ChapterPDF Available

The Urgency of Universal Health Coverage Policy for the Implementation of Public Health Services During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors:
The Urgency of Universal Health Coverage
Policy for the Implementation of Public Health
Services During the Covid-19 Pandemic
S. Dhike Putri and Gayatri Dyah Suprobowati(B)
Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
gayatridyah@staff.uns.ac.id
Abstract. Health services are a basic need that is included in the Mandatory
Government Affairs relating to Basic Services. Hospitals, puskesmas or similar
institutions carry out health services as a form of interpretation of the duties and
authorities of local governments. Withthe supervision process, the implementation
of health services is expected to run optimally and in accordance with the target
provisions that have been established.
Keyword: health services
1 Introduction
The state is the only foundation and hope for the community during the Covid-19 pan-
demic which has claimed many lives at this time. As the purpose of the formation of the
state, individuals and communities have the right to obtain security guarantees, safety
of life and property from natural threats and opponents who come from outside their
community. The state gains authority and legitimacy from society to maintain harmony,
protect private and community rights and realize shared wellbeing, or bonum comune.
In the practice of the state, state administrators have an obligation to fulfill all basic
human needs in accordance with the essence of a complete human being, namely the
entire human person consisting of body and soul. Aristotle stated about the obligations
of this state in his writings known as the Nicomachean Ethics, in his book, The Republic
[1]. In the modern society, the state must fully guarantee the rights to the freedom
of individuals and communities of citizens, the safety and security of their property,
as well as their body and soul [1]. These rights are known as basic rights that are
given, which in the context of the development of a modern state are then referred to
as fundamental rights or human rights. Likewise, during the COVID-19 pandemic that
hit almost all countries in the world today, health is a primary need for every individual
and society. The state as the person in charge of the safety of all its citizens is required
to ensure and protect the health of the body and soul of all citizens and residents in its
territory. In the terms of public service implementation, the government as the executor
of the function, responsibilities, and duties of the state must work hard to overcome the
pandemic outbreak. [2].
© The Author(s) 2023
S. U. Firdaus et al. (Eds.): YICGH 2022, AHSR 65, pp. 68–71, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-206-4_10
The Urgency of Universal Health Coverage Policy 69
In the practice of living as a state in Indonesia, service facilities and financial support
for the fulfillment of guarantees for the implementation of public health are one of the
responsibilities of the state in realizing general welfare [2]. As a means of supporting the
fulfillment of public health, the Government has established the National Social Security
System-Healthy Indonesia Card (SJSN-KIS) with the Social Security Administering
Body (BPJS), as an institution that manages the implementation of health insurance and
services for the community.
2 Discussion
Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has emerged since the last thirteen years, triggered by
the growing understanding of the relationship between barriers to population access to
essential and quality health services and the impoverishment of families due to spending
on health services. The Ministers of Health of the Member States of the United Nations
(UN) agreed at the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting initiated by the United
Nations in 2005, to promote UHC in national development policies in their respective
countries.
Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is actually not a new concept. The United Nations
has driven various efforts to urge its member states to guarantee health services for their
population. Starting from the Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, the United Nations
has continued to lead the health service movements for the population. All residents of
developed and developing countries members of the United Nations [3]. The 1948 United
Nations Declaration on Human Rights, in Article 25 paragraph 1 states that everyone
have the right for living adequately in health and well-beinfg condition. They also have
rhe right for himself and his family of food, housing and health-care. The rights also
count in necessary social services, and event which make an unemployment such as
illness, disability, widow or widower, or any other condition outside control.
