Content uploaded by Chinthamani .S
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Chinthamani .S on Aug 05, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.
INDIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
RESEARCH ARTICLE
OPEN ACCESS
Received: 26-05-2023
Accepted: 01-06-2023
Published: 18-07-2023
Citation: Chinthamani S, Lokesh P
(2023) The Extension of Chebyshev
Polynomial Bounds Involving
Bazilevic Function. Indian Journal of
Science and Technology 16(27):
2040-2046. https://doi.org/
10.17485/IJST/v16i27.icrms-207
∗Corresponding author.
chinthamani@stellamariscollege.edu.in
Funding: None
Competing Interests: None
Copyright: © 2023 Chinthamani &
Lokesh. This is an open access
article distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium,
provided the original author and
source are credited.
Published By Indian Society for
Education and Environment (iSee)
ISSN
Print: 0974-6846
Electronic: 0974-5645
The Extension of Chebyshev Polynomial
Bounds Involving Bazilevic Function
S Chinthamani1∗, P Lokesh2
1Department of Mathematics, Stella Maris College, Cathedral Road, Tamil Nadu, India
2Department of Mathematics, Adhiparasakthi College of Engineering, Kalavai, Tamil Nadu,
India
Abstract
Objectives: To propose a new class of bi-univalent function based on
Bazilevic Sakaguchi function using the trigonometric polynomials Tnq,ei
θ
and
to find the Taylor – Maclaurin coefficient inequalities and Fekete – Szego
inequality for upper bounds. Methods: The Chebychev’s polynomial has vast
applications in GFT. The powerful tool called convolution (Or Hadamard
product), subordination techniques are used in designing the new class.
In establishing the core results, derivative tests, triangle inequality and
appropriate results that are existing are used. Findings:The trigonometric
polynomials are applied and a class of Bi-univalent functions Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
)
involving Bazilevic Sakaguchi function is derived. More over, the maximum
bounds for initial coefficients and Fekete-Szego functional for the underlying
class are computed. This finding opens the door to young researchers to move
further with successive coefficient estimates and related research. Novelty:In
recent days, several studies on Chebyshev’s polynomial are revolving around
univalent function classes among researchers. But in this article a significant
amount of interplay between Chebyshev’s polynomial and Bazilevic Sakaguchi
function associated with Bi-univalent functions is clearly established.
Keywords: Bistarlike functions; Bi-Starlike Functions; Bi-Univalent Functions;
Sakaguchi Type Functions; Subordination; Trigonometric Polynomials
1 Introduction
Let A represent the family of functions f that are analytic in the open unit disk ∆=
(z∈C:(z|<1}of the form:
f(z) = z+∑∞
k=2
ρ
kzk(1)
For h(z)∈A, given by
h(z) = z+∑∞
k=2hkzk
Let S mean the subclass of A consisting of univalent functions in∆. It is well known
(refer(1,2)) that every function of f∈Svirtually possesses an inverse of f, dened by
f−1[f(z)] = z,(z∈∆)and f[f−1(w)] = w,((w|<r0(f);r0(f)≥1
4), where
f−1(w) = w−
ρ
2w2+ (2
ρ
2
2−
ρ
3)w3−(5
ρ
3
2−5
ρ
2
ρ
3+
ρ
4)w4+....... (2)
https://www.indjst.org/ 2040
Chinthamani & Lokesh / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2023;16(27):2040–2046
When the function f∈Ais bi-univalent, both fand f−1are univalent in∆. Let ∑be the class of bi-univalent functions in ∆
given by (1). In fact, Feras Yousef et al.(2)have revived the study of analytic and bi-univalent functions in recent years. Many
researchers investigated and propounded various subclasses of bi-univalent functions and xed the initial coecients (
ρ
2|and
(
ρ
3|(3–6)
For analytic functions f and g, f is said to be subordinate to g, denotedf(z)≺g(z), if there is an analytic function w such
that w(0) = 0,(w(z)|<1and f(z) = g(w(z)).
