ArticlePDF Available

Genital Ulcers Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - What are the Possible Causes? A Case Report

Authors:

Abstract

Unlabelled: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects many organs. In this report, we discuss the case of a patient with SLE who presented to an out-hospital clinic, complaining of fever and pain with genital ulcers. Negative evaluations for other causes of genital ulcers, indicated these ulcers as related to SLE. This case highlights the importance of including SLE ulcers in the differential diagnosis of genital ulcers. Learning points: Determining the cause of genital ulceration is a clinical challenge, especially in sexually active individuals.Genital ulcers associated with SLE are often underdiagnosed. Any patient with a history of SLE presenting with genital discomfort and/or pain must be evaluated for genital ulcers without delay.
© EFIM 2023 - European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine - Doi: 10.12890/2023_003972
European Federation of Internal Medicine
GENITAL ULCERS ASSOCIATED WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS
ERYTHEMATOSUS – WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE CAUSES? A
CASE REPORT
Maysoun Kudsi, Tasneem Drie, Ghina Haidar, Safaa Al-Sayed, Enas Roumieh
Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus university / Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syria
Corresponding author: Ghina Haidar e-mail: gtghinahaidar@gmail.com
Received: 06/06/2023 Accepted: 21/06/2023 Published: 29/07/2023
Conicts of Interests: The Authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Paent Consent: Consent was obtained from the patient but excluded the use of images.
This arcle is licensed under a Commons Aribuon Non-Commercial 4.0 License
How to cite this arcle: Kudsi M, Drie T, Haidar G, Al-Sayed S, Roumieh E. Genital ulcers associated with systemic lupus erythematosus – what are the possible
causes? A Case Report. EJCRIM 2023;10:doi:10.12890/2023_003972.
ABSTRACT
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects many organs. In this report, we
discuss the case of a patient with SLE who presented to an out-hospital clinic, complaining of fever and pain with genital
ulcers. Negative evaluations for other causes of genital ulcers, indicated these ulcers as related to SLE. This case highlights
the importance of including SLE ulcers in the differential diagnosis of genital ulcers.
KEYWORDS
Systemic lupus erythematosus, genital ulcers, autoimmune diseases, systemic conditions
LEARNING POINTS
Determining the cause of genital ulceration is a clinical challenge, especially in sexually active individuals.
Genital ulcers associated with SLE are often underdiagnosed. Any patient with a history of SLE presenting with genital
discomfort and/or pain must be evaluated for genital ulcers without delay.
INTRODUCTION
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic
autoimmune condition that targets healthy organs, with a
higher incidence in females, especially of reproductive age[1].
Infection is a frequent trigger factor for SLE. Infection can
also increase morbidity and mortality in SLE patients[2]. The
differentiation of SLE are and infection in a febrile patient is
difcult, thus C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and disease
activity markers play a role[3]. Although only a few cases of
SLE genital ulcers have been published, ruling out SLE in
patients presenting with genital ulcers is important[4]. The
precise etiology and pathogenesis of SLE remain unclear,
however, it is described as an excessive immune response
to infectious agents. Viruses, bacteria, parasites, and
fungi are thought to trigger inammation, autoantibody
production and immune-mediated tissue injury[5]. Recently,
molecular mimicry in genetically predisposed individuals
has been hypothesized to exacerbate immune responses to
self-antigens by immune mistake[6]. The rst case of genital
ulcer associated with SLE was reported by Fresko et al.[7].
We describe a case of a young female patient with SLE who
presented with a history of painful genital ulcers.
© EFIM 2023 - European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine - Doi: 10.12890/2023_003972
papular ulcers with well-demarcated borders. These lesions
are seen in both discoid lupus and SLE[7,11,12].
The pathophysiology of ulceration in the setting of immune
dysregulation remains largely unknown, although histologic
examination has shown inammatory inltrate, likely
involving activation of T cells, and release of tumor necrosis
factor alpha[10,11].
