Content uploaded by Chandan Suman
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Chandan Suman on Jul 24, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
24
Cultivating a Growth-Oriented Mindset in Educational Settings
Chandan Suman
Department of Foreign Language, Faculty of Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi
hps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8154509
Abstract
This research paper emphasizes the importance of cultivating a growth-oriented mindset in educational
settings. A growth-oriented mindset believes that intelligence, abilities, and talents can be improved
through effort, perseverance, and effective strategies. It explores the differences between a growth
mindset and a fixed mindset and their implications for learning, motivation, and achievement. Strategies
include providing constructive feedback, emphasizing effort and process, teaching metacognitive skills,
promoting a supportive classroom climate, and integrating mindset interventions into the curriculum.
The paper also examines empirical studies on the positive effects of mindset interventions on students'
academic performance, motivation, resilience, and attitudes towards learning.
Keywords: Growth Mindset, Fixed Mindset, Educational Settings, Mindset Interventions,
Motivation, Academic Performance, Metacognition
1. Introduction
Fostering a growth-oriented mindset in students is increasingly important in educational
settings in today's complex and rapidly changing world (Abdelrahman, 2020; Hanson et al.,
2016; Jared R. Baierschmidt, 2022; Moy et al., 2016; Schultz, 1997; Winstone et al., 2017).
The basic principle of a growth-oriented mindset is the belief that intelligence and abilities can
be developed through effort and successful strategies rather than being fixed traits. The
development of such a mindset can offer students more independence, improve their
educational experiences, and provide them the tools they need to succeed in college and beyond
(Barbouta et al., 2020; Bostwick et al., 2017; Limeri et al., 2020; Manchi Chao et al., 2017;
Nalipay et al., 2021; Rohne, 2015; Wormeli, 2018).
In order to investigate the development of a growth-oriented mindset in educational settings,
this research paper will concentrate on the theoretical foundations, various strategies and
interventions implemented by educators, the significance of offering constructive feedback,
highlighting the importance of effort and process, teaching metacognitive skills, promoting a
supportive classroom environment, and incorporating mindset interventions into the
curriculum.
The theoretical foundations of mindset serve as the foundation for understanding the idea and
its significance for education. Mindset theory, which has its roots in the groundbreaking
research of Carol Dweck, emphasises the malleability of intelligence and the belief that people
can improve their skills by hard work, strategic preparing, and a positive outlook (Dweck,
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
25
2017; Sanguras, 2021; Wormeli, 2018; Yeager & Dweck, 2012). By understanding the
theoretical foundations, educators may more clearly understand the significance of developing
a growth-oriented, and its impact on students' academic results (Balçikanli, 2010; Balçkanl,
2010; Entwistle, 2014; Luria et al., 2021).
The use of a variety of strategies and interventions by educators can help learners develop a
growth-oriented mindset. These strategies include giving helpful feedback that emphasises
work, success, and improvement. Students develop a sense of, motivation for, and commitment
to continuous growth whenever the emphasis is shifted from merely outcomes to the learning
process. The development of metacognitive skills additionally enables students to become self-
regulated learners who can maintain track of their development, evaluate their learning
approaches, and make the necessary changes to maximise their development and success
(Entwistle, 2014; Havard, 2007; "The Relation of Interest to the Motivation of Behaviour: A
Self-Determination Theory Perspective," 2020; Wang & Liou, 2017; Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
Another crucial aspect of fostering a growth-oriented mindset is creating an encouraging
educational setting. Students receive the support and motivation they need to adopt a growth
mindset in a classroom environment that encourages collaboration, encourages effort, and
welcomes taking risks (Ames, 1992; Ames & Archer, 1988; Bostwick et al., 2020; Kaur &
Awang Hashim, 2016; Lazarides & Rubach, 2017; Schraw et al., 1995; Vassiou et al., 2016).
Students are more inclined to accept challenges and persevere in the face of difficulties when
they feel valued, respected, and safe to make mistakes.
The consistent reinforcement of growth mindset principles can be achieved by integrating
mindset interventions into the curriculum (Blackwell et al., 2007; Krenn et al., 2013; Miller,
2019; Orosz et al., 2017; Pappa et al., 2003; Paunesku et al., 2015). Teachers can assist students
in understanding the value of a growth-oriented mindset in various situations by integrating
mindset-focused lessons, thinking exercises, and goal-setting opportunities across different
topics. Students who use this interdisciplinary method accept mindset concepts and apply them
to their academic work and personal growth.
This research paper aims to provide a thorough understanding of how a growth-oriented
mindset can be fostered in educational settings through an investigation of the theoretical basis
of various strategies and interventions applied by educators, the significance of offering
constructive feedback, emphasising the value of effort and process, teaching metacognitive
skills, encouraging a supportive classroom environment, and integrating mindset interventions
into the curriculum. Providing students, a growth mindset will enable them to accept
difficulties, persevere in the face of failures, and cultivate a lifetime passion of learning and
personal development.
2. Theoretical foundations of mindset
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
26
The underlying psychological ideas and concepts that serve as the framework for understanding
and investigating the various mindsets that people can have are referred to as the theoretical
foundations of mindset. Psychotherapist Carol Dweck (Dweck, 2017a) is one of the key players
in the theoretical foundations of mindset, and her research has significantly influenced our
understanding of the concept in question.
