No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Effects of masticatory movements on the head, trunk and body sway during the standing position
Abstract
Introduction Mastication involves complex tongue movements, coordination of lip, and cheek movements and is associated with head movement to facilitate the intraoral transport of food from ingesting to swallowing; it affects many functions of the whole body. However, studies to evaluate the relationship between masticatory movements and the body posture are still lacking to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of masticatory movements on the head, trunk, and body sway during the standing position. Methodology A total of 30 healthy subjects were evaluated. The MatScanTM system was used to analyze changes in body posture (center of foot pressure: COP) and the 3-dimensional motion analysis system was used to analyze changes in the head and trunk postures while subjects remained in the standing position with the rest position, centric occlusion, and masticating chewing gum. Results The total trajectory length of COP and head and trunk sways during masticating chewing gum were significantly shorter and smaller respectively than it was in the rest position and centric occlusion (p<0.016). COP area during masticating chewing gum was significantly smaller than it was in the 2 mandibular positions (p<0.016). Conclusion Masticatory movements positively affect the stability of the head, trunk, and body sways and enhance the postural stability during the standing position.
... Researchers have also investigated the relationship between mastication and body posture [11][12][13], and suggest the possibility that mastication affects the postural control by enhancing the postural stability. All these reports examined the relationship between mastication and standing posture. ...
... The CONFORMat TM (Tekscan Inc., South Boston, MA, USA, Nitta Corp., Osaka, Japan) [14,18,19] The three-dimensional motion analysis system (Library Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze head and trunk sways [13,14]. This instrument enabled measurement of three-dimensional movements of target points on the surface of the facial skin and body surface simultaneously. ...
... The trunk sway was analyzed based on the coordinate system on the ground [13,14]. and were requested not to swallow it for the time tested. ...
The interaction between mastication and cerebral blood flow was studied in 12 healthy volunteers (five males and seven females) aged 18-40 years. Positron-emission tomography (PET) autoradiography was carried out after bolus injection of 1.5 GBq H₂¹⁵O (¹⁵O-labelled water) with a half life of 2 min. The PET images were superimposed on magnetic resonance images of each participant. The regional cerebral blood flow images were normalized by the global cerebral blood flow value, and subtraction images (those during gum-chewing minus those during resting) were created and recut at the magnetic resonance image slice positions. Gum specially designed for chewing training was used. Mastication increased regional cerebral blood flow in the primary sensorimotor areas by 25-28%, in the supplementary motor areas and insulae by 9-17%, and in the cerebellum and striatum by 8-11%. These increases demonstrate that chewing activates widespread regions of the brain.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing mandibular position on body posture and reciprocally, body posture on mandibular position. Forty-five (45) asymptomatic subjects (24 males and 21 females, ages 21-53 years, mean age 30.7 years) were included in this study and randomly assigned to one of two groups, based on the table of random numbers. The only difference between group I and group II was the sequence of the testing. The MatScan (Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, MA) system was used to measure the result of changes in body posture (center of foot pressure: COP) while subjects maintained the following 5 mandibular positions: (1) rest position, (2) centric occlusion, (3) clinically midlined jaw position with the labial frena aligned, (4) a placebo wax appliance, worn around the labial surfaces of the teeth and (5) right eccentric mandibular position. The T-Scan II (Tekscan, Inc., South Boston, MA) system was used to analyze occlusal force distribution in two postural positions, with and without a heel lift under the right foot. Total trajectory length of COP in centric occlusion was shorter than in the rest position (p < 0.05). COP area in right eccentric mandibular position was larger than in centric occlusion (p < 0.05). When subjects used a heel lift under the right foot, occlusal forces shifted to the right side compared to no heel lift (p < 0.01). Based on these findings, it was concluded that changing mandibular position affected body posture. Conversely, changing body posture affected mandibular position.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the location of the body center of mass (CoM) determined by using a high accuracy reaction board (RB) and two different segment parameter models for motion analysis (Dempster, 1955, DEM and de Leva, 1996 adjusted from Zatsiorsky and Seluyanov, ZAT). The body CoM (expressed as percentage of the total body height) was determined from several subjects including athletes as well as physically active students and sedentary people. Some significant differences were found in the location of the body CoM between the used segment models and the reaction board method for all male subjects (n=58, 57.03±0.79%, 56.20±0.76% and 57.60±0.76% for RB, ZAT and DEM, respectively) and separately for male (n=12, RB 57.02±0.41%, ZAT 56.74±0.62%, DEM 58.19±0.60%) and female (n=12, RB 55.91±0.88%, ZAT 57.24±0.77%) students of physical activity. The ZAT model was a good match with RB for high jumpers (56.26±0.94% and 56.63±0.56%) whereas the DEM model was better for gymnasts (57.38±0.46% and 57.89±0.49%) and throwers (58.19±0.69% and 57.79±0.45%). For ice hockey players (IH) and ski jumpers (SJ) both segment models, ZAT and DEM, differed significantly from the reaction board results. The results of the present study showed that careful attention should be paid while selecting the proper model for motion analysis of different type of athletes.