In establishing a differential diagnosis of the genital ulcers,
we considered sexually transmitted diseases, infections,
dermatologic diseases-related, related systemic diseases
such as Crohn’s disease (CD), malignancies, traumatic ulcers,
and idiopathic disease[12].The diagnosis of Behçet’s disease
can be condently made if there are at least three reported
episodes of mouth ulcers over the past 12 months and the
presence of two of the following symptoms: genital ulcers,
ocular manifestation, dermatologic manifestation and
positive pathergy reaction[13]. The diagnosis is made when
the patient meets the rst critera: oral ulcer with 2 of the
other 4 manifestations. Our patient did not t the criteria of
Behçet’s disease, as she had only bipolar mouth ulcers.
Lipschütz ulcer is an infrequent, self-limited, nonsexually
transmitted ulcer characterized by the rapid onset of
vulvar edema along with painful necrotic ulcerations. It
may be preceded by inuenza-like or mononucleosis-like
symptoms. In our case, we made a diagnosis of exclusion[14].
Our patient had fever, no edema in the genital ulcer, she had
been diagnosed with SLE, and she did not report any prior
symptom compatible with inuenza or mononucleosis. The
patient did not report any sexual relationship outside of
marriage. She did not t the diagnostic criteria for Crohn’s
disease[15].
Negative culture for microorganisms in genital ulcers can
exclude infection[13], as in our case. In the 2019 ACR/EULAR
criteria, ANA at a titer of ≥1:80 is a mandatory criterion. The
more specic antibodies for SLE, anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm,
are grouped in one domain and weighted equally by 6 points.
Anti-dsDNA has been found to be positive in 70-90% of SLE
patients[8,16].
Physical examination alone cannot distinguish genital ulcers
associate with lupus from vulvar ulcers associated with
CD. The only way to conrm and differentiate between
genital CD and genital SLE is via biopsy[14], the procedure we
followed.
The treatment includes non-steroidal anti-inammatory
drugs, antimalarial drugs like hydroxychloroquine,
prednisolone, immunosuppressive drugs, and biologics, in
addition to surgery in some cases[15]. Our patient had been
treated with prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine, with
a good response. An untreated ulcer could progress to
squamous cell carcinoma[11].
Romiti and colleagues[16] prescribed prednisolone in
two cases of discoid lupus erythematosus affecting the
genital area, with widespread discoid lesions on the head.
Paidi and colleagues[11] prescribed the same treatment
to a young female patient with a history of CD, idiopathic
thrombocytopenic purpura, SLE, and hypothyroidism,
CASE PRESENTATION
A 28-year-old Syrian female presented to our out-hospital
clinic in December 2021, complaining of fever and discomfort
in the genital area for 10 days. She was diagnosed with
SLE, according to the American College of Rheumatology/
European League Against Rheumatism 2019[8], as she
had fever, fatigue, malar rash, oral aphthae, arthritis,
pleuritis, and positive antinucleotides antibody (ANA). She
had been treated with 200 mg/day hydroxychloroquine
until admission. The remaining medical history was
unremarkable. No family history of SLE was reported. On
physical examination, multiple papular genital ulcers, sized
1-3 mm and well dened were found. Lymphadenopathy was
present, but no vaginal discharge or ulcers were present. The
remaining physical examination was unremarkable.
Hematologic and metabolic proles were established, as
well as a viral prole on blood and urine cultures. A vulvar
biopsy and fungal swab test were ordered. CT of the pelvis
and abdomen was ordered. The complete chemical and
metabolic panels showed thrombocytopenia, with a platelet
level of 93,000/µl (150,000-400,000/µl). Anti-double-
stranded DNA (Anti dsDNA) antibody was 6UI/ml (normal).
Urinalysis was notable for 1+ hematuria and 1+ proteinuria.