The growth mindset and the fixed mindset are the two main mindsets that constitute mindset
theory. People who have a growth mindset, in Dweck's words, think that they can develop and
increase their skills, intelligence, and capabilities via effort, learning, and effective strategies
(Dweck, 2017; Hochanadel & Finamore, 2015; Rohne, 2015; Wormeli, 2018). They embrace
failures as opportunities for learning and view obstacles as opportunities for growth. People
who have a fixed mindset, on the other hand, think that their intellectual abilities and skill levels
are unchangeable fixed traits that cannot be effectively improved. Fearing failure, they
frequently shy away from difficulties and see failure as a sign of incompetence (Atwood, 2010;
Bostwick et al., 2017; Nalipay et al., 2021; Rattan et al., 2015).
The idea of mindset is influenced by a number of psychological concepts and theories.
Attribution theory, which focuses on how people explain the reasons of behaviour or results
(Nasu, 1989; Rotella, 1978; Thomas J. Sullivan, 1975; Ward, 1979; Weiner, 1986), is a
significant theoretical foundation. Ability is viewed as an uncontrollable cause in traditional
attribution theory (Weiner, 1972). Although students can blame their failure on their ability, if
they have a growth mindset, they won't view ability as being out of their control.
According to Nasu (1989), Rotella (1978), and Weiner (1972), attribution theory can describe
how people with various mindsets assign success or failure. While those with a fixed mindset
may attribute success or failure to innate ability or a lack of it, those with a growth mindset are
more likely to attribute their achievement to effort and effective strategies.
Another prominent paradigm that adds to the philosophical foundations of mindset is self-
efficacy theory, established by psychologist Albert Bandura (Wessels, 2012). Self-efficacy is
the concept that a person has faith in their abilities to carry out tasks and reach goals (Bandura,
Albert: Social Learning Theory, 2010). Albert Bandura's self-efficacy hypothesis, which was
first presented in 1977, contends that positive performance-associated mastery experiences can
lead to therapeutic changing. According to Bandura, self-efficacy judgements have a greater
influence on phobic behaviour than outcome expectations. Self-efficacy theory explains how
people's motivation and persistence are influenced by their ideas about their capacity to succeed
(Ajzen, 2002) in the context of mindset. Because they are convinced that their efforts will result
in growth and success, people with growth mindsets are more likely to have stronger self-
efficacy (Pretz & Nelson, 2017; Trautner & Schwinger, 2020).
Additionally, Albert Bandura's social cognitive theory is important to the study of mindset. The
important role of self-beliefs in human thought processes, motivation, and behaviour is
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
27
emphasised by Bandura's social cognitive theory of human functioning. The self-system that
enables people to exert some control over their thoughts, feelings, and actions is highlighted
by social cognitive theory (Bandura, A., 2003, 2008; Colledge, R., 2002). The reciprocal
interaction between people, their behaviour, and the environment is emphasised by social
cognitive theory. It emphasises how social modelling and observational learning play a part in
how beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours are formed (Abdullah, 2019; Bandura, 1988; Dweck &
Leggett, 1988; Mulhollem, 2017). The social setting, which includes the attitudes and
behaviours of teachers, peers, and parents, can develop and impact people's mindsets,
according to social cognitive theory.
These theoretical foundations offer a framework for understanding the underlying motivational
and cognitive processes that contribute to the development and maintenance of different
mindsets. They support the development of interventions and strategies by academics and
educators that foster a growth-oriented mindset and improve learning outcomes. Teachers and
policymakers can create evidence-based practises that support a positive learning environment
and encourage a belief in people's capacity for progress by understanding the theoretical
foundations of mindset.
3. Various strategies and interventions that educators can employ to foster a growth-
oriented mindset among students.
The development of a growth-oriented mindset in students are mostly the responsibility of
teachers, parents, friends and members of the society (Dweck, 2017; Manchi Chao et al., 2017;
Nalipay et al., 2021; Rohne, 2015; Wormeli, 2018). They can use these strategies and
interventions that promote a belief in growth and development:
1. Teach and promote the concept of a growth mindset:
Introduce the concept to kids that intelligence and skills can be acquired with work and
practical training rather than being fixed traits. Share examples of successful people
who overcame obstacles through perseverance and commitment (Barbouta et al., 2020;
Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
2. Provide explicit instruction on learning strategies:
Teach students how to set goals, reflect on their own thinking, engage in metacognition,
and use a variety of learning approaches as focused strategies for learning and problem-
solving. Encourage children to realise that purposeful practise can help them develop
their skills (Ames & Archer, 1988; Aslan & Aktaş, 2020; Kaplan & Midgley, 1999;
Shelly, 2001).
3. Encourage a positive learning environment:
Develop a culture in the classroom that encourages effort, taking on challenges, and
learning from mistakes. Make learning a priority rather than merely concentrating on
grades or results. Rather than focusing just on students' accomplishments, recognise
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
28
their growth and effort (Huang et al., 2019; Koul et al., 2012; Müller & Louw, 2004;
Tas, 2016; Zher Huey & Hussain, 2010).
