self-enclosed pre-fabricated song that was earlier used for aural
reference to help actors lip sync or perform with its rhythm, the diegetic song
production involved a recalibration of its sonic aesthetics. Paul Theberg’s concept
of a networked studio highlights a shift in the spatial logic of music recordings,
where the arrival of new technologies have made studios become spatially diused
(2004). Furthermore, Andrew Leyshon (2001) has underlined the connections
between networks and geography by enumerating four kinds of networks, that of
creativity, reproduction, distribution and consumption. These networks possess
distinctive but overlapping functions, temporalities, and geographies. Leyshon’s
ideas are based on a critique of Jacques Attali’s (1985) political economy approach
that emphasises the succession of musical codes in tune with a ‘stagist approach’ to
social change.15 Even though ‘Hawa Hawa’ had already been recorded for lming
in Prague (especially those sections that involved lip syncing), the post-production
practices involved a reworking of the song, by mobilising creativity and incorpo-
rating the sounds of musical instruments that were recorded on location in Prague.
According to Imtiaz Ali:
We had already recorded the song with Rahman but recording happens in
layers and it was possible for Rahman Sir to incorporate the sounds of local
instruments. So, he could use these live instruments to replace some of the
electronic sounds. . . . It is very easy to bring in these layers with Rahman
because he works in this way.16
Access to digital technologies and multiple tracks enables musicians and sound
engineers to introduce diverse sounds, expanding the tonalities of the song and the
sonorous space that has been created in the lm. This brings in an ‘audiovisual real-
ism’, acknowledging the presence of the musicking and dancing bodies on loca-
tion (Jaikumar 2019 p. 285). Furthermore, if we consider the production practices,
we can see how networks of creativity, reproduction, and consumption overlap
with each other, at the lm location. In the song ‘Aur Ho’ that follows ‘Hawa
hawa’, Rahman collaborated with Alma Ferovic, a Bosnian singer and performer
from Sarajevo. The song was created through a collaboration that occurred across
continents with the help of the internet and digital delivery technologies.17 After
explaining the context of the narrative, Ferovic was asked by Rahman and Imtiaz
94 Shikha Jhingan
Ali on a skype call to respond to the particular situation in the lm, and then com-
pose and sing a Sevdelinka song in her own language.18 Later, Ferovic was invited
to Prague and performed the song with Ranbir Kapoor in the lm. Once in Prague,
she recorded the song again with some minor changes that the track demanded.
In Imtiaz Ali’s Jab Harry Met Sejal, Harry and Sejal travel to several cities
of Europe to recover Sejal’s lost engagement ring. Harry, a tour guide, works for
wealthy South Asians who arrive in Europe for their summer vacations. In the
course of the lm, we discover that Harry left his native village in Punjab for
Canada to make a career in music. He works as a tour guide in Europe and is often
haunted by the memories of the past that remain ineable. In his trip across the
continent with Sejal, Harry’s inner journey starts to peel o, as music becomes an
important trigger to reveal stories about migration, displacement, and longing that
have a universal valence. In Lisbon, Harry and Sejal visit a Fado club where a local
artist is performing live for the guests. This deeply haunting song narrates the story
of a woman waiting for her beloved who has gone to India by sea and not returned.
The tonality of the song, the lighting in the space, and the performance of the lead
actors work to heighten the aective registers of the song. This sequence is placed
at a point in the lm when the protagonists are coming to terms with the fact that
their journey together is coming to an end. The singer breaks into an English trans-
lation of the song making references to the stories of sailors/men on trade routes
that connected Portugal to India through the sea. In the next scene, we see Harry
and Sejal near the sea where Harry tells Sejal about his past in Nurmahal, a village
in Punjab. Predicting the outcome of their failed romance, Harry starts calling out
Sejal’s name while facing the sea, revisiting the narrative of departure and loss in
the Fado song. The sonic trace of this Portuguese song is carried forward in ‘Yadon
mein/in my memories’, a background song that is introduced when Harry and Sejal
are travelling in the tram in Lisbon. Based on the tune and the tonal quality of the
Fadon song, ‘Yadon mein’ invites the spectators to witness the haunting and repeti-
tive cycle of migration, exile, and an unknown future that connects the colonial
history of Europe to the post-colonial condition of migration and displacement.
Furthermore, the Fadon song in the lm played as a diegetic performance and the
use of its sonic features to create a background song in the lm demonstrate the
way lmmakers are listening and conducting research on the soundscapes of loca-
tions from where their narratives are emerging.
In Tamasha (2015), the island of Corsica becomes an important site for the
two characters to meet each other and live their fantasy of a short, unencumbered
friendship while they are in this beautiful island. As a prelude to the ‘Matargashti/
Loitering’ song, we see an elaborate Parade De La Bastill, with local residents sing-
ing, performing, and walking through the city during the time of the Shepherd festi-
val. Later in the sequence Imtiaz Ali uses diegetic performances of acapella singers
and the sound of Caramusa (Corsican bagpipe) that is played by shepherds during
the local festivals. In another sequence, we see the two lead characters loitering
through the lanes of Corsica with a sense of abandon and freedom while we hear
the haunting song of Benedictus in the soundtrack. Later, we see a group of artists
dressed in black performing the song in a local church. The dense soundscape of
European locations in Bollywood songs 95
Corsica forms an important sensory layer that invites us to connect with the loca-
tions along with the lead protagonists, as they explore their hidden selves.
The Dance-Driven Production Number
My nal discussion is about song and dance numbers that involve a large crew and
the labour of a number of background dancers. Unlike the usual Bollywood dance
numbers that place the lead artists prominently in front of the camera with several
dancers lined up in the background, the new dance-oriented production numbers
employ specialist dancers and gig performers who demand a complex use of space
and choreographic practices. Here, I want to focus on two songs from Bekre and
Tiger Zinda Hai that were shot in Paris and Mykonos, respectively, and demanded
the involvement of a complex network of labour, technologies, and infrastructures
across continents and the mobilisation of diverse genres of dance and public art
practices.
In the prelude to ‘Nashe Si chad gayi/She is an intoxication’, in Bekre, we see
Shyra and Dharam meeting each other for the rst time at a daytime soiree in the
heart of Paris. Cheeky conversation between them is framed against the backdrop
of a crowd of local young Parisians dancing to music with a DJ playing tracks at
the base of Pont Alexandre III. The sequence nally leads to the most popular song
of the lm – ‘Nashe Si Chad Gayi’, with Shyra and Dharam dancing to the trendy
track. The sequence choreographed by Vaibhavi Merchant was mounted with the
aid of professional dancers from various parts of France and several rehearsals
to prep for the shoot. This involved a complex auditioning of dancers accessed
through local agents, watching show reels of selected dancers and conducting
online conversations. The song shows several dancers performing hip-hop style
movements in a semi-circle with the lead dancers performing in the middle. Unlike
the usual Bollywood dance numbers where background dancers have to repeat the
same gestures as the lead dancers, creating symmetrical lines, the hip-hop dancers
in ‘Nashe Si Chad Gayi’ perform with a more open and creative style, enjoying the
moment in the middle of the city of Paris. A third layer is formed by another set of
bystanders watching the performance from a distance and moving in rhythm with
the music. Thus, the camera and the editing reveal to us a vast acoustic territory
that becomes the space for performance. In the last section of the song, as night
falls, we see the two protagonists moving away from the rest of the dancers in slow
motion and walking towards the bridge.19
The lm Tiger Zinda Hai ends with the ‘Swag’ song which was shot in Mykonos,
Greece, with a large crew of dancers, performers, and the production crew
(Figure 5.10). The idea behind the song, according to the director Ali Abbas Zafar,
was to create ‘an anthem of love’.20 In an interview, Meghdeep Bose, the music
producer of the song, shared his strategy of starting the song with the ‘big’ sound
of 20 synthesisers premixed together, playing the ‘tiger theme’ music. For Bose,
this created the sound of unison that worked for the theme of the song.21 Accord-
ing to Vaibhavi Merchant, ‘Swag se karenge sabka swagat/we welcome everyone
with style’ was conceptualised as a dance number with a message of oneness and
96 Shikha Jhingan
peace, and therefore she decided to work with ‘unique people with unique swag’
that included ballerinas, Afro dancers, B Boyers, cyclists, and football tricksters,
who were all brought under one roof.22 The pre-production of the song involved
formal and informal networks, infrastructures, technologies and the logistics of
movement. The hip-hop dancers were selected via agents from Paris who had
helped the same production house for the Bekre song. A larger pool of artists were
called to Athens, and the nal selection was done by the choreographers. Finally,
90 dancers and artists were hired to perform for the song in Myknos. Apart from the
performers, these dance numbers required the involvement of crowd managers and
production sta enabling inter-cultural interactions and an embodied engagement
with lming locations.
Conclusion
This chapter has traced transformations in the aural and visual style of song
sequences of the last decade, along the axis of industrial practice and aesthetic
style. By focusing on lms like Queen (2013), Rockstar 2011, Cocktail (2012), and
Jab Harry Met Sejal, I have highlighted the emergence of a distinct style of song
presentation in lms shot in European locations. The non-lip-synced background
songs in particular mark a shift from the romantic duet songs associated with lms
like Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge (1995) of the 1990s. Songs in Queen, Rockstar,
and Cocktail depict character moods as aective states that seem to emanate from
the locations in which they reside. These songs present a darker feel of the Euro-
pean city, subtly incorporating its sonic characters, through the experience of South
Asian immigrant bodies. Songs that highlight the diegetic performance of music in
lmed space can be linked to the deployment of sync sound recording and the rise
of global music cultures and digital infrastructures. High energy dance numbers
that draw on the labour of highly eclectic performers involve the mobilisation of
mobile musicking bodies and new infrastructures that have expanded the sonic
geography of New Bollywood.
Acknowledgements
This chapter has come out of research conducted under the aegis of Equip: EU-
India Social Science and Humanities Platform, funded by the Indian Council of
Social Science Research (ICSSR).
Notes
1 Foley artists create ambient sounds for lm and other media at the post-production stage
with the help of props.
2 An often cited reason for following this practice was that lm cameras that were used
for capturing scenes were very noisy and would therefore interfere with sounds that
needed to be recorded from the perspective of the narrative.
3 Rakesh Ranjan is the HOD of sound design at Whistling Woods International and has
worked on several Hindi lms as a sound designer and mixer.
European locations in Bollywood songs 97
4 “Dekha ek khawab” (Silsila, Yash Chopra 1981) shot at the Keukenhof Tulip Gardens,
Netherlands became an iconic song, in which we see Amitabh Bachchan and Rekha
romancing with each other. Until then Yash Chopra had used Kashmir as a romantic
setting for lms like Kabhie Kabhie and Silsila.
5 In “Dholna”, in many shots, we see the grass and vines in a vineyard swaying in a gentle
motion to the wind but we never hear the sound of wind.
6 Amit Trivedi is the music director of Queen.
7 In the dubbing era, in contrast, sound designers used foley sound to create an ambient
environment indicated as spatial markers.
8 The song was shot in various locations of the city of Amsterdam.
9 In a YouTube video describing the making of Queen, Vikas Bahl described it as
a lm “about life not going as per plan and then how people she encounters, she
meets, how she lives, how she survives”. See available at: www.youtube.com/
watch?v=8A7hTyGNOP8.
10 The term musicking has been coined by Christopher Small to highlight music as a pro-
cess, a verb that may involve performing, listening, rehearsing or practicing (1998).
11 In an interview on YouTube, Karan Johar shared that he decided to make Ae Dil Hai
Mushkil in which his lead character is a musician because he wanted to show his pro-
tagonist singing in the lm.
12 Interview with Imtiaz Ali was jointly conducted with Ranjani Mazumdar in March 2020
in Mumbai.
13 Ibid.
14 Irshad Kamil is a celebrated lyricists of Bollywood who has had a successful partnership
with Imtiaz Ali. He has written lyrics for the songs of Rockstar, Tamasha and Jab Harry
Met Sejal, all three lms directed by Imtiaz Ali that are discussed in this paper.
15 Attali’s four musical orders are sacrice (ritual), representation (enactment), repetition
(recording and stockpiling) and composition (collective play).
16 Interview with Imtiaz Ali in Bombay during eld work in March 2020.
17 In an interview with Devdutta Baji available on YouTube, Alma Ferovic has described
how she was approached by Rahman and the song was created with Ferovic bringing in
the Sevdalinka style of singing in the opening section of the song. Talk Studio | Devdu-
tta Baji with Alma Ferovic | Tamasha|Rockstar | Pune Podcast | Part 2 – YouTube.
18 According to Christian Lopac, Sevdalinka are deeply emotional Balkan folk songs that
draw from a mix of Arabic, Persian, Turkish, and Su traditions (2022). They are also
generally described as songs about unfullled love.
19 Describing her experience of choreographing the song, Vaibhavi Merchant has shared
that the crowds gathered at the site of lming refused to move even after the shooting
had ended, as they continued to sing and move with the groove of the song. See avail-
able from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgsgn6c1TbY.
20 See available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gqf2ctBQ83k.
21 Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXMnbW-3NRM.
22 See available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gqf2ctBQ83k.
References
Attali, J., 1985. Noise: The political economy of music. Minneapolis: University of Min-
nesota Press.
Born, G., 2013. Introduction. In: G. Born, ed., Music, sound and space: Transformations of
public and private experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–70.
Chattopadhyay, B., 2021. The auditory setting: Environmental sounds in lm and media
arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
98 Shikha Jhingan
Gallagher, M., Kanngieser, A. and Prior, J., 2017. Listening geographies: Landscape, aect
and geotechnologies. Progress in Human Geography, 41 (5), 618–637.
Gopalan, L., 2002. Cinema of interruptions: Action genres in contemporary Indian cinema.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanson, H., 2013. The ambience of lm noir: Soundscapes, design and mood. In: A. Spicer
and H. Hanson, eds., A companion to lm noir. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 284–301.
Iyer, U., 2020. Dancing women: Choreographing corporeal histories of Hindi cinema. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Jaikumar, P., 2017. Out of sync: Gendered location sound work in Bollywood. Available
from: https://soundstudiesblog.com/2017/11/06/out-of-sync-gendered-location-sound-
work-in-bollywood/.
Jaikumar, P., 2019. Where histories reside: India as lmed space. Hyderabad: Orient
Blackswan.
LaBelle, B., 2010. Introduction: Your sound is my sound. In: Acoustic territories: Sound
culture and everyday life. New York: Continuum, 15–17.
Leyshon, A., 2001. Time – space (and digital) compression: Software formats, musical net-
works, and the reorganisation of the music industry. Environment and Planning A, 33 (1),
49–77.
Lopac, C., 2022. Six Bosnian Sevdalinka songs. Delos, 37 (2), 207–217.
Mazumdar, R., 2007. Bombay cinema: An archive of the city. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Parmar, C., 2020. Interview conducted in Mumbai in March 2020.
Pemmaraju, G., 2013. Soundbaazi: Space, place and meaning in the Hindi lm soundtrack.
Art Connect, 7 (1), 60–81.
Prasad, M., 1998. The ideology of the Hindi lm: A historical construction. New Delhi:
Oxford University Press.
Rego, A. and Maurya, S., Interview conducted during eld work in Mumbai in March 2020.
Schafer, R. M., 2012. The soundscape. In: J Sterne, ed., Sound studies reader. London:
Routledge, 95–103.
Small, C., 1998. Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Middletown, CT:
Wesleyan University Press.
Théberge, P., 2004. The network studio: Historical and technological paths to a new ideal in
music making. Social Studies of Science, 34 (5), 759–781.
Waitt, G. and Duy, M., 2010. Listening and tourism studies. Annales of Tourism Research,
37 (2), 457–477.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-8
Part III
On location
Film production, lm policy, and place
Figure 3 Lisbon in Portugal. Portugal features as one of the destinations oering generous
incentives.
Source: Hania Janta
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-9
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
In 2013, the Italian press made great play of how various Indian audiovisual
productions had elected to lm in Italy. Many had shot in Milan and the surrounding
region of Lombardy, prompting one of Italy’s main weekly magazines, L’Espresso,
to publish a piece titled “Bollywood: Miracolo a Milano” (Bollywood: Miracle in
Milan), ring on the title of one of Italy’s most famous Neorealist lms (Miracolo
a Milano/Miracle in Milan). It stated that as many as 14 productions had chosen
Lombardy in the space of 18 months, with an estimated total economic impact of
€11m (Sasso 2013). Intrigued by what we read, we immediately decided to study
the phenomenon of Indian productions lmed in Italy; the results were published
in the Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies (Cucco and Scaglioni 2014).
Nine years on, we are returning to the India–Italy relationship, in particular that
between the Indian audiovisual industry and Italian locations. We asked ourselves
whether Indian productions are still coming to lm in Italy. If so, why Italy? Have
the changes in recent years (the COVID-19 pandemic, the new Italian lm poli-
cies, the on-demand services that are now producing and screening lms) impacted
on Italy as a lming location of choice? On one hand, this second study serves to
conrm, disprove, or reshape the results of the rst. On the other, it extends the
study period (from 2010 to early 2022) and thus oers a more reliable panorama.
In other words, this second study will help to understand whether the 2010–2013
Indian lming boom was merely a blip or the start of a trend.
To answer these questions, we have divided this chapter into four sections. The
rst summarises the results of our 2013 study, analysing why many Indian lms
and TV series were shot abroad and in particular why some Indian producers chose
Italy. The second probes the more signicant changes in the Italian and global
audiovisual landscape between 2014 and early 2022 that may have inuenced the
relationship between Indian productions and Italian locations. We theoretically
discuss the potential impact of VOD platforms, new national and local lm poli-
cies introduced in Italy, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The same events will be
investigated during an interview with a key-mediator in the Italy–India relationship
(third section) in order conrm or refute our considerations. The third section also
examines the list of lms and television series shot in Italy between 2010 and 2022
6 On the Italian trail of Indian
lms through the lens of media
industry studies
Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
102 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
with a view to identifying trends. And the fourth oers a critical appraisal of the
Indian audiovisual productions’ relationship with Italian locations.
This chapter uses a media industry studies approach (Herbet et al. 2020). Spe-
cically, it brings together two study traditions linked to media industry studies: the
political economy of media (Wasko 2015) and production studies (Caldwell 2008;
Mayer et al. 2009; Szczepanik and Vonderau 2013). The former is a useful tool for
relating companies’ actions to the public policies regulating and/or supporting the
media industry and for highlighting key trends in the market and corporate strategy.
Production studies, meanwhile, are especially important for understanding the pro-
duction cultures in which the companies operate and where the audiovisual prod-
ucts are created, to examine the operational dynamics of the production processes
and how they aect the nal output.
The outsourcing (in Italy and abroad) of Indian shoots: a recap
Our earlier study on the delocalisation of Indian lm shoots in Italy (Cucco and
Scaglioni 2014) had three main stages: a) desk research on the Indian audiovis-
ual industry and the delocalisation of lming based on political economy studies;
b) in-depth interviews in Italy and India with audiovisual-industry professionals in
order to understand dynamics and production cultures of both countries in relation
to the outsourcing of Indian shoots in Italy; c) a survey of Italian lm commissions
aimed at collecting data and providing a quantitative support to our research. For
the purposes of our study, we had identied three principal push factors underlying
overseas delocalisation, in particular in Western countries, of shoots for Indian lm
and television series: a) logistical reasons, b) nancial reasons, and c) the search
for a wider audience, including the pursuit of specic key targets.
The logistical reasons concern how Indian crews nd working conditions more
congenial in the West: as many interviewees told us, the cities are less chaotic
than in India, and the services available from the state and local businesses are
more ecient, resulting in reduced costs and a higher-quality nal output. The
eectiveness of the host territories’ services is down to the eorts of the lm com-
missions and lm oces now active throughout all Western countries as pull fac-
tors leveraged by the local-government bodies. Film commissions and lm oces
assist crews with location scouting, obtaining permits, recruiting local skilled
workers, nding local services (hotels, catering, etc.), oering special discounts,
etc. In 2013, no such services existed in India, and the necessary permits had to
be applied for at various government departments (Ernst & Young and LA-India
Film Council 2012). In logistical terms, India’s monsoon season poses particular
problems: the unpredictable weather can delay lming and thus increase costs.
Another logistical benet of delocalisation is that lming becomes simpler and
less stressful, as the actors and crews are not besieged by fans and paparazzi in the
West as they are in India.
The second type of push factor is the funding and economic incentives oered
to audiovisual productions by many local- and national-government bodies. Subsi-
dies and tax breaks seek to attract productions and thus stimulate the host locations’
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 103
economies (Goldsmith 2015; Cucco 2018a). Pertinently, India’s public bodies have
long failed to support the audiovisual industry, even subjecting it to very high taxa-
tion on the same footing as the gaming sector (Ganti 2017).
The third factor is the desire to make lms with audience appeal and to reach
specic targets. This goal works in three dierent directions. First, shooting abroad
aims to make lms more spectacular. To compete with the satellite pay channel
oerings, lm producers have begun to make fewer titles but with bigger budgets.
With these extra resources, movies could be made that stood out from the routine
television fare with lower production values, fullling their box oce potential
better and justifying the ticket price (Ganti 2007, 2012). In this context, foreign
and exotic locations were a means to make lms dierent, unusual, appealing,
and thus more spectacular, even though the overseas locations were often mere
backdrops. There was no cultural, linguistic, or political interaction with the host
areas – except for the most famous cities and some of their celebrated landmarks, it
was often hard to identify where the action was happening. As Rao recalls, “these
spaces and geographies (and, implicitly, cultures) are Indianized by locating Mum-
bai lm actors, actresses, and extras, speaking Hindi, in them” (2010, pp. 9–10).
Second, the use of material lmed abroad serves to attract a more auent audi-
ence that can aord the more expensive tickets at the multi-screen cinemas that
have recently appeared, an audience interested in seeing a dierent world from
India, especially a Western one. Foreign lms have a tiny market share in India, so
Indian lms shot abroad are among the few opportunities to see dierent milieux
on screen. But the attempt to attract and satisfy a well-to-do audience is part of a
broader process of gentrication that Indian cinema has followed in this millen-
nium, aiming to position cinema as a cultural and economic activity acceptable to
politicians and the inuential strata of society (Ganti 2012).
And third, lms shot overseas appeal to rst- and second-generation Indian
expats – non-resident Indians (NRIs) who may like to watch lms shot abroad
with Indian actors or to engage with stories that may be similar to their own.
Between the late 1990s and the start of the millennium, the perception of NRIs
changed in India. Once seen as those who had abandoned the country for glamour
and comfort abroad, they have now become an “icon of the desirable cosmopolitan
Indian citizen straddling the globe” (Athique 2012, p. 282). Their representation
on screen is thus of interest for Indian audiences too. In this context, it is useful to
remember that ticket prices are higher in the West, so tickets sold abroad in dollars,
euros, or pounds are worth more than those sold in India.
The Italian case study has conrmed two of these three reasons. Our survey and
interviews have shown that Indian productions choose Italy for logistical reasons
and for the spectacular settings. Logistically, there are lm commissions all over
Italy, while the mild and sunny climate makes it possible to shoot for many hours
a day and many months a year, especially during the Indian monsoons. In terms of
the spectacular, Italy oers a great variety of landscapes – sea, mountains, rolling
hills, plus cities historic and modern, large, and small, and Indian productions have
used them all, sometimes combining very diverse settings even in the same picture.
In this framework, funding reasons are not relevant. National public nancing in
104 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
Italy is accessible only for Italian lms and international co-productions with Italy.
Foreign lms can apply for local public nancing, but local grants are too scant for
motivating far-away crews to move to Italy.
Do all these motivations still apply nine years later? What intervening changes
in India and Italy might have inuenced lming delocalisation processes?
Outsourcing: a dierent framework
Looking at the period from 2013 to today, there are some factors that could theo-
retically have inuenced the relationship between Indian audiovisual productions
and Italian locations.
The rst is the advent of the on-demand platforms. The streaming service com-
panies dier considerably from one another, operating to dierent business models
and in dierent-sized markets. Some provide content in one country only; others
work internationally or even globally. The best-known and most widespread plat-
forms in the world are currently Netix and Amazon Prime Video. Both operate
in 200+ countries (in India since 2016), oering self-produced/-funded content or
material bought in from other producers. In April 2020, also Disney+ entered the
Indian digital market with the VOD platform Disney+ Hotstar. To what extent can
the establishment of global on-demand services impact on the foreign delocalisa-
tion of Indian audiovisual productions?
The big platforms use their own original productions for dierent purposes
(Lobato 2019). On the one hand, they are interested in content that plays well in
their various markets, with a view to extracting the maximum possible return on
their economic investments in production. This can lead them to produce lms
and television series with transnational appeal, aided by outsourcing. Some studies
have indeed shown that having locations from dierent countries in the same lm
or series can increase its appeal to global audiences, which is why many sequels
feature more locations than the preceding product did (Cucco 2015). On the other
hand, the platforms use their original productions to obtain a foothold in the coun-
tries they wish to penetrate. Here, productions are conceived mainly for a national
market – to boost subscriptions in that country, to collaborate with local compa-
nies and to avoid oering content that is foreign to the national audience. This is
especially important for a country like India, where although there are no political
and commercial barriers to entry for foreign lms, audiences strongly prefer local
content. Box oce performance makes this clear: in pre-pandemic 2019, Indian
lms had an 87% market share in India; foreign ones, just 13% (European Audio-
visual Observatory 2020, p. 54). In other words, the platforms’ eect on outsourc-
ing could be twofold, working paradoxically in opposite directions.
As regards what has changed in Italy, the last ten years have seen a constant
growth in the lm commissions’ oerings.1 Through the experience gained on the
ground and the results achieved, lm commissions can now provide increasingly
competitive and eective services. Also, nearly all Italian lm commissions oer
one or more local funds for the various stages of production (development, prepro-
duction, and shooting), some of which are open even to foreign productions made
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 105
in Italy. These local funds have a primarily economic aim: to attract inward invest-
ment (Cucco 2018a). So public funding provided to foreign companies also helps
to achieve the set objectives and thus to attain a collective benet.
While the individual Italian regions are increasingly active in attracting lm and
other audiovisual shoots, the Italian government has bolstered the audiovisual and
cinema tax incentive schemes and put more money behind them. Tax credits have
proved useful in encouraging private investment and, more generally, a greater
alignment between Italian audiovisual productions and the market. It is important
to note here how the tax incentive programme has continually grown. It is dedi-
cated to foreign lms, shorts, TV series, documentaries, entertainment shows, and
web products shot at least partly in Italy and with an Italian executive producer.
The tax credits now on oer represent 40% of the Italian executive producer’s
costs, up to a total annual funded value of €50m. Through this measure aimed at
foreign productions, Italian locations are no longer just an exotic dimension that
adds to a lm’s appeal: they have become a strategic tool for accessing generous
tax incentives by bringing an Italian company on board. This measure is eective
at attracting investment into Italy, but with a side-eect that the government did
not envisage: it is now in foreign companies’ interest to have an Italian executive
producer rather than an Italian co-producer (Cucco 2018b).
Another major factor that may have been pivotal in the relationship between Indian
production companies and Italian locations is of course the COVID-19 emergency.
The pandemic halted lm and audiovisual production for months all over the world.
And when production managed to restart, delocalisations seemed particularly at risk,
for positive COVID cases could suddenly shut down lming – with all the costs to
the producer of being forced to stay idly overseas. Moreover, with Indian produc-
tions, the vaccines’ arrival did not necessarily help: those who received Covishield
(widespread in India) had to wait for the vaccine to be recognised by Europe’s indi-
vidual national agencies before being able to travel freely as in pre-pandemic days.
Indian shoots in Italy (2010–2022) and Occhi di Ulisse
To map the Indian lms and series shot in Italy, we consulted the Italian lm com-
mission websites, which almost invariably have a record of the productions hosted
in their area.2 The Indian titles we found always involved the Italian production
services company Occhi di Ulisse, set up in 2009 by Ivano Fucci and Michele
Saragoni. Our 2013 survey of the Italian lm commissions had already identied
this company’s central role as a key intermediary between India and Italy, which is
why in 2013 we had interviewed Ivano Fucci, line and executive producer for Occhi
di Ulisse. The conrmation of the company’s continued importance prompted us
to seek a second in-depth interview with Fucci to examine in detail the Indian
productions with which Occhi di Ulisse has worked.3
Occhi di Ulisse acts as an intermediary between Italy and foreign productions
often from India but also other countries from France, Hungary, and Switzerland to the
Czech Republic in recent years. From the year it was founded to early 2022, Occhi di
Ulisse was involved in the making of 47 Indian audiovisual works in Italy (Table 6.1).
106 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
Table 6.1 Indian audiovisual productions lmed in Italy (2010–2022).
Year Film title Production company Origin Italian region(s) + foreign countries
2011 Badrinath Geetha Arts Hyderabad Veneto
2011 Paglu Surinder Films Kolkata Lombardy, Tuscany
2011 Rajapattai PVP Production Tamil Nadu Lombardy, Tuscany
2012 Devudu Chesina Manushulu Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra Hyderabad Aosta Valley
2012 Paglu 2 Surinder Films Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy, Piedmont
2012 Ajab Gazab Love Vashu Bhagnani’s Production Mumbai Aosta Valley, Lombadry, Tuscany
2012 Baadshah Parameswara Art Productions Hyderabad Lombardy, Piedmont
2012 Sarocharu Vyjayanthi Production Hyderabad Lombadry, Tuscany
2012 Mirchi UV Creations Hyderabad Lombadry, Tuscany
2012 Rocky Shree Venkatesh Films Kolkata Sicily
2013 Attarintiki Daredi Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra Hyderabad Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2013 Rangbaaz Surinder Films India Lazio, Lombardy
2013 Majnu Surinder Films Kolkata Lombardy
2013 Matt & Juliet Shree Venkatesh Films Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy, Veneto
2013 Bramhan K Manju Cinemaas Chennai Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2013 Irumbu Kuthirai AGS Entertainment Chennai Tuscany, Veneto
2014 Bangali Babu English Mem SVF Entertainment Kolkata Veneto
2014 Bramman Anto Joseph Film Company, K Manju Cinemaas Kerala Lombardy
2014 Race Gurram Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Productions Hyderabad Lombardy
2014 Alludu Seenu Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Productions Hyderabad Veneto
2014 Irumbu Kuthirai AGS Entertainment Chennai Liguria, Lombardy, Tuscany
2015 Herogiri Surinder Film Kolkata Campania + Switzerland
2015 Besh Korechi Prem Korechi SVF Entertainment, Surinder Films Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2015 Vedalam Shri Saai Ram Creations Chennai Aosta Valley, Tuscany
2016 One Way Ticket Mekbrand Mumbai Liguria + France, Spain
2016 Abhimaan Grassroot Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy + Switzerland
2016 Haripada Bandwala SVF Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy
2017 Katamarayudu Northstar Entertainment Hyderabad Lombardy
2017 Mister Light House Movie Makers, Sri Lakashmi
Narasimha Productions
Hyderabad Lombardy
2017 Radha Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra Hyderabad Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige
2017 Ami Je Ke Tomar SVF Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy
2017 Fu: Friendship Unlimited Mahesh Manjrekar Movies Mumbai Lombardy
2017 Andhhagadu A.K. Entertainments Hyderabad Campania
2017 Rangbaaz Rup Rong Films, SVF Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige
2017 Vunnadhi Okate Zindagi Sravanthi Cinematics Hyderabad Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige
2017 Jawaan Arunachal Creations Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2018 Inspector Notty K Surinder Films, Jeetz Filmworks Kolkata Liguria
2018 Krishnarjuna Yudham Shine Screens Hyderabad Campania, Liguria + Czech Republic
2018 Aravindha Sametha Veera
Raghava
Haarika & Hassine Creations Hyderabad Lombardy + Switzerland
2019 Saaho UV Creations, T-Series Films Hyderabad Lazio + Croatia
2019 Chanakya AK Entertainment Hyderabad Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2019 Roam Rome Mein Rising Star Entertainment, Eros Worldwide Mumbai Lazio
2020 Bheeshma Sithara Entertainments Hyderabad Apulia, Campania
2021 Red Sri Sravanthi Movies Trentino-Alto Adige, Tuscany
2021 Bony Surinder Films Kolkata Lombardy, Tuscany
2022 Radhe Shyam Gopikrishna Movies, T-Series Films, UV
Creations
Hyderabad Aosta Valley, Lazio, Liguria,
Piedmont, Tuscany
2022 Thank You Sri Venkateswara Creations Hyderabad Piedmont
Source: Own elaboration, based on data from Occhi di Ulisse and the Internet Movie Database.
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 107
Table 6.1 Indian audiovisual productions lmed in Italy (2010–2022).
Year Film title Production company Origin Italian region(s) + foreign countries
2011 Badrinath Geetha Arts Hyderabad Veneto
2011 Paglu Surinder Films Kolkata Lombardy, Tuscany
2011 Rajapattai PVP Production Tamil Nadu Lombardy, Tuscany
2012 Devudu Chesina Manushulu Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra Hyderabad Aosta Valley
2012 Paglu 2 Surinder Films Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy, Piedmont
2012 Ajab Gazab Love Vashu Bhagnani’s Production Mumbai Aosta Valley, Lombadry, Tuscany
2012 Baadshah Parameswara Art Productions Hyderabad Lombardy, Piedmont
2012 Sarocharu Vyjayanthi Production Hyderabad Lombadry, Tuscany
2012 Mirchi UV Creations Hyderabad Lombadry, Tuscany
2012 Rocky Shree Venkatesh Films Kolkata Sicily
2013 Attarintiki Daredi Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra Hyderabad Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2013 Rangbaaz Surinder Films India Lazio, Lombardy
2013 Majnu Surinder Films Kolkata Lombardy
2013 Matt & Juliet Shree Venkatesh Films Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy, Veneto
2013 Bramhan K Manju Cinemaas Chennai Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2013 Irumbu Kuthirai AGS Entertainment Chennai Tuscany, Veneto
2014 Bangali Babu English Mem SVF Entertainment Kolkata Veneto
2014 Bramman Anto Joseph Film Company, K Manju Cinemaas Kerala Lombardy
2014 Race Gurram Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Productions Hyderabad Lombardy
2014 Alludu Seenu Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Productions Hyderabad Veneto
2014 Irumbu Kuthirai AGS Entertainment Chennai Liguria, Lombardy, Tuscany
2015 Herogiri Surinder Film Kolkata Campania + Switzerland
2015 Besh Korechi Prem Korechi SVF Entertainment, Surinder Films Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2015 Vedalam Shri Saai Ram Creations Chennai Aosta Valley, Tuscany
2016 One Way Ticket Mekbrand Mumbai Liguria + France, Spain
2016 Abhimaan Grassroot Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy + Switzerland
2016 Haripada Bandwala SVF Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy
2017 Katamarayudu Northstar Entertainment Hyderabad Lombardy
2017 Mister Light House Movie Makers, Sri Lakashmi
Narasimha Productions
Hyderabad Lombardy
2017 Radha Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra Hyderabad Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige
2017 Ami Je Ke Tomar SVF Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy
2017 Fu: Friendship Unlimited Mahesh Manjrekar Movies Mumbai Lombardy
2017 Andhhagadu A.K. Entertainments Hyderabad Campania
2017 Rangbaaz Rup Rong Films, SVF Entertainment Kolkata Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige
2017 Vunnadhi Okate Zindagi Sravanthi Cinematics Hyderabad Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige
2017 Jawaan Arunachal Creations Kolkata Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2018 Inspector Notty K Surinder Films, Jeetz Filmworks Kolkata Liguria
2018 Krishnarjuna Yudham Shine Screens Hyderabad Campania, Liguria + Czech Republic
2018 Aravindha Sametha Veera
Raghava
Haarika & Hassine Creations Hyderabad Lombardy + Switzerland
2019 Saaho UV Creations, T-Series Films Hyderabad Lazio + Croatia
2019 Chanakya AK Entertainment Hyderabad Aosta Valley, Lombardy
2019 Roam Rome Mein Rising Star Entertainment, Eros Worldwide Mumbai Lazio
2020 Bheeshma Sithara Entertainments Hyderabad Apulia, Campania
2021 Red Sri Sravanthi Movies Trentino-Alto Adige, Tuscany
2021 Bony Surinder Films Kolkata Lombardy, Tuscany
2022 Radhe Shyam Gopikrishna Movies, T-Series Films, UV
Creations
Hyderabad Aosta Valley, Lazio, Liguria,
Piedmont, Tuscany
2022 Thank You Sri Venkateswara Creations Hyderabad Piedmont
Source: Own elaboration, based on data from Occhi di Ulisse and the Internet Movie Database.
108 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
There is no register of foreign lms shot in Italy, so we cannot be sure how
many or which Indian productions chose to delocalise lming in Italy. Our
research, however, has not found any titles beyond those in this table. The rela-
tionship between Indian productions and Italian locations, therefore, is mediated
essentially by just one company: Occhi di Ulisse. No competition seems to exist in
this specic business, despite there are not entering barriers for national or foreign
companies.
Table 6.1 facilitates various immediate deductions. First, the number of produc-
tions hosted in Italy has tended to increase – tripling from three in 2011 to nine in
2017. The phenomenon detected in our initial study (2010–2013) was not therefore
a one-o but the start of a trend that has strengthened. Second, the works hosted in
Italy are both lms and TV series. Thus the delocalisation strategy serves the aims
of the lm and television industries alike. Third, these 47 works are by companies
based in dierent cities and are thus an expression of dierent regional cinemas.
This means that delocalisation in Italy transcends the dierences between the
industries in the various regions, linking Bollywood (whose output is also intended
for export), for example, to the country’s other producers. Fourth, the Indian pro-
ductions have used various Italian regions from the north, centre, and south; in
particular, some movies have been lmed simultaneously in several regions with
dierent traits. Often, for example, individual lms and TV series shot in Italy
combine big cities with small villages and urban settings with natural landscapes
(mountains, lakes, and the sea). This shows how Indian productions exploit Italy’s
scenic variety to lend their works a particular visual richness, making them spec-
tacular and thus attractive.4
Figure 6.1 is based on the data collected in the previous table, and it provides a
map of the Italian regions touched by Indian shoots. Despite the variety of regions
involved, a predilection for the north of the country looks quite evident: Lombardy
hosted 29 audiovisual works, while Aosta Valley 11. Lombardy counts on several
strengths: small-, medium-, and big-sized cities, modern buildings and infrastruc-
tures, industrial areas, and a rich environmental heritage (mountain, lakes, rivers,
etc.). However, in 27 cases out of 29, the audiovisual works involving Lombardy
have been shoot entirely or partially is Milan, the economic heart, the fashion
capital, and the most international city of Italy. The appealing of the main Italian
metropolis is in some way balanced by Aosta Valley, which holds the second posi-
tion of the ranking. In this case, Alps probably play a key role in attracting Indian
companies, as it happened in the case of Switzerland (Schneider 2011). Moreover,
the combined use of these two regions within the same audiovisual work (seven
cases) allows the access to a wide spectrum of dierent locations and guarantees a
spectacular backdrop for Indian lms and TV series.
Tuscany, located in the centre of Italy, hosted 11 Indian audiovisual works
too. In this case, two hypotheses stand out the other ones. The rst is related
to the region’s beauties and its international fame. The second one concerns
Ivano Fucci, line and executive producer at Occhi di Ulisse, that we already
mentioned earlier. Tuscany is his home region, and the Table 6.1 reveals that
Tuscany has been selected at the beginning of the decade more than at its end.
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 109
It means that probably when Occhi di Ulisse entered the business of lm loca-
tions, Ivano Fucci started to work by looking around himself, by exploiting his
own personal network of contacts, and suggesting his most familiar places to
Indian companies.
The in-depth interview with Ivano Fucci enabled us to probe these initial
considerations further and to deepen our understanding of the Italy – India relation-
ship. The interview conrmed that Italy appeals to Indian producers for two main
reasons: locations and tax breaks. Italy has a richly varied array of locations. Not
all Italian regions are equally enticing to Indian producers: although very attractive
to foreign producers for their scenic beauty, Puglia and Sardinia, for example, are
not very sought-after, as parts of India are similar. This shows that Indian producers
Figure 6.1 Map of Italian regions involved in Indian audiovisual works (2010–2022).
Source: Own elaboration
110 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
choose Italian locations to make their lms more spectacular and unique and thus
more attractive to audiences.
Nevertheless, Ivano Fucci maintains that access to tax incentives currently
matters more to Indian producers than the locations. That does not mean that pro-
duction cost savings are more important to them than content appeal. Essentially,
spectacular and exotic locations can be found in various countries, but some are
more generous with incentives than others. This understandable logic now works in
Italy’s favour, although it does entail the risk that Indian productions may go else-
where if other countries oer equally or more competitive tax breaks.5 According
to Fucci, Italy’s main competitors are now France, Hungary, and the UK6; the latter
has an advantage over them all, as the English language facilitates communication,
agreement, and cooperation between Italian crews and local stakeholders. So there
is no guarantee that Indian productions will still be using Italian locations in the
long term, although presumably they will continue to while the Italian government
oers incentives that the producers nd worthwhile.
Tax incentives are not the only economic carrot that Italy can oer. As
we have noted, nearly every Italian region now has at least one audiovisual-
production fund provided by its lm commission, some available to overseas
projects too. Yet as Ivano Fucci observes, these contributions are meagre at most
(maximum €250,000/project) and are not enough to attract Indian productions
on their own. On this regard, the data that we collected (Figure 6.1) conrm
Fucci’s words: Lombardy is the main Italian destination for Indian lms, but
Lombardy does not have a lm fund. It means that local public nancing is
not a key pull factor for attracting Indian crews in Italy. In addition, an Indian
producer looking to access these funds must monitor the regions’ invitations to
tender, apply with all the necessary paperwork, and wait for the adjudication to
be made. This all takes time, planning and a familiarity with how Italian public
bodies operate, so it tends to put Indian and foreign producers o. It seems much
more straightforward for them, however, to bring in an Italian executive pro-
ducer, thus rendering the project eligible for the tax incentives while the Italian
partner handles all the admin.
In this scenario of business strategy and public policy, Ivano Fucci’s insights
also remind us how production processes are often inuenced by chance and by
unpredictable circumstances that demand instant solutions and timely decisions.
As with Made in Heaven, a series exclusive to Amazon Prime Video centring on
two wedding planners, for which Occhi di Ulisse was line producer. The series
was to be shot in Italy, but the Italian authorities’ delay in recognising Covishield
prompted the production company to switch lming to France.7
The eventual recognition of the Indian vaccine made it possible to shoot Radhe
Shyam in Italy; it was one of the most expensive lms in Indian cinema history,
with an estimated budget of $30m. It was set in 1970s Italy across ve regions:
Lazio, Piedmont, Tuscany, Liguria, and Valle d’Aosta. In this case, the Italian set-
tings were not merely window dressing but were justied by the storyline. The lm
was shot in two languages (Hindi and Telugu) and will be dubbed into ve, with
distribution on Netix too.
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 111
New horizons: platforms and tourism
The Radhe Shyam case oers a springboard for some important observations. First,
the lm was the umpteenth conrmation of how supplying hospitality services
to lm and audiovisual productions could prove lucrative for the Italian regions.
Radhe Shyam’s arrival entailed foreign capital being spent in Italy, a boost to local
employment, increased local tax receipts, etc. Had the Indian producer gone else-
where, these benets would have been lost to other countries. In this context, the
relationship with India is especially crucial given that India is the world’s main
lm producing country with ever-growing numbers of titles: from 1,845 in 2015 to
2,446 in 2019, an annual rise of 7.3% (European Audiovisual Observatory 2020,
p. 13). Singularly too, production remained high during the pandemic, with 1,238
lms made in 2020 and 1,818 in 2021 (European Audiovisual Observatory 2022,
p. 15). Also, the corporatisation of Indian cinema has boosted the solidity and sta-
bility of the Indian rms operating in this arena (Ganti 2012, 2017), a source of
condence for Italian stakeholders.
The second consideration is that having the lm in the Netix catalogue aords
the Italian locations great visibility among Indian and international audiences. And
this can lead to increased interest in Italy as a travel destination. Unfortunately, lm
tourism is still a very dicult eld for quantitative study since a reliable method-
ology still has to be achieved (Cucco and Richeri 2021). Some researchers have
shown a bent for lm tourism on Indian viewers’ part (Josiam et al. 2020), although
we do not yet know whether Indian lms and TV series shot in Italy over the last ten
years have had an impact on tourism. Also, although some countries – for example,
Switzerland (Frank 2016) and Spain8 – have oered tourism experiences linked to
Indian lms shot there, this has not happened in Italy, thus limiting the scope for
monitoring and studying the Indian lm tourism phenomenon. Given these neces-
sary contextual considerations, the advent of the platforms and the boost that they
have given to the international circulation of audiovisual content can be said to
have favoured tourism. For the more people see the content, the greater the chance
that some of them will become lm tourists.
For those locations that aim at increasing their touristic ows, it is important
to remind that lm tourism could need to be encouraged and incentivised, since
in some cases it does not emerge spontaneously. In the case of Indian audiovisual
works, it is vital that viewers know in which Italian cities and regions the lms
and TV series that they have seen were shot in; often, though, these locations
remain anonymous. Their role is merely decorative, evocative, and spectacular.
As we noted in our earlier study, in many cases Italy’s presence in Indian lms is
often down to three types of dance and song sequences (Cucco and Scaglioni 2014,
pp. 427–428). The rst is the romantic song – choreographed scenes centring on
the male and female leads and their love story. Romantic songs normally require
stunning landscape backdrops, either the natural beauty of hill and mountain, lake
and sea, or the historic beauty of piazzas and city streets. The second type are the
transition songs, which punctuate or link up the lm’s narrative dynamic, resolv-
ing a series of negative events that have built up to that point. Small villages are
112 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
suitable locations for these songs, where the characters might take a walk together.
A third type are the party songs, scenes with crowded gatherings where the actors
are normally introduced at the start of the lm. Clearly, in most Indian lms shot in
Italy, the need for settings for musical scenes is bound up with the dreamy atmos-
phere of these moments and is not prompted or justied by specic references in
the storyline to actual places. The location remains an evocative backdrop that
chimes with the characters’ emotions rather than linking to points in the plot. Of
course, Indian producers and directors have no particular interest in making the
Italian locations recognisable, so it is hard to imagine how this problem could be
overcome.
Action would also be required to attract Indian lmgoers to Italy, which begs the
question: who is responsible for promoting it? Presumably the Italian regions host-
ing the lming, but local government often lacks the necessary skills and resources.
Film tourism is still also unpredictable and hard to manage, thus disincentivising ad
hoc initiatives. In other words, Indian lm shoots in Italy are currently a resource
that is only partially exploited, oering as yet unexplored avenues (e.g. tourism).
Finally, it should be noted that the advent of the platforms serves not only to
promote tourism to the Italian locations by Indian visitors but also to potentially
promote Indian lms to Italian audiences. Here too, locations have a key role to
play. In Italy, for example, very few Indian lms make it into theatres: 0 in 2015 and
2016, 2 in 2017 and 2018, 12 in 2019, and 0 again in 2020 (source: www. cinetel.it).
And the few Indian lms that do come to Italy are distributed only in the big cities,
so they do not reach a mass audience. Compared with this paucity, Italian subscrib-
ers of Netix and Amazon Prime Video now have dozens of Indian lms to watch.
In this context of an unprecedented availability of Indian lms in Italy, the use
of Italian locations may prove pivotal. Italian locations might theoretically repre-
sent a bridge, drawing Italian audiences into a cinema that they are unaccustomed
to encounter.
Some concluding considerations
As the analysis shows, Indian audiovisual productions’ choice of Italian loca-
tions is not an exceptional phenomenon but rather a trend that has remained stable
throughout the last decade. The delocalisation of Indian lm shoots in Western
countries has three types of driver: logistical, nancial, and appealing. These cat-
egories can be further broken down. For delocalisation in Italy, our analysis has
conrmed these three types, albeit in just some of their forms. As Figure 6.2 shows,
delocalisations are down to good local services, the weather, tax incentives, and a
desire for the spectacular. Our study has not, however, looked at Indian audiences,
so we hope that future studies may ll this gap and show whether Italian locations
really can appeal to auent Indian audiences or NRIs.
The comparison with our 2013 study shows how tax incentives have grown in
importance – understandably since lm production in India has long received no
public support, and even after the corporatisation of cinema in Italy, public fund-
ing remains marginal (Ganti 2017). Italy now oers various incentive schemes,
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 113
Figure 6.2 The reasons for outsourcing Indian lm shoots (black outlines indicate the drivers found for Italy).
Source: Own elaboration
114 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
which have become particularly generous during the pandemic, as the Italian
government has deemed them the most suitable tool to help relaunch the sector.