A function f∈Sis said to be Bazilevic function if it satises (see(7)):
ℜz1−
λ
f′(z)
(f(z))1−
λ
>0,(z∈∆,
λ
≥0)
is class of the function was denoted by B
λ
. Consequently when
λ
=0, the class of starlike function is obtained.
In recently, P.Lokesh et al(8)investigated the inequalities of coecient for certain classes of Sakaguchi type functions that
satisfy geometrical condition as
R(s−t)z(f′(z)
f(sz)−f(tz)>
α
(3)
for complex numbers s, t but s =t and
α
(0 ≤
α
< 1) .
e convolution or Hadamard product of two functions f,g∈Ais dened by f∗gand is dened by
(f∗g)(z) = z+∑∞
n=2
ρ
n
δ
nzn.
where fis given by (1) and g(z) = z+∑∞
n=2
δ
nzn.
Let R= (−∞,∞)be the set of real numbers. Cbe the complex numbers and
N:={1,2,3,...}=N0/(0}
be the set of positive integers. Let ∆= (z∈C:(z|<1}be open unit disc in C. A well known, the trigonometric polynomials
Tnq,ei
θ
are expressed by the generating function
ξ
qei
θ
,z=1
(1−zei
θ
)(1−qze−i
θ
)
=∑∞
n=0Tnq,ei
θ
zn,(q∈(−1,1),
θ
∈(−
π
,
π
],z∈∆).
where
Tnq,ei
θ
=ei(n+1)
θ
−qn+1e−i(n+1)
θ
ei
θ
−qe−i
θ
(n≥2)
with
T0q,ei
θ
=1,T1q,ei
θ
=ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
,T2q,ei
θ
=e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+q....
e obtained results for q=1give the corresponding ones for Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind. e classical
Chebyshev polynomials which are used in this paper, have been in the late eighteenth century, when was dened using de
Moivre’s formula by Chebyshev(refer(9)). Such polynomials as (for example) the Fibonacci polynomials, the Lucas polynomials,
the Pell polynomials and the families of orthogonal polynomials and other special polynomials as well as their generalizations
are potentially important in the elds of probability, statistics, mechanics and number theory(10–14)
2 Methodology
In the present work, the convolution operator Ia,b,cdue to Hohlov (refer(15,16), which is special case of the Rajavadivelu
emangani et al (refer(17)) is recalled.
For the complex parameters a,b&c(c=0,−1,−2,....)the Gaussian hyper geometric function 2F1(a,b,c:z)is dened as
2F1(a,b,c:z) = ∑∞
n=0
(a)n(b)n
(c)n
zn
n!=1+∑∞
n=2
(a)n−1(b)n−1
(c)n−1
zn−1
(n−1)!(z∈∆).
https://www.indjst.org/ 2041
Chinthamani & Lokesh / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2023;16(27):2040–2046
where (a)nis the Pochhammer symbol (or the shied factorial) given by
(a)n:=Γ(a+k)
Γ(a)=1,n=0
a(a+1)(a+2)... (a+n−1),n∈N:={1,2, ...}
Now, let us consider a linear operator introduced by Isra Al-shbeil et al (refer(18)) and
Ia,b,c:A→A.
dened by the Hadamard productIa,b,cf(z)=(z2F1(a,b,c:z)) ∗f(z).
It is observed that, for a function fof the form (1),
Ia,b,cf(z) = z+∑∞
n=2Ψn
ρ
nzn,(z∈∆).
where Ψn=(a)n−1(b)n−1
(c)n−1(n−1)!.
In this paper, a new class of bi-univalent function based on Bazilevic Sakaguchi function using the trigonometric polynomials
Tnq,ei
θ
is established. Furthermore, the coecient bounds and Fekete – Szego inequalities are also derived for this class.
Denition 1 : For 0≤
λ
<1,(
τ
|≤1,
τ
=1,q∈(−1,1),
θ
∈(−
π
,
π
], a function f∈Σgiven by (1) is said to be in the class
Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
)if it satises the following conditions,
((1−
τ
)z)1−
λ
Ia,b,cf(z)′
Ia,b,cf(z)−Ia,b,cf(
τ
z)1−
λ
≺
φ
qei
θ
,z,(z∈∆)(4)
((1−
τ
)z)1−
λ
Ia,b,cg(w)′
Ia,b,cg(w)−Ia,b,cg(
τ
w)1−
λ
≺
φ
qei
θ
,w,(w∈∆)(5)
where the function g=f−1.