Previous research has shown that mastication reduces shifts in the center of gravity of persons standing still. The present research was conducted to determine whether mastication improves reactive balance in the standing position in response to unanticipated external disturbances. The subjects were 32 healthy male adults (mean age 21.1 years, standard deviation (SD) 0.7 years). Latency data determined with the Motor Control Test of Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) were compared for the three conditions of mastication status, the direction of translation, and the magnitude of translation, using three-way repeated measures ANOVA and lower-order ANOVA with the three conditions separated. Latency was significantly shorter with mastication than with the lower jaw relaxed (P < 0.00001). Mastication alone, however, cannot be considered significant because of the complex interactions involved among the three conditions. Mastication increases not only static balance but also reactive balance in response to unanticipated external disturbances. Gum chewing may therefore reduce falls among elderly persons with impaired balance.
Previous findings, during chewing, that boluses of larger size and harder texture result in larger amplitudes of both mandibular and head-neck movements suggest a relationship between increased chewing load and incremental recruitment of jaw and neck muscles. The present report evaluated jaw (masseter and digastric) and neck [sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and trapezius] muscle activity during the chewing of test foods of different sizes and textures by 10 healthy subjects. Muscle activity was recorded by surface electromyography and simultaneous mandibular and head movements were recorded using an optoelectronic technique. Each subject performed continuous jaw-opening/jaw-closing movements whilst chewing small and large boluses of chewing gum and rubber silicone (Optosil). For jaw opening/jaw closing without a bolus, SCM activity was recorded for jaw opening concomitantly with digastric activity. During chewing, SCM activity was recorded for jaw closing concomitantly with masseter activity. Trapezius activity was present in some, but not all, cycles. For the masseter and SCM muscles, higher activity was seen with larger test foods, suggesting increased demand and recruitment of these muscles in response to an increased chewing load. This result reinforces the previous notion of a close functional connection between the jaw and the neck motor systems in jaw actions and has scientific and clinical significance for studying jaw function and dysfunction.
When chewing solid food, part of the bolus is propelled into the oropharynx before swallowing; this is named stage II transport (St2Tr). However, the tongue movement patterns that comprise St2Tr remain unclear. We investigated coronal jaw and tongue movements using videofluorography. Fourteen healthy young adults ate 6 g each of banana, cookie, and meat (four trials per foodstuff). Small lead markers were glued to the teeth and tongue surface to track movements by videofluorography in the anteroposterior projection. Recordings were divided into jaw motion cycles of four types: stage I transport (St1Tr), chewing, St2Tr, and swallowing. The range of horizontal tongue motion was significantly larger during St1Tr and chewing than during St2Tr and swallowing, whereas vertical tongue movements were significantly larger during chewing and St2Tr than during swallowing. Tongue movements varied significantly with food consistency. We conclude that the small horizontal tongue marker movements during St2Tr and swallowing were consistent with a "squeeze-back" mechanism of bolus propulsion. The vertical dimension was large in chewing and St2Tr, perhaps because of food particle reduction and transport in chewing and St2Tr.