The importance of tax incentives in attracting lm shoots nevertheless exposes
Italy to considerable uncertainty: if other European countries oer bigger incen-
tives, Italy risks losing out. Italy does not have a monopoly on sunshine and
varied, attractive landscapes, so that might not be enough to maintain its current
ow of hosted productions.
In this context, it remains uncertain how the on-demand services will aect
delocalisation. The platforms use their own original productions for dierent pur-
poses; delocalisation sometimes serves their aims and sometimes does not at all.
The Italy analysis uncovered only two cases where the platforms were involved:
Radhe Shyam and Made in Heaven (actually shot in France because of problems
with the Indian vaccine). On this front, therefore, the Italian case study cannot yet
identify any specic trends.
It has, however, proved extremely useful in reecting on the relationship between
audiovisual productions and local areas and its specic nature in the case of Indian
productions. This relationship has been mediated in Europe for nearly 20 years by
public intermediaries – the lm commissions, which provide primarily logistical
support and mediate on three levels. First, they act as intermediaries between the
audiovisual production (production companies, directors, and screenwriters) and
the host area (local institutions and the community). These stakeholders have dif-
ferent goals; they are not in with the industry lingo; and their work is subject to
timescales that are hard to reconcile. Second, lm commissions encourage collabo-
ration between dierent production cultures professionals that the audiovisual
productions bring to a given place for the lming and professionals recruited in situ
from local and non-local people. In other words, lm commissions help to create
bespoke teams whose members have dierent habits and ways of working. Third,
lm commissions incentivise a brand-new collaboration between the audiovisual
production and the tourist sector. These two worlds have traditionally always been
separated, unaware of each other’s dynamics yet capable of achieving signicant
economic results when they work together (Cucco and Richeri 2021).
The study of Indian lms shot in Italy shows how this economic and cultural
intermediation can also be performed by a private company, in our case Occhi di
Ulisse. This inevitably raises the question of why the Indian companies, which
could deal with the Italian lm commissions directly, have chosen to go through
a private rm. We can oer some explanations. The spirit of initiative and pro-
fessionalism of Occhi di Ulisse founder Ivano Fucci has certainly played a part.
Perhaps Italy’s lm commissions are not very proactive with far-o lm industries
whose products are not popular in Italy and Europe. Or perhaps (and this is our
preferred hypothesis) the Indian lm industries still strongly favour informal rela-
tionships based on trust. Ivano Fucci knows Indian culture well; he spends much
of the year in India and has built his reputation in the eld. This may oer greater
traction with the Indian producers than an Italian public body like a lm commis-
sion. And regardless of this specic case, this dynamic reminds us once again how
each lm industry has its own peculiarities, its own modus operandi and its own
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 115
preferences. Each industry is part of a specic production culture and needs suit-
able intermediaries in order to collaborate with external entities.
One nal note: as we have just observed, when lm crews go abroad, this is
always an encounter between two cultures. The public debate in Europe is rmly
centred on sustainability, which also impinges on audiovisual productions, espe-
cially during shooting. Green protocols are becoming increasingly adopted across
the industry in a practice that is strongly recommended by the institutions and is
also a subject of study and training (Pabiś-Orzeszyna and Keilbach 2021). Italy is
no exception. So green policies and how they can aect the ability to attract (or
deter) shoots from other production cultures will undoubtedly be a future theme
informing the relationship between Indian lm shoots and Italian locations.
Notes
1 For a map of local lm funds and services for national and foreign companies shooting
audiovisual works in Italy, please consult the website Italy For Movies, available from:
www.italyformovies.it/.
2 We consulted the websites of the 19 lm commissions aliated to the association
Italian Film Commissions. The links to the lm commissions’ websites are available in
the “Members” section of the association’s website, available from: www.italianlmcom
missions.it/.
3 Interview with Ivano Fucci made by the authors on 15.01.2022, via Microsoft Teams.
4 Some of the listed works were also lmed in other European countries, primarily
Switzerland but also Croatia, France, Spain and the Czech Republic.
5 For a comparative analysis of tax incentive schemes in Europe, please consult the Euro-
pean Audiovisual Observatory report (Milla et al. 2016). There are no more recent reports
providing a comparative approach.
6 Competition between countries to attract audiovisual shoots is no longer a novelty but
a reality documented for several years now (see for example Miller et al. 2005; Wasko
and Erickson 2008; Cucco 2015; Goldsmith 2015). Every production has its own specic
needs, however, so the countries competing for them vary from case to case.
7 While France recognised Covishield vaccine in July 2021, Italian Ministry of Health did
it at the end of September 2021. See the communication of the Embassy of Italy in New
Delhi, available from: https://ambnewdelhi.esteri.it/ambasciata_newdelhi/en/ambasciata/
news/bacheca-consolare/2021/09/riconoscimento-dell-equivalenza.html.
8 In 2013, Lonely Planet launched a guide to Spain aimed specically at the Indian market,
and travel agencies advertise tours to the locations featured in Zindagi Milegi Na Debora
(2011), a road trip entirely shot in Spain. In return for the support received by locals dur-
ing the shooting stage, the producer agreed to include a short advertisement promoting
Spain before the start of the lm. After the lm release 60,444 Indians visited Spain,
nearly double the 2011 gure. Source available from: www.theguardian.com/world/2016/
jun/19/spain-courts-bollywood-productions-to-attract-more-indian-tourists.
References
Athique, A., 2012. Addressing the nonresident: Soft power, Bollywood, and the diasporic
audience. In: A. G. Roy, ed., The magic of Bollywood: At home and abroad. New Delhi:
Sage, 277–294.
Caldwell, J. T., 2008. Production culture: Industrial reexivity and critical practice in lm
and television. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
116 Marco Cucco and Massimo Scaglioni
Cucco, M., 2015. Blockbuster outsourcing: Is there really no place like home? Film Studies,
13 (1), 73–93.
Cucco, M., 2018a. The vertical axis of lm policies in Europe: Between subsidiarity and
local anarchy. In: N. Mingant and C. Tirtaine, eds., Reconceptualising lm policies. New
York: Routledge, 263–275.
Cucco, M., 2018b. The many enemies of co-productions in Italy: Moviegoers, broadcast-
ers, policymakers and half-hearted producers. In: J. Hammett-Jamart, P. Mitric and E. N.
Redvall, eds., European lm and television co-production: Policy and practice. Cham:
Palgrave Macmillan, 191–206.
Cucco, M. and Richeri, G., 2021. European lm commissions as transcultural promoters and
mediators. Journal of Transcultural Communication, 1 (1), 45–57.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2014. Shooting Bollywood abroad: The outsourcing of Indian
lms in Italy. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 2 (3), 417–432.
Ernst & Young and LA-India Film Council, 2012. Roadmap for single window clear-
ance for production in India: A prelude. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/
document/view/47254009/roadmap-for-single-window-clearance-for-lm-production-
in-india-a-prelude.
European Audiovisual Observatory, 2020. World lm market trends: Focus 2020. Strasbourg:
European Audiovisual Observatory.
European Audiovisual Observatory, 2022. World lm market trends: Focus 2021. Strasbourg:
European Audiovisual Observatory.
Frank, S., 2016. Dwelling-in-motion: Indian Bollywood tourists and their hosts in the Swiss
Alps. Cultural Studies, 30 (2), 506–531.
Ganti, T., 2007. And yet my heart is still Indian: The Bombay lm industry and the (H)
Indianization of Hollywood. In: J. F. Codell, ed., Genre, gender, race, and world cinema.
Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 439–457.
Ganti, T., 2012. Producing Bollywood: Inside the contemporary Hindi lm industry.
Durham: Duke University Press.
Ganti, T., 2017. Complicating paradigms of media industry analyses: The case of Bollywood.
Economia della Cultura, 27 (4), 511–526.
Goldsmith, B., 2015. ‘It’s Africa. It’s Arizona. It’s Antarctica. It’s Afghanistan. Actu-
ally, it’s Alberta’: Marketing locations to lm producers. In: N. Mingant, C. Tirtaine
and J. Augros, eds., Film marketing in the twenty-rst century. London: BFI, Palgrave
Macmillan, 174–184.
Herbet, D., Lotz, A. D. and Punathambekar, A., 2020. Media industry studies. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Josiam, B. M., Spears, D. L., Dutta, K., Pookulangara, S. and Kinley, T., 2020. Bollywood
induced international travel through the lens of the involvement construct. Anatolia: An
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 31 (2), 181–196.
Lobato, R., 2019. Netix nations: The geography of digital distribution. New York: New
York University Press.
Mayer, V., Banks, M. and Caldwell, J. T., 2009. Production studies: Cultural studies of
media industries. London: Routledge.
Milla, J. T., Fontaine, G. and Kanzler, M., 2016. Public nancing for lm and television con-
tent: The state of soft money in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R. and Wang, T., 2005. Global Hollywood 2.
London: BFI, Palgrave Macmillan.
Pabiś-Orzeszyna, M. and Keilbach, J., 2021. Green(ing) media (studies). Necsus, 2, 105–112.
On the Italian trail of Indian lms 117
Rao, S., 2010. ‘I need an Indian touch’: Glocalization and Bollywood lms. Journal of
International and Intercultural Communication, 3 (1), 1–19.
Sasso, M., 2013. Bollywood: Miracolo a Milano. L’Espresso, 05.11.2013. Available from:
https://espresso.repubblica.it/visioni/societa/2013/11/04/news/bollywood-miracolo-a-
milano-1.139735/.
Schneider, A., 2011. La Suisse et Bollywood: Un ‘Disneyland de l’amour’. CinémAction,
138 (20), 62–66.
Szczepanik, P. and Vonderau, P., 2013. Behind the screen: Inside European production
cultures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wasko, J., 2015. The study of the political economy of the media in the twenty-rst century.
International Journal of Media & Cultural Policy, 10 (3), 259–272.
Wasko, J. and Erickson, M., 2008. Cross-border cultural production: Economic runaway or
globalization?. Amherst: Cambria Press.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-10
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
The globalisation of lm production has led to numerous socio-cultural and eco-
nomic impacts at lming destinations and, today, many destinations seek to attract
foreign productions to their locales, in the hope of achieving long-term benets.
Film-induced, tourism business opportunities are the well-researched, (mostly)
positive, impacts that derive from hosting foreign lm productions (Connell 2012;
Beeton 2008; Ward and O’Regan 2009). Other benecial factors include: i) cultural
diplomacy, which results in the establishment of important business and cultural
links between countries; ii) knowledge exchange and innovation; and iii) employ-
ment opportunities; although the importance of these factors for the local hosting
economies has been debated (Hill and Kawashima 2016).
Filming abroad, by Indian lm producers, is not a new trend: the rst Bolly-
wood lm production “Sangam” (Conuence) was shot in Switzerland and France
in 1964 (Euroscreen 2015; Frank 2016; Gyimóthy 2018). As a result of the conict
in Kashmir during the Indo-Pakistani War, many productions moved to the Swiss
Alps, because the region resembles the mountainous landscapes of Kashmir. The
pristine settings are a popular background for romantic scenes. From the lm pro-
ducers’ points of view, lming abroad adds value to their lm productions and
helps reach auent audiences by showcasing exotic locations and consumption
practices (Cucco and Scaglioni 2014). Practicalities are also important; lming
abroad entails working in easier weather conditions. However, recently, economic
reasons have been seen to dominate as producers are spoilt by invitations from
regions and countries that attempt to attract them by oering generous nancial
and non-nancial incentives (see Chapters 8 and 9 on Central and Eastern Euro-
pean lm productions in this volume). Despite the availability of new global loca-
tions, today, Switzerland continues to be used in Indian productions, although, as
will be argued in this chapter, on a dierent scale and form.
This chapter contributes to the literature examining globalised lm produc-
tion, lm policy, and attraction factors of a destination (e.g. Cucco and Scaglioni
2014). It focuses on one destination, Switzerland, which, historically, has been
important for Bollywood lm producers. By examining one location, the chapter
enhances our understanding of changing lm policies, production cultures and
7 Contemporary Indian lm
productions in Switzerland
Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 119
globalisation processes, as well as the evolving requirements of producers and
audiences.
The next section reviews the literature on globalised lm production, emphasis-
ing the push and pull factors that motivate producers to lm abroad. The second
part of the literature review outlines the case of Switzerland – a popular location for
Indian producers. The qualitative methodology is then explained, followed by the
ndings, which outline: i) the lm policy landscape of Switzerland; ii) the current
interest in lming in Switzerland and the key attraction factors of Swiss locations,
including the country’s top business environment and its proximity to diverse land-
scapes, high-end facilities, and specialist labour. The chapter ends with a discus-
sion and conclusions.
Globalised lm production
Writing about the globalisation of lm production, Goldsmith and O’Regan (2008,
p. 21) noted: “In the past, few places had the right mix of facilities, skilled crews,
production capacity, infrastructure, and ancillary services (hotels, airline connec-
tions) to host single large-scale incoming productions, let alone regular, ongoing
production”. In recent years, the lm policy landscape has experienced a signi-
cant change, facing intensive processes of globalisation of lm production. Many
more locations have joined the pool of countries oering the right infrastructure to
host large-scale lm productions.
O’Regan (2018) highlights the complex roles of a variety of governmental and
industry agencies in supporting, marketing, and developing lm-friendly infra-
structures and resources, with new lm commissions being formed globally to
market lm locations and ensure their “lm friendliness” (p. 11). These commis-
sions are typically responsible for allocating generous lm incentives, such as tax
rebates, cash incentives, and service production, but Cucco and Richeri (2021)
argue that the lm commissions’ roles are more signicant than just incentives;
they are cultural mediators between local rules and foreign producers, promoters
of transcultural communication and planners of future lm tourism development
(p. 10). A variety of dierent stakeholders (including ministries of culture and tour-
ism, economic development agencies, local authorities, and private businesses)
see the value in attracting lm productions to their destinations (Goldsmith and
O’Regan 2008), although it has been noted that there is limited alignment between
the dierent organisations needed to fully capitalise on the benets of hosting for-
eign lm productions (World Tourism Organisation and Netix 2021).
Today, almost all European destinations set up national and regional lm
commissions, which try to attract foreign producers through generous incentive
schemes (Cucco and Dagnino 2018; Cucco and Richeri 2021). The situation in
Switzerland remains somehow dierent. Following the exclusion of Switzerland
from the European Union’s (EU) MEDIA programme in 2014 (Cucco 2021),
three lm commissions were established in Switzerland: the Zurich Film Commis-
sion, the Ticino Film Commission, and the Lucerne & Central Switzerland Film
Commission. Their creation was a reaction to the removal of EU funds for the
120 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
Swiss lm industry and the introduction of a new fund devoted to lms shot in
the Swiss territory. Compared to its neighbours (e.g. Austria or Italy), Switzerland
does not provide country-level lm incentives. As will be discussed later in the
chapter, current incentives oered locally are modest, leaving Switzerland in a
non-competitive position.
Whereas economic reasons form an important pull factor for the producers,
non-economic factors can be equally vital for lmmakers when choosing a for-
eign locale. Previous research has explored, to a certain extent, what constitutes
an ideal foreign lming location and its amenities. According to Beeton (2008),
producers seek places that provide easy access and good transport to the sites,
accommodation for cast and crew, catering and access to a local, skilled, and semi-
skilled workforce. Writing specically about the Gold Coast in Australia, Ward and
O’Regan (2009) note that a selection of services and capabilities geared to high
production standards can give a region a reputation of being a lm-friendly desti-
nation; a “pleasurable” place to lm. Finally, trust, loyalty and personal contacts
have an inuence on location selection and, therefore, unsurprisingly, producers
tend to return to past destinations (Irimias 2015; Cucco and Scaglioni 2014).
Writing specically about Indian producers, Cucco and Scaglioni (2014) and
Nanjangud (2021) examine a number of factors that motivate producers to use
foreign locations rather than lming at home. The factors relate to practicalities
such as working in easier, less chaotic conditions and avoiding extreme weather
conditions, such as the monsoon season. Other factors relate to the lm’s end
value and overall reception. Consumption practices featured in the lms (in
relation to fashion, travel, shopping, dance, and food) portray the lifestyle of
the super-rich and these can be appealing to the growing middle class in India
(Gyimóthy 2018). Moreover, the portrayal of the lives of non-resident Indian
characters is an additional attraction and can appeal to the large Indian migrant
population (Cucco and Scaglioni 2014). Tobías (2017, p. 274) calls European
locations featured in Bollywood “sanitised paradises” as they deeply contrast
with the image of chaotic, polluted and uncontrollable Indian cities. As such, the
exposure of European locations in Indian cinema oers viewers an escape from
their everyday challenges.
The globalisation of lm production has led to numerous socio-cultural and eco-
nomic impacts on foreign destinations. Knowledge exchange, innovation, employ-
ment opportunities, increased hotel stays, and general location spending by lm
crews are some of the positive impacts noted from hosting foreign lm produc-
tions. Knowledge exchange seems to be particularly important to destinations that
lack modern lm infrastructure because it oers them the opportunity to acquire
new skills, such as from more advanced technology (Szczepanik 2016). Cultural
diplomacy and soft power skills have been cited as important for lming, allow-
ing locations to build national prestige abroad (Lee 2022). Finally, it has been well
documented that the enhanced destination image of a lming location results in
increased tourism ow (e.g. Beeton 2006; Gyimóthy 2018).
Some lm-friendly destinations have become so popular that even when the
setting does not match a lm’s plot, producers still choose to shoot in these locales.
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 121
In these cases, the lm-friendly destinations are used as “fake locations”, creat-
ing what lm tourism researchers call, “location dissonance” (Frost 2009) or
“displacement aspect” (Bolan et al. 2011). Historical lms often involve the use of
dierent locations and settings (Butler 2011). Examples include Romania used as
the 19th-century Appalachians in the United States in “Cold Mountain” (Hudson
and Ritchie 2006), Hungary as medieval England in the television series “Cad-
fael” (Busby et al. 2003), or Ireland as Scotland in “Braveheart” (Frost 2009).
Some places have developed expertise in standing in for other places, for example,
Prague (Goldsmith and O’Regan 2008). The availability of the right infrastructure
in these fake locations encourages producers to sacrice the authenticity of their
lming locations.
Dreaming of Switzerland in Mumbai
The focus on Switzerland as a lming location for Indian lm producers is justi-
ed for a number of reasons. Collaborations in the lm industry between India
and Switzerland were established decades ago, with the rst lm being shot in
1964. A conict in Kashmir was the cause for the rst Bollywood directors to
seek mountainous landscapes outside India; Hindi directors based in Mumbai
became interested in lming in the Alpine scenery (Ganti 2012; Frank 2016). The
most important period of Swiss–Indian collaborations took place during the 1990s
and early 2000s; at this time, Bollywood director, Yash Chopra, was lming a
song-and-dance sequence in Switzerland two to three times per month (Nanjangud
2021). His hallmark 1995 lm, “Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge” was shot exten-
sively in Switzerland, in numerous locations, and is still being shown in Indian
cinemas today (Switzerland Tourism 2020).
A variety of landscapes are featured in Chopra’s lms: lakes, rivers, glaciers,
mountains and meadows, as well as historical buildings and town squares. The
images of Switzerland, portrayed in Bollywood lms, as a heavenly, unspoiled,
peaceful place, subsequently triggered large tourism ows from India to Switzer-
land and provided economic opportunities for Swiss businesses (Gyimóthy 2018;
Frank 2016). The two towns of Engelberg and Interlaken, located in the Berner
Oberland region, which have been portrayed in Indian lms, remain the top desti-
nations among Indian tourists (Switzerland Tourism 2020). At the time of writing
this chapter, there are three Bollywood tours in Switzerland that take tourists to a
selection of Bollywood lm locations: i) Bollywood Tour, organised by the town
of Gstaad-Saanenland; ii) Indian Film Location Tour, based in Gstaad; and iii)
Bollywood Tour of Switzerland, by Erwin Tours of Switzerland. A must-see on all
these tours is a landmark in the village of Saanen, a bridge, where a couple from the
1995 lm “Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge” danced romantically (see Figure 7.1).
Undoubtedly, Yash Chopra, through his lms, was the greatest ambassador of
Switzerland. In 2002, Chopra received the Swiss Filmfare Award from the Swiss
government (Switzerland Tourism 2020) in recognition of his contribution to the
development of a “dreamlike” destination among the Indian audience. Following
his death in 2012, the late Chopra was honoured by the federation for the promotion
122 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
of Switzerland, and in 2015, a statue of him was placed outside Hotel Jungfrau in
Interlaken, one of the director’s favourite locations (see Figure 7.2).
Undoubtedly, Bollywood cinema played an important role in the development
of the relationship between India and Switzerland. However, contemporary cinema
in India comprises many regional lm industries (e.g. Telugu, Tamil, and Kan-
nada), each with their own language (Ganti 2012). These regional lm industries
entered globalised lm production much later than Bollywood. They now oer
new opportunities to the destinations in which they lm (Cucco and Scaglioni
2014), and they are increasingly present in Switzerland.
Methodology
The research presented in this chapter is part of a larger international project exam-
ining the various mobilities inspired by Indian lm industries and Europe and its
aim was to understand socio-cultural and economic impacts deriving from Indian
lm shooting in selected European countries (see Chapter 1). A qualitative research
approach was used to examine the perceptions and experiences of location stake-
holders in Switzerland when collaborating with Indian lm industries. Twenty in-
depth interviews were conducted in 2020 and 2021. The respondents included: lm
Figure 7.1 The iconic bridge in Saanen, outside Gstaad, where the hallmark 1995 lm
Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge was shot.
Source: Own resources
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 123
industry professionals in Switzerland (e.g. line/unit managers, scouts, cameramen);
representatives of state and local authorities; members of organisations that use
lming for their own purposes (e.g. tour operators); destination marketing organi-
sations; and regional lm commissions. The main research question for this study
was: How does Switzerland across dierent scales (country/region/city) attract the
Indian lm industry? The interview guide covered various questions related to the
Figure 7.2 One of the authors posing with the statue of Bollywood director, Yash Chopra,
in Interlaken.
Source: Own resources
124 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
strategies of attracting foreign lm productions, organisational arrangements, and
collaborations between lm productions and local companies.
The participants were accessed via LinkedIn or via professional websites using
a snowballing technique. Some were identied from recent lms shot in Switzer-
land as their names were listed in the lm credits. The interviews, each lasting
from 30 minutes to more than two hours, were conducted in English or German,
then audio-recorded and transcribed. Due to the global challenges of the COVID-
19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, the interviews were mostly conducted online via
Zoom or Skype but occasionally, also, in person or over the phone. The interviews
were later anonymised: the names of the interviewees, as well as any information
that could potentially identify them, were removed from the interview extracts.
Ethical issues were addressed throughout the data collection process and before
the interview took place; the respondents were informed about, and accepted, the
interview terms via a signed consent form. The data were analysed using codes and
categories (Lune and Berg 2017).
Although some of the interviewees were of Indian origins, the perspective pre-
sented in this chapter is that of the local stakeholders: those representing Switzer-
land. However, at the time of the interviews, some of the participants, mainly those
who acted as mediators between the two countries, partially lived in India.
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland
The role of Swiss Film Commissions
Although virtually all European States now provide tax incentives at a national
level, this is not the case for Switzerland (Cucco and Dagnino 2018, p. 444). Cur-
rently, Switzerland has three separate lm commissions: the Zurich Film Commis-
sion, the Ticino Film Commission, and the Lucerne & Central Switzerland Film
Commission. As noted earlier, compared to its neighbours (e.g. Austria or Italy),
Switzerland does not provide country-level lm incentives organised by the Swiss
Confederation. Launched in 2014, the Ticino Film Commission is the largest Swiss
lm commission and the only one that explicitly encourages lm producers to its
region by oering lm incentives and lm-related services. Ticino is the Italian
part of Switzerland and has picturesque terrain with lakes, palms, and beaches. The
commission’s incentives and services are targeted at foreign lms, shot in Ticino
and including clear location references, with a view to making Ticino recognisable
to the audience. The incentives are modest; the focus of the commission is mostly
on providing services as a Ticino Film Commission employee explained:
The condition to get that money, of course, is . . ., rst of all, that the
production is shooting in Ticino. Depending on how many days and how
many people are employed. Also, how the location will be shown in the nal
project. . . . Depending on how many expenses will be left in Ticino; in hotels,
meals, professionals and so on, we then decide with our board of directors
to give an incentive and how much. But we have to say that the incentives
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 125
that we give are quite small. The biggest one, the highest one, that we gave
was about 15,000 Swiss francs, well, it’s really a small incentive. And for the
location scouting it is that maybe we pay someone who together with us to
do this job and we can also oer some night hospitality to the production, to
the director who is coming to Ticino to see the location and so on. . . . What
is our strength, is our job, our service to connect, to ask for permissions, to
get facilities, to get discounts with the hotels and so on.
(R15)
As argued by Cucco and Richeri (2021), the role of lm commissions is to mediate
between various stakeholders and facilitate the complex lm production. Nonethe-
less, a desire to oer attractive nancial packages to the lm producers was clearly
expressed by the two lm commissions interviewed in our project, although they
recognised that incentives should be settled at a national level. One of the key line
producers from India operating in Switzerland noted that the lack of incentives is
discouraging Indian productions:
Ideally, there should be worked out something soon because we are losing to
many countries, to Portugal.
(R11)
The reference to Portugal, a low-cost destination that oers generous lm incen-
tives to producers, points to the importance of the economic aspects of lm des-
tination selection. The quote also indicates that competition between countries in
attracting so-called “y-in y-out productions” is erce and that new emerging
destinations have the potential to become favourite sets for Indian lm producers.
Switzerland is not an aordable country and the high costs of lming in Switzer-
land remain a challenge, making it a less competitive destination from an economic
perspective.
Why do Bollywood lmmakers shoot in Switzerland?
Indians were exposed to the Alpine scenery, particularly from the 1990s until early
2000 through so-called “massalah-lms” – lms with a certain predictable plot
as indicated in the quote here. Yash Chopra travelled to Switzerland two to three
times per month at the peak, to lm song-and-dance sequences (Nanjangud 2021).
A trade Commissioner for Switzerland, who worked closely with the late director,
explained the content of the popular genre:
So this genre of romance, you know what we call[ed] a “massalah-lm”
those days. Because each lm had a certain plot and you had a good actor
and an actress. You had either a bad mother-in-law or a bad father-in-law.
You had one villain, there was always one or two rape scenes. There were ten
songs. One of them was shot in the rain. And then at the end, there was a ght
and happily ever after. You know, basically, what was Bollywood? It’s a form
126 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
of escapism. You get away from reality for those three hours and you come
back feeling nice. Today’s lm is not that way. Today you come back and say
that’s actually happened in my country. That’s the dierence.
(R2)
Following years of intense exposure, the interest of Bollywood producers in lm-
ing in Switzerland weakened. The death of the director in 2012 marked an end of
a certain era in the Bollywood lm industry. Generous incentive schemes provided
by countries across the globe made Bollywood producers seek other destinations,
more in line with new genres, such as action lms.
As explained earlier, the Indian lm industry comprises many regional lm
industries, not just the famous Bollywood. While Bollywood is now exploring new
topics and looking for new locations, other Indian lm industries have become
attracted to Switzerland due to its Alpine scenery:
The Tamil lm industry and Telugu Film, they haven’t been exposed much
to Mr Chopra’s lms. Because they are very, I won’t say they are anti-Hindi
but they have pride in their language. . . . They are still going there. But
Bollywood has been, I mean, let me say, Switzerland has been a victim of its
own success.
(R8)
Today, other Indian industries, such as Telugu, Tamil, and Kannada, show an
increased interest in lming in Switzerland. This is not to say that Bollywood pro-
ducers have stopped lming in Switzerland. Some recent Bollywood productions
shot in the Alpine settings, such as “Simmba”, “Krish 3”, “War”, and “Dhoom 3”,
have achieved success in India and beyond.
Despite the changing lm production landscape, lm producers continue to take
advantage of the signicant lm infrastructure in Switzerland, as its high-quality
infrastructure remains an appealing pull factor for lmmakers. Our study demon-
strates that the key factors that make Switzerland continuously appealing are i) Top
business environment and proximity; ii) Diverse Settings: Alps, Riviera and mead-
ows; iii) Filming in substitute locations; iv) A luxury destination; and e) Qualied
professionals. These are discussed in turn in the following.
Top business environment
The key features of a lm-friendly destination are its connectedness (its close
proximity to the lming locations) and low levels of bureaucracy. Bureaucracy-
free conditions in the pre-production phase, involving a straightforward process of
applying for a visa to lm, is important when choosing Switzerland as a foreign
location. During our research, diplomats working at the Indian Embassy in Bern
said they do not receive queries from lm industry people because the applica-
tion process is simple so there is no reason to intervene. In contrast, one of the
interviewees explained the complex process of applying for a visa to shoot in the
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 127
United States, in which professionals are asked to verify what their speciality is.
For example, a group of dancers was asked to travel hundreds of miles to perform
a dance routine for ocials at the Embassy. Application practices such as this are
big deterrents to lm producers when applying for visas to shoot in certain foreign
countries.
In Switzerland, accessibility is very easy. As we land, we can immediately
lm the next day. . . . It is quite welcoming from the Swiss companies, so
the producers and directors have easy access to these places. . . . So, we
write to, for example, Freiburg police a week in advance, or three days in
advance, and they give you the permission instantly. And, you know, they
also give you the cover with the police, in case of any problem with anyone
from the public. You can always call the police for support. So, they come
and help you out.
(R11)
Close proximity to lming sites and international airports (as well as direct ights
between India and Switzerland) are important factors in the past for lm produc-
ers when choosing Switzerland over other less-established destinations. Zurich,
a key city with the main international airport and plentiful rental houses, is never
too far from any Swiss location. Close proximity to lm settings and the ability
to move around easily across the Swiss territory were perceived as key factors.
However, more important factors seem to be the welcoming attitudes of the Swiss
people. The openness of the public sector and the friendliness of its employees
were frequently mentioned in the interviews. Despite the famously high costs in
Switzerland (a “challenge” frequently mentioned by all the respondents), many of
the public locations were oered to the producers without charge (a dynamic that
occurs in many countries). This was illustrated by a lm professional:
If it’s a feature movie, it’s going to be almost for free. Maybe you have to pay
for their work, if they have to have the manpower to help us, of course, you
pay that but you don’t pay additionally for using the location . . . normally
Switzerland is very open to feature lms. I think it would be a little harder
if you want to shoot advertisers. And the costs would be much higher. But if
these are feature movies, you really can work quite good with authorities,
they try to help you to get things done.
(R9)
Swiss authorities were cited as helpful and supportive when asked to obtain nec-
essary permits to lm. The supportive attitudes were reciprocated by the lm
producers and Swiss professionals, who made eorts to consider the authorities’
responsibilities and priorities also. For example, lm industry requests to lm in
busy transport hubs, such as international airports or busy railways stations, were
carefully thought through in advance; the lm producers were prepared to shoot
outside of rush hours and at night. One of the interviewees who worked frequently
128 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
with Indian producers described the factors that were important to take into account
before approaching the authorities:
[Y]ou really need to have a plan. How you block it. What time. What day. It’s
exactly back to the day. If you do it Monday morning at 5 o’clock, it is much
better than trying to do it in the rush hour. And like, normally to also need to
get a permit to go to mountains at 6 o clock I can get it within an hour. It’s
just the price. The price to get up. And can they organise their people to open
the gondola that early? But you also want to go there as early as possible.
(R17)
According to the latest Tourism and Travel Competitiveness Index (2019), which
ranks various factors that contribute to the development and competitiveness of a
country, Switzerland is placed third out of 140 countries for its business environment.
This is reected in the respondents’ comments that emphasise red-tape-free condi-
tions at the pre-production and production stages and the friendliness of authorities
that facilitate work in the Swiss territory.
Diverse settings: Alps, “Riviera”, and meadows
In addition to the easy proximity of the Swiss locations, another positive factor is
their diversity. Despite being a small country, the country oers a wide-range of
landscapes that can meet various creative needs, ranging from the dramatic Alpine
views, lakes, rivers, and meadows to the relaxing Mediterranean-looking Riviera
with palm-lined lakes in the Italian part of the country. This diversity, combined
with ecient communication networks that facilitate mobility, oers countless
prospects in terms of locations, landscapes, and yearly seasons. Historically, Bol-
lywood lms portrayed specic regions of Switzerland. Alpine towns from Berner
Oberland canton, such as Interlaken, Engelberg and Gstaad have become must-see
destinations among Indian tourists as the towns featured extensively in the most
popular lms of all times (Gyimóthy 2018; Frank 2016). In the course of one of the
interviews conducted for this study at the end of 2020, during the second COVID-
19 lockdown in Switzerland, a lm industry professional with a rich experience of
collaborating with Indian lm producers was particularly positive about the value
of Switzerland for “y-in-y-out productions”:
We have facilities, the glacier, we have close by very good hotels. For sure
they will come back. It is just a question of when we are back again, how it
. . . was before. You know there are not that many countries where you have
very easy access to mountains and Switzerland has that.
(R4)
The possibility of shooting in unspoiled locations in the mountains, accessible only
by a gondola and then on foot was a reason to choose Switzerland. Next to the
mountainous landscapes, the Swiss territory oered other scenery: lakes, rivers,
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 129
meadows, charming villages as well as quaint old streets, medieval castles, and
other historical buildings, giving the producers a possibility of lming in diverse
settings, easily reachable by road.
Availability of substitute locations
The diverse, attractive, and pristine geographical settings of Switzerland, including the
country’s linguistic diversity, translate into another opportunity: into using the small
country sites as substitute locations. There are four ocial language regions of Swit-
zerland: German, French, Italian, and (the very small) Romansh; these make it easier
to use the regions to represent locations in Germany, France, or Italy. For example,
in some of the recent Indian lms, Swiss locations have represented Germany (Doon
Seenu 2010) and France (Endukante . . . Premanta 2012), while in the blockbuster
Dhoom 3 (2013), various scenes were shot in Switzerland, not in Chicago.
A number of interviewees brought up the Dhoom 3 lm, which was partially
lmed in Switzerland. A Swiss landmark, Versasca dam, was eventually chosen,
because it fullled a specic vision of the director and because it worked logisti-
cally. As a lm professional working on the lm explained:
Why “Dhoom 3” ended up in Switzerland, because they wanted to shoot
actually the scene where they jumped out, the dam, they wanted to do it on
the Hoover dam, next to Las Vegas. . . . But there was another crew already
there for a long time so they had to nd a new dam. And they had a Swiss
stand coordinator on their site and he proposed the dam in Ticino. That’s why
the whole thing ended up being in Switzerland basically because normally it
was not planned to shoot anything in Switzerland.
(R9)
A very specic, curved dam where two actors could perform a bungee jump in the
nal scene was required for the lm. Together, the diculties related to the acces-
sibility of the desired dam in the United States and the challenging administration
process to obtain permission to lm there directed the producers to the European
country:
It is really, really hard to get permission to shoot in Chicago. And in the
States if you want to shoot, you have to shoot with the local lm companies,
they have a very strong union, they can’t just come with their own crew, and
shoot in their location, and in Switzerland it’s much easier.
(R4)
Compared with the United States, no strict regulations about local sta employment
exist in Switzerland, which makes lming in Switzerland much easier for lm crew
to organise. The producers have more freedom in choosing which professionals
they want to bring directly from India and who they want to employ locally, either
from Switzerland or neighbouring countries. Once the strategic venue was secured
130 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
for lming Dhoom 3, the producer decided to shoot more scenes in Switzerland,
particularly because of the factors mentioned earlier, namely, easy access to per-
mits for challenging locations, such as international airports. Friendly lm policies
resulted in the producer shooting three additional scenes on the Swiss territory.
Our ndings indicate that sometimes unforeseen decisions are taken when
choosing locations. Concepts such as “location dissonance” (Frost 2009) or “dis-
placement aspect” (Bolan et al. 2011) are relevant here Switzerland is being
used as a fake location. While the use of replaced, or mock, locations may have an
undesired eect for the country, a representative of the regional lm commission
that collaborated with the Dhoom 3 producer noted, in an interview, that there had
been interest in the location, Vercasca valley; the falsely portrayed location was
attracting Indian tourists (see Figure 7.3).
A luxury destination
Another factor that was mentioned by our interviewees refers to the choice of Swit-
zerland as an appealing destination for celebrities, which gives producers greater
leverage to attract the desired actors. Cucco and Scaglioni (2014) note that the most
popular actors in India like working abroad; they have more privacy because they
Figure 7.3 Dhoom 3 features on the marketing material of a bungee jumping company
located in Vercasca, Ticino.
Source: Own resources
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 131
are more anonymous. Therefore, being mobbed by fans or journalists is less likely
in Europe than it is in India. Additionally, the Swiss environment and high-end
facilities, such as the availability of luxury 5-star hotels, act as an incentive. Film-
ing abroad is also seen as a bonus for directors who have more control over celebri-
ties’ time when the latter are outside their home countries. In a humorous manner,
the following quote describes working on a lm in India with a male celebrity:
You’ll be shooting in Bangalore and suddenly his wife calls him or his girl-
friend calls him and so he can go and meet her. You know, so you’re really
just waiting in Bangalore, waiting for him to come back. And he just said to
spend a weekend with his girlfriend. But if I take him he can’t do that. So he
stays with me. That’s number one. And then of course from morning to even-
ing. I mean an early start.
(R8)
Switzerland is one of the world’s top tourist destinations (The Tourism & Travel
Competitiveness Report 2019), and lming in Switzerland guarantees the use of
luxury accommodation, access to helicopters during early hours’ shootings, and
other, similarly luxurious, incentives – all the factors that play a role in the lives
of celebrities. Moreover, lm producers can work full days without interruptions.
Clearly, when it comes to attracting sought-after celebrities, a country with devel-
oped infrastructure and a high-end hospitality industry that is used to catering to
demanding visitors has a clear advantage over other competing destinations that
are not so well established.
Qualied professionals
The availability of creative labour, including aerial lming professionals and tech-
nical sta, is another pull factor. Some of the recent Indian lms were shot in
mountains, thus requiring aerial lming specialists, helicopter pilots, and aerial
lm directors. When asked about the local sta employed in the latest Indian lm
production, one of the lm industry professionals recalled the following:
Of course, it is like the key grip group, because they are in touch with the
rental houses. They know the equipment. And they have each assistant with
them. . . . And we had, I had my own assistant, I think the unit manager, XX
(name removed), he had his own assistant. And then ACs, PAs, that is, pro-
duction assistants, and runners. They just drive; drivers and helping hands.
Because it is always good to have Swiss people if you shoot in Switzerland,
because of communication, and, because you have like some policemen com-
ing up to Indians, that would be dicult (laughter).
(R9)
The quote illustrates that a good number of local lm industry professionals were
employed in this Indian lm production. Communication, cultural understanding,
132 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
and practicalities are some of the reasons why locals being present among the lming
crew can facilitate a smooth lming process. Providing jobs for creative industry pro-
fessionals is one of the local benets that lm commissions in Switzerland highlight
among their key aims. However, despite the potential benets to both the lm crew
and locals, our interviews revealed diverse views on the employment of local sta.
One of the interviewees, representing one of the lm commissions, expressed
disappointment when speaking about the use of the local workforce by the Indian
lm producers, commenting on the large size of the crews coming directly from
India, including drivers and cooks. We also found that, in some cases, professional
dancers employed for the dance-and-song sequences were recruited from other
European countries rather than Switzerland; this was due to established networks
in Europe where producers collaborate with various companies, based, for exam-
ple, in France.
Specic local talent can be utilised by producers, for example, when the lm’s
narrative directly refers to Swiss culture and heritage. In these cases, local talent is
always employed.
If they need a few locals for, you know, like somebody playing the Alphorn in
the background or you know, a few dancing women in Swiss costume.
(R7)
Our ndings reveal that, in practice, a large proportion of the sta come from
India, which suggests that there is limited, positive economic impact on the host
destination in terms of employment. However, as illustrated earlier, this nding,
which can be perceived as negative, also reects a positive reason for choosing
Switzerland as a lming location – producers appreciate having the freedom to
choose with whom they want to work in the foreign location.
Conclusions
This study is based on qualitative data collected via 20 in-depth interviews con-
ducted with location stakeholders based in Switzerland who have collaborated with
the Indian lm industry. Owing to one particular Bollywood director, Yash Chopra,
India and Switzerland established a strong collaboration in the lm industry that
reached its peak in the 1990s and early 2000s (Frank 2016). The images of Swit-
zerland as an immaculate, pristine and heavenly place, portrayed in Bollywood
lms, triggered large tourism ows from India to Switzerland and benetted Swit-
zerland culturally and economically (Frank 2016). However, in recent years, the
emergence of a global production infrastructure has resulted in increased competi-
tion in attracting Indian lmmakers to new European locations through tax breaks,
free services and other incentives (Cucco and Scaglioni 2014; Cucco and Richeri
2021). As a consequence, Switzerland is now facing challenges in keeping its sta-
tus as a lm-friendly destination.
Our ndings illustrate that, despite the lack of lm incentives provided by Swit-
zerland, it continues to play a role in the Indian lm industry, although at a smaller
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 133
scale than before. Fewer Bollywood productions are shot in Switzerland, although
other Indian lm industries are choosing the country to lm their productions in.
Our ndings illustrate that well-known attributes, such as ecient business admin-
istration, proximity to high-end tourism facilities and a selection of qualied local
sta, together play a key role in attracting large-scale productions. Additionally,
the pristine environment and diverse linguistic and geographical landscapes cre-
ate opportunities for lmmakers to use multilingual Switzerland as a substitute
location.
The attraction factors include the right business conditions, from a smooth visa
organisation process to the ease of accessing lming permissions and full sup-
port of authorities during lming. The key feature of a lm-friendly destination
relates to the connectedness and close proximity to the key locations. The small
size of the country, its linguistic diversity, ecient transport links, and diverse
landscapes, ranging from the dramatic Alpine views to the relaxing Mediterranean
Riviera oer a range of possibilities to lm. The same geographic and linguistic
diversity oers another opportunity – to use Switzerland as a substitute location.
Some recent Indian lms shot in Switzerland have done exactly that; they have
used the infrastructure in Switzerland to lm scenes in mock locations, which lm
history shows is not an unusual practice (e.g. Bolan et al. 2011). Switzerland, as a
source of diverse mock locations, is an opportunity for Indian lm producers from
Bollywood and other Indian lm industries.
Being one of the top, high-end tourist destinations in the world acts as a signi-
cant pull factor to attract the best actors for whom the luxury lming conditions in
Switzerland are more appealing than lming in their home country where chaos,
abuse from fans and dicult weather conditions play a role (Cucco and Scaglioni
2014). Also, having a developed infrastructure (including the hospitality industry,
which is used to cater for demanding visitors) is a strong advantage over other
destinations that are trying to catch up and compete. Another major benet of Swit-
zerland is the access it oers to specialist professionals, for example, aerial lm-
ing directors, when they are needed. There is a caveat to this nal benet though,
which is that many of the lm crew tend to come directly from India rather than
being employed locally.
This chapter contributes to the research exploring globalised lm production
processes and the attraction factors of choosing destinations as a lming location
(Cucco and Scaglioni 2014). By examining one destination, this chapter enhances
our understanding of the changing lm policies, production cultures, and globalisa-
tion, as well as the requirements of the producers and audiences. Future research
could examine the attraction factors in a comparative perspective to gain a better
understanding of the economic, and other, incentives that are important to lm
producers when selecting foreign lm locations.
Acknowledgement
This research is part of the FilmInd project, funded by EqUIP, SNSF: IZEQZ1_
180340.
134 Hania Janta and Metka Herzog
References
Beeton, S., 2006. Understanding lm-induced tourism. Tourism Analysis, 11 (3), 181–188.
Beeton, S., 2008. Location, location, location: Film corporations’ social responsibilities.
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 24 (2–3), 107–114.
Bolan, P., Boy, S. and Bell, J., 2011. ‘We’ve seen it in the movies, let’s see if it’s true’:
Authenticity and displacement in lm‐induced tourism. Worldwide Hospitality and Tour-
ism Themes, 3 (2), 102–116.
Busby, G., Brunt, P. and Lund, J., 2003. In Agatha Christie country: Resident perceptions of
special interest tourism. Tourism, 51 (3), 287–300.
Butler, R., 2011. It’s only make believe: The implications of ctional and authentic locations
in lms. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 3 (2), 91–101.
Connell, J., 2012. Film tourism – evolution, progress and prospects. Tourism Management,
33 (5), 1007–1029.
Cucco, M., 2021. Learning from Switzerland in the Brexit era. The MEDIA programme case
study. Studies in European Cinema, 18 (1), 22–36.
Cucco, M. and Dagnino, G., 2018. Public lm policy and the rise of economic Principles:
The case of Switzerland. In: P. C. Murschetz, R. Teichmann and M. Karmasin, eds., Hand-
book of state aid for lm: Finance, industries and regulation. Cham: Springer, 427–445.
Cucco, M. and Richeri, G., 2021. European lm commissions as transcultural promoters and
mediators. Journal of Transcultural Communication, 1 (1), 45–57.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2014. Shooting Bollywood abroad: The outsourcing of Indian
lms in Italy. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 2 (3), 417–432.
Euroscreen, 2015. Bollywood in Europe: A case study. Report commissioned by Film London
and the Euroscreen Partnership, Rzeczow. Available from: https://issuu.com/euroscreen_
casestudies/docs/euroscreen_case_study_bollywood (access date 10.02.2022).
Frank, S., 2016. Dwelling-in-motion: Indian Bollywood tourists and their hosts in the Swiss
Alps. Cultural Studies, 30 (3), 506–531.
Frost, W., 2009. From backlot to runaway production: Exploring location and authenticity in
lm-induced tourism. Tourism Review International, 13 (2), 85–92.
Ganti, T., 2012. Producing Bollywood: Inside the contemporary Hindi lm industry.
Durham: Duke University Press.
Goldsmith, B. and O’Regan, T., 2008. International lm production: Interests and motiva-
tions. Cross-Border Cultural Production: Economic Runaway or Globalization, 13–44.
Gyimóthy, S., 2018. Transformations in destination texture: Curry and Bollywood romance
in the Swiss Alps. Tourist Studies, 18 (3), 292–314.
Hill, J. and Kawashima, N., 2016. Introduction: Film policy in a globalised cultural economy.
International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22 (5), 667–672.
Hudson, S. and Ritchie, J. B., 2006. Film tourism and destination marketing: The case of
Captain Corelli’s Mandolin. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12 (3), 256–268.
Irimias, A., 2015. Business tourism aspects of lm tourism: The case of Budapest.
Almatourism-Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, 6 (4), 35–46.
Lee, S. T., 2022. Film as cultural diplomacy: South Korea’s nation branding through Parasite
(2019). Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 18, 93–104.
Lune, H. and Berg, B. L., 2017. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.
Harlow: Pearson.
Nanjangud, A., 2021. Navigating the lm-industry: Interview with Mr. Natarajan Ramji,
chairman and managing director, travel master’s India on what it means to be a location
scout in India. South Asian Popular Culture, 19 (2), 233–246.
Contemporary Indian lm productions in Switzerland 135
O’Regan, T., 2018. Revisiting lm cities and lm services: Methodology, theory and
applications. Journal of African Cinemas, 10 (1–2), 9–29.
Szczepanik, P., 2016. Transnational crews and postsocialist precarity globalizing screen
media labor in Prague. In: M. Curtin and K. Sanson, eds., Precarious creativity: Global
media, local labor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 88–103.
Switzerland Tourism, 2020. Indien und die indischen Gaste in der Schweiz. Zahlen und
Fakten. Available from: https://www.stnet.ch/app/uploads/2021/09/aa_factsheet_medien_
indien20_d-1.pdf.
Tobías, I. C., 2017. Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara: Exotic Spain, lm tourism and the imag-
ined geographies of the Indian middle class. In: A. Dhingra and G. López-Nadal, eds.,
Indo-Spanish cultural encounters (1956–2016), impacts and visions. New Delhi: Centre
of Spanish, Portuguese, Italian & Latin American Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University,
271–286.
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report, 2019. World economic forum. Available
from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_2019.pdf (access date 10.01.2022).
Ward, S. and O’Regan, T., 2009. The lm producer as the long-stay business tourist:
Rethinking lm and tourism from a Gold Coast perspective. Tourism Geographies, 11
(2), 214–232.
World Tourism Organisation and Netix, 2021. Cultural anity and screen tourism the
case of internet entertainment services. Madrid: UNWTO.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-11
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
I predict that the more time that passes, the more respected popular Eastern European
cinema will become as an object of academic study.