4. Foster a growth mindset through feedback:
Provide clear, constructive feedback that emphasises effort, progress, and potential
development areas. (Ashford & De Stobbeleir, 2013; Baghurst et al., 2012; Carless et
al., 2011; Earley et al., 1990; Krenn et al., 2013; Senko & Harackiewicz, 2005)
Encourage students to look at feedback as a helpful instrument for progress rather than
a judgement of their skills.
5. Use the power of "yet":
Introduce the word "yet" to your learners' reports about their abilities. For instance, urge
students to say, "I can't solve this problem yet," rather than, "I can't solve this problem."
This simple change in language emphasises the hopeful outlook for continued growth
and progress (Carol Dweck, 2012; Bailey & Garner, 2010; Park & Shon, 2020;
Winstone et al., 2017).
6. Emphasize the value of effort:
Help learners in realising that growth and change demand effort. Encourage them to
take on new challenges and persevere in the face of obstacles (Glerum et al., 2020;
Rautiainen et al., 2017). Show examples of well-known scientists, inventors, or artists
that overcame setbacks to succeed
7. Encourage reflection on learning experiences:
Encourage regular reflection on your life's lessons—both the successes and the failures.
Encourage learners to evaluate what strategies were effective and which needed to be
improved. This reflection supports the belief that change is achievable and helps
students in the growth of a deeper understanding of their learning process (Adelman &
Taylor, 1983; Cephe & Yalcin, 2015; Dweck, 1986; Erlenawati, 2002; Huitt & Monetti,
2008; Muoz & Ramirez, 2015).
8. Model a growth mindset:
Teachers should exhibit a growth mindset by being honest about their personal
struggles, setbacks, and educational experiences. According to Limeri et al. (2020),
Manchi Chao et al. (2017), Rohne (2015, 2016), Sanguras (2021) and Wormeli (2018),
this modelling can encourage students to adopt a similar mindset and approach their
own learning with determination and resilience.
9. Provide opportunities for self-paced learning:
Provide students the chance to choose their own pace and define their own learning
objectives. According to Dweck (1986); Dweck & Leggett (1988); Sutherland (2005);
Wang et al. (2017), this autonomy can enable students to take charge of their
educational experience and foster a sense of responsibility.
10. Incorporate mindset-focused curriculum and activities:
Incorporate discussions, activities, and lessons that are mindset-focused in the
curriculum. This could involve performing growth mindset exercises, investigating
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
29
real-world examples of people who have displayed a growth mindset, or incorporating
mindset concepts into subject-specific lessons (Bieg et al., 2011; Butler & Shibaz, 2008;
Johnson & Barrett, 2017; Power & Goodnough, 2018; Tang et al., 2012).
Educators may foster a growth-oriented mindset in the students they teach by using these
strategies and interventions, which will boost students' motivation, resiliency, and academic
success.
4. Providing constructive feedback, emphasizing the value of effort and process,
teaching metacognitive skills
Providing Constructive Feedback:
Offering students constructive feedback is a useful strategy for encouraging a growth-
oriented mindset. Teachers should provide feedback that is detailed, actionable, and
emphasises areas for growth rather than concentrating only on the outcome or grades.
(Carless et al., 2011; Koka & Hein, 2005; Krenn et al., 2013; Mcleod et al., 1992; Senko
& Harackiewicz, 2005; Winstone et al., 2019). Feedback should emphasise effort,
progress, and the development of skills rather than merely the result. Students may
promote a mindset that values continuous learning and perceives feedback as a chance
for progress by recognising the growth and improvement achieved by it.
Emphasizing the Value of Effort and Process:
By emphasising the significance of effort and the learning process, educators may help
in the development of a growth-oriented mindset. Praise for students' effort, dedication,
and approaches to learning should be given a greater importance than praise for their
achievements solely. This communicates the belief that dedication as well as
perseverance are necessary for success (Abuhassan & Bates, 2015; Glerum et al., 2020;
Rautiainen et al., 2017). Students are more likely to see obstacles as chances for
improvement when efforts and the process are emphasised, and they are also more
likely to believe that they can become better with persistent effort.
Teaching Metacognitive Skills:
The capacity to analyse and control one's own thought processes is referred to as
metacognition. By giving students metacognitive skills, educators can enable them to
take control of their learning experience and foster a growth-oriented mindset.
Educators can explicitly teach learners methods like goal-setting, self-reflection, self-
questioning, and planning (Abdelrahman, 2020; Deasyanti & Yudhistira, 2021).
Students can become more aware of their strengths and limitations and actively seek
out ways to improve by being encouraged to reflect on their own thinking and learning
strategies. With the help of metacognitive skills, students may keep updated on their
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
30
development, modify their approaches as needed, and feel confident in their ability to
learn and progress.
These strategies can make a big difference in helping students develop a growth-oriented
mindset in educational settings. Students can develop resilience, a love of learning, and the
confidence to grow and thrive both academically and personally by receiving constructive
criticism, emphasising the importance of effort and process, and gaining metacognitive skills
from their teachers.