By taking the parameters
λ
=0and
τ
=0, which was introduced by Sahsene Altinkaya et al (refer(19)).
3 Result and Discussion
In this section, we obtain the extension of Chebyshev polynomial bounds(
ρ
2|and (
ρ
3|for the function of the
class Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
).
eorem 1 Let the function fgiven by (1) be in the class Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
).
en
|
ρ
2|≤ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
2|ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|
2
e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q3−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
−e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))
+2e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+q(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2
|(6)
and
(
ρ
3|≤ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3
+e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q
(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2
,(7)
Proof. Since f∈Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
), there is two analytic functions
ϕ
,
χ
such that
ϕ
(0) = 0,(
ϕ
(z)|=r1z+r2z2+r3z3+...<1,(z∈∆)
χ
(0) = 0,(
χ
(w)|=s1w+s2w2+s3w3+...<1,(w∈∆)
https://www.indjst.org/ 2042
Chinthamani & Lokesh / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2023;16(27):2040–2046
We can express as
((1−
τ
)z)1−
λ
Ia,b,cf(z)′
Ia,b,cf(z)−Ia,b,cf(
τ
z)1−
λ
=1+T1q,ei
θ
ϕ
(z) + T2q,ei
θ
ϕ
2(z) + ...
and
((1−
τ
)w)1−
λ
Ia,b,cg(w)′
Ia,b,cg(w)−Ia,b,cg(
τ
w)1−
λ
=1+T1q,ei
θ
χ
(w) + T2q,ei
θ
χ
2(w) + ...
or, equivalently,
((1−
τ
)z)1−
λ
ℑa,b,cf(z)′
ℑa,b,cf(z)−Ia,b,cf(
τ
z)1−
λ
=1+T1q,ei
θ
r1z+T1q,ei
θ
r2+T2q,ei
θ
r2
1z2+.. . (8)
and
((1−
τ
)w)1−
λ
Ia,b,cg(w)′
Ia,b,cg(w)−Ia,b,cg(
τ
w)1−
λ
=1+T1q,ei
θ
s1w+T1q,ei
θ
s2+T2q,ei
θ
s2
1w2+... (9)
It is well known that
|ri|≤1and |si|≤1,(∀i∈N)(10)
From the equations (8) and (9), we obtain
(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))Ψ2
ρ
2=T1q,ei
θ
r1(11)
3−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
ρ
3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)
2(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
ρ
2
2
=T1q,ei
θ
r2+T2q,ei
θ
r2
1
(12)
−(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))Ψ2
ρ
2=T1q,ei
θ
s1(13)
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)
2(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
ρ
2
2−3−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
ρ
3
=T1q,ei
θ
s2+T2q,ei
θ
s2
1
(14)
From the equations (11) and (13), we easily nd
r1=−s1(15)
2(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2
ρ
2
2=T2
1q,ei
θ
r2
1+s2
1,(16)
Summing the equations (12) and (14), we get
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
ρ
2
2
=T1q,ei
θ
(r2+s2) + T2q,ei
θ
r2
1+s2
1(17)
https://www.indjst.org/ 2043
Chinthamani & Lokesh / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2023;16(27):2040–2046
By substituting the values of r2
1+s2
1from (16) in the right side of (17), we get
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
−2(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2T2(q,ei
θ
)
T2
1(q,ei
θ
)
=T1q,ei
θ
(r2+s2),
ρ
2
2
which yields
ρ
2
2=T3
1q,ei
θ
(r2+s2)
T2
1q,ei
θ
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
−2(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2T2q,ei
θ
(18)
By subtracting the equation (14) from equation (12), we nd
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
ρ
3−23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
ρ
2
2
=T1q,ei
θ
(r2−s2)(19)
In view of equation (16), the equation (19) becomes
ρ
3=T1q,ei
θ
(r2−s2)
2(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3
+T2
1q,ei
θ
r2
1+s2
1
2(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2
By applying equation (10), we can easily obtain the desired inequalities in eorem 1.