(Mazierska 2010, p. 12, opening article in Studies
in Eastern European Cinema)
India has long been known for its lm industry and remains by far the largest lm
producer in the world (Ghosh Dastidar and Elliott 2020). Indian lm industries
produce between 1,500 and 2,000 lms annually (Jain et al. 2016). While Indian
cinema has had a presence in certain parts of the world linked to its diaspora, more
recently, it has crossed over to non-South Asian audiences (Bandyopadhyay 2008;
Therwath 2010; Banaji 2013). This expansion has also led to widespread incor-
poration of new lming locations outside India (Hafeez and Ara 2016). Territori-
ally embedded Indian lmmaking enables the promotion of tourism (Mittal and
Anjaneyaswamy 2013; Jain 2019; Josiam et al. 2020), employment opportunities
(Cucco and Scaglioni 2014), cross-cultural exchange (Lourenço 2017), and coun-
try branding with long-term economic and transcultural eects (Ernst & Young and
LA-India Film Council 2012).
Many studies exist evaluating the scope and role of Indian lmmaking in
Australia (Madan 2000), Latin America (Ghosal 2013), non-South Asia (Karan and
Schaefer 2020), North America (Roy and Huat 2014), and Western Europe (Cucco
and Scaglioni 2014). However, there is no concrete study describing the situation in
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). This region has recently seen an increased Indian
investment in lm shooting (Parvulescu and Hanzlík 2022), which is in line with an
increasing number of lm production companies moving from mature markets into
emerging ones (Jenster 2020). Some authors refer to CEE as a “semi-periphery”,
contributing to the production and export of a variety of goods, including cultural
and creative goods (Stachowiak and Stryjakiewicz 2018). CEE has become an inter-
esting destination for foreign lmmakers after the start of European integration.
The new political and economic reality has enabled the free ow of goods, people,
and information and the rise of prosperity and social justice, which made it easier
for foreign productions to lm. The popularity of CEE has signicantly grown and
8 Slovenia as a new contender in
attracting Indian lmmakers
within the context of Central
and Eastern Europe
Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 137
diversied over the last decade (Mitric 2021). However, little is known about the
success factors of Indian producers in mobilising lming locations in this part of
Europe, as well as the obstacles they have to face when doing so.
This chapter explores the structures, mechanisms, and cultural contexts that
have popularised lming destinations in CEE among Indian producers. It aims
to specically analyse the pros and cons, the strategies, experiences, and impacts
of Indian lming in Slovenia. The term CEE is highly contested and dened in
multiple ways. To avoid any confusion, we decided to attribute it to European
countries with a post-socialist tradition and concrete tendencies towards European
integration. The focus is on Slovenia as the smallest of the countries belonging to
CEE. Here we highlight both the Slovenian characteristics for Indian lmmaking
that are similar to those of other CEE countries and those that are attributed more
specically to Slovenia.
By way of context, it should be noted that Slovenia, like most of the countries of
CEE, is a Slavic country that experienced the socialist tradition from 1945 to 1991.
Within this period, it was one of the six republics of Yugoslavia that distanced
itself from the Soviet type of socialism in 1948. Yugoslavia invented its own type
of socialism, which followed the principles of labour and social self-management
and thus already carried the seed for the development of direct democracy. A softer
form of socialism and a geostrategic location close to countries such as Austria,
Germany, and Italy allowed Slovenia to have relatively close relations with the
Western world during this period and a smoother transition to democracy after
the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 and its independence. Notwithstanding this,
Slovenia underwent similar processes of European integration, which culminated
in the largest enlargement of the European Union (EU) towards CEE in 2004. Since
then, Slovenia has behaved very similar to other CEE countries within the common
political, economic, and cultural framework of the EU (Kosi et al. 2020; Nared
et al. 2020).
The structure of the chapter is as follows. The following two sections provide
the theoretical overview of CEE as a lm shooting destination, particularly for
Indian lmmakers. The fourth section describes the data collection and analysis
through interviews with key informants (in)directly associated with lmmaking in
India and Slovenia, while fth to ninth sections present the results. The last section
outlines the main ndings and recommendations for Indian lmmaking in Slove-
nia, arguing that while generalisations can be made regarding the wider region,
Slovenia, being the smallest of the CEE countries with some unique historical and
geographical specicities, and home to only about 4% of the locations of Indian
lms in the CEE region (Bole et al. 2021), displays characteristics and challenges
that seem to be uniquely her own.
Central and Eastern Europe as a lm shooting destination
After the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent break-up of the Soviet
Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia, cultural industries were the rst to suer
massive cuts and withdrawal of secure funding early in the 1990s. Cinema was
138 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
aected most notably (Iordanova 1999). The state-owned and state-controlled lm
nancing and distribution infrastructure had entirely collapsed in all of the post-
Socialist countries in CEE. The shift to a market economy aected every level of
the lm industry, from its basic infrastructure to its mode of funding and manage-
ment (Ostrowska and Rydzewska 2017). Although the main changes resulted in
basic operational modications and did not have such an impact on the specics of
the artistic output (Iordanova 2003), the crumbling production routines also caused
a creative crisis in many lmmakers (Iordanova 1999).
Suddenly, as it were, Western European countries, alongside the United States
playing the leading role, became the much-sought-after partner for lmmakers
from all CEE countries (Iordanova 2002; Stachowiak and Stryjakiewicz 2018;
Mitric 2021). In the new international division of labour, the countries of CEE were
relegated to a supporting role. In the 1990s, the lm studios of CEE hosted a num-
ber of Western runaway productions, which kept the facilities busy and employed
local lmmakers without further recognition of the participation of the country
providing the services. In co-productions, the partners of CEE typically acted as
minority producers rather than as majority ones. However, such minority participa-
tion hardly counted as contributions to a national lm culture (Iordanova 2002).
For these reasons, well into the 2000s, CEE was still very much enclosed within
its national lm frames and, compared to other European regions, played a less
important role in co-productions (Kanzler et al. 2008).
European integration, most notably expressed through several waves of the EU
enlargement in 2004 (Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hun-
gary, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia), 2007 (Romania and Bulgaria), and
2013 (Croatia), began to change the narrative and to slowly reverse the downward
spiral. Foreign investment and the venture of big-budget lming in some countries
of CEE provided jobs for lm personnel and ensured investment in lm production
infrastructure, consequently saving production from the same decline experienced
in the early 1990s by the exhibition sector (Bergfelder 2005; Parvulescu and Han-
zlík 2022). Increasing internationalisation (Stachowiak and Stryjakiewicz 2018)
brought the proliferation of CEE-West co-productions, the emergence of transna-
tional producers (young, English-speaking, with liberal values) and the political
decision of national CEE governments to invest signicant public funding in lm-
subsidy structures (Mitric 2021).
Despite all the eorts, CEE is ultimately not a large market for the lm industry
in Europe, as the “Big Five” – France, Germany, UK, Italy, and Spain – account for
about 80% of releases, industry turnover and employees (Katsarova 2014). The EU
research suggests that the lm industry in CEE is generally uncompetitive and non-
commercially oriented at this stage (Mitkus and Nedzinskaitė-Mitkė 2016; Sta-
chowiak and Stryjakiewicz 2018). The reasons for this are complex. For example,
Mitkus and Nedzinskaitė-Mitkė (2016) blame CEE lmmakers’ systematic belief
that lm art and lm business are polar opposites, while Parvulescu and Hanzlík
(2021) argue that EU-funded VOD (video-on-demand) platforms tend to favour
larger European lm cultures like France to the disadvantage of smaller ones like
those from CEE (Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, etc.).
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 139
One of the rare studies attempting to understand both the reasons for the exist-
ing situation and also provide ideas of how to mitigate the obstacles and unveil
the potential of CEE for foreign lm shooting is that done by Jenster (2020). Her
comparative study of four CEE countries (Hungary, Czech Republic, Croatia, and
Poland) exposed numerous ways in which a lm production can increase the eco-
nomic return in the hosting country. They are concentrated on increasing auxiliary
services, raising awareness of cultural values and increasing tourism initiatives,
incentives, and co-production to strengthen the network and reduce overall costs.
However, her recommendations tend to be general in nature and could apply to any
type of foreign lm production.
The Slovenian professional lm production began in 1948 with the lm On
Our Own Land by the director France Štiglic (Slovenian Film Centre 2022). Dur-
ing Yugoslav period, Slovenia was an attractive destination for Western lmmak-
ers who recognised diverse and pristine nature and preserved cultural heritage as
suitable scenes for their movies. Important factors for outsourcing were low-cost
coproduction agreements with Yugoslavian market-oriented lm companies, low
production prices, and freer political atmosphere compared to the Soviet bloc
countries (Kumer 2019). Their interest, however, started to wane during 1980s
when Yugoslavia as a whole descended into a series of political, economic, and
ideological crises that ended with the dissolution of the country (Stanković 2012).
The process of dismantling the lm industry was similar to that in other countries
of CEE. The period between 1995 and 2015 represents the resurgence of Slovenian
lm and its increasing importance in the landscape of the world lm and especially
European lm (Slovenian Film Centre 2022). However, the lm industry in Slo-
venia remains a systemically disordered area and the most undernourished in the
entire cultural sector (Gričar 2015). Slovenia as an attractive shooting destination
for foreign lmmaking was rediscovered only recently by Indian lmmakers and
Western European and American companies which found advantage in recently
introduced tax rebate policy (Kumer 2019).
Central and Eastern Europe as a destination for Indian lmmakers
In spite of the fact that Europe pioneered both technological and content innovation
in cinema, the European lm landscape has become characterised by the strong
presence of Hollywood productions after WWII (Guback 1969). In 2013, Holly-
wood held a share of nearly 70% of the EU market, while European productions
represented only 26% (Katsarova 2014). Only a very small portion could be attrib-
uted to productions from other continents. Among them, however, we can trace
the increasing role of Indian lmmaking whose presence in the old continent dates
back to the late 1960s when political unrest in Kashmir as the preferred lming
location forced Raj Kapoor and other Indian directors to search for suitable foreign
locations, especially within Europe (Josiam et al. 2020). This trend accelerated in
the 1970s to 1990s when productions were transported to striking European loca-
tions like the Swiss Alps and Britain’s Summer Isles, which became the primary
backdrops of many Yash Chopra productions (Josiam et al. 2014).
140 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
Following the open market policy and economy, Indians gained wider access to
Western lms and television and thereby faced mounting competition for Indian
movies, especially in areas of action and special eects. The new trend resulted in
mega-budget lms with a particularly high focus in the action and sci- categories.
Sequences shot overseas have proven a real box oce draw, so Indian lm crews
started to increasingly lm in Australia, New Zealand, North America, Europe,
and elsewhere (Hafeez and Ara 2016). The focus in Europe was, to a large extent,
set on Western countries, especially Austria, Italy, Switzerland, Spain, and the UK
(Cucco and Scaglioni 2014).
As reported by Josiam et al. (2020), a vast majority of Bollywood movies,
particularly their song sequences but also parts of the lm, are shot abroad, with
lmmakers believing that scenic foreign landscapes contribute to the success of
the lm. Cucco and Scaglioni (2014, 2023) identied three principal push factors
underlying overseas delocalisation, in particular in Western countries, of shoots for
Indian lmmakers: a) easier logistics compared to the more chaotic Indian context
(transport, services, etc.); b) funding and economic incentives oered to audio-
visual productions by many local- and national-government bodies; c) the search
for a wider audience (auent Indians and non-resident Indians) and a spectacular
appeal.
Although some authors mention that Indian cinema is popular in CEE (Loren-
zen and Taeube 2007; Bhatt 2013; Frank 2016; Banerjee and Srivastava 2019),
a more detailed structural and contextual analysis of the spread and intensity of
Indian lmmaking in this part of the world is still missing. So far, we have limited
information from only a few CEE countries. Kaveri Devi (2018) hypothesised that
among them, Poland, with its castles, parks, palaces, monuments, gardens, and old
cities and towns, has taken the lead in attracting Indian lmmakers. Parvulescu and
Hanzlík (2022) reported that eective service organisation for foreign productions
has recently attracted Indian investment (alongside American and German) to the
Czech Republic. Banasiak (2015) mentioned Poland and Romania to be on the rise
with Indian lmmakers. Polish visibility could, to a large extent, be attributed to
the campaign “I like Poland” where Polish Tourist Organisation (PTO) used a grant
from the EU to promote Polish locations in India. PTO also organised location
tours for Indian lmmakers in 2013, and their representatives travelled to Mumbai
to meet the Bollywood producers in 2014. The outcome was a large inux of Indian
tourists to Poland (ibid.).
Besides natural beauties, cultural heritage, built environment, and services, one
could also argue that CEE has become more competitive compared to Western
markets for its cost-eectiveness (Srivastava 2015). The Budapest Reporter (2021)
has recently quoted Saran Raparthy – the executive producer at Geetha Arts – as
saying that CEE is more exible in terms of budgets and time spent on location.
Since there is no concrete academic input about the growing connections
between CEE and Indian lmmakers, it would be relevant to study these phenom-
ena in a deeper and more structured way. Our aim in this chapter is to use the
specic example of Slovenia, which has attracted a dozen of Indian lmmakers in
the last decade.
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 141
Research design
This study is based on ten in-depth interviews conducted with key informants
from India and Slovenia between December 2019 and July 2021 (Table 8.1). The
respondents belong to two main categories. The rst group consists of stakeholders
working directly in the lm industry and other creative industries related to lming
(e.g. actors, producers, line producers). The second group represents stakehold-
ers indirectly linked to lmmaking, such as state and local authorities and other
organisations that use lm for their purposes (e.g. destination marketing organisa-
tions, diplomats, lm commissions). Some interviewees belong to both types of
groups. The main reason for choosing these two categories is to bring out more
clearly the patterns of the relationship between lm and place by examining this
connection within and outside the lm industry. Half of the correspondents origi-
nate from India and a half from Slovenia, as we wanted to give equal representa-
tion to the experiences and perspectives of both the collaborating countries. Due
to mobility restrictions during the COVID-19 crisis, most of the interviews were
held online via Zoom, but some were implemented on location. The interviewees
were accessed via professional networks as well as a snowballing technique. Some
were identied in public media highlighting Indian lmmaking in Slovenia. Each
interview lasted between one hour and two hours. They were conducted in English
or Slovene, recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.
Table 8.1 The characteristics of the interviewees from India and Slovenia.
ID Interviewee
directly
connected to lm
industry
Interviewee
indirectly
connected to
lm industry
Indian
origin
Slovenian
origin
Location of
interviewee
Type of
interview
R1 / Diplomat Ljubljana,
Slovenia
On location
R2 / Diplomat New Delhi,
India
Online
R3 Producer Diplomat Mumbai, India On location
R4 / Film
commission
Ljubljana,
Slovenia
Online
R5 Line producer Celje, Slovenia On location
R6 Bollywood
dancer,
actress, model
/ Ljubljana,
Slovenia
Online
R7 Line producer / Maribor,
Slovenia
Online
R8 / Diplomat New Delhi,
India
Online
R9 Line producer Travel agent Bangalore, India Online
R10 Producer, actor Indian restau-
rant owner
Ljubljana,
Slovenia
Online
Source: Own elaboration.
142 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
Figure 8.1 The analysed topics of Indian lm shooting in Slovenia.
Source: Own elaboration
We built our analysis of Indian lmmaking in Slovenia around four broad topics
(Figure 8.1). First, we wanted to determine the comparative advantages of Slovenia
when it comes to hosting Indian lm shooting. The focus was on geographical,
social, and cultural characteristics. Second, the recognised conditions could serve
as a basis to think productively about the various kinds of initiatives and strategies
to attract Indian lmmakers to Slovenia. We were interested in understanding the
established mechanisms related to incentives, promotional campaigns, networking,
etc., and what their role, or lack thereof, has been up until the present moment.
Third, based on established collaborations between Indian lmmakers and Slove-
nian stakeholders, we were interested in recording and analysing their experiences.
The focus was on dierent sorts of organisational arrangements and cross-cultural
impacts on lm production. Fourth, as a nal outcome, we were eager to explore
the spatial and sectoral impacts of Indian lm shooting in Slovenia. We were par-
ticularly interested in the local spillover eects of lmmaking on places, busi-
nesses, and people.
Main characteristics of Indian lm shooting in Slovenia
Until we began this study, Indian lmmakers had used Slovenia as a location for
altogether 16 of their lm productions. Naayak was the rst lm featuring locations
shot in Slovenia to be released in 2013. Despite a decade-long history of lm shoot-
ing, Slovenia however is still a relatively unknown destination in the eyes of Indian
lmmakers, sometimes confused with Slovakia or imagined to be “somewhere in
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 143
Russia” (R6). So far, it has functioned merely as a backdrop for Indian lmmakers
and solely for song sequences, never as part of the plot. Film producers, in other
words, come to Slovenia to shoot a song-and-dance number in what to an Indian
audience would be a new and attractive location (usually famous tourist places,
such as Bled, Piran, and Ljubljana; see examples in Figures 8.2–8.6). In terms of
dialogues, action and plot, Slovenian locations carry no signicance whatsoever as
far as the Indian lm is concerned. This means that there is nothing in the lm that
would make Slovenia identiable to the viewer. This would explain why Slovenia
is still relatively unknown to the Indian lmmaker. Even as the focus of the viewers
is on the hero/heroine in the song rather than the backdrop, the backdrop nonethe-
less does serve as an eye-catcher and could potentially put the host country on the
wider tourist map.
Our interviewees agreed that in order for Slovenia to be clearly identiable in
the lm by the Indian audience, at least one of the following would need to hap-
pen: 1) the Slovenian setting(s) would need to be explicitly mentioned by the hero/
heroine in the script (a visual representation is not enough), 2) one of the characters
would have to be an expatriate (e.g. a student in Ljubljana) and therefore the setting
would gure in the plot itself, or 3) a memorable action would have to take place
in a particular location (e.g. a boat chase on Lake Bled), while pre-publicity would
need to reveal to the audience where the shot was actually taken. For this to change,
the Slovenian government and local authorities would need to invest additional
resources so as to intensify communication with Indian lm producers to increase
Figure 8.2 Film shooting for the Dhruva project at Maribor Edvard Rusjan Airport,
Slovenia.
Source: Azaleja Global
144 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
Figure 8.3 Film shooting for the Dhruva project in Maribor, Slovenia.
Source: Azaleja Global
Figure 8.4 Film shooting for the Khaidi No. 150 project at lake Bled, Slovenia.
Source: Azaleja Global
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 145
Figure 8.5 Film shooting in Ljubljana Old Town, Slovenia.
Source: Azaleja Global
Figure 8.6 Film shooting in the site of high mountain herdsmen’s villages Velika Planina,
Slovenia.
Source: Azaleja Global
146 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
the recognisability of their concrete destinations. In turn, this would provide an
added incentive and a boost to the tourism industry and other economic sectors.
Slovenian comparative advantages for Indian lm shooting
What determines the attraction of location is rarely a single over-riding factor, but
rather a unique combination of a number of considerations. At the same time what
is seen to be an advantage for one Indian lmmaker can constitute a disadvantage
for another. Our interlocutors have spoken of several comparative advantages for
choosing Slovenia to shoot their song-and-dance numbers rather than a Western
European country (or even a CEE country). It seems the Indian lmmakers prefer
Slovenia over other territories because it is geographically small and as a new post-
socialist country relatively unknown but diverse and relatively inexpensive loca-
tion with beautiful natural scenery, preserved cultural heritage, skilled technicians
and talented performers.
One of the main pull-factors for Indian lmmakers to come to Slovenia is the
combination of a wide diversity of landscapes in a small territory. This charac-
teristic can be said to be unique not only in the context of CEE but also at the
wider European, possibly even global, level. Slovenia has just over 20,000 km2 but
encompasses high Alpine peaks, the Mediterranean Sea, the Pannonian plains and
vineyards, the karst caves, extensive forests and numerous small and medium-sized
towns with medieval and (neo)classical architecture (Ciglič and Perko 2013). Both
the natural and cultural characteristics of Slovenia, the small distances between
dierent locations with the possibility to “capture everything” in just a few days
(green forests, blue rivers, sea and lakes, snowy peaks, etc.) is possibly the over-
arching consideration for most Indian lmmakers to come to Slovenia. As one
Indian line producer has succinctly put it, giving Slovenia’s “strategic location” as
its main advantage:
One major reason why I particularly pitch for Slovenia for most of the pro-
ducers is because of its strategic location. So, if I place the complete crew in
Ljubljana and the director and the creative head want to go to, say a beach
site, it is just a one-hour drive. If you want to go to the Alps, snow, it is one-
hour drive. If you want to go to lake, say lake Bohinj or Bled, it is a one-hour
drive. It is quite approachable. In the morning, when everybody gets up by
7:00, 7:30, in one-hour’s drive we are there on the location, we are ready for
the shoot, which is seldom what we see in other destinations.
(R9)
This exceptional view was rearmed from the opposite end by a Slovenian line
producer:
I saw very quickly what they [i.e., Indian lm producers] were looking for
and they also saw very quickly what we could oer and that was what no one
else could oer them, that is, on a small piece of land, all at hand. In the eight
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 147
days of lming, we were often one day on Krvavec, where we lmed snow,
the second day we were in Ljubljana, where we lmed a typical view of a big
city or a European city, and the third day we were at sea, where it was as if
we were in Spain. So, what we have may not even be oered by Switzerland,
which is a European Mecca in terms of Indian lm production.
(R5)
Slovenia’s strategic location between Austria, Italy, Croatia, and Hungary has
meant an additional incentive to some Indian lm producers in terms of invit-
ing cross-border collaborations. Namely, being wedged between other – mostly
stronger – lm centres within the CEE region and further aeld, such as Venice,
Vienna, Budapest, Istanbul, Prague and the neighbouring Croatia, Slovenia, so as
to remain competitive, has needed to undertake a dierent strategy of action. This
strategy has typically led Slovenian lm producers to collaborate with neighbour-
ing countries (e.g. Italy). In other words, Slovenia can compete with or rather
complement – the bigger players by oering something dierent (new attractive
locations) as well as by providing more competitive prices (see later).
Slovenia’s further comparative advantage is that it is a relatively young post-
socialist country that fully opened its borders to the Western world only after the
collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 and its accession to the EU in 2004 (Kosi et al.
2020). In this sense, Slovenia, similar to the other countries of the CEE, was a
completely unexplored territory until very recently. Foreign location, as one lm
industry player put it from her own experience as a Bollywood dancer and actress,
constitutes a “cherry on the cake” (R6) within the lm, typically feeding escapist
appetites of those Indians who never get a chance to travel. Slovenia, alongside
other CEE countries, has thus gured as part of the new search for unknown, attrac-
tive, and sometimes adventurous locations.
Although many well-known Slovenian locations have already been included in
Indian lms in the course of the last decade, interviewees expect this trend to inten-
sify after the end of the COVID-19 epidemic, which has halted lming throughout
the world. At the same time, the pool of interesting locations is not endless, espe-
cially for such a small country. One Indian line producer, working in the Kan-
nada lm industry, expressed some doubts about continuing the collaboration at
the same pace and manner, rather suggesting new forms of shooting connected to
regular scenes, if the trend is to expand or continue.
Well, there has been a saturation to go to Slovenia in terms of looking for
locations only from the song perspective. If you just think of going to do songs
in Slovenia, no, I think we are done with that. We have mobilised the opti-
mum locations in Slovenia. Now, Slovenia can be used only for the purpose of
scenes, a chase, a ght sequence from a dierent perspective. There is still a
lot of potential. It all depends on the creative head and what the demand is of
the movie. Based on that, we can denitely utilise Slovenia in a much better
way than just simply showing the landscape, nature and things like that.
(R9)
148 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
Another important advantage of Slovenia compared to the wealthier countries in
Western and Northern Europe is competitive prices, since one of the key considera-
tions in choosing foreign locations relates to the budget constraint of a particular
Indian lm. Slovenia, like the other countries of CEE, can oer comparable sites to
other, more economically developed European destinations, but at a considerably
lower price. The Indian interviewees expressed themselves clearly on this:
The moment any movie maker thinks about shooting overseas, the rst coun-
try to come to their mind is Switzerland. Because it is so popular in India.
Everybody wants to go to Switzerland. And Switzerland can be aorded by
industries like Bollywood and Hyderabad, who have a lot of money and can
aord this kind of locations. But industries like Tamil or like our Kannada
industry, they look for something similar, something beautiful and as good
as Switzerland but economically it should be feasible for producers. That is
when we pitch Slovenia to them. We say, you are looking for Switzerland, we
will give you something better than Switzerland and for a cheaper price. So
that is how we approach them with Slovenia.
(R9)
What Indian productions nd, at least when they go to Eastern Europe for a
shoot, is rich European heritage. It’s similar scenes to Western Europe, the
streets, the look, the architecture, everything. And at a much cheaper cost.
(R3)
Having enumerated the major pull-factors for Indian lmmakers to choose Slove-
nia for a lm location, one disincentive in terms of reachability did crop up during
the course of our interviews from several interlocutors: namely, the absence of
direct ights between India and Slovenia. Usually, passengers need to stop over in
the Middle East or Turkey, or they can opt for a direct ight to nearby Venice (Italy)
or Zagreb (Croatia). Nonetheless, since both airports are within a couple of hours,
this does not seem to be the deciding factor.
Slovenian strategies to attract Indian lmmakers
Slovenia wants to attract foreign lm producers via two channels of promotion. First,
the advertising campaign “Drive less. Film green. Film in Slovenia” (https://lmin-
slovenia.si/) undertaken by the Slovenian Film Commission has launched Slovenia
as a green destination for lming at various international fairs promoting lm loca-
tions and putting it on the map on two major global platforms: Movie-Locations.
com (www.movie-locations.com) and The Location Guide (www.thelocationguide.
com). The advertising campaign promotes Slovenian landscape diversity, proxim-
ity, and geostrategic position as key factors for foreign lmmaking (Figure 8.7).
Slovenia’s geostrategic position presents an added value also from the adminis-
trative point of view. Being a member of the Schengen area means that the holder
of a Slovenian visa can travel anywhere throughout Europe. From this perspective,
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 149
Slovenia is a more competitive destination compared to some other Eastern Euro-
pean countries like Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and Serbia, for example. How-
ever, the convenience of a Slovenian visa makes it also attractive to fraudsters who
pretend to be lmmakers and use the visa to freely enter the EU. The Slovenian
Embassy in India, aware of such misconduct from past experiences, has become
rigorous in checking visa stakeholders through detailed verication and assistance
of Indian partners (e.g. the Honorary Consulate of Slovenia in Mumbai). This has
led to making the process of applying for visas timelier and more complex, some-
times negatively aecting the Indian–Slovenian lm collaborations.
Second, the Slovenian Film Commission also supports foreign lmmakers with
cash rebates. Slovenia is one of the last European countries to adopt monetary
incentives for foreign lm productions. This happened in 2016, and since then,
the Slovenian Film Commission has had an annual budget of €1,000,000, which is
signicantly less compared to other European countries. The cash rebate amounts
to up to 25% of the total acknowledged expenses for the realisation of the post-
production of any given project realised on the territory of the Republic of Slove-
nia. Until recently, the applicants were required to submit their applications at least
45 days before the start of the shooting. This requirement has been reduced in early
2022 to a reasonable threshold of one day before the shooting commences.
However, with no strategy to attract Indian lm producers specically, no Indian
lm producer has received this kind of nancial support so far, although there
have been several attempts on behalf of Slovenian line producers collaborating
with Indian lm players to avail of this monetary incentive for their joint projects.
Figure 8.7 The advertising campaign “Drive less. Film green. Film in Slovenia” of the
Slovenian Film Commission.
Source: Slovenian Film Centre
150 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
The main reason, according to both, is the lack of competencies to comply with
“European standards”, which are perceived as administrative barriers. The Indian
lmmakers appear to be further dissatised with the form of these incentives, pre-
ferring to receive the funds upfront rather than having to reclaim them through the
invoices after the project is completed. Moreover, the wording “up to 25%” is in
itself confusing, because they want to receive exactly 25% of their costs and not
less as reimbursement. The biggest hurdle, however, remains the fact that Indian
producers usually only start talking to Slovenian line producers about the specics
a few weeks in advance of their arrival in Slovenia. In addition, such agreements
may change entirely once at the lming location since Indian producers often fol-
low their own rhythm, inspiration, and energy. A Slovenian line producer explains
the challenges in more detail:
As far as this nancial aid is concerned, it is true that it says that they reim-
burse up to 25% of the costs. I know that our administration is a big problem
again. We tried twice and both times we were too late. They are too rigid.
They can’t expect us to provide, for example, an American style script, detail-
ing exactly what is going to happen by the hour. This is not the case in India.
And we can’t tell them that. We can’t think half a year in advance and write
something with Indians on paper just so I can apply for these funds if it is a
literal lie.
(R7)
In the absence of any clear national strategy and lack of incentives, the success
of Indian lmmaking in Slovenia owes much to a strong entrepreneurial vision
and organisational skills of Slovenian line producers who have established close
personal relationships with Indian lm producers. Before getting the rst deals,
all Slovenian line producers travelled to India to meet the right people and to
learn about Indian business and culture. Previous online and electronic commu-
nication was usually pointless. The only decisive factor was to establish personal
face-to-face contact.
I’m just telling you that if you’re not present in India among production
houses, if there aren’t people out there looking for, following and knowing
about new projects, then it’s just one big coincidence or I don’t know what
has to coincide for someone here in Slovenia to get such a project, but at the
same time nothing would be done on the other side.
(R7)
Our ndings have also shown the (in)direct role of the Slovenian Embassy in
India in facilitating and promoting lming in Slovenia: directly through consular
services in issuing visas and indirectly through their networks and personal con-
tacts, including honorary ambassadors well connected in the Indian lm industry.
Occasionally, though not so frequently anymore, we were told, a lm producer
wanting to shoot in Slovenia would turn directly to the Embassy (as, for example,
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 151
a Bollywood producer working with Salman Khan), in which case they would for-
ward the enquiry to Slovene line producers. The importance of direct personal con-
nections with Indian lm industries, from Bollywood to Tollywood, and a physical
presence in the eld in India, was reiterated by all our interlocutors.
Experiences of Indian lm shooting in Slovenia
Organisational arrangements for shooting song sequences for Indian lms using
Slovene locations reveal a close collaborative process between Slovene line pro-
ducers and Indian location managers/gurus or lm industry partners in both the
pre-production and production stages. The nature of this collaboration, involving
entrepreneurially minded individuals looking for new business opportunities both
in Slovenia and India, has evolved over time, from trial-and-error beginnings to
solid collaborations over the last few years. The Indian point of view, based on our
interviews, has revealed that the decision to choose Slovene locations is primarily a
commercial one, facilitated by any number of crucial factors, from accommodation
facilities to logistics, concessions rates, permissions, etc. As one interlocutor put it,
the pragmatic side is all important.
The process of scouting for a foreign location begins in India, with Indian lm
producers having ideas about something they may have seen, or something they
imagine would be good, possibly seeing it on Google, and giving this to the line
producer in India who collaborates with the line producers abroad (R7). The rst
step typically involves the Indian producer sending some visuals of what the lm
director is looking for, to the location managers in India, who begin a database
search, while deferring with foreign line producers and partners to do the same
from their side. Sounding out what the lm director, the creative head, and the
producer (but also the cameraman, the cinematographer, and the song director) are
after, and what their particular requirements are, is where it all starts – typically in
an oce in India:
So, based on that, we give them ideas. If Slovenia ts their idea, we propose
Slovenia, if not, we give them Italy, or Switzerland or Norway, Iceland, it all
depends.
(R9)
Detailed knowledge of what Slovenia oers in terms of locations has been under-
lined by all key players in this co-production process, with Indian location manag-
ers regularly visiting the country and knowing its sites very well. Although Slovene
lm scouts also play their part in suggesting locations, their role comes to the fore
more prominently in securing location permits, attaining equipment, nding a crea-
tive team (i.e. dancers), hiring props, booking hotels, nding appropriate catering
services, local transportation, etc., everything needed for the lm shoot before and
during the production process.
Every movie has a shooting requirement of at least two songs in a foreign loca-
tion. Doing only one song makes no economic sense, given the size of the Indian
152 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
crew, which includes the director, the camera team, the choreographer, the cho-
reographer’s assistant, the make-up artist, the hair artist, the heroine’s assistant,
the hero’s assistant, the costume designer, alongside technical sta. The crew also
includes a number of Slovene participants on the set, from technicians, and danc-
ers to catering sta, alongside the logistics team. It is not uncommon for family
members of the main actors to travel to a foreign location as well. One interviewee
referred to them as stow-aways, seeing them as part of the Indian way of doing
things. From the organisational point of view, shooting song sequences in a foreign
location is a highly complex and demanding collaborative process, requiring sub-
stantial logistics and coordination skills on the part of everyone involved.
Slovene lm professionals have all stressed the key importance of cross- cultural
learning and negotiations in their joint projects with the Indian lm industry.
Unsurprisingly, the beginnings of this collaboration were seen to be challenging
for rather inexperienced Slovene line producers and other stakeholders. Dierent
(coping) strategies emerged to broach and negotiate what were perceived as dier-
ences in codes of communication and professional standards between Indians and
Europeans more generally. This could be as trivial as not allowing the crew to eat
on the bus to demanding a full advance payment for any extra services so as not to
risk not being paid. In this, the insistence on everyone following the host-country’s
rules was something that needed to be clearly articulated from the outset, so as to
minimise misunderstanding.
The interviews with both Slovenian and Indian interlocutors have led to for-
mulations of certain “cultural” traits, even stereotypes, seen to be underlying
their communication and constituting a challenge to their collaboration. Notions
of “European standards” were evoked and contrasted with what was seen to be
“Indian lack of professionalism”, something that was remarked upon also by the
Indian line producer:
Yes, there is a huge dierence. We need to learn a lot on professionalism
from European countries, though we Indians make so many movies, and we
have made some really big projects, but when it comes to the professional-
ism, I still feel that we are lacking behind. Europe is way ahead in terms of
commitments.
(R9)
Leaving everything to the last minute (R7), as one Slovenian line producer has
noted, often introduced a measure of unpredictability and sometimes fed unreal-
istic expectations on both sides. For example, as noted earlier, the 45-day dead-
line from the lm commission to apply for nancial reimbursements has so far
never been met from the Indian side (R7). Other examples of failed communication
involved a project in which the Indian lm director suddenly required orchestra
musicians, without having the budget for it. The impromptu solution of lay musi-
cians organised by the Slovene side was met with an angry response that these
were “not real musicians”. On the other hand, the sudden demand to put together a
guerrilla camp in the middle of the forest for a shoot, which put an enormous strain
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 153
on the Slovene producers and organisers to obtain barbed wire, army tents, army
vehicles, sand bags, etc., and assemble it in two days, was managed successfully.
The lesson learnt was that clarity in what is being promised on the deliverables
from the local side as well as careful preparation in advance to avoid miscommuni-
cation are of the utmost importance, though ultimately, as one interlocutor has put
it half-jokingly and half-seriously, there has to be an acceptance of this rock ’n’ roll
with Indians and their unpredictable ways of doing things (R7). There are lessons
to be learnt from cross-cultural communication and accepting dierence in com-
munication and ways of doing things was seen to be part of that learning process.
Therefore, even as conditions on the set, particularly when the crews are larger,
can appear to be dicult to manage from the Slovenian point of view, all Slovene
interlocutors could not but express a sense of amazement that things always some-
how work out at the end. Our ndings indeed testify to a collaborative process that
can be challenging but also extremely rewarding, even as these rewards are often
intangible. More than one interlocutor consider the years of collaborating across
cultures as nothing less than a school for life, a life-changing experience.
Honestly, I must say that I kept and kept going back to India, I was so ada-
mant to understand them, every caste in its own right, how they think, what
they want, how they operate, and how to communicate with them. And I’ve
learnt it all and am very proud of that.
(R5)
From our interviews, we have been able to establish that Indian lm shooting
in Slovenia has provided fertile ground for cross-cultural exchange; it has led to
increased mutual awareness, a tempering of mutual misconceptions, as well as a
desire to travel and actively explore a dierent culture and generate income for
both sides. The trajectory of collaboration is seen to be upward and positive.
Impacts of Indian lm shooting in Slovenia
A typical project of Indian lmmakers in Slovenia involves about 30–40 people
who stay in Slovenia between one and two weeks and spend between €50,000 and
€100,000. This amount includes the shooting, services of line producers and other
subcontractors, accommodation, dining, and shopping. Wealthier Indian guests
typically like to visit better restaurants, go for wine tasting, and engage in shop-
ping. Middle-class Indians, on the other hand, usually prefer to consume Indian
food. Direct spending by Indian visitors represents the major share of lm-induced
investments in Slovenia. No other signicant expenditures, including lm tourism,
were reported by the interviewees to have emerged from lm production.
According to our interlocutors, Indian tourism in Slovenia is still in its early
development or nascent form, one reason being that, strategically, Indian visitors
are not regarded as a priority. Several factors have contributed to this situation. On
the one hand, the general experience with Indian tourists in Slovenia is not seen to
be overly positive by the Slovenian tourist operators. Not least because, according
154 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
to them, Slovenia wants to avoid mass tourism and considers itself more suitable
and interesting for boutique tourism due to its small size, lack of large cities and its
predominantly “green” character.
Judging by the policy of the Slovenian Tourism Organisation, India is not one
of the priorities. My personal opinion is that Slovenia does not want to become
Barcelona or Venice. We do not want to be ooded with tourists. I think that
should not be our goal, but that we need to be strategic, and I would say target
this higher class of tourism. So, I personally think it would be worthwhile to go
after the wealthier class, even if it means we only get small numbers.
(R8)
On the other hand, in comparison to other more developed countries, Slove-
nia lacks ve-star accommodation, luxury spas, and boutique shops with prestig-
ious brands of clothing, jewellery, etc. which would satisfy the needs of wealthier
Indian guests.
I have travelled a lot in the world and I must say that the Indian ve-star
hotels are beyond comparison. The service you get in those hotels is exqui-
site, perhaps only in Thailand you get something comparable. I think that
here in Slovenia we can learn a lot from India in the eld of hospitality.
(R8)
The interviewees reported positive feedback from local communities and the media
in response to joint Indian Slovene lm ventures. Most people were surprised but
also proud and cooperative when they heard about the purpose of the Indian visits
to Slovenia. One Slovenian line producer responded in no uncertain terms:
And I must also say that all the local authorities in Slovenia, where we
worked, were positive. Certainly, at the beginning with anxiety of what will
happen now, but otherwise really positive. The locals, maybe not at the
beginning, but very soon it was like a fairy tale.
(R7)
Similarly, Indian lm producers shared some very positive experiences of their
collaboration with Slovenian artists and other stakeholders that were conducive to
what they perceived as an all-around supportive and rewarding working environ-
ment that seems to harness mutual respect. In the words of an Indian line producer:
I think they simply love Indian movies I feel. They are very inquisitive; they are
very eager. Having worked with local crews as well, I have worked with a lot of
Slovenian dancers and they are indeed phenomenal, fantastic dancers. Com-
pared to any other European country. Apart from Italy, I have found the best
dancers in Slovenia, they adapt so well to Indian music, they are very quick.
(R9)
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 155
Conclusions
This chapter has set out to investigate the structures, processes, and cultural con-
texts that have contributed to the popularisation of lming locations in CEE among
Indian producers. Its aim was to specically analyse the comparative advantages,
strategies, experiences, and impacts of Indian lming in Slovenia as an example
of a CEE country.
Our ndings have shown that Slovene–Indian lm collaboration is a relatively
recent phenomenon, going back merely a decade. At the same time, it is part of a
wider trend across the region, in which Slovenia has joined the club of countries
in CEE with increased Indian investment in lm shooting (Parvulescu and Hanzlík
2022). However, there are several specicities to the Slovenian scenario. First, the
shooting locations have, up until now, served merely as an (exotic) backdrop to
the dance-and-song numbers without being part of the lm plot. Second, the col-
laborations have involved almost exclusively South Indian lm partners and are
yet to attract and venture out into Bollywood co-productions. And third, our nd-
ings have shown that without any governmental infrastructure supporting Indian-
Slovene lm co-productions, all past collaborations have relied mostly on personal
initiatives of entrepreneurially minded individuals venturing out into India in
search of new business opportunities.
Strategically – and against the backdrop of rising interest in new CEE locations –
Slovenia has been shown to hold a number of competitive advantages as a geo-
graphically small, diverse, and inexpensive location with beautiful natural scenery
and cultural heritage, skilled technicians, and talented performers. Bureaucratically,
however, it presents several obstacles, particularly in terms of obtaining visas and
the red tape involved in applying for nancial remunerations. The organisational
and cultural challenges too have been faced by both sides of the cross-cultural col-
laboration, leading to questions of who adjusts to whom. From the initial trial-and-
error beginnings, the established solid connections between Slovene and Indian
line producers, including other local participants, have given rise to a rewarding
cultural-economic phenomenon of knowledge exchange with reasonably high
hopes and expectations for the future.
It seems that the rst step in developing Indian lmmaking in Slovenia would be
to appeal to the Slovenian government to recognise (the Indian) lm industry as a
force for generating income, especially through tourism. Namely, Slovenia has no
strategy to attract Indian lm producers specically, which is one of the main rea-
sons that no Indian lm producer has received any Slovenian nancial support so
far. Such an outcome in Slovenia stands in marked contrast to the political decision
of national CEE governments to invest signicant public funding to attract for-
eign lmmakers (Mitric 2021). The solution for this challenge could be to educate
both members of the public and the representatives of governmental bodies of the
importance and potential impact the Indian lm industry could have on Slovenia.
This would involve doing further research so as to obtain scientically sound data
to more eciently run awareness-raising campaigns, showcase previous success
stories in other countries, and engage dierent stakeholders in an ongoing fruitful
156 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
communication underpinned by a common goal. Sooner or later, the post-COVID
times will witness a relaunch of Indian lmmaking in Europe. There are already
calls for European countries to get ready to seize the opportunities once they arise
(see Chapter 6). It will be interesting to observe how countries of CEE and Slove-
nia in particular, will behave within this reshaped lm landscape.
Acknowledgement
FilmInd project – The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic con-
nections was carried out within EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and Human-
ities and nanced by national funding of the participating countries. The authors
acknowledge receipt of funding from the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport
of the Republic of Slovenia and Slovenian Research Agency (Research programme
P6–0101). The authors also thank the interviewees from India and Slovenia for
their kind cooperation in the research.
References
Banaji, S., 2013. Hindi lm audiences outside South Asia. In: K. M. Gokulsing, W. Dissanayake
and R. K. Dasgupta, eds., Routledge handbook of Indian cinemas. London: Routledge,
391–401.
Banasiak, M., 2015. Bollywood in Europe: A case study. London: Film London and the
EuroScreen Partnership. Available from: https://issuu.com/euroscreen_casestudies/docs/
euroscreen_case_study_bollywood (access date 22.09.2022).
Bandyopadhyay, R., 2008. Nostalgia, identity and tourism: Bollywood in the Indian
diaspora. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 6 (2), 79–100.
Banerjee, S. and Srivastava, R., 2019. Exploring export potential of Indian movies: A com-
parative advantage analysis of the Indian lm industry. Great Lakes Herald, 13 (1), 14–26.
Bergfelder, T., 2005. National, transnational or supranational cinema? Rethinking European
lm studies. Media, Culture & Society, 27 (3), 315–331.
Bhatt, S. K., 2013. The popular culture of Bollywood in teaching Hindi as a foreign language:
Facilitator or debilitator? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10 (1), 321–333.
Bole, D., Ciglič, R., Gašperič, P., Kozina, J. and Urbanc, M., 2021. Geoatlas of European
screen locations in Indian lm industries. Available from: https://lmind-atlas.zrc-sazu.
si (access date 21.09.2022).
Budapest Reporter, 2021. Why Bollywood movies lm in Eastern Europe. Available from:
www.budapestreporter.com/why-bollywood-movies-lm-in-eastern-europe/ (access date
04.07.2022).
Ciglič, R. and Perko, D., 2013. Europe’s landscape hotspots. Acta Geographica Slovenica,
53 (1), 117–139.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2014. Shooting Bollywood abroad: The outsourcing of Indian
lms in Italy. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, 2 (3), 417–432.
Cucco, M. and Scaglioni, M., 2023. On the Italian trail of Indian lms through the lens of
media industry studies. In: K. Stachowiak, H. Janta, J. Kozina and T. Sunngren- Granlund,
eds., Film and place in an intercultural perspective: India-Europe lm connections.
Routledge, forthcoming.
Ernst & Young and LA India Film Council, 2012. Film industry in India: New horizons. Available
from: http://producersguildindia.com/Pdf/Film%20Industry%20In%20India%20New%
20Horizons.pdf (access date 08.07.2022).
Slovenia as a new contender in attracting Indian lmmakers 157
Frank, S., 2016. Dwelling-in-motion: Indian Bollywood tourists and their hosts in the Swiss
Alps. Cultural Studies, 30 (3), 506–531.
Ghosal, T., 2013. Empathic cross-res: latinos in Bollywood . . . Bollywood in Latinolan-
dia. In: F. L. Aldama, ed., Latinos and narrative media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan,
173–192.
Ghosh Dastidar, S. and Elliott, C., 2020. The Indian lm industry in a changing international
market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 44, 97–116.
Gričar, N., 2015. Kaj kulturno vladovanje prinaša novega v kulturno politiko? Primerjava
kulturnega vladovanja v danskem in slovenskem modelu lmske politike [What does cul-
tural governance bring to cultural politics? Comparison of cultural governance in the
Danish and Slovenian models of lm politics]. Master Thesis, University of Ljubljana,
Faculty of Social Sciences. Available from: http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/magistrska_dela_2/
pdfs/mb22_gricar-nika.pdf (access date 21.09.2022).
Guback, T. H., 1969. The international lm industry: Western Europe and America since
1945. London: Indiana University Press.
Hafeez, E. and Ara, A., 2016. History and evolution of Indian lm industry. Journal of
History and Social Sciences, 7 (2), 61–74.
Iordanova, D., 1999. East Europe’s cinema industries since 1989: Financing structure and
studios. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 6 (2), 45–60.
Iordanova, D., 2002. Feature lmmaking within the new Europe: Moving funds and images
across the East-West divide. Media, Culture & Society, 24 (4), 517–536.
Iordanova, D., 2003. Cinema of the other Europe: The industry and artistry of East Central
European lm. London: Wallower Press.
Jain, N., Soneja, T. and Ahluwalia, J., 2016. Indywood: The Indian lm industry (Deloitte
Report). Deloitte. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/in/en/pages/technology-
media-and-telecommunications/articles/indywood-indian-lm-industry.html (access date
08.07.2022).
Jain, P., 2019. Sara Jahan Hamara: Indian lms and their portrayal of foreign destinations.
Visual Anthropology, 32 (3–4), 343–352.
Jenster, A. B., 2020. Assessment of production opportunities in Eastern European emerg-
ing lm markets: A comparative multi-case study analysis. Dissertation, Universidade
Católica Portuguesa. Available from: https://repositorio.ucp.pt/handle/10400.14/29676
(access date 06.07.2022).
Josiam, B. M., Spears, D. L., Dutta, K., Pookulangara, S. and Kinley, T., 2014. ‘Namastey
London’: Bollywood movies and their impact on how Indians perceive European destina-
tions. Hospitality Review, 31 (4), 1–22.
Josiam, B. M., Spears, D. L., Dutta, K., Pookulangara, S. and Kinley, T., 2020. Bollywood
induced international travel through the lens of the involvement construct. Anatolia, 31
(2), 181–196.
Kanzler, M., Newman-Baudais, S. and Lange, A., 2008. The circulation of European co-
productions and entirely national lms in Europe 2001 to 2007. European Audiovisual
Observatory. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/16807835ef (access date 30.06.2022).
Karan, K. and Schaefer, D. J., 2020. China and Bollywood: The potential for building the
world’s largest lm market. In: Y. C. Kim, ed., China-India relations: Understanding
China. Cham: Springer.
Katsarova, I., 2014. An overview of Europe’s lm industry: Brieng. Available from: www.
europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/545705/EPRS_BRI(2014)545705_
REV1_EN.pdf (access date 27.06.2022).
Kaveri Devi, M., 2018. Poland’s enchanted Bollywood. Journal of European Popular Cul-
ture, 9 (2), 119–129.
158 Jani Kozina and Ana Jelnikar
Kosi, M., Preinfalk, M. and Svoljšak, P., 2020. The history of Slovenia: The middle ages to
the present. In: D. Perko, R. Ciglič and M. Zorn, eds., The geography of Slovenia: World
regional geography book series. Cham: Springer, 143–156.
Kumer, P., 2019. Representation of Slovenian lming locations in narratives of foreign-
produced movies. Geographical Bulletin, 91 (1), 95–116.
Lorenzen, M. and Taeube, F. A., 2007. Breakout from Bollywood? Internationalisation of
Indian lm industry. DRUID Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics. DRUID
Working Paper No. 07-06. Available from: https://wp.druid.dk/wp/20070006.pdf (access
date 28.11.2022).