5. Promoting a supportive classroom climate for Growth mindset
Creating a supportive learning environment in the classroom is essential for encouraging
students to adopt a growth mindset. Students are more likely to believe they can develop, learn,
and overcome obstacles when they are in a supportive setting (Huang et al., 2019; Koul et al.,
2012; Müller & Louw, 2004; Sökmen, 2021; Tas, 2016; Zher Huey & Hussain, 2010). Here are
some specific strategies to create a welcoming environment in the classroom that encourages a
growth mindset:
5.1 Create a positive and inclusive classroom culture:
Create an environment in the classroom where learners feel appreciated, respected, and
involved. Promote collaboration, cooperation, and peer support. Celebrate diversity and
promote an environment of acceptance and respect for all students to help learners feel
a feeling of belonging (Ames, 1992; Ames & Archer, 1988; Buric & Soric, 2011;
Schraw et al., 1995).
5.2 Model and reinforce a growth mindset:
Model a growth mindset throughout your words and actions as a teacher. Tell stories of
how you've improved yourself and learned from your failures. Give instances of people
who have exhibited a growth attitude. Praise for effort, perseverance, and the
implementation of successful solutions might help students adopt a growth mindset
(Barbouta et al., 2020; Dweck, 2017; Rattan et al., 2015; Rohne, 2015; Wormeli, 2018).
5.3 Encourage risk-taking and embrace mistakes:
Establish an environment where learners are comfortable for making mistakes and
messing up. Insist on the concept that failures offer opportunities for growth and
learning. Encourage students to analyse their mistakes, come up with solutions, and
enjoy the process of learning and problem-solving (Deci, 1992b; Linnenbrink, 2005;
Pintrich, 1991; Poskiparta et al., 2003; Sideridis, 2006).
5.4 Provide specific and constructive feedback:
Feedback should be clear, constructive, and centred on an individual's effort and
improvement. Point out strengths and places for improvement. Encourage students to
use feedback as a means of self-reflection and progress. Help students recognise that
feedback is an important tool for their learning process (Earley et al., 1990; Koka &
Hein, 2005; Podsakoff & Farh, 1989).
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
31
5.5 Foster a growth mindset through goal-setting:
Teach students the significance of goal-setting and assist them in acquiring the skills
needed to create goals that are both meaningful and attainable. Encourage students to
make both immediate and long-term goals that are consistent with their interests and
aspirations. Help them develop action plans and track their results in achieving their
objectives (Bostwick et al., 2017, 2020; DeBacker et al., 2018, Ebenezer Nrumah et al.,
2021; Lim & Ryu, 2019).
5.6 Promote a growth mindset through self-reflection:
Provide opportunities for evaluation on learning and development on a regular basis for
the students. Encourage learners to evaluate their abilities, opportunities for growth,
and successful methods for learning. Offer guidance on self-reflection strategies
including goal monitoring, writing down, and self-evaluations (Hochanadel &
Finamore, 2015; Li & Bates, 2019; Myers et al., 2016; Yeager et al., 2016).
5.7 Encourage a growth mindset language:
Encourage students to adopt growth mindset language in the classroom. Encourage
children to say things like "I can't do it yet" or "This is challenging, but I'll keep trying."
Assist pupils in reframing fixed mindset or negative self-talk into growth mindset
statements. Create a culture where students speak positively to one another and
encourage one another (Garca & De Caso, 2004; Koul et al., 2012; Myers et al., 2016;
Wolters, 2004; Wolters et al., 1996).
5.8 Provide opportunities for self-directed learning:
By encouraging self-directed learning, educators can help students develop a sense of
autonomy and freedom. Provide students the freedom to decide what they want to learn
about, explore tasks that focus on their interests, and determine what they will learn.
By allowing students to direct their own learning, this fosters a sense of control over
what they learn and develop a growth mindset (Deci, 1992; Diseth et al., 2014; Havard,
2007; Jiang et al., 2019).
Teachers may foster a growth mindset in their students by putting these strategies into practice.
Students' resilience, motivation, and self-belief in their ability to learn and succeed are all
encouraged by a supportive environment. It creates an environment that encourages ongoing
development and a passion for lifelong learning.
6. Integrating mindset interventions into the curriculum for growth mindset
An effective approach for encouraging and reinforcing a growth mindset in students is to
incorporate mindset interventions within the curriculum (Armitage-Chan & Maddison, 2019;
Cunningham & Gibson, 2022; Dufort, 2020; Luo, 2021). A comprehensive approach for
promoting a growth-oriented mindset can be developed by educators by including focused
activities and lessons that focus on mindset development. The following methods can be used
to incorporate mindset interventions into the curriculum:
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
32
6.1 Mindset-focused lessons:
Develop and offer lessons that explicitly cover the growth mindset and fixed mindset
concepts. To help learners understand the differences between the two mindsets and the
advantages of adopting a growth mindset (Cooley & Larson, 2018; Hanson et al., 2016;
Havard, 2007; Nalipay et al., 2021), these sessions can incorporate discussions,
readings, and interactive activities.