Blood and urine cultures were negative for viruses. The
COVID-19 test was negative. Serologies for herpes virus
1 and 2, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, mycoplasma
pneumonia, parvovirus B19, toxoplasmosis, rubella,
hepatitis, human immunodeciency virus, and syphilis were
negative. Bacterial vaginosis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and
trichomoniasis were ruled out. The fungal swab test was
negative. Abdomen and pelvis CT were normal. A genital
ulcer biopsy showed irregular acanthosis in the epidermis,
ulceration, and lymphocyte inltrations, with brinoid
necrosis of the vessel wall, in the dermis. No granuloma
was seen. We decided against immunouorescence testing
due to its high costs. Other causes of genital ulcers being
ruled out, these ulcers were considered related to SLE, as
one of its mucosal involvement. The patient was treated
with 70 mg/day (1 mg/kg) prednisolone, continuing on 200
mg/day hydroxychloroquine. No antibiotic was prescribed.
Improvement started after 2 days, and the ulcers were
healed after 15 days. The prednisolone dose was eventually
tapered to 5 mg/week. After 3 months, she was doing well,
until the time of writing. Our case was submitted on the
research registry database under UIN 8837.
DISCUSSION
SLE usually involves organs, including the skin[1]. Cutaneous
manifestations are many and of wide spectrum[9]. In most
cases, skin lesions in SLE occur in sun-exposed areas[10].
Mucosal involvement is frequently manifested in lupus as
ulcers in the mouth, less frequently in the nose and throat
and rarely in the genital area[11]. Behçet’s disease presenting
as genital ulcer was excluded in our patient as she had the
diagnostic criteria of SLE[8].
SLE genital involvement presented as small–medium size,
© EFIM 2023 - European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine - Doi: 10.12890/2023_003972
presenting with recurrent chronic diarrhea, perianal ulcers,
the passage of blood in stools, and anal pain.
The novelty of our case is that the genital ulcers were due
to SLE, without a superimposed infection, or other diseases
such as CD. The lesions responded well to Epstein-Barr and
hydroxychloroquine, without using immunosuppressant
drugs.
REFERENCES
1. Angum F, Khan T, Kaler J, Siddiqui L, Hussain A. The Prevalence
of Autoimmune Disorders in Women: A Narrative Review. Cureus
2020;12:e8094
2. Jung JY, Suh CH. Infection in systemic lupus erythematosus, similarities,
and differences with lupus are. Korean J Intern Med 2017;32:429-438
3. Ospina FE, Echeverri A, Zambrano D, Suso JP, Martínez-Blanco J, Cañas
CA, et al. Distinguishing infections vs ares in patients with systemic
lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:i46-i54
4. Sara D, Ziani J, Issoual K, Douhi Z, Elloudi S, Baybay H, et al. Lupus
erythematosus affecting the genitalia: an unusual site. Dermatol Open J
2020;5:26–27
5. Vieira-Baptista P, Lima-Silva J, Beires J, Martinez-de-Oliveira J.
Lipschütz ulcers: should we rethink this? An analysis of 33 cases. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;198:149-152
6. de Castro Coelho F, Amaral M, Correia L, Nunes Campos MJ,
Paula T, Borges A, Borrego J. Lipschütz Genital Ulceration as Initial
Manifestation of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol
2018;2018:3507484
7. Fresko I, Yazici H, Işçi H, Yurdakul S. Genital ulceration in patients with
systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 1993;2:135
8. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-
Goldman R, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American
College of Rheumatology classication criteria for systemic lupus
erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1151-1159
9. Cooper EE, Pisano CE, Shapiro SC. Cutaneous Manifestations of
“Lupus”: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Beyond. Int J Rheumatol
2021;2021:6610509
10. Stull C, Sprow G, Werth VP. Cutaneous Involvement in Systemic
Lupus Erythematosus: A Review for the Rheumatologist. J Rheumatol.