Lourenço, I., 2017. Bollywood in Portugal: Watching and dancing practices in the construc-
tion of alternative cultural identities. Etnográca, 21 (1), 175–202.
Madan, M., 2000. Bollywood down under: Imagining new neighbourhoods. South Asia:
Journal of South Asian Studies, 23 (1), 21–30.
Mazierska, E., 2010. Eastern European cinema: Old and new approaches. Studies in Eastern
European Cinema, 1 (1), 5–16.
Mitkus, T. and Nedzinskaitė-Mitkė, V., 2016. The impact of globalisation to creative indus-
tries: The analysis of lm industries of Central and Eastern Europe. Creativity Studies, 9
(1), 64–74.
Mitric, P., 2021. The policy of internationalisation of East European lm industries: East-
west co-productions 2009–2019. Studies in Eastern European Cinema, 12 (1), 64–82.
Mittal, N. and Anjaneyaswamy, G., 2013. Film induced tourism: A study in Indian outbound
tourism. Atna Journal of Tourism Studies, 8 (2), 37–54.
Nared, J., Bole, D., Razpotnik Visković, N. and Tiran, J., 2020. Slovenian economy. In: D.
Perko, R. Ciglič and M. Zorn, eds., The geography of Slovenia: World regional geogra-
phy book series. Cham: Springer, 143–156.
Ostrowska, E. and Rydzewska, J., 2017. Developments in Eastern European cinemas since
1989. In: R. Stone, P. Cooke, S. Dennison and A. Marlow-Mann, eds., The Routledge
Companion to World Cinema. London: Routledge, 167–180.
Parvulescu, C. and Hanzlík, J., 2021. The peripheralization of East-Central European lm
cultures on VOD platforms. Iluminace, 22 (2), 5–25.
Parvulescu, C. and Hanzlík, J., 2022. Beyond post-socialist and small: Recent lm produc-
tion practices and state support for cinema in Czechia and Romania. Studies in European
Cinema, 19 (2), 129–146.
Roy, G. and Huat, C. B., 2014. Travels of Bollywood cinema: From Bombay to LA. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Slovenian Film Centre, 2022. Film in Slovenia. Available from: www.lm-center.si/en/
lm-in-slovenia/ (access date 21.09.2022).
Srivastava, A., 2015. Eastern Europe – Bollywood’s new favourite. Available from:
https://mediaindia.eu/destination/eastern-europe-bollywoods-new-favourite/ (access
date 04.07.2022).
Stachowiak, K. and Stryjakiewicz, T., 2018. The rise of lm production locations and spe-
cialised lm services in European semi-peripheries. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin,
67 (3), 223–237.
Stanković, P., 2012. A small cinema from the other side of the Alps: A historical overview of
Slovenian lms. Film History: An International Journal, 24 (1), 35–55.
Therwath, I., 2010. ‘Shining Indians’: Diaspora and exemplarity in Bollywood. South Asia
Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 4, 1–19.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-12
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
Globalisation processes and technological change, especially digitalisation, have
created a global lm industry and accelerated global competition. Local lm
industries were forced to undertake necessary reforms to compete successfully.
Otherwise, they will be unable to attract investment and lose their talents. Due
to historical circumstances and the relatively small local markets, the periphery
and semi-periphery, like most Eastern and Central European countries, have lm
industries dependent on public subsidies (Jäckel 2003). They subsidise some of the
production expenses of domestic producers or are used to attract foreign investment
in the form of contracts or location shooting. Inward subsidies and other incen-
tives have often been discussed in connection with possible trade distortions and
competition between locations oering the highest incentives. However, nancial
incentives alone, without the development of complementary human resources and
related infrastructures, are insucient to yield local benets except for short-term
ones (OECD 2008).
As Stachowiak and Stryjakiewicz (2018) point out, many less-developed regions
have been adapting by increasing international collaboration to keep up with struc-
tural changes in the global lm industry. These collaborations take dierent forms:
from co-productions and joint ventures providing services to foreign productions to
individual collaborations. These dierent forms of lm industry interaction mean
that dierent “lm production cultures” are increasingly coming together. In his
seminal work, J. T. Caldwell (2008) introduced the idea of a culture of production
and, thus, cultural practices and rituals that give meaning to workers in the lm and
television industry. He argues, among others, that workers’ ideas about the industry
are embedded in their daily practices and the media they create. In this chapter, we
want to take Caldwell’s arguments further and point to one element, interpersonal
relations, as vital in understanding the internationalisation of the lm industry and
the sub-education cultures that clash as a result. We also build on Coe’s (2000)
9 Production culture,
interpersonal relations,
and the internationalisation
of lmmaking industry
The case of Indian lm productions
in Poland
Malwina Balcerak, Krzysztof Stachowiak,
and Marcin Adamczak
160 Malwina Balcerak et al.
argument on the embeddedness of the lm industry in a network of interpersonal
relations. The concept of “embeddedness”, popularised in a seminal paper by Gran-
ovetter (1985), suggests that economic action, instead of representing some kind of
free-oating logic or rationality, is embedded in networks and institutions that are
socially constructed and culturally dened and therefore is inuenced by aspects
such as mutuality, trust, and cooperation (Zukin and DiMaggio 1990). In other
words, economic action is inseparable from the social relations through which it is
enacted. Bourdieu (1984) used the term “embodiment” to refer to similar processes
at the organisational level. However, we would like to argue in this chapter that
economic processes are embedded in key social actors and their networks and rep-
resent embodiment at the level of the individual. By contrast, economic sociology
and economic geography research has thus far focused on how organisations and
institutions are embedded in socio-spatial networks (Grabher 1993; Dicken et al.
1994; Hess 2004).
The chapter is structured as follows. In the rst section, we introduce the con-
cept of production culture and discuss it with reference to intercultural lmmaking
experiences. The next section attempts to explain the background of the critical
element in collaboration with the Indian lm industry: interpersonal relationships.
We argue that they may be the key to collaboration between the two lm industries.
Then we try to test it empirically by examining the Indian lm production culture
from the perspective of Polish lmmakers. In doing so, we present the dierences
between the Polish and Indian two production cultures. Furthermore, we try to
show what the informal side of the lm industry consists of, which plays an essen-
tial role in India. The last section tries to show how these dierences in production
cultures can be used to their advantage and how the rootedness in the network of
interpersonal relationships was used in Polish–Indian lm cooperation. The chap-
ter closes with concluding remarks.
Production culture and cultural embeddedness
Towards the end of the rst decade of the 21st century, the concept of “production
culture” research, initiated by John T. Caldwell (2008) and further developed by
his collaborators, attracted considerable interest in lm studies. Their research’s
novelty consisted of directing attention to spheres hitherto considered marginal in
academic lm studies and pointing out their considerable signicance and cogni-
tive complexity. This refers primarily to the complex process of producing a lm,
which involves textual, human, technological, and nancial factors. It has also
been suggested that the methodological palette should be expanded to include eth-
nographic tools such as participatory observation and unstructured in-depth inter-
views, as well as others based on a much broader spectrum of analysed production
documents, going beyond just the lms and scripts themselves.
Two terms have been used interchangeably to describe Caldwell’s proposed
methods and scope of research: production studies and production culture. They
form the titles of two signicant books inaugurating this approach (Caldwell 2008;
Mayer et al. 2009). In subsequent years, however, the term “production studies”
Production culture and interpersonal relations 161
gradually began to displace “production culture”. This happened not coinciden-
tally, as it better characterised the research undertaken in the spirit of Caldwell’s
concept. What was being studied was lm production: its institutions and market,
the work of lm crews, career trajectories, the complex process of creating lm
works, procedures, and working environments. It was lm production that turned
out to be the main focus of this strand of research. Culture, on the other hand, was
slowly forgotten.
This was also because Caldwell paradoxically devoted little space and interest
to it in his most important work. Despite including “culture of production” in the
book’s title (see Caldwell 2008), he deals with the concept of “culture” to an exceed-
ingly moderate degree. He expounds his understanding of it discreetly in a brief
footnote. His followers thus found it easier to forget about culture, and “production
culture” itself began to function more as an attractive and perhaps nobler-sounding
synonym for “production studies”, conducive to its smoother introduction more
widely into the curricula of academic lm studies. Caldwell (2008) only mentions
the eponymous term a couple of times in the pages of his book, primarily indicating
that he is interested in culture as an interpretative system (p. 2), seeing his project
as a cultural study of the industry’s self-theorising as a cognitive and social activity
and, at the same time, of production as a cultural practice (p. 7) and acknowledg-
ing, in the aforementioned discrete footnote (Caldwell 2008, p. 374, footnote 4),
the Geertzian tradition (see Geertz 1983). It is worth noting here that, of the rich
body of cultural studies thought, it is indeed the one that is best suited (along-
side the work of McRobbie 2002) to the nature of Caldwell’s research, which so
strongly emphasises the industry’s self-reexivity, its practice of ad hoc theorising
and its operation within elaborate industry interpretive-meaning structures. Cald-
well simply brilliantly, and perhaps partly intuitively, chooses the understanding
of culture that is operationally most eective for his inquiries, rather than dealing
with it with a fascination far more with the concreteness of his research material
than with theorising, as he makes clear in the nal sections of his work. Instead, he
associates theory with other distant approaches in lm studies.
In doing so, it is hard to resist the impression that Caldwell (2008) also tacitly
adopts an arguably “soft”, colloquial understanding of culture as the culture of
an organisation, in the spirit of the working environment determined, for exam-
ple, by “Google culture” or “Facebook culture”. The omission of broader theoreti-
cal inquiry does not harm the work, as the research material is largely previously
unknown, and this “soft” understanding is a form of ethnographic understanding
of culture. This is why this research has been able to develop so exuberantly and
its undoubted achievements today include a fuller understanding of the complex
process of creating a cannon, insightful descriptions of the market and institutional
mechanisms, and even knowledge that enables a rethinking of lmmaking pro-
cesses, with great educational and practical value for aspiring employees of pro-
duction divisions.
Central to the discussion on production culture is whether we can speak of dif-
ferent production cultures existing in the world. One can, of course, imagine the
legitimacy of the concept of the existence of a particular culture of production on
162 Malwina Balcerak et al.
the assumption that it is globally universal, that lms are produced everywhere in
the world in essentially the same way, that there is, namely, one culture of lm pro-
duction in the world. If the culture is one, perhaps not particularly, then a concept
of it is needed. We feel intuitive that the concept of culture presupposes a diversity
of cultures. Hence, the next step should be to nd at least a candidate for a dier-
ent production culture than Hollywood or the European one, which claims to be
universal. Is there anywhere in the world where lms are produced markedly dif-
ferently than in Los Angeles, Paris, London, or Warsaw?
Indian cinematographies, primarily the best-known Bollywood and Tamil, cer-
tainly provide good material for consideration (cf. Velayutham 2008; Ganti 2012).
They are examples of cinematographies that are in many respects rich and highly
developed while at the same time diering in important respects from Western
cinematographies such as Hollywood and Europe. This richness manifests itself
not only in high production volumes (in 2019, of 2,446 lms were released in
India, 20% were made in Bollywood, and 10% were the work of Tamil cinema-
tography1) and box oce (Bollywood, the Hindi lm industry, contributing 43%
of the revenue while Tamil lm industry contributes 19% – see Jain et al. [2016,
p. 10]), but also in a level of budgeting, staging mastery and technical prowess
that is not inferior to leading cinematographies. At the same time, the dierences
mentioned earlier are captivating: a dierent approach to issues of cinematic real-
ism, a narrative structure with a climax before the mid-screen break resulting from
a dierent organisation of the cinematic spectacles, a more Manichean division
between good and evil, elaborate genre and franchise traditions of their own, their
star system or, of course, the extended song-and-dance sequences most often men-
tioned in this context.
For these reasons, Indian cinematographies are captivating in their otherness not
only from a European perspective, providing unique cinematic experience pleas-
ures, but above all, from a theoretical lm studies perspective, they appear as an
excellent example for the analysis conducted from the position of production cul-
ture research. In other words, if we were to nd at least preliminary candidates for
indicating cultural dierences in the process of lmmaking, additionally linked
even more broadly to lm culture, allowing us to pose the thesis of the existence of
a dierent production culture in the world than the one adopted in the professional
Western world, we should look for them rst and foremost among Indian cinema-
tographers. Their analysis may provide preliminary answers to the question of the
existence or non-existence of clearly distinctive production cultures.
Interpersonal relations as a vital element in collaboration
with the Indian lm industry
One feature that distinguishes Indian lm production culture is its reliance on
interpersonal relations (Lorenzen and Taeube 2010). Many aspects of the Indian
economy are rmly embedded in social relations, which oset the underdevel-
oped formal institutions. Personal relations (particularly face-to-face interactions)
based on solid social group collective identity are the critical hallmark of business
Production culture and interpersonal relations 163
relationships in India – market relations are not built only on economic incentives.
India is thus labelled an “economy that runs on relationships” (Pellissery 2008,
p. 250).
For several decades, informal social relationships have underpinned the busi-
ness model of lm production in India (Lorenzen and Taeube 2007; Ganti 2012).
They are even seen as part of the wider global connectivity of the Bollywood lm
cluster (Lorenzen and Mudambi 2013). As Chitrapu (2018, p. 159) points out, “the
most powerful actors and producers of this industry are part of a close-knit net-
work, with professional and social ties”. In this network, there is a high degree
of social trust and an intense exchange of information due to family ties between
actors or frequent social gatherings (Lorenzen and Taeube 2007). However, before
characterising informal personal relationships in the lm industry, it is essential to
explain why social relations are so entrenched in Indian society.
Business relationships in India are based more on trust than on contracts. This
phenomenon probably has its roots, as Lal (1998, p. 28) writes, in “the three pil-
lars of the Indian social system . . . the relatively autarkic village communities, the
caste system, and the joint family”. He identies three elements as the foundation
of the “economy that runs on relationships”: (1) the family, (2) spirituality, and (3)
the housing situation in India are singled out in the literature as the foundation of
the economy that runs on relationships.
Regarding the role of the family, Harris (2003) points out that Indian business
is distinguished by a specic business culture characterised by “selective trust”.
This is because a majority of the most valuable companies are family businesses.
Most of India’s most inuential companies are family-owned, and many are multi-
generational businesses. As in other developing countries, the family is a power-
fully inuential informal institution in India (Prasad 2006), thus being one of the
most important motivators of individual behaviour (Lorenzen and Taeube 2010).
This emphasis on family ties can also be seen as a way to reduce the incidence of
risk (Chitrapu 2018). Thus, “outsiders” who are not part of the family but want to
establish a business relationship need to build trust through personal contacts.
The second element is spirituality. The signicant role of direct personal con-
tacts in India is also due to a strong sense of community and group orientation
(Ndubisi 2011). This is related to a distinctive feature of Indian culture, that is,
spirituality and the belief in the concept of “fatalism” (Ndubisi 2011). When mak-
ing decisions, karma and the belief that everything happens for a reason are essen-
tial. Furthermore, business decisions are inuenced by “the Indian philosophical
uniqueness of viewing the individual as a proto-type of collectivity redenes how
an individual is prompted to relate with others” (Pellissery 2008, p. 255) – more
than money, relationships matter.
This approach to personal social contact may also stem from the residential
situation of Indians, a third element of the “economy that runs on relationships”.
According to Pellissery (2008, p. 244), “only about 10–15 per cent of Indians lead
lives in which basic interactions are limited to immediate family members”. India
is the second most populous country after China, and New Delhi and Mumbai are
some of the most densely populated cities in the world. India’s population density
164 Malwina Balcerak et al.
in 2021 was 470 people per sq. km.2 The housing situation necessitates intensive
and regular contact with others, not solely limited to urban areas. Most of India’s
population lives in rural areas (about 64.8% in 2021), characterised by frequent
face-to-face interactions. Thus, proximity to residence essentially denes social
relationships and develops them. Such intense interactions in daily life make rela-
tionships multi-layered and easily transferable to other dimensions of life, such as
business.
The three elements described earlier make India’s relationship-based economy
characterised by informality. Most of the population works in the informal sector
(half are subsistence farmers). This means that getting a job is a matter of good
relationships and trust built on those relationships – this is more important than
the candidate’s qualications and the employer’s requirements (Pellissery 2008).
This practice is found in private companies (both large and small) and public enti-
ties such as the administration, the military and universities. Therefore, trust built
through personal relationships is part of the creative process and a critical factor in
establishing business relationships that help break down industry boundaries and
foster long-term cooperation (Kong 2005, p. 3).
Research method
This chapter is part of an international project exploring the lm relations between
India and Europe (see Chapter 1). Determining the nature of this relationship
required a qualitative approach, through which the primary method was individual
in-depth interviews with key actors involved in Indian lm production in Europe.
The material we draw on consists of ten interviews with producers, production
managers, and production division sta who worked in service to Bollywood and
Tamil productions being made in Poland. These were in service for large, viral pro-
ductions in India, being attendance successes there. The research was conducted
in 2020 and 2021. Interviews took place face-to-face and online using instant mes-
saging services such as Zoom. The interviews were then transcribed and analysed
using coding (Gibbs 2018). The primary method was thematic analysis, performed
using NVivo software. Studies using thematic analysis typically do not reect the
impact of the researcher’s preconceived ideas and pre-conceptualisations about the
data being analysed. The thematic analysis allows using existing theoretical con-
structs or other assumptions while maintaining a fresh and original perspective on
themes from the research material (Braun and Clarke 2021).
Indian production culture from the perspective of polish lmmakers
The Indian lm industry’s reliance on personal relationships may be one of the
elements that make this culture special. The research material collected during the
interviews with Polish lmmakers collaborating with Indians reveals ve main
features specic to Indian lm production culture, which dier signicantly from
those of European production culture in general and Polish in particular. First,
there is a much more robust and stricter hierarchy in Indian lm crew divisions,
Production culture and interpersonal relations 165
aecting communication within and with foreign partners. Traditionally, Indian
culture is patriarchal, hierarchical, and very conservative. Indians are a caste soci-
ety (Basham 2000). Each member of the lm crew is assigned a place in the hierar-
chy. Thus, for example, an employee of the technical division is not allowed to talk
back to the actor who plays the main role or to the director.
Most interviewees pointed out that hierarchy signicantly impacted work on the
set. First, the interlocutors pointed to a kind of “power game”, which they experi-
enced in contact with Indian partners, who were trying, perhaps unknowingly, to
sense their interlocutor’s position. One interviewee described it the following way:
My observation is that when an Indian approaches someone he doesn’t know,
he immediately tries to determine at the outset how the mutual hierarchy works,
that is, whether the person the Indian is talking to is higher or lower. If the
Indian senses that he’s higher up, he won’t have any resistance to take advan-
tage of that, whereas if he senses that he’s lower in the hierarchy, then it’s sort
of okay to just, give him maybe not commands, but ask him to do something.
(R1)
Second, it translated into a dierent type of communication imposed by the Indian
division, in which there was not much space for discussing individual solutions but
only following orders.
The phenomenon of hierarchy and its possible connection with the ocially
abolished caste system has two more aspects. Interlocutors perceive the rst one
with the most decadent experience in cooperation with Indian cinematographies of
a kind of “talent blocking”, in which, as a result of the aftermath of the caste system
for a signicant part of society, regardless of possible talent, certain artistic career
paths remain closed:
Hierarchy in the team is there. It is said that there are no castes in India
anymore, that is not true. Castration also occurs in the lm hierarchy. . . .
Because there are great talented people . . ., but for 25 years, 30 years they
will only work, because no one will give them an operator position, for exam-
ple. And he will not give them because of their material position or their
social position.
(R5)
Moreover, many times among the crew, there is an overt display of contempt
(sometimes even taking the form of physical violence) towards a person lower
in the hierarchy (Maj 2022). This is conrmed by one of the interviewees: They
among themselves have this hierarchy already established, well, and if someone
is lower, then according to my observations, he is rather treated disrespectfully,
unfortunately” (R1).
Without exception, these phenomena concerned aggressive behaviour in the
Indian crew, but they did not occur between Indian employers and Polish team
members.
166 Malwina Balcerak et al.
The second characteristic of Indian production culture is a signicantly more
exible approach to production planning and changes than European production
culture. The standard in the conditions of European production is the use of a cal-
endar shooting plan and an exact production schedule predicting which shots, in
which location, with the participation of which people from the team will be made
on a given day, starting at a specic time. Indian lm crews seem to work without
documentation such as a calendar shooting plan and an exact production schedule
predicting which shots (in which location, with the participation of which people
from the team, and the exact time of the start of shooting) will be made on a given
day. In addition, collaborators are deprived of access to the script, knowing it only
in a very general outline, but above all, being only recipients of often hotly formu-
lated commands to organise specic elements of costumes, scenery (such as 1,000
bicycles or 100 umbrellas for the next day) or animals (wolves, dogs, hawk, and
bear). An interviewee describes one such situation:
As far as costumes are concerned, sometimes there were situations such that
the costume girls sat up whole nights because, for example, suddenly there
was a need for 160 ies for the dancers. And we had to organise it all that
way – materials and so on. They would sit and sew. Or we had to organise a
conference for 700 people in three days.
(R2)
One interviewee indicates a potential reason for this phenomenon:
They only more or less said what kind of locations they needed, equipment
and so on, that we could at most guess something there ourselves, but for
someone to say, I don’t know, what kind of scene, then no. Well, and all the
time such a rumour was circulating on the set, that simply this is a produc-
tion that is really awesome, cited by very many millions of people, . . . and
precisely because of the fact that it was such a, I don’t know, Indian mega
production, that’s why they just told us so, that they are guarding this script,
so that it doesn’t leak anywhere.
(R1)
This high variability on the set was often a cause of frustration for Polish employ-
ees of production departments (because it hit them the most, causing the most
stress in this group).
A third characteristic of Indian production culture is a more relaxed approach
to the eciency of using props, costumes, or cameraman equipment ordered for
the set. Often there are situations when elements of scenery or costumes brought
to the set, at a cost not only nancially but also in terms of the crew’s eorts, were
not used later. It can be supposed that the excess of these elements can give the
director a sense of agency and power. Perhaps it is inspiring and allows him to
improvise with greater freedom during shooting, activating his creative potential
and imagination. Many wishes connected with that turned out to be ultimately
Production culture and interpersonal relations 167
abandoned, despite the eort involved in satisfying such needs. In Polish produc-
tion departments, this was seen as a waste of money and the team’s eort, so in a
sense a lack of respect for them. As one interviewee points out, such situations do
not occur only on Indian sets. In Poland, for example, some cinematographers are
notorious for ordering more lighting equipment or lenses than necessary to make
their work more comfortable.
The next feature of the production culture of Indian lm crews is the more fre-
quent handling of cash ow by Indus. Members of the Indian team manage their
budgets quite freely, compared to the Polish experiences. This allows them to aord
spontaneous ideas, decisions, or changes. As Maj (2022, p. 209) writes in his account
of experiences with Tamil production in Poland: “the budget they had at their dis-
posal allowed them not only to use the best of Poland on the lm set, but also to pull
in some support from abroad”. One of our interviewees describes it this way:
What makes Indian production dierent from European production? It’s the
nancing system. They just take money out of their wallet often. There’s an
investor who has the money, and that’s how it was here. It’s like he walks
around with a suitcase of cash. . . . We are more strict, we have to be like
that, because we settle on the basis of budgets and previously submitted cost
estimates, and then you have to account for every invoice meticulously. There
is no such thing there.
(R4)
The last characteristic of Indian production culture is rituals like muhurat shot.
In the Indian lm industry, the muhurat shot or muhurtam shot is the rst shot of a
lm, which marks the inauguration of the shots. It is preceded by a pooja (religious
rite). Contemporarily it means “auspicious moment”, a time or moment considered
lucky for beginning some project. In the latter case, however, it should be noted
that it appears in the statement of the Polish team member as an overheard story
while also being linked to other religious rituals observed on lm sets. During the
shooting in Poland, such rituals were not performed, or the Polish part of the crew
was not allowed to observe them and was unaware of their existence. A member
of the lm crew who worked with the Indus on another production describes the
event this way:
I have never participated in any conference, nor have I seen it, while the rst
day of shooting usually begins with such a ceremony, such a simple Puja over
the script, over the clapper. There is a priest who celebrates the Puja in the
presence of the heads of the divisions, the director, the producer, as if there
is a consecration of the script, a clapper, a re is lit. There are all these ele-
ments associated with this traditional such ceremony “for luck” at the begin-
ning of the lm. This happens in every lm, because no lm can do without it.
I took part in something like this, in this ritual. Not in the conference, but in
this ritual approach to the lm.
(R7)
168 Malwina Balcerak et al.
It is worth emphasising here that the purpose of such a juxtaposition is by
no means to demonstrate the superiority of one putative production culture over
another. For example, showing that a hypothetical Indian culture of production
would be inferior to a European or even wider Western, rational one based on pre-
cise control and planning is illusory because what is essential is the reconstruction
of the dierent cultures as coherent and alternative congurations.
The “informal” lm industry in India and Poland
Collaborations based on personal, direct, and informal relationships are wide-
spread in the lm industry. As early as the 1950s and 1960s, lm musicians did
not sign contracts or formal agreements yet maintained ongoing collaborations
(even parallel ones) with music directors (Booth 2008). Of course, as in other
industries, family connections also play an essential role. This is one of the fea-
tures that dierentiates the lm industry in India from Hollywood (Chitrapu
2018). The latter is dominated by large, integrated lm studios, whereas India
has many small, family-owned production lms. Family ties of trust enable key
players in the Indian lm industry to access valuable resources such as nanc-
ing, star actors, and distribution (Lorenzen and Taeube 2007, 2010; Ganti 2012;
Chitrapu 2018). Lorenzen and Taeube (2007) distinguish three types of trust and
informal relationships in India’s lm industry: between producers and star actors,
social relationships in nance, and between producers and star directors. From
the beginning of the industry, actors have preferred to work based on personal
trust – they are cast and sign contracts through informal social relationships rather
than with agents or lawyers (Lorenzen and Taeube 2007; Ganti 2012). It is pre-
cisely having strong personal relationships with Bollywood lm stars that are
extremely valuable for producers. Actors often agree to work without any written
guarantees. These relationships help sign contracts and prioritise the productions
of producers with whom they have an excellent personal relationship (Lorenzen
and Taeube 2007). Informal contacts also help in obtaining funding for the lm.
If funds ran out during production, contracts could be renegotiated. In this eld,
“handshake” agreements rather than contracts are the norm. A special network of
informal relationships was also established between producers and star actors who
wanted to try their hand at directing. This network is established based on family
ties (distant, closer family and friends) and through frequent social meetings (and
even participation in family celebrations) between producers and actor-directors
(Lorenzen and Taeube 2007). In this case, too, it is rare to nd a formally drawn-
up contract, as a handshake is more valuable to them.
Although family businesses dominate the lm industry in India, it is not closed
and inaccessible to people outside the family. The web of relationships is con-
stantly growing, not just family members or friends who are introduced to the
industry. Producers have a “base” of personal relationships with executive produc-
ers, talent agents, or entertainment lawyers, among others, with whom they did not
have a family or friendship relationship. However, these business relationships,
Production culture and interpersonal relations 169
established through lengthy negotiations and face-to-face meetings, are based on
the trust thus built. One interviewee describes it this way:
This trust is a sticking point in India in general, and it applies to everything,
every aspect of life. You have to have trust with your master, who will be x
something, you have to have trust with lady, who will be clean something,
it’s just that there’s a lot of dependence of one person and the other, that
relationship, it’s something that no one can get from a distance. You have to
go there, you have to show up, you have to participate in festivals. Dierent
kinds of trips also opportunities to promote, so that people see that there is
also a person outside the company. Because it’s more about the person than
the company itself.
(R5)
Given the combination of the outlined in the aforementioned paragraphs: “infor-
mal” dimensions of the functioning of cinematography in India and the conditions
of a relationship-based economy resulting from the need to balance less developed
formal institutions, the dierences in the functioning of Polish lm production as
an example of European cinematography should be apparent. The similar linking
of the general organisation of the economy and institutions with the lm produc-
tion process determines that such a high degree of “informal” relations (e.g. less
importance of contracts in favour of oral, informal agreements between important
gures in the lmmaking process) is not possible. The Polish lm production sys-
tem is based mainly on the participation of soft money, that is, various forms of
subsidies, grants, and subsidies from public funds. According to Majer et al. (2019,
p. 23), between 2007 and 2016, subsidies from the Polish Film Institute oscillated
between 45% and 51% of the total lm budget. The participation of public funds
entails a formalised and bureaucratic process related to the necessity of submitting
a whole series of documents, not only artistic ones, such as the lm script, but also
economic and production ones (e.g. a precise budget of the whole project), and
then a meticulous accounting of the spending of the received funds (Majer et al.
2019). The logic of informal relations is thus replaced here by bureaucratic logic.
However, in the crucial aspect of the importance of personal (family and friend-
ship) relationships for the “informal relationships in the Indian industry to function
in the lm business, the dierences may not be that great. Polish lm production
(and, more broadly, European lm production) also seems to rely heavily on rela-
tionships and social capital, as understood by Bourdieu (1984, 1986). This capital
is accumulated on a whole range of occasions: at festivals, at banquets and cock-
tail parties, during and after panel discussions, at workshops and industry training
events, during education at lm schools, and on the sets of other lms. The dif-
ference may lie only in the degree of importance of these relationships, the less
hermetic nature of the industry or, above all, the greater possibility of building
social capital based on resources other than family. In such a comparative study,
however, it is dicult to resist the impression of observing two mirror images of
170 Malwina Balcerak et al.
very similar mechanisms implemented, after all, in production systems belonging
to dierent cultural circles.
Kożuchowski et al. (2019, p. 84), while recapitulating the results of ethno-
graphic research on Polish lm sets, write:
Following the various accounts and analysing interviews with people in the
industry, one can sometimes get the impression that all the people are con-
nected in some way, have worked together on another project, have been rec-
ommended by a trusted employee/acquaintance or have a private relationship
with someone in the industry.
At the same time, it would be an oversimplication to reduce this phenomenon to
negatively perceived cronyism and personal arrangements. The persistence of this
mechanism demonstrates that it is benecial and functional for the lm industry.
As Kożuchowski et al. (2019, p. 85) also note:
A sense of security and trust in a proven person, even in the most crisis, is
a positive aspect of such selection of collaborators, at the same time, as the
researchers point out, it is also a form of responsibility, as it creates pressure
on the recommender to make the work of the recommended person satisfac-
tory. It is also important that the recommended person also feels comfortable
on set.
In a similar vein, Kożuchowski et al. (2019, p. 211) put it: “How do you become
an assistant on a lm set? It all depends on whom we know and who can help us
get our rst job”. At the same time, it seems reasonable to assume that such phe-
nomena are not limited in the circle of Western culture to Polish cinematography
but represent other cinematographies in this circle, as Caldwell’s (2008, p. 226)
observations seem to indicate.
Utilising network embeddedness in Polish–Indian lm cooperation
Although the rm reliance on interpersonal relationships of both the Indian and
Polish lm industries can be considered a hindrance, at the same time, it can be
an opportunity of sorts. The use of network rootedness can help build relation-
ships from the ground up. Actors with a rich network of relationships often act as
intermediaries in collaborations. One of the most important factors inuencing the
fact that Indian producers decide to produce in Europe, particularly in Poland, is
direct contact with lm industry representatives. However, establishing relation-
ships between Indian lmmakers and Polish production companies is a complex
process involving many activities at the state and industry levels. The rst includes
arrangements and contacts at the ocial level, local authorities, lm commissions,
or state ministries. The interviewees highlighted the location summit in Guja-
rat, organised every few years. This event allows for discussing possibilities and
relations that may connect Poland and Polish regions with Gujarat in lm. Such
Production culture and interpersonal relations 171
contacts, however, are only a kind of stimulus and do not prove sucient due to
their general and ocial character.
The second element is industry contact between representatives of companies
related to the audiovisual industry and their Indian counterparts. Representatives
of production companies from Poland participate in fairs and events dedicated to
the locations, which provide an opportunity to advertise the region and establish
direct contacts that can be an excellent prelude to further negotiations. During the
location summits that successfully bring together countries from around the world,
everyone can present their country, say something about incentives, and show their
locations.
Interviewees pointed to the Goa festival as a convenient contact forum where many
Polish companies go. The perfect market is where they can advertise Polish locations,
make folders, and ght for a customer. After the ocial part of the fair, during the gar-
den party, the subgroup activities already started. Participants in this event emphasise
that informal meetings after the festival were often more fruitful than attending the
ocial part. This again shows the importance of direct and informal contact with the
Indian lm industry. One interviewee recalls the festival this way:
We were at this lm festival in Goa. I can tell you that we were received very
warmly . . . there was a lot of interest, and they listened willingly to it, they
asked a lot about Poland . . . so we mostly sat, talked, arranged meetings so
that sometimes we just sat in this hotel restaurant, it looked like you know,
quick dates, that we changed tables, with this business card, with this some-
thing, we are in the process of this, this, this. . . . So this is what the after-
noons looked like, and in the evening from 6 pm, when the garden party . . .,
the subgroup activities already started. You had cocktail and bar tables, you
stopped, you took a drink, conversations started, you had a chance to demon-
strate, show something on the phone. Here is a recording of this, here we did
it, and on the set it is yes, then yes, then yes. And you did come back with a
pile of yers, business cards and then with those people somewhere in touch.
(R2)
The activities mentioned earlier are of auxiliary and initial signicance in gain-
ing the participation of individual locations in Indian lms. Most important, how-
ever, are the personal contacts established through them. The shared production
experience allows trust to be built, resulting in future collaboration on subsequent
projects. The interviewees emphasised that personal contact is crucial for estab-
lishing cooperation in India. They said these personal contacts are always more
important and meaningful and facilitate contact and cooperation. One interviewee
describes it this way:
Sometimes we say that the lm industry is small and here are these personal
contacts and the fact that you know someone and that someone knows some-
one . . . and these are the mutual relations, recommendations. It works best.
(R6)
172 Malwina Balcerak et al.
The interest in Polish locations and lmmakers from Poland is mainly due to
intermediaries who build relationships in India (especially in Mumbai) and gain the
trust of producers and the Indian lm industry, which later translates into participa-
tion in subsequent projects.
According to the interviewees, having a representative in Mumbai is the key in
establishing close relationships with lm industry representatives in India. They
point out that it is crucial to be ready to meet face to face with producers or other
industry representatives when they need to. This is conrmed by an interviewee:
I think India is no dierent from any other country in this respect. Always these
personal contacts are more important, they are more meaningful and facilitate
contact and cooperation” (R6).
The second adds that “when it comes to building deep relationships with pro-
ducers, you need to be there, this is a meeting the moment they want it, it is face to
face” (R5).
This is the strategy adopted by one of the largest production companies in
Poland, Film Poland Productions. Film Poland Productions has been bringing
Indian lmmakers to Poland for years, arranging for them to shoot in many Polish
locations, scenery, specialists, stunt performers, or extras (Figure 9.1).
It is a service and production company based in Krakow, Poland. It provides
Polish locations for foreign lm productions, provides access to complete lm
crews made up of professionals with the highest work standards, and establishes
contacts with potential foreign lm producers. They also have a database of Polish
and foreign actors, extras, and models. Film Poland Productions is most active in
working with Indian lmmakers. To establish a trust-based personal relationship,
the company sent its representative to India in 2014. The person lived in Mumbai
and spent several years intensively acquiring contacts in the industry there. Where
cooperation developed, these contacts worked bilaterally, that is, on the one hand,
to advertise Polish locations and attract Indian productions to Poland (Figure 9.2),
and on the other hand, to help representatives of the Polish lm industry (primarily
cinematographers) to participate in the shooting of Indian lms in India on a con-
tractual basis for individual projects. According to a representative of Film Poland
Productions, it was a test in the form of creating an agency that would represent
Polish, European, or global artists on the Indian market. Working in Mumbai,
which consisted of negotiations and talks with Indian producers, helped to identify
expectations and factors that may encourage lming in Poland. The work of such
a representative was about establishing relationships with producers and looking
for scripts and producers who would be interested in producing in Poland and, in
addition, looking for creators for the Indian market for lms that are produced there
or in other parts of the world.
Personal contacts are based on mutual trust and the exchange of information on
lmmaking opportunities in Poland, with Polish representatives acting as a point of
contact. Familiarity with working conditions in Poland and Europe makes it easier
for Indian producers to decide on locations to shoot parts of lms outside India.
Moreover, the relationship built on mutual trust is signicant in the context of the
specicity of work in Indian lm production, which is characterised by greater
Production culture and interpersonal relations 173
planning exibility than in European production. The creative process is character-
ised by a greater degree of improvisation and spontaneity, which means that many
plans change daily. Among other things, previously chosen locations and even the
countries in which they were supposed to be located may change during shooting.
One interviewee describes it this way:
No one from the Polish side knew the script. We knew what the general picture
was, but the NDA clause, i.e. condentiality, was at such a level that we knew
Figure 9.1 Indian and Polish lm crews during the lm shooting at the European Solidarity
Centre in Gdańsk, Poland.
Source: Photo by Jakub Maj
174 Malwina Balcerak et al.
from the other Indian oce director how it was supposed to look like and what
this scene was supposed to tell more or less about, but no one really saw the text,
so this it was quite interesting. All things were taken care of from day to day.
(R8)
Building good business relationships and trust are essential in India. They are
usually the aftermath of informal meetings, such as dinners and discussions in
nightclubs with potential business partners. India is no dierent from any other
country in this respect. These personal contacts are always more important, carry
more weight, and facilitate collaboration. Producers maintain contacts through
business and informal meetings in restaurants, bars, or private clubs (Gornostaeva
and Brunet 2009). Moreover, not least in the context of cooperation with the lm
industry in India, it is emphasised that a critical prerequisite for eective commu-
nication is an understanding and appreciation of the country’s culture with which
business is being conducted.
Conclusions
The chapter sought to show the role of interpersonal relationships as an essen-
tial element of production culture and also pointed to the role of the individual
Figure 9.2 Indian lm crew during the lm shooting at the Gdańsk Lech Walesa Airport in
Poland.
Source: Photo by Jakub Maj
Production culture and interpersonal relations 175
dimension of international lm production. This dimension is complemented by
the organisational level, which is the focus of many studies on the lm industry
(Epstein 2010; Dixon and Foster 2011; Balio 2013). This individual dimension
is embedded in culture: the individual’s actions are determined by social norms
and rules, both formal and informal. The latter seems to be no less important in
international lm cooperation. This is an important conclusion from the point of
view of the internationalisation of lmmaking, as many of the activities of public
authorities in support of internationalisation are oriented towards an organisational
or more formalised dimension.
The Indian lm industry is based on personal relationships. However, this is
perhaps not unusual, as cooperation based on face-to-face and informal relation-
ships is relatively common in the lm industry (see Coe 2000). The dierence
emerges in the degree of importance of these relationships and their dominance
over more formal ones – trust is more important to Indians than formal contracts.
Many aspects of the Indian economy are embedded in personal relationships and
for many years these have been the basis of the business model in India.
Signicant dierences are noticeable, however, in the approach to lm pro-
duction organisation. Indian lm crews are distinguished by a relatively casual
and unpredictable approach to scheduling, scene execution, or props or sets.
Despite the dierent production cultures, the Polish collaborators tried to full the
tasks assigned to them and adapt to the prevailing conditions, although they did
not always approve of the decisions made by the Indians. At the end of the day,
however, the shared awareness of the common goal becomes paramount, and, as
Caldwell (2008, p. 229) puts it, “the logic of collectivity goes beyond conicted
interpersonal exchanges”.
Network embeddedness, which means tying production processes to a network
of interpersonal relationships, is one of the critical elements for understanding and
explaining dierences between production cultures. It can also have a practical
dimension when realising its importance is used as an opportunity to build new
relationships. Previous research on network embeddedness in the lm industry by
Packard et al. (2016) has shown that lm success is based on team members’ con-
tributions. Those arise from their positions, or embeddedness, in a social network
weaved through past lm collaborations. These collaborations allow team mem-
bers to draw knowledge and skills from the network for new lm projects. In the
case of the Polish–Indian lm relationships presented in the chapter, we have also
shown that they can be a way to cross barriers between dierent production cul-
tures and build bridges between them. Central to this is the role of intermediaries,
that is, actors using the network of interpersonal relations not so much for their
benet but for the benet of the collaborating actors.
Despite the limited nature of this sample, we see it as a deepening of existing
research on lm production cultures in India, such as Velayutham (2008) on Tamil
cinema or Ganti (2012) on Bollywood. The experience of Polish producers and
Polish production companies in providing services to major Bollywood and Tamil
productions in Poland provided a unique cross-cultural opportunity for two cultur-
ally and nationally diverse lm crews to come together on the set of individual pro-
ductions. Thus, it provided an opportunity to look at dierent production cultures
176 Malwina Balcerak et al.
in action and interact with each other in the process of cooperation and sometimes
clash and conict, in the midst of which it is possible to identify and sound out dif-
ferences in production cultures.
Acknowledgement
The research presented in this chapter was carried out under the project “FilmInd
The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic connections between
India and Europe”, nanced by the Polish National Science Centre (project no.
2017/27/Z/HS4/00039).
Notes
1 Based on data on Indian feature lms certied by the Central Board of Film Certication
by Languages, available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20200413030711/www.
lmfed.org/downloads/Language-wise-Region-2018-19-26062019.pdf (access date
18.12.2022).
2 www.populationof.net/pl/india/ (access date 17.05.2022).
References
Balio, T., 2013. Hollywood in the new millennium. London: British Film Institute.
Basham, A. L., 2000. Indie: Od początku dziejów do podboju muzułmańskiego. Warszawa:
Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Booth, G. D., 2008. Behind the curtain: Making music in Mumbai’s lm studios. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., 1986. The forms of capital. In: J. Richardson, ed., Handbook of theory and
research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press, 241–258.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2021. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
Caldwell, J. T., 2008. Production culture: Industrial reexivity and critical practice in lm
and television. Durham: Duke University Press.
Chitrapu, S., 2018. Associations and networks: Inequalities in lm and TV production.
In: A. Athique, V. Parthasarathi and S. Srinivas, eds., The Indian media economy. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Coe, N. M., 2000. The view from out West: Embeddedness, inter-personal relations and the
development of an indigenous lm industry in Vancouver. Geoforum, 31, 391–407.
Dicken, P., Forsgren, M. and Malmberg, A., 1994. The local embeddedness of transnational
corporations. In: A. Amin and N. Thrift, eds., Globalization, institutions and regional
development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–45.
Dixon, W. W. and Foster, G. A., eds., 2011. 21st-century Hollywood: Movies in the era of
transformation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Epstein, E. J., 2010. The Hollywood economist: The hidden nancial reality behind the
movies. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
Ganti, T., 2012. Producing Bollywood: Inside the contemporary Hindi lm industry.
Durham: Duke University Press.
Production culture and interpersonal relations 177
Geertz, C., 1983. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York:
Basic Books.
Gibbs, G. R., 2018. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Sage.
Gornostaeva, G. and Brunet, J., 2009. Internationalization of the production process in
the US lm industry: The case of the United Kingdom. International Journal of Arts
Management, 21–30.
Grabher, G., ed., 1993. The embedded rm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks.
London: Routledge.
Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.
American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
Harriss, J., 2003. Widening the radius of trust: Ethnographic explorations of trust and Indian
business. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9 (4), 755–773.
Hess, M., 2004. ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness.
Progress in Human Geography, 28, 165–186.
Jäckel, A., 2003. European lm industries. London: British Film Institute.
Jain, N., Soneja, T. and Ahluwalia, J., 2016. Indywood: The Indian lm industry. Mumbai:
Deloitte.
Kong, L., 2005. The sociality of cultural industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy,
11, 61–76.
Kożuchowski, T., Morozow, I. and Sawka, R., 2019. Społeczny wymiar tworzenia lmu w
Polsce. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Biblioteki Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Filmowej, Telewiz-
yjnej i Teatralnej im. Leona Schillera w Łodzi.
Lal, D., 1998. Unintended consequences: The impact of factor endowments, culture, and
politics on long-run economic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lorenzen, M. and Mudambi, R., 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and
Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13, 501–534.
Lorenzen, M. and Taeube, F. A., 2007. Breakout from Bollywood?: Internationalization of
Indian lm industry. DRUID – Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics. DRUID
Working Paper No. 07-06. Available from: https://wp.druid.dk/wp/20070006.pdf (access
date 28.11.2022).
Lorenzen, M. and Taeube, F. A., 2010. The banyan and the birch tree: Family ties and
embeddedness in the Indian lm industry in Bollywood. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Busi-
ness School.
Maj, J., 2022. Różnice w kulturze i organizacji pracy na planie lmowym w Indiach iw
Polsce: Przypadek tamilskiego lmu pt. Mersal. Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, 21,
203–215.
Majer, A., Orankiewicz, A. and Wróblewska, A., 2019. Pieniądze, produkcja, rynek: Finan-
sowanie produkcji lmowej w Polsce. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Biblioteki PWSFTviT.
Mayer, V., Banks, M. J. and Caldwell, J. T., 2009. Production studies: Cultural studies of
media industries. New York: Routledge.
McRobbie, A., 2002. Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded
up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16, 516–531.
Ndubisi, N. O., 2011. Conict handling, trust and commitment in outsourcing relationship:
A Chinese and Indian study. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 109–117.
OECD, 2008. Remaking the movies: Digital content and the evolution of the lm and video
industries. Paris: OECD.
Packard, G., Aribarg, A., Eliashberg, J. and Foutz, N. Z., 2016. The role of network embed-
dedness in lm success. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 328–342.
178 Malwina Balcerak et al.
Pellissery, S., 2008. Social hierarchies, economic inequalities and interpersonal relation-
ships: An overview from India. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal
Relationships, 2, 243–259.
Prasad, G., 2006. The great Indian family: New roles, old responsibilities. New Delhi:
Penguin Group.
Stachowiak, K. and Stryjakiewicz, T., 2018. The rise of lm production locations and
specialised lm services in European semi-peripheries. Hungarian Geographical
Bulletin, 67, 223–237.
Velayutham, S., ed., 2008. Tamil cinema: The cultural politics of India’s other lm industry.
Abingdon: Routledge.
Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P., eds., 1990. Structures of capital: The social organization of the
economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-13
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
The creative industries receive increased attention – including in peripheral areas –
as municipalities, investors, and people who work in these industries hope that it will
boost their region.
(Sand 2020)
Many regions, municipalities, cities, and towns are working strategically to dene
their own place brands. In this process, lm and TV productions can be a powerful
tool and resource (Nordström 2018; Lind 2019). Film and television productions
are mobile and often produced in places where the economic and production con-
ditions are to their best advantage. If these productions become associated with
the place and are exposed to an international audience, this can sometimes trans-
late to extensive marketing values for the location or region in question (Lind and
Kristensson Uggla 2019).
This chapter aims to discuss how lm productions, and especially Indian lm
productions, are used, can be used, and could be used as a tool in regional develop-
ment in European rural areas in general and in Nordic and Finnish rural areas in
particular. Which lessons could be learned from previous productions and what are
the potential benets and challenges when attracting lm productions to a remote
region in Northern Europe?
Given the low number of Indian lm productions made in the Nordic coun-
tries so far, zooming in on Indian lm productions in Finland specically has its
challenges as a research eld.
That said, the topic of regional development through the lens of the interna-
tional lm industry touches on issues of periphery and centre (Dahlström 2005;
Sand 2020; Chow and Sand 2020), the balancing act of commercial and artistic
objectives (Miles and Paddison 2005; Florida 2002; Sacco et al. 2008), as well
as the connection between regional development, place branding, and narrative
capital (Lind 2019; Lind and Kristensson Uggla 2019).
The report Film and Regional Development – Policy and Practice in the Nor-
dic Countries (Dahlström 2005) discusses how regional lm projects can have
10 Film productions as a part of the
regional identity in rural areas –
the case of the Nordic countries
Therese Sunngren-Granlund
180 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
favourable eects on employment, education and training, regional identity, and
place branding. According to Dahlström, it is important to keep in mind that out-
comes from regional investments in lm productions often take time to manifest
and that some results are indirect, meaning that estimating the wider impact of lm
productions on regional development and identity, as well as how it aects employ-
ment and turnover, can sometimes be challenging.
Culture-led local and regional development has gained attention globally dur-
ing the past few decades, and there are both failures and success stories that can
be used to understand culture’s ability to create social and economic value (Miles
and Paddison 2005). Furthermore, economist Pier Luigi Sacco draws attention not
only to the size of the creative industries but also to the importance of cultural
involvement, which he believes to be crucial for the exchange of ideas between
dierent sectors (Sacco et al. 2008). The connection between cultural participation
and innovation also implies that narratives connected to the place are of importance
to the local population as well as to the hospitality industry (Lind and Kristensson
Uggla 2019).