Another fundamental statement related to human rights, which guarantees basic
rights in the field of health is the ILO Convention Number 130 of 1969 Chapter 130 con-
cerning Medical Care and Sickness Benefits Convention, 1969. This convention regulates
the principles of health protection, minimum participation guarantee, basic benefits, and
health facilities for workers in each member country that ratifies this provision. Support
for efforts to ensure the right to health is also expressed in the 1978 Alma Alta Dec-
laration on Primary Health Care. The 1978 Alma Ata Declaration is a joint agreement
between 140 countries, as a result of the International Conference on Primary Health
Care, which was held in Alma Ata City, Kazakhstan [4]. This conference was held in
September 1978 in collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO) and
the United Nation’s Children Fund (UNICEF) on 6–12. The main formulation of the
1978 Alma Ata Declaration adopted by the countries participating in the Conference
was the statement that Primary Health Services is the main strategy for achieving health
for all, as a form of embodiment of human rights [5].
Based on this Alma Ata Declaration, UN member countries agree that to realize
the implementation of public services in the health sector by providing facilities and
guarantees for basic health services which include health education, increased food and
nutrition provision, maternal and child health services, clean water, sanitation provision,
70 S. D. Putri and G. D. Suprobowati
family planning, immunization, prevention and eradication of endemic diseases, treat-
ment of common diseases, and provision of essential medicines. The points of basic
health care guarantees that had been formulated in the 1978 Alma Ata Declaration were
strengthened again through WHA Resolution 58.33 in 2005 concerning Universal Health
Coverage [6]. The theme Sustainable Health Financing by WHA Resolution 58.33 bring
up seven urgings for UN member countries mainly to reform the health funding sys-
rem by considering UHC (Universal Health Coverage) to ensure both the availability
of essential health service and financial risks on health utilization when someone feels
unwell [7].
3 Conclusion
Based on the results of the discussion of the formulation of the problem in this article, it
can be concluded that the urgency of the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) policy from
the perspective of health care for the community is the fulfillment of health insurance
that is affordable by all levels of society fairly and equitably to achieve prosperity and
happiness. as much as possible in accordance with the constitutional mandate. The
Universal Health Coverage (UHC) system scheme for public health is a public health
policy in the form of JKN. This policy has a different scope from UHC. The UHC system
has been modified by the Government in accordance with the conditions and objectives
of the national health administration, which is part of efforts to achieve the goals of
UHC.
References
1. Scott, D.: Levels of argument: A comparative study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s
Nicomachean Ethics. University Press, (2015).
2. Rachmawati, R., Mei, E. T., Nurani, I. W., Ghiffari, R. A., Rohmah, A. A., Sejati, M. A.:
Innovation in coping with the COVID-19 pandemic: The best practices from five smart cities
in Indonesia. Sustainability 13(21), 12072 (2021).
3. Lewis, T. M., Impact of globalization on the construction sector in developing countries.
Construction Management and Economics (2007).
4. Rechel, Bernd, McKee, Martin. EBOOK: Facets of Public Health in Europe. (2014).
5. Birn, A.-E., Krementsov, N.: Socialising’primary care? The Soviet Union, WHO and the 1978
Alma-Ata Conference. BMJ Global Health 3(3), 000992 (2018).
6. Rifkin, S. B.: Alma Ata after 40 years: Primary Health Care and Health for All—From
consensus to complexity. BMJ Global Health 3(3), 001188 (2018).