6.2 Reflective writing and journaling:
The curriculum should provide suggestions for writing and exercises for writing about
oneself. Encourage students to take a look about their growth, challenges, and learning
opportunities. Provide students questions that encourage self-awareness,
metacognition, and the use of growth mindset principles (Degol et al., 2018; Manchi
Chao et al., 2017; Rohne, 2015; Wormeli, 2018). Regular self-observation enables
students to internalise and reinforce the mindset ideas in a variety of academic and
personal circumstances
6.3 Mindset-infused project-based learning:
Create project-based learning activities that reflect the ideals of the growth mindset.
Create activities that challenge students, demand problem-solving, and promote
resilience. Throughout the project, emphasise the process of learning, repetition, and
growth. Give feedback that emphasises effort, improvement, and successful strategies.
Use project-based learning as a strategy to effectively foster and reinforce a growth
mindset (Bedford, 2017; Cooley & Larson, 2018; Hanson et al., 2016; Havard, 2007;
Zhao et al., 2018).
6.4 Mindset discussions and debates:
Provide time in class for discussions and arguments that are mindset-focused. Offer
open-ended queries or set up scenarios that challenge students' mindsets and encourage
them to think about other points of view. Encourage students to participate in respectful
discussions that foster critical thinking. Let them express their perspectives,
and provide evidence that supports up their claims (Degol et al., 2018; Rohne, 2015;
Wormeli, 2018; Yu & McLellan, 2020).
6.5 Mindset-based learning activities:
Create educational activities that concentrate on mindset development. Design puzzles
or challenges, for instance, that need determination, creative problem-solving, and a
growth mindset outlook. Engage students in mindset-focused activities and emphasise
the value of effort, learning from mistakes, and continual development by using
different strategies (Bedford, 2017; Cooley & Larson, 2018; Havard, 2007).
6.6 Mindset reinforcement across subject areas:
Introduce language and thinking concepts into various fields of study. Help learners in
establishing connections between their mindset principles and their development and
academic success. Encourage teachers from a variety of disciplines to incorporate
growth mindset in their assignments and tests. This multidisciplinary approach helps
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
33
students understand the need of a growth mindset in every aspect of their educational
experiences (DeBacker et al., 2018; Manchi Chao et al., 2017; Yeager et al., 2016).
6.7 Collaboration and peer support:
Encourage a collaborative and supportive peer environment that supports a growth
mindset. Encourage students to collaborate, offer constructive feedback, and help in
each other's personal and academic development. In order to foster shared belief in the
possibilities of progress and enhancement, create opportunities for peer mentoring,
cooperative learning activities, and collaborative endeavours (Krenn et al., 2013; Lai,
2011; Littlefield et al., 2015; Zher Huey & Hussain, 2010).
Teachers can make sure that growth mindset thoughts are continuously reinforced and
incorporated into various elements of students' learning experiences by including mindset
interventions into the curriculum. This comprehensive approach helps students in absorbing
mindset ideas, using them in many situations, and developing a strong self-belief in their
capacity for success.
7. Conclusion
It is crucial to foster students' confidence in their ability to learn, develop, and overcome
obstacles in learning settings by fostering a growth-oriented attitude. In understanding that
intelligence and abilities are not fixed but may be grown via effort and constructive strategies,
this research study has studied the theoretical foundations of mindset.
The study has provided a variety of strategies and interventions that teachers might use to
promote a growth-oriented mindset among students. Providing constructive criticism that
emphasises effort, process of learning, and progress while underlining the importance of effort
and the learning process is essential for encouraging a growth mindset. Additionally, teaching
metacognitive abilities empowers students to become self-regulated learners who can keep
watch of and adapt their learning approaches for continual growth.
Fostering a growth mindset in learners requires developing a supportive educational
environment. A classroom climate that promotes growth and resilience can be created through
establishing productive norms, creating strong connections between teachers and students, and
fostering collaboration and risk-taking. Furthermore, by including mindset interventions in the
curriculum, growth mindset principles are regularly emphasised and implemented in different
academic situations, supporting one's belief in the efficacy of improvement and growth.
The combination of these strategies will allow educators to develop a growth-oriented mindset
in learning environments. Teachers can encourage students to accept challenges, persevere in
the face of challenges, and cultivate a lifelong love of learning by implementing strategies like
giving constructive feedback, emphasising effort and process, teaching metacognitive skills,
encouraging a supportive classroom environment, and incorporating mindset interventions into
the curriculum.
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
34
In the end, encouraging a growth-oriented mindset gives students the knowledge and attitudes
they need to succeed in both their academic and personal lives. Students become resilient,
motivated learners who are better able to survive an ever-changing world and make significant
contributions to their communities and society as a whole by establishing a belief in their own
potential for growth and development.
Reference
Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their
impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
Abdullah, S. M. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory : A Bandura Thought Review. Journal
Psikodimensia, 18(1).
Abuhassàn, A., & Bates, T. C. (2015). Grit: Distinguishing effortful persistence from
conscientiousness. Journal of Individual Differences, 36(4).
https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000175
Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1983). Enhancing motivation for overcoming learning and
behavior problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16(7), 384–392.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948301600702
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory
of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2002.TB00236.X
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 84(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning
strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3).