Methodological remarks
This chapter is based on an analysis of lm policy documents in Finland, Sweden,
Norway, Denmark, and Iceland (2020–2022), as well as on ten in-depth inter-
views conducted between 2020 and 2021 with Finnish stakeholders working in the
lm industry. The policy documents were all accessed online through the ocial
websites of the respective country’s national and regional lm commissions.
The policy documents, such as “Finland Film Commissions Production
Guide”, “Film in Iceland – Filming in Iceland”, “Norwegian Film Commission
Funding & Partners”, “CPH Film Fund – How to Get Funding”, and “Nordic Film
Commissions – Our Shared Ambition” contain, among other things, information
about national incentives and tax rebates, which productions are eligible for sup-
port, how to apply for incentives, and the size of incentives in terms of percentages
or sums. The policy documents and websites also provide facts about locations,
scenery, daylight, and weather conditions. There are also details about local service
companies, salaries, working hours as well as which permits and documents are
needed and when (shooting, working, and visas).
The interviews were part of an international project studying the connections
between Indian lm industries and European locations with the objective to com-
prehend the socio-cultural and economic eects of Indian lm productions in
Europe. The study’s key research question was: Does Finland attract the Indian
lm industry, and how? The interview guide covered topics including methods
for attracting international lm productions, collaboration between dierent stake-
holder, and infrastructural and organisational arrangements. All the interviews
were held in English and conducted online via Teams or Zoom. Each interview
was approximately 45 minutes to an hour long. Professionals from the Finnish lm
industry, such as producers, cinematographers, art directors, location scouts, and
technical crew, as well as regional lm commissions were among the respondents,
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 181
and they were mainly reached through professional websites and networks. None
of the interviewees were of Indian origin. This means that the scene is set in a Finn-
ish context. Nevertheless, similarities are probably to be found in the other Nordic
countries as well as in other rural areas in Europe.
Rural areas, regional identity, and the creative industries
In Finland, 89% of the country’s territory is considered predominantly rural
(OECD 2008) and according to the Finnish Environment institute (SYKE 2020),
about 72% of the population reside in the urban areas of the country, which means
that 28% live in rural areas. Putting these numbers in a European context, the cor-
responding numbers are that around 20% of the population lives in predominantly
rural regions, and that rural regions make up approximately half of the continent
(European commission 2021). These gures show that in Finland, both the territory
considered as predominantly rural and the number of people living in such areas is
higher than in the rest of Europe.
According to the Finnish geographer Anssi Paasi (2011), a region’s identity is
developed by the acts of its citizens, while at the same time the actions of the
people of that region are inuenced by larger-scale entities, such as the state
and the global system. As a result, regional identity is a dynamic process that is
simultaneously produced, practised, and impacted by the local populace and larger
entities, continuously.
Regardless of whether the region is considered rural or urban, all places have a
brand, whether it is in print or not. A place brand is the sum of the associations that
exist around the place, for residents and for the outside world (Nordström 2018).
Today many regions, municipalities, cities, and towns are working strategically to
dene their own place brands, with the aim of attracting new residents, visitors and
business establishments (Logar 2022). In this process, lm and TV productions can
be a powerful tool and resource (Nordström 2018; Lind 2019).
Film is a multi-faceted eld which, in addition to direct values from production
and consumption, contributes to inspiration, identity creation and lifting places and
regions. The medium’s main strength lies in its narrative format, which creates and
conveys representations of our world, and where certain lms aects us personally
while others have an inuence on a collective level (Lind 2019). Film production
can also create powerful synergies between dierent competences and industry
areas and enable exchange of experience and collaborations. Economist Pierre
Luigi Sacco points out how the creative industries, including lm, strengthens
and develops innovation, welfare, sustainable development, social cohesion, and
learning (Sacco 2011).
Film and television productions are mobile and are often produced in places
where the economic and productions conditions are to their best advantage.
When trying to attract lm productions to a place, eective marketing of the
location’s qualities is of great importance. If these productions are associated
with the place and exposed to an international audience, it can mean exten-
sive marketing values, while also strengthening the location’s self-image and
182 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
identity for those who live there so-called secondary values (Lind and Kris-
tensson Uggla 2019).
Research by Pier Luigi Sacco (2011) and Richard Florida (2002) has contrib-
uted to a new and revitalised view of the creative industries’ value creation and
contribution to places, cities, and regions. According to Florida, the development
of the creative class is important in order to develop both creativity and innovation
in a region (Florida 2002). Sacco, on the other hand, talks about Culture 3.0, stat-
ing that the creative industries’ contribution to society cannot be reduced to direct
and short-term eects alone. Typical of research on creative clusters placed outside
urban centres, including those related to the lm industry, is that it often focuses
on how the creative industries impact and develop their geographical locations
from a regional development perspective (Hedling 2012). More unusual is to turn
the question around, that is, how does the fact that the place is peripheral aect the
creative cluster (Sand 2020).
However, previous research shows that lm industry clusters tend to form in
a “natural” way (Medel and Gossel 2015), meaning that most of the world’s lm
industry clusters have congregated in highly populated regions, where urban amen-
ities are easily accessible. Since the production system within the lm industry is
mainly project based, being close to actors participating in the production process
is a strong incentive for businesses and creative individuals to stay near each other
(Rosenfeld and Hornych 2010).
On the other hand, in more remote regions with a scattered populace, develop-
ing a strong and sustainable lm milieu is often a great challenge (Sand 2017).
Therefore, trying to impact the emergence of these types of structures or clusters in
peripheral and/or not so densely populated regions through external inuences can
be demanding, for reasons such as poor production volume, brain drain, and lack
of resources in the form of sucient critical mass.
Film funding and regional development in a Nordic context
Initiated by the country council of western Sweden, the rst regional lm fund
in the Nordic countries, Film i Väst, was founded in Trollhättan, 1992. The main
objective of Film i Väst was to promote professional lm and media production in
order to revitalise the region, which was struggling after economic crisis, industrial
decline, and growing unemployment (Hedling 2012). Since the beginning, Film
i Väst, or “Trollywood”, has had remarkable success with attracting numerous
international actors and directors. Unlike regional lm funds in the other Nordic
countries, Film i Väst changed the geography of lm production in Sweden. How-
ever, during the 1990s, lm production in Sweden decentralised into three regions:
Filmpool Nord in the north, Film i Skåne in the south, and Film i Väst in western
Sweden (Dahlström and Hermelin 2007). Stockholm, the capital, did not get its
own regional lm fund until 2007 (Sand 2020).
In 1999, the Northern Film and Media Foundation (POEM), an audiovisual pro-
duction resource centre, was established in northern Finland. The aim of POEM was
to develop and promote the lm industry in Northern Finland (Lähteenmäki-Smith
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 183
2005; Sand 2020). Some years later, POEM’s project portfolio was merged with
that of BusinessOulu. Today the Finnish lm commission operates as the rst point
of contact for all international inquiries about lming in Finland, utilising produc-
tion resources and services and obtaining funding. The Finnish lm commission
consists of a consortium of seven regional lm commissions located across the
country: Finnish Lapland Film Commission, North Finland Film Commission,
East Finland Film Commission, Southeast Finland Film Commission, West Finland
Film Commission, Film Tampere, and Åland Film Commission (Film in Finland
2022). Using joint resources, the regional lm commissions are pooled together to
promote Finland as a single international location for lm production (Janta 2021).
Inspired by their Nordic neighbours, local investors and public authorities estab-
lished Norway’s rst regional fund, Film 3 in Lillehammer in 2001. At the time,
the lm industry in the region was more or less non-existent, and the intention of
Film 3 was to increase the creative development of the region (Sand 2017, 2020).
Today, the Norwegian Film Institute (NFI) operates as the main lm nancing
body in Norway. NFI collaborates with the Norwegian Film Commission and the
four regional lm commissions, as well with the ve regional lm funds (Norwe-
gian Film Commission 2022).
In Denmark, Den Vestdanske Filmpulje, DVF, was founded in 2002 in Aarhus.
Like the regional lm funds in the neighbouring Nordic countries, the intention
here was also to strengthen the local lm industry (Sand 2020). DVF has since been
joined by two more Danish regional lm funds: Copenhagen Film Fund and Film-
Fyn. Today the regional lm funds collaborate with The Danish Film Institute
DFI, Denmark’s national agency for lm and cinema culture, as well as with the
regional lm commissions in Denmark (Det Danske Filminstitut 2022; Ol 2022).
In comparison with the other Nordic countries, Iceland is a bit of an exception.
Because of the country’s size, lm production in Iceland is not concentrated to any
specic region (Skúladóttir 2005; Sand 2020). Iceland, however, has oered a tax
rebate since 1999. Today the tax incentive is 25%, and in some cases even up to
a 35% refund on production costs (Film in Iceland 2022). Other Nordic countries
oering national, government-funded lm and television production incentives are
Finland, Sweden, and Norway. The latter oering an incentive of a 25% cash rebate
on local spending, with a possibility to increase the total incentive by combining it
with regional funding (Northern Norway Film Commission 2022).
In Finland, the national lm production incentive is administrated by Business
Finland (Business Finland is a Finnish public-sector company promoting tourism
and international investment in Finland), while also providing services for inter-
nationalisation and funding of innovative projects, with a maximum of 25% cash
rebate of production costs (Business Finland 2022). Combined with regional incen-
tives, it is possible to get up to a 40% cash rebate when lming in Finland (Film in
Finland 2022). In Sweden, Film i Väst launched a regional production tax-rebate
programme in 2019 (Economou 2019), and in August 2022, the Swedish govern-
ment announced that they will set aside SEK 100 million yearly in lm production
incentives (Kazinik 2022). Denmark in 2022 still did not oer any government
funded lm and television lming incentives. However, several regional lm funds
184 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
are oering dierent incentives; the conditions for eligibility may vary between
regions though (Fixer in Denmark 2022; CPH Film Fund 2022).
A challenge shared by all the Nordic countries at the time of starting to establish
regional lm funds was that they were all struggling with retaining their creative
talents, who tended to move to larger creative metropoles for more job opportuni-
ties (Chow and Sand 2020).
Strategies for attracting international lm productions to Finland
In this part, the results of the interviews with stakeholders from the Finnish lm
industry are discussed. Thematically, the section covers strategies for attracting
lm productions to Finland and identifying pull factors, discusses Indian lm pro-
ductions shot in Finland – experiences and lessons learned – and nally suggests
potential opportunities for regional niches. These are discussed in detail later.
The interview ndings reveal that one of the main reasons for international lm-
makers to come to Finland corresponds to the common notion of the nation as an
Arctic landscape covered with snow, as seen in both the Indian lm productions
War (2019) and Shamitabh (2015).
However, other locations, seasons, and weather conditions are equally promi-
nent, and Finland can oer a variety of scenery and settings from the archipelago in
the south, through the picturesque historical wooden towns and modern cityscapes,
to the lake lands and the endless forests with midnight sun and northern lights.
Finland is often presented as a new and uncharted location for lm productions,
and nding unique locations that haven’t been used in other lm productions is
therefore often not a problem. As one respondent states:
I would say that the main things that the foreign companies are looking for
are the locations. So, if you’re looking for snow, that’s denitely an advan-
tage for Finland. Especially now with the climate change, you get less and
less snow in central Europe. So, some of those productions are now moving
up to Scandinavian areas. So obviously the nature and locations are one
[advantage].
(R3)
Compared to the neighbouring countries, primarily the Nordics and Baltic states
but also to some extent Russia, another important competitive advantage for Fin-
land is the well-developed infrastructure. Even more remote locations are easily
reachable by road, and even in the wilderness, mobile phone coverage and Internet
connectivity are usually not an issue. Finland also has ve international airports
with Helsinki-Vantaa airport serving as an international hub, being the gateway for
Asia to the rest of Europe. One respondent also mentions accessibility and good
infrastructure as a possible competitive advantage:
[What] we have is accessibility, and very good infrastructure. So Finnish
Lapland, because of the longstanding tourism and even before that, because
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 185
of the logging industry, so we have like, roads going everywhere, and then
we have hotels, so accommodation, and everything is working well, and air-
ports. So, you can get to these wilderness landscapes easily. And then you
still have a hotel on the other side of the road. So, I think those are the things
that kind of make us, sort of, compete.
(R6)
Several respondents also emphasised the value of punctuality in the lm industry
and the fact that the high quality of Finnish work is an important selling point
internationally. This can be compared to Switzerland, which is a well-known
destination in Bollywood cinema, continuously attracting lmmakers because of,
among other things, its excellent infrastructure (see Chapter 7).
I would also think that one key selling point is the Finnish quality of
work. Finns are reliable in the productions, and what we say usually
means that the thing is being delivered on time, in budget. And so the
production budgets tend to be slightly less in Finland than elsewhere in
the Nordic area.
(R3)
Another important key aspect of lm production in Finland, often brought up by
the respondents, is the low level of bureaucracy. On publicly held land, which
makes up a large portion of Finland’s surface area, permits are often not required
due to a national law known as “Everyman’s Right”. If a permit is required, the
process is typically quite fast and simple, with the local regional lm commission
or the Finnish production company being able to handle the permits in just a short
period of time.
However, several of the respondents emphasised that none of the previously
mentioned pull factors individually constitutes a sales advantage when promoting
Finland as a lming location. It is rather the sum of all the factors, that is, the com-
bination of locations, incentives, logistics professional and creative local crews that
determines whether an international lm production chooses Finland as a lming
location or not.
Indian lm productions in Finland
In Finland, there has so far been two Indian lm productions. Shamitabh (2015),
directed by R. Balki, was partly shot in several locations in Helsinki and in Finnish
Lapland, and War (2019), directed by Siddhart Anand, which was partly shot in
locations close to the Arctic Circle and the city of Rovaniemi in Finnish Lapland
(see Chapter 3).
Shamitabh is the rst Indian lm shot in Finland. The opening weekend gross
in India was EURO 2.7 million which proved the lm to be a box oce success
(Snapper Films 2015). According to the Finnish Lapland Film Commission, the
lm War is the largest lm production so far to have been shot in Finnish Lapland
186 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
(Lapland. 2019). In India, Wa r was also the highest-grossing Bollywood action
lm in 2019 (Bollywood Hungama 2022).
Even though the Indian lm industry is one of the largest in the world (Josiam
2014), the in-depth interviews showed that there are no specic strategies or meas-
ures to attract Indian lm productions to Finland. Several of the respondents said
that it is rather the other way around: Indian cinema has already for decades been
interested in shooting abroad and therefore Indian productions are often the ones
taking the rst step into a collaboration. None of the respondents has any explana-
tion as to why there have not been more Indian lm productions in Finland, but the
lack of active marketing towards Indian lm productions and the lack of networks
within the Indian lm industry are probably part of the reason. However, according
to the interviewees there is both potential for and interest in further collaboration
with Indian lm producers from the Finnish side.
Experiences and lessons learned from the Indian lm productions
The rst-hand experiences from both the Indian lm productions are gener-
ally perceived as positive by the respondents, although some dierences in
the production culture were often brought up by the interviewees. The dis-
parities, however, were more often referred to as nds, rather than as negative
dierences.
One distinguishing factor often mentioned was the dierence in the range of
responsibilities in relation to the size of the crew, where the Finnish crews usually
were smaller and had more comprehensive tasks, while the Indian crew members
occasionally had very limited specialisations or ambiguous job descriptions. This
was also pointed out by two of the interviewees working on set:
The dierence come; I would say mostly because of the crew sizes. In India
it’s 400 people crew. In Finland we seldom have over 40.
(R4)
Yeah, the crew was massive even though it was like a mini unit. . . I don’t
remember how many people. But the people who was own to the mountain-
side was like 52 people or something.
(R9)
Another cultural dierence on set which was often mentioned by the respondents
was the Indian crew’s ability to adapt to a new situation if required or given the
opportunity. The interviewees often described it as a way of working that was new
for them and sometimes time-consuming, but on the other hand also stress-free and
creative. Several of the respondents also highlighted that they learned a lot from the
Indian lm crew during shooting:
That’s more like a cultural dierence, also, between Scandinavia
and India, is that they have more time. Like we, here, tend to prepare
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 187
really well, but then shoot really fast . . . in Indian productions, they
have more days to accomplish the same thing, so it allows people
to also, you know, plan on the set. Like we go to a location that they
have chosen, or that we have chosen together, and then basically we
start from zero on that day, that kind of OK, this is what we will do
today, and this is the plan . . . and denitely there is more time to do
the things that are needed. So, both ways are really good, and I think
the most special thing I experienced, I’ve never experienced in my life
in any other lm cultures: they are totally ne with changing plans . . .
and that was the most signicant thing that I love to work with Indian
productions, it’s that it’s very laid back, because of this attitude.
(R5)
I think we learned a lot from the Indians, they are so . . . they have been
shooting all over the world and they are really really experienced people.
And really good in what they do.
(R4)
Finally, the importance of serving qualitative Indian food on set was also some-
thing that often was commented on, however it was commonly accepted that the
importance of food quality was just another factor that needed to be taken care of.
The prevailing notion was that if the catering didn’t meet high standards, neither
the Indians nor the Finns on set would be happy. One of the respondents recalls
tasting the food at the recce, which is something that is not usually done:
When they went to do the recce, they wanted to taste the food on the premises.
So, they made them to cook for them, and they liked, they loved it, and then
it was OK. I don’t know if I’d ever tasted the food, if I went on a recce, never
ever, I think.
(R4)
Opportunities for a regional niche
British place marketing expert Simon Anholt believes that a place’s narrative capi-
tal is not forever given and that the established perception and reputation of a place,
region, or country regularly needs to be earned and reinforced. This reinforcement
of the narrative capital of the place can, for example, come from a lm reaching a
wide audience (Lind 2019), which is something that could be desirable for a region
that wants to increase its number of tourists and/or population.
According to the researcher Joakim Lind (2019), the rst step for a region which
in the future wishes to be present on the international lm map is to develop knowl-
edge about the lm industry’s value-creating and consider the lm industry as a
central part of their regional development.
Based on the answers from the interviews, it can also be concluded that all lm
industries do not have similar needs. Meaning, a region or location that wants to
188 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
attract international lm industry or a specic lm genre could, instead of trying
to attract just everyone, nd it benecial to start by focusing on one, and learn as
much as possible about their specic needs, whether that is the Indian lm industry
or any other.
The interviews also revealed that there is close co-operation between the Baltic
states (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and the Nordic countries due to the proximity
both geographically and historically, meaning it is possible to think of the entire
Nordic and Baltic region as one production hub where crews and equipment can
move around easily (Janta 2021). For regions wanting to be more present on the
international lm map, networking and collaborating with other already- established
actors and learning from them along the way could be a both a constructive and
quite feasible way to get started.
Conclusions
The purpose of this chapter has been to discuss the potential for using lm produc-
tion as a tool for regional development in a Nordic and European context. What
can be learned from other regions and previous productions, which networks and
infrastructure are needed, and what are the possible advantages and diculties of
luring lm projects to a remote area. The research is based on a review of existing
lm policy documents from Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland, as
well as on the ten in-depth interviews with Finnish lm industry stakeholders that
were conducted during 2020–2021.
The rst regional lm fund was Film i Väst, founded in 1992 in Sweden. Soon
after its funding, Film i Väst inspired the other Nordic countries to establish their
own regional lm funds during the 1990s and early 2000 (Sand 2020). At the time
of starting to establish regional lm funds, a challenge shared by all the Nordic
countries was that they were all struggling with retaining their creative talents, who
tended to move to international creative hubs for more job opportunities (Chow
and Sand 2020). Today, all Nordic countries have regional and national lm funds,
and all, except Denmark, oer government-funded lm and television lming
incentives.
According to the ndings from interviews with stakeholders in the Finnish lm
industry conducted as part of the FilmInd project, an Arctic landscape covered
in snow, as depicted in both Indian lm productions War (2019) and Shamitabh
(2015), is one of the primary draws for foreign lmmakers to come to Finland.
Other important pull factors are the well-developed infrastructure, with ve inter-
national airports, roads across the country and national mobile phone coverage not
being an issue even in more remote locations. In addition to this, the low level of
bureaucracy and the Finnish quality of work were factors often mentioned as posi-
tive aspects by the Finnish respondents themselves.
It was, however, emphasised among the respondents that none of the previously
identied pull factors individually constitute sales advantages, when promoting
Finland as a lming location. It is often the sum of all these aspects, that is, the
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 189
combination of locations, incentives, logistics, professional and creative local crew
that determines whether an international lm production chooses Finland as a lm-
ing location or not.
Even though India has one of the largest lm industries in the world (Josiam
2014), the in-depth interviews revealed that no special tactics or actions have been
taken to draw Indian lm productions to Finland. One reply even saying that it is
rather the other way around, with Indian lm already having a long history of inter-
est in shooting overseas and frequently being the ones to initiate a collaboration.
However, it is clear from the experiences of the two Indian lm productions that
were held in Finland that there is interest on the part of the Finnish side in increas-
ing the collaboration with the Indian lm industry.
A region’s rst step towards being visible on the global lm map is to learn
about the value that the lm industry creates. Viewing lm as a key component of
their regional economy could be an important rst step towards becoming more
“visible” on the international lm map (Lind 2019). Second, it is important to
identify unique local and regional strengths in order to be able to market them
eectively.
The interview responses made it evident that dierent lm industries possess
distinct requirements. This implies that if a particular region or location aims to
attract the global lm industry, it may be more advantageous for them to initially
focus on a specic lm industry or genre and gain extensive knowledge about its
specic needs. This applies to the Indian lm industry as well as any other lm or
creative industry.
Limitations and future research
It should be noted that no Indian respondents were included among the interview-
ees. The reason for this is that during the time the interviews were conducted, it
was not possible to reach any Indian stakeholders who were involved in the lm
productions shot in Finland. Although this is acknowledged as a limitation, it is
also a possible future research step.
In line with the increased interest in northern Europe as a lming location
(Lunde 2022), the number of Indian lm productions is also expected to increase,
which makes it likely that there will be additional opportunities to both broaden
and deepen this research in the future.
Acknowledgement
FilmInd project The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic
connections was carried out within EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and
Humanities and nanced by national funding of the participating countries. Novia
University of Applied Sciences acknowledges funding from the Academy of
Finland. The author would also like to thank the interviewees from Finland for
their kind cooperation in the research.
190 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
References
Bollywood Hungama, 2022. Bollywood top grossers worldwide 2019. Available from:
www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-oce-collections/worldwide/2019/ (access date
11.09.2022).
Business Finland, 2022. Production incentive for the audiovisual industry. Available from:
www.businessnland./en/for-nnish-customers/services/funding/cash-rebate (access
date 29.08.2022).
Chow, P.-S. and Sand, S. A., 2020. Regional screen ecosystems at the peripheries: Produc-
tion and talent development in Tromsø and Aarhus. Journal of Scandinavian Cinema, 10
(2), 169–189.
CPH Film Fund, 2022. How to get funding. Available from: http://cphlmfund.com/en/
(access date 29.08.2022).
Dahlström, M., 2005. Film och regional utveckling i Norden. In: M. Dahlström, H. Bjarna-
dóttir, B. Hermelin, J. Jörgensen, K. Lähteenmäki-Smith, G. Rusten, M. G. Skúladóttir
and E. Wengström, eds., Film och regional utveckling i Norden. Stockholm: Svenska
lminstitutet & Nordregio, 7–11.
Dahlström, M. and Hermelin, B., 2007. Creative industries, spatiality and exibility: The
example of lm production. Norsk Geogrask Tidskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geogra-
phy, 61 (3), 111–121.
Det Danske Filminstitut, 2022. Funding. Available from: www.d.dk/en/english/funding
(access date 30.08.2022).
Economou, V., 2019. Film i Väst launches the rst Swedish tax-rebate scheme. Available
from: https://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/369384/ (access date 30.08.2022).
European commission, 2021. Rural development. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/
regional_policy/en/policy/themes/rural-development/ (access date 11.07.2022).
Film in Finland, 2022. Finland lm commission production guide. Available from: www.
filminfinland.com/4a2e59/siteassets/finland-film-commission-production-guide.pdf
(access date 01.09.2022).
Film in Iceland, 2022. Up to 35% reimbursement, stunning nature and professional ser-
vices. Available from: https://lminiceland.com/incentives-to-lm-in-iceland/ (access
date 01.09.2022).
Fixer in Denmark, 2022. Filming in Denmark. Available from: https://xerdenmark.com/
lming-in-denmark/ (access date 02.09.2022).
Florida, R., 2002. The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Hedling, O., 2012. Making lms in Scandinavia: On work and production infrastructure in the
contemporary regional sector. In: A. Dawson and S. Holmes, eds., Working in the global lm
industries: Creativity, systems, space, patronage. London: Bloomsbury Academics, 57–74.
Janta, H., ed., 2021. Comparative report on the infrastructure of lm production & the
impact of Indian lm industries on place. Basel: University of Basel.
Josiam, B. M., Spears, D., Dutta, K., Pookulangara, S. A. and Kinley, T. L., 2014. ‘Namastey
London’: Bollywood movies and their impact on how Indians perceive European destina-
tions. Hospitality Review, 31 (4).
Kazinik, D., 2022. Klart: Nu blir det billigare att spela in lm i Sverige. SVT Nyheter/Kultur.
Available from: www.svt.se/kultur/lmbranschen-far-100-miljoner-i-produktionsrabatter-
stod-lmstod-svensk-lm-bidrag-kulturministern (access date 01.09.2022).
Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., 2005. The regional dimension of the lm sector in Finland. In: M.
Dahlström, H. Bjarnadóttir, B. Hermelin, J. Jörgensen, K. Lähteenmäki-Smith, G. Rusten,
Film productions as a part of the regional identity 191
M. G. Skúladóttir and E. Wengström, eds., Film och regional utveckling i Norden. Stock-
holm: Svenska lminstitutet & Nordregio, 178–195.
Lapland.., 2019. War – Bollywood blockbuster in Lapland. Available from: www.lapland.
/lm/for-productions/war-bollywood-action-movie-lapland/ (access date 12.08.2022).
Lind, J., 2019. The impact of lm on people and destinations: En rapport om värden
av lm och tv för utveckling av platser och regioner med fallstudie av japanskt Taiga
Drama i Stockholm 2019. Analysmodell och vägledning vid internationella lm-
produktioner. En rapport inom pilotstudie #11 i Smart Kreativ Stad. Stockholm: Film
Capital.
Lind, J. and Kristensson Uggla, B., 2019. The narrative capital of the place. How the
millennium narratives generate place-related values and attract tourists to Sweden. In: C.
Lundberg and V. Ziakas, eds., The Routledge handbook of popular culture and tourism.
London: Routledge, 311–324.
Logar, E., 2022. Place branding as an approach to the development of rural areas: A case study
of the brand ‘Babica in Dedek’ from the Škofja Loka Hills, Slovenia. Acta Geographica
Slovenica, 62 (2), 119–133.
Lunde, A. F., 2022. Bollywood til Balestrand: Landskap skal ha same x-faktor som stjernene.
Morgenbladet. Available from: www.morgenbladet.no/kultur/reportasje/2022/10/07/
fra-bollywood-til-balestrand/?fbclid=IwAR3K4MBB9Dcf8BnVh4s6FEViOqMeQ2y1Q
WkmS3q3CGxjicvOJY3s4zxx-x0 (access date 09.10.2022).
Medel, A. and Gossel, B., 2015. Film industry clusters: A strategy for urban and regional
development? Austral Communicación, 4 (1), 65–81.
Miles, S. and Paddison, R., 2005. The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban
Studies, 42, 833–839.
Nordström, H., 2018. Platsmarknadsföring: Konsten att attrahera invånare, besökare och
investeringar till en plats. Huskvarna: Placebrander.
Northern Norway Film Commission, 2022. Incentives – Northern Norway lm commission.
Available from: www.northernnorwaylm.no/incentives (access date 01.09.2022).
Norwegian Film Commission, 2022. Funding & partners. Available from: www.
norwegianlm.com/funds (access date 01.09.2022).
OECD, 2008. OECD rural policy reviews: Finland. Available from: www.oecd.org/nland/
oecdruralpolicyreviewsnland.htm (access date 09.08.2022).
Ol, 2022. Film funding in Denmark on Ol. Available from: www.ol.com/country/
Film-Funding-Cinema-Denmark-16.html (access date 30.08.2022).
Paasi, R., 2011. The region, identity, and power. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,
14, 9–16.
Rosenfeld, M. W. and Hornych, C., 2010. Could cities in de-industrialized regions become
hot spots for attracting cultural businesses? The case of media industry in Halle and der
Saale (Germany). European Planning Studies, 11 (5), 371–384.
Sacco, P., 2011. Culture 3.0: A new perspective for the EU-2014–2020. Structural funds
programming, produced for the OMC working group on cultural and creative industries.
Brussels: European Expert Network on Culture.
Sacco, P., Ferilli, G. and Pedrini, S., 2008. System-wide cultural districts: An introduction
from the Italian viewpoint. In: S. Kagan and V. Kirchberg, eds., Sustainability: A new
frontier for the arts and cultures. Frankfurt: VAS Verlag, 400–460.
Sand, S. A., 2017. Voices from the peripheries: A study of the regional lm and television
business in Norway. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Trondheim.
192 Therese Sunngren-Granlund
Sand, S. A., 2020. Creative clusters – urban Utopia or regional remedy? A Nordic perspec-
tive on the role of the creative industries in regional development. Nordic Journal of
Media Studies, 2 (1), 109–120.
Snapper Films, 2015. Bollywood lm Shamitabh partly shot in Finland released worldwide.
Available from: https://snapperlms.com/bollywood-lm-shamitabh-shot-partly-in-n-
land-released-worldwide/ (access date 11.08.2022).
Skúladóttir, M. G., 2005. Iceland a national player in a global market. In: M. Dahlström,
H. Bjarnadóttir, B. Hermelin, J. Jörgensen, K. Lähteenmäki-Smith, G. Rusten, M. G.
Skúladóttir and E. Wengström, eds., Film och regional utveckling i Norden. Stockholm:
Svenska lminstitutet & Nordregio, 178–195.
SYKE, 2020. Updated urban-rural classication: Finland’s degree of urbanisation currently
at over 72 per cent. Available from: www.syke./en-US/Current/Updated_urbanrural_
classication_Finlan(57443) (access date 09.08.2022).
Part IV
Beyond the screen
Socio-spatial impact of lm
Figure 4 The statue of Bollywood director Yash Chopra (1932–2012) “Ambassador of
Interlaken” with a note: “Numerous scenes of his renowned lms were shot in the
Bernese Oberland. These famous scenes prompt numerous guests from India to
visit Interlaken”.
Source: Hania Janta
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-14
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-15
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Human geographers and lm scholars have been astute to the importance and
benets of examining geographies inscribed by and in cinema.1 However, the
attention to non-human geographies or what Sarah Whatmore (2002) has called
‘more-than-Human’ geographies is recent to both geography and cinema studies.
Responding to Edward Said’s call for an ‘imaginative geography’ (1978, pp. 54–55,
71–72), Whatmore (2002), Philo and Wilbert (2000) et al. emphasise the need to
decentre the human and move beyond a singular focus on the human subject to
a ‘revived animal geography’ (Philo and Wilbert 2004, p. 4) that focuses on the
‘complex entanglings of human-animal relations with space, place, location, envi-
ronment and landscape’ (Philo and Wilbert 2004, p. 4). In the received schema of
‘anthropocentric geography’, there is a neat classication of lived spaces into the
city, countryside, and wilderness zones of human settlement, agriculture, and
unoccupied territories, where each zone is associated with pets/companion animals
(cats and dogs), livestock animals (sheep and cows), and wild animals (wolves and
lions), respectively (Philo and Wilbert 2004, p. 11). Thus anthropocentric geography
tends to ‘x animals in a series of abstract spaces “animal spaces” – which are
cleaved apart from the messy time-space contexts, or concrete places, in which these
animals actually live out their lives as beings in the world’ (Philo and Wilbert 2004,
p. 6). A focus on non-human geographies can reveal the spatial practices of non-
human animals, the ways in which they disrupt or negotiate boundaries between the
human and non-human and their complex entanglements with human lives.
Similarly, the ‘animal turn’ in lm studies is of recent vintage even if the history of
the moving image has been entangled with animals. Jonathan Burt (2002) claims that
it was the desire to understand the animal body in motion that led to the early cinema
experiments of Eadward Muybridge, Jules Etienne Marey et al. in the rst place,
yet animals have been typically overlooked in the study of cinema. In the last few
years, however a critical body of scholarship has produced diverse ways of looking at
the animal in narrative and non-ctional representations.2 How can we combine the
insights of the ‘animal turn’ in geography and cinema scholarship to understand how
cinema represents and produces its non-human animal geographies? How can we go
beyond the study of segregated animal spaces such as the wilds3 (indeed much schol-
arship tend to be focused on wildlife lms), or enclosures such as the zoo (Berger
1980)? From the boundedness of animals on screen – ‘the cinematic zoos’ – to Anat
11 Beastly places
European encounters with
Bollywood’s non-human
geographies
Veena Hariharan
196 Veena Hariharan
Pick’s more complex formulation of the ‘cine-zoo’ – ‘cinema as a zoomorphic stage
that transforms all living beings – including humans – into creatures’ (2011, p. 106),
the looking relations between humans and animals have been studied in fascinating
details. This chapter attempts to study animals in both on and o screen spaces of
lm. O-screen spaces here include location, pro-lmic realities at the time of shoot-
ing, and the discursive worlds of law, religion, and politics that inuence animal–
human relations and their on screen representations.
What can a study of animals on location tell us about the spatial practices of
animals and in turn how can they reveal new geographies for cinema? Priya Jai-
kumar’s expansive denition of location as ‘lmed space’ – ‘that captured artifact
of an encounter between a camera and its environment’ (2019, p. 18), enables us
to think about the entanglements of real locations, and their traces, with the on
screen image and it’s afterlife. In this case, location refers to more specically,
location shooting with animals, in other words animals on location. Thus, the
paper looks at diegetic as well as pro-lmic spaces, their representation on screen
as screen animals and on location as empirical, live, embodied and material beings.
Staging an encounter between Bollywood, Europe, and the inscription No Animals
Were Harmed in the Making of This Film’, I propose that this ubiquitous sign is
a cinematic palimpsest tied to the entangled life worlds of animals and humans,
regional cartographies, national and international animal laws, technologies of
special eects and narratives of animal care. I look at ways in which Bollywood
negotiates animal rights movements, legal debates on animals, censorship, politics
and religion, via a case study of the 2017 lm Tiger Zinda Hai (Tiger is Alive)
and the star text of Salman Khan. With its pre-existing knowhow (in this instance,
Hungarian animal trainer Zoltan Horkai) and animal infrastructures already tapped
by Hollywood, I show how Europe is a central node in these navigations.
‘No Animals Were Harmed in the Making of This Film’
‘No Animals Were Harmed in the Making of This Film’ is the trademark certica-
tion of the American Humane, an organisation established in 1877 that ‘monitors
animals in lmed media’ and hands out certications to productions only if they
meet the stringent requirements set in its guidelines on pro-lmic animals. Even
though The Indian Cinematograph Act 1952 mentions censorship of scenes depict-
ing ‘needless’ ‘cruelty to, or abuse of animals’, it is not until 1973 (Performing
Animals Rules and Performing Animals Registration Rules 2001) and as recently
as 2004 PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) versus CBFC (Central
Board of Film Certication) that the registration of every performing animal along
with a No Objection Certication (NOC) from the AWBI (Animal Welfare Board
of India) and from the Ministry of Environment and Forests, in the case of wild
animals, became mandatory for a lm’s release. ‘Performing animals’ are dened
as ‘any animal which is used for the purpose of any entertainment to which the
public is admitted through the sale of tickets’ and later expanded to include ‘ani-
mals used in lms and for equine events’.4 The rules pertaining to performing
animals are derived from and cite two landmark judgements that determined the
Beastly places 197
screen discourses around domestic and endangered animals in independent India:
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act (1960) and The Wildlife protection Act
(1972). Along with these acts, the legal apparatus, governmental and monitoring
institutions (AWBI and CBFC), and dramatis personae (Rukmini Devi Arundale,
Chinny Krishna, Justice KS Radhakrishnan, Maneka Gandhi, and naturalists M
Krishnan, Salim Ali, AP Gee et al.); civil society and international activist bodies
that exert inuence on policy – WWF (World Wildlife Fund), and PETA, lm per-
sons have also been very involved in propagating animal causes. PETA’s India
Chapter, launched in 2000, and its youth channel PETADishoom routinely ropes
in celebrities from the entertainment world to champion animal causes – famously,
Dia Mirza sporting a leopard skin outt to protest animal practices in the leather
industry or Lara Dutta in a gown of leaves and owers promoting vegetarianism,
while releasing hard hitting investigative videos on human cruelty in animal prac-
tices (livestock farming, vivisection, bullghting, circuses, etc.). Thus an ethnogra-
phy of lm industry practices vis-à-vis animals and their human trainers, wranglers,
handlers, and pet suppliers also reveals the processes of lming animals on screen
in accordance with the Performing Animals Rules and Guidelines.
Animals in Bollywood
Animals are not new to Bollywood, actors have shared screen spaces with pigeons,
peacocks, elephants, camels, cows, snakes, tigers, monkeys, horses, pigs, dogs, cats,
even ants and turtles, as pets and companion species or as animals to be hunted or
escaped from. We can count nearly 100 odd lms where animals take up substantial
footage in Bombay cinema alone, though this is not a large number, considering
the size of the lm industry (nearly 150 lms per year). Indian lm directors have,
by and large, stayed away from featuring animals owing to several reasons, a few
of which are listed here. The paucity of adequately trained animal trainers – most
of them segued from the circus to lms and the others who raised animals on their
farms were not necessarily up to speed about how to train them for lm shoot-
ing or how to sustain the high pressures of a shooting environment or shooting
schedules that involved travel, long hours, the presence of large crowds and heavy
lights and equipment. Added to this, the laws regarding animal certication for
lms that involved cumbersome bureaucratic rigmaroles from registration, tness
certication and vaccinations, and transportation rules, acted as disincentive for
many lmmakers. Echoing the sentiment of many lmmakers, Kaushik Ganguly,
the director of Kishore Kumar Junior (Bengali language lm 2018), complains:
Getting permission to shoot with camels is very tough and my lm’s censor
certication got delayed because of it. What’s more, in Kedara, where I play
the protagonist, the pigeons had to be turned white by using computer graphics
as usage of white pigeons is against the norms! Problem is, neither can you
show rural Bengal with cows moving around nor can you show horses in a
period lm. Getting permission to shoot with elephants is by far the toughest.
(Sen 2019)
198 Veena Hariharan
The Performing Animals Act (2001) all together bans shooting with monkeys, pan-
thers, lions, and tigers. Animal activists protesting the abuse of animals on set,
followed by public interest litigations on their behalf, have also made lmmakers
wary of using animals in their lms. Recently, the Animal Welfare Board of India
(AWBI),5 the statutory advisory body to oversee the use of performing animals
in lms, issued an advisory to lm, OTT content producers, and advertisers ‘to
prioritise the use of modern methods such as computer-generated imagery (CGI),
visual eects (VFX), and animatronics over live animals to prevent the iniction
of unnecessary pain and suering’ (Jha 2021) on performing animals. This advi-
sory was a result of PETA’s complaint following the death of a horse on the sets of
Mani Rathnam’s Tamil language historical spectacle, Ponniyin Selvan (upcoming
release). Some lmmakers like Prabhu Solomon say ‘there is a confusion running
in the industry that making lms with animals is complicated business and it’s
hard to get a Censor clearance’ (Bandhopadhyay 2021). He seems to have had an
exceptionally smooth path with his tusker lms Kumki (2012) and Haathi Mere
Saathi (2021). Others nd ways around this problem by using a combination of
real, dummy, and CGI animals example Suraj Barjatya’s Tota Raj the multi-
coloured talking parrot in Main Prem ki Deewani Hoon (2003).
Animatronics and CGI
AWBI’s advisory in turn created a huge demand for CGI (computer-generated
imagery) animals (the tiger in Life of Pi (Ang Lee 2012) or the parrot in Main
Prem ki Deewani Hoon) and animatronics. Directors ocked to Prasun Basu and
Gawri Tiwari’s animatronics studio based in Naigaon, Mumbai, to cast mechanical
animals for their historical spectacles – from the realistic looking elephants in Man-
ikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi (Kangana Ranaut 2019) to the hyper-real horses in
Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior (Om Raut 2020), Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy (Suren-
der Reddy 2019), Housefull 4 (Farhad Samji 2019), Panipat (Ashutosh Gowarikar
2019; Venugopalan 2019), etc. Action director Shyam Kaushal explains:
In the 1980s, a scene where a horse topples could be shot with real horses,
but today, it would be illegal . . . today the mechanism installed inside the
dummy horse accurately interprets the rhythm and bounce that a rider would
receive on a real horse.
(Guha 2022)
Basu and Tiwari take special pride in their painstakingly created realistic looking
horse heads developed with inputs from Ted Heines (who worked on the SFX in
Avatar and Jurassic Park) and India’s leading taxidermist Dr Santosh Gaikwad’s
inputs about fabrication. Nick Powel, Manikarnika’s stunt director (of X-Men,
Bourne Identity fame)
ew down one of the best wranglers in the world to attest that the ‘eect on the
body while riding was natural’, the duo claimed adding that ‘In Hollywood,
Beastly places 199
there’s only [creature eects artist] Mark Rappaport (The Revenant) who has
a couple of horses similar to ours’.
(ibid.)
The 100% CGI menagerie of the much celebrated RRR (S Rajamouli 2022) states
in its disclaimer at the outset of the lm: ‘No animals were harmed in the making
of the lm. Horses, oxen, birds, tigers, wolves, bears, leopards, deer, sh and snake
shown in the movie are all computer-generated’.
Advantage Europe
Thus, in a modern reversal, it is not for state-of-the-art technology but for expert
handling of real animals, that we see Bollywood directors looking towards Europe
as a shooting location as I demonstrate in a later section on Zoltan Horkai, the
animal trainer. More importantly, shooting the lm abroad meant that the lmmak-
ers had to follow the rules of that country, therefore sparing the lmmakers the
bureaucratic hassles of shooting with animals in India.6 Zoya Akthar director of Dil
Dhadakne Do says she chose to set the lm overseas – much of the lm’s action
takes place aboard a Mediterranean cruise liner – to avoid the tedium of having to
convince the Animal Welfare Board of India that the dog wasn’t harmed in any of
the scenes.7
I would have had to have a representative of the Animal Welfare Board of
India to tag along everywhere and everyday on my Mediterranean cruise to
vouch that the dog wasn’t harmed in any of the scenes if we shot in India but
this was not required for the overseas production!
While the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act (1960, pp. V, 22) prohibits the use
of monkeys, bears, lions, panthers, and bulls as performing animals in lms, there
is no mention of wolves. Furthermore, wolves are found aplenty in India, at least
2000–3000 of them according to a census (Kukreti 2001).8 Even so, wolves seldom
found their way into Indian movies. Shooting the lm in Austria enabled the lm
crew access to both the animals and their trainers while avoiding the red-tapism of
Indian bureaucracy.
Rules Pertaining to Performing Animals9
Not that dogs were harmed on the sets of Dil Dhadakne Do or wolves on the sets
of Tiger Zinda Hai but the cumbersome processes involved in the use of perform-
ing animals in lms led both directors to locations outside India. Complying with
AWBI rules for the shooting involves applying for registration to use the animals
and certication on completion of the lm, both of which may be granted only if the
Board is fully satised about the scenes with animals. The physical condition of the
animals, their vaccination proofs, and tness certicates needs to be veried by
the veterinary doctor who has to be present on set and ratify this on the completion
200 Veena Hariharan
of the lm. In case of animals such as wolves, listed in the Wildlife Protection
Act, the ownership of animals also needs to be proved. The Board also needs to
be convinced that the training methods deployed did not inict ‘unnecessary pain
or suering’, that the owner does not deprive the animal of food or water in order
to compel them to ‘perform a trick’, and that the owner shall ‘train an animal as a
performing animal to perform an act in accordance with its basic natural instinct’.
There is a ban on using sick, pregnant or injured animals and their on-screen rep-
resentations. There are also other rules about transportation and stay – animals had
to be transported in cages of stipulated sizes and not for more than 8 hours continu-
ously and the owners have to ensure feeding and watering enclosures on site. There
are also other details that need to be ensured such as the animals’ proximity to ‘sud-
den loud noises’, res, explosives, and sharp objects. Furthermore, the performing
animal is not to be exposed to articial light over an intensity of 500 lux. Finally,
getting a certicate of approval on completion of the lm that ‘No Animals Were
Hurt’ during the making of the lm, without which the lm could not be released in
theatres involves a cumbersome process of waiting, negotiation, censorship quib-
bles and sometimes rumours involving on-set cruelty as reported by animal activ-
ists or concerned citizens.
Tiger Zinda Hai
Tiger Zinda Hai features the iconic Indian superstar ‘Tiger’ Salman Khan combat-
ing a pack of wolves. Hungarian animal trainer, Zoltan Horkai, also called ‘Wolf
Man’ was hired by the lmmakers to execute the spectacular stunt sequences. The
sequence is shot in Austria’s Tirol region the forests of Praxmar and the quiet
alpine capital town of Innsbruck.10 While the sporting town of Innsbruck provided
the skiing facilities, snow mobiles, and the specialised gear and equipment, the
mountainous forest region, teeming with bears and wolves, oered the perfect set-
ting to stage RAW (India’s premier foreign intelligence agency) agent Tiger’s hide-
out and his dramatic face-o with the wolves.
Curiously, this is also a stand-alone segment in the lm as there is no reference
in the rest of the lm to this, and is in the lm mostly to introduce the star his
masculinity, prowess, and cunning. Later in the lm, we also see a brief scene involv-
ing the star riding a horse through the alley ways of war torn Iraq (shot on location
in Abu Dhabi and Morocco standing in for Iraq), in combat with his pursuers who
are on a motorbike. As the camera opens with a monumental score and a dynamic
long shot of a mountainous expanse of snow, we see Tiger and his young son Junior
walk uphill. The next shot reveals a signboard ‘Beware of wild animals’ and Junior
reading out from his tablet: ‘Nature gave every animal an instinct to run so it can sur-
vive’. Tiger, using his axe to chop rewood, listens indulgently to his son who asks
in English, ‘Don’t human beings also need to run to survive?’ Some good humoured
banter on the love for the English language in mother and son ensue between the
two. ‘A man’s identity is in his zabaan – Junior is made to recall a moral lesson that
he has been taught by his parents. Zabaan is a double play on the word tongue as
in language as well as the Urdu word for promise – or word – a man is as good as
Beastly places 201
his word. Thus, the segment establishes the location as a high risk zone, Junior as a
modern child versed in English, digitally literate and curious about the ways of the
wild, and Tiger as a moral being, a man of his word, simultaneously a man of the
world and familiar with the harsh terrain of the wilds. The next segment establishes
Tiger’s jungle know how: as a salivating wolf faces Junior, Tiger instructs, his back
still turned to the camera and the approaching wolf: ‘Look straight into his eyes and
don’t break eye contact’. As Junior turns to run, Tiger warns ‘Wait!’ Wolves never
hunt alone, only in packs . . . there are more coming’. The scene cuts to a pack of
wolves emerging behind the one we saw in the previous scene.
As the wolves advance, Salman utters the lm’s famous line: ‘Everyone hunts
but none better than Tiger’ – referring both to himself and the namesake animal.
When Junior is concerned that dad is going to kill all of them singlehandedly,
Tiger quips that if he doesn’t hunt them it would be Junior served on the dinner
table instead. Now Junior throws him the gauntlet: ‘If you can save me from here
without killing the wolves, then I accept that you are indeed the real Tiger’. Tiger
accepts the challenge and throws away his weapons. As Tiger rolls down the snow,
in a high-octane chase comprising a series of mid-air somersaults, captured in slow
motion helicam shots, he displaces tree trunks and logs that throw the wolves o
their trail. Finally, with a little ingenuity, and coordination between Tiger and Jun-
ior, the last of them with an intention of pouncing on Junior, jumps straight into the
parked SUV in a beautiful slow motion shot, as Junior holds the door open for him.
The scene ends with Tiger and Junior exchanging a hi-ve, both are pleased with
the outcome, Tiger and son have survived and so have the wolves – literally point-
ing to the o screen dictum – ‘No Animals were hurt in the making of this lm’.
The larger vision of the lm, however, remains a largely anthropocentric one,
that assumes the human–animal hierarchy, and the superior intelligence, cunning,
and skill of humans to overpower the animal, albeit appealing to his kindness,
again a virtue, that the lm implies only humans are capable of.
Figure 11.1 The snow-capped Praxmar Mountains.