A previous study in our laboratory demonstrated that the soleus H reflex was facilitated during mastication in humans. In the present study, we investigated whether there was any modulation of the magnitude of the pretibial H reflex during mastication in five healthy adult volunteers. The pretibial H reflex was significantly facilitated during mastication, and there was no significant difference in the facilitation between jaw-closing and jaw-opening phases; that is, the gain of the H reflex was modulated tonically but not in a phase-dependent manner during mastication. Furthermore, in the same subjects, we confirmed that the soleus H reflex was facilitated during mastication. Based on our findings, we conclude that the H reflexes in both the pretibial and soleus muscles undergo a nonreciprocal facilitation during mastication. It is suggested that mastication contributes to stabilization of postural stance in humans. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1142–1148, 2001
The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the effects of experimental leg length discrepancies on body posture and dental occlusion. Thirty asymptomatic subjects (15 males and 15 females, ages 19-33, mean age 25.6 years) were included in this study and randomly assigned to one of two groups based on a table of random numbers. The only difference between group A and group B was the sequence of testing. Experimental leg length discrepancies were provided by using ten types of insoles with heights ranging from one to ten mm at one mm intervals, placed under both feet. The MatScan (Nitta Corp., Osaka, Japan) system was used to measure changes in body posture (center of foot pressure: COP) while subjects maintained the following three postural positions: 1. natural standing posture (control); 2. control with a heel lift under the right foot; or 3. control with a heel lift under the left foot. The T-Scan II system (Nitta Corp., Osaka, Japan) was used to analyze the results of changes in dental occlusion (center of occlusal force: COF) in the above-mentioned three postural positions. When subjects used a heel lift of six mm or more under the right foot, lateral weight distribution (LWD) shifted to the right side compared to the control (p<0.05). When a heel lift of four mm or more was used under the left foot, LWD shifted to the left side compared to the control (p<0.05). When subjects used a heel lift of eight mm or more under the right foot, occlusal force shifted to the right side compared to the control (p<0.05). When subjects used a heel lift of seven mm or more under the left foot, occlusal force shifted to the left side compared to the control (p<0.05). Based on these findings, it was concluded that leg length discrepancy affected body posture and dental occlusion.
The chewing gum indirectly affects postural control by influencing vestibular function to stabilize posture during upright standing.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on static posturography in patients.
The subjects were 26 patients with chronic balance disorders. The subjects were instructed to stand as stably as possible on the force platform. The recording was conducted four times. For the first evaluation, postural sway was measured during motionless standing. Two weeks after the recording, the postural sway was recorded again as a second evaluation. Thereafter, the subjects were instructed to chew gum for 3 min. The third evaluation was conducted while the subjects continued to chew gum. Then 1 h after the subject had stopped chewing gum, a fourth evaluation was obtained. The total path length (LNG) and rectangle area (REC) were analyzed.
We found that postural stability tended to improve while the subjects masticated gum. Both LNG and REC were significantly improved while the subjects chewed gum with their eyes closed. In patients without canal paralysis (CP), the measurements of LNG with eyes closed and REC with eyes open were significantly decreased while masticating gum. In patients with CP, the REC, but not LNG, was significantly decreased while masticating gum both with eyes open and eyes closed.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of masticating chewing gum on postural stability during upright standing. To address this issue, 12 healthy subjects performed quiet standing on a force platform for the posturography study. The subjects were instructed to stand as stable as possible on the force platform in order to record the trajectory of the center-of-pressure (COP). After measuring the postural sway in the initial condition (pre-condition), the subjects were asked to stand while masticating chewing gum (gum-condition). Following the gum-condition, quiet standing without mastication was evaluated (post-condition) to ensure the effect of masticating chewing gum on postural stability. The trajectory and velocity of the COP were analyzed for each condition. We found that the postural stability tended to enhance during mastication of chewing gum. The rectangle area of the COP trajectory significantly diminished in the gum-condition and significantly enlarged in the post-condition. A similar effect was observed in the maximum velocity and standard deviation (SD) of the fore-aft amplitude of the COP trajectory. The values were significantly smaller in the gum-condition compared to those in the post-condition. These findings suggest that mastication of chewing gum affects the postural control by enhancing the postural stability during upright standing.