7. World Health Organization, Fifty Eighth World Health Assembly.
The Urgency of Universal Health Coverage Policy 71
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/),
which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any
medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In relation to innovations which help to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, the best practices of several smart cities become an important input to organize and create strategies for future cities. This research aims to identify the responses of cities to the COVID-19 pandemic; analyze their innovation in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic; and create strategies and planning for the future of the cities. This study analyzes aspects such as the use of information and communication technology (ICT), smart city implementation, the biological disaster of the COVID-19 pandemic, the environment, and spatial plans. This research was carried out in five smart cities using a case study. The results indicated that each case had innovations for coping with the COVID-19 pandemic. They showed a uniqueness and local innovations adapted to the problems faced in the five case areas. The innovations were demonstrated by the use of ICT-based applications in several public services as part of smart city implementation. The concept of a smart city, which addresses the biological disaster of the COVID-19 pandemic through the existence of ship-based isolation centers and sociotechnical innovations, was then adapted in various cities throughout Indonesia. In terms of the smart environment concept, this is translated through technological and social innovation approaches to improve medical and domestic waste management, public service systems, and the socialization of environmental protection programs in cities during the pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic is allegedly accelerating the implementation of the smart city concept in spatial planning. There is a tendency for the use of public space in the city center to shift to local-scale service centers. Additionally, other activities are increasingly occupying the digital space so that it affects the arrangement of spatial organization and increases the need for ICT infrastructure. The efficient and flexible use of applications for supporting the implementation of smart cities needs to be broadened for the public services provided by both the government and private sectors. Meanwhile, in relation to the dimensions of a smart environment, it is necessary to take into account the waste management as a result of COVID-19. The same case is the aspect of spatial planning in which it is necessary to redesign open spaces for public use. City planning in the future also needs to be capable of the smart mitigation of non-physical disasters, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Forty years ago, the 134 national government members of the WHO signed the Alma Ata Declaration. The Declaration made Primary Health Care (PHC) the official health policy of all members countries. Emerging from the conference was the consensus that health was a human right based on the principles of equity and community participation. Alma Ata broadened the perception of health beyond doctors and hospitals to social determinants and social justice. In the following years implementing this policy confronted many challenges. These included: (1) whether PHC should focus on vertical disease programmes where interventions had the most possibility of success or on comprehensive programmes that addressed social, economic and political factors that influenced health improvements; (2) whether primary care and PHC are interchangeable approaches to health improvements; (3) how equity and community participation for health improvements would be institutionalised; and (4) how financing for PHC would be possible. Experiences in implementation over the last 40 years provide evidence of how these challenges have been met and what succeeded and what had failed. Lessons from these experiences include the need to understand PHC as a process rather than a blueprint, to understand the process must consider context, culture, politics, economics and social concerns, and therefore, to recognise the process is complex. PHC needs to be examined within evaluation frameworks that address complexity. Recent developments in monitoring and evaluation have begun to respond to this need. They include realist evaluation and implementation research.
Article
Full-text available
In September 1978, the WHO convened a momentous International Conference on Primary Health Care in Alma-Ata, capital of the Soviet republic of Kazakhstan. This unprecedented gathering signalled a break with WHO’s long-standing technically oriented disease eradication campaigns. Instead, Alma-Ata emphasised a community-based, social justice-oriented approach to health. Existing historical accounts of the conference, largely based on WHO sources, have characterised it as a Soviet triumph. Such reasoning, embedded in Cold War logic, contradicts both the decision-making processes in Geneva and Moscow that led the conference to be held in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and the reality that the highest Soviet authorities did not consider it a significant ideological or political opportunity. To redress the omissions and assumptions of prior accounts, this article examines the Alma-Ata conference in the context of Soviet political and health developments, drawing from Soviet archival and published sources as well as WHO materials and interviews with several key Soviet protagonists. We begin by outlining the USSR’s complicated relationship to WHO and the international health sphere. Next, we trace the genesis of the proposal for—and realisation and repercussions of—the primary healthcare (PHC) meeting, framed by Soviet, Kazakh, WHO and Cold War politics. Finally, we explore misjudgements and competing meanings of PHC from both Soviet and WHO perspectives, in particular focusing on the role of physicians, community participation and socialist approaches to PHC.
Article
The international movement towards open markets promoted by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has as its premise that trade liberalisation will benefit all concerned. Each country should be able to exploit its position of comparative advantage once a free and fair trade regime has been implemented. Although most commentators agree that in theory free trade should be beneficial, its implementation has been anything but beneficial for the developing countries. The construction sector falls under the provisions of the services negotiations of the WTO, and stands to experience the effects of trade liberalisation. Whether construction firms from the developing countries stand to gain or lose from this exposure to open competition is discussed in the light of the inequity with which the developing countries have been treated in the globalization of markets to date.