Source: From the lm Tiger Zinda Hai (2017)
202 Veena Hariharan
The Paratexts of Tiger Zinda Hai
O-screen spaces can refer to the material and imaginary referents outside the cin-
ematic frame pointing to the continuity of the action before and beyond the tempo-
ral and spatial frames of the diegesis – ‘what the screen shows us seems to be part
of something prolonged indenitely into the universe’ (Bazin 1967, p. 166). In this
chapter, I take o screen spaces to include the pro-lmic realities of shooting with
animals on location and the legal, religious, political, and environmental discourses
surrounding animal–human relations and their lmic representations. One of the
key access points that enables a look at o screen spaces of the animal sequence in
the lm are the paratexts of the lm.
Figure 11.2 Encounter between Tiger and the Wolf. He combats the wolf single-handedly.
Source: From the lm Tiger Zinda Hai (2011)
Figure 11.3 A pack of wolves approach Tiger and Junior.
Source: From the lm Tiger Zinda Hai (2011)
Beastly places 203
As a composite practice involving the principles of documentary as well as pro-
motional lmmaking, the making-of-video is a ubiquitous artefact of our times and
accompany most lm productions – big and small. Making of videos come in all
forms and sizes and from dierent quarters – usually an ocial video sanctioned
by the production company and any number of fan videos on the internet or show
reels for the crew. From its evidentiary documentary value to its promo/trailer like
qualities, showcasing of the lm’s big moments, and behind-the-scenes endeavours
of its crew or their use of state-of-the-art technology, the making-of-videos can give
us valuable insights into what happened on location during and in – between shots
or how certain dicult scenes were rehearsed, executed and achieved. A typical
making of video can contain location footage, interviews, bytes, candid moments,
green room clicks, and may be shot with a hand held, cell phone, or a high-end
digital camera in the style of a home movie, documentary, or a glossy lm. Such
making-of-videos are also referred to as ‘paratexts’ (Gray 2010; Hight 2005) – the
‘greeters, gatekeepers, and cheerleaders for and of the media, lters through which
we must pass on our way to the “text itself” ’(Gray 2010, p. 17). In her discussion
of the making of music videos that she calls a ‘paratext of a paratext’, Pavitra
Sundar notes:
They (paratexts) may appear in the ‘Extras’ section of a DVD, on television
shows and websites promoting the lm, or on YouTube and other digital ven-
ues. They may be stand-alone features or part of a broader narrative about the
making of the lm. Making-of videos rarely use an authoritative voice-over,
relying instead on the music and the talking heads’ comments for a connec-
tive thread. Thus, while they purport to de-mystify the process of lm-song
production, what they do in fact is celebrate that process.
(2020, p. 222)
In this section, I look at three paratexts – the making-of-video of the lm made by
Saif Akhtar, Tiger vs Wolves (2017); Zoltan Horkai’s own showreel, and the 6-part
Discovery series on Zoltan the Wolf Man. Tiger vs Wolves, the making of video of
Tiger Zinda Hai, acts as a paratext that demysties the processes of shooting with
wolves on location, by introducing us to the techniques employed by Zoltan Horkai
specially hired for the job along with his team of wranglers and handlers. It also
showcases his unique methods and skills for handling wolves. The lm also serves
as a promotional for the star – the ‘brave’ Tiger, Salman Khan, uninching in his
scenes with the erce wolves even receiving an endorsement from Zoltan: ‘He (Sal-
man) is straight and natural, he loved the animals and the animals loved him back’.
The video also introduces the details of the location and elaborate arrangements to
accommodate the wolves including cages, and electric wire fencing for the shoot.
It is also a documentation of best practices the ethical, respectful, and loving
treatment of the animals in the lm. No accidents of crew or wolves were reported
says, director Abbas Ali, whose favourite shooting moments involved the ‘beauti-
ful wolves’. The goals of ethical cohabitation and jungle know-how permeate the
204 Veena Hariharan
entire crew. An instance of this can be seen in the way Abbas Ali himself started to
recite the mantras and know how on living in the wild:
They are wild animals treat them with respect and they will love you back. . . .
Don’t close your hands, they will believe that you have something to hide
and attack you . . . open your hands, let them sni you, etc.
It is evident in other ways too, for example in the way the entire crew including
Salman and Junior familiarised themselves with the wolves, even attributed a name
and character to each wolf on the set. Along with Zoltan, and the wolves crew of
animal handlers – Peter Ivanyi, Dori Ujvary, and Gergo Benkoczy, the end credits
also include the names of the screen wolves – Nelson, Rufus, Volko, Dakota, Mar-
cus, and Dante and the real wolves who played them – Eda, Lobo, Morius, Bobi,
Szami, and Hogan. Dakota is designated as the director’s favourite; Dakota and
Volko were ‘great with kids’; Nelson is the angry one, Eda was ferocious look-
ing but ‘supercute’. At the same time, everyone was aware of their all-too-human
borders with the wild. For safety, the shooting location was fenced on all sides
with electric wires. For some of the shots in the lm, example, when Tiger is on a
skateboard being chased by wolves – they had to repeat this action several times
to get the perfect shot, but no one inched. Though we know from the lm’s less
talked about production notes that this high risk stunt sequence was performed by
Salman’s usual body double Parvez Kazi.11
The Black Buck Case
This allows me to segue into another o screen detail that has a bearing on the ways
to read this lm. In 1998, during the shooting of the multi-starrer Hum Saath Saath
Hai (Sooraj Barjatya, Rajshri Productions 1999), the lm’s stars – Salman Khan
along with Saif Ali Khan, Tabu, and Sonali Bendre – allegedly hunted down two
black bucks in the Kankani village of Rajasthan. Following a case led by the vil-
lage’s ever-vigilant Bishnoi community, Salman was convicted under Section 9/51
of the Wildlife Protection Act (1972)12. Schedule I of the Act names the black buck
(Antelope Cervicapra) as an ‘endangered species’. After many a twist and turn
in the case, in 2007, the star was sentenced to 5 years of imprisonment and ned
Rs 25,000/-. He spent a week in the Jodhpur prison and was released soon after
on bail.13 The case, all but forgotten by everyone, except the Bishnoi community
who continued to appeal against Salman’s violation of the wild life habitat, was
reintroduced in the courts and in public discourse, again in 2016. Many see this as
a politically motivated campaign by a Hindu right wing government to pin down
an iconic Muslim star. In 2018, the actor was ned Rs 10,000 and 5 years imprison-
ment while the others charged in the case were acquitted.
The Bishnoi community of Western Rajasthan claims their lineage to Guru
Jambheswara and his bish noi (29 principles) that emphasise reverence and com-
passion for all animals. The legendary environmental Chipko movement, where
women of Uttarkhand hugged trees to resist government supported felling, has
Beastly places 205
been linked to the Bishnoi community’s Amrita Devi Bishnoi of Khejadali who
protected the region’s khejadi trees by hugging them against marauders of Mahara-
jah Abhay Singh of Jodhpur. Ramachandra Guha cautions against this ‘postmodern
myth’ as a ‘spiritual’ and ‘romantic stereotype’ that ‘obscures Chipko’s origins in
the specic conditions of Uttarakhand’ and suspects that it was in all probability
mobilised by Sunder Lal Bahuguna to revitalise a agging environmental move-
ment (2013) while acknowledging the role of Bishnois ‘assiduously protecting . . .
blackbuck, chinkara, neelgai and peafowl’, as one of the strands of the wildlife
conservation movement in India (1995, p. 98). Pankaj Jain characterised the com-
munity’s erce guard of wildlife in the region, in terms of ‘dharmic/religious’
environmentalism’ (2011, p. 60). The photograph of a native Rajasthani woman
feeding her baby and a baby fawn at the same time featured in Rajesh Bedi’s book
of photographs, Rajasthan: Under the Desert Sky (2013). Several versions of this
photograph have circulated on the internet since then, and even if apocryphal or
photoshopped, it serves as the community’s calling card – its religiously anointed
vocation to safeguard the wildlife habitat that includes the ‘sacred antelope’ – the
black buck. Against this, Salman Khan’s excesses were not forgiven though he
continues to be a popular draw in Jodhpur, as the box oce success of his action
thriller series Dabanng (2010, 2012, 2019), Ek Tha Tiger (2012), and indeed Tiger
Zinda Hai proves. The Bishnoi model of zealous environmentalism is pitched
against a more modern (read western) environmental model embodied by the star
in Tiger Zinda Hai.
Thus, it is possible to see the messaging of the lm as an antidote to Salman
Khan’s public image vis-a-vis animals accrued from his earlier encounter. The
lm’s vision of sustainable environmentalism the combination of jungle sensi-
tiveness and jungle know how – focalised through the child gure -and delivered
by the star could be understood as an exercise in star image building or in this case
image reparation. Director Sooraj Barjatya has been associated with the introduc-
tion of unforgettable animal protagonists to Bollywood – from Tuy in Hum Aapke
Hai Kaun to the multi-coloured CGI parrot in Main Prem ki Deewani Hoon while
Salman Khan’s namesake production company, Salman Khan Films continues to
be associated with children and animals in lms like Chillar Party (Nitesh Tiwari
and Vikas Bahl 2011).
Zoltan the Wolf Man
Director Abbas was himself primarily motivated by commercial values and the
desire to make what he calls a ‘Hollywood-looking’ lm, to this end, he hired Hol-
lywood stunt choreographer, Tom Struthers of Inception and Dark Knight fame,
and Zoltan, who Abbas refers to as the best animal trainer ‘in the world’. The
wolves themselves were cast for their ferocious cinematic beauty. Abbas regrets
that Indian lmmakers and producers rarely use animals in their lms these days,
at best maybe horses and livestock. The sequence lasting less than 8 minutes in the
2.5-hour-long lm, took 14 days to shoot. Director Abbas attributes this to the two
unpredictable factors on the set – the presence of the child actor and the performing
206 Veena Hariharan
animals – both of whom were uncontrollable and whimsical and subjected the crew
to the vagaries of their moods.14
All the paraphernalia for the shooting of this sequence came from Budapest
along with the wolves who were brought in by road with their wranglers and chief
trainer Zoltan. The desire to ‘keep it real’ drove Abbas to shoot with real wolves
rather than post-production animals achieved with CGI, VFX or manipulated stock
footage. This also meant that shooting preparations were elaborate with little margin
for error. The shots involving the wolves was storyboarded in minute detail When
Zoltan listened to the brief he knew that there was a challenging shoot ahead
he trained intensively with his wolves in his workshop farm in Budapest for two
whole weeks before arriving on location. But when he did, there was no doubt as
to who was helming the sequence: we see him announce in the making of video –
‘as long as the wolves are not in the trailer, or not on leash, I am in charge, nobody
else’. In the making of video we can see Zoltan and his crew of wranglers, han-
dlers, and trainers women and men in intimate interactions with the wolves
feeding, petting, and playing with them. Everyone is working in sync, united by a
shared camaraderie, joy, and sheer love of animals.
Zoltan Horkai’s unique animal training philosophy of ‘Natural Motivation’ is
critical to the vision espoused by his centre – the Horkai centre whose motto reads:
‘We Understand. We know. We Care’. A six-episode biographical series Zoltan
the Wolf Man (directed by Darius Miniotas 2015), aired on Discovery and Animal
Planet captures the intricate details of Zoltan’s work and philosophy. The series
reveals how Zoltan distances himself from the methods of the circus as far as possi-
ble. He never beats, threatens, or uses power to achieve his lm objectives; instead,
he uses the positive drive that the animal naturally possesses to motivate it to do the
required action by its own volition. This is primarily based on Zoltan’s unique tal-
ent to get under the wolf’s skin, or any other animal for that matter – he also works
with bears, grizzlies, foxes, wild boars, deer, lynxes, and even ies and wasps.
After listening to the director’s brief, he ‘translates’ the scripted action into the
wolf’s language – a ‘wolfspeak’, so to speak, and a ‘wolsh’ way of thinking. Zol-
tan is an exemplar of wranglers and handlers who possess such embodied knowl-
edge built through everyday interactions with animals, what Michael Polanyi in
another context refers to as ‘tacit knowing’.15 (Polanyi 2009) It could be a drive
for food, security, it can be jealousy or competition, or play with hierarchy – any
natural instinct which Zoltan then uses to motivate the animal to perform the neces-
sary action. Then he divides it into tasks by the motivation needed by the wolf to
perform it and later assembles it into one continuous action needed for the shot. For
example, in Tiger Zinda Hai, the scene where the wolf runs and pounces on Tiger
is achieved by rst releasing a hungry wolf from a cage for a high speed run and a
second wolf on a leash is let loose so that it can lunge on to Salman/Parvez’ body
to which pieces of meat are tied.
In the coda to the lm, Wolf Man, we are told that in Budapest, the last survi-
vors of this endangered canid can only be found in Zoltan’s training centre. In the
last episode of the series, we witness a rediscovery of a handful of grey wolves in
Budapest, as they cross over from the forests of bordering Slovakia.16 The episode
Beastly places 207
ends with Zoltan addressing schoolchildren in a talk about wolves. At the close of
the talk, he invites each one of them to the podium encouraging them to pet the
wolves to gift them a childhood memory that will never allow them to hurt wolves
when they are adults. A gesture that alludes to the history of wolves in Europe
captured, contained, and hunted as dangerous threats to livestock and to a future of
conservation and co-existence. To add a caveat here, Zoltan Horkai’s, (the animal
trainer whose) principles of ‘Natural Motivation’, we see ample amounts of care
and understanding of animals and no ostensible display of cruelty but these are
evidence based on the self-documentation of his commercially viable enterprise.
Conclusion
The use of animals in lms is always already implicated in the exploitative dynamic
of the entertainment industrial complex that animal activists have protested time
and again in connection with the circus, animal sport, performance, etc. Do we
become part of the solution, complying with the covenant – ‘No Animals Were
Harmed’ by abandoning the use of performing animals altogether or make possible
an inclusion of ‘beastly spaces’, the vital presence of animals in the cinematic land-
scape, as in our lives, in ethical ways? In this chapter, I have shown how the inscrip-
tion, No Animals were harmed, is both a sign and a palimpsest – the unravelling of
its multiple layers reveals the complex web of animal–human entanglements with
location, technology and special eects, tactical knowledge and animal expertise,
local and global cartographies, stardom, law, and politics. Through a case study of
the lm Tiger Zinda Hai and the star vehicle of Salman Khan, I show how the lm
attempts an ethical approach to the deployment of animals while recuperating the
actor with an embattled history vis-à-vis animals. With its prior expertise (in this
instance, Hungarian wolf trainer Zoltan Horkai) and animal infrastructures already
mobilised and tapped by Hollywood, I show how Europe is as a primary vector, a
force-eld even, for the staging of these encounters.
Notes
1 Aitken and Zonn (1994), Beeton (2005), Burgess and Gold (1995), Clarke (2007),
Escher and Zimmerman (2001), Jameson (1992), Kennedy and Lukinbeal (1997), Urry
(1992), Soja (1989), Bruno (2018), Conley (2007), Jaikumar (2019), Escher (2006).
2 Baker 2001; Berger 1980; Burt 2002; Cahill 2019; Haraway 1991; Hediger 2020; Lippit
2000; Pick 2011; Smaill 2016.
3 Bousé 2000; Chris 2006; Mitman 2012; Vivanco et al. 2012.
4 Section 2(b), of the Performing Animals Rules 1973, and Section 2(h) of the Performing
Animals (Registration) Rules 2001.
5 The Animal Welfare Board of India is a statutory advisory body on Animal Welfare
Laws and promotes animal welfare in the country. Established in 1962 under Section 4
of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 (No. 59 of 1960), the AWBI was the
rst of its kind to be established by any Government in the world and has since then
been the face of the animal welfare movement in the country.
6 The encounter between well-meaning animal protection laws in India and their imple-
mentation mired in red tape, is well documented by Nayanika Mathur in her work on the
bureaucracy surrounding the protection of Big Cats in India.
208 Veena Hariharan
7 Although that rule is about to change now, according to the news article” “Films shot
abroad will need “no animal cruelty” tag, Ohri, ET Bureau, 03.10.2015.
8 Two recent documentaries Treasures of the Grasslands (Mihir Godbole and Makarand
Dambhare 2019) and Walking with Wolves (Senani Hegde 2014) highlight the neglect of
wolves and their grassland habitats. Although listed as a protected species in Schedule
I of the Wildlife Protection Act, the wolf got less attention than the other charismatic
megafauna on the list namely tigers, lions, rhinos and elephants.
9 The Indian Cinematograph Act 1952; Performing Animals Rules 1973; Performing Ani-
mals Registration Rules, 2001; The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960; The
Wildlife Protection Act 1972.
10 Along with Praxmar and Innsbruck, the lm’s end credits mention that the lm was shot
in original locations in Tirol including Kaunertal, Kuhtai, the Holfburg Ball Room, and
the Golden Roof, Townsquare, Innsbruck while the Austria Film Commissioner and the
Mayor of Innsbruck are specially thanked along with the Cine Tirol Film Commission
and Innsbruck Tourism.
11 The credits of the lm mention the name of Parvez Shaikh in stunt support and Chad
Martin Guerrero as stunt double.
12 Some of the details of this episode can be found in Joshi, N. (2019). Reel India: Cinema
o the beaten track.
13 Qaidi No 210, a lm based on Salman’s experience of his few days in prison, was
mooted but never released.
14 Ali Abbas, 2020. Interview, Equip EQUIP-ICSSR research project “FilmInd: The Indian
lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic connections between India and Europe”.
15
Scientist-turned-philosopher, Michael Polanyi, dierentiates between two kinds of
knowing – the tacit and articulate – in his deceptively simple formulation: “We can
know more than we can tell” (1966, p. 4). One of his examples, is the human capac-
ity to know an individual face, recognizing it among millions of others, yet we can-
not tell exactly how we recognize a face we know – this inability to articulate the
“how” of knowing, Polanyi refers to as the tacit, ineable dimension of knowledge.
In the same vein, we can think of examples from the animal world – how did Sibe-
rian cranes know to migrate all the way from the arctic tundra to winter in India’s
tropical sanctuaries, or the Swedish moose to walk across the melting ice to reach
their summer pastures in the foothills? Yet this is knowledge that is passed on from
generation to generation of the species ineably, tacitly.
(Hariharan 2022)
16 As captured on WWF Hungary’s camera trap in Aggtelek National Park in Northern
Hungary.
References
Bandhopadhyay, B., 2021. Have animal-centric lms lost their appeal in mainstream Indian
cinema? News, 18.
Bazin, A., 1967. What Is Cinema? Vol. 1. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Califor-
nia Press.
Bedi, R., 2013. Rajasthan: Under the desert sky. New York: Roli Books.
Berger, J., 1980. Why look at animals? In: About looking. London: Bloomsbury.
Bousé, D., 2000. Wildlife lms. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Burt, J., 2002. Animals in lm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gray, J., 2010. Show sold separately: Promos, spoilers, and other media paratexts.
New York: New York University Press.
Beastly places 209
Guha, K., 2022. Meet the couple behind the animatronics for Tanhaji: The unsung warrior
and housefull 4. Mumbai Mirror, 14.02.2022.
Guha, R., 2013. The unquiet woods: Ecological change and peasant resistance in the Hima-
laya. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
Guha, R. and Gadgil, M., 1995. Ideologies of environmentalism. In: R. Guha and M. Gadgil,
eds., Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London:
Routledge.
Hariharan, V. (2022). Bio-logs and non-human. Frankfurt: Meson Press.
Hight, C., 2005. Making-of documentaries on DVD: The lord of the rings trilogy and special
editions. The Velvet Light Trap, 56 (1), 4–17.
The Indian Cinematograph Act, 1952.
Jaikumar, P., 2019. Filmed space: Where histories reside. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jain, P., 2011. Dharma and ecology of Hindu communities: Sustenance and sustainability.
Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Jha, S., 2021. Animal welfare board issues advisory to replace animals in lms with modern
technology. National Herald, 25.11.2021.
Joshi, N., 2019. Reel India: Cinema o the beaten track. New Delhi: Hatchette India.
Kukreti, I., 2001. Why the return of wolves to the Indian grassland is a bitter-sweet story.
Scroll.in, 26.10.2001.
Ohri, R., 2015. Films shot abroad will need ‘no animal cruelty’ tag. ET Bureau, 03.10.2015.
Performing Animals Registration Rules, 2001.
Performing Animals Rules, 1973.
Philo, C. and Wilbert, C. eds., 2000. Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of
human-animal relations. London and New York: Routledge.
Pick, A., 2011. Creaturely poetics: Animality and vulnerability in literature and lm. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Polanyi, M., 2009. The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
Said, E., 1978. Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sen, Z., 2019. Performing animals give lmmakers the jitters!. Entertainment Times,
11.01.2019.
Smaill, B., 2016. Regarding life: Animals and the documentary moving image. New York:
SUNY Press.
Staroseilski, N. and Walker, J., eds., 2016. Sustainable media: Critical approaches to media
and environment. London: Routledge.
Sundar, P., 2020. Making-of-videos: Of placeless studios and pioneering music directors. In:
M. Mukherjee and M. Mehta, eds., Industrial networks and cinemas of India: Shooting
stars, shifting geographies, and multiplying media. London: Taylor and Francis.
Venugopalan, V., 2019. Behind the scenes of Bollywood: Animatronics is how fake animals
in movies are brought to life. The Quint, 05.08.2019.
Whatmore, S., 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. Oxford: Sage
Publications.
The Wildlife protection Act, 1972.
Filmography
Chader Pahar (Kamaleswar Mukherjee 2013).
Chillar Party (Nitesh Tiwari and Vikas Bahl 2011).
Dil Dhadakne Do (Zoya Akthar 2015).
210 Veena Hariharan
Haathi Mere Saathi (Prabhu Solomon 2021).
Hum Aapke Hai Kaun (Sooraj Barjatya 1994).
Hum Saath Saath Hai (Sooraj Barjatya 1999).
Housefull 4 (Farhad Samji 2019).
Kishore Kumar Junior (Kaushik Ganguly 2018).
Kumki (Prabhu Solomon 2012).
Life of Pi (Ang Lee 2012).
Main Prem ki Deewani Hoon (Sooraj Bharjatya’s 2003).
Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi (Kangana Ranaut 2019).
Panipat (Ashutosh Gowarikar 2019).
Ponniyin Selvan (Mani Ratnam Upcoming Release).
Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy (Surender Reddy 2019).
Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior (Om Raut 2020).
Tiger v Wolves (Saif Akthar 2015).
Tiger Zinda Hai (Ali Abbas Zafar 2017).
Treasures of the Grasslands (Mihir Godbole, Makarand Dambhare 2019).
Walking with Wolves (Senani Hegde 2014).
Zoltan the Wolf Man (Darius Miniotas 2015).
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-16
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
A silent lm Bilat Pherat (1921) showed the tension between Indians living in
India versus Indians returning from abroad. From the 1960s to the 1980s, only a
handful of Indian lmmakers shot their lms in international locations. One cat-
egory of these lms belonged to the ‘Holiday’ genre pioneered by Raj Kapoor
(Around the World in Eight Dollars and Sangam), Shakti Samanta (An Evening in
Paris, The Great Gambler), and Pramod Chakravarty (Love in Tokyo). Such lms
showed foreign locales as tourist destinations (Jain 2019a). Another genre of lms
dealt with more contested issues such as cultural Nationalism or immigration. One
lm that stands out in this genre is Purab Aur Pachhim. Purab Aur Pachhim (PAP
for short), the East and the West, brought Indian immigrants to the screen. Fortu-
nately for him, even with such a non-formulaic and unconventional subject, PAP
emerged as the fourth highest-grossing Hindi lm in 1970,1 beating many other
lms with established plotlines, actors, and directors. Its underlying message, artic-
ulated primarily through its melodious songs and unique narrative about the Indian
encounter with a former colonial ruler and emphasising the cultural uniqueness
and superiority of Hindu culture, makes the lm relevant for study even though
50 years have passed since its release.
While the post-1990 lms about NRI characters (NRI refers to non-resident
Indians, i.e. Indians living abroad) such as Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge, Kabhi
Khushi Kabhi Gham, and Kal Ho Na Ho targeted the NRI audience, proclaiming
the arrival of a resurgent India as a soft power and garnered new respect for the
diasporic Indians, the earlier lms made in Europe looked at Indians settled abroad
through the disparaging gaze of a ‘deserter’. Of this, PAP is a striking example.
Manoj Kumar, a multi-faceted cinema personality, actor, writer, director, and
producer of commercially successful lms, was admired for his patriotic lms.
Looking back at PAP more than ve decades after its release in the context of
present-day political conditions in India makes for an insightful analysis. PAP’s
signicant box oce success after its release in 1970 implied that the ideology
propagated in the lm was unquestionably accepted by a large population of the
middle-class cinema-going public. We suggest that the lm’s popularity allows us
to see a template for Hindu Nationalism before it came into electoral power after
12 Film as a majoritarian
framework of Hindu nationalism
The case of Purab Aur Pachhim
Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
212 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
the 1990s. As per the tenets of Hindu Nationalism enunciated by its chief articula-
tor Savarkar (2007), there can be social and community unity only between India’s
indigenous faiths, the Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains. Muslims and Christians
cannot be included, because their holy land is not India. In this chapter, we analyse
how the narrative and the image-making (mise-en-scene) promote the idea of the
superiority of India’s cultural past over the West and how, through the propagation
of Hindu Nationalism, it becomes an early template for a majoritarian discourse
currently in full bloom over vast swathes of India’s political landscape.
More than ve decades after its release, PAP raises some intriguing questions
in the context of India’s present-day political trajectory. Such questions could not
be asked at the time or in the many years after its release because the ideology of
Hindu Nationalism was not a potent political force then. The subliminal ideologi-
cal framework of nation, citizenship, and the past and present of civilisation was
not implied in their Hindu context in the 1970s. It did not seem to alarm so much
then. In the second decade of the 21st century, the eects of Hindu Nationalism and
its majoritarian discourse unleashed upon India are palpable. Our reading of the
lm demonstrates that compared with current standards of stridency in discourse
over Nationalism, identity, culture, and religions, PAP seemed to have succeeded
as a Hindu nationalist project without resorting to an overtly chauvinist or trium-
phalist discourse. In this chapter, we rst survey East versus West tropes in Indian
literature and lms. Afterwards, we analyse PAP’s plot in various subsections,
from the opening scenes to the Indian hero’s visit to the UK, the British heroine’s
visit to India, and nally, the climactic sequence. In conclusion, we summarise our
analysis of the lm.
The East–West Divide in Indian Film Culture
The ideological basis of PAP reects the history of encounters between India and
the West. In the 21st century, the interactions among the cultures of the East (Asia)
and the West (Euro-America) are breaking the old barriers. In the context of India
and the West, Wilhelm Halbfass (1988) reminds us:
For Indians, preservation [of their traditions] is also an act of responding to
the West. In modern times, responding to the Western presence and the global
phenomenon of Westernisation is no longer a matter of personal choice or
preference. Even withdrawal, silence, armation, and continuation of tradi-
tional forms are ways of responding.
Non-Western cultures, such as India, were forced to respond to Western hegemony
from the 18th century onwards. In the heyday of the British Raj, Rudyard Kipling
(1940) pitted the cultures of the East and the West in his verse, ‘Oh, East is East,
and West is West, and never the twain shall meet’, in his poem The Ballad of East
and the West (1940). The inuence of this verse can be seen in the titles of the lms,
such as East Is East (1999) and West Is West (2010). Shortly after Kipling (1940)
noted this dichotomy, a dialogue between the East and the West started as Swami
Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism 213
Vivekananda began his speeches in Chicago on September 11, 1893. The enthu-
siastic reception by Americans led some to call him the bridge between the East
and the West. Many of his articles from 1900 to 2001 were later anthologised as
The East and the West (1909), reecting the planet’s two intellectual and spiritual
spheres. Although critical of a Western materialistic lifestyle, he often advocated
for a union of East and West (1909), ‘It is undoubtedly true that just as the too
active Western mind would prot by an admixture of Eastern introspection and the
meditative habit, the Eastern would benet by somewhat more signicant activity
and energy’.
In 1909, Mahatma Gandhi wrote his seminal work Hind Swaraj, one of Western
civilisation’s ercest critiques. Here is a glimpse from this work showing the deep
distrust he had against the West (Gandhi 1909, pp. 54–56):
The Indian civilisation tends to elevate the moral being, and that of the Western
civilisation is to propagate immorality. The latter is godless, and the former is
based on a belief in God. So, understanding and so believing, it behoves every
lover of India to cling to the old Indian civilisation even as a child clings to the
mother’s breast. India has evolved not to be beaten in the world. Nothing can
equal the seeds sown by our ancestors. Rome went, Greece shared the same
fate, the might of the Pharaohs was broken; Japan has become Westernised;
of China, nothing can be said; but India is still, somehow, or other, sound at
the foundation. The people of Europe learn their lessons from the writings of
the men of Greece or Rome, which exist no longer in their former glory. In
trying to learn from them, the Europeans imagined they would avoid Greece
and Rome’s mistakes. Such is their pitiable condition. In the midst of all this,
India remains immovable, and that is her glory. It is a charge against India
that her people are so uncivilised, ignorant, and stolid that it is impossible
to induce them to adopt any changes. It is a charge really against our merit.
What we have tested and found faithful on the anvil of experience; we dare
not change. Many thrust their advice upon India, and she remains steady. This
is her beauty: it is the sheet anchor of our hope. Civilisation is that mode of
conduct which points out to man the path of duty. Performance of duty and
observance of morality are convertible terms. To observe morality is to attain
mastery over our minds and our passions. So, doing, we know ourselves. The
Gujarati equivalent for civilisation means ‘good conduct.’ If this denition is
correct, as many writers have shown, India has nothing to learn from anybody
else, and this is as it should be.
Some such criticism found its way into two songs in Hindi lms, such as Navrang
(1959) and Jab Jab Phool Khile (1965). In PAP, Manoj Kumar was inuenced by
Western civilisation’s critiques by Gandhi and the East–West’s conuence by Vive-
kananda. In his earlier lms also, Manoj Kumar paid rich tributes to Indian leaders
such as Bhagat Singh in Shaheed (1965) and Lal Bahadur Shastri in Upkar (1967).
In addition to showing Swami Vivekananda’s portraits in the lm, the crew also
visited Kanyakumari to capture a few scenes from Vivekananda Rock Memorial,
214 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
where Vivekananda received the inspiration to travel to the United States in 1893.
In line with Vivekananda’s thoughts, PAP starts with the bold statement that India
is the heart of the East, the East that has given all the religions and their charismatic
founding gures to the world, including the Buddha, Jesus Christ, and Prophet
Muhammad. Like his earlier lms, PAP has no other reference to any Muslim
character, which led some critics to call him a right-winger or a Hindu national-
ist. However, his subsequent lms, Shor (1972) and Kranti (1981), had prominent
Muslim characters.
As the global migration pathways opened, the people of the ‘East’ and those of
the ‘West’ started mingling in the latter part of the 20th century. In 1965, American
Immigration Law permitted the immigration of Asians into the United States, and
this new law paved the way for thousands of Indians into the United States. Later
in the 1990s, the oodgates opened for Indian IT professionals into the United
States and elsewhere (Jain 2019b). Around the same time, in 1995, the lm Dil-
wale Dulhania Le Jayenge heralded the era of Hindi lms portraying the emerging
Indian diaspora. This new wave of Hindi lms led to books and articles analysing
diaspora lms. Although most recent studies have paid adequate attention to con-
temporary cinema, they have made only cursory references to PAP. Dudrah (2012)
notes that the 2007 lm Namastey London is inspired by PAP and even mentions
that explicitly in one of the scenes. Mishra (2002), Desai (2006), Gehlawat (2015),
and Chopra (2016) note that PAP shows the inuence of Westernisation on Indians
living abroad. Dudrah (2012) and a chapter in the volume by Domínguez and Des-
mond (2017) mention Gurinder Chadha’s Bride and Prejudice (2004) and Bhaji on
the Beach (1993), paying tribute to PAP. Krämer (2016) quotes Gurinder Chadha in
detail and explains that Chadha, who grew up in Britain, strongly reacted to PAP’s
stereotypical portrayal of Indians in Britain. She called the lm innovative and pro-
vocative (as cited in Macnab 2009) and counted Manoj Kumar as one of her lms’
inspirations. This review of various texts and lms demonstrates the relevance of
PAP even after ve decades of its release.
Plot Analysis
According to an article published in a popular lm magazine (Vijayakar 2000),
Manoj Kumar’s wife suggested the story idea to him after her disappointment with
one of her relatives who abandoned India and settled abroad. In the 1960s and
early 1970s, India was still beset with myriad political problems at the centre and
in its dierent states. The nation brewed with many discords and disagreements
on languages, regionalism, and internal and external security issues. India had to
ght wars on many fronts after becoming an independent country in 1947, such
as conicts with Portugal as India claimed territories such as Goa in 1961 and
Dadra and Nagar Haveli in 1954 (Rubino 1995) and full-scale wars with China
in 1962 (Garver 2011) and with Pakistan in 1947 and 1965 (Bajwa 2013). It was
still a country grappling with crippling poverty, food shortages, and a struggling
economy. It was a basket case that needed nancial help to nd its place as a self-
condent nation. In one of the PAP songs, there is a direct reference to a potentially
Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism 215
evil neighbour from which Indians must remain vigilant. Therefore, when PAP
was released and achieved its box oce success in the early 1970s, it must have
appeared to have a healing eect on a starved nation; a worthy attempt at rejuvenat-
ing the national pride of Indians in its spiritual and cultural heritage at a time when
everything else around appeared bleak and disheartening.
Opening Scenes and Prologue
The lm opens as a tribute to the revolutionary Indian freedom ghters portrayed
in an earlier black and white movie, Anand Math (1952). To stress the more right-
wing portrayal of the freedom struggle of the 1940s, PAP begins with an overlap
of religious fervour and patriotic passion. The lm is set in India’s heartland of
Allahabad in 1942 at the height of the Quit India movement, a nonviolent, secular
action led by M K Gandhi and the Congress Party. The choice of Allahabad could
also be imagined as a conuence point not just of the signicant Indian rivers
Ganga and Yamuna as well as religious traditions of Hinduism and Islam but also
of the great cultures of the East and the West that this lm portrays. The houses
adorn Hindu deities and Indian reformist leaders such as Rabindranath Tagore and
Swami Vivekananda.
In the prologue, we see the patriarch, known as Guruji (respected teacher),
played by Ashok Kumar. He is garbed as a Hindu sage and embodies the family’s
moral certitude steeped in conservative Hindu traditions. The extended family of
the patriarch consists of his two sons, Harnam and Om, their wives and assorted
cousins, and other relatives. The daughters-in-law in the family are named Ganga
and Kaushalya, after mythical characters from the Indian epics Ramayana and
Mahabharata. The elder son Harnam, played by Pran (an archetypal Indian lm vil-
lain), betrays Om, his freedom ghter brother, to the British. In a gesture recalling
a hoary tradition from Hindu customs, the martyred revolutionary’s wife declares
herself forever married. She refuses to be called a widow. Echoing this theme of a
forever married woman (Sada Suhagan, or eternally married – as martyr’s wives
liked to be called), we see that India as a nation is also referred to as a forever
married lady in the lm’s rst song, in contrast, a traitor’s wife achieves similar
respect only after she removes her jewellery and other makeup and starts living like
a widow. At the same time, the image of goddess Durga hovers over her highlight-
ing the feminine power, Shakti. Both the women depict their strong agency as one,
despite being a widow, refusing to wear a widow’s attire, and the other takes upon
a widow’s garb as her husband betrays the nation.
The scene of Om’s betrayal and martyrdom takes place in the main square of
the small Indian town during a rainy night, alluding to the story of the child Lord
Krishna (another epic gure). He is carried to safety by his father during a heavy
downpour to protect him from the evil king. While making the connection between
the Evil king and the British Empire transparent, the sequence also suggests the
eternal divide that ruled Indian polity then; the divide between the Indians who
favoured or emulated the British (the West) and those who wanted to live by the
age-old Indian traditions. According to this scheme, Bharat, the martyr’s orphan
216 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
son, will become a hero and be pitted against OP, the villain, the son of a traitor
who has escaped to England to further his progress. Here, the lm introduces its
main claim about the cultural and moral superiority of Indians vis-à-vis the West,
to be extended in-depth into the later parts of the lm.
The lm credits roll as India attains its freedom on August 15, 1947, with
the British ag coming down and a Hindu religious song playing in the back-
ground. Simultaneously, Bharat (played by Manoj Kumar), the protagonist’s name
and India’s ancient name, is born. The lm now acquires all the colours after the
rst 17 black-and-white minutes. As the religious prayer ends, Bharat becomes
a handsome man singing inside the Hindu temple with his mother and Guruji by
his side; Guruji retains his overarching spiritual presence throughout the lm. In
a cinematic eect much used in Indian popular cinema to show the growing up
of a hero from a child through a leap of 20 years, we see the baby Bharat (pre-
Independence) become a boy and then a young man (of present times) in three
time frames bridged by a devotional song Om jai Jagdish hare performed at the
town temple. The mis-en-scene of the scene shifts from monochrome to colour not
only to indicate the transition of India from the time of its independence, when
the Indian tricolour is raised to replace the British ag, to its striving as a prospec-
tive industrial and agricultural economy, but also to suggest the deeply inculcated
spiritual inuence of Hindu scriptures, saints, and gods. Considering reading the
lm narrative’s exposition, it would not be out of place to suggest that the town
square and the temple have shaped Bharat’s idea of India and his mental makeup in
profound ways, as we shall see further.
After this spiritual prayer ends, Bharat goes to New Delhi to perform and sing in
a college show on Indian Republic Day, which falls on January 26. At this college
function, while one group of students insists that the programme announcer speaks
in English, the other remains adamant that they would like to be addressed only in
Hindi. Wedged in a situation where the stage manager feels forced to talk in two
languages, the hero, in a typical Indian lmic fashion, comes to the rescue with a
song. The song’s lyrics celebrate India’s 20th birthday as the lm was released in
1970 (India became the Constitutional Republic on January 26, 1950). Paradoxi-
cally, the situation that frames this song’s occasion emerges from an unresolved
and divisive contestation in Indian polity over language and the continuing nature
of North and South India relations. Although Hindi is now widely spoken and
understood across India, partially due to the prevalence of Hindi lms and popular
songs, political resistance against Hindi remains strong in southern Indian states.
The Song of One India
Though PAP may be forgotten today, its songs such as Om jai Jagdish hare’,
‘Raghupati Raghav raja ram’, ‘Hai preet jahan ki reet sada’, and ‘Dulhan chali,
pehen chali continue to remain embedded in the collective memory of Indians to
this day. Many of these songs evoke national pride in India’s ancient heritage, its
culture of inclusiveness, its superiority over the West, and its devotion towards
free India’s founding gures. On Independence Day, Republic Day, and Gandhi’s
Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism 217
birth anniversary national celebrations, one can hear many PAP songs on televi-
sion, radio, and loudspeakers in many towns, villages, colleges, and schools.
One of the prayers in the lm Om jai Jagdish hare was written in the 1870s by
Shardha Ram Phillauri. The song preceded the lm, but its inclusion may have
increased its immense popularity among Hindus worldwide (Manuel 1993, p. 108).
The same verse, Om jai Jagdish hare, was earlier used in Anand Math (1952). Sim-
ilar prayer songs were used in other Hindi lms, including Bhakt Prahlad (1959),
Abdullah (1980), Aashiq Awara (1993), Namak (1996), Om Jai Jagdish (2002),
and Baghban (2003). This prayer, Om jai Jagdish hare and its many versions con-
tinue to be sung in many temples during morning and evening prayers. The back-
ground song on the lm’s opening credits earlier, an energetic rendition of Vande
Mataram, an ode to Mother India, alludes to the sacrices many patriotic Indians
made to liberate India from the British. It appropriately frames the genre of PAP as
a ‘patriotic lm’ for the audience. The sense of patriotism that PAP is imbued with
lters down to the audience in measured dosages through many other songs.
The song of One India, Dulhan chali, is a celebratory, vigorous, and rhythmic
composition that imagines India as an innocent bride representing India’s freedom
struggle, which needs nurturing and protection from the enemies within and at the
border. The three colours in the ‘teen rang ki choli’ allude to the tricolour Indian
national ag. The image of an inclusive and secular India that the song evokes
begins with references to the glory of the East, respect, and ownership of all reli-
gions that Indians practice, and contains a surfeit of references to India’s hoary
past, the Taj Mahal, Ajanta, the Himalayas, the Ganga and Yamuna rivers, and
the stalwarts of Indian Freedom struggle. In a regurgitation of the statist hype that
most Indians growing up in post-Nehruvian, socialist India of the 1960s and 1970s
would have imbibed from their homes and schools and through mass media, the
song counts the many attributes of India as one nation of much diversity. This is all
clearly a regurgitation of the statist hype that most Indian’s growing up in post
Nehruvian, socialist India of the 1960s and 1970s have imbibed from their homes,
schools, and through mass media.
Bharat – That Is India
After a few scenes, the grown-up Bharat leaves India for higher studies in the UK,
reminding the audience of the norm for several Indian leaders in the 19th and 20th
centuries, including Gandhi and Nehru. Guruji gifts him the Bhagavad Gita as he
leaves the favourite text of Indian sociopolitical and religious leaders in the last
couple of centuries. Bharat accepts it humbly and reminds Guruji (and the audi-
ence) that he is going abroad only to acquire scientic knowledge (Vigyaan). For
him and his Guruji, India will always remain the land of spiritual and cultural wis-
dom (Gyaan) (Brosius and Yazgi 2007). The idea that India’s freedom from con-
stitutional colonialism must lead to independence from cultural colonialism makes
this the essential premise of the lm. The values and attributes of India Bharat is
tasked to protect from corruption in his encounter with the West are a romanticised
version of a newly independent nation-state striving to nd its place in the world.
218 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
The idealised version of India he represents is unrepresentative of many parts of
India’s diverse cultures, classes, and religious traditions. The lm does not display
such diversities xing it and its protagonists as representatives and articulators of a
dominant caste, class, religion, and region (North India).
Bharat’s host in London, JP Sharma, is an old friend of his martyred father
and had migrated to England after the Partition. His family comprising his young
hippie son and his cigarette-smoking wife and daughter are also there for shock
and eect. The surprise is from knowing that this family is completely alienated
from their Indian roots, religion, and ‘culture’ and being told that changing one’s
name, life partners, and family is considered fashionable in London. After Bharat
is appropriately startled to see the heroine Preeti smoking cigarettes and wearing
miniskirts, the last part of the lm’s title, Pachhim (i.e. West), appears. Surpris-
ingly, many writings have used the spelling Paschim to refer to the lm’s title
even though the spelling used is Pachhim in the lm’s censor board certicate
and the lm’s title scene. The latter spelling highlights the local UP dialect while
the former refers to the version closer to the Sanskrit term for west direction.
The West (Pachhim) is iconied by the westernised heroine Preeti while the East
(Purab) is iconied by the hero Bharat, who proudly clings to his Hindu cultural
traditions.
As the protagonist meets other Indians in Britain, he is surprised that they are
either ignorant about India or ashamed of their Indian roots. In a later scene, the
British-raised Indian heroine, Preeti, mistakenly calls Bhagavad Gita, a novel
whose heroine’s name is Gita, highlighting the ignorance of Indians that grow up
in Western countries. The protagonist politely declines oers of smoking, drinking,
or dancing, greets everybody with a namaste and tries to remind everybody about
the Indian cultural and sociopolitical iconic gures, texts, and places. The heroine,
Preeti, the chain-smoking, blonde daughter of JP Sharma, a second- generation
British citizen of Indian descent, is a typical London-bred English woman in every
sense – in dress, demeanour, and outlook. She dresses ‘provocatively’ in short west-
ern dresses and high heels, chain-smokes, drinks heavily, and is in open, friendly
relationships (though not sexually) with many men at the same time, particularly
with the villainous OP (played by Prem Chopra), who is, in fact, Bharat’s cousin.
The East and the West
These scenes are followed by a short montage of London nightlife replete with
images of neon-lit billboards of Coca-Cola and assorted products and advertise-
ments of sex shops and bare bodies gyrating to fast-paced music the rst indi-
cator of how the East’s encounter vis-à-vis the West would be presented in PAP
through the rest of its discourse to strengthen its argument. Even among the many
attractions that London oers its visitors, the only place Bharat wants to visit is the
memorial dedicated to Udham Singh, who fought the British for India’s freedom.
Bharat’s idealised vision of India in PAP contrasts sharply with the assault on
the senses we face in scenes when Bharat is in London. The camera movements
comparing the nightlife and hippie culture of 1960s London with the Indian culture
Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism 219
of purity and serenity is a fascinating contrast of values. While most of London’s
shots are dark, with women showing cleavages and bare legs with playboy shots
and smoking and drinking youth, the landscape of the town where Bharat has
grown up; shot in broad daylight and vivid colours, does not seem to have changed
at all in the two and a half decades of lmic time lapse. In this town, as portrayed
in PAP, there is no milling of crowds, shopkeepers and hawkers on the streets, no
ugly grati on the walls, and no trac noise or people sounds. Instead, India has
been enveloped in a time warp away from the sweat, grime, heat, and dust which
typify an ordinary small-town street in India.
Bharat’s subsequent encounters and relationships in London with other charac-
ters of Indian descent fall neatly into three or four categories signifying a down-
ward gradation in stages of their alienation from the ideal Indian that Bharat claims
to be. In the rst group are the male members of Bharat’s host family. While the
father, JP Sharma, is nostalgic for a country left behind long ago, his son, who calls
himself an ‘Orphan’, is in the process of connecting back to India through a gradual
process of reclaiming his Hindu origins with the help of his hippie friends and fol-
lowers of ISKCON, International Society for Krishna Consciousness, a Hindu new
religious movement started in New York in the late 1960s. In the second group are
the female members of his host family; the mother and the daughter are western in
their outlook, behaviour, and attire for a signicant part of the lm. Bharat claiming
these women for his idea of India forms the lm’s central plot.
The third group is the traitors and the betrayers; the uncle, Harnam, who escaped
to London after betraying Bharat’s father, and an Indian student who came to Lon-
don to study but is so swayed by the temptations of the West that he refuses to go
back. In true, popular Indian lm fashion, both, with a bit of help from Bharat, will
repent their errors and return to reclaim their respective abandoned families and
country. However, it is the fourth group, Bharat’s cousin, OP, and a mixed group
of hoodlums of Indian and British descent who remain a challenge to Bharat until
the end. Crucially, this group is also a representative of all the signs and symbols
of Western culture’s decadence that PAP can manage to bring up in contrast with
the pristine nature of Indian society. In addition to disparaging the Indian values
and traditions of respect for women and the elderly, of family ties and abstinence
from vices, etc., this group is more than naturally preoccupied with all sorts of so-
called depravities – partying, boozing, drugs, sexual licentiousness, and disrespect
of women and of the elderly which, from the perspective of Bharat, seems to
constitute the West in its totality.
In the world of PAP, London is a decadent and hopelessly materialistic waste-
land lacking morally upright and decent British citizens who could aord a foil to
the moral degeneration of its society. Through its stress on the dark underside of
Western Culture and omission of any morally liberating redress, PAP suggests that
England is a spiritual desert that can only be saved by a Hindu spiritual movement
that acquires a near revolutionary momentum in the lm by its aggressive proselyt-
isation of Hindu spiritual values through the chanting of Hare Rama Hare Krishna
and singing of Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram on the streets. This shallow and reduc-
tive impression of England that we see from the perspective of Bharat and Manoj
220 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
Kumar (producer, writer, and director) is obviously at signicant variance from the
colonial or postcolonial experience of the diverse richness of European life that
Indians have known from its literature, music, philosophy, architecture and cultural
references, which abound in Indian landscape and cultural life even now.
In reading the PAP text, we must remember that in the period this lm depicts,
the 1970s, there was no internet or similar easy access or reach to the West in India.
Most non-English speaking Indians were unaware of the profound experience of
the colonial and postcolonial history of India’s encounter with Britain. Therefore,
for most such Indians, the idea of the West would come from Hollywood lms or
lms like PAP and similar Indian lms shot abroad or from word of mouth of some
of their rare relatives. The latter may have lived or travelled to the West. The eect
of such images on cine-going audiences in 1970 would be at the same level and of
similar nature as WhatsApp, Twitter, and Facebook forwards and sharing in present
days, where the authenticity or genuine nature of the shared media cannot be veri-
ed. The natural pretentiousness of cinema to appear ‘real’ and therefore ‘authen-
tic’ engenders a suspension of disbelief in audiences, which is more accurate in the
case of Indian popular cinema, where cine-goers approach the staged unfolding of
events on the cinema screen with a certain sense of loyalty or devotion and jouis-
sance towards the acts and travails of their screen heroes and heroines. PAP entraps
its audiences into a similar cul-de-sac-like narrative regarding how it is led to per-
ceive their hero’s labours in his encounter with the West.