The purpose of this study was to temporally and spatially analyze movements of lower facial skin during left- and right-side chewing in order to examine, from the viewpoint of kinematics, whether functional differences existed between these movements on the two sides.
Ten healthy young subjects (aged 24-32 years, mean age 26.7 years) were included in this study. The test bolus used in this study was sufficiently softened chewing gum. The cycle time, mean square error value and mean difference vector value of chewing paths were used as parameters.
Cycle times of movements of lower facial skin during gum chewing were invariant and stable on each chewing side, and showed no significant differences between the sides. The similarities of chewing paths and directions of movements of lower facial skin during gum chewing showed mirror-image relationships between the sides. Furthermore, these relationships during gum chewing were stable on both sides.
Based on these findings, it was found that movements of lower facial skin during left- and right-side chewing in healthy subjects were temporally and spatially invariant, stable and similar on both sides. Moreover, the present results suggest, from the viewpoint of kinematics, that a functional difference may not exist between these movements on the two sides.
Coordinated mandibular and head-neck movements during jaw opening-closing activities suggest a close functional linkage between the jaw and the neck regions. The present study investigated whether size and texture of bolus can influence head-neck behavior during chewing. Using an optoelectronic 3-D recording technique, we analyzed concomitant mandibular and head-neck movements in 12 healthy adults chewing small (3 g) and large (9 g) boluses of chewing gum and Optosil. The main finding was a head extension during chewing, the amount of which was related mainly to bolus size. Furthermore, each chewing cycle was accompanied not only by mandibular movements, but also by head extension-flexion movements. Larger head movement amplitudes were correlated with larger size and, to some extent, also with harder texture of the bolus. The results suggest that head-neck behavior during chewing is modulated in response to changes in jaw sensory-motor input.
The tongue plays an important role in mastication and swallowing by its contact with the hard palate. Using an experimental palatal plate with 7 pressure sensors, and recording jaw movement using mandibular kinesiography, we assessed, in healthy subjects, the coordination of tongue and jaw movements during the entire masticatory sequence of solids, by measuring tongue pressure against the hard palate. Tongue pressure appeared during the occlusal phase, reached a peak near the start of opening, and disappeared during opening. Specific patterns in order, duration, and magnitude of tongue pressure were seen at the 7 pressure sensors in each chewing stroke. Magnitude and duration were significantly larger in the late stage of chewing (8 strokes before initial swallowing) than in the early stage (until 8 strokes after starting mastication). The normal pattern of tongue contact against the hard palate, control of tongue activity, and coordination with jaw movement during mastication is described.
It has been generally suggested that chewing produces an enhancing effect on cognitive performance-related aspects of memory by the test battery. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that chewing is associated with activation of various brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex. However, little is known about the relation between cognitive performances affected by chewing and the neuronal activity in specified regions in the brain. We therefore examined the effects of chewing on neuronal activities in the brain during a working memory task using fMRI. The subjects chewed gum, without odor and taste components, between continuously performed two- or three-back (n-back) working memory tasks. Chewing increased the BOLD signals in the middle frontal gyrus (Brodmann's areas 9 and 46) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the n-back tasks. Furthermore, there were more prominent activations in the right premotor cortex, precuneus, thalamus, hippocampus and inferior parietal lobe during the n-back tasks after the chewing trial. These results suggest that chewing may accelerate or recover the process of working memory besides inducing improvement in the arousal level by the chewing motion.
Occlusion and brain function: mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction
- Y Ono
- T Yamamoto
- K Kubo
- M Onozuka
Ono Y, Yamamoto T, Kubo K, Onozuka M. Occlusion and brain
function: mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(8):624-640. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02079.x. PMID: 20236235.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
Chewing ability and quality of life among the elderly residing in a rural community in Japan
- H Miura
- K Miura
- H Mizugai
Miura H. Miura K. Mizugai H, et al. Chewing ability and quality of life among the elderly residing in a rural community in
Japan. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(8):731-734. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00590.x. PMID: 10931271.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS 24. Bracco P, Deregibus A, Piscetta R. Effects of different jaw relations on postural stability in human subjects
- A Shinya
- T Sato
- R Hisanaga
Shinya A, Sato T, Hisanaga R, et al. Time course analysis
of influence of food hardness on head posture and pitching
of head during masticatory movement. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll.