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.260
Armitage-Chan, E., & Maddison, J. (2019). The influences of curriculum area and student
background on mindset to learning in the veterinary curriculum: a pilot study.
Veterinary Medicine and Science, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.174
Ashford, S. J., & De Stobbeleir, K. E. M. (2013). Feedback, goal setting, and task
performance revisited. In New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082744
Aslan, M., & Aktaş, K. (2020). The relationship between learning strategies and achievement
goal orientations of high school students. İlköğretim Online.
https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.661869
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
35
Atwood, J. R. (2010). Mindset, Motivation, and Metaphor in School and Sport. The
International Journal of Sport and Society: Annual Review, 1(4).
https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/cgp/v01i04/54051
Baghurst, T., Bradford, S., & Mulekar, M. (2012). The Effect of Feedback on Goal Setting
and Performance in a Pushup Task. Tahperd Journal, Summer issue.
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the
paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher
Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019
Bandura, A. (1988). Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory. Australian
Journal of Management, 13(2), 275–302.
https://doi.org/10.1177/031289628801300210
Barbouta, A., Barbouta, C., & Kotrotsiou, S. (2020). Growth Mindset and Grit: How Do
University Students’ Mindsets and Grit Affect their Academic Achievement?
International Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(1).
Bedford, S. (2017). Growth mindset and motivation: a study into secondary school science
learning. Research Papers in Education, 32(4).
https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1318809
Bedford, S. (2017). Growth mindset and motivation: a study into secondary school science
learning. Research Papers in Education, 32(4).
https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1318809
Bieg, S., Backes, S., & Mittag, W. (2011). The role of intrinsic motivation for teaching,
teachers’ care and autonomy support in students’ self-determined motivation. Zur
Rolle von Intrinsischer Lehrmotivation, Lehrerfürsorglichkeit Und
Autonomieunterstützung Für Die Selbstbestimmte Lernmotivation von Schülerinnen
Und Schülern., 3(1).\
Bostwick, K. C. P., Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2017). Students’ growth
mindsets, goals, and academic outcomes in mathematics. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie
/ Journal of Psychology, 225(2). https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000287
Bostwick, K. C. P., Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2020). Teacher, classroom,
and student growth orientation in mathematics: A multilevel examination of growth
goals, growth mindset, engagement, and achievement. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103100
Buric, I., & Soric, I. (2011). POSITIVE TEST EMOTIONS - CONTRIBUTIONS OF
STUDENTS GOAL ORIENTATIONS, VOLITIONAL STRATEGIES AND
ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. SUVREMENA PSIHOLOGIJA, 14(2).
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
36
Butler, R., & Shibaz, L. (2008). Achievement goals for teaching as predictors of students’
perceptions of instructional practices and students’ help seeking and cheating.
Learning and Instruction, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.004
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback
practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4).
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Cephe, P. T., & Yalcin, C. G. (2015). Beliefs about foreign language learning: The effects of
teacher beliefs on learner beliefs. Anthropologist, 19(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891651
Cooley, J. H., & Larson, S. (2018). Promoting a growth mindset in pharmacy educators and
students. In Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (Vol. 10, Issue 6).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.021
Cooley, J. H., & Larson, S. (2018). Promoting a growth mindset in pharmacy educators and
students. In Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (Vol. 10, Issue 6).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.021
Cunningham, M., & Gibson, R. (2022). Rethinking curriculum: A pandemic opportunity for
re-engagement with the Arts? Curriculum Perspectives.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-022-00170-y
Deasyanti, D., & Yudhistira, S. (2021). Goal Orientation & Metacognitive Self-Regulation
Students on Discourse Learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4).
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i4.31396
DeBacker, T. K., Heddy, B. C., Kershen, J. L., Crowson, H. M., Looney, K., & Goldman, J.
A. (2018). Effects of a one-shot growth mindset intervention on beliefs about
intelligence and achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 38(6).
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1426833]
Deci, E. L. (1992a/1992b). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-
determination theory perspective. Role of Interest in Learning and Development.
Degol, J. L., Wang, M. Te, Zhang, Y., & Allerton, J. (2018). Do Growth Mindsets in Math
Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0739-8
Diseth, Å., Meland, E., & Breidablik, H. J. (2014). Self-beliefs among students: Grade level
and gender differences in self-esteem, self-efficacy and implicit theories of
intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.003
Dufort, J. J. L. (2020). Tenth-grade student-participants’ perceptions of a growth mindset
curriculum: An action research study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B:
The Sciences and Engineering.