2023;50:27-35
11. Paidi G, Himaja V. A Rare Case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Manifesting as Genital Ulcers. Cureus 2022;14:e23818
12. Roett MA. Genital Ulcers: Differential Diagnosis and Management. Am
Fam Physician. 2020;101:355-361
13. Kiafar M, Faezi ST, Kasaeian A, Baghdadi A, Kakaei S, Mousavi SA, et al.
Diagnosis of Behçet’s disease: clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria,
and differential diagnoses. BMC Rheumatol 2021;5:2
14. Pereira DAG, Teixeira EPP, Lopes ACM, Sarmento RJP, Lopes APC.
Lipschütz Ulcer: An Unusual Diagnosis that Should Not be Neglected.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43:414-416
15. Park SC, Jeen YT. Diagnostic Criteria for Crohn’s Disease. In: Chun, H.J.,
Seol, SY., Choi, MG., Cho, J.Y. (eds) Small Intestine Disease. Springer,
Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7239-2_36
16. Infantino M, Nagy E, Bizzaro N, Fischer K, Bossuyt X, Damoiseaux J.
Anti-dsDNA antibodies in the classication criteria of systemic lupus
erythematosus. J Transl Autoimmun 2021;5:100139
... Frequent symptoms include fever, joint pain, weight loss, and fatigue. In addition, other systemic organs symptoms may find at the disease onset or develop as the disease progresses [2] . Late-onset SLE was found to occur in patients over 50-60 years of age [1] . ...
... Late-onset SLE accounts for 2-12% of SLE patients with a minimum age of onset of 50 years and older, leading to significant delays in diagnosis [3] . The period from symptom onset to diagnosis has been reported to be up to 60 months for late-onset SLE, compared to 19-24 months for adult-onset SLE [2,3] . Late-onset SLE differs from early-onset SLE in terms of gender and ethnicity prevalence, clinical symptoms and signs, development of organ damage, disease activity and severity, and prognosis [3] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a systemic immune disease that classically occurs in young to middle-aged women and may present with cutaneous, renal, hematologic, neurological, and/or other symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Late-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the elderly is a subtype that differs from classic Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in terms of age group, clinical symptoms, organ involvement and severity. Case presentation A 63 years old female noted to have pancytopenia. The patient was diagnosed with lupus upon obtaining clinical presentations and serological marker, along with high titers of the antinuclear antibody and/or anti-double-stranded DNA antibody. The patient was managed with glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil therapy, which led to a rapid response. Discussion Late-onset SLE accounts for 2–12% of SLE patients with a minimum age of onset of 50 years and older, leading to significant delays in diagnosis. Late-onset SLE differs from early-onset SLE in terms of gender and ethnicity prevalence, clinical symptoms and signs, development of organ damage, disease activity and severity, and prognosis .Some studies have also shown that late-stage SLE patients have higher rates of RF and anti-Ro/anti-La antibody positivity, lower complement titer, and higher incidence of elevated creatinine and decreased creatinine clearance .First-line treatment of pancytopenia is glucocorticoid. In refractory cases, rituximab and immunosuppressants can be used. Conclusion It is important to assess any unusual presentation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus when clinical suspicion remains high and conducting further laboratory and imaging investigation.
Article
Full-text available
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting multiple organ systems. In this report, we discuss the case of a patient with a history of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), hypothyroidism, SLE, and Crohn's disease (CD) who presented to the emergency room with fever, burning micturition, abdominal pain, and perineal ulcers. Upon subsequent treatment for urinary tract infections (UTI) and negative evaluations for an infectious cause of genital ulcers like sexually transmitted diseases, the etiology of ulcers was found to be SLE. This case report highlights the importance of including SLE ulcers in the differential diagnosis when an SLE patient presents with genital ulcers and the importance of ruling out an SLE vs. infection or non-infection as the cause of ulcers in a former SLE patient.