2013;54(2):73-80. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.54.73. PMID:
903577.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus
18. Inada E, Saitoh I, Nakakura-Ohshima K, et al. Association
between mouth opening and upper body movement with
intake of different-size food pieces during eating. Arch Oral Biol.
2012;57(3):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.023. PMID:
21975117.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
19. Kobayashi Y, Shiga H, Arakawa I, et al. Masticatory path
pattern during mastication of chewing gum with regard to gender difference. J Prosthodont Res. 2009;53(1):11-14. doi: 10.1016/j.
jpor.2008.08.002. PMID: 19318065.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
20. Zammit GV, Menz HB, Munteanu SE. Reliability of the TekScan
MatScan (R) system for the measurement of plantar forces and
pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults. J Foot
Ankle Res. 2010;3:11-19. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-11. PMID:
20565812.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar WoS
21. Bracco P, Deregibus A, Piscetta R, Ferrario G. Observations on the correlation between posture and jaw
position: a pilot study. Cranio®. 1998;16(4):252-258. doi:
10.1080/08869634.1998.11746065. PMID: 10029753.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
22. Nicolakis P, Nicolakis M, Piehslinger E, et al. Relationship
between craniomandibular disorders and poor posture. Cranio®.
2000;18(2):106-112. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2000.11746121.
PMID: 11202820.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
23. Milani RS, De Perière DD, Lapeyre L, Pourreyron L. Relationship between dental occlusion and posture. Cranio®.
2000;18(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2000.11746124.
PMID: 11202823.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
24. Bracco P, Deregibus A, Piscetta R. Effects of different jaw
relations on postural stability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett.
2004;356(3):228-230. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.11.055. PMID:
15036636.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus
25. Bogduk N. The clinical anatomy of the cervical dorsal rami.
Spine. 1982;7(4):319-330. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198207000-00001. PMID: 71350
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS 29. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridges of cross-arch extension. I. Bilateral end abutments
- Y Yagi
- H Yajima
- A Sakuma
- Y Aihara
- J Kawanokuchi
- Q Fu
- J Cui
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
26. Yagi Y, Yajima H, Sakuma A, Aihara Y. Influence of vibration
to the neck, trunk and lower extremity muscles on equilibrium in normal subjects and patients with unilateral labyrinthine dysfunction. Acta Otolarygol. 2000;120(2):182-186. doi:
10.1080/000164800750000874. PMID: 11603768.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus
27. Kawanokuchi J, Fu Q, Cui J, et al. Influence of vestibulo-sympathetic reflex on muscle sympathetic outflow during headdown tilt. Environ Med. 2001;45(2):66-68. PMID: 12353535.
PubMed Google Scholar
28. Takada Y, Miyahara T, Tanaka T, et al. Modulation of H reflex
of pretibial muscles and reciprocal Ia inhibition of soleus muscle
during voluntary teeth clenching in humans. J Neurophysiol.
2000;83(4):2063-2070. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2063. PMID:
10758116.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
29. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Occlusal force pattern during
chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridges of
cross-arch extension. I. Bilateral end abutments. J Oral Rehabil.
1986;13(1):57-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb01556.x. PMID:
3511198.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus
30. Watanabe A, Shiga H, Kobayashi Y. Occlusal contacting
condition and masticatory function of 2 types of pattern that
differ in the closing path of the mandibular incisal point during
chewing. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55(4):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.
jpor.2011.03.004. PMID: 21531190.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS
31. Fitzpatrick R, Rogers DK, McCloskey DI. Stable human standing with lower-limb muscle afferents providing the only sensory
input. J Physiol. 1994;480(2):395-403. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.
sp020369. PMID: 7869254.
Full text links CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Scopus WoS