After the hero rescues the heroine from an attempted rape by OP, she falls in
love with him. Saira Banu played Preeti’s character well, perhaps because she
had lived a similar life in Britain growing up. But why Bharat feels attracted to
her is not explained in the lm. His choice of Preeti as his would-be soulmate
seems paradoxical given his disinterest in anything British and his background as
a fanatically, tradition-bound nationalist Indian male who has grown up to respect
convention-bound women who suer and obey men stoically (his mother, aunt,
and cousin). But this is not a love story in the conventional sense of a typical Bol-
lywood romance where the lovers face obstacles to their conjugation from their
families or the traditions of their society. Here, the love story’s obstacle is the hero
himself and his dogged insistence on returning to India with or without his heroine.
From Bharat’s point of view, this is an act of self-sacrice at the altar of his idea of
India as a culturally superior nation compared to the decadent West. Their marriage
proposal hangs in the balance as the heroine refuses to move to India. After some
negotiation, Bharat convinces her to a trip to India before the wedding, hoping that
the journey will impress her with Indian cultural values.
British Heroine in India
When Preeti comes to India to full her part of the bargain, her impressions of the
country are at rst of a typical western tourist. For her, India means only fearful
multi-armed, skull-garlanded goddesses, and the venomous fangs of a cobra at a
temple. Therefore, she demands to visit only the Taj Mahal wary of other stereo-
typical Hindu elements. As she lives with Bharat’s family, she smokes and wears
Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism 221
western clothes. However, nobody in the family or village judges her lifestyle or
choices, and she continues to experience their love and aection. But, through a
series of gentle initiations into Hindu rituals and customs, lively and joyful encoun-
ters with the nationalistic and spiritual inheritance of Bharat and his household,
introduction to the concept of devotion, diverse cultural heritage of the fairgrounds,
songs of the seasons, and visits to pilgrimage sites spread across India, her tour
in India turns into a process of gradual transformation leading to her embrace of
Hinduism in the climactic scene. Preeti slowly appreciates Indian cultural elements
such as bashfulness and obedience of Indian ladies, the ritual of kanyadaan at the
wedding ceremony, prohibition of alcohol, nature worship, and parental love. In
this transformation and acceptance of India, she also questions her western values
and upbringing and gives up drinking, smoking, and even her western wear.
The lm’s premise is that India’s freedom from colonialism must lead to cultural
colonialism. This requires that the transformation we see in Preeti would be con-
sidered far-reaching and conclusive only if it is manifested in her complete giving
up the inuences and attractions of the West and surrendering to Indianness in her
body and spirit. This happens in the lm’s last scene, an event staged as a surprise
for the characters and the audience. The British – Indian characters have returned to
India from the UK, and the villain has been appropriately punished. Preeti has quit
drinking and smoking already. The resolution of the other subplots aids her recon-
version process in the lm, most importantly centred around her brother’s complete
submission to the ISKCON by implication Hinduism, and by returning to India and
expression of remorse by Gurnam, the prodigal uncle. It is also no accident of the
plot that the lm’s penultimate sequence is played out when the entire family and
the British – Indian guests are on their way to the Badrinath temple shrine in the
Himalayas, one of the most sacred Hindu pilgrimage sites. Here, two sub-pivotal
events take place. First, Gurnam, having expressed remorse and regret for his past
deeds of betrayal of India, nally annihilates his evil ospring, OP, who bears all
the West’s evils in his character. At the same time, in the death of the patriarch
Guruji in the sacred environs of the Himalayas, we see the symbolic passing up of
the legacy of India’s age-old cultural values to the new heir, Bharat.
Happy Hindu Ending
The lm’s climax is a dramatic ourish that makes the audiences sit up. We are
almost stunned to hear Preeti, who is dressed for the rst time in an Indian bridal
saree, a family heirloom gifted to her by Bharat’s mother, sing the same old devo-
tional bhajan, ‘Om jai Jagdish hare’, that had bridged Bharat’s growing up years
in the early part of the lm. The connection of this particular bhajan with Bharat’s
cultural and spiritual coming of age, and its evocation by Preeti in the lm’s
denouement, as she goes through the same awakening process into an Indian, can-
not be missed. From the perspective of Preeti, who is not shown to have followed
any religious practice back in England and has lived her life as a typical English
citizen, her act of putting on the bridal sari, visiting the temple, and singing the
bhajan, Om Jai Jagadish Hare, may come across to Indian audiences like an act of
222 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
shuddhikaran. Her Ghar Wapsi thus culminates the lm’s arc towards its desired
project of liberating the Indians and its audiences from the cultural colonialism of
the British, 20 odd years after the political independence of India was achieved.
Shuddhi in Sanskrit (and other Indian languages) means purication, and it is a
term used for reconverting those deemed to have been converted from Hinduism
back to Hinduism (Mehta 2020). Ghar Wapsi (meaning Home Coming) is a series
of reconversion activities facilitated by various Hindu Nationalist organisations to
convert Christians and Muslims to Hinduism (Katju 2015).
Conclusion
Sheikh Mujibur Rehman in his review of a book by Partha Chatterjee (I am the
people) about populism and the rise of the Hindu Right writes:
In this grand narrative (about Hindutva), the idea of the people – nation is as
old as Indian civilisation. And the upper caste Hindu male, speaking a north-
ern Indian language is the most legitimate Indian, and every other identity is
to be dened and placed with respect to the authentic Indian identity.2
The most cursory recollection of the foundational tenets of Hindu National-
ism articulated by its prominent ideologues in their writings and practised by its
committed or unselfconscious adherents reminds us that it is a product of social
and political thought, particularly of India’s traditionally upper-caste male. It has
inconvertible conceptions about who other Indians are or should be, as per beliefs
and attitudes that have come down to them from ancient India’s spiritual and cul-
tural traditions. It automatically assumes xed denitions of Indianness based on
caste, religion, and specic moral attributes (or lack of) that people carry from birth
or have given up on; as in the case of many British Indians in the lm, who though
upper caste and Hindu, are alienated from their Hindu cultural and religious roots
and cannot be proper Indians till they are brought back home or converted back.
From the survey of the narrative and lmic discourse of PAP, it is amply clear
that Bharat and his family are at the centre of PAP story because of their upper-
caste Hindu status. Their conception of India and its rightful citizens is derived
exclusively from their unquestionable acceptance of its Hindu past and traditions.
Not only does PAP completely elide the subjectivities of other faiths, communities,
and marginalised India, but also there is not even a token mention or represen-
tation of any other Indian religious faith, non-Hindu community, or non-Hindu
traditions in its entire discourse spanning three hours of lm duration. Assuming
the mantle of an ideal Indian citizen as an inherited right by being the son of a
martyred freedom ghter, Bharat espouses his idea of India zealously in his songs,
religiosity, and eagerness to convert the lapsed Indians. He is the sole judge who
can be considered Indian, anti-Indian, partially Indian, or a lapsed Indian needing
reconversion. Those who hold contrasting views about India’s poverty and social
evils or even look up to the British culture favourably (e.g. OP, Gurnam) are not
his friends if one were to say it mildly, but anti-nationals, if one were to use the
Film as a majoritarian framework of Hindu nationalism 223
language prevalent in current nationalistic discourse. The only accomplices he can
muster in his ‘Greatness of India’ project are those (from his host family in Lon-
don) who are already on their way to reclaiming India by nostalgic remembrance
or interest in Hinduism.
This chapter has highlighted innumerable instances from the narrative, the plot-
line, and visual design of PAP to illustrate how under the veneer of a patriotic
lm, in its conscious and unconscious biases, it projects a majoritarian, upper-caste
Hindu and exclusive idea of India, derived from the core ideas of Hindu National-
ism. There is no evidence that this lm may have been produced with the conscious
intention to propagate Hindu Nationalism. Still, there can be many conjunctures
about how its narrative has been short-circuited to turn it into a vehicle for broad-
casting the values and anxieties of a dominant class of Indians. Indeed, there can
be no doubt that about 100 years of propagation of the idea of Hindu Nationalism
would undoubtedly aect arts and artists. The history of the trajectory of Hindu
Nationalism would certainly not leave many parts of Indian society unaected by
its inuence. The vacuum left after the abject collapse of the long rule of the secu-
lar Congress party is being lled up by other points of view on India’s future.
Notes
1 Available from: www.imdb.com/list/ls000041304/ (access date 14.07.2022).
2 Available from: https://frontline.thehindu.com/books/book-review-i-am-the-people-by-
partha-chatterjee-discusses-populism-and-the-rise-of-the-hindu-right-hindutva-politics-
in-india/article34115734.ece.
References
Bajwa, F. N., 2013. From Kutch to Tashkent: The Indo-Pakistan war of 1965. London: Hurst.
Brosius, C. and Yazgi, N., 2007. Is there no place like home? Contesting cinematographic
constructions of Indian diasporic experiences. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 41 (3),
353–384.
Chopra, S., 2016. The Indian diaspora in ‘Purab Aur Paschim’. Sonipat: Ashoka University.
Desai, J., 2006. Bollywood abroad: South Asian diasporic cosmopolitanism and Indian cin-
ema. In: G. Rajan and S. Sharma, eds., New cosmopolitanisms: South Asians in the US.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Domínguez, V. R. and Desmond, J., 2017. Global perspectives on the United States:
Pro-Americanism, anti-americanism, and the discourses between. Urbana: University of
Illinois Press.
Dudrah, R., 2012. Bollywood travels: Culture, diaspora, and border crossings in popular
Hindi cinema. Florence: Routledge.
Gandhi, M. K., 1909. Hind Swaraj, or Indian home rule. Ahmedabad: Navajivan.
Garver, J. W., 2011. Protracted contest: Sino-Indian rivalry in the twentieth century. Seattle:
University of Washington Press.
Gehlawat, A., 2015. Twenty-rst century Bollywood. London: Routledge.
Halbfass, W., 1988. India and Europe: An essay in understanding. Albany: SUNY Press.
Jain, P., 2019a. Sara Jahan Hamara: Indian lms and their portrayal of foreign destinations.
Visual Anthropology, 32 (3–4), 343–352.
224 Pankaj Jain and Ajay Raina
Jain, P., 2019b. Dharma in America: A short history of Hindu-Jain diaspora. London:
Routledge.
Katju, M., 2015. The politics of ‘Ghar Wapsi’. Economic and Political Weekly, 50 (1), 21–25.
Kipling, R., 1940. Rudyard Kipling’s verse: Denitive ed. Garden City, NY: Doubleday,
233–236.
Krämer, L., 2016. Bollywood in Britain: Cinema, brand, discursive complex. New York:
Bloomsbury.
Macnab, G., 2009. Screen epiphanies: Filmmakers on the lms that inspired them. London:
BFI, 51–53.
Manuel, P. L., 1993. Cassette culture: Popular music and technology in North India. Chi-
cago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mehta, N., 2020. The inner revolution: Shuddhi and the reinvention of Hinduism. Swarthmore
Undergraduate History Journal, 1 (1), Article 2.
Mishra, V., 2002. Bollywood cinema: Temples of desire. New York: Routledge.
Rubino, A. G., 1995. Political integration in Goa. Journal of Developing Societies, 11 (1),
36–60.
Savarkar, V. D., 2007. Essentials of Hindutva. Chandigarh: Abhishek Publications.
Vijayakar, R., 2000. Stardust special issue 2000: 100 greatest lms of all time. Purab Aur
Paschim. Available from: https://ilead-opac.blacloud.in/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?bibli
onumber=32948&shelfbrowse_itemnumber=41535.
Vivekananda, S., 1909. The East and the West. New York: Vedanta Society.
Filmography
Anand Math, 1952. Hemen Gupta, dir.; starring Prithviraj Kapoor, Pradeep Kumar, Bharat
Bhushan, Gita Bali; in Hindi.
Bhaji on the Beach, 1993. Gurinder Chadha, dir.; starring Kim Vithana, Jimmi Harkishin,
Sarita Khajuria, in English.
Bride and Prejudice, 2004. Gurinder Chadha, dir.; starring Aishwarya Rai and Martin Hen-
derson; in English.
Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, 1995. Aditya Chopra, dir.; starring Shah Rukh Khan, Kajol,
and Amrish Puri; in Hindi.
East Is East, 1999. In English, Damien O’Donnell, dir; starring Om Puri and Linda Bassett.
Jab Phool Khile, 1965. Suraj Prakash, dir.; starring Shashi Kapoor, Nanda; in Hindi.
Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, 2001. Karan Johar, dir.; starring Amitabh Bachchan, Jaya
Bachchan, Shah Rukh Khan, Hrithik Roshan, Kajol, Kareena Kapoor; in Hindi.
Namastey London, 2007. Vipul Shah, dir.; starring Akshay Kumar and Katrina Kaif; in
Hindi.
Navrang, 1959. V. Shantaram, dir.; starring Mahipal, Sandhya; in Hindi.
Pardes, 1997. Subhash Ghai, dir.; starring Shah Rukh Khan and Mahima Chaudhry; in
Hindi.
Purab Aur Pacchim, 1970. Manoj Kumar, dir.; starring Manoj Kumar and Saira Banu; in
Hindi.
Upkar, 1967. Manoj Kumar, dir.; Manoj Kumar, Asha Parikh, Prem Chopra; in Hindi.
West Is West, 2010. Andy De Emmony, dir.; Om Puri and Linda Bassett; in English.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-17
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Introduction
Bollywood lms are making waves across the international stage, not only with
their perfectly synchronised dancing but also in their depiction of Indian travel
behaviours. This industry is one of the largest lm industries in the world, produc-
ing over 1,000 movies every year. It is a $72 billion industry selling six billion
tickets annually (Desai 2005; Lovgren 2004; Minocha and Stonehouse 2006). Its
commercial size grew at the robust rate of 58% in the ve year period between
2001 and 2005 (Lorenzen and Täube 2008). Film exports also expanded 30–50%
year on year during the same period and were forecast to increase by a further 20%
to 2010 (2008). A large chunk of this movie output from India comes from the city
of Mumbai, formerly known as Bombay. Hence, the moniker of Bollywood was
given to the Indian lm Industry.
As a rapidly developing country, India has seen tremendous growth in its
300 million strong middle class (Rempel 2007) and their purchasing power in the
past two decades. This growth boom has impacted all sectors of the Indian econ-
omy, including outbound international tourism. The combination of these forces
has created an opportunity for growth in overseas tourism destinations, often inu-
enced by Indians’ perception of Bollywood lms. A noteworthy piece of evidence
of the Indian market potential is the recent surge of Indian tourists to Spain after
the release of the Bollywood lm Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara, set against a Span-
ish backdrop (Harjani 2011). Six months after its showing, the Spanish tourism
board saw a 32% upswing of visitors from India to Spain (Harjani 2011). Similarly,
Mr. Yash Chopra, a major producer/director of Bollywood movies, idealised Swit-
zerland as a romantic destination in his lms and subsequently caused an increase
in outbound travel from India to Switzerland, increasing the outbound travel from
India by 30% (Dubey 2008). With the proliferating number of consumers of Bol-
lywood lms, destination marketers are eager to capitalise on this crown jewel of
the Asian market.
Evoking positive perceptions of the destination through image presentations
has become an eective way to catapult the target destination into the tourist’s
consideration set. Images of lm locations eect the audience’s selection of
one destination over another and their subsequent behaviours in the destination
13 ‘Namastey London’
Bollywood movies and their impact
on how Indians perceive European
destinations1
Bharath M. Josiam, Daniel Spears, Kirti Dutta,
Sanjukta A. Pookulangara, and Tammy L. Kinley
226 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
(Bandyopadhyay 2008; Han and Lee 2008; Young and Young 2008; Kim and
O’Connor 2011). Not surprisingly, the tourists who travel to a place depicted in
a movie arrive with expectations and images about the location similar to what is
shown on screen (Butler 2011). The images of the lm thus aect some destination
image components and heighten tourists’ interest in visiting (Kim and Richardson
2003). Beverley and Niki (2009) suggested that media-induced tourism helps tour-
ists full fantasies of being in the lms via the vicarious experience of actually
travelling to the sites where they were lmed.
Tsiotsou and Ratten (2010) advocated that tourism marketers should heed gen-
eral shifts in the population in order to identify the changing habits and demands of
tourists. A number of convergent trends make it imperative to study the Indian out-
bound tourism market. First, with its swelling 300 million plus middle class (Rem-
pel 2007), India has become an important member of the global consumer market.
Second, there has been a tremendous growth of outbound international tourism
from India, which is expected to continue for years to come. Millions of Indians
now not only aspire to travel abroad but also actually possess the means to do so.
Third, the size and scale of the multi-billion dollar Bollywood movie industry, and
its role in lming movies in Europe, thus showcasing international destinations to
Indians for decades, is now enabling Indians to move from the fantasy world of
lms to the real world of travel to featured destinations.
Given the potential growth of Bollywood and its growing clout on the Indian
audience, a close look at their perceptions of European destinations, as seen through
Bollywood lms, will help open the door of European tourism wider for the Indian
market (Kaur 2002; Miglani 2006). The purpose of this chapter, thus, is to inves-
tigate the proles of Indian lm viewers and their perceptions of major European
destinations through the images of Bollywood cinema. The in-depth analysis of
this growing segment can help destination marketers gain insight into the travel
needs of the Indian market.
Objectives
The objectives of this study are:
1. To determine the demographic prole of Indians who watch Bollywood movies.
2. To determine Indians’ engagement with Bollywood movies.
3. To determine the relationships between perceived images of European countries
and their portrayal in Bollywood movies/TV.
4. To determine perceived images of European countries as destinations, and the
attractions and activities they present to tourists.
Literature review
Film-induced tourism
Film tourism is dened as a ‘tourist visit to a destination or attraction as a result
of the destination’s being featured on television, video, or the cinema screen’
‘Namastey London’ 227
(Hudson and Ritchie 2006b, p. 387; Beeton 2006). Evidence from around the world
arms that tourists are increasingly visiting destinations as a result of those places
being depicted or featured in lm or television (Connell 2005; Im and Chon 2008;
Iwashita 2008). ‘Destinations, landscapes, events and their contained cultures can
be signicant factors in the communication of tourism’ (Crouch 2007, p. 72). Films
not only inuence destination choice but also impact the tourism industry. ‘Film-
induced tourism is partially based on tourist demands to escape reality to a better
world represented in lms’ (O’Connor et al. 2008, p. 434). This makes it important
for destination marketers to carefully craft their role in the lming process in order
to portray an image that best reects the location.
Motivations for travelling to screened locations
The AIETA Model (Rogers 1962) in consumer behaviour suggests that consumers
go through a linear process of Awareness, Interest, Evaluation, Trial, and Adoption.
Taking consumers through each of these steps is an expensive and time-consuming
process for the marketer. According to Kotler et al. (2010), few methods in practice
eectively ‘take the consumer all the way from awareness to purchase’ (p. 365).
Time and money can be saved by giving free samples to consumers, eectively
moving consumers to the Trial stage in one step. ‘When you have a new or rela-
tively unknown product, you need to generate awareness; prospects simply won’t
buy unless they are aware of your product’s existence’ (5MetaCom 2006). This is
also true for destination marketing. Generating interest in a destination is the key
to increasing visitation. Using the AIETA model as a guideline, lms can act as a
means of marketing a destination to millions of viewers, eectively taking view-
ers from the Awareness stage straight to the Trial stage of marketing, as they are
‘taken’ to a destination on the movie screen (Hudson and Ritchie 2006a).
Mannell and Iso-Ahola (1987) identied two motivational forces or dimen-
sions of escaping and seeking that operate simultaneously to stimulate and result
in tourist behaviour. An individual’s travel behaviour is inuenced by the desire to
escape from one’s routine personal and/or interpersonal environment while seeking
rewarding personal and/or interpersonal experiences (Iso-Ahola 1983). Further-
more, according to Macionis and Sparks (2009), the two primary motivators for
travelling to screened locations are novelty and fantasy.
Hudson and Ritchie (2006a) indicated that eight of ten residents of the UK
remarked in a 2004 survey that they got the idea for their vacation destination
through movies. VisitBritain (2006) estimated that one in ve international tour-
ists to the UK are inspired by movies or TV. ‘The estimated nancial value of
movie-induced tourism in United Kingdom alone is about 1.6 billion pounds’
(Suni and Komppula 2012). Though no established methods yet exist to measure
lm-induced tourism, lm inuences on tourism are evident in the increase in
visitor numbers after a movie has been released (Singh and Best 2004). Their
study followed the lm-induced tourism prompted by the release of the Lord
of the Rings trilogy. The authors found that the main motivation to visit Hob-
biton (movie set/backdrop) was to experience the natural scenery of that place.
This indicated that travellers motivated by a movie expect to see the views/
228 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
sceneries as shown in the movie. After the release of the Lord of the Rings tril-
ogy, marketing material produced by Tourism New Zealand was created con-
necting locations from the lms to the scenery of New Zealand displaying a
documented eect on how movies can impact tourism (Croy 2004; Suni and
Komppula 2012).
New Zealand, a lm-friendly destination, is a prime example of a place that has
successfully collaborated and leveraged o the success of The Lord of the Rings
trilogy. Industry integration and collaboration between stakeholders are crucial
for sustainable lm-induced tourism to occur. The tourism and lm stakeholders
should work closely with each other to help promote their destination tourism and
marketing strategies as well as their product dierentiation more eectively.
Movies seen and places visited
The tourism literature is replete with studies that identify specic movies and then
examine how they have induced tourism to destinations worldwide. In the UK, the
relationship between lm-induced tourism and destination branding of Yorkshire
has been studied by O’Connor et al. (2008); Frost (2006) has studied the impact
of the historical lm – ‘Braveheartand its impact on the destination image of
Scotland. Furthermore, Iwashita (2008) has examined how Japanese tourists are
motivated to visit the UK by lms and television dramas. In addition, O’Connor
(2011) has examined lm-induced tourism to Ireland. Im and Chon (2008) studied
the long-felt impact of ‘The Sound of Music on tourism to Salzburg, Austria.
In addition to studies on movie-induced tourism to Europe, scholars have also
studied how Korean TV dramas have attracted tourists from the Middle-East to
Korea (Kim et al. 2009; Lin and Huang 2008). Frost (2010) has studied the impacts
of movies on the Australian outback on tourist perceptions. Shani (2009) and Hud-
son et al. (2011) have studied the impact of movies on tourism to South America.
Soliman (2011) has examined the impact of movies on domestic tourism within
Egypt. Law et al. (2007) have critically examined the role of foreign tourists in
Thailand.
Bollywood and travel motivations
In the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, romantic sequences in Indian lms were primarily
shot in the mountainous region of Kashmir in India, widely regarded as ‘heaven on
Earth’. Bollywood directors were mesmerised by the beauty of Kashmir, so much
so that the mountains in Kashmir became synonymous with romance in Bolly-
wood. However, when terrorism threats in the late 1980s made the region dicult
to reach, and later inaccessible, Bollywood directors began seeking substitute loca-
tions overseas (Qureshi 2012).
Fascination with foreign locations within Bollywood began in the mid-1960s
when Raj Kapoor (Bollywood Producer/Director/Actor) shot his rst colour lm,
titled Sangam, in Italy, France, and Switzerland. This started the foreign locations
trend in Indian cinema. The trend accelerated in the 1970s to 1990s when actors
‘Namastey London’ 229
were transported to striking foreign locations like the Swiss Alps and Britain’s
Summer Isles, which were the primary backdrops of many Yash Chopra produc-
tions (Shah 2012). More than 200 Bollywood titles have been shot in Switzer-
land over the past two decades alone (Global Tourism Industry News 2008). Many
Indians ock annually to Swiss locations in which popular Bollywood lms were
shot to recreate and relive scenes from their favourite lms. ‘Most of the Swiss
sequences are dream scenes in which lovers dance or romp on Alpine meadows
strewn with owers or roll in the snow in unlikely imsy Indian garb on wintry
slopes’ (Tagliabue 2010).
Veteran Bollywood director Mr. Yash Chopra, noted as one of the greatest lm-
makers in the history of Indian cinema, singlehandedly boosted tourism in Swit-
zerland by regularly featuring the country’s lakes, misty valleys, and snow-capped
mountains as the backdrop for his song and dance sequences during his career
spanning 53 years (Dubey 2008). So grateful was the Swiss Tourism Authority that
they named a lake after him. The director also played a part in promoting Britain
as a glamorous destination. His classic lm Lamhe (1991) was shot in London and
the Lake District. When he produced Mujhse Dosti Karoge a decade later, Chopra
again returned to England’s Lake District to lm aboard one of the steamers which
ply between Glen Ridding and Pooley Bridge, reveling in the twisting lake, rolling
hills, and winding roads of the national park (Quereshi 2012).
Some of the biggest blockbusters of Bollywood that were shot in Western
Europe and impacted Indian Bollywood viewers are An Evening in Paris (France
and Switzerland), Chandani, Lamhe, Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge (UK, mainly
Switzerland), Bachna Ae Haseno (Italy and Switzerland), Taal (Britain), Kabhi
Khushi Kabhi Gham (UK), Tal (UK), Namastey London (UK), Cheeni Kum
(UK), and Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara (Spain). Many articles in the popular press
have reported that Indian audiences and even non-Indian audiences who watch
Bollywood movies on a regular basis visit the destinations shown in the movies
(Tagliabue 2010; Munshi 2012; Lovgren 2004; Padmanabhan 2010).
To capitalise on this lm-induced tourism, destination marketers must crea-
tively advertise to these Bollywood viewers. An example of this type of creative
marketing occurred in England when the Britain’s Tourism Authority created a
‘Bollywood map’ (Bollywood movies shot in Britain) depicting the most visited
destinations by Indian tourists in Britain (‘Bollywood gives a boost’ 2008), pulling
Indians directly to locations shown in Bollywood lms.
Another major attraction and integral part of Bollywood movies are the elab-
orate song sequences. Almost every Bollywood movie has song sequences and
dance numbers contributing to its earnings/prot and these elaborate numbers are
often a major deciding factor in determining whether the movie will be a hit or a
op. Often, movie songs are shot at a scenic destination outside India, even though
the rest of the movie is lmed within India. This creates an exotic appeal within
the movies and plays a major role in attracting viewers. Movie soundtracks, music
videos, and even remixed versions of songs of the Bollywood movies released
in India and abroad are major pull factors to attract viewers to the theatre
( Padmanabhan 2010).
230 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
Top tourist destinations in Europe
With over 81 million visitors worldwide in 2011, France ranks highest in tour-
ist arrivals among all European destinations. Besides France, among the top ve
European countries with most tourist arrivals are Spain, Italy, Turkey, and the UK.
Germany, ranked at #6 in tourist arrivals, had just over 28 million inbound visi-
tors in 2011. Interestingly, Switzerland ranks at #16 among European countries in
terms of tourist arrivals, with a 2011 total of 8.3 million worldwide visitors (Market
Research Division, Ministry of Tourism 2011).
When looking at outbound travel, Indian tourists show dierent travel prefer-
ences to Europe. In 2010, outbound Indian tourists totalled just fewer than 14 mil-
lion, a 7.7% increase from the previous year (Market Research Division, Ministry
of Tourism 2011). The most popular European countries for outbound travel from
India vary from those of the rest of the world. Not surprisingly, the UK is listed
as one of the top destinations for Indian tourist. This preference for travel to the
UK by Indians is likely because India and the UK have linkages dating back to the
1800s, with England as colonial master until 1947. Furthermore, there are millions
of Indian immigrants living in the UK. Additionally, the UK is also prominently
featured in many Bollywood lms. These factors each amplify the levels of expo-
sure most Indians have to the UK. Even though there are strong perceived ties
between the UK and India, France attracts 50% more Indian tourists than UK (Alli-
ance, T 2012), giving it top rank among most travelled to countries by outbound
Indian tourists.
Though listed at #16 among worldwide rankings, Switzerland ranks as a top ve
destination for Indian tourists, with over 135,000 outbound travellers during 2009,
nishing just behind Italy among outbound Indian travellers (Market Research
Division, Ministry of Tourism 2011). Spain, also a current top ve global desti-
nation, reported 52 million international visitors in 2009, but a surprisingly low
number of only 12,800 were from India. However, numbers increased dramatically
after the 2011 release of the Bollywood blockbuster Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara.
The number of reported Indian tourists in Spain in 2011 topped 115,000, increasing
the arrivals from India by nearly 1000% (Munshi 2012).
Need for the study
The literature review has shown a number of convergent trends that contribute
to increasing tourism to Europe from India. However, this phenomenon has not
been addressed in the tourism literature. Furthermore, while there have been many
articles of the impact of movies on international travel and tourism, no study has
addressed the impact that Bollywood movies may have on outbound Indian travel-
lers to Europe. Furthermore, no study has attempted to link a genre of movies (such
as Bollywood) – and their impact on the image of multiple countries. These gaps
in the literature on lm-induced tourism need to be addressed. The purpose of this
chapter, thus, is to investigate the proles of Indian lm viewers and their percep-
tions of major European destinations through the images of Bollywood cinema.
‘Namastey London’ 231
Methodology
The population of this study consisted of Indians 18 years old or older. A total
of 670 respondents participated in this study. A survey questionnaire was con-
structed on the basis of previous studies on movie-induced tourism, destination
image, and tourist consumption activity. Using a convenience sampling method,
students in a post graduate marketing class, under the supervision of one of
the co-authors, were employed to collect data. Students approached potential
respondents at malls and metro stations in the national capital of India, New
Delhi. Respondents were screened for their ability to complete a survey in the
English language and by age.
The questionnaires included sections about movie preferences, levels of
involvement with foreign travel/tourism, destination choices based upon mov-
ies viewed, and perceptions of attractions and activities at the destination based
upon the inuence of Bollywood movies/TV. The instrument consisted of six
parts, all ranked on a 5-point Likert scale from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to ‘strongly
agree’ (5). The survey explored: (a) Indian Movie/TV preferences, (b) Sources
for travel ideas, (c) Movies/TV inuenced travel activity. Respondents also were
asked about their perceptions or images of countries in Europe and what they
oer for Indian tourists. Within this question, respondents were given ten Western
European countries and asked to choose from varied perceptions such as great
fun, great shopping, relaxing, and cultural and historic sites, among others. In
the last three sections of the questionnaire, respondents were asked to (d) rate
their level of involvement in international travel and tourism; (e) recall up to
three Indian movies/TV programmes as well as the places that have inspired their
choice of a travel destination abroad (outside of India); (f) complete questions
regarding personal demographics, which would be used to determine the general
characteristics of the sample. Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of
the survey results.
Findings
Objective 1: Demographic characteristics
The survey was successfully completed by 670 respondents. Table 13.1 illustrates
demographics of the sample. Results show that 59% of respondents were male.
The largest age cohort included respondents aged 22 to 29 years (58.1%). Most
respondents were married (57.2%) and spoke Hindi, the national language of India
(68.7%). The majority of respondents were employed full time (58.2%), though
nearly a quarter indicated that they were students who were unemployed (24.0%).
Furthermore, over 80% of respondents had a bachelor’s degree or higher. More
than half (55%) of respondents had monthly household incomes between U.S.
$1,000 and U.S. $ 2,000. Table 13.1 also shows that almost half of the respondents
have previously travelled outside India (48.5%). The sample demographics reect
the urban, English-speaking, upper middle class of the Indian population who have
the means and ability to travel to international destinations.
232 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
Objective 2: To determine Indian’s engagement with Bollywood movies
Results indicate that Indians are highly engaged with Bollywood movies
(Table 13.2). Over half of respondents (51.5%) seek information and gossip about
new Indian movies before their release, and 39.1% of respondents indicate they
watch movies in the theatre as soon as they are released. In addition, respondents
Table 13.1 Demographic prole of respondents.
N (670) %
Gender
Female 275 41.0
Male 395 59.0
Age
Under 21 years old 75 11.2
22–29 years old 389 58.1
30–39 years old 130 19.4
40–49 years old 50 7.5
50–60 years old 26 3.9
Marital status
Married 383 57.2
Single 286 42.6
Mother Tongue
Hindi 460 68.7
Punjabi 68 10.1
Bengali 42 6.3
Other 100 14.9
Employment status
Not Employed (Student) 161 24.0
Not Employed (Non-Student) 55 8.2
Employed Part-Time 64 9.6
Employed Full-Time 390 58.2
Monthly household income
Less than U.S. $1,000 175 26.1
U.S. $ 1,000 to U.S. $2,000 372 55.5
More than U.S. $1,000 123 18.4
Highest level of education
High school or lower 21 3.1
Some college 88 13.1
Bachelor’s degree 323 48.2
Graduate degree 228 34.0
Have travelled to
Asia 71 10.6
South East Asia 25 3.7
Middle East 36 5.4
Africa 41 6.1
Australia/New Zealand 22 3.3
Europe 58 8.7
North America 22 3.3
South America 13 1.9
Travelled to multiple continents 37 5.5
I have not travelled outside India 345 51.5
Source: Own elaboration.
‘Namastey London’ 233
were asked the number of Indian movies they watch per week in movie theatres, on
TV, and on the internet. Nearly half (48.1%) of respondents watched Indian movies
on TV three or more times per week, and 25.1% indicated that they watched three
or more lms weekly in movie theatres.
Objective 3: To explore the relationships between perceived images of
European countries and their portrayal in Bollywood movies/TV
To explore the relationship between Bollywood movie watching behaviour and
international travel and tourism, respondents were asked to recall names of three
movies that have inspired their choice of travel destination abroad. As illustrated
in Table 13.3, almost a third (30.7%) of respondents said that Zindagi Na Milegi
Dobara was one movie motivating them to travel to Europe. Multiple survey
respondents indicated that this Bollywood lm specically inuenced travel plans.
One respondent stated ‘[Bollywood lms are a] great inuence! Specically from
Indian movies, one of my friends had gone to Europe and planned another trip for
Spain just after watching Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara’. Another respondent states
‘one of my friends went to Europe after watching Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara’
and a third said ‘my family has been to places seen in the movies. My father has
Table 13.2 Enthusiasm and engagement with Bollywood movies.
N (670) %
Movie Viewing Preference
Seek information/gossip about new movies before release 345 51.5
Movie ‘Bu’ or ‘Super-fan’ 194 29.9
I watch movies on the rst day of release in theatres 193 28.8
I watch movies as soon as they are released in theatres 264 39.1
Weekly Consumption Behaviours:
Watched 3 or more movies in Movie Theatres 168 25.1
Watched 3 or more movies on TV 322 48.1
Watched 3 or more movies on the Internet 171 25.6
Source: Own elaboration.
Table 13.3 Top Bollywood movies inducing travel to Europe.
Name of Indian movie Filming location N (670) %
Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara Spain 206 30.7
Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge Switzerland, UK 182 27.2
Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam Italy 102 15.2
Namastey London UK 101 15.1
Don2 Germany, Switzerland 79 11.8
Bachna Ae Haseeno Italy, Switzerland 75 11.2
Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham UK 48 7.2
Rockstar Czech Republic 46 6.9
Source: Own elaboration.
234 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
been to Europe and brother plans to go to Spain’. Table 13.4 shows that 45.7% of
respondents wanted to travel to the UK after they watched movies, while 40.9% of
respondents were motivated by Bollywood movies to travel to Switzerland.
Objective 4: To determine perceived images of European countries as
destinations, and the attractions and activities they present to tourists
One of the main objectives of this study was to determine respondents’ perceptions
of European destinations; researchers wanted to understand what image comes to
the respondent’s mind when they think of a particular country. Respondents were
presented with a list of ten Western European countries and a list of attributes for
each of these countries. To facilitate concise presentation, this discussion catego-
rises the ten countries into two groups the ve most popular and the ve least
popular among Indians (Tables 13.5 and 13.6).
It is intriguing to note that the UK was perceived to be the best place for shop-
ping followed by France and Italy. Over 60% of respondents perceived UK to be
their favourite shopping destination.
Over 69% of respondents said that they perceived Switzerland to be a romantic
destination. Just over 40% perceive France and Italy as romantic destinations. It
is noteworthy that Switzerland has nearly twice as many references as a romantic
destination as its nearest competitor further suggesting that Switzerland has been
romanticised in Bollywood lms.
Table 13.4 Top European countries Indians want to visit
induced by Bollywood movies.
Country N (670) %
UK 306 45.7
Switzerland 274 40.9
Italy 256 38.2
Spain 164 24.5
France 107 16.0
Germany 65 9.7
Source: Own elaboration.
Table 13.5 Top ve European countries and their destination attributes as seen by Indians.
Good
shopping
Romantic Good
recreation Relaxing
Nature/
scenery
Cultural
sites
Great
fun
Things
to see
Switz.192 422 213 150 361 103 219 202
UK 356 223 178 161 200 226 224 271
Italy 202 260 147 141 194 202 184 118
Spain 143 192 229 144 223 163 191 173
France 211 253 151 171 189 140 138 107
Source: Own elaboration.
‘Namastey London’ 235
Additionally, more than 69% of respondents said that they perceived Switzer-
land to be the best location for scenery, followed by Spain (35.8%) and the UK
(32%). Switzerland was referenced by twice as many Indians for its scenery, prob-
ably, because hundreds of Bollywood lms have been shot there.
About a third of respondents indicated Spain and Switzerland as destinations
with good recreation. Similarly, these countries are perceived by approximately
30% of respondents as ‘great fun’. Often, recreational activities at these destina-
tions are featured in Bollywood movies. For example, the scuba diving, sky diving,
and Running With the Bulls in Spain are featured in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara,
likely enhancing Indian’s perception of Spain as ‘great fun’ and a destination with
good recreation.
Again, the UK, Switzerland, and Spain all rank highest in the ‘things to see’
category, with many Indian’s indicating that each country has plenty of things to do
and see (25–40%). This study also found that over 35% of respondents perceived
Greece, Italy, and the UK as excellent cultural sites.
Overall, it is seen that countries in the Top 5 list in unaided recall are cited most
often and in multiple categories (Figure 13.1). They are perceived to be destina-
tions that oer a rich and varied palate of places to see and activities to do. Further-
more, as seen in Figure 13.2, they also have a very low ranking in the category of
‘no image’. The strength of the perceived image of the UK, Spain, and Switzerland
is likely due to the prevalence of these top three attribute-rich locations as back-
drops for many Bollywood lms. Because exposure to these settings is high in Bol-
lywood lms, Indian viewers can formulate stronger opinions of their perceptions
of these countries.
Summary and implications
The ndings of this study are consistent with the literature. Hudson and Ritchie
(2006a, 2006b) have pointed out that some lms are more successful than others
in inducing tourism. They have also identied some critical factors that contribute
to destination promotion. If the story line and the site are inter-linked, the audience
is more likely to be emotionally involved with the lm (Tooke and Baker 1996).
Table 13.6 Bottom ve European countries and their destination attributes as seen by
Indians.
Good
shopping
Romantic Good
recreation
Relaxing Nature/
scenery
Cultural
sites
Great
fun
Things
to see
Germany 126 141 162 133 153 164 154 104
Austria 143 187 170 154 167 53 90 76
Greece 92 145 101 106 162 219 82 80
Netherlands 82 111 113 107 135 82 78 64
Portugal 64 81 97 89 103 163 83 86
Source: Own elaboration.
236 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
Figure 13.1 Total attributes cited by country.
Source: Own elaboration
Figure 13.2 Countries cited for ‘no image’.
Source: Own elaboration
‘Namastey London’ 237
The box-oce success of a lm can be a good predictor of movie-induced tourism
(Grihault 2003). It seems that the popularity of Spain with Bollywood movie fans
as a result of a single recent blockbuster hit (Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara) supports
both of these contentions. Filmed primarily in Spain, the lm played as a full length
advertisement for Spanish Tourism, featuring the Bollywood actors participating
in the La Tomatina Festival and the Running of the Bulls in Pamplona. Though not
nancing the lm, the Spanish tourism board contributed location support and an
additional $660,000 in subsidies (Munshi 2012). Since the release of the lm in
the Indian market, Spain witnessed a marked increase in Indian tourist, increas-
ing numbers by 65% from 2011 to 2012 (Munshi 2012). Subsequently, the movie
boosted Spanish tourism directly from India by more than 30%, especially in loca-
tions shown in the lm (Harjani 2011).
Repeating exposure to the destination would lead to a higher level of engage-
ment, familiarity, attachment, and identication. The popularity of Switzerland,
UK, and France with Bollywood audiences is not surprising, given the number
of movies that have showcased these countries over the decades, starting with
the 1960s. Furthermore, many of these Bollywood movies were blockbuster hits
in India.
Alarmingly, 35% of respondents said that they had ‘no image’ of Portugal or the
Netherlands as tourism destinations (Figure 13.2). Though the scenery in Portugal
is similar to its neighbouring country of Spain, this eect is likely because no major
blockbuster Bollywood hit has been lmed to date in Portugal. Similarly, no major
Bollywood blockbuster has been lmed in the Netherlands to date, thus the image
of the country has not been portrayed to most Indian Bollywood viewers.
Interestingly, Portugal has seemed to take a cue from the success of its neigh-
bouring country. PicturePortugal signed an agreement with a Mumbai company for
the production of Indian lms in Portugal in the hopes of spurring tourism growth
of Indians to Portugal (New Protocol with Bollywood 2012), a country of which
most Indians currently have little to no perceived image. Indian visitor numbers
are low, at around 13,000 annually (Dev 2012). Depending on the success of future
Bollywood movies lmed in Portugal, future research can compare and contrast
Indian perceptions from the current study with the future.
Though featured in past Bollywood lms, countries such as Greece, Austria, and
the Netherlands have yet to be featured within a successful Bollywood blockbuster,
or have failed to be identied as the correct country. For example, Silsila, directed
by the famous Yash Chopra, was not a box oce success but has since risen to cult
status among Bollywood viewers (Jha 2011). Filmed partially in the Netherlands,
the scenes of the Keukenhof Tulip Gardens are intertwined with mountains covered
in snow with the main characters running about, potentially confusing the audience
with images similar to those shot in Switzerland. Likely due to the confusion of
country identity, the Netherlands has a high prevalence of Indian Bollywood view-
ers who rated it as ‘no opinion/image’. Similarly, multiple Bollywood lms have
featured Grecian backdrops, including Chalte Chalte, Tashan, and Wanted, though
only one was commercially successful – Wanted reached blockbuster status as the
238 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
highest grossing lm in Bollywood in 2009. It is likely that the limited exposure of
Greece in lms has contributed to the lack of image among Indian viewers.
Looking at the graph of ‘no image’ countries (Figure 13.2), it is evident that
those countries with little to no blockbuster Bollywood movie exposure were
noted as ‘no image/opinion’ more often than those frequently featured in Bolly-
wood lms, or in major Bollywood blockbusters. Taken together, the two graphs
(Figures 13.1 and 13.2) seem to be an inverse of each other, with countries that
appear high on one list, falling low on the other.
Conclusions
This study makes a strong and unique contribution to the literature on movie-
induced tourism. First, Bollywood movies, as a major global movie genre, have
not been addressed in the literature. Second, few studies have examined the impact
of outbound tourism from India as major trend in global tourism. Third, no studies
have linked multiple movies to tourist perceptions of multiple attributes of destina-
tions in multiple countries. The current study is the rst one to address these three
major gaps in the literature.
The ndings of this study suggest that perceived destination image of European
countries is strongly inuenced by Bollywood lms among a large segment of the
Indian population. As noted earlier, through immersion in Bollywood lms, Indian
moviegoers go from the Awareness stage directly to the Trial stage, skipping the
Interest and the Evaluation stages of the AITEA process (Rogers 1962). View-
ers vicariously experience an alternate fantasy world set in Switzerland or France
within Bollywood lms (Nayar 1997). Thus, many viewers become immersed in a
fantasy lm world and use the portrayal of the country on lm as a representation of
what that country oers in reality. This is consistent with the assertion by Macionis
and Sparks (2009) that the two primary motivators for travelling to screened loca-
tions are novelty and fantasy. Indeed, J. Tagliabue (2010) has discussed how many
Indian tourists in Switzerland re-enact scenes from Bollywood movies while tour-
ing the Swiss Alps, literally acting out their fantasies.
This strong level of inuence has a signicant impact on the marketing of tour-
ism destinations through lm. As Bollywood lms seem to have such a signicant
inuence on perceived image and travel intentions of Indian viewers, it is critical
for destination marketers to concern themselves with Bollywood lms in order to
tap into the emerging market of auent Indian tourists.
Limitations and future studies
Though a large sample was obtained, this study utilised a convenience sample
to gather data. Thus, the ndings of this study may not be generalisable to the
entire Indian population. Future studies should utilise a random sampling proce-
dure to gather a sample more representative of the entire population. Additionally,
no verication procedures were utilised to check activity or purchase behaviour;
the survey simply asked respondents to specify personal behaviour, which could
‘Namastey London’ 239
have been exaggerated, understated, or incorrectly recorded. Adding more specic
questions in future data collection could aid in the verication of the inuences of
media on travel intentions and image perceptions.
Future studies could use a longitudinal design to look at how perceptions of
destination image vary over the years as more and more Bollywood movies are
lmed abroad. Additionally, the study design can be adapted for use in other Asian
countries to see how Bollywood lms inuence the destination perceptions of other
Asian populations and compare the eects to the results identied in this research.
Furthermore, the scope of the study can be expanded to analyse the perception of
worldwide destinations featured in Bollywood movies, including the United States,
Malaysia, Australia, and New Zealand.
As increasing numbers of Indians travel worldwide, future studies can examine
if Bollywood movies play a lesser or greater role in motivating Indians to travel
to specic destinations. As movie producers shift location shooting to Spain, Por-
tugal, and other countries, the country rankings found in this study will certainly
change. For example, the impact of one movie as a motivation to visit Spain is
likely to fade over time. Future studies can examine these issues.
Note
1 This chapter was originally published as Josiam, Bharath M., Spears, Daniel, Dutta, Kirti,
Pookulangara, Sanjukta A., and Kinley, Tammy L. (2014) “Namastey London”: Bolly-
wood Movies and Their Impact on how Indians Perceive European Destinations, Hospi-
tality Review: Vol. 31: Iss. 4, Article 2.
References
5MetaCom, 2006. How the adoption model aects your sales and marketing eort. Available
from: www.5metacom.com/documents/marketing_elements/marketing_elements-
adoption_model.pdf (access date 01.04.2013).
Alliance, T., 2012. UK Tourism Statistics 2013. Tourism Alliance.
Bandyopadhyay, R., 2008. Nostalgia, identity and tourism: Bollywood in the Indian dias-
pora. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 6 (2), 79–100.
Beeton, S., 2006. Understanding lm-induced tourism. Tourism Analysis, 11, 181–188.
Beverley, S. and Niki, M., 2009. Film-induced tourism: An incidental experience. Tourism
Review International, 13, 93–101.
Bollywood gives a boost to tourism in Britain, 2008. The Financial Express, 02.05.2008.
Available from: www.nancialexpress.com/news/bollywood-gives-a-boost-to-tourism-in-
britain/304253/ (access date 22.03.2010).
Butler, R. W., 2011. It’s only make believe: The implications of ctional and authentic
locations in lms. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 3 (2), 91–101.
Connell, J., 2005. Toddlers, tourism and Tobermory: Destination marketing issues and
television-induced tourism. Tourism Management, 26 (5), 763–776.
Crouch, D., 2007. The media and the tourist imagination. Culture, Tourism and the Media,
Proceedings of the 5th DeHaan Tourism Management Conference. Available from: www.
docstoc.com/docs/21705520/wwww (access date 19.05.2013).
240 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
Croy, W. G., 2004. The Lord of the Rings, New Zealand, and tourism: Image building with
lm. Department of Management Working Paper 10/04, Monash University, Melbourne,
https://doi.org/10.4225/03/5935fd34eb884.
Desai, R., 2005. Copyright infringement in the Indian lm industry. Vanderbilt Journal of
Entertainment Law & Practice, Spring, 7 (2), 259–278.
Dev, M., 2012. Turismo de Portugal expects to double visitor arrivals from India. Express
TravelWorld. Available from: http://travel.nancialexpress.com/sections/market-section/
979-turismo-de-portugal-expects-to-double-visitor-arrivals-from-india (access date
28.03.2013).
Dubey, B., 2008. Bollywood, pied-piper for tourists. Times of India, 18.10.2008. Avail-
able from: http://timesondia.indiatimes.com/india/Bollywood-pied-piper-for-tourists/
articleshow/5135167.cms (access date 03.03.2010).
Frost, W., 2006. Braveheart-ed Ned Kelly: Historic lms, heritage tourism and destination
image. Tourism Management, 27 (2), 247–254.
Frost, W., 2010. Life changing experiences: Film and tourists in the Australian outback.
Annals of Tourism Research, 37 (3), 707–726.
Global Tourism Industry News, 2008. Bollywood drives Indian tourists to Swiss Alps.