Article
Full-text available
Anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies play an important role in the diagnosis, classification and management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a wide range of autoantibodies, which makes the diagnosis quite challenging. In the absence of diagnostic criteria, classification criteria have been used for many decades. The first classification criteria for SLE were formulated in 1971 by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), followed by two revisions in 1982 and 1997. In order to improve their clinical performance and to reflect new knowledge on autoantibodies, new classification criteria for SLE were issued in 2012 by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC). These criteria proposed to classify only patients that have at least one immunologic criterion, overcoming SLE classification based solely on clinical manifestations. In 2019, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR proposed new criteria that aimed to maintain the high specificity of the ACR criteria with a sensitivity close to the SLICC 2012 criteria. These 2019 criteria reinforced the importance of autoantibodies in SLE diagnosis, assigning the highest score (6 points) to anti-dsDNA antibodies in the fully weighted scoring of the disease. The current criteria require the use of an anti-dsDNA assay with at least 90% specificity, such as the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) or FARR assay. However, the criteria do not comment on all the tests currently widely used in clinical laboratories. Neither do they consider the technological evolutions, nor standardization issues. Since strict adherence to any of the classification criteria, including the serological items, could lead to possible misclassification of SLE and/or delayed diagnosis, test characteristics of the distinct immunoassays should be taken into consideration.
Article
Full-text available
The diagnosis of genital ulcers remains a challenge in clinical practice. Lipschütz ulcer is a non-sexually transmitted rare and, probably, underdiagnosed condition, characterized by the sudden onset of vulvar edema along with painful necrotic ulcerations. Despite its unknown incidence, this seems to be an uncommon entity, with sparse cases reported in the literature. We report the case of an 11-year-old girl who presented at the emergency department with vulvar ulcers. She denied any sexual intercourse. The investigation excluded sexually transmitted infections, so, knowledge of different etiologies of non-venereal ulcers became essential. The differential diagnoses are extensive and include inflammatory processes, drug reactions, trauma, and malignant tumors. Lipschütz ulcer is a diagnosis of exclusion. With the presentation of this case report, the authors aim to describe the etiology, clinical course, and outcomes of this rare disease, to allow differential diagnosis of genital ulceration.
Article
Full-text available
Lupus, Latin for “wolf,” is a term used to describe many dermatologic conditions, some of which are related to underlying systemic lupus erythematosus, while others are distinct disease processes. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus includes a wide array of visible skin manifestations and can progress to systemic lupus erythematosus in some cases. Cutaneous lupus can be subdivided into three main categories: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Physical exam, laboratory studies, and histopathology enable differentiation of cutaneous lupus subtypes. This differentiation is paramount as the subtype of cutaneous lupus informs upon treatment, disease monitoring, and prognostication. This review outlines the different cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus and provides an update on both topical and systemic treatment options for these patients. Other conditions that utilize the term “lupus” but are not cutaneous lupus erythematosus are also discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Background The diagnosis of Behçet disease (BD) is challenging in many cases. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients at a referral BD clinic. Methods In a retrospective study, we collected data from patients at a national referral Behçet clinic from November 2018–August 2019. A BD diagnosis was confirmed (BD group) or ruled out (Non-BD group), and the two groups were compared for differences. Results A total of 238 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Forty patients (16.8%) were finally diagnosed with BD. Ocular and genital lesions were significantly more prevalent in the BD group. A positive pathergy test and HLA-B51 were also significantly more common in BD. However, oral lesions, articular involvement, and gastrointestinal manifestations were similar between groups. Also, patients with BD were significantly more likely to have multi-organ (≥2 organ systems) involvement. Conclusions Being the first study to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients who are visited at a referral BD clinic and are believed to have a high probability of Behçet, the results of this study are important from an epidemiological standpoint. Also, the findings of this study could be used by referral Behçet clinics, which evaluate and diagnose patients with a high pretest probability and atypical presentations of BD on a daily basis. The alternative diagnoses established in this study could be used as the list of the most common differential diagnoses for Behçet’s disease.