Taking the parameters
λ
=0and
τ
=0in the eorem 1, we get the following remark.
Remark 1 If f∈Pa,b,c
Σ(q,
θ
), then
(
ρ
2|≤(ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|(ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|
(2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)Ψ3−(2e2i
θ
+2q2e−2i
θ
+3q)Ψ2
2|,
and
(
ρ
3|≤ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
2Ψ3
+e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q
Ψ2
2
.
which was investigated by Sahsene Altinkaya et al(19).
Fekete – Szego inequality for the function classPa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
)
In this section, we provide Fekete – Szego inequalities for function in the class Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,q,
θ
). is inequality is given in
the following theorem.
eorem 2 For
µ
∈Rthe function f∈Pa,b,c
Σ(
λ
,
τ
,
µ
,q,
θ
).
ρ
3−
µρ
2
2≤
|ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|
(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3,|
µ
−1| ≤
γ
2|1−
µ
||e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q∥ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|
2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2)Ψ3
−e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))
+2e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+q(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2
|,|
µ
−1|≥
γ
where
γ
=
2e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q3−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
−e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))
+2e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+q(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2
2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3
.
Proof. From the equation (18) and the equation (19), we observe that
ρ
3−
µρ
2
2=T1q,ei
θ
(r2−s2)
2(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3
+(1−
µ
)T3
1q,ei
θ
(r2+s2)
T2
1q,ei
θ
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
−2(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2T2q,ei
θ
https://www.indjst.org/ 2044
Chinthamani & Lokesh / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2023;16(27):2040–2046
=T1q,ei
θ
ζ
(
µ
) + 1
2(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3r2
+
ζ
(
µ
)−1
2(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3s2
where
ζ
(
µ
) = (1−
µ
)T2
1q,ei
θ
T2
1q,ei
θ
23−(1−
λ
)1+
τ
+
τ
2Ψ3
−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
)(2(1−
τ
) +
λ
(1+
τ
))Ψ2
2
−2(2−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
))2Ψ2
2T2q,ei
θ
en, in view of equation (10), we get
ρ
3−
µρ
2
2≤
|T1(q,ei
θ
)|
(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3,0≤ |
ζ
(
µ
)| ≤ 1
(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3
2|
ζ
(
µ
)|T1q,ei
θ
,|
ζ
(
µ
)| ≥ 1
(3−(1−
λ
)(1+
τ
+
τ
2))Ψ3
is evidently completes the proof of eorem 2.
Taking the parameters
λ
=0and
τ
=0, in eorem 2,
Remark 2 For
µ
∈R, let the function f∈Pa,b,c
Σ(
µ
,q,
θ
). en
ρ
3−
µρ
2
2
≤
|ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|
2Ψ3,|
µ
−1| ≤ 2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)Ψ3−(2e2i
θ
+2q2e−2i
θ
+3q)Ψ2
2
2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)Ψ3
|1−
µ
||e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q∥ei
θ
+qe−i
θ
|
|2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)Ψ3−(2e2i
θ
+2q2e−2i
θ
+3q)Ψ2
2|,
|
µ
−1| ≥ 2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)Ψ3−(2e2i
θ
+2q2e−2i
θ
+3q)Ψ2
2
2(e2i
θ
+q2e−2i
θ
+2q)Ψ3
4 Conclusion
In the present investigation, a new class of bi univalent function based on Bazilevic Sakaguchi function using the trigonometric
polynomials Tnq,ei
θ
is obtained in the open unit disc. Furthermore, belonging to this class, the Taylor – Maclaurin coecient
inequalities and the well knownFekete – Szego inequalities are also derived. ese ndings can further be improved by nding
sharpness. Moreover, Hankel Determinants and Toeplitz determinants for various integral orders can be computed in the future.
5 Declaration
is work has been presented in “International conference on Recent Strategies in Mathematics and Statistics (ICRSMS2022),
Organized by the Department of Mathematics of Stella Maris College and of IIT Madras during 19 to 21 May, 2022 at Chennai,
India. e Organizer claims the peer review responsibility.