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
37
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational Processes Affecting Learning. American Psychologist,
41(10), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Dweck, C. S. (2017). The Journey to Children’s Mindsets—and Beyond. Child Development
Perspectives, 11(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/CDEP.12225
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and
Personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-
295X.95.2.256
Earley, P. C., Northcraft, G. B., Lee, C., & Lituchy, T. R. (1990). IMPACT OF PROCESS
AND OUTCOME FEEDBACK ON THE RELATION OF GOAL SETTING TO
TASK PERFORMANCE. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1).
https://doi.org/10.2307/256353
Ebenezer Nrumah, Prosper Nkrumah, & Yaw Frimpong. (2021). THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN GROWTH MINDSET, GRIT, AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT:
DOES GOAL COMMITMENT MATTER? EPRA International Journal of Research
& Development (IJRD). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra8371
Erlenawati. (2002). Beliefs about language learning: Indonesian learners’ perspectives, and
some implications for classroom practices. Australian Journal of Education, 46(3).
https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410204600306
García, J. N., & De Caso, A. M. (2004). Effects of a motivational intervention for improving
the writing of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly,
27(3), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593665
Glerum, J., Loyens, S. M. M., Wijnia, L., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2020). The effects of praise
for effort versus praise for intelligence on vocational education students. Educational
Psychology, 40(10), 1270–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1625306
Hanson, J., Bangert, A., & Ruff, W. (2016). Exploring the Relationship between School
Growth Mindset and Organizational Learning Variables: Implications for
Multicultural Education. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(2), 222–243.
https://doi.org/10.5296/JEI.V2I2.10075
Havard. (2007). Growth Mindset and Grit Literature review. Harvard Wellington Learning
and Research Centre.
Hochanadel, A., & Finamore, D. (2015). Fixed And Growth Mindset In Education And How
Grit Helps Students Persist In The Face Of Adversity. Journal of International
Education Research (JIER), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i1.9099
Huang, Y. C., Backman, S. J., Backman, K. F., McGuire, F. A., & Moore, D. W. (2019). An
investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: a self-
determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
38
Huitt, W. G., & Monetti, D. M. (2008). Social Learning Perspective. International
Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Jared R. Baierschmidt. (2022). Grit as a Predictor of Foreign Language Proficiency: An
Investigation of Grit and EFL Proficiency in Japanese University Students. English
as a Foreign Language International Journal, 26(3).
https://doi.org/10.56498/3302632022
Jiang, W., Xiao, Z., Liu, Y., Guo, K., Jiang, J., & Du, X. (2019). Reciprocal relations between
grit and academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual
Differences, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.004
Johnson, H. A., & Barrett, L. C. (2017). Your teaching strategy matters: How engagement
impacts application in health information literacy instruction. Journal of the Medical
Library Association, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.8
Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom
goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school: The mediating role of coping
strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 187–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80005-9
Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2005). The effect of perceived teacher feedback on intrinsic motivation
in physical education. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36(2).
Koul, R., Roy, L., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2012). Motivational goal orientation, perceptions of
biology and physics classroom learning environments, and gender. Learning
Environments Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9111-9
Krenn, B., Würth, S., & Hergovich, A. (2013). The impact of feedback on goal setting and
task performance: Testing the feedback intervention theory. Swiss Journal of
Psychology, 72(2). https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000101
Lai, K. W. (2011). Using collaborative peer feedback and supervision to support doctoral
research at a distance. ASCILITE 2011 - The Australasian Society for Computers in
Learning in Tertiary Education.
Li, Y., & Bates, T. C. (2019). You Can’t Change Your Basic Ability, but You Work at Things,
and That’s How We Get Hard Things Done: Testing the Role of Growth Mindset on
Response to Setbacks, Educational Attainment, and Cognitive Ability. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000669
Lim, H. J., & Ryu, J. J. (2019). The Role of Goal Contents in the Relationship between
Growth Mindset and Grit. The Education Research Institute, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.31352/jer.17.1.43
Limeri, L. B., Carter, N. T., Choe, J., Harper, H. G., Martin, H. R., Benton, A., & Dolan, E. L.
(2020). Growing a growth mindset: characterizing how and why undergraduate
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
39
students’ mindsets change. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00227-2
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple
goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 97(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197
Littlefield, C. M., Radosh, M. E., & Taddei, L. M. (2015). Organic collaborative teams: The
role of collaboration and peer to peer support for part-time doctoral completion.
International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10. https://doi.org/10.28945/2113
Luo, Y. (2021). Incorporating an analytics mindset into the audit curriculum. International
Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 17(3/4).
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaape.2021.10045793
Manchi Chao, M., Visaria, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Dehejia, R. (2017). Do rewards
reinforce the growth mindset?: Joint effects of the growth mindset and incentive
schemes in a field intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
146(10). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000355
Mcleod, P. L., Liker, J. K., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). Process Feedback in Task Groups: An
Application of Goal Setting. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(1).
https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886392281003
Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2016). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical
education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and
Sport Pedagogy, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1072506
Mulhollem, R. (2017). A General Overview Of Bandura ’ s Social Cognitive Theory. Liberty
University.
Müller, F. H., & Louw, J. (2004). Learning environment, motivation and interest:
Perspectives on self-determination theory. In South African Journal of Psychology
(Vol. 34, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400201
Muñoz, A., & Ramirez, M. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of motivation and motivating
practices in second-language learning: A self-determination theory perspective.
Theory and Research in Education, 13(2).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515593885
Myers, C. A., Wang, C., Black, J. M., Bugescu, N., & Hoeft, F. (2016). The matter of
motivation: Striatal resting-state connectivity is dissociable between grit and growth
mindset. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10).