Article
Full-text available
Autoimmune disorders are characterized as a condition in which the host's immune system mistakenly attacks itself. These disorders cause the immune system to cause a systemic reaction by attacking multiple organs or may be localized to attacking one specific organ, such as the skin. The exact mechanism of such autoimmune conditions is not well understood; however, the presumed mechanism tends to vary amongst the disorders. Autoimmune diseases present with a clear gender bias with a greater prevalence amongst women, occurring at a rate of 2 to 1. Many autoimmune disorders tend to affect women during periods of extensive stress, such as pregnancy, or during a great hormonal change. A far greater number of women are affected every year with autoimmune diseases, leading to researchers attempting to identify the underlying factors, which could be responsible for this disparity. Autoimmune disorders occur as a result of multiple factors as some disorders may be genetic, while others are sporadic. Throughout this review, various hypotheses are explored that provide insight into the increased susceptibility of autoimmune disorders within women.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) jointly supported by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Methods This international initiative had four phases. 1) Evaluation of antinuclear antibody (ANA) as an entry criterion through systematic review and meta‐regression of the literature and criteria generation through an international Delphi exercise, an early patient cohort, and a patient survey. 2) Criteria reduction by Delphi and nominal group technique exercises. 3) Criteria definition and weighting based on criterion performance and on results of a multi‐criteria decision analysis. 4) Refinement of weights and threshold scores in a new derivation cohort of 1,001 subjects and validation compared with previous criteria in a new validation cohort of 1,270 subjects. Results The 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE include positive ANA at least once as obligatory entry criterion; followed by additive weighted criteria grouped in 7 clinical (constitutional, hematologic, neuropsychiatric, mucocutaneous, serosal, musculoskeletal, renal) and 3 immunologic (antiphospholipid antibodies, complement proteins, SLE‐specific antibodies) domains, and weighted from 2 to 10. Patients accumulating ≥10 points are classified. In the validation cohort, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 93.4%, compared with 82.8% sensitivity and 93.4% specificity of the ACR 1997 and 96.7% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 criteria. Conclusion These new classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary and international input, and have excellent sensitivity and specificity. Use of ANA entry criterion, hierarchically clustered, and weighted criteria reflects current thinking about SLE and provides an improved foundation for SLE research.
Article
The majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have cutaneous manifestations at some point in their disease. The skin findings in lupus erythematosus are classified as lupus-specific or lupus-nonspecific based on histopathologic findings. Lupus-specific skin diseases include chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. There are subsets of skin lesions within each group and the likelihood of associated SLE varies amongst them. Lupus nonspecific lesions are more common in patients with SLE and tend to coincide with active systemic disease. Lupus nonspecific lesions may be seen as a feature of another disease process, including other connective tissue diseases. It is important for the rheumatologist to be familiar with the spectrum of cutaneous disease in lupus erythematosus to help prognosticate the likelihood of systemic disease and ensure patients receive timely dermatologic care with the goal of controlling disease activity to prevent damage.
Article
Genital ulcers may be located on the vagina, penis, and anorectal or perineal areas and may be infectious or noninfectious. Herpes simplex virus is the most common cause of genital ulcers in the United States. A diagnosis of genital herpes simplex virus infection is made through physical examination and observation of genital lesions. The 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted disease guidelines provide strategies for the management of patients with genital ulcer disease. Specific testing includes a polymerase chain reaction test for herpes simplex virus; syphilis serology and darkfield microscopy or a direct fluorescent antibody test for Treponema pallidum; and/or culture for Haemophilus ducreyi in settings where chancroid is highly prevalent. Rarely, cases of Epstein-Barr virus may present with genital ulcers. Syphilis and chancroid cause genital ulcers and are mandatory reportable diseases to the local health department. In some cases, no pathogen is identified. It is important to consider noninfectious etiologies such as sexual trauma, psoriasis, Behçet syndrome, and fixed drug eruptions. Genital ulcers are symptomatic by definition, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for syphilis infection for those at risk, early screening for syphilis infection in all pregnant women, and against routine serologic screening for genital herpes simplex virus infection in asymptomatic adolescents and adults, including those who are pregnant.