References
1) Pathak HK. Univalent Functions and Applications. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981- 13-9734- 9_14.
2) Yousef F, Alroud S. New subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions endowed with coecient estimate problems. Analysis and Mathematical Physics.
2021;58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13324-021-00491- 7.
3) Srivastava HM, Altınkaya Ş, Yalçın S. Certain Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with the Horadam Polynomials. Iranian Journal of Science
and Technology, Transactions A: Science. 2019;43(4):1873–1879. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-018-0647- 0.
4) Khan B, Liu ZG, Shaba T, Khan S, Khan M. Applications of Derivative Operator to the Subclass of Bi-Univalent Functions Involving-Chebyshev
Polynomials. Journal of Mathematics;2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8162182.
5) Sakar F. Based on a family of bi-univalent functions introduced through the Faber polynomial expansions and Noor integral operator. Aims Mathematics.
2022;7(4):5146–5155. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022287.
6) Illafe M, Yousef F, Mohd MH, Supramaniam S. Initial Coecients Estimates and Fekete–Szegö Inequality Problem for a General Subclass of Bi-Univalent
Functions Dened by Subordination. Axioms. 2023;12(3):235. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12030235.
7) Breaz D, Kadhavoor R, Karthikeyan G, Murugusundaramoorthy, Bazilevivc. Functions of Complex Order with Respect to Symmetric Points. 2022.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6060316.
https://www.indjst.org/ 2045
Chinthamani & Lokesh / Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2023;16(27):2040–2046
8) Lokesh P, Srutha B, Keerthi. Coecient inequality for for Sakaguchi kind of Functions Related to Shell – like Curves Connected with Fibonacci Numbers
. . Available from: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.J1038.08810S19.
9) Lokesh P, Keerthi BS. Type Of Functions. Advances in Mathematics: Scientic Journal. 2020;9(8):5763–5774. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37418/
amsj.9.8.44.
10) Amourah A, Al-Hawary T, Frasin BA. Application of Chebyshev polynomials to certain class of bi-Bazilevič functions of order
α
+i
β
.Afrika Matematika.
2021;32(5-6):1059–1066. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-021-00881- x.
11) Rahman A, Juma S, Al-Khafaji SN, Engel O. Chebyshev Polynomials for Certain Subclass of Bazilević Functions Associated with Ruscheweyh Derivative.
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics. 2021;45(2):173–180. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354780667.
12) Oluwayemi MO, Olubunmi A, Fadipe-Joseph. Results on a certain class of analytic functions associated with Chebyshev polynomial. . Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01482.
13) Najafzadeh S, Salleh Z. Univalent Functions by Means of Chebyshev Polynomials. Journal of Function Spaces. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.
1155/2022/9679912.
14) Altınkaya Ş, Yalçin S. e (p, q)-Chebyshev polynomial bounds of a general bi-univalent function class. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/
s40590-019- 00246-2.
15) Shehab NH, Juma ARS. Some Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Convolution Operator. 2021 International Conference on Communication &
Information Technology (ICICT). 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT52195.2021.9568420.
16) Sharma P, Raina KR, Sokół J. On a Generalized Convolution Operator. On a Generalized Convolution. . Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/
sym13112141.
17) emangani R, Porwal S, Magesh N. Generalized hypergeometric distribution and its applications on univalent functions. 2020. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020- 02515-5.
18) Isra Al-shbeil ,Jianhua Gong and Timilehin Gideon Shaba , Coecients Inequalities for the Bi-Univalent Functions Related to q-Babalola Convolution
Operator. Journal of fractal and fractional. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020155.
19) Altinkaya S, Mugesakar F, Aydogan SM. e extension Chebyshev polynomial bounds for general subclasses of bi-univalent functions involving
subordination. Tbilisi Mathematical Journal. 2020;p. 187–194. Available from: https://avesis.itu.edu.tr/yayin/af9d1e02-eead-4036-99ca- 095cb1b5872e/
the-extension- chebyshev-polynomial- bounds-for-general- subclasses-of-bi- univalent-functions-involving- subordination/document.pdf.
https://www.indjst.org/ 2046