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw065
Nalipay, M. J. N., King, R. B., Mordeno, I. G., Chai, C. S., & Jong, M. S. yung. (2021).
Teachers with a growth mindset are motivated and engaged: the relationships among
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
40
mindsets, motivation, and engagement in teaching. Social Psychology of Education,
24(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09661-8
Nasu, M. (1989). A Study of Weiner’s Attribution Theory of Achievement Motivation. The
Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(1).
https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.37.1_84
Park, M., & Shon, W. (2020). Relationships of Formative Feedback with Students’
Achievement Goal Orientation, Self-regulated learning and Academic Achievement.
The Journal of Elementary Education, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.29096/jee.33.2.01
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the Student goal
orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In Advances in motivation
and achievement, Vol. 7.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Farh, J. L. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting
and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
44(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90034-4
Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., Lepola, J., Ahtola, A., & Laine, P. (2003). Motivational-emotional
vulnerability and difficulties in learning to read and spell. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 73(2), 187–206.
https://doi.org/10.1348/00070990360626930
Power, K., & Goodnough, K. (2018). Fostering teachers’ autonomous motivation during
professional learning: a self-determination theory perspective. Teaching Education.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1465035
Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging Mindsets to Promote
Academic Achievement: Policy Recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 10(6), 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615599383
Rautiainen, R., Raty, H., & Kasanen, K. (2017). Effort, Ability, or Difficulties? Parents’ and
Teachers’ Explanations of the Malleability of Children’s Competences. Journal of
Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v7n1p146
Rohne, S. (2015). Developing True Grit and a Growth Mindset. Law Practice: The Business
of Practicing Law, 41(4).
Rotella, R. J. (1978). Improving sport performance: Implications of achievement motivation
and attribution theory. Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, 2(2).
Sanguras, L. Y. (2021). Integrating Grit, Mindsets, and Motivation. In Grit in the Classroom.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235385-4
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
41
Schraw, G., Horn, C., Thorndike-Christ, T., & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal
orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1023
Schultz, P. a L. (1997). Educational goals, strategies use and the academic performance of
high school students. High School Journal, 80(3).
Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of
competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3).
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.320
Shelly. (2001). GOAL ORIENTATION AND LEARNING STRATEGIES IN RELATION TO
ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1997.
Sideridis, G. D. (2006). Goal orientations and strong oughts: Adaptive or maladaptive forms
of motivation for students with and without suspected learning disabilities? Learning
and Individual Differences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.001
Sökmen, Y. (2021). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning
environment and student engagement. Educational Studies, 47(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1665986
Sutherland, T. (2005). Student goal orientation, motivation, and learning. Accounting
Education News, Spring/Summer.
Tang, E. L. Y., Lee, J. C. K., & Chun, C. K. W. (2012). Development of teaching beliefs and
the focus of change in the process of pre-service ESL teacher education. Australian
Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n5.8
Tas, Y. (2016). The contribution of perceived classroom learning environment and motivation
to student engagement in science. European Journal of Psychology of Education,
31(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0303-z
Thomas J. Sullivan. (1975). Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory. by Bernard
Weiner. Contemporary Sociology, American Sociological Association, 4(4).
Wang, S., Zhou, M., Chen, T., Yang, X., Chen, G., Wang, M., & Gong, Q. (2017). Grit and
the brain: Spontaneous activity of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex mediates the
relationship between the trait grit and academic performance. Social Cognitive and
Affective Neuroscience, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw145
Ward, M. J. (1979). Attribution theory and research: Implications for achievement motivation
and instructional design. NSPI Journal, 18(10).
https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4180181014
Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution Theory, Achievement Motivation, and the Educational Process.
Review of Educational Research, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1170017
Peer Review Journal
Talent Research Institute
(Gov. Registered Institute under Society Act, New Delhi)
42
Weiner, B. (1986). Beyond Achievement Motivation: The Generality of Attribution Theory.
In An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
1-4612-4948-1_7
Winstone, N. E., Mathlin, G., & Nash, R. A. (2019). Building Feedback Literacy: Students’
Perceptions of the Developing Engagement With Feedback Toolkit. Frontiers in
Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00039
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017). ‘It’d be useful, but I
wouldn’t use it’: barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience.
Studies in Higher Education, 42(11).
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal
orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 96(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and
students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual
Differences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1
Wormeli, R. (2018). Grit and Growth Mindset: Deficit Thinking? AMLE Magazine, 6(3).
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students
Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed. Educational Psychologist,
47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
Yeager, D. S., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O’Brien, J., Romero, C., Paunesku,
D., Schneider, B., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., &
Dweck, C. S. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions:
The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000098
Yu, J., & McLellan, R. (2020). Same mindset, different goals and motivational frameworks:
Profiles of mindset-based meaning systems. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101901
Zhao, Y., Niu, G., Hou, H., Zeng, G., Xu, L., Peng, K., & Yu, F. (2018). From growth mindset
to grit in Chinese Schools: The mediating roles of learning motivations. Frontiers in
Psychology, 9(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02007
Zher Huey, N., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). A qualitative research on teacher trainees as the
feedback-giver in a blended learning environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.239