Travel News Group. Available from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/
services/travel/bollywood-drives-indian-tourists-to-swiss-alps/articleshow/3330474.cms
(access date 07.07.2023).
Grihault, N., 2003. Film tourism – the global picture. Travel & Tourism Analyst, 5, 1–22.
Han, H. and Lee, J., 2008. A study on the KBS TV drama winter sonata and its impact on
Korea’s Hallyu tourism development. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 24, 115–126.
Harjani, P., 2011. India’s tourists ock to Spain. CNN.com, 19.09.2011. Available from:
www.cnngo.com/mumbai/life/indian-movie-boosts-spanish-tourism-694426 (access date
26.09.2012).
Hudson, S. and Ritchie, B., 2006a. Promoting destinations via lm tourism: An empiri-
cal identication of supporting marketing initiatives. Journal of Travel Research, 44 (4),
387–396.
Hudson, S. and Ritchie, B., 2006b. Film tourism and destination marketing: The case of
Captain Corelli’s Mandolin. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12 (3), 256–268.
Hudson, S., Wang, Y. and Gil, S. M., 2011. The inuence of a lm on destination image
and the desire to travel: A cross‐cultural comparison. International Journal of Tourism
Research, 13 (2), 177–190.
Im, H. H. and Chon, K., 2008. An exploratory study of movie‐induced tourism: A case of
the movie the sound of music and its locations in Salzburg, Austria. Journal of Travel &
Tourism Marketing, 24 (2–3), 229–238.
Iso-Ahola, S. E., 1983. Towards a social psychology of recreational travel. Leisure Studies,
2 (1), 45–56.
Iwashita, C., 2008. Roles of lms and television dramas in international tourism: The
case of Japanese tourists to the UK. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 24 (2–3),
139–151.
Kaur, R., 2002. Viewing the West through Bollywood: A celluloid occident in the making.
Contemporary South Asia, 11 (2), 199–209.
Kim, H. and Richardson, S., 2003. Motion picture impacts on destination images. Annals of
Tourism Research, 30, 216–237.
Kim, S., Long, P. and Robinson, M., 2009. Small screen, big tourism: The role of popu-
lar Korean television dramas in South Korean tourism. Tourism Geographies, 11 (3),
308–333.
‘Namastey London’ 241
Kim, S. and O’Connor, N., 2011. A cross-cultural study of screen-tourists’ proles. World-
wide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 3 (2), 141–158.
Kotler, P., Bowen, J. T. and Makens, J. C., 2010. Marketing for hospitality and tourism, 5th
Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Law, L., Bunnell, T. and Ong, C. E., 2007. The beach, the gaze and lm tourism. Tourist
Studies, 7 (2), 141–164.
Lin, Y. and Huang, J., 2008. Analyzing the use of TV miniseries for Korea tourism market-
ing. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 24 (2–3), 223–227.
Lorenzen, M. and Täube, F. A., 2008. Breakout from Bollywood? The roles of social
networks and regulation in the evolution of Indian lm industry. Journal of International
Management, 14, 286–299.
Lovgren, S., 2004. Bollywood: Indian lms splice Bombay, Hollywood. National Geographic
News. Available from: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/01/0121_040121_
bollywoodlms.html (access date 22.03.2010).
Macionis, N. and Sparks, B., 2009. Film-induced tourism: An incidental experience. Tour-
ism Review International, 13 (2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427209789604598.
Mannell, R. C. and Iso-Ahola, S. E., 1987. Psychological nature of leisure and tourism expe-
rience. Annals of Tourism Research, 14 (3), 314–331.
Market Research Division, Ministry of Tourism, 2011. India tourism statistics 2010. Minis-
try of Tourism, Government of India. Available from: http://tourism.nic.in/writereaddata/
CMSPagePicture/le/Primary%20Content/MR/pub-OR-statistics/2011statisticsenglish.
pdf (access date 19.04.2012).
Miglani, S., 2006. Sangam revisited. The Sunday Tribune – Spectrum.
Minocha, S. and Stonehouse, G., 2006. The ‘learning trap’: A Bollywood frame from strate-
gic learning. Management Decision, 44 (10), 1344–1362.
Munshi, N., 2012. Spain’s starring role in Bollywood movie a boon to tourism. Available from:
http://adage.com/article/global-news/spain-s-starring-role-bollywood-movie-a-boon-
tourism/232511/ (access date 11.02.2013).
Nayar, S. J., 1997. The values of fantasy: Indian popular cinema through Western scripts.
The Journal of Popular Culture, 31, 73–90.
New Protocol with Bollywood, 2012. Available from: www.pictureportugal.com/article/
new-protocol-bollywood (access date 28.03.2013).
O’Connor, N., 2011. A conceptual examination of the lm-induced tourism phenomenon in
Ireland. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 2 (3), 105–125.
O’Connor, N., Flanagan, S. and Gilbert, D., 2008. The integration of lm-induced tourism
and destination branding in Yorkshire, UK. International Journal of Tourism Research,
10, 423–437.
Padmanabhan, G., 2010. Jive to the beat. The Hindu, 08.03.2010. Available from: www.
thehindu.com/features/metroplus/Jive-to-the-beat/article16544893.ece?homepage=true
(access date 29.03.2010).
Qureshi, I., 2012. Bollywood in Britain-The Legacy of Yash Chopra. The Guardian, 23.
Rempel, S., 2007. Now it’s the Indian dream; middle class drives economy expected by IMF
to surpass the U.S. by 2050. The Toronto Star.
Rogers, E. M., 1962. Diusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
Shah, G. R., 2012. The man who sparked Bollywood’s love of foreign locales. The New York
Times Global Edition: India. Available from: http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/
the-man-who-sparked-bollywoods-love-of-exotic-locales/ (access date 18.05.2013).
Shani, A., 2009. Impacts of a historical lm on the destination image of South America.
Journal of Vacation Marketing, 15 (3), 229–242.
242 Bharath M. Josiam et al.
Singh, K. and Best, G., 2004. Film-induced tourism: Motivations of visitors to the Hobbiton
movies set as featured in the lord of the rings. In: W. Frost, G. Croy and S. Beeton, eds.,
International tourism and media conference proceedings. Melbourne: Tourism Research
Unit, Monash University, 98–111, 24–26.11.2004.
Soliman, D. M., 2011. Exploring the role of lm in promoting domestic tourism: A case
study of Al Fayoum, Egypt. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 17 (3), 225–235.
Suni, J. and Komppula, R., 2012. SF-lmvillage as a movie tourism destination – a case
study of movie tourist push motivations. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29 (5),
460–471.
Tagliabue, J., 2010. A beloved Bollywood extra draws Indians. The New York Times,
11.07.2010. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/world/europe/12swiss.
html?_r=0.
Tooke, N. and Baker, M., 1996. Seeing is believing: The eect of lm on visitor numbers to
screened locations, Tourism Management, 17 (2), 87–94.
Tsiotsou, R. and Ratten, V., 2010. Future research directions in tourism marketing. Market-
ing Intelligence & Planning, 28 (4), 533–544.
VisitBritain, 2006. Tourism insights: Info. Available from: http://tourisminsights.info/
ONLINEPUB/VISITBRITAIN/VISITBRITAIN.htm (access date 02.03.2010).
Young, A. and Young, R., 2008. Measuring the eects of lm and television on tourism to
screen locations: A theoretical and empirical perspective. Journal of Travel and Tourism
Marketing, 24 (2–3), 195–212.
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-18
Part V
Conclusions
Figure 5 Warsaw, with its iconic Palace of Culture and Science, is a symbol of a modern and
rapidly developing city. Warsaw’s downtown has been the setting for many Polish
and international lms, including the Indian action lm Kick (2014).
Source: Wojciech Zieliński / stock.adobe.com
DOI: 10.4324/9781003293347-19
This chapter has been made available under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Setting the scene
When the idea of this edited book rst emerged in late 2020, the mobility of
people and products, including work in the creative industry sector, came to a still.
Suddenly, studying the phenomenon of Indian–European connections through lm
production as part of the international research project FilmInd (The Indian lm
industry as a driver of new socio-economic connections between India and Europe)
became more complex than rst anticipated. Some of our research plans, includ-
ing participatory observation and unstructured interviews with an Indian lm crew
working in a European setting, became impossible to realise. International travel
came to a halt, and so did maintaining and building new connections between
Indian creative industries and European destinations. Today, three years later, the
world seems to be catching up with lost time and opportunities although not all
travel has resumed: “lockdowns” and restricted international travel continue, for
example, in China or Japan. To what extent the restrictions have transformed the
relationships between the creative industries, tourism and travel is yet to be seen.
Could lming in European locations be less appealing in the post-COVID world?
The globalisation of the lm industry in India is no longer a new phenomenon
(Mazumdar 2011), yet it has taken a new turn with the signicant upsurge of regional
and national lm commissions. After international travel resumed, in October 2022,
the India International Film Tourism Conclave (IIFTC) took place in Mumbai again,
attracting various global destinations ready to woo Indian producers (Everything
Experiential 2022). Indian–European collaboration seems to be renewed. Although
our edited volume analyses predominantly the Indian–European connections in the
lm industries prior COVID-19, the collectively gathered lessons learnt from the
pre-crisis period provide a useful input for the processes of redevelopment and rees-
tablishment of cooperation between Indian and European lmmakers.
Film and Place in an Intercultural Perspective lls an important gap in schol-
arship by exploring lmmaking in Europe by Indian producers. Our collection
addresses three themes that are of importance to the current state of research: a) the
representations of Europe on Indian screens: the diversity of the landscapes used
and meanings they attempt to convey; b) push and pull factors, including various
organisational arrangements and institutional mechanisms that play a key role in
14 Conclusions
Film as a driver of new socio-economic
connections between India and Europe
Hania Janta, Krzysztof Stachowiak,
Jani Kozina, and Therese Sunngren-Granlund
246 Hania Janta et al.
attracting Indian lm producers to specic European destinations; and c) social,
cultural, environmental and economic impacts that Indian lmmaking in Europe
has on destinations in both (sub)continents.
This edited book provides the observations of Indian and European research-
ers who represent various disciplinary strands, methodologies, and approaches to
studying this emerging topic: the changing geography of lm production. Based on
the output of the project FilmInd (2019–2022) as well as three additional papers
(Chapter 6: Cucco and Scaglioni; Chapter 13: Josiam et al.; Chapter 12: Jain and
Raina), this collection seeks to advance this topic further by addressing the com-
plexities of the changing geography of lm production. These processes and con-
sequences can be researched from dierent angles and this book oers a collection
of various perspectives and ways of looking at the phenomenon.
The chapters of this edited collection oer various methodological approaches,
such as in-depth interviews, surveys, textual analysis, ethnographic research, or cin-
ematic analysis. The book examines various territorial contexts, such as “dreamy”
Switzerland (Janta and Herzog this volume), “exciting” Italy (Cucco and Scaglioni
this volume), “modern” UK (Jain and Raina this volume), as well as newly emerging
destinations in much less studied Central and Eastern European and Nordic contexts:
“historic” Poland (Balcerak et al. this volume) and “diverse” Slovenia (Kozina and
Jelnikar this volume) as well as “snowy” Finland (Sunngren-Granlund this volume).
This way, the book brings new evidence on Indian lmmaking from dierent corners
of the European territory, stretching from east to west and south to north.
The collection also provides fascinating insights into cinematic aspects of vari-
ous old and new lms, which take us on a trip to the UK (Purab Aur Pachhim
1970), Switzerland (Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, The Big-Hearted Will Take the
Bride 1995), Spain (Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara 2011), or Austria (Tiger Zinda Hai
(Ali Abbas Zafar 2017). As noted by Jhingan (this volume), the changing style of
song sequences in recent lms highlights the diverse soundscapes of European
locations. Not only has the perception of these places changed radically but the
places themselves have also been transformed by the lms (Josiam et al. this vol-
ume, Janta and Herzog this volume).
How to research the nexus of lm and place?
The authors published in this collection represent dierent disciplines and exam-
ine this multifaceted phenomenon through dierent theoretical and methodological
perspectives. Sometimes this means taking advantage of theories and tools through
a number of disciplines: geography, cultural studies, media studies, or management.
In other cases, it means providing a singular perspective from which a phenome-
non is studied. Film studies scholars examine cinematic aspects of using European
locations in selected lms, which includes the lm’s storyline and/or sound, in rela-
tion to the specic locations used, sometimes supporting the insights with quali-
tative data. On the other hand, geographers are interested in studying place and
space, representation, and the meanings of spaces featured in lms. Management
researchers focus on various impacts deriving from lming in foreign locations,
in destination branding and regional development. Increased tourism, its planning
Conclusions 247
and promotion, and the management of sometimes undesired consequences of lm/
screen tourism ows are important themes for tourism researchers. Film policy is
investigated by media studies experts. Other key aspects related to the changing
geography of lmmaking are infrastructure, clusters, and knowledge transfer
topics that are sometimes studied by both geographers and management research-
ers. Film and Place in an Intercultural Perspective highlights these various
perspectives, providing insights into novel cases of globalisation of lm production
and the signicance of Europe for Indian lmmaking. Researching this topic from
dierent perspectives through various research methods has the potential to provide
a fuller, more insightful and data-rich portrayal of the contemporary geography of
lm production. Finally, an important contribution of the collection lies in its bal-
anced views: the book oers the voices of Indian as well as European researchers.
What is next? Future studies
As shown in Chapter 2 (Stachowiak this volume), lm has a complex and multi-
faceted relationship with place. On the one hand, a lm’s setting can be a central
element of its narrative, helping to dene the characters and their motivations, as
well as providing a backdrop against which the story unfolds. For example, a lm
set in a small town might examine the themes of community and isolation, while
a lm set in a bustling metropolis might explore themes of anonymity and urban
alienation. At the same time, the lm can also be used to examine and represent the
culture and history of a particular place. Filmmakers often draw upon the unique
qualities of a location to evoke a sense of authenticity and realism in their stories
and can use the lm’s setting as a way to comment on social and political issues
relevant to that place. Furthermore, the lm can also have a transformative eect
on the places in which it is set. The attention and publicity generated by a lm can
help revitalise struggling neighbourhoods and bring tourism to previously over-
looked destinations. In some cases, the lm’s depiction of a place can even shape
the way it is perceived and remembered by both locals and outsiders. The complex
and dynamic relationship between lm and place is worth further investigation.
Whether used as a backdrop, a reection of culture and history, or a catalyst for
change, the connection between lm and place is an integral part of the cinematic
experience.
This book refers broadly to the eld of lm geography by attempting to take
a step forward in understanding the complex relationship between lm and place
and space by looking at it from an intercultural perspective. Contemporary lm
geography moves beyond the role of lm as a medium and attempts to deconstruct
complex lm-space relationships by drawing on humanistic approaches. As Lukin-
beal and Sommerlad (2022, p. S1) note in the introduction to the special issue of
GeoJournal devoted to lm geography:
nowadays, a critical perspective on lm is central, which no longer considers
the medium merely as a text, but rather as a social practice – a perspective
that continues to focus not solely on the meaning of representations, but on
what representations do and how they do it.
248 Hania Janta et al.
Further research could then consider lm not only as social practice but also as spa-
tial practice (Roberts 2020) in order to better understand the creative engagement
with place mobilised through dierent lmmaking practices.
Next, this book addressed the absence of scholarly work on the increase in
Indian lmmaking in European locations. Although the consequences of Indian
lmmaking in Europe has been researched, to some extent, as part of screen/lm
tourism (Frank 2016; Gyimóthy 2018; Nanjangud and Reijnders 2022; Josiam et
al. this volume), we noted while preparing this book some other important gaps
that oer future research opportunities. Through our studies, as well as in our Fil-
mInd project, we observed that collaboration remains limited between creative
industries and other sectors who are interested in the productions, such as lm
commissions, Tourism Destination Management Organisations, and other public
bodies. There are rare examples of collaborations between all the stakeholders
from the pre-production phase (Tobías 2017). Set in the Spanish backdrop, Zindagi
Na Milegi Dobara presents such one successful case and invites the spectator, a
tourist-to-be, to explore Spain by car, plane and on foot (see Mazumdar this vol-
ume). Such collaborations can lead to outstanding results in country-branding and
increased tourism numbers (see Josiam et al. this volume).
The tourism numbers are indeed mentioned by the producers who negotiate
with destinations – a topic that requires careful planning and management. How
to manage the unwanted consequences of lm tourism? How to make cinematic
destinations sustainable? These are some of the important questions to be asked
when making lms in foreign locales. In their study of Bollywood-inspired tourism
to Iceland, Nanjangud and Reijnders (2022) observe limited interest in the actual
destination, rather than following a cinematic experience: a search for loved char-
acters dominates the tourism trip. Touring fans in Switzerland, England and France
act out their fantasies, chasing the “romance” they know from the screen (Josiam
et al. this volume). Technology also plays a vital role in shaping the experiences:
the “check in” features on social media sites may be more important for the movie-
lovers than the actual historic Europe.
The topic of sustainability and addressing the Sustainable Development Goals
goes beyond lm tourism – it is becoming important in relation to the whole envi-
ronmental footprint of media production and distribution (Pabiś-Orzeszyna and
Keilbach 2021). As postulated by Pabiś-Orzeszyna and Keilbach (2021), engaging
in climate communication through lm can be one way of “greening” media. Hari-
haran (in this volume), contributes to this debate by examining the deployment of
animals for the Tiger Zinda Hai 2017 lm shot in Austria. In analysing the lm,
Hariharan points to the attempts to pursue an ethical approach through its lm
inscription “No Animals Were Harmed in the Making of This Film”. She further
scrutinises how Bollywood negotiates animal rights movements and debates on
animals.
Other questions that require more academic attention relate to the location set-
ting. Film production culture (Caldwell 2008; Balcerak et al. this volume) has
rarely been a focus of the investigation. While working conditions on the lm set
have been previously researched to some extent (Blair 2001), Mazumdar (2015)
highlights the lack of research on media workers who will continue to remain
Conclusions 249
hidden, reinforced systematically even by academic Scholarship(p. 27). Indeed,
research on “invisible workers” – lower-end workforce of the creative industries –
remains another neglected topic.
Will the increased competition between destinations change the landscape of
Indian lmmaking? To what extent do economic incentives play a role? Which col-
laborations will survive? From the comparative perspective, we can observe, on the
one hand, that some traditional and well-established destinations, such as Switzer-
land (Janta and Herzog this volume), have already exceeded their saturation index,
while on the other hand, new players from once neglected Central and Eastern
(Kozina and Jelnikar this volume; Balcerak et al. this volume) and Nordic contexts
(Sunngren-Granlund this volume) are gaining their momentum. This constellation
of ranges between territories calls for a deeper understanding of new challenges for
old markets and new opportunities for emerging markets.
Through our research we also noted some limited attempts (see Urbanc et al.
this volume) to examine Europe on Indian screens from a quantitative perspective.
Which destinations and landscapes specically are attractive? Does their appeal
change over time? Such questions can be answered using quantitative approaches.
The previous research has rarely put any analytical focus on the territorial back-
grounds portrayed in Indian lms, although they represent a key scene in most
of the song sequences. It is clear that the Indian producers search for new and
exotic places to be mobilised into their lmmaking. However, less is known about
what types of landscape patterns, landforms, and natural and cultural heritage are
favoured by Indian lm producers and audiences. Future studies should deepen our
understanding of the European place-specic characteristics and/or requirements
of Indian lmmakers. Such basic knowledge could then be more eectively trans-
lated into territorial branding, management, and tourism strategies.
Overall, this collection of papers expands our understanding of the globalisa-
tion of lm production, looking specically at Indian lmmaking in Europe. We
hope that this book opens a new route of interdisciplinary dialogue between those
interested in researching and practising this exciting phenomenon.
Acknowledgement
FilmInd project – The Indian lm industry as a driver of new socio-economic con-
nections was carried out within the EU-India Platform for Social Sciences and
Humanities (EqUIP) and nanced by national funding from the participating coun-
tries. The authors acknowledge receipt of funding from the Ministry of Education,
Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia and Slovenian Research Agency
(Research program P6-0101), Swiss National Science Foundation (Project No.
IZEQZ1_180340), Academy of Finland (69 037; 324796), Polish National Science
Centre (Project No. 2017/27/Z/HS4/00039).
References
Blair, H., 2001. ‘You’re only as good as your last job’: The labour process and labour market
in the British lm industry. Work, Employment and Society, 15 (1), 149–169.
250 Hania Janta et al.
Caldwell, J. T., 2008. Production culture: Industrial reexivity and critical practice in lm
and television. Durham: Duke University Press.
Everything Experiential, 2022. International tourism boards woo Indian lmmakers
post Covid. Available from: http://everythingexperiential.businessworld.in/article/-
International-Tourism-Boards-woo-Indian-lmmakers-post-Covid-/20-10-2022-451266/
(access date 29.12.2022).
Frank, S., 2016. Dwelling-in-motion: Indian Bollywood tourists and their hosts in the Swiss
Alps. Cultural Studies, 30 (3), 506–531.
Gyimóthy, S., 2018. Transformations in destination texture: Curry and Bollywood romance
in the Swiss Alps. Tourist Studies, 18 (3), 292–314.
Lukinbeal, C. and Sommerlad, E., 2022. Doing lm geography. GeoJournal, 87 (1), 1–9.
Mazumdar, R., 2011. Aviation, tourism and dreaming in 1960s Bombay cinema. BioScope:
South Asian Screen Studies, 2 (2), 129–155.
Mazumdar, R., 2015. ‘Invisible work’ in the Indian media industries. Media Industries Jour-
nal, 1 (3), 26–31.
Nanjangud, A. and Reijnders, S., 2022. On the tracks of musical screenscapes: Analysing
the emerging phenomenon of Bollywood lmi-song tourism in Iceland. Tourist Studies,
22, 14687976221090728.
Pabiś-Orzeszyna, M. and Keilbach, J., 2021. Green(ing) media (studies). Necsus, 2, 105–112.
Roberts, L., 2020. Navigating cinematic geographies: Reections on lm as spatial practice.
In: T. Edensor, A. Kalandides and U. Kothari, eds., The Routledge handbook of place.
London: Routledge, 655–663.
Tobías, I. C., 2017. Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara: Exotic Spain, lm tourism and the imag-
ined geographies of the Indian middle class. In: A. Dhingra and G. López-Nadal, eds.,
Indo-Spanish cultural encounters (1956–2016), impacts and visions. New Delhi: Centre
of Spanish, Portuguese, Italian & Latin American Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University,
271–286.
Index
acoustic space 89 – 90
AIETA Model 227, 238
ambient sounds 87, 88
American Humane Society 196
Amsterdam, eld recordings 88 – 89
Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI)
198; rules pertaining to performing
animals 199 – 200
animals 11, 195; in Bollywood 197 – 198;
CGI 198 – 199; performing
196 – 197; see also Tiger Zinda Hai
animatronics 198 – 199
anthropocentric geography 195
architecture, heritage 57, 59
Arctic landscape 11, 69, 70; Finland 184;
snow 45
Australia, Gold Coast 120
Austria 200, 228, 237
authenticity 9, 32 – 33, 35; setting 28
background: mountains 73; songs 8, 85, 86,
87, 88, 90, 94
Bishnoi community 204 – 205
Bollywood 9, 12, 120, 121, 122, 140, 196,
225; animals 197 – 198; dance songs
95; lming in Switzerland 126, 229;
massalah-lms 125 – 126; portrayal
of European countries 233, 234;
song sequences 229; tours 121
bureaucracy 126; Finland 185
business relationships: contracts 168 – 169,
175 – 176; personal contacts
171 – 172, 173, 174; Polish-Indian
cooperation 170 – 172, 173, 174;
trust 163, 168, 171, 172; see also
collaboration; informal relationships;
intermediaries; interpersonal
relations; production culture
capital: narrative 179, 187; social 169 – 170
cartography 24, 33 – 34, 42; cartographic
consciousness 8; “performative”
59; in Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara
49 – 50, 51, 52 – 53
caste 165
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) 8, 9 – 10,
136 – 137; as a destination for
Indian lmmakers 139 – 140; as a
lm shooting destination 137 – 139;
urban settings 70, 72; see also
Poland/Polish; Slovenia/n
chase scene: Fan 57, 59, 60; War 45, 48, 49
Chipko movement 204 – 205
Chopra, Y. 86, 121, 122, 125, 132, 139,
225, 229, 237
choreography 95; see also dance songs
cinematography 32; Indian 162
cine-zoo 196
clusters, lm industry 182
Cold War 44 – 45
collaboration 159, 175, 249; co-production
151, 152, 155, 248; informal
relationships 168 – 169;
interpersonal relations 162 – 164;
network embeddedness 170 – 172,
173, 174
colonialism, cultural 217 – 218, 221
communication, cross-cultural 152 – 153
computer-generated imagery (CGI) 30 – 31,
198, 199
connectedness 126, 133
contracts 175 – 176; informal 168 – 169
Copenhagen Film Fund 183
Corsica 53 – 54, 55, 94 – 95
countryside 8, 72, 79
COVID-19 pandemic 101, 105, 124, 141,
245
252 Index
creative industries 181, 182; see also lm
commission/s
Croatia 57
cross-cultural communication 152 – 153
cultural colonialism 217 – 218, 221
cultural diplomacy 118, 120
cultural geography 5, 17
cultural studies 6, 161; spatial turn 33, 35
culture 161 – 162
Czech Republic 140
dance songs 8, 86, 94; see also song
sequences
Delhi 56
delocalisation 9, 102, 103, 104, 105, 108,
112, 140
Denmark: Copenhagen Film Fund 183;
Danish Film Institute 183; Den
Vestdanske Filmpulje (DVF) 183;
Film-Fyn 183
depiction 18, 20, 22, 24; see also
representation
destination branding 4, 6, 179; see also
place branding
destination management 7, 12, 229; see
also lm tourism
dialogue 21, 85
diaspora lms 214
diegesis 19 – 20, 28
diegetic music 90; Jab Harry Met Sejal
94; Rockstar 92, 93 – 94; Tamasha
94 – 95; Tiger Zinda Hai 95 – 96
diegetic song sequences 92, 93
diegetic space 25, 28 – 30, 32, 34
digital techniques 18 – 19, 93; see also
computer-generated imagery (CGI)
diplomacy, cultural 118, 120
displacement aspect 120, 130
diversity, landscape 78
drone camera 45, 56, 57
dubbing 85
Dubrovnik 57
economic incentives 102 – 103
editing 25, 30, 31, 34 – 35, 44; Fan 60
Eiel Tower 87
electronic dance music (EDM) 89
embeddedness 160; network 170 – 172, 173,
174
embodiment 89, 160
Engelberg 121
environmentalism 205
espionage lms, War 44 – 45
ethnography 160
Europe 11; countryside 72; ctionalised
locations 70; Indians’ perception
of 233, 234, 235; landscape
diversity 78; mountains 72, 73;
recognisability 70; scene analysis
68 – 69; top tourist destinations 230;
urban settings 70, 72
European Union (EU) 137, 140
fake locations 120, 129, 133; see also
ctionalised locations
family: -owned business 162; trust 168
fandom 23
fatalism 163
feature lm 19, 30; shooting in Switzerland
127
ctional lm 19; diegesis 19 – 20
ctionalised locations 70
eld recordings, Paris 88 – 89
lm commission/s 102, 103, 104, 119;
Finnish 183; Occhi di Ulisse 105,
106, 109, 114; Slovenian 148;
Swiss 124 – 125
lm geography 5, 17, 33, 247; see also
place; space
lm industry, clusters 182; see also
production culture
lm policy 9, 101, 119, 247; green 115;
Swiss 130
lm production infrastructure 3, 4, 6, 8, 42,
48, 57, 119, 120, 138; Slovenia 70,
72, 151; Switzerland 78, 126 – 127,
133; War 47, 48
lm songs see song sequences
lm studies 6, 246; ‘animal turn’ 195
lm tourism 3, 4, 6 – 7, 12, 35, 111 – 112,
118, 120, 226, 227; box-oce
success as predictor 237;
demographic characteristics of
Indian tourists 231; marketing
226; motivations for travelling
to screened locations 227; New
Zealand 33, 228; Slovenia
153 – 154; Spain 225; survey 231;
Switzerland 121; top European
destinations 230; typology of
tourists 32; United Kingdom 227
lm/s 63 – 64; analysis 65 – 66; cartography
24; digital techniques 18 – 19;
editing 31; feature 19, 30;
ctional 19; image 30; location
18; massalah- 125 – 126; mirror
Index 253
metaphor 76; -place relationship
20; scene 66; sets 27; setting
18; space 25, 29 – 30, 35; -space
relationship 21 – 24
Finland 10 – 11, 45, 47, 48, 64, 69, 70, 179;
Business Finland 183; countryside
72; Indian lm productions
185 – 186; infrastructure 184 – 185,
188; low level of bureaucracy
185; Northern Film and Media
Foundation (POEM) 182 – 183;
permits 185; rural 181; snow
188; strategies for attracting
international lm productions
184 – 185; water 74, 75
exibility, Indian production culture 166
“y-in-y-out productions,” Switzerland
125, 128
framing 25, 29, 34, 59; War 45
funding: Nordic countries 182 – 184; public
103, 104 – 105, 169; see also lm
commission/s
geography/ies 16, 246, 247 – 248;
anthropocentric 195; cultural 5, 7,
17; human 16, 17, 25; mountains
64 – 65, 72, 73, 74; non-human 195;
water 65, 74, 75 – 76; see also lm
geography
geospatial technology 33
globalised lm production 85, 120, 133,
159, 245; Bollywood 125 – 126; see
also infrastructure
Goa festival 171 – 172
Google Earth 43
grants 140, 169
Greece 237 – 238
green policies 115
helicopter 48
heritage architecture 57, 59
high mountains 73
Hindu Nationalism 12, 211 – 212, 222 – 223
hospitality services 111
Hungary 120
Iceland 183
iconography, Indian 65, 74, 79
identity 6; regional 181
imaginary space 22 – 23, 33, 34
imagination 22
IMDb 65 – 66
immersion 51; sky diving 52; sonic 89
immigrants/immigration 11, 211; diaspora
lms 214
incentives for shooting abroad 6, 9; appeal
to non-resident Indians (NRIs)
103; audience appeal 103, 104;
business environment 126 – 128;
cash rebate 149, 183; CEE
countries 140; diverse settings
128 – 129; economic/nancial
102 – 103, 118, 159; landscape
diversity 78; logistics 102; luxury
accommodation 130 – 131; non-
economic 120; policy documents
180; production services 120; push
factors 102 – 103, 140; qualied
professionals 131 – 132; Slovenia
146 – 149; Switzerland 124 – 125;
tax credits 105, 109 – 110, 114, 183
India International Film Tourism Conclave
(IIFTC) 41 – 42, 245
Indian business culture 163; family 163;
spirituality 163; trust 163, 164
Indian lms and lmmaking 3, 102 – 103,
136, 248; comparative advantages
of lming in Slovenia 146 – 148;
East versus West tropes 212 – 214;
in Finland 185 – 186; iconography
65, 74, 79; interpersonal relations
162 – 164; No Objection Certication
(NOC) 196 – 197; in Slovenia 142,
143, 146, 153 – 154; water 76
Indian production culture 162; nancing
system 167; exibility 166;
hierarchical 165; Polish
lmmakers’ perspective 164 – 168;
rituals 167; wastefulness 166 – 167
informal relationships 168
infrastructure: Finland 184 – 185, 188;
Switzerland 185; see also lm
production infrastructure
intercultural: communication 6, 11; lm 4
Interlaken 121
intermediaries 114 – 115, 172, 175
interpersonal relations 10, 159; in the Indian
lm industry 162 – 164, 168 – 169; in
Polish lm production 169
Ireland 120
Italy 9, 101; lm commissions 104 – 105,
105, 114; Indian audiovisual
productions lmed in 106 – 107,
108, 109 – 110; landscapes
103 – 104; Lombardy 108, 110; tax
incentive programs 105
254 Index
karma 163
Kashmir 228
Khan, S. 11, 42, 55, 56, 57, 200, 203,
204 – 205
knowledge transfer 4 – 5, 11, 118, 120
Kuch kuch hota hai 83
landscape/s 8, 63; Arctic 11, 45, 69,
70, 184; in Chopra’s lms 121;
diversity 78; Italian 103 – 104;
Middle-Earth 33; neutral
76; recognisability 76, 77;
representation 79; Slovenia
146 – 148; stereotypes 76, 77;
see also geography
Lapland 45, 69, 70, 185; see also Finland
leisure 51
lip syncing 83, 86, 92
Lisbon 49, 94
listening 85, 89
literature 21, 22, 34
local identity 6
local public nancing 103 – 104
local talent 132
location/s 3, 27 – 28, 41, 66, 74, 196, 247;
Arctic circle 45, 46 – 47; diegetic
space 29 – 30; dissonance 120, 130;
fake 70, 120, 129, 133; framing
45; Italy 101; Lisbon 48, 49;
Portugal 48; recognisability 70;
scene analysis 69, 70; scenery 32;
scouting 151; summits 170 – 171;
tours 140; see also Europe
logistics 102
Lombardy 108, 110
London 56, 229; in Purab Aur Pachhim
218 – 220
Lord of the Rings, The 23, 33; computer-
generated imagery (CGI) 31; lm-
induced tourism 227 – 228
Lucerne & Central Switzerland Film
Commission 119 – 120, 124 – 125
luxury accomodation, Switzerland
130 – 131
“making of” videos 44; Fan 58, 59;
Tamasha 54 – 55; Tiger Zinda Hai
203 – 204; War 48; Zindagi Na
Milegi Dobara 51
maps and mapping 8, 24, 33 – 34,
42, 43 – 44, 54 – 55; see also
cartography
marketing 7, 181 – 182; to Bollywood
viewers 229; tourism 226
massalah-lms 125 – 126
“Matargashti” 54 – 55
meaning 20, 21, 29, 33
media industry studies 9, 102
mediated space 23 – 24, 32, 34, 35
Mediterranean 53
metaphor 23, 33, 34, 93; mirror 76
Middle-earth 23, 33
mirror metaphor 76
mise-en-scène 25, 29, 31
monologue 21
mountains 64 – 65, 72, 73, 74, 79, 118
muhurat shot 167
music/al: diegetic 90, 92, 93 – 95; festivals
89; networks 86
Mykonos 95, 96
narration 28
narrative/s 21 – 22, 24, 42, 72, 73, 76;
background songs 88; capital 179,
187; national 76, 77; place 180;
songs 85, 87
national stereotypes, landscape 76, 77
Netherlands 237; Amsterdam eld
recordings 88 – 89
network/s 41, 47, 48, 53, 60, 93; embeddedness
160, 170 – 172, 173, 174, 175; Indian
lm production 163; informal contacts
168 – 169; musical 86
neutral landscapes 76
New Zealand 33, 228
No Objection Certication (NOC) 196 – 197
non-human geographies 195
non-resident Indians (NRIs) 103, 120, 211
Nordic countries: cooperation with Baltic
countries 188; lm funding and
regional development 182 – 184
Northern Film and Media Foundation
(POEM) 182 – 183
Norway, Film 3 183
Norwegian Film Institute (NFI) 183
Occhi di Ulisse 105, 106, 109, 114
o-screen space 29; Hum Saath Saath Hai
204 – 205; Tiger Zinda Hai 202,
203 – 204
on-demand platforms 104, 111 – 112, 114
on-location shooting 28
Pamplona 52
paratexts 203 – 204
Paris 95; eld recordings 88 – 89
parody 83
party songs 112
Index 255
People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals (PETA) 196, 197, 198
“performative cartography” 59
performing animals 196; AWBI rules
199 – 200; Ganguly on 197 – 198;
regulation 198
Performing Animals Act (India, 2001) 198
peripheral regions, creative clusters 182
permits 127 – 128, 185
personal contacts 171 – 172, 173;
see also collaboration; interpersonal
relations
place 3, 4, 6, 7, 16, 17 – 18, 64, 247;
branding 181 (see also destination
branding); familiarity 21; mediated
23 – 24; Middle-Earth 33; narrative
capital 187; narratives 180; rural
69, 70; topophilia 21, 34; urban
69, 70
plot 34 – 35; and diegetic space 30; Purab
Aur Pachhim 214 – 215
Poland/Polish 10, 64, 69, 70, 78, 140;
Film Institute 169; lmmakers’
perspective on Indian production
culture 164 – 168; -Indian lm
cooperation 170 – 172, 173, 174;
production culture 169 – 170;
water 74
policy documents 180; see also lm
policies
Polish Tourist Organisation (PTO) 140
political economy 9, 102
pooja 167
Portugal 42, 48, 125, 237; cartography 49;
countryside 72
power 42; soft 78
Prague 42, 92, 93 – 94, 120
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
(India, 1960) 197, 199
production culture 10, 102, 160 – 161,
175 – 176; Indian 162, 168 – 169;
interpersonal relations 162 – 164;
Polish 169 – 170
production studies 160 – 161
prolmic event 26 – 27
prolmic space 25, 26 – 28, 34, 44; location
27 – 28; studio 27; War 49
promotion 112, 150; Film i Väst 182;
Northern Film and Media
Foundation (POEM) 182 – 183
public funding 103, 104 – 105, 169
Punjabi music 90
Quit India movement 215
reading, imagination 22
real space 21
reality 20; virtual 30 – 31
recognisability: landscape 76, 77; location
70; Slovenia 143, 146
regional development 179 – 180, 182 – 184
regional identity 6, 181
regulation, performing animals 196 – 197,
198, 199 – 200
representation 16, 17, 18, 20, 32, 63;
diegesis 19 – 20; landscape 79;
maps 24, 33 – 34; spectator 20 – 21;
verbal 21, 22; visual 21, 23
risk 48, 51, 53, 163; bull run 52; scuba
diving 52; sky diving 52
rituals, Indian production culture 167
Romania 120, 140
romantic song sequences 71, 83, 111
rural setting 64, 69, 70, 79, 181; countryside
72, 79; mountains 70, 72, 79
scene/s 73; analysis 66, 68 – 69, 70;
romantic song sequences 71
Scotland 83
screen space 29, 44
secondary values 181 – 182
sky diving 52
Slovenia/n 10, 63, 64, 69, 70, 78, 137,
155 – 156; comparative advantages
for Indian lm shooting 146 – 148;
countryside 72; Embassy 150 – 151;
experiences of Indian lm shooting
in 151 – 153; Film Commission
148 – 149; lm production
infrastructure 151; lm tourism
153 – 154; impacts of Indian lm
shooting in 153 – 154; Indian
lmmaking in 142, 143, 146;
mountains 73; recognisability 143,
146; strategies to attract Indian
lmmakers 148 – 151; water 74
snow 45, 188
social capital 169
socialism 137
soft power 78
song sequences 8, 52 – 53, 79; background
songs 85 – 86, 89, 90, 94; Bollywood
229; Cocktail 90; diegetic 90,
92, 93 – 95; lming in Slovenia
146 – 148, 151 – 152; lip synced 83,
86; mountains 73; party 112; Purab
Aur Pachhim 216 – 217; Queen 89;
romantic 71, 111; synchronised
sound 85; transition 111 – 112
256 Index
sound: ambient 87, 88; eects 85; scape
85; synchronised 28, 87, 88; track
layering 89
space 3, 6, 7, 16; acoustic 89; diegetic 25,
28 – 30, 32, 34; lm 25, 29 – 30, 35;
-lm relationship 21, 22 – 24; lmed
196; framing 29; imaginary 22 – 23,
33, 34; immersion 51; Lisbon
48, 49; mediated 23 – 24, 32, 34,
35; Mediterranean 53; o-screen
29, 202, 203 – 204; prolmic 25,
26 – 28, 34, 44; real 21; screen 29,
44; virtual 30 – 31
Spain 49 – 50, 225, 237; Indians’ perception
of 235; see also Zindagi Na Milegi
Dobara
spatial turn, cultural studies 33, 35
spectator 20; imagination 22; topophilia 21
speed 45, 47, 48
spirituality, of Indian culture 163
sport 51
spy lms, War 45
stakeholders 10, 60; interviews 141
stereotypes 6; landscape 76, 77
studios 27; CEE 138
subsidies 159, 169, 237
sustainability 115, 205, 248
Sweden 64, 69, 70; countryside 72; Film i
Väst 182, 183
Switzerland 9, 64, 118, 121, 229;
Bollywood tours 121; business
environment 126 – 128; countryside
72; diverse settings 128 – 129; fake
locations 129; lm commissions
124 – 125; Film i Väst 188;
lm infrastructure 126 – 127;
lm permits 127 – 128; “y-in-
y-out productions” 125, 128;
Indians’ perception of 234, 235;
infrastructure 78, 133, 185; local
talent 132; luxury accommodation
130 – 131; mountains 73; qualied
professionals 131 – 132; water 74
synchronised sound 28, 85, 87, 88
Tamasha 8, 42, 53; diegetic music 94 – 95;
“making of” video 54 – 55;
“Matargashti” 54 – 55
Tamil lm industry 162
tax incentives 105, 109 – 110, 114
technology 85, 248; geospatial 33; sync
sound 87, 88; see also computer-
generated imagery (CGI)
thematic analysis 164
Ticino Film Commission 119 – 120,
124 – 125
Tiger v Wolves 203
Tiger Zinda Hai 11, 95, 200, 201; diegetic
music 95 – 96; “making of” video
203 – 204; paratexts 202, 203 – 204;
wolves, training 205 – 207
Tomatina 52 – 53
topophilia 21, 34
tourism 3, 78, 89; marketing 226
track layering 89
trade 8, 60
transition songs 111 – 112
transnational/ism 4, 11; collaboration 151,
152
trust 168, 171, 172; in business
relationships 163, 164
United Kingdom: lm tourism 227;
Indians’ perception of 235; London
56, 218 – 220, 229
urban settings 64, 69, 70, 72, 79
urbanism 4
value chains 4
verbal representation 21, 22
virtual space 30 – 31
visa: application process 126 – 127;
Slovenian 148–149
visual arts 23
visual culture 23 – 24
visual representation 21; see also
representation
Vivekananda 213, 214; The East and the
West 213
VOD platforms 101, 104, 111 – 112, 114,
138
War 8, 11, 42, 48, 185 – 186; Arctic
location 45, 46, 47; bike chase
48, 49; espionage 44 – 45; framing
45; ice sequence 45, 46, 47;
infrastructure 48; “making of”
video 48
water 65, 74, 75
Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara 8, 42, 49,
237, 248; bull run sequence 52;
immersion 51; “making of” video
51; scuba diving sequence 51, 52;
sky diving sequence 52; Tomatina
52 – 53
Zurich Film Commission 119 – 120,
124 – 125
... This paper contributes to the broader academic discourse on transnational and cross-continental audiovisual cooperation (Moreno Domínguez & Montero, 2009) and global production networks (Johnson-Yale, 2017) with a particular focus on growing connections between Indian film producers and their counterparts in other parts of the world (Straubhaar, 2010;Kumar, 2016;Bouquillion & Ithurbide, 2022;Saxena, 2022;Clini & Valančiūnas, 2023;Stachowiak et al., 2023). Theoretically, it contributes to the broader debates in 'film geography as a subdiscipline of cultural and media geography' (Lukinbeal & Sommerlad, 2022). ...
... Vol.: (0123456789) shooting in Europe was limited to a few countries (such as the UK or Switzerland), but in the twentyfirst century, it began to spread its scope. Indian film crews appeared in countries, such as Austria, Spain or Italy (Cucco & Scaglioni, 2014), and in subsequent years in Central and Eastern European countries, such as Poland, Romania, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia (Balcerak et al., 2023;Kozina & Jelnikar, 2023;Kumer, 2019;Parvulescu & Hanzlík, 2022;Stachowiak et al., 2023). Most recently, their presence has also emerged in the previously neglected Northern Europe, with Finland and Sweden getting a primary role (Sunngren-Granlund, 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
India has long been known for its film industry and remains by far the largest film producer in the world, surpassing other film-producing superpowers like the US and China. A major factor in India’s dominance in the global media landscape is the outsourcing of film production, especially within Europe. Although there are studies trying to explain the context and mechanisms of foreign settings being incorporated into Indian filmmaking, this knowledge remains scattered and unsystematic. The objective of this paper is to comprehensively examine the evolutionary, spatial, and collaborative dynamics of Indian filmmaking in Europe by analysing statistical data from IMDb as the world’s largest film database. Our findings show that Indian filmmakers appeared relatively infrequently in Europe until the mid-1990s. The British Isles and Western Europe, with London and the Swiss Alps as the main centres, became the first and most popular destinations for outsourcing Indian films. However, this trend has changed in the last two decades, with the focus shifting to other areas in Southern, Central, Eastern, and Northern Europe as well in recent decades. The initial wave of Bollywood productions has gradually been followed by other regional cinematographies. The increasing presence of Indian film shooting in Europe has also led to growing co-production between filmmakers on both (sub)continents. The paper provides a solid basis for further exploration of socio-economic linkages between India and Europe, especially in terms of job creation, local economic development, tourism, and cultural exchange.
... Filmmakers may view both Eastern and Western Europe as part of this broader Western construct, simplifying the complex mosaic of European cultures and regions for storytelling purposes. This perception not only serves narrative expediency but also reflects audience expectations, as Indian viewers may have limited exposure to the nuances of European regions (see case studies in Stachowiak et al., 2023). Therefore, imaginative geographies play here a prominent role. ...
Book
Full-text available
Production studies has developed into an interdisciplinary field of inquiry of film and television "production cultures," going beyond traditional examinations of authorship and industry structure. Studying production as culture involves gathering empirical data about the lived realities of people involved in media production - about collaboration and conflicts, routines and rituals, lay theories and performative actions. This volume broadens the scope of production studies by analyzing geographic and historical alternatives to contemporary Hollywood. At the same time, it invites disciplines such as ethnography, aesthetics, or sociology of art to reconsider established concepts of film and media studies like creative agency, genesis of a film work, or transnational production.
Article
Full-text available
Place branding is an approach to stimulating territorial development. From the theoretical point of view, place branding in rural areas should be an inclusive and participatory process. Applications and outcomes of the process have been insufficiently investigated so far in rural areas. The oldest place brand in Slovenia, “Babica in Dedek”, is analyzed to present its socioeconomic circumstances, impacts, and challenges from the perspective of local producers. Three qualitative methods are thus applied: analysis of documents, semi-structured interviews, and a focus group. This case study has revealed factors that contribute to new marketing opportunities, product packaging, holding seminars, and advertising local products in the area. On the other hand, the empirical findings are only partly aligned with the theoretical implications: the impacts of place branding are “sectorally limited” instead of being inclusive and participative.
Chapter
This chapter examines how Stieg Larsson's Millennium trilogy has contributed to Stockholm's narrative capital and generated significant place-related value, particularly in the form of tourism. This study's research question asks how popular culture narratives, such as those in the Millennium series, can contribute to economic and socio-cultural outcomes for a place. The focus is on how fiction-based narratives, despite being imaginary, have tangible impacts on real-world locations, in this case, Stockholm. One of the central themes is the merging of fiction and reality, which creates new opportunities for tourism and place branding. The success of the Millennium narratives in attracting visitors to Stockholm exemplifies how popular culture can reframe the identity of a city. The global appeal of the trilogy, combined with its rich portrayal of Stockholm, has attracted tens of thousands of tourists eager to immerse themselves in the world of Lisbeth Salander and Mikael Blomkvist. These tourists seek real-life locations from books and films, contributing to the city’s cultural and economic landscape. In conclusion, the case of the Millennium trilogy demonstrates how narrative capital can create cultural and economic value for a place. The trilogy's impact goes beyond the immediate financial benefits of tourism; it reshapes the place's cultural identity and strengthens its global brand. This case illustrates the broader potential of popular culture to generate long-lasting effects on the socio-economic landscape of a location. The chapter notes that "Millennium is a great contributor for place branding internationally" (Lind & Kristensson Uggla, 2018, p. 323), underscoring narratives' powerful role in shaping place-related value.
Chapter
What are the economic prospects of European regions in a globalizing world? One view suggests that European regions will be overwhelmed by global forces; another suggests the rise of a new localism leading to a Europe of the regions. This book argues that neither of these accounts is correct. The authors offer detailed accounts of the local economies of Baden Wüttemberg, Emilia-Romagna, Switzerland, and Eastern Germany amongst others to support their view. In so doing they discuss a number of important and topical issues: industrial districts and their distinctiveness, organizational flexibility, regional economic planning, and the role of transnational companies. Through the application of an institutionalist perspective which stresses the importance of institutionalizing processes within the economy, the chapters in the book argue that regional economic prosperity will depend upon the degree to which regions are able to mobilize flexible institutional strategies. The book concludes that adaptable regions with a diverse institutional presence can harness the forces of globalization to their own ends. Other regions, with more rigid institutional structures, face a bleak future.